Water Security in a Changing Environment: Concept, Challenges and Solutions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. Water Security: Concept and Evolution
4. Emerging Paradigms of Water Security
5. Water Security Assessment and Indicators
6. Sustainable Solutions
6.1. Polycentric and Adaptive Governance
- (a)
- Regional Circular and Ecological Sphere (RCES)—RCES is a concept that complements and supports regional resources by building broader networks, which is composed of natural connections (connections among forests; city and countryside; groundwater, rivers and the sea) and, economic connections (composed of human resources, funds, and others), thus complementing each other and generating synergy [37]. In terms of water security, this concept will lead to self-reliant and decentralized society. This will promote water reuse, reclamation, and restoration using decentralized water management systems. Additionally, it will enhance our reliability on renewable source of energy with less dependence on water resources.
- (b)
- Participatory Watershed Land-use Management (PWLM) approach—PWLM is another very innovative and successful approach for more robust water resource management [38]. It helps to make land-use and climate change adaptation policies more effective at a local scale. This is an integrative method using both participating tactics and computer simulation modeling for the water resource management at a regional scale. The whole process is divided into four main steps: (a) scenario analysis, (b) impact assessment, (c) developing adaptation and mitigation measures and its integration in local government policies, and (d) improvement of land-use plan.
- (c)
- Citizen science—Citizen science can be generally defined as “the engagement of non-professionals in scientific investigations” [39,40]. This is also a unique way for the general people to contribute to monitor water pollution and its management progress. This can be done by participating in “citizen science” initiatives, e.g., by reporting detections of water pollution in their locality. Normally, the citizens involved here are volunteers and unpaid, and contribute out of their own personal interest in the topic of the investigation. Although this is an old technique, it got into the limelight recently because of advances in information and communications technology (ICT) including mobile smartphones with internet, GPS, and camera capabilities [40,41]. Use of ICT has made it much easier for citizen volunteers to interact with professional scientists and pass this useful information about water quality to the decision makers.
- (d)
- Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM)—IWRM is a vital approach to improve water security and sustainability through better water use efficiency and conservation. Although the term or the concept IWRM, is available and frequently being used by different stakeholders since the last few decades but its ground application remains questionable [42,43,44,45]. While much progress has been made on water quality, water quantity components, this study suggests the critical elements for the success of IWRM in the ground are to prioritize the inclusion of human or socioeconomic dimension, nexus dimension (water–food–energy–health) etc., which are still unexplored in most of the regions [46,47]. In general, conventional models helps us to quantify and project plausible future of the water environment, but they cannot guarantee their goal attainment because of adaptive responses by humans and management decisions which might have unintended consequences [48,49,50]. Therefore, an integrated perspective in analyzing water related risk through socio-hydrological pathways is deemed essential for better understanding the action research and policy implication for sustainable water management [46].
6.2. Combination of Hard and Soft Measures
- (a)
- Water reuse, restoration and reclamation—Considering the interwoven issue of water scarcity in the lieu of rapid global change and frequent extreme weather conditions, it is important to think holistically for both water quality and quantity. This issue becomes more acute in case of countries with arid or semiarid environments with very little freshwater available. Henceforth, the concept of 3Rs (reduction, restoration, and reclamation) is very important to achieve a water secure world. Water reuse in terms of restoration and reclamation become a matter of prime concern, which has multidimensional (financial, socioeconomic, and environmental) benefits. To achieve this, all water users and stakeholders must be aware about the use of reclaimed water, its social acceptance, and pros and cons of using this reclaimed water [51]. However, in order to make this reuse more sustainable, a sound and scientific knowledge about the source of wastewater or treated saltwater, chemical composition, and its sectoral usage is most important [52]. For reducing the water usage, several innovative ways are already in practice such as smart monitoring to minimize nonrevenue loss of water, intelligent irrigation using agriculture engineering in the field, rainwater harvesting, financing urban water usage, water tariff, etc. [53].
- (b)
- Water conservation technologies (WCT)—WCT are of larger importance for developing countries like India with traditional irrigation schemes having efficiencies of 30–40% [54]. It is envisioned that increased use of WCT will play an important role in improving the productivity of rain-based agriculture and irrigation efficiency. Water conservation and water saving technologies are delivering benefits such as improved water productivity, improved farm profits and others, if it is well planned and managed. In addition, the WCT reduces the nonbeneficial consumptive water use such as the well-managed drip irrigation or orchard crops and enhances the distributional profits under regulatory frameworks.
- (c)
- Modeling and Forecasting—Different hydrologic simulation models are powerful tools, which enable to assess various implications of the rapidly changing global processes on water resources variables. Although, various hydrologic models with specific features are available for simulating the water resources variables like runoff, groundwater recharge, surface water–groundwater interaction, water quality, contaminant fate, and transport etc. Based on the goals to be achieved, different models (continuous or event-based type; empirical, conceptual, and physical types) can be selected. However, these models can be effectively applied only when it has a significant amount of required input datasets and skilled people to handle it. For data scarce countries, it is important to have easy access to free available data and tools for sustainable water management. On the other hand, capacity building is also critically important for making these countries self-sufficient for doing better in analyzing future status of water resources and hence can design appropriate adaptation and mitigation strategies for water resource management.
6.3. Nature-Based Solutions
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Reference Number | Title of the Reviewed Papers | Category (Key Topics According to the Seven Dimensions of Water Security) |
---|---|---|
[1] | Strengthening water security in Asia and the Pacific | Transboundary issues |
[2] | Water: Asia’s new battleground | Transboundary issues, |
[3] | Coping with water scarcity. Challenge of the twenty-first century | Household, Economic, Urban, Environmental |
[4] | Impact of urbanization on water shortage in face of climatic aberrations | Urban, Environmental, Transboundary issues, Safe or desirable quality, Economic |
[5] | Global water crisis and future food security in an era of climate change | Economic, Environmental |
[6] | Water Crisis Report | Transboundary issues, Economic, Environmental, Safe or desirable quality, Resilience to water related disasters |
[7] | Water quality management: a globally neglected issue | Safe and desirable quality |
[8] | Future Outlook of Urban Water Environment in Asian Cities | Economic, Urban, Environmental |
[9] | Land use, water management and future flood risk | Resilience to water related disasters, Safe or desirable quality |
[10] | Determinants of residential water consumption: Evidence and analysis from a 10-country household survey | Economic, Household |
[11] | Responding to the challenges of water security: the Eighth Phase of the International Hydrological Programme | Resilience to water related disasters, Environmental, Safe or desirable quality, Household, Economic |
[12] | Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change | Environmental |
[13] | UN-Water Analytical brief: Water security and the global water agenda | Environmental, Economic, Safe or desirable quality, Resilience to water related disasters |
[14] | A clash of paradigms in the water sector? Tensions and synergies between integrated water resources management and the human rights-based approach to development | Environmental, Economic, Transboundary water related issues, Safe or desirable quality |
[15] | Water security: what does it mean, what may it imply? | Environmental Economic, Urban, Resilience to water related disasters |
[16] | Web of Science use in published research and review paper Sciences 1997–2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis | For method used in this paper |
[17] | Water security: Debating an emerging paradigm | Integrative of the seven dimensions |
[18] | China’s water security: Current status, emerging challenges and future prospects. Environmental Science and Policy | Environmental, Economic, Urban, Safe or desirable quality |
[19] | "Water scarcity: Fact or Fiction?" | Economic, Household, Urban, Environmental |
[20] | Climate, climate change and human health in Asian Cities. | Environmental, Urban, Safe or desirable quality |
[21] | Global hydrological cycles and world water resources | Environmental |
[22] | Transitioning to Water Sensitive Cities: Historical, Current and Future Transition States | Urban |
[23] | A comprehensive optimum integrated water resource management approach for multidisciplinary water resources management problems | Integrative of seven dimensions |
[24] | Governing water: contentious transnational politics and global institution building | Environmental, Transboundary water related issues |
[25] | Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-) management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda | Household, Economic, Urban, Environmental, Resilience to water related disasters, Safe or desirable quality, Transboundary issues |
[26] | Assessing Water Security with Appropriate Indicators | Integrative of seven dimensions |
[27] | Integrated urban water management scenario modeling for sustainable water governance in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal | Urban, Economic, Environmental, |
[28] | Hydrogeochemical Evolution and Appraisal of Groundwater Quality in Panna District, Central India | Safe or desirable quality, Economic, Environmental |
[29] | Framework to assess sources controlling soil salinity resulting from irrigation using recycled water: an application of Bayesian Belief Network | Safe or desirable quality, Urban, Households |
[30] | Risk-based principles for defining and managing water security risk-based principles for defining and managing water security | Environmental, Economic, Safe or desirable quality, Resilience to waters related hazards |
[31] | Urban water security indicators: Development and pilot. | Urban |
[32] | Fresh Water-Related Indicators in Canada: An Inventory and Analysis | Environmental |
[33] | Water, people, and sustainability—a systems framework for analyzing and assessing water governance regimes | Integrative of seven dimensions |
[34] | Ten building blocks for sustainable water governance: an integrated method to assess the governance of water | Environmental, Economic, Safe or desirable quality, Resilience to water related disasters |
[35] | Climate justice in lieu of climate change: a sustainable approach to respond to the climate change injustice and an awakening of the environmental movement | Environmental |
[36] | Population growth and water supply: The future of Ghanaian cities. Megacities and Rapid Urbanization: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice | Urban |
[37] | Creation of a Regional Circular and Ecological Sphere (RCES) to address local challenges | Environmental |
[38] | Participatory approach for enhancing robust water resource management: case study of Santa Rosa sub-watershed near Laguna Lake | Urban, Environmental, Safe or desirable quality |
[39] | The history of public participation in ecological research | Environmental |
[40] | Citizen science websites/apps for invasive species sightings: An analysis of 26 ongoing initiatives. | Environmental |
[41] | Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography | Environmental |
[42] | IWRM: what should we teach? A report on curriculum development at the University of the Western Cape, South Africa | Household, Economic, Urban, Environmental, Resilience to water related disasters, Safe or desirable quality, Transboundary issues |
[43] | Integrated water resource management (IWRM): an approach to face the challenges of the next century and to avert future crises | Household, Economic, Urban, Environmental, Resilience to water related disasters, Safe or desirable quality, Transboundary issues |
[44] | Good water governance and IWRM in Zambia: challenges and chances | Household, Economic, Urban, Environmental, Resilience to water related disasters, Safe or desirable quality, Transboundary issues |
[45] | The water-energy-food nexus: trade-offs, thresholds and transdisciplinary approaches to sustainable development | Economic, Urban, Environmental, Resilience to water related disasters, Safe or desirable quality |
[46] | Debates—Perspectives on socio-hydrology: Capturing feedbacks between physical and social processes | Resilience to water related disasters |
[47] | Stochastic multi-objective modelling for optimization of water-food-energy nexus of irrigated agriculture | Economic, Environmental |
[48] | Socio-hydrology: use-inspired water sustainability science for the Anthropocene | Environmental, Resilience to water related disasters |
[49] | Earth systems: Model human adaptation to climate change | Economic, Urban, Environmental |
[50] | Small-island communities in the Philippines prefer local measures to relocation in response to sea-level rise | Household, Resilience to water related disaster |
[51] | Solutions to water resource scarcity: water reclamation and reuse | Economic, Urban, Environmental |
[52] | Occurrence and risk assessment of emerging contaminants in a water reclamation and ecological reuse project | Environmental, Safe or desirable water quality |
[53] | The potential of water reuse as a management option for water security under the ecosystem services approach | Economic, Environmental, Safe or desirable water quality |
[54] | Post-adaptation behaviour of farmers towards soil and water conservation technologies of watershed management in India | Economic, Environmental |
[55] | How is ecosystem health defined and measured? A critical review of freshwater and estuarine studies | Economic, Environmental |
[56] | Rivers as Socioecological Landscapes | Environmental dimension |
[57] | Connectivity in rivers | Environmental dimension |
[58] | Barriers and Bridges to Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions | Environmental and Transboundary dimension |
[59] | Ecological stakeholder analogs as intermediaries between freshwater biodiversity conservation and sustainable water management | Environmental and Transboundary dimension |
[60] | Integrating the social, hydrological and ecological dimensions of freshwater health: the Freshwater Health Index | Environmental, Safe or desirable quality, and Resilience to water related disasters dimension |
[61] | Exploring spatial variations in the relationships between residents’ recreation demand and associated factors: a case study in Texas | Household, Economic, Urban, Environmental, Resilience to water related disasters, Safe or desirable quality dimension |
[62] | Resilience and thresholds in river ecosystems | Environmental, Resilience to water related disasters dimension |
[63] | Managing urban water crises: adaptive policy responses to drought and flood in Southeast Queensland, Australia | Household, Economic, Urban, Environmental, Resilience to water related disasters, Safe or desirable quality dimension |
[64] | Participatory watershed land-use management approach: Interfacing science, policy and participation for effective decision making | Environmental, Safe or desirable quality, and Resilience to water related disasters dimension |
[65] | The Role of Community Champions in Long-Term Sustainable Urban Water Planning | Household, Economic, Urban, Environmental, Resilience to water related disasters, Safe or desirable quality dimension |
[66] | Public Participation in Natural Hazard Mitigation Policy Formation: Challenges for Comprehensive Planning | Household, Economic, Environmental, Resilience to water related disasters, Safe or desirable quality dimension |
[67] | Sustainable development and the water–energy–food nexus: A perspective on livelihoods | Household, Economic, Urban, Environmental, Resilience to water related disasters, Safe or desirable quality, Transboundary dimension |
[68] | Considering the energy, water and food nexus: towards an integrated modelling approach | Household, Economic, Urban, Environmental, Resilience to water related disasters, Safe or desirable quality, Transboundary dimension |
[69] | Ecosystem-based water security and the sustainable development goals. | Environmental, Resilience to water related disasters, Safe or desirable quality dimension |
[70] | UN - United Nations. Sustainable Development Goal 6 Synthesis Report 2018 on Water and Sanitation | Household, Economic, Urban, Environmental, Resilience to water related disasters, Safe or desirable quality, Transboundary dimension |
[71] | Global analysis of urban surface water supply vulnerability | Household, Economic, Urban, Environmental, Resilience to water related disasters, Safe or desirable quality, Transboundary dimension |
References
- Asian Water Development Outlook (AWDO). Strengthening Water Security in Asia and the Pacific. 2016. Available online: https://www.adb.org/publications/asian-water-development-outlook-2016 (accessed on 27 August 2018).
- Chellaney, B. Water: Asia’s New Battleground; Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- UN-Water. Coping with Water Scarcity. Challenge of the Twenty-First Century; UN-Water; FAO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007; p. 23. [Google Scholar]
- Majumder, M. Impact of Urbanization on Water Shortage in Face of Climatic Aberrations; Springer Briefs in Water Science and Technology; Springer: Singapore, 2015; p. 98. ISSN 2194-7244. [Google Scholar]
- Hanjra, M.A.; Qureshi, M.E. Global water crisis and future food security in an era of climate change. Food Policy 2010, 35, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guppy, L.; Anderson, K. Water Crisis Report; United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health: Hamilton, ON, Canada, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Biswas, A.K.; Tortajada, C. Water quality management: A globally neglected issue. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2019, 35, 913–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masago, Y.; Mishra, B.K.; Jalilov, S.; Kefi, M.; Kumar, P.; Dilley, M.; Fukushi, K. Future Outlook of Urban Water Environment in Asian Cities; United Nations University: Tokyo, Japan, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Wheater, H.; Evans, E. Land use, water management and future flood risk. Land Use Policy 2009, 26, S251–S264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grafton, R.Q.; Ward, M.B.; To, H.; Kompas, T. Determinants of residential water consumption: Evidence and analysis from a 10-country household survey. Water Resour. Res. 2011, 47, W08537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jimenez-Cisneros, B. Responding to the challenges of water security: The Eighth Phase of the International Hydrological Programme, 2014–2021. Proc. IAHS 2015, 366, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Pachauri, R.K., Meyer, L.A., Eds.; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014; p. 151. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations University (UNU). UN-Water Analytical Brief: Water Security and the Global Water Agenda. Hamilton, ON, Canada. 2013, p. 47. Available online: http://inweh.unu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/water-security-and-the-global-water-agenda (accessed on 16 August 2018).
- Tremblay, H. A clash of paradigms in the water sector? Tensions and synergies between integrated water resources management and the human rights-based approach to development. (1 August 2010). Nat. Resour. J. 2011, 51, 307–356. [Google Scholar]
- Schultz, B.; Uhlenbrook, S. Water security: What does it mean, what may it imply? In Proceedings of the International Symposium “Water for a Changing World Developing Local Knowledge and Capacity”, Delft, The Netherlands, 13–15 June 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Li, K.; Rollins, J.; Yan, E. Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics 2018, 115, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cook, C.; Bakker, K. Water security: Debating an emerging paradigm. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2012, 22, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y. China’s water security: Current status, emerging challenges and future prospects. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 54, 106–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rijsberman, F.R. Water scarcity: Fact or Fiction? Agric. Water Manag. 2006, 80, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kovats, S.; Akhtar, R. Climate, climate change and human health in Asian Cities. Environ. Urban. 2008, 20, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oki, T.; Kanae, S. Global hydrological cycles and world water resources. Science 2006, 313, 1068–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brown, R.; Keath, N.; Wong, T. Transitioning to Water Sensitive Cities: Historical, Current and Future Transition State. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh, UK, 31 August–5 September 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Jawad, J.Y.; Alsaffar, H.M.; Bertram, D.; Kalin, R.M. A comprehensive optimum integrated water resource management approach for multidisciplinary water resources management problems. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 239, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gareau, B.J.; Crow, B. Ken Conca. Governing Water: Contentious Transnational Politics and Global Institution Building; International Environmental Agreements; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2006; p. 466. [Google Scholar]
- Huitema, D.; Mostert, E.; Egas, W.; Moellenkamp, S.; Pahl-Wostl, C.; Yalcin, R. Adaptive water governance: Assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-) management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecol. Soc. 2009, 14, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GWP. Assessing Water Security with Appropriate Indicators; Global Water Partnership: Stockholm, Sweden, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Saraswat, C.; Mishra, B.K.; Kumar, P. Integrated urban water management scenario modeling for sustainable water governance in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Sustain. Sci. 2017, 12, 1037–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Kumar, A.; Singh, C.K.; Saraswat, C.; Avtar, R.; Ramanathan, A.L.; Herath, S. Hydrogeochemical Evolution and Appraisal of Groundwater Quality in Panna District, Central India. Expo. Health 2016, 8, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.M.; Hagare, D.; Maheshwari, B. Framework to assess sources controlling soil salinity resulting from irrigation using recycled water: An application of Bayesian Belief Network. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 105, 406–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, J.W.; Borgomeo, E. Risk-based principles for defining and managing water security risk-based principles for defining and managing water security. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2013, 371, 20120407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Jensen, O.; Wu, H. Urban water security indicators: Development and pilot. Environ. Sci. Policy 2018, 83, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunn, G.; Bakker, K. Fresh Water-Related Indicators in Canada: An Inventory and Analysis. Can. Water Resour. J. 2011, 36, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wiek, A.; Larson, K.L. Water, people, and sustainability—A systems framework for analyzing and assessing water gover-nance regimes. Water Resour Manag. 2012, 26, 3153–3171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van-Rijswick, M.; Edelenbos, J.; Hellegers, P.; Kok, M.; Kuks, S. Ten building blocks for sustainable water governance: An integrated method to assess the governance of water. Water Int. 2014, 39, 725–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saraswat, C.; Kumar, P. Climate justice in lieu of climate change: A sustainable approach to respond to the climate change injustice and an awakening of the environmental movement. Energy Ecol. Environ. 2016, 1, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cobbinah, P.B.; Okyere, D.K.; Gaisie, E. Population growth and water supply: The future of Ghanaian cities. In Megacities and Rapid Urbanization: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice; IGI Global: Pasadena, CA, USA, 2020; pp. 96–117. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Environment. Creation of a Regional Circular and Ecological Sphere (RCES) to Address Local Challenges. 2018. Available online: https://www.env.go.jp/policy/kihon_keikaku/plan/plan_5 (accessed on 20 August 2020).
- Kumar, P.; Johnson, B.A.; Dasgupta, R.; Avtar, R.; Chakraborty, S.; Masayuki, K.; Macandog, D. Participatory approach for enhancing robust water resource management: Case study of Santa Rosa sub-watershed near Laguna Lake, Philippines. Water 2020, 12, 1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rushing, M.; Primack, R.; Bonney, R. The history of public participation in ecological research. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2012, 10, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, B.; Mader, A.; Dasgupta, R.; Kumar, P. Citizen science websites/apps for invasive species sightings: An analysis of 26 ongoing initiatives. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2019, 21, e00812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodchild, M.F. Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 2007, 69, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jonker, L. IWRM: What should we teach? A report on curriculum development at the University of the Western Cape, South Africa. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2005, 30, 881–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radif, A.A. Integrated water resource management (IWRM): An approach to face the challenges of the next century and to avert future crises. Desalination 1999, 124, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uhlendahl, T.; Salian, P.; Casarotto, C.; Doetsch, J. Good water governance and IWRM in Zambia: Challenges and chances. Water Policy 2011, 13, 845–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kurian, M. The water-energy-food nexus: Trade-offs, thresholds and transdisciplinary approaches to sustainable development. Environ. Sci. Policy 2017, 68, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baldassarre, D.; Viglione, G.A.; Carr, G.; Kuil, L.; Yan, K.; Brandimarte, L.; Bloschl, G. Debates—Perspectives on socio-hydrology: Capturing feedbacks between physical and social processes. Water Resour. Res. 2015, 51, 4770–4781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mo, L.; Qiang, F.; Singh, V.P.; Dong, L.; Tianxiao, L. Stochastic multi-objective modelling for optimization of water-food-energy nexus of irrigated agriculture. Adv. Water Resour. 2019, 127, 209–224. [Google Scholar]
- Sivapalan, M.; Konar, M.; Srinivasan, V.; Chhatre, A.; Wutich, A.; Scott, C.A.; Wescoat, J.L.; Iturbe, I.R. Socio-hydrology: Use-inspired water sustainability science for the Anthropocene. Earths Future 2014, 2, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Palmer, P.I.; Smith, M.J. Earth systems: Model human adaptation to climate change. Nature 2014, 7515, 365–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamero, M.L.; Onuki, M.; Esteban, M.; Billones-Sensano, X.K.; Tan, N.; Nellas, A.; Takagi, H.; Thao, N.D.; Valenzuela, V.P. Small-island communities in the Philippines prefer local measures to relocation in response to sea-level rise. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2017, 7, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Y.; Hu, H.; Zhang, J. Solutions to water resource scarcity: Water reclamation and reuse. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 5095–5097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, X.; Xu, J.; Keller, A.A.; He, L.; Gu, Y.; Zheng, W.; Sun, D.; Lu, Z.; Huang, J.; Huang, X.; et al. Occurrence and risk assessment of emerging contaminants in a water reclamation and ecological reuse project. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 744, 140977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voulvoulis, N. The potential of water reuse as a management option for water security under the ecosystem services approach. Desalination Water Treat. 2015, 53, 3263–3271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagdi, G.L.; Mishra, P.K.; Kurothe, R.S.; Arya, S.L.; Patil, S.L.; Singh, A.K.; Bihari, B.; Prakash, O.; Kumar, A.; Sundarambal, P. Post-adaptation behaviour of farmers towards soil and water conservation technologies of watershed management in India. Inter. Soil & Water Cons. Res. 2015, 3, 161–169. [Google Scholar]
- O’Brien, A.; Townsend, K.; Hale, R.; Sharley, D.; Pettigrove, V. How is ecosystem health defined and measured? A critical review of freshwater and estuarine studies. Ecol. Ind. 2016, 8, 722–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, A.; Chakraborty, S. Rivers as Socioecological Landscapes. In Rivers and Society: Landscapes Governance and Livelihoods; Earthscan Studies in Water Resource Management; Cooper, M., Chakraborty, A., Chakraborty, S., Eds.; Earthscan; Routledge: London, UK, 2017; Chapter 2; pp. 9–26. [Google Scholar]
- Wohl, E. Connectivity in rivers. Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ. 2017, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunderson, L.H.; Holling, C.S.; Light, S. Barriers and Bridges to Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Van-Rees, C.B.; Cañizares, J.R.; Garcia, G.M.; Reed, J.M. Ecological stakeholder analogs as intermediaries between freshwater biodiversity conservation and sustainable water management. Environ. Pol. Gov. 2019, 29, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vollmer, D.; Shaad, K.; Souter, N.J.; Farrell, T.; Dudgeon, D.; Sullivan, C.A.; Fauconnier, I.; MacDonald, G.M.; McCartney, M.P.; Power, A.G.; et al. Integrating the social, hydrological and ecological dimensions of freshwater health: The Freshwater Health Index. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 627, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.H.; Schuett, M.A. Exploring spatial variations in the relationships between residents’ recreation demand and associated factors: A case study in Texas. Appl. Geogr. 2014, 53, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parsons, M.; Thoms, M.; Capon, T.; Capon, S.; Reid, M. Resilience and Thresholds in River Ecosystems; National Water Commission; Waterlines: Canberra, Australia, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Head, B.W. Managing urban water crises: Adaptive policy responses to drought and flood in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Endo, I.; Didham, R.J. Participatory Watershed Land-Use Management Approach: Interfacing Science, Policy and Participation for Effective Decision Making; IGES: Hayama, Japan, 2016; Available online: https://www.iges.or.jp/en/pub/participatory-watershed-land-use-management-0/en (accessed on 2 September 2020).
- Lindsay, J.; Rogers, B.C.; Church, E.; Gunn, A.; Hammer, K.; Dean, A.J.; Fielding, K. The Role of Community Champions in Long-Term Sustainable Urban Water Planning. Water 2019, 11, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Godschalk, D.R.; Brody, S.; Burby, R. Public Participation in Natural Hazard Mitigation Policy Formation: Challenges for Comprehensive Planning. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2010, 46, 733–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biggs, E.M.; Bruce, E.; Boruff, B.; Duncan, J.M.A.; Horsley, J.; Pauli, N.; McNeil, K.; Neef, A.; Ogtrop, F.V.; Curnow, J.; et al. Sustainable development and the water–energy–food nexus: A perspective on livelihoods. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 54, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bazilian, M.; Rogner, H.; Hoells, M.; Hermann, S.; Arent, D.; Gielen, D.; Steduto, P.; Mueller, A.; Komor, P.; Tol, R.S.J.; et al. Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 7896–7906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vörösmarty, C.J.; Osuna, V.R.; Cak, A.; Bhaduri, A.; Bunn, S.E.; Corsi, F.; Gastelumendi, J.; Green, P.; Harrison, I.; Lawford, R.; et al. Ecosystem-based water security and the sustainable development goals. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UN—United Nations. Sustainable Development Goal 6 Synthesis Report 2018 on Water and Sanitation; United Nations Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Padowski, J.C.; Gorelick, S.M. Global analysis of urban surface water supply vulnerability. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 104004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Water Security Solution | References |
---|---|
Governance (Adaptive and Polycentric) including Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) | Kumar et al., 2020; Pahl Wostl et al., 2018; Saraswat et al., 2017; Head et al., 2014; Cook and Bakker, 2012; Wiek and Larson, 2012; Uhlendahl et al., 2011; Huitema et al., 2009; Brown et al., 2008; Masago et al., 2019; Al-Jawad et al., 2019; Weather et al., 2009; Radiff 1999 |
Combination of Hard and Soft Approaches | Masago et al., 2019; Mo et al., 2019; Mishra et al., 2018; Tian et al., 2017; Voulvoulis et al., 2015; Grafton et al., 2011; Biswas and Tortajada, 2019; Brown et al., 2008; Mishra et al., 2020 |
Nature-Based Solutions | Van-Rees et al., 2019; Lindsay et al., 2019; Vorosmarty et al., 2018; Jamero et al., 2017; Chakraborty and Chakraborty 2017; Gunderson et al., 1995; Mishra et al. 2020 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mishra, B.K.; Kumar, P.; Saraswat, C.; Chakraborty, S.; Gautam, A. Water Security in a Changing Environment: Concept, Challenges and Solutions. Water 2021, 13, 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040490
Mishra BK, Kumar P, Saraswat C, Chakraborty S, Gautam A. Water Security in a Changing Environment: Concept, Challenges and Solutions. Water. 2021; 13(4):490. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040490
Chicago/Turabian StyleMishra, Binaya Kumar, Pankaj Kumar, Chitresh Saraswat, Shamik Chakraborty, and Arjun Gautam. 2021. "Water Security in a Changing Environment: Concept, Challenges and Solutions" Water 13, no. 4: 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040490
APA StyleMishra, B. K., Kumar, P., Saraswat, C., Chakraborty, S., & Gautam, A. (2021). Water Security in a Changing Environment: Concept, Challenges and Solutions. Water, 13(4), 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040490