Next Article in Journal
Prospective Evaluation of Ultrasound in a Novel Position with MRI Virtual Navigation for MRI-Detected Only Breast Lesions: A Pilot Study of a More Efficient and Economical Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Reduced Image Noise on Deauville Scores in Patients with Lymphoma Scanned on a Long-Axial Field-of-View PET/CT-Scanner
Previous Article in Journal
Vibrational Spectroscopy in Urine Samples as a Medical Tool: Review and Overview on the Current State-of-the-Art
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Long Axial Field-of-View PET for Ultra-Low-Dose Imaging of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma during Pregnancy

by
Joyce van Sluis
1,*,
Mar Bellido
2,
Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans
1 and
Riemer H. J. A. Slart
1,3
1
Medical Imaging Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
2
Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
3
Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(1), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010028
Submission received: 16 November 2022 / Revised: 13 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 22 December 2022

Abstract

:
Generally, positron emission tomography imaging is not often performed in the case of pregnant patients. The careful weighing of the risks of radiation exposure to the fetus and benefits for cancer staging and the swift onset of treatment for the mother complicates decision making in clinical practice. In oncology, the most commonly used PET radiotracer is 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG), a glucose analog which has established roles in the daily routines for, among other applications, initial diagnosis, staging, (radiation) therapy planning, and response monitoring. The introduction of long axial Field-of-View (LAFOV) PET systems allows for PET imaging with a reduced level of injected 18F-FDG activity while maintaining the image quality. Here, we discuss the first reported case of a pregnant patient diagnosed with follicular lymphoma using LAFOV PET imaging for the staging and therapy selection. The acquired PET images show diagnostic quality images with clearly distinguishable areas of lymphadenopathy, even with only 34 MBq of injected 18F-FDG activity, leading to a considerable decrease in the level of radiation exposure to the fetus.

1. Introduction

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common type of low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and, representing approximately 35% of all NHLs, the second most commonly diagnosed lymphoma in the United States and Western Europe [1]. FL arises from B-lymphocytes and can therefore be classified as a B-cell lymphoma. Generally, patients with FL present with asymptomatic lymphadenopathy.
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) integrated with Computed Tomography (CT) is a standard of care used in oncology [2,3,4] and many other applications, such as infectious diseases, cardiology, and neurology, providing both metabolic and anatomic information [5]. In oncology, PET/CT is a commonly used and rapidly evolving technique applied in daily clinical practice for, among other applications, initial diagnosis, cancer staging, radiation therapy planning, and response monitoring [4,6,7]. At present, the most commonly used PET radiotracer is 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG), a glucose analog, for which the accumulation in tissue is proportional to the glucose utilization [6].
The ability to determine the positions of single annihilation events along the line of response (LOR) with precise timing information (time-of-flight (ToF)) is the main strength of state-of-the-art PET systems. With the introduction of ‘digital’ silicon-photomultiplier (SiPM)-based PET technology, the ToF can be improved to reach 210–400 picoseconds (ps), thereby providing images of an improved quality [8]. Moreover, in the case of the ‘analog’ photomultiplier-tube-based systems, the sensitivity was found to be one of the limiting factors affecting both the temporal and spatial image resolution. Long acquisition times had to be used, and image filtering was often applied to reduce the image noise. The improved sensitivity of the state-of-the-art PET systems results in a substantial increase in the counts, i.e., the detected annihilation photons, which results in improved statistics and, thus, a substantially increased signal-to-noise ratio [9]. The latest development in the field of PET system technology was the introduction of long axial Field-of-View (LAFOV) PET systems, which are also equipped with SiPMs, to the commercial market. To date, few selected sites have such an innovative system installed that is (clinically) operational. These systems surround the patient with more detectors in the axial Field-of-View (FOV) direction, which provides two major improvements [10]: (1) a longer axial coverage, resulting in a higher detection efficiency, as more photon pairs are captured, and (2) one bed position that covers a much larger proportion of the patient. Thus, in the same scanning time, a larger part of the body is covered.
Recently, the LAFOV Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system (Siemens Healthineers, Knoxville, TN, USA) [11] was installed at the department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging at the University Medical Center Groningen. This system is essentially composed of four interconnected ‘digital’ Biograph Vision PET systems (Siemens Healthineers, Knoxville, TN, USA) [12]. The extended axial FOV of 106 cm results in a substantial increase in the sensitivity, which allows for improved image quality, even in the case of shorter scan durations and/or lower injected activity [13], compared with the conventional PET/CT systems.
The current case report describes the first case of a pregnant female with FL imaged on a LAFOV PET system. Additional post-processing of the PET data and the subsequent reconstructions revealed that there was potential to administer ultra-low levels of 18F-FDG activity in order to minimize fetal radiation exposure, a technique which could be used in the future imaging of pregnant patients.

2. Case Presentation

This case involved an obese 28-year-old female patient (height: 179 cm, weight: 115 kg, BMI: 35.9), G1P0. At 13.5 weeks pregnant, she underwent non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), which was abnormal. The NIPT revealed an aberrant pattern with multiple chromosomal aberrations in chromosomes 13 and 18. The differential diagnosis included a maternal (hematologic) malignancy, or a trisomy 18 diagnosis of the fetus.
At 16.2 weeks pregnant, the patient underwent a whole-body MRI scan, which revealed extensive lymphadenopathy in the neck, axillary region, mediastinum, abdomen, and inguinal region. Additional findings were hepatosplenomegaly and bone marrow abnormalities, which were most pronounced in the distal femora and proximal tibiae. The bloodwork showed hemoglobin levels of 10.8 g/dL and a non-elevated LDH of 141 U/L. Following diagnostic imaging, a bone marrow biopsy was performed, confirming a follicular lymphoma of grade 1–2 in the bone marrow.
At the time of presentation, the patient, at 19 weeks pregnant, had no complaints, and after a multidisciplinary discussion, she was referred to the department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging for an 18F-FDG PET/CT for the further staging of the follicular lymphoma as either transformed or not so as to determine the best chemotherapy treatment. We informed the patient of the risks of radiation but also explained that using our LAFOV PET, we would be able to maintain the radiation levels well below the 100 mGy malformative risk limit defined by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 84 [14].
Prior to intravenous 18F-FDG activity injection, the patient was instructed to avoid strenuous exercise, fast for 6 h, and drink 1 L of water. A plasma glucose level of 4.7 mmol/L was measured before the activity administration. The ICRP Publication 84 also states that using smaller administered activities and longer imaging times during pregnancy can reduce the dose absorbed by the fetus. This is stated to be feasible if the patient is not too sick and is able to remain still for the increased duration of the PET acquisition [14]. Hence, the patient received a lowered weight-based (1.5 MBq/kg) injection of 170 MBq 18F-FDG activity, followed by a whole-body 15 min listmode PET acquisition for an increased scan duration of 60 min post-injection (in general, 3 MBq/kg is administered, according to the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) guidelines, for tumor imaging with 18F [6], with the associated scan durations, as per the bed position, depending on the scanner type and bed overlap so as to ensure sufficient count statistics). Using a single static bed position measuring 106 cm in axial length (approximately from vertex to mid-thigh), listmode PET emission data were acquired using a maximum ring difference of 85, i.e., a photon acceptance angle of 18 degrees [11]. Following the updated recommended fetal dose estimates for 18F-FDG [15] and taking into account the placental crossover values suggested by Benveniste et al. [16], the average dose administered to the fetus per unit activity administered to the mother is 2.2 × 10−2. After administering 170 MBq, the average dose administered to the fetus equals a total of 3.74 mGy (please note, the estimate is for 3 months of gestation, whereas at 19 weeks, the estimated average dose to the fetus is lower).
The obtained 18F-FDG PET images show physiologic uptake in the brain, eye muscles, salivary glands, myocardium, liver, spleen, kidneys, and bladder (see Figure 1, left image). Extensive intense pathologic 18F-FDG uptake was observed in the lymph nodes above and below the diaphragm (neck bilateral nodal areas, axillae, mediastinum intramammary, mesenteric, retroperitoneal, inguinal, and around the iliac arteries). Other abnormal uptake was observed in the liver and in the musculoskeletal system, e.g., the medial clavicles, vertebral body Th11, the left humeral head, and the left ventral ilium. The disease was staged as stage IV and scored using the follicular lymphoma international prognostic index (FLIPI) with a score of 3 because of the involvement of >4 nodal sites [17]. Figure 2 shows illustrative coronal slice CT and fused PET/CT images of the fetus.
Subsequently, the PET data were reconstructed and, in addition, the listmode data were reprocessed to simulate acquired images with a lower level of 18F-FDG activity administration, e.g., a factor of five times lower, resembling 34 MBq (Figure 1, right image). Here, the average dose administered to the fetus was calculated according to the updated recommended fetal dose estimates, as described above (15), as a result of the 34 MBq 18F-FDG activity administered to the mother, and it equaled a total of 0.7 mGy. Images acquired over 15 min were reconstructed using the vendor-recommended, clinically optimized protocol for optimal image reading, consisting of 3D ordinary Poisson (OP-) OSEM with four iterations, five subsets, and a matrix size of 440 × 440 × 708, with a voxel size of 1.6 × 1.6 × 1.5 mm3, time-of-flight (ToF) application, and resolution modelling (PSF) without filtering. Additional images obtained resembling the administration of a factor of five times lower 18F-FDG activity, e.g., 34 MBq, were reconstructed according to the European Association of Nuclear Medicine Research Ltd. standard 2 [13,18], with the settings consisting of 3D OP-OSEM with four iterations, five subsets, and a matrix size of 220 × 220 × 708, with a voxel size of 3.3 × 3.3 × 1.5 mm3, ToF, PSF, and the application of a 5 mm full-width and half-maximum Gaussian filter. These images were considered to be of an adequate image quality to settle the diagnosis of stage IV FL.
Based on the 18F-FDG PET presentation, which provided insight into the extent of the disease, combined with earlier FLIPI 3 scoring [17] and an axillary lymph node biopsy, the diagnosis of non-transformed BCL2-break-positive FL was settled, and six cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy were prescribed. After three cycles, a follow-up 18F-FDG PET was performed, which revealed diminished 18F-FDG avidity and a lower number of lymph nodes involved with regard to the pre-treatment scan, classified as a partial response. After the fourth cycle, the patient delivered a healthy baby. She is currently finishing the fifth cycle of chemotherapy.
For a complete overview of the diagnostic procedures, treatment, and follow-up, please refer to the schematic in Figure 3.

3. Discussion

The current case represents a patient population, namely that of pregnant patients, on whom PET imaging is not commonly performed. Weighing the risks and benefits of the increasing number of options of ever-developing and advancing technologies can be challenging, especially when information about their influences on fetal tissues is limited. A previously published case report of interest by Calais et al. (2014) [19] showed the feasibility of performing 18F-FDG PET/CT during pregnancy for malignant lymphoma staging, administering the normal administered dose of 3 MBq/kg, according to EANM guidelines. The current case shows that an adequate imaging quality can be achieved using LAFOV PET in pregnant women, even with a 10-fold decrease in the normal dose administered to adults, i.e., instead of administering the recommended 3 MBq/kg, resulting in a 345 MBq 18F-FDG injection, in the current presented case, a mere 0.3 MBq/kg dose, resulting in a 34 MBq 18F-FDG injection, proved to be sufficient for an adequate image quality. This enables a reduction in the average dose to the fetus from 3.7 to 0.7 mGy. Currently, PET imaging is part of the established daily routine in clinical practice used to detect and stage malignancies. With the emergence of LAFOV PET and its substantially increased sensitivity, it is feasible to lower the radiation exposure to such an extent that even the most vulnerable patient populations can benefit from the potential of PET.
Alternatively, instead of a significant reduction in the administered activity, for other patient populations, a proportionate reduction in the scan duration can be achieved (or a combination of both). This significant reduction in the scan duration may make it possible to scan other vulnerable patient populations who are unable to lie still for a long time, such as children (without anesthesia) or elderly patients, and patients with, e.g., severe back pain, or claustrophobic patients [9]. In the case of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, on whom PET/CT imaging is currently rarely performed due to logistical issues and the need for continuous monitoring in the case of unstable patients [20], an ultra-fast scan protocol may be beneficial for the use of anatomical CT to obtain one-stop-shop metabolic information, for example, at the possible locations and sources of frequently occurring infections.
Other applications of low-dose or faster PET acquisition procedures can include, for example, the indeterminate pulmonary nodule quantification of 18F-FDG uptake to distinguish benign (i.e., inflammatory processes) from malignant diseases as part of a lung cancer screening protocol. In particular, the imaging and quantification of small nodules (<1 cm) [21] at the lung base can be erroneous due to partial volume effects and respiratory motion artifacts [22]. Fast-breath-hold 18F-FDG PET, acquiring images within 15–30 s, may be achieved using a LAFOV scanner, which can mitigate these issues [23] and obviate the necessity to apply sophisticated motion correction algorithms [24].
Equivalent to imaging methods with less injected radioactive tracer, the increased sensitivity of a LAFOV scanner could be used for delayed imaging with acquisition times post-injection reaching far beyond the possibilities of conventional PET systems, e.g., 2–18 h (10 half-lives) for 18F-FDG [25,26]. This prolonged uptake time ensures the increased entrapment of the tracer in the metabolically active tissues. The tumor contrast increases over time and a nearly full washout of the free (i.e., non-metabolized) 18F-FDG (background) occurs, resulting in a higher lesion-to-background ratio, i.e., the signal’s specificity increases. Delayed imaging is particularly promising for the detection of metastases in tissues with a high physiological uptake, such as the liver, which decreases over time [27].
Of course, the improved performance characteristics of LAFOV PET can also be used to translate the improved count statistics into an excellent image quality, allowing for smaller voxels while maintaining a high signal-to-noise ratio.

4. Conclusions

The first case of ultra-low-dose 18F-FDG imaging in oncology during pregnancy using LAFOV PET was described here. This report showed that even with a mere 34 MBq of administered 18F-FDG activity (a 10-fold lower administered dose than that defined by the EANM guidelines), a clear image of a more than adequate diagnostic quality can be obtained, limiting the radiation exposure to the fetus substantially compared to the use of conventional PET systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.v.S., A.W.J.M.G., and R.H.J.A.S.; methodology, J.v.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.v.S.; writing—review and editing, J.v.S., M.B., A.W.J.M.G., and R.H.J.A.S.; visualization, J.v.S.; supervision, A.W.J.M.G. and R.H.J.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The medical ethics review board of the University Medical Center Groningen waived the need for a formal ethical review for clinical validation and optimization of using the LAFOV Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT (waiver number METc2020/554). All data described in this case were part of routine clinical work.

Informed Consent Statement

Specifically for optimization and validation of the new LAFOV PET/CT system, the ethical committee waived the need for formal ethical review (waiver number METc2020/554). In addition, patient consent was waived due to an opt-out agreement for the use of clinically acquired anonymized PET data for which ‘no objection’ was registered in the electronic patient file for the patient involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Freedman, A. Foillicular lymphoma: 2015 Update on diagnosis and management. Am. J. Hematol. 2015, 90, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bastiaannet, E.; Groen, B.; Jager, P.L.; Cobben, D.C.P.; van der Graaf, W.T.A.; Vaalburg, W.; Hoekstra, H.J. The value of FDG-PET in the detection, grading and response to therapy of soft tissue and bone sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2004, 30, 83–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Slomka, P.J.; Pan, T.; Germano, G. Recent Advances and Future Progress in PET Instrumentation. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2016, 46, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hsu, D.F.C.; Ilan, E.; Peterson, W.T.; Uribe, J.; Lubberink, M.; Levin, C.S. Studies of a Next-Generation Silicon-Photomultiplier–Based Time-of-Flight PET/CT System. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 58, 1511–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Townsend, D.W. Dual-Modality Imaging: Combining Anatomy and Function. J. Nucl. Med. 2008, 49, 938–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Boellaard, R.; Delgado-Bolton, R.; Oyen, W.J.G.; Giammarile, F.; Tatsch, K.; Eschner, W.; Verzijlbergen, F.J.; Barrington, S.F.; Pike, L.C.; Weber, W.A.; et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: Version 2.0. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2014, 42, 328–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Boellaard, R.; Oyen, W.J.G.; Hoekstra, C.J.; Hoekstra, O.S.; Visser, E.P.; Willemsen, A.T.; Arends, B.; Verzijlbergen, F.J.; Zijlstra, J.; Paans, A.M.; et al. The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2008, 35, 2320–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Surti, S.; Viswanath, V.; Daube-Witherspoon, M.E.; Conti, M.; Casey, M.E.; Karp, J.S. Benefit of improved performance with state-of-the art digital PET/CT for lesion detection in oncology. J. Nucl. Med. 2020, 61, 1684–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Slart, R.H.J.A.; Tsoumpas, C.; Glaudemans, A.W.J.M.; Noordzij, W.; Willemsen, A.T.M.; Borra, R.J.H.; Dierckx, R.A.J.O.; Lammertsma, A.A. Long axial field of view PET scanners: A road map to implementation and new possibilities. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2021, 48, 4236–4245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vandenberghe, S.; Moskal, P.; Karp, J.S. State of the art in total body PET. EJNMMI Phys. 2020, 7, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Prenosil, G.A.; Sari, H.; Fürstner, M.; Afshar-Oromieh, A.; Shi, K.; Rominger, A.; Hentschel, M. Performance Characteristics of the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system with long axial field of view using the NEMA NU 2-2018 Standard. J. Nucl. Med. 2021, 63, 476–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Van Sluis, J.; De Jong, J.; Schaar, J.; Noordzij, W.; Van Snick, P.; Dierckx, R.; Borra, R.; Willemsen, A.; Boellaard, R. Performance Characteristics of the Digital Biograph Vision PET/CT System. J Nucl Med 2019, 60, 1031–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. van Sluis, J.; van Snick, J.H.; Brouwers, A.H.; Noordzij, W.; Dierckx, R.A.J.O.; Borra, R.J.H.; Slart, R.H.J.A.; Lammertsma, A.A.; Glaudemans, A.W.J.M.; Boellaard, R.; et al. EARL compliance and imaging optimisation on the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT using phantom and clinical data. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2022, 49, 4652–4660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. ICRP. Pregnancy and Medical Radiation, ICRP Publication 84: Approved by the Commission in November 1999. Ann. ICRP 2000, 30, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Stabin, M.G. Proposed addendum to previously published fetal dose estimate tables for 18F-FDG. J. Nucl. Med. 2004, 45, 634–635. [Google Scholar]
  16. Benveniste, H.; Fowler, J.S.; Rooney, W.D.; Moller, D.H.; Backus, W.W.; Warner, D.A.; Carter, P.; King, P.; Scharf, B.; Alexoff, D.A.; et al. Maternal-fetal in vivo imaging: A combined PET and MRI study. J. Nucl. Med. 2003, 44, 1522–1530. [Google Scholar]
  17. van de Schans, S.A.M.; Steyerberg, E.W.; Nijziel, M.R.; Creemers, G.J.; Janssen-Heijnen, M.L.; van Spronsen, D.J. Validation, revision and extension of the follicular lymphoma international prognostic index (FLIPI) in a population-based setting. Ann. Oncol. 2009, 20, 1697–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Boellaard, R.; Kaalep, A.; Sera, T.; Oyen, W.; Krause, B.J.; Chiti, A.; Liu, Y. New Developments of EANM Oncology PET/CT Guidelines and Update of the EARL Accreditation Standards Presentation. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2018, 45, 412–422. [Google Scholar]
  19. Calais, J.; Hapdey, S.; Tilly, H.; Vera, P.; Chastan, M. Hodgkin’s Disease Staging by FDG PET/CT in a Pregnant Woman. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2014, 48, 244–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Pijl, J.P.; Londema, M.; Kwee, T.C.; Nijsten, M.W.N.; Slart, R.H.J.A.; Dierckx, R.A.J.O.; van der Voort, P.H.J.; Glaudemans, A.W.J.M.; Pillay, J. FDG-PET/CT in intensive care patients with bloodstream infection. Crit. Care 2021, 25, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maiga, A.W.; Deppen, S.A.; Mercaldo, S.F.; Blume, J.D.; Montgomery, C.; Vaszar, L.T.; Williamson, C.; Isbell, J.M.; Rickman, O.B.; Pinkerman, R.; et al. Assessment of fluorodeoxyglucose F18–Labeled positron emission tomography for diagnosis of high-Risk lung nodules. JAMA Surg. 2018, 153, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Surti, S.; Pantel, A.R.; Karp, J.S. Total Body PET: Why, How, What for? IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. 2021, 4, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Torizuka, T.; Tanizaki, Y.; Kanno, T.; Futatsubashi, M.; Yoshikawa, E.; Okada, H. Single 20-Second Acquisition of Clinical Feasibility for Lung Cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2009, 50, 1579–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lu, Y.; Fontaine, K.; Mulnix, T.; Onofrey, J.A.; Ren, S.; Panin, V.; Jones, J.; Casey, M.E.; Barnett, R.; Kench, P.; et al. Respiratory Motion Compensation for PET/CT with Motion Gated PET Data. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 1480–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Pantel, A.R.; Viswanath, V.; Daube-witherspoon, M.E.; Dubroff, J.G.; Muehllehner, G.; Parma, M.J.; Pryma, D.A.; Schubert, E.K.; Mankoff, D.A.; Karp, J.S. PennPET Explorer: Human Imaging on a Whole-Body Imager. J. Nucl. Med. 2020, 61, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Badawi, R.D.; Shi, H.; Hu, P.; Chen, S.; Xu, T.; Price, P.M.; Ding, Y.; Spencer, B.A.; Nardo, L.; Liu, W.; et al. First human imaging studies with the explorer total-body PET scanner. J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 60, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, J.W.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.M.; Moon, S.H.; Kim, T. Detection of Hepatic Metastases Using Dual-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Scans in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2011, 13, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Maximum intensity projection PET images acquired with 170 MBq (left) and 34 MBq (right).
Figure 1. Maximum intensity projection PET images acquired with 170 MBq (left) and 34 MBq (right).
Diagnostics 13 00028 g001
Figure 2. Coronal slice CT (left) and fused PET/CT images (right) of the fetus.
Figure 2. Coronal slice CT (left) and fused PET/CT images (right) of the fetus.
Diagnostics 13 00028 g002
Figure 3. Schematic of the diagnostic procedures, therapy, and follow-up.
Figure 3. Schematic of the diagnostic procedures, therapy, and follow-up.
Diagnostics 13 00028 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

van Sluis, J.; Bellido, M.; Glaudemans, A.W.J.M.; Slart, R.H.J.A. Long Axial Field-of-View PET for Ultra-Low-Dose Imaging of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma during Pregnancy. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010028

AMA Style

van Sluis J, Bellido M, Glaudemans AWJM, Slart RHJA. Long Axial Field-of-View PET for Ultra-Low-Dose Imaging of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma during Pregnancy. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(1):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010028

Chicago/Turabian Style

van Sluis, Joyce, Mar Bellido, Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans, and Riemer H. J. A. Slart. 2023. "Long Axial Field-of-View PET for Ultra-Low-Dose Imaging of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma during Pregnancy" Diagnostics 13, no. 1: 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010028

APA Style

van Sluis, J., Bellido, M., Glaudemans, A. W. J. M., & Slart, R. H. J. A. (2023). Long Axial Field-of-View PET for Ultra-Low-Dose Imaging of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma during Pregnancy. Diagnostics, 13(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010028

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop