Aerosol Information Retrieval from GF-5B DPC Data over North China Using the Dark Dense Vegetation Algorithm
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- Dark target method. The reflectance of thick vegetation is low in the visible band such as red light and blue light, and the linear relationship between the short-wave infrared band and red light and blue light is assumed. The dark target method has been well applied in the data of MODIS, AVHRR/NOAA, MERIS/ENVISAT, VIIRS/S-NPP, WFV/GF-1, MERSI/FY-3D, and so on [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11];
- (2)
- Deep blue method. According to the principle that the reflection of ground objects in the blue band is weak and the aerosol optical thickness makes a significant contribution to the satellite observation signal, the deep blue algorithm can be well applied to MODIS and Sea WIFS data [12], and also successfully applied to LANDSAT, NOAA, GF-1, INSAT-3D and other satellites [13,14,15,16,17]. DB method has also been applied on VIIRS instrument and delivery NRT product [18,19];
- (3)
- (4)
- Multi-angle polarization algorithm. Since polarization signals are sensitive to aerosol physical properties and the surface polarization reflection is small and stable, the surface reflection can be better removed for retrieving aerosol modal and AOD information [24]. The PODLER series was the first satellite payload to use polarization observation for aerosol monitoring [25], which realized the inversion of AOD, complex refractive index, single scattering albedo and other parameters [26,27]. The algorithms applied to POLDER aerosol microphysical retrieval include GRASP, SPON, statistical optimization inversion algorithm and so on [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. The DPC camera mounted on China’s Gaofen-5 satellite can also use polarization observation for aerosol inversion [36,37]. Recently, some research on DPC has been applied to retrieve the content and optical properties of terrestrial aerosol components, retrieve high-precision and high-resolution aerosol products [33,34,35,38,39].
2. Materials and Methods
- (1)
- Masking cloud. Cloud were masked through the threshold. It is shown that, in the red channel, cloud-free reflectance is lower than 0.18 [45]. In the paper, when apparent reflectance was greater than 0.18, the pixel was masked as cloud.
- (2)
- Selecting appropriate channel. The DPC receives signals in two blue channels: 0.443 and 0.490 μm. In 2008, we measured the spectra of several areas of vegetation by using an analytical spectral device (ASD) in Beijing in October. By integrating ASD data with the DPC filter response function, we could obtain 324 sets of surface reflectance measurements in the 0.443-, 0.49-, 0.675-, and 0.865-μm channels of the DPC. The scale for the red and blue channels was approximately 2, and the scale for the 0.443-μm channel was greater than that for the 0.49-μm channel (Figure 1). Moreover, the relationship between the 0.49- and 0.675-μm channels was stronger than that between the 0.443- and 0.675-μm channels. Accordingly, this study used the 0.490 μm channel for retrieving aerosol measurements collected in the 0.675 μm channel. As indicated in (4), the scale was set to 1.8875, and the offset was set to −0.0161.
- (3)
- Selecting dark pixels. This study used the NDVI to identify dark pixels. On the basis of (3), the NDVI values for different vegetation areas were calculated using surface reflectance measurements captured in the 0.675 and 0.865 μm channels. As displayed in Figure 2, the NDVI values for most vegetation areas were between 0.5 and 0.9. The data applied for NDVI calculation were from ASD measurements above.
- (4)
- Selecting measurement angle. Because the DPC on board GF-5B observes its target from 17 angles, we selected the most aerosol-sensitive angle for aerosol measurement. We simulated TOA reflectance in the blue (0.49 μm) and red (0.675 μm) channels, as presented in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. The viewing geometry is also shown in Table 2. Increases in TOA reflectance were greatest from angle 1. In the blue channel, as the AOD increased from 0 to 2, the TOA reflectance from angle 1 increased from 0.22 to 0.50 in December, while that increased from 0.11 to 0.24 in June. In the red channel, the TOA reflectance increased from 0.12 to 0.47 in December, while that increased from 0.07 to 0.17 in June. This was because angle 1 was associated with the largest view zenith angle and the longest sunlight transmission path; therefore, the angle with the largest view zenith angle was selected as the measurement angle.
3. Results and Validation
- (1)
- Retrieving AOD images during pollution event. In the beginning of January 2022, an aerosol pollution event occurred in North China. We monitored the contamination process using DPC images. As depicted in Figure 6, on 1 January 2022, the overall AOD in North China began to increase, with obvious AOD growth over the border of Shandong Province and Hebei Province and the eastern part of Hebei Province. On 3 January 2022, obvious pollution was observed in the south of North China, and the overall AOD in Shandong was >1. On 4 January 2022, the pollution event continued, and the AOD also began to increase in Beijing and western Hebei; however, most of the polluted areas in the south could not be monitored because of cloud cover.
- (2)
- Comparing of inversion results with MODIS aerosol product data. We resampled the aerosol measurements from GF-5B to the same spatial resolution (10 km) as the MODIS aerosol product (MOD04 Collection 6.1) [46,47,48]. Subsequently, the GF-5B aerosol measurements obtained on 6 December 2021, were compared with the MODIS aerosol product data. As presented in Figure 7, the aerosol measurements obtained from the DPC were consistent with distribution of the MODIS aerosol product data, and a high AOD was detected in eastern and southern Shandong. However, the aerosol levels detected using our DPC data were lower than those indicated by the MODIS aerosol product. In addition, in northeastern Shandong, some cloud regions were not successfully identified, resulting in numerous regions with high pixel values. By comparing the valid data from MODIS and the DPC inversion results, 4553 effective pixel results were obtained in Figure 8. The mean value, maximum value, minimum value, and standard deviation of the absolute difference between the MODIS aerosol product data and the DPC inversion results were −0.06, 0.94, −1.48, and 0.13, respectively. The mean value, maximum value, minimum value, and standard deviation of the relative difference between the MODIS aerosol product data and the DPC inversion results were 6%, 5714%, −86%, and 44%, respectively. The correlation coefficient between the DPC measurements and MODIS aerosol product was 0.87, the absolute error was 0.2, and the relative accuracy was 49%.
- (3)
- Validating the data by using AERONET data. The GF-5B aerosol measurements obtained from 1 December 2021 to 25 January 2022, were compared with those from of the AERONET Beijing-RADI station. The inversion results were obtained in 34 days. The mean value, maximum value, minimum value, and standard deviation of the absolute difference between the measurements were −0.06, 0.03, −0.35, and 0.07, respectively. The mean value, maximum value, minimum value, and standard deviation of the relative difference between the measurements were −32%, 27%, −86%, and 26%, respectively. As shown in Figure 9, the correlation coefficient between the DPC aerosol inversion results and the AERONET measurements was 0.97, the absolute error was 0.06, and the relative accuracy was 32%. Our results underestimated because the scale was 0.7878. The reason may be the lack of vegetation in winter. Although the mean AOD diff. (DPC-MODIS) and (DPC-AERONET) was −0.06, our results were closed to AERONET because of the higher R.
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- The TOA reflectance of typical vegetation in different channels and different AODs were analyzed, and the DDV algorithm was applied to DPC data.
- (2)
- The algorithm was tested on data collected in North China, and the results reveal that the process of air pollution can be accurately measured using DPC data.
- (3)
- Comparing the results obtained using our algorithm with the MODIS aerosol product and AERONET ground observation data showed that the results obtained using our algorithm were strongly correlated with the MODIS aerosol product and AERONET ground observation data, although the overall results obtained using our algorithm were lower than the MODIS aerosol product and AERONET ground observation data.
- (1)
- More view angles should be introduced to more effectively remove surface effects and improve the accuracy of AOD inversion.
- (2)
- The DDV and Deep Blue algorithms should be combined to expand the application possibilities of DPC data.
- (3)
- Polarization observation data should be introduced for simultaneous inversion of AOD and modal aerosol data.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kaufman, Y.J.; Tanré, D.; Remer, L.A.; Vermote, E.F.; Chu, A.; Holben, B.N. Operational remote sensing of tropospheric aerosol over land from EOS moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer. J. Geophys. Res. 1997, 102, 17051–17067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levy, R.C.; Remer, L.A.; Mattoo, S.; Vermote, E.F.; Kaufman, Y.J. Second-generation operational algorithm: Retrieval of aerosol properties over land from inversion of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer spectral reflectance. J. Geophys. Res. D Atmos. 2007, 112, D13211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, Y.J.; Xue, Y.; de Leeuw, G.; Li, C.; Yang, L.K.; Hou, T.T.; Marir, F. Retrieval of aerosol optical depth and surface reflectance over land from NOAA AVHRR data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 133, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mei, L.L.; Rozanov, V.; Vountas, M.; Burrows, J.P.; Levy, R.C.; Lotz, W. Retrieval of aerosol optical properties using MERIS observations: Algorithm and some first result. Remote Sens. Environ. 2017, 197, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xue, Y.; He, X.W.; de Leeuw, G.; Mei, L.L.; Che, Y.H.; Rippin, W.; Guang, J.; Hu, Y.C. Long-time series aerosol optical depth retrieval from AVHRR data over land in North China and Central Europe. Remote Sens. Environ. 2017, 198, 471–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.T.; Ma, P.F.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.H.; Zhang, L.J.; Li, S.S.; Li, Q.; Chen, L.F. Aerosol retrieval in the autumn and winter from the red and 2.12 μm bands of MODIS. Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2019, 57, 2372–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Sun, C.; Liu, Q.; Zhong, B. Aerosol optical depth retrieval by HJ-1/CCD supported by MODIS surface reflectance data. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2010, 53, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, F.W.; Gu, X.F.; Cheng, T.H.; Wang, Y.; Guo, H.; Chen, H.; Wei, X.; Xiang, K.S.; Li, Y.N. High-Spatial-Resolution Aerosol Optical Properties Retrieval Algorithm Using Chinese High-Resolution Earth Observation Satellite I. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2016, 54, 5544–5552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, B.Y.; Li, Z.Q.; Liu, L.; Yang, L.K.; Chen, X.F.; Hou, W.Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.H.; Li, L.; Qie, L.L. A Dark Target Method for Himawari-8/AHI Aerosol Retrieval: Application and Validation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2019, 57, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, J.M.; Liu, H.; Laszlo, I.; Kondragunta, S.; Remer, L.A.; Huang, J.; Huang, H.C. Suomi-NPP VIIRS aerosol algorithms and data products. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2013, 118, 12673–12689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, S.K.; Zhang, M.; Ma, Y.; Gong, W.; Chen, C.; Yang, L.; Hu, X.; Liu, B.; Chen, N.; Du, B.; et al. Adapting the Dark Target Algorithm to Advanced MERSI Sensor on the FengYun-3-D Satellite: Retrieval and Validation of Aerosol Optical Depth Over Land. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2021, 59, 8781–8797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, N.; Jeong, M.J.; Bettenhausen, C.; Sayer, A.M.; Hansell, R.; Seftor, C.S.; Huang, J.; Tsay, S.C. Enhanced deep blue aerosol retrieval algorithm: The second generation. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2013, 118, 9296–9315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, N.C.; Lee, J.; Sayer, A.M.; Carletta, N.; Chen, S.H.; Tucker, C.J.; Holben, B.N.; Tsay, S.C. Retrieving near-global aerosol loading over land and ocean from AVHRR. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2017, 122, 9968–9989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mishra, M.K. Retrieval of Aerosol Optical Depth from INSAT-3D Imager over Asian Landmass and Adjoining Ocean: Retrieval Uncertainty and Validation. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2018, 123, 5484–5508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, K.; Chen, X.L.; Zhu, Z.M.; Zhang, T.H. High Resolution Aerosol Optical Depth Retrieval Using Gaofen-1 WFV Camera Data. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 89–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wei, P.; Li, Z.Q.; Wang, Y.; Xie, Y.S.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, H. Remote sensing estimation of aerosol composition and radiative effects in haze days. J. Remote Sens. 2013, 17, 1021–1031. [Google Scholar]
- Lyapustin, A.; Martonchik, J.; Wang, Y.; Laszlo, I.; Korkin, S. Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC): Part 1. Radiative Transfer Basis and Look-Up Tables. J. Geophys. Res. 2011, 116, D03210. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.; Hsu, N.C.; Sayer, A.M.; Bettenhausen, C.; Yang, P. AERONET-Based Nonspherical Dust Optical Models and Effects on the VIIRS Deep Blue/SOAR Over Water Aerosol Product. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2017, 122, 10441–10458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasekamp, O.P.; Landgraf, J. Retrieval of aerosol properties over land surfaces: Capabilities of multiple-viewing-angle intensity and polarization measurements. Appl. Opt. 2007, 46, 3332–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Diner, D.J.; Martonchik, J.V.; Kahn, R.; Pinty, B.; Gobron, N.; Nelson, D.L.; Holben, B.N. Using Angular and Spectral Shape Similarity Constraints to Improve MISR Aerosol and Surface Retrievals over Land. Remote Sens. Environ. 2005, 94, 155–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.Q.; Jiang, X.; Yu, B.; Jiang, M. A Hierarchical Bayesian Approach for Aerosol Retrieval Using MISR Data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2013, 108, 483–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, S.Y.; Cheng, T.H.; Gu, X.F.; Chen, H.; Guo, H.; Wang, Y.; Bao, F.W.; Xu, B.; Wang, W.N.; Zuo, X.; et al. Synergy of MODIS and AATSR for better retrieval of aerosol optical depth and land surface directional reflectance. Remote Sens. Environ. 2017, 195, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veefkind, J.P.; de Leeuw, G.; Durkee, P. Retrieval of aerosol optical depth over land using two-angle view satellite radiometry during TARFOX. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1998, 25, 3135–3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herman, M.; Deuzé, J.L.; Devaux, C.; Goloub, P.; Bréon, F.M.; Tanré, D. Remote sensing of aerosols over land surfaces including polarization measurements and application to POLDER measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 1997, 102, 17039–17049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deuzé, J.L.; Bréon, F.M.; Devaux, C.; Goloub, P.H.; Herman, M.; Lafrance, B.; Maignan, F.; Marchand, A.; Nadal, F.; Perry, G.; et al. Remote sensing of aerosols over land surfaces from POLDER-ADEOS 1 polarized measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 2001, 106, 4913–4926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Russell, P.B.; Kacenelenbogen, M.; Livingston, J.M.; Hasekamp, O.P.; Burton, S.P.; Schuster, G.L.; Johnson, M.S.; Knobelspiesse, K.D.; Redemann, J.; Ramachandran, S.; et al. A multiparameter aerosol classification method and its application to retrievals from spaceborne polarimetry. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2014, 119, 9838–9863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, G.; Hasekamp, O. Retrieval of aerosol microphysical and optical properties over land using a multimode approach. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2018, 11, 6627–6650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dubovik, O.; Herman, M.; Holdak, A.; Lapyonok, T.; Tanré, D.; Deuzé, J.L.; Ducos, F.; Sinyuk, A.; Lopatin, A. Statistically optimized inversion algorithm for enhanced retrieval of aerosol properties from spectral multi-angle polarimetric satellite observations. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2011, 4, 975–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ou, Y.; Li, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Dubovik, O.; Derimian, Y.; Chen, C.; Fuertes, D.; Xie, Y.; Lopatin, A.; et al. Spatio-Temporal Variability of Aerosol Components, Their Optical and Microphysical Properties over North China during Winter Haze in 2012, as Derived from POLDER/PARASOL Satellite Observations. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Dubovik, O.; Derimian, Y.; Schuster, G.L.; Lapyonok, T.; Litvinov, P.; Ducos, F.; Fuertes, D.; Chen, C.; Li, Z.; et al. Retrieval of aerosol components directly from satellite and ground-based measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 13409–13443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, C.; Dubovik, O.; Fuertes, D.; Litvinov, P.; Lapyonok, T.; Lopatin, A.; Ducos, F.; Derimian, Y.; Herman, M.; Tanré, D.; et al. Validation of GRASP algorithm product from POLDER/PARASOL data and assessment of multi-angular polarimetry potential for aerosol monitoring. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2020, 12, 3573–3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herman, M.; Deuzé, J.L.; Marchand, A.; Roger, B.; Lallart, P. Aerosol remote sensing from POLDER/ADEOS over the ocean: Improved retrieval using a nonspherical particle model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2005, 110, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Che, H.; Zhang, X.; Chen, C.; Chen, X.; Gui, K.; Liang, Y.; Wang, F.; Derimian, Y.; Fuertes, D.; et al. A satellite-measured view of aerosol component content and optical property in a haze-polluted case over North China Plain. Atmos. Res. 2022, 266, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, L.; Hasekamp, O.; Fu, G.; Gong, W.; Wang, S.; Wang, W.; Han, Q.; Tang, S. Retrieval of Aerosol Optical Properties over Land Using an Optimized Retrieval Algorithm Based on the Directional Polarimetric Camera. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.P.; Gong, W.; Fang, L.; Wang, W.; Zhang, P.; Lu, N.; Tang, S.; Zhang, X.; Hu, X.; Sun, X. Aerosol Retrieval over Land from the Directional Polarimetric Camera Aboard on GF-5. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Hou, W.; Hong, J.; Zheng, F.; Luo, D.; Wang, J.; Gu, X.; Qiao, Y. Directional Polarimetric Camera (DPC): Monitoring aerosol spectral optical properties over land from satellite observation. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra. 2018, 218, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.-L.; Ti, R.-F.; Zhang, D.-Y.; Fang, W.; Sun, X.-B.; Yi, W.-N. Inversion of aerosol optical depth over land from directional polarimetric camera onboard Chinese Gaofen-5 satellite. J. Infrared Millim. Waves 2020, 39, 454–461. [Google Scholar]
- Ge, B.Y.; Li, Z.; Chen, C.; Hou, W.; Xie, Y.; Zhu, S.; Qie, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, K.; Xu, H.; et al. An Improved Aerosol Optical Depth Retrieval Algorithm for Multiangle Directional Polarimetric Camera (DPC). Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, S.K.; Ma, Y.; Chen, C.; Dubovik, O.; Hong, J.; Liu, B.; Gong, W. Performance evaluation for retrieving aerosol optical depth from the Directional Polarimetric Camera (DPC) based on the GRASP algorithm. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2022, 15, 4323–4337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vermote, E.; Tanre, D.; Deuzé, J.L.; Herman, M.; Morcrette, J.J. Second simulation of the satellite signal in the solar spectrum: An overview. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1997, 35, 675–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bodhaine, B.A.; Wood, N.B.; Dutton, E.G.; Slusser, J.R. On Rayleigh optical depth calculations. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 1999, 16, 1854–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.M.; Chen, H.; Wang, Z.T. Terrestrial aerosol retrieval over Beijing from Chinese GF-1 data based on the blue/red correlation. Remote Sens. Lett. 2021, 12, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotchenova, S.Y.; Vermote, E.F.; Matarrese, R.; Klemm, F.J., Jr. Validation of a Vector Version of the 6S Radiative Transfer Code for Atmospheric Correction of Satellite Data. Part I: Path radiance. Appl. Opt. 2006, 45, 6762–6774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaufman, Y.J.; Sendra, C. Algorithm for automatic atmospheric corrections to visible and near-IR satellite imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1988, 9, 1357–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ackerman, S.A.; Strabala, K.I.; Menzel, W.P.; Frey, R.A.; Moeller, C.C.; Gumley, L.E. Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 1998, 103, 32141–32157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levy, R.C.; Munchak, L.A.; Mattoo, S.; Patadia, F.; Remer, L.A.; Holz, R.E. Towards a long-term global aerosol optical depth record: Applying a consistent aerosol retrieval algorithm to MODIS and VIIRS-observed reflectance. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2015, 8, 4083–4110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sayer, A.M.; Munchak, L.A.; Hsu, N.C.; Levy, R.C.; Bettenhausen, C.; Jeong, M.J. MODIS Collection 6 aerosol products: Comparison between Aqua’s e-Deep Blue, Dark Target, and “merged” data sets, and usage recommendations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2014, 119, 13965–13989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levy, R.C.; Mattoo, S.; Munchak, L.A.; Remer, L.A.; Sayer, A.M.; Patadia, F.; Hsu, N.C. The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2013, 6, 2989–3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Characteristics | DPC/GF-5B | DPC/GF-5 | POLDER3 |
---|---|---|---|
Channel (P is polarization) | 443 nm, 490 nm (P), 565 nm, 670 nm (P), 763 nm, 765 nm, 865 nm (P), 910 nm | 443 nm, 490 nm (P), 565 nm, 670 nm (P), 763 nm, 765 nm, 865 nm (P), 910 nm | 443 nm, 490 nm (P), 565 nm, 670 nm (P), 763 nm, 765 nm, 865 nm (P), 910 nm, 1020 nm |
Polarized angle | 0°, 60°, 120° | 0°, 60°, 120° | 0°, 60°, 120° |
Number of directions | ≤17 | ≤13 | ≤17 |
resolution at nadir | ≤3.3 km | ≤3.3 km | 6 × 7 km |
FOV (Field of View) | ≥50° | ≥50° | ≥51° |
No. | Sun Zenith Angle | View Zenith Angle | Relative Azimuth Angle | Scattering Angle | Choose for Show |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 63.48 | 54.23 | 153.13 | 155.31 | Yes |
2 | 63.48 | 50.05 | 153.22 | 154.04 | No |
3 | 63.46 | 45.25 | 153.61 | 152.09 | No |
4 | 63.44 | 39.75 | 154.22 | 149.18 | No |
5 | 63.44 | 33.44 | 154.78 | 144.99 | Yes |
6 | 63.42 | 26.39 | 155.88 | 139.78 | No |
7 | 63.41 | 18.44 | 158.52 | 133.46 | No |
8 | 63.4 | 10.05 | 165.01 | 126.27 | No |
9 | 63.4 | 2.32 | 134.48 | 118.21 | Yes |
10 | 63.38 | 8.53 | 43.74 | 110.32 | No |
11 | 63.36 | 16.99 | 36.2 | 102.59 | No |
12 | 63.35 | 24.92 | 33.24 | 95.27 | Yes |
13 | 63.35 | 32.19 | 31.99 | 88.61 | No |
14 | 63.34 | 38.65 | 31.33 | 82.74 | No |
15 | 63.32 | 44.23 | 30.81 | 77.67 | No |
16 | 63.31 | 49.13 | 30.37 | 73.20 | Yes |
17 | 63.29 | 53.43 | 30.18 | 69.37 | No |
No. | Sun Zenith Angle | View Zenith Angle | Relative Azimuth Angle | Scattering Angle | Choose for Show |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 21.45 | 54.98 | 123.43 | 134.36 | Yes |
2 | 21.42 | 50.85 | 123.75 | 138.17 | No |
3 | 21.4 | 46.11 | 124.07 | 142.45 | No |
4 | 21.35 | 40.75 | 124.73 | 147.24 | No |
5 | 21.33 | 34.58 | 125.33 | 152.41 | Yes |
6 | 21.29 | 27.62 | 126.49 | 157.77 | No |
7 | 21.26 | 19.77 | 128.89 | 162.56 | No |
8 | 21.22 | 11.45 | 134.15 | 164.51 | No |
9 | 21.19 | 3.28 | 189.33 | 162.04 | Yes |
10 | 21.16 | 7.22 | 76.02 | 156.10 | No |
11 | 21.12 | 15.65 | 65.73 | 149.13 | No |
12 | 21.1 | 23.82 | 62.42 | 141.83 | Yes |
13 | 21.07 | 31.24 | 61.04 | 135.04 | No |
14 | 21.04 | 37.79 | 60.19 | 128.92 | No |
15 | 21 | 43.48 | 59.6 | 123.55 | No |
16 | 20.96 | 48.53 | 59.18 | 118.76 | Yes |
17 | 20.94 | 52.89 | 58.75 | 114.56 | No |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhang, R.; Zhou, W.; Chen, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, L.; Ma, P.; Zhao, S.; Wang, Z. Aerosol Information Retrieval from GF-5B DPC Data over North China Using the Dark Dense Vegetation Algorithm. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14020241
Zhang R, Zhou W, Chen H, Zhang L, Zhang L, Ma P, Zhao S, Wang Z. Aerosol Information Retrieval from GF-5B DPC Data over North China Using the Dark Dense Vegetation Algorithm. Atmosphere. 2023; 14(2):241. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14020241
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Ruijie, Wei Zhou, Hui Chen, Lianhua Zhang, Lijuan Zhang, Pengfei Ma, Shaohua Zhao, and Zhongting Wang. 2023. "Aerosol Information Retrieval from GF-5B DPC Data over North China Using the Dark Dense Vegetation Algorithm" Atmosphere 14, no. 2: 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14020241
APA StyleZhang, R., Zhou, W., Chen, H., Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Ma, P., Zhao, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). Aerosol Information Retrieval from GF-5B DPC Data over North China Using the Dark Dense Vegetation Algorithm. Atmosphere, 14(2), 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14020241