Next Article in Journal
Symmetries and Conservation Laws for a Class of Fourth-Order Reaction–Diffusion–Advection Equations
Next Article in Special Issue
On Conformable Fractional Milne-Type Inequalities
Previous Article in Journal
Cross-Version Software Defect Prediction Considering Concept Drift and Chronological Splitting
Previous Article in Special Issue
Symmetry Analyses of Epidemiological Model for Monkeypox Virus with Atangana–Baleanu Fractional Derivative
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Some Fractional Integral Inequalities by Way of Raina Fractional Integrals

by
Miguel Vivas-Cortez
1,†,
Asia Latif
2,*,† and
Rashida Hussain
2,†
1
Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, School of Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Av. 12 de Octubre 1076 y Roca, Apartado, Quito 17-01-2184, Ecuador
2
Department of Mathematics, Mirpur University of Science & Technology (MUST), Mirpur 10250, AJK, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Symmetry 2023, 15(10), 1935; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15101935
Submission received: 11 July 2023 / Revised: 7 September 2023 / Accepted: 12 September 2023 / Published: 19 October 2023

Abstract

:
In this research, some novel Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér-type inequalities using Raina fractional integrals for the class of ϑ -convex functions are obtained. These inequalities are more comprehensive and inclusive than the corresponding ones present in the literature.

1. Introduction

Convexity has been known for a long time and has been intensively studied. Convex functions play a significant role in pure and applied mathematics, see [1,2,3]. To cope with the needs of modern mathematics, various generalizations of convex functions have been presented in the literature, such as the ( α , β , γ , δ ) -convex function [4], coordinated convex function [5], harmonically convex function [6], h 1 , h 2 -convex function [7], G A -convex function [8], biconvex function [9], refined convex function of Raina type [10], s-HH convex function [11], 4-convex function [12], ϑ -convex function [13] and so on. This work utilizes the ϑ -convex function, which is defined as follows.
Definition 1. 
A function p : H R R is said to be ϑ-convex on H if there is a function ϑ : R R such that H is a ϑ-convex set and the inequality
p υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) υ p ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) p ϑ ( κ ) , ( 0 υ 1 ) ,
is valid for each ι , κ H .
If the inequality sign in (1) is reversed, then p is called ϑ -concave on the set H. Every convex function p on a convex set H is a ϑ -convex function provided that ϑ ( υ ) = υ . The Hermite–Hadamard-type inequality for ϑ -convex functions is given in the following theorem.
Theorem 1. 
Suppose that ϑ : J R R is a continuous increasing function and ι , κ J with ι < κ . Moreover, let p : I R R be a ϑ-convex function on I = [ ι , κ ] , then the inequality
p ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 1 ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) p ( ϑ ( υ ) ) d ϑ ( υ ) p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) + p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) 2 ,
is valid, see [14].
If ϑ ( υ ) = υ in Theorem 1, then Inequality (2) reduces to the classical Hermite–Hadamard inequality
p ι + κ 2 ι κ p ( υ ) d υ p ι + p κ 2 ,
where p is a convex function on [ i , κ ] . For a thorough review of recent work related to Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities, see [15] and the references therein. An extension of Inequality (3) is the classical Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér inequality
p ι + κ 2 ι κ q ( υ ) d υ ι κ p ( υ ) q ( υ ) d υ p ι + p κ 2 ι κ q ( υ ) d υ ,
where the function q : [ ι , κ ] R is integrable and symmetric with respect to ι + κ 2 , see [16]. For detailed a investigation of Inequality (4), see [8,17,18,19]. In the present work, we will extend Inequality (4) for ϑ -convex functions.
It is riveting to study generalized convex functions in the scenario of fractional integral operators, see [20,21,22] and the references therein. There are various fractional operators inspired by applied problems or analytical approaches, for example, the Caputo–Fabrizio fractional integral [23], generalized fractional operators [24], fractional conformable operators [25], weighted fractional integrals [26], variable order and distributed order fractional operators [27], tempered fractional calculus [28,29] and the Raina fractional integral operator [30,31]. In the present paper, ϑ -convexity is utilized together with Raina fractional integrals. These integrals are defined in the following.
Definition 2. 
Suppose that p L ( ι , κ ) , then for σ , ρ R + , δ R , the Raina fractional integrals of p are given as follows
I σ , ρ , ι + ; δ ϖ p ( s ) = ι s ( s υ ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( s υ ) σ ] p ( υ ) d υ , ( s > ι )
and
I σ , ρ , κ ; δ ϖ p ( s ) = s κ ( υ s ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( υ s ) σ ] p ( υ ) d υ , ( s < κ ) .
Here, R σ , ρ ϖ ( s ) is the Raina function given as follows
R σ , ρ ϖ ( s ) = R σ , ρ ϖ ( 0 ) , ϖ ( 1 ) , ϖ ( 2 ) , ( s ) = t = 0 ϖ ( t ) Γ ( σ t + ρ ) s n , ( σ , ρ R + , s R ) ,
where { ϖ ( t ) } is a bounded sequence of positive real numbers, see [31].
The Raina fractional integrals are highly significant because of their generality. For instance, if we set t = 0 , ϖ ( 0 ) = 1 and δ = 0 in Definition 2, then the classical Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals are obtained
J ι + ρ p ( s ) = 1 Γ ( ρ ) ι s ( s υ ) ρ 1 f ( υ ) d υ , ( s > ι )
and
J κ ρ p ( s ) = 1 Γ ( ρ ) s κ ( υ s ) ρ 1 f ( υ ) d υ , ( s < κ ) .
Similarly, various fractional integrals can be obtained by specifying the coefficients ϖ ( t ) . For recent work on inequalities based on Raina fractional integrals, see [20,32] and the references therein. In this article, we obtain Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér-type inequalities for ϑ -convex functions in the context of Raina fractional integrals; therefore, the results will be novel and considerably general.

2. Results

In this section, we establish the Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér inequalities in the setting of ϑ -convex functions and Raina fractional integrals. Firstly, we generalize Inequality (4) for ϑ -convex functions. Then, a Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér-type inequality for ϑ -convex functions involving the Raina fractional integral is obtained. Moreover, the estimates related to the left-hand side of this generalized fractional inequality are provided. The correlation of these results with the contemporary results present in the literature is also determined. We begin with the following result.
Lemma 1. 
Suppose that the function q : [ ϑ ( ι ) , ϑ ( κ ) ] R is integrable and symmetric with respect to ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 , then the following equality
I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) = I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( ι ) ) = 1 2 I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) + I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( ι ) ) ,
is valid for all σ , ρ R + and δ R .
Proof. 
As q is symmetric with respect to ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 , we have q ( ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) h ) = q ( h ) for all h [ ϑ ( ι ) , ϑ ( κ ) ] . Consider the left Raina fractional integral
I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) σ ] q ( υ ) d υ = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ( h ϑ ( ι ) ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( h ϑ ( ι ) ) σ ] q ( ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) h ) d h = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ( h ϑ ( ι ) ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( h ϑ ( ι ) ) σ ] q ( h ) d h = I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( ι ) ) ,
which is the right Raina integral. □
In the sequel, J represents an interval of non-negative real numbers and ι , κ J with ι < κ and I represents the interval of real numbers. The function q : [ ϑ ( ι ) , ϑ ( κ ) ] R is an integrable and symmetric function with respect to ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 with q = s u p υ [ ι , κ ] | q ( υ ) | . Furthermore, the following notation is used to reduce complexity.
Δ : = κ ι , ϑ ( Δ ) : = ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) ,
M ( J ) : = p ( ι ) + p ( κ ) 2 J ι + ρ p ( κ ) + J κ ρ p ( ι ) J ι + ρ p q ( κ ) + J κ ρ p q ( ι ) ,
M ( I ) : = p ( ι ) + p ( κ ) 2 I σ , ρ , ι + ; δ ϖ p ( κ ) + I σ , ρ , κ ; δ ϖ p ( ι ) I σ , ρ , ι + ; δ ϖ p q ( κ ) + I σ , ρ , κ ; δ ϖ p q ( ι )
and
M ( E ( J ) ) = p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) + p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) 2 I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) + I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ p q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) + I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ p q ( ϑ ( ι ) ) .
Theorem 2. 
Suppose that ϑ : J R is a continuous increasing function and the function p : I R is such that p L ( [ ϑ ( ι ) , ϑ ( κ ) ] ) for ϑ ( ι ) , ϑ ( κ ) I . If p is a ϑ-convex function on [ ι , κ ] , then the inequality
p ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) q ( υ ) d υ ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) p ( υ ) q ( υ ) d υ p ϑ ( ι ) + p ϑ ( κ ) 2 ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) q ( υ ) d υ ,
is valid for all σ , ρ R + and δ R .
Proof. 
Considering the following integral, using the change in variable and the fact that q is symmetric with respect to ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 , we have
ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) p ( υ ) q ( υ ) d υ = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 p ( υ ) q ( υ ) d υ + ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 ϑ ( κ ) p ( υ ) q ( υ ) d υ = 0 ϑ ( Δ ) 2 p ( ϑ ( ι ) + h ) q ( ϑ ( ι ) + h ) d h + 0 ϑ ( Δ ) 2 p ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) q ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) d h = 0 ϑ ( Δ ) 2 [ p ( ϑ ( ι ) + h ) + p ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ] q ( ϑ ( ι ) + h ) d h .
Since p is convex, for 0 a b , we have
p ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 + a + p ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 a p ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 + b + p ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 b ,
see ([33] pp. 164–165). On substituting a = 0 and b = ϑ ( Δ ) 2 h 0 into (6), we have
2 p ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 p ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) + p ( ϑ ( ι ) + h ) .
By using Inequality (7) in Inequality (5), we have
ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) p ( υ ) q ( υ ) d υ 2 p ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 0 ϑ ( Δ ) 2 q ( ϑ ( ι ) + h ) d h = p ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) q ( υ ) d υ .
Now, putting a = ϑ ( Δ ) 2 h 0 and b = ϑ ( Δ ) 2 in (6), we have
p ( ϑ ( ι ) + h ) + p ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) + p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) .
By using Inequality (9) in Inequality (5), we have
ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) p ( υ ) q ( υ ) d υ p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) + p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) 0 ϑ ( Δ ) 2 q ( ϑ ( ι ) + h ) d h = p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) + p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) 2 ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) q ( υ ) d υ .
By combining Inequality (8) and Inequality (10), we get the required result. □
Remark 1. 
If ϑ is taken as an identity function in Theorem 2, then Inequality (4) is retrieved.
Theorem 3. 
Suppose that ϑ : J R is a continuous increasing function and the function p : I R is such that p L ( [ ϑ ( ι ) , ϑ ( κ ) ] ) for ϑ ( ι ) , ϑ ( κ ) I . If p is ϑ-convex on [ ι , κ ] , then for Raina fractional integrals, the inequality
p ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) + I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( ι ) ) I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ p q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) + I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ p q ( ϑ ( ι ) ) p ϑ ( ι ) + p ϑ ( κ ) 2 I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) + I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( ι ) ) ,
is valid for all σ , ρ R + and δ R .
Proof. 
Since p is a ϑ -convex function on [ ι , κ ] , for ϑ ( a ) , ϑ ( b ) I , we have
p ϑ ( a ) + ϑ ( b ) 2 p ( ϑ ( a ) ) + p ( ϑ ( b ) ) 2 .
By substituting ϑ ( a ) = υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) and ϑ ( b ) = ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( ι ) + υ ϑ ( κ ) , we have
2 p ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 p ( υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) ) + p ( ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( ι ) + υ ϑ ( κ ) ) .
On multiplying both sides of (12) by υ ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ υ σ ] q ( υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) ) and then integrating the resultant inequality with respect to υ over [ 0 , 1 ] , we have
2 p ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 0 1 υ ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ υ σ ] q ( υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) ) d υ 0 1 υ ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ υ σ ] p υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) q ( υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) ) d υ + 0 1 υ ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ υ σ ] p ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( ι ) + υ ϑ ( κ ) q ( υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) ) d υ .
By substituting u = υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) , we have
p ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ( ϑ ( κ ) u ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( κ ) u ) σ ] q ( u ) d u ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ( ϑ ( κ ) u ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( κ ) u ) σ ] p ( u ) q ( u ) d u + ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ( ϑ ( κ ) u ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( κ ) u ) σ ] p ( ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) u ) q ( u ) d u .
By substituting ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) u = v and then utilizing the symmetry of q, we have
p ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ( ϑ ( κ ) u ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( κ ) u ) σ ] q ( u ) d u ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ( ϑ ( κ ) u ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( κ ) u ) σ ] p ( u ) q ( u ) d u + ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ( v ϑ ( ι ) ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( v ϑ ( ι ) ) σ ] p ( v ) q ( v ) d v .
Now, using Definition 2 and Lemma 1, we have
p ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) + I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( ι ) ) I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ p q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) + I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ p q ( ϑ ( ι ) ) .
Considering again the ϑ -convexity of p over the interval [ ι , κ ] , we have
p υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) t p ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) p ϑ ( κ )
and
p ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( ι ) + υ ϑ ( κ ) ( 1 υ ) p ϑ ( ι ) + t p ϑ ( κ ) .
Adding (14) and (15), we have
p υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) + p ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( ι ) + υ ϑ ( κ ) p ϑ ( ι ) + p ϑ ( κ ) .
On multiplying both sides of (16) by υ ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ υ σ ] q ( υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) ) and integrating with respect to υ over the interval [ 0 , 1 ] , we have
0 1 υ ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ υ σ ] p υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) q ( υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) ) d υ + 0 1 υ ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ υ σ ] p ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( ι ) + υ ϑ ( κ ) q ( υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) ) d υ p ϑ ( ι ) + p ϑ ( κ ) 0 1 υ ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ υ σ ] q ( υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) ) d υ .
Substituting u = υ ϑ ( ι ) + ( 1 υ ) ϑ ( κ ) , then utilizing the symmetry of q and finally using Definition 2 and Lemma 1, we have
I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ p q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) + I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ p q ( ϑ ( ι ) ) p ϑ ( ι ) + p ϑ ( κ ) 2 I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) + I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( ι ) ) .
By combining (13) and (17), we get the required result. □
Remark 2. 
If ϑ is taken as an identity function in Theorem 2, then the following inequality is valid for all σ , ρ R + and δ R
p ι + κ 2 I σ , ρ , ι + ; δ ϖ q ( κ ) + I σ , ρ , κ ; δ ϖ q ( ι ) I σ , ρ , ι + ; δ ϖ p q ( κ ) + I σ , ρ , κ ; δ ϖ p q ( ι ) p ι + p κ 2 I σ , ρ , ι + ; δ ϖ q ( κ ) + I σ , ρ , κ ; δ ϖ q ( ι ) .
Remark 3. 
If ϑ is taken as an identity function and ϖ ( 0 ) = 1 and υ = 0 in Theorem 2, then the following inequality is valid
p ι + κ 2 J ι + ρ q ( κ ) + J κ ρ q ( ι ) J ι + ρ p q ( κ ) + J κ ρ p q ( ι ) p ι + p κ 2 J ι + ρ q ( κ ) + J κ ρ q ( ι ) ,
which is given in [34].
Lemma 2. 
Suppose that ϑ : J R is a continuous increasing function and p : I R is a differentiable function on I o such that p L ( [ ϑ ( ι ) , ϑ ( κ ) ] ) for ϑ ( ι ) , ϑ ( κ ) I . Then, the equality
M ( ϑ ( R ) ) = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ + 1 ϖ [ υ ϑ ( Δ ) ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) σ ] q ( h ) d h υ ϑ ( κ ) ( h ϑ ( ι ) ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ + 1 ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ( h ϑ ( ι ) ) ) σ ] q ( h ) d h p ( υ ) d υ ,
is valid for all σ , ρ R + and δ R .
Proof. 
By applying the integration by parts technique on the following integral, using change in variable and then by applying Definition 2, we have
I 1 = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) σ ] q ( h ) d h p ( υ ) d υ = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) σ ] q ( h ) d h p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ + 1 ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) σ ] q ( υ ) p ( υ ) d υ = I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ p q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) = I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) + I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( ι ) ) p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) 2 I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ p q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) .
Similarly,
I 2 = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) υ ϑ ( κ ) ( h ϑ ( ι ) ) ρ R σ , ρ + 1 ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ( h ϑ ( ι ) ) σ ] q ( h ) d h p ( υ ) d υ = I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) + I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ q ( ϑ ( ι ) ) p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) 2 + I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ p q ( ϑ ( ι ) ) .
Thus,
I 1 I 2 = p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) + p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) 2 I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) + I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) I σ , ρ , ϑ ( ι ) + ; δ ϖ p q ( ϑ ( κ ) ) + I σ , ρ , ϑ ( κ ) ; δ ϖ p q ( ϑ ( ι ) ) = M ( ϑ ( R ) ) .
Theorem 4. 
Suppose that ϑ : J R is a continuous increasing function and p : I R is a differentiable function on I o such that p L ( [ ϑ ( ι ) , ϑ ( κ ) ] ) for ϑ ( ι ) , ϑ ( κ ) I and | p | is ϑ-convex, then the inequality
M ( ϑ ( R ) ) ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) ρ + 1 q R σ , ρ + 2 ϖ 1 [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) 2 σ ] p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) + p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) ,
is valid for all σ , ρ R + and δ R , where ϖ 1 ( t ) = ϖ ( t ) 1 1 2 σ t + ρ   f o r t = 0 , 1 , 2 , .
Proof. 
Since p is ϑ -convex on [ ι , κ ] , then
| p ( υ ) | = p ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( ι ) ) + υ ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( κ ) υ ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) + υ ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) .
As q is symmetric with respect to p ι + p κ 2 , then
υ ϑ ( κ ) ( h ϑ ( ι ) ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ( h ϑ ( ι ) ) ) σ ] q ( h ) d h = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ) σ ] q ( h ) d h .
Consider the integral
ϑ ( ι ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ) σ ] q ( h ) d h υ ϑ ( κ ) ( h ϑ ( ι ) ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ( h ϑ ( ι ) ) σ ] q ( h ) d h = υ ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ) σ ] q ( h ) d h
υ ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ) σ ] q ( h ) d h ϑ ( ι ) , ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ) σ ] q ( h ) d h ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 , ϑ ( κ ) .
Using Lemma 1 and inequalities (18)–(20), we have
M ( ϑ ( R ) ) = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) υ ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ) σ ] q ( h ) d h | p ( υ ) | d υ = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 υ ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) σ ] q ( h ) d h ϑ ( κ ) υ ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) + υ ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) d υ + ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) σ ] q ( h ) d h ϑ ( κ ) υ ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) + υ ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) d υ q ϑ ( Δ ) t = 0 ϖ ( t ) Γ ( σ t + ρ + 1 ) ( δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ) t ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 { ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) σ t + ρ ( υ ϑ ( ι ) ) σ t + ρ } ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) + ( υ ϑ ( ι ) ) p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) d υ + ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 ϑ ( κ ) { ( υ ϑ ( ι ) ) σ t + ρ ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) σ t + ρ } ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) + ( υ ϑ ( ι ) ) p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) d υ
and we have
ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 { ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) σ t + ρ ( υ ϑ ( ι ) ) σ t + ρ } ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) d υ = ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 ϑ ( κ ) { ( υ ϑ ( ι ) ) σ t + ρ ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) σ t + ρ } ( υ ϑ ( ι ) ) d υ = ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ t + ρ + 2 ( σ t + ρ + 1 ) σ t + ρ + 1 σ t + ρ + 2 1 2 σ t + ρ + 1 .
Also, we have
ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 { ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) σ t + ρ ( υ ϑ ( ι ) ) σ t + ρ } ( υ ϑ ( ι ) ) d υ = ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 ϑ ( κ ) { ( υ ϑ ( ι ) ) σ t + ρ ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) σ t + ρ } ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) d υ = ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ t + ρ + 2 ( σ t + ρ + 1 ) 1 σ t + ρ + 2 1 2 σ t + ρ + 1 .
By substituting (22) and (23) into (21), we have
M ( ϑ ( R ) ) = ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) ρ + 1 q t = 0 ϖ ( t ) Γ ( σ t + ρ + 2 ) δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) 2 σ t 1 1 2 σ t + ρ p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) + p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) = ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) ρ + 1 q t = 0 ϖ 1 ( t ) Γ ( σ t + ρ + 2 ) δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) 2 σ t p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) + p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) = ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) ρ + 1 q R σ , ρ + 2 ϖ 1 [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) 2 σ ] p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) + p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) ,
where
ϖ 1 ( t ) = ϖ ( t ) 1 1 2 σ t + ρ for t = 0 , 1 , 2 , .
Remark 4. 
If ϑ is taken as an identity function in Theorem 4, then the following inequality is valid
M ( R ) ( Δ ) ρ + 1 q R σ , ρ + 2 ϖ 1 [ δ ( Δ ) 2 σ ] p ( ι ) + p ( κ ) .
Remark 5. 
If ϑ is taken as an identity function and ϖ ( 0 ) = 1 and υ = 0 in Theorem 4, then the following inequality is valid
M ( J ) ( Δ ) ρ + 1 q Γ ( ρ + 2 ) 1 1 2 ρ p ( ι ) + p ( κ ) ,
which is given in [34].
Theorem 5. 
Suppose that ϑ : J R is a continuous increasing function and p : I R is a differentiable function on I o such that p L ( [ ϑ ( ι ) , ϑ ( κ ) ] ) for ϑ ( ι ) , ϑ ( κ ) I . If p n , n > 1 , is a ϑ-convex function on [ ι , κ ] , then for Raina fractional integrals, the inequality
M ( ϑ ( R ) ) 2 1 m ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) ρ + 1 q R σ , ρ + 1 ϖ 2 [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) 2 σ ] 1 m p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) n + p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) n 2 1 n ,
is valid for all σ , ρ R + , δ R and 1 m + 1 n = 1 . Here, ϖ 2 ( t ) = ϖ ( t ) ( σ t + ρ ) m + 1 1 1 2 ( σ t + ρ ) m 1 m for t = 0 , 1 , 2 , .
Proof. 
Using Lemma 2, Inequality (21), the properties of the modulus and the well-known Hölder’s inequality,
M ( ϑ ( R ) ) ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) υ ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ + 1 ϖ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) σ ] q ( h ) d h p ( υ ) d υ = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) υ ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) σ ] q ( h ) d h m d υ 1 m ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) | p ( υ ) | n d υ 1 n = I 3 1 m I 4 1 n .
Considering the following integral, using Inequality (20) and solving the resultant integrals, we have
I 3 = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) υ ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) σ ] q ( h ) d h m d υ ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 υ ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) σ ] q ( h ) m d h + ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) σ ] q ( h ) m d h q t = 0 ϖ ( t ) Γ ( σ t + ρ + 1 ) δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ t m ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 | ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) σ t + ρ ( υ ϑ ( ι ) ) σ t + ρ | m d υ + ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 ϑ ( κ ) | ( υ ϑ ( ι ) ) σ t + ρ ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) σ t + ρ | m d υ q t = 0 ϖ ( t ) Γ ( σ t + ρ + 1 ) δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) σ ) t m ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) ( σ t + ρ ) m ( υ ϑ ( ι ) ) ( σ t + ρ ) m d υ + ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) 2 ϑ ( κ ) ( υ ϑ ( ι ) ) ( σ t + ρ ) m ( ϑ ( κ ) υ ) ( σ t + ρ ) m d υ q t = 0 ϖ ( t ) Γ ( σ t + ρ + 1 ) δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) 2 σ ) t m 2 ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) m ρ + 1 ( σ t + ρ ) m + 1 1 1 2 ( σ t + ρ ) m = 2 ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) m ρ + 1 q m R σ , ρ + 1 ϖ 2 [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) 2 σ ] m ,
where ϖ 2 ( t ) = ϖ ( t ) 1 ( σ t + ρ ) m + 1 1 1 2 ( σ t + ρ ) m 1 m . Furthermore, we have used here the fact that ( a b ) m a m b m for 0 b a and m 1 .
Now, considering the following integral and using the fact that p n is ϑ -convex on [ ι , κ ]
I 4 = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) | p ( υ ) | n d υ ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) p ϑ ( κ ) υ ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( ι ) ) + υ ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ) n d υ ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( κ ) υ ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) n + υ ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) ϑ ( ι ) p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) n d υ = ϑ ( Δ ) p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) n + p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) n 2 .
By substituting the values of integrals I 3 and I 4 into (24), we have the required result. □
Remark 6. 
If ϑ is taken as an identity function in Theorem 5, then the following inequality is valid:
M ( J ) 2 1 m ( Δ ) ρ + 1 q R σ , ρ + 1 ϖ 2 [ δ ( Δ ) 2 σ ] 1 m p ( ι ) n + p ( κ ) n 2 1 n .
Remark 7. 
If ϑ is taken as an identity function and ϖ ( 0 ) = 1 and υ = 0 in Theorem 5, then the following inequality is valid
M ( R ) 2 1 m ( Δ ) ρ + 1 q Γ ( ρ + 1 ) 1 ρ m + 1 1 1 2 ρ m 1 m p ( ι ) n + p ( κ ) n 2 1 n ,
which is given in [34].
Theorem 6. 
Suppose that ϑ : J R is a continuous increasing function and p : I R is a differentiable function on I o such that p L ( [ ϑ ( ι ) , ϑ ( κ ) ] ) for ϑ ( ι ) , ϑ ( κ ) I . If p n , n > 1 , is a ϑ-convex function on [ ι , κ ] , then the following inequality
M ( ϑ ( R ) ) 2 ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) ρ + 1 + 1 n q R σ , ρ + 2 ϖ 1 [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) 2 σ ] p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) n + p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) n 2 1 n ,
is valid for all σ , ρ R + and δ R , where ϖ 1 is as defined in Theorem 4.
Proof. 
Using Lemma 2, Inequality (21), the properties of the modulus and the well-known Hölder’s inequality, we have
M ( ϑ ( R ) ) = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) υ ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ + 1 ϖ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) σ ] q ( h ) d h p ( υ ) d υ = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) υ ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) σ ] q ( h ) d h d υ 1 1 n ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) υ ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) σ ] q ( h ) d h | p ( υ ) | n d υ 1 n = I 5 1 1 n I 6 1 n .
Considering I 5 and solving it by using (20) and (22)–(23), respectively, we have
I 5 = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) υ ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) σ ] q ( h ) d h d υ = 2 ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) ρ + 1 q R σ , ρ + 2 ϖ 1 [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) 2 σ ] .
Similarly, solving I 6 by using (20), the ϑ -convexity of | p | n and (22)–(23), we have
I 6 = ϑ ( ι ) ϑ ( κ ) υ ϑ ( ι ) + ϑ ( κ ) υ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) ρ 1 R σ , ρ ϖ [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) σ ( ϑ ( κ ) h ) σ ] q ( h ) d h | p ( υ ) | n d υ = ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) ρ + 2 q R σ , ρ + 2 ϖ 1 [ δ ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) 2 σ ] p ( ϑ ( ι ) ) n + p ( ϑ ( κ ) ) n .
By substituting values of integrals I 5 and I 6 into (27), we get the required result. □
Remark 8. 
If ϑ is taken as an identity function in Theorem 6, then the following inequality is valid
M ( R ) 2 ( ϑ ( Δ ) ) ρ + 1 + 1 n q R σ , ρ + 2 ϖ 1 [ δ ( Δ ) 2 σ ] p ( ι ) n + p ( κ ) n 2 1 n .
Remark 9. 
If ϑ is taken as an identity function, ϖ ( 0 ) = 1 and υ = 0 in Theorem 6, then the following inequality is valid
M ( R ) 2 ( Δ ) ρ + 1 + 1 n q Γ ( ρ + 2 ) 1 1 2 ρ p ( ι ) n + p ( κ ) n 2 1 n ,
which is given in [34].

3. Conclusions

In the present work, Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér-type inequalities are established by utilizing the Raina fractional integrals for ϑ -convex functions. Primarily, a generalized version of the Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér inequality for ϑ -convex functions is obtained. Moreover, the fractional Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér inequality is also established by using Raina fractional integrals. Furthermore, right-sided estimates are formulated for the said fractional inequality. The backward compatibility of the results obtained in the study shows that these results are a considerable extension of the analogous results present in the literature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L. and R.H.; methodology, A.L. and R.H.; validation, A.L. and R.H.; investigation, R.H.; writing—original draft preparation, A.L.; writing—review and editing, M.V.-C., A.L. and R.H.; visualization, A.L.; supervision, R.H.; funding acquisition, M.V.-C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is supported by Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Proyect Título: “Algunos resultados Cualitativos sobre Ecuaciones diferenciales fraccionales y desigualdades integrales” Cod UIO2022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bubeck, S.; Eldan, R. Multi-scale exploration of convex functions and bandit convex optimization. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA, 23–26 June 2016; pp. 583–589. [Google Scholar]
  2. Niculescu, C.; Persson, L.E. Convex Functions and Their Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; Volume 23. [Google Scholar]
  3. Udriste, C. Convex Functions and Optimization Methods on Riemannian Manifolds; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1994; Volume 297. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hassan, A.; Khan, A.R. Inequalities Via (ϖ,β,γ,δ)-Convex Functions. Fract. Differ. Calc. 2022, 12, 13–36. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dragomir, S.S. On the Hadamard’s inequlality for convex functions on the co-ordinates in a rectangle from the plane. Taiwan. J. Math. 2001, 5, 775–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Latif, M.A.; Kalsoom, H.; Abidin, M.Z. Hermite–Hadamard-Type Inequalities Involving Harmonically Convex Function via the Atangana–Baleanu Fractional Integral Operator. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Latif, M.A. Properties of Coordinated h1,h2-Convex Functions of Two Variables Related to the Hermite–Hadamard–Fejér Type Inequalities. Mathematics 2023, 11, 1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Latif, M.A. Some Companions of Fejér Type Inequalities Using GA-Convex Functions. Mathematics 2023, 11, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Noor, M.A.; Noor, K.I.; Lotayif, M. Biconvex functions and mixed bivariational inequalities. Inform. Sci. Lett 2021, 10, 469–475. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tariq, M.; Sahoo, S.K.; Ntouyas, S.K. Some Refinements of Hermite–Hadamard Type Integral Inequalities Involving Refined Convex Function of the Raina Type. Axioms 2023, 12, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, J.Z.; Wang, W. Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for the s– HH convex functions via k-fractional integrals and applications. J. Math. Inequal. 2020, 14, 291–303. [Google Scholar]
  12. You, X.; Adil Khan, M.; Ullah, H.; Saeed, T. Improvements of Slater’s inequality by means of 4-convexity and its applications. Mathematics 2022, 10, 1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Youness, E.A. E-convex sets, E-convex functions, and E-convex programming. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 1999, 102, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sarikaya, M.Z.; Yaldiz, H. On Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for ϕ-convex functions via fractional integrals. Malays. J. Math. Sci. 2015, 9, 243–258. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tariq, M.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Shaikh, A.A. A Comprehensive Review of the Hermite–Hadamard Inequality Pertaining to Fractional Integral Operators. Mathematics 2023, 11, 1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fejér, L. Über die fourierreihen, II. Math. Naturwiss. Anz Ungar. Akad. Wiss 1906, 24, 369–390. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kalsoom, H.; Latif, M.A.; Khan, Z.A.; Vivas-Cortez, M. Some New Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér fractional type inequalities for h-convex and harmonically h-Convex interval-valued Functions. Mathematics 2021, 10, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rashid, S.; Khalid, A.; Karaca, Y.; Chu, Y.M. Revisiting fejér–hermite–hadamard type inequalities in fractal domain and applications. Fractals 2022, 30, 2240133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vivas-Cortez, M. Fejér type inequalities for (s,m)-convex functions in second sense. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 2016, 10, 1689–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Latif, A.; Hussain, R. New Hadamard-type inequalities for E-convex functions involving generalized fractional integrals. J. Inequal. Appl. 2022, 2022, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rashid, S.; Khalid, A.; Bazighifan, O.; Oros, G.I. New modifications of integral inequalities via P-convexity pertaining to fractional calculus and their applications. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Budak, H.; Sarikaya, M.Z. On refinements of Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities with generalized fractional integral operators. Frac. Differ. Calc. 2021, 11, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Caputo, M.; Fabrizio, M. A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel. Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl. 2015, 1, 73–85. [Google Scholar]
  24. Fernandez, A.; Özarslan, M.A.; Baleanu, D. On fractional calculus with general analytic kernels. Appl. Math. Comput. 2019, 354, 248–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jarad, F.; Ugurlu, E.; Abdeljawad, T.; Baleanu, D. On a new class of fractional operators. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2017, 247, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kalsoom, H.; Latif, M.A.; Khan, Z.A.; Al-Moneef, A.A. New Hermite–Hadamard Integral Inequalities for Geometrically Convex Functions via Generalized Weighted Fractional Operator. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lorenzo, C.F.; Hartley, T.T. Variable order and distributed order fractional operators. Nonlinear Dyn. 2002, 29, 57–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Obeidat, N.A.; Bentil, D.E. New theories and applications of tempered fractional differential equations. Nonlinear Dyn. 2021, 105, 1689–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sabzikar, F.; Meerschaert, M.M.; Chen, J. Tempered fractional calculus. J. Comput. Phys. 2015, 293, 14–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Agarwal, R.P.; Luo, M.J.; Raina, R.K. On Ostrowski type inequalities. Fasc. Math. 2016, 56, 5–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Raina, R.K. On generalized Wright’s hypergeometric functions and fractional calculus operators. East Asian Math. J. 2005, 21, 191–203. [Google Scholar]
  32. Vivas-Cortez, M.; Kashuri, A.; Hernández, J.E.H. Trapezium-type inequalities for Raina’s fractional integrals operator using generalized convex functions. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mitrinovic, D.S.; Vasic, P.M. Analytic Inequalities; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1970; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  34. Işcan, I. Hermite-Hadamard-Fejér type inequalities for convex functions via fractional integrals. Stud. Univ. Babeş Bolyai Math. 2015, 60, 355–366. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vivas-Cortez, M.; Latif, A.; Hussain, R. Some Fractional Integral Inequalities by Way of Raina Fractional Integrals. Symmetry 2023, 15, 1935. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15101935

AMA Style

Vivas-Cortez M, Latif A, Hussain R. Some Fractional Integral Inequalities by Way of Raina Fractional Integrals. Symmetry. 2023; 15(10):1935. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15101935

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vivas-Cortez, Miguel, Asia Latif, and Rashida Hussain. 2023. "Some Fractional Integral Inequalities by Way of Raina Fractional Integrals" Symmetry 15, no. 10: 1935. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15101935

APA Style

Vivas-Cortez, M., Latif, A., & Hussain, R. (2023). Some Fractional Integral Inequalities by Way of Raina Fractional Integrals. Symmetry, 15(10), 1935. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15101935

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop