Next Article in Journal
Estrogenic Prenylated Flavonoids in Sophora flavescens
Previous Article in Journal
Cross-Species Comparison of the Pan-RAF Inhibitor LY3009120’s Anti-Tumor Effects in Equine, Canine, and Human Malignant Melanoma Cell Lines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Somatic Mutations within Myocilin due to Aging May Be a Potential Risk Factor for Glaucoma

1
Department of Ophthalmology, Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
2
Department of Ophthalmology, California Northstate University College of Medicine, 9700 West Taron Dr., Elk Grove, CA 95757, USA
3
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
4
Department of Computer Science, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
5
Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2024, 15(2), 203; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15020203
Submission received: 28 December 2023 / Revised: 17 January 2024 / Accepted: 29 January 2024 / Published: 4 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases)

Abstract

:
Glaucoma is a chronic optic neuropathy that leads to irreversible vision loss. Aging and family history are the two most important risk factors of glaucoma. One of the most studied genes involved in the onset of open-angle glaucoma is myocilin (MYOC). About 105 germline mutations within MYOC are known to be associated with glaucoma and result in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, which leads to trabecular meshwork (TM) cell death and subsequent intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation. However, only about 4% of the population carry these mutations. An analysis of MYOC somatic cancer-associated mutations revealed a notable overlap with pathogenic glaucoma variants. Because TM cells have the potential to accumulate somatic mutations at a rapid rate due to ultraviolet (UV) light exposure, we propose that an accumulation of somatic mutations within MYOC is an important contributor to the onset of glaucoma.

1. Introduction

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible vision loss and blindness around the world, with it affecting approximately 68.6 million individuals [1,2]. It has been estimated that by the year 2040, 111.8 million people will be affected by this chronic optic neuropathy [3], thus emphasizing the importance of studying the underlying mechanisms associated with its pathophysiology.
Aging is one of the major risk factors of glaucoma; everyone aged 60 and older is at high risk of glaucoma [1,2]. However, a family history of the disease is also known as a risk factor [1,2]. Advances in the field of genetic and genomic research have led to extensive investigations of the genes contributing to glaucoma and have resulted in the identification of 127 associated genomic regions [4,5,6]. The majority of the identified loci are linked with the onset of open-angle glaucoma (OAG), whereas eight genes are associated with primary angle closure glaucoma [4]. The most frequently occurring subtypes of glaucoma are early-onset juvenile OAG (JOAG) and late-onset primary OAG (POAG), together accounting for 74% of all reported incidents [7]. Mutations in the myocilin gene (MYOC) were first identified in families with an autosomal dominant inheritance of JOAG and were linked to the GLC1A locus on chromosome 1q24.3-q25.2 [5,8,9,10]. Ever since, extensive efforts have been focused on studying myocilin (MYOC), the most associated protein in OAG development [11,12].
MYOC, a trabecular meshwork-inducible glucocorticoid response protein, is expressed in various tissue and cell types including the trabecular meshwork (TM), ciliary body, retina, myocytes, astrocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and some epithelial cells [11,13,14]. Despite the broad expression profile of MYOC, mutations in the protein are currently known to cause disease only in the eye. Thermodynamically unstable pathologic germline mutations in MYOC lead to its overexpression in TM cells [15,16,17,18], which initiates a cascade of events that lead to glaucoma. Recent studies have illustrated that increasing the concentration of the transforming growth factor-β2 (TGF-β2) induces MYOC expression in TM cells [19], resulting in changes to the extracellular matrix (ECM) structure [11]. Modulating the ECM of TM cells has been shown to obstruct aqueous humor outflow and increase intraocular pressure (IOP), subsequently leading to glaucoma [20].
There are 105 known glaucoma-causing MYOC variants (www.myocilin.com), the majority of which localize to the olfactomedin (OLF) domain of MYOC [21]. Glaucoma-associated OLF variants compromise the thermal stability of MYOC [22], leading to protein misfolding and a decrease in melting temperature (Tm) [23], thus reducing protein folding efficiency [22] and promoting the formation of aggregates within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of TM cells [20]. This leads to activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) pathway and subsequent TM cell death due to elevated ER stress [20]. TM cells play an essential role in modulating the aqueous humor outflow from the anterior chamber of the eye, whereas the death of TM cells has been associated with elevated IOP, retinal ganglion cell death, and irreversible loss of vision through OAG progression [24,25]. Inherited germline mutations in MYOC are disease-causing in about 4% of POAG and up to 36% of JOAG cases [26,27], which amount to over 3 million and up to 29 million affected individuals, respectively. A recent study shows a moderate correlation between the stability of inherited germline MYOC variants and the age at glaucoma diagnosis [28], which underlines the importance of the thermodynamic stability of mutated MYOC in activating the UPR pathway.
Herein, we analyze germline and somatic MYOC mutations obtained from glaucoma and cancer genomics databases. MYOC genome analysis revealed a remarkable overlap between glaucoma-causing and cancer-associated mutations. Hence, we reason that somatic mutations within MYOC may also contribute to glaucoma because an increase in the frequency of ultraviolet (UV) light exposure to the eye can accelerate the accumulation of disease-causing somatic mutations within the MYOC of TM cells. This would result in the aging-related pathogenic phenotype of glaucoma. As mutated C→T variants account for ≥60% of UV-induced mutations [29], when combined with the complement G→A variants, MYOC may accumulate a large variety of pathogenic mutations due to UV exposure. Indeed, it has been shown that extended periods of time spent outdoors is associated with a higher risk of developing exfoliation syndrome glaucoma [30], underscoring the potential importance of somatic MYOC variants in OAG development. Other studies have ascertained a link between age-related neurodegeneration and the accumulation of somatic mutations in neurons [31,32]. Age-associated defects in development and neurogenesis could result from an elevated frequency of somatic mutations due to a higher rate of cell division and an increase in oxidative damage [33]. Thus, we propose that age-related MYOC somatic mutations are also major contributors to the onset of glaucoma, and the mechanisms driving the emergence of glaucoma have both hereditary and crucial environmental components.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Methods for the Mutation Diagram in Figure 1 and Protein Structure Assembly

We obtained 278 known MYOC variants that exhibit Mendelian inheritance from the MYOC allele-specific glaucoma phenotype online database (www.myocilin.com, accessed on 10 June 2018); of the 278 MYOC germline mutations, 105 manifest a glaucoma phenotype, while 173 were identified as neutral polymorphisms or mutations with unknown pathogenicity. We also found 155 somatic cancer-associated MYOC missense and nonsense mutations acquired from the cancer genomics online database cBioPortal (www.cbioportal.org, accessed on 10 June 2018). All of the mutations are listed in the file Glaucoma-Cancer Myocilin Mutation Correlation—Colorcoded.xlsx (Supplementary Information). We utilized the mutation diagram generated through the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics MutationMapper and modified it using the Hypertext Markup Language (HTML).
Figure 1. Schematic diagrams of MYOC germline and somatic mutations color-coded based on the additive color model. (ac) Diagrams depicting MYOC missense and nonsense mutations that are color-coded based on the additive color wheel and represent glaucoma-causing mutations (a), neutral polymorphisms or variants of uncertain pathogenicity (b), and cancer-associated variants (c). SS is defined as the signal sequence and CC is the coiled-coil domain. (d) Venn diagram of the additive color model representing mutation phenotypes assigned to a specific color. The overlap of colored cylindrical slices illustrates respective mutation types that are consistent on the mutation diagrams (ac).
Figure 1. Schematic diagrams of MYOC germline and somatic mutations color-coded based on the additive color model. (ac) Diagrams depicting MYOC missense and nonsense mutations that are color-coded based on the additive color wheel and represent glaucoma-causing mutations (a), neutral polymorphisms or variants of uncertain pathogenicity (b), and cancer-associated variants (c). SS is defined as the signal sequence and CC is the coiled-coil domain. (d) Venn diagram of the additive color model representing mutation phenotypes assigned to a specific color. The overlap of colored cylindrical slices illustrates respective mutation types that are consistent on the mutation diagrams (ac).
Genes 15 00203 g001

2.2. Methods for Energy-Based Analysis

The MYOC structure (PDB entry 4WXQ) was generated using PyMOL 2.5 computer software for molecular visualization.
Python programming language and the PyRosetta-166 program (www.pyrosetta.org, accessed on 10 June 2018) were used for the Rosetta energy calculations. After obtaining an initial score for the relaxed wild-type protein, the mutate_residue() function within PyRosetta was used to introduce a mutation of interest, and the fast relax on this mutation was also applied. Then, a Cartesian version of Rosetta’s ΔΔG protocol with the β_nov16_cart energy score function was used to calculate the ΔΔG values of the mutations from the wild type.

3. Results

The MYOC gene is mapped to chromosome 1q24.3-q25.2 and comprises three exons that encode a 58 kD, 504 amino acid polypeptide with a leucine zipper motif within a coiled-coil domain at the N-terminus and an OLF domain at the C-terminal fragment [34] (Figure 1a–c). The N-terminal segment includes a signal sequence at amino acid position 1–32, which is cleaved off at the ER [11,35] during protein synthesis. Recent evidence suggests that the homo-oligomerizing coiled-coil domains at amino acids 74–102 and 118–180 assemble into a Y-shaped tripartite parallel dimer of dimers structure [36]. Glaucoma-causing variants within the tetramer modulate the structure without altering stability [36]. MYOC undergoes proteolytic cleavage between residues R226 and I227, which produces a 35 kD secreted C-terminal OLF domain and a 20 kD N-terminal tetramer fragment with coiled-coil domains [37]. The OLF domain comprises amino acids 244–503 and contains two cysteine residues that participate in disulfide bond formation, C245 and C433 [11,38].
We obtained 278 known MYOC variants that exhibit Mendelian inheritance from the MYOC allele-specific glaucoma phenotype database [21]; of the 278 MYOC germline mutations, 105 manifest a glaucoma phenotype, while 173 were identified as neutral polymorphisms or mutations with unknown pathogenicity [21]. Using small cycles, all of the mutations are summarized in Figure 1. The colors of those cycles are defined in the Venn diagram (Figure 1d). The overlaps between glaucoma-causing and neutral polymorphisms (cyan cycles) are the residue positions where the mutated amino acids are different.
We also found 155 somatic cancer-associated MYOC missense and nonsense mutations acquired from the cancer genomics online database, cBioPortal (www.cbioportal.org) [39,40]; the most frequent cancer types associated with these mutations are cutaneous melanoma, glioblastoma multiforme, and uterine endometrioid carcinoma. Notably, 38 glaucoma-causing germline mutations (36%) [21] and 38 melanoma somatic variants (83% of the total melanoma mutants) [39,40] arise from C→T or G→A nucleotide transitions. There are 11 MYOC somatic mutations that precisely overlap with glaucoma-inducing germline mutations (R91STOP, G246R, L255P, T285M, R296C, A363T, G367R, T377M, D384N, A427T, and R470C). All white circles within the mutation diagrams demonstrate varying amino acid changes at the same position with exact overlaps between either cancer and glaucoma variants or cancer mutations and neutral polymorphisms.
Somatic cancer-associated variants and germline neutral polymorphisms are spread evenly across the entire protein with frequent overlap; glaucoma-causing germline mutations largely localize to the OLF domain of MYOC (Figure 1a,b). All except one glaucoma and cancer overlapping variant localized to the OLF domain. To investigate the thermodynamic parameters of MYOC and determine the effect of each mutation on protein stability, we utilized the Rosetta energy function and calculated the change in free energy (ΔΔG) of individual cancer and glaucoma mutations [41] (online methods) with refinement (β_nov16_cart), which provided a very efficient sampling of the global minimum [41]. As expected, stabilizing mutations were predominantly located on the exterior of the MYOC OLF domain. These variants are schematically illustrated as dotted sidechain structures for glaucoma-causing (Figure 2a) and cancer-associated (Figure 2b) mutations. Amino acid changes are color-coded based on the Venn diagram additive color model (Figure 1a). The stable and unstable variants of glaucoma-causing and cancer-linked mutations within the MYOC OLF domain are also shown in Figure 2c and Figure 2d, respectively; in the figures, variants with positive and negative ΔΔG values are plotted on the bottom and top row, respectively. The ratio of cancer to glaucoma-stabilizing variants was significant; 31 cancer-associated and four glaucoma-inducing mutations exhibited negative ΔΔG values. Five of these mutations overlapped with the germline neutral polymorphisms (T293K, T325M, E414K, A447V, and R470H), and one variant (A427T) overlapped with a germline glaucoma-causing mutation observed in older individuals (61 ± 21.1 years of age) [21]. A427T was previously reported to possess a relatively high Tm (48.3 ± 0.3 °C) compared to other glaucoma-causing mutations [23]. Additionally, the other three stabilizing glaucoma-inducing mutations, Q297H, E300K, and N450D, also had a late age onset between 60–75 years of age [21,42].
G367R, a germline glaucoma-causing variant with an early age of onset (13–23 years of age) and a high maximum IOP (40 mmHg) [43] was observed in the tumors of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Interestingly, this variant was not stabilizing according to Rosetta calculations with a ΔΔG value of +4.23 kcal/mol. Several glaucoma pathogenic mutations manifested similar characteristics (i.e., overlap with somatic variants, early age of onset, and destabilizing properties) including G246R, L255P, T285M, R296C, A363T, P370L, T377M, D384N, and R470C, thus recapitulating the likelihood that these pathogenic mutations accumulate within the MYOC of TM cells and largely contribute to the onset of glaucoma.

4. Discussion

In this study, we present a collection of known somatic and germline MYOC variants and demonstrate that a significant level of overlap exists between the two types of mutations. We propose that an accumulation of pathogenic MYOC somatic mutations within the TM of the eye by means of UV radiation throughout aging can lead to protein aggregation, induced ER stress, TM cell death, and subsequent IOP elevation, which are attributes of the glaucoma phenotype induced by the known germline MYOC glaucoma-causing variants. In particular, UV-induced somatic C→T or G→A transition mutations within the MYOC coding region that lead to pathogenic MYOC missense or nonsense glaucoma variants are likely to be overexpressed in glaucomatous TM cells. Therefore, age-related glaucoma onset may be influenced by somatic mutation buildup within key genes associated with its pathophysiology.
MYOC mutations can either be detrimental or stabilizing depending on the thermodynamic properties of the mutated residues’ biochemical environment. Deleterious mutations, such as MYOC glaucoma-causing variants, reduce the folding efficiency of a protein and can induce protein aggregation, among other harmful responses. Genome editing using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 technology has been shown to accomplish the alleviation of the glaucomatous phenotype by knocking down the expression of mutant MYOC, reducing ER stress, and ultimately decreasing IOP [44]. With the advent of genetic modification, it may soon be feasible to reverse the harmful mutations within the genome and prevent the onset of age-related neurodegenerative diseases. On the other hand, stabilizing mutations can enhance mutated protein’s stability, resulting in a product that can sustain its desired native structure to a higher degree. Indeed, many cancer-associated variants that lead to more stable protein products likely have gain-of-function properties, thereby leading to cancer progression. For example, MYOC mutations that were determined to be stabilizing have been found in prostate neuroendocrine, cervical squamous cell, uterine endometrioid, bladder urothelial, and lung squamous cell carcinomas; colon, endocervical, colorectal, prostate, and lung adenocarcinomas; and acral and desmoplastic melanomas, uterine carcinosarcoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, and diffuse glioma [39,40]. The most stabilizing E253Q variant is associated with endocervical adenocarcinoma, with the next stabilizing A447V mutation linked to colon adenocarcinoma [39,40]. Four of the glaucoma-causing mutations are stabilizing MYOC variants (Figure 2c), and two of them overlap with cancer somatic mutations (Figure 2d). Those mutations may have an alternative pathway for glaucoma progression and are likely not involved in the activation of the UPR pathway. Further studies on those stabilizing glaucoma-causing variants may explore the possibility of uncovering a secondary pathological mechanism of multifaceted glaucoma progression.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our analysis suggests that the accumulation of pathogenic somatic variants within individual cells may also contribute to other age-related diseases, as observed in the development of cancers [45]. Additionally, glaucoma-causing MYOC stabilizing mutations may contribute to its pathogenesis via an alternative pathway not involved in ER stress induction. Furthermore, stabilizing MYOC cancer-associated variants could be cancer risk factors for those who carry the mutations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes15020203/s1. Glaucoma-Cancer Myocilin Mutation Correlation—Colorcoded.xlsx.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.J.Z.; methodology, Y.S.; software, A.V.; validation, Y.S. and J.J.Z.; formal analysis, Y.S.; data curation, Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.S.; writing—review and editing, J.J.Z.; visualization, Y.S. and J.J.Z.; supervision, J.J.Z.; project administration, J.J.Z.; funding acquisition, J.J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported in part by NIH grants R01EY028557 and 5P30EY000331 and Research to Prevent Blindness.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All of the data are included in Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mark Sheffield, For-Shing Lui, Rajendra Ramsamooj, Floyd Culler, and Dean Joseph Silva from the California Northstate University, College of Medicine, and Glenn Yiu from the Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California, Davis for the insightful discussions and helpful comments on the manuscript. We also thank members of Jie J. Zheng laboratory for providing support and valuable discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Weinreb, R.N.; Aung, T.; Medeiros, F.A. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma a review. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2014, 311, 1901–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, N.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Jiang, B. Prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma in the last 20 years: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Nat. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tham, Y.C.; Li, X.; Wong, T.Y.; Quigley, H.A.; Aung, T.; Cheng, C.Y. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2014, 121, 2081–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wiggs, J.L.; Pasquale, L.R. Genetics of glaucoma. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017, 26, R21–R27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, Y.; Allingham, R.R. Major review: Molecular genetics of primary open-angle glaucoma. Exp. Eye Res. 2017, 160, 62–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gharahkhani, P.; Jorgenson, E.; Hysi, P.; Khawaja, A.P.; Pendergrass, S.; Han, X.; Ong, J.S.; Hewitt, A.W.; Segrè, A.V.; Rouhana, J.M.; et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 127 open-angle glaucoma loci with consistent effect across ancestries. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Quigley, H.A.; Broman, A.T. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006, 90, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sheffield, V.C.; Stone, E.M.; Alward, W.L.; Drack, A.V.; Johnson, A.T.; Streb, L.M.; Nichols, B.E. Genetic linkage of familial open angle glaucoma to chromosome 1q21–q31. Nat. Genet. 1993, 4, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stone, E.M.; Fingert, J.H.; Alward, W.L.M.; Nguyen, T.D.; Polansky, J.R.; Sunden, S.L.F.; Nishimura, D.; Clark, A.F.; Nystuen, A.; Nichols, B.E.; et al. Identification of a gene that causes primary open angle glaucoma. Science 1997, 275, 668–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Michels-Rautenstrauss, K.G.; Mardin, C.Y.; Budde, W.M.; Liehr, T.; Polansky, J.; Nguyen, T.; Timmerman, V.; Van Broeckhoven, C.; Naumann, G.O.; Pfeiffer, R.A.; et al. Juvenile open angle glaucoma: Fine mapping of the tigr gene to 1q24.3–q25.2 and mutation analysis. Hum. Genet. 1998, 102, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nguyen, T.D.; Chen, P.; Huang, W.D.; Chen, H.; Johnson, D.; Polansky, J.R. Gene structure and properties of tigr, an olfactomedin-related glycoprotein cloned from glucocorticoid-induced trabecular meshwork cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 6341–6350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stamer, W.D.; Hoffman, E.A.; Luther, J.M.; Hachey, D.L.; Schey, K.L. Protein profile of exosomes from trabecular meshwork cells. J. Proteom. 2011, 74, 796–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Noda, S.; Mashima, Y.; Obazawa, M.; Kubota, R.; Oguchi, Y.; Kudoh, J.; Minoshima, S.; Shimizu, N. Myocilin expression in the astrocytes of the optic nerve head. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 276, 1129–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kubota, R.; Noda, S.; Wang, Y.; Minoshima, S.; Asakawa, S.; Kudoh, J.; Mashima, Y.; Oguchi, Y.; Shimizu, N. A novel myosin-like protein (myocilin) expressed in the connecting cilium of the photoreceptor: Molecular cloning, tissue expression, and chromosomal mapping. Genomics 1997, 41, 360–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fingert, J.H.; Heon, E.; Liebmann, J.M.; Yamamoto, T.; Craig, J.E.; Rait, J.; Kawase, K.; Hoh, S.T.; Buys, Y.M.; Dickinson, J.; et al. Analysis of myocilin mutations in 1703 glaucoma patients from five different populations. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1999, 8, 899–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fingert, J.H.; Stone, E.M.; Sheffield, V.C.; Alward, W.L. Myocilin glaucoma. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2002, 47, 547–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gong, G.; Kosoko-Lasaki, O.; Haynatzki, G.R.; Wilson, M.R. Genetic dissection of myocilin glaucoma. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004, 13, R91–R102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Stothert, A.R.; Fontaine, S.N.; Sabbagh, J.J.; Dickey, C.A. Targeting the er-autophagy system in the trabecular meshwork to treat glaucoma. Exp. Eye Res. 2016, 144, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, W.; Guo, M.; He, Q.; Hu, Y. Effects of transforming growth factor-beta2 on myocilin expression and secretion in human primary cultured trabecular meshwork cells. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014, 7, 4827–4836. [Google Scholar]
  20. Carbone, M.A.; Ayroles, J.F.; Yamamoto, A.; Morozova, T.V.; West, S.A.; Magwire, M.M.; Mackay, T.F.C.; Anholt, R.R.H. Overexpression of myocilin in the drosophila eye activates the unfolded protein response: Implications for glaucoma. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hewitt, A.W.; Mackey, D.A.; Craig, J.E. Myocilin allele-specific glaucoma phenotype database. Hum. Mutat. 2008, 29, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Burns, J.N.; Turnage, K.C.; Walker, C.A.; Lieberman, R.L. The stability of myocilin olfactomedin domain variants provides new insight into glaucoma as a protein misfolding disorder. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 5824–5833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Donegan, R.K.; Hill, S.E.; Freeman, D.M.; Nguyen, E.; Orwig, S.D.; Turnage, K.C.; Lieberman, R.L. Structural basis for misfolding in myocilin-associated glaucoma. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015, 24, 2111–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kwon, Y.H.; Fingert, J.H.; Kuehn, M.H.; Alward, W.L.M. Mechanisms of disease: Primary open-angle glaucoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 1113–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zode, G.S.; Sharma, A.B.; Lin, X.; Searby, C.C.; Bugge, K.; Kim, G.H.; Clark, A.F.; Sheffield, V.C. Ocular-specific er stress reduction rescues glaucoma in murine glucocorticoid-induced glaucoma. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 1956–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shimizu, S.; Lichter, P.R.; Johnson, A.T.; Zhou, Z.H.; Higashi, M.; Gottfredsdottir, M.; Othman, M.; Moroi, S.E.; Rozsa, F.W.; Schertzer, R.M.; et al. Age-dependent prevalence of mutations at the glc1a locus in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2000, 130, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, Y.; Allingham, R.R. Molecular genetics in glaucoma. Exp. Eye Res. 2011, 93, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tanji, T.; Cohen, E.; Shen, D.; Zhang, C.; Yu, F.; Coleman, A.L.; Zheng, J.J. Age at glaucoma diagnosis in germline myocilin mutation patients: Associations with polymorphisms in protein stabilities. Genes 2021, 12, 1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Brash, D.E. Uv signature mutations. Photochem. Photobiol. 2015, 91, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kang, J.H.; Wiggs, J.L.; Pasquale, L.R. Relation between time spent outdoors and exfoliation glaucoma or exfoliation glaucoma suspect. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 158, 605–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lodato, M.A.; Rodin, R.E.; Bohrson, C.L.; Coulter, M.E.; Barton, A.R.; Kwon, M.; Sherman, M.A.; Vitzthum, C.M.; Luquette, L.J.; Yandava, C.N.; et al. Aging and neurodegeneration are associated with increased mutations in single human neurons. Science 2018, 359, 555–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Verheijen, B.M.; Vermulst, M.; van Leeuwen, F.W. Somatic mutations in neurons during aging and neurodegeneration. Acta Neuropathol. 2018, 135, 811–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bae, T.; Tomasini, L.; Mariani, J.; Zhou, B.; Roychowdhury, T.; Franjic, D.; Pletikos, M.; Pattni, R.; Chen, B.J.; Venturini, E.; et al. Different mutational rates and mechanisms in human cells at pregastrulation and neurogenesis. Science 2018, 359, 550–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fingert, J.H.; Ying, L.; Swiderski, R.E.; Nystuen, A.M.; Arbour, N.C.; Alward, W.L.; Sheffield, V.C.; Stone, E.M. Characterization and comparison of the human and mouse glc1a glaucoma genes. Genome Res. 1998, 8, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sohn, S.; Joe, M.K.; Kim, T.E.; Im, J.E.; Choi, Y.R.; Park, H.; Kee, C. Dual localization of wild-type myocilin in the endoplasmic reticulum and extracellular compartment likely occurs due to its incomplete secretion. Mol. Vis. 2009, 15, 545–556. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hill, S.E.; Nguyen, E.; Donegan, R.K.; Patterson-Orazem, A.C.; Hazel, A.; Gumbart, J.C.; Lieberman, R.L. Structure and misfolding of the flexible tripartite coiled-coil domain of glaucoma-associated myocilin. Structure 2017, 25, 1697–1707.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Aroca-Aguilar, J.D.; Sanchez-Sanchez, F.; Ghosh, S.; Coca-Prados, M.; Escribano, J. Myocilin mutations causing glaucoma inhibit the intracellular endoproteolytic cleavage of myocilin between amino acids arg226 and ile227. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 21043–21051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Nagy, I.; Trexler, M.; Patthy, L. Expression and characterization of the olfactomedin domain of human myocilin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 302, 554–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gao, J.J.; Aksoy, B.A.; Dogrusoz, U.; Dresdner, G.; Gross, B.; Sumer, S.O.; Sun, Y.C.; Jacobsen, A.; Sinha, R.; Larsson, E.; et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cbioportal. Sci. Signal. 2013, 6, pl1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cerami, E.; Gao, J.J.; Dogrusoz, U.; Gross, B.E.; Sumer, S.O.; Aksoy, B.A.; Jacobsen, A.; Byrne, C.J.; Heuer, M.L.; Larsson, E.; et al. The cbio cancer genomics portal: An open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012, 2, 401–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Alford, R.F.; Leaver-Fay, A.; Jeliazkov, J.R.; O’Meara, M.J.; DiMaio, F.P.; Park, H.; Shapovalov, M.V.; Renfrew, P.D.; Mulligan, V.K.; Kappel, K.; et al. The rosetta all-atom energy function for macromolecular modeling and design. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017, 13, 3031–3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pang, C.P.; Leung, Y.F.; Fan, B.J.; Baum, L.; Tong, W.C.; Lee, W.S.; Chua, J.K.H.; Fan, D.S.P.; Liu, Y.; Lam, D.S.C. Tigr/myoc gene sequence alterations in individuals with and without primary open-angle glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43, 3231–3235. [Google Scholar]
  43. Souzeau, E.; Glading, J.; Ridge, B.; Wechsler, D.; Chehade, M.; Dubowsky, A.; Burdon, K.P.; Craig, J.E. Predictive genetic testing in minors for myocilin juvenile onset open angle glaucoma. Clin. Genet. 2015, 88, 584–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jain, A.; Zode, G.; Kasetti, R.B.; Ran, F.A.; Yan, W.; Sharma, T.P.; Bugge, K.; Searby, C.C.; Fingert, J.H.; Zhang, F.; et al. Crispr-cas9-based treatment of myocilin-associated glaucoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 11199–11204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tomasetti, C.; Li, L.; Vogelstein, B. Stem cell divisions, somatic mutations, cancer etiology, and cancer prevention. Science 2017, 355, 1330–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. Graphical representation of MYOC cancer-associated somatic and glaucoma-causing germline variants color-coded according to the Venn diagram additive color model (Figure 1d). (a,b) Cartoon molecular structures of the MYOC OLF domain portraying glaucoma—(a) and cancer-associated (b) mutations as α-carbon spheres. Stabilizing mutations are illustrated as dotted Van der Waals structures. (c,d) MYOC OLF domain diagrams depicting glaucoma-causing (c) and cancer-linked (d) variants with positive ΔΔG and negative ΔΔG values plotted on the bottom (unstable variants) and top row (stable variants), respectively. The stabilizing R470H cancer-linked and neutral variant, illustrated as a white circle with a thicker lining (c), overlaps with a glaucoma-causing and cancer-inducing R470C mutation, which did not exhibit favorable thermodynamic properties.
Figure 2. Graphical representation of MYOC cancer-associated somatic and glaucoma-causing germline variants color-coded according to the Venn diagram additive color model (Figure 1d). (a,b) Cartoon molecular structures of the MYOC OLF domain portraying glaucoma—(a) and cancer-associated (b) mutations as α-carbon spheres. Stabilizing mutations are illustrated as dotted Van der Waals structures. (c,d) MYOC OLF domain diagrams depicting glaucoma-causing (c) and cancer-linked (d) variants with positive ΔΔG and negative ΔΔG values plotted on the bottom (unstable variants) and top row (stable variants), respectively. The stabilizing R470H cancer-linked and neutral variant, illustrated as a white circle with a thicker lining (c), overlaps with a glaucoma-causing and cancer-inducing R470C mutation, which did not exhibit favorable thermodynamic properties.
Genes 15 00203 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sazhnyev, Y.; Venkat, A.; Zheng, J.J. Somatic Mutations within Myocilin due to Aging May Be a Potential Risk Factor for Glaucoma. Genes 2024, 15, 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15020203

AMA Style

Sazhnyev Y, Venkat A, Zheng JJ. Somatic Mutations within Myocilin due to Aging May Be a Potential Risk Factor for Glaucoma. Genes. 2024; 15(2):203. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15020203

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sazhnyev, Yevgeniy, Akaash Venkat, and Jie J. Zheng. 2024. "Somatic Mutations within Myocilin due to Aging May Be a Potential Risk Factor for Glaucoma" Genes 15, no. 2: 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15020203

APA Style

Sazhnyev, Y., Venkat, A., & Zheng, J. J. (2024). Somatic Mutations within Myocilin due to Aging May Be a Potential Risk Factor for Glaucoma. Genes, 15(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15020203

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop