Next Article in Journal
Molecular Epidemiology and Diversity of SARS-CoV-2 in Ethiopia, 2020–2022
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetic Predictors of Antipsychotic Efflux Impairment via Blood-Brain Barrier: Role of Transport Proteins
Previous Article in Journal
Complete Chloroplast Genome of Four Thai Native Dioscorea Species: Structural, Comparative and Phylogenetic Analyses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association of APOE (rs429358 and rs7412) and PON1 (Q192R and L55M) Variants with Myocardial Infarction in the Pashtun Ethnic Population of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lack of Association of Polymorphism Located Upstream of ABCA1 (rs2472493), in FNDC3B (rs7636836), and Near ANKRD55MAP3K1 Genes (rs61275591) in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients of Saudi Origin

1
Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia
2
Glaucoma Research Chair in Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia
3
King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55347, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(3), 704; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030704
Submission received: 2 February 2023 / Revised: 6 March 2023 / Accepted: 10 March 2023 / Published: 13 March 2023

Abstract

:
Polymorphisms rs2472493 near ABCA1, rs7636836 in FNDC3B, and rs61275591 near the ANKRD55–MAP3K1 genes were previously reported to exhibit genome-wide significance in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Since these polymorphisms have not been investigated in the Arab population of Saudi Arabia, we examined their association with POAG in a Saudi cohort. Genotyping was performed in 152 POAG cases and 246 controls using Taqman real-time assays and their associations with POAG and clinical markers, such as intraocular pressure, cup/disc ratio, and the number of antiglaucoma medications, were tested by statistical methods. There was no association observed between POAG and the minor allele frequencies of rs2472493[G], rs7636836[T], or rs61275591[A]. None of the genetic models such as co-dominant, dominant, recessive, over-dominant, and log-additive demonstrated any genotype link. The Rs2472493 genotype showed a modest association (p = 0.044) with the number of antiglaucoma medications in the POAG group, but no significant genotype effect on post hoc analysis. In addition, a G-T allelic haplotype of rs2472493 (ABCA1) and rs7636836 (FNDC3B) did show an over two-fold increased risk of POAG (odds ratio = 2.18), albeit non-significantly (p = 0.092). Similarly, no other allelic haplotype of the three variants showed any significant association with POAG. Our study did not replicate the genetic association of rs2472493 (ABCA1), rs763683 (FNDC3B), and rs61275591 (ANKRD55MAP3K1) in POAG and related clinical phenotypes, suggesting that these polymorphisms are not associated with POAG in a Saudi cohort of Arab ethnicity. However, large population-based multicenter studies are needed to validate these results.

1. Introduction

Glaucoma is a heterogeneous group of eye diseases that affect more than 60 million individuals globally and is the second most common cause of irreversible blindness, including in the Saudi population [1]. Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is the most common form of glaucoma with clinical features such as progressive death of retinal ganglion cells (RGC), damage to the optic nerve, and loss of vision [2]. Risk factors for POAG include aging, gender, increased intraocular pressure (IOP), family history, and African ancestry [3]. POAG is inherited as a complex trait; familial studies and genome-wide genetic association studies (GWAS) have led to strong evidence for the important contribution of genetic influence in the pathogenesis of POAG [4]. Several GWAS have identified significant genetic association in multiple genes and loci but with a varying effect on POAG outcomes [5], including the rs2472493 (chromosome 9, Position 106735669) located upstream of the ATP-binding cassette subfamily A (ABC1) member 1 (ABCA1); rs7636836 (chromosome 3, Position 173247819) in fibronectin type III domain containing 3B (FNDC3B); and rs61275591 (chromosome 5, Position 55811313) flanking the ANKRD55MAP3K1 intergenic loci [6,7].
ABCA1 and polymorphisms in this gene are recognized for their role in lipid metabolism [8,9]. Studies also support their contribution in neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative conditions, RGC apoptosis, and plausibly a regulatory role in eye development [10,11,12]. Polymorphism rs2472493 is located in the 5′ upstream region near the ABCA1 gene and has shown a significant association with POAG and IOP in the European and Asian populations [6]. Similar associations were reported in an Australian cohort [10] and POAG patients from southern China [13], supporting a crucial role of ABCA1 genetic polymorphism in POAG pathogenesis. Similarly, another genome-wide study reported two novel polymorphisms, rs7636836 and rs61275591, to be associated with the Japanese POAG cases [7]. Rs7636836 in FNDC3B encoding an extracellular matrix protein may contribute to the regulation of the TGFβ pathway which is strongly implicated in glaucoma pathogenesis [14,15]. The presence of a genetic variant could potentially disrupt these signaling pathways and contribute to the development of glaucoma. Meanwhile, rs61275591 is flanked in between two genes, ANKRD55 and MAP3K1, of unknown significance. ABCA1, FNDC3B, and ANKRD55MAP3K1 are all highly expressed in the tissues relevant to glaucoma, supporting their plausible role in ocular development and glaucoma-related phenotypes [7,10]. Moreover, these polymorphisms might alter certain regulatory motifs and histones, and have been associated with cis-expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) as predicted using the NIH SNP function prediction (https://snpinfo.niehs.nih.gov/snpinfo/snpfunc.html, accessed on 11 December 2022) and HaploReg v4.1 web tools highlighting their plausible regulatory function (Supplementary Table S1).
Glaucoma is a prevalent disease in the Arab population, with some studies reporting a higher prevalence rate compared to other populations [1]. The Middle East is also known for its high rate of consanguinity, which suggests that genetics might play a role in certain subsets of this population. This makes it crucial to investigate the genetic basis of glaucoma in Arab populations, as genetic factors may be contributing to the high prevalence of the disease. However, despite the need for research, there is currently a lack of consistent data on the possible causative genes or variants involved in glaucoma in this population [16,17,18,19]. Therefore, genetic association studies are needed to provide a better understanding of the genetic factors underlying glaucoma in the Arab population. Moreover, genome-wide studies identifying genetic polymorphism(s) or loci to be associated with POAG have been mostly performed in Caucasians, Europeans, or Asians and need replication in other ethnicities. Using a case-control candidate gene approach we investigated the association of polymorphisms rs2472493 upstream of ABCA1, rs7636836 in FNDC3B, and rs61275591 near ANKRD55MAP3K1 genes with POAG and its related phenotypes in a Saudi cohort.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design and Study Population

A retrospective case-control study was performed. POAG patients and controls were recruited at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia as described in detail elsewhere [20]. Briefly, POAG patients showed the presence of (1) glaucomatous changes at the optic disk or retinal nerve fiber changes (such as narrowing or absence of neuroretinal rim, cup-to-disc ratio exceeding 0.7, an inter-eye asymmetry of >0.2, and/or notching); (2) corresponding visual field defects typical of glaucoma; (3) bilaterally open angles; (4) late-onset; (5) high IOP (≥21 mm Hg) in one or both eyes before treatment; (6) and no secondary causes of glaucomatous optic neuropathy with identifiable causes such as exfoliative glaucoma, angle-closure, pigmentary glaucoma, post-traumatic, infectious or inflammatory glaucoma (e.g., uveitis), or post-surgical and post-medication glaucoma (e.g., after corticosteroids). The controls were of the same ethnicity, with normal IOP (<21 mm Hg with no medication), no glaucoma, normal optic disc (cup/disc ratio <0.5), absence of a family history of glaucoma, and aged ≥40 years. Individuals who did not wish to participate in the study were excluded.

2.2. Genotyping of rs2472493, rs7636836, and rs61275591 Polymorphisms

DNA extracted from EDTA blood were genotyped for the rs2472493 (A > G), rs7636836 (C > T), and rs61275591 (G > A) polymorphisms using commercially available TaqMan® assays, C__16235609_10, C_189412462_10, and C__88653935_10 (catalog number: 4351379; Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA) on ABI-7500 real-time PCR (Applied Biosystems) as recommended by the manufacturer and described previously [21].

2.3. Statistics

SPSS version 22 (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), Stat View software version 5.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), SNPStats (https://www.snpstats.net/start.htm, accessed on 11 December 2022), and SHEsis (http://analysis.bio-x.cn/myAnalysis.php, accessed on 11 December 2022) were used for statistical analysis. Normality distribution was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Non-parametric methods such as the Mann–Whitney U test were used to examine age differences and the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to evaluate the effect of genotypes on clinical phenotypes. Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE), gender differences, and genetic association testing were performed using Pearson’s chi-square analysis or Fisher’s exact test. The effects of multiple risk factors such as age, sex, and genotypes on POAG were examined by logistic regression analysis. The linkage disequilibrium (LD) and combined allelic (haplotype) effect of polymorphisms were examined by SHEsis. Power calculation was performed using PS program version 3.1.2 (https://vbiostatps.app.vumc.org/ps/, accessed on 11 December 2022). A p < 0.05 (2-tailed) was considered significant. Bonferroni’s correction p-value (0.05/5 = 0.01) for multiple testing was considered when applicable.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic and Minor Allele Frequency Distribution

The age, gender, and minor allele frequency (MAF) distribution of participants included in the study is shown in Table 1. As shown, age and gender showed no significant difference between POAG cases and controls.
Overall, 246 controls and 152 POAG cases were included in the study. Of the total number of 398 samples genotyped in our cohort, the success rate of genotyping was 99%, 100%, and 99% for rs2472493, rs7636836, and rs61275591 polymorphisms, respectively. Five DNA samples—one control and one patient for rs2472493, and three controls for rs61275591—failed to amplify. The samples with missing genotypes were not included in their respective single and combined allele/genotype analysis. The allelic distribution showed no significant deviation from HWE (p > 0.05). As shown in Table 1, there was no significant difference in age and gender distribution in cases and controls. In addition, none of the three polymorphisms showed any significant overall or gender-specific association with POAG (Table 1).

3.2. Genotype Association Analysis with POAG

Since POAG does not show a clear inheritance pattern, genotype association analysis was conducted using multiple genetic models with SNPStats software. Polymorphism rs2472493, rs7636836, and rs61275591 genotypes showed no significant association with POAG in univariate, and age- and sex-adjusted analysis (Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4). Likewise, the genotype analysis according to gender categorization was also not associated with POAG in any genetic models (Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4).

3.3. Combined Genotype, Linkage, and Haplotype Analysis

The three polymorphisms were tested for LD and subjected to haplotype analysis using the SHEsis online version. The standardized LD coefficient D’ and r2 values between rs2472493, rs7636836, and rs61275591 indicated that these polymorphisms are not in LD (Supplementary Figure S1). In addition, the haplotype distribution did not show any significant association with POAG (overall X2 = 10.43, df = 6, p = 0.107) (Table 5). However, a G-T haplotype of rs2472493 of ABCA1 and rs7636836 of FNDC3B did increase the risk of POAG by more than twofold (OR = 2.18, 95% and CI = 0.86–5.51) albeit non-significantly (p = 0.092). In addition, combined genotype analysis of AA-CC-GG of rs2472493, rs7636836, and rs61275591, respectively, versus other genotypes also did not show any significant association with POAG (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = (0.79–2.04), p = 0.345).

3.4. Binary Logistic Regression Analysis and Genotype Influence on Clinical Markers

To determine the impact of several risk factors, including age, sex, and the genotypes of rs2472493, rs7636836, and rs61275591 on the outcome of POAG, a binary logistic regression analysis was conducted. This analysis showed that the risk of POAG was not significantly influenced by any of these criteria. (Table 6). Moreover, these polymorphisms showed no significant genotype influence on clinical markers of disease severity such as IOP, cup/disc ratio, and the number of anti-glaucoma drugs (Figure 1). Although the rs2472493 polymorphism near ABCA1 did show a moderately significant genotype effect with the number of antiglaucoma medications of (p = 0.044) in POAG, the post hoc analysis did not show any significant genotype effect. In addition, further analysis of rs2472493 in dominant and recessive models did not show any significant genotype association with the number of antiglaucoma medications variable (p = 0.154 and p = 0.142, respectively).

4. Discussion

The polygenic nature, high probability of inheritance, and race-specific prevalence to POAG suggests a risk of genetic predisposition to the disease [5,16,22]. Although polymorphisms in a number of genes or loci have linked with POAG, the exact molecular contribution of these genes toward POAG development and/or progression is still unclear [5,16]. Likewise, the genetic basis of POAG in the middle-eastern Arab population is not clear and remains to be identified [19]. Thus, we investigated three previously reported polymorphisms that had been associated with POAG and/or increased IOP [6,7]. However, we observed no association of these polymorphisms with POAG and other related clinical markers.
Rs2472493[G] near ABCA1 had a MAF of 0.38 in our POAG cases and was not significantly different compared to controls (0.39). As compared to other ethnicities, the MAFs were found to be similar to the POAG population of Hispanics (0.37), and African American (0.35) [23], but lower than the POAG population of non-Hispanics (0.42), East Asians (0.56) [23], and Europeans (0.51) [10], exhibiting ethnic variations.
Hysi et al., using a genome-wide meta-analysis study, first reported an association of polymorphism rs2472493 near ABCA1 with POAG in a multi-ethnic population of European and Asian ancestry [6]. The association was successfully replicated in POAG patients in Australia [10] and southern China [13]. However, our study failed to replicate these findings in POAG patients of Saudi origin. Similarly, no associations of ABCA1 gene polymorphism(s) have been reported among a PACG population of Han Chinese [24], in a Brazilian POAG cohort [25], and in Arab POAG and congenital glaucoma patients from Jordan [17]. This supports our finding that polymorphism rs2472493 in ABCA1 may not have a major role in the POAG pathogenesis of Saudi Arab ethnicity.
There are enough data to implicate the role of ABCA1 in eye diseases, including glaucoma. Expression of ABCA1 has been confirmed in several ocular tissues relevant to glaucoma [13]. An in vivo study has demonstrated the role of ABCA1 in the inhibition of ocular inflammation by activating liver X-receptor in autoimmune uveitis [26]. In another glaucoma model, ABCA1 was related to RGC apoptosis [27]. Likewise, a strong linkage has been reported between rs2472493 and rs2472494 near ABCA1 that may modify the regulatory binding motif sequence of PAX6, suggesting a plausible regulatory role in ocular development [10]. However, the exact molecular mechanism(s) are still unknown. This is in contrast to our negative findings which indicate that polymorphism rs2472493 located near ABCA1 might not be a major player in POAG pathogenesis in Middle Eastern Saudi Arab patients. There could be several possible reasons for the noted absence of this association in the Saudi cohort. The absence of an association between the rs2472493 polymorphism in ABCA1 and POAG in Saudi Arabs could be due to several factors. Genetic differences may affect the expression of certain genes and their association with diseases, and this could be a possible reason for the lack of association in Saudi Arabs. In addition, a relatively small number of samples investigated in this study may not have enough statistical power to detect a significant association. Environmental factors, such as diet or lifestyle, may also play a role in influencing the outcome. Moreover, clinical differences or variations in POAG patients could also be a factor that could contribute to the lack of association in Saudi Arab populations. However, the association of other polymorphisms in this gene with POAG cannot be completely ruled out and requires further investigation.
The expression of FNDC3B has been demonstrated in all the ocular tissues involved in glaucoma [7,28]. FNDC3B plays a regulatory role in the adipocyte formation [29] and encodes proteins involved in cell adhesion, and TGFβ and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways [30,31,32]. These processes and pathways play a critical role in glaucoma pathophysiology and could be the plausible mechanism(s) by which rs7636836 in FNDC3B might influence the risk of POAG [14,33,34,35]. In a large population-based study of POAG patients in Japan, Shiga et al. reported the genome-wide association of polymorphism rs7636836 in the FNDC3B gene [7]. However, these findings were not replicated in Singapore Chinese, European, and African populations [7]. The observed MAFs of rs7636836[T] in FNDC3B in our POAG patients and controls were 0.05 and 0.07, respectively. The MAF was comparable to the European POAG population (0.06) but lower than those observed in POAG patients from Japan (0.40) and Chinese patients in Singapore (0.21) [7]. No significant allelic and genotype association was seen between rs7636836 in FNDC3B and our POAG cohort.
In addition to rs7636836, the rs61275591 locus was also one of the novel loci associated with POAG in the Japanese population in the same study by Shiga et al. [7]. The MAFs reported were 0.27 in the Japanese, 0.31 in the Singaporean Chinese, 0.08 in the European, 0.07 in the African American, and 0.06 in the African population as compared to 0.17 observed in our Saudi cohort, which is lower than the East Asians but higher than the Africans. Rs61275591 was not associated with POAG in our cohort as was reported in the Singaporean Chinese, European, and African populations [7]. The rs61275591 locus is mapped between ANKRD55 and MAP3K1 genes. ANKRD55 encodes ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein 55, which mediates protein–protein interactions and may have a role in autoimmune diseases [36], whereas MAP3K1, which is also known as MEK kinase 1, is a serine/threonine kinase that belongs to the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAP3K) family. MAP3K1 helps regulate signaling pathways that control various processes in the body, including sex determination, cell development, differentiation, migration, survival, and apoptosis. Genomic alterations in MAP3K1 have been reported in diverse cancer types and the Swyer syndrome [37,38]. However, the possible relevance of ANKRD55 and MAP3K1 in glaucoma is unknown.
Epistatic interactions are known to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of polygenic multifactorial diseases highlighting the plausible role of genetic background and interplay in disease outcome and progression [39,40,41]. Since glaucoma is also polygenic in nature with no clear pattern of inheritance, there may exist similar mechanism(s) that might modulate the disease processes [42]. Thus, to examine any synergistic effect, we conducted a combined allelic and genotype analysis of rs2472493, rs7636836, and rs61275591 in POAG. However, none of the genotype and allelic (haplotype) combinations showed any significant association with POAG. Nonetheless, the possible effect(s) of other polymorphism(s) in LD or other epistatic interactions cannot be ruled out.
The genetic variants of ABCA1 and FNDC3B have also been linked with increased IOP [6]. ABCA1 was demonstrated to regulate IOP via the CAV-1/NO/eNOS pathways [43]. However, all three polymorphisms investigated in this study showed no genotype effect on the clinical markers of disease severity in our cohort. Similarly, rs2472494 (in strong LD with rs2472493), rs7636836, and rs61275591 in a few of the glaucoma loci investigated by Chai et al. were recently reported to show no association with optic disc parameters [44].
Therefore, our findings suggest that rs2472493 upstream of ABCA1, rs7636836 in FNDC3B, and rs61275591 near ANKRD55MAP3K1 may not play a significant role in POAG in Arabs of Saudi origin. However, to rule out the role of other polymorphisms in these genes, the epistatic, and gene-environment interaction need further investigation. Moreover, the relatively small sample size used in this study further warrants the need for replication in a well-designed, multicenter, population-based study to validate these results. The calculated power of our study was >0.9 per allele for the rs2472493 (ABCA1) and rs61275591 (ANKRD55MAP3K1) polymorphisms but was underpowered (0.68 per allele) for the rs7636836 (FNDC3B) polymorphism to detect an odds of 2.0 and α = 0.05 but the sample size needs to be much larger to detect an effect size of 1.5 or less, as is commonly reported in polygenic case-control studies.
We conclude that the polymorphisms rs2472493 upstream of ABCA1, rs7636836 in FNDC3B, and rs61275591 near the ANKRD55 and MAP3K1 genes are not associated with POAG in Middle Eastern Arabs of Saudi origin. However, the results require further confirmation in different regions and in much larger samples.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14030704/s1, Figure S1: Linkage disequilibrium test between rs2472493 (Site1), rs7636836 (Site 2) and rs61275591 (Site3) using SHEsis online version (http://analysis.bio-x.cn/, accessed on 11 December 2022); Table S1: Details of the genomic region of the polymorphisms location, frequency and its predicted neighboring features such as transcription binding sites, altered regulatory elements, eQTLs, miRNA binding sites, and conservation among species obtained using NIH SNPinfo(https://snpinfo.niehs.nih.gov/snpinfo/snpfunc.html, accessed on 11 December 2022) and HaploRegv4.1 web tools.

Author Contributions

A.A.K.: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, analysis, writing draft, review and editing, and supervision; T.A.A. and T.S.: investigation, methodology, data curation, manuscript review, and editing; E.A.O. and F.A.A.: data curation, resources, manuscript review, and editing G.P.L.: analysis and data interpretation, resources, manuscript review, and editing; S.A.A.-O.: concept, resources, funding acquisition, project administration, manuscript review, and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by King Saud University through the Vice Deanship of Scientific Research Chair and Glaucoma Research Chair in Ophthalmology (GRC-2023).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) Committee of the College of Medicine, King Saud University (IRB protocol number #E-09–657).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the conclusions of this article are all presented within the report.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Vice Deanship of Scientific Research Chair, Glaucoma Research Chair in Ophthalmology at King Saud University. We also thank Abdulrahman Al-Mosa for his clinical assistance during the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Khandekar, R.; Chauhan, D.; Yasir, Z.H.; Al-Zobidi, M.; Judaibi, R.; Edward, D.P. The prevalence and determinants of glaucoma among 40 years and older saudi residents in the riyadh governorate (except the capital)—A community based survey. Saudi J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 33, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Weinreb, R.N.; Aung, T.; Medeiros, F.A. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: A review. JAMA 2014, 311, 1901–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. McMonnies, C.W. Glaucoma history and risk factors. J. Optom. 2017, 10, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Youngblood, H.; Hauser, M.A.; Liu, Y. Update on the genetics of primary open-angle glaucoma. Exp. Eye Res. 2019, 188, 107795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gharahkhani, P.; Jorgenson, E.; Hysi, P.; Khawaja, A.P.; Pendergrass, S.; Han, X.; Ong, J.S.; Hewitt, A.W.; Segre, A.V.; Rouhana, J.M.; et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 127 open-angle glaucoma loci with consistent effect across ancestries. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hysi, P.G.; Cheng, C.-Y.; Springelkamp, H.; Macgregor, S.; Bailey, J.N.C.; Wojciechowski, R.; Vitart, V.; Nag, A.; Hewitt, A.W.; Höhn, R.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of multiethnic cohorts identifies new loci influencing intraocular pressure and susceptibility to glaucoma. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 1126–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Shiga, Y.; Akiyama, M.; Nishiguchi, K.M.; Sato, K.; Shimozawa, N.; Takahashi, A.; Momozawa, Y.; Hirata, M.; Matsuda, K.; Yamaji, T.; et al. Genome-wide association study identifies seven novel susceptibility loci for primary open-angle glaucoma. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2018, 27, 1486–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Wang, S.; Smith, J.D. Abca1 and nascent hdl biogenesis. Biofactors 2014, 40, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Shi, Z.; Tian, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Wu, Y.; Hu, X.; Li, J.; Chen, Q.; Wang, Y.; An, C.; Zhang, K. Association between the abca1 (r219k) polymorphism and lipid profiles: A meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gharahkhani, P.; Burdon, K.P.; Fogarty, R.; Sharma, S.; Hewitt, A.W.; Martin, S.; Law, M.H.; Cremin, K.; Bailey, J.N.C.; Loomis, S.J.; et al. Common variants near abca1, afap1 and gmds confer risk of primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 1120–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Karasinska, J.M.; de Haan, W.; Franciosi, S.; Ruddle, P.; Fan, J.; Kruit, J.K.; Stukas, S.; Lutjohann, D.; Gutmann, D.H.; Wellington, C.L.; et al. Abca1 influences neuroinflammation and neuronal death. Neurobiol. Dis. 2013, 54, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yang, J.; Chen, Y.; Zou, T.; Xue, B.; Yang, F.; Wang, X.; Huo, Y.; Yan, B.; Xu, Y.; He, S.; et al. Cholesterol homeostasis regulated by abca1 is critical for retinal ganglion cell survival. Sci. China Life Sci. 2023, 66, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, Y.; Lin, Y.; Vithana, E.N.; Jia, L.; Zuo, X.; Wong, T.Y.; Chen, L.J.; Zhu, X.; Tam, P.O.; Gong, B.; et al. Common variants near abca1 and in pmm2 are associated with primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 1115–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Prendes, M.A.; Harris, A.; Wirostko, B.M.; Gerber, A.L.; Siesky, B. The role of transforming growth factor β in glaucoma and the therapeutic implications. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2013, 97, 680–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cai, C.; Rajaram, M.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Q.; Marchica, J.; Li, J.; Powers, R.S. Activation of multiple cancer pathways and tumor maintenance function of the 3q amplified oncogene fndc3b. Cell. Cycle 2012, 11, 1773–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Zukerman, R.; Harris, A.; Verticchio Vercellin, A.; Siesky, B.; Pasquale, L.R.; Ciulla, T.A. Molecular genetics of glaucoma: Subtype and ethnicity considerations. Genes 2021, 12, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Alkhatib, R.; Abudhaim, N.; Al-Eitan, L.; Abdo, N.; Alqudah, A.; Aman, H. Genetic analysis of abca1 gene of primary glaucoma in jordanian arab population. Appl. Clin. Genet. 2019, 12, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Narooie-Nejad, M.; Rasouli, A.; Mousavi, M.; Rohani, M.R. Study of myoc gene mutation in poag patients in zahedan, iran. Clin. Lab. 2017, 63, 1283–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Abu-Amero, K.; Kondkar, A.A.; Chalam, K.V. An updated review on the genetics of primary open angle glaucoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 28886–28911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kondkar, A.A.; Azad, T.A.; Alobaidan, A.S.; Sultan, T.; Osman, E.A.; Almobarak, F.A.; Lobo, G.P.; Al-Obeidan, S.A. Lack of association between polymorphisms in txnrd2 and lmx1b and primary open-angle glaucoma in a saudi cohort. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 690780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kondkar, A.A.; Sultan, T.; Azad, T.A.; Osman, E.A.; Almobarak, F.A.; Lobo, G.P.; Al-Obeidan, S.A. Evaluation of abca1 and fndc3b gene polymorphisms associated with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma in a saudi cohort. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 877174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zukerman, R.; Harris, A.; Oddone, F.; Siesky, B.; Verticchio Vercellin, A.; Ciulla, T.A. Glaucoma heritability: Molecular mechanisms of disease. Genes 2021, 12, 1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Choquet, H.; Paylakhi, S.; Kneeland, S.C.; Thai, K.K.; Hoffmann, T.J.; Yin, J.; Kvale, M.N.; Banda, Y.; Tolman, N.G.; Williams, P.A.; et al. A multiethnic genome-wide association study of primary open-angle glaucoma identifies novel risk loci. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Luo, H.; Chen, Y.; Ye, Z.; Sun, X.; Shi, Y.; Luo, Q.; Gong, B.; Shuai, P.; Yang, J.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Evaluation of the association between common genetic variants near the abca1 gene and primary angle closure glaucoma in a han chinese population. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015, 56, 6248–6254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Araki, M.V.R.; Silva, Y.C.O.; Rodrigues, T.A.R.; Bajano, F.F.; de Souza, B.B.; Costa, F.F.; Costa, V.P.; de Melo, M.B.; de Vasconcellos, J.P.C. Association of abca1 (rs2472493) and gas7 (rs9913911) gene variants with primary open-angle glaucoma in a brazilian population. Mol. Vis. 2022, 28, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yang, H.; Zheng, S.; Qiu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, C.; Yang, P.; Li, Q.; Lei, B. Activation of liver x receptor alleviates ocular inflammation in experimental autoimmune uveitis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 2795–2804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Li, L.; Xu, L.; Chen, W.; Li, X.; Xia, Q.; Zheng, L.; Duan, Q.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y. Reduced annexin a1 secretion by abca1 causes retinal inflammation and ganglion cell apoptosis in a murine glaucoma model. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Z.; Allingham, R.R.; Nakano, M.; Jia, L.; Chen, Y.; Ikeda, Y.; Mani, B.; Chen, L.J.; Kee, C.; Garway-Heath, D.F.; et al. A common variant near tgfbr3 is associated with primary open angle glaucoma. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015, 24, 3880–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tominaga, K.; Kondo, C.; Johmura, Y.; Nishizuka, M.; Imagawa, M. The novel gene fad104, containing a fibronectin type iii domain, has a significant role in adipogenesis. FEBS Lett. 2004, 577, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Nishizuka, M.; Kishimoto, K.; Kato, A.; Ikawa, M.; Okabe, M.; Sato, R.; Niida, H.; Nakanishi, M.; Osada, S.; Imagawa, M. Disruption of the novel gene fad104 causes rapid postnatal death and attenuation of cell proliferation, adhesion, spreading and migration. Exp. Cell. Res. 2009, 315, 809–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Y.Q.; Chen, Y.; Xu, Y.F.; He, Q.M.; Yang, X.J.; Hong, X.H.; Huang, S.Y.; Tang, L.L.; Liu, N. Fndc3b 3’-utr shortening escapes from microrna-mediated gene repression and promotes nasopharyngeal carcinoma progression. Cancer Sci. 2020, 111, 1991–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Goto, M.; Osada, S.; Imagawa, M.; Nishizuka, M. Fad104, a regulator of adipogenesis, is a novel suppressor of tgf-β-mediated emt in cervical cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zhong, Y.; Wang, J.; Luo, X. Integrins in trabecular meshwork and optic nerve head: Possible association with the pathogenesis of glaucoma. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 202905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Webber, H.C.; Bermudez, J.Y.; Millar, J.C.; Mao, W.; Clark, A.F. The role of wnt/β-catenin signaling and k-cadherin in the regulation of intraocular pressure. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 1454–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Dhamodaran, K.; Baidouri, H.; Sandoval, L.; Raghunathan, V. Wnt activation after inhibition restores trabecular meshwork cells toward a normal phenotype. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020, 61, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lopez de Lapuente, A.; Feliu, A.; Ugidos, N.; Mecha, M.; Mena, J.; Astobiza, I.; Riera, J.; Carrillo-Salinas, F.J.; Comabella, M.; Montalban, X.; et al. Novel insights into the multiple sclerosis risk gene ankrd55. J. Immunol. 2016, 196, 4553–4565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Pham, T.T.; Angus, S.P.; Johnson, G.L. Map3k1: Genomic alterations in cancer and function in promoting cell survival or apoptosis. Genes Cancer 2013, 4, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Nimgaonkar, I.; Jamgochian, M.; Milgraum, D.M.; Pappert, A.S.; Milgraum, S.S. Ulerythema ophryogenes in association with map3k1-mutated swyer syndrome. JAAD Case Rep. 2022, 25, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Marchini, J.; Donnelly, P.; Cardon, L.R. Genome-wide strategies for detecting multiple loci that influence complex diseases. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pan, W. Network-based model weighting to detect multiple loci influencing complex diseases. Hum. Genet. 2008, 124, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Brossard, M.; Fang, S.; Vaysse, A.; Wei, Q.; Chen, W.V.; Mohamdi, H.; Maubec, E.; Lavielle, N.; Galan, P.; Lathrop, M.; et al. Integrated pathway and epistasis analysis reveals interactive effect of genetic variants at terf1 and afap1l2 loci on melanoma risk. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 137, 1901–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Zakharov, S.; Wong, T.Y.; Aung, T.; Vithana, E.N.; Khor, C.C.; Salim, A.; Thalamuthu, A. Combined genotype and haplotype tests for region-based association studies. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Hu, C.; Niu, L.; Li, L.; Song, M.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, Y.; Chen, Y.; Sun, X. Abca1 regulates iop by modulating cav1/enos/no signaling pathway. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020, 61, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chai, X.; Low, K.Y.; Tham, Y.C.; Chee, M.L.; Thakur, S.; Zhang, L.; Tan, N.Y.; Khor, C.C.; Aung, T.; Wong, T.Y.; et al. Association of glaucoma risk genes with retinal nerve fiber layer in a multi-ethnic asian population: The singapore epidemiology of eye diseases study. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020, 61, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Genotype effects of polymorphisms rs2472493 (ABCA1), rs7636836 (FNDC3B), and rs61275591 (ANKRD55MAP3K1) on intraocular pressure, cup/disc ratio, and the number of antiglaucoma medications in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients.
Figure 1. Genotype effects of polymorphisms rs2472493 (ABCA1), rs7636836 (FNDC3B), and rs61275591 (ANKRD55MAP3K1) on intraocular pressure, cup/disc ratio, and the number of antiglaucoma medications in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients.
Genes 14 00704 g001
Table 1. Demographic characteristics and distribution of minor allele frequency of study participants.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics and distribution of minor allele frequency of study participants.
CharacteristicsControls (n = 246) POAG (n = 152)Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)p-Value
Age in years (SD)59.5 (7.2)60.9 (10.5)-0.112
Male/Female, n 132/11484/680.81 (1.06–0.06)0.751
Minor Allele Frequency
rs2472493[G]
Total0.390.380.95 (0.71–1.26)0.700
Men0.370.371.01 (0.69–1.48)0.970
Women0.420.390.88 (0.57–1.35)0.560
rs7636836[T]
Total0.050.071.34 (0.74–2.41)0.330
Men0.040.071.61 (0.68–3.80)0.273
Women0.060.071.14 (0.52–2.51)0.750
rs61275591[A]
Total0.170.181.09 (0.75–1.59]0.629
Men0.040.071.61 (0.68–3.80)0.273
Women0.060.071.14 (0.52–2.51)0.750
Table 2. Association analysis of rs2472493 polymorphism upstream of ABCA1 with primary open-angle glaucoma.
Table 2. Association analysis of rs2472493 polymorphism upstream of ABCA1 with primary open-angle glaucoma.
GroupGenetic Model 1GenotypeControls n (%)Cases n (%)OR (95% CI)p-Value 2p-Value 2,3
OverallCo-dominantA/A97 (39.6)59 (39.1)1.000.6100.650
G/A104 (42.5)70 (46.4)1.11 (0.71–1.72)
G/G44 (18.0)22 (14.6%)0.82 (0.45–1.51)
DominantA/A97 (39.6)59 (39.1)1.000.9200.960
G/A-G/G148 (60.4)92 (60.9)1.02 (0.67–1.55)
RecessiveA/A-G/A201 (82.0)129 (85.4)1.000.3800.380
G/G44 (18.0)22 (14.6)0.78 (0.45–1.36)
Over-dominantA/A-G/G141 (57.5)81 (53.6)1.000.4500.540
G/A104 (42.5)70 (46.4)1.17 (0.78–1.76)
Log-additive---------0.95 (0.71–1.26)0.7000.620
MenCo-dominantA/A56 (42.4)35 (41.7)1.000.9800.990
G/A55 (41.7)36 (42.9)1.05 (0.58–1.90)
G/G21 (15.9)13 (15.5)0.99 (0.44–2.23)
DominantA/A56 (42.4)35 (41.7)1.000.9100.990
G/A-G/G76 (57.6)49 (58.3)1.03 (0.59–1.80)
RecessiveA/A-G/A111 (84.1)71 (84.5)1.000.9300.880
G/G21 (15.9)13 (15.5)0.97 (0.46–2.06)
Over-dominantA/A-G/G77 (58.3)48 (57.1)1.000.8600.920
G/A55 (41.7)36 (42.9)1.05 (0.60–1.83)
Log-additive---------1.01 (0.69–1.48)0.9700.930
WomenCo-dominantA/A41 (36.3)24 (35.8)1.000.4300.530
G/A49 (43.4)34 (50.8)1.19 (0.61–2.31)
G/G23 (20.4)9 (13.4)0.67 (0.27–1.68)
DominantA/A41 (36.3)24 (35.8)1.000.9500.970
G/A-G/G72 (63.7)43 (64.2)1.02 (0.54–1.91)
RecessiveA/A-G/A90 (79.7)58 (86.6)1.000.2300.280
G/G23 (20.4)9 (13.4)0.61 (0.26–1.40)
Over-dominantA/A-G/G64 (56.6)33 (49.2)1.000.3400.430
G/A49 (43.4)34 (50.8)1.35 (0.73–2.47)
Log-additive---------0.88 (0.57–1.35)0.5600.550
1 Tested by SNPStats; 2 chi-square analysis; 3 adjusted for age and sex. Bonferroni corrected p-value is 0.01. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Table 3. Association analysis of rs7636836 polymorphism in FNDC3B with primary open-angle glaucoma.
Table 3. Association analysis of rs7636836 polymorphism in FNDC3B with primary open-angle glaucoma.
GroupGenetic Model 1GenotypeControls n (%)Cases n (%)OR (95% CI)p-Value 2p-Value 2,3
OverallCo-dominantC/C224 (91.1)133 (87.5)1.000.4800.480
C/T20 (8.1)18 (11.8)1.52 (0.77–2.97)
T/T2 (0.8)1 (0.7)0.84 (0.08–9.38)
DominantC/C224 (91.1)133 (87.5)1.000.2600.250
C/T-T/T22 (8.9)19 (12.5)1.45 (0.76–2.79)
RecessiveC/C-C/T244 (99.2)151 (99.3)1.000.8600.930
T/T2 (0.8)1 (0.7)0.81 (0.07–8.99)
Over-dominantC/C-T/T226 (91.9)134 (88.2)1.000.2300.220
C/T20 (8.1)18 (11.8)1.52 (0.78–2.97)
Log-additive---------1.34 (0.74–2.41)0.3300.310
Men--C/C121 (91.7)73 (86.9)1.000.2600.250
C/T11 (8.3)11 (13.1)1.66 (0.68–4.02)
T/T0 (0)0 (0)-
WomenCo-dominantC/C103 (90.3)60 (88.2)1.000.8500.900
C/T9 (7.9)7 (10.3)1.34 (0.47–3.77)
T/T2 (1.8)1 (1.5)0.86 (0.08–9.67)
DominantC/C103 (90.3)60 (88.2)1.000.6500.680
C/T-T/T11 (9.7)8 (11.8)1.25 (0.48–3.28)
RecessiveC/C-C/T112 (98.2)67 (98.5)1.000.8800.970
T/T2 (1.8)1 (1.5)0.84 (0.07–9.39)
Over-dominantC/C-T/T105 (92.1)61 (89.7)1.000.5800.640
C/T9 (7.9)7 (10.3)1.34 (0.47–3.78)
Log-additive---------1.14 (0.52–2.51)0.7500.740
1 Tested by SNPStats; 2 chi-square analysis; 3 adjusted for age and sex. Bonferroni corrected p-value is 0.01. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Table 4. Association analysis of rs61275591 polymorphism near ANKRD55MAP3K1 genes with primary open-angle glaucoma.
Table 4. Association analysis of rs61275591 polymorphism near ANKRD55MAP3K1 genes with primary open-angle glaucoma.
GroupGenetic Model 1GenotypeControls n (%)Cases n (%)OR (95% CI)p-Value 2p-Value 2,3
OverallCo-dominantG/G167 (68.7)101 (66.5)1.000.8900.860
A/G69 (28.4)46 (30.3)1.10 (0.70–1.72)
A/A7 (2.9)5 (3.3)1.18 (0.37–3.82)
DominantG/G167 (68.7)101 (66.5)1.000.6400.600
A/G-A/A76 (31.3)51 (33.5)1.11 (0.72–1.71)
RecessiveG/G-A/G236 (97.1)147 (96.7)1.000.8200.740
A/A7 (2.9)5 (3.3)1.15 (0.36–3.68)
Over-dominantG/G-A/A174 (71.6)106 (69.7)1.000.6900.680
A/G69 (28.4)46 (30.3)1.09 (0.70–1.71)
Log-additive---------1.10 (0.75–1.60)0.6300.580
MenCo-dominantG/G90 (69.8)56 (66.7)1.000.7900.730
A/G35 (27.1)24 (28.6)1.10 (0.59–2.04)
A/A4 (3.1)4 (4.8)1.61 (0.39–6.69)
DominantG/G90 (69.8)56 (66.7)1.000.6300.590
A/G-A/A39 (30.2)28 (33.3)1.15 (0.64–2.08)
RecessiveG/G-A/G125 (96.9)80 (95.2)1.000.5400.470
A/A4 (3.1)4 (4.8)1.56 (0.38–6.43)
Over-dominantG/G-A/A94 (72.9)60 (71.4)1.000.8200.80
A/G35 (27.1)24 (28.6)1.07 (0.58–1.98)
Log-additive---------1.17 (0.71–1.92)0.5400.480
WomenCo-dominantG/G77 (67.5)45 (66.2)1.000.8300.840
A/G34 (29.8)22 (32.4)1.11 (0.58–2.12)
A/A3 (2.6)1 (1.5)0.57 (0.06–5.65)
DominantG/G77 (67.5)45 (66.2)1.000.8500.920
A/G-A/A37 (32.5)23 (33.8)1.06 (0.56–2.01)
RecessiveG/G-A/G111 (97.4)67 (98.5)1.000.5900.590
A/A3 (2.6)1 (1.5)0.55 (0.06–5.42)
Over-dominantG/G-A/A80 (70.2)46 (67.7)1.000.7200.780
A/G34 (29.8)22 (32.4)1.13 (0.59–2.15)
Log-additive---------1.01 (0.57–1.79)0.9800.960
1 Tested by SNPStats; 2 chi-square analysis; 3 adjusted for age and sex. Bonferroni corrected p-value is 0.01. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Table 5. Combined allelic effect of rs2472493 (ABCA1), rs7636836 (FNDC3B), and rs61275591 (ANDPT55-MAP3K1) variants in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Table 5. Combined allelic effect of rs2472493 (ABCA1), rs7636836 (FNDC3B), and rs61275591 (ANDPT55-MAP3K1) variants in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Allele Combination 1POAG FrequencyControls FrequencyFisher’s p 2Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)
A-C-G0.4950.5050.7700.95 [0.71~1.28]
A-C-A0.1010.0730.1801.41 [0.84~2.36]
A-T-G0.0300.0320.8870.94 [0.40~2.17]
A-T-A0.0010.002--
G-C-G0.2680.2760.7860.95 [0.69~1.32]
G-C-A0.0690.0960.1860.69 [0.40~1.19]
G-T-G0.0240.0160.4141.53 [0.54~4.31]
G-T-A0.0130.000--
1 Tested by SHEsis in the order of rs247243, rs7636836, and rs61275591; 2 Uncorrected p-value. Global X2 = 10.43, df = 6 (frequency < 0.01 not considered), Fisher’s p-value is 0.107. POAG, primary open-angle glaucoma.
Table 6. Binary logistic regression analysis to determine the effect of age, sex, rs2472493, rs7636836, and rs61275591 genotypes on the risk of disease outcome.
Table 6. Binary logistic regression analysis to determine the effect of age, sex, rs2472493, rs7636836, and rs61275591 genotypes on the risk of disease outcome.
Group VariablesBS.E.Waldp-ValueOdds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)
Age0.0200.0122.4750.1161.02 (0.99–1.04)
Sex0.0180.2130.0070.9321.01 (0.67–1.54)
Rs2472493 0.9880.610-
G/A0.0530.2330.0520.8201.05 (0.66–1.66)
G/G−0.2550.3180.6410.4240.77 (0.41–1.44)
Rs7636836 1.7090.426-
C/T0.4510.3461.7000.1921.57 (0.79–3.09)
T/T−0.0701.2410.0030.9550.93 (0.08–10.6)
Rs61275591 0.3490.840-
G/A0.0780.2350.1090.7411.08 (0.68–1.71)
A/A0.3200.6080.2780.5981.37 (0.41–4.53)
Constant−1.7520.7705.1710.0230.17
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kondkar, A.A.; Sultan, T.; Azad, T.A.; Osman, E.A.; Almobarak, F.A.; Lobo, G.P.; Al-Obeidan, S.A. Lack of Association of Polymorphism Located Upstream of ABCA1 (rs2472493), in FNDC3B (rs7636836), and Near ANKRD55MAP3K1 Genes (rs61275591) in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients of Saudi Origin. Genes 2023, 14, 704. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030704

AMA Style

Kondkar AA, Sultan T, Azad TA, Osman EA, Almobarak FA, Lobo GP, Al-Obeidan SA. Lack of Association of Polymorphism Located Upstream of ABCA1 (rs2472493), in FNDC3B (rs7636836), and Near ANKRD55MAP3K1 Genes (rs61275591) in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients of Saudi Origin. Genes. 2023; 14(3):704. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030704

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kondkar, Altaf A., Tahira Sultan, Taif A. Azad, Essam A. Osman, Faisal A. Almobarak, Glenn P. Lobo, and Saleh A. Al-Obeidan. 2023. "Lack of Association of Polymorphism Located Upstream of ABCA1 (rs2472493), in FNDC3B (rs7636836), and Near ANKRD55MAP3K1 Genes (rs61275591) in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients of Saudi Origin" Genes 14, no. 3: 704. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030704

APA Style

Kondkar, A. A., Sultan, T., Azad, T. A., Osman, E. A., Almobarak, F. A., Lobo, G. P., & Al-Obeidan, S. A. (2023). Lack of Association of Polymorphism Located Upstream of ABCA1 (rs2472493), in FNDC3B (rs7636836), and Near ANKRD55MAP3K1 Genes (rs61275591) in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients of Saudi Origin. Genes, 14(3), 704. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030704

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop