Next Article in Journal
Modeling Hydro-Dynamics in a Harbor Area in the Daishan Island, China
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Drought Conditions in the Three River Headwaters Region from 2002 to 2011 Using Multiple Drought Indices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effluent Water Reuse Possibilities in Northern Cyprus

1
Department of Civil Engineering, Near East University, Near East Boulevard, Nicosia 99138, Northern Cyprus
2
Department of Environmental Engineering, Near East University, Near East Boulevard, Nicosia 99138, Northern Cyprus
3
Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(2), 191; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020191
Submission received: 28 November 2018 / Revised: 13 January 2019 / Accepted: 18 January 2019 / Published: 23 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Wastewater Treatment and Reuse)

Abstract

:
Northern Cyprus (NC) is suffering from limited water resources and reiterated drought condition experiences due to global warming effects. Previous studies revealed that the water management policy in the country is not sustainable from the perspective of demand and balance. Apparently, the reuse of recycled water will be an alternative resource and can be utilized for some specific purposes to reduce water extraction from the ground. It is expected that treated wastewater will reach 20 million cubic meters (MCM) per year after the completion of the new sewage system for Lefkosa. Today, 20,000 m3 of wastewater is treated at the Lefkosa Central Treatment Plant up to the secondary treatment level, in which the degree of treatment varies from 60% to 95% owing to the weather conditions in the country during the year. Effluent water reuse in NC was not accepted due to cultural belief. However, water scarcity was experienced in the country during the last decade, forcing the farmers to benefit from the recycled water. There is no regulatory framework available in the country for effluent water reuse. However, preparation studies are almost finalized after discussions among government and European Union (EU) agencies. Cyprus, as an EU country, has an obligation to treat the wastewater up to the secondary level before releasing it in an environmentally friendly nature, following the Directive 91/271/EEC. This paper analyzes the effluent water reuse possibilities as a component of integrated water resource management in Northern Cyprus considering laboratory experiment results. It appears that applying tertiary treatment in Northern Cyprus will allow 20 MCM of water contribution to the water budget and it will help protect the vulnerable environment. Also, since the cost of tertiary treatment will be 0.2 United States dollars (USD)/m3, it would be reasonable to prefer this process to the desalination of water, which costs of 1 USD/m3.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Northern Cyprus (NC) covers an area of 3355 km2, approximately one-third of Cyprus Island. Nearly half of the coastline of the island is also within the boundaries of NC (Figure 1). NC has a population of approximately 260,000 inhabitants and a population of 300,000 livestock [1]. The water shortfall in almost all countries was aggravated in the last few decades due to population increase, drought condition effects and a decrease in water quality, climate change, and a consequent considerable reduction in rainfall, which makes the purification of water important [2,3,4]. The over-abstraction of fresh water from groundwater resources caused a high degree of salinization in coastal aquifers and a complete depletion in the interior level [5,6]. To overcome this problem, 41 dams were constructed, of which 18 serve the agricultural sector and the remaining recharge the aquifers in the regions they are located. The diversion of surplus water from the wet regions to supply recharge water to the aquifers was already applied in the Lefkosa Main Region with a 20-km-long surface flow, despite the high evaporation effects. Small- and moderate-scale desalination projects are applied in some of the regions having shortfall in the country, which are considered to be more reliable resources independent from weather conditions with a cost of about 1 United States dollar (USD)/m3 [6,7]. There are 20,000 m3/day of wastewater flow to the Lefkosa Central Treatment Plant (LCTP), of which 12,000 m3 comes from the southern part of Cyprus, and it is treated up to the secondary level. The level of treatment varies from 60% to 90% depending on the weather conditions [1]. In the summer, due to high evaporation effects (1000 mm/year), the quantity of wastewater is reduced, which makes the treatment process more difficult. In the meantime, in the winter, owing to excessive storm water conditions, the plant cannot treat the wastewater up to the desired level due to limited capacity. Lefkosa has a coverage area of 30 km2. The main wastewater collection system involved cesspools until the last decade. However, after the EU development plan, about 60% of the city was managed by a sewage system. It is obvious that the treatment plant will be insufficient after the completion of the sewage system of the city, which is expected to provide 20 million cubic meters (MCM) per year [8]. Lefkosa as a region has 90 km2 of agricultural land growing vegetables and fruits including artichoke, lettuce, cabbage, leek, apple, apricot, and peach. Currently, the irrigation systems are modified, and sprinkle or drip irrigation systems are used depending on the type of cultivated crop [6,8]. The aquifer located at the area is rather small, with about 1 MCM of storage in wet and 0.5 MCM in drought seasons. Water shortage experienced is around 0.5 MCM in dry periods; however, the water shortage at the nearby region at Guzelyurt is 40 MCM per year [6,8]. Lefkosa as a part of Cyprus, which is an EU member, has an obligation to satisfy the Directive 91/271/EEC, concerning urban wastewater treatment (1991), as amended by Commission Directive 98/15/EC (1998) for environmental protection and upgrade [9]. Accordingly, Member States have to identify the agglomerations with more than 2000 population equivalence (PE). Evidently, the directive will force the members to establish and complete new sewage systems in these cities, which will cause the collection of a substantial amount of wastewater. This concentrated wastewater must somehow be treated up to the secondary level before disposing it to sensible areas, as enforced by the EU Directive [10]. Since the water deficiency shows an increasing trend, effluent water reuse in the agricultural sector is currently focused upon in order to reduce the water stress in the aquifers [11,12]. Furthermore, after the completion of the sewage systems of the cities, wastewater reuse will contribute about 20 MCM to the water supply in Lefkosa in 2025, and reduce the use of fresh water for cultivating the lands [12]. The economic studies on wastewater reuse revealed that tertiary treatment cost is less than the cost of desalinated water, indicating the necessity for the reuse of effluent water as a more reliable water resource [13]. It is estimated that the marginal cost of tertiary treatment effluent is 0.2 USD/m3, while the late desalination cost in NC is about 1 USD/m3. Obviously, this treated effluent water may be used in the agricultural sector for some specific purposes, especially in drought seasons when safe yields of the aquifers are limited due to a remarkable decline in the recharge process [14,15].
The water resources in NC are groundwater resources, semi-perennial low-discharge springs, several surface water reservoirs, and few small-scale desalination plants with a few small-scale sanitary treatment plants (Table 1) [6,16].
LCTP collects nearly 20,000 m3/day of sewage water from the north and south parts of the city and treats it up to the secondary level. Several local treatment plants are also available as institutional bases. The treated effluent wastewater is used for the irrigation of green fields only, which is about 0.1 MCM [17,18]. To overcome the water shortage, water transportation from Turkey was attempted between 1998 and 2002, with the objective of supplying 7 MCM of water per annum through balloons (so-called Medusa bags). Unfortunately, this system was unsuccessful since only 4.1 MCM of water was transported in five years [8]. Rainfall data obtained from the department of meteorology at the North between 1974 and 2003 was analyzed using a two-year moving average method, whereby a decrease of 2.2 mm/year in rainfall was observed [18]. This catastrophe caused a decrease in the recharging process of the underground resources, resulting in an aggravation of water deficiencies of the aquifers, as experienced in all European countries and, in general, the world [19,20,21].

2. Materials and Methods

The average monthly temperature variations based on districts of NC, for the years from 1975 to 2001, are illustrated in Figure 2. Based on the years between 1975 and 2001, the maximum average temperature was measured in the Guzelyurt region in July as 36.6 °C and its minimum average was 4.6 °C. Similarly, for the abovementioned period, the average temperature distribution in the regions were 18.8 °C in Guzelyurt, 19.3 °C in Lefkosa, 19.9 °C in Girne, 19.8 °C in Magosa, and 19.2 °C in Y. Erenkoy [22].
Monthly rainfall distribution of the country varied considerably among the regions (Figure 3). The minimum annual average value measured in the Lefkosa region was 294.7 mm/year, and the maximum average in the Girne region was 456.6 mm/year. The annual average rainfall for NC was 373.3 mm/year. This figure implies that, for the whole country, only two of the regions observed rainfall more than the average value (Karpaz and Girne), while the others were below the average, indicating drought regions [22].
This study considered the possibility of using recycled water for proper water resource management, to reduce groundwater extraction and for the sustainability of water resources in terms of demand and supply points of view, in the four largest cities of NC including Guzelyurt, Girne, Lefkosa, and Magusa (Figure 1). This was done by firstly determining the present situation of water resources in NC by analyzing the water balance of the main Magusa coastal, Girne karstic, and Guzelyurt coastal aquifers and the remaining small aquifers in NC (Figure 4). Due to a mismanagement of the Magusa aquifer, it is out of use owing to high salt-water contamination. The Girne karstic aquifer receives the highest precipitation due to its mountainous topography; however, due to steep slopes, most of the water reaches the sea in a short period of time. Roughly, the annual safe yield is 10 MCM and is in balance in terms of demand and supply [16]. The Guzelyurt coastal aquifer is the biggest aquifer with a storage area of 280 km2. Citrus fruit plantation is mainly carried out in this region. The cultivated area dropped from 70 km2 to 55 km2 within the last 25 years, depleting the aquifer 55 m below mean sea level as a result of overharvesting. The NaCl concentration reaches above 5000 ppm along a band of more than 1 km from the coast. The estimated annual safe yield of the aquifer is about 37 MCM [16,17]. Secondly, the concept of integrated water resource planning and management (IWRPM) was applied to estimate the historical water extractions and the consequent deficiencies in the aquifers. Finally, a sophisticated tertiary wastewater treatment process that could efficiently treat the recycled water with less cost is proposed.

Governance Systems in Natural Resource Management

Natural resource management (NRM) is generally defined in this field as the scientific application of ecological knowledge to resource management [23]. Technologies, procedures, and regulations are the main focus areas of this discourse [24]. However, the success of sustainable development is determined by potential relationships among the involved competing actors with natural resources across the entire levels and management structures in different governance scales. To meet competing socioeconomic demands, natural resources are governed, while environmental sustainability is also given priority [25].

3. Results and Discussion

Groundwater is the main source of water resources, and provides about 75.5% of the total available water resources in NC, as displayed in Table 1. This reveals that a shortage of water recharge into the aquifers would intensify water scarcity in NC. Therefore, the excessive exploitation of groundwater might lead to a large drawdown of water, which could, in turn, make NC vulnerable to water scarcity for a long period of time. Water recharge into the aquifer takes place slowly and can take several years until it maintains its initial level before drawdown, and a large drawdown would increase the number of years. The agricultural sector consumes the major portion of water resources in NC; by supplying the recycled treated water into agriculture, the water that was initially supplied could be channeled for other domestic use, thereby reducing the groundwater exploitation.
As an EU member, NC has an obligation to fulfill the standards enforced by the EU Directive. Hence, the treatment of wastewater up to the secondary level is compulsory for agglomerations before removal to the environment. This water can be used by the agricultural sector at a minimum cost of tertiary treatment which can be less expensive (0.2 USD/m3) than the desalination of water (1 USD/m3).

3.1. The Water Balance Situation in the Country

The aquifer capacities (safe yields) and the water balance in the aquifers foreseen by the Department of Geology and Mines (JMD) of NC are summarized in Table 2, indicating almost 30 MCM of deficit in total. The estimation of historical water extraction and the consequent deficiencies in the aquifer were performed using the integrated water resource planning and management (IWRPM) concept in order to evaluate and compare the results proposed by the JMD (Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4) [22]. In Table 3 and Table 4, the share of the tourism sector is 12% of the domestic use of the country. This research reveals that the deficiencies predicted by the department are highly optimistic, and the real extractions are far beyond those expectations, especially in drought conditions, when deficiencies reach the highest levels due to a reduction in the safe yields of the aquifers, as illustrated in Figure 5 [26,27,28]. In Figure 5, dry and wet conditions were used in order to distinguish the maximum and minimum average of the extractions and deficiencies in the aquifers. Water tariffs for agricultural use significantly vary from 0.04 to 0.15 USD/m3 of water, depending on the water resource and the region in which it is located. No charge is given to irrigation water in rural areas for poverty alleviation [8,16]. Irrigation water quality also shows great variation in NC. The costal aquifers are affected by seawater intrusion and NaCl concentrations reach up to 5000 ppm in some locations, which makes the water useless. Excessive water withdrawals above the safe yield reduce the quality of water and make it not useful for drinking or as irrigation water [18,27]. Currently, purified water in demijohns (19-liter bottles) supplied by private institutions is used for drinking water in homes, costing about 1.7 USD each. In NC, the sectors benefiting from the water supply are the domestic sector and industry, the agricultural sector, and the tourism sector.

3.2. The Need for Wastewater Reuse in Northern Cyprus

Previous studies stated that intensive and safe wastewater reuse schemes should be practiced on a large scale in Mediterranean countries due to an increase in the need for water in the irrigation sector [29,30]. Furthermore, the reuse of effluent water to defeat water shortages is one of the components of IWRM, which also contributes to environmental protection and upgrading [31,32]. The tertiary treatment of wastewater offers a cost much lower than the cost of desalinated water, considering that treatment up to the secondary level is unavoidable, according to the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWTD) 91/271/EEC [9]. UWTD involves the collection, treatment, and disposal of wastewater from agglomerations, and the treatment and discharge of biodegradable wastewater from certain industrial sectors. Since NC is physically part of the island of Cyprus and obtained EU membership upon reunification of the island, there is an obligation to satisfy the necessities of this directive.
Evidently, the quality of treatment water depends on the intention of use. Domestic use requires water of high quality, whereas agriculture allows lower-quality water. The irrigation of comestible crops necessitates more care because of possible health problems that may be caused by the effluents [14]. Effluent water reuse is a very favorable source in NC and wastewater treatment was initiated in the last two decades; however, its utilization was very limited. Since the treatment degree was not stable and varied from 60% to 90%, the society had negative trust regarding the reuse of effluent water; hence, treated water was diverted into channels upon flowing to the sea. However, recently, farmers living around the plant obligatorily used this effluent water for some specific crop plantations, such as artichoke, eggplant, and maize owing to the water shortage experienced in the last decade [12]. Tertiary treatment was tried in Southern Cyprus, and the cost of production for the tertiary treated effluent was found to be much lower than that for desalinated water. It is estimated that the marginal cost of the tertiary treatment of effluent is currently about 0.2 USD/m³ [14].

3.3. Effluent Water Reuse Practices

In NC, four medium-scale central treatment plants were constructed to treat the sewage water of the cities of Girne, Magosa, Guzelyurt, and Lefkosa. The first three of these plants have the capacity to treat up to 600 m3/day. However, the volume treated drops 50% in the winter as the utilization of the freshwater is reduced owing to the colder weather conditions. The Lefkosa Central Treatment Plant (LCTP) treats about 20,000 m3/day of sewage water, of which 60% comes from the northern part and the remainder from the southern part of Lefkosa city [8,28]. There are several small private institutional treatment plants constructed at hotel sites for the irrigation of the lawns, trees, and small gardens in order to reduce the dependence on municipal networks [17]. The decrease in the rainfall intensity in the country resulted in a reduction in the yield capacity of the aquifers due to the inefficient water recharge phenomenon. This caused drops at the water table of the aquifers and started the interaction of wastewater and freshwater. Contamination of the aquifers due to a lack of sewage systems in the cities enforced the government to quicken the installation of new systems for the collection and removal of the wastewater in order to protect the vulnerable groundwater resources. However, the sewage installation process is not yet at the desired level (Table 5) [33]. According to the data obtained by the municipalities in the country, only 15% of sewage systems are completed, which amounts to the 18% of the total population. Currently, the surveying studies for construction are being carried out, allowing the municipalities to arrange new bids for the implementation of the new sewage systems. Guzelyurt city was one of those suffering from the contamination of the freshwater owing to a complete use of the cesspool system for wastewater removal, which was the greatest aquifer supplying water to the whole country [33].
LCTP is the greatest plant in Northern Cyprus. The first phase of its construction was completed in 1980 over an area of 25 ha. After 20 years, in 2000, the second phase was completed, increasing the capacity up to 20,000 m3/day and the surface coverage area to 75 ha. The plant treats, on average, 4 MCM of wastewater per annum. Treatment phases of the plant are summarized in Figure 6 [26,33]. The source of the influent of the wastewater is basically domestic. However, some influents from industries are carried by the Lorries and discharged into the system externally. The effluent water treated at the plant is diverted into the Kanlidere Creek to flow out to the sea. Only a limited quantity of this treated water is restricted to use for irrigation purposes (0.1 MCM per year) [8]. The present waste stabilization process requires more area for the ponds in order to be sufficient for future treatment purposes. However, the expansion of the plant is not possible due to the location of the site, which is so close to the residential areas of Lefkosa city. In the meantime, a large pond area also causes very high water loss owing to evaporation effects during summer periods, which can be as much as 10 mm/day. This results in a very limited discharge of recycled water to the creek, and increases the salt concentration of the pond water [34].
The quality of the treated effluent water of the plant is very poor, since the present stabilization process at the plant is not capable of meeting the limits dictated by UWTD (91/271/EEC) [9] for discharge to sensible areas. The grimy odor affects the whole area around the plant, and spreads to the interior parts of the Lefkosa city. A research concluded by UNOPS revealed that the primary cause of the odors is the biological overloading of anaerobic ponds joined with a high concentration of hydrogen sulfide in the influent [35]. The samples obtained from the LCTP between 2007 and 2008 were analyzed, and the average results obtained from laboratory tests are displayed in Table 6 and Table 7 [34].
The electrical conductivity of the treated water measured at the LCTP is considerably high, which makes it difficult to be used for irrigational purposes. This is because of the poor quality of the domestic water supply and very high evaporation effects during the summer, which might reach up to 10 mm/day. According to the tests results, only TSS met the criteria requested by the European Union (EU) directive (Table 8) considering that the population equivalent (PE) is between 2000 and 10,000. This indicates that the treatment degree in the plant is unsatisfactory and further treatment is required. Knowing that, in the near future, the PE will go beyond 10,000, more treatment will be required and the present waste stabilization process will be insufficient; thus, a contemporary treatment system should be introduced. Hence, the government of NC constructed a new plant to serve both the north and south areas with European Union (EU) financial support. The new plant is the largest installation employing membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology, which uses physical, chemical, and organic processes to remove contaminants from the wastewater. The plant has a capacity to produce 10 MCM of water per year, which will be used for irrigation of agricultural lands at the region. The plant produces about three tons of sludge, which can be used as natural fertilizer. Treated water meets the criteria adopted in South Cyprus [36]. This involves the construction of infrastructure for conveyance purposes for the irrigation of cultivated lands, training the beneficiaries using this water so as to not cause any epidemic disease, and acceptance. Great effort was undertaken for the preparation of wastewater reuse standards and criteria with the call of the European Union (EU) and government agencies in last three years. It appears that effluent water will be supplied to the farmers without any charge.

4. Conclusions

One of the components of the IWRM is to reuse wastewater in the country as a water resource. Future projections reveal that an enormous quantity of water will be collected from the sewage system of Lefkosa city. Hence, the greatest treatment plant with MBR technology is being constructed in order to treat this quantity of water to a desired level to be used as irrigation water. It is imperative that the preparation of the standards for the reuse of treated wastewater in the irrigation sector is conducted after the completion of a new plant in order to take effect. Additionally, since no water charge will be given to farmers using effluent water, it will encourage them to use this water with more benefit. Obviously, the quantity of water treated at the LCTP in the near future will be a very reliable alternative water resource with a remarkable quantity (20 MCM). The distribution of this treated water and beneficiaries should be designated and well planned. Desalination of saline water for sensitive areas and for the agricultural sector depending on the type of the crops being grown should be arranged for soil and aquifer protection and efficient crop production, since some of the products are sensitive to the salt content of the irrigation water.

Author Contributions

G.E. and F.A. collected the data, conceived the study, and developed the methodology; G.E. and S.H. analyzed and organized the results into figures and tables; G.E., F.A., and S.H. contributed to the manuscript’s revision.

Funding

This research did not receive any funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of Northern Cyprus institutions for providing the data used in this study. The authors would like to take the opportunity and thank Taibe Efe Celiker for her support throughout this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Elkiran, G.; Turkman, F. Cisterns: How they can contribute against increasing trend of water shortage in TRNC? In Proceedings of the 6th National Hydrology Congress, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey, 22–24 September 2010; pp. 793–803. [Google Scholar]
  2. Asano, T.; Levine, A.D. Wastewater reclamation, recycling and reuse: past, present, and future. Water Sci. Technol. 1996, 33, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Eriksson, E.; Auffarth, K.; Henze, M.; Ledin, A. Characteristics of grey wastewater. Urban Water 2002, 4, 85–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Mazumder, A.; Zhang, T.C.; Dai, C. The application of advanced materials on the water or wastewater treatment. J. Chem. 2015, 2015, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ergil, M. The salination problem of the Guzelyurt aquifer, Cyprus. Water Resour. 2000, 34, 1201–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Elkiran, G.; Ergil, M. The assessment of a water budget of North Cyprus. J. Build. Environ. 2006, 41, 1671–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kajenthira, A.; Siddiqi, A.; Anadon, L.D. A new case for promoting wastewater reuse in Saudi Arabia: Bringing energy into the water equation. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 102, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mavioglu, Y. Personal Communication; Directive, H. A. T. Council Directive of 21 May 1991 Concerning Urban Waste Water Treatment (91/271/EEC); Ministry of Interior, Water Works Department: Nicosia, Cyprus, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  9. Underground Water Treatment Plant (UWTP). Council of the European Community—Council directive concerning urban waste water treatment (91/271/EEC). Off. J. Eur. Un. 1991, 40–52. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31991L0271&from=EN (accessed on 28 October 2018).
  10. Angelakis, A.N.; Bontoux, L. Wastewater reclamation and reuse in Eureau countries. Water Policy 2001, 3, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Angelakis, A.N.; Do Monte, M.M.; Bontoux, L.; Asano, T. The status of wastewater reuse practice in the Mediterranean basin: Need for guidelines. Water Res. 1999, 33, 2201–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Elkiran, G. Wastewater reuses possibilities in Northern Cyprus. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gemikonagi, Cyprus, 2008; pp. 56–71. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jiménez, B. Treatment technology and standards for agricultural wastewater reuse: A case study in Mexico. Irrig. Drain. J. Int. Com. Irrig. Drain. 2005, 54, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Papaiacovou, I. Case study-wastewater reuse in Limassol as an alternative water source. Desalination 2001, 138, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rebhun, M. Desalination of reclaimed wastewater to prevent salinization of soils and groundwater. Desalination 2004, 160, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Elkiran, G.; Ergil, M. The water budget analysis of Girne region, North Cyprus. In Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, Bogazici University, Instanbul, Turkey, 6–8 October 2004; pp. 1238–1247. [Google Scholar]
  17. Muslu, T. Hotels in Northern Cyprus. Rep. No: 31.T.Ç.B.75/01-335; Ministry of Tourism and Environment, Tourism Planning Division: Nicosia, Cyprus, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  18. Elkiran, G.; Ergil, M. Integrated water resources planning and management of North Cyprus. In Where Waters Meet: Auckland 28 November–2 December 2005: NZHS-IAH-NZSSS Auckland Conference 2005; New Zealand Hydrological Society: Wellington, New Zealand, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  19. Alberti, L.; La Licata, I.; Cantone, M. Saltwater intrusion and freshwater storage in sand sediments along the coastline: Hydrogeological investigations and groundwater modeling of Nauru Island. Water 2017, 9, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Angelakis, A.N.; Bontoux, L.; Lazarova, V. Challenges and prospective for water recycling and reuse in EU countries. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 2003, 3, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, Z.; Grasby, S.E.; Osadetz, K.G. Relation between climate variability and groundwater levels in the upper carbonate aquifer, southern Manitoba, Canada. J. Hydrol. 2004, 290, 43–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Elkiran, G. Implementations of Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management: The Case of North Cyprus; Lambert Academic Publishing: Riga, Latvia, 2010; ISBN 978-3-8383-7902-9. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rist, S.; Chidambaranathan, M.; Escobar, C.; Wiesmann, U.; Zimmermann, A. Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: The role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. J. Rural Stud. 2007, 23, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Stern, M.J.; Coleman, K.J. The multidimensionality of trust: Applications in collaborative natural resource management. Soc. Nat. Res. 2015, 28, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Withanachchi, S.S.; Ghambashidze, G.; Kunchulia, I.; Urushadze, T.; Ploeger, A. A paradigm shift in water quality governance in a transitional context: A critical study about the empowerment of local governance in Georgia. Water 2018, 10, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Elkiran, G.; Ergil, M. Integrated water resources planning and management of North Cyprus: Case study on water supply and demand including drought conditions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Water Observation and Information System for Decision Support BALWOIS, Ohrid, Macedonia, 23–26 May 2006; MagnaSken: Skopje, Macedonia, 2008; Available online: www.balwois.org (accessed on 15 February 2007).
  27. Elkiran, G.; Ongul, Z. Implications of excessive water withdrawals to the environment of Northern Cyprus. Water Environ. J. 2009, 23, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Alkaravli, M. Groundwater Resources of Northern Cyprus. Rep. No: 118/98; Department of Geology and Mining, Ministry of Interior: Nicosia, Cyprus, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  29. Brissaud, F. Criteria for water recycling and reuse in the Mediterranean countries. Desalination 2008, 218, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bixio, D.; Thoeye, C.; De Koning, J.; Joksimovic, D.; Savic, D.; Wintgens, T.; Melin, T. Wastewater reuse in Europe. Desalination 2006, 187, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Madungwe, E.; Sakuringwa, S. Greywater reuse: A strategy for water demand management in Harare? Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A B C 2007, 32, 1231–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pedrero, F.; Kalavrouziotis, I.; Alarcón, J.J.; Koukoulakis, P.; Asano, T. Use of treated municipal wastewater in irrigated agriculture—Review of some practices in Spain and Greece. Agric. Water Manag. 2010, 97, 1233–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Oznel, N. Answers of the Questions Related to Treatment Plant in Haspolat; Document; Lefkoşa Turkish Municipality, Sewage Division: Lefkosa, Cyprus, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  34. Celiker, T.E. Laboratory Results of LCTP; Lefkosa Turkish Municipality, Sewage Division: Lefkosa, Cyprus, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  35. Oznel, N. The New LCTP and the Consequences. Rep. No: 82/76/A; Lefkosa Turkish Municipality, Sewage Division: Lefkosa, Cyprus, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  36. Fatta, D.; Anayiotou, S. MEDAWARE project for wastewater reuse in the Mediterranean countries: An innovative compact biological wastewater treatment system for promoting wastewater reclamation in Cyprus. Desalination 2007, 211, 34–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geographical location of Northern Cyprus (NC).
Figure 1. Geographical location of Northern Cyprus (NC).
Water 11 00191 g001
Figure 2. Average monthly temperature variations based on districts of NC, in the years from 1975 to 2001 (°C).
Figure 2. Average monthly temperature variations based on districts of NC, in the years from 1975 to 2001 (°C).
Water 11 00191 g002
Figure 3. Monthly average rainfall values based on different regions of NC between 1975 and 2001.
Figure 3. Monthly average rainfall values based on different regions of NC between 1975 and 2001.
Water 11 00191 g003
Figure 4. Schematic map of aquifers and their locations in NC (Department of Geology and Mines, 2018).
Figure 4. Schematic map of aquifers and their locations in NC (Department of Geology and Mines, 2018).
Water 11 00191 g004
Figure 5. Estimated aquifer deficiencies under normal (average) and drought weather conditions owing to excessive water extraction in Northern Cyprus (NC) between 1998 and 2010 [27,28].
Figure 5. Estimated aquifer deficiencies under normal (average) and drought weather conditions owing to excessive water extraction in Northern Cyprus (NC) between 1998 and 2010 [27,28].
Water 11 00191 g005
Figure 6. Wastewater treatment flowchart of the Lefkosa Central Treatment Plant.
Figure 6. Wastewater treatment flowchart of the Lefkosa Central Treatment Plant.
Water 11 00191 g006
Table 1. Total available water at the resources of Northern Cyprus (NC) (Water Works Department, 2016).
Table 1. Total available water at the resources of Northern Cyprus (NC) (Water Works Department, 2016).
Northern CyprusResourceVolumePercentage
Springs0.3 × 106 m30.3%
Dams20.0 × 106 m320.4%
Groundwater74.1 × 106 m375.5%
Desalination3.7 × 106 m33.8%
Total water volume 98.1 × 106 m3100%
Table 2. Aquifer capacities and consequent conditions after annual extractions in NC (Department of Geology and Mines (JMD), 2002) [28].
Table 2. Aquifer capacities and consequent conditions after annual extractions in NC (Department of Geology and Mines (JMD), 2002) [28].
AquifersSafe Yield (million m3)Withdrawals (million m3)Situation (million m3)
Guzelyurt3757−20 (deficit)
Yesilirmak7.57.5-
Girne Mountains11.511.5-
East Mesaria28.5−6.5 (deficit)
South East Mesaria2.52.5-
Central Mesaria0.50.5-
Yesilkoy1.63−1.4 (deficit)
Girne Coast55-
Karpaz1.81.8-
Akdeniz-Korucam2.72.7-
Others (spread)22-
Total74.1103−28.9 (deficit)
Table 3. Annual water demands by sector and sources of supply in 2010 [27].
Table 3. Annual water demands by sector and sources of supply in 2010 [27].
SectorResourceVolumePercentageOverall (%)
AgricultureSprings0.1 × 106 m30%
Dams3.4 × 106 m33%
Groundwater96.8 × 106 m397%
Total100.3 × 106 m3100%71%
DomesticSprings0.2 × 106 m31%
Desalination3.7 × 106 m39%
Groundwater36.6 × 106 m390%
Total40.5 × 106 m3100%29%
Total water demand 140.8 × 106 m3 100%
Table 4. Annual water demand by sector and principal use in 2010 [26,27].
Table 4. Annual water demand by sector and principal use in 2010 [26,27].
SectorUnitVolumePercentageOverall (%)
AgricultureIrrigation60.8 × 106 m361%
Losses39.5 × 106 m339%
Total100.3 × 106 m3100%71%
DomesticHousehold29 × 106 m372%
Institutions1.7 × 106 m34%
Losses9.8 × 106 m324%
Total40.5 × 106 m3100%29%
Total water demand 140.8 × 106 m3 100%
Table 5. The completion percentages of the sewage systems in towns in 2008 [22,33].
Table 5. The completion percentages of the sewage systems in towns in 2008 [22,33].
City/TownCompletion (%)
Girne50
Iskele40
Mehmetcik15
Beyarmudu25
Lapta100
Y. Bogazici25
Lefkosa60
Table 6. Experimental results obtained from the Lefkosa Central Treatment Plant between 2007 and 2008.
Table 6. Experimental results obtained from the Lefkosa Central Treatment Plant between 2007 and 2008.
ParametersInlet WaterOutlet WaterEfficiency (%)
BOD5 (mg/L)4763094
COD (mg/L)99814785
TSS (mg/L)3854290
TP (mg/L)1812.871
TKN (mg/L)120N/AN/A
Note: BOD5: Biological Oxygen Demand; COD: Chemical Oxygen Demand; TSS: Total Suspended Solid; TP: Total Phosphorus; TKN: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen.
Table 7. Additional parameters obtained at the outlet of Lefkosa Central Treatment Plant between 2007 and 2008.
Table 7. Additional parameters obtained at the outlet of Lefkosa Central Treatment Plant between 2007 and 2008.
ParametersOutlet Water
Conductivity micromhos/cm (25 °C)3160
F (mg/L)0.009
Cl (mg/L)540
NO2 (mg/L)<0.05
Br (mg/L)1.40
NO3 (mg/L)0.3
PO4 (mg/L)38.6
SO4 (mg/L)80
HCO3586
Li (mg/L)<0.001
Na (mg/L)371
NH4 (mg/L)120
K (mg/L)32.2
Fecal coliforms count/100 mL>2000
Mg (mg/L)63.7
Ca (mg/L)106.4
Table 8. Effluent standards required according to the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWTD) of the European Union (EU).
Table 8. Effluent standards required according to the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWTD) of the European Union (EU).
ParametersMaximum ValueMinimum Percentage of Reduction (1)
Requirement for normal area
BOD525 mg/L O270% to 90%
COD125 mg/L O275%
TSS35 mg/L (WTPs with more than 10,000 PE)
60 mg/L (WTPs with 2000 till 10,000 PE)
90% (for WTPs with more than 10,000 PE) (2) 70% (for WTPs with 2000 till 10,000 PE) (2)
Additional requirements for sensitive areas
Total P2 mg/L P (WTPs with 10,000 till 100,000 PE)
1 mg/L P (WTPs with more than 100,000 PE)
80%
Total N (3)15 mg/L N (WTPs with 10,000 till 100,000 PE) (4)
10 mg/L N (WTPs with more than 100,000 PE) (3)
70% to 80%
Note: (1) Reduction is in relation to the load of the influent; (2) this requirement is optional; (3) total nitrogen means the sum of Kjeldahl Nitrogen (total organic nitrogen) (NH4-N + organic-N) + NO3-N + NO2-N; (4) these values for concentration are annual means, when the effluent of the biological reactor is superior or equal to 12 °C.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Elkiran, G.; Aslanova, F.; Hiziroglu, S. Effluent Water Reuse Possibilities in Northern Cyprus. Water 2019, 11, 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020191

AMA Style

Elkiran G, Aslanova F, Hiziroglu S. Effluent Water Reuse Possibilities in Northern Cyprus. Water. 2019; 11(2):191. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020191

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elkiran, Gozen, Fidan Aslanova, and Salim Hiziroglu. 2019. "Effluent Water Reuse Possibilities in Northern Cyprus" Water 11, no. 2: 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020191

APA Style

Elkiran, G., Aslanova, F., & Hiziroglu, S. (2019). Effluent Water Reuse Possibilities in Northern Cyprus. Water, 11(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020191

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop