Next Article in Journal
SLC25A12 Missense Variant in Nova Scotia Duck Tolling Retrievers Affected by Cerebellar Degeneration—Myositis Complex (CDMC)
Next Article in Special Issue
Interspecific Hybridization of Transgenic Brassica napus and Brassica rapa—An Overview
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Analysis of miR159 Gene Family and Predicted Target Genes Associated with Environmental Stress in Dendrobium officinale: A Bioinformatics Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development and Application of a Target Capture Sequencing SNP-Genotyping Platform in Rice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 13
Issue 7
10.3390/genes13071222
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification and Characterization of PTE-2, a Stowaway-like MITE Activated in Transgenic Chinese Cabbage Lines

by
Young-Ji Jeon
†,
Yun-Hee Shin
†,
Su-Jeong Cheon
and
Young-Doo Park
*
Department of Horticultural Biotechnology, Kyung Hee University, 1732 Deogyoung-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si 17104, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2022, 13(7), 1222; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13071222
Submission received: 25 June 2022 / Revised: 7 July 2022 / Accepted: 7 July 2022 / Published: 8 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Research and Plant Breeding)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Transposable elements (TEs) are DNA fragments that can be replicated or transposed within a genome. TEs make up a high proportion of the plant genome and contribute to genetic diversity and evolution, affecting genome structure or gene activity. Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) are short, non-autonomous class II DNA transposable elements. MITEs have specific sequences, target site duplications (TSDs), and terminal inverted repeats(TIRs), which are characteristics of the classification of MITE families. In this study, a Stowaway-like MITE, PTE-2, was activated in transgenic Chinese cabbage lines. PTE-2 was revealed by in silico analysis as the putative activated element in transgenic Chinese cabbage lines. To verify the in silico analysis data, MITE insertion polymorphism (MIP) PCR was conducted and PTE-2 was confirmed to be activated in transgenic Chinese cabbage lines. The activation tendency of the copy elements of PTE-2 at different loci was also analyzed and only one more element was activated in the transgenic Chinese cabbage lines. Analyzing the sequence of MIP PCR products, the TSD sequence and TIR motif of PTE-2 were identified and matched to the characteristics of the Stowaway-like MITE family. In addition, the flanking region of PTE-2 was modified when PTE-2 was activated.

1. Introduction

Transposable elements(TEs) are genetic components that can be replicated or transposed within a genome [1]. TEs can be transposed by transposase (TPase) or replicated by reverse transcriptase (RT), which is encoded in autonomous TEs. Although non-autonomous TEs do not encode TPase or RT, it depends on the enzymes produced by autonomous TEs [2]. When autonomous TEs are excised, its derivatives arise from abortive gap repair at the excision site [2]. If the derivatives have identical terminal sequences to the original autonomous TEs, they can be recognized and activated by the TPase produced from the autonomous TEs. Derivatives with a terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) motif and target site duplications (TSDs), without any coding domains, are called miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs). MITEs are non-autonomous class II DNA TEs. They are short (<800 bp), AT-rich, and present in high copy numbers in eukaryotic genomes [3].
Wicker et al. [4] proposed a hierarchical classification system for TEs. According to this classification system, superfamilies are distinguished by the structure of their coding proteins. In plants, six superfamilies of MITEs have been reported and abbreviated as three-letter codes: Tc1/mariner (DTT), PIF/Harbinger (DTH), hAT (DTA), Mutator (DTM), CACTA (DTC), and P element (DTP) [4,5]. Each superfamily contains several families distinguished by their conserved DNA sequences. As MITEs do not encode TPase or other proteins, it is difficult to classify MITEs by their protein domains. However, MITEs are classified by sequence homology compared with autonomous TEs. In particular, the TIR motif and TSD sequence are important for classifying MITEs. Two main families of MITEs are major in plants: Tourist-like family and Stowaway-like family. Tourist and Stowaway were the first MITEs elements discovered [6,7]. The Tourist-like family has target site preferences of 3 bp, TAA or TTA, whereas the Stowaway-like family has TA as the TSD. The autonomous superfamily encoding the TPase for the transposition of the Tourist-like and Stowaway-like MITEs are the PIF/Harbinger superfamily and Tc1/mariner superfamily, respectively, which share the same TSD sequence and TIR motif as the MITEs [8]. The other family, the hAT superfamily, also has the unique features of an 8 bp TSD sequence and a short TIR motif [9].
TEs are activated or repressed under stress conditions [10]. In stress conditions, plant tissue culture is the acknowledged motive for TEs activation. In rice, the retrotransposon Tos17 has been cultured for a longer period in vitro, and a high frequency of its activation has been detected [11]. Several TEs in diverse plants have also been activated under tissue culture, such as the Spm and TCUP elements in maize [12,13] and Tto1, Tto2, and Tnt1 elements in tobacco [14]. Plant tissue culture forms the basis of biotechnology, such as genetic transformation and subsequent regeneration. There are few studies on the activation of TEs during genetic transformation. Tag1 and Tos17 are the retrotransposons in Arabidopsis and rice, respectively. Both showed a higher transposition activation ratio in transgenic plants than in regenerated plants [15,16]. In Chinese cabbage (also called kimchi cabbage), a MITE named PTE-1 was found to be activated by the transformation procedure [17]. In rice, mPing, a MITE in the rice genome, was mobilized in transgenic rice plants [18].
Using the resequencing data of pseudomolecule of ‘CT001’ and Chinese cabbage transgenic lines, a Stowaway-like MITE named PTE-2 was characterized in this study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Brassica rapa (B. rapa) L. ssp. pekinensis, inbred line ‘CT001’ was used to develop transgenic Chinese cabbage lines. The ‘CT001’ inbred line was used as the control line for comparison with transgenic lines.
Five transgenic Chinese cabbage lines were developed from ‘CT001’ using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. ‘IGA’; the Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) gene down-regulated transgenic lines [19], ‘COPB2’; the Tetranychus urticae-resistant transgenic lines [20], ‘BTTP’; the Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt)-resistant transgenic lines with transit peptide, ‘PPi’; the self-incompatibility down-regulated lines [21], and ‘BT’; the other Bt-resistant transgenic lines were analyzed for transposition and characteristics of MITE.

2.2. Identification of Activated PTE-2 by In Silico Analysis

To detect activated MITEs in transgenic Chinese cabbage lines, a three-point analysis was conducted in a previous study [17]. The resequencing data of ‘IGA’ transgenic lines were aligned and compared with MITE-mapped ‘CT001’ pseudomolecule. The read depths at three points of the resequencing data, 10 bp upstream from PTE-2 start locus, the middle of PTE-2 locus, and 10 bp downstream from PTE-2 end locus, were measured. These three points were termed UP, ON, and DN, respectively (Figure 1).

2.3. MITE Insertion Polymorphism (MIP) PCR Analysis

Genomic DNA of Chinese cabbage was extracted from leaves using a RICE buffer [500 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mM EDTA, and 1.25% (w/v) SDS]. MIP PCR analysis was used to detect MITEs transposition status (Figure 2). Forward and reverse primers were designed from 200 to 300 bp regions flanking the MITE locus. If MITE is activated, the length of the amplicon should be shorter than that of the inactivated amplicon. Primer sequences were obtained from previous research: 5′-TAT ACA TGA CGA GTA TAC GAG GG-3′ as the forward primer and 5′-CCA CAA GTG ATC GTT GTC TAG-3′ as the reverse primer [17]. BioFACT™ 2X Taq PCR Pre-Mix (BIOFACT, Seoul, Korea) was used to carry out PCR amplification with 10 pmol of forward primer, 10 pmol of reverse primer, and 50–100 ng of gDNA template. PCR amplification was conducted using a thermocycler (Applied Biosystem, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with an amplification program comprising a pre-denaturation step at 95 °C for 2 min, 35 cycles (denaturation step at 95 °C for 20 s, annealing step at 61 °C for 30 s, and extension step at 72 °C for 1 min) and a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min.

2.4. Detection of the Other PTE-2 Elements at Different Loci

PTE-2 and copy elements at different loci within the Chinese cabbage genome were investigated from the MITE-mapped pseudomolecule using the genome browser of ‘CT001’ (DNAcare, Seoul, Korea). MIP PCR was conducted for each locus to identify the activation of copy elements. The primer sets used for the MIP PCR of the copy elements are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

2.5. Confirmation of PTE-2 Structure and Classification

PTE-2 and its flanking regions were sequenced from the amplicons by MIP PCR. The target amplicon was eluted from the loaded MIP PCR amplicon on a 1% agarose gel using NucleoSpin Gel and a PCR Clean-up Kit (MACHENERY-NAGEL, Duren, Germany). To obtain an accurate consensus sequence for MITEs, the eluted DNA fragment of interest was cloned into the TOPO vector using the MG TA TOPO Cloning kit (MGmed, Seoul, Korea). The consensus sequence was confirmed by multiple alignments created using CLC Sequence Viewer 8.0 (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). PTE-2 structure was visualized using the mfold web server (http://www.unafold.org/mfold/applications/dna-folding-form.php/; accessed on 20 May 2020), which provides a predictive secondary structure using FASTA format.

3. Results

3.1. In Silico Detection of Activated MITE with NGS Analysis

P-MITE is a database of putative plant MITE information constructed using MITE investigation programs, MITE Digger, MITE-Hunter, and RSPB [5,22,23,24]. MITE information of Chinese cabbage from P-MITE was mapped on a pseudomolecule of ‘CT001’. It was discovered that 280,501 MITEs from the P-MITE database are distributed in the ‘CT001’ genome [17].
Among the MITE mapped on ‘CT001’, SQ041022219 was selected to be activated at the locus of the ‘IGA’ 6 transgenic lines. SQ041022219 from P-MITE was designated PTE-2.

3.2. MIP PCR Analysis of PTE-2 in Transgenic Chinese Cabbage Lines

To verify the in silico analysis data of activated MITEs in ‘IGA’ transgenic lines, MIP PCR was performed with advanced generations of ‘IGA’ lines. PTE-2 loci, which were excised from ‘IGA’ 6 resequencing data, showed an activated status in the MIP PCR test of the T1 ‘IGA’ 6 lines (Figure 3A). These results suggested that the selection of activated MITEs by in silico analysis was valid.
Each of the 15 plants from the ‘COPB2’, ‘BTTP’, ‘PPi’, and ‘BT’ transgenic lines was used to analyze PTE-2 activation. PTE-2 was activated in several transgenic plants of four transgenic lines (Figure 3B). The length of PTE-2-excised MIP PCR products was longer than that expected in the in silico analysis (Table 1 and Figure 3).
TEs absence detection modules combined mapping and read depth coverage information to identify reads providing evidence for the presence and for the absence, respectively.

3.3. MIP PCR Analysis of PTE-2 Copy Elements at Different Loci in Transgenic Chinese Cabbage Lines

MITEs in the ‘CT001’ genome were classified by family and the location of each MITE was analyzed. MITEs located in the intergenic region accounted for the largest portion, whereas MITEs located in the exonic region accounted for only a few (Table S2 and Figure 4A). The copy elements that concluded the homologous sequences of PTE-2 were detected by the BLAST tool using the PTE-2 sequence as a query. Fifteen PTE-2 copy elements were distributed in the ‘CT001’ genome (Table 2 and Figure 4B). Based on in silico analysis, PTE-2 copy elements were mapped to the ‘CT001’ genome and distributed, except for the A01, A05, and A10 chromosomes (Figure 4B). Fifteen copies (3, 1, 1, 2, 4, 2, and 2 on chromosomes 2–4, 6–9, respectively) were positioned.
To analyze the transposition activity of PTE-2 copy elements, MIP PCR analysis of the copy elements was conducted. PTE-2 copy elements were selected to include all loci on every chromosome and were located adjacent to the genic region. The copy elements were named PTE-2_cN, where N is the consecutive number (Table 2).
MIP PCR analysis was conducted on transgenic lines that were identified to be activated. The PCR results of copy elements were compared to the loci of PTE-2 activated in the transgenic lines (Figure 5). Among the PTE-2 copy elements, PTE-2_c1 was activated in ‘COPB2’ and ‘BTTP’ transgenic lines and PTE-2_c10 was activated in ‘COPB2’ and ‘BT’ transgenic lines (Figure 5). In conclusion, although the copy elements had identical sequences, only a few copies were activated, and the activation tendencies were different.

3.4. Structural Characterization of PTE-2

To identify the PTE-2 activated in the transgenic lines, MIP PCR amplicons were sequenced. The sequences of the ‘CT001’ and PTE-2-activated transgenic lines were compared to identify the PTE-2 sequence. The PTE-2-inserted sequences were collected from more than three amplicons of the ‘CT001’ lines to obtain the PTE-2 consensus sequence. The PTE-2 consensus sequence was used to confirm structural characteristics. The secondary structure of PTE-2 was displayed using the mfold web server (http://www.unafold.org/mfold/applications/dna-folding-form.php/; accessed on 20 May 2020), which provides a predictive secondary structure from the sequence of nucleic acids [25]. The TIR motif was investigated from the PTE-2 secondary structure, which analyzes hairpin-like base pairing with the 5′ and 3′ ends of PTE-2. The TSD sequence was investigated by comparing the excision site of PTE-2-excised transgenic lines with that of the PTE-2-inserted ‘CT001’ lines. The TSD sequence was duplicated and flanked by the PTE-2 sequence at the PTE-2-inserted sequence, whereas the single TSD sequence remained at the PTE-2-excised sequence. The superfamily of the PTE-2 was classified based on its TSD sequence and TIR motif. The CENSOR web server (https://www.girinst.org/censor/; accessed on 9 June 2020) was used to confirm the similarity to previously described repetitive DNA sequences collected in the Repbase database [26].
The PTE-2 had 78% of A+T content and was 268 bp in length. The TSD sequence of PTE-2 was 5’–TA–3’, which is homologous to the Stowaway MITE family (Figure 6B). The TIR motif of PTE-2 was determined to be 23 bp, with base pairing in the secondary structure (Figure 6A). Using the consensus sequence of the PTE-2 as a query for the CENSOR tool, it was masked to the Tc1/Mariner DNA transposon in the Brassica oleracea genome, matching the 2 bp TSD sequence and the 26 bp TIR motif (Table 3).

3.5. Flanking Sequence Duplication of PTE-2-Excised Site

The product of the MIP PCR analysis with the PTE-2-excised fragment was identified to be longer than expected (Figure 7A). The amplicons were sequenced to align them with the PTE-2-inserted sequences. As a result, there were four nucleotide insertions adjacent to the PTE-2-excised site, which were generated by duplication of the PTE-2 flanking sequence (Figure 7B). The insertions were generated by duplications of the sequences before each insertion (Figure 7B,C). In Figure 7C, a’ is a duplicated sequence from the a sequence and it was 19 bp in length. Between a and a’, the 13 bp sequences, including (A)7 microsatellites, were spaced. b’ is a duplicated sequence from the b sequence and it was 9 bp in length. Only eight microsatellites were spaced between the b and b’. c’ is a duplicated sequence from the c sequence and it is 12 bp in length. Between c and c’, 17 bp of sequences, including (T)11 microsatellites, were spaced. d’ is a duplicated sequence from the d sequence, and it was 15 bp in length. Between d and d’, 14 bp of sequences, including (A)8 microsatellites, were spaced.

4. Discussion

The number of studies on TEs has increased for many crops. McClintock observed that the specific locus on chromosome 9 of maize had broken frequently and termed this locus a dissociator (Ds) element. The Ds element can move to a new location within the genome only if the activator (Ac) element has provided a transposase (TPase), which is responsible for the transposition event of Ds element [27]. The Ac/Ds system represents the relationship between autonomous TEs and non-autonomous TEs. TEs can be divided into two major classes. Class I retrotransposons possess a copy-and-paste transposition mechanism. The class I element is transcribed into mRNA, the intermediate of its transposition, by RNA polymerase II. The mRNA was converted into to cDNA by RT and integrated into the new location of the genome. Because of its transposition event, the retrotransposon element is replicated to a new location, remaining in the donor location. In contrast, class II DNA transposons exhibit a cut-and-paste mechanism. Class II elements are excised from their donor location and moved to a new location by TPase [28]. Although DNA transposons are not replicated through the transposition process, PTE-2, a class II element, has multiple copies within the genome (Figure 4). MITEs are the major type of TEs, comprising approximately 4.05% of the Chinese cabbage genome by having 6637 different elements and 280,501 copies [17].
TEs make up a high proportion of the plant genome, accounting for 18.5% of Arabidopsis thaliana, 58.7% of Glycine max, 39.5% of Oryza sativa (O. sativa), and 84.7% of Zea mays [29]. The transposition and amplification of TEs contribute to genetic diversity and evolution, affecting genome structure and the gene activity [30]. The TE-Thrust hypothesis states that TEs have the potential to facilitate evolution by promoting ectopic recombination and reformatting genomes by TE transposition and integration [31].
P-MITE is a database of MITE information for 41 plant species. A total of 174 MITE families, including 1 DTC, 11 DTM, 16 DTT, 56 DTH, and 90 DTA families, in the B. rapa reference genome were published in the P-MITE database [5,32]. The MITE information derived from computer programs can be used to develop MITEs characteristics and to study the dynamics of MITEs in plant genomes. From the structural characteristic analysis, PTE-2 was classified as the DTT family, the third largest family in B. rapa. Because the Tc1/Mariner superfamily of DNA transposons was considered to be the origin of the Stowaway-like family via its internal deletion [33], PTE-2 was classified into the Stowaway-like family based on its 2 bp TSD sequence of 5′–TA–3′ and TIR motif homology to the Tc1/Mariner superfamily. Although studies on the activity of MITE belonging to the DTT family are limited, studies have shown that gene expression changes according to the activity of MITE belonging to the DTM family. MnM2, a member of the Mutator family, regulates the MnANR gene associated with the color of tobacco flowers in mulberry trees (Morus notabilis). The expression level of the MnANR gene in transgenic plants was higher than that in the wild type [34].
TEs are activated or repressed under stress conditions [10]. In stress conditions, plant tissue culture is the acknowledged motive for MITE activation. In rice, mPing, a MITE in the O. sativa genome, was mobilized in transgenic rice plants [18]. nDaiZ, a member of the hATt family, was activated during tissue culture. In scutellum-induced rice plants, nDaiZ was confirmed to transpose another genomic region through PCR analysis [35]. In addition, peanut AhMITE1, was activated during tissue culture. AhMITE1 was activated with a 6.25% transposition frequency in cultivar “Tifrunner” [36]. These results indicate that tissue cultures may create an appropriate environment for transposon activation in plants.
MITEs have contributed to the evolution of the Brassica genome by comparing 20 MITEs that have shown dynamic activity throughout the Brassica genus [37]. PTE-1, which is a MITE in the Brassica genome, was found to be activated during the transformation procedure [17]. Likewise, PTE-2, PTE-2_c1, and PTE-2_c10 were partially activated in transgenic Chinese cabbage lines (Figure 3 and Figure 5).
Activated MITEs have been used to analyze the relationship between changes in the characteristic variations in various food crops. In maize, early flowering was induced by MITE insertion in major quantitative trait loci related to flowering time [38]. The MITE insertion position was extraordinarily methylated and related to the ZmRap2.7 transcription level. In addition, MITE inserted upstream of the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) gene increased aluminum toxicity as the gene expression changed [39]. As MITEs were activated and inserted into the gene, color variations were observed in potato tuber skin [40] and gentian petals [41].
In general, DNA transposons left only a single TSD or footprint, the remnant sequence from the excised transposon sequence when TEs have been activated [42,43]. When PTE-2 elements were activated, only a single TSD sequence was left at the excised site; however, the sequences flanking the PTE-2-excised site were modified by generating insertions in four regions. It was confirmed that nucleotides A and T remained in the PTE-2 adjacent region when activated (Figure 7B,C). When PTE-2 was activated, duplications and mononucleotide repeats were generated near the PTE-2-excised site. A few studies have analyzed the modifications induced by TEs transposition. The overall frequency of nucleotide substitutions and indels increased in the TEs-excised site [44]. TEs activation can trigger the generation of tandem repeats [45], and the genomic structure can be modified by the insertion of MITEs without TPase. Gene expression may be affected by the activation or inactivation of MITEs or by small RNA derived from MITEs [46,47].

5. Conclusions

TEs were composed of 40% B. rapa genome. In particular, MITEs, which are TEs, have high copy numbers and play a significant role in genetic evolution. In this study, PTE-2 was selected by resequencing data from in silico analysis. MIP PCR was performed to identify MITE activation polymorphisms. The activation tendency of PTE-2 and copy elements at different loci was confirmed in transgenic Chinese cabbage lines. Sequencing and analysis of the TSD sequence and TIR motif of PTE-2 classified it as a Stowaway-like family. In addition, when PTE-2 was activated, duplications and mononucleotide repeats were generated adjacent to the PTE-2-excised site. The results of this study indicated that MITEs are activated during tissue culture and transformation and will provide helpful information for the genetic diversity of the plant genome.

6. Patents

We are in the process of obtaining a patent for the data in Korea (patent application number 10-2021-0055780; application date 29 April 2021).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13071222/s1, Table S1: List of primer sets for MITE insertion polymorphism (MIP) PCR analysis, Table S2: Distribution of MITE family in “CT001” genome.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-J.J., Y.-H.S. and Y.-D.P.; data curation, Y.-J.J. and Y.-H.S.; investigation, Y.-J.J., Y.-H.S. and S.-J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-J.J. and Y.-H.S.; and conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision, and writing—review and editing, Y.-D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ01579301)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out with the support of the “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ01579301)”, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jangam, D.; Feschotte, C.; Betrán, E. Transposable element domestication as an adaptation to evolutionary conflicts. Trends Genet. 2017, 33, 817–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Feschotte, C.; Jiang, N.; Wessler, S.R. Plant transposable elements: Where genetics meets genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fattash, I.; Rooke, R.; Wong, A.; Hui, C.; Luu, T.; Bhardwaj, P.; Yang, G. Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements: Discovery, distribution, and activity. Genome 2013, 56, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wicker, T.; Sabot, F.; Hua-Van, A.; Bennetzen, J.L.; Capy, P.; Chalhoub, B.; Flavell, A.; Leroy, P.; Morgante, M.; Panaud, O.; et al. A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8, 973–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, J.; Hu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, C.; Kuang, H. P-MITE: A database for plant miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 2013, 42, D1176–D1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bureau, T.E.; Wessler, S.R. Tourist: A large family of small inverted repeat frequently associated with maize genes. Plant Cell. 1992, 4, 1283–1294. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bureau, T.E.; Wessler, S.R. Stowaway: A new family of inverted repeat elements associated with the genes of both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants. Plant Cell. 1994, 6, 907–916. [Google Scholar]
  8. Nouroz, F.; Noreen, S.; Heslop-Harrison, J.S. Evolutionary genomics of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) in Brassica. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2015, 290, 2297–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Windsor, A.J. Transposons in Arabidopsis: Structure, Activity, Genome Restructuring. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada, 2001. Available online: https://escholarship.mcgill.ca/concern/theses/1831cm61c (accessed on 8 June 2022).
  10. Horváth, V.; Merenciano, M.; González, J. Revisiting the relationship between transposable elements and the eukaryotic stress response. Trends Genet. 2017, 33, 832–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hirochika, H.; Sugimoto, K.; Otsuki, Y.; Tsugawa, H.; Kanda, M. Retrotransposons of rice involved in mutations induced by tissue culture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 7783–7788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Peschke, V.M.; Phillips, R.L. Activation of the maize transposable element suppressor-mutator (spm) in tissue culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1991, 81, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Smith, A.; Hansey, C.; Kaeppler, S. TCUP: A novel hAT transposon active in maize tissue culture. Front. Plant. Sci. 2012, 3, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Hirochika, H. Activation of tobacco retrotransposons during tissue culture. EMBO J. 1993, 12, 2521–2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bhatt, A.M.; Lister, C.; Crawford, N.; Dean, C. The transposition frequency of Tag1 elements is increased in transgenic Arabidopsis lines. Plant Cell. 1998, 10, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wu, R.; Guo, W.L.; Wang, X.R.; Wang, X.L.; Zhuang, T.T.; Clarke, J.L.; Liu, B. Unintended consequence of plant transformation: Biolistic transformation caused transpositional activation of an endogenous retrotransposon Tos17 in rice ssp. japonica cv. Matsumae. Plant Cell Rep. 2009, 28, 1043–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kim, S.A.; Jeon, Y.J.; Park, J.S.; Park, Y.D. Discovery of PTE-1, Tourist-like miniature inverted repeat transposable element (MITE), and its activation in transgenic Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis plants. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2019, 60, 955–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Park, D.; Choi, I.Y.; Kim, N.S. Detection of mPing mobilization in transgenic rice plants. Genes Genom. 2020, 42, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Park, J.H.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, B.R.; Woo, E.T.; Lee, J.S.; Han, E.H.; Lee, Y.H.; Park, Y.D. Isolation of myrosinase and glutathione S-transferase genes and transformation of these genes to develop phenylethylisothiocyanate enriching Chinese cabbage. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2011, 29, 623–632. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shin, Y.H.; Lee, S.H.; Park, Y.D. Development of mite (Tetranychus urticae)-resistant transgenic Chinese cabbage using plant-mediated RNA interference. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2020, 61, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, G.H.; Shin, N.R.; Park, Y.D. Reverse genetics analysis of the 55-kDa B regulatory subunit of 2A serine/threonine protein phosphatase (PP2A) related to self-incompatibility in Chinese cabbage. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2020, 61, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Han, Y.; Wessler, S.R. MITE-Hunter: A program for discovering miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements from genomic sequences. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 2010, 38, e199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Lu, C.; Chen, J.J.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, Q.; Su, W.Q.; Kuang, H.H. Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) have been accumulated through amplification bursts and play important roles in gene expression and species diversity in Oryza sativa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29, 1005–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Yang, G. MITE Digger, an efficient and accurate algorithm for genome wide discovery of miniature inverted repeat transposable elements. BMC Bioinform. 2013, 14, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Zuker, M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3406–3415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kohany, O.; Gentles, A.J.; Hankus, L.; Jurka, J. Annotation, submission and screening of repetitive elements in Repbase: Repbase Submitter and Censor. BMC Bioinform. 2006, 7, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. McClintock, B. The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1950, 36, 344–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lisch, D. How important are transposons for plant evolution? Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 14, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Oliver, K.R.; McComb, J.A.; Greene, W.K. Transposable elements: Powerful contributors to angiosperm evolution and diversity. Genome Biol. Evol. 2013, 5, 1886–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Biémont, C. A brief history of the status of transposable elements: From junk DNA to major players in evolution. Genetics 2010, 186, 1085–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Oliver, K.R.; Greene, W.K. Mobile DNA and the TE-Thrust hypothesis: Supporting evidence from the primates. Mob. DNA 2011, 2, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Nandini, B. Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs), derived insertional polymorphism as a tool of marker systems for molecular plant breeding. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 3155–3167. [Google Scholar]
  33. Feschotte, C.; Mouches, C. Evidence that a family of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) from the Arabidopsis thaliana genome has arisen from a pogo-like DNA transposon. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000, 17, 730–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Xin, Y.; Ma, B.; Xiang, Z.; He, N. Amplification of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements and the associated impact on gene regulation and alternative splicing in mulberry (Morus notabilis). Mob. DNA 2019, 10, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Huang, J.; Zhang, K.; Shen, Y.; Huang, Z.; Li, M.; Tang, D.; Gu, M.; Cheng, Z. Identification of a high frequency transposon induced by tissue culture, nDaiZ, a member of the hAT family in rice. Genomics 2009, 93, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Chandran, M. Transgene Stability, Transposon Activation and Potential for Gene Tagging in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sampath, P.; Murukarthick, J.; Izzah, N.K.; Lee, J.; Choi, H.I.; Shirasawa, K.; Choi, B.S.; Liu, S.; Nou, I.S.; Yang, T.J. Genome-wide comparative analysis of 20 miniature inverted-repeat transposable element families in Brassica rapa and B. oleracea. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e94499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Castelletti, S.; Tuberosa, R.; Pindo, M.; Salvi, S. A MITE transposon insertion is associated with differential methylation at the maize flowering time QTL Vgt1. G3 Genes Genom. Genet. 2014, 4, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Magalhaes, J.V.; Liu, J.; Guimarães, C.T.; Lana, Y.G.P.; Alves, V.M.C.; Wang, Y.H.; Schaffert, R.E.; Hoekenga, O.A.; Piñeros, M.A.; Shaff, J.E.; et al. A gene in the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) family confers aluminum tolerance in sorghum. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Momose, M.; Abe, Y.; Ozeki, Y. Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements of Stowaway are active in potato. Genetics 2010, 186, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Nishihara, M.; Hikage, T.; Yamada, E.; Nakatsuka, T. A single-base substitution suppresses flower color mutation caused by a novel miniature inverted-repeat transposable element in gentian. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2011, 286, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, D.; Yu, C.; Zhang, J.; Peterson, T. Excision and reinsertion of Ac macrotransposons in maize. Genetics 2022, iyac067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sato, M.; Kawabe, T.; Hosokawa, M.; Tatsuzawa, F. Tissue culture-induced flower-color changes in Saintpaulia caused by excision of the transposon inserted in the flavonoid 3′, 5′ hydroxylase (F3′ 5′ H) promoter. Plant Cell Rep. 2011, 30, 929–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wicker, T.; Yu, Y.; Haberer, G.; Mayer, K.F.; Marri, P.R.; Rounsley, S.; Chen, M.; Zyccolo, A.M.; Panaud, O.; Wing, R.A.; et al. DNA transposon activity is associated with increased mutation rates in genes of rice and other grasses. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Guffanti, G.; Bartlett, A.; DeCrescenzo, P.; Macciardi, F.; Hunter, R. Transposable elements. Curr. Top Behav. Neurosci. 2019, 42, 221–246. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Yan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, K.; Sun, Z.; Fu, Y.; Chen, X.; Fang, R. Small RNAs from MITE-derived stem-loop precursors regulate abscisic acid signaling and abiotic stress responses in rice. Plant J. 2011, 65, 820–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, J.; Hu, Q.; Lu, C.; Kuang, H. Evolutionary genomics of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) in plants. In Evolutionary Biology: Genome Evolution, Speciation, Coevolution and Origin of Life; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 13 01222 g001 550
Figure 1. Confirmation of PTE-2 excision by in silico analysis. UP, 10 bp upstream from PTE-2 start locus; ON, middle of PTE-2 locus; DN, 10 bp downstream from PTE-2 end locus.
Figure 1. Confirmation of PTE-2 excision by in silico analysis. UP, 10 bp upstream from PTE-2 start locus; ON, middle of PTE-2 locus; DN, 10 bp downstream from PTE-2 end locus.
Genes 13 01222 g001
Genes 13 01222 g002 550
Figure 2. Identification of MITE activation polymorphism using MIP PCR analysis. a, MITE inactivated amplicon; b, MITE activated amplicon; F, Forward primer; R, Reverse primer.
Figure 2. Identification of MITE activation polymorphism using MIP PCR analysis. a, MITE inactivated amplicon; b, MITE activated amplicon; F, Forward primer; R, Reverse primer.
Genes 13 01222 g002
Genes 13 01222 g003 550
Figure 3. The activation analysis of the PTE-2 by MIP PCR analysis. (A) MIP PCR analysis of the PTE-2 in the control line, ‘CT001’ and the ‘IGA’ transgenic lines. M, 100 bp DNA ladder; C, ‘CT001’; lane, ‘IGA’ transgenic lines of the T1 generation advanced from ‘IGA’6. (B) MIP PCR analysis of the PTE-2 in the control line, ‘CT001’ and four transgenic lines (‘COPB2’, ‘BTTP’, ‘PPi’, and ‘BT’). M, 100 bp DNA ladder; C, ‘CT001’; Lane, the transgenic lines. Black arrow, PTE-2-inserted amplicon; White arrow, PTE-2-excised amplicon.
Figure 3. The activation analysis of the PTE-2 by MIP PCR analysis. (A) MIP PCR analysis of the PTE-2 in the control line, ‘CT001’ and the ‘IGA’ transgenic lines. M, 100 bp DNA ladder; C, ‘CT001’; lane, ‘IGA’ transgenic lines of the T1 generation advanced from ‘IGA’6. (B) MIP PCR analysis of the PTE-2 in the control line, ‘CT001’ and four transgenic lines (‘COPB2’, ‘BTTP’, ‘PPi’, and ‘BT’). M, 100 bp DNA ladder; C, ‘CT001’; Lane, the transgenic lines. Black arrow, PTE-2-inserted amplicon; White arrow, PTE-2-excised amplicon.
Genes 13 01222 g003
Genes 13 01222 g004 550
Figure 4. In silico mapping of PTE-2 and copy elements in ‘CT001’ genome. (A) Distribution of MITE family in ‘CT001’ genome. DTT, Tc1/mariner; DTH, PIF/Harbinger; DTA, hAT; DTM, Mutator; DTC, CACTA; and DTP, P element. 1kup, 1k bp upstream from gene locus; 1kdn, 1k bp downstream from gene locus. (B) Location of PTE-2 and copy elements in ‘CT001’ genome. Black bar, PTE-2 and copy elements; Black arrow, PTE-2 position.
Figure 4. In silico mapping of PTE-2 and copy elements in ‘CT001’ genome. (A) Distribution of MITE family in ‘CT001’ genome. DTT, Tc1/mariner; DTH, PIF/Harbinger; DTA, hAT; DTM, Mutator; DTC, CACTA; and DTP, P element. 1kup, 1k bp upstream from gene locus; 1kdn, 1k bp downstream from gene locus. (B) Location of PTE-2 and copy elements in ‘CT001’ genome. Black bar, PTE-2 and copy elements; Black arrow, PTE-2 position.
Genes 13 01222 g004
Genes 13 01222 g005 550
Figure 5. The activation analysis of PTE-2 and copy elements at different loci by MIP PCR analysis. M, 100 bp DNA ladder; C, ‘CT001’; ‘COPB2’, ‘COPB2’ transgenic lines; ‘BTTP’, ‘BTTP’ transgenic lines; ‘BT’, ‘BT’ transgenic lines; ‘PPi’, ‘PPi’ transgenic lines. Black arrow, MITE-inserted amplicon; White arrow, MITE-excised amplicon.
Figure 5. The activation analysis of PTE-2 and copy elements at different loci by MIP PCR analysis. M, 100 bp DNA ladder; C, ‘CT001’; ‘COPB2’, ‘COPB2’ transgenic lines; ‘BTTP’, ‘BTTP’ transgenic lines; ‘BT’, ‘BT’ transgenic lines; ‘PPi’, ‘PPi’ transgenic lines. Black arrow, MITE-inserted amplicon; White arrow, MITE-excised amplicon.
Genes 13 01222 g005
Genes 13 01222 g006 550
Figure 6. Confirmation of structural characteristics of the PTE-2. (A) A secondary structure was constructed from consensus sequence of the PTE-2. The entropy values (ΔG) indicating the stability of this secondary structure was −19.16. The brace indicated the base pair produced by the TIR motif. The TIR motif was determined by comparing the 5′ terminal sequence and reverse-complementary sequence of 3′ terminal. (B) The remaining TSD sequence from excision of the PTE-2. Grey box, TSD sequence; White arrow, TIR motif.
Figure 6. Confirmation of structural characteristics of the PTE-2. (A) A secondary structure was constructed from consensus sequence of the PTE-2. The entropy values (ΔG) indicating the stability of this secondary structure was −19.16. The brace indicated the base pair produced by the TIR motif. The TIR motif was determined by comparing the 5′ terminal sequence and reverse-complementary sequence of 3′ terminal. (B) The remaining TSD sequence from excision of the PTE-2. Grey box, TSD sequence; White arrow, TIR motif.
Genes 13 01222 g006
Genes 13 01222 g007 550
Figure 7. Comparison of PTE-2-inserted and -excised sequence. (A) MIP PCR analysis of PTE-2. M, 100 bp DNA ladder; In, PTE-2 inserted sequence amplicon; Ex, PTE-2 excised sequence amplicon. (B) Alignment of PTE-2 inserted sequence and excised sequence. Grey box, TSD sequence; White arrows, TIR motif. (C) Four duplicated regions that were flanking to PTE-2 excised site. a’, b’, c’, and d’ indicate the sequences that were duplicated from a, b, c, and d, respectively, when the PTE-2 had been activated.
Figure 7. Comparison of PTE-2-inserted and -excised sequence. (A) MIP PCR analysis of PTE-2. M, 100 bp DNA ladder; In, PTE-2 inserted sequence amplicon; Ex, PTE-2 excised sequence amplicon. (B) Alignment of PTE-2 inserted sequence and excised sequence. Grey box, TSD sequence; White arrows, TIR motif. (C) Four duplicated regions that were flanking to PTE-2 excised site. a’, b’, c’, and d’ indicate the sequences that were duplicated from a, b, c, and d, respectively, when the PTE-2 had been activated.
Genes 13 01222 g007
Table
Table 1. PTE-2-excised detection combine mapping and read depth coverage.
Table 1. PTE-2-excised detection combine mapping and read depth coverage.
LineUP zON yDN x
‘CT001’6.386
‘IGA’670.093
z Read depth coverage at a point 10 bp upstream from PTE-2 start locus. y Read depth coverage at the middle of PTE-2 locus. x The read depth coverage at the point 10 bp downstream from PTE-2 end locus.
Table
Table 2. PTE-2 copy elements at different loci in ‘CT001’ genome.
Table 2. PTE-2 copy elements at different loci in ‘CT001’ genome.
cN zChr yStartEndStrandLength
(bp)		Identity x
PTE-2A06637,582637,854+273100
PTE-2_c1A0210,813,95610,814,192+23886.97
PTE-2_c2A0216,240,44716,240,682+23786.08
PTE-2_c3A0219,985,34519,985,574+23986.19
PTE-2_c4A0326,668,86726,669,128-27882.01
PTE-2_c5A043,356,0393,356,288-25284.92
PTE-2_c6A065,906,5935,906,822+23387.12
PTE-2_c7A07814,580814,816+24080.42
PTE-2_c8A071,776,2441,776,481+23988.28
PTE-2_c9A077,412,9147,413,154+24486.07
PTE-2_c10A0716,535,96616,536,195+23680.51
PTE-2_c11A087,875,5717,875,815-24886.69
PTE-2_c12A088,011,5228,011,748-22987.77
PTE-2_c13A098,224,0678,224,306-24488.53
PTE-2_c14A0926,516,54526,516,815+28082.50
z PTE-2 copy elements, where N is the consecutive number. y MITEs loci on ‘CT001’ chromosome. Chr, chromosome. x The identity value was derived by a BLAST search using PTE-2 sequence as a query.
Table
Table 3. The structural characteristics of PTE-2.
Table 3. The structural characteristics of PTE-2.
A + T
(%)		Length
(bp)		TSD
(5′–3′)		TIR
(5′–3′)		MITE Family
78268TATTCANTCTGTTTCNNAATAAGTGStowaway
(DTT)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeon, Y.-J.; Shin, Y.-H.; Cheon, S.-J.; Park, Y.-D. Identification and Characterization of PTE-2, a Stowaway-like MITE Activated in Transgenic Chinese Cabbage Lines. Genes 2022, 13, 1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13071222

AMA Style

Jeon Y-J, Shin Y-H, Cheon S-J, Park Y-D. Identification and Characterization of PTE-2, a Stowaway-like MITE Activated in Transgenic Chinese Cabbage Lines. Genes. 2022; 13(7):1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13071222

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeon, Young-Ji, Yun-Hee Shin, Su-Jeong Cheon, and Young-Doo Park. 2022. "Identification and Characterization of PTE-2, a Stowaway-like MITE Activated in Transgenic Chinese Cabbage Lines" Genes 13, no. 7: 1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13071222

APA Style

Jeon, Y. -J., Shin, Y. -H., Cheon, S. -J., & Park, Y. -D. (2022). Identification and Characterization of PTE-2, a Stowaway-like MITE Activated in Transgenic Chinese Cabbage Lines. Genes, 13(7), 1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13071222

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop