3.1. Peculiarities of Regular Variations of the Atmospheric Electric Field
Variations in the atmospheric electric field due to regular, periodic sources of disturbances reflect its dynamics under “fair weather” conditions. The classic example of the global variation of the electric field is the unitary variation, which is characterized by the diurnal change in the magnitude of the electric field with a maximum of around 19:00 UT, which is known as the Carnegie curve [
13]. The generally accepted explanation for this phenomenon is that both the number of thunderstorms and the magnitude of the atmospheric electric field E across the Earth reach a maximum at 19:00. The maximum thunderstorms at middle latitudes are observed in the summer afternoon hours, which is due to the creation of favorable conditions for their development at this time, and the minimum is observed for the time before sunrise.
Figure 1 represents a comparison between total land thunderstorm area (thick solid line, left-hand axis) with its regional contributions [
14], and the Carnegie curve (red dashed line, right-hand axis) calculated in percentage of mean. The seasonal range in timing of the Carnegie curve’s maximum and minimum is shown by horizontal bars at their annual mean values. The land thunder area is the land area over which storms occur and is accepted as a rough measure of the activity of thunderstorms in all parts of the world.
The dynamics of diurnal variations of the atmospheric electric field, Ez, under “fair weather” conditions was studied on the basis of continuous long-term measurements at the high-mountain Tien-Shan station. Explicit seasonal dependence can be traced both in the features of diurnal variations of the electric field, and in their magnitude (50 ÷ 200 V/m in the daytime). The average value of the electric field in winter is much higher than in summer. This feature of the electric field at the high-mountain Tien-Shan station coincides with observations at other stations. The typical daily course of the atmospheric electric field for different seasons is shown in
Figure 2 [
15].
The absence of the Carnegie effect in the diurnal variation of the electric field at the high-mountain Tien-Shan station was already established in the first few years of continuous measurements. The unitary variation was not detected during the entire period of measurements of the atmospheric electric field at the high-mountain station, regardless of the season. The obtained feature of the diurnal variation of the electric field at the Tien Shan high-mountain station does not agree with the measurements at the Borok medium-latitude lowland observatory or at the Marsta observatory in winter [
16,
17]. The high-mountain location of the station (3340 m above sea level) is also not a condition for the allocation of unitary variation, as follows from the conclusions of the authors [
18].
We considered that the most probable explanation for this fact was the proximity to the thunderstorm source in the Himalayas, where the maximum thunderstorm activity occurs much earlier than in other regions at our latitude. The local features of the location of the station prevail over the global effects that affect the diurnal dynamics of the atmospheric electric field in this case.
3.2. Features of the Daily Distribution of Thunderstorms at the High-Mountain Station of the Northern Tien-Shan
The orography of the terrain, climatic and geological features significantly affect the dynamics of the surface atmospheric electric field and the occurrence of thunderstorms. An important and significant factor in the spatial distribution of thunderstorms in the region of the high-mountain Tien-Shan station is the presence of mountain ranges, gorges, valleys, rivers and lakes, and the direction of movement of air masses. One of the strongest thunderstorm centers affecting the global electrical circuit is located in the mountain regions of the Himalayas,
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ (accessed on 9 January 2023).
Visual observations over many years at the high-mountain Tien-Shan station (confirmed by meteorologists) have shown that the prevailing movement of thunderclouds has a southwesterly direction; from the Issyk-Kul Lake through the Prokhodnoe gorge and the Dzhusaly-Kezen pass. The space station is located on the Dzhusaly-Kezen pass at an altitude of 3340 m above sea level. Thunderclouds pass very low over the station; lightning discharges are observed in the immediate vicinity of the recording complex. The catalog of thunderstorms with powerful lightning activity was compiled for the period from 2005 to 2015 to analyze the daily distribution of thunderstorm activity at the Tien-Shan high-mountain station. The catalog includes 125 thunderstorm events. The main catalog of lightning events has been divided into separate catalogs, in which thunderstorms are classified according to the types of lightning discharges: positive, negative, and mixed (positive and negative discharges).
Diagrams of the daily distribution of thunderstorm events for the period 2005–2015 according to catalogs are shown in
Figure 3. From the diagram of the daily distribution of the total number of thunderstorm events at the Tien-Shan high-mountain station, it follows that the maximum and minimum thunderstorm activity correspond to the distribution curve of daily thunderstorm activity for the Asian region in
Figure 1.
It is also obvious that there are much fewer thunderstorms with positive discharges than with negative discharges. Their number does not exceed 24%. However, this value is twice the generally accepted ideas about this value in the scientific literature [
19,
20].
Diagrams of the daily distribution of thunderstorm events based on 3-h data from Almaty meteorological station for the period 2005–2019 (archive weather from Almaty) and from Big Almaty Lake (BAL) meteorological station for the period 2011–2014 and 2017–2020 (archive weather from Big Almaty Lake (BAL)) are presented in
Figure 4. The geographical coordinates of these stations differ slightly, but they are located below the high-mountain Tien-Shan station (BAL—43°07′ N, 76°54′ E, 2506 m above sea level; Almaty—43°15′ N, 76°55′ E, 787 ÷ 851 m above sea level).
It is clearly seen from the diagrams that the maximum daily distribution of thunderstorm activity falls in the afternoon time (at 15 ÷ 24 h local time, LT), both for the city of Almaty and for BAL. The difference between universal time and local time is 6 h. This result is consistent with the scientific literature data that the maximum thunderstorms at our latitudes for plains and mountain-valley objects occur in the afternoon hours, and the minimum, just like for mountains, is before sunrise.
Thus, it was established that the maximum thunderstorm activity at the Tien-Shan high-mountain station is observed much earlier than on the plain and mountain-valley objects at our latitude, despite the insignificance of the distance between the Tien-Shan high-mountain station and meteorological stations BAL (~5 km) and Almaty (~17 km). Air currents arising over the ocean, having traveled thousands of kilometers, convey moisture to the Tien-Shan and determine the weather features and thunderstorm activity at the Tien Shan high-mountain station.
3.3. Peculiarities of Manifestations of Sporadic Disturbance Sources on the Dynamics of the Atmospheric Electric Field
The problem of disturbances of the electric field of the surface atmosphere by sporadic sources is one of the tasks of atmospheric electricity. Giant coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and high-velocity solar wind streams from coronal holes (HSSs) are the most geoeffective sporadic manifestations of solar activity. Their collision with the Earth’s magnetosphere and atmosphere leads to magnetic and ionospheric storms, a Forbush decrease in the intensity of cosmic rays, and other phenomena. Forbush effects (Forbush decreases) and magnetic storms are often considered inseparable from each other as a consequence of one source of disturbances. Contradictory results appear in studies of the impact of sporadic solar activity phenomena on geophysical parameters in connection with this [
21]. However, the most significant difference between them is that the Forbush effect is determined by the conditions in the extended heliospheric region, while geomagnetic activity depends on the local situation near the Earth [
22]. Our studies were carried out by taking into account features of manifestations of geoeffective sporadic phenomena of solar activity in the atmosphere and magnetosphere of the Earth for three different cases: 1—large Forbush effects and large magnetic storms, 2—large Forbush effects and weak magnetic disturbance, and 3—large magnetic storms and Forbush effects of less 1%. Only periods of “fair weather” were analyzed in this case.
In the first case, both an increase and a decrease in the electric field were observed after the impact of powerful coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and were simultaneously accompanied by large magnetic storms and Forbush decrease in cosmic rays,
Figure 5.
It should be noted that the increases in the atmospheric electric field in these events were rarer. Perhaps the increase was due to a lower background level the day before. However, it is obvious that it is incorrect to apply the epoch superimposition method to study the response to the impact of such events on the atmospheric electric field. The solid vertical line in the figures is the arrival of a CME into the Earth’s orbit.
In the second case, an obvious decrease in the atmospheric electric field was observed after the impact of powerful coronal mass ejections on the near-Earth space, accompanied by a significant decrease in galactic cosmic rays (Forbush effect), but an insignificant magnetic disturbance. Values of the atmospheric electric field after CMEs, accompanied by the significant Forbush decreases and weak magnetic disturbances are shown in
Figure 6, where the Dst and FE values are shown in the figure field.
Galactic cosmic rays are the main source of ionization up to altitudes of 60 km. Near the Earth’s surface, radioactive gases serve as an additional source of ionization; above 60 km, ultraviolet radiation dominates [
23]. The high stability of the intensity of cosmic rays ensures relatively small variations in the electric field. During Forbush effects, the current in the Earth–ionosphere column decreases due to a decrease in atmospheric ionization, which should lead to a decrease in
Ez according to estimates [
24]. Our results did not contradict the statements of the authors [
23,
24]; however, the relative contribution of radioactive gases to the ionization of the surface atmosphere needs to be clarified.
For the third case, the values of the atmospheric electric field at the high-mountain station under the influence of the large geomagnetic storm,
Dst = −103, and under “fair weather” conditions for the 14 November 2012 event are shown in
Figure 7 (left panel). The values of the electric field characteristic of “fair weather” conditions were not observed in this event, but significant field fluctuations were observed from 40 to 120 V/m. The results of calculations of the normalized power spectra of variations in the atmospheric electric field during magnetic storms (dashed line curve) against the background of spectral estimates of the undisturbed atmosphere (solid line) are presented in the right panel of
Figure 7. Spectral peaks exceeding the 95% confidence interval were observed in the minute ranges 10
−3 ÷ 10
−2 Hz and 10
−2 ÷ 10
−1 Hz.
Thus, coronal mass ejections affect the atmospheric electric field by increasing or decreasing its level or causing its fluctuations, depending on the features of manifestations in the near-Earth space and in the Earth’s magnetosphere.
3.4. Investigation of the Statistical Relationship between Thunderstorm Activity and Processes on the Sun
In general, 125 cases of thunderstorm events were recorded in the 2005–2015 period; of these, 55 cases were characterized by the appearance of negative, 30 cases by the appearance of positive, and 40 cases by the appearance of mixed discharges. The results of a joint analysis of geomagnetic, solar and thunderstorm activity showed that there is a tendency for thunderstorm activity to appear during periods of increased geomagnetic activity (geomagnetic storms) with the highest probability in the recovery phase to the level of a quiet geomagnetic field, as well as during the impact of geoeffective coronal mass ejections on the Earth’s magnetosphere and high-velocity solar wind streams (HSS) observed during the considered periods. It was found that 21 events of lightning activity with positive discharges, 39 out 55 events with negative discharges, and 24 out of 40 events with mixed discharges were accompanied or preceded by the CME and HSS effects.
Figure 8 shows an example of the occurrence of thunderstorm activity in July 2013.
In this figure, the symbols “↑”, “▼”, and “◆” indicate the dates of thunderstorm events with positive, negative, and mixed discharges, respectively; powerful events are highlighted in red. The horizontal arrows in the figures mark the time intervals when the Earth was under the influence of the effects of CMEs and HSSs, where the length of each arrow indicates the duration of greatest impact.
As a result, it has been observed that in no less than 70% of cases, thunderstorm activity was found during periods of impact on the Earth’s magnetosphere by CMEs and HSSs, and this suggests that the increase in thunderstorm activity occurs under the influence of high-speed flows of energetic particles of the solar wind (protons and electrons).
Figure 9 shows the frequency of occurrence of the thunderstorm events as a function of time delay between an observed thunderstorm and the arrival of geoeffective CMEs and HSSs to the Earth. One can see that thunderstorm activity was most likely to increase during or 1–2 days after the arrival of geoeffective CMEs and HSSs to the Earth.
It is known that the main necessary condition for the formation of thunderclouds is the state of instability of the atmosphere, which forms updrafts. Sporadic manifestations of solar activity modify the state of atmosphere, change atmospheric pressure, and contribute to the formation of clouds, cyclones and the formation of thunderclouds.
Figure 10 is a striking example of the influence of a powerful coronal mass ejection in January 2005 on a decrease in the intensity of cosmic rays and a change in atmospheric pressure at different altitudes with a delay of two days.
This event is interesting because in atmospheric pressure, as well as in the intensity of cosmic rays, two characteristic minimums are observed with a delay of two days. This fact confirms the causal relationship between Forbush decreases and changes in atmospheric pressure. It has been established that after coronal mass ejections, ~80% of Forbush decreases of cosmic rays with modulation amplitude of ≥3% are accompanied by a change in atmospheric pressure after 0.5 ÷ 2 days. The depth of pressure reduction can reach 14 mb [
25].
At present, two possible physical mechanisms of the influence of cosmic rays on cloudiness variations in the lower atmosphere are considered according to the authors of [
26]. One physical mechanism is directly related to the ionization of the upper layers of the troposphere by cosmic rays [
27]. According to another hypothesis, the atmospheric conductivity is modulated by cosmic rays and, as a result, the intensity of currents in the global current circuit varies, which can also lead to a change in the cloud formation rate [
3,
28].
A number of cases has been studied when thunderstorm activity was observed in a quiet geomagnetic field, for example, when CMEs and HSSs events are not observed or these events are not geoeffective,
Figure 11. Solid curve—current values of fmin and foEs, dashed curve—median values, powerful thunderstorm events are highlighted in red. In these cases, an increase in the values of
fmin and intensification of the sporadic layer Es were observed, which indicated an increase in the level of absorption of radio waves in the D-region of the ionosphere and the level of electron density at altitudes of 100–120 km.
However, the analysis of thunderstorm events under quiet helio-geomagnetic conditions and the study of the ionospheric response to thunderstorm activity are beyond the scope of the present work, which requires further work in this direction and study of the relationship between processes in the Sun–Earth system.