Next Article in Journal
Britholite Group Minerals from REE-Rich Lithologies of Keivy Alkali Granite—Nepheline Syenite Complex, Kola Peninsula, NW Russia
Previous Article in Journal
Copper Minerals at Vesuvius Volcano (Southern Italy): A Mineralogical Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Minerals
Volume 9
Issue 12
10.3390/min9120731
minerals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sintering Behavior and Technological Properties of Low-Temperature Porcelain Tiles Prepared Using a Lithium Ore and Silica Crucible Waste

by
Lihua Peng
1,2 and
Shan Qin
2,*
1
School of Science, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014000, China
2
School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2019, 9(12), 731; https://doi.org/10.3390/min9120731
Submission received: 1 October 2019 / Revised: 20 November 2019 / Accepted: 22 November 2019 / Published: 26 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Crystallography and Physical Chemistry of Minerals & Nanominerals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Porcelain tiles are a building material that has been widely used in recent years and that consumes substantial resources during the sintering process. This study reports on the production of low-temperature porcelain tiles by using low-grade lithium ore (LO) and silica crucible waste (SCW) in a new SiO2–Al2O3–Na2O–K2O–Li2O system. The firing temperature of the porcelain tiles was reduced from 1260 °C to 1070 °C by adding 30% LO instead of feldspar in a modified triaxial ceramic body, and SCW was recycled and used as a raw material. These actions help to reduce the carbon emissions produced during sintering and achieve sustainable development. The effect of phase transitions on the sintering and technological properties of the porcelain tiles was studied by quantitative phase analysis, using X-ray diffraction (XRD). Secondary mullite (0–19%) can be formed at 1040–1100 °C, where more quartz and cristobalite will be retained, which increases the rupture modulus of the porcelain tiles. While the vitreous phase increases rapidly at 1100–1160 °C, the closed pores (0.1–33.1%) will simultaneously expand, causing a decrease in compactness. The results show that low-grade LO (with a cost similar to that of feldspar) allows for the production of porcelain tiles with better process performance at lower temperatures (≤1100 °C).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Porcelain tiles have been widely used as building materials in recent years because of their excellent technical properties, such as water absorption (≤0.5%), rupture modulus (30–75 MPa), deep-abrasion resistance (120–160 mm3), chemical resistance, and high fracture toughness [1,2,3,4]. For example, the total consumption of ceramic tiles in the United States in 2018 was 289,000,000 m2 [5]. Conventionally, porcelain tiles are triaxial ceramics made from quartz (10–25%), clay (40–45%), and feldspathic materials (30–50%) by wet-grinding the raw materials, then dry-pressing, fast-drying, and fast-single-firing the tiles at 1150–1300 °C [6,7,8,9]. With the consideration of protecting the environment and reducing the costs, considerable research has been devoted to reducing the firing temperature and replacing natural minerals with industrial-waste products.
The use of lithium-bearing minerals as a liquid-phase sintering aid has been investigated in various ceramics, to reduce the firing temperature or to improve the thermal-shock resistance of the ceramics [10,11,12,13,14,15]. The effects of CaO–Li2O–K2O–Na2O as fluxing agents in porcelain ceramic tiles was discussed by Zhou et al. [16], who showed that a multicomponent eutectic system can produce a liquid phase at a lower temperature. However, the influence of a lithium-bearing fluxing agent on the sintering and technological properties of porcelain tiles has not been systematically studied. Moreover, the price of high-grade spodumene (5–7% Li2O) is approximately 5–10 times higher than that of feldspar [17], which restricts the industrial application of lithium-bearing minerals in porcelain tiles. In this study, a low-grade lithium ore (LO) with 2.7% Li2O is introduced as a raw material to replace feldspar. Since this low-grade LO has a price similar to that of feldspar, this LO can be applied in practical industry.
To achieve the recycling of resources, several studies have focused on finding alternative materials to replace the conventional minerals in ceramic bodies [18], such as (i) mineral waste, including spodumene tailings [19], granite waste [20], marble waste [21], gneiss rock waste [22], and petroleum oily sludge [23]; and (ii) industrial waste, including waste glass [1,3], fly ash [24,25], polished tile waste [26], and furnace slag [27,28]. Additionally, new minerals have recently been discovered that have also been considered for the manufacture of ceramic tiles, such as new feldspar [6] and new clay [29,30]. Silica crucibles are the containers used for preparing polycrystalline silicon, and they can only be used once because of the phase change occurring during the ingot production process [31]. The annual amount of silica crucible waste (SCW) produced in China is estimated to be 100,000 tons [32], which wastes resources and introduces environmental hazards.
The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a low-grade LO (2.7% Li2O) on reducing the firing temperature of porcelain tiles and to achieve the recycling of SCW. Porcelain tiles were obtained at firing temperatures of 1070–1160 °C and 1180–1280 °C, and a certain amount (20%) of quartz and varying amounts (0–50%) of feldspar were replaced by SCW and LO, respectively. The experimental results are systematically discussed in terms of “chemical composition and firing temperature → phase composition and microstructure → technological properties” based on SiO2–Al2O3–Na2O–K2O–Li2O system. The final result of this study was the successful production of low-temperature porcelain tiles by introducing LO and crucible waste, which are helpful for reducing energy consumption in the preparation process of ceramics.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Base Materials

Four types of raw materials were used to manufacture the porcelain tiles in the laboratory, namely, LO, calcined kaolin, feldspar, and SCW, all of which are readily available as industrial products. LO and calcined kaolin were purchased from Borun (Zhengzhou, China). Feldspar was purchased from Fuhua (Guangzhou, China). SCW was provided by the crucible manufacturer (Yangzhong, China). Fluorite (99.99% CaF2) for XRD quantification was purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). The raw materials were characterized according to inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES, Blue Sop mode, Spectro, Germany) in Table 1. About 50 mg of carbonate-free sample was dissolved in a Teflon beaker by a mixture of 3 mL of concentrated HF and 1 mL of concentrated HNO3 at 120 °C for 12 h. The solution was dried down in a hotplate, and the residue was then dissolved in 4 mL of concentrated HNO3 at 120 °C for 12 h. After it was dried down in a hotplate, the residue was then dissolved in 2% HNO3, for elemental composition analyses. The major and minor elemental compositions were determined by an ICP-OES with error below 5%. The elemental compositions were calculated on the carbonate-free basis, and all major and minor elements are considered as oxides (i.e., Na2O, MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, K2O, CaO, FeO, MnO, P2O5, TiO2, and Li2O). The silica content was determined by the bulk sample weight (carbonate-free) minus the total weight of all other oxides. LO was mainly used to replace for feldspar, and the SCW was used to replace quartz, to produce modified triaxial ceramics. The LO can provide Li2O, in addition to Na2O and K2O, as a fluxing agent. The SCW is composed mainly of SiO2 with small amounts of impurities, thus forming the basis for the substitution of quartz with SCW.

2.2. Preparation of Porcelain Tiles

Table 2 shows the formulation of the experimental samples for the porcelain tiles. This study performed two series of experiments. In the first series, the LO was added to the mixtures as a replacement for feldspar, and these samples were designated S10, S20, S30, S40, and S50, which represent the percentage of feldspar that was replaced, i.e., 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 wt.%, respectively. The content of crucible waste (20%) and calcined kaolin (30%) used in the ceramic bodies was fixed. S10–S50 ceramics were all fired at temperatures of 1040 °C, 1070 °C, 1100 °C, 1130 °C, and 1160 °C.
The second series of experiments are reference experiments that were based on the first series, in which all the ceramics are prepared by using a fixed proportion of raw material, including 20% SCW, 30% calcined kaolin, and 50% feldspar. These sintered samples were designated R1180, R1200, R1220, R1240, R1260, and R1280, which indicate the sintering temperatures of 1180 °C, 1200 °C, 1220 °C, 1240 °C, 1260 °C, and 1280 °C, respectively.
The raw materials were first mixed in the designed ratio specified in Table 2, using wet-grinding with an alumina medium in a nylon jar for 8 h. The speed of the roller-ball mill (WZM-1, Haoqiang, Yixing, China) was set to 90 r/min. The slips were then dried in an oven at 110 °C for 12 h, and the dried cakes were crushed and passed through an 80-mesh sieve. Humidification using 7–8% water with a 0.7% carboxymethylcellulose sodium content was carried out, and the test samples with diameters of 51 mm and heights of 7 mm were prepared by uniaxial pressing at 30 MPa. The finished products were dried in an electric oven at 110 °C for 10 h. Finally, the samples were fired in a box furnace (KSL-1700A2, HF-Kejing, Heifei, China), at maximum temperatures of 1040–1160 °C and 1180–1280 °C, with a holding time of 20 min. The heating rate and cooling rate were both 5 °C/min, and the temperature was naturally cooled after cooling to 500 °C.

2.3. Sample Characterization

The crystalline phases of the raw materials were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D/max-rB, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) analysis, with Cu X-ray radiation at 40 kV and 100 mA. Powder XRD was conducted over a reflection angle range of 2θ = 15°–55°, with a counting step of 0.01° and a scanning speed of 4° (2θ) min−1. The phase composition of the porcelain tiles was quantitatively determined by using the Reference Intensity Ratio and X-ray powder diffraction (RIR-XRPD), using 20% CaF2 as an internal standard [33]. The experimental error was within 5%. The mineralogy of the raw materials was assessed via XRD under the same conditions. Furthermore, the polished surface of the fired samples was observed and analyzed by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Quanta 200FEG, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA), with secondary electrons at 10 kV.
Firing shrinkage was evaluated from the variation in the diameter of the circular samples (QB/T 1548–2015) [34]. The porcelain tiles were evaluated for their water absorption (Ev), as expressed in Equation (1); bulk density (B), as expressed in Equation (2); and for open porosity, as expressed in Equation (3), according to GB/T 3810.3–2006 [35], using a boiling method. The properties were obtained according to the following equations:
E V = M 2 − M 1 M 1
B = M 1 M 2 − M 3
P a = M 2 − M 1 M 2 − M 3
where M1 is the dry mass, M2 is the water saturated mass, and M3 is the submerged (hydrostatic scale weight) mass.
The rupture modulus of the fired samples was measured by conducting three-point bending tests with an electronic universal testing machine (CMT-4305, Sans, Shenzhen, China), at a loading rate of 0.1 mm/min (GB/T 3810.4–2006) [36]. The rupture modulus (R) was calculated by using Equation (4):
R = 3 P t L 2 b h 2
where L, b, and h are the span, width, and depth of the specimens, respectively, and Pt is the ultimate load.
The true density was measured, according to QB/T 1010–2015 [37], using the pycnometer method.
The total porosity (Pt) was calculated by using Equation (5):
P t = D t − D b D t × 100 %
where Pt, Dt, and Db are the total porosity, true density, and bulk density of the samples, respectively.
The closed porosity (Pc) was calculated by using Equation (6):
P c = P t − P a
where Pc, Pt, and Pa represent the closed porosity, total porosity, and open porosity of the samples, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phase Composition of the Raw Materials

As shown in Figure 1, the crystalline phases of the raw materials were determined by XRD analysis. The phases of LO include spodumene, muscovite, Na-feldspar, K-feldspar, and quartz. Feldspar is a mixed mineral composed of Na-feldspar, K-feldspar, and quartz (Figure 1b). The calcined kaolin used to be exposed to a high temperature of 1200 °C, and, in this process, various forms of H2O were removed. Different from the high loss on ignition (7–14%) of industrial clay [1,2,3,19], calcined kaolin will not produce gas in the sintering process, which is conducive to improving the compactness of ceramic. The phases of the calcined kaolin consist of quartz, mullite, cristobalite, and a vitreous phase (Figure 1c). The SCW is mainly composed of fused silica and cristobalite (Figure 1d). The crystalline content of cristobalite can be measured according to an external standard method [31], using Equation (7):
W c = 4.3 × 10 − 4 I c − 3.53
where WC is the crystalline content of α-cristobalite, and IC is the intensity of the (101) diffraction peak in the XRD pattern. Refinement shows that the SCW is composed of 57% cristobalite and 44% silica. Knowing the mineral composition of the raw materials, along with their chemical composition (Table 1), is helpful for clear analysis of the phase changes of the raw materials that occur in the sintering process.

3.2. Phase Transitions in the Sintering Process

Figure 2 shows the phase change trends of the fired samples with different LO contents and firing temperatures, including cristobalite, quartz, spodumene, mullite, feldspar, and vitreous phases. Quantitative calculation of different phases is based on XRD patterns (Supplementary Materials, Table S1 and files XRD1). Figure 3 shows the normalized ternary diagrams of the fired samples, which correspond to the SiO2–Al2O3–Na2O–K2O–Li2O system. The vitreous phase content first increases and then decreases with the increase in LO (Figure 2a), and the vitreous phase content reaches a maximum value with a LO content of 30%. On the one hand, the introduction of Li2O to the base of Na2O and K2O can further reduce the formation temperature of the liquid phase during combustion [16]. On the other hand, the increase rate of Al2O3 is much higher than that of other components with the increase in LO content, which makes the sintered samples produce more mullite and spodumene (Figure 3a–c), thus reducing the proportion of the vitreous phase.
The amount of cristobalite and quartz slowly decreases with increasing temperature and LO content (Figure 2b,c) because they are more involved in sintering reactions to form the vitreous phase and mullite (Figure 3a,b). The correlation between cristobalite and the vitreous phase is higher than that of quartz, which seems to imply that cristobalite only participates in the co-melting reaction, while quartz participates in the co-melting reaction and the mullite formation reaction at the same time. Quartz undergoes a series of phase transitions of α-quartz, β-quartz, and metastable cristobalite under the temperatures of this experiment [38,39], so it is more likely to participate in high-temperature reactions than the stable cristobalite.
The trend of the mullite content as a function of the LO content and firing temperature is shown in Figure 2d. The mullite content is generally higher than 19% in the range of 1070–1100 °C, with a maximum value of 38%, while the mullite content in the mixed raw materials is 19%, which is calculated by using XRD quantitative analysis (Figure 1) and the raw material ratios (Table 2). The result indicates that there is a crystallization of mullite (0–19%) during the firing process, especially under 1040–1100 °C. In previous studies, 20% of mullite was formed in ceramic bodies at 1200 °C, with the flux of Na2O and K2O, which shows the addition of Li2O reduced the temperature of sintering reaction. The phase present should be secondary mullite (3Al2O3·2SiO2), since there is no clay present in the raw materials [40,41,42]. This secondary mullite is likely to be acicular crystals and will improve the mechanical properties of the ceramics [19,43]. On the other hand, the mullite content is mostly lower than 26% when the firing temperature exceeds 1100 °C. This finding is because the stability of mullite decreases at increasing temperatures for the SiO2–Al2O3–Na2O and SiO2–Al2O3–K2O systems (Figure 3a,b), and a large amount of Al2O3 and SiO2 enters the vitreous phase at these temperatures, rather than only the secondary mullite.
As shown in Figure 2e,f, the residual spodumene gradually increases with increased LO, and no feldspar could be detected in the fired samples with LO contents exceeding 30%. Moreover, the muscovite detected in the raw materials (Figure 1a) was not observed in the final samples, which means that all the muscovite melted at firing temperatures exceeded 1040 °C.

3.3. Microstructure Analysis

The effects of the firing temperature and LO content on the porosity of the samples are presented in Figure 4 (Supplementary Materials, Table S2). The open porosity of most of the samples decreases rapidly with increases in the LO content or firing temperature (Figure 4a). When the LO content is less than 20%, the samples with an open porosity of less than 10% can be obtained only at relatively high firing temperatures (≥1100 °C). When the LO content is 30–50%, samples with an open porosity less than 1% can be prepared at lower firing temperatures (≥1070 °C), indicating that LO improves the sintering behavior [16]. The closed porosity of the samples S10–S50 increases rapidly with increases in the firing temperature, especially above 1100 °C (Figure 4b), which is due to the closing of the open pores and the expansion of the volume of the closed pores at higher sintering temperatures. The minimum value of total porosity in this study is 2.9%, which is among the lowest values reported for ceramic tiles made from waste minerals [1,4,21,44].
The samples with higher total porosity are concentrated in two regions at the edge of Figure 4c: (i) LO contents and firing temperatures below 20% and 1100 °C, respectively, and (ii) LO contents and firing temperatures exceeding 20% and 1100 °C, respectively. Samples with lower total porosity (<10%) are concentrated in the diagonal area of Figure 3c, in which the vitreous phase content is 34–61%. When the vitreous phase content is below or above this range, the total porosity of the samples increases rapidly. Moreover, the firing shrinkage of all the samples ranges from 1.6 cm/m to 15.0 cm/m. This firing shrinkage forms an area with high brightness (red) along the diagonal of Figure 4d, in which the firing shrinkage of these samples is higher than other areas, while the porosity of the samples in this area is also lower (Figure 4c).
Figure 5a–j shows the individual effects of the sintering temperature and LO content on the microstructures of samples, respectively. As shown in Figure 5a–e, when the LO content is fixed at 40%, the closed pores in the ceramic body gradually change from irregular gaps to regular circles with increases of the firing temperature. The small pores gradually disappear, and the larger pores gradually expand, as the sintering temperature exceeds 1100 °C. On the other hand, as the LO content increases from 10% to 50% (Figure 5f–j), the total porosity first increases and then decreases at a firing temperature of 1130 °C, and then reaches a maximum for a LO content of 40%, which is similar to the distribution trend of the vitreous phase content (Figure 2a). Higher values of closed porosity from the ceramic compositions containing more glass vitreous phase were also observed by others [3,45,46], and it was speculated that the total increase in porosity was caused by entrapment of air in the relatively viscous melt or gas release from raw materials [44]. This paper determines that this phenomenon can be explained by Ostwald ripening [47], the driving force of which is the decrease in the total interfacial free energy between the pores and the melt at high temperatures, and it can lead to the merging of pores and increasing the total volume of closed pores (Figure 3b). This phenomenon is particularly evident in ceramic tiles prepared by alluvial clay [31].

3.4. True Density and Bulk Density

Figure 6 shows the distribution trends of the true density and the bulk density of the porcelain tiles (Supplementary Materials, Table S2). It was found that the true density of the ceramic bodies depends mainly on the phase composition of the samples, while the bulk density is mainly dependent on the porosity of the samples. The true density of samples ranges from 2.3 g/cm3 to 2.6 g/cm3, which is almost opposite to the distribution trend of the vitreous phase (Figure 2a). This finding results from the fact that the content of vitreous phase in most of the samples is between 20% and 60% and is far greater than that of other crystalline phases, which causes the vitreous phase to dominate the changes of the true density. On the other hand, the bulk density of the samples ranges from 1.5 g/cm3 to 2.4 g/cm3 (Figure 6b), with a distribution trend closely related to the total porosity (Figure 3c) and firing shrinkage (Figure 4d). The maximum values of the true density and bulk density of the ceramic bodies are similar to those of ceramic tiles prepared from waste glass [1,2,3,44], and the common feature between them is that they contain more flux, such as Na2O, instead of Al2O3.

3.5. Water Absorption and Rupture Modulus

Figure 7 and Figure 8 show the water absorption and rupture modulus for the samples (Supplementary Materials, Table S2), which are the most important technological parameters used in actual production and determine whether a type of porcelain tile can be used in the construction industry. According to the international standard ISO 13006 [48], porcelain tiles are ceramic tiles with water absorption ≤0.5% and a rupture modulus ≥35 MPa. When the LO content is 10% and 20%, the lowest firing temperatures to achieve a water content below 0.5% are 1160 °C and 1100 °C, respectively. The firing temperature can be reduced to 1070 °C for LO contents of 30–40%, but the water absorption of the ceramic samples increases rapidly when the LO content exceeds 40%. The water absorption depends on the degree of raw materials participating in the sintering reaction. When the LO content is increased, the sintering reaction is first enhanced by the increased amount of Li2O [16], and more glass phases are produced, which reduces the open porosity and water absorption of samples. However, as more LO is added, excessive Al2O3 leads to the increase of crystalline phases, resulting in the opposite trend.
As show in Figure 8, the rupture modulus reached a maximum of 107 MPa for an LO content of 10% and firing temperature of 1160 °C, which is the highest reported value to date. The rupture modulus is highest in two ranges (red area): (i) LO contents exceeding 20% and firing temperatures below 1070 °C and (ii) LO contents below 20% and firing temperatures exceeding 1070 °C. The quartz and cristobalite content (Figure 2b,c) is higher in the first range, and the mullite content (Figure 2d) is higher in second range, implying that the crystalline phases enhance the rupture modulus of the samples. The secondary mullite formed during the sintering process might be acicular crystals and form a network structure in the matrix, improving the mechanical properties of the ceramics [43]. The samples with a high rupture modulus are concentrated in the diagonal region of Figure 8, where the vitreous phase content is in the medium value range (30–51%), and the rupture modulus decreases rapidly when the vitreous phase content exceeds this range. In fact, the rupture modulus is almost completely inversely correlated with the vitreous-phase content, especially for firing temperatures exceeding 1100 °C, which is mainly due to the expansion of closed pores at higher temperatures (the blue region in Figure 8). The results show that lower firing temperatures are beneficial for obtaining porcelain tiles with improved mechanical properties.

3.6. Environmental and Economic Effects

To verify the effect of LO content on the firing temperature of porcelain tiles, a comparative experiment was carried out, in which the ceramic tiles were produced by SCW, calcined kaolin, and feldspar, without the addition of LO. As shown in Table 3 (Supplementary Materials, files XRD2), with the firing temperature increasing from 1180 °C to 1280 °C, the Na-feldspar, K-feldspar, quartz, and cristobalite in the ceramic tiles gradually decrease and form more vitreous phase. Na-feldspar and K-feldspar completely disappeared when the firing temperature exceeded 1240 °C, causing the vitreous phase content to stop increasing due to the lack of Na2O and K2O as flux. Generally, the diversification of flux in raw materials is beneficial to the sintering reaction. For example, with Na2O, K2O, and CaO as fluxes, Na-feldspar and K-feldspar can react completely at 1180–1200 °C [1,3], and this temperature can be reduced to 1120 °C with fluxes of Na2O, K2O, CaO, and Li2O [16]. The mullite content in the raw material and fired samples are 2% and 9–13%, respectively, which indicates that more than 6% of secondary mullite is formed during the sintering process.
Figure 9 shows SEM images of the samples fired at 1180–1280 °C. As the sintering temperature increases, the raw-material particles gradually form a vitreous phase and the number of pores in the samples decreases (Figure 9a–e). The porosity reaches the lowest at 1260 °C (Figure 9e), while the diameter of the closed pores increases significantly at 1280 °C (Figure 9f), which can reduce the compactness and rupture modulus of the sample, indicating that the firing temperature of the sample should not exceed 1260 °C.
Table 4 shows the technological characteristics of the sintered ceramic tiles. When the firing temperature increased from 1180 °C to 1260 °C, the water absorption of the samples decreased from 11.2% to 0.3%, and the rupture modulus increased from 24 MPa to 61 MPa. The fracture modulus of the samples decreased to 59 MPa for a firing temperature of 1280 °C, which was due to the increase of the closed porosity. The water absorption and rupture modulus of the samples fired at 1260–1280 °C are in line with the international standards ISO 13006 for porcelain tiles. The water absorption and rupture modulus results show that the lowest firing temperature to produce porcelain tiles meeting international standards is 1260 °C, which is higher than that of most porcelain tiles made from waste materials. In fact, the firing temperature of porcelain tiles prepared from natural mineral waste is usually higher than that of industrial waste because the flux in industrial waste is higher in content, or more diversified, such as in waste glass [1,44] and fly ash [24,28].
The lowest firing temperature for preparing porcelain tiles from recycled waste was recently reported to be between 1100 °C and 1300 °C [24,25,26,49]. The firing temperature of porcelain tiles can be reduced to 1070 °C by introducing LO in this experiment. The environmental and economic benefits of these new porcelain tiles can be estimated. Unlike high-grade spodumene, the price of low-grade LO used in this study is almost the same as that of traditional feldspar (80 $/t, China), and the price of the SCW is also very low because it has not been effectively recycled. In terms of the sintering process, the firing temperature of modified triaxial ceramics can be reduced by 190 °C by adding LO, which reduces the consumption of natural gas and is conducive to the realization of low carbon emissions and sustainable production.

4. Conclusions

The work presented here aimed to study the effect of low-grade LO (2.7% Li2O) on reducing the firing temperature of ceramic tile. The recycling of SCW and the application of calcined kaolin in ceramics were also tested. The phase composition and technological characteristics of porcelain tiles were precisely controlled by adjusting the composition and temperature of the new SiO2–Al2O3–Na2O–K2O–Li2O system.
When the firing temperature is 1040–1100 °C, 0–19% secondary mullite could be formed, and more quartz and cristobalite was retained, which proved to be beneficial to increase the rupture modulus of ceramics. As the firing temperature increased to 1100–1600 °C, the above crystal contents decreased rapidly, and the vitreous-phase contents increased, which lead to the expansion of closed pores in the sample. The compactness and rupture modulus of ceramics can be reduced at the same time. On the other hand, when the LO content is 10–20% and 50%, there will be more feldspar and spodumene, respectively, in fired ceramic bodies. In contrast, feldspar and spodumene almost participate in the sintering reaction at LO content of 30–40%. Finally, the ceramics with lower sintering temperature and higher compactness and rupture modulus were found concentrated in the range of 30–40% LO and 1070–1100 °C. Impermeable porcelain tile with a water absorption of 0.02% and a rupture modulus of 45 MPa can be obtained at a lower firing temperature (1070 °C) by adding 30% LO and 20% SCW. While the content of LO in the sample is 0%, the porcelain tile can be obtained only at 1260 °C. Moreover, a porcelain tile with very high rupture modulus (107 MPa) and low water absorption (0.04%) can be obtained at 10% LO and 1160 °C.
The results show that the firing temperature of porcelain tiles can be reduced by adding low-grade LO instead of feldspar, without increasing the cost of raw materials, and SCW can be recycled as raw materials instead of quartz, which is conducive to reducing energy consumption in the industry and achieving sustainable development.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/9/12/731/s1. Table S1: Phase data of porcelain tiles; Table S2: Technological parameter data of porcelain tiles; File XRD1: XRD data of S10–S50; File XRD2: XRD data of R1180–R1280.

Author Contributions

Data curation, L.P.; funding acquisition, S.Q.; methodology, L.P.; project administration, S.Q.; resources, S.Q.; software, L.P.; supervision, S.Q.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Raimondo, M.; Zanelli, C.; Matteucci, F.; Guarini, G.; Dondi, M.; Labrincha, J.A. Effect of waste glass (TV/PC cathodic tube and screen) on technological properties and sintering behaviour of porcelain stoneware tiles. Ceram. Int. 2007, 33, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tucci, A.; Esposito, L.; Rastelli, E.; Palmonari, C.; Rambaldi, E. Use of soda-lime scrap-glass as a fluxing agent in a porcelain stoneware tile mix. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2004, 24, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Matteucci, F.; Dondi, M.; Guarini, G. Effect of soda-lime glass on sintering and technological properties of porcelain stoneware tiles. Ceram. Int. 2002, 28, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, W.; Chen, W.; Liu, H.; Han, C. Recycling of waste red mud for production of ceramic floor tile with high strength and lightweight. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 748, 876–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, T. Latest Data of American Ceramic Brick Market. Available online: http://www.xbcd.cn/hyxw/jjgc/201905/499691822.html (accessed on 16 May 2019).
  6. Matthew, G.O.; Fatile, B.O. Characterization of vitrified porcelain tiles using feldspar from three selected deposits in Nigeria. Res. J. Recent Sci. 2014, 3, 2277–2502. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yue, L. Experimental study on preparation of vitrified brick from coal gangue (in Chinese). J. Liaoning Technol. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2010, 29, 201–204. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dana, K.; Das, S.K. Enhanced resistance to thermal cycling of slag-containing vitrified porcelain tiles. Ceram. Int. 2008, 28, 121–124. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pinatti, D.G.; Conte, R.A.; Borlini, M.C.; Santos, B.C.; Oliveira, I.; Vieira, C.M.F.; Monteiro, S.N. Incorporation of the ash from cellulignin into vitrified ceramic tiles. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 26, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tulyaganov, D.U.; Agathopoulos, S.; Fernandes, H.R.; Ferreira, J.M.F. Influence of lithium oxide as auxiliary flux on the properties of triaxial porcelain bodies. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 26, 1131–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ismatova, R. Properties and structure of spodumene-porcelain. Glass Ceram. 1987, 44, 314–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yamuna, A.; Devanarayanan, S.; Lalithambika, M. Mullite-β-spodumene composites from aluminosilicates. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2001, 84, 1703–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Low, I.M.; Mathews, E.; Garrod, T.; Zhou, D.; Phillips, D.N.; Pillai, X.M. Processing of spodumene-modified mullite ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. 1997, 32, 3807–3812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Oberžan, M.; Holc, J.; Buh, M.; Kuščer, D.; Lavrač, I.; Kosec, M. High-alumina porcelain with the addition of a Li2O-bearing fluxing agent. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 29, 2143–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bayuseno, A.P.; Latella, B.A.; O’Connor, B.H. Resistance of alumina spodumene ceramics to thermal shock. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 82, 819–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, J.E.; Liu, K.; Dong, W.X.; Bao, Q.F.; Zhao, T.G.; Wang, Y.Q. Effects of CaO-Li2O-K2O-Na2O fluxing agents on the properties of porcelain ceramic tiles. Key Eng. Mater. 2015, 655, 258–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sheng, Y. Business Club: Spodumene Price of Zhongjin Taifu Mining Co. Ltd. Stayed Stable on July 12. Available online: http://www.100ppi.com/news/detail-20190712-1481629.html (accessed on 12 July 2019).
  18. Sánchez, E.; García-Ten, J.; Sanz, V.; Moreno, A. Porcelain tile: Almost 30 years of steady scientific-technological evolution. Ceram. Int. 2010, 36, 831–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lemougna, P.N.; Yliniemi, J.; Ismailov, A.; Levanenb, E.; Tanskanenc, P.; Kinnunena, P.; Roningd, J.; Illikainena, M. Spodumene tailings for porcelain and structural materials: Effect of temperature (1050–1200 °C) on the sintering and properties. Miner. Eng. 2019, 141, 105843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dhanapandian, S.; Manoharan, C.; Ramkumar, T.; Gnanavela, B.; Sutharsana, P.; Shanthi, M. Effect of incorporation of granite and marble rejects in clay brick products: Physico-mechanical analysis. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2010, 118, 688–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Saboya, F., Jr.; Xavier, G.C.; Alexandre, J. The use of the powder marble by-product to enhance the properties of brick ceramic. Constr. Build. Mater. 2007, 21, 1950–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Souza, A.J.; Pinheiro, B.C.A.; Holanda, J.N.F. Recycling of gneiss rock waste in the manufacture of vitrified floor tiles. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 91, 685–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pinheiro, B.C.A.; Holanda, J.N.F. Obtainment of porcelain floor tiles added with petroleum oily sludge. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Luo, Y.; Zheng, S.; Ma, S.; Liu, C.; Wang, X. Ceramic tiles derived from coal fly ash: Preparation and mechanical characterization. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 11953–11966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ji, R.; Zhang, Z.T.; Yan, C.; Zhu, M.G.; Li, Z.M. Preparation of novel ceramic tiles with high Al2O3 content derived from coal fly ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 114, 888–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ke, S.J.; Wang, Y.M.; Pan, Z.D.; Ning, C.Y.; Zheng, S.L. Recycling of polished tile waste as a main raw material in porcelain tiles. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 115, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dana, K.; Dey, J.; Das, S.K. Synergistic effect of fly ash and blast furnace slag on the mechanical strength of traditional porcelain tiles. Ceram. Int. 2005, 31, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Das, S.K.; Pal, M.; Ghosh, J.; Pathi, K.V.; Mondal, S. The effect of basic oxygen furnace slag and fly ash additions in triaxial porcelain composition: Phase and micro structural evolution. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 2013, 66, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Patrick, D.O.; Kefas, H.M.; John, Y.M.; Ameh, V.I. Investigation of the physical properties of tiles produced with Otukpo clay. Leonardo Electron. J. Pract. Technol. 2015, 27, 162–176. [Google Scholar]
  30. Manoharan, C.; Sutharsan, P.; Dhanapandian, S.; Venkatachalapathy, R.; MohamedAsanulla, R. Analysis of temperature effect on ceramic brick production from alluvial deposits, Tamilnadu, India. Appl. Clay Sci. 2011, 54, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, J.; Peng, L.; Qin, S. Structure and properties of the fused quartz crucibles for silicon ingots in sintering and casting process. J. Synth. Cryst. 2016, 45, 1261–1265, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhou, J.; Ma, G.Y.; Ma, R. Quantitative analysis on amorphous phase content in blast furnace slag. Phys. Test Chem. Anal. Part A 2015, 51, 711–716. [Google Scholar]
  33. Peng, L.; Qin, S. Mechanical behaviour and microstructure of an artificial stone slab prepared using a waste SiO2 crucible and quartz. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 50, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. GB/T 1548-2015, Test Method for Linear Shrinkage of Ceramic Body Slurry; Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2015. (In Chinese)
  35. GB/T 3810.3-2006, Test Methods of Ceramic Tiles: Determination of Water Absorption, Apparent Porosity, Apparent Relative Porosity and Bulk Density; Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2006. (In Chinese)
  36. GB/T 3810.4-2006, Test Methods of Ceramic Tiles-Part 4: Determination of Modulus of Rupture and Breaking Strength; Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2006. (In Chinese)
  37. QB/T 1010-2015, Test Methods of for True Density of Ceramic Materials and Pigment; Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2015. (In Chinese)
  38. Stevens, S.J.; Hand, R.J.; Sharp, J.H. Polymorphism of silica. J. Mater. Sci. 1997, 32, 2929–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Marians, C.S.; Hobbs, L.W. Network properties of crystalline polymorphs of silica. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1990, 124, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Castelein, O.; Guinebretiere, R.; Bonnet, J.P.; Blanchart, P. Shape, size and composition of mullite nanocrystals from rapidly sintered kaolin. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2001, 21, 2369–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Iqbal, Y.; Lee, W.E. Fired porcelain microstructures revisited. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 82, 3384–3390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Iqbal, Y.; Lee, W.E. Microstructural evolution in triaxial porcelain. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2000, 83, 3121–3127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lu, H.Y.; Wang, W.L.; Tuan, W.H.; Lin, M.H. Acicular mullite crystals in vitrified kaolin. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2004, 87, 1843–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gualtieri, M.L.; Mugoni, C.; Guandalini, S.; Cattini, A.; Mazzini, D.; Alboni, C.; Siligardi, C. Glass recycling in the production of low-temperature stoneware tiles. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 197, 1531–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Luz, A.P.; Ribeiro, S. Use of glass waste as a raw material in porcelain stoneware tile mixtures. Ceram. Int. 2007, 33, 761–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tucci, A.; Esposito, L.; Malmusi, L.; Rambaldi, E. New body mixes for porcelain stoneware tiles with improved mechanical characteristics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2007, 27, 1875–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Falamaki, C.; Afarani, M.S.; Aghaie, A. Initial sintering stage pore growth mechanism applied to the manufacture of ceramic membrane supports. J. Eur. Ceram. 2004, 24, 2285–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. ISO 13006, Ceramic Tiles-Definitions, Classification, Characteristics and Marking; Technical Committee: ISO/TC 189 Ceramic Tile; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
  49. Gouvêa, D.; Kaneko, T.T.; Kahn, H.; Conceição, E.S.; Antoniassi, J.L. Using bone ash as an additive in porcelain sintering. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Minerals 09 00731 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns and mineral phases of raw materials: (a) SCW; (b) feldspar; (c) calcined kaolin; and (d) LO.
Figure 1. XRD patterns and mineral phases of raw materials: (a) SCW; (b) feldspar; (c) calcined kaolin; and (d) LO.
Minerals 09 00731 g001
Minerals 09 00731 g002 550
Figure 2. Quantitative phase analyses for the (a) vitreous phase, (b) cristobalite, (c) quartz, (d) mullite, (e) spodumene, and (f) feldspar of porcelain tiles with different LO contents (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) and firing temperatures (1040 °C, 1070 °C, 1100 °C, 1130 °C, and 1160 °C).
Figure 2. Quantitative phase analyses for the (a) vitreous phase, (b) cristobalite, (c) quartz, (d) mullite, (e) spodumene, and (f) feldspar of porcelain tiles with different LO contents (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) and firing temperatures (1040 °C, 1070 °C, 1100 °C, 1130 °C, and 1160 °C).
Minerals 09 00731 g002
Minerals 09 00731 g003 550
Figure 3. Composition trends and phases of samples S10–S50 in system of (a) SiO2–Na2O–Al2O3, (b) SiO2–K2O–Al2O3, and (c) SiO2–Li2O–Al2O3.
Figure 3. Composition trends and phases of samples S10–S50 in system of (a) SiO2–Na2O–Al2O3, (b) SiO2–K2O–Al2O3, and (c) SiO2–Li2O–Al2O3.
Minerals 09 00731 g003
Minerals 09 00731 g004 550
Figure 4. Trend of the (a) open porosity, (b) closed porosity, (c) total porosity, and (d) firing shrinkage as a function of LO content (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) and firing temperature (1040 °C, 1070 °C, 1100 °C, 1130 °C, and 1160 °C).
Figure 4. Trend of the (a) open porosity, (b) closed porosity, (c) total porosity, and (d) firing shrinkage as a function of LO content (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) and firing temperature (1040 °C, 1070 °C, 1100 °C, 1130 °C, and 1160 °C).
Minerals 09 00731 g004
Minerals 09 00731 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of samples with an LO content of 40% fired at (a) 1040 °C; (b) 1070 °C; (c) 1100 °C; (d) 1130 °C; and (e) 1160 °C. SEM micrographs of the samples fired at 1130 °C at the LO content of (f) 10%, (g) 20%, (h) 30%, (i) 40%, and (j) 50%.
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of samples with an LO content of 40% fired at (a) 1040 °C; (b) 1070 °C; (c) 1100 °C; (d) 1130 °C; and (e) 1160 °C. SEM micrographs of the samples fired at 1130 °C at the LO content of (f) 10%, (g) 20%, (h) 30%, (i) 40%, and (j) 50%.
Minerals 09 00731 g005
Minerals 09 00731 g006 550
Figure 6. True density (a) and bulk density (b) of samples with different LO contents (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) and firing temperatures (1040 °C, 1070 °C, 1100 °C, 1130 °C, and 1160 °C).
Figure 6. True density (a) and bulk density (b) of samples with different LO contents (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) and firing temperatures (1040 °C, 1070 °C, 1100 °C, 1130 °C, and 1160 °C).
Minerals 09 00731 g006
Minerals 09 00731 g007 550
Figure 7. Water absorption of samples S10, S20, S30, S40, and S50 at different firing temperatures (1040 °C, 1070 °C, 1100 °C, 1130 °C, and 1160 °C).
Figure 7. Water absorption of samples S10, S20, S30, S40, and S50 at different firing temperatures (1040 °C, 1070 °C, 1100 °C, 1130 °C, and 1160 °C).
Minerals 09 00731 g007
Minerals 09 00731 g008 550
Figure 8. Rupture modulus of samples with different LO contents (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) and firing temperatures (1040 °C, 1070 °C, 1100 °C, 1130 °C, and 1160 °C).
Figure 8. Rupture modulus of samples with different LO contents (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%) and firing temperatures (1040 °C, 1070 °C, 1100 °C, 1130 °C, and 1160 °C).
Minerals 09 00731 g008
Minerals 09 00731 g009 550
Figure 9. SEM micrographs of samples fired at (a) 1180 °C; (b) 1200 °C; (c) 1220 °C; (d) 1240 °C; (e) 1260 °C; and (f) 1280 °C.
Figure 9. SEM micrographs of samples fired at (a) 1180 °C; (b) 1200 °C; (c) 1220 °C; (d) 1240 °C; (e) 1260 °C; and (f) 1280 °C.
Minerals 09 00731 g009
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition of raw materials.
Table 1. Chemical composition of raw materials.
wt.%SCWCalcined KaolinFeldsparLO
SiO299.764.677.668.2
Al2O30.233.312.419.9
Fe2O30.10.40.60.2
CaO<0.10.80.90.1
MgO<0.10.10.2<0.1
K2O<0.10.15.46.1
Na2O<0.1<0.12.72.2
MnO<0.1<0.1<0.10.4
TiO2<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1
P2O5<0.1<0.1<0.10.2
Li2O<0.1<0.1<0.12.7
Table
Table 2. Formulation of experimental bodies for porcelain tiles.
Table 2. Formulation of experimental bodies for porcelain tiles.
wt.%SCWCalcined KaolinFeldsparLO
S1020304010
S2020303020
S3020302030
S4020301040
S502030050
R1180–R12802030500
Table
Table 3. Phase composition of ceramic tiles produced by SCW, calcined kaolin, and feldspar (wt.%).
Table 3. Phase composition of ceramic tiles produced by SCW, calcined kaolin, and feldspar (wt.%).
RefVitreous PhaseCristobaliteQuartzK-FeldsparNa-FeldsparMullite
R11803952214119
R1200515218510
R1220605193211
R1240614212013
R1260644200012
R1280653190013
Table
Table 4. Technological characteristics of ceramic tiles produced by SCW, calcined kaolin, and feldspar.
Table 4. Technological characteristics of ceramic tiles produced by SCW, calcined kaolin, and feldspar.
RefWater Absorption (%)Rupture Modulus (MPa)Firing Shrinkage
(cm·m−1)		Bulk Density
(g·cm−1)		True Density
(g·cm−1)		Open Porosity
(%)		Closed Porosity
(%)		Total Porosity
(%)
R118011.2 ± 0.824 ± 3.03.8 ± 0.11.90 ± 0.012.57 ± 0.0221.3 ± 0.64.7 ± 0.426.0 ± 1.1
R12007.1 ± 0.737 ± 1.45.9 ± 0.12.08 ± 0.022.35 ± 0.0214.8 ± 0.83.2 ± 0.418.0 ± 1.3
R12203.8 ± 0.445 ± 2.58.1 ± 0.22.25 ± 0.022.29 ± 0.018.5 ± 0.51.4 ± 0.210.0 ± 0.6
R12401.2 ± 0.259 ± 1.79.2 ± 0.22.31 ± 0.012.18 ± 0.022.7 ± 0.12.8 ± 0.15.5 ± 0.2
R12600.3 ± 0.161 ± 1.59.8 ± 0.32.29 ± 0.012.14 ± 0.020.5 ± 0.14.3 ± 0.24.8 ± 0.2
R12800.1 ± 0.159 ± 2.67.0 ± 0.12.23 ± 0.022.11 ± 0.010.2 ± 0.18.5 ± 0.48.8 ± 0.3

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peng, L.; Qin, S. Sintering Behavior and Technological Properties of Low-Temperature Porcelain Tiles Prepared Using a Lithium Ore and Silica Crucible Waste. Minerals 2019, 9, 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9120731

AMA Style

Peng L, Qin S. Sintering Behavior and Technological Properties of Low-Temperature Porcelain Tiles Prepared Using a Lithium Ore and Silica Crucible Waste. Minerals. 2019; 9(12):731. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9120731

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peng, Lihua, and Shan Qin. 2019. "Sintering Behavior and Technological Properties of Low-Temperature Porcelain Tiles Prepared Using a Lithium Ore and Silica Crucible Waste" Minerals 9, no. 12: 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9120731

APA Style

Peng, L., & Qin, S. (2019). Sintering Behavior and Technological Properties of Low-Temperature Porcelain Tiles Prepared Using a Lithium Ore and Silica Crucible Waste. Minerals, 9(12), 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9120731

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop