Next Article in Journal
Cervical Cancer Detection Techniques: A Chronological Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Lung Ultrasound to Determine the Effect of Lower vs. Higher PEEP on Lung Aeration in Patients without ARDS—A Substudy of a Randomized Clinical Trial
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Differential Diagnosis of Tuberous Vas Deferens Tuberculosis and Metastatic Inguinal Lymph Nodes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chronic or Changeable Infarct Size after Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/diagnostics13101764
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bronchoscopy Findings during Percutaneous Dilation Tracheostomy: A Single Tertiary Medical Center Experience

by
Ko-Wei Chang
1,2 and
Hsin-Yueh Fang
3,*
1
Department of Thoracic Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
2
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
3
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(10), 1764; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101764
Submission received: 20 April 2023 / Revised: 11 May 2023 / Accepted: 15 May 2023 / Published: 17 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Care Imaging—2nd Edition)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Percutaneous dilation tracheostomy (PDT) is a common procedure in intensive care units. Bronchoscopy has been recommended to guide PDT to decrease complication rates, but no study has analyzed bronchoscopy outcomes during PDT. In this retrospective study, we analyzed bronchoscopy findings and clinical outcomes during PDT. We collected data on all patients who underwent PDT between May 2018 and February 2021. All PDT operations were guided by bronchoscopy, and we assessed the airway to the third order of the bronchi. Forty-one patients who underwent PDT were included in this study. The average duration of PDT was 102.8 ± 34.6 s, and the average duration of bronchoscopy was 49.8 ± 43.8 s. No complications related to bronchoscopy and no significant changes in gas exchange or ventilator parameters were noted after the procedure. Fifteen patients (36.6%) exhibited abnormal bronchoscopy findings, including two patients (13.3%) with intra-airway mass lesions and obvious airway obstruction. None of the patients with intra-airway masses could be liberated from mechanical ventilation. This study observed a non-negligibly high incidence of unexpected endotracheal or endobronchial masses in patients with chronic respiratory failure during PDT, and a high rate of weaning failure was noted in these patients. The completion of bronchoscopy during PDT may provide additional clinical benefits.

1. Introduction

Tracheostomy is now a common procedure, particularly for patients who require prolonged usage of mechanical ventilation [1,2]. Tracheostomy is indicated for long-term ventilator use, weaning failure, upper airway disease, and copious secretions [2]. In addition to surgical tracheostomy, percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is commonly used in the intensive care unit (ICU) [3]. Numerous studies have compared surgical tracheostomy with PDT. A meta-analysis demonstrated that PDT can reduce wound infection, bleeding, and mortality [4], and another meta-analysis revealed that PDT can be performed faster but with greater technical difficulties [5]. Guidelines from 2018 describe PDT as the standard method in the ICU (grade 1+/strong agreement) [1]. The use of bronchoscopy to guide PDT has been suggested to potentially reduce complication rates [6].
Chronic respiratory failure can be caused by pulmonary, neurological, or cardiovascular diseases. Among these, pulmonary disease is the most common cause [7,8]. No study on patients with chronic respiratory failure has discussed bronchoscopy findings. Although studies have suggested tracheostomy for prolonged mechanical ventilation [1], the weaning success rate is not significantly higher in patients undergoing tracheostomy [8].
This study analyzed the data of patients with chronic respiratory failure who underwent PDT guided by bronchoscopy to investigate the relationship between bronchoscopy and weaning outcomes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Population

We conducted a retrospective case series study in a tertiary referral center in Taiwan with 278 adult ICU beds and 24 respiratory care center beds. The respiratory care centers specialize in the care of patients who require prolonged ventilation and have no other systemic problems. We collected the data of all patients who underwent PDT between May 2018 and February 2021. The demographic data, bronchoscopy findings, laboratory data, pathology reports, ventilator settings, and clinical conditions and outcomes were all collected from the electronic medical record system. The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score [9], laboratory data, ventilator parameters, and blood gas data were collected within 3 days before PDT. Institutional review board approval was obtained (CGMHIRB-202101105B0).

2.2. PDT

Our PDT team included a thoracic surgeon and a pulmonologist. In our hospital, the bronchoscopy is mandatory to guide the PDT to avoid complications, such as misplaced puncture, posterior tracheal wall damage, or hemorrhage, and we arranged bronchoscopy examination for all patients who underwent PDT. Patients who were indicated for tracheostomy exhibited long-term ventilator usage, weaning failure, upper airway disease, or copious secretions. Contraindications for PDT include a high bleeding risk that may necessitate electrocoagulation, abnormal neck structure, or previous neck surgery; some patients did not undergo PDT due to the duty doctor’s preferences. Before the surgical procedure, the pulmonologist assessed the airway to the third order of the bronchi using bronchoscopy, and secretions in the trachea and bronchi were cleaned thoroughly. Subsequently, the endotracheal tube was drawn near the vocal cord level, and a bronchoscope was placed in the upper trachea to monitor the puncture site. The thoracic surgeon then performed the PDT as the standard procedure [3]. We used the Ciaglia Blue Rhino G2 set (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) for all of the procedures in this study. The bronchoscope was inserted into the tracheostomy tube to assess bleeding and remove as much blood or secretions as possible. Bronchial washing for pathogen survey or biopsy by forceps was performed after the tracheostomy under the bronchoscopy findings and the request for duty intensivists. All of the PDTs or bronchoscopies were performed by the same thoracic surgeon and pulmonologist, so factors such as the operator’s skill or practice habits may not have impacted further analysis in this study. Bronchoscopy duration was measured from the entrance of the endotracheal tube to the completion of the bronchoscopy survey. Tracheostomy duration was measured from needle puncture to the completion of the procedure.

2.3. Arterial Blood Gas and Ventilator Setting Data

The respiratory therapists and intensivists established and adjusted the mechanical ventilator settings according to the patient’s condition and arterial blood gas data. All patients were administered mechanical ventilation in pressure-limited ventilation, and the time-cycled pressure-control mode or flow-cycled pressure-support mode was chosen according to the patients’ demand for a mechanical ventilator. The peak airway pressure and positive end-expiratory pressure were set, and the tidal volume was detected by the ventilator. If the patients used non-invasive ventilation or a T-piece before the tracheostomy, the intubation was performed before the operation. Arterial blood gas and ventilator setting data were collected in the morning preceding PDT and the morning following PDT.
The dynamic lung compliance was calculated as tidal volume divided by dynamic driving pressure, and the dynamic driving pressure was calculated as peak airway pressure minus positive end-expiratory pressure. The changes in arterial blood gas data or ventilator setting data were defined as post-tracheostomy data minus pre-tracheostomy data.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The numbers (percentages) for nominal variables are presented, and Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare these variables. The means ± standard deviations of continuous variables are presented, and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare these variables. Paired samples t-tests were used to compare the parameters before and after tracheostomy. Two-tailed tests were used, and the significance level was set at p < 0.05. All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 22.0.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Data

Forty-one patients underwent PDT performed by our team during the specified period, all of whom were included in this study. A flow chart of the patients in this study is shown in Figure 1. The demographic data are presented in Table 1. Twenty-two patients were female. The mean age of the patients was 70.3 years. Most patients underwent tracheostomy in the medical ICU or respiratory care center (73.2%), and the remaining patients were admitted to the cardiac, alimentary, or surgical ICUs. Twenty-seven patients (65.9%) had lung disease-induced chronic respiratory failure, six patients had central nervous system disease-related respiratory drive problems, and eight patients had central airway problems (i.e., vocal cord palsy in two patients, supraglottic inflammation in one patient, facial bone fracture in one patient, and trachea problems in four patients). The average duration from the start of mechanical ventilation to the tracheostomy was 26.4 days. Before undergoing tracheostomy, 23 (56.1%) patients used a ventilator in pressure control mode, thirteen (31.7%) patients used a ventilator in pressure support mode, two patients used noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, one patient used a T-piece, and one patient used a simple mask. The mean PaO2/FiO2 ratio was 313.5 mm Hg, and the mean PaCO2 was 45.3 mm Hg. The mean SOFA score before tracheostomy was 4.6.

3.2. Clinical Outcomes

The average duration of PDT was 102.8 ± 34.6 s (minimum–maximum duration was 61–229 s), and no significant differences between patients with intra-airway abnormalities and other patients were observed (98.9 ± 39.0 vs. 105.5 ± 31.9, p = 0.334). The average duration of bronchoscopy was 49.8 ± 43.8 s (minimum–maximum duration was 13–242 s); bronchoscopy duration was significantly longer in patients with intra-airway abnormalities than in other patients (77.3 ± 57.3 vs. 33.1 ± 20.6 s, p = 0.001; Table 1). No complications related to bronchoscopy, such as significant oxygen desaturation pneumothorax, or bleeding, were recorded during the examination. Tracheostomy wound blood oozing was observed in two patients, but this was resolved after local compression and epinephrine gauze administration. None of the procedures involved any injury of the thyroid ima artery, a variant artery supplying the thyroid that exists in 3.8% of the population [10].
Of these patients, 19 patients (46.3%) were liberated from mechanical ventilation, 14 (34.1%) remained ventilator-dependent, and 8 (19.5%) died in the hospital.

3.3. Comparison of Gas Exchange and Ventilator Parameters before and after Tracheostomy

The gas exchange and ventilator parameters data before and after tracheostomy are shown in Table 2. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased after PDT, but there was no significant difference (from 313.5 ± 100.4 to 331.6 ± 93.8 mm Hg, p = 0.196). The PaCO2 measure (from 45.3 ± 13.1 to 45.4 ± 12.0 mm Hg) and pH level (from 7.4 ± 0.1 to 7.4 ± 0.1) exhibited no significant differences before and after tracheostomy. In patients with mechanical ventilation before tracheostomy, no significant changes were noted in peak airway pressure (from 23.4 ± 6.9 to 22.6 ± 7.8 cm H2O, p = 0.403), positive end-expiratory pressure (from 8.1 ± 0.8 to 7.9 ± 1.0 cm H2O, p = 0.183), tidal volume/predicted body weight (from 8.3 ± 1.9 to 8.3 ± 2.7 mL/kg, p = 0.962), or dynamic lung compliance (from 36.5 ± 23.4 to 39.0 ± 24.9 mL/cm H2O, p = 0.455).

3.4. Bronchoscopy Findings

Fifteen patients (36.6%) exhibited abnormal bronchoscopy findings, including seven patients (46.7%) with increased secretion in the distal airway (one patient contracted Acinetobacter baumannii from the bronchial washing culture) (Figure 2a), three patients (20.0%) with endobronchial granulation tissue without airway obstruction (Figure 2b), one patient (6.7%) with mucosal patches that a secretion culture indicated to be Burkholderia cepacia complex (Figure 2c), one patient (6.7%) with peripheral airway mucosal blood oozing (Figure 2d), one patient (6.7%) with known tumor invasion, and two patients (13.3%) with intra-airway mass lesions with obvious airway obstruction from suspected malignancies. The brief case histories of these two patients were as follows:

3.4.1. Case 1

A 92-year-old man was admitted with dyspnea, pneumonia, and respiratory failure. Tracheostomy was performed on ventilator day 25 for long-term ventilator usage. A bronchoscopy revealed an irregular surface mass lesion in the right middle bronchus (Figure 2e), and a biopsy indicated the presence of atypical cells. However, the patient’s family refused further testing or management, and the patient was transferred to the respiratory care ward.

3.4.2. Case 2

A 60-year-old man with underlying stage-IV squamous cell carcinoma of the lung experienced respiratory failure caused by nosocomial pneumonia. A bronchoscopy on ventilator day 3 indicated only increased secretion and no mass lesions. A tracheostomy was performed on ventilator day 22 because of the difficulty of weaning with high airway resistance. The bronchoscopy revealed an irregular whitish mass in the lower trachea with approximately 50% obstruction (Figure 2f). A thoracic surgeon was consulted for tumor removal or stent placement, but the patient’s family refused further management. The patient was transferred to the respiratory care ward.

3.5. Bronchoscopy Findings and Clinical Outcomes

The clinical outcomes of different bronchoscopy findings are shown in Table 3. The patients with no abnormal bronchoscopy findings had a 50% success rate of weaning from a mechanical ventilator. The patients with increased secretion in the distal airway and endobronchial granulation tissue without airway obstruction exhibited better clinical outcomes than others, and their rates of ventilator liberation were 57.1% and 66.7%, respectively. None of the patients with mucosal patches, intra-airway masses, tumor invasion, or endobronchial blood oozing were liberated from mechanical ventilation, and 80% of such patients required long-term mechanical ventilation.
Patients with no abnormal bronchoscopy findings and with increased secretion in the distal airway, compared to patients with unsolvable abnormalities (endobronchial granulation tissue, tumor invasion, intra-airway mass lesions, or endobronchial blood oozing), had no significant change in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio after tracheostomy (14.5 ± 87.1 vs. 35.0 ± 94.9 mm Hg, p = 0.508). However, patients with no abnormal bronchoscopy findings and with increased secretion had better dynamic lung compliance, and patients with unsolvable abnormalities had poor dynamic lung compliance after tracheostomy (+4.5 ± 21.0 vs. −5.7 ± 7.8 mm Hg, p = 0.059).

4. Discussion

Several studies have discussed the relationship between PDT and bronchoscopy, but no study has investigated bronchoscopy findings during PDT. In this study, an average of 49.8 s was required for a bronchoscopy survey of the third order of the bronchi, and no obvious complications were noted. We observed intra-airway abnormalities in 36.6% of the patients, and 13.3% of them had unexpected mass lesions that were highly suspected of malignancy in the airway. Patients with intra-airway masses, mucosal patches, or endobronchial blood oozing had a low probability of being liberated from ventilation.
Whether bronchoscopy guidance is required during PDT remains controversial. Studies have suggested using bronchoscopy-guided PDT for safety purposes [11], but some studies have reported no differences in complication rates with or without bronchoscopy [12,13]. Furthermore, one study reported that compared with ultrasound-guided procedures, bronchoscopy may confer a higher risk of hypoventilation, hypercapnia, and respiratory acidosis [14]. Another study reported that the puncture site varied even in the bronchoscopy-guided procedures [15]. However, a randomized-controlled study [16] and a meta-analysis [17] have reported that the complication rates and clinical outcomes of ultrasound-guided PDT were not significantly different from those of bronchoscopy-guided PDT. In our study, the use of bronchoscopy to guide the PDT did not induce a significant change in PaCO2 levels compared to the levels before the procedure (from 45.3 ± 13.1 to 45.4 ± 12.0 mm Hg), and no obvious complications were recorded. Moreover, bronchoscopy has additional benefits, such as the assessment of airway conditions, the identification of previously undetected endotracheal or endobronchial abnormalities, and secretion suction. The clinical benefits of secretion suction are difficult to determine because we cannot compare the clinical outcomes if we do not remove the secretion. The collection of unhandled secretion may interfere with PDT monitoring, and we have to clean the secretion as much as possible. However, detected endotracheal or endobronchial abnormalities can reveal the possible etiology of respiratory failure, such as that observed in Case 2, or reveal a possible malignant disease, such as in Case 1.
A study analyzed gas exchange before and after PDT and reported a significant decrease in PaCO2 after PDT (from 43 ± 9 to 42 ± 7 mm Hg) without significant changes in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in all patients (from 304 ± 85 to 305 ± 81 mm Hg) [18]. Another study reported a considerable increase in PaCO2 (24 ± 3 mm Hg) during PDT [14]. In our study, PaCO2 exhibited no significant changes (from 45.3 ± 13.1 to 45.4 ± 12.0 mm Hg), and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio improved after PDT without any statistical significance (from 313.5 ± 100.4 to 331.6 ± 93.8 mm Hg, p = 0.196). One explanation for this difference may be the different timing of arterial blood gas sampling or differences in the patients’ baseline conditions. The PDT duration (13 ± 6 min) in one study [14] was much higher than that of our study (sum of bronchoscopy duration and PDT duration, 159.2 ± 65.8 s), and the different procedure duration may influence changes in PaCO2. Hence, the changes in PaCO2 reported in research are inconsistent, and increases in PaCO2 may not be a serious concern in bronchoscopy-guided PDT.
A study investigating pediatric tracheostomy patients evaluated routine airway outcomes approximately one year after tracheostomy [19], and they observed that suprastomal granulation was the most common abnormality. However, they also reported that distal airway granulation was observed in 4.9% of the patients. They noted that the decision of whether to resect granulation was based on the probability that the larger granulation may have obstructed the airway. Of these patients, 61.5% underwent granulation resection. In our study, distal airway granulation was observed in 7.3% of the patients. One of them was removed using forceps after PDT, and the others were simply observed. Two of these patients were later liberated from mechanical ventilation without obvious airway obstruction.
Several etiologies may cause endotracheal or endobronchial masses with airway obstruction, including both malignant and nonmalignant diseases, such as granulation tissues, webs, or pseudotumors [20]. Several case reports have reported endobronchial or endotracheal lesions that induce acute respiratory failure, including lymphoma [21,22], metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma [23], or small-cell lung cancer [24]. However, no study has explored the relationship between endotracheal or endobronchial masses with chronic respiratory failure or ventilator dependence. As routine screening using bronchoscopy for airway mass lesions in patients with chronic respiratory failure is infeasible, we used bronchoscopy-guided PDT to survey the accessible airway.
Another benefit of bronchoscopy during PDT is complete sputum suction. A study used daily bronchoscopic sputum suction in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and respiratory failure compared to general sputum suction, and the results showed the patients with daily bronchoscopic sputum suction had better infectious control, shorter mechanical ventilation duration and hospital stay, lower reintubation rate, lower ventilator-associated pneumonia rate, higher weaning success rate, and lower mortality [25]. Another study on patients with bronchiectasis showed that patients who received bronchoscopic airway clearance therapy had a significantly longer duration to another acute exacerbation after discharge and had fewer symptoms [26]. In our study, we only performed the bronchoscopic sputum suction once during the PDT. However, patients with no endobronchial abnormalities or increased secretion had better dynamic lung compliance after the procedure. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the benefit of more frequent bronchoscopic sputum suction in chronic respiratory failure.
This study had several limitations. First, only one group at our hospital was qualified to undergo PDT; therefore, the sample size was limited. However, we observed two patients with endobronchial or endotracheal masses even in such a small sample; thus, the number of abnormalities observed is likely to be higher in larger samples. Second, the diversity of patients in our study may have interfered with the analysis of endobronchial abnormality etiologies or predictors of weaning success. Third, the patients in our study were not representative of all the patients with chronic respiratory failure because we only included patients who underwent PDT, and randomization could not be performed. A large-scale cross-sectional study is required to investigate the prevalence of endobronchial or endotracheal abnormalities in patients with chronic respiratory problems, and a randomized controlled design should be used to investigate the relationship between these abnormalities and clinical outcomes.

5. Conclusions

We observed a non-negligibly high incidence (4.9%) of unexpected intra-airway masses in patients with chronic respiratory failure during PDT, and they exhibited a high weaning failure rate (100%). The completion of bronchoscopy during PDT did not significantly increase the procedure duration or complication incidence but may provide additional clinical benefits.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.-W.C. and H.-Y.F.; validation, H.-Y.F.; formal analysis, K.-W.C.; data curation, H.-Y.F.; writing—original draft preparation, K.-W.C.; writing—review and editing, H.-Y.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The local Institutional Review Boards for Human Research at Linkou Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital approved this study (CGMHIRB-202101105B0).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Trouillet, J.L.; Collange, O.; Belafia, F.; Blot, F.; Capellier, G.; Cesareo, E.; Constantin, J.-M.; Demoule, A.; Diehl, J.-L.; Guinot, P.-G.; et al. Tracheotomy in the intensive care unit: Guidelines from a French expert panel. Ann. Intensiv. Care 2018, 8, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. De Leyn, P.; Bedert, L.; Delcroix, M.; Depuydt, P.; Lauwers, G.; Sokolov, Y.; Van Meerhaeghe, A.; Van Schil, P. Tracheotomy: Clinical review and guidelines. Eur. J. Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2007, 32, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Susarla, S.M.; Peacock, Z.S.; Alam, H.B. Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy: Review of Technique and Evidence for Its Use. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2012, 70, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Delaney, A.; Bagshaw, S.M.; Nalos, M. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Care 2006, 10, R55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Putensen, C.; Theuerkauf, N.; Guenther, U.; Vargas, M.; Pelosi, P. Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: A meta-analysis. Crit. Care 2014, 18, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saritas, A.; Saritas, P.U.; Kurnaz, M.M.; Beyaz, S.G.; Ergönenç, T. The role of fiberoptic bronchoscopy monitoring during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy and its routine use into tracheotomy practice. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2016, 66, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Su, J.; Lin, C.-Y.; Chen, P.-J.; Lin, F.J.; Chen, S.-K.; Kuo, H.-T. Experience with a step-down respiratory care center at a tertiary referral medical center in Taiwan. J. Crit. Care 2006, 21, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, Y.-K.; Tsai, Y.-H.; Lan, C.-C.; Huang, C.-Y.; Lee, C.-H.; Kao, K.-C.; Fu, J.-Y. Prolonged mechanical ventilation in a respiratory-care setting: A comparison of outcome between tracheostomized and translaryngeal intubated patients. Crit. Care 2010, 14, R26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vincent, J.L.; Moreno, R.; Takala, J.; Willatts, S.; De Mendonca, A.; Bruining, H.; Reinhart, C.K.; Suter, P.M.; Thijs, L.G. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996, 22, 707–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yurasakpong, L.; Nantasenamat, C.; Janta, S.; Eiamratchanee, P.; Coey, J.; Chaiyamoon, A.; Kruepunga, N.; Senarai, T.; Langer, M.F.; Meemon, K.; et al. The decreasing prevalence of the thyroid ima artery: A systematic review and machine learning assisted meta-analysis. Ann. Anat. Anat. Anz. 2021, 239, 151803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Winkler, W.-B.; Karnik, R.; Seelmann, O.; Havlicek, J.; Slany, J. Bedside percutaneous dilational tracheostomy with endoscopic guidance: Experience with 71 ICU patients. Intensive Care Med. 1994, 20, 476–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jackson, L.S.M.; Davis, J.W.; Kaups, K.L.; Sue, L.P.; Wolfe, M.M.; Bilello, J.F.; Lemaster, D. Percutaneous Tracheostomy: To Bronch or Not to Bronch—That Is the Question. J. Trauma: Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 2011, 71, 1553–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gadkaree, S.K.; Schwartz, D.; Gerold, K.; Kim, Y. Use of Bronchoscopy in Percutaneous Dilational Tracheostomy. JAMA Head Otolaryngol. Neck Surg. 2016, 142, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Reilly, P.M.; Sing, R.F.; Giberson, F.A.; Anderson, H.L., III; Rotondo, M.F.; Tinkoff, G.H.; Schwab, C.W. Hypercarbia during tracheostomy: A comparison of percutaneous endoscopic, percutaneous Doppler, and standard surgical tracheostomy. Intensive Care Med. 1997, 23, 859–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dollner, R.; Verch, M.; Schweiger, P.; Deluigi, C.; Graf, B.; Wallner, F. Laryngotracheoscopic Findings in Long-term Follow-up After Griggs Tracheostomy. Chest 2002, 122, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gobatto, A.L.N.; Besen, B.; Tierno, P.F.G.M.M.; Mendes, P.V.; Cadamuro, F.; Joelsons, D.; Melro, L.; Carmona, M.J.C.; Santori, G.; Pelosi, P.; et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous dilational tracheostomy versus bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in critically ill patients (TRACHUS): A randomized noninferiority controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2016, 42, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gobatto, A.L.N.; Besen, B.A.M.P.; Cestari, M.; Pelosi, P.; Malbouisson, L.M.S. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Dilational Tracheostomy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-Analysis. J. Intensive Care Med. 2018, 35, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bellani, G.; El, S.A.; Pradella, A.; Mauri, T.; Citerio, G.; Foti, G.; Pesenti, A. Effect of Percutaneous Tracheostomy on Gas Exchange in Hypoxemic and Nonhypoxemic Mechanically Ventilated Patients. Respir. Care 2013, 58, 482–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gergin, O.; Adil, E.; Kawai, K.; Watters, K.; Moritz, E.; Rahbar, R. Routine airway surveillance in pediatric tracheostomy patients. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2017, 97, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ernst, A.; Feller-Kopman, D.; Becker, H.D.; Mehta, A.C. Central Airway Obstruction. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2004, 169, 1278–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, G.S.; Xu, Z.H.; Cui, W.; Zhou, F.; Xia, Y.; Li, W.; Li, L.B.; Shen, H.H. A case with lethal endobronchial lymphoma pre-senting with respiratory failure requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation. Chin. Med. J. 2008, 121, 280–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ivanick, N.M.; Moh, M.; Seeley, E.J.; Benn, B.S. Bilateral Endobronchial Masses and Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. J. Bronchol. Interv. Pulmonol. 2019, 26, e65–e67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Uchida, R.; Masugi, Y.; Nishizawa, T.; Kimura, T.; Yamada, T. Extensive endobronchial growth of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma resulting in respiratory failure: A case report. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2010, 206, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lan, C.C.; Yang, M.C.; Lee, C.H.; Huang, S.F.; Wu, Y.K. Solitary primary tracheal small-cell lung cancer causing acute respir-atory failure: Diagnosis and treatment. Respir. Care 2010, 55, 929–932. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Qiao, Z.; Yu, J.; Yu, K.; Zhang, M. The benefit of daily sputum suction via bronchoscopy in patients of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with ventilators. Medicine 2018, 97, e11631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Y.; Lu, H.-W.; Gu, S.-Y.; Wang, W.-W.; Ge, J.; Jie, Z.-J.; Jia, J.-G.; Gao, Z.-T.; Li, J.; Shi, J.-Y.; et al. Bronchoscopic airway clearance therapy for acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis. Ebiomedicine 2021, 72, 103587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diagnostics 13 01764 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow chart of patients in this study.
Figure 1. Flow chart of patients in this study.
Diagnostics 13 01764 g001
Diagnostics 13 01764 g002 550
Figure 2. Bronchoscopy findings. (a) Increased secretion in the distal airway; (b) endobronchial granulation tissue without airway obstruction; (c) mucosal patches; (d) peripheral airway mucosal blood oozing; (e) endobronchial mass; (f) endotracheal mass.
Figure 2. Bronchoscopy findings. (a) Increased secretion in the distal airway; (b) endobronchial granulation tissue without airway obstruction; (c) mucosal patches; (d) peripheral airway mucosal blood oozing; (e) endobronchial mass; (f) endotracheal mass.
Diagnostics 13 01764 g002
Table
Table 1. Demographic data.
Table 1. Demographic data.
CharacteristicsTotal Patients
(n = 41)		Intraairway Abnormality (n = 15)No Intraairway Abnormality (n = 26)p Value
Sex (female/male)22/197/815/110.495
Age (years)70.3 ± 13.169.8 ± 10.770.5 ± 14.50.758
BMI (kg/m2)22.7 ± 4.123.0 ± 4.022.5 ± 4.20.799
Patients’ source
Respiratory care center16 (39.0%)7 (46.7%)9 (34.6%)0.667
Medical ICU14 (34.1%)4 (26.7%)10 (38.5%)
Cardiac ICU2 (4.9%)0 (0.0%)2 (7.7%)
Alimentary ICU6 (14.6%)3 (20.0%)3 (11.5%)
Surgical ICU3 (7.3%)1 (6.7%)2 (7.7%)
Indication for tracheostomy or etiology of chronic respiratory failure
Pulmonary disease27 (65.9%)12 (80.0%)15 (57.7%)0.488
Central nervous system problem6 (14.6%)1 (6.7%)5 (19.2%)
Upper airway problem8 (19.5%)2 (13.3%)6 (23.1%)
Duration from respiratory failure to tracheostomy (days)26.4 ± 19.929.8 ± 24.124.4 ± 17.30.547
SOFA score4.6 ± 2.75.5 ± 3.34.0 ± 2.10.211
Laboratory Data
White blood cell (1000/uL)9.3 ± 5.88.1 ± 3.410.0 ± 6.70.659
Platelet (1000/uL)217.2 ± 116.2181.3 ± 130.0237.9 ± 104.50.086
PT/INR 1.2 ± 0.11.2 ± 0.11.2 ± 0.10.565
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)0.7 ± 0.90.7 ± 0.60.7 ± 1.00.547
Creatinine (mg/dL)1.2 ± 1.21.1 ± 1.11.3 ± 1.30.529
Blood gas data before tracheostomy
PaO2/FIO2 ratio (mmHg)313.5 ± 100.4294.1 ± 105.2324.8 ± 97.80.277
PaCO2 (mmHg)45.3 ± 13.148.0 ± 15.343.7 ± 11.70.445
pH7.4 ± 0.17.4 ± 0.17.4 ± 0.10.183
Ventilator settings before tracheostomy
Positive end-expiratory pressure (cm H2O)8.0 ± 0.98.4 ± 0.87.8 ± 0.90.131
Peak airway pressure (cm H2O)22.7 ± 7.022.5 ± 5.822.8 ± 7.8>0.999
Tidal volume/predicted body weight (mL/kg)8.4 ± 2.08.7 ± 2.08.1 ± 1.90.283
Procedure duration
Bronchoscopy (second)49.8 ± 43.877.3 ± 57.333.1 ± 20.60.001 *
Tracheostomy (second)102.8 ± 34.698.9 ± 39.0105.5 ± 31.90.334
ICU: intensive care unit; SOFA score: sequential organ failure assessment score; PT/INR: prothrombin time/international normalized ratio. *: p Value < 0.05.
Table
Table 2. Comparison of blood gas data and ventilator setting before and after tracheostomy.
Table 2. Comparison of blood gas data and ventilator setting before and after tracheostomy.
Before TracheostomyAfter Tracheostomyp Value
PaO2/FiO2 ratio (mmHg)313.5 ± 100.4331.6 ± 93.80.196
PaCO2 (mmHg)45.3 ± 13.145.4 ± 12.00.933
pH7.4 ± 0.17.4 ± 0.10.927
Positive end-expiratory pressure (cm H2O)8.1 ± 0.87.9 ± 1.00.183
Peak airway pressure (cm H2O)23.4 ± 6.922.6 ± 7.80.403
Tidal volume/predicted body weight (mL/kg)8.3 ± 1.98.3 ± 2.70.962
PaO2: Partial pressure of oxygen; FiO2: Fraction of inspired oxygen; PaCO2: Partial pressure of carbon dioxide.
Table
Table 3. Clinical outcomes in patients with no intra-airway abnormality or different intra-airway abnormalities.
Table 3. Clinical outcomes in patients with no intra-airway abnormality or different intra-airway abnormalities.
TotalLiberated from VentilatorVentilator DependentIn-Hospital Mortality
No abnormality2613 (50.0%)9 (34.6%)4 (15.4%)
Increased secretion74 (57.1%)1 (14.3%)2 (28.6%)
Granulation tissue without airway obstruction32 (66.7%)0 (0.0%)1 (33.3%)
Mucosal patches10 (0.0%)1 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)
Mass lesions with airway obstruction20 (0.0%)2 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)
Tumor invasion10 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (100.0%)
Peripheral airway mucosal blood oozing10 (0.0%)1 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, K.-W.; Fang, H.-Y. Bronchoscopy Findings during Percutaneous Dilation Tracheostomy: A Single Tertiary Medical Center Experience. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101764

AMA Style

Chang K-W, Fang H-Y. Bronchoscopy Findings during Percutaneous Dilation Tracheostomy: A Single Tertiary Medical Center Experience. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(10):1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101764

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Ko-Wei, and Hsin-Yueh Fang. 2023. "Bronchoscopy Findings during Percutaneous Dilation Tracheostomy: A Single Tertiary Medical Center Experience" Diagnostics 13, no. 10: 1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101764

APA Style

Chang, K. -W., & Fang, H. -Y. (2023). Bronchoscopy Findings during Percutaneous Dilation Tracheostomy: A Single Tertiary Medical Center Experience. Diagnostics, 13(10), 1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101764

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop