Next Article in Journal
Navigating the ALS Genetic Labyrinth: The Role of MAPT Haplotypes
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Omic Analysis Reveals the Molecular Mechanism of UV-B Stress Resistance in Acetylated RcMYB44 in Rhododendron chrysanthum
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thyroid Transcriptomics Revealed the Reproductive Regulation of miRNA in the Follicular and Luteal Phases in Small-Tail Han Sheep with Different FecB Genotypes

1
State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, China
2
College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2023, 14(11), 2024; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14112024
Submission received: 1 October 2023 / Revised: 27 October 2023 / Accepted: 27 October 2023 / Published: 30 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
MicroRNA (miRNA) is a type of endogenous short−stranded ncRNA that influences many biological processes such as animal growth, development and metabolism. The thyroid gland is an important endocrine gland in sheep, and an increasing number of studies have shown that the thyroid gland plays an important role in animal reproduction, but the molecular mechanisms of the thyroid gland in sheep reproduction are poorly understood. In this study, RNA-seq was used to detect transcriptome expression patterns in the thyroid gland between the follicular phase (FP) and luteal phase (LP) in FecB BB (MM) and FecB ++ (ww) small-tail Han (STH) sheep, respectively, and to identify differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) associated with reproduction. Bioinformatic analysis of the target genes of these DEMs revealed that they can be enriched in multiple GO terms associated with the reproductive process in animals and in the KEGG signaling pathway. The miRNA–mRNA coexpression network revealed that oar-miR-133 and oar-miR-370-3p may play an important role in sheep reproduction. The results of the dual-luciferase reporter assay suggest a possible targeting relationship between novel-51 and TARBP2. These results provided a novel resource for elucidating regulatory mechanisms underlying STH sheep prolificacy.

1. Introduction

STH sheep have excellent characteristics such as fast growth and development, high fertility, perennial estrus, strong disease resistance and genetic stability; reproductive performance is one of the most important economic traits of STH sheep, influenced by factors such as breed, age, nutrition, ovarian cycle and genetics [1]. Genetic factors are intrinsic and controlled by several genes [2]. The FecB gene is the most important gene affecting lambing traits in sheep, and it is also the most studied and widely studied gene; our team found that the average lambing number of the FecB BB genotype is significantly higher than that of the FecB ++ genotype [3].
The thyroid gland is one of the “three glands” in sheep and is involved in most physiological processes of the body. Thyroid follicular epithelial cells are responsible for the synthesis and secretion of thyroid hormones, including triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) [4], which are tyrosine-based compounds containing iodine, and primarily act on nuclear receptors [5]. The thyroid gland primarily relies on T3 and T4 to promote the body’s metabolism and sustain normal growth and development [6]. Thyroid peroxidase (TPO) is a key enzyme in thyroid hormone synthesis, and its gene is specifically expressed in thyroid tissue as a glycosylated heme protein [7]. Disorders of thyroid secretion affect the basal metabolic rate of the organism, which in turn affects the health of the animal [8]. A growing number of studies have demonstrated that thyroid hormones play an irreplaceable role in animal reproduction. T3 and T4 can act directly on tissues such as ovary, placenta and uterus through specific nuclear receptors [9]. In addition, T3 and T4 can also influence the release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons in the hypothalamus through the action of kisspeptins (KISSs) and RFamide-related peptides (RFRPs) to regulate the secretion of LH and FSH to modulate the estrous cycle. GnRH, in turn, regulates the secretion of LH and FSH to regulate the animal’s estrous cycle. In seasonal estrous animals such as sheep, an additional pathway of T3 and T4 action involves the regulation of GnRH secretion by controlling the plasticity of the hypothalamic ventricular membrane cells [10], and through the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis to impact the follicular and luteal phases in mammals [11], consequently affecting the reproductive process in sheep.
miRNA is a category of noncoding RNA of about 19~22 nucleotides in length, which has a complex occurrence. First, primary miRNA is transcribed in the nucleus, then processed by Drosha enzymes into precursor miRNA with hairpin structure, and finally mature miRNA is formed [12]. The mechanism of action of miRNA in most mammals is base complementary pairing with the 3’UTR of mRNA, thereby inhibiting the translation process of mRNA [13]. A growing number of studies suggest that miRNAs play an important role in animal reproduction. miR-484 regulates granulosa cell function through YAP1-mediated mitochondrial function and apoptosis and reduces human ovarian reserves [14]. Transfection of miR-155 into the oocyte–corona cumulus complex (COC) of B6D2F1 female mice for in vitro culture revealed that miR-155 inhibited oocyte expansion and oocyte maturation [15]. In addition, miRNAs play a crucial role in the regulation of thyroid hormone secretion, studies have demonstrated that rno-miR-224-5p can modulate thyroid hormone synthesis in mice by directly or indirectly targeting type 1 deiodinase (DIO1) and type 3 deiodinase (DIO3) [16]. Zhang et al. [17] found several differentially expressed miRNAs in the thyroid gland of rats with chronic hypothyroidism and high iodine-induced hypothyroidism. These miRNAs could regulate the expression of key genes affecting the synthesis of thyroid hormones, such as NIS, pendrin, TPO, MCT8, TSHR, TSHα and TSHβ, which suggests that miRNAs play a very important role in the metabolism of the thyroid gland. In the context of sheep reproduction, Liu et al. [18] detected a total of 2968 DEGs and 99 DEMs in granulosa cells of high- and low-fertility goats using the RNA-seq technique, and these DEGs and DEMs were found to be significantly enriched in signaling pathways involved in animal reproductive processes, including the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway and JAK-STAT, etc. Through further validation, it was discovered that chi-miR-493-3p regulates ovarian development and growth in goats by modulating the expression of the JAK3 gene. Di et al. [19] identified 427 miRNAs in the pineal gland of sheep with different estrous cycles and revealed that miR-89 can regulate the reproductive process in sheep by targeting the AANAT gene. An et al. [20] conducted an RNA-seq analysis of ovarian tissues from single- and multi-lamb dairy goats, identified several miRNAs involved in the reproductive process, and subsequent study found that miR-101-3p targets the STC1 gene to regulate the growth process of goat ovaries.
In this study, we identified differentially expressed miRNAs and predicted their potential functions related to reproduction using transcriptomic analysis of the thyroid gland of STH sheep with follicular- phase and luteal-phase FecB BB and FecB ++ genotypes. It provides a new resource to better understand the molecular mechanisms of miRNA regulation of reproduction in sheep.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Sample Collection

The FecB genotype was identified using TaqMan probes from male jugular vein blood collection from 890 healthy infertile sheep aged 2–4 years from a core breeding herd in the Luxi region of Shandong, China. Twelve STH sheep were selected for the experiment (six FecB BB genotypes and six FecB ++ genotypes). All test ewes were treated for simultaneous estrus and CIDR plugs were placed in the vagina for 12 d and then removed. Fifty hours after bolus withdrawal, three FecB BB genotype (MM) and three FecB ++ genotype (ww) ewes were euthanized, and thyroid tissue was collected. Seven days after bolus withdrawal, three additional MM-type and three ww-type ewes were euthanized, and thyroid tissue was collected. The collected samples were temporarily stored in liquid nitrogen. They were returned to the laboratory and immediately stored in a −80 °C refrigerator for later experiments. The 12 thyroid tissues were divided into 4 groups: follicular-phase FecB BB genotype sheep (MM−FT), luteal-phase FecB BB genotype sheep (MM−LT), follicular-phase FecB ++ genotype sheep (ww−FT) and follicular-phase FecB ++ genotype sheep (ww−LT) for transcriptome sequencing.

2.2. RNA Extraction, Library Construction and Sequencing

According to the requirements of the sequencing company, 3 μg of total RNA that passed the test was selected as input material for miRNA library construction, and then miRNA libraries were constructed according to the operating instructions of the Small RNA Sample Pre Kit (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA). The specific steps were as follows: taking advantage of the special structure of the 3’ end and 5’ end of small RNA (complete phosphate group at the 5’ end and hydroxyl group at the 3’ end), we used total RNA as a starting sample, directly added the splice to both ends of small RNA, and then synthesized cDNA using reverse transcription. The target DNA fragments were subsequently amplified using PCR, separated using PAGE gel electrophoresis, and recovered using gel cutting as a cDNA library. The quality and quantity of cDNA libraries were characterized using Qubit 2.0 and Agilent 2100 to finally obtain miRNA libraries. Afterward, the library was sequenced on the Illumina Hiseq2500 platform to generate 50 bp single-end (SE50) reads.

2.3. Sequencing Data Filtering and Comparative Analysis

The raw reads obtained from sequencing were removed using fine filtering methods to remove interfering information. The steps of data filtering are as follows: (1) Remove low-quality reads by filtering out the sequencing read when the number of low-quality (≤20) bases contained in the sequencing read exceeds 50% of the length ratio of those read. (2) Remove the reads containing a high proportion of N. Filter out the sequencing reads when they contain more than 10% of the proportion of the length of the read. (3) Remove reads with 5’ joint contamination. (4) Remove reads without 3’ splice sequences and insertion fragments. (5) Remove the reads containing consecutive A/T/G/C. (6) Remove the reads with abnormal final length.
After filtering the data using the above steps, we obtained a large number of small RNA (sRNA) sequences. Clean reads of length 18–35 nt were used for the subsequent analysis. The sRNAs were compared with the reference genome and the sRNAs and their distributions in the genome were compared for each sample. Bowtie v1.0.1 was used to identify known miRNAs by comparing the clean reads of each sample to the miRNA sequences in the miRBase v22 database. The clean reads of miRNA sequences that were not matched to the miRbase database were matched to data from Rfam v14.2 or Repeat Masker database for sRNA taxonomic annotation. Based on the signature hairpin structure of miRNA precursor molecules, novel miRNAs in the samples were predicted based on mirEvo/miRDeep V2.0.0.5 analysis by probing the secondary structure, Dicer enzyme cleavage site information and minimum free energy of unannotated small RNAs in the previous step.

2.4. Differential Expression Analysis

The DESeq2 R package was used to analyze differential miRNAs for different comparison combinations based on TPM values. Quantities were pooled and DEMs were screened at both foldchange and p-value levels of assessment. p < 0.05 and |log2(foldchange)| > 1 were set as the threshold for significant DEMs.

2.5. Target Gene Prediction of miRNAs

The target genes of miRNAs were predicted using miRanda (3.3a), RNAhyribd (https://bibiserv.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/rnahybrid/., accessed on 12 February 2023) and PITA (https://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/mir07/mir07_dyn_data.html., accessed on 20 February 2023) online website, and the intersection of the three databases prediction results was taken as the target genes of DEMs in this study (the number of intersecting genes predicted using the three databases types in the MM−LT vs. ww−LT group was 0, so no analysis was performed in this paper); GO and KEGG analysis of target genes of differentially expressed miRNAs were performed using the DAVID online website (https://david.ncifcrf.gov., accessed on 10 Match 2023) and were considered significantly enriched if p < 0.05 in the pathway.

2.6. Construction of miRNA-mRNA Co-Expression Network

The miRNA-mRNA co-expression network was visualized using Cytoscape (V3.9.0) software.

2.7. Validation of Sequencing Data

2.7.1. Reverse Transcription of miRNA

After extracting the total RNA of the samples, the reverse transcription operation of miRNA was performed using the reverse transcription kit of Tiangen (Beijing, China), and the reverse transcription system is shown in Table 1.
The reaction conditions were as follows: 42 °C, 60 min; 95 °C, 3 min. The cDNA that were obtained after the reverse transcription were diluted 5 times and then stored at −20 °C.

2.7.2. Primer Design and Synthesis

Reverse primers are provided in the kit, and based on the sequences of mature miRNAs, we used Primer Premier 5.0 software to design forward primers for miRNAs (Table 2) for subsequent qPCR, with U6 as the internal reference.

2.7.3. RT-qPCR Analysis of miRNA

Fluorescent quantitative PCR was performed using Tiangen’s Fluorescent Quantitative Assay Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). The fluorescence quantitative PCR system is shown in Table 3.
The reaction was performed by placing the configured mixture in a Roche Light Cycler® 480II (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) fluorescent quantitative PCR instrument according to the fluorescent quantitative PCR system, and the reaction conditions are shown in Table 4.

2.8. Carrier Construction

The TARBP2 dual luciferase vector was constructed by selecting the pmirGLO vector and designing PCR primers according to the sequence matching novel-51 in the NCBI database of the TARBP2−3’UTR sequence, adding the SacⅠenzyme cut site GAGCTC upstream and the Xho I enzyme cut site CTCGAG downstream of the PCR primers. The remaining steps were performed as above, and finally the TARBP2−3’UTR wild-type vector (pmirGLO−TARBP2−WT) and TARBP2−3’UTR mutant vector (pmirGLO−TARBP2−MT) were successfully constructed.

2.9. Validation of miRNA–mRNA Targeting Relationship

HEK293T cell lines were inoculated into 12-well cell culture plates containing complete medium (DMEM + 10% FBS + 1.5% double antibody) and incubated in a 37 °C cell culture incubator. Transfection was performed when the cell density reached 70–80%, and the experiment was divided into 4 groups, with 3 replicates set in each group. Group I: pmirGLO−TARBP2−WT + novel-51 mimics. Group II: pmirGLO−TARBP2−WT + novel-51 mimics NC. Group III: pmirGLO−TARBP2−MT + novel-51 mimics. Group IV: pmirGLO−TARBP2−MT + novel-51 mimics NC. After transfection, the cells were placed in a cell culture incubator and starved with OPTI-MEM for 6 h. After replacing the complete medium, the culture was continued for 48 h. The supernatant was aspirated and 100 μL of trypsin was added to each well, and the digestion was terminated by adding the appropriate amount of serum after 3 min, and the cells were collected after discarding the supernatant. The double-luciferase activity assay was performed with the TransDetect Double-Luciferase Reporter Assay Kit (Promega, Beijing, China). Seventy-five microliters of Luciferase Reaction Reagent I was added to the cell precipitate according to the instructions. After thorough mixing, the firefly luciferase activity was detected using a Tecan Infiniate 200 Pro multifunctional enzyme marker, and then 75 μL of Luciferase Reaction Reagent II was added after the assay was completed, and the sea kidney luciferase activity was detected after waiting for 20–30 min.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

The relative expression of miRNAs was analyzed using an independent samples t-test. The dual-luciferase reporter gene data were calculated from the relative luciferase activity data using a one-way ANOVA, and the data complied with the assumption of normality and the assumption of chi-square of variance of the “ANOVA” test. Relative luciferase activity = activity of sea kidney luciferase reporter gene/activity of firefly luciferase reporter gene. p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference. Statistical analysis and plots were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.3.0.

3. Results

3.1. Differential Expression and Analysis of miRNA

The MM−FT vs. MM−LT group identified 23 DEMs (9 upregulated and 14 downregulated, Figure 1A). The MM−FT vs. ww−FT group identified 11 DEMs (4 upregulated, 7 downregulated, Figure 1B). One DEM was found in the MM−LT vs. ww−LT group (downregulated, Figure 1C). Five DEMs were found in the ww−LT vs. ww−FT group (two upregulated, three downregulated, Figure 1D). The heat map shows the number and expression pattern of DEMs, and all DEMs were statistically significant (Figure 1E, p < 0.05; Supplementary Table S1).

3.2. Functional Enrichment Analysis of miRNA Target Genes

In the GO and KEGG bioinformatics analysis of the identified DEMs, GO enrichment revealed that in the MM−FT vs. MM−LT group (Figure 2A), the most significant GO entry enriched during BP was Lipid localization, with a total of 22 DEMs target genes being enriched; the CC category Extracellular region was the most enriched; the Serine-type endopeptidase activity was the most enriched term in the MF process. The most significant GO entries enriched during BP in both the MM−FT vs. ww−FT group (Figure 2B) and the ww−FT vs. ww−LT group (Figure 2C) were inflammatory responses; the CC category proteasome core complex is the most enriched term in the MM−FT vs. ww−FT group and the ww−FT vs. ww−LT group. The most enriched term in the MM−FT vs. ww−FT group during MF was Potassium-transporting ATPase activity, and the most enriched term in ww−FT vs. ww−LT was Signal recognition particle binding (Supplementary Table S2). KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that the most significantly enriched signaling pathways in the three groups of DEMs target genes were Nucleotide excision repair, Proteasome and Protein export signaling pathway, JAK-STAT signaling pathway and Hippo signaling pathway (Figure 3, and Supplementary Table S3).

3.3. Analysis of miRNA–mRNA Co-Expression Network

To better understand the role of DEGs in the thyroid gland of STH sheep, we constructed an miRNA–mRNA co-expression network (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table S4). A total of 123 DEGs were targeted by 10 DEMs in the co-expression network. Among them, oar-miR-370-3p and oar-miR-133 targeted the most regulated mRNAs, implying that oar-miR-370-3p and oar-miR-133 play an important role in the reproductive process of STH sheep.

3.4. Validation of Sequencing Data

To verify the accuracy of the sequencing data, we randomly selected nine miRNAs: oar-miR-3958-3p, oar-miR-374b, novel_348, novel_51, novel_68, oar-miR-133, oar-miR-3959-5p, oar-miR-181a and oar-miR-148a for RT-qPCR test validation, and the results showed that the RT-qPCR trends and RNA-seq expression trends were consistent, indicating that the sequencing results were reliable (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table S5).

3.5. Plasmid Construction and Dual-Luciferase Experimental Validation

Sequencing of recombinant plasmid DNA showed that the sequences of overexpression plasmid and wild-type plasmid were consistent with the reference sequence, and the mutant plasmid sequences were GTGAG mutated to CACTC, TACC mutated to ATGG, and GGTGCCA mutated to CCACGGT for TARBP2−3’UTR (Figure 6A); The results of the dual-luciferase assay showed that the relative fluorescence activities of pmirGLO−TARBP2−WT + novel-51 mimics group (Figure 6B) (p < 0.05 and Supplementary Tables S6 and S7).

4. Discussion

In this study, DEMs were screened for the first time in thyroid tissues from follicular- and luteal-phase STH sheep of FecB BB and FecB ++ genotype. Bioinformatic analysis of DEMs target genes revealed that miR-133, miR-370-3p, miR-29, miR-181a and novel-51 target genes were significantly enriched in signaling pathways related to the reproductive process.
miR-133b has been reported to impact estrogen synthesis by targeting FOXL2 in mice [21], and may also be involved in early oogenesis in tilapia through regulation of TAGLN2 expression [22]. miR-2 and miR-133 bind to the 3’UTR of the cyclin B gene of the crab Eriocheir sinensis to regulate its oocyte meiosis [23]. Liu et al. [24] identified circRNAs in ovarian tissues of goats with different reproductive cycles using the RNA-seq technique. They discovered that the differentially identified circRNAs could be targeted by miR-133, indicating that miR-133 plays an important role in the reproductive process of goats. Moreover, miR-370-3p has been recognized as an important regulator of gene expression in animal reproduction, specifically acting as a negative regulator of endometriotic cell proliferation [25]. Using microarray technology to determine miRNA expression patterns in the endometrium of ewes at different periparturient stages, we identified significant differences in miR-370-3p expression. These findings suggest that miR-370-3p may function as a regulator of early pregnancy establishment and maintenance in sheep [26]. RNA-seq analysis of the adrenal glands of STH sheep [27] with different FecB genotypes and thyroid tissues of Sunite sheep [28] with different photoperiods revealed miR-370-3p as the central element of the network. These findings suggest that miR-370-3p could potentially impact the reproductive process in sheep.
In addition, miR-29 and miR-181a have also been reported to be involved in the reproductive process of animals. In the context of lncRNA Xist, miR-29 obstructs the maturation of miR-23b-3p/miR-29a-3p by inhibiting pre-miR-23b/pre-miR-29a to the cytoplasm and attenuates miR-23b-3p/miR-29a-3p inhibition of STX17, leading to oocyte autophagy in the periparturient ovary, resulting in massive oocyte loss [29]. Knockout of miR-29a/b1 gene in mice leads to abnormal expression of numerous proteins involved in vesicular transit and cytokinesis in the mouse pituitary gland, leading to impaired ovulation and compromised LH secretion [30]. miR-29b regulates DNA methylation during early porcine embryonic development by targeting DNMT3A/3B and TET1/2/3 [31]. Additionally, research has revealed that miR-29 might regulate early bovine embryogenesis by regulating the expression of NPM2 [32]. miR-181a has been identified to promotes follicle development and ovulation in mice by targeting the AMH gene, thus preventing follicular atresia [33]. Zayed et al. [34] used RNA-seq to identify miRNA expression profiles in zebrafish stage IIIa follicle cells and stage IIIb follicle cells and found differences in miR-181a expression, implying that miR-181a is an important regulator of follicle development and oocyte maturation in zebrafish.
GO enrichment analysis revealed that DEMs target genes could be enriched in extracellular regions, serine-type endopeptidase activity, inflammatory response, proteasome core complex, potassium-transporting ATPase activity, and signal recognition particle binding terms. KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that these DEMs put genes significantly enriched in signaling pathways involved in the reproductive process such as the Hippo signaling pathway, cGMP-PKG signaling pathway, VEGF signaling pathway and JAK-STAT signaling pathway. The Hippo signaling pathway plays vital role in embryonic development, organ size regulation and carcinogenesis. Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1), as a significant constituent of the Hippo signaling pathway, holds particular importance. The Hippo pathway is crucial in regulating proliferation of bovine ovarian granulosa cells and the synthesis of estradiol, thereby contributing to the maintenance of normal follicular development [35]. Inhibition of the Hippo signaling pathway inhibits GnRH-induced ovulation in cattle, indicating that this pathway indeed plays a crucial role in animal ovulation [36]. Additionally, the Hippo signaling pathway might regulate the secretion of luteinizing hormone in the mouse pituitary gland, consequently regulating the reproductive process in mice [37].
The cGMP-PKG signaling pathway holds paramount important in animals. Li et al. [38] used RNA-seq to identify ovarian tissues from sheep with the FecB BB genotype and FecB ++ genotype and identified several differential miRNAs, which were found to be significantly enriched in the cGMP-PKG signaling pathway for their target genes. Activation of cGMP-PKG signaling in spermatozoa increases Ca2+ and tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins, which in turn promotes hyperactivation and induces acrosome responses ultimately facilitating sperm capacitation [39]. Studies have shown that nitric oxide activates the cGMP-PKG pathway by upregulating glucose transporter-1 (GLUT1) and glucose transporter-4 (GLUT4) in granulosa cells, which increases cellular glucose uptake and promotes granulosa cell development [40].
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is thought to exert beneficial effects on sheep oocyte maturation in vitro and subsequent early embryonic development by binding to its main receptor, KDR. This binding event activates the MAPK signaling pathway, thus promoting the maturation of sheep oocytes [41]. The observation revealed that heat stress could elevate miR-33 expression in tilapia, diminish follicle-stimulating hormone and 17β-estradiol levels via the miR-33-TGFβ1I1 axis, and increase apoptosis by inhibition VEGF signaling, ultimately leading to follicular atresia [42]. Furthermore, studies have indicated the FSH-HIF-1α-VEGF pathway is responsible for ovulation and oocyte health in mice, while it exerts minimal influence on follicle growth [43].
The JAK-STAT signaling pathway sustains and stimulates the growth of primordial follicles in women, thereby regulating the oocyte growth process and consequently female fertility [44,45]. Additionally, leptin inhibits uterine contractions in mice by stimulating the JAK-STAT signaling pathway [46]. The characterization of miRNA and mRNA expression profiles in hypothalamic tissues of high- and low-follicular fertility goats reveals that the identified differential expressed genes are significantly enriched in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway [47,48].
To gain a deeper understanding of the mechanisms governed by miRNAs in the reproductive process of STH sheep, we constructed a miRNA-mRNA co-expression network. Within this network, we discovered that oar-miR-133 and oar-miR-370-3p targeted the largest number of genes, implying that oar-miR-133 and oar-miR-370-3p play important roles in the thyroid gland of STH sheep. In addition, we confirmed the targeting relationship between novel-51 and its target gene TARBP2, as well as between oar-miR-370-3p and its target gene COL4A3 [49], where the COL4A3 gene encodes type IV collagen α 3 protein [50]. The differential gene expression profiles of the endometrium in high- and low-fertility heifers were identified using microarray technology, which highlighted COL4A3 as the significantly differentially expressed gene, implying that the COL4A3 gene may affect the late development process of the corpus luteum and fertility in heifers [51]. In this study, COL4A3 was also enriched in signaling pathways such as the relaxin signaling pathway and PI3K-Akt, suggesting that oar-miR-370-3p may affect PI3K-Akt signaling pathway by targeting COL4A3, which in turn regulates thyroid tissue. RNA-seq analysis of the endometrium of sows at 12, 16 and 20 days of gestation revealed TARBP2 as the gene with significant differences in expression, indicating that TARBP2 plays an important role in the reproduction of sows [52]. In the present study, a possible targeting relationship between novel-51 and TARBP2, oar-miR-370-3p and COL4A3 was tentatively identified using a dual-luciferase reporter assay, providing a basis for further understanding of the role played by the thyroid gland in sheep reproduction.

5. Conclusions

In this study, multiple DEMs were found in the thyroid glands of STH sheep with follicular- and luteal-phase FecB BB genotypes and FecB ++ genotypes. These DEM genes, which can be significantly enriched in multiple signaling pathways, are involved in the reproductive process of animals. miRNA−mRNA co-expression network analysis revealed that oar-miR-133 and oar-miR-370-3p play important roles in sheep reproduction. Dual-luciferase assays suggest a possible targeting relationship between novel-51 and TARBP2, oar-miR-370 and COL4A3. Further functional validation of its function in the sheep thyroid is necessary.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14112024/s1, Table S1: Information of total miRNAs in four groups. Table S2: Total set of DEMs was up- and downregulated in four groups. Table S3: GO enrichment of differentially expressed DEMs targets in four groups. Table S4: KEGG enrichment pathways for differentially expressed DEMs targets in four groups. Table S5: Co-expression details of miRNA–mRNA network in four groups. Table S6: qPCR data of DEMs in four groups. Table S7: Dual-luciferase report experimental data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: X.H., R.D., X.W. and M.C.; Methodology: C.C., X.H., R.D., X.W. and M.H.; Software: C.C., X.H. and M.H.; Validation: C.C. and X.H.; Formal analysis: X.H., R.D., X.W. and M.C.; Investigation: X.H., R.D., X.W. and M.C.; Resources: X.H., R.D., X.W. and M.C.; Data curation: X.H., R.D., X.W. and M.C.; Writing—original draft preparation: C.C. and X.H.; Writing—review and editing: X.H., R.D., X.W., C.L. and M.C.; Visualization: C.C., X.H., R.D., X.W., M.H., C.L. and M.C.; Supervision: X.H., R.D., X.W., C.L. and M.C.; Project administration: X.H., R.D., X.W. and M.C.; Funding acquisition: M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (32172704), China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-38), Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of China (CAAS-ZDRW202106 and ASTIP-IAS13), General Project of Shanxi Province Basic Research Program (20210302123371).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Experimental animals in this study were authorized by the Science Research Department (in charge of animal welfare issues) of the Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (IAS-CAAS; Beijing, China). Additionally, ethical approval of animal survival and the sample collection was provided by the animal ethics committee of IAS-CAAS (No. IAS2019-49). The criteria for euthanasia of ewes in this study were (1) no signs of panic or pain at the time of death; (2) ewes with no respiration, pulse, and no heartbeat by auscultation with a stethoscope or by touching the cardiac area of the chest cavity for more than 5 min; and (3) the animal’s corneal reflexes disappeared, the pupils dilated, and the neurological reflexes disappeared.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

All data are included in this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cheng, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Q.; He, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yang, L.; Shi, J. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Identifying the Different Molecular Genetic Markers Related to Production Performance and Meat Quality in Longissimus Dorsi Tissues of MG × STH and STH Sheep. Genes 2020, 11, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Medina-Montes, A.; Carrillo-Gonzalez, D.F.; Hernández-Herrea, D.Y. Association of a genetic polymorphism in the BMPR-1B gene, and non-genetic factors with the natural prolificacy of the Colombian-haired sheep. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2021, 53, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, X.; Guo, X.; He, X.; Liu, Q.; Di, R.; Hu, W.; Cao, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Chu, M. Effects of FecB mutation on estrus, ovulation, and endocrine characteristics in Small Tail Han sheep. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 709737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Webster, J.R.; Moenter, S.M.; Woodfill, C.J.; Karsch, F.J. Role of the thyroid gland in seasonal reproduction. II. Thyroxine allows a season-specific suppression of gonadotropin secretion in sheep. Endocrinology 1991, 129, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ortiga-Carvalho, T.M.; Chiamolera, M.I.; Pazos-Moura, C.C.; Wondisford, F.E. Hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid axis. Compr. Physiol. 2016, 6, 1387–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ikegami, K.; Refetoff, S.; Van Cauter, E.; Yoshimura, T. Interconnection between circadian clocks and thyroid function. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019, 15, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bliddal, S.; Derakhshan, A.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, L.M.; Männistö, T.; Ashoor, G.; Tao, F.; Brown, S.J.; Vafeiadi, M.; Itoh, S.; et al. Association of thyroid peroxidase antibodies and thyroglobulin antibodies with thyroid function in pregnancy: An individual participant data meta-analysis. Thyroid 2022, 32, 828–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gauthier, B.R.; Sola-García, A.; Cáliz-Molina, M.; Lorenzo, P.I.; Cobo-Vuilleumier, N.; Capilla-González, V.; Martin-Montalvo, A. Thyroid hormones in diabetes, cancer, and aging. Aging Cell 2020, 19, e13260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Silva, J.F.; Ocarino, N.M.; Serakides, R. Thyroid hormones and female reproduction. Biol. Reprod. 2018, 99, 907–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abdoli, R.; Zamani, P.; Mirhoseini, S.Z.; Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, N.; Nadri, S. A review on prolificacy genes in sheep. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2016, 51, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Constantin, S. Progress and Challenges in the Search for the Mechanisms of Pulsatile Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Secretion. Front. Endocrinol. 2017, 8, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, J.; Xu, Y.; Liu, H.; Pan, Z. MicroRNAs in ovarian follicular atresia and granulosa cell apoptosis. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2019, 17, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Donadeu, F.X.; Schauer, S.N.; Sontakke, S.D. Involvement of miRNAs in ovarian follicular and luteal development. J. Endocrinol. 2012, 215, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, H.; Wang, X.; Mu, H.; Mei, Q.; Liu, Y.; Min, Z.; Zhang, L.; Su, P.; Xiang, W. Mir-484 contributes to diminished ovarian reserve by regulating granulosa cell function via YAP1-mediated mitochondrial function and apoptosis. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 18, 1008–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dehghan, Z.; Mohammadi-Yeganeh, S.; Salehi, M. MiRNA-155 regulates cumulus cells function, oocyte maturation, and blastocyst formation. Biol. Reprod. 2020, 103, 548–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, C.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, H.; Ji, M.; Chen, C.; Hu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Xia, R.; Shen, J.; et al. Rno-miR-224-5p contributes to 2,2’,4,4’-tetrabromodiphenyl ether-induced low triiodothyronine in rats by targeting deiodinases. Chemosphere 2020, 246, 125774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, C.; Yao, J.; Liu, C.; Yang, K.; Zhang, W.; Sun, D.; Gu, W. The Role of Thyroid Hormone Synthesis Gene-Related miRNAs Profiling in Structural and Functional Changes of The Thyroid Gland Induced by Excess Iodine. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Guo, S.; Li, K.; Wang, P.; Fan, Y.; He, X.; Jiang, Y.; Lan, R.; Chen, S.; et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals key miRNA-mRNA pathways in ovarian tissues of Yunshang Black Goats with different kidding numbers. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 883663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Di, R.; Liu, Q.Y.; Song, S.H.; Tian, D.M.; He, J.N.; Ge, Y.; Wang, X.Y.; Hu, W.P.; Mwacharo, J.M.; Pan, Z.Y.; et al. Expression characteristics of pineal miRNAs at ovine different reproductive stages and the identification of miRNAs targeting the AANAT gene. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. An, X.; Ma, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, F.; Song, Y.; Li, G.; Bai, Y.; Cao, B. Effects of miR-101-3p on goat granulosa cells in vitro and ovarian development in vivo via STC1. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2020, 11, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dai, A.; Sun, H.; Fang, T.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, S.; Jiang, Y.; Ding, L.; Yan, G.; Hu, Y. MicroRNA-133b stimulates ovarian estradiol synthesis by targeting Foxl2. FEBS Lett. 2013, 587, 2474–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ma, Z.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, C.; Wei, J.; Sun, L.; Wang, D.; Tao, W. miR-133b targets tagln2 and functions in tilapia oogenesis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2021, 256, 110637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Song, Y.N.; Shi, L.L.; Liu, Z.Q.; Qiu, G.F. Global analysis of the ovarian microRNA transcriptome: Implication for miR-2 and miR-133 regulation of oocyte meiosis in the Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis (Crustacea:Decapoda). BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, Y.; Zhou, Z.; He, X.; Jiang, Y.; Ouyang, Y.; Hong, Q.; Chu, M. Differentially expressed circular RNA profile signatures identified in prolificacy trait of Yunshang Black Goat ovary at estrus cycle. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 820459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hu, Z.; Mamillapalli, R.; Taylor, H.S. Increased circulating miR-370-3p regulates steroidogenic factor 1 in endometriosis. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 316, E373–E382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kose, M.; Hitit, M.; Kaya, M.S.; Kırbas, M.; Dursun, S.; Alak, I.; Atli, M.O. Expression pattern of microRNAs in ovine endometrium during the peri-implantation. Theriogenology 2022, 191, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chu, M. miRNA-mRNA analysis of sheep adrenal glands reveals the network regulating reproduction. BMC Genom. Data 2022, 23, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, W.; He, X.; Di, R.; Wang, X.; Chu, M. Photoperiods induced the circRNA differential expression in the thyroid gland of OVX+E2 ewes. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 974518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhou, M.; Liu, X.; Qiukai, E.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, S.; Zhang, X. Long non-coding RNA Xist regulates oocyte loss via suppressing miR-23b-3p/miR-29a-3p maturation and upregulating STX17 in perinatal mouse ovaries. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guo, Y.; Wu, Y.; Shi, J.; Zhuang, H.; Ci, L.; Huang, Q.; Wan, Z.; Yang, H.; Zhang, M.; Tan, Y.; et al. miR-29a/b1 regulates the luteinizing hormone secretion and affects mouse ovulation. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 636220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Z.; Cao, Y.; Zhai, Y.; Ma, X.; An, X.; Zhang, S.; Li, Z. MicroRNA-29b regulates DNA methylation by targeting Dnmt3a/3b and Tet1/2/3 in porcine early embryo development. Dev. Growth Differ. 2018, 60, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lingenfelter, B.M.; Tripurani, S.K.; Tejomurtula, J.; Smith, G.W.; Yao, J. Molecular cloning and expression of bovine nucleoplasmin 2 (NPM2): A maternal effect gene regulated by miR-181a. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. RBE 2011, 9, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hayes, E.; Kushnir, V.; Ma, X.; Biswas, A.; Prizant, H.; Gleicher, N.; Sen, A. Intra-cellular mechanism of Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in regulation of follicular development. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2016, 433, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zayed, Y.; Qi, X.; Peng, C. Identification of novel microRNAs and characterization of microRNA expression profiles in zebrafish ovarian follicular cells. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Plewes, M.R.; Hou, X.; Zhang, P.; Liang, A.; Hua, G.; Wood, J.R.; Cupp, A.S.; Lv, X.; Wang, C.; Davis, J.S. Yes-associated protein 1 is required for proliferation and function of bovine granulosa cells in vitro†. Biol. Reprod. 2019, 101, 1001–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dos Santos, E.C.; Lalonde-Larue, A.; Antoniazzi, A.Q.; Barreta, M.H.; Price, C.A.; Dias Gonçalves, P.B.; Portela, V.M.; Zamberlam, G. YAP signaling in preovulatory granulosa cells is critical for the functioning of the EGF network during ovulation. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2022, 541, 111524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lalonde-Larue, A.; Boyer, A.; Dos Santos, E.C.; Boerboom, D.; Bernard, D.J.; Zamberlam, G. The hippo pathway effectors YAP and TAZ regulate LH release by pituitary gonadotrope cells in mice. Endocrinology 2022, 163, bqab238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Z.; He, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Guo, X.; Sun, W.; Chu, M. Analysis of expression profiles of circRNA and miRNA in oviduct during the follicular and luteal phases of sheep with two fecundity (FecB gene) genotypes. Animals 2021, 11, 2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, K.; Mei, C.; Chen, Y.; Guo, L.; Yu, Y.; Huang, D. C-type natriuretic peptide regulates sperm capacitation by the cGMP/PKG signalling pathway via Ca2+ influx and tyrosine phosphorylation. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2019, 38, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tian, Y.; Heng, D.; Xu, K.; Liu, W.; Weng, X.; Hu, X.; Zhang, C. cGMP/PKG-I pathway-mediated GLUT1/4 regulation by NO in female rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 2018, 159, 1147–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yan, L.; Luo, H.; Gao, X.; Liu, K.; Zhang, Y. Vascular endothelial growth factor-induced expression of its receptors and activation of the MAPK signaling pathway during ovine oocyte maturation in vitro. Theriogenology 2012, 78, 1350–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Qiang, J.; Tao, F.Y.; Lu, Q.S.; He, J.; Xu, P. Upregulation of miR-33 exacerbates heat-stress-Induced apoptosis in granulosa cell and follicular atresia of nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) by Targeting TGFβ1I1. Genes 2022, 13, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Li, C.; Liu, Z.; Li, W.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, J.; Sun, M.; Zhou, J.; Yao, W.; Zhang, X.; Wang, H.; et al. The FSH-HIF-1α-VEGF pathway Is critical for ovulation and oocyte health but not necessary for follicular growth in mice. Endocrinology 2020, 161, bqaa038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Frost, E.R.; Ford, E.A.; Peters, A.E.; Reed, N.L.; McLaughlin, E.A.; Baker, M.A.; Lovell-Badge, R.; Sutherland, J.M. Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 1 and STAT3 are expressed in the human ovary and have Janus kinase 1-independent functions in the COV434 human granulosa cell line. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2020, 32, 1027–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sutherland, J.M.; Frost, E.R.; Ford, E.A.; Peters, A.E.; Reed, N.L.; Seldon, A.N.; Mihalas, B.P.; Russel, D.L.; Dunning, K.R.; McLaughlin, E.A. Janus kinase JAK1 maintains the ovarian reserve of primordial follicles in the mouse ovary. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2018, 24, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Srinivasan, G.; Parida, S.; Pavithra, S.; Panigrahi, M.; Sahoo, M.; Singh, T.U.; Madhu, C.L.; Manickam, K.; Shyamkumar, T.S.; Kumar, D.; et al. Leptin receptor stimulation in late pregnant mouse uterine tissue inhibits spontaneous contractions by increasing NO and cGMP. Cytokine 2021, 137, 155341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liang, C.; Han, M.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, Y.; He, X.; Jiang, Y.; Ouyang, Y.; Hong, Q.; Chu, M. Hypothalamic transcriptome analysis reveals the crucial microRNAs and mRNAs affecting litter size in goats. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 747100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dong, S.; Hou, B.; Yang, C.; Li, Y.; Sun, B.; Guo, Y.; Deng, M.; Liu, D.; Liu, G. Comparative hypothalamic transcriptome analysis reveals crucial mRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs affecting litter size in goats. Genes 2023, 14, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cheng, C.; Qian, Z.; Xiaoyun, H.; Mingxing, C.; Chen, L. Preliminary study on the regulation of fertility traits by miR-370-3-p targeting COL4A3 gene in sheep thyroid gland. J. China Agric. Univ. 2023, 28, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Savige, J.; Harraka, P. Pathogenic variants in the genes affected in alport syndrome (COL4A3-COL4A5) and their association with other kidney conditions: A review. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2021, 78, 857–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Killeen, A.P.; Diskin, M.G.; Morris, D.G.; Kenny, D.A.; Waters, S.M. Endometrial gene expression in high- and low-fertility heifers in the late luteal phase of the estrous cycle and a comparison with midluteal gene expression. Physiol. Genom. 2016, 48, 306–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Krawczynski, K.; Bauersachs, S.; Reliszko, Z.P.; Graf, A.; Kaczmarek, M.M. Expression of microRNAs and isomiRs in the porcine endometrium: Implications for gene regulation at the maternal-conceptus interface. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. DEMs analysis among four groups. Volcano plots show the up− and downregulation distribution of DEMs in (A) MM−FT vs. MM−LT, (B) MM−FT vs. ww−FT, (C) MM−LT vs. ww−LT and (D) ww−FT vs. ww−LT, where red and green represent up− or downregulation, respectively. Heatmap (E) shows the expression patterns of the four groups of DEMs.
Figure 1. DEMs analysis among four groups. Volcano plots show the up− and downregulation distribution of DEMs in (A) MM−FT vs. MM−LT, (B) MM−FT vs. ww−FT, (C) MM−LT vs. ww−LT and (D) ww−FT vs. ww−LT, where red and green represent up− or downregulation, respectively. Heatmap (E) shows the expression patterns of the four groups of DEMs.
Genes 14 02024 g001
Figure 2. Top 10 enriched GO terms of genes targeted by DELs in four groups. The top 10 enriched GO terms of genes targeted by DELs in (A) MM−FT vs. MM−LT (B) MM−LT, MM−FT vs. ww−FT, (C) ww−FT vs. ww−LT. The horizontal and vertical coordinates represent the GO terms and −lg (p−Value) of the enriched genes, respectively.
Figure 2. Top 10 enriched GO terms of genes targeted by DELs in four groups. The top 10 enriched GO terms of genes targeted by DELs in (A) MM−FT vs. MM−LT (B) MM−LT, MM−FT vs. ww−FT, (C) ww−FT vs. ww−LT. The horizontal and vertical coordinates represent the GO terms and −lg (p−Value) of the enriched genes, respectively.
Genes 14 02024 g002
Figure 3. Twenty enriched KEGGs of genes targeted by DEMs in four groups. Twenty enriched KEGG of genes targeted by DEMs in (A) MM−FT vs. MM−LT, (B) MM−FT vs. ww−FT, (C) ww−FT vs. ww−LT. Horizontal and vertical coordinates represent the −lg (p−Value) of the enriched genes and KEGG pathway, respectively.
Figure 3. Twenty enriched KEGGs of genes targeted by DEMs in four groups. Twenty enriched KEGG of genes targeted by DEMs in (A) MM−FT vs. MM−LT, (B) MM−FT vs. ww−FT, (C) ww−FT vs. ww−LT. Horizontal and vertical coordinates represent the −lg (p−Value) of the enriched genes and KEGG pathway, respectively.
Genes 14 02024 g003
Figure 4. DEM−DEG network interaction analysis. The DEM–DEG network between (A) MM−FT vs. MM−LT, (B) MM−FT vs. ww−FT, (C) ww−FT vs. ww−LT. Note: Nodes represent DEMs or DEGs, and edges represent the interaction between DEMs and DEGs. Red represents upregulation and green represents downregulation. Circular and inverted rhombus represents DEGs and DEMs, respectively.
Figure 4. DEM−DEG network interaction analysis. The DEM–DEG network between (A) MM−FT vs. MM−LT, (B) MM−FT vs. ww−FT, (C) ww−FT vs. ww−LT. Note: Nodes represent DEMs or DEGs, and edges represent the interaction between DEMs and DEGs. Red represents upregulation and green represents downregulation. Circular and inverted rhombus represents DEGs and DEMs, respectively.
Genes 14 02024 g004
Figure 5. RT−qPCR verification of DEMs. RT−qPCR verified the expression trend of DEMs in MM−FT vs. MM−LT, MM−FT vs. ww−FT, MM−LT vs. ww−LT, and ww−FT vs. ww−LT.
Figure 5. RT−qPCR verification of DEMs. RT−qPCR verified the expression trend of DEMs in MM−FT vs. MM−LT, MM−FT vs. ww−FT, MM−LT vs. ww−LT, and ww−FT vs. ww−LT.
Genes 14 02024 g005
Figure 6. Plasmid construction and double-luciferase activity detection results. (A) Sequencing results of TARBP2−3’UTR−WT and MT plasmids. (B) Relative fluorescence activity was detected after cotransfection of novel-51 mimics, novel-51 mimics NC, TARBP2−WT and TARBP2−MT into 293T cells. Note: “*” denotes significant differences in expression (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Plasmid construction and double-luciferase activity detection results. (A) Sequencing results of TARBP2−3’UTR−WT and MT plasmids. (B) Relative fluorescence activity was detected after cotransfection of novel-51 mimics, novel-51 mimics NC, TARBP2−WT and TARBP2−MT into 293T cells. Note: “*” denotes significant differences in expression (p < 0.05).
Genes 14 02024 g006
Table 1. The amount of miRNA reverse transcription reagents used.
Table 1. The amount of miRNA reverse transcription reagents used.
ReagentsVolume
Total RNA (500 ng/µL)2 µL
2×miRNA RT Reaction Buffer10 µL
miRNA RT Enzyme Mix2 µL
RNase-Free ddH2O6 µL
Table 2. The primer sequences designed for real-time fluorescence quantification.
Table 2. The primer sequences designed for real-time fluorescence quantification.
Gene NamePrimer Sequences (5′-3′)Tm (°C)
oar-miR-3958-3pF: CGCAGATATTGCACGGTTGATCTCT60
oar-miR-374bF: CGCCGCATATAATACAACCTGC60
novel_348F: TCTGGTGCTTAGACTCTGTGCT60
novel_51F: GCTATGGCACTGGTAGAATTCACT60
novel_68F: GTTTGGCACTAGCACATTTTTGCT60
oar-miR-133F: TTGGTCCCCTTCAACCAGCTGT60
oar-miR-3959-5pF: CGCGGTTGATCAGAGAACATAC60
oar-miR-181aF: AACATTCAACGCTGTCGGTGAGT60
oar-miR-148aF: GCTCAGTGCACTACAGAACTTTGT60
U6F: CCAAGGATGACACGCAAATTCG60
Table 3. qPCR reagent usage.
Table 3. qPCR reagent usage.
ReagentsVolume
2×miRcute plus miRNA premix 10 µL
Forward primer0.4 µL
Reverse primer (provided in the reagent kit)0.4 µL
miRNA first strand cDNA2 µL
RNase-free ddH2O7.2 µL
Table 4. Condition setting of qPCR.
Table 4. Condition setting of qPCR.
CyclesTemperature (°C)TimeReaction Content
9515 minStarting template denaturation
9420 sEnrichment of target miRNAs
6430 s
7234 s
40×9420 sTemplate denaturation in PCR cycles
6034 sAnnealing, extension
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, C.; He, X.; Di, R.; Wang, X.; Han, M.; Liang, C.; Chu, M. Thyroid Transcriptomics Revealed the Reproductive Regulation of miRNA in the Follicular and Luteal Phases in Small-Tail Han Sheep with Different FecB Genotypes. Genes 2023, 14, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14112024

AMA Style

Chang C, He X, Di R, Wang X, Han M, Liang C, Chu M. Thyroid Transcriptomics Revealed the Reproductive Regulation of miRNA in the Follicular and Luteal Phases in Small-Tail Han Sheep with Different FecB Genotypes. Genes. 2023; 14(11):2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14112024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Cheng, Xiaoyun He, Ran Di, Xiangyu Wang, Miaoceng Han, Chen Liang, and Mingxing Chu. 2023. "Thyroid Transcriptomics Revealed the Reproductive Regulation of miRNA in the Follicular and Luteal Phases in Small-Tail Han Sheep with Different FecB Genotypes" Genes 14, no. 11: 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14112024

APA Style

Chang, C., He, X., Di, R., Wang, X., Han, M., Liang, C., & Chu, M. (2023). Thyroid Transcriptomics Revealed the Reproductive Regulation of miRNA in the Follicular and Luteal Phases in Small-Tail Han Sheep with Different FecB Genotypes. Genes, 14(11), 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14112024

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop