Next Article in Journal
Solution for the Kinematics of Non-H-D Couplings Applied to RPCR Mechanism
Next Article in Special Issue
Abundant Solitary Wave Solutions for the Boiti–Leon–Manna–Pempinelli Equation with M-Truncated Derivative
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Variational Iterations Method for Studying Physically and Geometrically Nonlinear Kirchhoff Nanoplates: A Mathematical Justification
Previous Article in Special Issue
Existence and Uniqueness Theorems for a Variable-Order Fractional Differential Equation with Delay
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Generalized Bessel–Maitland Function and Its Properties

1
Department of General Requirements, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Sur 411, Oman
2
Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India
3
Departamento de Matemática Aplicada y Estadística, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30203 Cartagena, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Axioms 2023, 12(4), 356; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040356
Submission received: 5 March 2023 / Revised: 29 March 2023 / Accepted: 3 April 2023 / Published: 5 April 2023

Abstract

:
In this article, we introduce the generalized Bessel–Maitland function (EGBMF) using the extended beta function and some important properties obtained. Thus, we first show interesting relationships of this function with Laguerre polynomials and the Whittaker functions. We also introduce and prove some properties of the derivatives associated with EGBMF. In this sense, we establish a result relative to the extended fractional derivatives of Riemann–Liouville. Furthermore, the Mellin transform of this function is evaluated in terms of the generalized Wright hypergeometric function, and its Euler transform is also obtained. Finally, we derive several graphical representations using the Gauss quadrature and the Laguerre–Gauss quadrature methods, which show that the numerical and theoretical simulations are consistent. The results derived from this research can be potentially useful in applications in several fields, in particular, physics, applied mathematics, and engineering.

1. Introduction

The theory of the Bessel function is closely related to the theory of certain types of differential equations. A detailed description of the applications of the Bessel function in engineering or natural sciences is provided in Watson [1]. On the other hand, the Bessel–Maitland function is a generalization of the Bessel function introduced by Edward Maitland Wright [2] and which is given by
J ν μ ( z ) = n = 0 ( z ) n Γ ( μ n + ν + 1 ) n ! .
where μ , ν C ; ( μ ) 0 , ( ν ) 1 .
In recent years, the research of many mathematicians has focused on establishing some generalizations (or unifications) and introducing various integral transforms of the Bessel function (see [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]). In this sense, M. Singh et al. [12] introduced and studied properties of the generalized Bessel–Maitland function defined as follows
J ν , q μ , γ ( z ) = n = 0 ( γ ) q n ( z ) n Γ ( μ n + ν + 1 ) n ! ,
where μ , ν , γ C ; ( μ ) 0 , ( ν ) 1 , ( γ ) 0 and q ( 0 , 1 ) N and ( γ ) 0 = 1 , ( γ ) q n = Γ ( γ + q n ) Γ ( γ ) denotes the generalized Pochhammer symbol (see [13]).
In this paper, using the definition of the extended beta function, we extend the generalized Bessel–Maitland function J ν , q μ , γ ( z ) as follows
J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = n = 0 B p ( γ + q n , c γ ) ( c ) q n ( z ) n B ( γ , c γ ) Γ ( μ n + ν + 1 ) n ! ,
( p > 0 , q N , ( c ) > ( γ ) > 0 )
which will be known as the extended generalized Bessel–Maitland function (EGBMF).
The above equation is obtained using the fact that ( γ ) q n ( c ) q n = B ( γ + q n , c γ ) B ( γ , c γ ) , where
B p ( x , y ) = 0 1 t x 1 ( 1 t ) y 1 e p t ( 1 t ) d t , ( ( p ) > 0 , ( x ) > 0 , ( y ) > 0 ) .
Please note that for p = 0 , we obtain the classical beta function
B ( x , y ) = 0 1 t x 1 ( 1 t ) y 1 d t = Γ ( x ) Γ ( y ) Γ ( x + y ) .
Recent research established important properties of and results from the generalized Bessel–Maitland function. Thus, in [14], new integrals involving the generalized Bessel–Maitland function are investigated in terms of the hypergeometric and beta functions. Furthermore, some integral transforms and generalized integration formulas for the generalized Bessel–Maitland function are proposed in [15]. In one paper [16], a new integral with a generalized Bessel–Maitland kernel is introduced, and its properties are examined. Another interesting approach to the generalized Bessel–Maitland function is proposed in [17]. In this recent research, the integral representation of the function is established by applying the Gauss multiplication theorem and the representation of the beta function, as well as the Mellin-Barnes representation through the residue theorem.
Since the new formulation of EGBFM was introduced in (3), the objective of our research is to obtain interesting results, such as its characterization as an integral, its relationship with the Laguerre polynomials or the Whittaker function, its properties associated with the fractional derivative, and its integral transform. As we have just indicated, one of the objectives of our research is the study of EGBMF in the context of Fractional Calculus, given the relevance that this theory has currently reached in the field of mathematics, both from the theoretical point of view, and for its applications in various fields of science and engineering. From a theoretical point of view, the various definitions of derived fractional proposals are based on two conceptions: global (non-local) and local. In the first conception, the fractional derivative is defined by an integral transformation, so its nature is non-local and has “memory”. This global formulation is associated with the appearance of the Fractional Calculus itself, from the pioneering works of Euler, Laplace, Lacroix, Fourier, Abel, Liouville etc., to the establishment of the well-known Riemann–Liouville and Caputo definitions. More information about this definition of fractional derivative, its physical meaning, and its applications can be found in (see [18,19,20]). In the second conception of the fractional derivative (local), it is formulated using certain quotients of increments (see [21,22,23,24,25,26]). Recently, the theory and applications of ordinary differential equations and equations in partial derivatives, which involve derivatives defined in this local sense, constitute one of the fields that researchers have focused on most.
Finally, we will recall some notions necessary to develop the results that we will establish in the following sections.
The Wright generalized hypergeometric function is defined as (see [13])
p Ψ q ( z ) = p Ψ q ( a 1 , α 1 ) , ( a 2 , α 2 ) , , ( a p , α p ) ; ( b 1 , β 1 ) , ( b 2 , β 2 ) , , ( b q , β q ) ; z ,
= k = 0 i = 1 p Γ ( a i , α i k ) z k j = 1 q Γ ( b j , β j k ) k ! ,
where the coefficients α i ( i = 1 , 2 , , p ) and β j ( j = 1 , 2 , , q ) are positive real numbers such that
1 + j = 1 q β j i = 1 p α i 0 .
The Mellin transform (see [27]) of the function f ( z ) is defined as
M [ f ( z ) ; s ] = 0 z s 1 f ( z ) d z = f * ( s ) , ( s ) > 0 .
The inverse of Mellin transform is defined as
M 1 [ f * ( s ) ; z ] = 1 2 π i f * ( s ) z s d s .
The Euler (Beta) (see [27]) transform of the function f ( z ) is defined as
B [ f ( z ) : a , b ] = 0 1 z a 1 ( 1 z ) b 1 f ( z ) d z .
In this paper, we use the extended Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative introduced by Özarslan and Özergin [10] which is defined as
D x μ , p { f ( x ) } = 1 Γ ( μ ) 0 x f ( t ) ( x t ) μ 1 e p x 2 t ( x t ) d t , ( μ ) < 0 , ( p ) > 0 .
where the path of integration is a line from 0 to z in the complex t-plane. For the case p = 0 , we obtain the classical Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative operator as follows
D x μ { f ( x ) } = 1 Γ ( μ ) 0 x f ( t ) ( x t ) μ 1 d t , ( μ ) < 0 .
Some authors have found interesting results and applications of new extensions of this fractional derivative operator (see [28,29,30]).

2. Characterization of EGBMF as Integral

In this section, we establish the integral representation of EGBMF in Theorem 1. In addition, by giving special values to the parameters, new results are obtained as corollaries. Throughout the section, we will make the following assumptions: Let p > 0 , q N , ( c ) > ( γ ) > 0 , ( μ ) > 0 , ( ν ) > 1 .
Theorem 1.
The following integral representation for the extended generalized Bessel–Maitland function holds
J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = 1 B ( γ , c γ ) 0 1 t γ 1 ( 1 t ) c γ 1 e p t ( 1 t ) J ν , q μ , c ( t q z ) d t .
Proof. 
By substituting Equation (4) in Equation (3), we obtain
J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = 0 1 t γ + q n 1 ( 1 t ) c γ 1 e p t ( 1 t ) d t n = 0 ( c ) q n ( z ) n B ( γ , c γ ) Γ ( μ n + ν + 1 ) n ! .
By the above assumptions, summation and integration can be interchanged, then we obtain
J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = 1 B ( γ , c γ ) 0 1 t γ 1 ( 1 t ) c γ 1 e p t ( 1 t ) n = 0 ( c ) q n ( t q z ) n Γ ( μ n + ν + 1 ) n ! d t ,
Finally using (2), our result follows.  □
Corollary 1.
By setting t = u 1 + u in (11), we obtain the following special case of Theorem 1:
J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = 1 B ( γ , c γ ) 0 u γ 1 ( 1 + u ) c e p ( 1 + u ) 2 u J ν , q μ , c u q z ( 1 + u ) q d u .
Corollary 2.
By setting t = sin 2 θ in (11), we obtain the following special case of Theorem 1:
J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = 2 B ( γ , c γ ) 0 π 2 ( sin θ ) 2 γ 1 ( cos θ ) 2 c 2 γ 1 e p sin 2 θ cos 2 θ J ν , q μ , c ( z sin 2 q θ ) d θ .
Corollary 3.
The recurrence relation for the EGBMF is given by the following formula:
J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = ( ν + 1 ) J ν + 1 , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) + μ z d d z J ν + 1 , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) .
Proof. 
Starting with right hand side of (14) and using (3), we obtain
( ν + 1 ) J ν + 1 , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) + μ z d d z J ν + 1 , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = ( ν + 1 ) n = 0 B p ( γ + q n , c γ ) ( c ) q n ( z ) n B ( γ , c γ ) Γ ( μ n + ν + 2 ) n !
+ μ z d d z n = 0 B p ( γ + q n , c γ ) ( c ) q n ( z ) n B ( γ , c γ ) Γ ( μ n + ν + 2 ) n !
= n = 0 B p ( γ + q n , c γ ) ( c ) q n ( z ) n ( μ n + ν + 1 ) B ( γ , c γ ) Γ ( μ n + ν + 2 ) n !
= J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) .
 □

3. Properties of the EGBMF and Derivative

In this section, we demonstrate some interesting derivative properties associated with the generalized Bessel–Maitland function. In the following result, we consider the extended Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative defined in (9).
Theorem 2.
Let p > 0 , q N , ( λ ) > 0 , ( μ ) > 0 , ( γ ) > 0 , ( ν ) > 1 , then
D z λ c , p z λ 1 J ν , q μ , c ( z q ) = z c 1 Γ ( c λ ) B ( λ , c λ ) J ν , q μ , λ ; c ( z q ; p ) .
Proof. 
Replace μ by λ c in the definition of the extended fractional derivative operators, we obtain
D z λ c , p z λ 1 J ν , q μ , c ( z q ) = 1 Γ ( c λ ) 0 z t λ 1 ( z t ) c λ 1 J ν , q μ , c ( t q ) e p z 2 t ( z t ) d t
= z c λ 1 Γ ( c λ ) 0 z t λ 1 1 t z c λ 1 J ν , q μ , c ( t q ) e p z 2 t ( z t ) d t
introducing u = t z in above equation, we have
= z c 1 Γ ( c λ ) 0 1 u λ 1 ( 1 u ) c λ 1 J ν , q μ , c ( u q z q ) e p u ( 1 u ) d u .
Finally, using (11), we obtain the desired result.  □
Theorem 3.
The derivative formula of the extended generalized Bessel–Maitland function is as follows:
d n d z n J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = ( c ) q ( c + q ) q ( c + ( n 1 ) q ) q J ν + n μ μ , ν + n q ; c + n q ( z ; p ) .
Proof. 
Taking derivative as regards z in (3), we obtain
d d z J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = ( c ) q J ν + μ μ , ν + q ; c + q ( z ; p ) .
So, by applying the derivative as regards z in (17), we obtain
d 2 d z 2 J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = ( c ) q ( c + q ) q J ν + 2 μ μ , ν + 2 q ; c + 2 q ( z ; p ) .
Finally, if we apply the derivation as regards z n times, our result follows easily.  □
Theorem 4.
Under mentioned derivative formula of the extended generalized Bessel–Maitland function holds true:
d n d z n [ z ν J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( λ z μ ; p ) ] = z ν n J ν n , q μ , γ ; c ( λ z μ ; p ) .
Proof.  
To prove (18) it is enough to replace z by λ z μ in (3) and apply the derivative as regards z n times of the product with λ z μ with J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( λ z μ ; p ) . □

4. Relation of the EGBMF with Laguerre Polynomial and Whittaker Function

In this section, we establish the representation of the generalized extended Bessel–Maitland function in terms of Laguerre polynomials and the Whittaker function.
Theorem 5.
Let p > 0 , q N , ( μ ) > 0 , ( γ ) > 0 , ( ν ) > 1 . The following representation of EGBMF in terms of Laguerre polynomials is defined as:
e 2 p J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = ( 1 ) k B ( γ , c γ ) m , n , k = 0 L n ( p ) L m ( p ) ( γ ) q k z k Γ ( μ k + ν + 1 ) k ! B ( γ + m + q k + 1 , c + n γ + 1 ) .
Proof.  
Using the generating function of Laguerre polynomials (see [13])
e p t ( 1 t ) = n = 0 L n ( p ) t n ( 1 t ) ,
which can be expanded as follows
e p t ( 1 t ) = e 2 p m , n = 0 L n ( p ) L m ( p ) t m + 1 ( 1 t ) n + 1 , 0 < t < 1 .
Setting (21) in (11), we obtain
J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = 1 B ( γ , c γ ) 0 1 t γ 1 ( 1 t ) c γ 1 e 2 p m , n = 0 L n ( p ) L m ( p ) t m + 1 ( 1 t ) n + 1 J ν , q μ , c ( t q z ) d t .
Now, if we apply (2), we obtain
= ( 1 ) k e 2 p B ( γ , c γ ) 0 1 t γ 1 ( 1 t ) c γ 1 m , n , k = 0 L n ( p ) L m ( p ) t m + q k + 1 ( 1 t ) n + 1 ( γ ) q k z k Γ ( μ k + ν + 1 ) k ! .
Interchanging integration and summation in the equation above, we have
= ( 1 ) k e 2 p B ( γ , c γ ) m , n , k = 0 L n ( p ) L m ( p ) ( γ ) q k z k Γ ( μ k + ν + 1 ) k ! 0 1 t γ + m + q k ( 1 t ) c + n γ d t .
Using the definition of Beta function (5), we obtain
= ( 1 ) k e 2 p B ( γ , c γ ) m , n , k = 0 L n ( p ) L m ( p ) ( γ ) q k z k Γ ( μ k + ν + 1 ) k ! B ( γ + m + q k + 1 , c + n γ + 1 ) .
Multiplying on both sides by e 2 p , we obtain the required result.  □
Theorem 6.
Let p > 0 , q N , ( μ ) > 0 , ( γ ) > 0 , ( ν ) > 1 . The EGBMF is represented in terms of the Whittaker function as follows:
e 3 p 2 J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = ( 1 ) k Γ ( c γ + 1 ) B ( γ , c γ ) m , k = 0 L m ( p ) ( c ) q k z k Γ ( μ k + ν + 1 ) k ! p m + γ + q k 1 2 W γ 2 c q k m 1 2 , m + γ + q k 2 ( p ) .
Proof.  
Using (20), we obtain
e p t ( 1 t ) = e p e p t m = 0 L m ( p ) t m ( 1 t ) .
Introducing (23) in (11), we obtain
J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = 1 B ( γ , c γ ) 0 1 t γ 1 ( 1 t ) c γ 1 e p e p t ( 1 t ) m = 0 L m ( p ) t m J ν , q μ , c ( t q z ) d t .
Now, we apply (2) in the equation above
J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = e p B ( γ , c γ ) 0 1 t γ 1 ( 1 t ) c γ e p t m = 0 L m ( p ) t m k = 0 ( c ) q k ( t q z ) k Γ ( μ k + ν + 1 ) k ! d t .
If we interchange integration and summation, we obtain
J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = ( 1 ) k e p B ( γ , c γ ) m , k = 0 L m ( p ) ( c ) q k z k Γ ( μ k + ν + 1 ) k ! 0 1 t m + q k + γ 1 ( 1 t ) c γ e p t d t .
Finally, using the following equation, we obtain
0 1 t μ 1 ( 1 t ) ν 1 e p t d t = Γ ( ν ) p μ 1 2 e p 2 W 1 μ 2 ν 2 , μ 2 ( p ) , [ ( ν ) > 0 , ( p ) > 0 ] .
We obtain our result.  □

5. Integral Transforms of EGBMF

In this section, we propose certain integral transforms for the EGBMF. To prove our results, the following assumptions are considered: μ , ν , γ , c , s C ; ( μ ) 0 , ( ν ) 1 , ( c ) > ( γ ) > 0 , ( s ) > 0 and q N which guarantee convergence.
Theorem 7.
The following Mellin transform of extended generalized Bessel–Maitland function holds true:
M J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) ; s = Γ ( s ) Γ ( s + c γ ) Γ ( γ ) Γ ( c γ ) 2 Ψ 2 ( c , q ) , ( γ + s , q ) ; ( ν + 1 , μ ) , ( c + 2 s , q ) ; z .
Proof. 
Using Mellin transform (7) on extended generalized Bessel–Maitland function
M J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) ; s = 0 p s 1 J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) d p .
Now using (11)
= 1 B ( γ , c γ ) 0 p s 1 0 1 t γ 1 ( 1 t ) c γ 1 e p t ( 1 t ) J ν , q μ , c ( t q z ) d t d p .
Reciprocate the order of integrals in the overhead equation, which is acceptable so far as the conditions in the statement of the Theorem, we obtain
= 1 B ( γ , c γ ) 0 1 t γ 1 ( 1 t ) c γ 1 J ν , q μ , c ( t q z ) 0 p s 1 e p t ( 1 t ) d p d t .
Now setting u = p t ( 1 t ) and using the fact that Γ ( s ) = 0 u s 1 e u d u , we obtain
= Γ ( s ) B ( γ , c γ ) 0 1 t γ + s 1 ( 1 t ) s + c γ 1 J ν , q μ , c ( t q z ) d t .
Using (2) in the equation above
= Γ ( s ) B ( γ , c γ ) 0 1 t γ + s 1 ( 1 t ) s + c γ 1 n = 0 ( c ) q n ( t q z ) n Γ ( μ n + ν + 1 ) n ! d t .
If we interchange summation and integration, we have
= Γ ( s ) B ( γ , c γ ) n = 0 ( c ) q n ( z ) n Γ ( μ n + ν + 1 ) n ! 0 1 t γ + s + q n 1 ( 1 t ) s + c γ 1 d t .
Using the classical beta function (5), we obtain
= Γ ( s ) B ( γ , c γ ) n = 0 ( c ) q n ( z ) n Γ ( μ n + ν + 1 ) n ! Γ ( γ + s + q n ) Γ ( s + c γ ) Γ ( 2 s + c + q n ) .
Considering ( γ ) q n = Γ ( γ + q n ) Γ ( γ ) , B ( γ , c γ ) = Γ ( γ ) Γ ( c γ ) Γ ( c ) , we obtain
= Γ ( s ) Γ ( s + c γ ) Γ ( γ ) Γ ( c γ ) n = 0 Γ ( c + q n ) Γ ( γ + s + q n ) ( z ) n Γ ( μ n + ν + 1 ) Γ ( c + 2 s + q n ) n ! .
Finally, using (6), our result follows.  □
Now, by putting s = 1 in Theorem 7, we can obatin the following corollary.
Corollary 4.
The following result holds true:
0 J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) d p = Γ ( c γ + 1 ) Γ ( c γ ) Γ ( γ ) 2 Ψ 2 ( c , q ) , ( γ + 1 , q ) ; ( ν + 1 , μ ) , ( c + 2 , q ) ; z .
Corollary 5.
The following inverse Mellin transform of EGBMF holds true:
J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z ; p ) = 1 2 π i Γ ( γ ) Γ ( c γ ) λ ι λ + ι Γ ( s ) Γ ( s + c γ ) 2 Ψ 2 ( c , q ) , ( γ + s , q ) ; ( ν + 1 , μ ) , ( c + 2 s , q ) ; z p s d s .
Theorem 8.
The Euler transform of extended generalized Bessel–Maitland function is given by
B J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z μ ; p ) : ν + 1 , 1 = J ν + 1 , q μ , γ ; c ( 1 ; p ) .
Proof. 
By definition of Euler transform (8) and (3), we obtain
B J ν , q μ , γ ; c ( z μ ; p ) : ν + 1 , 1 = 0 1 z ν + 1 1 ( 1 z ) 1 1 n = 0 B p ( γ + q n , c γ ) ( c ) q n ( z μ ) n B ( γ , c γ ) Γ ( μ n + ν + 1 ) n ! d z .
Reciprocating the summation and integral which is guaranteed under convergence condition, we obtain
= n = 0 ( 1 ) n B p ( γ + q n , c γ ) ( c ) q n B ( γ , c γ ) Γ ( μ n + ν + 1 ) n ! 0 1 z μ n + ν + 1 1 ( 1 z ) 1 1 d z .
Applying definition of Beta function (5), we obtain our result.  □

6. Numerical Representations

In this section, we present some numerical simulations of the theoretical results obtained. Specifically, we focus on Theorem 1, Corollary 1, and Theorem 7 in terms of the variable z, to show the compatibility of the numerical solutions and the analytical expressions.
Evaluation of J ν , q μ , γ ; c z ; p : The following figure presents a graphical simulation of (3), (11) and (12) vs. The variable z. The parameters are taken as c = 8 , γ = 6 , μ = 2 , ν = 3 , p = 1 and q = 2 . The integrals in (11) and (12) are evaluated numerically using the Gaussian quadrature and Laguerre–Gauss quadrature methods (see [31]), respectively, and compare this with the series representation of J ν , q μ , γ ; c z ; p (Equation (3)). From Figure 1, we can note that the obtained results are identical.
Evaluation of M J ν , q μ , γ ; c z ; p ; s : The below figure illustrates the evolution of M J ν , q μ , γ ; c z ; p ; s established from (7) and (24). The Mellin transform of J ν , q μ , γ ; c z ; p ; s is evaluated using th Laguerre–Gauss quadrature method. The values of the other parameters are as follows: c = 10 , γ = 6 , μ = 2 , ν = 3 , s = 2 and q = 1 .
We have demonstrated that the numerical solutions derived by the Laguerre–Gauss quadrature method and the exact analytical formulation are compatible as shown in Figure 2.

7. Conclusions

In this article, we introduced a generalized Bessel–Maitland function using the extended beta function and obtained some interesting results. The extended generalized Bessel–Maitland function is expressed in terms of the Mittag–Leffler function, generalized Wright hypergeometric function, and Fox H-function. It is also worth noting that we have established results that connect the generalized extended Bessel–Maitland introduced with the Fractional Calculus or the integral transforms. Furthermore, to compare our theoretical and numerical results, some numerical simulations were performed. The obtained results show that there is an excellent agreement between the numerical solution obtained using the Gaussian quadrature and Laguerre–Gauss quadrature methods and our theoretical results. Finally, we think that the results of our research may have applicability in fields, such as applied sciences, mathematical physics, and engineering.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, T.U.; Writing—review and editing, T.U.; Methodology, T.U.; Conceptualization, N.K.; Funding acquisition, F.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The first author Talha Usman would like to thank Scientific Research Department at University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Sur for supporting this work under Project No. UTAS-Sur-SRD-IRF 23-04/06.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Watson, G.N. A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions; Cambridge Mathematical Library Edition; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1965; Reprinted in 1996. [Google Scholar]
  2. Marichev, O.I. Handbook of Integral Transforms and Higher Transcendental Functions; Ellis Horwood: Chichester, UK; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  3. Choi, J.; Agarwal, P. Certain unified integrals associated with Bessel functions. Bound. Value Probl. 2013, 2013, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Choi, J.; Agarwal, P. Certain unified integrals involving a product of Bessel functions of first kind. Honam Math. J. 2013, 35, 667–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kamarujjama, M.; Khan, N.U.; Khan, O. Estimation of certain integrals associated with Multi-index Bessel function. Malaya J. Mat. 2019, 7, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Khan, N.U.; Ghayasuddin, M.; Usman, T. On certain integral formulas involving the product of Bessel function and Jacobi polynomial. Tamkang J. Math. 2016, 47, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khan, N.U.; Khan, S.W.; Ghayasuddin, M. Some new results associated with the Bessel-Struve kernel function. Acta Univ. Apulensis. 2016, 48, 89–101. [Google Scholar]
  8. Khan, N.U.; Kashmin, T. Some integrals for the generalized Bessel-Maitland functions. Electron. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2016, 4, 139–149. [Google Scholar]
  9. Khan, N.U.; Usman, T.; Aman, M. Extended beta, hypergeometric and confluent hypergeometric functions. Trans. Natl. Acad. Sci. Azerb. Ser. Phys.-Tech. Math. Sci. 2019, 39, 83–97. [Google Scholar]
  10. Özarsalan, M.A.; Özergin, E. Some generating relations for extended hypergeometric functions via generalized fractional derivative operator. Math. Comput. Model. 2010, 52, 1825–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shadab, M.; Jabee, S.; Choi, J. An extended beta function and its applications. Far East J. Math. Sci. 2018, 103, 235–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Singh, M.; Khan, M.A.; Khan, A.H. On some properties of a generalization of Bessel-Maitland function. Int. J. Math. Trends Technol. 2014, 14, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Srivastava, H.M.; Manocha, H.L. A Treatise on Generating Functions; Halsted Press (Ellis Horwood) Limited: Chichester, UK; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  14. Suthar, D.L.; Habenom, H. Integrals involving generalized Bessel-Maitland function. J. Sci. Arts 2016, 16, 357–362. [Google Scholar]
  15. Arshad, M.; Mubeen, S.; Nisar, K.S.; Rahman, G. Extended Wright-Bessel function and its properties. Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 2018, 33, 143–155. [Google Scholar]
  16. Albayrak, D.; Dernek, A.; Dernek, N.; Uçar, F. New intregral transform with generalized Bessel–Maitland function kernel and its applications. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 2021, 44, 1394–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zayed, H.M. On generalized Bessel–Maitland function. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021, 2021, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kilbas, A.A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations; NorthHolland Mathematics Studies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 204. [Google Scholar]
  19. Miller, K.S. An Introduction to Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pathak, R.S. Certain convergence theorems and asymptotic properties of a generalization of Lommel and Maitland transformations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India. Sect. A. 1966, 36, 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  21. Khalil, R.; Horani, M.A.; Yousef, A.; Sababheh, M. A new definition of fractional derivative. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2014, 264, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guzmán, P.M.; Langton, G.; Lugo, L.M.; Medina, J.; Valdés, J.E.N. A new definition of a fractional derivative of local type. J. Math. Anal. 2019, 9, 88–98. [Google Scholar]
  23. Abu-Shady, M.; Kaabar, M.K.A. A generalized definition of the fractional derivative with applications. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021, 2021, 9444803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, K.-J. The fractal active low-pass filter within the local fractional derivative on the Cantor set. Int. J. Comput. Math. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2023. Accepted. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, K. Fractal travelling wave solution for the fractal-fractional Ablowitz-Kaup-Segur model. Fractals 2022, 30, 2250171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. He, J.H. Fractal calculus and its geometrical explanation. Res. Phys. 2018, 10, 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sneddon, I.N. The Use of Integral Transforms; Tata McGraw-Hill: New Delhi, India, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sharma, S.C.; Devi, M. Unified Mittag–Leffler Function and Extended Riemann–Liouville Fractional Derivative Operator. Int. J. Math. Res. 2017, 9, 135–148. [Google Scholar]
  29. Shadab, M.; Khan, M.F.; Lopez-Bonilla, J.L. A new Riemann–Liouville type fractional derivative operator and its application in generating functions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2018, 2018, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Agarwal, P.; Nieto, J.J.; Luo, M.J. Extended Riemann–Liouville type fractional derivative operator with applications. Open Math. 2019, 15, 1667–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I.A. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables; Dover: New York, NY, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Comparison between the series and integral representations of J ν , q μ , γ ; c z ; p from (a) Equation (11) and (b) Equation (12).
Figure 1. Comparison between the series and integral representations of J ν , q μ , γ ; c z ; p from (a) Equation (11) and (b) Equation (12).
Axioms 12 00356 g001
Figure 2. Illustration of M J ν , q μ , γ ; c z ; p ; s as a function of z from (7) and (24) with c = 10, γ = 6 , μ = 2 , ν = 3 , s = 2 and q = 1 .
Figure 2. Illustration of M J ν , q μ , γ ; c z ; p ; s as a function of z from (7) and (24) with c = 10, γ = 6 , μ = 2 , ν = 3 , s = 2 and q = 1 .
Axioms 12 00356 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Usman, T.; Khan, N.; Martínez, F. Analysis of Generalized Bessel–Maitland Function and Its Properties. Axioms 2023, 12, 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040356

AMA Style

Usman T, Khan N, Martínez F. Analysis of Generalized Bessel–Maitland Function and Its Properties. Axioms. 2023; 12(4):356. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040356

Chicago/Turabian Style

Usman, Talha, Nabiullah Khan, and Francisco Martínez. 2023. "Analysis of Generalized Bessel–Maitland Function and Its Properties" Axioms 12, no. 4: 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040356

APA Style

Usman, T., Khan, N., & Martínez, F. (2023). Analysis of Generalized Bessel–Maitland Function and Its Properties. Axioms, 12(4), 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12040356

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop