Building a Smart Water City: IoT Smart Water Technologies, Applications, and Future Directions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- The measurement layer consists of the pulse water meter, control unit, and ball valve. The pulse water meter gives information on the volume and consistency of water flow. Any pulse water meter may be used (irrespective of the number of pulses per litre). The central control unit (CPU) receives information regarding the water flow rate from the water meter, uses a wireless network for communication within the application interface, evaluates the water flow periodically using established rules in line with application logic, and controls the two-way valve. Any microcontroller can be used. The two-way ball valve controls the opening or closing of the water flow, which responds to requests from the control unit.
- The communication layer provides an application interface (API) with access to the cloud database. The API is implemented as a web service, and it allows communication between the smart water meter and the customer. There are three parts to the communication interface: communication with the sensor, ball valve, and mobile API.
- Two applications exist in the user layer. Firstly, the web application enables remote configuration, management of the water meter, and user administration. The second application is designed for mobile devices with a more intuitive and user-friendly experience [22].
2. Internet of Things (IoT)
2.1. Microcontroller and Sensors
2.2. Wireless Communication Technology
2.2.1. Short Range Wireless Communication Technologies
2.2.2. Long Range Wireless Communication Technologies
- LoRa: LoRa means long range. It is a physical layer LPWAN solution created and patented by the Semtech Corporation that modulates signals using a spread spectrum technique [47]. LoRa uses the chirp spread spectrum (CSS) modulation, which spreads a narrow-band signal over a larger channel bandwidth, allowing for high interference resilience while also lowering the signal-to-noise-and-interference ratio (SINR) needed at a receiver for proper data decoding [48]. The CSS spreading factor can range from 7 to 12, allowing for variable data rates and tradeoffs between throughput and link robustness, coverage range, or energy consumption. The data rate of LoRa can range from 50 bps to 300 kbps, depending on the spreading factor and channel bandwidth [49,50]. The LoRa-based communication protocol known as LoRaWAN networks uses a star-of-stars topology, with gateway devices relaying messages between end devices and network servers. LoRaWAN has three classes of devices (Class A, B, and C) with varying capabilities. Class A LoRaWAN devices have the lowest power consumption and only require short downlink communication, and they use pure-ALOHA RA for the uplink. Class B devices are made for applications requiring more downlink transmission demands. Class C devices, on the other hand, continuously receive slots, meaning they constantly listen to the channel apart from when they need to transmit. Out of the three LoRaWAN classes, all the devices need to be compatible with Class A [51]. Smart water technologies like sensor nodes and water meters are often installed in harsh environments and rely solely on batteries for power. LoRaWAN provides low power consumption (battery life can last up to ten years), allowing these devices to operate for as long as possible. Furthermore, the LoRaWAN protocol offers long communication ranges (1–5 km in urban areas and up to 15 km in rural areas) and excellent penetration for underground communications. As a result, LoRaWAN offers enormous opportunities. LoRaWAN networks can be used for various smart water applications, including smart water quality monitoring, smart water metering, and leak detection [36].
- SigFox: Another popular unlicensed LPWAN solution available is SigFox. SigFox suggests using ultra narrow-band (UNB) technology for transmission with a bandwidth of only 100 Hz for extremely short-payload transmission. Sigfox technology allows for lower power consumption devices and offers wider coverage than LoRA, at a lower cost data rate [52]. When Sigfox was first released, it could only support uplink communication; but, over time, it developed into a bidirectional technology that has a sizable asymmetry link [53]. However, only after an uplink transmission can the downlink transmission be initiated. Furthermore, the number of uplink messages per day is limited to 140, and each uplink message can only have a maximum payload length of 12 bytes [50]. Owing to these rigid limitations and an unopened business network model [49], academia and industry have turned their attention away from Sigfox to its competitor LoRaWAN, which is regarded as being more open and flexible.
- LTE-M: LTE-M and existing cellular networks are completely compatible [54]. It can be viewed as a simplified form of LTE designed for Internet of Things applications requiring low power consumption and low device cost [55]. LTE-M technology supports mobile MTC (machine-type communications) use cases and voice-over networks [56]. In the downlink of LTE-M, multi-tone single-carrier frequency-division multiple access (SC-FDMA) is used, and in the uplink, orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) is used. To reduce the cost of hardware and complexity, LTE-M has a 1.4 MHz bandwidth and usually supports half-duplex operations (full-duplex operations are also allowed) and one receive antenna chain. New features were proposed for the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Rel-14 and Rel-15 to improve LTE-M performance in terms of positioning, data rate, latency, and voice coverage.
- Narrow-band IoT (NB-IoT): NB-IoT is also known as long-term evolution (LTE) Cat NB1. It is an LPWAN technology that coexists with cellular networks, specifically LTE and GSM. When compared to existing cellular networks, NB-IoT has a long communication range, long battery life (up to 10 years), high penetration, and low data rates. NB-IoT uses a frequency bandwidth of 200 kHz, which is equivalent to one physical resource block in LTE and GSM transmission [57]. With a frequency bandwidth of 200 kHz, NB-IoT can function in three different modes as follows: stand-alone operation (the NB-IoT can connect to one or more existing GSM carriers); guard-band operation (using unused resource blocks in the LTE spectrum guard-band); in-band operation (use of resource blocks in an LTE carrier). NB-IoT reuses several LTE functionalities and adapts them to meet the needs of IoT applications. For example, NB-IoT uses the LTE back-end system to broadcast valid messages to all end devices (EDs) in a cell. The data rates for uplink and downlink communications are 200 kbps and 20 kbps, respectively [58]. Each message has a maximum payload of 1600 bytes. Data communication uses QPSK modulation. Precisely, downlink communication uses OFDMA, whereas uplink transmission uses SC-FDMA modulation. NB-IoT has several advantages for smart water applications, particularly its low power consumption, long communication range, and excellent penetration. NB-IoT has demonstrated benefits in some smart water applications. Huawei and Vodafone used NB-IoT to send data to an end device that was installed in a water meter [53]. Finally, NB-IoT is preferred for smart water applications because of its extremely low power consumption. Table 2 below provides a summary of the discussed technical parameters of LPWAN.
2.3. Method for Real-Time Data Analysis
2.4. Software for Data Management
3. Real-World Applications of Smart Water Technologies
4. Methods
4.1. Research Questions
- What are the current smart water application designs for water management? The objective is to identify the current smart water application techniques used in managing water.
- How are these studies geographically distributed? The objective is to examine and comprehend the publication statistics of the studies to increase collaboration between stakeholders.
4.2. Search Strategy
4.3. Study Selection
- 1.
- Inclusion criteria:
- Empirical studies on smart water meter systems and adoption factors.
- Empirical studies using IoT techniques for water management.
- Empirical studies using ICT and water.
- 2.
- Exclusion criteria:
- Studies completed before 2005, or not conducted in English.
- Review papers.
4.4. Data Quality Assessment
4.5. Data Extraction Form
4.6. Data Synthesis
5. Results
5.1. What Are the Current Smart Water Application Design Techniques for Water Management?
5.2. How Are These Studies Geographically Distributed?
6. Discussion and Recommendations for Future Research
6.1. IoT-Based Smart Water Technologies
6.2. Publication Distribution by Country Based on Reviwed Studies
6.3. Industry Collaboration
7. Methods Limitation
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Raimi, M.O.; Adedoyin, O.O.; Ayibatonbira, A.A.; Anu, B.; Odipe, O.E.; Deinkuro, N.S. “Digging deeper” evidence on water crisis and its solution in Nigeria for Bayelsa state: A study of current scenario. Int. J. Hydrol. 2019, 3, 244–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olmstead, S.M. Climate change adaptation and water resource management: A review of the literature. Energy Econ. 2014, 46, 500–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahile, S.I.; Udoumoh, E.F.; Adzande, P. Residents coping strategies with water scarcity in Makurdi town, Nigeria. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. 2015, 6, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, J.; Balfour, F.; Zwinkels, M.; Gobel, T.; Heyningen, P.; Frame, J. Western Cape Sustainable Water Management Plan 2017–2022: Towards a New Norm for Water Resilience; Western Cape Government, Environmental Affairs and Development Planning: Cape Town, South Africa, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Allam, Z.; Dhunny, Z.A. On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities 2019, 89, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, G.C.A.; Nunes, M.B.; Zheng, L. Impacts of low citizen awareness and usage in smart city services: The case of London’s smart parking system. Inf. Syst. E-Bus Manag. 2017, 15, 845–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, R.E.; Bowerman, B.; Braverman, J.; Taylor, J.; Todosow, H.; Von Wimmersperg, U. The vision of a smart city. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Life Extension Technology Workshop, Paris, France, 28 September 2000; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Schaffers, H.; Ratti, C.; Komninos, N. Special issue on smart applications for smart cities—New approaches to innovation: Guest editors’ introduction. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2012, 7, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abraham, S.; Beard, J.; Manijacob, R. Remote environmental monitoring using Internet of Things (IoT). In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), San Jose, CA, USA, 19–22 October 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Günther, M.; Camhy, D.; Steffelbauer, D.; Neumayer, M.; Fuchs-Hanusch, D. Showcasing a smart water network based on an experimental water distribution system. Procedia Eng. 2015, 119, 450–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mutchek, M.; Williams, E. Moving towards sustainable and resilient smart water grids. Challenges 2014, 5, 123–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Y.; Liang, L.; Zhao, H.; Jiang, Y. The system architecture of smart water grid for water security. Procedia Eng. 2016, 154, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, C.; Hazen, J. Testing the Water: Smart Metering for Water Utilities. 2010. Report, Oracle. Available online: http://www.oracle.com/us/dm/h2fy11/oracle-utilitstngwterprtfinl-11v2-336423.pdf (accessed on 22 October 2022).
- Allen, M.; Preis, A.; Iqbal, M.; Whittle, A.J. Case study: A smart water grid in Singapore. Water Pract. Technol. 2012, 7, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Bao, S.; Burian, S. Real-time data assimilation potential to connect micro-smart water test bed and hydraulic model. H2Open J. 2019, 2, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKenna, K.; Keane, A. Residential load modeling of price-based demand response for network impact studies. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid. 2016, 7, 2285–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kartakis, S.; Abraham, E.; McCann, J.A. Waterbox: A testbed for monitoring and controlling smart water networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems for Smart Water Networks, Seattle, WA, USA, 14–16 April 2015; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stewart, R.A.; Willis, R.; Giurco, D.; Panuwatwanich, K.; Capati, G. Web-based knowledge management system: Linking smart metering to the future of urban water planning. Aust. Plan. 2010, 47, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Britton, T.C.; Stewart, R.A.; O’Halloran, K.R. Smart metering: Enabler for rapid and effective post meter leakage identification and water loss management. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 54, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morote, Á.F.; Hernández-Hernández, M. Unauthorised domestic water consumption in the city of Alicante (Spain): A consideration of its causes and urban distribution (2005–2017). Water 2018, 10, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monks, I.; Stewart, R.A.; Sahin, O.; Keller, R. Revealing unreported benefits of digital water metering: Literature review and expert opinions. Water 2019, 11, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fikejz, J.; Rolecek, J. Proposal of a smart water meter for detecting sudden water leakage. In Proceedings of the 2018 ELEKTRO, Mikulov, Czech Republic, 21–23 May 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mancosu, N.; Snyder, R.; Kyriakakis, G.; Spano, D. Water scarcity and future challenges for food production. Water 2015, 7, 975–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adedeji, K.B.; Nwulu, N.I.; Clinton, A. IoT-based smart water network management: Challenges and future trend. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Africon, Accra, Ghana, 25–27 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; Yang, X.; Sitzenfrei, R. Rethinking the framework of smart water system: A review. Water 2020, 12, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuptuk, N.; Hazell, P.; Watson, J.; Hailes, S. A systematic review of the state of cyber-security in water systems. Water 2021, 13, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Guo, S.; Huang, H.; Liu, W.; Xiang, Y. Information and communications technologies for sustainable development goals: State-of-the-art, needs and perspectives. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 2018, 20, 2389–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashton, K. That “internet of things” thing. RFiD J. 2009, 22, 97–114. [Google Scholar]
- Gubbi, J.; Buyya, R.; Marusic, S.; Palaniswami, M. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2013, 29, 1645–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunko, G.; Misra, J.; Robertson, J.; Snyder, T. A Reference Guide to the Internet of Things; Bridgera LLC: Raleigh, NC, USA, 2017; pp. 1–82. [Google Scholar]
- Teja, R. What Is a Sensor? Different Types of Sensors and Their Applications. Electron. Hub. 2021. Available online: https://www.electronicshub.org/different-types-sensors/ (accessed on 30 May 2023).
- Rao, Y.R. Automatic smart parking system using Internet of Things (IoT). Int. J. Eng. Technol. Sci. Res. 2017, 4, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- TechTarget. Sensor. Available online: https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/sensor (accessed on 29 May 2023).
- Bernard, C. Smart water management: 5 innovative solutions to water scarcity offered by the IoT. 2022. Available online: https://saft.com/energizing-iot/smart-water-management-5-innovative-solutions-water-scarcity-offered-iot (accessed on 14 May 2023).
- Ding, J.; Nemati, M.; Ranaweera, C.; Choi, J. IoT connectivity technologies and applications: A survey. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 67646–67673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lalle, Y.; Fourati, M.; Fourati, L.C.; Barraca, J.P. Communication technologies for smart water grid applications: Overview, opportunities, and research directions. Comput. Netw. 2021, 190, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ford, R.; Pritoni, M.; Sanguinetti, A.; Karlin, B. Categories and functionality of smart home technology for energy management. Build Environ. 2017, 123, 543–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horsburgh, J.S.; Leonardo, M.E.; Abdallah, A.M.; Rosenberg, D.E. Measuring water use, conservation, and differences by gender using an inexpensive, high frequency metering system. Environ. Model Softw. 2017, 96, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gautam, J.; Chakrabarti, A.; Agarwal, S.; Singh, A.; Gupta, S.; Singh, J. Monitoring and forecasting water consumption and detecting leakage using an IoT system. Water Supply 2020, 20, 1103–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelwahab, R.H.; El-Habrouk, M.; Abdelhamid, T.H. Survey of communication techniques in smart grids. In Proceedings of the 21st Int Middle East Power Syst Conf (MEPCON), Cairo, Egypt, 17 December 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arshad, Q.K.U.D.; Kashif, A.U.; Quershi, I.M. A review on the evolution of cellular technologies. In Proceedings of the 2019 16th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences & Technology (IBCAST), Islamabad, Pakistan, 8–12 January 2019; pp. 989–993. [Google Scholar]
- Quevedo, J.; Puig, V.; Cembrano, G.; Blanch, J.; Aguilar, J.; Saporta, D.; Benito, G.; Hedo, M.; Molina, A. Validation and reconstruction of flow meter data in the Barcelona water distribution network. Control. Eng. Pract. 2010, 18, 640–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salam, A.E.U.; Tola, M.; Selintung, M.; Maricar, F. On-line monitoring system of water leakage detection in pipe networks with artificial intelligence. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2014, 9, 1817–1822. [Google Scholar]
- Abbas, O.; Abou Rjeily, Y.; Sadek, M.; Shahrour, I. A large-scale experimentation of the smart sewage system. Water Environ, J. 2017, 31, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guibene, W.; Nolan, K.E.; Kelly, M.Y. Survey on clean slate cellular-IoT standard proposals. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Liverpool, UK, 26–28 October 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayoub, W.; Samhat, A.E.; Nouvel, F.; Mroue, M.; Prévotet, J.C. Internet of mobile things: Overview of LoRaWAN, DASH7, and NB-IoT in LPWANs standards and supported mobility. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 2019, 21, 1561–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lalle, Y.; Fourati, L.C.; Fourati, M.; Barraca, J.P. A Comparative study of LoRaWAN, SigFox, and NB-IoT for smart water grid. In Proceedings of the 2019 Global Information Infrastructure and Networking Symposium (GIIS), Paris, France, 18–20 December 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adelantado, F.; Vilajosana, X.; Tuset-Peiro, P.; Martinez, B.; Melia-Segui, J.; Watteyne, T. Understanding the limits of LoRaWAN. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017, 55, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Centenaro, M.; Vangelista, L.; Zanella, A.; Zorzi, M. Long-range communications in unlicensed bands: The rising stars in the IoT and smart city scenarios. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2016, 23, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mekki, K.; Bajic, E.; Chaxel, F.; Meyer, F. A comparative study of LPWAN technologies for large-scale IoT deployment. ICT Express 2019, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ikpehai, A.; Adebisi, B.; Rabie, K.M.; Anoh, K.; Ande, R.E.; Hammoudeh, M.; Gacanin, H.; Mbanaso, U.M. Low-power wide area network technologies for internet-of-things: A comparative review. IEEE Internet Things J. 2019, 6, 2225–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osman, N.I.; Abbas, E.B. Simulation and modelling of LoRa and Sigfox low power wide area network technologies. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Computer, Control, Electrical, and Electronics Engineering (ICCCEEE), Khartoum, Sudan, 12–14 August 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mekki, K.; Bajic, E.; Chaxel, F.; Meyer, F. Overview of cellular LPWAN technologies for IoT deployment: Sigfox, LoRaWAN, and NB-IoT. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), Athens, Greece, 19–23 March 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoglund, A.; Bergman, J.; Lin, X.; Liberg, O.; Ratilainen, A.; Razaghi, H.S.; Tirronen, T.; Yavuz, E.A. Overview of 3GPP release 14 further enhanced MTC. IEEE Commun. Stand. Mag. 2018, 2, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratasuk, R.; Mangalvedhe, N.; Bhatoolaul, D.; Ghosh, A. LTE-M evolution towards 5G massive MTC. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), Singapore, 4–8 December 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dawaliby, S.; Bradai, A.; Pousset, Y. In depth performance evaluation of LTE-M for M2M communications. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 12th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), New York, NY, USA, 17–19 October 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boisguene, R.; Tseng, S.C.; Huang, C.W.; Lin, P. A survey on NB-IoT downlink scheduling: Issues and potential solutions. In Proceedings of the 2017 13th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), Valencia, Spain, 26–30 June 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adhikary, A.; Lin, X.; Wang, Y.P.E. Performance evaluation of NB-IoT coverage. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 84th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall), Montreal, QC, Canada, 18–21 September 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Miao, Y.; Hao, Y.; Hwang, K. Narrow band internet of things. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 20557–20577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratasuk, R.; Mangalvedhe, N.; Xiong, Z.; Robert, M.; Bhatoolaul, D. Enhancements of narrowband IoT in 3GPP Rel-14 and Rel-15. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Standards for Communications and Networking (CSCN), Helsinki, Finland, 18–20 September 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Peng, M.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, Y.; Mao, S. Application of machine learning in wireless networks: Key techniques and open issues. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 2019, 21, 3072–3108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammadpour, R.; Shaharuddin, S.; Chang, C.K.; Zakaria, N.A.; Ghani, A.A.; Chan, N.W. Prediction of water quality index in constructed wetlands using support vector machine. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 6208–6219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rashid, S.; Akram, U.; Khan, S.A. WML: Wireless sensor network based machine learning for leakage detection and size estimation. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2015, 63, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porwal, S.; Akbar, S.A.; Jain, S.C. Leakage detection and prediction of location in a smart water grid using SVM classification. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and Soft Computing (ICECDS), Chennai, India, 1–2 August 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brentan, B.M.; Luvizotto, E.; Herrera, M.; Izquierdo, J.; Pérez-García, R. Hybrid regression model for near real-time urban water demand forecasting. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2017, 309, 532–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saravanan, M.; Das, A.; Iyer, V. Smart water grid management using LPWAN IoT technology. In Proceedings of the 2017 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS), Geneva, Switzerland, 6–9 June 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuang, W.Y.; Tsai, Y.L.; Wang, L.H. Leak detection in water distribution pipes based on CNN with mel frequency cepstral coefficients. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rdInternational Conference onInnovation in Artificial Intelligence, Suzhou, China, 15 March 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Folgado, F.J.; González, I.; Calderón, A.J. Data acquisition and monitoring system framed in Industrial Internet of Things for PEM hydrogen generators. Internet Things 2023, 22, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okoli, N.J.; Kabaso, B. Smart Water Metering System (SWMS) Adoption: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Its Applications (icARTi 2023), Mahebourg, Mauritius, 9–10 November 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnston, H. Success Story: Embracing IoT & Smart Metering for a Water Resilient Barcelona. Utility Magazine. 2021. Available online: https://utilitymagazine.com.au/success-story-suez-iot-barcelona/ (accessed on 22 October 2022).
- PUB. Smart Water Meter. Singapore’s National Water Agency. 2022. Available online: https://www.pub.gov.sg/smartwatermeter/about-swm.html (accessed on 22 October 2022).
- Beal, C.D.; Flynn, J. Toward the digital water age: Survey and case studies of Australian water utility smart-metering programs. Util. Policy 2015, 32, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jagtap, S.; Skouteris, G.; Choudhari, V.; Rahimifard, S.; Duong, L.N.K. An internet of things approach for water efficiency: A case study of the beverage factory. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Int. J. Surg. 2010, 8, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Briner, R.B.; Denyer, D. Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. In Handbook of Evidence-Based Management: Companies, Classrooms and Research; Rousseau, D.M., Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Wong, Y.J.; Nakayama, R.; Shimizu, Y.; Kamiya, A.; Shen, S.; Rashid, I.Z.M.; Sulaiman, N.M.N. Toward industrial revolution 4.0: Development, validation, and application of 3D-printed IoT-based water quality monitoring system. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 324, 129230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ntuli, N.; Abu-Mahfouz, A. A simple security architecture for smart water management system. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2016, 83, 1164–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikhil, R.; Rajender, R.; Dushyantha, G.R.; Khadri, M.N.S.; Jagadevi, N.K. Water quality monitoring system using IoT Environment. Int. J. Innov. Eng. Technol. 2018, 10, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Yang, S.H.; Magiera, E.; Froelich, W.; Jach, T.; Laspidou, C. Domestic water consumption monitoring and behaviour intervention by employing the internet of things technologies. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2017, 111, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gosavi, G.; Gawde, G.; Gosavi, G. Smart water flow monitoring and forecasting system. In Proceedings of the 2017 2nd IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT), Bengaluru, India, 19–20 May 2017; pp. 1218–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suresh, M.; Muthukumar, U.; Chandapillai, J. A novel smart water-meter based on IoT and smartphone app for city distribution management. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP), Cochin, India, 14–16 July 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, S. Domestic water conservation by IOT (Smart Home). Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 5, 328–330. [Google Scholar]
- Anandhavalli, D.; Sangeetha, K.; Dharshini, V.P.; Fathima, B.L. Smart meter for water utilization using IoT. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 5, 1002–1005. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, K.; Kulkarni, M.; Magdum, M.; Baldawa, Y.; Patil, S. Smart Water Management in Housing Societies using IoT. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT), Coimbatore, India, 27 September 2018; pp. 1609–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soh, Z.H.C.; Shafie, M.S.; Shafie, M.A.; Sulaiman, S.N.; Ibrahim, M.N.; Abdullah, S.A.C. IoT water consumption monitoring alert system. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICELTICs), Banda Aceh, Indonesia, 19–20 September 2018; pp. 168–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Paula, H.T.L.; Gomes, J.B.A.; Affonso, L.F.T.; Rabelo, R.A.L.; Rodrigues, J.J.P.C. An IoT-based water monitoring system for smart buildings. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), Shanghai, China, 20–24 May 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasibuan, A.A.; Fahrianto, F. Consumer’s activity prediction in household water consumption based-IoT (Internet of Things). In Proceedings of the 2019 7th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), Jakarta, Indonesia, 6–8 November 2019; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, C.S.; Gaikwad, J.A. Design and development of IOT based smart water distribution network for residential areas. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES), Coimbatore, India, 17–19 July 2019; pp. 2019–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rapelli, N.; Myakal, A.; Kota, V.; Rajarapollu, P.R. IoT based smart water management, monitoring and distribution system for an apartment. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICCS), Madurai, India, 15–17 May 2019; pp. 440–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jisha, R.C.; Vignesh, G.; Deekshit, D. IOT based water level monitoring and implementation on both agriculture and domestic areas. In Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Instrumentation and Control Technologies (ICICICT), Kannur, India, 5–6 July 2019; pp. 1119–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herath, I.S. Smart water buddy: IoT based intelligent domestic water management system. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Advancements in Computing (ICAC), Malabe, Sri Lanka, 5–6 December 2019; pp. 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vithanage, J.; De Silva, R.; Karunaratne, K.; Silva, M.D.; Bogoda, P.; Kankanamge, R.; Kehelella, P.; Jayakody, K.D.; Wijekoon, J.L. SmartOne: IoT-based smart platform to manage personal water usage. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Advancements in Computing (ICAC), Malabe, Sri Lanka, 5–6 December 2019; pp. 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harika, G.L.; Chowdary, H.; Kiranmai, T.S. Cloud-based internet of things for smart water consumption monitoring system. In Proceedings of the 2020 5th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES), Coimbatore, India, 10–12 June 2020; pp. 967–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, A.; Goswami, S. IoT and cloud computing based smart water metering system. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Power Electronics & IoT Applications in Renewable Energy and Its Control (PARC), Mathura, India, 28–29 February 2020; pp. 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, A.; Ray, H. SSIWM: Smart secured IoT framework for integrated water resource management system. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Bangalore Humanitarian Technology Conference (B-HTC), Vijiyapur, India, 8–10 October 2020; pp. 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarangi, A.K. Smart water leakage and theft detection using IoT. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Industry 4.0 Technology (I4Tech), Pune, India, 13–15 February 2020; pp. 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranjan, V.; Reddy, M.V.; Irshad, M.; Joshi, N. The internet of things (IoT) based smart rain water harvesting system. In Proceedings of the 2020 6th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (ICSC), Noida, India, 5–7 March 2020; pp. 302–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alves Coelho, J.; Glória, A.; Sebastião, P. Precise water leak detection using machine learning and real-time sensor data. IoT 2020, 1, 474–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuentes, H.; Mauricio, D. Smart water consumption measurement system for houses using IoT and cloud computing. Environ. Monit. Assess 2020, 192, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Migabo, E.; Djouani, K.; Kurien, A. Design of an energy efficient LoRaWAN-based smart IoT water meter for African municipalities. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET), Cape Town, South Africa, 9–10 December 2021; pp. 9–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alejandrino, R.S.; Diomampo, M.C.G.; Balbin, J.R. Smart water meter with cloud database and water bill consumption monitoring via sms and mobile application. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS), Shah Alam, Malaysia, 25 June 2022; pp. 90–95. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, A.S.; Abdelmoez, M.N.; Heshmat, M.; Ibrahim, K. A solution for water management and leakage detection problems using IoTs based approach. Internet Things 2022, 18, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrić, I.; Vrsalović, A.; Perković, T.; Čuvić, M.A.; Šolić, P. IoT approach towards smart water usage. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 367, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khosravani, M.R.; Reinicke, T. 3D-printed sensors: Current progress and future challenges. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2020, 305, 111916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Decker, A. Solar energy harvesting for autonomous field devices. IET Wirel. Sens. Syst. 2014, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ford, N. Seeking water solutions for Africa. African Bus. 2008, 338, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
- Gurung, T.R.; Stewart, R.A.; Sharma, A.K.; Beal, C.D. Smart meters for enhanced water supply network modelling and infrastructure planning. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2014, 90, 34–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Smart Water Definitions | Reference |
---|---|
The smart water system includes smart meters, smart valves, data communication, data fusion, data management, and analysis tools. | [10] |
The smart water network would include smart meters, smart pumps, and smart valves. | [11] |
The smart water grid is founded on IoT and the smart water system’s architecture. | [12] |
The smart water system demonstrates the different ways technology, software, and middleware increase the benefit of smart metering data for stakeholders. | [13] |
Smart water management differs from the traditional method of water management because it integrates ICT and water management technologies. | [14] |
An innovative smart water supply system that integrates ICT into the water supply network. | [15] |
The smart water grid incorporates ICTs into the water management distribution system. | [16] |
Smart water system uses data-driven components to assist in the operation and management of a physical pipe network. | [17] |
LoRa | SigFox | LTE-M | NB-IoT | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Topology | Star | Star | Star | Star |
Frequency | Unlicensed ISM bands | Unlicensed ISM bands | Licensed LTM bands | Licensed LTM bands |
Bandwidth | 125 kHz and 250 kHz | 100 Hz | 1.4 MHz | 200 kHz |
Bidirectional | Half-duplex | Limited/Half-duplex | Full/ Half-duplex | Half-duplex |
Maximum data rate | 50 kbps | 100 bps | 1 Mbps | 250 kbps |
Maximum payload length | 243 bytes | 12 bytes | 1000 bits | 1000 bits |
Link budget | 164 dB | 156 dB | 153 dB | 164 dB |
Coverage | Urban (5 km), rural (20 km) | Urban (10 km), rural (50 km) | Few kilometers | Urban (1 km), rural (10 km) |
Localisation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Mobility | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
Inference immunity | High | Very high | Low | Low |
Battery life | 10 years | 10 years | 10 years | 10 years |
Quality Assessment Questions |
---|
Are the aims of the research clearly stated? |
Are the independent variables defined? |
Is the data-collection procedure clearly defined? |
Are the techniques clearly defined? |
Are the results and findings clearly stated? |
Are the limitations of the study specified? |
Is the research methodology repeatable? |
Does the study contribute/add to the literature? |
Variables |
---|
Paper title: |
Authors: |
Type of Publication: |
Year: |
Study area: |
Country of publication |
Score for overall quality assessment (out of 8.0): |
Microcontroller used |
Sensors used |
Embedded programming language used |
Communication module |
Strengths (solution) |
Weaknesses |
Microcontroller | Embedded Programming Language | Sensors | Communication Module | Protocol | Solution | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raspberry Pi, Arduino | X | Turbidity, ultrasonic water level | USB Wi-Fi dongle | HTTP | Water quality monitoring system for a palm oil plantation using solar energy as the main source of energy. | [76] |
Wi-Fi gateway | Visual Studio, Microsoft SQL server. | Flow rate, temperature | Wi-Fi router | X | The amount of water consumed by each household appliance is wirelessly recorded, along with the exact consumption time, and stored in a central database. People’s water consumption habits may be influenced by real-time water consumption awareness, prompt practical tips for water-saving activities, and individual classification of water consumption behaviour. | [79] |
Arduino Uno, Raspberry Pi | Python | Hall Effect flow meter | Wi-Fi build-in | HTTP/WAP | Real-time water consumption data to assist customers in saving water through real-time asset monitoring, water quality monitoring, and water pressure monitoring. | [80] |
Electronic Interface Module (EIM) | Android SDK and Java | Build-in tamper flags, tamper signal from Hall effect | Wi-Fi or Bluetooth | WAP | The system reduces the costs for utilities by handling meter readings and billing for water distribution in urban areas. | [81] |
NodeMCU | Arduino code (Arduino IDE) | Water flow, flow Rate, Hall Effect | Wi-Fi built-in microcontroller | HTTP | The proposed system calculates the water flow rate, and quantity consumed by householders and sends it to the cloud to monitor water consumption. | [83] |
NodeMCU ESP8266, (Raspberry Pi as the home server) | X | Water level | Wi-Fi build-in | MQTT | Monitors water levels and stops water flow in the tank when full. | [82] |
Raspberry Pi Zero W model | C Language | Ultrasonic water level, turbidity | Wi-Fi build-in | MQTT | The system allows users to remotely monitor and manage water management systems using their smartphone. | [84] |
Intel Edison | Arduino IDE | Water flow | Ubidots | MQTT | Water monitoring and alert system | [85] |
MSP 430 | Arduino C | Water flow, pressure, solenoid valve | CC2650 | MQTT | Detects water leakages, prevents natural water waste, and manages water wastage. | [86] |
NodeMCU | LUA | Flow rate | ESP8266—12E | HTTP | Increases individual awareness regarding saving water for sustainable water resources. | [87] |
Raspberry Pi, Arduino Uno | PYTHON, Arduino C | Ultrasonic, turbidity, water flow | Raspberry Pi Wi-Fi build-in | HTTP | The system is designed to distribute the same amount of water to each consumer, maintain the water level in the tank, reduce water wastage, and maintain water quality. | [88] |
Arduino UNO | Arduino C | Ultrasonic, flow meter | ESP8266 | MQTT | Water wastage is monitored, resulting in a cost-effective system for saving both water and money. | [89] |
Arduino UNO | Arduino IDE | Ultrasonic, soil moisture | Arduino Ethernet Shield | HTTP | The system remotely monitors the water level in the tank and soil. Then, it sends alert messages to relevant users’ smartphones in the event of excessive water consumption. | [90] |
NodeMCU | C language | YF-S201, solenoid valve | ESP8266 | MQTT | A detection model for unusual household water use. | [91] |
NodeMCU | Arduino IDE | pH, turbidity | ESP8266 | MQTT | The SmartOne water bottle is designed to help users drink good quality water and regularly maintain water intake for proper functioning of the human organs. | [92] |
Raspberry Pi Zero | MATLAB | YF-S201 | Built-in microcontroller | HTTP | The system uses data from household water flow meters that are collected in real time to draw appropriate inferences. | [93] |
Node MCU ESP8266 | Lua scripting | YF-S201 | Wi-Fi built-in MC | MQTT | Uses machine learning to detect excessive water use. | [94] |
Node MCU ESP8266 | Arduino code (Arduino IDE) | Water flow YF-S201 | Wi-Fi build-in | HTTP | Generating water use pattern when implemented, monitoring of urban water resource use pattern, alert system, secure and reliable system, user friendly, proposal of water tariff so people are responsible for their water use, and an architecture that can give room for additional functionalities and computations. | [95] |
Arduino Nano, Arduino UNO | Arduino C | YF-S201 | Zigbee, LoRa | HTTP | The system detects water theft and water leakages in the pipeline. | [96] |
NodeMCU V3 ESP8266 | Lua scripting | pH, rainfall, ultrasonic | Wi-Fi build in | MQTP | Collects and retains the quality of precious rainwater in areas with small houses. | [97] |
ESP32 | Machine learning, Python script, Paho Java MQTT library | YF-B2 Water flow (water rotor and Hall Effect sensor) | Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), LoRa | MQTT (NB-IoT) | The system uses machine learning to monitor water distribution systems, such as irrigation systems, and real-time detection of leaks and their locations in pipes. | [98] |
NodeMCU ESP8266, Raspberry Pi | Python | Water flow, motion sensor | Wi-Fi build-in | MQTT | The system covers five aspects of water consumption: measurement, local record process, security of device, storage and visualization, and leak detection. | [99] |
Silab EFM32 | X | Tunnel magneto-resistance (TMR) sensor | RF radio for CIU communications, LoRaWAN modem for IoT packet transmissions | HTTP | Smart water meter with a 10-year battery lifespan that is energy-efficient for a municipal setting in Africa. | [100] |
NodeMCU ESP8266 | Arduino code (Arduino IDE), Kodular IDE | Water flow (Hall Effect flow meter) | Wi-Fi build-in | HTTPS | A smart water meter that sends updates on water flow rate, consumption, and monthly bills via mobile application and SMS service. | [101] |
Arduino-based boards | JavaScript and TypeScript | Water flow, ultrasonic | LoRa, Sigfox, NB-IoT, LoRaWAN | MQTT | The system detects water consumption patterns, quantifies water loss, and their location. | [103] |
Arduino NodeMCU | C | Flow sensors and water quality sensors (water flow rate, water turbidity, water pH level) | Wi-Fi build-in | X | Leak detection in smart homes, measurement of consumption, and water quality monitoring. | [102] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Okoli, N.J.; Kabaso, B. Building a Smart Water City: IoT Smart Water Technologies, Applications, and Future Directions. Water 2024, 16, 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16040557
Okoli NJ, Kabaso B. Building a Smart Water City: IoT Smart Water Technologies, Applications, and Future Directions. Water. 2024; 16(4):557. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16040557
Chicago/Turabian StyleOkoli, Nwakego Joy, and Boniface Kabaso. 2024. "Building a Smart Water City: IoT Smart Water Technologies, Applications, and Future Directions" Water 16, no. 4: 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16040557
APA StyleOkoli, N. J., & Kabaso, B. (2024). Building a Smart Water City: IoT Smart Water Technologies, Applications, and Future Directions. Water, 16(4), 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16040557