Next Article in Journal
Spreading or Contraction of an Axisymmetric Viscous Drop between Two Plates in a Rapidly Rotating Frame
Previous Article in Journal
Infinitely Many Solutions for the Fractional p&q-Laplacian Problems in RN
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Formulation to Synthetize Semiconductor Bi2S3 Thin Films Using Chemical Bath Deposition for Optoelectronic Applications

by
Amanda Carrillo-Castillo
1,*,
Brayan G. Rivas-Valles
1,
Santos Jesus Castillo
2,
Marcela Mireles Ramirez
3 and
Priscy Alfredo Luque-Morales
4
1
Institute of Engineering and Technology, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez, Ciudad Juárez C.P. 32310, Chihuahua, Mexico
2
Physics Research Department, University of Sonora, Hermosillo C.P. 83000, Sonora, Mexico
3
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA
4
Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Design, Autonomous University of Baja California, Ensenada C.P. 22860, Baja California, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2022, 14(12), 2487; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14122487
Submission received: 10 September 2022 / Revised: 12 October 2022 / Accepted: 18 October 2022 / Published: 24 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Chemistry: Symmetry/Asymmetry)

Abstract

:
Anisotropic materials possess direction dependent properties as a result of symmetry within their structure. Bismuth sulfide (Bi2S3) is an important semiconductor exhibiting anisotropy due to its crystalline and stratified structure. In this manuscript we present a new and straightforward procedure to deposit Bi2S3 thin films on soda lime glass substrates by the chemical bath deposition (CBD) technique. We studied two fundamental parameters, the time to deposit a single layer and the total number of layers deposited. The single layer deposition time was varied between 70 and 100 min and samples were coated with a total of 1, 2, or 3 layers. It is important to note that a fresh aqueous solution was used for every layer. Visible and near infra-red spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectrons spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction were the characterization techniques used to study the resulting films. The calculated band gap values were found to be between 1.56 and 2.1 eV. The resulting Bi2S3 deposited films with the new formulation showed uniform morphology and orthorhombic crystalline structure with an average crystallite size of 19 nm. The thickness of the films varied from 190 to 600 nm in direct correlation to the deposition time and in agreement with the number of layers. The XPS results showed the characteristic bismuth doublet centered around 164.11 and 158.8 eV corresponding with the presence of Bi2S3. The symmetry within the Bi2S3 structure makes it a strong anisotropic crystal with potential applications in optoelectronic and photovoltaic devices, catalysis, and photoconductors among others.

1. Introduction

Semiconductor thin films have been the basis of the development of an astounding variety of modern technologies. In recent years, research in this field has been accelerated by the realization and success of several applications [1,2,3,4,5]. A thin film is a layer of material, which can be an insulator, a semiconductor, or a conductor, with a thickness from a couple to hundreds of nanometers. Thin films have enabled countless applications such as electronic devices, transistors, solar cells, solid state illumination, sensors, and data storage [6]. To date, new applications are still being developed, even for the medical field such as biosensors and scaffolds for tissue engineering [7,8,9,10].
Thin films can be obtained through a vast catalog of methods; some of the most used are spray pyrolysis, physical or chemical vapor deposition, electrochemical deposition, successive ionic layer adsorption/reaction, and chemical bath deposition [11,12,13,14,15,16].
Bismuth based materials exhibit unique structure, high carrier mobility, and environmental stability, which makes them attractive for optoelectronic applications [17]. Moreover, bismuth is known for its significant infrared refractive index (n∼10) as well as negative ultraviolet-visible permittivity [18].
Bismuth chalcogenide has demonstrated a stability in ambient conditions and can be easily integrated into electronic devices fabricated on traditional rigid or flexible substrates. In addition, its semiconducting properties can be varied with the addition of oxygen [19,20].
Bismuth sulfide (Bi2S3) is a binary salt also called bismuthinite and it is the most common form in which bismuth is found in nature. Bismuthinite is cataloged as a chalcogenide semiconductor. Bi2S3 thin films have been obtained using chemical and physical methods, aerosol assisted chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [14], melt-quench techniques [21], successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction (SILAR) methods [22], and chemical bath deposition (CBD) [23,24]. CBD is perhaps the simplest and most affordable method for depositing thin films. It is based on an aqueous solution and a substrate in which the material is to be deposited. Film growth during CBD can occur ion-by-ion or though the formation of a hydroxide cluster. In the first mechanism, sequential ionic reactions are involved; the second mechanism requires the formation of a metal complex, which also prevents precipitation. In this work, film growth followed the second mechanism since Bi(OH)3 was formed first (see reaction mechanism proposed). The initial nucleation of hydroxide occurs homogeneously in solution; therefore, the chalcogenide is formed homogeneously as well and usually precipitates out of solution. It is advisable to control the rate of the chemical reactions involved, to remain slow enough as to allow the chalcogenide to gradually form on the substrate as well as to diffuse and adhere either to the substrate itself or to the growing film [25]. This simple system restricts some of the variables that would allow controlling some of the properties of the resulting thin film, including temperature stability, deposition angle, and precursor solubility [1,3,9].
Different authors have utilized Bi2S3 as an n-type semiconductor with a 1.6–1.9 eV band gap [1,3,26]. The properties of semiconductor materials can be influenced by the symmetry of their structure. The crystal structure of Bi2S3 is strongly anisotropic and stratified, presenting as orthorhombic bismuthinite. The latter makes this material a good candidate for optoelectronic applications [27,28,29]. Unlike other materials used for solar cells, its toxicity is considerably low. Depositing this material, as a thin film for its application in electronic devices, stiff or flexible, has not been explored methodically. For these reasons, the development of a low-cost route for its synthesis is of high interest.
This work focuses on a new formulation for the synthesis of Bi2S3 thin films, which were characterized by visible and near infra-red (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy to analyze their absorption response properties, scanning electrons microscopy (SEM) to determine their morphology and thicknesses, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to confirm the chemical composition, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) to investigate the crystalline structure and crystallite size.

2. Materials and Methods

The Bi2S3 thin coatings were deposited on soda lime glass substrates (25 × 75 mm), these glass substrates were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath with acetone followed by isopropanol and finally rinsed with distilled water and dried with N2 gas.
The used reagents were: Pentahydrate bismuth nitrate Bi(NO3)3. 5H2O (ACS reagent, ≥98.0%, ALDRICH), triethanolamine C6H15NO3 (TEA) (99%, J.T. Baker), sodium hydroxide NaOH (ACS Reagent Grade 97%, FERMONT), and thiourea CH4N2S (ACS reagent, ≥98.0%, J.T. Baker).
Our recipe designed to deposit Bi2S3 consists of a mixture of 5 mL of TEA (1 M) with 40 mL of Bi(NO3)3·5H2O (0.1 M), 2.5 mL of TEA (C6H15NO3) (0.5 M), 2.5 mL of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) (1 M), and 5 mL of thiourea (CH4N2S) (0.15 M). The role of each reagent is as follows: to provide bismuth ions, to act as a complexing agent, to raise the pH, and to provide sulfur ions, respectively. The reagents were added to the beaker in the order listed, and the beaker was stirred after each addition to ensure a homogeneous solution. The solution was poured into a 50 mL beaker where 40 mL of water was added. The thermal bath temperature was chosen to be 60 °C and the beaker was placed in the bath promptly after all the reagents were added, the pH of the solution was kept at a value of 12. After deposition, the Bi2S3 films were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath with methanol followed by distilled water and dried with N2 gas.
Initially, we studied reaction times from 10 to 180 min and found 70, 80, 90, and 100 min to be the most stable, resulting in homogeneous coatings and improving film adhesion. Then, we evaluated the effect of the number of layers (1, 2, and 3), and selected reaction or deposition times (70, 80, 90, and 100 min). As we are mainly interested in developing a new synthesis route, we propose the following reaction mechanism:
Bi(NO3)3 ∙ 5H2O + 3Na(OH) → Bi(OH)3 + 3Na(NO3) + 5H2O
2Bi(OH)3 + 2n[C6H15NO3] →2[Bi(TEA)n]3+ + 6(OH)1−
SC(NH2)2 + 2H2O → H2S(g) +CO2(g) ↑ + 2NH3(g)↑→ S2− + H2O
[Bi(TEA)n]3+ → Bi3+ + n(TEA)
2 Bi3+ + 3S2− → Bi2S3
We deposited twelve Bi2S3 samples, identified with labels following the nomenclature “Smn” explained in Table 1.
Our characterization included UV-Vis-(NIR), SEM, XPS, and XRD. The UV-Vis-(NIR) measurements were carried out with a Jenway 6850 with a 0.1 nm resolution in the 300–1100 nm range. The SEM images were obtained with a JEOL 7000 F JSM using an acceleration voltage of 0.1–30 KV. The average Bi2S3 films thicknesses were obtained by measuring the SEM cross-section. Chemical analysis was done with an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer from Perkin Elmer Phi 5600 ESCA system equipped with an Aluminum (Al) X-ray source. The crystalline structure of the Bi2S3 films was investigated in a Rigaku Ultima III X-ray diffractometer with CuKα (λ) = 1.54 Å, operated at 40 kV and 44 mA with a scan step set at 0.5 °/min.

3. Results and Discussion

We first characterized the absorption of the films between 350 and 1100 nm. Figure 1 presents the absorption of the three sets of samples corresponding to films deposited with different number of layers and deposition times. The Tauc method was used to calculate the direct band gap value from the absorbance spectra (Figure 2).
From the Tauc method d 2 τ d E 2 0 , assuming a direct band gap τ = [ ( A ) ( E ) ] 2 = C ( E E g ) , where τ = Tauc variable, C= slope of linear behavior, Eg = Energy band gap, E = Incident energy, and A = A(E) = Absorption of the coating. d 2 τ d E 2 = d 2 C ( E E g )   d E 2 0
The Bi2S3 samples showed to have an absorption edge within 950–1100 nm depending on deposition time and the number of layers, this corresponds to 2.1–1.6 eV band gap (Figure 3). The optical band gap (Eg) decreased when the number of layers increased. A decrease of the band gap can be attributed to an increase of the grain size of the Bi2S3 films. The effect of grain size on the optical band gap can be attributed to quantum confinement effects [30,31,32,33,34]. The obtained values in this work are in agreement with the ones reported by others [1,3,25]. In the range from 700 to 1100 nm, the absorption intensity can be correlated to the increase of the deposition time for samples consisting of one and three layers. The reason for the nonlinear tendency in absorption intensity for the samples with two layers may be the presence of structural defects.
Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the morphology of the films with one, two, and three layers. A level of homogeneity was observed for the following samples: one layer––100 min; two layers––70, 80, 90, and 100 min; and three layers––70, 80, and 90 min.
Figure 4a shows the morphology of the film with one layer and 100 min deposition time; the morphology shows aggregates resembling isolated sea urchins with a size of 500 nm–1 μm; the size increases with the number of layers. Figure 4b shows a SEM image cross-section for the film where a thickness of ~195 nm on average was measured.
Figure 5 shows the morphology for the samples deposited with two layers and different deposition time.
The surface morphology resembles entangled sea urchins, as can be observed in parts a, b, c, and d of Figure 5. However, a bilayer formed when using a deposition time of 100 min showing larger sea urchins that are better defined; this deposition time was discarded and no longer pursued when studying three-layer samples.
Figure 6 shows the morphology of the obtained samples deposited with three layers. Overall, the films seem to follow the same trend as the films deposited with two layers.
The long deposition time for the growth of Bi2S3 thin films by CBD might be due to the use of stronger complexing agents in the process, as in some cases becomes necessary to assist the dissolution of the bismuth salt with agents such as TEA.
The SEM images showed an incomplete coverage of material over the surface of the substrates for Bi2S3 films deposited with one layer; however, formation of more homogeneous films was achieved upon increasing the number of layers and deposition. This is due to the fact that growth on a substrate depends on the formation of nucleation sites that form during the deposition of the first layer. The process of aggregation then occurs during subsequent layers. High concentrations of bismuth or sulphur can produce a high number of particles in each layer. In theory, the van der walls forces increases if two particles approach each other, until an individual particle has formed [25]. SEM micrographs of Bi2S3 films deposited with one, two, and three layers demonstrate the process of aggregation during the growth of thin films, similar morphology has been reported elsewhere [31,32]. The morphology of Bi2S3 films could be attributed to the film growth proceeding cluster-by-cluster, as proposed in this work. The latter can strongly depend on the complexing agent, which acts by suppressing the growth of certain crystal facets via coordination to metal cations, in this case with the use of a stronger complexing agent [32,33].
In the present work, we report on the preparation of Bi2S3 homogeneous and compact microstructure films. In the next section, we focus on the Bi2S3 films deposited with two and three layers and a deposition time of 80 min.
In order to confirm the presence of Bi2S3, XPS was carried out after mild surface cleaning with an Ar sputter gun to remove the adsorbed species from the atmosphere. Figure 7 shows the results obtained for the Bi 4f region; the data have been fitted with a doublet showing an energy splitting of 5.31 eV. The main peak in the doublet, Bi 4f 7/2, was found to be centered at 158.8 eV, which is in agreement with the presence of Bi2S3 [35].
Figure 8 shows the XRD pattern obtained for a Bi2S3 sample deposited with three layers and a deposition time of 80 min. The crystalline planes are indexed from reference to PDF 17-0320 for Bi2S3-bismuthinite [1,2,3,4,8,9]. The average crystallite diameter for Bi2S3 was calculated to be 19.07 nm, as estimated from the (221) peak. In general, the resulting properties such as the band gap and crystalline structure are similar to previous reports. The samples in this work did not require any post-deposition processing to obtain Bi2S3 films. The reaction mechanism reported here is a new contribution and agrees well with the different deposition times and number of layers deposited [36,37,38].

4. Conclusions

The present work shows the effect of the deposition time and number of layers on Bi2S3 films obtained by chemical bath deposition. The methodology presented here yields uniform films deposited at a low temperature. These processing conditions play an important role in the morphology and optical properties. The XPS characterization demonstrated the presence of Bi2S3 and the diffraction data showed the presence of its orthorhombic phase. The low temperature and low-cost process to obtain Bi2S3 films presented here complies with the requirements for optoelectronic and flexible electronics technologies and can be extended to the fabrication of semiconductor devices.

Author Contributions

A.C.-C.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review and Editing, Visualization, Project administration, Funding acquisition. B.G.R.-V.: Methodology, Writing—Review and Editing Marcela Mireles: Validation, Writing—Review and Editing, Investigation, Visualization. S.J.C.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Review and Editing, Visualization. M.M.R.: Validation, Writing—Review and Editing, Investigation, Visualization. P.A.L.-M.: Validation, Writing—Review and Editing, Investigation, Visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge partial financial support from CONACyT through the grants Problemas Nacionales 3529-2016 and Ciencia Básica 2013-IOO17-22111.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge partial financial support from CONACyT through the grants Problemas Nacionales 3529-2016 and Ciencia Básica 2013-IOO17-22111, Government of the State of Chihuahua through the Secretariat of Innovation and Economic De-velopment, through the Institute of Innovation and Competitiveness and the staff of the flexible electronics laboratory of UACJ.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. García, M.H.; Nair, M.T.S.; Nair, P.K. All-chemically deposited Bi2S3/PbS solar cells. Thin Solid Films 2011, 519, 7364–7368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liufu, S.C.; Chen, L.D.; Yao, Q.; Wang, C.F. Bismuth Sulfide Thin Films with Low Resistivity on Self-Assembled Monolayers. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 47, 24054–24061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nair, P.K.; Nair, M.T.S.; Garcia, V.M.; García, O.L.; Arenas, O.L.; Piña, Y.; Castillo, A.; Ayala, I.T.; Gomezdaza, O.; Sánchez, A.; et al. Semiconductor thin films by chemical bath deposition for solar energy related applications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1998, 52, 313–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nie, G.; Lu, X.; Lei, J.; Yang, L.; Wang, C. Facile and controlled synthesis of bismuth sulfide nanorods-reduced graphene oxide composites with enhanced supercapacitor performance. Electrochim. Acta. 2015, 154, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Miller, N.C.; Bernechea, M. Research Update: Bismuth based materials for photovoltaics. Appl. Mater. 2018, 6, 084503. [Google Scholar]
  6. Herner, S.B. Chapter 13—Application of Thin Films in Semiconductor Memories. In Handbook of Thin Film Deposition, 4th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 417–437. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhu, Q.; Gao, F.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Wang, W. Electrochemical preparation of polyaniline capped Bi2S3 nanocomposite and its application in impedimetric DNA biosensor. Sens. Actuators B. Chem. 2015, 207, 819–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fernandes, A.M.; Abdalhai, M.H.; Ji, J.; Xi, B.W.; Xie, J.; Sun, J.; Noeline, R.; Lee, B.H.; Sun, X. Development of highly sensitive electrochemical genosensor based on multiwalled carbon nanotubes-chitosan-bismuth and lead sulfide nanoparticles for the detection of pathogenic Aeromonas. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 63, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kinsella, M.; Jimenez, R.E.; Karmali, P.P.; Rush, A.M.; Kotamraju, V.R.; Gianneschi, N.C.; Ruoslathi, E.; Stupack, D.; Sailor, M.J. X-ray computed tomography imaging of breast cancer by using targeted peptide-labeled bismuth sulfide nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 12308–12311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Qu, C.; Zhou, S.; Li, G.; Wang, C.; Synders, R.; Bittencourt, C.; Li, W. Bi2S3/rGO Composite Based Electrochemical Sensor for. Ascorbic Acid Detection. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 190–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, C.; Shen, H.; Sun, L.; Shen, Z. Chemical bath deposition o Bi2S3 films by a novel deposition system. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 7529–7533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ali, N.; Hussain, A.; Ahmed, R.; Omar, M.F.B.; Sultan, M.; Fu, Y.Q. Crystallized InBiS3 thin films with enhanced optoelectronic properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 436, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Munawar, K.; Mansoor, M.A.; Basirun, W.J.; Misran, M.; Huang, N.M.; Mazhar, M. Single step fabrication of CuO-MnO-2TiO2 composite thin films with improved photoelectrochemical response. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 15885–15893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Zamani, M.; Jamali-Sheini, F.; Cheraghizade, M. Visible-range and self-powered bilayer p-Si/n-Bi2S3 heterojunction photodetector: The effect of Au buffer layer on the optoelectronics performance. J. Alloy. Compd. 2022, 905, 164119–164149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ho, S.M.; Nilai, P.; Sembilan, N. Review Article Chalcogenide Thin Films Prepared using Chemical Bath Deposition Method: Review. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2015, 11, 1058–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pineda, E.; Nicho, M.E.; Nair, P.K.; Hu, H. Optoelectronic properties of chemically deposited Bi2S3 thin films and the photovoltaic performance of Bi2S3/P3OT solar cells. Sol. Energy 2012, 86, 1017–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Luo, Y.; Wen, J.; Zhang, J. Introductory Chapter: BISMUTH-Related Optoelectronic Materials. In Bismuth-Fundamentals and Optoelectronic Applications, 1st ed.; Intechopen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  18. Toudert, J.; Serna, R.; Deeb, C.; Rebollar, E. Optical properties of bismuth nanostructures towards the ultrathin film regime. Opt. Mater. Express 2019, 9, 2924–2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, F.; Yang, S.; Wu, J.; Hu, X.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, X.; Luo, J.; Zhai, T. Emerging two-dimensional bismuth oxychalcogenides for electronics and optoelectronics. InfoMat 2021, 3, 1251–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pandey, A.; Yadav, R.; Kaur, M.; Singh, P.; Gupta, A.; Husale, S. High performing flexible optoelectronic devices using thin films of topological insulator. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Patil, A.L.; Chanshetti, U.B. Refractive Index and Density Properties of Bismuth Sulfide (Bi2S3) Glass Nanocomposite. Int. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 12, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Jiang, L.; Sun, K.; Liu, F.; Lai, Y. Photoelectrochemical properties of Bi2S3 thin films deposited by successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction (SILAR) method. J. Alloy. Compd. 2016, 686, 684–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fazal, T.; Ismail, B.; Shah, M.; Iqbal, S.; Elkaeed, E.B.; Awwad, N.S.; Ibrahium, H.A. Simplified Route for Deposition of Binary and Ternary Bismuth Sulphide Thin Films for Solar Cell Applications. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4603–4614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ahire, R.R.; Sharma, R.P. Photoelectrochemical characterization of Bi2S3 thin films deposited by modified chemical bath deposition. Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci. 2006, 13, 140–144. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hodes, G. Chemical Solution Deposition of Semiconductor Films, 1st ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hussain, A.; Ahmed, R.; Ali, N.; AbdEl-Salam, N.M.; Deraman, K.; Fu, Y.Q. Synthesis and characterization of thermally evaporated copper bismuth sulphide thin films. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 320, 404–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nair, M.T.S.; Nair, P.K. Photoconductive bismuth sulphide thin films by chemical deposition. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1990, 5, 1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mane, R.S.; Sankapal, B.R.; Lokhande, C.D. Photoelectrochemical (PEC) characterization of chemically deposited Bi2S3 thin films from non-aqueous medium. Mater. Chem. Phys. 1999, 60, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shah, M.P.; Holmberg, S.H.; Kostylev, S.A. Reversible switching in thin amorphous chalcogenide films—Electronic effects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1973, 31, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Subramania, S.; Balaji, M.; Chithralekha, P.; Sanjeev, G.; Subramanian, E.; Pathinettam, D. Electron beam induced modifications of bismuth sulphide (Bi2S3) thin films: Structural and optical properties. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2010, 79, 1127–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shein, H.; Shao, Z.; Zhao, Q.; Jin, M.; Shen, C.; Deng, M.; Zhong, G.; Huang, F.; Zhu, H.; Chen, F.; et al. Facile synthesis of novel three-dimensional Bi2S3 nanocrystals capped by polyvinyl pyrrolidone to enhance photocatalytic properties under visible light. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 573, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Onwudiwe, D.C.; Nkwe, V.M. Morphological variations in Bi2S3 nanoparticles synthesized by using a single source precursor. Heliyon 2020, 7, e04505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, K.; Shen, Z.R.; Li, Y.; Han, S.D.; Hu, T.L.; Zhang, D.S.; Bu, X.H.; Ruan, W.J. Solvent induced rapid modulation of micro/nano structures of metal carboxylates coordination polymers: Mechanism and morphology dependent magnetism. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6023–6029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Yu, I.; Isobe, T.; Seena, M. Preparation and properties of CdS thin films comprising nano-particles by a solution growth technique. Mater. Res. Bull. 1995, 30, 975–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wagner, C.D.; Naumkin, A.V.; Kraut-Vass, A.; Allison, J.W.; Powell, C.J.; Rumble, J.R. NIST Standard Reference Database 20; Version 3.4; Available online: http:/srdata.nist.gov/xps/ (accessed on 10 December 2021).
  36. Ahire, R.R.; Sankapal, B.R.; Lokhande, C.D. Preparation and characterization of Bi2S3 thin films using modified chemical bath deposition method. Mater. Res. Bull. 2001, 36, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hussain, A.; Begum, A.; Rahman, A. Effects of annealing on nanocrystalline Bi2S3 thin films prepared by chemical bath deposition. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2014, 2, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Moreno-García, H.; Messina, S.; Calixto-Rodriguez, M.; Martínez, H. Physical properties of chemically deposited Bi2S3 thin films using two post-deposition treatments. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 311, 729–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Obtained absorption spectra of different as ground Bi2S3 films, labeled as it is indicated in figure.
Figure 1. Obtained absorption spectra of different as ground Bi2S3 films, labeled as it is indicated in figure.
Symmetry 14 02487 g001
Figure 2. Tauc variable vs. Energy plot for selected bismuth sulfide film deposited by CBD.
Figure 2. Tauc variable vs. Energy plot for selected bismuth sulfide film deposited by CBD.
Symmetry 14 02487 g002
Figure 3. Direct band gap obtained for each subgroup of Bi2S3 films as function of total deposition time.
Figure 3. Direct band gap obtained for each subgroup of Bi2S3 films as function of total deposition time.
Symmetry 14 02487 g003
Figure 4. SEM micrographs for Bi2S3 samples containing one layer grown with a deposition time of 100 min (a) film morphology (b) SEM image cross-section.
Figure 4. SEM micrographs for Bi2S3 samples containing one layer grown with a deposition time of 100 min (a) film morphology (b) SEM image cross-section.
Symmetry 14 02487 g004
Figure 5. SEM micrographs for Bi2S3 samples deposited with two layers grown with a deposition time of: (a) 70 min, (b,e) 80 min, film morphology and SEM image cross-section, respectively, (c) 90 min, and (d) 100 min.
Figure 5. SEM micrographs for Bi2S3 samples deposited with two layers grown with a deposition time of: (a) 70 min, (b,e) 80 min, film morphology and SEM image cross-section, respectively, (c) 90 min, and (d) 100 min.
Symmetry 14 02487 g005
Figure 6. SEM morphology of three Bi2S3 three layers grown with a deposition time of: (a,b) 70 min, (c,d,g) 80 min, film morphology (two micrographs), and SEM image cross-section, respectively, and (e,f) 90 min.
Figure 6. SEM morphology of three Bi2S3 three layers grown with a deposition time of: (a,b) 70 min, (c,d,g) 80 min, film morphology (two micrographs), and SEM image cross-section, respectively, and (e,f) 90 min.
Symmetry 14 02487 g006
Figure 7. Spectra from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy for the Bi 4f region taken from the Bi2S3 thin films analyzed.
Figure 7. Spectra from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy for the Bi 4f region taken from the Bi2S3 thin films analyzed.
Symmetry 14 02487 g007
Figure 8. XRD patterns of Bi2S3 films deposited with three layers and 80 min deposition time.
Figure 8. XRD patterns of Bi2S3 films deposited with three layers and 80 min deposition time.
Symmetry 14 02487 g008
Table 1. Bi2S3 samples deposited by chemical bath deposition.
Table 1. Bi2S3 samples deposited by chemical bath deposition.
Sm,n~Total Deposition Time (Minutes)m, Represents the Number of Layers
n, represents the deposition timeS1,70~70S2,70~140S3,70~210
S1,80~80S2,80~160S3,80~240
S1,90~90S2,90~180S3,90~270
S1,100~100S2,100~200S3,100~300
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carrillo-Castillo, A.; Rivas-Valles, B.G.; Castillo, S.J.; Ramirez, M.M.; Luque-Morales, P.A. New Formulation to Synthetize Semiconductor Bi2S3 Thin Films Using Chemical Bath Deposition for Optoelectronic Applications. Symmetry 2022, 14, 2487. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14122487

AMA Style

Carrillo-Castillo A, Rivas-Valles BG, Castillo SJ, Ramirez MM, Luque-Morales PA. New Formulation to Synthetize Semiconductor Bi2S3 Thin Films Using Chemical Bath Deposition for Optoelectronic Applications. Symmetry. 2022; 14(12):2487. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14122487

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carrillo-Castillo, Amanda, Brayan G. Rivas-Valles, Santos Jesus Castillo, Marcela Mireles Ramirez, and Priscy Alfredo Luque-Morales. 2022. "New Formulation to Synthetize Semiconductor Bi2S3 Thin Films Using Chemical Bath Deposition for Optoelectronic Applications" Symmetry 14, no. 12: 2487. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14122487

APA Style

Carrillo-Castillo, A., Rivas-Valles, B. G., Castillo, S. J., Ramirez, M. M., & Luque-Morales, P. A. (2022). New Formulation to Synthetize Semiconductor Bi2S3 Thin Films Using Chemical Bath Deposition for Optoelectronic Applications. Symmetry, 14(12), 2487. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14122487

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop