1. Introduction
Manganese oxides and hydroxides, especially compounds with tunnel structures, are important materials used as pigments, ion exchangers for water purification, and cathode materials [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7]. In this paper, we discuss the mechanisms of isomorphic substitutions in natural Mn
3+O(OH) polymorphs and their relationships with the IR spectra.
Three polymorphs of the compound MnO(OH) are known. All of them were found in nature.
Groutite, α-MnO(OH), is an orthorhombic (space group
Pnma) mineral with the 1 × 2 tunnel structure and unit-cell parameters
a = 4.55–4.56,
b = 10.47–10.70,
c = 2.87 Å;
Z = 4 [
3,
8,
9,
10]. The mineral is isostructural, with diaspore AlO(OH) and goethite Fe
3+O(OH) and forming an isomorphous series with ramsdellite MnO
2. The crystal structure of groutite is a distorted derivative of the MnO
2 polymorph ramsdellite.
Electrochemical proton intercalation in ramsdellite results in the formation of groutite as a final reduction product via an intermediate isostructural phase (Mn
4+, Mn
3+)O(O, OH), so-called “groutellite” [
11]. It was shown that under a laser beam, at a very low laser power, “groutellite” transforms into ramsdellite through the loss of H
+ and the oxidation of Mn
3+ to Mn
4+ [
7]. Post et al. [
12] discovered that domains of “groutellite” occur in most natural ramsdellite samples. The crystal structure of the “groutellite” variety with the composition (Mn
4+0.5Mn
3+0.5)O
1.5(OH)
0.5 was solved on a sample with a significant admixture of ramsdellite and a minor admixture of pyrolusite [
13]. Groutite transforms into the tetragonal rutile-type MnO
2 polymorph pyrolusite upon heating in air above 300 °C [
10].
Manganite is a monoclinic (pseudo-orthorhombic) γ-MnO(OH) modification with the unit-cell parameters
a = 5.304,
b = 5.277,
c = 5.304 Å, β = 90°;
Z = 4 (space group
P2
1/
c [
10]) or, in the pseudo-orthorhombic cell setting,
a = 8.88–8.94,
b = 5.25–5.28,
c = 5.71–5.75 Å, β ≈ 90°;
Z = 8 (space group
B2
1/
d) [
10,
14,
15]. Manganite is the most stable MnO(OH) polymorph under common natural conditions [
4,
16,
17]. This mineral is known in numerous localities.
The crystal structure of manganite is a distorted derivative of the pyrolusite structure. Partial substitution of Mn
4+ with Mn
3+ in pyrolusite with charge compensation by H
+ results in symmetry lowering from tetragonal to orthorhombic, with
a = 4.4609,
b = 4.6113, and
c = 2.7661 Å for the compound Mn
4+0.9Mn
3+0.1O
1.9(OH)
0.1 [
3,
18] and, further, to the monoclinic for manganite. The structures of all these minerals contain 1 × 1 channels (“tunnels”), which are too small for the incorporation of ions or water molecules.
The oxidation of manganite results in the formation of pyrolusite [
10]. Pseudomorphs of pyrolusite after manganite crystals are common at the type locality of manganite—Ilfeld, Thuringia, Germany [
19]. In the infrared (IR) spectrum of synthetic manganite nanorods obtained via a solvothermal method [
20], relatively weak bands of H
2O molecules at 3440 and 1630 cm
−1 are observed. These bands have been assigned by the authors of this work to adsorbed water, but partial substitution of Mn
3+ + OH for Mn
2+ + H
2O cannot be excluded.
Feitknechtite β-MnOOH is an insufficiently studied metastable phase in natural hydrothermal or supergene systems. This mineral is a hexagonal or trigonal polymorph of MnO(OH), which is typically formed in a mixture with hausmannite, Mn
2+Mn
3+2O
4, as a result of rapid supergene oxidation of pyrochroite, Mn(OH)
2 [
21,
22,
23], whereas the slow oxidation of Mn(OH)
2 produces only hausmannite. Synthetic “hydrohausmannite” obtained via the oxidation of Mn(OH)
2 [
24] was found to be a mixture of Mn
2+Mn
3+2O
4 and/or γ-Mn
2O
3 with β-MnOOH rather than an individual single phase [
22]. The structure of β-MnOOH is assumed, based on morphological and X-ray diffraction (XRD) data, to be closely related to the Mn(OH)
2 (pyrochroite) structure [
22]. According to Yang and Wang [
25], almost-pure feitknechtite can be obtained as an intermediate phase of pyrochroite’s transformation to a birnessite-type Mn oxide in aqueous medium, at low pH values. However, as-synthesized feitknechtite rapidly transforms into manganite, the IR absorption bands of presumed feitknechtite at 1153 and 1084 cm
−1, erroneously assigned in [
25] to Mn
3+···OH vibrations of feitknechtite, almost coincide with the IR bands of manganite (see below).
According to [
26,
27], feitknechtite is isostructural with CdI
2 and has the hexagonal unit cell parameters
a = 3.32 and
c = 4.71 Å (
Z = 1), which are close to those of pyrochroite (
a ≈ 3.33,
c ≈ 4.71 Å; Z = 1). Bricker [
22] proposed the existence of a transformational (oxidation) series between Mn(OH)
2 and β-MnO(OH) with a distorted brucite-related tetragonal structure and the existence of structurally related compounds (Mn
2+, Mn
3+)(OH, O)
2 with intermediate compositions and, consequently, nonequivalent situations around the OH groups. The two-stage dehydration of feitknechtite from the Noda-Tamagawa mine, Iwate Prefecture, Japan [
23], is in agreement with this assumption. Natural feitknechtite samples do not contain significant amounts of cations other than Mn
n+, whereas an Mg-doped synthetic analogue of feitknechtite is known [
28].
In numerous works on manganite-type MnO(OH) synthesis, feitknechtite formed as an intermediate unstable phase. Nanorods consisting of trigonal lamellae of twinned feitknechtite particles were synthesized in the reaction of reduction of MnO
4− by S
2O
32− [
10]. According to powder XRD data, as-synthesized feitknechtite is unstable and transforms into manganite, forming pseudomorphs after feitknechtite nanoparticles.
Nanofibers of feitknechtite-type MnO(OH) were synthesized in the reaction between Mn(NO
3)
2 and aminoethanol in aqueous solution [
29]. All peaks in the powder XRD pattern of as-synthesized MnO(OH) nanofibers were indexed to pure feitknechtite (JCPDS No. 18-0804), as reported in [
16]. It was shown that the nanofibrous feitknechtite-type MnO(OH) can be efficiently converted into mixtures of manganese oxides (tetragonal phases of Mn
2+Mn
3+2O
4 and MnO
2 and orthorhombic Mn
2O
3) through heating it to 400 °C. However, the strongest peaks at 621, 518, and 418 cm
−1 in the IR spectrum of the product of the heating of feitknechtite nanofibers to 400 °C [
29] correspond to hausmannite [
30]. Peng and Ichinose [
29] wrote that the initial feitknechtite is tetragonal and structurally related to tetragonal modifications of Mn
2+Mn
3+2O
4 and MnO
2, but this is an obvious mistake because the powder XRD data and morphological features definitively indicate that feitknechtite is trigonal. Unfortunately, no data on the IR spectrum of the products of the heating of feitknechtite at 400 °C in the range of O–H stretching vibrations (2000–3800 cm
−1) are provided in the cited paper. However, taking into account the fact that the complete removal of hydrogen from other MnO(OH) polymorphs, manganite and groutite, occurs upon heating in air at temperatures ≥400 °C [
31,
32], one can suppose that the products of the heating of feitknechtite at 400 °C do not contain OH groups.
Thus, the structures of feitknechtite, groutite, and manganite can be considered derivatives of the pyrochroite Mn(OH)2 layered structure, the ramsdellite MnO2 1 × 2 tunnel structure, and the densest pyrolusite MnO2 1 × 1 tunnel structure, respectively. This fact predetermines specific features and mechanisms of isomorphous substitutions in MnO(OH) polymorphs as well as their reduction and oxidation transformations.
This paper provides new data on isomorphism in natural MnO(OH) polymorphs mainly based on the IR spectroscopic data. A description of a mineral with the simplified formula Mn3+ZnO2(OH)(H2O), isostructural with manganite, is given herein.
2. Materials and Methods
Powder XRD data were collected with a Rigaku R-AXIS Rapid II diffractometer (image plate, rotating anode with microfocus optics) (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) using CoKα radiation, at the accelerating voltage of 40 kV and current of 15 mA in Debye–Scherrer geometry, camera diameter d = 127.4 mm and an exposure time of 15 min. The powder XRD pattern of feitknechtite was recorded using a Rigaku Oxford Diffraction SuperNova diffractometer (in microdiffraction mode with 0–360° Φ rotation scan) (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Pilatus 200K Dectris detector and an X-ray micro-source (MoKα radiation) with an accelerating voltage of 50 kV, beam current of 0.12 mA, beam size on the sample of about 0.12 mm, and an exposure time of 30 min. The sample-to-detector distance was 68 mm.
Single-crystal XRD studies of the groutite–ramsdellite series minerals were carried out using an Xcalibur S diffractometer (Agilent Technologies, Oxford, UK) equipped with a CCD detector (MoKα radiation).
Seven samples of MnO(OH) polymorphs and related minerals, listed below, have been investigated. All of them were characterized using IR spectra, X-ray diffraction (XRD) data and/or electron microprobe analyses.
Groutite from the Zaval’evskoe graphite deposit, Kirovohrad Oblast, Ukraine, forms lustrous black blocky flattened (lamellar or lenticular) crystals up to 1 cm across, assembled in groups or rose-like clusters. They occur in cracks of mica schist in association with calcite and baryte. The strongest reflections of the powder XRD pattern [d, Å (I, %)] are: 4.183 (100), 2.801 (32), 2.672 (34), 2.519 (21), 2.363 (64), 2.300 (15), 1.695 (26), 1.606 (17).
OH-bearing ramsdellite (“groutellite”) from the El’vor deposit, Goygol District, Azerbaijan, forms a dense subparallel aggregate of black long-prismatic crystals up to 5 mm long. The orthorhombic unit-cell parameters determined from the single-crystal XRD data are a = 4.61(8), b = 9.30(3), c = 2.868(7) Å; V = 123(2) Å3. The strongest lines of the powder XRD pattern (d, Å (I, %)) are: 4.09 (100), 2.631 (74), 2.551 (34), 2.458 (41), 2.435 (52), 2.409 (37), 2.352 (35). The presence of Mn4+ in this sample can be assumed based on a lowered b parameter of the unit cell as compared to that of ramsdellite.
Intergrowths of groutite with “groutellite” from the Black Water mine, Apache Co., Arizona, USA, form pseudomorphs after prismatic crystals of ramsdellite up to 1 mm long. The strongest lines of the powder XRD pattern (d, Å (I, %)) are: 4.24 (100), 4.10 (80), 2.828 (50), 2.644 (50), 2.458 (60), 2.390 (90), 2.351 (50), 2.193 (50), 1.783 (50), 1.710 (70), 1.623 (50), 1.448 (70). The reflections with d = 4.24 and 4.10 Å correspond to groutite and “groutellite”, respectively. The orthorhombic unit-cell parameters of “groutellite”, determined from the single-crystal XRD data are a = 4.556(10), b = 10.73(2), c = 2.898(13) Å; V = 141.6(7) Å3.
H-free ramsdellite from Negusata Mountain, Shimoda, Sizuoka, Japan, occurs as an aggregate of randomly oriented black prismatic crystals. The sample was identified via IR spectrum and electron microprobe analysis.
Manganite from its type locality, Ilfeld, Thuringia, Germany, forms a group of black prismatic crystals up to 2 cm long. The IR spectrum of this sample coincides with the IR spectra of natural and synthetic manganite from literature sources.
Feitknechtite from the Zmeinogorskoe Mn deposit, Chebarkul’ district, South Urals, Russia, occurs as black granular aggregates, also containing rhodochrosite, nsutite, hausmannite, and manganite impurities. The associated minerals are rhodonite and tephroite. Feitknechtite was identified by the reflections with d values of 4.61, 2.63 (the strongest ones) as well as 2.35, 1.96, and 1.55 Å.
The electron microprobe analyses of all the above-listed minerals showed the presence of Mn as the only detectable component with an atomic number higher than that of oxygen.
The Zn-rich manganite-related mineral occurs as a black fine-grained aggregate. It originates from Kapova Cave (another name Shulgan-Tash Cave) of karst origin situated in the Burzyansky district, Bashkortostan, South Urals, Russia (53°2′40″ N, 57°3′50″ E). The cave has a passage length of more than 3000 m and is best known for the rock paintings of the primitive man of the Paleolithic era (about 36,400 years ago). Detailed analytical data for this mineral are given below.
In order to obtain IR absorption spectra, powdered samples were mixed with anhydrous KBr, pelletized, and analyzed using an ALPHA FTIR spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Karlsruhe, Germany) at a resolution of 4 cm−1. The pellets were dried at 60 °C for 15 min before the analysis. Sixteen scans were collected for each spectrum. The IR spectrum of an analogous pellet of pure KBr was used as a reference. The accuracy of the determination of wavenumbers did not exceed 2 cm−1.
Chemical analyses were carried out using a Tescan VEGA-II XMU INCA Energy 450 (EDS mode, 20 kV, 190 pA, beam size < 5 μm) (TESCAN, Brno. Czech Republic). The standards used were wollastonite for Ca, Mn metal for Mn, Zn metal for Zn, SiO2 for Si, and LaPO4 for P. The detection limits were (wt.%) 0.12 for CaO, 0.18 for ZnO, 0.11 for Mn2O3, 0.08 for SiO2, and 0.12 for P2O5.
4. Discussion
The nature of H-bearing species in ramsdellite is discussed by Potter and Rossman [
39]. The authors of that paper wrote, “We have found that ramsdellite invariably contains a single crystallographically-ordered water” and “The intensity relationship of the bands indicate that the major hydrous species is H
2O… in a well-defined crystallographic site”. However, our data show that both hydrogen-free ramsdellite (curve
c in
Figure 1) and ramsdellite with admixed OH groups but without H
2O molecules (curve
b in
Figure 1) exist. The peak at 1637 cm
−1, corresponding to H
2O molecules in the IR spectrum of ramsdellite from Chihuahua, Mexico (
Figure 5), is accompanied by the broad shoulder at ~3480 cm
−1. These bands are absent in the IR spectrum of OH-bearing ramsdellite from El’vor (curve
b in
Figure 1) and should be assigned to H
2O molecules, whereas the narrow peak at 3386–3387 cm
−1 corresponds to OH groups. Thus, ramsdellite samples investigated by Potter and Rossman [
39] contain both OH and H
2O, whereas the sample from El’vor contains only OH groups. A similar band of OH groups forming weak hydrogen bonds was observed at 3392 cm
−1 in the IR spectrum of “groutellite” from the Black Water mine (
Figure 2). The bands at 1637 and ~3480 cm
−1 (
Figure 5) may correspond to water molecules adsorbed by powdered mineral samples or to admixtures of hydrous minerals [
40].
The comparison of IR spectra presented in
Figure 1,
Figure 2, and
Figure 5 shows that there may be two stages of the hydrolytic alteration of ramsdellite. In the first stage, partial protonation of the O2 atom, accompanied by partial substitution of Mn
4+ with Mn
3+, takes place. According to the Libowitzki correlation [
33], the product of this reaction (“groutellite”
s.s.) is characterized by the O1···O2 distance of 2.79 Å, which is intermediate between analogous distances in the structures of groutite (2.62 Å) and H-free ramsdellite (3.23 Å). It is to be noted that the incorporation of OH
− anions and any cations (required for the charge compensation) in the 1 × 2 channels is impossible because of steric restrictions. On the second stage, further protonation of the O2 atom results in the transformation of the configuration of the ramsdellite framework into the topologically identical groutite framework and the formation of strong hydrogen bonds with a short O1···O2 distance (up to 2.62 Å for the groutite end-member).
Feitknechtite has been synthesized in the reaction of nanocrystalline vernadite (δ-MnO
2) with aqueous solutions containing Mn
2+ cations, at a pH below 9 [
41]. It was shown [
37] that in the presence of Mn
2+ cations, transformation of a birnessite-type MnO
2 compound into manganite (
Mng) proceeds via the intermediate unstable feitknechtite (
Ftk) phase in accordance with the scheme Mn
2+(aq) + MnO
2 + 2H
2O → 2
Ftk + 2H
+(aq);
Ftk →
Mng. The formation of the intermediate feitknechtite phase was faster for Zn-coprecipitated birnessite than for pure birnessite. Feitknechtite can be easily synthesized in the form of aggregates of hexagonal lamellar individuals in reactions of hexagonal birnessite-like phyllomanganate compounds with aqueous solutions containing Mn
2+, at pH ≥ 7 [
17,
35]. Feitknechtite is metastable and converts into manganite during aging in aqueous solution [
22,
42]. Thus, manganite occurring in close association with feitknechtite in the sample from the Zmeinogorskoe deposit may be a product of partial feitknechtite alteration.
Reaction with Mn
2+ promotes the conversion of relatively disordered, poorly crystalline feitknechtite into fully crystalline manganite [
17,
35]. The mechanism underlying this phenomenon is unknown. Hypothetically, Mn
2+ impurity (and, possibly, admixtures of other bivalent cations, e.g., Zn
2+) may stabilize the manganite structure. Taking into account the presence of a trace amount of a Mn
2+-bearing phase (rhodochrosite) in the manganite-related Zn,Mn-mineral from Kapova Cave, one can suppose that this mineral formed in accordance with a similar mechanism, from a birnessite-related mineral via an intermediate feitknechtite phase. The morphological features of the mineral from Kapova Cave confirm this assumption. The mineral occurs as curved hexagonal lamellae (
Figure 6), which is typical for feitknechtite, rather than manganite.
Thus, the existence of isostructural compounds or those that are closely related to each other in terms of structure with the general formula (Mn
3+, Mn
2+)O(OH,H
2O), formed as a result of manganite reduction, cannot be excluded. It should be noted that the existence of so-called “manganous manganite” with the simplified formula 4MnO
2·Mn(OH)
2·2H
2O and a disordered structure was proposed by Feitknecht and Marti [
24] based on powder XRD data.
As noted above, the 1 × 1 channels in the manganite-related structures are too small for the incorporation of H2O molecules. Consequently, the bands of H2O observed in the IR spectrum of the mineral from Kapova Cave may correspond to water molecules, substituting a part of the OH groups.
In conclusion, let us consider the problem of origin of the Zn,Mn-mineral from Kapova Cave. The cave is famous for its wall paintings of primitive people [
43]. A number of sediment-hosted massive zinc-lead sulfide ore occurrences are situated in the Burzyansky district of Bashkortostan. The most famous of them is the Kuzha deposit (53°15′24″ N, 57°10′2″ E) [
44]. It can be assumed that the ZnMn hydroxide was brought from the oxidation zone of one of such ore occurrences by people of the Stone Age as a black pigment. However, this matter requires a separate serious investigation.
5. Conclusions
The three natural MnO(OH) polymorphs, namely, manganite, groutite, and feitknechtite, show different preferable mechanisms of coupled isomorphous substitutions involving Mn in different valence states and H-bearing species. The partial oxidation of groutite, a polymorph with tunnel structure that is isotypic with ramsdellite MnO2, results in the formation of so-called “groutellite”, (Mn3+, Mn4+)O(OH,O), whereas groutite can be obtained in a reverse process of ramsdellite reduction. In groutite, OH groups form very strong hydrogen bonds. Ramsdellite is nominally hydrogen-free, but in some ramsdellite samples the IR spectra indicate weak hydrogen bonds formed by OH groups.
The IR spectroscopic and XRD data show that there are two stages in the hydrolytic reduction of ramsdellite. One of these is accompanied by the formation of so-called “groutellite” as a result of partial protonation of the O2 atoms. “Groutellite” contains OH groups forming weak hydrogen bonds. Further protonation of O2 results in a phase transfer into a groutite-type compound, accompanied by a significant transformation of the framework and formation of strong hydrogen bonds. In both stages, the substitution of Mn4+ for Mn3+ takes place.
Manganite forms two solid-solution series: (1) with pyrolusite, forming oxy-hydroxides with the general formula (Mn4+, Mn3+)O(OH, O), and (2) with a hypothetical structurally related compound ZnO·H2O, with the formation of hydrous oxy-hydroxides with the general formula (Mn3+, Zn2+)O(OH, H2O).
Feitknechtite is considered to be isostructural with (or structurally related to) the compounds (Mn2+, Mn3+)(OH, O)2, presumably formed in nature as intermediate phases during the rapid oxidation of pyrochroite. On the other hand, Mn2+ cations can promote the transformation of birnessite-type compounds with layered structures into manganite via an intermediate feitknechtite phase. Hypothetically, the mineral with the idealized formula Mn3+0.5Zn2+0.5O(OH)0.5(H2O)0.5 from Kapova Cave is a product of the Zn- and/or Mn2+-promoted transformation of a birnessite-related mineral via an intermediate feitknechtite-like phase. The existence of compounds with the general formula (Mn3+, Mn2+)O(OH, H2O), structurally related to manganite and formed as a result of manganite reduction, cannot be excluded.