Next Article in Journal
Study on the Motion Characteristics of Particles Transported by a Horizontal Pipeline in Heterogeneous Flow
Previous Article in Journal
Simulation of the Water Storage Capacity of Siling Co Lake on the Tibetan Plateau and Its Hydrological Response to Climate Change
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Role of Ports in Tourism: Porto Santo Harbour

by
Sérgio Lousada
1,2,3,4,5,* and
Rui Alexandre Castanho
2,6,7
1
Department of Civil Engineering and Geology (DECG), Faculty of Exact Sciences and Engineering (FCEE), University of Madeira (UMa), 9000-082 Funchal, Portugal
2
CITUR—Madeira—Research Centre for Tourism Development and Innovation, 9000-082 Funchal, Portugal
3
VALORIZA—Research Centre for Endogenous Resource Valorization, Polytechnic Institute of Portalegre (IPP), 7300 Portalegre, Portugal
4
Environmental Resources Analysis Research Group (ARAM), University of Extremadura, 06071 Badajoz, Spain
5
RISCO—Department of Civil Engineering, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
6
Faculty of Applied Sciences, WSB University, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
7
College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2022, 14(19), 3176; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193176
Submission received: 17 May 2022 / Revised: 26 July 2022 / Accepted: 30 September 2022 / Published: 9 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Oceans and Coastal Zones)

Abstract

:
The island of Porto Santo belongs to the Madeira Archipelago and is often described as an idyllic paradise for its warm waters and its iconic sandy beach, though it faces vulnerabilities such as insularity; a small economy; geographic remoteness; and scarce population, area, and available resources. Nevertheless, these disadvantages have a silver lining because small territories can act as laboratories to test and develop models that can subsequently be implemented at a larger scale. This work provides a case study of the role of ports in tourism development It presents an analysis of air and maritime transport used by tourists to visit the Island of Porto Santo, Madeira Islands, Portugal. The climate changes and strong winds during the year can reduce tourist demand for the inter-island sea travel in the Madeira Archipelago. Porto Santo is a strategic transfer point for tourism, and improving the shipping infrastructures will enable a faster and more diversified maritime transportation system. To capitalise on these developments, Porto Santo needs to improve its reputation as an exclusive beach destination. This will reduce tourism seasonality and improve sustainability.

1. Introduction

Porto Santo is an island in the Archipelago of Madeira, as shown in Figure 1. The main economic sector of the island is tourism, based on its beaches and climate. Due to its peripheral location, transportation is a key consideration that places constraints on the local tourism economy. However, increases in transport accessibility are dependent on demand and in turn accommodation availability.
Meanwhile, sustainable tourism refers to sustainable practices in and by the tourism industry. It is an aspiration to acknowledge all impacts of tourism, both positive and negative. It aims to minimize the negative impacts and maximize the positive ones. Sustainable tourism is defined by the UN Environment Program and UN World Tourism Organization as “tourism that takes full account of its current and future economic, social and environmental impacts, addressing the needs of visitors, the industry, the environment and host communities.” Additionally, sustainable tourism “refers to the environmental, economic, and socio-cultural aspects of tourism development, and a suitable balance must be established between these three dimensions to guarantee its long-term sustainability” [1,2,3,4,5].
The definition states that sustainable tourism should satisfy the requirements of current visitors and host communities while preserving and enhancing prospects for the future. In order to do this, it is necessary to manage all resources in a way that satisfies economic, social, and aesthetic goals while preserving cultural integrity, crucial ecological processes, biological diversity, and life support systems [6].
The competitiveness and quality of tourism destinations, which are influenced by both natural and cultural settings, as well as their successful integration into the local community, are the foundations of tourism sustainability [7].
Tourism is considered one of the most important pillars for the social and economic sustainability of many regions and localities. Its impact is strong in various segments of society, and it is an excellent source of income and socioeconomic development for any region or country in the world. The economic importance of tourism and the sociocultural nature of the tourism phenomenon are undeniable in societies where tourism develops [8].
Tourist activity on the island of Porto Santo is considered by many a lifeline for the development of the island. In fact, tourism, thanks to its economic and social importance, is an important pillar of the island’s economy and development, as it constitutes a market of excellence for local products. It thus becomes the sector with the most weight in the local economy, bringing with it a number of activities, both commercial and very relevant services [8].
In this process, the ports constitute the identity frameworks of the cities that were born from them; with them they grew and have been transformed, tending to integrate recreational, cultural, and tourist uses in their activity [9].
Following the extensive changes within the post-industrial economic environment over the previous few decades, port cities all over the world reorganized themselves to meet the new demands and challenges. The conversion of beachfront vacant land parcels to new uses, often the so-called emergent landscapes of consumption like shopping malls and entertainment centers, was one of the numerous developments that attracted notice. Different port cities have gradually incorporated tourism activities into urban waterfront reconstruction projects due to widespread de-industrialization, the growth of the service sector, and the belief that tourism development would lead to the regeneration of urban centers [10,11].
Today, waterfront revitalization is a worldwide trend, with thousands of projects being implemented in major cities, medium-sized cities, and even small towns. Waterfronts offer highly exploitable urban spaces for new purposes including large-scale office, leisure, and residential buildings due to their excellent placement at the interface between built environment and water, close to the city centers [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Unlike more recent projects, which must deal with complicated urban development issues, early examples of historic waterfront redevelopment concentrated primarily on leisure and retail applications [15,21,22]. The transformation from a manufacturing to service-based economy and the rising demand for cultural amenities in post-industrial towns eventually made culture an essential tool for waterfront revitalization. Due to the widespread utilization of abandoned warehouses and port factories as venues for cultural events and amenities, historic waterfronts are now more appealing to tourists and have greater local vibrancy [16,17,23].
Due to the concentration of engaging land and sea activities, urban waterfronts—generally defined as the area of a town or city that borders the water, particularly a district of wharves where ships dock—have traditionally been advantageous locations [14,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Water was the primary human resource for sustenance, irrigation, and transportation in man’s early settlements, and events and development along the world’s coasts, rivers, bays, and lakes have played crucial roles in civilization. In the past, port expansion has dominated neighborhood life by enhancing the local economy and adding a cosmopolitan element. Ports developed into important urban centers thanks to a number of productive industries, including manufacturing and the modern “product services,” as well as the development of thriving urbanist cultures and societies [31]. This development process of value-added labor, value-added production, and value-added service [25] epitomizes the diversity of ports and their significance to life, industry, and commerce [32], from the early fishing village developing from settlements near the water to the busy transshipment stations serving the rapidly growing global transportation up to the modern expanding logistics hubs [25].
The 20th century saw a decline in the functional relationship between ports and cities, mostly as a result of advancements in maritime technology and the increasingly multifunctional nature of post-industrial cities, which steadily reduced their reliance on port activities. Ports were gradually pushed out of the center of cities as a result of shifts in international shipping methods, which resulted in the employment of ever-larger ships, containerization, and more extensive stocking areas. Following port closures, traditional harbor and manufacturing businesses saw a slump and relocated to the suburbs. The traditional harbor economy rapidly ceased to serve as the primary economic engine for urban growth, leading to sharp declines in local labor forces, depopulation, and urban decay. Historic waterfront dock areas have changed from being emblems of affluence to being symbols of social and economic decline [29,33,34].
However, as Ashworth [13] notes, the waterfront’s abandonment by ports and related industries, along with these regions’ likely prior historical significance, led to the conservation of architectural artifacts and historical connotations. The ensuing “zone of discard” [35], which was at or near city centers and involved the land/water interface, endowed urban waterfronts with potentially high-quality constructed environments from which stem intrinsic qualities that might be used as resources for urban tourism. In order to restore their economic and social connections with the city and support urban economic growth, formerly active but now underutilized and physically degraded port districts have to adapt their uses [12]. Waterfront restructuring, also known as waterfront “redevelopment,” “regeneration,” “revitalization,” or “rehabilitation” in the literature [28,36,37,38], became the focus of urban planning initiatives in the context of sustainable urban development strategy.
The gradually growing flows of urban tourism, which is classified as a complex phenomenon with a diversified and ill-defined collection of activities, are fueling tourism, which is commonly believed by academics and practitioners to become the largest worldwide industry [24,39]. Cities around the world are transforming into hotspots for cultural tourism, and to varying degrees [40] based on local elements like legacies of beautiful buildings and history but also on contemporary cultural interchange and experience, which combine to produce various results.
Paradoxically so close to nature, climate, and tides, and so heavily industrialized and close to civilization (cities and the globalized world), ports are unique places, populated with contrasting facets. Warehouses, docks, cranes and hoists, unexpected corners, quays, walls, rails, cargo and containers, along with old boats and some abandoned spaces, are other characteristic images of the port. On the other hand, as borders, ports have always had their own control and security mechanisms, namely military/police, customs and sanitary [9,41,42].
The global economy benefits from the dynamic development of maritime transport. International maritime trade, transportation, and tourism are all sea-based activities that are critical to modern society’s economic development [43,44,45].
This study aims to understand the role of ports as tourism resources and how to maximize the outcome of a faster and diversified maritime transportation system.
In order to understand the interactions between supply of transportation and accommodation and anticipated demand, this study examines first operational port capacity and any development issues, then the ongoing economy of the port in the light of external trends. Next, there is a discussion of past and projected tourism accommodation trends followed by some general concerning strategies for the tourism development for the Island of Porto Santo in a sustainable way.

2. Port Study

2.1. Schematic of the Methodology

To structure the methodology for this study, it was subdivided into six chapters, as illustrated in Figure 2. Extensive bibliographic research and review was initially performed. Then, from the bibliography taken into consideration, data were selected related to the theme under study towards deepening the analysis. Using programmed Excel sheets, it became possible to determine the parameters and indexes needed, i.e., significant wave height, peak period, direction of propagation.
Then, the port economy in general is discussed, as well as specifying the importance of the port for the local economy (Porto Santo Island). Subsequently, the duly processed data relating to tourism development are presented. Subsequently, a chapter on strategy for the development of tourist models for Porto Santo Island is included.
Finally, in the last chapter of the methodology, some conclusions were drawn, expanding the scope of this paper. The following steps are further explained above.

2.2. Case Study

This section examines the Port of Porto Santo Island in order to maximize its use, being a key element for the local economy, as well as allowing the development of tourism. The Archipelago of Madeira is located in the Atlantic Ocean, close to the African coast. The archipelago of Madeira belongs to a biogeographic region called Macaronesia that includes the archipelagos of Azores, Canaries and Cape Verde. These are all volcanic islands and have biological, geological and human similarities [46]. Porto Santo is located in the northeast of Madeira Island and southwest of Portugal’s mainland. The island has an area of approximately 41 km2, a 38 km coastal strip, is 11 km long between Furna das Amasiadas and Ponta do Focinho do Urso, and 6 km wide from Ponta da Cruz to Ponta do Incão [46,47,48,49]. The number of people residing in Porto Santo has increased over the last century with 4473 inhabitants in 2001 and 5483 inhabitants in 2011 [46,47,50].
The Autonomous Region of Madeira has a number of port structures around its coast. The Port of Porto Santo Island is located northeast of Madeira Island and 26 km from Ponta de S. Lourenço [51,52,53]. The Port of Porto Santo Island is characterized by being a mixed infrastructure, as it is used by cruise ships and cargo ships, as shown in Figure 3. In addition, as can be observed in Figure 4, it has a pier for fishing vessels, recreational vessels and a cement terminal, thus being considered a small-scale port when compared with the resident population.
The main pier is in the south, is 290.0 m long, and it has a hydrographic zero of 7.0 m and a roll-on/roll-off ramp. It is used by cruise ships and cargo ships with a maximum length of 150 m. The protection pier has a length of 210 m and a draft of 4.0 m [54]. This pier is used by fishing and recreational vessels. The port is quite exposed to the southern sea, and when the tide is strong it becomes inoperable for ships, but 95% of the time it is fully functional [54]. In addition, the Lobo Marinho´s undergoes maintenance for five weeks a year and unavailable for the transportation of people and goods.
The geographic location, altitude and relief orientation are key factors when determining a region’s climatic characteristics. For Madeira Island, the climate tends to be mild during the year in areas of medium and low altitude, with lower temperatures in the mountainous slopes. Porto Santo has a lower average altitude than Madeira, making the climate less humid. Therefore, the climatic characteristics of the island of Porto Santo are a reflection of a set of factors such as location, reduced area, relief, altitude [55,56].
The annual rainfall distribution of Porto Santo (Figure 5) shows the variation in precipitation on the island, where the rainfall is more intense between October and March, having its peaks between November and December and between February and March. It is also noted that in periods close to July, the precipitation reaches its minimum.
The data retrieved from Madeira Regional Delegation of the Meteorological Institute between the years of 1961 until 1990, enables us to characterize the island considering multiple parameters—e.g., cloudiness, temperature, humidity, atmospheric pressure, potential evapotranspiration, sunshine and wind [55,56].
Climatically, Porto Santo is located in the domain of the trade winds that blow most of the year from the north. Unlike in Madeira, the island does not have a mountainous barrier preventing their passage, so they sweep the island in all directions, reaching very high speeds. The absence of high altitudes makes it difficult for condensation (and subsequently rainfall) of the surrounding moist air masses. [...] To these unfavourable natural conditions there is also the thinness and poverty of sandy, salty soils with high percentage of clays, which does not allow the development of vegetation, nor favour agriculture [55,57]”.
In relation to vegetation, note that there is little vegetation present on Porto Santo and that the trees present on the island are due to the reforestation program [58]. This program began since “the regional forest was consumed early, subsisting, in areas inaccessible to man. The dragon tree, the juniper, the marmulano, the wild-olive tree, the zambujeiro and the laurel tree subsisted probably because they are resistant to dryness” [55].

2.3. Coastal Dynamics

The geological and geomorphological characteristics associated with the capacity for erosion and transport of solids appear to be factors that influence the dynamics of the coastal strip of the island of Porto Santo. Sea waves and tidal currents have modified the coast. The tide has a maximum height of 2.9 m and direction of propagation from the south (spate), changing its course to the east where it reaches a speed of 0.5 m/s [54]. The rise of the sea level in association with meteorological events, i.e., storm surge, are reported by APRAM (1998) and LNEC (2004) as having a maximum value of 0.6 m for storms. Thus, the study of the maritime climate is a relevant element in the planning and design process of maritime-port infrastructures, enabling the determination of wave conditions using historical data from local waves [59].
The peak period of the waves is a highly variable parameter, with a maximum around 8 s. A detailed analysis of wave data indicates that the prominent wave propagation in Porto Santo is found in the northeast quadrant, with approximately 32.03% of the waves originated in the north and 23.92% in the north-northeast. On the other hand, from the northwest quadrant, there are 6.10% of north-northwest and 2.37% of northwest, as can be observed in Figure 6.
Regarding the predominant significant wave height, it appears that it is between 1.0 and 1.5 m, 10% of the times coming from the north and 7.5% of the times from the north-northeast, as can be observed in Figure 7.
These data validate the previously description that the port is quite exposed to the southern sea and that only 5% of the time does it become inoperable for ships. As previously described, Lobo Marinho undergoes maintenance for five weeks a year and is unavailable for the transportation of people and goods. This maintenance turns out to be relevant in the analysis of wave data, having implications and affecting tourism in Porto Santo.
Therefore, in relation to the Port of Porto Santo Island, its form of execution and geographical framing in relation to the island. The fact that the island climate is not very humid, with more intense rains between October and March and trade winds most of the year from the north. In terms of coastal dynamics, the maritime agitation that affects the use of the port is little relevant, making the port inoperable for only 5% of the time (about 3 weeks per year). The joint analysis of these factors validates this port as a key element for the local economy, as well as for the development of tourism.
The island of Porto Santo has unique characteristics: Its excellent geographical location and its fabulous climate make it an appealing destination, despite its reduced dissemination, which is well implemented, and all its great features can make it a destination for tourists.

3. Port Economy

This section aims to assess whether the port of the island of Porto Santo has become a fundamental element for economic development, achieved through the increase of its use in a sustainable way, both by passengers and in the loading and unloading of goods.
Over the past few years, ports have become a strategic point for economic development in different regions worldwide. Contextually, ports not only influence the cost of living, but also the speed at which ships move along a country´s coast [60].
“It can be said that a port is a place that provides good conditions for anchoring and permanence of ships, in a relatively safe way, which can shelter them from winds and storms. Vessels and ships dock in order to embark or disembark passengers and load or unload goods [61,62]”.
The relevance of ports concerning a country’s economy for matters of tourism and cargo transportation is evidenced in countries with an economic base geared to international trade [63,64,65]. According to Estrela, the Portuguese port management model started to stand out in 2012 due to three main reasons [66,67,68,69,70,71], namely:
  • Troika: the government intends to improve the management of the port system;
  • Exports: the progress of industrial exports is an important tool for reducing the impacts of the economic crisis;
  • Sea: the endogenous resource potential must be maximized.
The Troika, consisting of the European Commission, ECB and IMF, negotiated an Economic Adjustment Programme aimed at restoring confidence, enabling the return of the economy to sustainable growth, and safeguarding financial stability in Portugal, a euro area in the European Union.
According to the Memorandum of Understanding on Economic Policy Conditionalities, the government was to adopt several measures in the waterway transport sector, as stated by Estrela (2014):
  • Define a strategy to integrate ports into the global logistics and transport system. Establish the goals, scope and priorities of the strategy, as well as the respective link to the Strategic Transport Plan;
  • Develop a legal framework to facilitate the implementation of the strategy and improve the governance model of the port system. Define the necessary measures to ensure the separation of regulatory activity, port management and commercial activities.
Since 2012, several documents with strategic content published by the government on the theme of the sea and ports have been published in order to follow the guidelines suggested by the European Union.
“What is impressive about the vision of the sea economy outlined in this study, is the possibility to grow and the subsequent business opportunities that are envisaged, when comparing the current situation with the natural potential of the resource and the use of the sea and when external long-term trends are known, which are driving a growing international demand for products and services related to the sea´s economy [67].”
Regarding the port on Porto Santo Island, there has been exponential growth in the number of passengers—mostly on cruise ships—during the last twenty years, following the global trend [68]. According to Brida, between 1990 and 2007, there was an average annual growth of 7.4%, and even with the slowdown in the growth rate, it is likely that this growth will be maintained in the future [68].
This growth can be understood as the result of a strategic change of cruising routes, making it affordable to everyone. Branchik and Dickinson and Vladimir corroborate this theory, stating that the adaptation of the ships and offer made it possible for the middle class to use this type of service [69].

4. Tourism Development Data

In this section, data related to tourist demand for accommodation and transport are analysed, specifically, the time series on the number of hotel establishments in operation, the number of guests entering hotel establishments, the evolution of the average stay in hotel units and preference for the transportation mode of passengers and goods (by air or sea).
The Regional Directorate of Statistics of Madeira (DREM) releases every year short and long series of metadata collected over the years, making it possible to create comparative graphs for different themes, e.g., tourism, transport, economy. The number of hotel establishments in Porto Santo has seen minor changes over the years, except for the time period between 2012 and 2015, i.e., the Portuguese economic crisis (Figure 8).
The comparative graph shown in Figure 9 lists the number of guests entering hotel establishments, subdivided into two categories, residing in Portugal and foreigners, between the years 2007 and 2017. It is possible to identify two distinct time periods in the graph, the first taking place between the years of 2007 and 2012 and the second between 2012 and 2017.
The first season shows a clear preference of national guests over foreigners with the maximum differential being reached in 2009, approximately 28,000 more national guests (40,514 in total) than foreigners. On the other hand, during the second season, the maximum differential was only 5675 in 2013, with both types reaching over 45,000 guests in 2019, although with a slight preference for the Portuguese.
Thus, the growing demand for Porto Santo as a tourist hub becomes evident, where the stay overnight is a key parameter, that is, the stays last at least four nights on the island, a positive indicator that favours a tourist destination´s sustainability (Figure 10).
Assessing the record of disembarked passengers, differentiating them as to their entry route on the island, Figure 11, there is a period of decrease in both methods between the years of 2008 and 2012, which then stabilizes until 2014, when the disembark of passengers either by sea or air starts to increase again reaching values of 167,235 and 78,370 passengers in 2019, respectively.
In 2011, there was also an increase in the number of average stays in hotels related to the strategy implemented by the ARM (Autonomous Region of Madeira) government to promote Destination Madeira internally and externally with a view to strengthening competitiveness in view of the situation experienced at the time and competing destinations. Porto Santo has always been promoted as a beach destination due to the quality and richness of its grains of sand and the temperature of its turquoise waters. These qualities are worth the title of Golden Island, or even “Caribbean Europe”; however, with the strategy implemented by the ARM government, other points of attraction were valued [72,73]
Although the annual records remain within the same order of magnitude, the preference for the sea route as a way for tourism to travel to the island is evident, the maximum differential being reached in 2009 with approximately 125,000 more passengers than by air. This highlights the importance of the port of Porto Santo as a strategic point and enhances the need to optimize the process. On the other hand, despite the increase in the demand for air transport to the island, this study highlights the possibility of maximizing the existing resources, promoting tourism sustainability, particularly in other seasons.
Finally, a comparison is made between both access routes to Porto Santo for the transportation of goods, as shown in Table 1, with particular emphasis on the sea route with a maximum of 60,890 tonnes compared with 191 by air in 2008 Analysing the temporal evolution of cargo transportation in Figure 12 and Figure 13, the currently recorded minimum values are noticeable, implying lower consumption by the residents and non-residents and subsequently the need to adopt strategies to stimulate Porto Santo´s local economy. Regarding 2018, the last year under analysis, the amount of cargo transportation was approximately 21,175 tonnes by sea and only 63 by air.
The results in this section indicate a preference for the transport of passengers and goods by sea. The island of Porto Santo suffered from a decline in demand at the beginning of the last decade that resulted first in a reduction in the hotel establishments in operation in 2012 followed by a longer-term trend towards higher international visitor numbers and also longer average stays in hotel units. It appears that there is ongoing demand for travel to Madeira and Porto Santo.

5. Strategy for the Development of Tourist Models

This section reviews regional and sectorial reference documents, including those related to the national strategy for the sector, updated statistical and qualitative information, as well as the most recent international studies.
The various changes that occurred in the regional, national and international conjuncture determine a global review and a strategic reorientation in the approach to the sector and its different components in order to reinforce and consolidate the work that has been developed by the Regional Government of Madeira, by the Madeira Promotion Association, by the sector’s private agents and by all other related entities, framing it and laying the necessary foundations for the future.

5.1. Actual Situation

According to GRM (Regional Government of Madeira)-A1 (2017), an increase of 3.3% per year in international tourism is expected worldwide between the period of 2010 and 2030. However, from the analysis between the years of 2000 and 2015, there is a stabilization in the number of accommodation and tourist establishments in the Autonomous Region of Madeira [74], as shown in Table 2.
The analysis of the table presented above corroborates that except for the variation between 2000 and 2001, there was not a clear increase in the local tourist supply, probably because the supply is less than the demand.
In this context, the potential for growth in the offer of accommodation in ARM reveals itself to be pivotal towards ARM´s sustainable development, particularly of Porto Santo [74].

5.2. Model Improvement Proposals

The island of Porto Santo despite its contained socio-territorial and cultural dimension presents a diversified and qualified matrix, with the potential to develop sustainable and sustained tourism, with a diversity of spaces for nature, sports and leisure activities. To do this, it will have to rebalance its positioning and seek to base its development on a different and differentiating tourism model.
The tourist model for the island of Porto Santo is based on the following vision for this island: enhancing the affirmation of Porto Santo in Destination Madeira due to the uniqueness of its socio-territorial dimension and its environmental, landscape, historical and cultural particularities.
For Porto Santo, “[...] there is a strong probability of growth in the offer of tourist accommodation (in a tourist resort) to adopt the format of “self-sufficient” tourist establishments based on an all-inclusive offer and supported by charter air transport operations (GRM, 2017)”. Therefore, for the optimization of the tourism model it becomes necessary for the following topics [38], as shown in Table 3.

5.3. Strategic Options

The strategic option adopted is the need to position Porto Santo as differentiated and authentic, with high-quality tourism.
Develop Porto Santo as a differentiated tourist destination based on the authenticity of the offer; genuine and quality service; and economic, social and environmental sustainability.
According to the Regional Government of Madeira, the systematization of the development aspects is based on a guideline with four fundamental topics [38], as shown in Table 4.

5.4. Growth Prospects

The ARM that saw an evolution in demand between 2000 and 2015 of just 1.5% (lower than the growth seen for Europe between 1980 and 2010—higher than 3%) should not be able to exceed this indicator and, in the case of maintaining the same dynamics compared with Europe, will be below the European indicator again, that is, below the line of 2.3% of annual average growth. Despite this indicator, the constructive dynamics related to the creation of the number of beds have an increasing trend.
“There are 3873 beds in ARM in tourism establishments under construction, of which approximately 20% are located in Porto Santo and 60% in Funchal [37]”, while the remaining 20% can be found in other municipalities of Madeira. Regarding future investments, there are approximately 2304 beds already approved by the Regional Tourism Directorate (DRT), as shown in the Table 5.
As described at the beginning of this section, based on specific documents as well as on the conjuncture that defines the evolution of tourism at a global level, the port of the island of Porto Santo is a key part in the evolution of tourism in a sustainable way, as it is allied with the optimization of tourism models and its growth. The topics presented in the previous sub-sections are intrinsically connected to the use of the main tourist entry structure on the island, the respective port.

6. Conclusions

In conclusion, the port of the island of Porto Santo is a key and unique element in sustainable and sustained tourism that allows for enhancing different activities, thus being a unique piece in the development of a different and differentiating tourism model.
This study provides an extensive analysis of the port of Porto Santo Island, and the parameters that influence its effect on the local economy. Porto Santo’s climate is influenced by the small area and low relief of the island. These factors, among others, make it less humid and the soil more arid, and less useful for agricultural purposes. The climate affects the production capacity, leading to an increase in imports and therefore to the transportation of cargo and goods. The sea route is preferable to air for transporting goods, so the port infrastructure of Porto Santo Island is the strategic point for loading and unloading goods.
An analysis of the coastal dynamics and sea waves that tend to affect the island indicate that the predominant wave direction is from the northeast quadrant, with a predominant wave height estimated between 1.5 and 2.0 m, occurring during 30.2% of the recorded time and with a maximum wave height of between 4.5 and 5 m. The records of the operation of Porto Santo´s port indicate that the maximum wave heights during heavy storm events would have a greater impact on the local economy, due to the inconveniences to the transportation of passengers, cargo and goods by sea.
An analysis of the evolution of tourism and access to the island, either by sea or air, indicates a clear preference for the sea route between islands. This highlights the importance of passenger daily transport by a regional company, which can also be seen in the prices of the air alternative, which may be two to three times higher than sea. The Funchal-Porto Santo connection, and vice versa, is currently carried out by a single company for each type of passenger transport, which ends up making the sea route much more economically and financially attractive. This compensates for the travel time, which is four to five times longer. In this sense, the value of transportation by sea and subsequently of the port of Porto Santo Island is unquestionable. Therefore, due to the increase in investments made and the implementation of development strategies, there is a constant improvement in the performance of the ports.
Finally, the environment is another key factor for sustainable development. The main goals of initiatives like GreenPort are as guidelines for the implementation of laws that help economic progress, whilst causing the least possible environmental impact. Although there is still a major conflict between the market´s offers and the environmental protection due to lack of economic feasibility, programs such as GreenPort have promoted and enabled the creation of new technologies that allow the cleaner and more sustainable development of insular territories, particularly for the island of Porto Santo.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L. and R.A.C.; methodology, S.L.; software, S.L.; validation R.A.C.; formal analysis, S.L. and R.A.C.; investigation, S.L.; resources, S.L.; data curation, S.L. and R.A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.L. and R.A.C.; writing—review and editing, S.L.; visualization, R.A.C.; supervision, S.L. and R.A.C.; project administration, S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funded by national funds through FCT—Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation, within the project reference UIDB/04470/2020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available. Additionally, it is possible to contact one of the study authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Batista, M.D.G.; Couto, G.; Castanho, R.A.; Sousa, Á.; Pimentel, P.; Carvalho, C. The Rural and Nature Tourism Development Potential in Islands. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mateoc-Sîrb, N.; Albu, S.; Rujescu, C.; Ciolac, R.; Țigan, E.; Brînzan, O.; Mănescu, C.; Mateoc, T.; Milin, I.A. Sustainable Tourism Development in the Protected Areas of Maramureș, Romania: Destinations with High Authenticity. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Klinsrisuk, R.; Pechdin, W. Evidence from Thailand on Easing COVID-19′s International Travel Restrictions: An Impact on Economic Production, Household Income, and Sustainable Tourism Development. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Šaparnienė, D.; Mejerė, O.; Raišutienė, J.; Juknevičienė, V.; Rupulevičienė, R. Expression of Behavior and Attitudes toward Sustainable Tourism in the Youth Population: A Search for Statistical Types. Sustainability 2022, 14, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. UNEP; UNWTO. Making Tourism More Sustainable—A Guide for Policy Makers; United Nations Environment Programme: Paris, France; World Trade Organization (WTO): Madrid, Spain, 2005; pp. 11–12. [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu, Z. Sustainable tourism development: A critique. J. Sustain. Tour. 2003, 11, 459–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Cope, D. Sustainable Development and the Trust. In The National Trust: The Next Hundred Years; Newby, H., Ed.; The National Trust: London, UK, 1995; pp. 53–69. [Google Scholar]
  8. Marujo, M.; Carvalho, P. Turismo, planeamento e desenvolvimento sustentável. Tur. Soc. 2010, 3, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Chaline, C. Forme urbaine et territoire en transition dans la ville portuaire de notre temps. In Urbanité des Cités Portuaires; Baudouin, T., Collin, M., Prélorenzo, C., Eds.; L’Harmattan: Paris, France, 1997; pp. 345–358. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cybriwsky, R. Changing Patterns of Urban Public Space: Observations and Assessments from the Tokyo and New York Metropolitan Areas. Cities 1999, 16, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pearce, D.G. An Integrative Framework for Urban Tourism Research. Ann. Tourism Res. 2001, 28, 926–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hoyle, B.S.; Pinder, D.A.; Husain, M.S. (Eds.) Revitalising: The Waterfront: International Dimensions of Dockland Redevelopment; Belhaven: London, UK, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ashworth, G.J. Heritage Planning: Conservation as the Management of Urban Change; GeoPers: Groningen, The Netherlankds, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoyle, B.S. Urban Waterfront Revitalization in Developing Countries: The Example of Zanzibar’s Stone Town. Geogr. J. 2002, 168, 141–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jauhiainen, J.S. Waterfront Redevelopment and Urban Policy: The Case of Barcelona, Cardiff and Genoa. Eur. Plan. Stud. 1995, 3, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Craig-Smith, S.; Fagence, M. (Eds.) Recreation and Tourism as a Catalyst for Urban Waterfront Redevelopment: An International Survey; Praeger: London, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gunay, Z.; Dokmeci, V. Culture-Led Regeneration of Istanbul Waterfront: Golden Horn Cultural Valley Project. Cities 2011, 29, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hall, P. Cities and Civilization: Culture, Innovation, and Urban. Order; Weidenfeld and Nicholson: London, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fainstein, S. Mega-Projects in New York, London and Amsterdam. Int. J. Urban. Reg. 2008, 32, 768–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lehrer, U.; Laidley, J. Old Mega-Projects Newly Packaged? Waterfront Redevelopment in Toronto. Int. J. Urban. Reg. 2008, 32, 786–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bender, R. Where the City Meets the Shore. In Waterfronts: A New Frontier for Cities on Water; Bruttomesso, R., Ed.; International Centre Cities on Water: Venice, Italy, 1993; pp. 32–38. [Google Scholar]
  22. Romein, A. Leisure in Waterfront Redevelopment: An Issue of Urban Planning in Rotterdam? Available online: http://aesop2005.scix.net/data/papers/att/606.fullTextPrint.pdf (accessed on 27 May 2012).
  23. Evans, G. Measure for Measure: Evaluating the Evidence of Culture’s Contribution to Regeneration. Urban. Stud. 2005, 42, 959–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ashworth, G.; Page, J.S. Urban Tourism Research: Recent Progress and Current Paradoxes. Tourism Manag. 2011, 32, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, W.-C.; Chen, C.-H.; Kao, S.-K.; Chen, K.-Y. The Concept of Diverse Developments in Port Cities. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2011, 54, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sairinen, R.; Kumpulainen, S. Assessing Social Impacts in Urban Waterfront Regeneration. Environ. Impact Asses. 2006, 26, 120–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Breen, A.; Rigby, D. Caution: Working Waterfront—The Impact of Change on Marine Enterprise; The Waterfront Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  28. Goodwin, R.F. Redeveloping Deteriorated Urban Waterfronts: The Effectiveness of US Coastal Management Programs. Coast. Manag. 1999, 27, 239–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hoyle, B. Revitalizing the Port-City Waterfront: Retrospect and Prospect. Geogr. Rev. 2000, 90, 395–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vallega, A. Urban Waterfront Facing Integrated Coastal Management. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2001, 44, 379–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Norcliffe, G.; Bassett, K.; Hoare, T. The Emergence of Postmodernism on the Urban Waterfront. J. Transp. Geogr. 1996, 4, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bassett, K.; Griffiths, R.; Smith, I. Testing Governance: Partnerships, Planning and Conflict in Waterfront Regeneration. Urban. Stud. 2002, 39, 1757–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lorente, J.P. Urban Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration. The Special Case of Declining Port Cities—Liverpool, Marseilles, Bilbao. In Global Cultural Media, Arts, Policy, and Globalization; Crane, D., Kawasshima, N., Kawasaki, K., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 93–104. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rodwell, D. Planning Systems: Do They Fit the Current Needs of Historic Port Cities? In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Waterfront: Culture, Heritage and Regeneration of Port Cities, BT Convention Centre, Kings Waterfront, Liverpool, UK, 19–21 November 2008; pp. 19–21. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tunbridge, J.; Ashworth, G. Leisure Resource Development in City Port Revitalization: The Tourist-Historic Dimension. In European Port Cities in Transition; Hoyle, B.S., Pinder, D.A., Eds.; Belhaven: London, UK, 1992; pp. 177–199. [Google Scholar]
  36. Vayona, A. Investigating the Preferences of Individuals in Redeveloping Waterfronts: The Case of the Port of Thessaloniki—Greece. Cities 2011, 28, 424–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gospodini, A. Urban Waterfront Redevelopment in Greek Cities: A Framework for Redesigning Space. Cities 2001, 18, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wood, R.; Handley, J. Urban Waterfront Regeneration in the Mersey Basin, North West England. J. Environ. Plan. Man. 1999, 42, 565–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Edwards, D.; Griffin, T.; Hayllar, B. Urban Tourism Research: Developing an Agenda. Ann. Tourism Res. 2008, 35, 1032–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ashworth, G.J.; Tunbridge, J.E. The Tourist-Historic City; Belhaven: London, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  41. Fabre, M. Les nouveaux territories de l’économie portuaire. In Métropoles Portuaires en Europe: Barcelone, Gênes, Hambourg, Liverpool, Marseille, Rotterdam, Les Cahiers de la Recherche Architecturale; Bonillo, J.-L., Donzel, A., Fabre, M., Eds.; 1992; pp. 179–191. Available online: http://www.sudoc.abes.fr/cbs/xslt/DB=2.1//SRCH?IKT=12&TRM=003630021 (accessed on 15 May 2022).
  42. Hayuth, Y. Changes on the waterfront: A model-based approach. In Revitalising the Waterfront: International Dimensions of Dockland Redevelopment; Hoyle, B.S., Pinder, D.A., Husain, M.S., Eds.; John Wiley: Chichester, UK, 1994; pp. 52–64. [Google Scholar]
  43. Katsanevakis, S. Marine debris, a growing problem: Sources, distribution, composition, and impacts. In Marine Pollution: New Research; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 53–100. [Google Scholar]
  44. Vinogradov, S. The impact of the deep-water horizon: The evolving international legal regime for offshore accidental pollution prevention, preparedness, and response. Ocean Dev. Int. Law 2013, 44, 335–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wi´snicki, B.; Kujawski, A. Conditions for developing a port city transport infrastructure illustrated with the example of Szczecin agglomeration. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 16, 566–575. [Google Scholar]
  46. Gonçalves, R.; Lousada, S.A.N. Metodologias de Determinação de Alturas de Onda Para Dimensionamento de Obras Marítimas. Master’s Thesis, University of Madeira, Madeira, Portugal, 2018. Available online: https://digituma.uma.pt/handle/10400.13/1263 (accessed on 1 February 2022).
  47. Abreu, M. Mar e Mar—Caso Porto Santo. Graduation Final Exam, University of Coimbra. UC Repository. 2008. Available online: https://estudogeral.uc.pt/handle/10316/7433 (accessed on 1 February 2022).
  48. Fernandes, J.M.; Janeiro, M.D.L. A Arquitetura Vernácula da Região Saloia: Enquadramento na Área Atlântico; Ministério da Educação: Lisboa, Portugal, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lousada, S.A.N.; Gonçalves, R. Metodologias de Determinação de Alturas de Onda: Dimensionamento de Obras Marítimas; Novas Edições Acadêmicas: Funchal, Portugal, 2019; ISBN 978-613-9-61105-8. [Google Scholar]
  50. Oliveira, F.M.; Pestana, E.; Vasconcelos, F.; Brito, R.; Freitas, S.; Mendonça, V. Plano de Ação Para a Energia Sustentável do Município do Porto Santo; Município do Porto Santo: Porto Santo, Portugal, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  51. Prada, S.; Sequeira, M.; Figueira, C.; Cruz, J.V. Disponibilidades Hídricas da Ilha da Madeira. In AQUAMAC—Técnicas e Métodos Para a Gestão Sustentável da Água na Macaronésia; Instituto Tecnológico de Canarias, Cabildo de Lanzarote, Consejo Insular de Águas de Lanzarote: Lanzarote, Spain, 2005; pp. 261–294. [Google Scholar]
  52. Brito, G. Micropropagação de duas espécies autóctones da Ilha de Porto Santo (Olea europaea L. ssp. maderensis Lowe e Juniperus phoenicea L.) e estudo da resposta de rebentos in vitro a stress osmótico. Master’s Thesis, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  53. Mata, J.; Fonseca, P.; Prada, S.; Rodrigues, D.; Martins, S.; Ramalho, R.; Madeira, J.; Cachão, M.; Da Silva, C.M.; Matias, M.J. O Arquipélago da Madeira. In Geologia de Portugal; Dias, R., Araújo, A., Terrinha, P., Kullberg, J.C.., Eds.; Escolar Editora: Lisboa, Portugal, 2013; Volume II, pp. 691–746. [Google Scholar]
  54. APRAM. Plano de Ordenamento da Orla Costeira da Ilha do Porto Santo. In Vol. 1—Estudos de Base, Tomo 1 (Relatório) e Tomo 2 (Figuras e Anexo I); Câmara Municipal do Porto Santo,: Porto Santo, Portugal, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ferreira, M.R. Património geológico da Ilha do Porto Santo e ilhéus adjacentes (Madeira): Inventariação, Avaliação e Valorização como contributo para a geoconservação. Master’s Thesis, Universidade dos Açores, Açores, Portugal, 2013; 527p. [Google Scholar]
  56. Silva, J. Areia de Praia da Ilha do Porto Santo: Geologia, génese, dinâmica e propriedades justificativas do seu interesse medicinal. In Madeira Rochas—Divulgações Científicas e Culturais; University of Aveiro: Aveiro, Portugal, 2003; 344p. [Google Scholar]
  57. Roseira, M. Porto Santo. Isolamento, arcaísmos e perspetivas. In Livro de Homenagem a Orlando Ribeiro; Centro de Estudos Geográficos: Lisboa, Portugal, 1988; Volume 2, pp. 493–505. [Google Scholar]
  58. Soares, A.; Callapez, P.; Marques, J. Aprender em Viagem—Geologia de Porto Santo (notas para uma viagem de estudo). Rev. Assoc. Port. Profr. Biol. Geol. 2006, 27, 7–45. [Google Scholar]
  59. LNEC. Manutenção e Melhoramento da Praia do Porto Santo; Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil: Lisbon, Portugal, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  60. Lafuente, J. Comparação dos modelos de Parcerias Público-Privadas (PPP) nos portos da Europa. Master’s Thesis, Portugues Catholic University, Porto, Portugal, 2012. Available online: https://repositorio.ucp.pt/bitstream/10400.14/9295/1/Jorge%20Lafuente_Projeto_Finan%C3%A7as.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2022).
  61. Dias, J.C.Q. Logística Global e Macrologística; Edições Silabo: Porto, Portugal, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  62. Grilo, J.F.C. Avaliação de Desempenho de Terminais de Carga Geral Fracionada: Aplicação do Método DEA. Master’s Thesis, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal, 2014. Available online: https://fenix.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/downloadFile/281870113701914/Dissertacao_57267.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2022).
  63. Lukman, R.K.; Brglez, K.; Krajnc, D. A Conceptual Model for Measuring a Circular Economy of Seaports: A Case Study on Antwerp and Koper Ports. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Othman, A.; El-Gazzar, S.; Knez, M. A Framework for Adopting a Sustainable Smart Sea Port Index. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Estrela, J.M. Repensar os Modelos de Governação dos Portos de Setúbal e Lisboa: Um contributo. Master’s Thesis, University Institute of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal, 2014. Available online: https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/handle/10071/10258 (accessed on 1 February 2022).
  66. Pitta; Cunha, T. Blue Growth for Portugal—Uma Visão Empresarial da Economia do Mar. Relatório Completo, Sumário Executivo, Sugestões e Medidas Podem ser Consultados Pelo Site da COTEC, Associação Empresarial Para a Inovação. 2012. Available online: http://www.cotecportugal.pt/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2165&Itemid=420 (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  67. Chase, G.; Alon, I. Evaluating the Economic Impact of Cruise Tourism: A Case Study of Barbados. Anatolia 2002, 13, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Brida, J.G.; Zapata-Aguirre, S. Economic Impacts of Cruise Tourism: The Case of Costa Rica. Anatolia 2010, 21, 322–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Branchik, B. Staying afloat. J. Hist. Res. Mark. 2014, 6, 234–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dickinson, B.; Vladimir, A. Selling the Sea: An Inside Look at the Cruise Industry; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; Available online: http://books.google.pt/books/about/Selling_the_Sea.html?id=bLwP1aDfFzsC&pgis=1 (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  71. Santos, R.; Castanho, R.A.; Lousada, S. Return Migration and Tourism Sustainability in Portugal: Extracting Opportunities for Sustainable Common Planning in Southern Europe. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Santos, R.; Castanho, R.A.; Lousada, S. The Portuguese Emigrants’ Return and the Impacts over Tourism Development in Rural Areas: Directions for a Sustainable Planning. In Espacios y Sociedades en Transformación; Thomson, R.A., Ed.; Aranzadi: Pamplona, Spain, 2020; Chapter 5; pp. 85–100. ISBN 978-84-1346-693-4. [Google Scholar]
  73. GRM-A1. Cenários de Crescimento Oferta/Procura 2017/2027; Turismo e Cultura: Revisão da POT da Região Autónoma da Madeira; Secretaria Regional da Economia: Funchal, Portugal, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  74. GRM. Estratégia de Desenvolvimento—Opções Sectoriais e Objetivos: Normas de Execução e Implementação; Turismo e Cultura: Revisão do POT da Região Autónoma da Madeira; Secretaria Regional da Economia: Funchal, Portugal, 2017. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Archipelago of Madeira—Porto Santo Island. (Source: Authors by ESRI ArcGIS, 2020).
Figure 1. Archipelago of Madeira—Porto Santo Island. (Source: Authors by ESRI ArcGIS, 2020).
Water 14 03176 g001
Figure 2. Organogram of the adopted methodology (source: Authors).
Figure 2. Organogram of the adopted methodology (source: Authors).
Water 14 03176 g002
Figure 3. Port of Porto Santo Island (Plan). (Adapted from: APRAM - Administração dos Portos da Região Autónoma da Madeira, S. A.).
Figure 3. Port of Porto Santo Island (Plan). (Adapted from: APRAM - Administração dos Portos da Região Autónoma da Madeira, S. A.).
Water 14 03176 g003
Figure 4. Port of Porto Santo Island. (Source: Authors).
Figure 4. Port of Porto Santo Island. (Source: Authors).
Water 14 03176 g004
Figure 5. Annual rainfall distribution in Porto Santo. (Source: Madeira Regional Delegation of the Meteorological Institute).
Figure 5. Annual rainfall distribution in Porto Santo. (Source: Madeira Regional Delegation of the Meteorological Institute).
Water 14 03176 g005
Figure 6. Porto Santo’s waves propagation direction. (Source: Authors).
Figure 6. Porto Santo’s waves propagation direction. (Source: Authors).
Water 14 03176 g006
Figure 7. Direction of the significant wave heights of Porto Santo. (Source: Authors).
Figure 7. Direction of the significant wave heights of Porto Santo. (Source: Authors).
Water 14 03176 g007
Figure 8. Number of hotel establishments in operation. (Source: Edited by Authors).
Figure 8. Number of hotel establishments in operation. (Source: Edited by Authors).
Water 14 03176 g008
Figure 9. Guests entering Porto Santo. (Source: Authors).
Figure 9. Guests entering Porto Santo. (Source: Authors).
Water 14 03176 g009
Figure 10. Average stay in hotel units. (Source: Authors).
Figure 10. Average stay in hotel units. (Source: Authors).
Water 14 03176 g010
Figure 11. Passengers disembarked in Porto Santo. (Source: Edited by Authors).
Figure 11. Passengers disembarked in Porto Santo. (Source: Edited by Authors).
Water 14 03176 g011
Figure 12. Cargo and goods unloaded by sea in Porto Santo. (Source: Authors).
Figure 12. Cargo and goods unloaded by sea in Porto Santo. (Source: Authors).
Water 14 03176 g012
Figure 13. Cargo and goods unloaded by air in Porto Santo. (Source: Authors).
Figure 13. Cargo and goods unloaded by air in Porto Santo. (Source: Authors).
Water 14 03176 g013
Table 1. Cargo and goods unloaded by sea and by air in Porto Santo. (Source: Authors).
Table 1. Cargo and goods unloaded by sea and by air in Porto Santo. (Source: Authors).
Year20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018
Cargo and goods unloaded by sea (t)60,89035,09729,19023,81921,53619,67823,41018,62917,29120,13521,175
Cargo and goods unloaded by air (t)1911681351201161066858574363
Table 2. Evolution of the accommodation offer by number of beds. (Source: Edited by Authors).
Table 2. Evolution of the accommodation offer by number of beds. (Source: Edited by Authors).
Year20002001200220032004200520062007
ARM22,72225,39926,89427,01927,94928,06927,79927,307
Var. %0%11.8%5.9%0.5%3.4%0.4%−1.0%−1.8%
Year20082009201020112012201320142015
ARM28,05728,91528,53028,39927,73227,86228,28128,432
Var. %2.7%3.1%−1.3%−0.5%−2.3%0.5%1.5%0.5%
Table 3. Optimization of the tourism model—Topics.
Table 3. Optimization of the tourism model—Topics.
General AspectEnvironmental Aspect
Increase the routes between the archipelago´s most important islands and between the mainland and Porto SantoThe sustainable use of water and low carbon emissions
Fixation of the population residing on the island by improving their life qualitySustainable management of solid waste and urban effluents
Flexibility of the local economyDecrease in the use of fossil fuels through the improvement and implementation of renewable energy sources
Proper control concerning the growth of leisure-housing and the regulation of the entry market, in order to consider other demands, thus exploring the sustainable development of the territory
Use of a global mobility system (electric vehicles and second-life batteries), in order to allow the free movement of tourists through the various facilities, both existing and to be built in the futureEnable sustainable mobility
Emphasize the development based on tourist´s well-being, safety and comfortProviding support for sustainable tourism entrepreneurship
Validation of Porto Santo’s tourism destination´s quality, considering its products and services
Table 4. Systematization of the development aspects—Topics.
Table 4. Systematization of the development aspects—Topics.
Structural factorsRecognition of the singularity in ARM´s offer
Public sector´s intervention towards the regulation of development
Valorisation of natural and cultural resources
Structuring of tourism products
Maintenance of the acquired sustainable status
Demand SegmentationConsolidated tourist sectors
Unconsolidated tourist sectors
Tourists
Residents
Geographic Segmentation of the OfferValorisation of the existing heritage
Improvement of the complementary offer
Decreasing costs for tourists
Management based on the population growth-rate
Quality of the Products and ServicesNature and landscape
The sun and the sea
Culture
Well-being
Sport
Table 5. Tourism development projects in ARM. (Source: Edited by Authors).
Table 5. Tourism development projects in ARM. (Source: Edited by Authors).
Municipality2016In Construction2017/2018Approved ProjectsPOT 2002/2012
ExistentStartedTotalNot StartedTotalBeds
Porto Santo3154706386090047604000
Madeira27,540316730,707140432,11135,000
ARM30,694387334,567230436,87139,000
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lousada, S.; Castanho, R.A. The Role of Ports in Tourism: Porto Santo Harbour. Water 2022, 14, 3176. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193176

AMA Style

Lousada S, Castanho RA. The Role of Ports in Tourism: Porto Santo Harbour. Water. 2022; 14(19):3176. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193176

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lousada, Sérgio, and Rui Alexandre Castanho. 2022. "The Role of Ports in Tourism: Porto Santo Harbour" Water 14, no. 19: 3176. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193176

APA Style

Lousada, S., & Castanho, R. A. (2022). The Role of Ports in Tourism: Porto Santo Harbour. Water, 14(19), 3176. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193176

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop