1. Preliminaries
All particular cases of the general summation formula for the trigonometric series
with parameters
, we derived in [
1] and expressed as a single formula via the power series
and one can obtain each of them by looking up in
Table 1 and taking the corresponding parameters, including
and
, with
F standing for Riemann’s
function, initially defined by the series [
2]
or Dirichlet
functions defined as follows:
Riemann’s
function satisfies the functional equation [
3]
where
is the gamma function [
4]
introduced by Euler. On the other hand, integration by parts of the integral (
6) gives rise to the basic relation
which can be extended for arbitrary
:
and this formula one can use to express the Pochhammer symbol:
Rewriting integral (
6) as
provides the analytic continuation of the gamma function for all complex numbers, except for integers less than or equal to zero.
For
, Euler’s reflection formula [
4] (p. 35) holds:
The first logarithmic derivative of the gamma function [
5] is the function
(also known as the digamma), i.e.,
whence we find
. It is connected to the
nth harmonic number
, given as the sum of reciprocal values of the first
n positive integers by the equality
where
is the Euler–Mascheroni constant, obtained as the limiting value of the sequence
as
.
As an extension of the Riemann zeta function the Hurwitz zeta function appears, initially defined by the series [
2]
Obviously,
. A straightforward consequence of (
12) is
and because of that, for most purposes, it suffices to restrict
a to
. In addition, most references treat
a as a real number with
. Considering a function of
a, with
fixed,
is analytic in the half-plane
.
The Hurwitz zeta function satisfies an identity that generalizes the functional equation of the Riemann zeta function [
3] (p. 257, Theorem 12.6)
but we rewrite it in a more suitable form:
For
in (
14), by relying on Euler’s famous formula
and elementary properties of the complex logarithm, we evaluate
Multiplying
by
, taking account of (
12) and (
6), we have
Introducing the substitution
, then interchanging the sum and integral, we obtain the integral representation of the Hurwitz zeta function:
Given (
4), one easily derives the relations of the
function to
and
:
We conclude that the
function extends analytically to the whole complex plane, including
, since
Further, using (
5), then setting
in (
15), we find
However, (
17) tells us that, as for the
function,
is analytical for all complex numbers except
, where it has a non-removable singularity. In addition, (
17) immediately gives rise to
,
, because by setting
, in the functional equation for the Riemann zeta function (
5), we find
Because of
we express the
function through a difference of two Hurwitz functions:
Using (
16), we find its integral, represented as
which defines
as an analytical function for
, but employing the functional equations conjectured by Euler in 1749 and proved by the Swedish mathematician Malmsten in 1842,
extends to the whole complex plane. By virtue of (
9), Equation (
20) can be rewritten as follows:
whence we find
,
.
Thus, owing to
the right-hand side series in (
2) truncates. Thus, we obtain [
1], one type of closed-form formula. So, for
, where
and
or
, we have all these cases comprised by the general formula [
1]
We can obtain each from
Table 1 by choosing the corresponding parameters.
2. Alternative Closed-Form Formulas
For
in (
1), and putting
, then
, we have
where
presents Riemann’s zeta function.
However, by taking limits
and
in the first and the second formula of (
22), respectively, one encounters singularities of the
function, so we have to act differently.
Theorem 1. Letting in the first formula of (22), one brings the sine series in closed form:where . This series defines the Clausen function [
1] (p. 452).
Proof. We are not allowed to replace
with
in the first formula of (
22) since
and in the term for
in the series, and we encounter singularities. We recall the Hurwitz formula connecting a trigonometric series and the Hurwitz zeta function.
In the first derivative of the Formula (
14) for
and
, we have
For
, we have
By subtracting these equalities, we obtain
Hence, we obtain the sum of the sine series. □
Theorem 2. Letting in the second formula of (22), one brings the cosine series in closed form:where . This series defines the Clausen function [
1] (p. 452).
Proof. Similarly, one cannot immediately replace
with
, so it is necessary to perform a different method. Taking the first derivative of Formula (
14) with respect to
z for
, we have
Setting here
, we find
For
, we have
By adding these equalities, we obtain
Thence, we obtain the sum of the cosine series. □
For
and putting
in (
1), based on (
22) and using its relation to the zeta function, (
17), we obtain the alternating series over the sines and cosines expressed in terms of the Dirichlet eta function:
Similarly, for
and putting
in (
1), we find
Theorem 3. For , the series (25) takes the closed form Proof. These replacements are legitimate since we encounter no singularities in (
25).
Further, from (
25), we have
and split the right-hand side series as follows:
Taking account of
, we can express the last right-hand side series in terms of the zeta function as a difference of two series:
If we set
in (
5), we can determine values of Riemann’s zeta function at negative odd integers:
By shifting indices in both series of (
29) and applying (
30) and (
8), the difference (
29) becomes
where
denotes Pochhammer’s symbol, given by (
8). We refer now to the theorem in [
6] (p. 419), which we state here in a slightly modified form.
Theorem 1. For every non-negative integer n there holdswith . For the first series of (
31), we set in (
32)
,
,
, then again,
,
,
, and subtract the second equality from the first. In this way, we obtain
Knowing that
for
and
,
, the right-hand side sum becomes
Taking the derivative with respect to
s on both sides of (
13), then putting there
and
, we find
We obtain the same structure for the second series, with the sole difference that instead of
, there appears
. The subtraction yields the sum of (
31), which is the sum of the right-hand side series in (
28). So, for (
31) we find
By differentiating (
5) we can evaluate
for positive integers
n. So, the left-hand side is
, but on the right-hand side, we obtain a sum of four terms; and notice that in three of them,
appears while only one contains
, i.e.,
With
, all the terms except for the latter become zero, and we find
Because of (
34) and
, for the last row of (
33), we have
Adding this modified Formula (
33) to (
28), after a rearrangement, we arrive at (
27). □
Theorem 5. For , the series (26) takes the closed form Proof. Following a similar procedure as in the proof of the preceding theorem, we replace
with
in (
26) and have
The function
is analytic in the whole complex plane, so to bring the latter series into closed form, we express it first as a sum comprising the value of
, obtained for
, and its remainder, i.e.,
Further, we act in the same manner as in the previous proof. Relying on the relation
and (
30), we determine the remainder in (
36) as a difference of the two series
Applying again Theorem 4, where we take
and
, then in succession set
and
, we obtain two formulas of the same structure. Subtracting them gives rise to the sum of the right-hand side series in (
36), which is
Adding (
37) to (
36), we obtain (
27). □
By using the identity
, and summing up the first and second equations of (
22) with (
25) and (
26), respectively, we obtain
Theorem 6. If in the first formula of (38), the following holds: Proof. Since
, in the first formula of (
38) for
singularity is encountered, and for
there is singularity of the lambda function at 1, so we are not permitted to immediately replace
with
but have to take the limit
Further, by bringing the fractions to the same denominator, we have
The denominator tends to zero as
tends to
.
As for the numerator, knowing that
, we have
where, relying on the functional equation for the Riemann zeta function (
5), we make use of the limiting value
So, we can apply L’Hopital’s rule here. For the limiting value of the first derivative of the denominator, we find
Now, we take the limit of the first derivative of the numerator
First of all, using the relation
, we find
It is easy to see that in the neighborhood of
, there holds
and looking up in [
7] (p. 23), we read
Thus, there follows
By replacing this in (
41), omitting
, it remains to calculate
Because of
, we conclude that the limiting value of the sum of only the first and third terms is zero, and finding the limit reduces to
We have applied here the relation (
11).
Thus, taking account of all of this, the value of (
40) is
and the trigonometric series (
39) can now be expressed as
and after shifting the summation index in the last series, making use of the relation
and applying (
30), one can represent it as a difference of two series in terms of the zeta function:
We have already dealt with these series in Formula (
31), but here we express this difference as follows:
Adding the right-hand side to (
42), after a rearrangement, and using (
13), we obtain (
39). □
Theorem 7. If in the second formula of (38), it holds that Proof. After taking the limit
in the second formula of (
38), acting in the same manner as in the proof of the previous theorem, we first find
We deal again with the remainder and rewrite it as follows:
Employing a similar procedure as in the case of the preceding theorem, we come to the closed-form Formula (
43). □
For alternating series related to (
38) we can express them as a power series involving Dirichlet’s beta function
Theorem 8. If α is replaced with in the first formula of (45), we obtain the following closed form: Proof. These replacements are legitimate because we do not encounter singularities since the function
is analytic in the whole complex plane; knowing that
and by using (
20), we easily calculate
Further, from (
45), we have
splitting the right-hand side series in three, but writing it for brevity now as
By shifting the summation index and making use of (
21), the last series becomes
Taking account of (
18), we further change (
47) to
That means we are dealing with two series over the Hurwitz zeta functions and set
and
in (
32), considering, apart from
t, the same formula for
as well.
Replacing
a in succession with
and
in (
32), then subtracting these equalities, we obtain (
48) on the left-hand side. The right-hand side consists of a sum of four terms, the first one being
then of the two sums
and finally of
For
, the expressions
present negative odd integers, which means
, so the first sum in (
49) equals zero.
Differentiating the relation (
21) at
, for
, yields
whereby the second sum in (
49) becomes
Expression (
50) is transformed into
and this is obtained by setting
in the relation
which in turn we obtain from (
18) by relying on the identity [
5]
Collecting all the cases, we arrive at the closed-form Formula (
46). □
Theorem 9. If α is replaced with in the second formula of (45), we obtain the following closed forms: Proof. Acting in the same manner as in deducing Formula (
46), we come to Formula (
51). □
We can organize all these formulas by writing them as a general closed-form formula comprising the Formulas (
23), (
24), (
27), (
35), (
39), (
43), (
46), and (
51), i.e.,
and one can obtain all its particular cases from
Table 2 by choosing the corresponding parameters.
Thus, we have two types of closed-form formulas for each case of trigonometric series.