Next Article in Journal
Diagnostic Accuracy of Line-Field Confocal Optical Coherence Tomography for the Diagnosis of Skin Carcinomas
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparison of MGMT Testing by MSP and qMSP in Paired Snap-Frozen and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Gliomas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ocular Morpho-Functional Evaluation in ATTRv Pre-Symptomatic Carriers: A Case Series

1
Institute of Ophthalmology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00135 Rome, Italy
2
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, 00135 Rome, Italy
3
Institute of Neurology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00135 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(3), 359; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030359
Submission received: 9 December 2022 / Revised: 12 January 2023 / Accepted: 17 January 2023 / Published: 18 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)

Abstract

:
The present study aimed to investigate ocular findings in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) pre-symptomatic carriers. Fourteen ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers, who are patients with positive genetic testing but without signs or symptoms of the disease, were retrospectively evaluated. Retinal morphology was assessed using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT-angiography. Retinal function was evaluated using cone b-wave and photopic negative response (PhNR). Pupillometry and in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (IVCM) were performed. ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers presented a significantly reduced central macular thickness (CMT) (p = 0.01) and outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness (p = 0.01) in comparison to normal controls. No differences were found when analyzing sub-foveal choroidal thickness, retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell complex. In comparison to healthy controls, pre-symptomatic carriers presented an attenuated superficial retinal vascular network and a significantly augmented PhNR amplitude (p = 0.01). However, PhNR implicit times, B-wave amplitude and B-wave peak time did not show significant differences in comparison to controls. No differences were found for pupillometric values. All the examined eyes presented alterations in the IVCM. Preclinical ocular structural and functional abnormalities can be found in ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers. Thus, an extensive ophthalmological evaluation should be included at the baseline visit and during follow-up. Considering the availability of new drugs potentially able to prevent or delay disease progression, the identification of new disease biomarkers appears to be particularly promising.

1. Introduction

Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv) is an adult-onset, autosomal-dominant, multisystemic disease caused by mutations in the gene encoding transthyretin (TTR). TTR is a plasma protein that functions as a carrier for thyroxine (T4) and retinol (vitamin A) [1].
ATTRv amyloidosis is spread globally, with endemic foci in Portugal, Sweden, Japan, Brazil, Maiorca, and Cyprus. The Italian national prevalence is 4.33/million, with higher values in southern Italy [2].
The main organs involved in ATTRv are peripheral nerves and the heart, resulting in sensory–motor neuropathy, autonomic dysfunction and cardiomyopathy. However, 10% of patients present with ocular involvement [3].
The main signs of ocular amyloidosis include vitreous opacities, chronic open-angle glaucoma (COAG), abnormal conjunctival vessels (ACVs), sicca keratoconjunctivitis (SKC), loss of corneal sensitivity and neurotrophic corneal ulcers, lens anterior capsule opacities, retinal vascular changes, pupillary light-near dissociation, irregular pupils and optic neuropathy [3]. The ocular manifestation affecting the anterior compartment of the eye (e.g., ACVs) is due to a circulating mutated protein produced by the liver. However, plasma TTR cannot cross the blood–retina barrier [4]. Thus, the manifestation affecting the posterior compartment of the eye is mainly due to local production of amyloid fibrils, especially by the retinal pigment epithelium [5]. The progression of ocular involvement after liver transplant confirms that the ocular alterations are largely related to a local production of amyloid deposits [6].
In the last few years, new drugs potentially able to prevent or delay disease progression have become available [7,8]. In this perspective, the identification of reliable disease biomarkers appears to be particularly promising. The early identification of disease onset in ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers could allow prompt treatment as soon as minor, but clinically meaningful, disease signs are detected [9,10,11,12].
The aim of the present study was to investigate ocular findings in ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers using optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT-angiography (OCT-A), electrophysiology, pupillometry and in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (IVCM) in order to find novel potential ocular biomarkers of the disease.

2. Materials and Methods

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board of the Catholic University (Prot. ID 4108). This research adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and informed consent was obtained from all patients. All the clinical, imaging, and electrophysiological data reported in this study were analyzed retrospectively. Recruitment was performed from January 2021 to September 2022 according to a collaboration protocol with the Department of Neurology of Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli.

2.1. Subjects

All the subjects included were selected from a larger cohort of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of ATTRv. All the “ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers” were included in the study. Patients were defined as pre-symptomatic carriers in the presence of an established diagnosis of ATTRv confirmed by a positive genetic testing without signs or symptoms of the disease.
Exclusion criteria were as follows: the comorbidity of diabetes, atherosclerotic vasculopathy, glaucoma, or any other macular or retinal disorders, optical media opacity precluding reliable retinal functional exams, and inability of the patients to maintain visual fixation.

2.2. Neurological Evaluation and Pupillometry

Global neurological evaluation and nerve conduction studies, after the genetic characterization of the pathogenetic variant, were performed for each patient.
Quantitative automated pupillary light reflex (PLR) was measured in all subjects with NPi-200 (developed by NeurOptics, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA). Baseline pupil diameter (BPD), minimum pupil diameter (MPD), reflex latency (RL), constriction velocity (CV), maximum constriction velocity (MCV), dilation velocity (DV), constriction index (CI), which is the percentage of change, calculated as ( BPD MPD ) / BPD and expressed as a percentage (%), and neuro-pupillary index (NPi), which is a composite parameter integrating RL, CV, and DV, were calculated.

2.3. Ophthalmological Evaluation

All the enrolled patients underwent a full ophthalmologic examination, including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, as well as anterior segment slit lamp biomicroscopy and indirect fundus ophthalmoscopy. Color fundus photos were taken with Eidon (Centervue, Freemont, CA, USA).

2.3.1. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and OCT-Angiography (OCT-A)

SD-OCT was performed using Zeiss Cirrus 5000-HD-OCT Angioplex, sw version 10.0, (CarlZeiss, Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA, USA). A high-definition 5 Line Raster, a macular map (6 × 6 mm Macular Cube 512 × 128) and optic nerve head map for retinal nerve fiber layer (Rnfl) evaluation were acquired. OCT-A imaging was performed using a 6 × 6 mm volume scan pattern centered on the fovea.
OCT qualitative assessment was performed by two independent masked investigators (A.M.M. and M.M.) who evaluated macular scans in search of vitreous opacities, vitreo-retinal interface and outer retina alterations. Central macular thickness (CMT) was automatically measured using macular cube scans. Subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) was manually measured on horizontal OCT B-scans, with calipers measuring the distance from the posterior edge of the RPE to the choroid–sclera junction. Outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness was manually measured at 5 points from the posterior edge of the outer plexiform layer (OPL) to the external limiting membrane (ELM) at the fovea, and at 1.500-micron and 3000-micron intervals temporal and nasal to the fovea. An average thickness for ONL was calculated from the 5 values obtained. Ganglion cell complex (GCC) average thickness was automatically measured using ganglion cell analysis from the macular cube. GCC includes the ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer (IPL). An image of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP) was generated using automated layer segmentation, corrected by manual readjustments of the segmentation lines. SCP 6 × 6 vessel density (VD) was expressed as a percentage derived from the ratio of the total vessel area (all white pixels, defined as pixels with a ratio value between 0.7 and 1.0) to the total area of the analyzed region (size of the image in pixels). Vessel perfusion (VP) was defined as the total area of perfused retinal microvasculature per unit area in a region of measurement. FAZ perimeter was calculated as the length of the contour based on pixel-to-pixel distance in a scale and was expressed in millimeters. The area of FAZ was measured by counting the total number of pixels within FAZ in a scale multiplying the dimension of a pixel and expressed in square millimeters. FAZ circularity was also registered.
Twenty-six eyes of thirteen healthy patients were evaluated as controls for OCT and OCT-A measurements.

2.3.2. Electroretinogram Assessment

Ganzfeld cone-mediated (light adapted) electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded in all patients. For each patient, ERGs were recorded according to a published protocol employed to isolate and analyze the PhNR from the single-flash cone-mediated responses [13,14,15]. The amplitude and peak time of the cone b-wave and the PhNR were measured in each recording session. The instrument used was Retimax, (CSO Company, Florence, Italy). A group of 40 healthy eyes with no signs of any ocular disease served as controls

2.3.3. In Vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy (IVCM)

IVCM was performed with HRT laser Rostock cornea module (Heidelberg, Germany). A qualitative evaluation was performed by one expert investigator (R.F.) who analyzed the subepithelial nervous plexus (extension and density), the nerve segmentation and/or fragmentation (increased beads) and the branch density.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

We analyzed both right and left eyes. For statistical reasons, we considered in the analysis only the results from the right eyes. Values were expressed as frequencies (%), mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median [interquartile range] as appropriate. Results were analyzed by parametric tests (t-test and analysis of variance) assuming normal distribution. A conservative p-value = or < 0.01 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

Among all the patients with a genetic diagnosis of ATTRv followed up with at the Neurology Department, 14 patients (28 eyes) met all the requirements of the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The mean (range) age of patients was 54 (38–73) years and 5 (36%) patients were men, whereas 9 (64%) patients were women. TTR gene sequencing revealed Val30Met pathogenic variant in five patients, Phe64Leu in seven patients, andAla120Ser and Glu89Gln in one patient each. The main demographic and genetic data of the study sample are summarized in Table 1.

3.1. Neurological Examination and Nerve Conduction Studies

Clinical examination was unremarkable in each subject. Nerve conduction studies were normal in all cases excluding peripheral neuropathy.

3.2. Pupillometry

No differences were found for pupillometric values between ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers and healthy controls [16]. Results from automated pupillometry are reported in Table 2.

3.3. Anterior Segment

Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was substantially preserved in all subjects, with a mean value of 84 ETDRS letters (range 57–90). Three eyes presented a decreased BCVA because of cataracts in two cases and keratoconus with corneal apex opacification in one case. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was within normal limits in all subjects, with a mean IOP of 16 mmHg. None of the examined patients had a diagnosis of glaucoma. Slit lamp biomicroscopy of the anterior segment was unremarkable in all the examined eyes, with the exception of the abovementioned cases of cataract and keratoconus. Two of the examined eyes were pseudophakic. Data are reported in Table 1.

3.4. Posterior Segment

Fundus examination did not reveal vitreous opacities or vascular abnormalities of the retinic vascular arcades in all the examined patients. Three eyes showed RPE dystrophic alteration in macular region, whereas one eye showed vitreoretinal interface abnormalities (Table 1).

3.5. OCT and OCT-A Assessment

Regarding retinal OCT assessment, 26 normal control eyes of 13 healthy patients (5 males, 7 females) were evaluated for comparison. OCT findings are reported in detail in Table 3. In the ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers, qualitative assessment of B-scan OCT images did not reveal vitreal abnormalities; vitreo-retinal interface alteration consisting of a macular cellophane were found in three eyes (11%). Notably, four eyes showed pachychoroid-spectrum OCT abnormalities, with RP epitheliopathy in all cases associated with subretinal fluid in the macular region in one eye. In ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers, CMT was significantly decreased (251.35 ± 18.05 μm vs. 266.15 ± 11.61 μm, p = 0.01), while SFCT did not differ in comparison to healthy controls (270.85 ± 68.77 μm vs. 270.38 ± 36.75 μm, p = 0.9). In ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers, ONL thickness was significantly reduced compared to normal controls (67.5 ± 5.98 μm vs. 79.87 ± 5.5 μm, p = 0.01). Rnfl showed a mean value of 94 ± 8.7 μm in ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers, not differing from normal controls. None of the examined eyes presented focal defects in the optic nerve head map. GCC was similar between the two examined groups (83.92 ± 5.09 μm in pre-symptomatic carriers vs. 80.92 ± 5.4 μm in healthy controls, p = 0.1). Although the results were not statistically significant, pre-symptomatic carriers presented an attenuated superficial retinal vascular network in comparison to healthy controls: a reduced VD (17.5 ± 0.7 vs. 18.86 ± 0.8 mm/mm2, p = 0.05), a reduced PD (42.77 ± 5.5 vs. 45.7 ± 1.7%, p = 0.08), larger FAZ area (0.30 ± 0.1 vs. 0.23 ± 0.07 mm2, p = 0.4), and a larger FAZ perimeter (2.24 ± 0.4 vs. 2.09 ± 0.5 mm, p =0.4). Ophthalmological measurements are reported in detail for each patient in Table 3. Figure 1 shows OCT and OCT-A scans of a pre-symptomatic carrier in comparison to a normal control.

3.6. Electrophysiology

Pre-symptomatic carriers presented a mean photopic ERG B wave amplitude of 28.83 μV (SD 10.36), with an implicit time of 33.9 ms (SD 1.8). No significant differences were found in comparison to normal controls. However, PhNR amplitude was significantly augmented in pre-symptomatic carriers in comparison to controls (12.58 μV, SD 3.45 vs. 7.82 μV, SD 2.28, p = 0.01). PhNR implicit time did not show significant differences in comparison to the healthy group (48.48 μV, SD 5.3 vs. 49.58 μV, SD 2.64; p = 0.5, not significant). Notably, ONL thickness showed a positive correlation with photopic ERG B wave amplitude (p = 0.002).
Electrophysiological data are reported in Table 2. Figure 1 shows electrophysiological measures of a pre-symptomatic carrier in comparison to a normal control.

3.7. In Vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy (IVCM)

Sixteen eyes of eight patients were analyzed using IVCM. All the examined eyes presented a rarefied subepithelial nervous plexus (for extension and density), nerve segmentation and/or fragmentation (increased beads) and a reduced branch density. One patient presented endotheliosis in both eyes. Details on IVCM are summarized in Table 4, and IVCM images are represented in Figure 1.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we identified preclinical structural and functional ocular abnormalities in ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers. ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers presented a significant reduction in CMT and ONL thickness and an attenuated superficial retinal vascular network. Electrophysiological parameters showed significantly augmented PhNR values, and IVCM was altered in all the examined eyes. The identification of ocular alterations in pre-symptomatic carriers without any clinical sign of systemic involvement can be plausible considering the frequent dissociation between systemic and ocular symptoms. Indeed, there is evidence that ocular manifestations do not run parallel to the entity of systemic symptoms, and this is due to the eye being capable of its own TTR production. Hara et al. followed up for a mean time of 7 years with a number of ATTR Val30Met amyloidosis patients and assessed ocular involvement after liver transplantation [17]. Liepnieks et al. provided further evidence that local synthesis of variant TTR by the RPE is responsible for vitreous amyloid formation, not TTR from hepatic production [6].
Recent studies have revealed the presence of subclinical structural and functional ocular abnormalities in ATTRv patients. In a cohort of ATTRv-affected patients with an apparently normal ocular examination, CMT and SFCT were slightly reduced, as well as ONL thickness, which was significantly reduced (p = 0.002) in comparison to controls (72.57 ± 8 μm vs. 79.5 ± 6.05 μm) [18]. Mixed rod–cone and cone ERG b-wave amplitudes were reduced, as well as PhNR amplitude [18]. Similarly to ATTRv patients, ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers presented a significant reduction in CMT and ONL thickness in comparison to healthy controls. As postulated by Minnella et al., the loss of ONL could be a consequence of a reduced retinoid supply—given that TTR is a carrier for thyroxine (T4) and retinol—and a consequent reduced number of photoreceptors [18].
Concerning OCT-A findings, the sole analysis of the superficial capillary plexus—without the deep plexus—is a limitation of the study. However, the rarefaction of the superficial plexus found in pre-symptomatic carriers resembles that found by Marques et al. in a group of ATTRv patients [19]. They found that scalloped irises in ATTRv eyes are associated with a more advanced subclinical retinal angiopathy than eyes without scalloped irises [19], confirming that OCT-A may identify vascular alterations serving as potential disease biomarkers.
Amyloid deposition in the retinal and choroidal vessels has long been reported [20]. Retinal microvascular changes in ATTRv patients could be explained by considering the micro-occlusive damage derived from amyloid deposition. Although further studies would be needed to elucidate the characteristics of all the capillary plexa in a larger cohort of patients, OCT-A could be a promising non-invasive technique to identify early signs of retinal vascular involvement in ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers.
Interestingly, we found a significant increase in PhNR amplitude in pre-symptomatic carriers. Several studies have reported supernormal ERG values in CRVO eyes with mild retinal ischemia [20]. The supernormal ERG may be caused by changes in the electrical activity of retinal cells through an ischemia-induced increase in anti-VEGF levels. Considering that retinal neurons do not express anti-VEGF receptors, supernormal ERGs may be secondary to extravasation and activation of the kallikrein-kinin system [21] or to Nitrix Oxide [22] production, both induced by VEGF.
Considering the research evidence, we speculate that the supernormal PhNR in pre-symptomatic carriers is likely to be related to chronic ischemic inflammatory damage due to microvascular alterations in the internal retina.
IVCM is a useful tool for detecting early nerve damage in vivo. In ATTRv patients, a correlation between corneal nerve damage and the severity of both sensorimotor and autonomic neuropathies has been noted [23]. Thus, corneal nerve damage detected by IVCM can be considered as a disease biomarker. A recent study conducted on five ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers found that corneal sub-basal nerve density was low in all of the examined patients during the entire 3 years of follow-up [24]. Our results support the evidence of an altered subepithelial nervous plexus in ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers, confirming that IVCM is a sensitive technique for identifying systemic neuropathy even when other instrumental examinations are found to be negative. Subclinical ocular abnormalities detected by IVCM in TTR mutation carriers could be early expression of small fiber neuropathy (SFN). Actually, IVCM has already proved to be able to detect and quantify small-fiber involvement in several peripheral neuropathies, such as diabetes, Fabry disease, and idiopathic small-fiber neuropathy (iSFN), early [25]. Analogously, this rapid, noninvasive technique may be used as a surrogate early marker of SFN in ATTRv [23], since subclinical ocular abnormalities in IVCM may sometimes even precede the loss of intraepidermal nerve fibers in skin biopsy [24,25].
The small sample size is a limitation of the study. However, considering the rarity of the condition and the lack of literature data on pre-symptomatic carriers, the sample examined could be relevant. Further studies with larger sample sizes would be needed to elucidate the ophthalmological findings in this particular population.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that preclinical ocular structural and functional abnormalities can be found in ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers. The identification of novel disease biomarkers appears to be particularly useful, considering that nowadays patients may benefit from treatments able to prevent or delay disease progression. Extensive ophthalmological evaluation should be included in the baseline visit and during follow-up in ATTRv pre-symptomatic carriers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.L., A.M.M., M.M., B.F. and S.R.; methodology, B.F.; formal analysis, M.M. and B.F.; investigation, A.R., V.G., R.F., M.M., G.P. and E.D.; resources, A.M.M.; data curation, M.M. and P.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M., B.F. and M.L.; writing—review and editing, M.M., B.F., M.L., A.M.M. and R.F.; supervision, S.R.; project administration, A.M.M.; funding acquisition, A.M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board Catholic University of Rome (Prot. ID 4108).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from authors.

Conflicts of Interest

Luigetti received financial grants from Akcea, Alnylam, Sobi, and Pfizer, and travel grants from Akcea, Alnylam, Sobi, Pfizer, Kedrion, Csl Behring, and Grifols. The present study was supported by an Investigator-Initiated Research to “Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS” from Pfizer Inc. Pfizer Inc. had no role in the study design, data analysis, and results interpretation of the present study. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Richardson, S.J. Cell and molecular biology of transthyretin and thyroid hormones. Int. Rev. Cytol. 2007, 258, 137–193. [Google Scholar]
  2. Russo, M.; Obici, L.; Bartolomei, I.; Cappelli, F.; Luigetti, M.; Fenu, S.; Cavallaro, T.; Chiappini, M.G.; Gemelli, C.; Pradotto, L.G.; et al. ATTRv amyloidosis Italian Registry: Clinical and epidemiological data. Amyloid 2020, 27, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Minnella, A.M.; Rissotto, R.; Antoniazzi, E.; Di Girolamo, M.; Luigetti, M.; Maceroni, M.; Obici, L. Ocular involvement in hereditary amyloidosis. Genes 2021, 12, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Beirão, J.M.; Malheiro, J.; Lemos, C.; Beirão, I.; Costa, P.; Torres, P. Ophthalmological manifestations in hereditary transthyretin(ATTR V30M) carriers: A review of 513 cases. Amyloid 2014, 22, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Ando, E.; Ando, Y.; Okamura, R.; Uchino, M.; Ando, M.; Negi, A. Ocular manifestations of familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy type I: Long term follow up. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1997, 81, 295–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Liepnieks, J.J.; Phan, A.-D.T.; Wise, R.J.; Hrisomalos, F.N.; Benson, M.D. Biochemical characterization of vitreous amyloid formed after liver transplantation. Amyloid 2016, 23, 136–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Adams, D.; Koike, H.; Slama, M.; Coelho, T. Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis: A model of medical progress for a fatal disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 15, 387–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Luigetti, M.; Romano, A.; Di Paolantonio, A.; Bisogni, G.; Sabatelli, M. Diagnosis and Treatment of Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis (ATTRv) Polyneuropathy: Current Perspectives on Improving Patient Care. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2020, 16, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Manganelli, F.; Fabrizi, G.M.; Luigetti, M.; Mandich, P.; Mazzeo, A.; Pareyson, D. Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis overview. Neurol. Sci. 2020, 43, 595–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Conceição, I.; Damy, T.; Romero, M.; Galán, L.; Attarian, S.; Luigetti, M.; Sadeh, M.; Sarafov, S.; Tournev, I.; Ueda, M. Early diagnosis of ATTR amyloidosis through targeted follow-up of identified carriers of TTR gene mutations. Amyloid 2019, 26, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Luigetti, M.; Guglielmino, V.; Romozzi, M.; Romano, A.; Di Paolantonio, A.; Bisogni, G.; Sabatelli, E.; Modoni, A.; Sabatelli, M.; Servidei, S.; et al. Nerve Conduction Studies of Dorsal Sural Nerve: Normative Data and Its Potential Application in ATTRv Pre-Symptomatic Subjects. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Luigetti, M.; Di Paolantonio, A.; Guglielmino, V.; Romano, A. Cutaneous silent period in ATTRv carriers: A possible early marker of nerve damage? Neurol. Sci. 2022, 12, 6979–6982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Galli-Resta, L.; Falsini, B.; Rossi, G.; Piccardi, M.; Ziccardi, L.; Fadda, A.; Minnella, A.M.; Marangoni, D.; Placidi, G.; Campagna, F.; et al. Bilateral Symmetry of Visual Function Loss in Cone–Rod Dystrophies. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, 3759–3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Abed, E.; Piccardi, M.; Rizzo, D.; Chiaretti, A.; Ambrosio, L.; Petroni, S.; Parrilla, R.; Dickmann, A.; Riccardi, R.; Falsini, B. Functional Loss of the Inner Retina in Childhood Optic Gliomas Detected by Photopic Negative Response. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015, 56, 2469–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Abed, E.; Placidi, G.; Campagna, F.; Federici, M.; Minnella, A.; Guerri, G.; Bertelli, M.; Piccardi, M.; Galli-Resta, L.; Falsini, B. Early impairment of the full-field photopic negative response in patients with Stargardt disease and pathogenic variants of the ABCA4 gene. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2018, 46, 519–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Romano, A.; Guglielmino, V.; Di Paolantonio, A.; Bisogni, G.; Sabatelli, M.; Della Marca, G.; Minnella, A.M.; Maceroni, M.; Bellavia, S.; Scala, I.; et al. Pupillometric findings in ATTRv patients and carriers: Results from a single-centre experience. Amyloid 2022, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hara, R.; Kawaji, T.; Ando, E.; Ohya, Y.; Ando, Y.; Tanihara, H. Impact of liver transplantation on transthyretin-related ocular amyloidosis in Japanese patients. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2010, 128, 206–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Minnella, A.M.; Rissotto, R.; Maceroni, M.; Romano, A.; Fasciani, R.; Luigetti, M.; Sabatelli, M.; Rizzo, S.; Falsini, B. Ocular involvement in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis: A case series describing novel potential biomarkers. Genes 2021, 12, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Marques, J.H.; Coelho, J.; Malheiro, J.; Pessoa, B.; Beirão, J.M. Subclinical retinal angiopathy associated with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis–Assessed with optical coherence tomography angiography. Amyloid 2021, 28, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Paton, D.; Duke, J.R. Primary familial amyloidosis. Ocular manifestations with histopathologic observations. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1966, 61, 736–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Miyata, R.; Kondo, M.; Kato, K.; Sugimoto, M.; Matsubara, H.; Ikesugi, K.; Terasaki, H. Supernormal flicker ERGs in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion: Clinical characteristics, prognosis, and effects of anti-VEGF agent. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 5854–5861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Joussen, A.M.; Poulaki, V.; Qin, W.; Kirchhof, B.; Mitsiades, N.; Wiegand, S.J.; Adamis, A.P. Retinal vascular endothelial growth factor induces intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression and initiates early diabetic retinal leukocyte adhesion in vivo. Am. J. Pathol. 2002, 160, 501–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Rousseau, A.; Cauquil, C.; Dupas, B.; Labbé, A.; Baudouin, C.; Barreau, E.; Théaudin, M.; Lacroix, C.; Guiochon-Mantel, A.; Benmalek, A.; et al. Potential Role of In Vivo Confocal Microscopy for Imaging Corneal Nerves in Transthyretin Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016, 134, 983–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bekircan-Kurt, C.E.; Yilmaz, E.; Arslan, D.; Yildiz, F.G.; Dikmetas, Ö.; Ergul-Ulger, Z.; Kocabeyoglu, S.; Irkec, M.; Hekimsoy, V.; Tokgozoglu, L.; et al. The functional and structural evaluation of small fibers in asymptomatic carriers of TTR p.Val50Met (Val30Met) mutation. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2022, 32, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tavakoli, M.; Malik, R.A. Corneal Confocal Microscopy: A Novel Non-invasive Technique to Quantify Small Fibre Pathology in Peripheral Neuropathies. J. Vis. Exp. 2011, 3, 47. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Top to bottom: photopic electroretinogram (ERG), in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (IVCM), OCT B scan and OCT-A images of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) of normal controls (A) and pre-symptomatic ATTRv carriers (B). (A) shows normal PhNR values (10.52 mV), as well as normal nervous corneal plexus. OCT B scan reveals preserved morphology and reflectivity of all retinal layers, with a mean ONL thickness of 79 microns. OCT-A enface images of the SCP reveal a vessel density of 19.8 mm/mm2. (B) shows supernormal PhNR (18.52 mV), with an altered corneal nervous plexus. No alterations in retinal morphology and reflectivity are observed on OCT scan. Mean ONL thickness is 61 microns and VD SCP is 17 mm/mm2.
Figure 1. Top to bottom: photopic electroretinogram (ERG), in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (IVCM), OCT B scan and OCT-A images of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) of normal controls (A) and pre-symptomatic ATTRv carriers (B). (A) shows normal PhNR values (10.52 mV), as well as normal nervous corneal plexus. OCT B scan reveals preserved morphology and reflectivity of all retinal layers, with a mean ONL thickness of 79 microns. OCT-A enface images of the SCP reveal a vessel density of 19.8 mm/mm2. (B) shows supernormal PhNR (18.52 mV), with an altered corneal nervous plexus. No alterations in retinal morphology and reflectivity are observed on OCT scan. Mean ONL thickness is 61 microns and VD SCP is 17 mm/mm2.
Diagnostics 13 00359 g001
Table 1. Demographic, clinical and ophthalmological data.
Table 1. Demographic, clinical and ophthalmological data.
CaseGenderAgePathogenetic
Variant
BCVA (ETDRS Letters, n)IOPAnterior SegmentVitreous
Opacities
Ocular
Fundus
1
RE
LE
F68Val30Met
85
77

16
12

Cataract,
Cataract

No
No

U
U
2
RE
LE
M42Val30Met
85
83

14
15

U
U

No
No

U
U
3
RE
LE
F45Val30Met
85
85

18
17

U
U

No
No

U
U
4
RE
LE
M49Phe64Leu
86
86

19
15

U
U

No
No

RPE dystrophy
RPE dystrophy
5
RE
LE
F43Phe64Leu
85
85

14
16

U
U

No
No

U
U
6
RE
LE
F70Phe64Leu
83
71

14
12

DALK for KC,
KC

No
No

U
U
7
RE
LE
F73Phe64Leu
85
85

13
13

U
U

No
No

U
U
8
RE
LE
M44Glu89Gln
90
90

19
16

U
U

No
No

U
U
9
RE
LE
F59Val30Met
85
83

15
16

U
U

No
No

RP epitheliopathy
10
RE
LE
F72Ala120Ser
84
84

20
20

Pseudofachic
Pseudofachic

No
No

U
Macular cellophane
11
RE
LE
F38Phe64Leu
87
87

19
19

U
U

No
No

U
U
12
RE
LE
M49Phe64Leu
85
85

18
18

U
U

No
No

U
U
13
RE
LE
M41Phe64Leu
90
90

20
20

U
U

No
No

U
U
14
RE
LE
F73Val30Met
57
85

21
20

Cataract,
Cataract

No
No

U
U
BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; F, female; IOP, intraocular pressure; LE, left eye; M, male; RE, right eye; U, unremarkable.
Table 2. Electrophysiological and pupillometric findings.
Table 2. Electrophysiological and pupillometric findings.
CasePhotopic ERGPhNRPupillometry
B Wave AmplitudeB Wave Peak TimeAmplitudePeak TimeNPIBDPMPDCICVMCVRLDV
1
RE
LE

31.44
18.05

33.98
33.11

11.66
9

48.93
41.43

4.7
4.7

3.44
3.53

2.25
2.28

35
35

2.80
3.18

4.27
4.74

0.23
0.20

Na
Na
2
RE
LE

31.86
20.34

33.69
33.98

12.69
11.86

43.07
50.1

4.1
4.2

4.22
3.63

2.93
2.74

29
25

2.06
1.87

3.73
2.74

0.20
0.20

Na
1.19
3
RE
LE

10.45
19.81

34.28
33.69

7.79
10.77

50.1
49.22

3.7
3.5

5
4.57

2.47
3.36

31
26

2.43
2.80

4.27
4.04

0.23
0.23

1.57
1.18
4
RE
LE

30.57
22.51

33.11
32.81

8.63
9.4

42.28
41.02

4.5
4.6

4.11
4.01

2.61
2.51

36
37

3.50
3.46

4.72
4.82

0.20
0.20

1.59
1.50
5
RE
LE

38.14
32.56

33.11
33.12

11.83
9.55

50.98
49.51

4.6
4.6

4.62
4.49

2.74
2.64

41
41

2.60
3.14

4.42
4.45

0.23
0.20

1.11
1.29
6
RE
LE

28.91
31.97

33.40
33.13

14.12
9.16

48.34
49.51

4.8
4.5

3.33
3.73

2.04
2.56

39
31

2.17
2.24

3.55
3.01

0.27
0.27

0.92
Na
7
RE
LE

25.41
25.66

33.69
33.40

14.85
9.77

46
44.82

4.5
4.5

3.77
3.96

2.55
2.59

32
35

2.38
2.26

3.48
3.94

0.23
0.23

0.51
1.21
8
RE
LE

24.26
26.98

32.81
34.11

8.83
10.03

49.22
42.19

4.6
4.7

4.30
4.30

2.56
2.49

40
42

2.64
3.14

3.75
4.44

0.23
0.17

1.31
0.96
9
RE
LE

20.18
14.70

33.40
33.40

10.65
9.78

54.49
46.58

4.4
4.6

4.01
4.01

2.70
2.48

33
38

2.49
2.50

3.67
4.09

0.23
0.23

1.36
1.00
10
RE
LE

27.20
30.80

33.69
33.68

13.29
12.23

49.22
48.93

4.6
4.8

3.37
2.83

2.33
1.84

31
35

2.44
1.87

3.40
3.02

0.23
0.20

0.73
0.95
11
RE
LE

43.33
37.62

32.81
33.11

17.88
15.72

42.77
42.48

4.6
4.4

4.98
4.37

2.77
2.74

44
37

3.29
2.92

5.33
4.63

0.17
0.2

1.44
1.44
12
RE
LE

34.55
46.20

33.40
32.81

16.37
19.07

46.58
46.88

4.3
4.3

5.57
5.44

3.31
3.28

41
40

3.38
3.62

5.61
5.42

0.23
0.23

1.55
1.45
13
RE
LE

46.01
34.87

33.11
33.11

18.52
19.39

44.24
45.12

4
4.3

5.57
5.53

3.55
3.39

36
39

3.17
3.66

4.54
5.49

0.2
0.2

1.18
1.84
14
RE
LE

11.36
11.38

40.14
39.55

9.11
8.47

62.4
62.7

4.4
4.2

3.48
4.04

2.86
2.55

29
27

2.53
2.09

3.36
3.29

0.17
0.23

1.05
1.12
BPD, baseline pupil diameter; CI, constriction Index; CV, constriction velocity; DV, dilation velocity; LE, left eye; MCV, maximum constriction velocity; MPD, minimum pupil diameter; NPI, neuro-pupillary index; RE, right eye; RL, reflex latency.
Table 3. OCT and OCT-A assessment.
Table 3. OCT and OCT-A assessment.
CaseOCTOCT-A
CMTSFCTONLGCCRNFLQualitative
Alterations
VD SCP (mm/mm2)PD SCP (%)FAZ AREA (mm2)FAZ PERIMETER
(mm)
1
RE
LE

245
250

267
296

77
71

80
74

95
87

No
No

18
18.8

44.1
46.3

0.18
0.19

1.64
1.8
2
RE
LE

251
252

391
327

72
73

88
90

87
92

No
no

19.1
19

46.1
45.9

0.39
0.33

2.64
2.43
3
RE
LE

213
224

302
343

57
61

77
80

91
93

No
No

17.8
18.9

44.4
47

0.49
0.41

2.81
2.6
4
RE
LE

289
294

390
332

72
70

88
89

98
97

RPE dystrophy
RPE dystrophy

18.8
18.4

46.6
45.8

0.14
0.14

1.6
1.55
5
RE
LE

253
245

243
296

64
66

82
81

91
93

No
No

18.7
18.5

44.8
44.6

0.21
0.22

1.86
1.84
6
RE
LE

252
244

249
267

60
66

77
80

82
75

No
No

11.9
Media opacities

28.4
Media opacities

0.42
Media opacities

2.76
Media opacities
7
RE
LE

252
237

267
250

67
69

80
80

94
88

Cellophane
Cellophane

14.4
16.8

35.9
41.4

0.18
0.33

1.78
2.22
8
RE
LE

269
267

272
249

67
68

82
83

92
88

No
No

19.3
18.7

47.1
45.8

0.18
0.19

1.63
1.76
9
RE
LE

269
263

272
278

70
74

79
79

97
99

RPE dystrophy
No

18.2
17.8

45.3
44.3

0.19
0.22

1.77
2.2
10
RE
LE

260
259

320
278

64
63

88
87

101
95

No
cellophane

18.1
18.3

45.5
45.6

0.23
0.24

2.1
2.11
11
RE
LE

231
230

280
249

79
79

90
90

113
110

No
No

18
19.1

44.9
47

0.44
0.44

2.77
2.64
12
RE
LE

251
255

254
261

72
75

92
93

100
96

No
No

19.2
19.2

47.5
46.6

0.3
0.24

2.13
2
13
RE
LE

239
244

260
284

74
72

89
89

98
97

No
No

18.1
17

44.3
41.2

0.36
0.29

2.51
2.24
14
RE
LE

245
233

101
163

50
56

83
83

77
83

No
No

15
13.6

37
32.5

0.36
0.47

2.4
2.83
CMT, central macular thickness; FAZ, foveal avascular zone; GCC, ganglion cell complex; LE, left eye; ONL, outer nuclear layer; PD, perfusion density; RE, right eye; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; SCP, superficial capillary plexus; SFCT, subfoveal choroidal thickness; VD, vessel density.
Table 4. IVCM results.
Table 4. IVCM results.
PatientsEyeIVCM
Rarefied Subepithelial NP (Extension and Density)Nerve Segmentation and/or FragmentationReduced Branch DensityOther Alterations
#1REnanana
LEnanana
#2REnanana
LEnanana
#3REnanana
LEnanana
#4REnanana
LEnanana
#5REyesyesyes
LEyesyesyes
#6REyesyesyesendotheliosis
LEyesyesyesendotheliosis
#7REyesyesyes
LEyesyesyes
#8REyesyesyes
LEyesyesyes
#9REyesnana
LEyesnana
#10REyesyesyes
LEyesyesyes
#11REyesyesyes
LEyesyesyes
#12REnoyesyes
LEnoyesyes
#13REnanana
LEnanana
#14REyesyesyes
LEyesyesyes
LE, left eye; na, not available; RE, right eye.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maceroni, M.; Falsini, B.; Luigetti, M.; Romano, A.; Guglielmino, V.; Fasciani, R.; Placidi, G.; D’Agostino, E.; Sasso, P.; Rizzo, S.; et al. Ocular Morpho-Functional Evaluation in ATTRv Pre-Symptomatic Carriers: A Case Series. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030359

AMA Style

Maceroni M, Falsini B, Luigetti M, Romano A, Guglielmino V, Fasciani R, Placidi G, D’Agostino E, Sasso P, Rizzo S, et al. Ocular Morpho-Functional Evaluation in ATTRv Pre-Symptomatic Carriers: A Case Series. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(3):359. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030359

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maceroni, Martina, Benedetto Falsini, Marco Luigetti, Angela Romano, Valeria Guglielmino, Romina Fasciani, Giorgio Placidi, Elena D’Agostino, Paola Sasso, Stanislao Rizzo, and et al. 2023. "Ocular Morpho-Functional Evaluation in ATTRv Pre-Symptomatic Carriers: A Case Series" Diagnostics 13, no. 3: 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030359

APA Style

Maceroni, M., Falsini, B., Luigetti, M., Romano, A., Guglielmino, V., Fasciani, R., Placidi, G., D’Agostino, E., Sasso, P., Rizzo, S., & Minnella, A. M. (2023). Ocular Morpho-Functional Evaluation in ATTRv Pre-Symptomatic Carriers: A Case Series. Diagnostics, 13(3), 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030359

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop