Next Article in Journal
Geochemistry of the Cheremkhovo and Lower Prisayan Formations from the Jurassic Irkutsk Coal-Bearing Basin: Evidence for Provenance and Climate Change in Pliensbachian–Toarcian
Next Article in Special Issue
Describing Phosphorus Sorption Processes on Volcanic Soil in the Presence of Copper or Silver Engineered Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Mineralogy of Dolomite Carbonatites of Sevathur Complex, Tamil Nadu, India
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pollution Characteristics, Distribution and Ecological Risk of Potentially Toxic Elements in Soils from an Abandoned Coal Mine Area in Southwestern China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Minerals
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/min11040356
minerals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of the Long-Term Application of Sewage Sludge to A Calcareous Soil on Its Total and Bioavailable Content in Trace Elements, and Their Transfer to the Crop

by
Armelle Zaragüeta
1,2,
Alberto Enrique
1,*,
Iñigo Virto
1,
Rodrigo Antón
1,
Henar Urmeneta
3 and
Luis Orcaray
2
1
Departamento Ciencias, IS-FOOD, Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
2
Área de Innovación, Sección de Sistemas Sostenibles, Instituto Navarro de Tecnologías e Infraestructuras Agroalimentarias, 31610 Villava, Spain
3
Departamento Estadística, Informática y Matemáticas, Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2021, 11(4), 356; https://doi.org/10.3390/min11040356
Submission received: 6 March 2021 / Revised: 24 March 2021 / Accepted: 26 March 2021 / Published: 30 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Elemental Concentration and Pollution in Soil, Water, and Sediment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sewage sludge (SS) can be used as an organic amendment in agricultural soils, provided they comply with the relevant legislation. This use can incorporate traces of metals into the soil, which can cause environmental or human health problems. In the study period between 1992 and 2018 (26 years), it was observed that the use of SS as an organic fertilizer significantly increased the total concentration of Zn, Cu, Cr, Ni and Hg of this study between 55.6% (Hg) and 7.0% (Ni). The concentration of Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni and Cd extracted with DTPA, also increased between 122.2% (Zn) and 11.3% (Cd). In contrast, the Mn concentrations extracted with Diethylene Triamine Pentaacetic Acid (DTPA)were 6.5% higher in the treatments without SS. These changes in the soil had an impact on the crop, which showed a significant increase in the concentration of Zn, Cu and Cr in the grain, between 15.0% (Cr) and 4.4% (Cu), and a decrease in the concentration of Mn, Cr and Ni in the barley straw when SS was added to the soil between 32.2% (Mn) and 29.6% (Ni). However, the limits established by current legislation on soil protection and food were not exceeded. This limited transfer to the crop, is likely due to the high content of carbonates and organic matter in the soil, which limit the bioavailability of most of the trace metals (TM) in the soil. As a conclusion, we observe that the use of SS as an organic amendment increased the concentration of some TM in the soil, in its bioavailable forms, and in the crop.

1. Introduction

As a consequence of the urbanization and industrialization of urban environments, there is a growing generation of wastewater of domestic and industrial origin. This water must be treated to ensure an environmentally safe and economically viable final destination. This wastewater treatment is generally carried out in treatment plants, and involves a generation of sludge (sewage sludge, SS). As in many other countries, in Spain, SS is considered waste, in accordance with the provisions of Law 22/2011 [1] on waste and contaminated soils, and must be managed in accordance. Depending on its final composition, SS can have three possible destinations within the Spanish legislative framework. By order of priority, these destinations are: (i) the application on agricultural soils, (ii) incineration or co-incineration, and (iii) deposition in landfills. In Spain, the annual generation of SS accounts for approximately 1,000,000 tons of dry matter, remaining stable in recent years, approximately 80% of which is used in agricultural soils [2].
The agricultural use of SS as an organic amendment has been reported to provide several benefits to agrosystems [3,4,5,6]. They include an increase in macro and micro nutrients in soil [7,8] and an increase in the content of organic matter [9,10,11,12]. These inputs normally result in higher crop yields [10,13,14].
However, this application involves a series of environmental and human health risks. Some of these risks are the possible transfer of genes encoding resistance to antibiotics [11], and the accumulation of persistent organic pollutants [4] or of trace metals (TM) in soil. Trace metals can accumulate in the surface layers [12,15,16,17] and/or leach out of the agrosystem [18,19,20], causing environmental contamination [4,21], ecotoxicity problems [14,22,23] or becoming part of the trophic chain due to their translocation in crops [21,24].
To control these risks, different strategies have been developed in order to minimize the impact of TM on soils where SS is applied [25]. On the one hand, there are legislative tools addressing soil protection [25,26,27] and animal and human food protection [28,29]. On the other hand, SS purification and stabilization techniques have been improved to obtain higher quality biosolids with a lower concentration in TM [30,31,32].
Along with these strategies, long-term studies are of great importance, as they allow observing the actual evolution of TM in soil, and therefore, the assessment of their true risk of accumulation and possible transfer to food, in the particular conditions of each soil and crop [16,17,32,33,34]. In this sense, the literature shows variable results, with some studies showing enrichments of TM in crops [16,33], and other studies reporting no accumulation [24,35]. This reflects the possible influence of edaphoclimatic conditions and SS composition on the consequences of their application, and highlights the need to consider these conditions in its study.
In this framework, a relevant factor in the assessment of the consequences of SS application to soil is to determine the proportion of TM present in the soil that are available to be adsorbed by crops. This proportion constitutes the so-called bioavailable fraction, and is influenced by the nature of the element, their interaction with soil components, soil properties, and the contact time of soil with the metal [36]. Some studies have shown that this concentration increases faster than the total concentration in soil as a consequence of the application of SS [37]. A series of methodologies have been developed to determine the concentration of bioavailable TMs in soils. A widely extended and accepted one is the use of the chelating agent DTPA (Diethylene Triamine Pentaacetic Acid) as an extractant [16,37,38,39,40,41].
Among the aspects related to the composition of soil that can modulate the bioavailability of TM, the amount and type of organic matter received with SS is determinant, as it can determine the formation of chelates, exchange complexes or organometallic complexes [12,42,43]. These phenomena can lengthen the retention time of trace metals in soil [44], limiting their bioavailability and their introduction into the trophic chain. On the other hand, in calcareous soils, the bioavailability of TMs in relation to their total content is assumed to be lower than in other types of soils due to the presence of carbonates. Carbonates maintain a high soil pH and are associated with sorption and precipitation processes of TM [15,45].
The general objective of this study was to assess the effect of long-term application of SS on the content of TM and their analytical bioavailability, and actual transfer to the most frequent crop in the rotation used in the area of study, in a cultivated calcareous soil. To this end, we studied the effect of the accumulated dose of SS on the total and DTPA-extracted content of TM in the soil after 26 years of SS application at different doses and frequencies in an experimental field. Then, the actual absorption by the crop was assessed by studying the concentration in TM of grains and leaves of barley grown after 26 years of experimentation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description

The study was carried out in an experimental field located in the municipality of Arazuri, in the region of Navarre, in Northern Spain. The field belongs to the local municipal wastewater treatment company (Commonwealth of Pamplona, Navarre, Spain). The experimental field was setup in 1992, in order to assess the long-term effect of the direct application of SS as an agricultural amendment both in the soil and crops.
The experimental field is located on a Calcaric Cambisol [46], with a loam-clay-silty texture and more than 16% carbonates in the upper horizon (0–30 cm). The main soil characteristics at this depth are shown in Table 1. It is a well-drained soil, without problems of effective depth and under rainfed agricultural use for decades. Climate in this region is temperate sub-humid Mediterranean, with an average annual temperature of 12.9 °C, an average annual rainfall of 771 mm, and an average potential evapotranspiration according to Thornthwaite [47] of 696.7 mm between 1981 and 2010. [48].

2.2. Experimental Design

The experimental field was setup to study the effect of SS in the soil and crops, by verifying which doses were the most adequate ones to avoid risks of contamination by TM, on a conventional crop rotation in this area. The design is block factorial, with four repetitions (n = 4), and with combinations of two application rates (40 Mg ha−1 and 80 Mg ha−1) of SS, and three frequencies (1, 2 and 4 years). Therefore, the treatments applied are 40 Mg ha−1 annually, 40 Mg ha−1 every two years, 40 Mg ha−1 every four years, 80 Mg ha−1 annually, 80 Mg ha−1 every two years and 80 Mg ha−1 every four years. There is also a control treatment in which SS or other fertilizers are not applied denominated “Control”, and a treatment that receives mineral fertilization (46% urea and Ammonium Sulfate) at the commercially recommended dose denominated “MinFer”. The individual plots per replicate, corresponding to the different treatments, had a surface area of 35 m2 (10 m × 3.5 m).
The doses were calculated in 1992 based on the restrictive regulation of 250 N fertilizer units (NFU) per hectare and year, without taking into account the N yield for the year of application. As such, the treatment using 40 Mg ha−1 per year was set as the one corresponding to this dose, and those receiving less or more SS were used to follow the evolution of soil and crops below and above the recommended dose at the time. The frequencies of two and four years were established according to the common practices of farmers in the area, and the recommendations of the entity that supplied the SS. The N equivalence of the added doses has varied (Table 2) due to the SS composition changes over time (Table 3).
Due to the interest of the cumulative study of TM, from the total doses provided in each treatment during the 26 years of the study, 5 ranges of accumulated SS were established: (i) 0 Mg ha−1 of SS (MinFer and Control), (ii) 250 Mg ha−1 of SS (40 Mg ha−1 every 4 years), called 250MgSS, (iii) correspondent 520 Mg ha−1 of SS and 560 Mg ha−1 of SS (40 Mg ha−1 every 2 years and 80 Mg ha−1 every 4 years) called 500MgSS, (iv) 1040 Mg ha−1 of SS (40 Mg ha−1 every year and 80 Mg ha−1 every 2 years) called 1000MgSS and (v) 2080 Mg ha−1 of SS (80 Mg ha−1 every year) called 2000MgSS. The crops used corresponded to a rainfed conditions in a rotation of 3 years (barley–barley–sunflower), managed in a conventional way (annual tillage with a 30 cm deep moldboard plough, and application of phytosanitary products according to the needs of the crops each year). The 2018 yield values expressed in percent 12% moisture were provided as supplementary material, firstly, for each fertilization treatment (Table S1) and, secondly, an average value was provided for treatments that had received SS and those that had not received SS (Table S2).

2.3. Sewage Sludge Characteristics and Application

The application of SS in each campaign was carried out in September, coinciding with the work of preparing the soil for cultivation. This application was made using a 3.5-m wide spreader trailer. Once the amount of SS corresponding to each treatment was spread, it was mixed with a moldboard plough down to 30 cm. This was conducted annually between three and four weeks before seeding.
The SS used in this study comes from the wastewater treatment plant corresponding to the city of the Pamplona region and its metropolitan area, with approximately 335,000 inhabitants [58]. Wastewater undergoes a primary treatment, followed by a biological treatment and a nitrification and denitrification treatment. The resulting sludge undergoes a mesophilic and dehydration treatment, obtaining biologically stable SS, with the physical-chemical characteristics detailed in Table 3. These characteristics comply with the Spanish national regulations on the maximum concentration of TM in SS used as organic amendments in Agriculture [26].

2.4. Soil and Crops Sampling

After 26 years from the beginning of the trial, a specific sampling was carried out to evaluate the concentration and availability of trace metals in the soil, as well as in the aerial parts (grain and straw) of barley.
Soil sampling was carried out in September, after the previous crop cycle ended, and before the application of SS for the following campaign. Samples of each treatment and replicate were collected at 0–30 cm depth, with an auger. A sample composed of three subsamples was collected in each plot. Samples were immediately transferred to the laboratory in polyethylene bags protected from sunlight, were dried at room temperature and ground to 2 mm.
Crop sampling was carried out at complete physiological maturity, 5 days before harvest. A sample of the aerial part of the crop was taken from each treatment and repetition, avoiding the edges of each plot. Crop samples were transferred to the laboratory in paper bags, and oven-dried at 50 °C for 7 days. Once dry, they were shelled with a 6mm sieve to separate the grain from the straw, and each part was ground separately with an agate ball mill.

2.5. Analytical Methods

2.5.1. Total Concentration in TM in Soil and Crop Samples

Soil, grain and straw samples for the determination of Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Zn, Cd, Pb and Hg were microwave-digested. Following the methodology described in EPA 3051 [55], 0.3 g of soil, 6 mL of 67–69% TraceMetal™ HNO3, 2 mL 34–37% TraceMetal™ HCl and 2 mL of Milli-Q water were used for total Soil TM determinations. For the analysis of both parts of the crop (straw and grain), the methodology described in EPA 3052 [61] was followed; 0.25 g of sample, 4 mL of 67–69% TraceMetal™ HNO3, 2 mL of H2O2 at 30% and 4 mL of Milli-Q water were used.
The mixing of the samples with the reagents was carried out directly in teflon tubes (PTFE) and then closed. They were treated in an ETHOS UP, Microwave digestion system (Milestone, Sorisole, Italy). For soil and crop samples, microwaves were emitted for 50 min and 1 h, respectively. To obtain a complete digestion, soil samples reached 200 °C for 20 min, and crop samples, 220 °C for 30 min. The temperature was controlled by a system of probes that constantly measure the process temperature. Once the digested samples had cooled within the system, each sample was filtered and transferred pre-tared 50 mL polypropylene containers, which were made up to their capacity with Milli-Q water. Between samples, the PTFE was rinsed with 5% HNO3, five times and subsequently washed with Milli-Q water. Between different matrices, to avoid contamination, a blank digestion was carried out at 170 °C and, subsequently rinsed with Milli-Q water.
External calibration standards, and internal standards, were included in the sample set by means of a T system in the equipment’s sample introduction system.

2.5.2. Extraction with DTPA of Soil Samples

To evaluate the bioavailability of TM in the soil, the DTPA-extractable concentrations of Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Zn, Cd and Pb were determined, using the extraction procedure described in the UNE 77315:2001 standard [62], equivalent to the international standard ISO 14870:2001 [63]. This extraction procedure aims to detect the TM concentrations in the most labile fractions of soil, and therefore potentially absorbable by plants [64].
The extraction solution was prepared by mixing, first, 0.735 g of CaCl2·2H2O, 0.984 g of diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid—DTPA (C14H23N3O10) and 7.46 g of Triethanolamine—TEA (C6H15NO3) in a beaker. The mixture was then diluted with 800 mL of deionized water and the pH was adjusted to 7.3 with HCl. The solution was finally transferred to a 1000 mL flask, made up to the mark and homogenized. The solution was stored at 20 °C until used. Subsequently, in a 100 mL wide-mouth polypropylene container, 20 g of soil sample and 40 mL of the solution were mixed. The recipient was hermetically closed and stirred for 2 h at 20 °C on a reciprocating shaker at 30 rpm. Then a fraction of the extract was decanted, placed in a centrifuge tube, and centrifuged for 10 min at 6000 rpm. The supernatant was filtered with a membrane filter with a pore size of 0.45 µm, collected in a polyethylene bottle, and stored in the refrigerator. The blank extractions for each batch of analysis were carried out in the same way but without soil samples.
All glass and plastic material used in this procedure were previously washed in 5% HNO3, and in deionized water, 3 times. Then they were rinsed with distilled water and with the extracting solution, 3 and 1 times, respectively.

2.5.3. Trace Metals Determination

The determination of TM concentrations in digested soil and crop samples was carried out by ICP-MS in a 7700x analyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), following the UNE-EN 17053 standard [54]. The DTPA extracts were analyzed before 48 h from their preparation, using the same analysis method.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

A statistical analysis was carried out for each MT, with a significance level of 5%, to contrast the difference in means depending on the fertilizer dose received, understand this factor in six different levels associated with the ranges of accumulated contribution of SS, and distinguish the control of mineral fertilization. Thus, it was analyzed by one-factor ANOVA, carried out with R (R Core Team 2019, Vienna, Austria), with six levels: control (Control), mineral fertilizer (MinFer), 250 Mg per ha of SS (250MgSS), 520–560 Mg per ha of SS (500MgSS), 1040 Mg per ha of SS (1000MgSS) and 2080 Mg per ha of SS (2000MgSS). We will refer to the factor as “Fertilizer Treatment”.
The ANOVA results are presented accompanied by BoxPlot graphs with whiskers where indicated, when the existence of any difference was confirmed, the groupings of factor levels (a, b, c...) after a study of multiple comparison of means two to two using the Tukey test.
In a complementary way, in order to contrast the effect of the application of SS per se, a study was carried out for each TM for the difference in means depending on whether the treatment had received SS (regardless of the quantity) called “With SS” or had not received SS (control and MinFer) called “Without SS”, at 5% significance. This statistical analyses were carried out with R (R Core Team 2019, Vienna, Austria).

3. Results

3.1. Total Concentration of Trace Metals in Soil

The ANOVA showed significant differences in the total concentration of Zn, Cu, Cr, Ni and Hg in soil between the different Fertilizer Treatments (Figure 1).
The total concentrations of Cu, Cr and Hg showed significant differences between the control treatment (either SS or mineral fertilization) and the treatment with the highest accumulated SS dose (2000MgSS), which displayed the lowest and highest concentrations, respectively.
The total concentration of Ni in soil was significantly different between the treatments that had not received SS (control and MinFer) and those that had received SS.
In the case of Zn, significant differences were found between the treatments that had not received SS and those that had received SS. Moreover, in treatment 2000MgSS, the concentration increased.
No significant differences were found in the total concentration in Pb, Cd, and Mn as a function of the different fertilizer treatments studied.
The complementary study based on the contrast between treatments with SS and without SS (Table 4) confirmed the results obtained from ANOVA. This analysis, revealed higher values overall for the total concentration of Zn, Cu, Cr, Ni and Hg in the treatments that had received SS than in those that had not received SS. The average increase with SS was of 55.6% in Hg, 29.3% in Zn, 21.5% in Cu, 7.7% in Cr and 7.0% in Ni.

3.2. Concentration of DTPA-Extracted Trace Metals in Soil

The results showed that the concentration in DTPA-extracted Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni and Cd, increased with the use and dose of SS (Figure 2).
In all TM except for Mn, DTPA-extracted concentrations were found to be significantly lower in the control than in the treatment 2000MgSS. Furthermore for Pb, a significant difference was observed between the treatments that did not receive SS and those that received SS. For these TMs, the minimum amount of SS applied represented a significant increase in the extractable concentration by DTPA.
In the case of Zn extracted with DTPA (Figure 2), a significant difference was observed between the treatments that did not receive SS and those that received SS. At treatment 2000MgSS, the bioavailable concentration in soil increased.
Cu showed three statistically different groups, with the treatments corresponding to 0 Mg per ha of SS accumulated (control and MinFer) grouped together with the lowest concentrations, the treatments comprised between 250MgSS to 1000MgSS in another homogeneous group with intermediate values, and the treatment 2000MgSS with the highest observed value.
Finally, it was not possible to quantify the concentrations of Cr extracted by DTPA, as it was below the detection limit of 0.5939 ppb.
The complementary statistical study found that the average concentration in Mn extracted with DTPA was 6.5% higher in the plots that had not received any dose of SS, compared to those that had received SS (Table 5). This same analysis confirmed the results of the ANOVA analysis, revealing higher values in the treatments that had received SS applications compared to the treatments without SS for DTPA-extractable Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni and Cd. The average gains were of 122.2% in Zn, 61.1% in Cu, 27.3% in Ni, 14.9% in Pb and 11.3% in Cd. Finally, only Cu and Zn showed a clear correlation in their DTPA-extracted concentrations and those found in bulk soil (Figure S1).

3.3. Concentration of Trace Metals in Barley Grain and Straw

In relation to grain, no significant differences were detected in the concentration of TM in grain as a function of the different treatments, with the exception of Zn (Table 6). Zn concentration showed the highest concentration in grain in the fertilizer treatment corresponding to 2000MgSS. The result of the complementary analysis, confirmed the significant difference in Zn, and revealed differences in Cu and Cr (Table 7). For these TM, the concentrations in barley grains were significantly higher in the treatments that had received SS than in those without SS application. The average increases were of 15.0% in Cr, 8.3% in Zn and 4.4% in Cu.
In straw, no significant differences were found in the concentration of TM analyzed as a function of the fertilizer treatment, with the exception of Mn (Table 6). The Mn concentration in straw in the treatments without SS was significantly higher than in those that had received SS. The result of complementary analysis confirmed the significant difference in Mn and revealed differences in Cr and Ni (Table 7). In the three TM, the concentrations in the straw of the treatments that had not received SS were higher than those that had received SS. The average decrease was 32.2% in Mn, 30.0% in Cr and 29.6% in Ni.

4. Discussion

4.1. Influence of Sewage Sludge in Total and DTPA-Extracted Concentrations of Trace Metals in Soil

4.1.1. Total TM Concentrations in Soil

In general, the TM concentration found in soil, in descending order was Mn> Zn> Cr> Ni> Cu> Pb> Cd> Hg. The application of SS significantly increased the total concentration of Zn, Cu, Cr, Ni and Hg in the soil. These results are in line with those found in other locations and experimental sites. For instance, in a study carried out on a Mediterranean agricultural soil, Reference [16] obtained similar results, where the concentrations of Cu, Zn, Ag, Sb, Hg and Pb in the soil increased with the application of SS over 15 years, compared to the control and to mineral fertilization. In studies conducted on other soil types such as Cumulic Haplustolls and an Udic Calciustoll [65], it was also concluded that Cr, Cu, Cd, Pb and Zn accumulated in the most superficial layers of the soil after the application of SS over several years.
The different behavior of the TM analyzed can be explained by both their concentration in SS, and their particular behavior in soil. As it can be seen in Figure 1, the concentrations of Zn, Cu, Cr and Hg were significantly higher in the treatments receiving the highest dose of SS, 2000MgSS (corresponding 80 Mg ha−1 of SS every year for 26 years), compared to the control plots. This dose is possible only within the framework of research. Although the annual amounts of TM that can be applied to agricultural soils comply with the current legislation RD 1310/1190 [26], the regional regulations on the use of SS in agriculture in Navarra (Orden Foral 359/2010 [66]) is more strict. This regulation prohibits exceeding the dose of 250 NFU annually in general, and of 170 NFU in areas designated as vulnerable to nitrate contamination according to EU Directive 91/676/CEE [67]. The dose of 80 Mg ha−1 of SS every year is therefore well above the one allowed at the local level (Table 2), which corresponds to 20 Mg ha−1 every four years in rainfed crops. To this, it has to be added that current regulations on organic fertilization also impose limits that make this dose above those allowed [68].
In the particular case of Zn, the significant enrichment observed in the soil with increasing SS application can be related to the high concentration of Zn in SS (874 mg Kg−1, Table 3). These results were also observed in a previous study carried out in this experimental field [11].
In Ni, a significant difference was observed between the treatments that had received SS compared to those that had not received SS (Figure 1). This was not observed in studies previously conducted under similar conditions [39], and in the same experimental field [11]. This suggests, that although the concentration of Ni in SS was low (32.1 mg Kg−1, Table 3) it was sufficient to generate an increase in concentration in the plots that received SS at any dose after 26 years of continuous application. The application time and the accumulated dose seem therefore to have consequences in the accumulation of this element in soils like the one studied here. A significant increase in total Ni was also observed in a study carried out in two soils in India, with neutral pH, warm steppe climate, sunflower and wheat cultivation, fewer applications and lower doses of SS than those used in this study [41].
In Mn, Pb and Cd there were no significant differences in their total concentration in the soil between any fertilizer treatment, whether they received SS or not, as previously found in this experimental site [11], and in other studies with similar conditions but lower doses of SS, for Mn and Cd [16]. Despite amending with lower doses, Iglesias [16] found a significant increase in Pb, probably due to the concentration of this element in the SS used (112 ± 21 mg ka−1), while in our study, the concentration of Pb was lower (39 ± 1.2 mg ka−1, Table 3). In another study in Sweden, since 1997, in a silty clay soil (42% clay), cereal crop but acid pH, Pb did not suffer significant increases and Cd increased only when SS with metal salts was added [10]. It is important to note that the doses applied were lower than in our case study.
It has to be noted that, despite the observed cumulative effect of SS application on total Zn, Cu, Cr, Ni and Hg concentrations, these concentrations were always below the legal limit for soils with a pH greater than 7, as indicated by the Spanish national legislation RD 1310/1190 [26], and the European Directive 86/278/EEC [27]. Previous studies carried out under similar conditions coincide with this observation [12,16,17]. Our results indicate, however, that the use of SS for fertilization purposes, in the conditions used here can have a relevant and cumulative effect on the total concentration of TM in the soil, which should be monitored in the long term.

4.1.2. DTPA-Extractable TM Concentrations in Soil

In general, the order of concentration of TM in the DTPA extractable fraction was Mn > Zn > Cu > Pb > Ni > Cd. It was observed that for Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni and Cd, the concentration extracted with DTPA was significantly higher in the treatments that received SS than in those without SS, as already observed in many other studies [22,35]. Assuming that these concentrations represent the most readily available forms of TMs in soil, they would be affected by three factors: the source or origin of these TM (in the case, the SS), the characteristics of the soil and soil conditions associated with their application, and the particular behavior of each TM. In relation to the source, anthropogenic TMs are known to be more bioavailable than pedogenic metals [42,69,70].
In relation to soil parameters that might influence TMs bioavailability in the experimental site of this study, the most relevant ones are pH, the presence of carbonates, and the possible modifications in the retention of cations associated with the presence of organic matter. The high pH (8.5) associated with a high content of carbonates in the depth of study, hinders the mobility of TM in the soil to phases easily absorbed by the crops [15,45]. To this fact we must add that increasing the content of organic matter by continuous addition of SS can favor the formation of organo-metallic complexes [12,42,43], and increase the cation-exchange capacity of soil [42,71,72], which would also reduce the mobility and availability of TMs. In addition, the use of phosphate compounds has been proven to be efficient for the chemical immobilization of heavy metals in soils [73,74]. In this study, SS contributed a high concentration of phosphorus (P) to the soil, due to the affinity of this element with the solid fraction of SS during the wastewater treatment process [6]. It has been indeed observed in this experimental field that the application of SS increased the total and available content of P in soil [11], which could increase the immobilization of different TMs [71]. The behavior of the different TM analyzed was however not homogeneous. In Ni and Cd extracted by DTPA, only the treatment 2000MgSS caused a significant increase in the concentration with respect to the control (Figure 2). Both TMs have similar mobility in SS [39]. Cd tends to be found in a greater proportion strongly absorbed to organic matter and/or easily reducible Mn oxides and amorphous iron oxides, while Ni can also be strongly bound or incorporated into organic matter or into other oxidizable species [39]. When SS is incorporated into the soil, these TM undergo a minimum redistribution, remaining above all strongly adsorbed to organic matter and carbonates [39,75,76]. This mobility in SS and soil, together with the low concentrations of both TMs in SS (Table 3), can explain the observed increase in bioavailability only in the treatments corresponding to the highest SS doses, as well as the lack of a clear relationship between total and DTPA-extractable concentrations (Figure S1). These results coincide with those described by Navarro [77], who determined, by means of a column experiment, that the Cd and Ni extracted by DTPA increased only after the use of large doses of SS in calcareous soils. In the case of Cd, it has however been observed that in soils modified with biosolids greater mobility can be observed as exchangeable Cd associated to the greater exchange capacity of some organic components added to the soils [76]. It is important to take this into account since Cd is a non-essential TM.
For Pb extracted by DTPA, a significantly higher concentration was observed in the treatments with SS compared to those that had not received SS. In this case, the contributions through SS were low (39.0 mg Kg−1, Table 3), and considering its affinity with organic ligands [78], it can be thought that a relevant part of its concentration was associated to organic matter in SS. The mineralization of organic matter would thus imply a gradual release of the Pb attached to it. In the case of calcareous soils, this release would be associated with the formation of forms that are not readily bioavailable for crops, mostly in the form of carbonates [76,79,80]. As such, the increasing concentration of Pb with increasing accumulation of SS-derived organic matter would be outbalanced by this behavior of Pb in calcareous soils that would imply its progressive incorporation into stable forms as it is released by organic matter mineralization, explaining also the low correlation between total and DTPA-extractable Pb (Figure S1).
In relation to Zn extracted by DTPA (Figure 2), the response was similar to that observed for total concentration in soil (Figure 1 and Figure S1). This is probably due to the high concentration of Zn in SS (874 mg Kg−1, Table 3) and the mobility of this TM. According to Morera [39], in SS such as the one used, Zn is mainly found together to organic matter and Fe and Mn oxides. However, about 10% can be in easily mobile forms. Some studies have determined that Zn may be biologically available and mobile in soils that have been treated with SS for long periods [81]. Kabata Pendias [82] already mentioned that the long-term addition of biosolids to the soil can increase the fraction of bioavailable Zn. This mobility has been observed to increase with time of SS addition to soil since, as it can form soluble chelates with humified and non-humidified forms of organic matter, which in turn can be easily degraded by soil microorganisms [83,84].
DTPA-extractable Cu showed significant differences between the different doses of accumulated SS, with an increasing concentration with the increase of cumulative SS dose (Figure 2 and Figure S1). This behavior can be related to the great affinity that Cu has with organic matter [78,85]. It is likely that the Cu present in SS was mostly bound to organic matter. When added to the soil would hardly undergo any redistribution, as it can be retained to the organic fraction of the soil through stable organic-mineral complexes [40]. At the same time, the increment in the density and activity of the soil microbial biomass associated to the addition of SS with a low concentration in TM to the soil [86], can contribute to gradually incorporate this Cu into more available forms. Some studies have shown that the amount of SS that actually affects the increase in Cu availability is that accumulated mainly on the last 4 years of application [87,88]. This seems to support the observation that the fertilizer treatment with 2000MgSS, corresponding to an annual application of 80 Mg ha−1 of SS, was the treatment with the highest concentration of Cu extracted with DTPA. This observed correlation of DTPA-extracted Zn and Cu and their total concentration in soil has been observed in fact in other studies including SS additions to calcareous soils [38].
In the Mn extracted with DTPA, a higher concentration was observed in the treatments that had not received SS. This may be due to the affinity that Mn has with carbonates in SS and in soil, coupled with the low Mn contribution normally associated with SS [33]. Mn in SS is usually bound to carbonates, Fe and Mn oxides, and/or bound to the residual fraction [89,90]. When incorporated into calcareous soils, Mn hardly undergoes a redistribution [80], remaining bound to carbonates. This could explain the low efficiency of SS in incorporating Mn into the soil and a higher efficiency of mineral amendments. Previous results where the highest concentration of Mn extractable by DTPA was obtained in the control amended with mineral fertilization, support this hypothesis [40].

4.2. Concentration of TM in Barley

The study of TM concentrations in crops, as a reliable method to assess the actual bioavailability of TMs in the studied experimental field, detected some differences and trends between TMs, and for the different parts of the crop (grains and straw).
As a general trend, it was observed how the essential TM were adsorbed in higher concentrations than the non-essential ones, being the order of concentration from highest to lowest Zn > Mn > Cu > Cr > Ni > Pb > Cd > Hg, and Mn > Zn > Cu > Cr > Ni > Pb > Cd = Hg, for grain and straw respectively. However, significant differences were observed for Mn, Zn, Cu, Cr and Ni accumulation in barley grains and straw. In grain, Zn, Cu and Cr showed higher concentrations in the treatments that had received SS than in those without SS (Table 7). On the contrary, in straw, Mn, Cr and Ni showed higher concentrations in the treatments that had not received SS (Table 7).
In the case of Zn, the highest concentration in grain coincided with the highest concentration extracted with DTPA, corresponding to 2000MgSS, in line with the general correspondence between the total concentration of this TM and of Cu in the soil and that found in plants in soils amended with SS [3,38]. However, the differences observed for soil Cu concentrations between doses were not observed in grain (Table 6). This could be explained by what was observed by Montaghian [91], who found that in calcareous soils amended with SS, the concentration of bioavailable Cu was lower in the soil of the rhizosphere than in the rest of the soil. They observed a redistribution of Cu between the different soil fractions, increasing the proportion linked to organic matter as a consequence of an increase in dissolved organic carbon released by the roots. This suggests a possible antagonistic effect, hindering the accumulation of Cu in grain (the organ that normally accumulates the most Cu in mature plants [92]) beyond a certain level of accumulation of Cu in the soil of this study. In the case of Mn, a tendency to a greater accumulation was observed in the grains of barley plants from the treatment MinFer. This highlights the low efficiency of SS to supply Mn to crops.
In straw, the treatments without SS contained higher concentrations of Mn, Ni and Cr than the treatments that had received any dose of SS. This can be related to the “dilution effect” for these elements caused differences in yield between treatments. As SS produced an increase in yields (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2) also observed in other studies [14,38,93] and the applied and available concentrations of these TM were low, a dilution of these TM in the crop can be expected. Similar results have been reported before for Mn in long-term field [94] and pot experiments for Mn and Ni [71].
Finally, in the case of Cr, for which the DTPA-extracted concentration was below the method’s detection limit, it was not possible to relate this concentration and that observed in the crop aerial parts. However, our results seem to indicate a different efficiency in the use of Cr depending on the plant organ and SS dose received. In a study carried out in pots, a high correlation was observed between the Cr concentration in the grain of different varieties of wheat and that extracted from soil with EDTA [35].
The study of TM concentrations in aerial crop parts allowed to contrast them with the limits and thresholds defined in the legislation. The European regulation referring to food products intended for human [29] and animal consumption [28] only contemplates Pb, Cd and Hg as risk elements. In our study, in general terms, it was found that the concentrations found in barley that complied with current regulations, coinciding with other studies [16,94]. In the case of grain, the concentrations were below the limit allowed for both norms. In the case of straw, however Pb concentrations were above that allowed by the legislation for human consumption. Despite the fact that straw is not intended for this type of use, it should be noted that even the control was found above this limit, which indicates that SS was not the main reason for Pb exceeding the value allowed by the legislation.

5. Conclusions

The application of SS as a long-term organic amendment in the conditions of soil, climate, management and type of sludge studied here, caused an accumulation of total Zn, Cu, Cr, Ni and Hg in soil, of Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni and Cd in their bioavailable form extracted by DTPA and of Zn, Cu and Cr in grain. This suggests the existence of potential environmental risks and supports the need for long-term monitoring of this type of practice. On the other hand, a higher concentration of Mn extracted with DTPA, as well as a higher concentration of Mn, Ni and Cr in the straw was observed, in the treatments without SS amendment.
Therefore, it was observed that Zn, Cu and probably Cr, suffered an increase in their concentration in soil and extractable by DTPA, that was visualized in grain. Other TM, such as Hg, increased their total concentration in soil and others, such as Cd and Pb, increase their concentration extracted by DTPA. In the case of Ni, both the total and DTPA-extracted concentration increased without any influence in the grain content.
Despite the existence of an increase in the total and bioavailable concentration of some TMs, the resulting crop complied with the current regulations imposed by the European Union for human and animal nutrition.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/min11040356/s1, Table S1: Yield expressed in percentage 12% humidity in 2018 of each fertilizer treatment (mean ± standard deviation); Table S2: Yield expressed in percentage 12% humidity in 2018 of the treatments that had received SS and those that had not received SS (mean ± standard deviation); Figure S1: Total TM concentration (TMSoil) vs Extractable TM concentration by DTPA (TMBio).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.Z., A.E., I.V. and L.O.; methodology, A.Z., A.E., I.V., H.U. and L.O.; software, H.U.; validation, A.Z., A.E., I.V., H.U. and L.O.; formal analysis, A.Z., A.E., I.V., H.U. and L.O.; investigation, A.Z., A.E. and I.V.; writing—original draft preparation, A.Z., A.E., I.V., H.U. and L.O.; writing—review and editing, A.Z., A.E., I.V., H.U., R.A. and L.O.; supervision, A.Z., A.E., I.V. and H.U.; project administration, L.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study has been financed and promoted by the Sectoral Program for Agricultural and Food Research and Development of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (M.AP.A.) from its beginning in 1992 to 1993 within “Other Projects” and since 1993 until 1997 through Project SC94-025. On the other hand, the National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA) granted aid for the hiring of teaching and research staff through the RTA2017-00088-C03-01 project from 2018 to 2022.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to their belonging to a multi stakeholder project.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the services and disposition of the Commonwealth of Pamplona, which contributed the experimental plot and the sludge from the Arazuri treatment plant. We also thank the team of the Soil Science Laboratory of the Public University of Navarra, and the Environment and Soil Sciences team, and the Technical Scientific Service for Elemental Analysis of the University of Lleida for their help and advice.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ministerio de la Presidencia, Relaciones con las Cortes y Memoria Democrática. Ley 22/2011, de 28 de Julio, de Residuos y Suelos Contaminados; Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado: Madrid, España, 2011; Número 181; pp. 85650–85705. (In Spanish)
  2. Ministerio de agricultura pesca y alimentación. Resolución de 8 de Octubre de 2015; Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado: Madrid, España, 2015; Número 253; pp. 99107–99116. (In Spanish)
  3. McBride, M.B. Toxic metals in sewage sludge-amended soils: Has promotion of beneficial use discounted the risks? Adv. Environ. Res. 2003, 8, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Singh, R.P.; Agrawal, M. Potential benefits and risks of land application of sewage sludge. Waste Manag. 2008, 28, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Roig, N.; Sierra, J.; Martí, E.; Nadal, M.; Schuhmacher, M.; Domingo, J.L. Long-term amendment of Spanish soils with sewage sludge: Effects on soil functioning. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 158, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alvarenga, P.; Mourinha, C.; Farto, M.; Santos, T.; Palma, P.; Sengo, J.; Morais, M.C.; Cunha-Queda, C. Sewage sludge, compost and other representative organic wastes as agricultural soil amendments: Benefits versus limiting factors. Waste Manag. 2015, 40, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Latare, A.M.; Kumar, O.; Singh, S.K.; Gupta, A. Direct and residual effect of sewage sludge on yield, heavy metals content and soil fertility under rice-wheat system. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 69, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lloret, E.; Pascual, J.A.; Brodie, E.L.; Bouskill, N.J.; Insam, H.; Juárez, M.F.D.; Goberna, M. Sewage sludge addition modifies soil microbial communities and plant performance depending on the sludge stabilization process. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2016, 101, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Parat, C.; Chaussod, R.; Lévêque, J.; Andreux, F. Long-term effects of metal-containing farmyard manure and sewage sludge on soil organic matter in a fluvisol. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2005, 37, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Börjesson, G.; Kirchmann, H.; Kätterer, T. Four Swedish long-term field experiments with sewage sludge reveal a limited effect on soil microbes and on metal uptake by crops. J. Soils Sediments 2014, 14, 164–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Urra, J.; Alkorta, I.; Mijangos, I.; Epelde, L.; Garbisu, C. Application of sewage sludge to agricultural soil increases the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes without altering the composition of prokaryotic communities. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 647, 1410–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hamdi, H.; Hechmi, S.; Khelil, M.N.; Zoghlami, I.R.; Benzarti, S.; Mokni-Tlili, S.; Hassen, A.; Jedidi, N. Repetitive land application of urban sewage sludge: Effect of amendment rates and soil texture on fertility and degradation parameters. Catena 2019, 172, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chiba, M.K.; Mattiazzo, M.E.; Oliveira, F.C. Sugarcane cultivation in a sewage-sludge treated ultisol. I—Soil nitrogen availability and plant yield. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo 2008, 32, 643–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. López-Rayo, S.; Laursen, K.H.; Lekfeldt, J.D.S.; Delle Grazie, F.; Magid, J. Long-term amendment of urban and animal wastes equivalent to more than 100 years of application had minimal effect on plant uptake of potentially toxic elements. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 231, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alloway, B.J.; Jackson, A.P. The behaviour of heavy metals in sewage sludge-amended soils. Sci. Total Environ. 1991, 100, 151–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Iglesias, M.; Marguí, E.; Camps, F.; Hidalgo, M. Extractability and crop transfer of potentially toxic elements from mediterranean agricultural soils following long-term sewage sludge applications as a fertilizer replacement to barley and maize crops. Waste Manag. 2018, 75, 312–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Marguí, E.; Iglesias, M.; Camps, F.; Sala, L.; Hidalgo, M. Long-term use of biosolids as organic fertilizers in agricultural soils: Potentially toxic elements occurrence and mobility. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 4454–4464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Moolenaar, S.W.; Beltrami, P. Heavy metal balances of an Italian soil as affected by sewage sludge and bordeaux mixture applications. J. Environ. Qual. 1998, 27, 828–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gascó, G.; Lobo, M.C.; Guerrero, F. Land application of sewage sludge: A soil columns study. Water SA 2005, 31, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Toribio, M.; Romanyà, J. Leaching of heavy metals (Cu, Ni and Zn) and organic matter after sewage sludge application to Mediterranean forest soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 363, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cameron, K.C.; Di, H.J.; McLaren, R.G. Is soil an appropriate dumping ground for our wastes? Aust. J. Soil Res. 1997, 35, 995–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Smith, S.R. A critical review of the bioavailability and impacts of heavy metals in municipal solid waste composts compared to sewage sludge. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 142–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yoshida, H.; ten Hoeve, M.; Christensen, T.H.; Bruun, S.; Jensen, L.S.; Scheutz, C. Life cycle assessment of sewage sludge management options including long-term impacts after land application. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 174, 538–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Sharma, S.; Sharma, P.; Bhattacharyya, A.K. Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seedlings Grown in Soils Amended with Electroplating Industrial Sludge. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2010, 41, 2505–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Collivignarelli, M.; Abbà, A.; Frattarola, A.; Carnevale Miino, M.; Padovani, S.; Katsoyiannis, I.; Torretta, V. Legislation for the Reuse of Biosolids on Agricultural Land in Europe: Overview. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ministerio de agricultura pesca y alimentación. Real Decreto 1310/1990U, de 29 de Octubre, por el que se Regula la Utilización de los Lodos de Depuración en el Sector Agrario; Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado: Madrid, España, 1990; Número 262; pp. 32339–32340. (In Spanish)
  27. European Commission. Council Directive of 12 June 1986 on The Protection of The Environment, and in Particular of The Soil, When Sewage Sludge is Used in Agriculture; Official Journal of the European Communities: Aberdeen, UK, 1986; Volume 181, pp. 6–12. [Google Scholar]
  28. European Commission. Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 May 2002 on Undesirable Substances in Animal Feed; Official Journal of the European Communities: Aberdeen, UK, 2002; Volume 140, pp. 10–22. [Google Scholar]
  29. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 Setting Maximum Levels for Certain Contaminants in Foodstuffs; Official Journal of the European Communities: Aberdeen, UK, 2006; Volume 364, pp. 5–24. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kacprzak, M.; Neczaj, E.; Fijałkowski, K.; Grobelak, A.; Grosser, A.; Worwag, M.; Rorat, A.; Brattebo, H.; Almås, Å.; Singh, B.R. Sewage sludge disposal strategies for sustainable development. Environ. Res. 2017, 156, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Campbell, H.W. Sludge management—Future issues and trends. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 41, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Börjesson, G.; Menichetti, L.; Kirchmann, H.; Kätterer, T. Soil microbial community structure affected by 53 years of nitrogen fertilisation and different organic amendments. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2012, 48, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hamnér, K.; Kirchmann, H. Trace element concentrations in cereal grain of long-term field trials with organic fertilizer in Sweden. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2015, 103, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cambier, P.; Michaud, A.; Paradelo, R.; Germain, M.; Mercier, V.; Guérin-Lebourg, A.; Revallier, A.; Houot, S. Trace metal availability in soil horizons amended with various urban waste composts during 17 years—Monitoring and modelling. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651, 2961–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jamali, M.K.; Kazi, T.G.; Arain, M.B.; Afridi, H.I.; Jalbani, N.; Kandhro, G.A.; Shah, A.Q.; Baig, J.A. Heavy metal accumulation in different varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown in soil amended with domestic sewage sludge. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 1386–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Naidu, R.; Rogers, S.; Gupta, V.V.S.R.; Kookana, R.S.; Bolan, N.S.; Adriano, D. Bioavailability of metals in the soil-plant environment and its potential role in risk assessment. In Bioavailability, Toxicity, and Risk Relationship in Ecosystems; Naidu, R., Rogers, S., Gupta, V.V.S.R., Kookana, R.S., Bolan, N.S., Adriano, D., Eds.; Science Publishers: Enfield, NH, USA, 2003; pp. 21–59. [Google Scholar]
  37. Madrid, F.; López, R.; Cabrera, F. Metal accumulation in soil after application of municipal solid waste compost under intensive farming conditions. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 119, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Karami, M.; Afyuni, M.; Rezainejad, Y.; Schulin, R. Heavy metal uptake by wheat from a sewage sludge-amended calcareous soil. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 2009, 83, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Morera, M.T.; Echeverría, J.C.; Garrido, J.J. Mobility of heavy metals in soils amended with sewage sludge. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2001, 81, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nogueirol, R.C.; De Melo, W.J.; Alleoni, L.R.F. Testing extractants for Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn in tropical soils treated with sewage sludge for 13 consecutive years. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2013, 224, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dhanker, R.; Chaudhary, S.; Bhatia, T.; Goyal, S. Impact of Long Term Application of Municipal Solid Waste on Physicochemical and Microbial Parameters and Heavy Metal Distribution in Soils in Accordance to Its Agricultural Uses. Int. J. Agric. Biosyst. Eng. 2017, 11, 351–359. [Google Scholar]
  42. Naidu, R.; Kookana, R.S.; Sumner, M.E.; Harter, R.D.; Tiller, K.G. Cadmium Sorption and Transport in Variable Charge Soils: A Review. J. Environ. Qual. 1997, 26, 602–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Achiba, W.B.; Lakhdar, A.; Gabteni, N.; Du Laing, G.; Verloo, M.; Boeckx, P.; Van Cleemput, O.; Jedidi, N.; Gallali, T. Accumulation and fractionation of trace metals in a Tunisian calcareous soil amended with farmyard manure and municipal solid waste compost. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 176, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Raikhy, N.P.; Takkar, P.N. Zinc and Copper Adsorption by a Soil with and without Removal of Carbonates. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 1983, 31, 611–614. [Google Scholar]
  45. Smith, S.R. Effect of soil pH on availability to crops of metals in sewage sludge-treated soils. I. Nickel, copper and zinc uptake and toxicity to ryegrass. Environ. Pollut. 1994, 85, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. FAO-UNESCO Soil Map of the World. Available online: http://www.fao.org/soils-portal/data-hub/soil-maps-and-databases/faounesco-soil-map-of-the-world/en/.# (accessed on 24 November 2020).
  47. Thornthwaite, C.W. An approach towards a rational classification of climate. Geogr. Rev. 1948, 38, 55–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gobierno de Navarra Mapa de Estaciones. Available online: http://meteo.navarra.es/estaciones/mapadeestaciones.cfm# (accessed on 12 December 2020).
  49. Hendershot, W.H.; Lalande, H. Chapter 16. Soil Reactionand Exchangeable Acidity. In Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis; Carter, M.R., Ed.; CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1993; pp. 141–142. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pansu, M.; Gautheyrou, J. Chapter 18. Soluble Salts. In Handbook of Soil Analysis. Mineralogical, Organic and Inorganic Methods; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 608–609. [Google Scholar]
  51. Culley, J.L.B. Chapter 50. Density and Compressibility. In Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis; Carter, M., Ed.; CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1993; pp. 530–533. [Google Scholar]
  52. Pansu, M.; Gautheyrou, J. Chapter 17. Carbonates. In Handbook of Soil Analysis. Mineralogical, Organic and Inorganic Methods; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 593–601. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tiessen, H.; Moir, J.O. Chapter 21. Total and Organic Carbon. In Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis; Carter, M., Ed.; CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1993; pp. 187–191. [Google Scholar]
  54. AENOR. Alimentos para animales. Métodos de Muestreo y Análisis. Determinación de Elementos Traza, Metales Pesados y Otros Elementos en los Alimentos Para Animales por ICP-MS (UNE-EN 17053); Asociación Española de Normalización: Génova, Madrid, 2018. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  55. U.S. EPA. Method 3051A (SW-846): Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, and Oils, Revision 1; United States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
  56. Pansu, M.; Gautheyrou, J. Chapter 29. Phosphorus. In Handbook of Soil Analysis. Mineralogical, Organic and Inorganic Methods; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; p. 809. [Google Scholar]
  57. Pansu, M.; Gautheyrou, J. Chapter 26. Cation Exchange Capacity. In Handbook of Soil Analysis. Mineralogical, Organic and Inorganic Methods; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 732–738. [Google Scholar]
  58. Instituto Nacional de Estadística INE. Available online: https://www.ine.es/ (accessed on 12 December 2020).
  59. Ministerio de la Presidencia, Relaciones con las Cortes y Memoria Democrática. Orden de 17 de Septiembre de 1981 por la que se Establecen Métodos Oficiales de Análisis de Aceites y Grasas, Aguas, Carnes y Productos Cárnicos, Fertilizantes, Productos Fitosanitarios, Leche y Productos Lácteos, Piensos y sus Primeras Materias, Producto; Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial del Estado: Madrid, España, 1981; Número 246; pp. 24003–24034. (In Spanish)
  60. McGill, W.B.; Figueiredo, C.T. Chapter 22. Total Nitrogen. In Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis; Carter, M., Ed.; CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1993; pp. 201–207. [Google Scholar]
  61. U.S. EPA. Method 3052 (SW-846): Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Siliceous and Organically Based Matrices; United States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1996.
  62. AENOR. Calidad del suelo. Extracción de Oligoelementos con una Disolución Tampón de ADTP (UNE 77315:2001); Asociación Española de Normalización: Génova, Madrid, 2001. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  63. ISO. Soil Quality—Extraction of Trace Elements by Buffered DTPA Solution; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  64. González, D.; Almendros, P.; Álvarez, J.M. Metodos de analisis de elementos en suelos: Disponibilidad y fraccionamiento. An. Real Soc. Española Química 2009, 105, 205–212. [Google Scholar]
  65. Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Westerhoff, P.; Hristovski, K.; Jin, V.L.; Johnson, M.V.V.; Arnold, J.G. Metal and nanoparticle occurrence in biosolid-amended soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 485–486, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Gobierno de Navarra. Orden Foral 359/2010, de 26 de Julio, de la Consejera de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente, por la que se Regula la Utilización de Lodos de Depuración en la Agricultura de la Comunidad Foral de Navarra; Boletín Oficial de Navarra: Navarra, España, 2010; Número 16 de Agosto de 2010; pp. 1–11. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  67. European Commission. Council Directive 91/676/CEE of 12 December 1991 Concerning the Protection of Waters Against Pollution Caused by Nitrates from Agricultural Sources; Official Journal of the European Communities: Aberdeen, UK, 1991; Volume 375, pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  68. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Regulation (Eu) 2019/1009 of The European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 Laying Down Rules on the Making Available on the Market of EU Fertilising Products and Amending Regulations (EC) No 1069/2009 and (EC) No 1107/2009 and Repealing Regula; Official Journal of the European Communities: Aberdeen, UK, 2019; Volume 170, pp. 1–114. [Google Scholar]
  69. Merrington, G.; Oliver, I.; Smernik, R.J.; McLaughlin, M.J. The influence of sewage sludge properties on sludge-borne metal availability. Adv. Environ. Res. 2003, 8, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Reyes, Y.; Vergara, I.; Torres, O.E.; Díaz, M.; González, E. Heavy metals contamination: Implications for health and food safety Yulieth. Rev. Ing. Investig. Desarro. 2016, 16, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kidd, P.S.; Domínguez-Rodríguez, M.J.; Díez, J.; Monterroso, C. Bioavailability and plant accumulation of heavy metals and phosphorus in agricultural soils amended by long-term application of sewage sludge. Chemosphere 2007, 66, 1458–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Alcantara, S.; Pérez, D.V.; Almeida, M.R.A.; Silva, G.M.; Polidoro, J.C.; Bettiol, W. Chemical Changes and Heavy Metal Partitioning in an Oxisol Cultivated with Maize (Zea mays, L.) after 5 Years Disposal of a Domestic and an Industrial Sewage Sludge. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2009, 203, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bolan, N.S.; Adriano, D.C.; Naidu, R. Role of phosphorus in (im)mobilization and bioavailability of heavy metals in the soil-plant system. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2003, 177, 1–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Naidu, R.; Bolan, N.S.; Megharaj, M.; Juhasz, A.L.; Gupta, S.K.; Clothier, B.E.; Schulin, R. Chapter 1. Chemical bioavailability in terrestrial environments. In Chemical Bioavailability in Terrestrial Environment; Hartemink, A.E., McBratney, A.B., Naidu, R.B.T.-D., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; Volume 32, pp. 1–6. ISBN 0166-2481. [Google Scholar]
  75. de Melo, W.J.; de Stéfani Aguiar, P.; Maurício Peruca de Melo, G.; Peruca de Melo, V. Nickel in a tropical soil treated with sewage sludge and cropped with maize in a long-term field study. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2007, 39, 1341–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Pardo, F.; Jordán, M.M.; Sanfeliu, T.; Pina, S. Distribution of Cd, Ni, Cr, and Pb in amended soils from alicante province (SE, Spain). Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2011, 217, 535–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Navarro-Pedreño, J.; Almendro-Candel, M.B.; Jordán-Vidal, M.M.; Mataix-Solera, J.; García-Sánchez, E. Mobility of cadmium, chromium, and nickel through the profile of a calcisol treated with sewage sludge in the southeast of Spain. Environ. Geol. 2003, 44, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Taylor, R.W.; Xiu, H.; Mehadi, A.A.; Shuford, J.W.; Tadesse, W. Fractionation of residual cadmium, copper, nickel, lead, and zinc in previously sludge-amended soil. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1995, 26, 2193–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cabral, A.R.; Lefebvre, G. Use of sequential extraction in the study of heavy metal retention by silty soils. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 1998, 102, 329–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Moral, R.; Gilkes, R.J.; Jordán, M.M. Distribution of heavy metals in calcareous and non-calcareous soils in Spain. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2005, 162, 127–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kabala, C.; Karczewska, A.; Szopka, K.; Wilk, J. Copper, zinc, and lead fractions in soils long-term irrigated with municipal wastewater. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2011, 42, 905–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kabata-Pendias, A. Zinc. In Trace Elements in Soil and Plants; CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000; pp. 146–158. [Google Scholar]
  83. Kiekens, L. Zinc. In Heavy Metals in Soils; Alloway, B.J., Ed.; Blackie Academic and Professional: Glasgow, Scotland, 1995; pp. 284–305. [Google Scholar]
  84. Gonzalez Flores, E.; Tornero Campante, M.A.; Sandoval Castro, E.; Pérez Magaña, A.; Gordillo Martínez, A.J. Biodisponibilidad y Fraccionamiento de Metales Pesados en Suelos Agrícolas Enmendados con Biosólidos de Origen Municipal. Available online: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0188-49992011000400002 (accessed on 23 December 2020).
  85. Bolan, N.; Adriano, D.; Mani, S.; Khan, A. Adsorption, complexation, and phytoavailability of copper as influenced by organic manure. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2003, 22, 450–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bünemann, E.K.; Smernik, R.J.; Marschner, P.; McNeill, A.M. Microbial synthesis of organic and condensed forms of phosphorus in acid and calcareous soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 932–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Rundle, H.; Calcroft, H.; Holt, C. Agricultural disposal of sludges on a historic sludge disposal site. Water Pollut. Control 1982, 81, 619–632. [Google Scholar]
  88. McGrath, S.P.; Zhao, F.J.; Dunham, S.J.; Crosland, A.R.; Coleman, K. Long-Term Changes in the Extractability and Bioavailability of Zinc and Cadmium after Sludge Application. J. Environ. Qual. 2000, 29, 875–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Nkinahamira, F.; Suanon, F.; Chi, Q.; Li, Y.; Feng, M.; Huang, X.; Yu, C.P.; Sun, Q. Occurrence, geochemical fractionation, and environmental risk assessment of major and trace elements in sewage sludge. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhu, N.; Li, Q.; Guo, X.J.; Zhang, H.; Deng, Y. Sequential extraction of anaerobic digestate sludge for the determination of partitioning of heavy metals. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 102, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Motaghian, H.R.; Hosseinpur, A.R. Rhizosphere effects on Cu availability and fractionation in sewage sludge-amended calcareous soils. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2015, 178, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Garnett, T.P.; Graham, R.D. Distribution and Remobilization of Iron and Copper in Wheat. Ann. Bot. 2005, 95, 817–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Morera, M.T.; Echeverría, J.; Garrido, J. Bioavailability of heavy metals in soils amended with sewage sludge. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2002, 82, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Codling, E.E. Long-Term Effects of Biosolid-Amended Soils on Phosphorus, Copper, Manganese, and Zinc Uptake by Wheat. Soil Sci. 2014, 179, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Minerals 11 00356 g001 550
Figure 1. Box-and-whisker plot indicating different homogeneous groups in the multiple comparison Scheme (0–30 cm). Values showing the same letter belong to the same homogeneous group according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Box-and-whisker plot indicating different homogeneous groups in the multiple comparison Scheme (0–30 cm). Values showing the same letter belong to the same homogeneous group according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Minerals 11 00356 g001
Minerals 11 00356 g002 550
Figure 2. Box-and-whisker plots that indicate different homogeneous groups in the multiple comparison of means two to two of the concentration extracted by DTPA of the trace metal Mn, Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni and Cd existing in the soil according to the fertilizer treatment received in the study horizon (0–30 cm). Values showing the same letter belong to the same homogeneous group according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Box-and-whisker plots that indicate different homogeneous groups in the multiple comparison of means two to two of the concentration extracted by DTPA of the trace metal Mn, Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni and Cd existing in the soil according to the fertilizer treatment received in the study horizon (0–30 cm). Values showing the same letter belong to the same homogeneous group according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Minerals 11 00356 g002
Table
Table 1. Average values of the physicochemical properties of the tilled horizon (0–30 cm) of the study soil and analytical methods used. Control soil and soil amended with sewage sludge for 26 years. Values are given as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 4).
Table 1. Average values of the physicochemical properties of the tilled horizon (0–30 cm) of the study soil and analytical methods used. Control soil and soil amended with sewage sludge for 26 years. Values are given as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 4).
Soil Physical-Chemical PropertiesControlAfter 26 YearsAnalysis Methods
pH8.67 ± 0.038.45 ± 0.11Soil pH in water 1:2 [49]
Electric Conductivity (μs cm−3)169 ± 10233 ± 11Diluted soil:water Extract 1:2.5 [50]
Bulk density (g cm−3)1.59 ± 0.081.54 ± 0.01Core Method [51]
Carbonates (%)16.0 ± 2.116.7 ± 1.4Bernard calcimeter [52]
Organic Carbon (%)1.35 ± 0.021.56 ± 0.03Wet Oxidation-Redox Titration Method [53]
Total Phosphorus (mg kg−1)603 ± 52945 ± 38Microwave digestion + ICP-MS [54,55]
Available Phosphorus (mg kg−1)32.2 ± 1.599.4 ± 8.4Sodium Bicarbonate-Extractable P at pH 8.5 [56]
Total Potassiun (mg kg−1)9294 ± 5509709 ± 185Microwave digestion + ICP-MS [54,55]
Available Potassiun (mg kg−1)109 ± 15.0110 ± 9.00Ammonium Acetate Method at pH 7.0 [57]
Table
Table 2. N fertilizer units (NFU) provided by the study doses according to the N concentration in SS as used at the beginning of the study (1992), and at the end of the study (2018), without taking into account the annual yield of N for the dose provided.
Table 2. N fertilizer units (NFU) provided by the study doses according to the N concentration in SS as used at the beginning of the study (1992), and at the end of the study (2018), without taking into account the annual yield of N for the dose provided.
Doses Sewage Sludge NFU 1992NFU 2018
40 Mg ha−1 every year250480
80 Mg ha−1 every year500960
Table
Table 3. Physical-chemical properties of the sewage sludge (SS) used in this study in 1992 (start of the experiment) and 2018 (sampling) together with the analytical methods used. Mean annual values ± standard deviation. The maximum legal limits of TM allowed in SS intended for agricultural use are indicated for each TM.
Table 3. Physical-chemical properties of the sewage sludge (SS) used in this study in 1992 (start of the experiment) and 2018 (sampling) together with the analytical methods used. Mean annual values ± standard deviation. The maximum legal limits of TM allowed in SS intended for agricultural use are indicated for each TM.
Sewage Sludge Physical-Chemical Properties19922018Legal LimitAnalysis Method
General parameters
pH8.018.16 ± 0.03NASoil pH in water 1:5 [49]
Electric Conductivity (μs cm−3)NA1795 ± 28NADiluted Extracts 1:5 [50]
Dry material (%)28.818.1 ± 0.4NA Direct calcination at 540 °C [59]
Volatile matter (% of dry substance)NA62.8 ± 1.9NA Direct calcination at 540 °C [59]
C/N105.35 ± 0.08NA
Fertilizing elements (% of dry substance)
N total 2.185.85 ± 0.13NA Kjeldahl digestion and distillation [60]
N ammonium0.180.75 ± 0.02NAKjeldahl digestion and distillation [60]
Phosphorus (P2O5)3.625.59 ± 0.22NAMicrowave digestion + ICP-MS [54,55]
Potassium (K2O)0.510.62 ± 0.05NAMicrowave digestion + ICP-MS [54,55]
Iron (Fe)1.481.68 ± 0.04NAMicrowave digestion + ICP-MS [54,55]
Calcium (CaO)NA7.98 ± 0.29NAMicrowave digestion + ICP-MS [54,55]
Magnesium (MgO)NA1.10 ± 0.05NA Microwave digestion + ICP-MS [54,55]
Trace metals (mg Kg−1 dry weight)
Cadmium (Cd)<100.88 ± 0.0940Microwave digestion + ICP-MS [54,55]
Copper (Cu)302187 ± 111750Microwave digestion + ICP-MS [54,55]
Nickel (Ni)7532.1 ± 0.77400Microwave digestion + ICP-MS [54,55]
Lead (Pb)19139.0 ± 1.21200Microwave digestion + ICP-MS [54,55]
Zinc (Zn)1230874 ± 384000Microwave digestion + ICP-MS [54,55]
Mercury (Hg)NA0.003 ± 0.00325Microwave digestion + ICP-MS [54,55]
Chromium (Cr)11258.3 ± 3.21500Microwave digestion + ICP-MS [54,55]
Manganese (Mn)NANANAMicrowave digestion + ICP-MS [54,55]
NA: Not analyzed.
Table
Table 4. Mean ± standard deviation of the total concentration of Mn, Zn, Cu, Cr, Pb, Ni, Cd and Hg in soil, depending on whether they have received SS or not, together with their p-value.
Table 4. Mean ± standard deviation of the total concentration of Mn, Zn, Cu, Cr, Pb, Ni, Cd and Hg in soil, depending on whether they have received SS or not, together with their p-value.
TreatmentTMSOIL TOTAL (mg kg−1)
MnZnCuCrPbNiCdHg
With SS484 ± 2169.0 ± 9.221.7 ± 2.150.3 ± 1.719.0 ± 1.326.6 ± 1.20.23 ± 0.020.14 ± 0.03
Without SS475 ± 1353.4 ± 2.317.9 ± 1.046.7 ± 1.618.4 ± 0.824.9 ± 0.70.23 ± 0.010.09 ± 0.01
p-value0.130.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.140.00 *0.220.00 *
* Significant difference.
Table
Table 5. Mean ± standard deviation of the DTPA extractable concentration of Mn, Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni and Cd in soil, depending on whether they have received SS or not, together with their p-value.
Table 5. Mean ± standard deviation of the DTPA extractable concentration of Mn, Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni and Cd in soil, depending on whether they have received SS or not, together with their p-value.
TreatmentTMSOIL DTPA (mg kg−1)
MnZnCuPbNiCd
With SS8.85 ± 0.864.20 ± 1.272.82 ± 0.532.00 ± 0.110.28 ± 0.040.07 ± 0.00
Without SS9.47 ± 0.281.89 ± 0.361.75 ± 0.161.74 ± 0.070.22 ± 0.020.06 ± 0.00
p-value0.01 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *
* Significant difference.
Table
Table 6. Different homogeneous groups in the multiple comparison of two to two means of the concentration of the trace metal Mn, Zn, Cu, Cr, Pb, Ni, Cd and Hg in grain and straw according to the fertilizer treatment received in the study horizon (0–30 cm). Mean ± standard deviations. Values in the same column showing the same letter belong to the same homogeneous group according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Table 6. Different homogeneous groups in the multiple comparison of two to two means of the concentration of the trace metal Mn, Zn, Cu, Cr, Pb, Ni, Cd and Hg in grain and straw according to the fertilizer treatment received in the study horizon (0–30 cm). Mean ± standard deviations. Values in the same column showing the same letter belong to the same homogeneous group according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05).
Fertilizer
Treatment		TM Crop (mg kg−1)
MnZnCuCrPbNiCdHg
GrainStrawGrainStrawGrainStrawGrainStrawGrainStrawGrainStrawGrainStrawGrainStraw
250MgSS17.3 ± 0.616.8 ab ± 2.434.3 ab ± 2.48.16 ± 1.005.94 ± 0.392.88 ± 0.281.35 ± 0.231.71 ± 0.440.10 ± 0.000.24 ± 0.010.83 ± 0.110.95 ± 0.250.01 ± 0.000.04 ± 0.010.01 ± 0.000.01 ± 0.00
500MgSS16.8 ± 1.617.4 a ± 2.231.0 a ± 2.67.31 ± 0.965.69 ± 0.322.50 ± 0.411.23 ± 0.181.58 ± 0.190.10 ± 0.010.25 ± 0.070.81 ± 0.091.01 ± 0.210.01 ± 0.000.03 ± 0.000.01 ± 0.000.01 ± 0.00
1000MgSS17.1 ± 1.815.6 a ± 4.635.2 ab ± 3.26.98 ± 1.685.67 ± 0.322.67 ± 0.631.31 ± 0.31.84 ± 0.710.10 ± 0.010.22 ± 0.090.83 ± 0.131.02 ± 0.320.01 ± 0.000.03 ± 0.000.01 ± 0.000.01 ± 0.00
2000MgSS17.8 ± 1.217.7 ac ± 3.137.1 b ± 4.17.00 ± 0.375.63 ± 0.442.78 ± 0.531.41 ± 0.081.54 ± 0.820.11 ± 0.010.27 ± 0.140.90 ± 0.020.96 ± 0.480.01 ± 0.000.03 ± 0.010.00 ± 0.000.01 ± 0.00
MinFer18.4 ± 1.124.4 bc ± 3.430.4 ab ± 2.66.91 ± 1.765.66 ± 0.212.82 ± 0.551.03 ± 0.062.26 ± 1.010.10 ± 0.010.31 ± 0.100.73 ± 0.051.51 ± 0.570.01 ± 0.000.04 ± 0.010.01 ± 0.000.01 ± 0.00
Control17.3 ± 1.825.1 c ± 5.332.1 ab ± 2.69.26 ± 1.605.27 ± 0.172.25 ± 0.391.26 ± 0.472.55 ± 0.450.12 ± 0.030.23 ± 0.040.78 ± 0.251.34 ± 0.400.01 ± 0.000.03 ± 0.010.00 ± 0.000.01 ± 0.00
Table
Table 7. Mean ± standard deviation of the concentration of Mn, Zn, Cu, Cr, Pb, Ni, Cd and Hg in the crop (grain and straw), depending on whether or not they have received SS, together with their p-value.
Table 7. Mean ± standard deviation of the concentration of Mn, Zn, Cu, Cr, Pb, Ni, Cd and Hg in the crop (grain and straw), depending on whether or not they have received SS, together with their p-value.
TreatmentTMCROP (mg kg−1)
MnZnCuCrPbNiCdHg
GRAIN With SS17.1 ± 1.434.0 ± 3.75.71 ± 0.351.30 ± 0.220.10 ± 0.010.83 ± 0.100.01 ± 0.000.01 ± 0.00
GRAIN Without SS17.8 ± 1.631.4 ± 2.65.47 ± 0.271.13 ± 0.300.11 ± 0.030.75 ± 0.150.01 ± 0.000.01 ± 0.00
p-value0.320.045 *0.038 *0.047 *0.640.0620.250.59
STRAW With SS16.8 ± 3.37.29 ± 1.212.66 ± 0.481.68 ± 0.530.24 ± 0.091.00 ± 0.290.03 ± 0.010.01 ± 0.00
STRAW Without SS24.8 ± 4.18.08 ± 2.002.53 ± 0.542.40 ± 0.740.27 ± 0.081.42 ± 0.470.03 ± 0.010.01 ± 0.00
p-value0.00 *0.190.260.01 *0.400.00 *0.710.46
* Significant difference.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zaragüeta, A.; Enrique, A.; Virto, I.; Antón, R.; Urmeneta, H.; Orcaray, L. Effect of the Long-Term Application of Sewage Sludge to A Calcareous Soil on Its Total and Bioavailable Content in Trace Elements, and Their Transfer to the Crop. Minerals 2021, 11, 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11040356

AMA Style

Zaragüeta A, Enrique A, Virto I, Antón R, Urmeneta H, Orcaray L. Effect of the Long-Term Application of Sewage Sludge to A Calcareous Soil on Its Total and Bioavailable Content in Trace Elements, and Their Transfer to the Crop. Minerals. 2021; 11(4):356. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11040356

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zaragüeta, Armelle, Alberto Enrique, Iñigo Virto, Rodrigo Antón, Henar Urmeneta, and Luis Orcaray. 2021. "Effect of the Long-Term Application of Sewage Sludge to A Calcareous Soil on Its Total and Bioavailable Content in Trace Elements, and Their Transfer to the Crop" Minerals 11, no. 4: 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11040356

APA Style

Zaragüeta, A., Enrique, A., Virto, I., Antón, R., Urmeneta, H., & Orcaray, L. (2021). Effect of the Long-Term Application of Sewage Sludge to A Calcareous Soil on Its Total and Bioavailable Content in Trace Elements, and Their Transfer to the Crop. Minerals, 11(4), 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11040356

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop