Author Contributions
Conceptualization, J.Y. and Z.Z.; methodology, J.Y.; software, J.Y.; validation, J.Y., H.W. and C.L.; formal analysis, J.Y.; investigation, W.H.; resources, L.Y.; data curation, R.R.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Y.; writing—review and editing, H.W.; visualization, J.Y.; supervision, H.W.; project administration, J.Y.; funding acquisition, A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Figure 1.
Structure of no-tillage corn precision planter. (a) 3D graphic of a no-tillage corn precision planter; (b) 2D graphic of a no-tillage corn precision planter seed discharge mechanism and seeding mechanism.
Figure 1.
Structure of no-tillage corn precision planter. (a) 3D graphic of a no-tillage corn precision planter; (b) 2D graphic of a no-tillage corn precision planter seed discharge mechanism and seeding mechanism.
Figure 2.
Structural sketches of three different inclination angles of planter plates. (a) 0° slot inclination; (b) 45° slot inclination; (c) 60° slot inclination.
Figure 2.
Structural sketches of three different inclination angles of planter plates. (a) 0° slot inclination; (b) 45° slot inclination; (c) 60° slot inclination.
Figure 3.
Vibration response model of no-tillage corn precision planter.
Figure 3.
Vibration response model of no-tillage corn precision planter.
Figure 4.
Simulink model of single-degree-of-freedom no-tillage corn precision planter.
Figure 4.
Simulink model of single-degree-of-freedom no-tillage corn precision planter.
Figure 5.
Seeding process of maize grain.
Figure 5.
Seeding process of maize grain.
Figure 6.
Mesh delineation of 0° inclined seed discharge discs. (a) Density rough mesh; (b) Density medium mesh; (c) Density good mesh.
Figure 6.
Mesh delineation of 0° inclined seed discharge discs. (a) Density rough mesh; (b) Density medium mesh; (c) Density good mesh.
Figure 7.
Stress analysis of planter plate. (a) 0° slot inclination; (b) 45° slot inclination; (c) 60° slot inclination.
Figure 7.
Stress analysis of planter plate. (a) 0° slot inclination; (b) 45° slot inclination; (c) 60° slot inclination.
Figure 8.
Motion of maize grains. (a) Simulation of the motion trajectory of corn grain; (b) Model of corn grain.
Figure 8.
Motion of maize grains. (a) Simulation of the motion trajectory of corn grain; (b) Model of corn grain.
Figure 9.
Simulation results. (a) Vibration displacement response curve; (b) Vibration velocity response curve; (c) Vibration acceleration response curve.
Figure 9.
Simulation results. (a) Vibration displacement response curve; (b) Vibration velocity response curve; (c) Vibration acceleration response curve.
Figure 10.
Disturbance effect diagrams for different inclination angles. (a) 0° inclination angle; (b) 45° inclination angle; (c) 60° inclination angle.
Figure 10.
Disturbance effect diagrams for different inclination angles. (a) 0° inclination angle; (b) 45° inclination angle; (c) 60° inclination angle.
Figure 11.
Histogram of the number of rows of seeds at different inclination angles. (a) 0° inclination angle; (b) 45° inclination angle; (c) 60° inclination angle.
Figure 11.
Histogram of the number of rows of seeds at different inclination angles. (a) 0° inclination angle; (b) 45° inclination angle; (c) 60° inclination angle.
Figure 12.
Line graphs of mean velocity and mean kinetic energy for different inclination states. (a) Mean velocity; (b) Mean kinetic energy.
Figure 12.
Line graphs of mean velocity and mean kinetic energy for different inclination states. (a) Mean velocity; (b) Mean kinetic energy.
Figure 13.
Histogram of the number of seeds discharged in different slot number states. (a) 10 slots; (b) 15 slots; (c) 20 slots.
Figure 13.
Histogram of the number of seeds discharged in different slot number states. (a) 10 slots; (b) 15 slots; (c) 20 slots.
Figure 14.
Line plots of mean velocity and mean kinetic energy for different notch states. (a) Mean velocity; (b) Mean kinetic energy.
Figure 14.
Line plots of mean velocity and mean kinetic energy for different notch states. (a) Mean velocity; (b) Mean kinetic energy.
Figure 15.
Histogram of the number of seeds discharged at different rotational speed states. (a) 35 rpm; (b) 45 rpm; (c) 55 rpm.
Figure 15.
Histogram of the number of seeds discharged at different rotational speed states. (a) 35 rpm; (b) 45 rpm; (c) 55 rpm.
Figure 16.
Line plots of mean velocity and mean kinetic energy for different speed states. (a) Mean velocity; (b) Mean kinetic energy.
Figure 16.
Line plots of mean velocity and mean kinetic energy for different speed states. (a) Mean velocity; (b) Mean kinetic energy.
Figure 17.
Plot of means of the number of rows at each level of the three factors.
Figure 17.
Plot of means of the number of rows at each level of the three factors.
Figure 18.
Plot of means of average speeds for each level of the three factors.
Figure 18.
Plot of means of average speeds for each level of the three factors.
Figure 19.
Plot of mean values of average kinetic energy for each level of the three factors.
Figure 19.
Plot of mean values of average kinetic energy for each level of the three factors.
Figure 20.
Three-factor variation of maize grain. (a) Plot of number of seeds in rows; (b) Plot of average velocity; (c) Plot of average kinetic energy.
Figure 20.
Three-factor variation of maize grain. (a) Plot of number of seeds in rows; (b) Plot of average velocity; (c) Plot of average kinetic energy.
Table 1.
Main parameters of no-tillage corn precision planter.
Table 1.
Main parameters of no-tillage corn precision planter.
Norm | Overall Quality/(kg) | Overall Volume/(mm) | Line Spacing Range/(mm) |
---|
Digital | ≤50 | 820 × 450 × 440 | 350–600 |
Table 2.
Discrete element simulation parameters.
Table 2.
Discrete element simulation parameters.
Sports Event | Corn Pellets | Steel |
---|
Poisson’s Ratio | 0.4 | 0.3 |
Shear Modulus/MPa | 117 | 70,000 |
Density/(kg·m−3) | 1180 | 7800 |
Contact Mechanical Parameters | Crash Recovery Factor | Corn Pellets-Steel | 0.6 |
Corn Pellets–Corn Pellets | 0.182 |
Coefficient of Static Friction | Corn Pellets–Steel | 0.3 |
Corn Pellets–Corn Pellets | 0.431 |
Coefficient of Kinetic Friction | Corn Pellets–Steel | 0.01 |
Corn Pellets–Corn Pellets | 0.0782 |
Table 3.
Experimental Data.
Table 3.
Experimental Data.
Test Mark | Factor A (Inclination) | Factor B (Number of Grooves) | Factor C (Rotation Speed) | Number of Particles | Velocity | Kinetic Energy |
---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.10 | 0.60 | 6.09 × 10−5 |
2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.10 | 0.66 | 5.06 × 10−5 |
3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0.15 | 0.98 | 1.26 × 10−4 |
4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.15 | 0.81 | 6.86 × 10−5 |
5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0.15 | 0.62 | 4.91 × 10−5 |
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.10 | 0.62 | 5.23 × 10−5 |
7 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0.30 | 0.58 | 4.41 × 10−5 |
8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0.55 | 0.88 | 7.65 × 10−5 |
9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 5.15 × 10−5 |
Table 4.
Pearson’s Correlation at Different Inclinations—Standard Format.
Table 4.
Pearson’s Correlation at Different Inclinations—Standard Format.
| Average Value | Standard Deviation | Inclination | Number of Particles | Velocity | Kinetic Energy |
---|
Inclination | 28.636 | 20.987 | 1 | | | |
Number of Particles | 0.310 | 0.157 | 0.763 * | 1 | | |
Velocity | 0.580 | 0.020 | 0.742 * | 0.847 ** | 1 | |
Kinetic Energy | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.657 * | 0.628 * | 0.692 * | 1 |
Table 5.
Pearson’s Correlation at Different Number of Slots—Standard Format.
Table 5.
Pearson’s Correlation at Different Number of Slots—Standard Format.
| Average Value | Standard Deviation | Number of Grooves | Number of Particles | Velocity | Kinetic Energy |
---|
Number of Grooves | 18.636 | 5.056 | 1 | | | |
Number of particles | 0.527 | 0.188 | 0.930 ** | 1 | | |
Velocity | 0.609 | 0.078 | 0.713 * | 0.694 * | 1 | |
Kinetic Energy | 0.003 | 0.009 | 0.719 * | 0.674 * | 0.867 ** | 1 |
Table 6.
Pearson’s correlation at different rotational speeds—Standard Format.
Table 6.
Pearson’s correlation at different rotational speeds—Standard Format.
| Average Value | Standard Deviation | Rotation Speed | Number of Particles | Velocity | Kinetic Energy |
---|
Rotation Speed | 47.273 | 14.485 | 1 | | | |
Number of particles | 0.525 | 0.142 | 0.943 ** | 1 | | |
Velocity | 0.541 | 0.171 | 0.953 ** | 0.976 ** | 1 | |
Kinetic Energy | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.956 ** | 0.979 ** | 0.972 ** | 1 |
Table 7.
Number of particles—extreme analysis.
Table 7.
Number of particles—extreme analysis.
Item | Level | Inclination | Number of Grooves | Rotation Speed |
---|
K-Value | 1 | 0.35 | 0.55 | 0.75 |
2 | 0.40 | 0.80 | 0.60 |
3 | 1.45 | 0.85 | 0.85 |
K avg-Value | 1 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.25 |
2 | 0.13 | 0.27 | 0.20 |
3 | 0.48 | 0.28 | 0.28 |
Optimum Level | 3 | 3 | 3 |
R | 0.25 | 0.37 | 0.10 |
Number of Levels | 3 | 3 | 3 |
r (Number of Replicates Per Level) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Table 8.
Velocity—extreme analysis.
Table 8.
Velocity—extreme analysis.
Item | Level | Inclination | Number of Grooves | Rotation Speed |
---|
K-Value | 1 | 2.24 | 1.99 | 2.10 |
2 | 2.05 | 2.16 | 2.18 |
3 | 2.07 | 2.21 | 2.08 |
K avg-Value | 1 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 0.70 |
2 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.73 |
3 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.69 |
Optimum Level | 1 | 3 | 2 |
R | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.03 |
Number of Levels | 3 | 3 | 3 |
r (Number of Replicates Per Level) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Table 9.
Kinetic energy—extreme analysis.
Table 9.
Kinetic energy—extreme analysis.
Item | Level | Inclination | Number of Grooves | Rotation Speed |
---|
K-Value | 1 | 2.37 × 10−4 | 1.74 × 10−4 | 1.90 × 10−4 |
2 | 1.70 × 10−4 | 1.76 × 10−4 | 2.18 × 10−4 |
3 | 1.72 × 10−4 | 2.29 × 10−4 | 1.71 × 10−4 |
K avg-Value | 1 | 7.92 × 10−5 | 5.79 × 10−5 | 6.32 × 10−5 |
2 | 5.67 × 10−5 | 5.87 × 10−5 | 7.30 × 10−5 |
3 | 5.74 × 10−5 | 7.66 × 10−5 | 5.69 × 10−5 |
Optimum Level | 1 | 3 | 2 |
R | 2.25 × 10−5 | 1.87 × 10−5 | 1.61 × 10−5 |
Number of Levels | 3 | 3 | 3 |
r (Number of Replicates Per Level) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |