Next Article in Journal
Concern Condition for Applying Optimization Techniques with Reservoir Simulation Model for Searching Optimal Rule Curves
Next Article in Special Issue
Risks of Antibiotic Resistance Dissemination by Leachates from Municipal Landfills of Different Ages
Previous Article in Journal
Removal of Membrane Fouling and Control of Halogenated By-Products by a Combined Cleaning Process with Peroxides and Sodium Hypochlorite
Previous Article in Special Issue
Metal Pollution and Mining in the Iberian Pyrite Belt: New Remediation Technologies to Improve the Ecosystem Services of the River Basins
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tradescantia-Based Test Systems Can Be Used for the Evaluation of the Toxic Potential of Harmful Algal Blooms

1
National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, 23 Akadeemia Tee, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia
2
Laboratory of General and Molecular Genetics, RI Biology, Faculty of Biology, Yerevan State University, 8 Charents Str., Yerevan 0025, Armenia
3
Chair of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Faculty of Biology, Yerevan State University, 8 Charents Str., Yerevan 0025, Armenia
4
Scientific Center of Zoology and Hydroecology, National Academy of Sciences of Armenia, 7 Paruir Sevak Str., Yerevan 0014, Armenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2023, 15(13), 2500; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132500
Submission received: 10 June 2023 / Revised: 29 June 2023 / Accepted: 4 July 2023 / Published: 7 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Rivers)

Abstract

:
Harmful algal blooms (HABs) are overgrowths of toxic strains of algae (diatoms, green) and cyanobacteria (blue-green algae). While occurring naturally, human-induced environmental changes have resulted in more frequent occurrences of such blooms worldwide. Meantime, the ecotoxicological risk of HABs is rarely evaluated by means of standard test methods. For the first time, the genotoxic potential of the HAB event 2020 was assessed using two different Tradescantia-based test systems (Trad-SHM and Trad-MN, 24-h exposure). An integrated analysis of biological (algal abundance) and ecotoxicological (testing) data revealed linkages among algal proliferation, changes in Tradescantia stamen hairs (mutations and suppressed growth) and chromosomal aberrations during microsporogenesis (appearance of micronuclei) that were likely to be caused by toxic algal groups. Green alga Botryococcus braunii and the cyanobacterial species Anabaena and Oscillatoria could suppress stamen hair growth; Cyanobacteria Phormidium and Aphanothece sp. could trigger mutations in stamen hairs (appearance of pink and colorless cells); and Oscillatoria sp. could be responsible for the occurrence of chromosomal damage. Diatom proliferation in the spring was not related to the genotoxic response in Tradescantia. Both tests, the Trad-SHM and Trad-MN, are suitable for the evaluation of the toxic potential of HABs.

1. Introduction

Harmful algal blooms (HABs), the overgrowth of toxic strains of algae (diatoms, green) and cyanobacteria (known as blue-green algae) occur naturally in lakes and slow-moving rivers. HABs pose direct toxicity to fish and humans, create certain environmental risks via the formation of oxygen-depleted water (so-called dead zones), affect ecosystem services and disrupt aquatic recreation. The toxins produced by freshwater diatoms and cyanobacteria enter the human body directly from drinking water, recreational exposure and the consumption of agricultural produce irrigated by contaminated water or seafood from contaminated areas [1,2]. For example, saxitoxin (a neurotoxin known as paralytic shellfish poison) enters organisms by ingesting contaminated seafood and can cause acute toxicity within days [3,4]. The liver, gut and muscle of fish inhabiting the lakes affected by algal blooms were found to contain microcystins—natural toxins produced by Microsystis and Anabaena [5]. The consumption of contaminated food may result in human and animal intoxication [6]. Massive fish kills, which occurred in aquaculture facilities in the Arabian Gulf, Canada and Malaysia, were associated with the blooming of dinoflagellate Cochlodinium sp. [7,8,9]. Changes in the zooplankton assemblages were also related to summer and winter HAB events in a Mediterranean lagoon in Greece, causing a sharp decline of all taxa, including the disappearance of some key copepod species [10]. Although grazing on toxic algae does not always cause adverse effects on copepods, ingestion of toxic algae during HABs may diminish their survival, egg production or egg hatching [11]. Although the factors causing the blooms are not yet fully understood [12], it is commonly acknowledged that human-induced environmental changes have resulted in more frequent occurrences of such blooms (https://www.noaa.gov/what-is-harmful-algal-bloom, accessed on 4 June 2023).
Lake Sevan (Armenia), a mountain lake situated at 1900.5 m asl, is an oligotrophic water body receiving discharge from 28 rivers (Figure 1). The lake comprises two morphologically different parts: a northern deep part (with an average/maximum depth of 35.82/83.62 m), the Small Sevan (SS), and a southern shallow part (with an average/maximum depth of 22.62/43.62 m), the Big Sevan (BS) (data on the location and depth are for 2022, provided by the Institute of Geology of Armenia). Anthropogenic activity, such as lowering the water level, habitat degradation, land use in the catchment area, and overfishing, has severely affected the lake’s ecosystem [13]. In particular, land use changes were followed by an increased nutrient supply from the catchment area, especially from the rivers. In the 1980s, 57% of nitrogen and 45% of phosphorus entered the lake from the river flow, while only 16% of nitrogen and 27% of phosphorus entered from the diffuse sources [14]. An intensive input of nutrients from the catchment area resulted in an increase in the total average annual algal biomass: from 0.2–0.5 g m−3 (1937–1962) to 2.0–3.0 g m−3 (1976–1983) [13,14]. The first cyanobloom in the lake (Anabaena flos-aquae and Aphanizomenon flos-aquae) occurred in 1964 [15].
Over time, the diversity of the phytoplankton community decreased and an unpredictable succession of species became frequent [16]. From 2018 to 2020, the mean annual phytoplankton biomass doubled in the littoral (from 8 g m−3 to 16 g m−3). The share of cyanobacterial species increased in the phytoplankton community, and HAB events were recorded in 2018 and 2020 (Figure 2).
HAB events may be also observed in rivers. It is commonly known that the blooms occur in slow-moving waters. Yet, the Ohio River cyanoHAB event of 2015 resulted in green water flowing for hundreds of kilometers, starting 135 km from the river’s origin and reaching its confluence with the Mississippi River in 30 days ([17]; https://www.epa.gov/sciencematters/better-way-application-risk-characterization-habs-ohio-river, accessed on 4 June 2023). Such a phenomenon may suggest that even moving rivers can be susceptible to an algal bloom or its consequences, such as oxygen reduction [18,19] or cyanotoxin occurrence [20,21].
Considering the predicted climate warming, HABs are likely to become more frequent worldwide, and hence, the assessment of risk for resident aquatic communities is of great importance. However, a search in the Web-of-Science database, with the keywords “HAB” and “toxic*” resulted in 906 hits, which were mainly devoted to monitoring, mitigating, controlling and predicting harmful algal blooms. According to this dataset, few studies assessed the toxicity of HABs. For example, the macrophyte Ceratophyllum submersum showed physiological stress under HAB events [22]. The swimming behavior of spermatozoa and the egg viability of pearl oysters, Pinctada fucata martensii, were affected by their exposure to toxic dinoflagellates and raphidophytes [23]. Microtox (R) testing detected toxicity in the samples collected during cyanobacteria, dinoflagellate and haptophyte blooms [24]. However, no studies used the Tradescantia test for the evaluation of HABs’ potential toxicity, although the Tradescantia-based test systems are known for their high sensitivity to even low concentrations of contaminants and wide applicability for a variety of risk assessment purposes (air, water, soils) [25,26,27,28]. For example, the Trad-SHM and Trad-MN test systems with Tradescantia clone 02 showed toxic effects, even when most of the measured toxicants in a lake were below the WHO standards for drinking water quality [29], suggesting high sensitivity to low contaminant concentrations [25] or high performance in the detection of the potential toxicity of a contaminant mix. T. pallida was employed in a 2 h exposure to diesel and biodiesel exhaust emissions, demonstrating higher genotoxicity, consistent with higher concentrations of particulate matter, carbonyls and PAH content [28]. In this work, for the first time, the genotoxic potential of a HAB event was assessed using two different Tradescantia-based test systems on HAB in Lake Sevan (Armenia) in July 2020. Our working hypothesis was that the toxic potential of HABs could be determined by standard Tradescantia-based test systems.

2. Materials and Methods

  • Study Sites and Sampling
Three bays of Lake Sevan (Armenia), situated on the eastern side of the lake, were investigated. Bays represent biodiversity-rich environments due to their partial surroundings by land, specific hydrological conditions, low depth, and increased heating of the water column. Lichk Bay, into which two rivers empty, is located in the southern part of the lake (in BS). Norashen and Lchashen bays, located in the northern part of the lake (in SS), are not fed by rivers. All three bays receive inputs from various anthropogenic sources (domestic wastewater, agricultural runoff, industrial activity). The water samples were collected in 2020 during three different seasons—spring (25th of May), summer (7th of July) and autumn (5th of October). In July, a HAB event occurred in Lichk Bay.
  • Chemical analysis
The concentration of algal nutrients (ammonium and phosphate) and other ions (F, Cl, HCO3, SO42−) was determined by using standard methods by the Laboratory of Hydrogeochemistry of the Institute of Geological Sciences (Armenia). The concentration of metals (K, Na, Ca, Mg, total Fe, Cu, Zn, Pb and Cd) in water was measured on an ICP-MS inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer by the Hydrometeorology and Monitoring Center under the Ministry of Environment of Armenia.
  • Hydrometeorological data
Data on the mean air temperature in the study area at different seasons were obtained from the Armenia State Hydrometeorological and Monitoring Service (Figure S1).
  • Algae and cyanobacteria
A 1 L sample per site (0.5 m depth) was preserved with a 40% formaldehyde solution and stored for 10 days in darkness. After concentrating the solution to a 10 mL volume by standard methods [30,31], the phytoplankton was identified to the genera or species level using the key determinants [32,33,34,35,36]. The numbers of phytoplankton by species were counted using the Nageotte counting chamber (0.1 mL) [37,38].
  • Bioassays
Two standard tests with the plant Tradescantia (clone 02), described by [39,40], were used for assessing the potential toxicity of the HAB event that occurred in 2020. Briefly, the first test is a stamen hair mutation test (Trad-SHM), which allows for the evaluation of the genotoxicity potential of contaminants. It scores the changes in the heterozygous dominant blue color of the stamen hair cells to pink color (a mutation of the dominant gene) and the appearance of stunted hairs (hair containing less than 12 cells). The second test is a micronuclei test (Trad-MN), which allows the evaluation of the clastogenic potential of a contaminant(s). It scores the micronuclei (MN) frequency in pollen mother cells and detects disturbances in the process of microsporogenesis. For both tests, three to seven young Tradescantia inflorescences were submerged in the water samples for 24 h at room temperature. In the Trad-SHM test, after a recovery period of 7 days, opened flowers were daily analyzed for the appearance of pink cells (PC), colorless cells (CC) and stunted hairs (SH). Inflorescences were collected and analyzed over 21 days. The number of mutations was calculated per 1000 hairs. An amount of 10,000 to 20,000 stamen hairs were analyzed per sample.
In the Trad-MN test, inflorescences were fixed in Carnoy’s solution (3:1 ethanol-glacial acetic acid) for 24 h and stained with 0.5% acetocarmine. The number of MN and the number of tetrads with MN were calculated per 100 tetrads. A total of 3000 tetrads were analyzed per sample. Both tests were performed in triplicate. As a negative control, dechlorinated tap water was used. As a positive control, the 10 mM chromium (VI) oxide (CrO3) solution was used.
  • Statistical analysis
To determine the statistical differences in the genotoxicity indicators among treatments and between treatments and the control, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test was used (the significance level was set to 5%). A Pearson correlation analysis between the related responses (MN and Tetrads with MN) was conducted after the normality check of their distributions. An integrated analysis of biological and ecotoxicological data was conducted using principal component analysis (PCA) to reveal linkages among the nutrient concentration, algal bloom (algal and cyanobacterial numbers) and genotoxicity indicators (PC, CC, SH, MN). For this, only those algal and cyanobacterial species that were present for most of the seasons at each site were chosen to avoid the missing data in datasets. PCA was run for the total algal/cyanobacterial numbers and for the individual species separately. Biplots of factor scores and factor loadings (≥0.4) were interpreted for interpreting the linkages between variables. The statistical analysis was performed in R (version 4.1.3 2022) using the corrr, ggcorrplot, FactoMineR and factoextra packages.

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Analysis

The results of the chemical analyses of the water samples are shown in Table 1. The concentrations of all measured metals (K, Na, Ca, Mg, total Fe, Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd) and other (Cl, HCO3, SO42−) ions were far below the “average” water quality index, mostly conforming to “good” and even “excellent” water quality criterion, according to the national surface water quality criteria adopted by the Ministry of Environment of Armenia (http://env.am/en/environment/environmental-monitoring, accessed on 4 June 2023). The concentration of fluoride ion (F) was far below the WHO’s drinking water quality guidelines of 1.5 mg L−1 [41].
The concentrations of select biogenic elements (algal nutrients) in the water at different seasons are shown in Figure 3.

3.2. Biological and Ecotoxicological Analyses

The abundance of the main phytoplankton phyla at different seasons is shown in Figure 4.
The abundance of various cyanobacterial and green algal genera by season is shown in Figure 5.
The frequencies of occurrence of the study genotoxicity indicators are shown in Figure 6.

3.3. Integrated Analysis of Biological and Ecotoxicological Data

For the different datasets, three principal components were extracted. In all PCA runs, the extracted components together explained more than 83% of the total variance, while each principal component explained nearly 30% of the total variance in a dataset. The results of the PCA analysis with total numbers of each phylum, Cyanophyta (blue-green), Chlorophyta (green) and Bacillariophyta (diatom), are shown in Figure 7. Due to a high positive correlation between MN and Tetrads with MN (R = 0.96, Pearson correlation analysis, significance level 0.01), only MN values were used in the PCA.
The relationships between the abundance of individual Cyanophyta and Chlorophyta species and the genotoxicity indicators are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9. The Bacillariophyta abundance by genera/species is shown in Figure S2.

4. Discussion

The genotoxic potential of the HAB event of 2020 was evaluated by means of the Trad-SHM and Trad-MN tests and the integrated analysis of chemical, biological and ecotoxicological data (PCA). Numerous relationships were revealed among the algal nutrient availability in water, abundance of various phytoplankton taxa and the genotoxicity indicators at various seasons: before (May), during (July) and after (October) the HAB event.
  • Algal nutrients availability and algal blooming
Appropriate climatic conditions and nutrient availability foster the proliferation of algae in aquatic systems. However, specific ecological requirements of different species (e.g., related to the hydrological regime, light and temperature) and their nutrient acquisition strategies may influence the proliferation of certain groups. PCA grouped the total numbers of Chlorophyta and Cyanophyta with ammonium and phosphate concentrations at Lichk in the summer (Figure 7). At Lichk, the ammonium load was the greatest from the summer to autumn, compared to the other bays (Figure 3), although it corresponded to the “good” water quality (according to the above-mentioned national surface water quality criteria). Different forms of a specific nutrient element do not equally contribute to the growth of phytoplankton [12], however, easily accessible phosphate and ammonium are key elements for photoautotrophs [42]. Ammonium is incorporated into carbon skeletons of photosynthetic organisms, and hence they prefer to uptake it directly from the medium without the energy expense of a reduction in other nitrogen forms to ammonium [43,44].
The phosphate ion concentration in the summer corresponded to a nearly “average” water quality, according to the above-mentioned criteria (Figure 3), indicating phosphorus enrichment in the bay. Hence, the highest abundance of Chlorophyta and Cyanophyta observed in the summer at Lichk Bay was likely caused by the availability of algal nutrients and appropriate environmental conditions. Chlorophyta was shown to be abundant in standing or slow-moving waters enriched with nutrients and when light and temperature are relatively high [45]. Similarly, cyanobacteria also benefit from increased water temperatures, which lead to a reduction in turbulent mixing of the water column and prolonged stratification periods [46] and, hence, stimulate a high cell replication rate [47]. At Lichk, where the nutrient concentrations were the greatest among the sites in the summer, HAB caused by Cyanophyta reached 2,136,000 cells L−1 with Dolichospermum/Anabaena flos-aquae amounting to 1,980,000 cells L−1 (Figure 5).
PCA also grouped the Bacillariophyta (diatom) numbers with phosphate concentrations at Lichk in the spring (Figure 7). The phosphate concentration exceeded 0.4 mg L−1, corresponding to the “unsatisfactory” water quality index. Diatoms proliferated in the spring, reaching 1,356,000 cell L−1 (Figure 4). Diatoms, the most abundant species in the phytoplankton [48], often dominate in spring [49]. This is likely stipulated by the peculiar water mixing regime, which increases the availability of algal nutrients. Hydrodynamics play a significant role in triggering diatom blooms, especially of the lotic diatom genera (such as Cymbella, Nitzshia and Navicula [50,51]), which adopted appropriate growth and nutrient uptake strategies. For example, slight turbulence enhances the diffusion rate of nutrients to the cell surface of lotic and/or phosphorus-tolerant diatoms Cyclotela atomus, Fragilaria crotonensis, and Nitzshia palea, increasing their growth rates [50]. At Lichk, the share of lotic diatoms, including F. crotonensis, N. palea, N. linearis, N. acicularis, A. ovalis, Navicula radioza, C. ventricose, Caloneis silicula, Cocconeis placentula, Diatoma vulgaris and Surirella ovata in the spring, exceeded 24%.
  • HAB and genotoxic responses of Tradescantia
One of the main concerns about HABs is the exposure to cyanotoxins. A release of toxins from diatom/cyanobacteria in the summer–autumn periods was well demonstrated for various water bodies (e.g., [4,52,53,54]). In a past HAB event in Lake Sevan (July 2018), the total (cell-bound only) microcystin concentration exceeded 2.4 µg L−1 [55]. In 2019, the anatoxin-a concentration in Lake Sevan’s water reached ~0.15 µg L−1 [56]. While summer is a characteristic period for cyanobacterial blooms [49], toxin production and release can also occur during diatom blooms from winter to spring [4]. The production of toxins by algae/cyanobacteria and, hence, toxin bioavailability, depends on many factors. For example, phosphorus availability stimulates the growth of microcystin production by Microcystis aeruginosa. However, when the phosphorus was limited, the microcystin content increased (even towards producing more toxic forms of microcystin), despite the reduced growth of M. aeruginosa [57]. Similarly, at the phosphate concentration of 0.1 mg L−1, the growth of two strains of Oscillatoria agardhii was the lowest (~0.01 mg mL−1 dw), while toxin production was high at 1.5–2 µg L−1 vs. a toxin concentration of 3–5 µg L−1 at ~0.2 mg mL−1 dw [58].
In this study, all measured environmental variables in the water samples of the Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays were far lower than the “average” water quality index (Table 1), approaching the “good” or even “excellent” water quality criteria adopted in Armenia. However, most of the genotoxic responses of the Tradescantia inflorescences exposed to the water samples were significantly greater than that found in the control (Figure 6). While it is difficult to predict a cause-and-effect relationship between blooms and environmental conditions [4], the proliferation of algae and cyanobacteria and the presence of toxins in the water may be one of the factors causing such genotoxic responses. Moreover, the effect of unmeasured environmental agents cannot be excluded. The results of the integrated PCA analysis on the available biological and ecotoxicological data showed that all genotoxicity indicators (PC, CC, SH and MN) were grouped with the total numbers of either Cyanophyta or Chlorophyta measured in the bays’ water (Figure 7). A more detailed PCA analysis with individual genera of Cyanophyta and Chlorophyta grouped the frequency of SH occurrences with the abundance of Anabaena (Dolichospermum/Anabaena flos-aquae) and Oscillatoria sp. at all sites during the spring and summer (Figure 8). The SH frequencies were similar across the sites and significantly exceeded that of the control (Figure 6). The numbers of Oscillatoria sp. were higher in the spring and summer (at Norashen), while Anabaena sp. bloomed in the summer (at Lichk) (Figure 5). Both species produce neurotoxins (e.g., anatoxins), while Anabaena also produces dissolved microcystins, cyanobacterial secondary metabolites [58,59,60]. While both microcystin and anatoxin-a can be degraded to nontoxic degradation products [61,62,63], microcystins can persist for weeks [64,65]. Even if a bloom has collapsed, microcystins can still exist for several months [66] and be transported over long distances [67]. The persistence of microcystin variants leads to their accumulation in surface waters [66]. Hence, elevated cyanotoxin concentrations could be expected at the Lichk and Norashen bays to trigger the occurrence of SH in the Tradescantia.
Although, with lower factor loadings, the occurrences of PC were grouped with the abundance of Phormidium sp. at Norashen Bay in the autumn and the MN occurrences were grouped with Oscillatoria sp. at Norashen in the summer (Figure 8). In both seasons, these genotoxicity indicators were the greatest at Norashen compared to the other bays (Figure 5). Phormidium sp. dominated the phytoplankton community in the autumn at Norashen. Oscillatoria sp. development mainly occurred at Norashen during spring and summer. Both species are known for forming benthic mats, which later start to float in stagnant waters. Moreover, these genera contain toxin-producing taxa [68]. An availability of mats likely containing toxins could have contributed to the greatest values of PC and MN at Norashen compared to the other sites. Such attributions may be further supported by the fact that the genotoxicity indicators of different sensitivities (highly sensitive MN and less sensitive PC) were the greatest at Norashen Bay. Gerashkin et al. [69] mentioned that the Trad-MN test is more sensitive in comparison with the Trad-SHM test due to the appearance of micronuclei at any damaged site of any of the 12 chromosomes of Tradescantia, in contrast to PC, which happens only at one locus in one chromosome in the stamen hair cell in the plant.
The PCA grouped the frequency of CC occurrences with the abundance of Aphanothece sp. in all autumn samples (Figure 8). Similar to Phormidium sp., the Aphanothece sp. also forms benthic mats and also includes toxin-producing taxa [68]. Higher occurrences of CC in the Tradescantia stamen hair may reasonably be attributed to the accumulation of cyanotoxins in the water bodies by the autumn.
A detailed PCA with Chlorophyta sp. grouped the SH frequencies with the numbers of green alga Botryococcus sp. at Lichk bay in the spring and summer (Figure 9). The Botryococcus sp. was represented by B. braunii in the studied bays. Their numbers were the greatest at Lichk compared to other sites. B. braunii releases free fatty acids (when cells disintegrate, e.g., at a later stage of blooming), which can be toxic to aquatic organisms, although the relationship between the production and disintegration of the toxin remains to be understood [70]. The allelopathic effect of the free fatty acids of B. braunii on phytoplankton was attributed to the suppressed diversity of phytoplankton in Lake Liyu (Taiwan) in 1998 and 1999 at B. braunii numbers from ~12,000 to 24,000 cells L−1, correspondingly. Moreover, testing with the extracts of different fatty acids from the alga showed toxicity to various zooplankton species. Finally, fish deaths, mainly Tilapia sp., were also associated with its bloom [70]. In Lichk Bay, the numbers of B. braunii amounted to 48,000 and 24,000 cells L−1 in the spring and summer, respectively, being similar to or even exceeding those reported for Lake Liyu. One may assume that this alga can be toxic to Tradescantia inflorescences as well, in particular, affecting the growth of normal stamen hair and generating SH.
The PCA indicated a relatively weak relationship between the Bacillariophyta abundance and SH at Lichk Bay in the spring (Figure 7), although the bay’s water was enriched in phosphate (>0.4 mg L−1), and diatoms proliferated (>1.3 mln cells L−1) (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The diatom genera Amphora, Pseudo-nitzschia and Nitzschia include strains that produce domoic acid, a neurotoxin. Within cells, its domoic acid content is at a pico scale [71,72]; however, it can accumulate within the food web [72,73,74]. In the study bays, the Amphora genus was represented by A. ovalis, which was abundant in the spring at Lichk Bay. The Nitzschia genus was represented by several species, N. dissipata, N. acicularis, N. angustata, N. palea and N. linearis, which were also highly abundant at Lichk in the spring (Figure S2). However, we could not find data on the production of domoic acid or other toxins by these species. Although the presence of toxin-producing diatoms at Lichk cannot be excluded, and thus their potential effect on the occurrences of SH, the results of the PCA did not demonstrate a strong relationship between the diatom abundance and genotoxic responses of Tradescantia.
  • Suitability of Tradescantia-based test systems for the evaluation of toxic potential of HABs
While the reported HAB event occurred at Lichk Bay in the summer of 2020 (Dolichospermum/Anabaena flos-aquae reaching nearly 2 mln cells L−1), strong relationships between the proliferation of green algae and cyanobacteria and the genotoxic responses of Tradescantia (clone 02) inflorescences were found by PCA for other bays and seasons as well. Both phyla (green algae and cyanobacteria) studied in this work included known toxin-producing taxa. Green alga B. braunii could adversely affect the production of short stamen hair (SH) in the plant. From cyanobacteria species, Anabaena and Oscillatoria sp. could also be the cause for the suppression of the growth of stamen hair (SH), while Phormidium sp. could trigger pink cell occurrence in the stamen hair (PC). Aphanothece sp. could be responsible for colorless cell occurrence (CC), and Oscillatoria sp. could be responsible for the occurrence of chromosomal damage in the pollen mother cells (MN) in inflorescences. Diatom proliferation in the spring was unlikely to trigger a genotoxic response in Tradescantia. Thus, Tradescantia inflorescences demonstrated both genotoxic (point mutations) and clastogenic (disturbances in the microsporogenesis) responses when exposed to natural water with a high abundance of toxin-producing algal/cyanobacterial taxa, in which the concentrations of other contaminants were below regulatory norms. The relationships between the genotoxic and clastogenic responses and individual toxin-producing genera were also demonstrated by PCA. These results suggest that the Trad-SHM and Trad-MN test systems can be used for the evaluation of the ecotoxicity of algal/cyanobacterial toxins in water, particularly during HABs.

5. Conclusions

The biological, ecotoxicological and integrated results of this study demonstrated the genotoxic (mutations in somatic cells in the stamen hair and stunted stamen hairs) and clastogenic (chromosomal aberrations during microsporogenesis in the pollen mother cells) responses in Tradescantia (clone 02) inflorescences. They were likely caused by the toxins produced by certain algal/cyanobacterial groups (green alga B. braunii, cyanobacteria Anabaena, Oscillatoria, Phormidium and Aphanothece) under the appropriate environmental conditions because the values of the regularly monitored chemical parameters in the studied waters corresponded to the good water quality classification. Hence, both standard tests, the Trad-SHM and Trad-MN, are suitable for the evaluation of the toxic potential of algal proliferation and HABs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/w15132500/s1, Figure S1: Mean air temperature in Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays of Lake Sevan (Armenia) from May to October 2020; Figure S2: Total numbers of Bacillariophyta (diatom) genera/species in Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays of Lake Sevan (Armenia) in 2020 by season.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.G. and R.A. (Rouben Aroutiounian); methodology, R.A. (Rima Avalyan), A.A., E.A. and L.H.; formal analysis, A.K.; investigation, R.A. (Rima Avalyan), A.A., E.A. and L.H.; resources, B.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K.; writing—review and editing, B.G. and R.A. (Rouben Aroutiounian); supervision, B.G. and R.A. (Rouben Aroutiounian); project administration, B.G.; funding acquisition, B.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science Committee of Armenia, grants 21SC-BRFFR-1F028 and 1-15/20TB. AK was supported by the institutional grant, Arengufond_AK.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding author on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gusik, K.D.; Sayler, G.S. An overview on the marine neurotoxin, saxitoxin: Genetics, molecular targets, methods of detection and ecological functions. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 991–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Drobac, D.; Tokodi, N.; Simeunovic, J.; Baltic, V.; Stanic, D.; Svircev, Z. Human exposure to cyanotoxins and their effects on health. Arch. Ind. Hyg. Tocixol. 2013, 64, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Sharma, A.; Gautam, S.; Kumar, S. Phycotoxins. In Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, 2nd ed.; Batt, C.A., Tortorello, M.L., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Whalen, J.K.; Cai, C.; Shan, K.; Zhou, H. Harmful cyanobacteria-diatom/dinoflagellate blooms and their cyanotoxins in freshwaters: A nonnegligible chronic health and ecological hazard. Water Res. 2023, 233, 119807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nyakairu, G.W.; Nagawa, C.B.; Mbabazi, J. Assessment of cyanobacteria toxins in freshwater fish: A case study of Murchison Bay (Lake Victoria) and Lake Mburo, Uganda. Toxicon 2010, 55, 939–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dionysiou, D. Overview: Harmful algal blooms and natural toxins in fresh and marine waters—Exposure, occurrence, detection, toxicity, control, management and policy. Toxicon 2010, 55, 907–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Anton, A.; Teoh, P.L.; Mohd-Shaleh, S.R.; Mohammad-Noor, N. First occurrence of Cochlodinium blooms in Sabah, Malaysia. Harmful Algae 2008, 7, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Richlen, M.L.; Morton, S.L.; Jamali, E.A.; Rajan, A.; Anderson, D.M. The catastrophic 2008–2009 red tide in the Arabian gulf region, with observations on the identification and phylogeny of the fish-killing dinoflagellate Cochlodinium polykrikoides. Harmful Algae 2010, 9, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Whyte, J.N.S.; Haigh, N.; Ginther, N.G.; Keddy, L.J. First record of blooms of Cochlodinium sp. (Gymnodiniales, Dinophyceae) causing mortality to aquacultured salmon on the west coast of Canada. Phycologia 2001, 40, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Papantoniou, G.; Cladas, Y.; Ketsilis-Rinis, V.; Vaitsi, Z.; Fragopoulu, N. Effects of HABs and a dystrophic event on zooplankton community structure in a Mediterranean lagoon (W Greece). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2020, 245, 106985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Turner, J.T. Planktonic marine copepods and harmful algae. Harmful Algae 2014, 32, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wells, M.L.; Karlson, B.; Wulff, A.; Kudela, R.; Trick, C.; Asnaghi, V.; Berdalet, E.; Cochlan, W.; Davidson, K.; De Rijcke, M.; et al. Future HAB science: Directions and challenges in a changing climate. Harmful Algae 2020, 91, 101632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gabrielyan, B.; Khosrovyan, A.; Schultze, M. A review of anthropogenic stressors on Lake Sevan, Armenia. J. Limnol. 2022, 81, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hovhanissian, R.O. Lake Sevan Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow; Gitutyn: Yerevan, Armenia, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  15. Legovich, N. Qualitative changes in the phytoplankton community of Lake Sevan under the water level lowering. Biol. J. Armen. 1968, 21, 31–42. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  16. Hovsepyan, A.A.; Khachikyan, T.G. Phytoplankton of littoral zone and submerged areas of Lake Sevan coast. In Lake Sevan. Ecological State during the Period of Water Level Change; Krylov, A.V., Ed.; Filigran: Yaroslavel, Russia, 2016; pp. 109–113. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nietch, C.T.; Gains-Germain, L.; Lazorchak, J.; Keely, S.P.; Youngstrom, G.; Urichich, E.M.; Astifan, B.; DaSilva, A.; Mayfield, H. Development of a Risk Characterization Tool for Harmful Cyanobacteria Blooms on the Ohio River. Water 2022, 14, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Son, G.; Kim, D.; Kim, Y.D.; Lyu, S.; Kim, S. A Forecasting Method for Harmful Algal Bloom (HAB)-Prone Regions Allowing Preemptive Countermeasures Based only on Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Measurements in a Large River. Water 2020, 12, 3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, H.; Chen, R.; Li, F.; Chen, L. Effect of flow rate on environmental variables and phytoplankton dynamics: Results from field enclosures. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2015, 33, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Graham, J.L.; Dubrovsky, N.M.; Foster, G.M.; King, L.R.; Loftin, K.A.; Rosen, B.H.; Stelzer, E.A. Cyanotoxin occurrence in large rivers of the United States. Inland Waters 2020, 10, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Loftin, K.A.; Clark, J.M.; Journey, C.A.; Kolpin, D.W.; Van Metre, P.C.; Bradley, P.M. Spatial and temporal variation in microcystins occurrence in wadeable streams in the southeastern USA. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2016, 35, 2281–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ujvárosi, A.Z.; Riba, M.; Garda, T.; Gyémánt, G.; Vereb, G.; Hamvas, M.M.; Vasas, G.; Máthé, C. Attack of Microcystis aeruginosa bloom on a Ceratophyllum submersum field: Ecotoxicological measurements in real environment with real microcystin exposure. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 662, 735–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Banno, K.; Oda, T.; Nagai, K.; Nagai, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Basti, L. Deleterious Effects of Harmful Dinoflagellates and Raphidophytes on Egg Viability and Spermatozoa Swimming Velocity in the Japanese Pearl Oyster Pinctada fucata martensii. J. Shellfish Res. 2018, 37, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lopez-Flores, R.; Boix, D.; Badosa, A.; Brucet, S.; Quintana, X.D. Is Microtox (R) toxicity related to potentially harmful algae proliferation in Mediterranean salt marshes? Limnetica 2010, 29, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aghajanyan, E.A.; Avalyan, R.E.; Simonyan, A.E.; Atoyants, A.L.; Gabrielyan, B.; Aroutiounian, R.M.; Khosrovyan, A. Clastogenecity evaluation of water of Lake Sevan (Armenia) using Tradescantia micronucleus assay. Chemosphere 2018, 209, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Khosrovyan, A.; Aghajanyan, E.; Avalyan, R.; Atoyants, A.; Sahakyan, L.; Gabrielyan, B.; Aroutiounian, R. Assessment of the mutagenic potential of the water of an urban river by means of two Tradescantia-based test systems. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2022, 876, 503449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Misik, M.; Pichler, C.; Rainer, B.; Nersesyan, A.; Misikova, K.; Knasmueller, S. Micronucleus assay with tetrad cells of Tradescantia. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 2031, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Placencia, F.; Fadic, X.; Janes, K.; Cereceda-Balic, F. Tradescantia as a biomonitor for genotoxicity evaluation of diesel and biodiesel exhaust emissions. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 173, 2297–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality. 2017. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254637/9789241549950-eng.pdf (accessed on 4 June 2023).
  30. Abakumov, V.A. Guide on Methods for the Hydrobiological Analysis of Surface Water and Bottom Sediments (Guide); Gidrometeoizdat: Leningrad, Russia, 1983. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  31. Abakumov, V.A.; Talskikh, V.N.; Popchenko, V.I.; Bulgakov, G.P.; Svirskaya, N.L.; Krineva, S.V.; Popcheko, I.I.; Semin, V.A.; Khromov, V.M.; Raspopov, I.M.; et al. Guide on the Hydrobiological Monitoring of Freshwater Ecosystems (Guide); Gidrometeoizdat: Saint-Petesburg, Russia, 1992. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  32. Tsarenko, P.M. Short Determinant Chlorococcus Algae of the Ukraine; Naukova Dumka: Kyiv, Ukraine, 1990. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  33. Streble, H.; Krauter, D. Das Leben im Wassertropfen; Kosmos: Stuttgart, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  34. Berg, L.K.; Hoef-Emden, K.; Melkonian, M. Der Kosmos-Algenfuhrer: Die Wichtigsten Subwasseralgen im Mikroskop; Kosmos: Stuttgart, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hambaryan, L.; Shahazizyan, I. Determinant and Educational Manual for Genera of Freshwater Algae; YSU Press: Yerevan, Armenia, 2014. (In Armenian) [Google Scholar]
  36. Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. AlgaeBase; World-Wide Electronic Publication; National University of Ireland: Galway, Ireland, 2023; Available online: https://www.algaebase.org (accessed on 4 June 2023).
  37. Devlin, M.; Best, M.; Bresnan, E.; Scanlan, C.; Baptie, M. Water Framework Directive: The development and status of phytoplankton tools for ecological assessment of coastal and transitional waters. In Technical Report WFD-UKTAG; Water Framework Directive—United Kingdom Technical Advisory Group (WFD-UKTAG): UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kitaev, S.P. Fundamentals of Limnology for Hydrobiologists and Ichthyologists; Karel. Nauchn. Center, Russ. Akad. Sciences: Petrozavodsk, Russia, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ma, T.H.; Cabrera, G.L.; Cebulska-Wasilevska, A.; Chen, R.; Loarca, A.I.; Vandenberg, A.L.; Salamone, M.F. Tradescantia stamen hair mutation bioassay. Mutat. Res. 1994, 310, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ma, T.H.; Cabrera, G.L.; Chen, R.; Gill, B.S.; Sandhu, S.S.; Vandenberg, A.L.; Salamone, M.F. Tradescantia micronucleus bioassay. Mutat. Res. 1994, 310, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, Incorporating The 1st Addendum (Chapters). Chemical Aspects. Technical Document, 4th ed.; World Health Organization (WHO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2021; Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/guidelines-for-drinking-water-quality-4th-ed.-incorporating-the-1st-addendum-(chapters) (accessed on 4 June 2023).
  42. Li, M.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Q.; Iqbal, M.S.; Xi, Y.; Xiang, X. The significance of phosphorus in algae growth and the subsequent ecological response of consumers. J. Freshwater Ecol. 2022, 37, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Britto, D.T.; Siddiqi, M.Y.; Glass, A.D.M.; Kronzucker, H.J. Futile transmembrane NH4+ cycling: A cellular hypothesis to explain ammonium toxicity in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 4255–4258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Muro-Pastor, M.I.; Florencio, F.J. Regulation of ammonium assimilation in cyanobacteria. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2003, 41, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sheath, R.G.; Wehr, J.D. Introduction to freshwater algae. In Aquatic Ecology, Freshwater Algae of North America; John, D., Wehr, R.S., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sommer, U.; Adrian, R.; Bauer, B.; Winder, M. The response of temperate aquatic ecosystems to global warming: Novel insights from a multidisciplinary project. Mar. Biol. 2012, 159, 2367–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sukenik, A.; Quesada, A.; Salmaso, N. Global expansion of toxic and non-toxic cyanobacteria: Effect on ecosystem functioning. Biodivers. Conserv. 2015, 24, 889–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Malviya, S.; Scalco, E.; Audic, S.; Vincent, F.; Veluchamy, A.; Poulain, J.; Wincker, P.; Iudicone, D.; Vargas, C.; Bittner, L.; et al. Insights into global diatom distribution and diversity in the world’s ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E1516–E1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Song, X.L.; Liu, Z.W.; Pan, H.K.; Yang, G.J.; Chen, Y.W. Phytoplankton community structure in Meiliang Bay and Lake Wuli of Lake Taihu. J. Lake Sci. 2007, 19, 643–651. [Google Scholar]
  50. Wang, P.; Shen, H.; Xie, P. Can Hydrodynamics Change Phosphorus Strategies of Diatoms?—Nutrient Levels and Diatom Blooms in Lotic and Lentic Ecosystems. Microb. Ecol. 2012, 63, 369–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Tang, T.; Tang, T.; Tan, L.; Gu, Y.; Jiang, W.; Cai, Q. Identifying community thresholds for lotic benthic diatoms in response to human disturbance. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Altamirano, R.C.; Sierra-Beltrán, A.P. Biotoxins from freshwater and marine harmful algal blooms occurring in Mexico. Toxin Rev. 2008, 27, 27–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Metcaf, J.S.; Codd, G.A. Co-occurrence of Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins with other Environmental Health Hazards: Impacts and Implications. Toxins 2020, 12, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Watson, S.B.; Ridal, J.; Boyer, G.L. Taste and odour and cyanobacterial toxins: Impairment, prediction, and management in the Great Lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2008, 65, 1779–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gevorgyan, G.; Rinke, K.; Schultze, M.; Mamyan, A.; Kuzmin, A.; Belykh, O.; Sorokovikova, E.; Hayrapetyan, A.; Hovsepyan, A.; Khachikyan, T.; et al. First report about toxic cyanobacterial bloom occurrence in Lake Sevan, Armenia. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 2020, 105, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hambaryan, L.; Khachikyan, T.; Ghukasyan, E. Changes in the horizontal development of phytoplankton of the littoral of Lake Sevan (Armenia) in conditions of water level fluctuations. Limnol. Freshwater Biol. 2020, 4, 662–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Oh, H.-M.; Lee, S.J.; Jang, M.-H.; Yoon, B.-D. Microcystin Production by Microcystis aeruginosa in a Phosphorus-Limited Chemostat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 176–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Sivonen, K. Cyanobacterial toxins. In Encyclopedia of Microbiology, 3rd ed.; Schaechter, M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 290–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Otero, P.; Silva, M. Chapter 7—The role of toxins: Impact on human health and aquatic environments. In The Pharmacological Potential of Cyanobacteria; Lopes, G., Silva, M., Vasconcelos, V., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 173–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pflugmacher, S. Possible allelopathic effects of cyanotoxins, with reference to microcystin-LR, in aquatic ecosystems. Environ. Toxicol. 2002, 17, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water (USEPA). Health Effects Support Document for the Cyanobacterial Toxin Anatoxin-A. 2015. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-06/documents/anatoxin-a-report-2015.pdf (accessed on 4 June 2023).
  62. Stevens, D.K.; Krieger, R.I. Stability studies on the cyanobacterial nicotinic alkaloid snatoxin-A. Toxicon 1991, 29, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sun, Q.; Wang, G.; Yin, R.; Zhang, T.; Zheng, Y.; Wu, C.; Liu, C.; Huang, K.; Wang, F. Effects of molecular-level component variation of fulvic acid on photodegradation of Microcystin-LR under solar irradiation. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 449, 137553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jones, G.J.; Negri, A.P. Persistence and degradation of cyanobacterial paralytic shellfish poisons (PSPs) in freshwaters. Water Res. 1997, 31, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lahti, K.; Rapala, J.; Färdig, M.; Niemelä, M.; Sivonen, K. Persistence of cyanobacterial hepatotoxin, microcystin-LR in particulate material and dissolved in lake water. Water Res. 1997, 31, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zastepa, A.; Pick, F.R.; Blais, J.M. Fate and Persistence of Particulate and Dissolved Microcystin-LA from Microcystis Blooms. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2014, 20, 1670–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Preece, E.P.; Hardy, F.J.; Moore, B.C.; Bryan, M. A review of microcystin detections in estuarine and marine waters: Environmental implications and human health risk. Harmful Algae 2017, 61, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Gaysina, L.A.; Saraf, A.; Singh, P. Chapter 1—Cyanobacteria in diverse habitats. In Cyanobacteria; Mishra, A.K., Tiwari, D.N., Rai, A.N., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gerashkin, S.; Evseeva, T.; Oudalova, A. Plants as a tool for the environmental health assessment. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Health, 2nd ed.; Nriagu, J., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chiang, I.-Z.; Huang, W.-Y.; Wu, J.-T. Allelochemicals of Botryococcus brauna (Chlorophyceae). J. Phycol. 2004, 40, 474–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Suriyanti, S.N.P.; Usup, G. First report of the toxigenic Nitzschia navis-varingica (Bacillariophyceae) isolated from Tebrau Straits, Johor, Malaysia. Toxicon 2015, 108, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Thoha, H.; Kotaki, Y.; Panggabean, L.; Lundholm, N.; Ogawa, H.; Lim, P.T.; Takata, Y.; Kodama, M.; Fukuyo, Y. Screening of diatoms that produce ASP toxins in Southermost Asian waters. Coast. Mar. Sci. 2012, 35, 34–38. [Google Scholar]
  73. Dhar, B.C.; Cimarelli, L.; Singh, K.S.; Brandi, L.; Brandi, A.; Puccinelli, C.; Marcheggiani, S.; Spurio, R. Molecular Detection of a Potentially Toxic Diatom Species. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 4921–4941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Romero, M.L.J.; Lirdwitayaprasit, T.; Kotaki, Y.; Relox, J.J.; Furio, E.F.; Terada, R.; Yokoyama, T.; Kodama, M.; Fukuuo, Y. Isolation of ASP toxin-producing Nitzschia navis-varingica from Thailand. Mar. Res. Indones. 2008, 33, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of sampling sites in the bays of Lake Sevan (Armenia). SS (Small Sevan)—northern part of the lake; BS (Big Sevan)—southern part. Bays: Lchashen, Norashen and Lichk.
Figure 1. Location of sampling sites in the bays of Lake Sevan (Armenia). SS (Small Sevan)—northern part of the lake; BS (Big Sevan)—southern part. Bays: Lchashen, Norashen and Lichk.
Water 15 02500 g001
Figure 2. Mean total algal and cyanobacterial numbers in the month of July in different parts of Lake Sevan (Armenia) by year. SS—northern part of the lake; BS—southern part.
Figure 2. Mean total algal and cyanobacterial numbers in the month of July in different parts of Lake Sevan (Armenia) by year. SS—northern part of the lake; BS—southern part.
Water 15 02500 g002
Figure 3. Ammonium and phosphate concentrations in water at Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays of Lake Sevan (Armenia) in 2020 by season.
Figure 3. Ammonium and phosphate concentrations in water at Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays of Lake Sevan (Armenia) in 2020 by season.
Water 15 02500 g003
Figure 4. Total phytoplankton numbers by main algal/cyanobacterial phyla at Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays of Lake Sevan (Armenia) in 2020 by season.
Figure 4. Total phytoplankton numbers by main algal/cyanobacterial phyla at Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays of Lake Sevan (Armenia) in 2020 by season.
Water 15 02500 g004
Figure 5. Total numbers of Cyanophyta (A) and Chlorophyta (B) genera in Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays of Lake Sevan (Armenia) in 2020 by season.
Figure 5. Total numbers of Cyanophyta (A) and Chlorophyta (B) genera in Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays of Lake Sevan (Armenia) in 2020 by season.
Water 15 02500 g005
Figure 6. Genotoxicity responses in Tradescantia (clone 02) exposed to water samples from Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays of Lake Sevan (Armenia) in 2020 by season (mean ± SD). Responses: SH—stunted stamen hair; PC—pink cells in the stamen hair; CC—colorless cells in the stamen hair; micronuclei (MN), tetrads with MN. Control: municipal tap water. All responses are significantly different compared to the control (p < 0.05), except for those denoted by “I”.
Figure 6. Genotoxicity responses in Tradescantia (clone 02) exposed to water samples from Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays of Lake Sevan (Armenia) in 2020 by season (mean ± SD). Responses: SH—stunted stamen hair; PC—pink cells in the stamen hair; CC—colorless cells in the stamen hair; micronuclei (MN), tetrads with MN. Control: municipal tap water. All responses are significantly different compared to the control (p < 0.05), except for those denoted by “I”.
Water 15 02500 g006
Figure 7. Biplot of component loadings and scores for genotoxicity indicators (PC, CC, SH, MN), algal nutrients (ammonium, phosphate), algal/cyanobacterial abundance (total numbers) and sampling sites (Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays) in the coordinate system of two principal components. In parentheses: percent of total variance explained by each component.
Figure 7. Biplot of component loadings and scores for genotoxicity indicators (PC, CC, SH, MN), algal nutrients (ammonium, phosphate), algal/cyanobacterial abundance (total numbers) and sampling sites (Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays) in the coordinate system of two principal components. In parentheses: percent of total variance explained by each component.
Water 15 02500 g007
Figure 8. Biplot of component loadings and scores for genotoxicity indicators (PC, CC, SH, MN), cyanobacterial species abundance (total numbers) and sampling sites (Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays) in the coordinate system of two principal components. In parentheses: percent of total variance explained by each component.
Figure 8. Biplot of component loadings and scores for genotoxicity indicators (PC, CC, SH, MN), cyanobacterial species abundance (total numbers) and sampling sites (Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays) in the coordinate system of two principal components. In parentheses: percent of total variance explained by each component.
Water 15 02500 g008
Figure 9. Biplot of component loadings and scores for genotoxicity indicators (PC, CC, SH, MN), green algae species abundance (total numbers) and sampling sites (Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays) in the coordinate system of two principal components. In parentheses: percent of total variance explained by each component.
Figure 9. Biplot of component loadings and scores for genotoxicity indicators (PC, CC, SH, MN), green algae species abundance (total numbers) and sampling sites (Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays) in the coordinate system of two principal components. In parentheses: percent of total variance explained by each component.
Water 15 02500 g009
Table 1. Concentrations of select elements present in the water samples of Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays of Lake Sevan (Armenia) in 2020 by season.
Table 1. Concentrations of select elements present in the water samples of Lichk, Norashen and Lchashen bays of Lake Sevan (Armenia) in 2020 by season.
KCa2+Na+Mg2+FClSO42−HCO3Fe TotalCu2+Zn2+Pb2+Cd2+
mg L−1
Spring
Lichk7.83143210.444192200.26<dL<dL<dL<dL
Norashen152755460.6553393660.04<dL<dL<dL<dL
Lchashen152765450.6852383660.04<dL<dL<dL<dL
Summer
Lichk20.22760400.6556343370.07<dL<dL<dL<dL
Norashen28.272865450.6567353660<dL<dL<dL<dL
Lchashen34.092763450.6869333660.04<dL<dL<dL<dL
Autumn
Lichk12.35275442<dL<dL<dL<dL0.02<dL<dL<dL<dL
Norashen13.5276145<dL<dL<dL<dL0.04<dL<dL<dL<dL
Lchashen13.5276046<dL<dL<dL<dL0.02<dL<dL<dL<dL
“average” water quality *4 × B2004 × B100-150150-0.50.050.20.025B + 0.002
“good” quality *2 × B1002 × B50-2 × B2 × B-2 × BB + 0.02
“excellent” quality *BBBB-BB-BB
Notes: * Armenia surface water quality guidelines. B: background value of a given element in a local environment; - not available; dL detection limit: 0.002 mg L−1.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khosrovyan, A.; Avalyan, R.; Atoyants, A.; Aghajanyan, E.; Hambaryan, L.; Aroutiounian, R.; Gabrielyan, B. Tradescantia-Based Test Systems Can Be Used for the Evaluation of the Toxic Potential of Harmful Algal Blooms. Water 2023, 15, 2500. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132500

AMA Style

Khosrovyan A, Avalyan R, Atoyants A, Aghajanyan E, Hambaryan L, Aroutiounian R, Gabrielyan B. Tradescantia-Based Test Systems Can Be Used for the Evaluation of the Toxic Potential of Harmful Algal Blooms. Water. 2023; 15(13):2500. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132500

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khosrovyan, Alla, Rima Avalyan, Anahit Atoyants, Evelina Aghajanyan, Lusine Hambaryan, Rouben Aroutiounian, and Bardukh Gabrielyan. 2023. "Tradescantia-Based Test Systems Can Be Used for the Evaluation of the Toxic Potential of Harmful Algal Blooms" Water 15, no. 13: 2500. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132500

APA Style

Khosrovyan, A., Avalyan, R., Atoyants, A., Aghajanyan, E., Hambaryan, L., Aroutiounian, R., & Gabrielyan, B. (2023). Tradescantia-Based Test Systems Can Be Used for the Evaluation of the Toxic Potential of Harmful Algal Blooms. Water, 15(13), 2500. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132500

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop