Next Article in Journal
Stable Isotope Composition of River Waters across the World
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Bottom Sediments and Inoculation with Rhizobacterial Inoculants on the Physiological State of Plants Used in Urban Plantings
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Irrigation in Agriculture: An Analysis of Global Research
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gradual Exposure to Salinity Improves Tolerance to Salt Stress in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Application of Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis against Chemical Pollution of Water

by
Inga Tabagari
1,
Maritsa Kurashvili
1,
Tamar Varazi
1,
George Adamia
1,
George Gigolashvili
1,
Marina Pruidze
1,
Liana Chokheli
1,
Gia Khatisashvili
1 and
Peter von Fragstein und Niemsdorff
2,*
1
Durmishidze Institute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology of Agricultural University of Georgia, Davit 240 David Agmashenebeli Alley, Tbilisi 0131, Georgia
2
Department of Organic Vegetable Production (before Retirement), Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, University of Kassel, Steinstraße 19, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(9), 1759; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091759
Submission received: 17 July 2019 / Revised: 13 August 2019 / Accepted: 20 August 2019 / Published: 23 August 2019

Abstract

:
The basis of phytoremediation technology for cleaning chemically polluted water was developed in the framework of the presented work. This technology is based on the ability of blue-green alga Arthrospira platensis to eliminate different environmental toxicants from water. This technological approach was conducted for the following pollutants: 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane (DDT), 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT), and cesium ions. The effectiveness of the technology was tested in model experiments, which were carried out in glass containers (volume 40 L). In particular, the different concentrations of alga biomass with the aforementioned pollutants were incubated with permanent illumination conditions and air barbotage, at a temperature of 25 °C. The results of the model experiments showed that after two weeks from the start of remediation Arthrospira effectively cleaned artificially polluted waters. Particularly in the case of TNT 56 mg/L concentration, the effect of water remediation was 97%. In the case of DDT 10 mg/L concentration, the degree of cleaning was 90%. Similar results were obtained in the case of 100 mg/L concentration of cesium ions. Thus, the model experiments confirmed that the alga Arthrospira effectively removed tested pollutants from water. That is the basis of phytoremediation technology.

1. Introduction

For the last few decades, distribution of chemical pollutants from urban, agricultural, and industrial sources caused the accumulation of toxic substances potentially harmful for plants and animals, becoming a serious concern for the ecosystem survival. In this context, the development of soil and water remediation methods for the removal of chemical contaminants is a widely recognized, challenging problem. Nowadays, the technological implementation of methodologies devoted to the removal of pharmaceutical and waste residues, pesticides, and heavy metals from natural and agricultural ecosystems is urgent for all countries.
Currently, urban environmental pollution comprises hundreds of substances, including aliphatic, aromatic and polycyclic hydrocarbons, phenols, pesticides, organochlorine compounds, explosives based on nitro compounds, heavy metals, radionuclides, etc. [1]. Despite the major efforts that have been made over recent years to clean up the environment, pollution remains a major problem and poses continuous risks to health.
At present, the freshwaters from rivers and lakes of industrialized countries are mainly used to produce tap water for large cities. Proceeding from the information mentioned above, the creation of quick-response, strategic approaches against chemical pollution of numerous precipitates of sewage sludge will resolve the important environmental problem.
The given work is focused on the setup of the technological approach on the bioaccumulation and removal of pollutants from water, based on the integrated assimilation of target toxicants by using modern phytoremediation technology [1,2,3].
Modern phytoremediation technologies may include different methodological approaches, depending on their purposes. One of the methods of cleaning the chemically polluted waters is phycoremediation, based on the application of algae [4]. There are some examples of using algae for cleaning water polluted with heavy metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, pesticides, etc. [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11].
The main idea of the presented work is to create the basis for an effective cleaning technology of water that is artificially polluted with cesium ions, 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethane (or 1,1’-(2,2,2-trichloroethane-1,1-diyl)bis(4-chlorobenzene)—DDT) and 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) by using blue-green alga Arthrospira platensis (formerly Spirulina platensis) as a phytoremediator.
Arthrospira, which is currently widely used in the food industry and in pharmacology [9,10], can be applied also as a phytoremediation agent for cleaning the chemically polluted waters. The cells of Arthrospira contain large amounts of compounds (enzymes, peptides, amino acids, etc.) capable of binding as ions of heavy metals to organic toxic compounds. The structures inside the cells of Arthrospira swell with air bubbles, which promotes their emerging on the water surface. Thus, the algae biomass is easily removed from the testing reservoirs.
It is known that Arthrospira is applied for remediation of water that is contaminated mainly with heavy metals [5,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Additionally, it is known for its use in cases of water polluted with petroleum hydrocarbons [12], pesticides [13], radioactive elements [18], fluoride ions [19], some estrogens [20], etc.
Water pollution caused by hazardous heavy metals and radionuclides is one of the most important ecological problems. Among them, 137Cs is very dangerous. Nonradioactive cesium ions that occur in nature and are released into the environment through mining and milling of ores are only mildly toxic [21]. Both radioactive and stable cesium, when they occur in a human or animal body, act the same way [22]. There are only limited data concerning the use of Arthrospira as a phytoremediation agent in cases of water polluted with Cs+ ions.
TNT that is used as a military high explosive is one of the most toxic compounds. It can accumulate in human organs, stimulating some chronic diseases, and it is considered a hazardous contaminant of the environment [23].
DDT was a widely used insecticide in the 20th century because it was applied to fight malaria-carrying mosquitoes [24]. Despite banning DDT application, this pesticide, as other organochlorine pollutants, stays in the environment in undestroyed form for a long time due to its chemical stability. Its high hydrophobicity allows the insertion of DDT into the food chain. DDT easily penetrates human organisms through the digestive tract or the skin and damages nerve tissue [1].
In our previous works it we showed Arthrospira has a high ability to eliminate Cs+ ions, TNT, and DDT from artificially polluted water via adsorption on the surface of cellular lipopolysaccharides and then by their moving into cells [25,26,27]. The presented article gives the results of work that was performed to test the phytoremediation potential of Arthrospira in the model experiments.
Thus, the goal of the presented work is to investigate opportunities to use Arthrospira platensis as a tool for removing pollutants with different chemical natures from water. For this aim, model experiments were conducted to establish the optimal concentration of biomass of Arthrospira that allows elimination of Cs+ ions, TNT, and DDT from artificially contaminated water with maximal effectiveness.

2. Materials and Methods

In the experiments we used the biomass Arthrospira platensis obtained via cultivation in standard Zarrouk’s medium (pH—8.7; content in g/L: NaHCO3—16.8, K2HPO4—0.5, NaNO3—2.5, K2SO4—1.0, NaCl—1.0, MgSO4·7H2O—0.2, CaCl2·2H2O—0.04, FeSO4·7H2O—0.01, EDTA—0.08; and microelements kit A5—1 mL). The cultivation was conducted in the following conditions: Permanent air barbotage (rate of air flow 2 L/min); temperature of 25 °C; a photoperiod of lighting of 16 L/8 D (16 h of light:8 h of dark); a total photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of ≈15 µmol·m−2·s−1.
The biomass of Arthrospira in the incubation medium was measured spectrophotometrically at 750 nm [28].
For determination of DDT, the incubation medium was centrifuged at 1000 g for 20 min and DDT was extracted from the obtained supernatant by hexane. The extract was concentrated by evaporation, and DDT content was determined by gas chromatographic analysis (Instrument—Agilent 7890A (Beijing, China)) [29]. Limit of detection—0.01 mg/L. Detailed conditions for analysis are described in our previous work [26].
Concentration of residual TNT in the incubation area was measured spectrophotometrically at 447 nm, in a highly alkaline (pH > 12.2) area (spectrophotometer—Shimadzu UV1900 (Kyoto, Japan)) [30]. Limit of detection—0.2 mg/L.
The content of Cs+ ions in the samples was determined by the method of atomic absorption (flame emission) analysis [31]. Conditions for analysis are the following: Instrument—PerkinElmer HGA900 Graphite Furnace (Waltham, MA, USA); wavelength—852.1 nm; slit—0.2/0.4 nm; flame—air-acetylene; stock standard solution—CESIUM 1000 mg/L; light source—EDL; interface—ionization controlled by addition of 0.1% KCl. Limit of detection—0.5 mg/L.
The model experiments for cleaning water polluted by tested toxicants were carried out in the following conditions: (1) Arthrospira was cultivated in Zarrouk’s medium (volume 20 L) for 7 days; (2) thereafter, the solution of DDT, TNT, or Cs+ was added (volume 20 L); (3) the incubation period was finished after 15 days. According to our previous experiments [21,22,23], the concentrations of pollutants were as follows: 10 mg/L in case of DDT, 22.5 or 56 mg/L in case of TNT, and 100 mg/L in case of Cs+ ions. The biomass of Arthrospira varied from 3.0 to 4.5 g/L (see tables in Section 3). The incubation was carried out in a glass container with sizes 60 × 21 × 40 (in cm, length × width × height), with permanent air barbotage (rate of air flow 2 L/min), at a temperature of 25 °C, under the following illumination conditions: 24 L/0 D, PPFD ≈ 15 µmol·m−2·s−1. In the control variant, instead of the tested contaminant solution, we added 20 L of water. Model experiments were carried out in periods: April–June, 2017; September–October, 2017; April–June, 2018; September–October, 2018.
Presented data are the mean of three replicates ± standard deviation (SD). The replicates represent an assay of a sample from the same source multiple times. The statistical analysis of obtained data was performed using the method of Descriptive Statistics of Excel.

3. Results and Discussion

The model experiments for development of the phytoremediation technology based on the application of Arthrospira for cleaning chemically polluted waters were carried out. In the model experiments the initial biomass of Arthrospira was changed until we got maximal absorption of the toxicant.
In the case of DDT, Arthrospira was cultivated in artificially polluted waters containing different concentrations of the pollutant and Arthrospira biomass. The initial biomass of Arthrospira was changed in the model experiments to reach maximal elimination of the toxicant from the polluted water. The obtained results are given in Table 1.
The obtained data show that the remediation process was optimal when the biomass content of Arthrospira in the incubation medium was 4 g/L (Table 1, Experiment No. DDT-3). In this case the mass ratio of the DDT and the raw biomass of the alga was approximately 1:400. In this experiment alga removes about 90% of the tested pollutant, indicating the effectiveness of the presented method. At an increase of the alga biomass up to 4.5 g/L, a significant decrease of the DDT amount in the polluted water was not observed. On higher concentrations of DDT (15 mg/L), the effectiveness of elimination out of the polluted water decreased up to approximately 77% in spite of an increase of the initial content of the Arthrospira biomass (Table 1, Experiment No. DDT-5).
The results of the model experiments for the development of phytoremediation technology for cleaning waters polluted by TNT are given in Table 2. As seen from the obtained results, the most efficient cleaning rate could be achieved by a ratio of 1:60 from the contaminant and algal concentration (Table 2, Experiment No. TNT-3). In this case, alga removes about 98% of TNT from the polluted water. These data indicate the high effectiveness of the presented method for cleaning water polluted by TNT.
The model experiments for testing of Arthrospira as a remediator for cleaning water polluted with 100 mg/L of Cs+ ions show that the best results were obtained in cases of using 3.5 and 4.0 g/L of the Arthrospira biomass (Table 3, Experiments Nos. CS-2 and CS-3). As can be seen from the obtained data, in these cases the efficiency of remediation was achieved up to 90%. When both the Cs+ ions concentration and the Arthrospira initial biomass were increased, the effectiveness of uptake was only about 83%. These results indicate that the most effective ratio of heavy metal and raw biomass of alga was approximately 1:35.
Comparison of the obtained results with the results of the previous publications will corroborate that the cleaning rate was improved by choosing the proper correlation of the biomass of Arthrospira and the organic pollutants. In particular, in the case of DDT, cleaning efficiency was improved from 70% [26] to 90%, and in the case of TNT, from 87% [25] to 97%. As for cesium ions, nothing different from the previous experiments [27] was received.
The ability of Arthrospira to remove Cs+ ions from polluted water supposedly might be related to the presence of heavy metal chelating compounds in this alga. This mechanism is still unknown and should be clarified in further studies. As for the organic pollutants, supposedly their uptake should occur via metabolizing by alga, which implies the primary transformations of compounds penetrated in the cells and then the conjugation of formed intermediates with intracellular compounds. In the case of TNT, the primary transformations should be performed via reduction of nitro groups to amine groups. Such transformations must be catalyzed by enzymes similar to nitroreductases, which participate in TNT transformation in plants and microorganisms [1]. DDT may be undergoing dehalogenation and/or hydroxylation analogous to plants, by the enzymes such as monooxygenases, peroxidases, phenoloxidases, and dehalogenases [1,32]. Intermediates of transformation of DDT and TNT probably conjugate with the following intracellular compounds: Saccharides, amino acids, peptides, proteins, etc., which are in Arthrospira in large amounts. Therefore, to determine the mechanism of removing organic pollutants by Arthrospira, it is necessary to study the above-mentioned enzymes in this alga.
The above results show that the application of Arthrospira is indicated for cleaning chemically polluted waters. Until now, Arthrospira was considered effective mainly in cases of pollution with heavy metals [5,7,14,15,16,17,18]; but the presented results corroborate universal phytoremediation features and the high cleaning potential of Arthrospira. Further, it is desirable to continue investigations in the following directions:
  • Optimization of incubation conditions of Arthrospira;
  • Investigation of the processes of organic toxicant metabolism and binding heavy metals in cells of Arthrospira;
  • Revelation of enzymes and enzymatic systems of Arthrospira, participating in the transformation of organic toxicants and chelating of heavy metals.
Moreover, it will be possible to refine and improve Arthrospira-based phytoremediation technology, due to the development of proper equipment providing, in automatic mode, cultivation of Arthrospira, a polluted water supply, and purified water removal.
Although the information and works are often found on remediation of sewage from heavy metals and microorganisms where Arthrospira is the key bio-tool, the presented work contains specific novelty. Removal from water and biodegradation of such persistent and toxic organic pollutants as TNT and DDT via the application of ecological potential Arthrospira is the first attempt and has no direct analogy.

4. Conclusions

The overall results of completed investigations can become a basis for the development of phytoremediation technology based on the application of Arthrospira for cleaning waters polluted with research toxicants.
The main idea of these technologies is to add the effective amount of Arthrospira biomass to polluted water and remove it from the artificially contaminated areas consecutive times.
The effectiveness of the technological approach tested in the model experiments was carried out in glass containers (volume 40 L). The results of the model experiments showed that after 15 days from the start of the experiments using Arthrospira the following results are obtained:
  • Water remediation was occurring by 97%, in the case of 56 mg/L concentration of TNT and 3.5 g/L initial content of Arthrospira;
  • The degree of cleaning was 90%, in the case of 10 mg/L concentration of DDT and 4.0 g/L initial content of Arthrospira;
  • The degree of cleaning was 90%, in the case of 100 mg/L concentration of cesium ions and 3.5 g/L initial content of Arthrospira.
From the above-mentioned data, it can be supposed that Arthrospira platensis has high phytoremediation potential to pollutants with different chemical natures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: G.K., G.G. and G.A.; investigation: I.T., L.C., T.V. and G.A.; methodology: G.K., G.G., M.K., M.P. and G.A.; formal analysis: M.K., G.K., T.V. and M.P.; writing: M.K., G.K., P.v.F.u.N. and M.P. All the authors have approved of the submission of this manuscript.

Funding

The research study was funded by Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation (SRNSF) and the National Research Council of Italy (CNR) grant #04/51 and the Volkswagenstiftung under the collaborative project, Sustainable Agricultural and Food Systems (SAFS), between University of Kassel, Germany, and the Agricultural University of Georgia. This research paper is published as an open access journal article with the financial support from the Open-Access-Publikationsfonds from the University of Kassel, financed by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Library of University of Kassel, Germany.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kvesitadze, G.; Khatisashvili, G.; Sadunishvili, T.; Ramsden, J.J. Biochemical Mechanisms of Detoxification in Higher Plants. Basis of Phytoremediation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. Salt, D.E.; Smith, R.D.; Raskin, I. Phytoremediation. Annu. Rev. Plants Physiol. Mol. Biol. 1998, 49, 643–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tsao, D.T. Phytoremediation; Advances in Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  4. Phang, S.M.; Chu, W.L.; Rabiei, R. Phycoremediation. In The Algae World; Sahoo, D., Seckbach, J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 357–389. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rangsayatorn, N.; Upatham, E.S.; Kruatrachue, M.; Pokethitiyook, P.; Lanza, G.R. Phytoremediation potential of Spirulina Arthrospira platensis: Biosorption and toxicity studies of cadmium. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 119, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jacques, N.R.; McMartin, D.W. Evaluation of algal phytoremediation of light extractable petroleum hydrocarbons in subarctic climates. Remediat. J. 2009, 20, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ahmad, A.; Ghufran, R.; Wahid, Z.A. Cd, As, Cu and Zn transfer through dry to rehydrated biomass of Spirulina Platensis from wastewater. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 2010, 19, 887–893. [Google Scholar]
  8. Arif, I.A.; Bakir, M.A.; Khan, H.A. Microbial Remediation of Pesticides. In Pesticides: Evaluation of Environmental Pollution; Rathore, H.S., Nollet, L.M.L., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 131–144. [Google Scholar]
  9. Matamoros, V.; Gutiérrez, R.; Ferrer, I.; García, J.; Bayona, J.M. Capability of microalgae-based wastewater treatment systems to remove emerging organic contaminants: A pilot-scale study. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 288, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Iasimone, F.; Panico, A.; De Felice, V.; Fantasma, F.; Iorizzi, M.; Pirozzi, F. Effect of light intensity and nutrients supply on microalgae cultivated in urban wastewater: Biomass production, lipids accumulation and settleability characteristics. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 223, 1078–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Markou, G.; Depraetere, O.; Vandamme, D.; Muylaert, K. Cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris and Arthrospira platensis with Recovered Phosphorus from Wastewater by Means of Zeolite Sorption. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 4250–4264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ciferri, O. Spirulina, the edible microorganism. Microbiol. Rev. 1983, 47, 551–578. [Google Scholar]
  13. Khan, Z.; Bhadouria, P.; Bisen, P.S. Nutritional and therapeutic potential of Spirulina. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2005, 6, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chojnacka, K.; Chojnacki, A.; Górecka, H. Biosorption of Cr3+, Cd2+ and Cu2+ ions by blue–green algae Spirulina sp.: Kinetics, equilibrium and the mechanism of the process. Chemosphere 2005, 59, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zinicovscaia, I.; Cepoi, L.; Chiriac, T.; Mitina, T.; Grozdov, D.; Yushin, N.; Culicov, O. Application of Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis biomass for silver removal from aqueous solutions. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2017, 19, 1053–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, H.; Pan, S. Bioremediation potential of Spirulina: Toxicity and biosorption studies of lead. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2005, 6, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Murali, O.; Mehar, S. Bioremediation of heavy metals using Spirulina. Int. J. Geol. Earth Environ. Sci. 2014, 4, 244–249. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fukuda, S.; Lwamoto, K.; Asumi, M.; Yokoyama, A.; Nakayama, T.; Ishida, K.; Inouye, I.; Shraiwa, Y. Global searches for microalgae and aquatic plants that can eliminate radioactive cesium, iodine and strontium from the radio-polluted aquatic environment. J. Plant Res. 2014, 127, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zazouli, M.A.; Mahvi, A.H.; Dobaradaran, S.; Barafrashtehpour, M.; Mahdavi, Y.; Balarak, D. Adsorption of fluoride from aqueous solution by modified Azolla filiculoides. Fluoride 2014, 47, 349–358. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shi, W.; Wang, L.; Rousseau, D.P.L.; Lens, P.N.L. Removal of estrone, 17α-ethinylestradiol, and 17β-estradiol in algae and duckweed-based wastewater treatment systems. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2010, 17, 824–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Pinsky, C.; Bose, R.; Taylor, J.R.; McKee, J.; Lapointe, C.; Birchall, J. Cesium in mammals: Acute toxicity, organ changes and tissue accumulation. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 1981, 16, 549–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rundo, J. A Survey of the Metabolism of Caesium in Man. Br. J. Radiol. 1964, 37, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Juhasz, A.L.; Naidu, R. Explosives: Fate, dynamics, and ecological impact in terrestrial and marine environments. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2007, 191, 163–215. [Google Scholar]
  24. Konradsen, F.; Van der Hoek, W.; Amerasinghe, F.P.; Mutero, C.; Boelee, E. Engineering and malaria control: Learning from the past 100 years. Acta Trop. 2004, 89, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Adamia, G.; Chogovadze, M.; Chokheli, L.; Gigolashvili, G.; Gordeziani, M.; Khatisashvili, G.; Kurashvili, M.; Pruidze, M.; Varazi, T. About possibility of alga Spirulina application for phytoremediation of water polluted with 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene. Ann. Agrar. Sci. 2018, 16, 348–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kurashvili, M.; Varazi, T.; Khatisashvili, G.; Gigolashvili, G.; Adamia, G.; Pruidze, M.; Gordeziani, M.; Chokheli, L.; Japharashvili, S.; Khuskivadze, N. Blue-green Alga Spirulina as a Tool Against Water pollution by 1,1′-(2,2,2-Trichloroethane-1,1-diyl)bis(4-chlorobenzene) (DDT). Ann. Agrar. Sci. 2018, 16, 405–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kurashvili, M.; Adamia, G.; Varazi, T.; Khatisashvili, G.; Gigolashvili, G.; Pruidze, M.; Chokheli, L.; Japharashvili, S. Application of Blue-green Alga Spirulina for removing Caesium ions from polluted water. Ann. Agrar. Sci. 2019, in press. [Google Scholar]
  28. Butterwick, C.; Heaney, S.I.; Talling, J.F. A comparison of eight methods for estimating the biomass and growth of planktonic algae. Br. Phycol. J. 1982, 17, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Garrido Frenich, A.; Martínez Vidal, J.L.; Moreno Frías, M.; Olea-Serrano, F.; Olea, N.; Cuadros Rodriguez, L. Determination of organochlorine pesticides by GC-ECD and GC-MS-MS techniques including an evaluation of the uncertainty associated with the results. Chromatographia 2003, 57, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Oh, B.; Sarath, G.; Drijber, R.A.; Comfort, S.D. Rapid spectrophotometric determination of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene in a Pseudomonas enzyme assay. Microbiol. Methods 2000, 42, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guba, L.V.; Dovgyy, I.I.; Rizhkova, M.A. Method of measuring of cesium by flame emission photometry method. Sci. Notes Taurida V. Vernadsky Natl. Univ. Ser. Biol. Chem. 2012, 25, 284–288. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mondal, M.; Halder, G.; Oinam, G.; Indrama, T.; Tiwari, O.N. Bioremediation of Organic and Inorganic Pollutants Using Microalgae. In New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Gupta, V.K., Pandey, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 223–235. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Results of model experiments for cleaning water polluted with DDT by using Arthrospira. Mean values (n = 3) and ±SD are given.
Table 1. Results of model experiments for cleaning water polluted with DDT by using Arthrospira. Mean values (n = 3) and ±SD are given.
Number of Model ExperimentInitial Content of Arthrospira in Polluted Water, g/LContent of DDT in Polluted Water, mg/L
Initial (before Incubation)Final (after Incubation)
DDT-13.0102.56 ± 0.15
DDT-23.5101.42 ± 0.08
DDT-34.0100.98 ± 0.06
DDT-44.5100.97 ± 0.06
DDT-54.5153.49 ± 0.21
Table 2. Results of model experiments for cleaning water polluted with TNT by using Arthrospira. Mean values (n = 3) and ±SD are given.
Table 2. Results of model experiments for cleaning water polluted with TNT by using Arthrospira. Mean values (n = 3) and ±SD are given.
Number of Model ExperimentInitial Content of Arthrospira in Polluted Water, g/LContent of TNT in Polluted Water, mg/L
Initial (before Incubation)Final (after Incubation)
TNT-13.022.52.61 ± 0.13
TNT-23.356.04.50 ± 0.25
TNT-33.556.01.80 ± 0.11
Table 3. Results of model experiments for cleaning water polluted with Cs+ ions by using Arthrospira. Mean values (n = 3) and ±SD are given.
Table 3. Results of model experiments for cleaning water polluted with Cs+ ions by using Arthrospira. Mean values (n = 3) and ±SD are given.
Number of Model ExperimentInitial Content of Arthrospira in Polluted Water, g/LContent of Cs+ Ions in Polluted Water, mg/L
Initial (before Incubation)Final (after Incubation)
CS-13.010018.3 ± 0.91
CS-23.510010.3 ± 0.06
CS-34.01009.90 ± 0.05
CS-44.515025.1 ± 2.26

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tabagari, I.; Kurashvili, M.; Varazi, T.; Adamia, G.; Gigolashvili, G.; Pruidze, M.; Chokheli, L.; Khatisashvili, G.; von Fragstein und Niemsdorff, P. Application of Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis against Chemical Pollution of Water. Water 2019, 11, 1759. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091759

AMA Style

Tabagari I, Kurashvili M, Varazi T, Adamia G, Gigolashvili G, Pruidze M, Chokheli L, Khatisashvili G, von Fragstein und Niemsdorff P. Application of Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis against Chemical Pollution of Water. Water. 2019; 11(9):1759. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091759

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tabagari, Inga, Maritsa Kurashvili, Tamar Varazi, George Adamia, George Gigolashvili, Marina Pruidze, Liana Chokheli, Gia Khatisashvili, and Peter von Fragstein und Niemsdorff. 2019. "Application of Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis against Chemical Pollution of Water" Water 11, no. 9: 1759. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091759

APA Style

Tabagari, I., Kurashvili, M., Varazi, T., Adamia, G., Gigolashvili, G., Pruidze, M., Chokheli, L., Khatisashvili, G., & von Fragstein und Niemsdorff, P. (2019). Application of Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis against Chemical Pollution of Water. Water, 11(9), 1759. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091759

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop