Next Article in Journal
Performance of Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) for Short-Term Prediction of PM10 Concentration in the Peninsular Malaysia
Next Article in Special Issue
Fugitive Emissions from Mobile Sources—Experimental Analysis in Buses Regulated by the Euro 5 Standard
Previous Article in Journal
Health Effects of Urban Atmospheric Aerosols
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improvements of Simulating Urban Atmospheric CO2 Concentration by Coupling with Emission Height and Dynamic Boundary Layer Variations in WRF-STILT Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Estimation of Carbonaceous Aerosol Sources under Extremely Cold Weather Conditions in an Urban Environment

by
Steigvilė Byčenkienė
*,
Touqeer Gill
,
Abdullah Khan
,
Audrė Kalinauskaitė
,
Vidmantas Ulevicius
and
Kristina Plauškaitė
Center for Physical Sciences and Technology (FTMC), Saulėtekio Av. 3, LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2023, 14(2), 310; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14020310
Submission received: 15 December 2022 / Revised: 18 January 2023 / Accepted: 31 January 2023 / Published: 4 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Emission and Transport: Measurement and Simulation)

Abstract

:
The present study investigated the characteristics of carbonaceous species in an urban background site. Real-time measurements of inorganic (sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, chloride, and black carbon [BC]) and organic submicron aerosols (OA) were carried out at the urban background site of Vilnius, Lithuania, during January–February 2014. An aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM, Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, MA, USA) and co-located 7-λ aethalometer (AE-31, Magee Scientific, Berkeley, CA, USA) were used to analyze the chemical compositions, sources, and extinction characteristics of the PM1. Extremely contrasting meteorological conditions were observed during the studied period due to the transition from moderately cold (~2 °C) conditions to extremely cold conditions with a lowest temperature of −25 °C; therefore, three investigation episodes were considered. The identified periods corresponded to the transition time from the moderately cold to the extremely cold winter period, which was traced by the change in the average temperature for the study days of 1–13 January, with T = −5 °C and RH = 92%, in contrast to the period of 14–31 January, with T = −14 °C and RH = 74%, and the very short third period of 1–3 February, with T = −8 °C and RH = 35%. On average, organics accounted for the major part (53%) of the non-refractory submicron aerosols (NR-PM1), followed by nitrate (18%) and sulfate (9%). The source apportionment results showed the five most common OA components, such as traffic and heating, to be related to hydrocarbon-like organic aerosols (HOAtraffic and HOAheating, respectively), biomass-burning organic aerosols (BBOA), local organic aerosol (LOA), and secondary organic aerosol (SOA). Traffic emissions contributed 53% and biomass burning 47% to the BC concentration level. The highest BC and OA concentrations were, on average, associated with air masses originating from the southwest and east–southeast. Furthermore, the results of the PSCF and CWT methods indicated the main source regions that contributed the most to the BC concentration in Vilnius to be the following: central–southwestern and northeastern Poland, northwestern–southwestern and eastern Belarus, northwestern Ukraine, and western Russia. However, the potential sources of OA were widely distributed.

1. Introduction

Carbonaceous aerosols are the major components of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and they can create challenges for the urban environment due to their variability in chemical and physical properties and originating from a wide range of pollution sources [1,2]. Carbonaceous aerosols have negative impacts on air quality and human health [3]. Carbonaceous PM2.5 is five times more hazardous than PM2.5 of inorganic origin (nitrate, sulfate, ammonia) [4,5,6]. Carbonaceous aerosols make up a significant portion (about 20–70%) of atmospheric aerosols, and they play a crucial role in haze formation, visibility degradation, adverse health effects, and atmospheric heating [7]. Carbonaceous aerosols primarily consist of organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), and water-soluble ions [8]. OC can be divided into two categories: primary organic aerosol (POA) and secondary organic aerosol (SOA), the latter of which is produced by the condensation of oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs) or the atmospheric oxidation of primary organic aerosol. Both fossil and non-fossil sources, such as the burning of coal and automobile exhaust, can release the precursors to POA and SOA (e.g., biomass burning, vegetation emission, and cooking) [9]. The refractory light-absorbing fractions of carbonaceous aerosols are commonly elemental carbon (EC) (when assessed using thermal optical methods) and black carbon (BC) (when quantified using light absorption techniques) [10]. OC contributes a major portion of about 90%, while a relatively very low portion of about ≤10% is contributed by EC to carbonaceous aerosols [10,11]. Due to having a graphite-like structure, EC is a major contributor to light absorption, while OC is a mixture of thousands of particulate organic compounds, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs), and other hazardous components, which can harm human health and increase morbidity and mortality [12,13,14].
The concentration of OC and EC in atmospheric aerosols is regulated by numerous sources (natural and anthropogenic) as well as by the formation of secondary organic carbon affected via local meteorology. This causes significant seasonal and diurnal fluctuations in the observed concentrations. The examination of carbonaceous aerosols under severely cold weather conditions reveals the effect of the major carbon sources on particulate matter [15]. Studies conducted in Athens (Greece) by Diapouli et al. (2017) [16] revealed that the BC concentrations were greater during the winter season due to wood burning as compared to the warm season. Based on the findings of research conducted by Klejnowski et al. (2017) [17] in Cracow (Poland), it was discovered that the concentrations of carbonaceous material (OC, EC, and levoglucosan) were greater when the weather was severely cold. Additionally, a study by Minderyte et al. (2022) [18] conducted in Vilnius (Lithuania) showed that the carbonaceous aerosol concentration is higher in the cold season compared to the warm season because there is less need for residential heating.
The IPCC’s special report, Global Warming of 1.5 °C, recognized the significance of BC as the second-largest anthropogenic contributor to global warming after CO2 [19,20]. BC is produced as primary particles through incomplete combustion, particularly from gasoline and diesel-fuel vehicles, and it is one of the major sources of pollution in urban environments in many European countries [21,22,23,24,25]. Due to their substantial contribution (90%) to BC emissions, diesel engine vehicles have drawn particular attention in urban areas [26]. In addition to diesel engines from the transportation sector, the primary sources of BC in the atmosphere are residential heating (using fossil or biomass fuels) and biomass burning [27]. In recent years, residential wood burning has become a more popular alternative energy source to fossil fuels. The promotion of CO2-neutral regulations, greater taxes on heating fuel, and the financial crisis, which has had a considerable impact on the average household income, have all led to a rise in the use of biomass as a heating source recently [28]. In this regard, wood smoke may represent a significant source of gaseous and particle pollution that adversely affects both urban and rural areas. This is crucial in the winter, when the weather and increased use of biomass burning could have a negative and considerable influence on urban air quality, exposing huge populations to pollutant concentrations that are over regulatory limits [29]. Emissions from biomass burning have been identified as a significant source of air pollution in Central and Northern Europe [30]. In addition to burning biomass for home heating, burning agricultural waste is another prevalent practice that contributes significantly to the release of gaseous and particle pollution into the atmosphere [30].
Several regulations and policies have been put in place to help reduce the effects of climate change [31]. These include stricter standards for testing vehicle emissions, such as the EURO 6 European Emission Standards (Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/646 2016), and programs to reduce the use of diesel cars in cities, such as low emission zones, all the way up to the complete phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles by 2035 [32,33,34,35,36].
The European Union has established laws designed to reduce PM emissions in the region, particularly from vehicles and large point sources [37]. Emissions from home solid fuel appliances have been on the rise due to a lack of regulation, although the eco-design guideline is anticipated to reverse this trend [38]. In the year 2000, transportation was responsible for roughly 45% of all BC emissions in the EU, but by the year 2019, that number had dropped to 30%. Since the year 2000, there has been a significant reduction in PM and BC emissions across the EU-28. Emissions of PM2.5, PM10, and BC decreased by 36%, 32%, and 48%, respectively [32].
In order to enhance air quality and reduce individual exposure to harmful air pollutants, it is imperative to pinpoint specific regional sources of carbonaceous aerosol pollution and create mitigation strategies. The promotion of biofuels as a low-carbon substitute could result in larger black carbon emissions than those from the combustion of fossil fuels, making the exhaust emissions from the burning of biofuels potentially the second largest source of global-warming emissions.
This study aims to investigate the chemical composition of carbonaceous aerosols in an urban environment, to quantify the source contributions, and to evaluate the contribution of remote sources to the mass of carbonaceous species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description

An intensive 2-month field measurement campaign was performed in an urban background site in Vilnius (Lithuania) during the winter of 2014 (January–February). Continuous real-time measurements of the OA composition and BC mass concentrations were carried out on the top floor of the academic building of the Center for Physical Sciences and Technology campus located in Vilnius (54°38′ N, 25°10′ E, 197 m asl). The inlet of the sampling system was placed on the top floor, about 20 m above ground level, 12 km southwest of the downtown area. The sampling site was relatively far from densely populated residential areas. The station was surrounded by forests to the north/northeast, and by villages to the south/east. The nearest roadway was 300 m to the southwest, while on the opposite side, a low traffic road was 600 m away. The location can be described as an urban background (Figure 1). Under normal meteorological conditions, the potential for the accumulation of vehicle emissions is limited by the site location.

2.2. Instrumentation

2.2.1. Organic Aerosol

An Aerodyne Research, Inc. (Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA) Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor [39] was deployed at an urban background site in Vilnius (Figure 1) with the aim of achieving real-time continuous monitoring of organics, SO42−, NO3, NH4+, and Cl.
The sampled air passed through a Nafion dryer (MD-110-48S-4, PermaPure LLC, Toms River, NJ, USA) and through a ∼2.65 m long stainless-steel sampling tube (6 mm i.d.) before reaching the ACSM inlet. Aerosol particles with an aerodynamic diameter in the range of 40–1000 nm were sampled at a flow rate of ∼1 l min−1 into the ACSM through a 100 μm critical orifice mounted at the inlet of an aerodynamic lens. The particles were then directed onto a resistively heated surface where the NR-PM1 components were flash vaporized on impaction with the vaporizer, which was typically operated at ∼600 °C. The generated vapors were then ionized by 70 eV electron impact. The ACSM was operated at a time resolution of ∼28 min for typical aerosol loadings, with a scan rate of 220 ms amu−1 from m/z 10 to 140. A detailed description of the ACSM has been given by Ng et al. (2011) [39,40]. The time series of organic mass spectra were processed using multivariate factor analysis methods to extract the distinct factor profiles further associated with aerosol sources. A graphical user interface, SoFi (Source Finder) [41], developed at the Paul Scherrer Institute was used to perform the source apportionment of the NR-PM1 OA mass spectra collected during January–February 2014. A collection efficiency (CE) of 0.5 was used.

2.2.2. Black Carbon

A Magee Scientific Company Aethalometer (Model AE31, Magee Scientific, Berkeley, CA, USA) was deployed at the site, which provided real-time, continuous measurements of the BC mass concentration. The optical transmission of the carbonaceous aerosol particles was measured at 7 wavelengths ranging from 370 nm to 950 nm (370, 450, 520, 590, 660, 880, and 950 nm). In this regard, 880 nm is considered to be the standard channel for BC measurements [42,43]. Using the assumed mass absorption efficiency, the output of the aethalometer was evaluated directly as the BC mass concentrations. It was investigated whether attenuation in the aethalometer was also affected by the multiple scattering of light from the filter due to the shadowing effect [44,45]. The aethalometer converted the light attenuation into the BC mass using a fixed specific attenuation cross-section (σ) of 16.6 m2 g−1 of BC (Aethalometer Operations Manual, Magee Scientific) set for a wavelength of 880 nm. The 5-minute time-step BC measurements were averaged to obtain the 1 h means. The aethalometer was equipped with an impactor that removed the particles with a particle aerodynamic diameter higher than 2.5 μm. The detection limit of the aethalometer was ±100 ng BC m−3, which is typically considered sufficient for the total BC concentration in urban environments (1–10 μg m−3).
The absorption coefficient babs for airborne particles is defined by the Lambert–Beer law as follows:
I = I 0   · e b a b s . · x ,
where I is the intensity of the incoming light and I0 is the transmitted light intensity after passing through a medium with thickness x. A power law fit is commonly used to describe the wavelength dependence of the aerosol absorption coefficient:
b a b s     λ a
where λ is the wavelength and α is the Ångström exponent of the absorption coefficient (the wavelength’s dependence on the optical depth). The meteorological factors (temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and wind direction [T, RH, WS, and WD, respectively]) were supplied by a site belonging to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) less than 1 km from our monitoring site.

2.3. Source Apportionment Techniques

2.3.1. Organic Aerosol Source Apportionment

The ACSM data were analyzed in terms of the aerosol chemical composition and mass concentrations using the standard ACSM data analysis software (version 1.5.3.0) written in Igor Pro (WaveMetrics, Inc., Oregon, USA) m/z < 120 [46,47], which was also used for the PMF analysis [48,49,50]. A positive matrix factorization (PMF) model was used to describe the ACSM measurements (ACSM organic mass spectra as a function of time) as a linear combination of several static factors. The PMF algorithm iteratively solves the equation:
X = G F + E
where X is the data matrix, G and F represent the factor profile and factor time series matrices, respectively, while E is the residual matrix.

2.3.2. Black Carbon Source Apportionment

The source apportionment technique relies on the observation of distinct absorption spectra at various wavelengths of light from individual particles. For this purpose, Weingartner et al. (2003) [44] proposed and implemented a correction to reduce “shadow”, multi scattering, and other effects causing measurement biases. To assign the BC mass concentration to biomass burning (BCbb) and fossil fuels (BCff), the origin aethalometer model proposed by Sandradewi et al. (2008) [51] was applied. For selected wavelengths (470 and 880 nm), this method uses the absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) as follows:
b a b s , BC ff ( 880 nm ) = b a b s ( 470 nm ) ( 470 880 ) AAE ff ( 470 880 ) AAE bb ( 470 880 ) AAE ff
b a b s , BC bb ( 880 nm ) = b a b s ( 470 nm ) ( 470 880 ) AAE bb ( 470 880 ) AAE ff ( 470 880 ) AAE bb
In this work, the absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) values were selected on the basis of previous studies by Zotter et al. (2017), Quin et al. (2018), Pauraite et al. (2020), and Minderytė et al. (2022) [52,53,54]: absorption Ångström exponent for fossil fuel (AAEff) = 0.9, absorption Ångström exponent for biomass burning (AAEbb) = 1.68, and absorption Ångström exponent for black carbon (AAEBC) = 1.43. The wavelength dependence method (WDA) of Quin et al. (2018) [53] was used to investigate the AAE of brown carbon (BrC):
b abs , BC ( 370 nm ) = b abs ( 880 nm ) ( 880 370 ) AAE BC
b abs , BrC ( 370 nm ) = b abs ( 370 nm ) b abs , BC ( 370 nm )
This method assumes that light absorption at 370 nm could be related to both BC and BrC light absorption, while light absorption at 880 nm represents only BC.

2.4. Air Mass Backward Trajectories

The TrajStat software includes trajectory statistics and a geographical information system proposed by Wang et al. (2009) [55]. A potential source contribution function (PSCF) model represents the proportion of pollution trajectories in a study area. The higher the value of weighted PSCF (WPSCF), the greater the impact on the concentration of an object [56]. However, it cannot illustrate the trajectories with certain pollution levels. Therefore, the concentration-weighted trajectory (CWT) method developed by Hsu et al. (2003) [57] was used for this purpose by calculating the weighted trajectory concentration [55]. The aim was to identify the pathways of the 72 h air masses with higher concentrations of OA and BC that arrived at Vilnius in January and February 2014, as well as the geographical source regions of OA and BC, using three trajectory analysis methods: clustering analysis, PSCF, and CWT. The grid covered a study domain between 35–75° north latitude and −30–75° east longitude with a 0.3° × 0.3° resolution. The NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis Archive for global scale analysis provided the meteorological data for the Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model [58] in order to calculate the air masses’ backward trajectories arriving every hour (00–23 UTC). The arrival height of the backward trajectories was 20 m agl.

3. Results

3.1. Overview

The time series of NR-PM1 species, aerosol BC mass concentration, PMs, gases, and meteorology parameters for the entire period are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. The total PM1 mass concentration of the non-refractory species measured by the ACSM varied from a few μg m−3 to 77.5 μg m−3. During the campaign, OA comprised the major fraction of NR-PM1, accounting for 53% (10.1 μg m−3) on average, with ammonium and nitrate being the second largest (18% [3.4 and 3.4 μg m−3, respectively]). Sulfate accounted for 9% (1.8 μg m−3) of the total NR-PM1 mass, while chloride represented a minor fraction, ∼2% (0.3 μg m−3). The high contribution of ammonia mainly came from the agriculture sector [59]. Thus, it can be concluded that ammonia was long-range transported to the measurement site from more distant locations [51]. The nitrate mainly came from oxidation processes of gaseous NOX onto pre-existing particles or through new particle formation [58]. It can be concluded that the nitrate content reflects the contribution of transport exhaust to the chemical makeup of aerosol particles, as there are no other significant sources of NOX in Vilnius [51]. The exceptional meteorological conditions also influenced the increase in pollutant emissions from combustion processes, contributed to the changes in the composition of the carbonaceous particles, and resulted in changes in their transport characteristics. During the monitoring periods, a maximum temperature of 2 °C and a minimum temperature of −25 °C were measured. The last weeks of January 2014 were unusually cold, such that a record low temperature was observed (Figure 3), with a mean relative humidity of 80% (min 32%, max 97%) (Figure 3).
In order to understand the behavior of the atmosphere during the days with a high PM1 concentration, the measurement period was divided into days with and without episodes. The first two episodes (Ep. 1 and Ep. 2) corresponded to the transition time from a moderately cold winter to an extremely cold winter period, which was evidenced by the change in the average air temperature for the 1–13 January days of campaign, T = −5 °C, RH = 92%, in contrast to the 14–29 January days, T = −14 °C, RH = 74%
The first episode (Ep. 1) during 1–13 January was characterized by lower concentrations of organic matter (47%, 6.2 μg m−3). After a slow gradual temperature decrease, on 14 January extremely low temperatures all day long were observed, together with a wind direction from the N–NE–NW sectors with a mean wind speed of 1.5 m s−1 (Figure 3). During Episode 1, the mean mass concentration of the pollutants (SO2—1.8 μg m−3, NOx—14.0 μg m−3, PM10—11.0 μg m−3, and BC—1.5 μg m−3) was significantly lower compared to Episode 2 (SO2—3.4 μg m−3, NOx—20.1 μg m−3, PM10—18.6 μg m−3, and BC—3.5 μg m−3). The fraction of sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium increased from 8% to 10%, 15% to 16%, and 13% to 20%, respectively, in Episode 2 as compared to Episode 1. According to Calvo et al. (2013) [60], the decrease in ammonium occurred due to the neutralization of HNO3 and H2SO4 with NH3 likely forming ammonium-derived aerosol in the form of NH4NO3 and (NH4)2SO4. During the low pollution episode (Ep. 3), the average relative humidity suddenly dropped to 53%, while the wind speed was relatively high, with a mean value of 2.4 ms−1.

3.2. Source Apportionment of Ambient Black Carbon

The source apportionment of BC from fossil fuel and biomass burning was analyzed using the AAEff and AAEbb values obtained in Section 2.3.1. Figure 4a depicts the time series of BCff and BCbb, as well as their contributions to the total BC for the whole measurement campaign. The percentage contribution showed that BCff and BCbb contributed 53% and 47% to the total BC mass concentration, respectively. The highest contribution of BCff was observed for the whole measurement campaign, and it was associated with fossil fuel-related pollution from on-road transport.
BC and brown carbon (BrC) have different spectral dependences, with brown carbon being expected to strongly absorb in UV range. Figure 4b depicts the time series of the light absorption coefficients of BC and BrC. The light absorption coefficient of BrC at 370 nm (babs,BrC) varied spatially from 0.02 to 0.80 M m1. The babs,BC showed slightly higher contribution 57% to light absorption at a lower wavelength (370 nm). According to the studies by Li et al. (2016) [61] and Qin et al. (2018) [49], it is obvious that during the winter season, the major source of BrC was biomass burning.

3.3. Source Apportionment of Ambient Organic Aerosol

The PMF analysis of the ACSM OA mass spectra identified five components, i.e., hydrocarbon-like organic aerosol (HOA) from traffic (HOAtraffic) and heating (HOAheating) sources, secondary organic aerosol (SOA), local organic aerosol (LOA), and biomass burning organic aerosol. The biomass burning organic aerosols (BBOA) according to Minderytė et al. (2022), can be further divided into BBOAWB from wood burning (levoglucosan) and BBOADH from domestic heating [55]. Each of those components showed a distinct time series, mass spectral profile, and diurnal variation corresponding to different sources (Figure 5). The BBOAWB profile was characterized by higher contributions at m/z’s 60 (C2H4O2+) and 73 (C3H5O2+), which were associated with the fragmentation of sugars such as levoglucosan [62,63,64]. The BBOADH showed similar peaks to the BBOAWB, albeit with additional prominent contributions of m/z 29 and 41. Additionally, the BBOADH was primarily detected following the beginning of the central household heating season, which supported the notion that the sources were associated with domestic heating [55]. The SOA component had the characteristics of oxygenated organic aerosol with a pronounced relative intensity of m/z 44 (indicating more oxidized aerosol). The intensity of the other fragments in its spectrum was low (<10). The LOA determined in this study showed a spectral pattern, which was characterized by high peaks of m/z 18, m/z 27, and m/z 86. Additionally, it had a highly clear source area because all the larger concentrations were connected to the west wind direction, where many industrial businesses were situated [18].
From the initial unconstrained PMF five-factor solution, we could identify mixing between two different HOA sources: one from traffic and one from the additional heating mostly contributing during the coldest period. These two contributions were identified by looking at the diurnal cycle of the HOA, which showed two higher concentration peaks at unusual times for traffic (at c.a. 4:00 am and 10:00 pm) and lower concentration peaks during traffic rush hours (c.a. 7:00 am and 7:00 pm). Increasing the number of factors (>4) did not resolve the additional HOA factors, while the mixing persisted. Therefore, in order to separate the two contributions, we performed an unconstrained PMF analysis using as input the time points included in the hours. In addition to that, HOAheating showed two higher concentration peaks for Ep. 2 between (4:30–6:30 am and 7:30–11:30 pm). In total, 100 bootstrap PMF runs were conducted on this subset of the original data [50,65].
Figure 6 displays the computed diurnal pattern of the five OA components (HOAheating, HOAtraffic, BBOA, LOA, and SOA) for the entire period by dividing it into three episodes. Here, the “Day” and “Night” values were calculated by averaging the factor concentration (μgm−3) between 6 am and 7 pm (6:00–18:59 local time) for the “Day” values and from 7 pm to 6 am for the “Night” values (19:00–05:59 local time). The percentage expression of the difference (Diff) between the night-time and daytime factors concentration (CNight and CDay, respectively) was calculated using Equation (8) and is presented in Table 1.
D i f f = ( C N i g h t C D a y ) / C N i g h t × 100 %
The HOAtraffic diurnal pattern strongly suggested that it was associated with rush hours, while the HOAheating had a more pronounced diurnal profile. The highest HOAheating concentration occurred at 4:30–6:30 am and 7:30–11:30 pm. As expected, BBOA accounted for a large fraction of OA at the site, which was presumably associated with intensive domestic heating, and its contribution to the total OA mass varied on average between 26 and 77% (corresponding to 0.1–22.0 μgm−3). The SOA factor represented a large fraction of the OA. On average, its relative contributions to the total OA spanned from 2 to 80%. Finally, LOA contributed on average 2%, from 1% to 40% (corresponding to 0.3–8.0 μgm−3), to the total OA mass. The LOA factor did not show any regular diurnal pattern, although the contribution variation suggested that LOA mostly influenced (up to 40% [corresponding to 8.7 μgm−3]) the OA concentration during extremely cold periods. This behavior allowed the identification of SOA, BBOA, and LOA emissions as the sources that were responsible for reaching high levels during the winter season in Vilnius. Extremely low temperatures were the primary meteorological factor that caused these high pollution episodes.
It is important to note that during Ep. 2., when the site was affected by extremely low temperatures, the HOAheating could be a product of the combustion of residual oil. The observed HOAheating diurnal cycle (Figure 6) was comparable to the reserved intensity of residual fuel combustion in the Vilnius Combined Heat and Power Plant (CHPP) during working days (during Monday–Friday only). The main fuels used in the Vilnius CHPP were natural gas and secondary (reserve) fuel—residual fuel oil. The Vilnius CHPP capacity was 603 MW heating power and 360 MW electric power. It was the most polluting electricity generating power plant in Lithuania and, therefore, it was closed at the beginning of 2016. The HOAheating mass concentration was strongly higher when the prevailing wind was from the N–NW (same as the direction of the plant). Therefore, it appears that a large portion of the HOA was transported to the measurement site over a period of 30 min. Thus, the diurnal cycle of the HOAheating was more likely driven by the emissions from the CHPP, which is consistent with a number of previous studies’ findings that HOA is mainly associated with transport-related emissions [60,61].
The plot shows that the primary organic components, HOAheating and BBOA, had higher night-time concentration values during Ep. 2. If the daytime average was calculated from 6 am to 7 pm and the night average was calculated from 8 pm to 5 am, then the night average was 53% higher for HOAheating and 29% higher for BBOA. On the other hand, SOA showed a smaller difference in concentration during all the episodes and exhibited an increase in daytime during Ep. 2, although its contribution was higher over the whole measurement period, particularly during the cleaner periods. Consequently, secondary pollutants play a major role in this part of the city. The hydrocarbon-like OA factor from heating contributed on average 11% to the total OA mass, with concentration ranges between 0.1 and 63.0 μgm−3 depending on the measurement period, while HOA from traffic accounted for on average 13% (~1.4 μgm−3) during the whole measurement period.

3.4. Impact of Air Masses on the Concentration Level of OA and BC

For the cluster analysis of OA and BC, the 72 h backward trajectories were grouped into five clusters (Figure 7 and Figure 8).
In the trajectory analysis, the air masses assigned to clusters 1 and 3 came from the southwest and were observed in 33.83% and 13.56% of the cases, respectively; the air masses assigned to clusters 2 and 5 came from the east–southeast and accounted for 18.79% and 24.51% of the analyzed trajectories, respectively; while the air masses in cluster 4 arrived from the north and were composed of 9.32% of all the trajectories (Table 2). The clusters were also characterized by fluctuating atmospheric pressure (hPa) (subgraphs in Figure 7 and Figure 8).
In the beginning, the air masses in cluster 1 reached ~962 hPa, while later at the receptor site the pressure increased to 994 hPa. The pressure in the air masses in cluster 2 fluctuated the least—from ~983 hPa in the beginning to ~1003 hPa at the receptor site. The pressure of cluster 3 fluctuated from almost 940 hPa to 990 hPa, while cluster 4 reached a pressure level of 973 hPa in the beginning and rose up to ~995 hPa at the end. Meanwhile, cluster 5 had the biggest amplitude of all the clusters, as it was characterized by a lower pressure of ~945 hPa in the beginning and reached almost 1009 hPa passing over the site area.
According to the statistical analysis of the clusters (Table 2), the highest BC concentration on average was calculated in clusters 5 and 1, with 0.25 μg m−3 and 0.21 μg m−3, respectively (Table 2). The lowest BC concentration in cluster 3 was 0.11 μg m−3, which was 1.1–2.27 times smaller than that of the other clusters.
Meanwhile, the air masses in clusters 5 and 1 had the highest OA concentration on average—12.27 and 11.15 μg m−3, respectively. The average OA concentration in cluster 3 was 1.6–2.5 times lower compared with the average OA concentrations in the other clusters. In the WPSCF of the BC plot (Figure 9), the colors reflect the conditional probability that a cell is a source of BC, while in the WCWT plot (Figure 10), the colors express the weighted average concentration of BC in the cells [66]. As shown in Figure 9, the highest WPSCF values of the BC concentration were associated with air masses from northeastern Poland, northern–central Slovakia, northwestern–western–southern and southeastern Belarus, northwestern Ukraine, and western Russia, with the potential contribution to the BC being up to 1.1.
From these areas, the atmospheric BC arrived with air masses to the receptor site along clusters 1, 2, and 5 and affected the local BC concentration. The distribution of the WCWT values represents the contribution of potential sources to the BC mass concentration in Vilnius (Figure 10).
The highest concentrations of BC arrived with air masses from western Russia (which contributed up to 0.4 μg m−3 to the BC), northern–western–southwestern–eastern–northeastern Belarus (up to 0.35 μg m−3), northwestern–western–central–southwestern–southern Ukraine (up to 0.29 μg m−3), northwestern–southern Romania (up to 0.24 μg m−3), southwestern and northern Slovakia (up to 0.25 μg m−3), northeastern and southern Czech Republic (up to 0.27 μg m−3), and northeastern–eastern–southeastern–southern–southwestern Poland (up to 0.25 μg m−3). According to the WCWT analysis results, these territories made the biggest impact on the increased BC concentration in Vilnius. However, the lowest concentrations were associated with air masses passing from further southwestern, northern, southeastern, and further eastern Lithuania; therefore, the WCWT values varied within the range of 0.03–0.06 μg m−3. These results indicate that these regions made the smallest contribution to the BC concentration in Vilnius. Meanwhile, the highest WPSCF values of OA (Figure 11) were calculated for central Slovakia, eastern–northeastern Poland, western–southern and eastern Belarus, northwestern Ukraine, and western Russia. The range of the WPSCF values was also 1.0–1.1.
Atmospheric BC from these areas arrived at the receptor site with air masses in clusters 1, 2, and 5, and it had a noticeable impact on the BC concentration level. The contribution of potential sources to the OA concentrations in Vilnius is represented in Figure 12. The highest concentrations of OA associated with air masses originated from Central Europe (western–central–northeastern Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland [except western parts], northeastern Hungary), Southeastern Europe (northeastern–central–southern and eastern Romania), Eastern Europe (northwestern–western–southwestern–southern Ukraine, northwest Moldova, Belarus [except the southeastern part]), southeastern Latvia, and western Russia. The range of the highest WCWT values ranged from 9.7 to 16.37 μg m−3. As shown in Figure 12, these territories, which had the greatest impact on the concentration of OA in Vilnius, are geographically widely distributed.
Meanwhile, the regions that had the weakest influence on the OA concentration at the receptor site were further west–southwest, southeast, and north of Lithuania and much further east–southeast in the territory of Russia. The trajectories of the air masses arriving over Vilnius territories were evaluated for the third period (Ep. 3) due to the extremely low temperature event (Figure 13). A 96 h backward trajectory was computed every 3 h for altitudes fixed at 500 m, 1000 m, and 1500 m above the observation site. The analysis disclosed that the receptor site was affected by widely distributed air masses that originated from different regions in Eurasia. In Figure 13, the red trajectory distinguishes the height of which, on 27 January, reached more than 3000 m agl over the territory of northern Siberia. Its height gradually dropped to 1500 m agl on 29 January. Later, the height of the trajectory descended less quickly to 500 m agl at the receptor site. There is noticeable compliance between the movement of a high-pressure system towards the Baltic region and the red trajectory that came from northern Siberia to Vilnius on the same days in Ep. 3. Although the air temperature dropped below −10 °C on almost all the days of Ep. 3 and no precipitation was recorded (these meteorological conditions are favorable for an increase in air pollution), the hourly average BC and OA concentrations in Vilnius gradually decreased during this period. Such an effect could have been caused by the increased wind during these days.
In addition, on 1 February, no precipitation was recorded. The temperature dropped to minus −14 °C at night and the wind speed reached 8–13 ms−1, with wind gusts up to 15–18 ms−1. The increased windiness, coupled with the air masses that arrived to the receptor site from different altitudes (ranging from below 500 m agl in the source regions to 1000–1500 m agl above the receptor site) and directions, were expected to improve the air quality in Vilnius by dispersing the air pollution.

4. Conclusions

This study investigated the chemical components of NR-PM1 and the BC mass concentration and sources in an urban environment in Vilnius during January–February 2014. The organic fraction was apportioned into five organic aerosol factors representing HOA, which were likely to be related to traffic and residual fuel oil combustion for central household heating, biomass burning that mostly originated from residential wood burning and domestic heating, local OA factor and secondary organics. The diurnal five-factor behavior allowed us to identify HOAheating and BBOA as the sources that were responsible for the high night-time PM1 concentrations reached during the extremely low ambient temperature episode in Vilnius. Secondary organic aerosols played a major role during the whole measurement campaign in this part of the city, contributing on average from 2 to 80% to the total OA mass in Vilnius. Combinations of the AAE values AAEff = 0.9 and AAEbb = 1.68 were used for the BC source apportionment in an urban background environment. After completing the BC source apportionment using the predetermined AAE values (0.9; 1.68), it was discovered that BCff contributed more (53%) than BCbb (47%) in 2014. The fossil fuel-related BC contribution was further supported by an analysis of brown carbon (BrC). The babs BC presented a higher contribution of 57% and babs BrC presented a lower contribution of 43%, which showed that the transportation sector is a significant contributor to rising BC emissions in Vilnius. The reduction in pollution was significantly and directly impacted by the low relative humidity of the air. The clustering analysis revealed that the highest BC and OA concentrations on average were observed in air masses arriving from southwest–south–southeast–east and northeast. However, the potential sources of OA were widely distributed—the highest WCWT values were seen in some countries in Central, Southern, Southeastern, and Eastern Europe and western Russia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.B. and K.P.; methodology, S.B., A.K. (Audrė Kalinauskaitė) and V.U.; validation, T.G.; formal analysis, T.G.; investigation, S.B. and T.G.; data curation, S.B., T.G., V.U. and K.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.B., A.K. (Abdullah Khan) and T.G.; writing—review and editing, S.B., V.U., and K.P.; visualization, A.K. (Audrė Kalinauskaitė) and T.G.; supervision, S.B. and K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Lithuanian–Swiss Cooperation Programme “Research and Development” project AEROLIT (no. CH-3-SMM-01/08). The authors gratefully acknowledge the Environment Protection Agency in Lithuania for the PM and meteorological data provided.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Oh, H.J.; Ma, Y.; Kim, J. Human inhalation exposure to aerosol and health effect: Aerosol monitoring and modelling regional deposited doses. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ouidir, M.; Seyve, E.; Rivière, E.; Bernard, J.; Cheminat, M.; Cortinovis, J.; Ducroz, F.; Dugay, F.; Hulin, A.; Kloog, I.; et al. Maternal ambient exposure to atmospheric pollutants during pregnancy and offspring term birth weight in the nationwide elfe cohort. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. WHO. WHO global air quality guidelines. Coast. Estuar. Process. 2021, 1–360. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lelieveld, J.; Evans, J.S.; Fnais, M.; Giannadaki, D.; Pozzer, A. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 2015, 525, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cao, J.J.; Lee, S.C.; Ho, K.F.; Zhang, X.Y.; Zou, S.C.; Fung, K.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G. Characteristics of carbonaceous aerosol in Pearl River Delta Region, China during 2001 winter period. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 1451–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zou, C.; Wang, J.; Hu, K.; Li, J.; Yu, C.; Zhu, F.; Huang, H. Distribution characteristics and source apportionment of winter carbonaceous aerosols in a rural area in Shandong, China. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chung, C.E.; Ramanathan, V.; Decremer, D. Observationally constrained estimates of carbonaceous aerosol radiative forcing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 11624–11629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ancelet, T.; Davy, P.K.; Trompetter, W.J.; Markwitz, A.; Weatherburn, D.C. Carbonaceous aerosols in a wood burning community in rural New Zealand. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2013, 4, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pachauri, T.; Singla, V.; Satsangi, A.; Lakhani, A.; Kumari, K.M. Characterization of carbonaceous aerosols with special reference to episodic events at Agra, India. Atmos. Res. 2013, 128, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Safai, P.D.; Raju, M.P.; Rao, P.S.P.; Pandithurai, G. Characterization of carbonaceous aerosols over the urban tropical location and a new approach to evaluate their climatic importance. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 92, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bisht, D.S.; Dumka, U.C.; Kaskaoutis, D.G.; Pipal, A.S.; Srivastava, A.K.; Soni, V.K.; Attri, S.D.; Sateesh, M.; Tiwari, S. Carbonaceous aerosols and pollutants over delhi urban environment: Temporal evolution, source apportionment and radiative forcing. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 521, 431–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pani, S.K.; Wang, S.H.; Lin, N.H.; Chantara, S.; Lee, C.T.; Thepnuan, D. Black carbon over an urban atmosphere in Northern Peninsular Southeast Asia: Characteristics, source apportionment, and associated health risks. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 259, 113871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lin, W.; Dai, J.; Liu, R.; Zhai, Y.; Yue, D.; Hu, Q. Integrated assessment of health risk and climate effects of black carbon in the Pearl River Delta Region, China. Environ. Res. 2019, 176, 108522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mauderly, J.L.; Chow, J.C. Health effects of organic aerosols. Inhal. Toxicol. 2008, 20, 257–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Daniele, C.; Vechhi, R.; Viana, M. Carbonaceous aerosols in the atmosphere. Atmosphere 2018, 9, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Diapouli, E.; Kalogridis, A.C.; Markantonaki, C.; Vratolis, S.; Fetfatzis, P.; Colombi, C.; Eleftheriadis, K. Annual variability of black carbon concentrations originating from biomass and fossil fuel combustion for the suburban aerosol in Athens, Greece. Atmosphere 2017, 8, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Klejnowski, K.; Janoszka, K.; Czaplicka, M. Characterization and seasonal variations of organic and elemental carbon and levoglucosan in PM10 in Krynica Zdroj, Poland. Atmosphere 2017, 8, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Minderytė, A.; Pauraite, J.; Dudoitis, V.; Plauškaitė, K.; Kilikevičius, A.; Matijošius, J.; Rimkus, A.; Kilikevičienė, K.; Vainorius, D.; Byčenkienė, S. Carbonaceous aerosol source apportionment and assessment of transport-related pollution. Atmos. Environ. 2022, 279, 119043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Goss, M.; Swain, D.L.; Abatzoglou, J.T.; Sarhadi, A.; Kolden, C.A.; Williams, A.P.; Diffenbaugh, N.S. Climate change is increasing the likelihood of extreme autumn wildfire conditions across California. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 094016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kirchmeier-Young, M.C.; Gillett, N.P.; Zwiers, F.W.; Cannon, A.J.; Anslow, F.S. Attribution of the influence of human-induced climate change on an extreme fire season. Earth’s Future 2019, 7, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hamilton, R.S.; Mansfield, T.A. Airborne particulate elemental carbon: Its sources, transport and contribution to dark smoke and soiling. Atmos. Environ. Part A Gen. Top. 1991, 25, 715–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Briggs, N.L.; Long, C.M. Critical review of black carbon and elemental carbon source apportionment in Europe and the United States. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 144, 409–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Popovicheva, O.; Ivanov, A.; Vojtisek, M. Functional factors of biomass burning contribution to spring aerosol composition in a Megacity: Combined ftir-pca analyses. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chernyshev, V.V.; Zakharenko, A.M.; Ugay, S.M.; Hien, T.T.; Hai, L.H.; Kholodov, A.S.; Burykina, T.I.; Stratidakis, A.K.; Mezhuev, Y.O.; Tsatsakis, A.M.; et al. Morphologic and chemical composition of particulate matter in motorcycle engine exhaust. Toxicol. Rep. 2018, 5, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chernyshev, V.V.; Zakharenko, A.M.; Ugay, S.M.; Hien, T.T.; Hai, L.H.; Olesik, S.M.; Kholodov, A.S.; Zubko, E.; Kokkinakis, M.; Burykina, T.I.; et al. Morphological and chemical composition of particulate matter in buses exhaust. Toxicol. Rep. 2019, 6, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Reddington, C.L.; McMeeking, G.; Mann, G.W.; Coe, H.; Frontoso, M.G.; Liu, D.; Flynn, M.; Spracklen, D.V.; Carslaw, K.S. The mass and number size distributions of black carbon aerosol over Europe. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 4917–4939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ceolato, R.; Bedoya-Velásquez, A.E.; Fossard, F.; Mouysset, V.; Paulien, L.; Lefebvre, S.; Mazzoleni, C.; Sorensen, C.; Berg, M.J.; Yon, J. Black carbon aerosol Number and mass concentration measurements by picosecond short-range elastic backscatter lidar. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 8443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Weagle, C.L.; Snider, G.; Li, C.; Van Donkelaar, A.; Philip, S.; Bissonnette, P.; Burke, J.; Jackson, J.; Latimer, R.; Stone, E.; et al. Global sources of fine particulate matter: Interpretation of PM2.5 chemical composition observed by SPARTAN using a global chemical transport model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 11670–11681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kwon, H.S.; Ryu, M.H.; Carlsten, C. Ultrafine particles: Unique physicochemical properties relevant to health and disease. Exp. Mol. Med. 2020, 52, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, C.; Ye, Z.; Yu, Y.; Gong, W. Estimation of bus emission models for different fuel types of buses under real conditions. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 640, 965–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shan, X.; Chen, X.; Jia, W.; Ye, J. Evaluating urban bus emission characteristics based on localized MOVES using Sparse GPS data in Shanghai, China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Byčenkienė, S.; Khan, A.; Bimbaitė, V. Impact of PM2.5 and PM10 emissions on changes of their concentration levels in Lithuania: A case study. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jonidi Jafari, A.; Charkhloo, E.; Pasalari, H. Urban Air Pollution Control Policies and Strategies: A Systematic Review; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; Volume 19, ISBN 0123456789. [Google Scholar]
  34. Triantafyllopoulos, G.; Dimaratos, A.; Ntziachristos, L.; Bernard, Y.; Dornoff, J.; Samaras, Z. A Study on the CO2 and NOx emissions performance of Euro 6 diesel vehicles under various chassis dynamometer and on-road conditions including latest regulatory provisions. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 666, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Brewer, T.L. Black carbon emissions and regulatory policies in transportation. Energy Policy 2019, 129, 1047–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Grigoratos, T.; Fontaras, G.; Giechaskiel, B.; Zacharof, N. Real world emissions performance of heavy-duty euro vi diesel vehicles. Atmos. Environ. 2019, 201, 348–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lurkin, V.; Hambuckers, J.; van Woensel, T. Urban low emissions zones: A behavioral operations management perspective. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2021, 144, 222–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Trojanowski, R.; Fthenakis, V. Nanoparticle emissions from residential wood combustion: A critical literature review, characterization, and recommendations. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 103, 515–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ng, N.L.; Herndon, S.C.; Trimborn, A.; Canagaratna, M.R.; Croteau, P.L.; Onasch, T.B.; Sueper, D.; Worsnop, D.R.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, Y.L.; et al. An aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) for routine monitoring of the composition and mass concentrations of ambient aerosol. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 780–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Middlebrook, A.M.; Bahreini, R.; Jimenez, J.L.; Canagaratna, M.R. Evaluation of composition-dependent collection efficiencies for the aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer using field data. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 258–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Canonaco, F.; Crippa, M.; Slowik, J.G.; Baltensperger, U.; Prévôt, A.S.H. SoFi, an IGOR-based interface for the efficient use of the generalized multilinear engine (ME-2) for the source apportionment: ME-2 application to aerosol mass spectrometer data. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2013, 6, 3649–3661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Helin, A.; Niemi, J.V.; Virkkula, A.; Pirjola, L.; Teinilä, K.; Backman, J.; Aurela, M.; Saarikoski, S.; Rönkkö, T.; Asmi, E.; et al. Characteristics and source apportionment of black carbon in the Helsinki Metropolitan area, Finland. Atmos. Environ. 2018, 190, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, C.; Chung, C.E.; Yin, Y.; Schnaiter, M. The absorption Ångström exponent of black carbon: From numerical aspects. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2018, 18, 6259–6273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Weingartner, E.; Saathoff, H.; Schnaiter, M.; Streit, N.; Bitnar, B.; Baltensperger, U. Absorption of light by soot particles: Determination of the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometers. J. Aerosol Sci. 2003, 34, 1445–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zotter, P.; Herich, H.; Gysel, M.; El-Haddad, I.; Zhang, Y.; Mocnik, G.; Hüglin, C.; Baltensperger, U.; Szidat, S.; Prévôt, A.S.H. Evaluation of the absorption Ångström exponents for traffic and wood burning in the aethalometer-based source apportionment using radiocarbon measurements of ambient aerosol. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 17, 4229–4249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Paatero, P. Least squares formulation of robust non-negative factor analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997, 37, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Crippa, M.; Canonaco, F.; Lanz, V.A.; Äijälä, M.; Allan, J.D.; Carbone, S.; Capes, G.; Ceburnis, D.; Dall’Osto, M.; Day, D.A.; et al. Organic aerosol components derived from 25 AMS data sets across Europe Using a consistent ME-2 based source apportionment approach. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 6159–6176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sandradewi, J.; Prévôt, A.S.H.; Weingartner, E.; Schmidhauser, R.; Gysel, M.; Baltensperger, U. A study of wood burning and traffic aerosols in an Alpine valley using a multi-wavelength aethalometer. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Qin, Y.M.; Bo Tan, H.; Li, Y.J.; Jie Li, Z.; Schurman, M.I.; Liu, L.; Wu, C.; Chan, C.K. chemical characteristics of brown carbon in atmospheric particles at a suburban site near Guangzhou, China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2018, 18, 16409–16418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pauraite, J.; Mainelis, G.; Kecorius, S.; Minderytė, A.; Dudoitis, V.; Garbarienė, I.; Plauškaitė, K.; Ovadnevaite, J.; Byčenkienė, S. Office indoor PM and BC level in Lithuania: The role of a long-range smoke transport Event. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, Y.L.; Zhang, Q.; Schwab, J.J.; Demerjian, K.L.; Chen, W.N.; Bae, M.S.; Hung, H.M.; Hogrefe, O.; Frank, B.; Rattigan, O.V.; et al. Characterization of the sources and processes of organic and inorganic aerosols in New York City with a high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass apectrometer. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11, 1581–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Saarikoski, S.; Niemi, J.V.; Aurela, M.; Pirjola, L.; Kousa, A.; Rönkkö, T.; Timonen, H. Sources of black carbon at residential and traffic environments obtained by two source apportionment methods. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2021, 21, 14851–14869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Paatero, P.; Tapper, U. Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values. Environmetrics 1994, 5, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Paglione, M.; Gilardoni, S.; Rinaldi, M.; Decesari, S.; Zanca, N.; Sandrini, S.; Giulianelli, L.; Bacco, D.; Ferrari, S.; Poluzzi, V.; et al. The impact of biomass burning and aqueous-phase processing on air quality: A multi-year source apportionment study in the Po Valley, Italy. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 1233–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, Y.Q.; Zhang, X.Y.; Draxler, R.R. TrajStat: GIS-Based software that uses various trajectory statistical analysis methods to identify potential sources from long-term air pollution measurement data. Environ. Model. Softw. 2009, 24, 938–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Guo, Y.; Lin, C.; Li, J.; Wei, L.; Ma, Y.; Yang, Q.; Li, D.; Wang, H.; Shen, J. Persistent pollution episodes, transport pathways, and potential sources of air pollution during the heating season of 2016–2017 in Lanzhou, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hsu, Y.K.; Holsen, T.M.; Hopke, P.K. Comparison of hybrid receptor models to locate pcb sources in Chicago. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 545–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Draxler, R.R.; Hess, G.D. An overview of the hysplit_4 modelling system for trajectories, dispersion and deposition. Aust. Meteorol. Mag. 1998, 47, 295–308. [Google Scholar]
  59. Teinilä, K.; Aurela, M.; Niemi, J.V.; Kousa, A.; Petäjä, T.; Järvi, L.; Hillamo, R.; Kangas, L.; Saarikoski, S.; Timonen, H. Concentration variation of gaseous and particulate pollutants in the helsinki city centre—Observations from a two-year campaign from 2013–2015. Boreal Environ. Res. 2019, 24, 115–136. [Google Scholar]
  60. Calvo, A.I.; Alves, C.; Castro, A.; Pont, V.; Vicente, A.M.; Fraile, R. Research on aerosol sources and chemical composition: Past, current and emerging issues. Atmos. Res. 2013, 121, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, X.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wen, T.; Hu, B.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, G. Composition and sources of brown carbon aerosols in Megacity Beijing during the winter of 2016. Atmos. Res. 2021, 262, 105773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Weitzel, K.; Chemie, F.; Rev, M.S.; Introduction, I.; Reference, C. Bond-dissociation energies of cations—Pushing the limits to quantum state resolution. WHO Libr. Cat. Data 2011, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Thepnuan, D.; Chantara, S.; Lee, C.T.; Lin, N.H.; Tsai, Y.I. Molecular markers for biomass burning associated with the characterization of PM2.5 and component sources during dry season haze episodes in upper South East Asia. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 658, 708–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Weimer, S.; Alfarra, M.R.; Schreiber, D.; Mohr, M.; Prévôt, A.S.H.; Baltensperger, U. Organic aerosol mass spectral signatures from wood-burning emissions: Influence of burning conditions and type. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2008, 113, D10304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. May, N.; Kuo, L.; Caby, E.A. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. ASQ 2014, 42, 216–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Berriban, I.; Azahra, M.; Chham, E.; Ferro-García, M.A.; Milena-Pérez, A.; Nouayti, A.; Orza, J.A.G.; Brattich, E.; Tositti, L.; Piñero-García, F.; et al. PSCF and CWT Methods as a Tool to Identify Potential sources of 7Be and 210Pb aerosols in Granada, Spain. J. Environ. Radioact. 2022, 251, 106977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Map of the observation site in Vilnius (indicated by the red marker) (source of maps: free within www.maps.lt (accessed on 10 December 2022)).
Figure 1. Map of the observation site in Vilnius (indicated by the red marker) (source of maps: free within www.maps.lt (accessed on 10 December 2022)).
Atmosphere 14 00310 g001
Figure 2. Temporal variation of species (organics, sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and chloride) and aerosol black carbon. The pie charts show the fractional abundances of individual BC and ACSM species averaged over the episodes.
Figure 2. Temporal variation of species (organics, sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and chloride) and aerosol black carbon. The pie charts show the fractional abundances of individual BC and ACSM species averaged over the episodes.
Atmosphere 14 00310 g002
Figure 3. Time series of SO2, PM10, NO2, NO3, NOx, ambient temperature, wind direction (dots), wind speed, and humidity.
Figure 3. Time series of SO2, PM10, NO2, NO3, NOx, ambient temperature, wind direction (dots), wind speed, and humidity.
Atmosphere 14 00310 g003
Figure 4. Time series and contributions of the hourly average BCff and BCbb to the total BC (a), as well as babs BrC and babs BC to the total babs (Mm−1) (b).
Figure 4. Time series and contributions of the hourly average BCff and BCbb to the total BC (a), as well as babs BrC and babs BC to the total babs (Mm−1) (b).
Atmosphere 14 00310 g004
Figure 5. Mass spectra of the five factors from the PMF calculation. The time series (left), mass spectra (middle), and diurnal patterns (right) of the five OA factors determined on the basis of the PMF analysis.
Figure 5. Mass spectra of the five factors from the PMF calculation. The time series (left), mass spectra (middle), and diurnal patterns (right) of the five OA factors determined on the basis of the PMF analysis.
Atmosphere 14 00310 g005
Figure 6. Diurnal patterns of the five OA factors (HOAheating, HOAtraffic, LOA, BBOA, and SOA) determined based on the PMF analysis.
Figure 6. Diurnal patterns of the five OA factors (HOAheating, HOAtraffic, LOA, BBOA, and SOA) determined based on the PMF analysis.
Atmosphere 14 00310 g006
Figure 7. Air mass backward trajectories and clusters with associated BC mass concentration in January and February 2014.
Figure 7. Air mass backward trajectories and clusters with associated BC mass concentration in January and February 2014.
Atmosphere 14 00310 g007
Figure 8. Air mass backward trajectories and clusters with associated OA concentration in January and February 2014.
Figure 8. Air mass backward trajectories and clusters with associated OA concentration in January and February 2014.
Atmosphere 14 00310 g008
Figure 9. Weighted potential source contribution function of BC in Vilnius in January and February 2014.
Figure 9. Weighted potential source contribution function of BC in Vilnius in January and February 2014.
Atmosphere 14 00310 g009
Figure 10. Weighted concentration weighted trajectory of BC in Vilnius in January and February 2014.
Figure 10. Weighted concentration weighted trajectory of BC in Vilnius in January and February 2014.
Atmosphere 14 00310 g010
Figure 11. Weighted potential source contribution function (WPSCF) of OA in Vilnius in January and February 2014.
Figure 11. Weighted potential source contribution function (WPSCF) of OA in Vilnius in January and February 2014.
Atmosphere 14 00310 g011
Figure 12. Weighted concentration weighted trajectory (WCWT) of OA in Vilnius in January and February 2014.
Figure 12. Weighted concentration weighted trajectory (WCWT) of OA in Vilnius in January and February 2014.
Atmosphere 14 00310 g012
Figure 13. The 96 h backward trajectories of air masses arriving at Vilnius when the pollutant mass concentrations were the lowest. Trajectories were evaluated at each 3 h intervals.
Figure 13. The 96 h backward trajectories of air masses arriving at Vilnius when the pollutant mass concentrations were the lowest. Trajectories were evaluated at each 3 h intervals.
Atmosphere 14 00310 g013
Table 1. Average of the factor concentration (μg m−3) of the three episodes, during daytime (6 am–7 pm) and night-time (7 pm to 6 am).
Table 1. Average of the factor concentration (μg m−3) of the three episodes, during daytime (6 am–7 pm) and night-time (7 pm to 6 am).
HOAheatingHOAtrafficLOABBOASOA
DayNightDiffDayNightDiffDayNightDiffDayNightDiffDayNightDiff
Ep. 1.0.550.573%0.790.69−15%0.130.146%1.501.563%2.733.2817%
Ep. 2.1.463.1153%1.601.8815%0.750.66−13%3.664.7222%3.403.719%
Ep. 3.0.410.38−9%0.590.53−12%0.100.107%1.061.2716%2.602.797%
Whole period1.121.5428%1.331.395%0.350.376%2.583.2521%4.064.5010%
Table 2. Statistics of the clusters.
Table 2. Statistics of the clusters.
General Statistics of ClustersTrajectories of BCTrajectories of OA
Cluster no.No. of
trajectories
Ratio to all trajectoriesNo. of
trajectories
Mean
conc., µg/m3
Standard
deviation
No. of
trajectories
Mean
conc., µg/m3
Standard
deviation
147933.83%4790.210.1247311.155.85
226618.79%2640.190.192549.606.26
319213.56%1920.110.091644.903.59
41329.32%1200.120.091328.048.49
534724.51%2970.250.2134612.278.03
Total1416100.01%13520.190.16136910.107.00
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Byčenkienė, S.; Gill, T.; Khan, A.; Kalinauskaitė, A.; Ulevicius, V.; Plauškaitė, K. Estimation of Carbonaceous Aerosol Sources under Extremely Cold Weather Conditions in an Urban Environment. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14020310

AMA Style

Byčenkienė S, Gill T, Khan A, Kalinauskaitė A, Ulevicius V, Plauškaitė K. Estimation of Carbonaceous Aerosol Sources under Extremely Cold Weather Conditions in an Urban Environment. Atmosphere. 2023; 14(2):310. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14020310

Chicago/Turabian Style

Byčenkienė, Steigvilė, Touqeer Gill, Abdullah Khan, Audrė Kalinauskaitė, Vidmantas Ulevicius, and Kristina Plauškaitė. 2023. "Estimation of Carbonaceous Aerosol Sources under Extremely Cold Weather Conditions in an Urban Environment" Atmosphere 14, no. 2: 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14020310

APA Style

Byčenkienė, S., Gill, T., Khan, A., Kalinauskaitė, A., Ulevicius, V., & Plauškaitė, K. (2023). Estimation of Carbonaceous Aerosol Sources under Extremely Cold Weather Conditions in an Urban Environment. Atmosphere, 14(2), 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14020310

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop