Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification of AhMDHs and Analysis of Gene Expression under Manganese Toxicity Stress in Arachis hypogaea
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Application Potential of Aquaculture Sewage Treatment of Pseudomonas chengduensis Strain WD211 Based on Its Complete Genome
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Epidemiological Factors and SNP rs3804100 of TLR2 for COVID-19 in a Cohort of Professionals Who Worked in the First Pandemic Wave in Belém-PA, Brazil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association between Polymorphism rs61876744 in PNPLA2 Gene and Keratoconus in a Saudi Cohort

by
Altaf A. Kondkar
1,2,3,*,
Taif A. Azad
1,
Tahira Sultan
1,
Tanvir Khatlani
4,
Abdulaziz A. Alshehri
5,
Glenn P. Lobo
6,
Hatem Kalantan
1,
Saleh A. Al-Obeidan
1,2 and
Abdulrahman M. Al-Muammar
1,3
1
Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia
2
Glaucoma Research Chair in Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia
3
King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Blood and Cancer Research, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University of Health Sciences, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Ophthalmology, Imam Abdulrahman Alfaisal Hospital, Riyadh 14723, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55347, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(12), 2108; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14122108
Submission received: 12 September 2023 / Revised: 5 November 2023 / Accepted: 17 November 2023 / Published: 21 November 2023

Abstract

:
The genetic etiology of Keratoconus (KC) in Middle Eastern Arabs of Saudi origin is still unclear. A recent genome-wide study identified two significant loci in the region of PNPLA2 (rs61876744) and CSNK1E (rs138380) for KC that may be associated with KC in the Saudi population. In addition, polymorphisms in the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene, namely, rs429358 and rs7412, responsible for APOE allelic variants ε2, ε3, and ε4, may influence KC via oxidative stress mechanism(s). Thus, we investigated the possible association of polymorphisms rs61876744, rs138380, rs429358, rs7412, and APOE genotypes in KC patients of the Saudi population. This study included 98 KC cases and 167 controls. Polymorphisms rs6187644 and rs138380 were genotyped using TaqMan assays, and rs429358 and rs7412 were genotyped via Sanger sequencing. Although the allele frequency of rs61876744(T) in PNPLA2 was a protective effect against KC (odds ratio (OR) = 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.44–0.93), the p-value (p = 0.020) was not significant for multiple testing correction (p = 0.05/4 = 0.015). However, rs6187644 genotype showed a modestly significant protective effect in the dominant model (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.32–0.88, p = 0.013). Polymorphisms rs138380, rs429358, and rs7412 showed no significant allelic or genotype association with KC. However, the ε2-carriers (ε2/ε2 and ε2/ε3 genotypes) exhibited a greater than 5-fold increased risk of KC, albeit non-significantly (p = 0.055). Regression analysis showed no significant effect of age, gender, and the four polymorphisms on KC. Our results suggest that polymorphism rs6187644 in PNPLA2 might be associated with KC in the Middle Eastern Arabs of Saudi origin but warrant a large-scale association analysis at this locus.

1. Introduction

Keratoconus (KC) is a degenerative disorder associated with the dysregulation of cellular and extracellular matrix (ECM) function, leading to progressive thinning and bulging of the cornea and loss of vision [1]. The prevalence of KC varies globally, ranging from 0.3% to 2.3% per 100,000 individuals [2,3]. KC can manifest early in life and progress asymmetrically, affecting each eye differently [4]. The therapeutic interventions of KC depend on the clinical stage of the disease. They may vary from contact lenses and corneal collagen UV-cross linking at early stages to corneal transplantation in progressive KC [4]. Therefore, it is essential to identify specific biomarkers that can facilitate early diagnosis. Consanguinity, family history, eye rubbing, contact lens wear, and allergy are some of the associated risk factors of KC [5,6,7]. Inflammation, oxidative stress, and ECM abnormalities are potential pathways involved in KC pathogenesis [8]. However, the exact etiology of KC remains elusive and is believed to involve an interaction between genetic and environmental factors [9,10,11]. Familial clustering, a variable inheritance pattern, and increased prevalence among Asian and Middle Eastern populations suggest a strong genetic link in KC [2,7,12].
In an attempt to examine the genetic risk of KC, many investigators have identified single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in several genes using linkage, whole-exome, genome-wide association study (GWAS) or candidate gene approaches [9,11,13,14]. These include DOCK9, LOX, MIRNA184, HGF, RAB3GAP1, RXRA–COL5A1, FOXO1, FNDC3B, DCN, MPDZ-NF1B, and ZNF469 among many others. As a result of genetic heterogeneity, identifying the causative genes or genetic marker(s) responsible for KC needs further research to elucidate the underlying genetic mechanisms.
In a recent GWAS, McComish et al. identified two SNPs, rs61876744 located in the intronic region of the PNPLA2 (patatin-like phospholipase domain–containing 2) gene and rs138380 near the CSNK1E (casein kinase I isoform epsilon) locus reaching a genome-wide significance for association with KC in populations of European ancestry [15]. PNPLA2 locus is hypothesized to implicate apoptotic pathways in KC pathogenesis via AP006621 gene, and SNP rs61876744 was associated with overexpression of AP006621 (antisense RNA transcript AP006621) that might destabilize corneal structures and increase the risk of KC [15]. The protein-encoding CSNK1E has been implicated in controlling cytoplasmic and nuclear processes, including DNA replication and repair [16]. Variants in this gene have been associated with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy 1 [17]. However, little is known about this gene or polymorphism rs138380 plausible contribution to KC pathogenesis. It would thus be interesting to explore the possible association of these newly identified variants in a non-European KC cohort of Saudi origin.
Genetic polymorphisms in apolipoprotein E (APOE) have been implicated in various systemic diseases, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), glaucoma, and other neurodegenerative disorders [18]. Rs429358 and rs7412 are the two most commonly investigated polymorphisms in this gene [19]. These polymorphisms at codons 112 (rs429358; T>C) and 158 (rs7412; C>T) result in a Cys/Arg interchange, giving rise to three major allelic APOE variants ε2, ε3, and ε4 encoding Cys/Cys, Cys/Arg, and Arg/Arg, respectively [19]. APOE plays a crucial role in lipid homeostasis, maintaining and repairing neuronal cell membranes, coagulation, immunoresponse, and oxidative stress [20,21,22]. APOE knockout mice on a high-fat diet exhibit chronic inflammation, increased oxidative stress, impaired wound healing, and altered ECM remodeling [23]—processes that are all relevant to KC biology. APOE was reported to be the most significantly decreased protein in the KC corneal stroma [24]. In addition, the APOE variants have been reported to affect APOE levels [25,26]. It might thus be plausible that these variants may be associated with KC.
The underlying contribution of genes and genetic polymorphism(s) involved in KC in Middle Eastern Arabs remains unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the possible association of rs61876744, rs138380, rs429358, rs7412, and APOE genotypes in KC patients of Saudi origin. To our knowledge, these SNPs have not been investigated in KC patients of Arab ethnicity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Stduy Design and Cohort

A retrospective case–control genetic association study was performed adhering to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, where all the participants gave written informed consent. The ethical approval was obtained from the College of Medicine Institutional Review Board Committee, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients (n = 98), selected from the anterior segment clinic at King Abdulaziz University Hospital in Riyadh, were diagnosed with KC based on specific clinical criteria as described previously [27]—a Schimpff-flow-based elevation map showing posterior corneal elevation within the central 5 mm ≥ +20 μm, an inferior–superior dioptric asymmetry value > 1.2 diopters (D), and the steepest keratometry > 47D. All the participants were unrelated. Secondary cases of KC due to trauma, surgery, Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, osteogenesis imperfecta, and pellucid marginal degeneration, and patients with post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ectasia were excluded. Healthy control participants (n = 167) of Saudi nationality with no ocular disease or history of ophthalmic surgery, clear cornea on examination, and normal Schimpff-flow-based elevation map were recruited from the general ophthalmology clinic [27]. Participants refusing to enroll in this study were excluded.

2.2. DNA Preparation

Blood samples drawn into EDTA tubes were used for DNA preparation. DNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Cat. No. 51306, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the specific protocols provided by the manufacturer. The DNA aliquots were stored at −80 °C until further use.

2.3. Genotyping of rs138380 (G>A) and rs61876744 (T>C)

Genotyping of rs138380 (G>A) near CSNK1E and rs61876744 (T>C) in PNPLA2 was conducted using commercially available custom-designed TaqMan® genotyping assay mix (Cat. No.: 4331349; Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA) on ABI-7500 real-time PCR (Applied Biosystems). Real-time PCR amplification was conducted under recommended conditions in a 25 μL mix of 1X TaqMan® genotyping master mix (Cat. No.: 4371355; Applied Biosystems), 1X SNP genotyping assay mix, and 20 ng DNA. Two negative controls (without DNA) were included in each 96-well plate. An in-built 2-color allele discrimination software version 2.0.5 was used for genotype calling. Probes and primers used for genotyping are described in Table 1.

2.4. Genotyping of rs429358 (T>C) and rs7412 (C>T)

SNPs rs429358 (T>C) and rs7412 (C>T) in the APOE gene were genotyped using PCR-based Sanger sequencing. The PCR reaction consisted of 1X PCR buffer, 250 µM dNTP mix, 100 pmoles of each primer, 1.5 U Taq polymerase, 1X Q-solution (Cat. No. 203205, Qiagen), and 20 ng of DNA. After stringent optimization, the target region was amplified using primers described in Table 2 using the optimum cycling conditions. Following confirmation of the amplified DNA (371 bp) via agarose gel electrophoresis and visualization in a UV gel documentation system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), the PCR products were purified using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Cat. No. 28106, Qiagen) before being subjected to sequencing reactions. Sequencing was performed in both forward and reverse direction using M13 primers (Table 2) and BigDye Terminator V3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Samples were electrophoresed on the ABI 3730 genetic analyzer sequencer (Applied Biosystems) after removal of unincorporated dye terminators using DyeEx 96 Kit (Cat. No. 63183, Qiagen). The sequencing data was analyzed using CLC Sequence Viewer 6.0 (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) to determine the nucleotide variations and APOE genotypes.

2.5. Statistics

The continuous variable was analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U-test after normality testing was conducted using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and the categorical variable were examined using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests, where applicable. In addition, the frequency of genotypes was also compared using the Cochran–Armitage test for trend assuming additive model. Binary logistic regression analysis assessed the effects of multiple risk factors (age, sex, and genotypes) on KC. All the analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25 (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and SNPStats online software version 1.0 (https://www.snpstats.net/start.htm accessed on 2 August 2023). Power analysis was performed using the PS program (version 3.1.2). A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A Bonferroni’s correction p-value for multiple testing (p = 0.05/4 = 0.015) was applied where applicable.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic of Study Cohort

A total number of 265 subjects consisting of 98 KC and 167 controls were genotyped in this study. KC patients included sporadic (n = 67) and familial (n = 31) cases. Table 3 shows the age and gender distribution in cases and controls. The KC patients with a mean age of 25.8 (±7.3) ranging from 12 to 50 years were significantly younger (p < 0.001) than the controls with a mean age of 60.1 (±8.1) ranging from 35 to 78 years. Among the keratoconus patients, there were 55 males and 43 females compared to 88 males and 79 females in controls. The gender distribution was non-significant (p = 0.589).

3.2. Allelic Association Analysis

Table 4 represents the genomic location and minor allele frequency of the polymorphisms investigated in KC. SNPs rs138380, rs429358, and rs7412 were in HWE in the cases and controls, while SNP rs61876744 showed a slight deviation (p = 0.041) in KC cases. The frequency of rs6187674 (T) allele in PNPLA2 was lower in KC (0.33) than in controls (0.43) and exhibited a significant protective effect against KC (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.44–0.93, p = 0.020) but did not survive Bonferroni’s correction for multiple testing. There was no significant difference in allele frequencies of other SNPs between cases and controls.

3.3. Genotype Association Analysis

Genotype association analysis of polymorphisms in PNPLA2 and near CNSK1E locus is represented in Table 5. Rs138380 near CNSK1E showed no association with KC in additive, dominant, and recessive genetic models. In contrast, rs61876744 in PNPLA2 showed a modestly significant protective effect in the dominant model (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.32–0.88, p = 0.013). Although the heterozygous T/C genotype of rs61876744 was also protective (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.31–0.92) in the additive model, the p-value (p = 0.024) was insignificant for multiple testing. Likewise, the Cochran Armitage trend test assuming an additive model revealed 0.64-fold protection against KC but was insignificant for multiple corrections (p = 0.020).
The genotype distribution and analysis of polymorphisms rs429358 and rs7412 in the APOE gene is represented in Table 6. Overall, no significant genotype association of these polymorphisms with KC existed in any of the tested genetic models. The frequency of rs429358 C/C homozygous genotype was higher (3.1%) in cases than in controls (0%); likewise, the frequency of rs7412 C/T heterozygous genotype was 6.1% in KC compared to 4.2% in controls showing a 1.48-fold increased risk of KC. However, none of these differences were found to be statistically significant.
The association analysis of the two APOE polymorphisms according to APOE alleles and genotypes is shown in Table 7. The allelic distribution was found in the order of ε3> ε4 > ε2 in both cases and controls. However, the distribution was non-significant. Likewise, ε3/ε3 was the most common genotype in both patients and controls, and the overall distribution of different types of apoε genotypes was statistically significant (Pearson Chi-Square = 16.54, df = 5, p = 0.0005). The ε2/ε3 genotype showed a significant association with KC (p = 0.012). However, a further analysis of APOE genotypes according to carrier status (Table 7) showed that the ε2-carriers (ε2/ε2 and ε2/ε3 genotypes) exhibited more than 5-fold increased risk of KC but were not statistically significant (p = 0.055). Representative sequence chromatograms of APOE genotypes based on rs429358 (T>C) and rs7412 (C>T) polymorphisms are shown in Figure 1.

3.4. Regression Analysis

Binary logistic regression analysis showed no significant impact of age (p = 0.079), sex (p = 0.077), rs138380 (p = 0.292), rs61876744 (p = 0.574), rs429358 (p = 0.232), and rs7412 (p = 0.982) polymorphisms on KC outcome (Table 8).

3.5. Power of This Study

Based on the allele frequencies observed in our cohort, this study had a power of 0.96, 0.97, and 0.72 per allele to detect a significant association between KC and SNPs rs138380, rs61876744, and rs429358, respectively, at an α level of 0.05 and an odds risk of 2.0. But, it was sufficiently underpowered (0.37) to detect any significant association for poly-morphisms rs7412.

4. Discussion

Keratoconus is a leading cause of visual morbidity in adolescents and young adults, with genetic, environmental, and behavioral traits contributing to the risk of KC [3]. Although a higher incidence of KC is reported in the Middle Eastern population compared to the Europeans [3], the genetic predisposition of KC in the Middle Eastern Arabs is predominantly unknown. It is thus essential to identify the genetic factors associated with KC in this population. This study examined the association of two newly identified polymorphisms, rs61876744 in PNPLA2 and rs138380 near the CSNK1E locus [15], and the two commonly investigated variants in the APOE gene, namely the rs429358 and rs7412 [19], in KC patients of Saudi origin. We report no association of rs138380, rs429358, and rs7412 but a modest association of rs61876744 in the PNPLA2 gene in our KC cohort.
McComish and colleagues [15] reported an association between two novel loci and KC at a genome-wide significance level in the Australian population using a genome-wide approach. These included rs61876744 in PNPLA2 on chromosome 11 (p = 7.46 × 10−9) and rs138380 located 2.2 kb upstream of CSNK1E on chromosome 22 (6.35 × 10−12). Unlike the rs138380 near CSNK1E, the novel locus in PNPLA2 was reported to remain significant in the replication analysis of the American, Irish, and Australian cohorts (p = 2.45 × 10−8).
According to the 1000Genomes NCBI database, the rs138380 (G) allele frequency is 0.47 in Europeans, 0.23 in Africans, 0.37 in Americans, and 0.28 in South Asians. The G allele frequency was reported to be 0.52 in controls and 0.38 in KC in the Australian cohort and was reported to be protective against KC. In comparison, in our study, the G allele frequency was 0.50 in controls and 0.52 in KC. However, we could not replicate an association of rs138380 near CSNK1E in our Saudi cohort. Likewise, in the GWA study by McComish et al. [15], the association of polymorphism rs138380 in KC was not replicated in the US, Ireland, and Australian replication cohort, suggesting that this variant may not have a significant role in KC. However, the significance of other polymorphisms near this locus cannot be ruled out. There are no other published studies of this polymorphism in different ethnicities in KC.
The rs61876744 (T) allele in PNPLA2 has a frequency of 0.42 in Europeans, 0.30 in Americans, 0.35 in Africans, and 0.60 in South Asians, highlighting the existence of ethnic variations of this polymorphism (1000Genomes NCBI database). The rs61876744 (T) allele was reported to be protective (OR = 0.59) in the Australian, American, and Irish cohorts with the T allele frequency of 0.34 in KC and 0.44 in controls [15]. A similar protective effect of rs61876744 (T) allele (OR = 0.64) was observed in our study, having an allele frequency of 0.33 and 0.43 in KC and controls, respectively. Likewise, we observed a significant protective effect of rs61876744 genotypes in the dominant model (p = 0.013). However, the effect of this polymorphism was not independent of age, gender, and other SNPs included in this study, as observed in logistic regression analysis. Notably, the controls in our cohort were older than KC. Thus, the plausible presence of gene–gene and gene–environment interactions or the role of other causal variants that might be in linkage with this rs61876744 cannot be ruled out and needs further investigation.
PNPLA2 is a key enzyme catalyzing the first step of triglyceride hydrolysis in adipose and non-adipose lipid droplets [28]. PNPLA2 has been demonstrated to function as a retinyl ester hydrolase in the retinal pigment epithelium and an essential component of the visual cycle [29] and is suggested to be a potential therapeutic target in treating AMD [30]. The PNPLA2 gene is highly expressed in all eye tissues, including the cornea [15], and is differentially expressed in the corneal epithelium in patients with KC and myopia [15,31]. Using the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTex) data, McComish et al. identified an expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) for an antisense RNA transcript AP006621 with rs61876744 in which the C allele was associated with increased levels of AP006621 transcript in the sun-exposed skin [15]. The authors hypothesized that the overexpression of AP006621 might destabilize corneal structures and the presence of rs61876744 (T) allele may reduce AP006621 expression and thereby decrease the risk of KC [15], thus exhibiting a protective effect. However, the exact pathogenetic mechanism(s) by which PNPLA2 might be involved in KC remains to be investigated.
The individual analysis of polymorphisms rs429358 and rs7412 in the APOE gene showed no significant allelic or genotype association with KC. The allele frequencies of these SNPs observed in our cohort were consistent with the global frequency reported for these SNPs across different ethnicities (1000Genomes NCBI database). Further analysis of these polymorphisms was performed according to APOE alleles (ε2, ε3, and ε4), and the resulting six genotypes (ε2/2, ε2/3, ε2/4, ε3/3, ε3/4, and ε4/4) [19]. Globally, the frequency of allelic variation in the APOE locus lies in the range of 60–90% for ε3, 0 to 20% for ε2, and 10–20% for ε4 alleles, respectively [32]. Similarly, ε3 was the most predominant allele, followed by ε4 and ε2 in both our study groups, but showed no significant association with KC. Although the ε2/ε3 genotype was significantly associated with an increased risk of KC, the significance was lost when ε2 carriers were analyzed. There are no published reports on the association of APOE genotypes in KC. Several investigators have reported ε4/ε4 to be associated with an increased risk of CVD, diabetes, and Alzheimer’s [33,34,35]. In contrast, ε2/ε2 has been reported to be associated with increased risk in AMD [36,37]. It has been demonstrated that the APOE isoforms exhibit differences in net charge and that their cell-specific binding properties and function may vary depending on the target cell type [38,39]. These differences may explain the variable effects of APOE2 or E4 isoforms.
Beyond the role of APOE in lipid transport, apoE deficiency has been demonstrated to promote increased oxidative stress in an APOE isoform-dependent manner [40,41,42]. Oxidative stress plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of KC, and the cornea is particularly susceptible to oxidative damage [2,43]. A high ROS production, decreased antioxidant status, and increased mitochondrial DNA damage can eventually lead to ECM dysfunction in the stroma, triggering stromal thinning [43]. Similar to the reported studies in AMD [36,37], a significantly five-fold increased risk of KC was observed in our patients with ε2-carriers, but the effect was non-significant. The lack of significance in our cohort may be related to fewer numbers in each genotype group and needs further evaluation in a much larger cohort.
This study has certain limitations, and the results thus need careful interpretation. The number of samples analyzed in this study is relatively small, with much smaller numbers in different subgroup analyses, which may affect the power of this study. Our study had sufficient power to detect an odds of 2.0 for all the polymorphisms investigated in this study, except for rs7412. However, a larger sample number should be examined to detect an odds of ≤1.5, as commonly reported in genetic association studies to establish a strong association. This study provides no functional or mechanistic evidence. Since ours is a tertiary care center, there could be a possible referral or selection bias that may not truly represent the general Saudi population. Also, considering the significant role of epistatic/gene–environment interactions in KC further accentuates the need to confirm these results in well-designed, sizeable, population-based samples.
In conclusion, our study suggests that polymorphism rs61876744 in the PNPLA2 gene is associated with KC in Middle Eastern Arabs of Saudi origin. However, the results warrant further replication in a large-scale association analysis with cohorts from multiple centers, possibly with age- and gender-matched controls, to confirm the risk rs61876744/PNPLA2 locus may confer in the development or progression of KC.

Author Contributions

A.A.K.: concept, investigation, methodology, analysis and data interpretation, writing draft, review and editing, and supervision; T.A.A. and T.S.: investigation, methodology, data curation, manuscript review, and editing; T.K.: analysis and data interpretation, resources, manuscript review, and editing; A.A.A. and G.P.L.: data curation, resources, manuscript review, and editing; H.K.: concept, resources, manuscript review, and editing; S.A.A.-O. and A.M.A.-M.: concept, resources, project administration, manuscript review, and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, “Ministry of Education” in Saudi Arabia for funding this research (IFKSUOR3-193-1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board Committee of the College of Medicine, King Saud University (protocol number #09–659).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the conclusions of this article are all presented within this report.

Acknowledgments

We thank Abdulrahman Al-Mosa for his clinical assistance during this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Davidson, A.E.; Hayes, S.; Hardcastle, A.J.; Tuft, S.J. The pathogenesis of keratoconus. Eye 2014, 28, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Shetty, R.; D’Souza, S.; Khamar, P.; Ghosh, A.; Nuijts, R.; Sethu, S. Biochemical markers and alterations in keratoconus. Asia Pac. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 9, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Santodomingo-Rubido, J.; Carracedo, G.; Suzaki, A.; Villa-Collar, C.; Vincent, S.J.; Wolffsohn, J.S. Keratoconus: An updated review. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye 2022, 45, 101559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Deshmukh, R.; Ong, Z.Z.; Rampat, R.; Alio Del Barrio, J.L.; Barua, A.; Ang, M.; Mehta, J.S.; Said, D.G.; Dua, H.S.; Ambrosio, R., Jr.; et al. Management of keratoconus: An updated review. Front. Med. 2023, 10, 1212314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Almusawi, L.A.; Hamied, F.M. Risk factors for development of keratoconus: A matched pair case-control study. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2021, 15, 3473–3479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Debourdeau, E.; Planells, G.; Chamard, C.; Touboul, D.; Villain, M.; Demoly, P.; Babeau, F.; Fournie, P.; Daien, V. New keratoconus risk factors: A cross-sectional case-control study. J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 2022, 6605771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hashemi, H.; Heydarian, S.; Hooshmand, E.; Saatchi, M.; Yekta, A.; Aghamirsalim, M.; Valadkhan, M.; Mortazavi, M.; Hashemi, A.; Khabazkhoob, M. The prevalence and risk factors for keratoconus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cornea 2020, 39, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Soiberman, U.; Foster, J.W.; Jun, A.S.; Chakravarti, S. Pathophysiology of keratoconus: What do we know today. Open Ophthalmol. J. 2017, 11, 252–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abu-Amero, K.K.; Al-Muammar, A.M.; Kondkar, A.A. Genetics of keratoconus: Where do we stand? J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 2014, 641708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Chen, S.; Li, X.Y.; Jin, J.J.; Shen, R.J.; Mao, J.Y.; Cheng, F.F.; Chen, Z.J.; Linardaki, E.; Voulgaraki, S.; Aslanides, I.M.; et al. Genetic screening revealed latent keratoconus in asymptomatic individuals. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 650344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Loukovitis, E.; Sfakianakis, K.; Syrmakesi, P.; Tsotridou, E.; Orfanidou, M.; Bakaloudi, D.R.; Stoila, M.; Kozei, A.; Koronis, S.; Zachariadis, Z.; et al. Genetic aspects of keratoconus: A literature review exploring potential genetic contributions and possible genetic relationships with comorbidities. Ophthalmol. Ther. 2018, 7, 263–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Netto, E.A.T.; Al-Otaibi, W.M.; Hafezi, N.L.; Kling, S.; Al-Farhan, H.M.; Randleman, J.B.; Hafezi, F. Prevalence of keratoconus in paediatric patients in riyadh, saudi arabia. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 102, 1436–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Froukh, T.; Hawwari, A.; Al Zubi, K. Whole exome sequencing highlights variants in association with keratoconus in jordanian families. BMC Med. Genet. 2020, 21, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lu, Y.; Vitart, V.; Burdon, K.P.; Khor, C.C.; Bykhovskaya, Y.; Mirshahi, A.; Hewitt, A.W.; Koehn, D.; Hysi, P.G.; Ramdas, W.D.; et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify multiple loci associated with central corneal thickness and keratoconus. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. McComish, B.J.; Sahebjada, S.; Bykhovskaya, Y.; Willoughby, C.E.; Richardson, A.J.; Tenen, A.; Charlesworth, J.C.; MacGregor, S.; Mitchell, P.; Lucas, S.E.M.; et al. Association of genetic variation with keratoconus. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020, 138, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fish, K.J.; Cegielska, A.; Getman, M.E.; Landes, G.M.; Virshup, D.M. Isolation and characterization of human casein kinase i epsilon (cki), a novel member of the cki gene family. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 14875–14883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chen, X.; Jin, J.; Wang, Q.; Xue, H.; Zhang, N.; Du, Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, B.; Wu, J.; Liu, Z. A de novo pathogenic csnk1e mutation identified by exome sequencing in family trios with epileptic encephalopathy. Hum. Mutat. 2019, 40, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Alagarsamy, J.; Jaeschke, A.; Hui, D.Y. Apolipoprotein e in cardiometabolic and neurological health and diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mahley, R.W.; Rall, S.C., Jr. Apolipoprotein e: Far more than a lipid transport protein. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2000, 1, 507–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Civeira-Marin, M.; Cenarro, A.; Marco-Benedi, V.; Bea, A.M.; Mateo-Gallego, R.; Moreno-Franco, B.; Ordovas, J.M.; Laclaustra, M.; Civeira, F.; Lamiquiz-Moneo, I. Apoe genotypes modulate inflammation independently of their effect on lipid metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, Y.; Pang, J.; Peng, J.; Cao, F.; Guo, Z.; Jiang, L.; Teng, Z.; Huang, Z.; Cheng, C.; Jiang, Y.; et al. Apolipoprotein e deficiency aggravates neuronal injury by enhancing neuroinflammation via the jnk/c-jun pathway in the early phase of experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage in mice. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 3832648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Butterfield, D.A.; Mattson, M.P. Apolipoprotein e and oxidative stress in brain with relevance to alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2020, 138, 104795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hiebert, P.R.; Wu, D.; Granville, D.J. Granzyme b degrades extracellular matrix and contributes to delayed wound closure in apolipoprotein e knockout mice. Cell Death Differ. 2013, 20, 1404–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shinde, V.; Hu, N.; Renuse, S.; Mahale, A.; Pandey, A.; Eberhart, C.; Stone, D.; Al-Swailem, S.A.; Maktabi, A.; Chakravarti, S. Mapping keratoconus molecular substrates by multiplexed high-resolution proteomics of unpooled corneas. OMICS 2019, 23, 583–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sullivan, P.M.; Han, B.; Liu, F.; Mace, B.E.; Ervin, J.F.; Wu, S.; Koger, D.; Paul, S.; Bales, K.R. Reduced levels of human apoe4 protein in an animal model of cognitive impairment. Neurobiol. Aging 2011, 32, 791–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Blanchard, J.W.; Bula, M.; Davila-Velderrain, J.; Akay, L.A.; Zhu, L.; Frank, A.; Victor, M.B.; Bonner, J.M.; Mathys, H.; Lin, Y.T.; et al. Reconstruction of the human blood-brain barrier in vitro reveals a pathogenic mechanism of apoe4 in pericytes. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 952–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Abu-Amero, K.K.; Kondkar, A.A.; Azad, T.A.; Sultan, T.; Kalantan, H.; Al-Muammar, A.M. Keratoconus is associated with increased copy number of mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Vis. 2014, 20, 1203–1208. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Zimmermann, R.; Strauss, J.G.; Haemmerle, G.; Schoiswohl, G.; Birner-Gruenberger, R.; Riederer, M.; Lass, A.; Neuberger, G.; Eisenhaber, F.; Hermetter, A.; et al. Fat mobilization in adipose tissue is promoted by adipose triglyceride lipase. Science 2004, 306, 1383–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hara, M.; Wu, W.; Malechka, V.V.; Takahashi, Y.; Ma, J.X.; Moiseyev, G. Pnpla2 mobilizes retinyl esters from retinosomes and promotes the generation of 11-cis-retinal in the visual cycle. Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 112091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Subramanian, P.; Becerra, S.P. Role of the pnpla2 gene in the regulation of oxidative stress damage of rpe. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1185, 377–382. [Google Scholar]
  31. You, J.; Corley, S.M.; Wen, L.; Hodge, C.; Hollhumer, R.; Madigan, M.C.; Wilkins, M.R.; Sutton, G. Rna-seq analysis and comparison of corneal epithelium in keratoconus and myopia patients. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Singh, P.P.; Singh, M.; Mastana, S.S. Apoe distribution in world populations with new data from india and the uk. Ann. Hum. Biol. 2006, 33, 279–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Di Battista, A.M.; Heinsinger, N.M.; Rebeck, G.W. Alzheimer’s disease genetic risk factor apoe-epsilon4 also affects normal brain function. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2016, 13, 1200–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lumsden, A.L.; Mulugeta, A.; Zhou, A.; Hypponen, E. Apolipoprotein e (apoe) genotype-associated disease risks: A phenome-wide, registry-based, case-control study utilising the uk biobank. EBioMedicine 2020, 59, 102954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shinohara, M.; Tashiro, Y.; Suzuki, K.; Fukumori, A.; Bu, G.; Sato, N. Interaction between apoe genotype and diabetes in cognitive decline. Alzheimers Dement. 2020, 12, e12006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Rasmussen, K.L.; Tybjaerg-Hansen, A.; Nordestgaard, B.G.; Frikke-Schmidt, R. Associations of alzheimer disease-protective apoe variants with age-related macular degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023, 141, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Levy, O.; Lavalette, S.; Hu, S.J.; Housset, M.; Raoul, W.; Eandi, C.; Sahel, J.A.; Sullivan, P.M.; Guillonneau, X.; Sennlaub, F. Apoe isoforms control pathogenic subretinal inflammation in age-related macular degeneration. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 13568–13576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Davignon, J.; Gregg, R.E.; Sing, C.F. Apolipoprotein e polymorphism and atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis 1988, 8, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guillaume, D.; Bertrand, P.; Dea, D.; Davignon, J.; Poirier, J. Apolipoprotein e and low-density lipoprotein binding and internalization in primary cultures of rat astrocytes: Isoform-specific alterations. J. Neurochem. 1996, 66, 2410–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shea, T.B.; Rogers, E.; Ashline, D.; Ortiz, D.; Sheu, M.S. Apolipoprotein e deficiency promotes increased oxidative stress and compensatory increases in antioxidants in brain tissue. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2002, 33, 1115–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Piccarducci, R.; Daniele, S.; Polini, B.; Carpi, S.; Chico, L.; Fusi, J.; Baldacci, F.; Siciliano, G.; Bonuccelli, U.; Nieri, P.; et al. Apolipoprotein e polymorphism and oxidative stress in human peripheral blood cells: Can physical activity reactivate the proteasome system through epigenetic mechanisms? Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 8869849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dose, J.; Huebbe, P.; Nebel, A.; Rimbach, G. Apoe genotype and stress response—A mini review. Lipids Health Dis. 2016, 15, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wojcik, K.A.; Kaminska, A.; Blasiak, J.; Szaflik, J.; Szaflik, J.P. Oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of keratoconus and fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 19294–19308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Representative DNA sequence chromatograms of APOE genotypes based on rs429358 (T>C) and rs7412 (C>T) polymorphisms. Arrows indicate the position of the nucleotide change and the homozygous nucleotide variant observed is highlighted. The nucleotide at the variant position in—(a) ε3/ε3 genotype is T/T and C/C, (b) ε2/ε2 genotype is T/T and T/T, (c) ε4/ε4 genotype is C/C and C/C at rs429358 and rs7412 polymorphisms, respectively, as indicated by arrows. Accordingly, the heterozygous—(d) ε2/ε3 genotype has T/T and C/T, (e) the ε3/ε4 genotype has T/C and C/C, and (f) ε2/ε4 has T/C and C/T at rs429358 and rs7412 polymorphisms, respectively, as shown by arrows.
Figure 1. Representative DNA sequence chromatograms of APOE genotypes based on rs429358 (T>C) and rs7412 (C>T) polymorphisms. Arrows indicate the position of the nucleotide change and the homozygous nucleotide variant observed is highlighted. The nucleotide at the variant position in—(a) ε3/ε3 genotype is T/T and C/C, (b) ε2/ε2 genotype is T/T and T/T, (c) ε4/ε4 genotype is C/C and C/C at rs429358 and rs7412 polymorphisms, respectively, as indicated by arrows. Accordingly, the heterozygous—(d) ε2/ε3 genotype has T/T and C/T, (e) the ε3/ε4 genotype has T/C and C/C, and (f) ε2/ε4 has T/C and C/T at rs429358 and rs7412 polymorphisms, respectively, as shown by arrows.
Genes 14 02108 g001
Table 1. Primer and probe sequences used in TaqMan® assays for genotyping rs138380 and rs61876744 polymorphisms.
Table 1. Primer and probe sequences used in TaqMan® assays for genotyping rs138380 and rs61876744 polymorphisms.
rs138380Primers and Probe Sequences (5′–3′)
Forward PrimerGGGAAACAATCAAATATTTTGACAAATAATCGT
Reverse PrimerCTCAGAAAATAATTCAGTAGCAACAAGGT
Probe Reporter dye [VIC/FAM]CCAGGAATC[T/C]CCTTGTT
rs61876744
Forward PrimerTGAACTTTGTCCTGGGAGGGA
Reverse PrimerGGCTGTTCCCAATAATAGCTCTAGT
Probe Reporter dye [VIC/FAM]CAGAAGTGAACC[T/C]CTCAGG
Table 2. PCR and sequencing primers used for APOE genotyping.
Table 2. PCR and sequencing primers used for APOE genotyping.
PCR PrimersPrimer Sequences (5′–3′)
APOE-ForwardTGTAAAACGACGGCCAGTGACCATGAAGGAGTTGAAGGCCTAC
APOE-ReverseCAGGAAACAGCTATGACCGATGGCGCTGAGGCCGCGCT
Sequencing Primers
M13-ForwardTGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT
M13-ReverseCAGGAAACAGCTATGACC
Bold and underlined sequences represent M13 sequence.
Table 3. Demographic data for each group.
Table 3. Demographic data for each group.
TypenMean Age, Years (SD)% Male
Keratoconus9825.8 (7.3)56
Controls16760.1 (8.1)52
Table 4. Polymorphism details and allele frequencies observed in controls and Keratoconus cases.
Table 4. Polymorphism details and allele frequencies observed in controls and Keratoconus cases.
SNP IDGene/
Locus
ChromosomePosition *Minor AlleleMinor Allele FrequencyOdds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)p-Value
ControlsCases
rs138380CSNK1E22q13.138400624G0.500.521.06 (0.74–1.51)0.729
rs61876744PNPLA211p15.5820754T0.430.330.64 (0.44–0.93)0.020
rs429358APOE19q13.3244908683C0.090.101.05 (0.57–1.91)0.887
rs7412APOE19q13.3244908821T0.030.031.14 (0.40–3.25)0.806
* Genomic base pair position per GRCh38/hg38.
Table 5. Association analysis of polymorphisms near CNSK1E locus (rs138380) and in PNPLA2 (rs61876744) in Keratoconus.
Table 5. Association analysis of polymorphisms near CNSK1E locus (rs138380) and in PNPLA2 (rs61876744) in Keratoconus.
SNP IDGenetic ModelGenotypeControl
n (%)
Cases
n (%)
Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)p-Value
rs138380AdditiveA/A43 (25.8)27 (27.6)1.00-
G/A81 (48.5)41 (41.8)0.80 (0.437–0.148)0.488
G/G43 (25.8)30 (30.6)1.11 (0.56–2.17)0.764
DominantA/A43 (25.8)27 (27.6)1.00
G/G-G/A124 (74.2)71 (72.5)0.91 (0.52–1.60)0.751
RecessiveG/A-A/A124 (74.268 (69.4)1.00
G/G43 (25.8)30 (30.6)1.27 (0.73–2.20)0.392
CA trend * 167/167101/951.06 (0.74–1.51)0.729
rs61876744AdditiveC/C56 (33.5)48 (49)1.00-
T/C79 (47.3)36 (36.7)0.53 (0.31–0.92)0.024
T/T32 (19.2)14 (14.3)0.51 (0.24–1.07)0.071
DominantC/C56 (33.5)48 (49)1.00
T/C-T/T111 (66.5)50 (51)0.53 (0.32–0.88)0.013
RecessiveC/C-T/C135 (80.8)84 (85.7)1.00
T/T32 (19.2)14 (14.3)0.70 (0.35–1.39)0.310
CA trend * 143/19164/1320.64 (0.44–0.93)0.020
* CA Cochran Armitage trend test assuming additive model.
Table 6. Association analysis of polymorphisms in APOE gene in Keratoconus.
Table 6. Association analysis of polymorphisms in APOE gene in Keratoconus.
SNP IDGenetic ModelGenotypeControl
n (%)
Cases
n (%)
Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)p-Value
rs429358AdditiveT/T136 (81.4)82 (83.7)1.00-
T/C31 (18.6)13 (13.3)0.70 (0.34–1.41)0.310
C/C0 (0)3 (3.1)NA (0.00–NA)0.055
DominantT/T136 (81.4)82 (83.7)1.00
T/C-C/C31 (18.6)16 (16.3)0.86 (0.44–1.66)0.640
RecessiveT/T-T/C167 (100)95 (96.9)1.00
C/C0 (0)3 (3.1)NA (0.00–NA)0.014
CA trend * 31/30319/1771.05 (0.57–1.91)0.887
rs7412AdditiveC/C159 (95.2)92 (93.8)1.00-
C/T7 (4.2)6 (6.1)1.48 (0.48–4.52)0.560
T/T1 (0.6)0 (0)NA (0.00–NA)1.00
DominantC/C159 (95.2)92 (89.8)1.00
C/T-T/T8 (4.8)6 (10.2)1.29 (0.43–3.85)0.639
RecessiveC/C-C/T166 (99.4)98 (100)1.00
T/T1 (0.6)0 (0)NA (0.00–NA)0.340
CA trend * 9/3256/1901.14 (0.39–3.25)0.806
* CA Cochran Armitage trend test assuming additive model, NA not available, Fisher exact test.
Table 7. Association analysis of APOE polymorphisms according to APOE alleles and genotypes.
Table 7. Association analysis of APOE polymorphisms according to APOE alleles and genotypes.
APOEControls
n (%)
Cases
n (%)
Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)p-Value
Alleles
ε3294 (88.0)171 (87.2)1.00-
ε29 (2.7)6 (3.1)1.14 (0.40–3.27)0.806
ε431 (9.2)19 (9.7)1.08 (0.59–1.96)0.862
Genotypes
ε2/ε201 (0.6)00 (0)0.00 (0.00–NA)0.770
ε2/ε301 (0.6)06 (6.1)10.5 (1.25–89.52)0.012
ε2/ε406 (3.6)00 (0)0.00 (0.00–NA)0.092
ε3/ε3134 (80.2)76 (77.5)1.00-
ε3/ε425 (15.0)13 (13.3)0.91 (0.44–1.89)0.823
ε4/ε400 (0)03 (3.1)0.00 (0.00–NA)0.095
Carrier a
ε3/ε3134 (83.2)76 (80.8)1.00-
ε*2 b02 (1.2)06 (6.4)5.28 (1.04–26.8)0.055
ε*4 c25 (15.5)16 (12.8)1.12 (0.56–2.24)0.730
a ε2/ε4 were excluded from either ε*2 or ε*4 group, b includes ε2/ε2 and ε2/ε3, c includes ε4/ε4 and ε3/ε4. NA not available.
Table 8. Binary logistic regression analysis.
Table 8. Binary logistic regression analysis.
Group
Variables
BSEWaldp-Value
Age−1.1020.6273.0900.079
Sex3.8592.1823.1270.077
rs138380 2.4620.292
G/A9.7756.5532.2250.136
G/G5.5204.7831.3320.248
rs61876744 1.1110.574
C/T−0.2982.3050.0170.897
T/T3.2143.0511.1100.292
rs429358 2.2620.323
T/C−0.6030.4012.2620.133
C/C21.57823,051.6280.0000.999
rs7412 0.0360.982
C/T1.4737.7270.0360.849
T/T10.17127,454.9350.0001.000
Constant35.88320.0813.1930.074
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kondkar, A.A.; Azad, T.A.; Sultan, T.; Khatlani, T.; Alshehri, A.A.; Lobo, G.P.; Kalantan, H.; Al-Obeidan, S.A.; Al-Muammar, A.M. Association between Polymorphism rs61876744 in PNPLA2 Gene and Keratoconus in a Saudi Cohort. Genes 2023, 14, 2108. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14122108

AMA Style

Kondkar AA, Azad TA, Sultan T, Khatlani T, Alshehri AA, Lobo GP, Kalantan H, Al-Obeidan SA, Al-Muammar AM. Association between Polymorphism rs61876744 in PNPLA2 Gene and Keratoconus in a Saudi Cohort. Genes. 2023; 14(12):2108. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14122108

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kondkar, Altaf A., Taif A. Azad, Tahira Sultan, Tanvir Khatlani, Abdulaziz A. Alshehri, Glenn P. Lobo, Hatem Kalantan, Saleh A. Al-Obeidan, and Abdulrahman M. Al-Muammar. 2023. "Association between Polymorphism rs61876744 in PNPLA2 Gene and Keratoconus in a Saudi Cohort" Genes 14, no. 12: 2108. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14122108

APA Style

Kondkar, A. A., Azad, T. A., Sultan, T., Khatlani, T., Alshehri, A. A., Lobo, G. P., Kalantan, H., Al-Obeidan, S. A., & Al-Muammar, A. M. (2023). Association between Polymorphism rs61876744 in PNPLA2 Gene and Keratoconus in a Saudi Cohort. Genes, 14(12), 2108. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14122108

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop