Next Article in Journal
Applying Cascade-Correlation Neural Networks to In-Fill Gaps in Mediterranean Daily Flow Data Series
Next Article in Special Issue
Streamflow Intensification Driven by the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) in the Atrato River Basin, Northwestern Colombia
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Straw Mulch on Soil Evaporation during Freeze–Thaw Periods
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of the North Atlantic Thermohaline Circulation on Changes in Climatic Conditions and River Flow in Poland
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationship between Water Temperature of Polish Rivers and Large-Scale Atmospheric Circulation

Department of Hydrology and Water Management, Institute of Physical Geography and Environmental Planning, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Bogumiła Krygowskiego 10 str., 61-680 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(8), 1690; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081690
Submission received: 30 May 2019 / Revised: 30 July 2019 / Accepted: 12 August 2019 / Published: 15 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Oceanic-Atmospheric Oscillations on Rivers)

Abstract

:
The objective of the paper consisted in determining the effect of macroscale types of NAO, AO, EA, EAWR, SCAND, and AMO atmospheric circulation on changes in water temperature in Polish rivers. The study has made use of a broad body of hydrometeorological materials covering daily water temperature values for 96 water gauge stations located on 53 rivers and air temperature values for 43 meteorological stations. Percentage shares of positive and negative coefficients of correlation of annual, seasonal, and monthly circulation type indices with air and river water temperature were determined, demonstrating the character of teleconnection. Determinations were made of water temperature deviations in positive and negative phases of the analyzed indices from average values from the years 1971–2015, and their statistical significance ascertained. Research has shown that relations between the temperature of river waters in Poland and macroscale circulation types are not strong, however they are noticeable, sometimes even statistically significant, and both temporally and spatially diverse. NAO, AO, EA, and AMO indices are characterized by a generally positive correlation with temperature, whereas SCAND and EWAR indices are characterized by a negative correlation. Research showed a varying impact of types of atmospheric circulation, with their effectiveness increasing in the winter season. The strongest impact on temperature was observed for the positive and negative NAO and AO phases, when deviations of water temperature from average values are correspondingly higher (up to 1.0 °C) and lower (by a maximum of 1.5 °C), and also for the positive and negative SCAND phases, when water temperature are correspondingly lower (by a maximum of 0.8 °C) and higher (by 1.2 °C) than average values. The strongest impact on water temperature in summer, mainly in July, was observed for AMO. The results point to the complexity of processes determining the thermal regime of rivers and to the possibility of additional factors—both regional and local—exerting an influence on their temporal and spatial variability.

1. Introduction

The temperature of river water constitutes an important element of the hydrological regime, being subjected to daily, seasonal, annual, and multi-annual change [1]. Seasonal changes are the consequence of the influence of climatic factors predominant in a given geographical zone, whereas multi-annual changes may additionally point to the impact of local factors, also anthropogenic [2,3,4,5].
The thermal characteristics of river waters are impacted first and foremost by air temperature, the variability of which points to a considerable dependence on macroscale types of atmospheric circulation [6,7,8,9,10]. The exchange of thermal energy takes place primarily on the air–water level, and to a lesser extent on the riverbed–water level [11]. Changes observed in water temperature are first and foremost the consequence of surface heat exchange with the atmosphere in processes of radiation, evaporation and convection, and also of the turbulent mixing of water of varying temperatures; this is impacted, among others, by the method and intensity of water-course supply connected with the seasonality of the hydrological cycle, and also by the inflow of wastes [12]. Żelazny et al. [13] have recognized the following as being the main factors controlling the variability of water temperature in mountain rivers (Tatry Mountains—Poland), which are characterized among others by a low degree of anthropogenic interference: height relations (48.5% of variability) and the thermal and hydrological regime of individual water-courses (22.5% of variability).
The existence of a relationship between fluctuations in air temperature and river water temperature has been confirmed under differing climatic conditions and at various levels of temporal resolution of measurement data [4,10,11,14,15,16]. The majority of studies result in high and statistically significant coefficients of correlation between variables and coefficients of determination (R2 > 0.8), which means that more than 80% of river water temperature variability may be explained by the variability of air temperature [2,17,18]. Research has shown that, in the case of rivers in the Northern Hemisphere, we may observe a seasonal distribution of water temperature, while exceptions to this rule may be the result of weather anomalies or of the impact of anthropogenic factors [2,4,12,19]. High correlations between annual and monthly air and river water temperature values have been demonstrated for various regions, among others in the United States and Canada [16,20,21,22,23,24], in Asia and Eurasia [25,26,27,28], and in Europe [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Studies concerning the thermal regime of Polish rivers have also confirmed the existence of significant relations and the impact of air temperature on the variability of river water temperature [4,5,13,37,38,39].
The increase in air temperature, a recently observed phenomenon which may unfavorably impact river water temperature, is given particular emphasis [40,41]. This tendency has been confirmed by research into changes in water temperature in European rivers, which has demonstrated that this parameter has increased by approximately 1–3 °C over the past century [42]. An increase in river water temperature may lead to changes in the conditions of functioning of specific biotic communities, and this may fundamentally impact the ecological state of water-courses [43]. Tendencies of climate change have found confirmation in the observed trend of rising air temperature, particularly in the winter seasons, which translates into an increase in river water temperature [44]. A clear increase in the temperature of air and inland waters has been determined for the Polish Lowlands [38], and this indicates that changes in climate influence water temperature in the area.
One of the aspects of research into the consequences of contemporary climate change and the variability of climate features in Europe concerns determining the importance of macroscale circulation types for shaping hydroclimatic conditions. The result of the influence of various circulation types is visible in, among others, changes in air temperature, precipitation, and plant formations, while close connections between these three elements are visible first and foremost on the regional scale [7,44]. Research into teleconnection patterns between circulation types and air temperature, and also river water temperature, has demonstrated the existence of mutual relations both in both positive and negative oscillation phases.
Circulation oscillations are long-term phenomena with a regional impact. However, the way in which they influence regional climate features is highly complicated, and they should therefore not be perceived as simple, linear dependences. Research carried out by Kenyon and Hegerl [45] shows that temperature extremes are substantially affected by large-scale circulation patterns, and that they display distinct regional patterns of response to modes of climate variability. Modes of variability in large-scale atmospheric circulations are evident for the global effects of teleconnection, and they constitute an important factor of change in regional climatic extremes, particularly extremes of temperature. Acting in various ways, they impact, among others, the character of distribution of daily air temperature and its extremes, and sometimes also daily temperature (i.e., day and night). In the majority of regions around the world, contemporary warming is accompanied by an increase in the frequency and intensity of occurrence of heat waves and a decrease in the frequency and intensity of occurrence of cold waves [41,46,47]. Similar trends are also being observed in Europe [48,49,50,51] and Poland [52,53,54,55], whereas the most intense warming is noted in winter and spring, while slight cooling may be observed in autumn. In the opinion of Kenyon and Hegerl [45], all the main indices of atmospheric circulation are characterized by a considerable and universal impact on the probability of occurrence of temperature extremes in Europe. Research into the connections between seasonal temperature extremes in relation to macroscale circulation explains up to one-third (locally even one-half) of the variances of changes therein. However, it is not possible to fully foresee quantitative changes in atmospheric circulation, and this considerably impairs the ability to anticipate changes in extreme characteristics of temperature in the region. Individual macroscale circulations influence climatic conditions in Europe with varying intensity. Research has shown that interactions occur between macroscale atmospheric oscillations, and that these interactions tend to vary between seasons of the year and also during the positive and negative phases of these oscillations. The coincidence of certain of their common phases may cause extreme hydrological phenomena.
Studies conducted in Central Europe have confirmed the impact of various macroscopic types of atmospheric circulation, for example of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), the Arctic Oscillation (AO), the East Atlantic (EA) pattern, the East Atlantic/Western Russia (EAWR) pattern, the Scandinavian (SCAND) pattern, and of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), on climate features and the hydrological regime of rivers and lakes. The impact of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) on air temperature and atmospheric precipitation has been described in detail [8,28,40,56,57,58], as a macroscopic pattern of atmospheric circulation that determines climatic conditions [59]. Regarding Poland, research into the NAO focuses on, for example, the occurrence of frosty days [60], snow cover [61,62], seasonal river run-off [63], and also water levels, thermal characteristics, and ice phenomena on lakes [64,65]. The influence of NAO variability on hydrological phenomena, including on the hydrological regime, changes in flow rate, and the thermal and ice regime of rivers and lakes, has been described, among others, by Yoo and D’Odorico [29] and Klavins et al. [33]. Relations between large scale oscillation patterns and river water temperature have been described, among others, by Webb and Nobilis [2], whereas Hannah and Garner [66] assessed the changes in water temperature which occurred in the United Kingdom in the 20th century, and also made predictions about changes therein for the 21st century. In the case of other circulation patterns, this approach continues to require more detailed research.
Positive NAO phases associated with an increased influx of warm and humid air over Europe, and in particular over the western part of the Continent, bring about warmer winters (which begin at a later date) and earlier springs [6,67]. A considerable increase in air temperature in the winter and spring seasons has been observed since the 1970s [68]. Yoo and D’Odorico [29] have demonstrated that the winter NAO index has a weak although important influence on the spring temperature regime in the Baltic region, and explain the most significant variables embedded in the cryophenological records. Uvo [69] has conducted an analysis and regionalization of winter precipitation in Northern Europe using NAO relations as his basis. Przybylak et al. [70] have determined the influence of the North Atlantic Oscillation and the Arctic Oscillation on thermal conditions in the cold season in Poland from the 16th to the 20th century.
In order to take into consideration the role of atmospheric circulation in shaping climate change, circulation indices presenting its most significant features in specific months, seasons, and years have been determined for Poland on a regional scale. These include the following indices: western circulation, southern circulation, and cyclonicity [71]. Values of indices determined as averages for the whole country are very well correlated with indices for individual regions (the best correlation occurs for central Poland), and thus they may be used to assess the tendencies of climate circulatory features. Circulation indices on the regional scale excellently characterize the variability of weather conditions in Poland, which is caused by the differing forms of circulation. Currently, however, we possess insufficient information regarding how and which types of circulation—macroscale or regional—impact thermal conditions in Poland, thus shaping the features of the river thermal regime.
The objective of the paper consisted in determining the effect of teleconnection patterns on temporal and spatial changes in river water temperature in Poland. Research took into consideration the most important types of circulation which shape weather patterns in Central Europe with varying degrees of intensity. With regards to this part of Europe, the impact of certain teleconnections is only rarely discussed in topical literature. There are no studies for the territory of Poland that would concern relations between macroscale circulation types and river water temperature.
The analysis was based on the determination of the annual and seasonal activity and intensity of influence of macroscale types of atmospheric circulation on the development of water temperature in rivers functioning in the moderate climate zone, and on the identification of the month in which the effect of teleconnection patterns on changes in water temperature is greatest. Particular emphasis was placed on ascertaining the circulatory determinants of deviations of annual, seasonal, and monthly water temperature in various phases of the studied circulation types from average values for the years 1971–2015, and on establishing their statistical significance. Special attention was paid to anomalous situations when weather models in the researched part of Europe change, which may lead to the disruption of models of the river thermal regime.
Seasonal changes in the thermal characteristics of rivers impact the ecological state of waters and environmental conditions, whereas the significance of these changes depends on the susceptibility of individual features of the river system to the changing climate and the influence of local factors [72,73]. Information obtained in this regard may constitute the basis for determining thermal tolerance thresholds and performing assessments of the risk of exceeding values which condition the existence of water organisms—for example fresh-water fish—in river ecosystems. Among others, these data are useful for ascertaining the impact of changes in water temperature, conditioned by circulation, on the formation and disappearance of ice phenomena in the winter season, and, for the remaining seasons, on the course of biological and biogeochemical processes occurring in rivers. The results obtained may be used to supplement databases of river thermal regime features, which are indispensable for ensuring the rational management and protection of water ecosystems under changing climatic conditions.

2. Data and Research Methods

Research made use of daily water temperature values for 53 rivers in Poland gathered at 96 water gauge stations, and of air temperature values gathered at 43 meteorological stations (Figure 1). The aforementioned data, which concerns the period 1971–2015, is held in its entirety at the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management—National Research Institute (IMGW-PIB) Warsaw, Poland.
Average monthly, seasonal, and annual water temperature and air temperature values were calculated on the basis of daily values thereof as the arithmetic mean. Data have been presented in relation to the hydrological year, which in Poland lasts from 1 November until 31 October.
In Poland, water temperature measurements are conducted using the standard measurement and observation network of the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management—National Research Institute (IMGW-PIB). Measurements are performed daily at 7:00 a.m. (GMT + 1) at water gauge stations located on the larger rivers using automatic station probes or, if these are unavailable, by means of mercury thermometers. Automatic measurements are taken simultaneously with water level measurements every 10 min with an accuracy of 0.1 °C (source IMGW-PIB). Manual measurements, on the other hand, are carried out immediately following observation of the water level using a hand-held thermometer at a depth of approximately 40 cm over a period of 5–10 min, with an accuracy of 0.1 °C. Measurements of air temperature (the ground layer) are taken at meteorological stations of the IMGW-PIB by means of electrical sensors or mercury thermometers. The mercury thermometers are placed in meteorological cages or radiation casings at a height of 2 m above ground level. Temperature measurement accuracy is 0.1 °C. The results of measurements are given with the appropriate time step or for precisely defined dates, depending on the specificity of individual parameters, i.e., daily extreme temperatures (minimal and maximum) are submitted every 12 h, while current air temperature measurements—every 10 min. Mean daily air temperature results from eight measurements and is calculated according to the method: (T00 + T03 + T06 + … + T21)/8. The hours are given in the UTC time. Water and air temperature measurement data are directly available on the www.pogodynka.pl website and on the MONITOR IMGW-PIB platform as operational data.
The study utilized monthly indices of six macroscale types of atmospheric circulation: NAO, AO, EA, EAWR, SCAND, and AMO for the years 1971–2015. These data were obtained from the Climate Prediction Centre of NOAA (CPC NOAA) (http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/teledoc/telecontents.shtml). The circulation types presented in the CPC database are determined through principal components analysis on the basis of monthly values of 500 hPa isobaric surface anomalies [74]. The website also includes diagrams of individual teleconnections and loading patterns for selected months.
The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) is a bipolar type circulation with centers in the vicinity of Iceland and the Azores Islands. The positive NAO phase is associated with negative pressure anomalies in the area of the Icelandic Low and with positive anomalies in the area of the Azores High, which influences the formation of high-pressure gradients over the North Atlantic. Consequently, there occurs the advection of humid and warm air masses from the west and south-west over the area of Northern, Western, and Central Europe, which leads to the occurrence of mild winters. Whereas the negative NAO phase, which occurs under the opposite distribution of pressure anomalies, is characterized by the inflow of dry and cool air masses from the north-east which is accompanied by the slowing down of inflow from the western sector; this manifests itself in cold and snowy winters in central Europe [7,8,75,76].
The Arctic Oscillation (AO) is the dominant type of atmospheric circulation in the Northern Hemisphere, especially in the winter season. The positive AO phase is associated with lower than normal pressure in the Arctic region and higher than normal pressure in moderate geographical latitudes, which blocks the inflow of Arctic air masses to the lower geographical latitudes. In the negative AO phase, with higher than average pressure in the Arctic and lower pressure in the moderate geographical latitudes, air masses from the Arctic are directed southwards [77,78].
The Eastern Atlantic (EA) system is associated with two centers on the north–south line, while its southern sector is connected with the intertropical circulation (Barnston and Livezey 1987). In the positive EA phase, which is associated with a deep low-pressure system over the Atlantic, warm air masses are prevalent above Europe. Whereas in the negative EA phase there is a high-pressure system over the Atlantic, and this leads to the predominance of cool and dry air masses [79,80].
The Eastern European circulation type (EA/WR), which is characterized by two pressure centers situated latitudinally, has the least degree of impact on the climate and weather conditions of central Europe. In the positive phase, a low-pressure area is apparent over western Russia, and a high-pressure area above western Europe and the British Isles. In the positive phase, when a low-pressure area is located over western Russia and a high-pressure area above western Europe and the British Isles, the system brings about the inflow of air masses from the northern sector. Whereas in the negative phase, when the pressure areas are arranged reversely, air masses from the southern sector are predominant [81,82].
The Scandinavian circulation type (SCAND) concerns atmospheric circulation over northern Europe, and is associated with the region’s surrounding baric centers. In the positive phase, it is characterized by a strong rise in pressure throughout the Scandinavian Peninsula, with a center over Finland, while the low-pressure area stretches from Western Europe to Eastern Russia and Western Mongolia. Its negative phase is associated with lower than average pressure in Northern Europe [83,84].
The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) is connected with the periodic and alternating occurrence of positive (warm phase) and negative (cool phase) temperature anomalies along the surface of the North Atlantic. The AMO type exerts a regional impact on the climate over the Atlantic and adjacent continents, and is associated with NAO [85,86].
An analysis of correlation between atmospheric circulation types and the temperature of river waters in Poland has been preceded by research into the homogeneity of water and air temperature measurement series. Specific meteorological stations and water gauge stations on rivers were selected following verification of the homogeneity of daily temperature series by means of an Alexandersson test (SNHT—Standard Normal Homogeneity Test) [87,88]. The Alexandersson test serves to detect the step change in mean value for a series of variables with a normal distribution, and further identifies the moment when the change occurred. However, the test may be also applied to log-normally distributed hydrological series, where normality is achieved by logarithmization. Sometimes, for example mean and maximum annual flows are subject to this distribution. The traditional test for equality of means is a competitor of the Alexandersson test, but it requires knowledge of the change point. The next stage of work consisted in the calculation of correlations between annual seasonal (winter—DJF; spring—MAM; summer—JJA; autumn—SON) and monthly indices of the analyzed types of atmospheric circulation and average annual and monthly air and river water temperature values. To this end, use was made of Spearman’s rank-order correlation test, which is a non-parametric test, while correlation is rank-based. The analysis makes it possible to correlate variables that have a non-normal distribution with each other at the order and quantitative level, and at the same time remains largely unsusceptible to outliers. Spearman’s rank-order correlation (utilized in the study) constitutes a measure of the monotonic statistical dependence, also non-linear, between random variables.
The results of the correlational analysis made it possible to determine the percentage shares of positive and negative coefficients of correlation, at various levels of statistical significance, between annual seasonal and monthly indices of macroscale circulation types and air and river water temperature. For each teleconnection pattern—i.e., NAO, AO, EA, EA/WR, SCAND, and AMO—an analysis was performed of the spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation of annual seasonal (additionally monthly) water temperature values with circulation type indices.
During the next stage determinations were made of deviations of water temperature in various phases of the studied macroscale circulation types from average values for the years 1971–2015, and the statistical significance thereof established. Average annual, seasonal, and monthly temperatures were calculated for the entire research period (1971–2015), and thereafter for 11 years with low and 11 years with high analyzed circulation indices. Index threshold values correspond to the first- and third-quartile from the whole set of indices for the period 1971–2015. Statistical significance was determined using the t test for dependent samples. In each and every instance, the hypothesis H0: μ = μ0 as to the equality of expected values was against H1: μμ0. The rejection of the hypothesis makes it possible to draw conclusions as to significant differences between average temperatures observed in various phases and their average values from the period 1971–2015. In order to verify the hypothesis, use was made of the small sample test based on the t-Student distribution at n − 1 degrees of freedom
t = | x ¯ μ 0 s n |
where: n—sample size, s—standard deviation, x ¯ —sample average, μ0—population average.
Detailed analyses of seasonal deviations of water temperature values from average values for the years 1971–2015 were conducted for various phases of circulation types for two selected indices with the highest teleconnection activity. The spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation of monthly water temperature values with circulation type indices and of deviations of monthly temperature values in various phases thereof from average values for the years 1971–2015 was interpreted for selected months. For each teleconnection pattern, a month was selected with the highest percentage share of positive or negative coefficients of correlation of monthly circulation type indices with water temperature. The graphical part, which concerns the results of analyses of relations between indices and water temperature values of Polish rivers, performed utilizing monthly data, has been included in the manuscript as Appendix A.
Calculations were performed by means of the Statistica 12 software suite (Statistica, Tulsa, OK, USA). Graphic elements were executed using the Surfer 10 [GoldenSoftware] program, while the kriging procedure was applied for the construction of isolinear maps.

Study Area

Poland is situated in Central Europe within the moderate transient climate zone, which has properties intermediate between the maritime climate and the continental climate. An increase in continentalism is observed in the easterly direction. Due to the country’s physico-geographical location, various masses of air clash above its territory and impact the development of weather states, and therefore the climate, which is characterized by considerable weather variability and high fluctuations in the course of seasons in successive years. The following masses of air are most frequently encountered over the territory of Poland: polar maritime air from the northern part of the Atlantic Ocean, polar continental air from over Eastern Europe and Asia, Arctic air from over the Arctic Sea, subtropical maritime air from around the Azores, and subtropical continental air from over Africa [40,56,70,71]. The country’s climate is most greatly impacted by masses of polar maritime air and polar continental air, which appear over the territory of Poland practically throughout the year.
In the case of Poland, the average annual air temperature indicative of the area’s macroclimatic and mesoclimatic differentiation is 6–8.5 °C (Figure 2A). The course of annual isotherms is close to the meridional, while the temperature decreases from the south-west to the north-east. Average annual temperatures are also lower in the south, in the mountains, totaling less than 4 °C. In contrast to air temperature, the distribution of average annual river water temperatures of river water is close to the latitudinal (Figure 2B). The highest average annual water temperatures occur in rivers of central and Northwestern Poland (>10 °C), while the lowest, below 8.0 °C, in Southern Poland, in the mountain tributaries of the Wisła and Odra rivers.
Characteristic features of the Polish thermal system include season-dependent changes in the courses of isotherms from latitudinal to longitudinal. During the winter season (DJF), the decrease in air temperature from west to east (to below −2 °C) is conditioned by atmospheric circulation. The arrangement of isotherms in winter is similar to the longitudinal, with the exception of mountainous areas (in the south of the country) and the Baltic coast (in the north); this is the result of the influence of masses of continental air, which declines in a westward direction. In winter, the distribution of air temperature is to some extent copied by the temperature of river waters, which falls from the west (approximately 2 °C) to the east (below 1 °C)—Figure 2B. Rivers in the southern mountainous region also attain low temperatures. The coldest month in Poland is January.
In the spring season (MAM), the distribution of air temperature values is similar to the latitudinal, with the highest temperatures being observed in central Poland (in excess of 8 °C, and locally 9 °C). Whereas in individual regions of the country the temperature of water usually exceeds air temperature by some 1–2 °C, and attains the highest values in central Poland (over 9 °C).
In the summer season (JJA), with considerably higher air temperatures, isotherms are arranged latitudinally or closely resemble this arrangement. The summer drop in temperature from central Poland (in excess of 18 °C) in a southward (under 14 °C in mountainous regions) and northward direction (under 17 °C, Pomerania) is associated with hypsometric conditions. For the researched period, the spatial distribution of water temperature values references the distribution of air temperature values (Figure 2), whereas it attains the highest values (in excess of 18 °C) in the central part of the area, and the lowest in the mountains (the tributaries of the Wisła and Odra rivers) and in Pomerania (below 15 °C).
In the autumn season (SON), air temperature changes from approximately 8 °C in Western Poland to below 7 °C in the eastern part of the country. Lower temperatures occur in the coastal region (in the north) and in the south of the country, in the mountains (below 5 °C). Whereas water temperature displays greater spatial diversity and a greater scope of variability. The arrangement of isotherms is similar to the latitudinal; the highest temperatures exceed 8 °C, while mountain rivers (the southern part of the area) and the rivers of the northern coastal strip are cooler (under 9 °C).

3. Results

3.1. Annual Teleconnections

Correlations between annual indices of macroscale types of atmospheric circulation and the average annual value of air and water temperature displayed certain similarities, and this is confirmed by the percentage share of positive and negative coefficients of correlation (Figure 3). An analysis of annual variables shows that positive correlations with temperature values were typical of the NAO, AO, EA, and AMO indices, whereas negative correlations were predominant for the two remaining indices (EAWR and SCAND). Average annual air temperature values for all stations display statistically significant correlations with the NAO and AO indices, whereas 95% of stations display such a regularity for the EA and AMO indices, and 80% of stations for the SCAND indices (Figure 3A). The weakest negative correlations of annual air temperature values were established for EA/WR.
The analysis showed that the correlational relations of macroscale circulation types with the average water temperature of rivers in Poland are similar to those of air temperature, with the difference being that the strength of the former is weaker (Figure 3B). Statistically significant and positive coefficients of correlation were ascertained for the AO, EA, and AMO indices at the majority (>80%) of water gauge stations, while as regards the NAO index—at one half of all studied water gauge stations. The SCAND and EA/WR indices correlate negatively with water temperature, and statistically significant relations were determined for 48% and 20% of water gauge stations respectively.
For the NAO index, the highest (and statistically significant) coefficients of correlation (p < 0.05) have been observed in the southern and central part of the research area (Figure 4A). In the negative NAO phase, the temperature of the majority of rivers is usually 0.3 °C lower than average, while in the positive phase it is slightly—i.e., 0–0.3 °C—higher than average (Figure 4B). The strongest connections between water temperature and the AO index were observed in rivers in the central and western part of the research area. High coefficients of correlation (r > 0.469, p < 0.001) were registered for rivers in the catchment area of the lower Wisła, for the middle and lower reaches of the Odra, and for rivers in the coastal strip—i.e., Rega, Łeba, and Słupia. In the negative AO phase, the temperature of rivers in this area is between 0.3 °C and 0.5 °C lower than average, while for the positive phase: water temperature values are higher, with the largest deviations from average values exceeding 0.5 °C and being statistically significant.
High and significant coefficients of correlation (r > 0.469, p < 0.001) were also determined for annual river water temperature values and the EA index, however primarily in rivers in Northeastern and Eastern Poland, and also for the mountain tributaries (the south of Poland) of the River Wisła (Figure 4A). In the negative EA phase, the largest negative deviations of the water temperature of these rivers from average values exceed 0.6 °C, while in the positive phase exceed average values by as much as 0.7 °C (mountain rivers in the south of Poland). As regards the AMO index, the spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation is similar, and a greater correlation (r > 0.469) was also determined for rivers in Greater Poland—in Central-western Poland and the lower Odra. In the negative AMO phase, temperature values for the majority of rivers are visibly lower, by up to 0.5 °C, and higher than average in the positive phase. For the SCAND pattern, higher coefficients of correlation (r > –0.291, p < 0.05) were observed only for the River Odra in the west and for rivers in the lower and middle reaches of the Wisła and Warta. In the negative phase, river water temperatures are higher by 0.1–0.4 °C, while in the positive phase the lower by 0.1–0.2 °C. The weakest connection between annual water temperature values was observed for the EA/WR pattern. In the negative phase, the direction of temperature deviations from multi-annual averages is varied, while their values are low, in the positive phase, however, water temperature values for the majority of rivers are lower than average (Figure 4A).

3.2. Seasonal and Monthly Teleconnections

An analysis of relations between seasonal indices of macroscale types of atmospheric circulation and seasonal water temperature values indicates that positive correlations are clearly predominant in the case of the NAO, AO, EA, and AMO indices, while negative correlations are prevalent for the two remaining indices (EA/WR and SCAND)—Figure 5.
Similarly, as in the case of average seasonal temperature values, correlations between monthly indices of macroscale types of atmospheric circulation and monthly water temperature values display strong likenesses, and this fact is brought out by the resemblant distribution of percentage shares of positive and negative coefficients of monthly correlations in the annual cycle (Figure A1). However, certain differences in the intensity and monthly distribution of relations between specific circulation types and the features of the thermal regime of rivers also became apparent (Figure A2).
Detailed analyses of seasonal deviations of water temperature values from average values for the years 1971–2015 were conducted in various phases of circulation types for the Arctic Oscillation (AO− and AO+) and the East Atlantic pattern (EA− and EA+). These specific indices were selected for detailed analysis on the basis of results concerning the percentage share of positive and negative coefficients of correlation of seasonal indices with water temperature values, presented in Figure 5.

North Atlantic Oscillation

An analysis of the correlation of NAO with seasonal river water temperature values disclosed the strongest and most statistically significant relations in winter and spring (Figure 5). The spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation in the winter season points to strong relations between the temperature values of the majority of rivers and NAO (p < 0.05), while the weakest and statistically least significant relations concern mountain rivers (in Southern Poland) (Figure 6). Particularly high and significant coefficients of correlation (p < 0.001) have been determined for rivers in the north of the country (the Baltic Coast), and in the middle and lower reaches of the Odra and Warta rivers.
The strongest positive correlations (p < 0.001) were observed for the majority of rivers in January (Figure A1), and this is confirmed by the spatial distribution of monthly coefficients of correlation of water temperature values with the monthly index (Figure A2). During the negative, phase average river water temperature values in January are clearly lower than average, with the difference ranging from 0.4 °C to more than 1.2 °C, with the exception of the mountain tributaries of the River Wisła, while in the positive phase temperature deviations are smaller and usually do not exceed 0.6 °C. In the major part of the country, the average monthly temperature of river waters ranges from 1.0 to 3.0 °C. In January, the rivers in the eastern part of the country are colder, while the waters of rivers in the northern coastal strip and of the Odra and Warta (in their upper reaches) are warmer.
In the summer season (MAM), higher coefficients of correlation—albeit usually of no statistical significance—have been determined for rivers in Northwestern Poland, while in other parts of the country relations between NAO and water temperature were weak, similarly as in the two following seasons (Figure 6).

Arctic Oscillation

The strongest correlations between seasonal water temperature values and the AO index were observed in the winter season (DJF), while slightly weaker correlations were noted in the spring (MAM) and autumn (SON) seasons (Figure 5). The spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation in the winter season hints at strong relations between AO (p < 0.05) and the water temperature of the majority of rivers, with the exception of the mountain tributaries of the River Wisła (Southern Poland) (Figure 6). The strongest relations concern the rivers of the coastal strip (Northern Poland). In the spring season, the relation in question weakens, while for certain rivers it even becomes statistically insignificant; the situation is similar in summer, when AO has no more than a very weak impact on the thermal characteristics of waters. This relation reappears in autumn (SON), however its significance has been confirmed only for some rivers, particularly in the western and north-western part of the country.
In the negative AO phase, when masses of air from over the Arctic are directed southwards, the deviation of seasonal water temperature in Poland from average values differs in individual seasons (Figure 7). The greatest deviations have been noted in the winter (DJF) and spring (MAM) seasons, when river water temperatures are as much as 0.6 °C lower than average, whereas in the remaining seasons this difference ranges from 0.2 to 0.4 °C. In the winter season, temperature deviations are statistically significant (p < 0.05) for the River Wisła (and its tributaries) in the middle and lower sections of its course, and also for a few rivers of the coastal strip (in the north of Poland). Only in the case of the upper reaches of one river, theNarew, were the results obtained statistically significant, at a level of p < 0.001. In the summer season, temperatures observed in the mountain tributaries of the River Wisła (in the south of Poland) are only slightly higher than the averages for the season (up to 0.2 °C). In the positive AO phase, river water temperatures are higher, while the greatest deviations from average values exceed 0.8 °C in the winter season and are statistically significant, at a level of p < 0.05, and also in the spring season, when however they are not statistically significant (Figure 7). In winter, greater seasonal water temperatures are observed in particular in Northwestern Poland, while in spring—in the north-eastern part of the country. In the remaining seasons, deviations of river water temperature from average values approach at maximum approximately 0.2 °C (JJA) and 0.4 °C (SON), however they are statistically insignificant. As regards the AO index, the most significant coefficients of correlation were calculated for March (Figure A1), and this is confirmed by the spatial distribution of monthly coefficients of correlation of water temperature values with the monthly index (Figure A2). At more than 50% of stations very high and statistically significant coefficients of correlation (p < 0.001) were determined for water temperature for rivers in Northeastern Poland. During the negative AO phase in March, river water temperature values throughout the country are considerably lower than average, by 1–1.5 °C, and in the positive AO phase, river temperatures in March are between 0.6 and 1.0 °C higher than under average conditions, while the differences are also statistically significant for the majority of analyzed cases.

East Atlantic Pattern

In all seasons of the year, there occurred positive correlations of varying degrees of statistical significance between seasonal river water temperature values and the EA index (Figure 5). The strongest relations were observed for autumn, while those for the remaining seasons were somewhat weaker, however with a slight increase in intensity in the spring. The spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation in the autumn season (Figure 6) hints at strong relations between the index and water temperature values for the majority of rivers in Poland (p < 0.05), with the exception of rivers in Upper Silesia (the Katowice region in Figure 1). The strongest connection, which is at once statistically significant (p < 0.001), was determined for the mountain tributaries of the Wisła and Odra (in Southern Poland) and for certain sections of the course of the River Warta. In the spring season, this relation is somewhat weaker, while the strongest correlations were ascertained first and foremost for the River Wisła and its tributaries, and for the upper and middle reaches of the Warta and Odra. In summer, relations between water temperature and the EA index become weak in the west of the country, however they remain relatively strong in the east (the River Wisła and its tributaries). During the winter season, these connections are statistically insignificant—with the exception of the mountain tributaries of the River Wisła and the upper reaches of the River Odra.
Whereas in the negative phase of the EA index, when cool and dry air masses are directed over Europe from the Atlantic (the East Atlantic system), the greatest deviations are observed in the autumn season (SON), when the water temperature values of the majority of Polish rivers is lower than average by as much as 0.8–1.0 °C, and locally by more than 1.0 °C (Figure 8). At a level of p < 0.05, these deviations are statistically significant over practically the entire analyzed area. Negative deviations of seasonal water temperature from average values (in the main by 0.6 °C, however in some instances exceeding 0.8 °C) have also observed in the spring season (MAM), however these deviations are statistically significant only for observation series on rivers in the eastern part of the country and in the region between the Warta and Wisła rivers. In the remaining seasons (JJA, SON), negative deviations of river water temperature from average values approach at maximum approximately 0.2–0.4 °C but are statistically significant only in the north-eastern part of the area. In a small number of instances positive deviations of seasonal water temperature from average values were observed in the negative EA phase. During the positive EA phase, when masses of warm air are predominant over Europe, seasonal river water temperature values are higher than average, while the greatest deviations even exceed 0.8–1.0 °C (the mountain tributaries of the River Wisła in the south of the country) in the summer and autumn seasons, and are statistically significant at a level of p < 0.05 (Figure 8). In the summer season, the impact of the positive EA phase on the thermal characteristics of waters is visible primarily in the south and east, while in the autumn season—partially in the central, but predominantly in the south and south-eastern parts of the area. In the remaining seasons, deviations of river water temperature from average values approach at maximum approximately 0.4 °C (MAM) and 0.6 °C (DJF).
As regards monthly indices, the most significant coefficients of correlation were calculated for October (Figure A1), and this is confirmed by the spatial distribution of monthly coefficients of correlation (Figure A2). Somewhat weaker correlations (p < 0.01) were observed for a few rivers in the mountains. In the negative EA phase, water temperature values in October are between 0.8 and 1.4 °C lower than average, and in the positive are some 0.2–0.8 °C higher, however the differences are usually statistically insignificant.

Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation

The index displayed positive correlations with seasonal water temperature values, particularly in summer (Figure 5). This is the only one of the analyzed indices to have such a strong impact on water temperature in the summer season, especially in Northern, Eastern, and Central Poland (Figure 9). Weaker relations have been determined in autumn, and the weakest in the cool season.
As regards monthly indices, the strongest connections were observed in July (Figure A1), and this is confirmed by the spatial distribution of monthly coefficients of correlation (Figure A2). The distribution of coefficients of correlation in July points to considerable spatial differentiation. The average monthly water temperature in July is highest (>20.0 °C) in the lowland rivers of central Poland, while the coolest waters, with temperatures below 14.0 °C, are those of the rivers of the coastal strip (in the north of the country) and of the mountain tributaries of the Odra and Wisła (in Southern Poland). In the negative phase, water temperature readings at the majority of water gauge stations are some 0.2–1.2 °C lower than average, while in the positive phase they are between 0.6 and 1.6 °C higher than average.

East Atlantic/Western Russia

As regards the seasonal EA/WR index, coefficients of correlation (negative correlation) with seasonal river water temperature values were strongest in the autumn (Figure 5). No significant correlations were registered for the remaining seasons, with the exception of winter, when weak positive correlations were observed. The spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation in the autumn season (Figure 9) points to strong relations (p < 0.05) between the index and the temperature of river waters in Eastern Poland, particularly of the tributaries of the River Wisła (Bug, Narew). In the remaining seasons these connections are statistically insignificant.
The strongest relations were determined in September (Figure A1), and this is confirmed by the spatial distribution of monthly coefficients of correlation (Figure A2). In the negative EA/WR phase, deviations of water temperature values from average values range from −0.2 to +0.2 °C, and in the positive phase there were determined decidedly greater—and negative—deviations (some exceeding 1.0 °C).

Scandinavian Pattern

The strongest (and negative) correlations between the index and river water temperature values were observed in the winter season, and somewhat weaker in spring (Figure 5). River water temperature values have also displayed somewhat weaker positive correlations with the index in the autumn and spring seasons (at a few stations). The spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation in the winter season hints at the strongest relations with river water temperature values in the northern and central parts of Poland (Figure 9).
In the case of monthly indices, the strongest connections were established for February (Figure A1), and this is confirmed by the spatial distribution of monthly coefficients of correlation (Figure A2). During the negative SCAND phase, water temperature values in February are between 0.4 and 1.2 °C higher than average for the majority of rivers with the exception of rivers in mountainous catchment areas (in the south of Poland) and those in the drainage basin of the River Odra in the west. In the positive SCAND phase, temperature values for the majority of rivers are some 0.2–0.8 °C lower than average, while the differences are more statistically significant than in the negative phase and occur mainly in rivers in the north-eastern part of the country.

4. Discussion

The NAO and AO indices are of particular importance for determining weather patterns in central Europe (Poland), and this has been confirmed by the present study, with a high statistical significance of correlation being ascertained for the majority of air temperature measurement stations in relation to annual and monthly indices. The activity of both circulations becomes particularly marked in the winter season.
Positive NAO and AO indices are usually indicative of thaws and an increase in air temperature, which result in a rise in river water temperature, particularly in the western part of the country, whereas in the east air temperature values are often maintained at a level of 0 °C. An exception occurs when Poland is under the influence of a deep Russian high-pressure system, which brings about frosty weather. Research conducted by Kenyon and Hegerl [45] confirmed that during positive NAO phases the seasonal results of the DJFM index (for the 4 winter months) display up to 10% more warm days and up to 10% less cold days in Europe, and also in Siberia, attaining a peak in the vicinity of Scandinavia, which is concordant with the results obtained by Scaife et al. [58]. Observations of NAO indicate that the index also attains positive correlation with average temperature in winter in other regions of the Northern Hemisphere, for example in the eastern part of the United States [89,90]. In the negative NAO phase, lower temperatures are observed in northern Europe and Asia, whereas the Mediterranean region is warmer. During the period of activity of oscillation in the positive phase, extremely cold days are on average 4 °C warmer, while exceptionally warm days are on average 2 °C warmer. Negative NAO and AO indices lead to a reduction in air temperature (particularly in the north of the country) and long-term snowfalls, which may also cause a reduction of river water temperature values.
The following are the main factors impacting the relation between NAO and temperature in the winter season: total NAO magnitudes, and the magnitude and longitude of the NAO center over the Azores Islands. At the time, the probable mechanism of activity of NAO are positive pressure anomalies, which block the inflow of polar air over specific regions during the positive NAO phase [91]. Of special importance for research into the impact of future changes in NAO on regional temperature in the winter season is the location and changes in values of individual NAO centers.
For Polish rivers, the correlational relations of macroscale circulation types with average annual river water temperature values are similar to those of air temperature, with the difference being that the strength of the former is weaker. The impact of specific teleconnection patterns on changes in river water temperature may be observed with greater clarity when we apply the seasonal approach.
The relations existing between indices of atmospheric circulation and water temperature values in Poland were confirmed by earlier research into selected groups of lakes on the territory of Poland [64,65]. Using the results of studies conducted on the Iberian Peninsula as their basis, Frais et al. [92] have suggested that the NAO and AO indices may differently impact the hydrological regime, and thus the thermal characteristics of waters. The effect of such change, which frequently leads to changes of the run-off regime and the thermal characteristics of waters, depends on the susceptibility of the river system to the changing climate. As regards other teleconnection patterns, the body of data gathered for the territory of Poland is insufficient to draw valid conclusions.
On the territory of Poland, the impact of individual circulation types in the studied period is more clearly visible in the spatial distribution of the annual average of air temperature values, and this is further confirmed by the results of research previously conducted by Ptak et al. [65]. The distribution of air temperature values discloses typical patterns documenting features of the temporariness of the Polish climate, with the distinguishment of features of continentalism in the east and features of the oceanic climate in the west. As regards average annual river water temperature values, relations with macroscale types of atmospheric circulation are less clear, this due to the fact that their intensity changes seasonally.
The strongest dependences between circulation indices and water temperature occur in winter, mainly due to the intense activity of atmospheric circulation and the weaker effects of solar radiation [93,94]. The activity of atmospheric circulation follows from the stronger baric gradients over Europe in the cool season of the year. At this time of the year, the frequency of occurrence of deep low-pressure systems over the Baltic Sea increases, and thus the thermal properties of air masses inflowing over Poland will impact the variability of temperature of river waters. However, the thermal effects of winter circulation coded in the temperature of river waters will recede over time. In successive seasons, these dependences are clearly weaker due to the decreased activity of atmospheric circulation. In the spring and summer season, the impact of the differentiation of solar radiation increases; in summer, it attains its maximum, and has a dominant impact on the thermal conditions of waters [94]. In the summer season the differences in temperature between inflowing masses of air are relatively slight, and thus there occur only slight fluctuations of water temperature, which may impact its weaker relations with macroscale types of atmospheric circulation.
In Poland, similarly as in other regions of the moderate climate zone, river freezing is a common phenomenon in the winter season, and it tends to intensify in periods that are at least very cool. The formation of ice cover is facilitated in days that are very frosty (t < −10 °C) or with a strong frost (t < −20 °C) [37].
In their study of trends and fluctuations of dates of termination of ice phenomena on the lakes and rivers of Northern Europe with reference to the impact of NAO, Yoo and D’Odorico [29] have stressed that the North Atlantic Oscillation influences mainly late winter temperature (January–March), which also exerts a significant impact in the mid-spring period (April–May), when air temperature is strongly correlated with river icing dates. In this case, a regional analysis demonstrated the existence in the series of winter temperatures of the same fluctuations as in the winter NAO index; furthermore, the same components were identified in the series of spring temperatures. When studying multi-annual changes in the icing and run-off regime of regions in the Baltic region with reference to climate change, Klavins et al. [33] determined that these are strongly influenced by processes associated with the macroscale type of atmospheric circulation over the North Atlantic, and this manifests itself in a close correlation with the NAO index. Ćmielewski and Grześ [95] in their research into the time of formation and disappearance of ice cover on two Polish rivers, the Wisła and the Niemen, have shown that the correlation of air temperature with the dates of formation and disappearance of ice cover explains approximately 35–40% of the variability of these phenomena, whereas the coefficient of correlation of the dates of disappearance of ice cover with the NAO index makes it possible to explain approximately 30% of freezing changes occurring in these rivers. During the past 40 years, the frequency of occurrence and duration of ice phenomena on European rivers has diminished as the result of climate change [96]. We are observing the increasingly later appearance of ice cover and its steadily earlier disappearance, while on some rivers no ice cover has been observed since the second half of the 20th century. Statistically significant trends consisting in the shortening of the duration of ice cover on rivers are typical of the majority of rivers in the Northern Hemisphere [97].
Research into the relationship between water temperature values of Polish rivers and large-scale atmospheric circulation has shown that for various phases of the analysed types of microscale circulations, deviations of water temperature values of Polish rivers have a tendency to vary both as regards their individual magnitudes and statistical significance. The spatial distribution of rivers with the largest statistically significant coefficients of annual correlation shows that they are predominant on a countrywide scale, with the exception of Northeastern Poland and rivers in the upper reach of the drainage basin of the Wisła (particularly its mountain tributaries). The results of analyses of relations between seasonal indices of macroscale types of atmospheric circulation and seasonal river water temperature values in Poland have confirmed the occurrence of positive correlations in the case of NAO, AO, EA, and AMO, and of negative correlations for the two remaining indices (EA/WR and SCAND). An intensification of the activity of NAO, AO, and SCAND was observed in the researched area in the winter season (with the exception of the Carpathian tributaries of the River Wisła), and this may in future contribute to an increase in river water temperature (in extreme instances by as much as 1 °C) and reduce the occurrence of ice phenomena thereon.
The percentage increase in the positive phase of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) that occurred in the years 1987–1989 has led to a considerable decrease in the severity of winters in Poland after 1989 [98]. The impact of the positive air temperature trend in the first decade of the 21st century on warming in the spring season has also been confirmed [56,70,94,99]. In Poland, climate changes find expression in the positive trend of air temperatures not only in the winter months, but also in those of summer and autumn.
Analyses of teleconnection patterns carried out by the authors in relation to changes in river water temperature values have demonstrated that in the summer season (and particularly in July) the activity of the AMO circulation in Poland increases, and that in the positive phase this brings about an increase in river water temperature values by even more than 1 °C (0.6–1.6 °C). This may bring about an increased share in the temperature observation series of measurements exceeding the permitted thermal thresholds, which is particularly dangerous for fish. Research carried out by Graf [100] into the thermal characteristics of waters of the River Warta has demonstrated that in the years 1991–2010 the maximum temperature of waters registered in the summer season attained or exceeded 24 °C, while the thermal thresholds for cyprinids and salmonoids are 21.5 °C and 28.0 °C, respectively. An increase in river water temperatures in the summer, which is the result of circulatory conditions, may negatively influence the maintenance of thermal stabilization in the water-course, which contributes among others to the strengthening of the biodiversity of species, e.g., aquatic ichthyofauna. As regards the EA and EA/WR indices analyzed by the authors, the intensification of their activity occurred in the autumn season, particularly in the months of September and October. In autumn, the impact of these indices on seasonal water temperature values of Polish rivers may contribute to the lengthening of the period of warming or to the more rapid cooling of rivers. Research performed by Graf and Tomczyk [37] has confirmed the appearance in Poland (the catchment area of the River Noteć) of negative air temperature values in October, which were registered for a number of years of the period 1987–2013. These were individual days or series of a few days with negative temperatures, which, however, did not contribute to the appearance of ice phenomena on the river; these were initiated only under conditions of greater water over-cooling.
The results obtained confirm that macroscale types of atmospheric circulation are characterized by varying relations with features of the thermal regime of Polish rivers. This is concordant with the results of research conducted, among others, by Frais et al. [92] on the Iberian Peninsula. Relations between macroscale types of atmospheric circulation and river water temperature are analyzed less often than relations between air and water temperature. This is because air temperature is recognized as the main regional factor impacting its variability.
The observed increase in river water temperature values may be the result of the rise in air temperature, confirmed by strong air–water relations, or of anthropogenic factors [12,22,101]. Research into water temperature variability trends has confirmed that trend patterns are the result of anthropogenic factors impacting the river system (riverbed regulation, land melioration), and may therefore become dominant or influence the direction of climate change [2,10,17,19]. Statistically insignificant relations were determined for some Polish rivers and analyzed macroscale types of atmospheric circulation. In the majority of instances, these are rivers strongly impacted by anthropogenic factors. Among others, they include the rivers in the Upper Silesian Industrial Region (Katowice area, Figure 1), which for years have been the recipients of polluted mine waters [102].
The impact of anthropogenic factors on the structure of the measurement series of river water temperature values has been confirmed, among others, by Westhoff and Paukert [3] and Hester and Doyjle [12]. Whereas Ptak et al. [65] and Hernández et al. [103], who researched the relations existing between types of atmospheric circulation and lake water temperature values, have stressed the considerable role of anthropopressure in stifling signals of teleconnection patterns. In their opinion, changes in the thermal regime of lakes may be caused by the supply of pollutants from urbanized areas. While studying the impact of the North Atlantic Oscillation on the hydrological conditions of Lake Morskie Oko (Carpathian Mountains), the authors have demonstrated that in this instance, too, local factors may mask the effect of macroscale atmospheric circulation [104].
Numerous studies conducted under different climatic and environmental conditions have shown that regional climatic tendencies are coincident with variable, local river water temperature trends. Without a doubt, a good synthesis of the circulatory conditions existing over Poland and an assessment of their impact on the thermal characteristics of river waters would be provided by a simultaneous analysis of the so-called indices of the Polish oscillation, which have been determined on the basis of differences in atmospheric pressure (reduced to sea level) between selected meteorological stations (e.g., the index of the Polish western oscillation (PLO-W), determined on the basis of the pressure difference PKraków–PHel). However, pertinent research has not been conducted to date with reference to river waters.
The features of the thermal regime of rivers are shaped under the influence of the large-scale spatial and temporal variability of climate–water temperature associations, and of river basin properties which act as modifiers of these relationships [10,14]. Whereas the thermal susceptibility of rivers to climate change and its seasonal variability are controlled by complex factors: air temperature, downward short-wave and long-wave radiation, wind speed, specific humidity, and precipitation, which must be distinguished in order to properly understand the patterns of temporal and spatial change. Seasonal changes in river water temperature shaped by correlations between positive and negative phases of macroscale atmospheric circulation are presented in only a small number of articles. The significance of this problem for research into relations between macroscale types of atmospheric circulation and climatic and hydrological factors has been duly recognized—among others by de Beurs et al. [28]. Its crucial importance is underscored by the fact that these changes are critical for maintaining the ecological function of rivers.

5. Conclusions

Research carried out for the territory of Poland has demonstrated that regional climatic patterns play an important role in shaping the temperature of river waters and its seasonal variability. The analysis focused on six macroscale types of atmospheric circulation, and this made it possible to ascertain their annual and seasonal intensity and determine the months in which their joint impact on the studied variables is strongest. Research has shown that relations between the temperature of river waters in Poland and macroscale circulation types are not strong; however, it is noticeable and both temporally and spatially diverse. NAO, AO, EA, and AMO indices are characterized by a generally positive correlation with air and water temperature, whereas SCAND and EW/AR indices are characterized by a negative correlation. The relation between the temperatures of Polish rivers and macroscale types of atmospheric circulation varies; however, a greater effectiveness becomes apparent in the winter season (NAO, AO, EA, SCAND). As regards the EA index, its relation with water temperature is high in various seasons of the hydrological year, and displays an increased intensity in autumn, whereas in the case of the EW/AR index the relation was observed as being strong in September. Stronger relations between AMO and temperature values were registered mainly in summer.
The spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation of annual indices with annual river water temperature values shows that the NAO index (1971–2015) is more strongly connected with river water temperature in Central and Southern Poland, and the AO index in the western and central parts of the country—as opposed to the EA index, which has a strong association with water temperature values in the eastern part of the country. Teleconnections between the AMO index and water temperature values have been confirmed in the northern and southern part of the country, and in the rivers of Western and Central Poland for the SCAND index. As regards the EW/AR index, no regular spatial patterns of the distribution of coefficients of correlation have been observed.
It has been demonstrated that in the negative NAO, AO, EA and AMO phases, river water temperature values are visibly lower, by approximately 0.1–0.4 °C, and seasonally by as much as 0.8–1.0 °C (negative EA phase)—than the multi-annual averages for the years 1971–2015; these differences are statistically significant. In the positive phase, deviations of annual water temperature from average values are greater and range from 0.1 to 0.5 °C, while seasonally these deviations may even exceed 1.0 °C (positive EA phase). During the negative SCAND phase, the annual river water temperature values in Poland are approximately 0.1–0.4 °C higher, while in the positive phase deviations are negative and statistically insignificant. As regards the positive phase of the EA/WR index, deviations of annual water temperature from average values are greater and statistically significant, while in the negative phase of this index these relations are statistically insignificant.
The present paper is the first to take up the issue on such a scale—not only in Poland, but also in this part of Europe. The results obtained possess a considerable informational and utilitarian potential, and may be utilized in comparative hydrological and environmental research, particularly as regards the transformation of river ecosystems caused by climate change. The relations determined between atmospheric circulation types and water temperature may constitute an indicator of the degree of risk for habitats and species susceptible to changes in river water temperature, which is of special significance for the functioning of aquatic ecosystems and the rationalization of fisheries management.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.G. and D.W.; Methodology, R.G. and D.W.; Software, R.G. and D.W.; Validation, D.W.; Formal analysis, R.G. and D.W.; Investigation, R.G. and D.W.; Resources, R.G. and D.W.; Writing—original draft preparation, R.G. and D.W.; Writing—review and editing, R.G.; Visualization, R.G. and D.W.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Percentage share of positive and negative coefficients of correlation of monthly indices of macroscale circulation types with air temperature (A) and river water temperature (B).
Figure A1. Percentage share of positive and negative coefficients of correlation of monthly indices of macroscale circulation types with air temperature (A) and river water temperature (B).
Water 11 01690 g0a1
Figure A2. Spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation of monthly water temperature values with indices of macroscale circulation types (A) and deviations of monthly temperature values (ΔT) in various phases thereof from average values for the years 1971–2015 and their statistical significance (p)—(B).
Figure A2. Spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation of monthly water temperature values with indices of macroscale circulation types (A) and deviations of monthly temperature values (ΔT) in various phases thereof from average values for the years 1971–2015 and their statistical significance (p)—(B).
Water 11 01690 g0a2

References

  1. Huntington, T.G. Climate warming-induced intensification of the hydrologic cycle: A review of the published record and assessment of the potential impacts on agriculture. Adv. Agron. 2010, 109, 1–53. [Google Scholar]
  2. Webb, B.W.; Nobilis, F. Long-term changes in river temperature and the influence of climatic and hydrological factors. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2007, 52, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Westhoff, J.T.; Paukert, C.P. Climate Change Simulations Predict Altered Biotic Response in a Thermally Heterogeneous Stream System. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Graf, R. Distribution Properties of a Measurement Series of River Water Temperature at Different Time Resolution Levels (Based on the Example of the Lowland River Noteć, Poland). Water 2018, 10, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Graf, R. A multifaceted analysis of the relationship between daily temperature of river water and air. Acta Geophys. 2019, 67, 905–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Hurrell, J.W. Decadal Trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation: Regional Temperatures and Precipitation. Science 1995, 269, 676–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Marshall, J.; Kushnir, Y.; Battisti, D.; Chang, P.; Czaja, A.; Dickson, R.; Hurrell, J.; McCartney, M.; Saravanan, R.; Visbeck, M. North Atlantic climate variability: Phenomena, impacts and mechanisms. Int. J. Clim. 2001, 21, 1863–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marsz, A.; Styszyńska, A. The North Atlantic Oscillation and the Air Temperature over Poland; Wyższa Szkoła Morska: Gdynia, Poland, 2001; p. 101. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  9. Arismendi, I.; Safeeq, M.; Dunham, J.B.; Johnson, S.L. Can air temperature be used to project influences of climate change on stream temperature? Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 084015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hockman-Wert, D.; Arismendi, I.; Johnson, S.L.; Dunham, J.B.; Haggerty, R. The paradox of cooling streams in a warming world: Regional climate trends do not parallel variable local trends in stream temperature in the Pacific continental United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2012, 39, L10401. [Google Scholar]
  11. Caissie, D. The thermal regime of rivers: A review. Freshw. Biol. 2006, 51, 1389–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hester, E.T.; Doyle, M.W. Human impacts to river temperature and their effects of biological process: A quantitative synthesis. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2011, 47, 571–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Żelazny, M.; Rajwa-Kuligiewicz, A.; Bojarczuk, A.; Pęksa, Ł. Water temperature fluctuation patterns in surface waters of the Tatra Mts., Poland. J. Hydrol. 2018, 564, 824–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hilderbrand, R.H.; Kashiwagi, M.T.; Prochaska, A.P. Regional and Local Scale Modeling of Stream Temperatures and Spatio-Temporal Variation in Thermal Sensitivities. Environ. Manag. 2014, 54, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Toffolon, M.; Piccolroaz, S. A hybrid model for river water temperature as a function of air temperature and discharge. Environ. Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 114011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhu, S.; Nyarko, E.K.; Hadzima-Nyarko, M. Modelling daily water temperature from air temperature for the Missouri River. PeerJ 2018, 6, e4894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Morrill, J.C.; Bales, R.C.; Conklin, M.H. Estimating Stream Temperature from Air Temperature: Implications for Future Water Quality. J. Environ. Eng. 2005, 131, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zhu, S.; Hadzima-Nyarko, M.; Gao, A.; Wang, F.; Wu, J.; Wu, S. Two hybrid data-driven models for modeling water-air temperature relationship in rivers. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 12622–12630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Poole, G.C.; Berman, C.H. An Ecological Perspective on In-Stream Temperature: Natural Heat Dynamics and Mechanisms of Human-CausedThermal Degradation. Environ. Manag. 2001, 27, 787–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Caissie, D.; Satish, M.G.; El-Jabi, N. Predicting river water temperatures using the equilibrium temperature concept with application on the Miramichi River catchments (New Brunswick, Canada). Hydrol. Process. 2005, 9, 2137–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahmadi-Nedushan, B.; St-Hilaire, A.; Ouarda, T.B.M.J.; Bilodeau, L.; Robichaud, É.; Thiémonge, N.; Bobée, B. Predicting river water temperatures using stochastic models: Case study of the Moisie river (Quebec, Canada). Hydrol. Process. 2007, 21, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Isaak, D.J.; Wollrab, S.; Horan, D.; Chandler, G. Climate change effects on stream and river temperatures across the northwest U.S. from 1980–2009 and implications for salmonid fishes. Clim. Chang. 2012, 113, 499–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kelleher, C.; Wagener, T.; Gooseff, M.; McGlynn, B.; McGuire, K.; Marshall, L. Investigating controls on the thermal sensitivity of Pennsylvania streams. Hydrol. Process. 2012, 26, 771–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Krider, L.A.; Magner, J.A.; Perry, J.; Vondracek, B.; Ferrington, L.C. Air-water temperature relationships in the trout streams of southeastern Minnesota’s carbonate-sandstone landscape. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2013, 49, 896–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, B.; Yang, D.; Ye, B.; Berezovskaya, S. Long-term open-water season stream temperature variations and changes over Lena River Basin in Siberia. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2005, 48, 96–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Dmitrenko, I.A.; Kirillov, S.A.; Tremblay, L.B. The long-term and interannual variability of summer fresh water storage over the eastern Siberian shelf: Implication for climatic change. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2008, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Agafonova, S.A.; Florova, N.L. Features of ice regime of Northern Dvina Rivers’ basin. Water Resour. J. 2007, 34, 123–131. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. De Beurs, K.M.; Henebry, G.M.; Owsley, B.C.; Sokolik, I.N. Large scale climate oscillation impacts on temperature, precipitation and land surface phenology in Central Asia. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 065018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yoo, J.; D’Odorico, P. Trends and fluctuations in the dates of ice break-up of lakes and rivers in Northern Europe: The effect of the North Atlantic Oscillation. J. Hydrol. 2002, 268, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pedersen, N.L.; Sand-Jensen, K. Temperature in lowland Danish streams: Contemporary patterns, empirical models and future scenarios. Hydrol. Process. 2007, 21, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Benyahya, L.; St-Hilaire, A.; Ouarda, T.B.M.J.; Bobée, B.; Dumas, J. Comparison of non-parametric and parametric water temperature models on the Nivelle River, France. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2008, 53, 640–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Bonacci, O.; Trninić, D.; Roje-Bonacci, T. Analysis of water temperature regime of Danube and its tributaries in Croatia. Hydrol. Process. 2008, 22, 1014–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Klavins, M.; Briede, A.; Rodinov, V. Long term changes in ice and discharge regime of rivers in the Baltic region in relation to climatic variability. Clim. Chang. 2009, 95, 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Agafonova, S.; Frolova, N.L. Influence of Ice Regime of the Northern Rivers of European Russia on the Hydroecological Safety under the Climate Changes. In Proceedings of the 20th IAHR Symposium on Ice, Lahti, Finland, 14–18 June 2010. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jurgelėnaitė, A.; Kriauciuniene, J.; Šarauskienė, D. Spatial and temporal variation in the water temperature of Lithuanian rivers. Baltica 2012, 25, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Rabi, A.; Hadzima-Nyarko, M.; Šperac, M. Modelling river temperature from air temperature in the River Drava (Croatia). Hydrol. Sci. J. 2015, 60, 1490–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Graf, R.; Tomczyk, A.M. The Impact of Cumulative Negative Air Temperature Degree-Days on the Appearance of Ice Cover on a River in Relation to Atmospheric Circulation. Atmosphere 2018, 9, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marszelewski, W.; Pius, B. Relation between Air Temperature and Inland Surface Water Temperature during Climate Change (1961–2014): Case Study of the Polish Lowland. In Water Management and the Environment: Case Studies; Zelenakova, M., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2018; pp. 175–195. [Google Scholar]
  39. Graf, R.; Łukaszewicz, J.T.; Jawgiel, K. The analysis of the structure and duration of ice phenomena on the Warta River in relation to thermic conditions in the years 1991–2010. Woda-Środowisko-Obszary Wiejskie 2018, 18, 5–28. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  40. Kożuchowski, K. Seasons in Poland—Seasonal Changes in the Environment Versus Long–Term Climatic Climatic Tendencies; Wyd. Uniw. Łódzkiego: Łódź, Poland, 2000. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  41. IPCC. International Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  42. EEA Report No 12 “Climate Change, Impacts and Vulnerability in Europe 2012en” 2012. Available online: http://www.eea.europa.eu/pl/themes (accessed on 15 May 2019).
  43. Allan, J.D.; Castillo, M.M. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters, 2nd ed.; Chapman and Hall: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hagen, E.; Feistel, R. Climatic turning pints and regime shifts in the Baltic Sea region: The Baltic winter index (WIBIX) 1659–2002. Boreal Environ. Res. 2005, 10, 211–224. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kenyon, J.; Hegerl, G.C. Influence of Modes of Climate Variability on Global Temperature Extremes. J. Clim. 2008, 21, 3872–3889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Beniston, M.; Stephenson, D.B. Extreme climatic events and their evolution under changing climatic conditions. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2004, 44, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Brohan, P.; Kennedy, J.J.; Harris, I.; Tett, S.F.B.; Jones, P.D. Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: A new data set from 1850. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2006, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Tank, A.M.G.K.; Können, G.P. Trends in Indices of Daily Temperature and Precipitation Extremes in Europe, 1946–99. J. Clim. 2003, 16, 3665–3680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Domonkos, P.; Kyselý, J.; Piotrowicz, K.; Petrovic, P.; Likso, T. Variability of extreme temperature events in south-central Europe during the 20th century and its relationship with large-scale circulation. Int. J. Clim. 2003, 23, 987–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Moberg, A.; Jones, P.D. Trends in indices for extremes in daily temperature and precipitation in central and western Europe, 1901–1999. Int. J. Climatol. 2005, 25, 1173–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tomczyk, A.M.; Bednorz, E.; Półrolniczak, M. The occurrence of heat waves in Europe and their circulation conditions. Geografie 2019, 124, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  52. Wibig, J.; Glowicki, B. Trends of minimum and maximum temperature in Poland. Clim. Res. 2002, 20, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wibig, J.; Podstawczyńska, A.; Rzepa, M.; Piotrowski, P. Hotwaves in Poland—Frequency, trends and relations to atmospheric circulation. Geogr. Pol. 2009, 82, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wibig, J.; Podstawczyńska, A.; Rzepa, M.; Piotrowski, P. Coldwaves in Poland—Frequency, trends and relations to atmospheric circulation. Geogr. Pol. 2009, 82, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tomczyk, A.M.; Bednorz, E.; Półrolniczak, M.; Kolendowicz, L. Strong heat and cold waves in Poland in relation with the large-scale atmospheric circulation. Theor. Appl. Clim. 2018, 137, 1909–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Kożuchowski, K.; Degirmendžic, J. Circulation indicators and air temperature in Poland. In North Atlantic Oscillation and its Inflow on Variability of Climatic and Hydrologic Conditions of Poland; Marsz, A., Styszyńska, A., Eds.; Akademia Morska w Gdyni: Gdynia, Poland, 2002; pp. 111–128. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  57. Niedźwiedź, T. Relations between NAO and circulation indicators over Poland. In North Atlantic Oscillation and its Inflow on Variability of Climatic and Hydrologic Conditions of Poland; Marsz, A., Styszyńska, A., Eds.; Wyższa Szkoła Morska: Gdynia, Poland, 2002; pp. 87–97. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  58. Scaife, A.A.; Folland, C.K.; Alexander, L.V.; Moberg, A.; Knight, J.R. European Climate Extremes and the North Atlantic Oscillation. J. Clim. 2008, 21, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Niedźwiedź, T.; Twardosz, R.; Walanus, A. Long-term variability of precipitation series in east central Europe in relation to circulation patterns. Theor. Appl. Clim. 2009, 98, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tomczyk, A.M. Impact of macro-scale circulation types on the occurrence of frosty days in Poland. Bull. Geogr. Phys. Geogr. Ser. 2015, 9, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Bednorz, E. Synoptic conditions for rapid snowmelt in the Polish-German lowlands. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2009, 97, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Falarz, M. Snow cover variability in Poland in relation to the macro- and mesoscale atmospheric circulation in the twentieth century. Int. J. Clim. 2007, 27, 2069–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wrzesiński, D. Regional differences in the influence of the North Atlantic Oscillation on seasonal river runoff in Poland. Quaest. Geogr. 2011, 30, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Wrzesiński, D.; Ptak, M.; Baczyńska, A. Effect of the North Atlantic Oscillation on Ice Phenomena on Selected Lakes in Poland Over the Years 1961–2010. Quaest. Geogr. 2013, 32, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ptak, M.; Tomczyk, A.M.; Wrzesiński, D. Effect of Teleconnection Patterns on Changes in Water Temperature in Polish Lakes. Atmosphere 2018, 9, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hannah, D.; Garner, G. River water temperature in the United Kingdom: Changes over the 20th century and possible changes over the 21st century. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2015, 39, 68–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Paeth, H.; Hense, A.; Glowienka-Hense, R.; Voss, S.; Cubasch, U. The North Atlantic Oscillation as an indicator for greenhouse-gas induced regional climate change. Clim. Dyn. 1999, 15, 953–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lizuma, L.; Klavins, M.; Briede, A.; Rodinovs, V. Long-term changes of air temperature in Latvia. In Climate Change in Latvia; Klavins, M., Ed.; UL Publishing House: Riga, Latvia, 2007; pp. 11–21. [Google Scholar]
  69. Uvo, C.B. Analyses and regionalization of Northern Europe winter precipitation based on its relationship with North Atlantic Oscillations. Int. J. Climatol. 2003, 23, 1185–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Przybylak, R.; Wójcik, G.; Marciniak, K. Influence of the North Atlantic Oscillation and Arctic Oscillation on thermal conditions in the cold season In Poland form the 16th to the 20th centuries Przegl. Geofiz 2003, 48, 61–74. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  71. Niedźwiedź, T. Typology of circulation for Poland and the methods of calculations the regional circulation indices. Ann. Univ. Mariae Сurie-Skłodowska Lub.-Pol. Sect. B 2006, 61, 326–335. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  72. Wenger, S.J.; Isaak, D.J.; Luce, C.H.; Neville, H.M.; Fausch, K.D.; Dunham, J.B.; Dauwalter, D.C.; Young, M.K.; Elsner, M.M.; Rieman, B.E.; et al. Flow regime, temperature, and biotic interactions drive differential declines of trout species under climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 14175–14180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Arismendi, I.; Safeeq, M.; Johnson, S.L.; Dunham, J.B.; Haggerty, R. Evaluating recent changes in timing and synchrony of extreme annual hydro-climatic events in streams. Hydrobiologia 2013, 712, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Barnston, A.G.; Livezey, R.E. Classification, Seasonality and Persistence of Low-Frequency Atmospheric Circulation Patterns. Mon. Weather Rev. 1987, 115, 1083–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Portis, D.H.; Walsh, J.E.; El Hamly, M.; Lamb, P.J. Seasonality of the North Atlantic Oscillation. J. Clim. 2001, 14, 2069–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Trigo, R.; Osborn, T.; Corte-Real, J. The North Atlantic Oscillation influence on Europe: Climate impacts and associated physical mechanisms. Clim. Res. 2002, 20, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Higgins, R.W.; Leetmaa, A.; Kousky, V.E. Relationships between Climate Variability and Winter Temperature Extremes in the United States. J. Clim. 2002, 15, 1555–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Kang, D.; Lee, M.-I.; Im, J.; Kim, D.; Kim, H.-M.; Kang, H.-S.; Schubert, S.D.; Arribas, A.; MacLachlan, C. Prediction of the Arctic Oscillation in boreal winter by dynamical seasonal forecasting systems. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2014, 41, 3577–3585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Mikhailova, N.; Yurovsky, A. The East Atlantic Oscillation: Mechanism and Impact on the European Climate in Winter. Phys. Oceanogr. 2016, 4, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Moore, G.W.K.; Renfrew, I.A. Cold European winters: Interplay between the NAO and the East Atlantic mode. Atmos. Sci. Lett. 2012, 13, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Krichak, S.O.; Alpert, P. Decadal trends in the east Atlantic-west Russia pattern and Mediterranean precipitation. Int. J. Clim. 2005, 25, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lim, Y.K. The East Atlantic/West Russia (EA/WR) teleconnection in the North Atlantic: Climate impact and relation to Rossby wave propagation. Clim. Dyn. 2015, 44, 3211–3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bueh, C.; Nakamura, H. Scandinavian pattern and its climatic impact. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2007, 133, 2117–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhou, W.; Chen, W. Three Eurasian teleconnection patterns: Spatial structures, temporal variability, and associated winter climate anomalies. Clim. Dyn. 2014, 42, 2817–2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Alexander, M.A.; Kilbourne, K.H.; Nye, J.A.; Kilbourne, H. Climate variability during warm and cold phases of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) 1871–2008. J. Mar. Syst. 2014, 133, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Woollings, T.; Zanna, L.; O’Reilly, C.H. The Dynamical Influence of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation on Continental Climate. J. Clim. 2017, 30, 7213–7230. [Google Scholar]
  87. Alexandersson, H.; Moberg, A. Homogenization of swedish temperature data. Part I: Homogeneity test for linear trends. Int. J. Clim. 1997, 17, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Khaliq, M.N.; Ouarda, T.B. Short Communication on the critical values of the standard normal homogeneity test (SNHT). Int. J. Clim. 2007, 27, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Notaro, M.; Wang, W.-C.; Gong, W. Model and Observational Analysis of the Northeast U.S. Regional Climate and Its Relationship to the PNA and NAO Patterns during Early Winter. Mon. Weather Rev. 2006, 134, 3479–3505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ning, L.; Bradley, R.S. Winter Climate Extremes over the Northeastern United States and Southeastern Canada and Teleconnections with Large-Scale Modes of Climate Variability. J. Clim. 2015, 28, 2475–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ning, L.; Bradley, R.S. NAO and PNA influences on winter temperature and precipitation over the eastern United States in CMIP5 GCMs. Clim. Dyn. 2016, 46, 1257–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Frias, T.; Trigo, R.; Valente, M.; Pires, C. The impact of the NAO and AO on the Iberian water resources. Geophys. Res. Abs. 2005, 7, 1607–7962. [Google Scholar]
  93. Sepp, M.; Post, P.; Jaagus, J. Long-term changes in the frequency of cyclones and their trajectories in Central and Northern Europe. Hydrol. Res. 2005, 36, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Girjatowicz, J.P.; Świątek, M. Effects of atmospheric circulation on water temperature along the southern Baltic Sea coast. Oceanologia 2019, 61, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ćmielewski, M.; Grześ, M. Multiannual variability of the ice cover on Vistula in Toruń and Niemen in Smolniki in the 19th and 20th centuries. Gospod. Wodna 2010, 3, 112–115. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  96. Beltaos, S.; Prowse, T.D. River-ice hydrology in a shrinking cryosphere. Hydrol. Process. 2009, 23, 122–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Magnuson, J.J.; Robertson, D.M.; Benson, B.J.; Wynne, R.H.; Livingstone, D.M.; Arai, T.; Assel, R.A.; Barry, R.G.; Card, V.; Kuusisto, E.; et al. Historical Trends in Lake and River Ice Cover in the Northern Hemisphere. Science 2000, 289, 1743–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Marsz, A.; Styszyńska, A. Variability of the thermal character of winter periods in Poland and its reasons. Autom. Elektr. Zakłócenia 2015, 6, 118–127. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  99. Michalska, B. Tendencies of air temperature changes in Poland. Prace Studia Geogr. 2011, 47, 67–75. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  100. Graf, R. Variations of the thermal conditions of the Warta in the profile connecting the Urstromtal and gorge sections of the valley (Nowa Wieś Podgórna—Śrem—Poznań). In Monografie Komisji Hydrologicznej PTG, Nowoczesne Metody i Rozwiązania w Hydrologii i Gospodarce Wodnej; Absalon, D., Matysik, M., Ruman, M., Eds.; Komisja Hydrologiczna PTG, PTG Oddział Katowice: Katowice, Poland, 2015; pp. 177–194. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  101. Mantua, N.; Tohver, I.; Hamlet, A. Climate change impacts on streamflow extremes and summertime stream temperature and their possible consequences for freshwater salmon habitat in Washington State. Clim. Chang. 2010, 102, 187–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Matysik, M. The Impact of Mine Water Discharges on the Runoff of the Rivers of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego: Katowice, Poland, 2018. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  103. Hernández, A.; Trigo, R.M.; Pla-Rabés, S.; Valero-Garces, B.L.; Jerez, S.; Rico-Herrero, M.; Vega, J.C.; Jambrina-Enríquez, M.; Giralt, S. Sensitivity of two Iberian lakes to North Atlantic atmospheric circulation modes. Clim. Dyn. 2015, 45, 3403–3417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Wrzesiński, D.; Choiński, A.; Ptak, M. Effect of North Atlantic Oscillation on the hydrological conditions of Lake Morskie Oko (Carphatian Mountains). Bull. Geogr. Phys. Geogr. Ser. 2016, 10, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Location of the water gauges and meteorological stations.
Figure 1. Location of the water gauges and meteorological stations.
Water 11 01690 g001
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of average annual and seasonal air (A) and river water (B) temperature values.
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of average annual and seasonal air (A) and river water (B) temperature values.
Water 11 01690 g002
Figure 3. Percentage share of positive and negative coefficients of correlation of annual indices of macroscale circulation types with air temperature (A) and river water temperature (B).
Figure 3. Percentage share of positive and negative coefficients of correlation of annual indices of macroscale circulation types with air temperature (A) and river water temperature (B).
Water 11 01690 g003
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation of annual water temperature values with indices of macroscale circulation types (A) and of deviations of annual temperature values (∆T) in various phases thereof from average values for the years 1971–2015 and their statistical significance (p)—(B).
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation of annual water temperature values with indices of macroscale circulation types (A) and of deviations of annual temperature values (∆T) in various phases thereof from average values for the years 1971–2015 and their statistical significance (p)—(B).
Water 11 01690 g004
Figure 5. Percentage share of positive and negative coefficients of correlation of seasonal indices of macroscale circulation types with river water temperature values.
Figure 5. Percentage share of positive and negative coefficients of correlation of seasonal indices of macroscale circulation types with river water temperature values.
Water 11 01690 g005
Figure 6. Spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation (R) between seasonal water temperature values and circulation types NAO, AO, and EA, and their statistical significance (p).
Figure 6. Spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation (R) between seasonal water temperature values and circulation types NAO, AO, and EA, and their statistical significance (p).
Water 11 01690 g006
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of seasonal deviations of water temperature values (ΔT) in various AO phases from average values for the years 1971–2015 and their statistical significance (p).
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of seasonal deviations of water temperature values (ΔT) in various AO phases from average values for the years 1971–2015 and their statistical significance (p).
Water 11 01690 g007
Figure 8. Spatial distribution of seasons deviations of water temperature (ΔT) in various EA phases from average values for the years 1971–2015 and their statistical significance (p).
Figure 8. Spatial distribution of seasons deviations of water temperature (ΔT) in various EA phases from average values for the years 1971–2015 and their statistical significance (p).
Water 11 01690 g008
Figure 9. Spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation (R) between seasonal water temperature values and circulation types EA/WR, SCAND, and AMO, and their statistical significance (p).
Figure 9. Spatial distribution of coefficients of correlation (R) between seasonal water temperature values and circulation types EA/WR, SCAND, and AMO, and their statistical significance (p).
Water 11 01690 g009

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Graf, R.; Wrzesiński, D. Relationship between Water Temperature of Polish Rivers and Large-Scale Atmospheric Circulation. Water 2019, 11, 1690. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081690

AMA Style

Graf R, Wrzesiński D. Relationship between Water Temperature of Polish Rivers and Large-Scale Atmospheric Circulation. Water. 2019; 11(8):1690. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081690

Chicago/Turabian Style

Graf, Renata, and Dariusz Wrzesiński. 2019. "Relationship between Water Temperature of Polish Rivers and Large-Scale Atmospheric Circulation" Water 11, no. 8: 1690. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081690

APA Style

Graf, R., & Wrzesiński, D. (2019). Relationship between Water Temperature of Polish Rivers and Large-Scale Atmospheric Circulation. Water, 11(8), 1690. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081690

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop