Gas within the Intervertebral Disc Does Not Rule Out Spinal Infection—A Case Series of 135 Patients with Spontaneous Spondylodiscitis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Knutsson, F. The Vacuum Phenomenon in the Intervertebral Discs. Acta Radiol. 1942, 23, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Resnick, D.; Niwayama, G.; Guerra, J., Jr.; Vint, V.; Usselman, J. Spinal vacuum phenomena: Anatomical study and review. Radiology 1981, 139, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kakitsubata, Y.; Theodorou, S.J.; Theodorou, D.J.; Yuko, M.; Ito, Y.; Yuki, Y.; Wada, S.; Maehara, T. Symptomatic epidural gas cyst associated with discal vacuum phenomenon. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009, 34, E784–E789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kuh, S.U.; Heo, D.H.; Kim, K.S.; Cho, Y.J. Lumbar epidural gas-containing pseudocysts as a cause of severe radicular pain. Joint Bone Spine 2011, 78, 398–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qasho, R.; Santoro, A.; Vangelista, T.; Cantore, G. Nerve root compression by a gas-containing cyst associated with stenotic lateral recess. Case Rep. Rev. Literature. J. Neurosurg. Sci. 2001, 45, 181–184. [Google Scholar]
- Coulier, B. The spectrum of vacuum phenomenon and gas in spine. Jbr-Btr 2004, 87, 9–16. [Google Scholar]
- Oertel, M.F.; Korinth, M.C.; Reinges, M.H.; Krings, T.; Terbeck, S.; Gilsbach, J.M. Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of pneumorrhachis. Eur. Spine J. 2006, 15 (Suppl. S5), 636–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cianci, F.; Ferraccioli, G.; Ferraccioli, E.S.; Gremese, E. Comprehensive review on intravertebral intraspinal, intrajoint, and intradiscal vacuum phenomenon: From anatomy and physiology to pathology. Mod. Rheumatol. 2021, 31, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ford, L.T.; Gilula, L.A.; Murphy, W.A.; Gado, M. Analysis of gas in vacuum lumbar disc. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1977, 128, 1056–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yoshida, H.; Shinomiya, K.; Nakai, O.; Kurosa, Y.; Yamaura, I. Lumbar nerve root compression caused by lumbar intraspinal gas: Report of three cases. Spine 1997, 22, 348–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grenier, N.; Grossman, R.I.; Schiebler, M.L.; Yeager, B.A.; Goldberg, H.I.; Kressel, H.Y. Degenerative lumbar disk disease: Pitfalls and usefulness of MR imaging in detection of vacuum phenomenon. Radiology 1987, 164, 861–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schömig, F.; Palmowski, Y.; Nikiforov, I.; Hartwig, T.; Pumberger, M.; Schwabe, P.; Jacobs, C. Burst fractures lead to a fracture-associated intervertebral vacuum phenomenon: A case series of 305 traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Eur. Spine J. 2021, 30, 3068–3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, S.W.; Chang, M.C.; Wu, H.T.; Yu, J.K.; Wang, S.T.; Liu, C.L. Are intravertebral vacuum phenomena benign lesions? Eur. Spine J. 2011, 20, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pate, D.; Katz, A. Clostridia discitis: A case report. Arthritis Rheum. 1979, 22, 1039–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bielecki, D.K.; Sartoris, D.; Resnick, D.; Van Lom, K.; Fierer, J.; Haghighi, P. Intraosseous and intradiscal gas in association with spinal infection: Report of three cases. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1986, 147, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tsiodras, S.; Falagas, M.E. Clinical assessment and medical treatment of spine infections. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2006, 444, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frangen, T.M.; Kälicke, T.; Gottwald, M.; Andereya, S.; Andress, H.J.; Russe, O.J.; Müller, E.J.; Muhr, G.; Schinkel, C. Surgical management of spondylodiscitis. An analysis of 78 cases. Unfallchirurg 2006, 109, 743–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butler, J.S.; Shelly, M.J.; Timlin, M.; Powderly, W.G.; O’Byrne, J.M. Nontuberculous pyogenic spinal infection in adults: A 12-year experience from a tertiary referral center. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006, 31, 2695–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berbari, E.F.; Kanj, S.S.; Kowalski, T.J.; Darouiche, R.O.; Widmer, A.F.; Schmitt, S.K.; Hendershot, E.F.; Holtom, P.D.; Huddleston, P.M., 3rd; Petermann, G.W.; et al. 2015 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis in Adults. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 61, e26–e46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Duarte, R.M.; Vaccaro, A.R. Spinal infection: State of the art and management algorithm. Eur. Spine J. 2013, 22, 2787–2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Morishita, K.; Kasai, Y.; Uchida, A. Clinical symptoms of patients with intervertebral vacuum phenomenon. Neurologist 2008, 14, 37–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lardé, D.; Mathieu, D.; Frija, J.; Gaston, A.; Vasile, N. Spinal vacuum phenomenon: CT diagnosis and significance. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1982, 6, 671–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Modic, M.T.; Ross, J.S. Lumbar degenerative disk disease. Radiology 2007, 245, 43–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, F.C.; Zhang, N.; Chen, W.S.; Chen, Q.X. Endplate degeneration may be the origination of the vacuum phenomenon in intervertebral discs. Med. Hypotheses 2010, 75, 169–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lener, S.; Wipplinger, C.; Lang, A.; Hartmann, S.; Abramovic, A.; Thomé, C. A scoring system for the preoperative evaluation of prognosis in spinal infection: The MSI-20 score. Spine J. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heuer, A.; Strahl, A.; Viezens, L.; Koepke, L.G.; Stangenberg, M.; Dreimann, M. The Hamburg Spondylodiscitis Assessment Score (HSAS) for Immediate Evaluation of Mortality Risk on Hostpial Admission. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Conservative Treatment (n = 35) | Surgical Treatment (n = 100) | |
---|---|---|
CT-guided biopsy | 29 (82.9%) | 18 (18.0%) |
Open biopsy | 2 (5.7%) | 44 (44.0%) |
Intraoperative tissue sampling | - | 88 (88.0%) |
Gas-Positive (n = 31) | Gas-Negative (n = 104) | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age | 71.9 ± 10.8 | 64.0 ± 13.9 | 0.004 * |
Gender (f:m) | 14:17 | 47:57 | 0.998 |
BMI | 27.6 ± 6.1 | 26.4 ± 6.2 | 0.361 |
CCI | 3.9 ± 2.9 | 2.7 ± 2.8 | 0.044 * |
Comorbidities | |||
Smoking | 7/31 (22.6%) | 21/94 (22.3%) | 0.978 |
Diabetes | 9/31 (29.0%) | 22/104 (21.2%) | 0.360 |
Cancer | 15/31 (48.4%) | 28/104 (26.9%) | 0.024 * |
IV drugs | 0/31 (0%) | 1/104 (1.0%) | 1.000 |
HIV | 1/31 (3.2%) | 1/104 (1.0%) | 0.408 |
Symptoms | |||
Body temperature (°C) | 37.2 ± 1.1 | 36.8 ± 0.7 | 0.044 * |
Fever | 6/29 (20.7%) | 7/98 (7.1%) | 0.035 * |
Back pain at rest (VAS) | 4.0 ± 2.6 | 3.9 ± 2.7 | 0.950 |
Back pain moving (VAS) | 5.5 ± 2.7 | 5.7 ± 2.7 | 0.652 |
Localization | 0.066 | ||
Cervical | 1/31 (3.2%) | 6/104 (5.8%) | |
Thoracic | 4/31 (12.9%) | 33/104 (31.7%) | |
Lumbar | 25/31 (80.6%) | 56/104 (53.8%) | |
Disseminated | 1/31 (3.2%) | 9/104 (8.7%) | |
Lab values | |||
CRP (mg/L) | 134.2 ± 127.1 | 89.8 ± 97.3 | 0.040 * |
WBC (/nL) | 11.7 ± 6.2 | 10.2 ± 5.7 | 0.209 |
Hb (g/dL) | 11.7 ± 2.0 | 11.3 ± 1.7 | 0.241 |
Positive microbiology | 19/31 (61.3%) | 74/104 (71.2%) | 0.298 |
Treatment | 0.986 | ||
Conservative | 8/31 (25.8%) | 27/104 (26.7%) | |
Surgical | 23/31 (74.2%) | 77/104 (73.3%) | |
Duration of hospital stay (d) | 25.4 ± 17.6 | 22.1 ± 17.8 | 0.369 |
Gas-Positive (n = 19) | Gas-Negative (n = 74) | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Staphylococcus aureus | 4/19 (21.1%) | 24/74 (32.4%) | 0.410 |
Coagulase-negative staphylococci | 7/19 (36.8%) | 22/74 (29.7%) | 0.551 |
Propionibacterium acnes | 2/19 (10.5%) | 10/74 (13.5%) | 0.729 |
Streptococci | 3/19 (15.8%) | 6/74 (8.1%) | 0.382 |
Enterococci | 3/19 (15.8%) | 1/74 (1.4%) | 0.026 * |
Escherichia coli | 3/19 (15.8%) | 6/74 (8.1%) | 0.382 |
Other gram-positive | 0/19 (0%) | 3/74 (4.1%) | 0.372 |
Other gram-negative | 3/19 (15.8%) | 6/74 (8.1%) | 0.382 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Schömig, F.; Li, Z.; Becker, L.; Vu-Han, T.-L.; Pumberger, M.; Diekhoff, T. Gas within the Intervertebral Disc Does Not Rule Out Spinal Infection—A Case Series of 135 Patients with Spontaneous Spondylodiscitis. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051089
Schömig F, Li Z, Becker L, Vu-Han T-L, Pumberger M, Diekhoff T. Gas within the Intervertebral Disc Does Not Rule Out Spinal Infection—A Case Series of 135 Patients with Spontaneous Spondylodiscitis. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(5):1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051089
Chicago/Turabian StyleSchömig, Friederike, Zhao Li, Luis Becker, Tu-Lan Vu-Han, Matthias Pumberger, and Torsten Diekhoff. 2022. "Gas within the Intervertebral Disc Does Not Rule Out Spinal Infection—A Case Series of 135 Patients with Spontaneous Spondylodiscitis" Diagnostics 12, no. 5: 1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051089
APA StyleSchömig, F., Li, Z., Becker, L., Vu-Han, T. -L., Pumberger, M., & Diekhoff, T. (2022). Gas within the Intervertebral Disc Does Not Rule Out Spinal Infection—A Case Series of 135 Patients with Spontaneous Spondylodiscitis. Diagnostics, 12(5), 1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051089