Next Article in Journal
Symmetry in Genetic Distance Metrics: Quantifying Variability in Neurological Disorders for Personalized Treatment of Alzheimer’s and Dementia
Previous Article in Journal
Continuum Effect on Mirror Symmetry Breaking Within the Gamow Frameworks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

What Is Inside the Double–Double Structure of the Radio Galaxy J0028+0035?

by
Sándor Frey
1,2,3,*,
Andrzej Marecki
4,
Krisztina Éva Gabányi
1,2,5,6 and
Marek Jamrozy
7
1
Konkoly Observatory, HUN-REN Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Konkoly Thege Miklós út 15-17, 1121 Budapest, Hungary
2
CSFK, MTA Centre of Excellence, Konkoly Thege Miklós út 15-17, 1121 Budapest, Hungary
3
Institute of Physics and Astronomy, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/A, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
4
Institute of Astronomy, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Informatics, Nicolaus Copernicus University, ul. Grudziądzka 5, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
5
Department of Astronomy, Institute of Physics and Astronomy, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/A, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
6
HUN-REN—ELTE Extragalactic Astrophysics Research Group, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/A, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
7
Astronomical Observatory, Jagiellonian University, Orla 171, 30-244 Kraków, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2025, 17(2), 171; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020171
Submission received: 14 December 2024 / Revised: 20 January 2025 / Accepted: 22 January 2025 / Published: 23 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Physics)

Abstract

:
The radio source J0028+0035 is a recently discovered double–double radio galaxy at redshift z = 0.398 . Its relic outer lobes are separated by about 3 in the sky, corresponding to ∼1 Mpc projected linear size. Inside this large-scale structure, the inner pair of collinear lobes span about 100 kpc. In the arcsec-resolution radio images of J0028+0035, there is a central radio feature that offers the intriguing possibility of being resolved into a pc-scale, third pair of innermost lobes. This would make this radio galaxy a rare triple–double source where traces of three distinct episodes of radio activity could be observed. To reveal the compact radio structure of the central component, we conducted observation with the European Very Long Baseline Interferometer Network and the enhanced Multi Element Remotely Linked Interferometer Network. Our 1.66 GHz image with high (∼5 milliarcsec) resolution shows a compact central radio core with no indication of a third, innermost double feature. The observation performed in multi-phase-centre mode also revealed that the physically unrelated but in projection closely separated background source 5BZU J0028+0035 has a single weak, somewhat resolved radio feature, at odds with its blazar classification.

1. Introduction

Owing to their powerful emission across the entire electromagnetic spectrum, active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are distant signposts in the Universe, e.g., [1]. They are powered by accretion onto supermassive black holes, BHs, located in the centres of galaxies. Nearly one-tenth of AGNs, e.g., [2], have powerful bipolar plasma jets where the charged particles spiralling around the magnetic field lines with relativistic speeds produce synchrotron radiation. It makes these objects especially luminous in the radio waveband. They are called radio-loud or jetted [3] AGNs. The appearance and observational properties of radio-loud AGNs strongly depend on the orientation of their jets with respect to our line of sight [4]. In blazar-type AGNs, one side of the symmetric pair of jets emanating from the vicinity of the BH is closely (≲ 10 ) aligned with the viewing direction, leading to Doppler-boosted emission. On the contrary, radio galaxy jets lie close to the plane of the sky.
Highly collimated jets in radio galaxies can travel significantly beyond the visible boundaries of their host galaxies, extending up to several Mpc in size. Giant radio galaxies are conventionally defined as being larger than 0.7 Mpc [5]. However, the jets do not extend indefinitely, as they interact with the surrounding intergalactic medium, eventually transferring sufficient energy and momentum to the ambient medium to substantially reduce their propagation speed. Here, the plasma carried by the jets all along from the central AGN spreads out and forms extended lobes on both sides of the galaxy. The lobes are filled with relativistic plasma and are magnetized, continuing to emit synchrotron radiation. The continuous supply for these reservoirs of magnetic fields and high-energy charged particles can stop when the nuclear activity terminates and thus jets are no longer fed. Consequently, the radio emission of the lobes gradually fades out. In the synchrotron process, higher-energy electrons lose energy faster, thus the radio spectrum of the source steepens over time at higher frequencies. As a consequence of spectral aging, the initial power-law shape develops a spectral break and steepens over time, e.g., [6]. This way, the past history of central activity is imprinted in the structural and spectral properties of the lobes.
Returning to the central engine, intermittent jet activity can be caused by alternating phases of accretion and quiescence of the supermassive BH powering the AGN. During active phases, powerful relativistic jets are produced, while in quiescent phases, jet production ceases, though previously ejected plasma still radiates as it cools. There is ample evidence for the intermittent nature of the AGN phenomenon. Activity periods can last for a total of ∼ 10 7 9 years during the whole lifetime of a galaxy, but are most likely decomposed into a series of much shorter periods that can be as short as ∼ 10 5 years [7]. Radio galaxy lobe structures may demonstrate in the most definite way two or even three successive episodes of nuclear activity, in the form of double–double or triple–double sources. In these cases, two or three pairs of distinct radio lobes are observed. The aging synchrotron-radiating plasma in the outermost lobes created during an earlier activity episode is still observable as diffuse steep-spectrum radio emission, while the renewed nuclear activity produces the inner pair(s) of lobes closer to the galactic centre. If the recurrent activity starts before the total disappearance of the outer lobe emission, we can observe nested, collinear pairs of radio lobes. In double–double radio galaxies (DDRGs), there is evidence for two activity periods, e.g., [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. There are more than a hundred DDRGs known to date. The discovery of the faint, diffuse relic lobes requires sensitive imaging at low radio frequencies. Triple–double sources with evidence of two previous and one current activity episodes are much more rare; only four of them are known at present [15,16,17,18].
The double–double radio galaxy J0028+0035 was discovered by [14] when investigating the large-scale radio structure of the blazar 5BZU J0028+0035 from the Roma-BZCAT multifrequency catalogue [19,20]. The corresponding optical source is known as SDSS J002839.77+003542.2 [21] or SDSS J002839.77+003542.1 [22]. The 1.4 GHz radio image from the Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty-cm (FIRST) survey [23,24] indicated two symmetric relic lobes straddling the source that was accompanied by two other, similarly compact components within ∼ 20 (Figure 1). A thorough analysis of archival radio data as well as new higher-resolution radio images revealed that the two additional compact components are in fact the inner lobes of a Fanaroff–Riley (FR) type II [25] radio galaxy. The relic outer lobes also belong to this object, making J0028+0035 a double–double radio galaxy [14]. It is identified with the optical galaxy SDSS J002838.86+003539.7 [21], also known as SDSS J002838.85+003539.8 at a spectroscopic redshift of z G = 0.398 [22]. This is one of the possible candidates for the brightest galaxy (BCG) of the cluster number 6035 in the optical catalogue of [26]. On the other hand, the source 5BZU J0028+0035 appears as a background AGN seen coincidentally close in projection to the radio galaxy. Its redshift is z B = 0.686 [22], excluding the possibility of a physical relationship with the double–double radio galaxy.
According to [14], the observed properties of J0028+0035 resemble a typical DDRG. The estimated ages of the outer and inner lobes are 2.45 × 10 8 years and 3.6 × 10 6 years, respectively. The time length of quiescence between the two active phases was 1.1 × 10 7 years. (These age estimates are believed to be accurate to ∼ 20 % .) Our general understanding of the physical processes that trigger restarted jet activity is still limited [27]. According to observations, AGN jets are disrupted on a broad range of timescales, from ∼ 10 4 years to ∼ 10 7 years. This suggests that various mechanisms may be at work that influence jet (re)triggering. These include instabilities of the accretion flow and accretion rate variability, variations of the magnetic field of the accretion disk, in some cases galaxy interactions and mergers that can funnel gas towards the central supermassive BHs, and BH spin changes either caused suddenly by mergers or gradually by prolonged accretion episodes.
The spin plays a crucial role in jet production since the rotational energy of the supermassive BH can be extracted to power relativistic jets through the Blandford–Znajek mechanism [28]. BH spins can change with time as a consequence of accretion, as well as mergers during the hierarchical formation of galaxies and their central BH [29]. However, in the case of the DDRG J0028+0035, there is no evidence for a recent BH merger, especially because the position angles of the outer and inner lobes, at least as projected onto the sky, are similar [14]. Since jets are expelled along the rotation axis, it is unlikely that a spin flip caused by a major merger, e.g., [30], occurred when the jet activity restarted. Therefore, possible effects of accretion are considered only in the following. Coherent accretion (i.e., when the angular momentum of the inflowing gas aligns with that of the BH) can spin up the BH to the theoretical maximum (i.e., the dimensionless spin parameter a almost reaching unity) within ∼ 10 8 years. On the other hand, chaotic (misaligned) accretion in a gas-poor environment can reduce BH spin on a timescale of ∼ 10 8 10 9 years, depending on the actual accretion rate. In comparison with the ages estimated by [14] for the radio features in DDRG J0028+0035, it is feasible that the activity cycle responsible for the relic outer lobes ceased because of BH spin-down due to chaotic accretion at a sub-Eddington rate. On the other hand, the central BH could regain enough momentum via coherent accretion during its radio-quiet period of ∼ 10 7 years that is sufficient for jet production. Powerful jets are known to require high BH spin ( a 0.5 ). However, moderate values ( a 0.1 ) can already be enough for producing relativistic jets in magnetically arrested accretion flows [31]. While the timescales are broadly consistent with possible changes in the BH spin, this effect is not necessarily the main driver behind the subsequent periods of jet activity and quiescence in the DDRG J0028+0035, especially because, after all, the spin may not be a dominant parameter for powering jets. Instead, state changes in the accretion disk may be responsible for jet production [32]. By simulating the evolution of massive BH spins on cosmological timescales, ref. [29] also found that high spin is not a necessary and sufficient condition for jetted AGNs. In a study of jet activity in BCGs, ref. [33] were not able to tell whether gas accretion or BH spin was the dominant factor in powering jets, but their data are consistent with a broad range of spin parameters and accretion rates. It is more likely that intrinsic effects like magnetic flux variations or changes in the mass accretion rate within the accretion system cause the jets to switch off and on with a similar power [13].
In the double–double radio sources, the inner lobes evolve into an almost uniform medium inside a cocoon surrounding them, formed by the jet flow during the previous active phase of the nucleus that produced the outer lobes. The largest linear size between the outer lobes exceeds 1 Mpc, making J0028+0035 a giant radio galaxy [5,34]. The inner lobes span nearly 100 kpc. The asymmetries seen in the structure may be caused by jet reorientation between the subsequent activity episodes or/and the inhomogeneity of the surrounding intergalactic medium.
The highest-resolution images of [14] made at 1.5 GHz (restoring beam size: 1.0 × 2.5 , see also in Figure 2) and 5.5 GHz ( 0.3 × 0.75 ) with the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA) indicate that the southwestern inner lobe-like feature is clearly separated into an actual faint diffuse lobe and a bright compact central component that remains unresolved on these scales. The latter core component positionally coincides with the optical galaxy, suggesting that the AGN itself is located here.
To reveal the nature of the arcsec-scale compact core in the DDRG J0028+0035, we performed radio imaging observation with even higher angular resolution, ∼5 milliarcseconds (mas), using the technique of very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) involving 17 globally distributed radio telescopes of the European VLBI Network (EVN) and the British enhanced Multi Element Remotely Linked Interferometer Network (e-MERLIN) at 1.66 GHz frequency. We also observed the nearby Roma-BZCAT source 5BZU J0028+0035 seen in projection within a small angular distance from the DDRG core. In Section 2, we describe the observation and the data reduction. The results are presented in Section 3 and discussed in Section 4. Finally, we summarise our findings in Section 5.
In this paper, to calculate linear sizes and luminosity distances, we assume the same flat Λ Cold Dark Matter cosmological model as [14], with Hubble constant H 0 = 71 km s−1 Mpc−1, vacuum energy density parameter Ω Λ = 0.73 , and matter density parameter Ω m = 0.27 . In this model, the angular scale at the redshift z G = 0.398 of the DDRG J0028+0035 is 5.327 kpc arcsec 1 [35].

2. VLBI Observation and Data Reduction

2.1. Phase-Referenced EVN Observation in Multi-Phase-Centre Mode

The observation with the EVN and e-MERLIN (project code: EM152, PI: A. Marecki) took place on 21 May 2021 at the central frequency of 1.66 GHz. The experiment lasted for 4 h. The bandwidth was divided into four adjacent 32 MHz wide intermediate frequency channels (IFs), each consisting of 64 spectral channels. Recording was conducted in both left and right circular polarizations, with a 1024 Mbps data rate.
The observation was scheduled in phase-referencing mode [36]. This involved regular nodding between a nearby calibrator source and the weak target, to allow for coherent integration on the latter well exceeding the atmospheric coherence time. Phase referencing also provided accurate position determination for the target relative to the calibrator source. We used 580 s long phase-reference cycles, with 460 s spent on the target sources. The total on-target time was 2.8 h. We selected the compact quasar J0029−0113 ( 1.82 separation) as the phase-reference calibrator. Its accurate astrometric position (right ascension α ref = 00 h 29 min ( 00.98603 ± 0.00001 ) s , declination δ ref = 01 13 ( 41.7597 ± 0.0003 ) ; reference epoch J2015.0) is listed in the third edition of the Internationial Celestial Reference Frame [37] catalogue (https://hpiers.obspm.fr/icrs-pc/newwww/icrf/icrf3sx.txt, accessed on 14 December 2024). The bright radio source 3C 454.3 was also occasionally observed as a fringe-finder.
Our primary target was the core component of the DDRG J0028+0035 (referred to as C hereafter; see Figure 2 as a finding chart), revealed earlier in the arcsec-resolution VLA A-configuration images [14]. Given that the nearly coincident Roma-BZCAT source 5BZU J0028+0035 (referred to as B) is located within only ∼ 15 in projection, we utilized the multi-phase-centre observing mode [38,39,40]. Since the sources fell well within the primary beam of even the largest EVN antennas [39], the same antenna pointings could be used for observing them. At the correlation, separate passes with different a priori positions were made. We were also granted correlation at a third phase centre, positioned at the brighter northeastern (NE) inner lobe of J0028+0035 [14], to see whether any mas-scale compact radio emission from a putative hotspot could be detected there. This way, the EVN observation and correlation allowed us to investigate three different very nearby targets with the same antenna pointings. The data were processed at the Joint Institute for VLBI European Research Infrastructure Consortium (JIVE, Dwingeloo, The Netherlands) with the SFXC software correlator [40] using 2 s integration time.
The following 17 radio telescopes participated in the experiment and provided useful data (their antenna diameters are given in parentheses): Jodrell Bank Mk2 ( 38 m × 25 m , United Kingdom), Westerbork (25 m, The Netherlands), Effelsberg (100 m, Germany), Medicina (32 m, Italy), Onsala (25 m, Sweden), Tianma (65 m, China), Toruń (32 m, Poland), Hartebeesthoek (26 m, South Africa), Svetloe (32 m, Russia), Zelenchukskaya (32 m, Russia), Badary (32 m, Russia), Irbene (32 m, Latvia), Sardinia (65 m, Italy), and the e-MERLIN antennas in the United Kingdom: Cambridge (32 m), Darnhall, Knockin, and Pickmere (25 m each).

2.2. Data Calibration and Imaging

The raw correlated visibility data were loaded into the U.S. National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) Astronomical Image Processing System (aips) [41] and calibrated following the standard steps, e.g., [42]. The amplitudes were calibrated using the antenna gain curves and system temperatures ( T sys ) measured at the telescopes. For the e-MERLIN stations, nominal T sys values had to be used. Data points obtained when antennas were off-source were flagged. The dispersive ionospheric delays were determined using total electron content maps derived from global navigation satellite systems data. Phase corrections due to source parallactic angle variations (for azimuth–elevation mounted antennas), and manual instrumental phase and delay corrections using a short 1 min scan on the phase-reference calibrator source J0029−0113 were performed. As a simple bandpass correction, the first and last four frequency channels of each IF were flagged because of low amplitudes and noisier phases. After performing global fringe-fitting [43] on the strong phase-reference (J0029−0113) and fringe-finder (3C 454.3) sources, the calibrated visibility data were exported to the Caltech Difmap software package [44] for hybrid mapping. This involved several iterations of clean deconvolution [45] and phase-only self-calibration [46], followed by iterations of amplitude and phase self-calibration with solution intervals gradually decreasing from the whole observing period to zero. The antenna-based gain correction factors determined using the two strong sources were averaged and, after returning to aips, applied to the visibility amplitudes if they exceeded the absolute value of 5 % . Fringe-fitting was then repeated for the phase-reference calibrator J0029−0113, now taking its clean component model determined in Difmap into account, to correct for potential source structure contribution to the phases. The final fringe-fit solutions obtained for the calibrator were interpolated to the target source data (C, B, and NE) for all three corresponding correlator passes separately.
The calibrated visibility data of the target sources were transferred to Difmap for imaging and brightness distribution modelling. Two target sources (C and B) were detected as they produced a signal in the dirty images. Their visibility data were modelled using a single circular Gaussian brightness distribution component [47] in Difmap. The model parameters were adjusted during the hybrid mapping process involving phase-only self-calibration steps, with gradually decreasing solution intervals from 30 to 2 min. Only selected sensitive European antennas (Effelsberg, Sardinia, Onsala, Jodrell Bank, and Toruń) were set to correctable; phases at the other antennas were held fixed. Uncertainties of the final Gaussian model parameter were estimated following [48,49]. For the flux densities, an additional 5 % uncertainty was added in quadrature because of the VLBI absolute amplitude calibration uncertainty.
The phase-referenced positions of the targets detected were determined by locating their brightness peaks with the aips command maxfit. The estimated astrometric accuracy is ∼1 mas in both right ascension and declination.

3. Results

3.1. The Core of the Radio Galaxy J0028+0035

Our primary target, the core of the DDRG J0028+0035 (C), was detected at right ascension α C , VLBI = 00 h 28 min 38.85220 s and declination δ C , VLBI = + 00 35 39.7843 . Its VLBI image shows a single component (Figure 3). The parameters of the circular Gaussian brightness distribution model, the 1.66 GHz flux density (S), and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) diameter ( θ ), are listed in Table 1. We derived the brightness temperature, e.g., [50],
T b = 1.22 × 10 12 ( 1 + z ) S θ 2 ν 2 [ K ] ,
and the monochromatic radio power
P ν = 4 π D L 2 S ( 1 + z ) 1 α .
In Equation (1) above, z is the redshift. The observing frequency ν is measured in GHz (in our case, ν = 1.66 GHz), S in Jy, and θ in mas. In Equation (2), D L denotes the luminosity distance. Here, the parameters are expressed in SI units, [ P ν ] = W Hz 1 , [ D L ] = m, and [S] = W m 2 Hz 1 . In the absence of VLBI measurements at any other frequency, for the radio power-law spectral index α (according to the definition S ν α ), we assume the approximate value of 0.9 inferred from the multi-frequency flux density measurements collected by [14] on the arcsec scale. (Note that the exact value of α has moderate influence on the power calculation because the source is at relatively low redshift, z G = 0.398 .)

3.2. The Northeastern Inner Lobe of J0028+0035

In our high-resolution VLBI imaging observation, we did not detect the northeastern inner radio galaxy lobe (NE). The brightness upper limit derived from the dirty image was 0.26 mJy beam 1 , corresponding to 6 σ noise level. Assuming a coherence loss of ∼ 25 % [51,52,53,54], we can conclude that there was no 10 -mas-scale compact component (hotspot) embedded in this lobe above 0.33 mJy flux density. In other words, the extended emission with a total ∼18 mJy flux density measured at this frequency band on arcsec scale [14] is completely resolved out on the EVN and e-MERLIN baselines.

3.3. The Radio AGN 5BZU J0028+0035

Our secondary target in chance coincidence with the radio galaxy, the Roma-BZCAT source 5BZU J0028+0035 (B), was also detected with the EVN. Its right ascension and declination were α B , VLBI = 00 h 28 min 39.77257 s and δ B , VLBI = + 00 35 42.2164 , respectively. Similarly to the radio galaxy core, we detected a single mas-scale compact component (Figure 4). The parameters of the circular Gaussian brightness distribution model and the derived physical parameters are given in Table 1. To calculate the rest-frame 1.66 GHz monochromatic power, we assumed the power-law spectral index 0.6 based on multi-frequency total flux density measurements [14].

4. Discussion

4.1. The Radio Galaxy J0028+0035

The brightness temperature of the single component detected at mas scale ( T b 10 8 K, Table 1) clearly indicates that its radio emission is of AGN origin since it cannot be reconciled with any plausible extended emission from the host galaxy [55]. The monochromatic radio power ( P 1.66 GHz 10 24 W Hz 1 ) is typical for low-luminosity radio AGN, e.g., [56,57]. Concerning its position, an optical counterpart of the DDRG J0028+0035 core is not found in the Gaia space astrometry mission [58] Data Release 3 (DR3) [59] catalogue. However, the coordinates of this weak optical source (r magnitude 19.08 ± 0.04 ) in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR13 [22] ( α C , SDSS = 00 h 28 min 38.8555 s , δ C , SDSS = + 00 35 39.803 ; https://skyserver.sdss.org/dr13/en/tools/explore/Summary.aspx?id=1237663716017439748, accessed on 14 December 2024) are consistent with our VLBI position, given that the SDSS astrometry is known to be accurate to ∼50 mas in both coordinates [60]. Thus, we did not find an innermost double-lobe structure that would have served as a clear evidence for a distinct third, most recent activity cycle, nor a mas-scale jet pointing towards the arcsec-scale lobes. The single weak central component may indicate that the source is currently in transition from radio-loud to radio-quiet state [61].
The host of the radio galaxy J0028+0035 is also detected by the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) satellite [62] in the mid-infrared. Its magnitudes in the W 1 and W 2 bands, as well as magnitude limits in the W 3 and W 4 bands as given in the AllWISE catalogue ([63], https://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/II/328, accessed on 14 December 2024), are listed in Table 2.
According to the VLA imaging [14], the two inner lobes (NE and SW) show highly asymmetric properties. While NE seems to be an FR-II type lobe, SW has a faint, diffuse appearance. However, according to our VLBI observation, there is no evidence for a compact hotspot in NE either. The different morphologies of the two inner lobes may naturally be explained if they are no longer actively fueled by a jet. In this case, their apparent asymmetry results from light-travel time lag: because of the inclination of the system with respect to the plane of the sky, the NE lobe is farther away from us than the SW one, so we observe it at an earlier evolutionary stage when its radio emission is less decayed than that of the SW lobe. For a detailed explanation of this phenomenon, see [64].
The difference in the core flux density between the arcsec-scale VLA ( 8.4 ± 0.9 mJy at 1.52 GHz, [14]) and our mas-scale VLBI measurements ( 3.7 ± 0.6 mJy at 1.66 GHz, Table 1) can be attributed to the presence of diffuse emission on ∼0.1–1″ angular scale, resolved out on the long interferometer baselines. Furthermore, there may be some coherence loss in our VLBI imaging [51] since self-calibration could not be performed for all telescopes.

4.2. The Blazar Candidate 5BZU J0028+0035

The putative blazar 5BZU J0028+0035 also shows a single mas-scale component in our 1.66 GHz VLBI image (Figure 4). Both the brightness temperature and the monochromatic power values are in the same order of magnitude as measured for the DDRG J0028+0035 core (Table 1). Blazars are known to have relativistic jets pointing nearly to the line of sight, resulting in Doppler-boosted radio emission. For blazars, the Doppler factor, i.e., the ratio of the measured and the intrinsic brightness temperatures ( Δ = T b / T b , int ), exceeds unity. Since T b , int 10 10 K [65,66], and the measured brightness temperature for 5BZU J0028+0035 is two orders of magnitude smaller than that, we found Δ 1 and thus no evidence for the blazar nature of this source.
The definition of blazars is quite vague and can be more liberal in other wavebands (see a recent discussion in [67]). For the Roma-BZCAT catalogue [19], the set of selection criteria includes radio detection down to mJy-level flux densities, compact radio structure (albeit generally on ∼1–10″ scales only), the availability of optical spectrum, and X-ray detection. The letter “U” in the designation of 5BZU J0028+0035 indicates an uncertain/transitional type. It is known that, under radio scrutiny, not all Roma-BZCAT sources qualify as blazars, even among the high-confidence ones [68].
As evidenced by the VLA A-configuration observations, especially at 1.5 GHz (Figure 2) [14], the arcsec-scale structure of 5BZU J0028+0035 shows a jet-like extension towards east. By comparing our 1.66 GHz flux density ( 5.1 ± 0.9 mJy, Table 1) with the VLA value ( 21.3 ± 2.2 mJy, [14]), it is most likely that a large fraction of the total flux density comes from extended structures resolved out on VLBI baselines. Alternatively, high-amplitude variability, a characteristic property of blazars, might also explain the flux density difference between the VLA and EVN measurements. However, there is no indication of variability from multi-epoch flux-density data [14]. Finally, the steep radio spectrum ( α 0.6 , [14]) is also atypical for blazars.
It is worth mentioning that, similarly to the radio galaxy host, 5BZU J0028+0035 also has mid-infrared detection by WISE (Table 2).
These values place the source outside of the AGN wedge defined on the ( W 1 W 2 ) vs. ( W 2 W 3 ) colour–colour diagram [69], and also below the γ -ray blazar strip [70]. We consider these facts as additional indications against the blazar nature of 5BZU J0028+0035.
The most accurate optical position of this object from the Gaia space astrometry mission [58] DR3 [59] is right ascension α B , Gaia = 00 h 28 min 39.77278 s and declination δ B , Gaia = + 00 35 42.2173 (reference epoch J2016.0), with formal errors of 0.45 and 0.34 mas, respectively. However, the non-zero astrometric excess noise [71] of 1.07 mas suggests the presence of modelling errors that are not accounted for by the observational noise. Its significance value ( 0.95 ) is below the threshold of 2, therefore the source may still be astrometrically reliable (see the Gaia DR3 documentation at https://gea.esac.esa.int/archive/documentation/GDR3/pdf/GaiaDR3_documentation_1.3.pdf, accessed on 14 December 2024). The Gaia and VLBI positions of 5BZU J0028+0035 differ by ∼3 mas in right ascension and ∼1 mas in declination, therefore agree within reasonable uncertainties.

5. Summary and Conclusions

We observed the core (C) and the northeastern (NE) inner lobe of the recently discovered double–double radio galaxy J0028+0035 [14] at 1.66 GHz with the high-resolution VLBI technique using the EVN and e-MERLIN arrays. While mas-scale compact radio emission was not detected from the lobe, the galaxy core showed a single emission feature at a celestial position consistent with that of the optical host galaxy. The measured brightness temperature and monochromatic radio power are typical of a low-luminosity radio AGN. Together with the arcsec-scale radio data, the lack of mas-scale jet emission suggests that the DDRG J0028+0035 is in transition from radio-loud to radio-quiet state, and the inner lobes are no longer actively supplied by the central engine.
Multi-phase-centre correlation of VLBI data allowed us to image the Roma-BZCAT blazar candidate 5BZU J0028+0035 (B) as well. This background AGN is physically unrelated to the DDRG but located inside the primary beam of the radio telescopes. A single mas-scale radio component was detected in accurate positional coincidence with the corresponding optical AGN. Our measurements indicate low brightness temperature and low radio power. Together with other radio and mid-infrared evidence, our results suggest that 5BZU J0028+0035 is in fact not a blazar.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M., S.F., K.É.G. and M.J.; methodology, A.M., S.F., K.É.G. and M.J.; formal analysis, S.F.; writing—original draft preparation, S.F.; writing—review and editing, A.M., K.É.G. and M.J.; visualization, S.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement No. 101004719 (OPTICON RadioNet Pilot). This research was funded by the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH, grant no. OTKA K134213), the NKFIH excellence grant TKP2021-NKTA-64, and the HUN-REN Hungarian Research Network.

Data Availability Statement

The observational data are in the public domain and available in the EVN Data Archive (https://archive.jive.nl/, accessed on 14 December 2024). Calibrated data will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the comments received from the three anonymous referees. The EVN is a joint facility of independent European, African, Asian, and North American radio astronomy institutes. Scientific results from data presented in this publication are derived from the following EVN project code: EM152. The e-MERLIN is a National Facility operated by the University of Manchester at Jodrell Bank Observatory on behalf of STFC. This work presents results from the European Space Agency (ESA) space mission Gaia. Gaia data are being processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC). Funding for the DPAC is provided by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the Gaia MultiLateral Agreement (MLA). The Gaia mission website is https://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia, accessed on 14 December 2024. The Gaia archive website is https://archives.esac.esa.int/gaia, accessed on 14 December 2024. This publication made use of data products from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, which is a joint project of the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. We thank Krisztina Perger for assistance in generating the figures with radio images.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AGNactive galactic nuclei
AIPSAstronomical Image Processing System
BCGbrightest cluster galaxy
BHblack hole
DDRGdouble–double radio galaxy
DRdata release
e-MERLINenhanced Multi Element Remotely Linked Interferometer Network
EVNEuropean VLBI Network
FIRSTFaint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty cm
FRFanaroff–Riley type
FWHMfull width at half maximum
IFintermediate frequency channel
masmilliarcsecond
NRAOU.S. National Radio Astronomy Observatory
PAposition angle
SDSSSloan Digital Sky Survey
SIInternational System of Units
VLAKarl G. Jansky Very Large Array
VLBIvery long baseline interferometry

References

  1. Padovani, P.; Alexander, D.M.; Assef, R.J.; De Marco, B.; Giommi, P.; Hickox, R.C.; Richards, G.T.; Smolčić, V.; Hatziminaoglou, E.; Mainieri, V.; et al. Active galactic nuclei: What is in a name? Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 2017, 25, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ivezić, Ž.; Menou, K.; Knapp, G.R.; Strauss, M.A.; Lupton, R.H.; Vanden Berk, D.E.; Richards, G.T.; Tremonti, C.; Weinstein, M.A.; Anderson, S.; et al. Optical and Radio Properties of Extragalactic Sources Observed by the FIRST Survey and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astron. J. 2002, 124, 2364–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Padovani, P. On the two main classes of active galactic nuclei. Nat. Astron. 2017, 1, 0194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Urry, C.M.; Padovani, P. Unified Schemes for Radio-Loud Active Galactic Nuclei. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 1995, 107, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dabhade, P.; Saikia, D.J.; Mahato, M. Decoding the giant extragalactic radio sources. J. Astrophys. Astron. 2023, 44, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Carilli, C.L.; Perley, R.A.; Dreher, J.W.; Leahy, J.P. Multifrequency Radio Observations of Cygnus A: Spectral Aging in Powerful Radio Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 1991, 383, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schawinski, K.; Koss, M.; Berney, S.; Sartori, L.F. Active galactic nuclei flicker: An observational estimate of the duration of black hole growth phases of ∼105 yr. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 451, 2517–2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schoenmakers, A.P.; de Bruyn, A.G.; Röttgering, H.J.A.; van der Laan, H.; Kaiser, C.R. Radio galaxies with a ‘double-double morphology’—I. Analysis of the radio properties and evidence for interrupted activity in active galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2000, 315, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Saikia, D.J.; Jamrozy, M. Recurrent activity in Active Galactic Nuclei. Bull. Astron. Soc. India 2009, 37, 63–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Brocksopp, C.; Kaiser, C.R.; Schoenmakers, A.P.; de Bruyn, A.G. Double-double radio galaxies: Further insights into the formation of the radio structures. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2011, 410, 484–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nandi, S.; Saikia, D.J. Double-double radio galaxies from the FIRST survey. Bull. Astron. Soc. India 2012, 40, 121–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kuźmicz, A.; Jamrozy, M.; Kozieł-Wierzbowska, D.; Weżgowiec, M. Optical and radio properties of extragalactic radio sources with recurrent jet activity. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017, 471, 3806–3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mahatma, V.H.; Hardcastle, M.J.; Williams, W.L.; Best, P.N.; Croston, J.H.; Duncan, K.; Mingo, B.; Morganti, R.; Brienza, M.; Cochrane, R.K.; et al. LoTSS DR1: Double-double radio galaxies in the HETDEX field. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 622, A13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marecki, A.; Jamrozy, M.; Machalski, J.; Pajdosz-Śmierciak, U. Multifrequency study of a double-double radio galaxy J0028+0035. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 501, 853–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Brocksopp, C.; Kaiser, C.R.; Schoenmakers, A.P.; de Bruyn, A.G. Three episodes of jet activity in the Fanaroff-Riley type II radio galaxy B0925+420. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2007, 382, 1019–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hota, A.; Sirothia, S.K.; Ohyama, Y.; Konar, C.; Kim, S.; Rey, S.C.; Saikia, D.J.; Croston, J.H.; Matsushita, S. Discovery of a spiral-host episodic radio galaxy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2011, 417, L36–L40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Singh, V.; Ishwara-Chandra, C.H.; Kharb, P.; Srivastava, S.; Janardhan, P. J1216+0709: A Radio Galaxy with Three Episodes of AGN Jet Activity. Astrophys. J. 2016, 826, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chavan, K.; Dabhade, P.; Saikia, D.J. A giant radio galaxy with three cycles of episodic jet activity from LoTSS DR2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 525, L87–L92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Massaro, E.; Giommi, P.; Leto, C.; Marchegiani, P.; Maselli, A.; Perri, M.; Piranomonte, S.; Sclavi, S. Roma-BZCAT: A multifrequency catalogue of blazars. Astron. Astrophys. 2009, 495, 691–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Massaro, E.; Maselli, A.; Leto, C.; Marchegiani, P.; Perri, M.; Giommi, P.; Piranomonte, S. The 5th edition of the Roma-BZCAT. A short presentation. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2015, 357, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Adelman-McCarthy, J.K.; Agüeros, M.A.; Allam, S.S.; Allende Prieto, C.; Anderson, K.S.J.; Anderson, S.F.; Annis, J.; Bahcall, N.A.; Bailer-Jones, C.A.L.; Baldry, A.A.; et al. The Sixth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2008, 175, 297–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Albareti, F.D.; Allende Prieto, C.; Almeida, A.; Anders, F.; Anderson, S.; Andrews, B.H.; Aragón-Salamanca, A.; Argudo-Fernández, M.; Armengaud, E.; Aubourg, E.; et al. The 13th Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: First Spectroscopic Data from the SDSS-IV Survey Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2017, 233, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Becker, R.H.; White, R.L.; Helfand, D.J. The FIRST Survey: Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty Centimeters. Astrophys. J. 1995, 450, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. White, R.L.; Becker, R.H.; Helfand, D.J.; Gregg, M.D. A Catalog of 1.4 GHz Radio Sources from the FIRST Survey. Astrophys. J. 1997, 475, 479–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fanaroff, B.L.; Riley, J.M. The morphology of extragalactic radio sources of high and low luminosity. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1974, 167, 31P–36P. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Szabo, T.; Pierpaoli, E.; Dong, F.; Pipino, A.; Gunn, J. An Optical Catalog of Galaxy Clusters Obtained from an Adaptive Matched Filter Finder Applied to Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 6. Astrophys. J. 2011, 736, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mahatma, V.H. The Dynamics and Energetics of Remnant and Restarting RLAGN. Galaxies 2023, 11, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Blandford, R.D.; Znajek, R.L. Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1977, 179, 433–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Volonteri, M.; Madau, P.; Quataert, E.; Rees, M.J. The Distribution and Cosmic Evolution of Massive Black Hole Spins. Astrophys. J. 2005, 620, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gergely, L.Á.; Biermann, P.L. The Spin-Flip Phenomenon in Supermassive Black hole binary mergers. Astrophys. J. 2009, 697, 1621–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tchekhovskoy, A.; Narayan, R.; McKinney, J.C. Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2011, 418, L79–L83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. van Velzen, S.; Falcke, H. The contribution of spin to jet-disk coupling in black holes. Astron. Astrophys. 2013, 557, L7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. McNamara, B.R.; Rohanizadegan, M.; Nulsen, P.E.J. Are Radio Active Galactic Nuclei Powered by Accretion or Black Hole Spin? Astrophys. J. 2011, 727, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dabhade, P.; Mahato, M.; Bagchi, J.; Saikia, D.J.; Combes, F.; Sankhyayan, S.; Röttgering, H.J.A.; Ho, L.C.; Gaikwad, M.; Raychaudhury, S.; et al. Search and analysis of giant radio galaxies with associated nuclei (SAGAN). I. New sample and multi-wavelength studies. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 642, A153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wright, E.L. A Cosmology Calculator for the World Wide Web. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 2006, 118, 1711–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Beasley, A.J.; Conway, J.E. VLBI Phase-Referencing. In Proceedings of the Very Long Baseline Interferometry and the VLBA, Socorro, NM, USA, 23–30 June 1993; Zensus, J.A., Diamond, P.J., Napier, P.J., Eds.; Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series. Astronomical Society of the Pacific (ASP): San Francisco, CA, USA, 1995; Volume 82, p. 327. [Google Scholar]
  37. Charlot, P.; Jacobs, C.S.; Gordon, D.; Lambert, S.; de Witt, A.; Böhm, J.; Fey, A.L.; Heinkelmann, R.; Skurikhina, E.; Titov, O.; et al. The third realization of the International Celestial Reference Frame by very long baseline interferometry. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 644, A159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Deller, A.T.; Brisken, W.F.; Phillips, C.J.; Morgan, J.; Alef, W.; Cappallo, R.; Middelberg, E.; Romney, J.; Rottmann, H.; Tingay, S.J.; et al. DiFX-2: A More Flexible, Efficient, Robust, and Powerful Software Correlator. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 2011, 123, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cao, H.M.; Frey, S.; Gurvits, L.I.; Yang, J.; Hong, X.Y.; Paragi, Z.; Deller, A.T.; Ivezić, Ž. VLBI observations of the radio quasar J2228+0110 at z = 5.95 and other field sources in multiple-phase-centre mode. Astron. Astrophys. 2014, 563, A111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Keimpema, A.; Kettenis, M.M.; Pogrebenko, S.V.; Campbell, R.M.; Cimó, G.; Duev, D.A.; Eldering, B.; Kruithof, N.; van Langevelde, H.J.; Marchal, D.; et al. The SFXC software correlator for very long baseline interferometry: Algorithms and implementation. Exp. Astron. 2015, 39, 259–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Greisen, E.W. AIPS, the VLA, and the VLBA. In Information Handling in Astronomy—Historical Vistas; Heck, A., Ed.; Astrophysics and Space Science Library; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; Volume 285, p. 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Diamond, P.J. VLBI Data Reduction in Practice. In Proceedings of the Very Long Baseline Interferometry and the VLBA, Socorro, NM, USA, 23–30 June 1993; Zensus, J.A., Diamond, P.J., Napier, P.J., Eds.; Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series. Astronomical Society of the Pacific (ASP): San Francisco, CA, USA, 1995; Volume 82, p. 227. [Google Scholar]
  43. Schwab, F.R.; Cotton, W.D. Global fringe search techniques for VLBI. Astron. J. 1983, 88, 688–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shepherd, M.C.; Pearson, T.J.; Taylor, G.B. DIFMAP: An interactive program for synthesis imaging. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 1994, 26, 987–989. [Google Scholar]
  45. Högbom, J.A. Aperture Synthesis with a Non-Regular Distribution of Interferometer Baselines. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 1974, 15, 417. [Google Scholar]
  46. Pearson, T.J.; Readhead, A.C.S. Image Formation by Self-Calibration in Radio Astronomy. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1984, 22, 97–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pearson, T.J. Non-Imaging Data Analysis. In Proceedings of the Very Long Baseline Interferometry and the VLBA, Socorro, NM, USA, 23–30 June 1993; Zensus, J.A., Diamond, P.J., Napier, P.J., Eds.; Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series. Astronomical Society of the Pacific (ASP): San Francisco, CA, USA, 1995; Volume 82, p. 267. [Google Scholar]
  48. Fomalont, E.B. Image Analysis. In Proceedings of the Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy II, Socorro, NM, USA, 17–23 June 1998; Taylor, G.B., Carilli, C.L., Perley, R.A., Eds.; Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series. Astronomical Society of the Pacific (ASP): San Francisco, CA, USA, 1999; Volume 180, p. 301. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lee, S.S.; Lobanov, A.P.; Krichbaum, T.P.; Witzel, A.; Zensus, A.; Bremer, M.; Greve, A.; Grewing, M. A Global 86 GHz VLBI Survey of Compact Radio Sources. Astron. J. 2008, 136, 159–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Condon, J.J.; Condon, M.A.; Gisler, G.; Puschell, J.J. Strong radio sources in bright spiral galaxies. II. Rapid star formation and galaxy-galaxy interactions. Astrophys. J. 1982, 252, 102–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Martí-Vidal, I.; Ros, E.; Pérez-Torres, M.A.; Guirado, J.C.; Jiménez-Monferrer, S.; Marcaide, J.M. Coherence loss in phase-referenced VLBI observations. Astron. Astrophys. 2010, 515, A53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gabányi, K.É.; Frey, S.; Satyapal, S.; Constantin, A.; Pfeifle, R.W. Very long baseline interferometry observation of the triple AGN candidate J0849+1114. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 630, L5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Krezinger, M.; Perger, K.; Gabányi, K.É.; Frey, S.; Gurvits, L.I.; Paragi, Z.; An, T.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, H.; Sbarrato, T. Radio-loud Quasars above Redshift 4: Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) Imaging of an Extended Sample. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2022, 260, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Krezinger, M.; Baldini, G.; Giroletti, M.; Sbarrato, T.; Ghisellini, G.; Giovannini, G.; An, T.; Gabányi, K.É.; Frey, S. Revealing faint compact radio jets at redshifts above 5 with very long baseline interferometry. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, 690, A321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kewley, L.J.; Heisler, C.A.; Dopita, M.A.; Sutherland, R.; Norris, R.P.; Reynolds, J.; Lumsden, S. Compact Radio Emission from Warm Infrared Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2000, 530, 704–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Krezinger, M.; Frey, S.; Paragi, Z.; Deane, R. High-Resolution Radio Observations of Five Optically Selected Type 2 Quasars. Symmetry 2020, 12, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, A.; An, T.; Cheng, X.; Ho, L.C.; Kellermann, K.I.; Baan, W.A.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y. VLBI observations of a sample of Palomar-Green quasars—I. Parsec-scale morphology. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 518, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gaia Collaboration; Prusti, T.; de Bruijne, J.H.J.; Brown, A.G.A.; Vallenari, A.; Babusiaux, C.; Bailer-Jones, C.A.L.; Bastian, U.; Biermann, M.; Evans, D.W.; et al. The Gaia mission. Astron. Astrophys. 2016, 595, A1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gaia Collaboration; Vallenari, A.; Brown, A.G.A.; Prusti, T.; de Bruijne, J.H.J.; Arenou, F.; Babusiaux, C.; Biermann, M.; Creevey, O.L.; Ducourant, C.; et al. Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 674, A1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Orosz, G.; Frey, S. Optical-radio positional offsets for active galactic nuclei. Astron. Astrophys. 2013, 553, A13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Marecki, A.; Swoboda, B. The transition from quasar radio-loud to radio-quiet state in the framework of the black hole scalability hypothesis. Astron. Astrophys. 2011, 525, A6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wright, E.L.; Eisenhardt, P.R.M.; Mainzer, A.K.; Ressler, M.E.; Cutri, R.M.; Jarrett, T.; Kirkpatrick, J.D.; Padgett, D.; McMillan, R.S.; Skrutskie, M.; et al. The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance. Astron. J. 2010, 140, 1868–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cutri, R.M.; Wright, E.L.; Conrow, T.; Fowler, J.W.; Eisenhardt, P.R.M.; Grillmair, C.; Kirkpatrick, J.D.; Masci, F.; McCallon, H.L.; Wheelock, S.L.; et al. VizieR Online Data Catalog: AllWISE Data Release II/328. 2023. Available online: https://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/II/328 (accessed on 14 December 2024).
  64. Marecki, A. Activity restart - a key to explaining the morphology of J1211+743. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 544, L2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Readhead, A.C.S. Equipartition Brightness Temperature and the Inverse Compton Catastrophe. Astrophys. J. 1994, 426, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Homan, D.C.; Cohen, M.H.; Hovatta, T.; Kellermann, K.I.; Kovalev, Y.Y.; Lister, M.L.; Popkov, A.V.; Pushkarev, A.B.; Ros, E.; Savolainen, T. MOJAVE. XIX. Brightness Temperatures and Intrinsic Properties of Blazar Jets. Astrophys. J. 2021, 923, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kozák, B.; Frey, S.; Gabányi, K.É. Superluminal Motion and Jet Parameters in the Gamma-ray-Emitting Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxy TXS 1206+549. Galaxies 2024, 12, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xie, Z.L.; Bañados, E.; Belladitta, S.; Mazzucchelli, C.; Schindler, J.T.; Davies, F.; Venemans, B.P. Recognizing Blazars Using Radio Morphology from the VLA Sky Survey. Astrophys. J. 2024, 964, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mateos, S.; Alonso-Herrero, A.; Carrera, F.J.; Blain, A.; Watson, M.G.; Barcons, X.; Braito, V.; Severgnini, P.; Donley, J.L.; Stern, D. Using the Bright Ultrahard XMM-Newton survey to define an IR selection of luminous AGN based on WISE colours. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2012, 426, 3271–3281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Massaro, F.; D’Abrusco, R.; Tosti, G.; Ajello, M.; Gasparrini, D.; Grindlay, J.E.; Smith, H.A. The WISE Gamma-Ray Strip Parameterization: The Nature of the Gamma-Ray Active Galactic Nuclei of Uncertain Type. Astrophys. J. 2012, 750, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lindegren, L.; Lammers, U.; Hobbs, D.; O’Mullane, W.; Bastian, U.; Hernández, J. The astrometric core solution for the Gaia mission. Overview of models, algorithms, and software implementation. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 538, A78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The 1.4 GHz FIRST [23] image of the DDRG J0028+0035, together with the Roma-BZCAT source 5BZU J0028+0035 (the easternmost one in the central trio of compact sources on the arcsec scale). The symmetric pair of relic outer lobes is seen as faint extended features towards the northeast and southwest. The peak intensity is 16.3 mJy beam 1 . The lowest contours are drawn at ± 0.34 mJy beam 1 (∼ 3 σ image noise). The positive contour levels increase by a factor of 2. The half-power width of the elliptical Gaussian restoring beam is 5.4 × 6.4 at major axis position angle PA = 0 , as indicated with an ellipse in the lower-right corner.
Figure 1. The 1.4 GHz FIRST [23] image of the DDRG J0028+0035, together with the Roma-BZCAT source 5BZU J0028+0035 (the easternmost one in the central trio of compact sources on the arcsec scale). The symmetric pair of relic outer lobes is seen as faint extended features towards the northeast and southwest. The peak intensity is 16.3 mJy beam 1 . The lowest contours are drawn at ± 0.34 mJy beam 1 (∼ 3 σ image noise). The positive contour levels increase by a factor of 2. The half-power width of the elliptical Gaussian restoring beam is 5.4 × 6.4 at major axis position angle PA = 0 , as indicated with an ellipse in the lower-right corner.
Symmetry 17 00171 g001
Figure 2. The 1.52 GHz VLA A-configuration image of the Roma-BZCAT source 5BZU J0028+0035 (labeled as B) and the DDRG J0028+0035, whose core, northeastern, and southwestern inner lobes are marked with C, NE, and SW, respectively. The image is adopted from Figure 5 in [14]. The peak intensity is 11.3 mJy beam 1 . The lowest contours are drawn at ± 0.25 mJy beam 1 . The positive contour levels increase by a factor of 2. The half-power width of the elliptical Gaussian restoring beam is 1.0 × 2.5 at PA = 52 . The coordinates are relative to the phase centre at right ascension 00 h 28 min 39.164 s and declination + 00 35 51.61 . Note that this reference position is different from the one in Figure 1.
Figure 2. The 1.52 GHz VLA A-configuration image of the Roma-BZCAT source 5BZU J0028+0035 (labeled as B) and the DDRG J0028+0035, whose core, northeastern, and southwestern inner lobes are marked with C, NE, and SW, respectively. The image is adopted from Figure 5 in [14]. The peak intensity is 11.3 mJy beam 1 . The lowest contours are drawn at ± 0.25 mJy beam 1 . The positive contour levels increase by a factor of 2. The half-power width of the elliptical Gaussian restoring beam is 1.0 × 2.5 at PA = 52 . The coordinates are relative to the phase centre at right ascension 00 h 28 min 39.164 s and declination + 00 35 51.61 . Note that this reference position is different from the one in Figure 1.
Symmetry 17 00171 g002
Figure 3. The naturally weighted 1.66 GHz EVN image of the DDRG J0028+0035 core (C). The peak intensity is 2.18 mJy beam 1 . The lowest contours are drawn at ± 0.14 mJy beam 1 (∼ 3 σ image noise). The positive contour levels increase by a factor of 2. The half-power width of the elliptical Gaussian restoring beam is 5.5 mas × 5.8 mas at PA = 76 .
Figure 3. The naturally weighted 1.66 GHz EVN image of the DDRG J0028+0035 core (C). The peak intensity is 2.18 mJy beam 1 . The lowest contours are drawn at ± 0.14 mJy beam 1 (∼ 3 σ image noise). The positive contour levels increase by a factor of 2. The half-power width of the elliptical Gaussian restoring beam is 5.5 mas × 5.8 mas at PA = 76 .
Symmetry 17 00171 g003
Figure 4. The naturally weighted 1.66 GHz EVN image of 5BZU J0028+0035 (B). The peak intensity is 3.15 mJy beam 1 . The lowest contours are drawn at ± 0.16 mJy beam 1 (∼ 3 σ image noise). The positive contour levels increase by a factor of 2. The half-power width of the elliptical Gaussian restoring beam is 5.5 mas × 5.8 mas at PA = 77 .
Figure 4. The naturally weighted 1.66 GHz EVN image of 5BZU J0028+0035 (B). The peak intensity is 3.15 mJy beam 1 . The lowest contours are drawn at ± 0.16 mJy beam 1 (∼ 3 σ image noise). The positive contour levels increase by a factor of 2. The half-power width of the elliptical Gaussian restoring beam is 5.5 mas × 5.8 mas at PA = 77 .
Symmetry 17 00171 g004
Table 1. Parameters of the circular Gaussian model components describing the brightness distribution of the DDRG J0028+0035 core (C, top) and the Roma-BZCAT source 5BZU J0028+0035 (B, bottom), along with their derived physical parameters.
Table 1. Parameters of the circular Gaussian model components describing the brightness distribution of the DDRG J0028+0035 core (C, top) and the Roma-BZCAT source 5BZU J0028+0035 (B, bottom), along with their derived physical parameters.
SourceFlux DensitySize FWHMBrightness TemperatureRadio Power
(mJy)(mas)(K)(W Hz−1)
C 3.7 ± 0.6 4.0 ± 0.6 ( 1.4 ± 1.0 ) × 10 8 ( 2.0 ± 0.3 ) × 10 24
B 5.1 ± 0.9 3.5 ± 0.5 ( 3.1 ± 2.1 ) × 10 8 ( 8.6 ± 1.5 ) × 10 24
Table 2. WISE mid-infrared magnitudes of the DDRG J0028+0035 (top) and the Roma-BZCAT source 5BZU J0028+0035 (bottom).
Table 2. WISE mid-infrared magnitudes of the DDRG J0028+0035 (top) and the Roma-BZCAT source 5BZU J0028+0035 (bottom).
Source W 1 Band W 2 Band W 3 Band W 4 Band
3.35 μm4.6 μm11.6 μm22.1 μm
DDRG J0028+0035 14.93 ± 0.04 14.79 ± 0.07 > 11.76 > 8.94
5BZU J0028+0035 14.31 ± 0.03 14.06 ± 0.05 > 11.99 > 8.42
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Frey, S.; Marecki, A.; Gabányi, K.É.; Jamrozy, M. What Is Inside the Double–Double Structure of the Radio Galaxy J0028+0035? Symmetry 2025, 17, 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020171

AMA Style

Frey S, Marecki A, Gabányi KÉ, Jamrozy M. What Is Inside the Double–Double Structure of the Radio Galaxy J0028+0035? Symmetry. 2025; 17(2):171. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020171

Chicago/Turabian Style

Frey, Sándor, Andrzej Marecki, Krisztina Éva Gabányi, and Marek Jamrozy. 2025. "What Is Inside the Double–Double Structure of the Radio Galaxy J0028+0035?" Symmetry 17, no. 2: 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020171

APA Style

Frey, S., Marecki, A., Gabányi, K. É., & Jamrozy, M. (2025). What Is Inside the Double–Double Structure of the Radio Galaxy J0028+0035? Symmetry, 17(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17020171

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop