Recovery of Lithium from Industrial Li-Containing Wastewater Using Fluidized-Bed Homogeneous Granulation Technology
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe manuscript presents an interesting topic for scientific community, however needs some improvements.
I suggest not including abbreviations in the abstract.
Please, correct formula of Li3PO4 (wrong in many places during all manuscript)
Please correct the typos (some of them highlighted in the text)
Do authors believe that the economic analysis is accurate? Which changes authors forecast with technology scale-up? Please include it in the manuscript.
I miss the application for pellets produced. Please include it in the manuscript.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageThere are some typos and confusion of words in the text, please revise the English language.
Author Response
The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their recognition. Below listed are the response to the comments point by point, and the corresponding revision would be made and indicated in the context that was highlighted in blue.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe Li recovery from waste water is valuable for this article.
However, there are some corrected and additional points as follows,
In the introduction, please also mention the Li recovery from brine using the references for example,
Materials 2023, 16, 4190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114190
Line118
Please write the meanings of SLin in the sentence.
In Figure 2, please write the y axis explanation in all graphs (a) to (e).
In 3.1.2
Please explain the reason of highest recovery of Li at pH11.5 more minutely.
Line 165, please explain the difference between Li3PO4 and Li3O4P.
Line 236,238
Please explain ν4 andν3.
In Figure3 (a) and (b), please indicate the scale more clearly.
Please show the maximum capacity to recover Li+ in fluidized bed.
Also please explain how to elute the recovered Li+ and recycle method of fluidized bed.
In conclusion, please write by point to point using values.
In supplementary information
Size distribution, Please use 2 digits after the decimal point.
In Figure S1, please show the error bars.
Comments on the Quality of English LanguagePlease check the English by native speaker.
Author Response
Please allow us to express our heartfelt gratitude for your insightful feedback and careful review. Thank you for your encouraging remarks and valuable comments. All authors consistently think that your comments will help us improve the quality of the manuscript. We have carefully revised the manuscript according to the suggestions, and all the revisions are highlighted. Our responses to your comments are listed as follows
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsAbstract
The abstract was not well written. The introduction and the materials and methods part were not present in abstract. The abstract provides only the optimum conditions for the recovery of Li.
1. Introduction
The introduction part was well written, but the background about the Li recycling was lacking and also the background about the disadvantage of other processes was not provided enough.
2. Materials and Methods
The materials and methods part was well written, but the tools for analyzing wastewater need to be specified in the paragraph.
3. Results and Discussion
This part was well written, but Figure 2 and its caption needs to be revised. The axis title of each graph in figure 2 needs to be added and the figure caption was hard to understand even if it was with the figure. Other than that, Table 2 needs to be revised due to it is hard to read and the reference needs to be added the two references for the economic analysis were not enough.
4. Conclusion
The conclusion part was not well written. The details from economic analysis from results and discussion part was not refer.
Author Response
Please allow us to express our heartfelt gratitude for your insightful feedback and careful review. Thank you for your encouraging remarks and valuable comments. All authors consistently think that your comments will help us improve the quality of the manuscript. We have carefully revised the manuscript according to the suggestions, and all the revisions are highlighted. Our responses to your comments are listed as follows
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe manuscript was well corrected.
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsAbstract
In the abstract part, the introduction and the material methods part were added.
1. Introduction
This part, the background of Li recycling was added with the reason of using fluidize bed.
2. Materials and methods
The details of tool for analysis were added.
3. Results and discussion
This part, figure 2 was already revised.
4. Conclusion
In the conclusion part, all the result that was presented are already in the conclusion.