Next Article in Journal
SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies in Mexican Population: A Five Vaccine Comparison
Next Article in Special Issue
Urinary Tract Infection and Microbiome
Previous Article in Journal
Is Laser Therapy an Adjuvant in the Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis? A Randomized Clinical Trial
Previous Article in Special Issue
Update on the Effect of the Urinary Microbiome on Urolithiasis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Menopausal Changes in the Microbiome—A Review Focused on the Genitourinary Microbiome

1
Department of Urology, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital, 9 Mareunnae-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04551, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Urology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, 170 Juhwa-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si 10380, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Urology, Korea University Guro Hospital, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul 08308, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(6), 1193; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061193
Submission received: 24 January 2023 / Revised: 1 March 2023 / Accepted: 19 March 2023 / Published: 21 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbiome in Urological Diseases)

Abstract

:
A balanced interaction between the host and its microbiome is crucial to health. Research regarding the significance of the gut and vaginal microbiomes in female health is substantial. However, less data regarding the urinary microbiome are available. Interactions between the gut, vaginal, and urinary microbiomes are also currently being researched. Hormone-induced dysbiosis after menopause is believed to have effects on physical changes and health consequences. Postmenopausal changes in the gut microbiome are associated with increased short-chain fatty acids and hydrogen sulfide levels. Increased vaginal pH caused by reduced estrogen alters the vaginal microbiome, resulting in reduced levels of Lactobacillus. Such changes influence the vaginal structure and functions, contributing to the onset of genitourinary syndrome of menopause. A dysbiosis of the urinary microbiome is associated with urgency and urinary incontinence and also related to interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome and neuropathic bladder. As these diseases commonly affect postmenopausal women, hormone-induced changes in the microbiome may play a role. Menopause increases the alpha diversity of the urinary microbiome and lowers the percentage of Lactobacillus in urine, and such changes precede recurrent cystitis. More research regarding the effects of changes in the urinary microbiome due to menopause on urinary tract diseases is needed.

1. Introduction

Humans are host organisms with stable and transient symbiotic microbiota [1]. A balanced interaction between the host and microbiota is crucial to maintaining host health [2]. Several studies have investigated the effects of the gut microbiota on human health and diseases, leading to studies investigating the microbiomes of the vagina and skin. However, data regarding the urinary tract microbiota are lacking [3].
Menopause is the conclusion of the menstrual cycle in relation to ovarian failure due to reduced estrogen secretion and the loss of progesterone secretion, and with increased life expectancy, the postmenopausal period may account for up to one-third of a woman’s life [1]. The dramatic changes in a woman’s health after menopause are well-known, and menopause alters the gut microbiota, which has several effects on a woman’s health [4]. In the ovulatory cycle, estrogen and progesterone cause thickening of the stratified squamous epithelium of the vagina, deposition of glycogen, and local immunity; therefore, these hormones have substantial effects on the composition of the microbiome [5]. Alterations in the microbiota due to postmenopausal hormone changes are similar to vaginal dysbiosis observed in inflammatory pelvic disease, human immunodeficiency virus and human papillomavirus (HPV) infections, and pregnancy [1].
Further research is required to determine the role of the urinary microbiome in maintaining a structural and functional homeostasis of the urinary tract [6]. Several studies have reported that the urinary microbiome is associated with various diseases of the urinary system, including overactive bladder [7,8], interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) [9], bladder cancer [10], and urinary tract infections [6]. These findings suggest that the urinary microbiome plays an important role in urinary tract disease [6].
Urinary pathogens are believed to originate in the gastrointestinal tract, with an intermediary step of vaginal colonization [11,12]. Approximately 62.5% of intestinal-derived species and 32% of vaginal-derived species overlap with species in the urine [13]. These common pathogens support the origination of the urinary microbiome from the gut and vagina, and a mutual, symbiotic relationship of these strains suggests that diseases can occur due to crosstalk between each environment. Therefore, changes in the gut and vaginal microbiome as a result of dramatic hormonal changes during menopause will impact the urinary microbiome. The changes of the urinary microbiome require investigation in relation to the pathophysiology of various urinary tract diseases that commonly affect postmenopausal women.
An understanding of the changes in the microbiome from the perspective of postmenopausal changes and the correlations between the microbiome and postmenopausal changes will help identify new methods for alleviating and controlling various postmenopausal symptoms, including the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). Moreover, these findings will provide more insight into functional urological diseases. In this review, we discuss postmenopausal changes in the gut, vagina, and urinary microbiomes, the possibility of their interactions, and their effects on postmenopausal health. We particularly focus on postmenopausal changes and the urinary microbiome, which are lesser studied than the gut and vaginal microbiome.

2. Changes in Gut Microbiota in Menopausal Women

It has been reported that diversity in intestinal microbiome and functions can affect various estrogen-dependent disorders by altering estrogen concentrations independent of the ovaries [14]. Conversely, several studies have investigated the effects of postmenopausal changes in female hormones on the gut microbiome. For instance, a study by Auriemma et al. examined changes in the vaginal and gut microbiome in 35 pre- and postmenopausal women and reported that postmenopausal women had significantly lower vaginal Lactobacillus compared to premenopausal women, but their overall diversity in gut flora did not significantly differ from that of premenopausal women [15]. Furthermore, another study compared the microbiomes of the small intestine in postmenopausal women receiving hormone therapy (n = 13), postmenopausal women not receiving hormone therapy (n = 12), and reproductive-aged women (n = 10) [16]. Leite et al. found that the core duodenal microbiomes differed between those who received hormone therapy and those who did not [16]. Moreover, those receiving hormone therapy had similar microbiome compositions to those of the premenopausal group. Those not receiving hormone therapy had a higher abundance of Proteobacteria but lower Bacteroidetes and duodenal microbial diversity compared to those receiving hormone therapy. Additionally, the hormone therapy group had relatively higher Prevotella and lower Escherichia and Klebsiella [16]. Thus, in contrast to the study by Auriemma et al. [15], these results suggest that menopause-induced hormonal changes significantly alter the gut microbiome and that hormone therapy can restore the microbiome to some degree. Santos-Marcosa et al. [17] also reported that postmenopausal women have a higher Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio and a higher relative abundance of Lachnospira and Roseburia compared to premenopausal women, while premenopausal women have a lower relative abundance of the Prevotella, Parabacteroides, and Bilophila genera. Yang et al. [4] performed a meta-analysis to examine changes in the intestinal microbiota in menopausal women. While no significant changes were observed at the phylum level, such as changes in Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, or Proteobacteria compositions, genera Odoribacter and Bilophila were more abundant in menopausal women than in premenopausal women. The prevalence of Sutterella, Roseburia, and Blautia was decreased, while Prevotella, Parabacteroides, and Bacteroidetes were more common in menopausal women, though these differences were not significant. Hydrogen sulfide produced by Biophila spp. relaxes the ileal smooth muscles and increases the blood supply of the gastrointestinal mucosa [18]. Increased Bilophila in menopausal women leads to increased hydrogen sulfide production, inducing local inflammation and mucosal damage, increased serum endotoxin concentrations, and inflammatory reactions in several types of tissues. The intracellular inflammatory response caused by inflammatory factors leads to insulin resistance by interfering with insulin signal transduction. In bones, inflammatory factors (such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-1, and IL-6) enhance the function of osteoclasts, contributing to osteopenia. Inflammatory factors in peripheral blood cross the blood–brain barrier and activate microglia in the central nervous system, resulting in inflammation in neurons and exacerbating the aggregation and accumulation of nerve fiber tangles and β-amyloid protein, which contribute to Alzheimer’s disease [4].
Increased Odoribacter in menopausal women results in elevated levels of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), hydrogen, and hydrogen sulfide [19,20]. SCFAs increase fatty acid oxidation and energy metabolism, are involved in the synthesis of serotonin and stabilizing neurons, and increase circulating insulin-like growth factor-1, which stimulates osteogenesis. Thus, Odoribacter-related increases of SCFAs in menopausal women may lower the risk of obesity, hyperlipidemia, depression, and osteoporosis. In contrast, increased hydrogen sulfide production leads to inflammatory reactions. Therefore, Odoribacter has both positive and adverse effects (similar to the effects of postmenopausal syndrome) [4].
Furthermore, a study that analyzed the gut microbiome of menopausal women with and without menopausal syndrome at time of menopause found that those with menopausal syndrome exhibited gut microbiome imbalance due to a deficiency of Aggregatibacter segnis, Bifidobacterium animalis, and Acinetobacter guillouiae [21]. Regarding osteoporosis, which commonly affects menopausal women, Yang et al. [22] reported significant differences in the gut microbiome associated with the severity of osteoporosis. Those without osteoporosis had an abundance of Romboutsia, unclassified_Mollicutes, and Weissella spp. In contrast, those with osteoporosis had an abundance of Fusicatenibacter, Lachnoclostridium, and Megamonas spp. Changes in the gut microbiome were more pronounced than those of the vaginal microbiome in the various severities of osteoporosis, suggesting that the gut microbiome of women may influence bone metabolism [22].

3. Changes in Vaginal Microbiota in Menopausal Women

The composition of vaginal microbiota is highly dynamic, and it is affected by age, ethnicity, physiological factors, and the immune system. Vaginal infections, medications, as well as lifestyle and diet affect the vaginal microbiota [23]. The vaginal microbiome changes throughout a woman’s lifetime, and such changes have an important impact on quality of life [24]. Before describing the postmenopausal vaginal microbiome, we summarize the changes in the vaginal microbiome from birth, throughout puberty, and in reproductive periods (Table 1) [23,24].
The vaginal microbiome composition is altered after menopause, although there are individual variations. Generally, the vaginal microbiota includes Gardnerella vaginalis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Candida albicans, and Prevotella spp., while the prevalence of Lactobacillus progressively declines [25,26]. The reduction of lactic acid bacteria in menopausal women is a normal physiological change [27], and changes in the vaginal microbiome in menopausal women can impair sexual health by causing vulvovaginal atrophy and vaginal dryness [27].
According to a study that analyzed the differences in the vaginal microbiome in Korean pre- and postmenopausal women [28], postmenopausal women had significantly fewer Lactobacillus and significantly more Prevotella, unclassified Lactobacillaceae, Escherichia, Pseudomonas, Proteus, Finegoldia, and Atopobium. Hillier et al. [29] examined the vaginal microflora of 73 menopausal women who had not undergone hormone replacement therapy, and these women had markedly lower percentages of Lactobacillus and vaginosis-associated bacteria compared to women of childbearing age. The prevalence of bacteria were 49% Lactobacilli, 27% Gardnerella vaginalis, 13% Ureaplasma urealyticum, 1% Candida albicans, and 33% Prevotella bivia [30]. Cauci et al. [31] reported that the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis is lower (6%) among menopausal women than among women of childbearing age (9.8%) or perimenopausal (11%) women. Mirmonsef et al. [32] analyzed the differences in the types of vaginal glycogen and Lactobacillus in the cervicovaginal lavage samples of 11 premenopausal women and 12 postmenopausal women. L. jensenii levels were significantly correlated with free glycogen levels in all samples. L. iners levels were significantly higher in premenopausal women than in menopausal women. According to Lee et al. [33], menopausal women had a significantly lower free glycogen concentration than premenopausal women, and premenopausal women had higher Lactobacillus levels and lower vaginal pH than menopausal women. Overall, a positive correlation between L. iners and glycogen levels was identified in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. In a cross-sectional observational study to identify the main characteristics of the vaginal microbiota in healthy postmenopausal women and to examine the influence of rectal lactobacilli, it was confirmed that rectal lactobacilli maintain a normal vaginal microbiota by playing the role of a reservoir in menopausal women lacking vaginal lactobacilli [34].
Emerging evidence shows that the uterus harbors its own microbiome, which can modify uterine functions and disease [35]. There is also rapidly accumulating evidence for the role of the postmenopausal vaginal microbiome in endometrial cancer. In a study of the microbiome in cervicovaginal and anorectal swab samples from menopausal women with endometrioid adenocarcinoma, uterine serous carcinoma, and benign uterine conditions, the microbial diversity of anatomical ecological niches with endometrioid adenocarcinoma and uterine serous carcinoma was found to be different compared with that in benign controls [36]. Walsh et al. [37] identified the postmenopausal status as the main driver of a polymicrobial network associated with endometrial cancer microbiome in their clinical study on 151 patients undergoing hysterectomy. The presence of Porphyromas somerae is the most predictive microbial marker of endometrial cancer and might be useful in detecting endometrial cancer in high-risk, asymptomatic women. Wang et al. [38] revealed the significant differences between the paired endometrial cancer and adjacent non-endometrial cancer endometrial microbiota in their clinical study of 28 menopausal women who were histopathologically diagnosed with endometrioid adenocarcinoma, some of whom underwent hysterectomy using the open surgical approach.
Some recent clinical trials administered Lactobacillus to postmenopausal women. Ribeiro et al. [39] randomly divided 60 menopausal women into three groups and provided different interventions: isoflavone alone, isoflavone with probiotics (L. acidophilus, L. casei, Lactococcus lactis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Bifidobacterium lactis), and hormone therapy (1 mg estradiol and 0.5 mg norethisterone acetate). The vaginal pH and Lactobacilli levels were restored to premenopausal levels in patients who underwent hormone therapy, though no significant changes were observed in the other groups [39]. In a systematic review of four clinical trials investigating the effects of percutaneous estrogen administration on the vaginal microbiome in postmenopausal women, Ratten et al. [40] found that topical estrogen administration increases vaginal Lactobacillus. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted by Petricevic et al., when probiotic capsules containing L. rhamnosus GR-1 and L. reuteri RC-14 were administered daily for 14 days, there was a significant improvement in the Nugent score compared with that in the placebo group. The results suggest an alternative modality to restore the normal vaginal flora using oral administration of specific lactobacilli strains [41].

4. Changes in Urinary Microbiota in Menopausal Women

The clinical significance and functions of the urinary tract microbiome have not been extensively studied. However, some studies have reported that dysbiotic urinary microbiota is associated with urge urinary incontinence (UUI) [7,42,43,44], overactive bladder (OAB) [45], neuropathic bladder [46], IC/BPS [47] and recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI) [48]. However, the causal relationships between altered urinary microbiota and urinary tract diseases remain elusive. The risks of UUI, OAB, IC/BPS, and rUTI increase with advancing age and after menopause [49,50,51]. The reason for the high incidence of urinary tract disease after menopause is unclear, though altered urinary microbiota as a result of age or hormone changes likely contribute to some degree [52,53,54,55]. As noted, age-related or menopausal/hormone-related changes in the microbiota have been observed in other microbial niches, including those in the gut and vagina [56,57]. However, as shown in Table 2, studies on the urinary microbiome in postmenopausal women have not been extensively conducted.
Ammitzbøll et al. [58] analyzed urinary microbiota composition via 16S rRNA gene sequencing of catheterized urine samples of menopausal women to determine the effects of menopause on the urinary microbiota and found that urine from menopausal women had a substantially higher alpha diversity compared to urine from premenopausal women. Lactobacillus was the most abundant bacteria in both groups, although the relative abundance of Lactobacillus was 77.8% in premenopausal women and 42.0% in postmenopausal women. Premenopausal women had Lactobacillus-dominant urotypes, while postmenopausal women had a more diverse urinary microbiota with more abundant Gardnerella and Prevotella genera [58].
Hugenholtz et al. [59] compared the urine and vaginal microbiota compositions of pre- and postmenopausal women, those with recurrent UTI (RUTI), and those who had undergone renal transplantation. There was a difference in urine and vaginal microbiota composition between the pre- and postmenopausal groups, where postmenopausal women had a lower abundance of Lactobacilli and gram-negative uropathobionts, and a higher abundance of bacterial vaginosis anaerobes and gram-positive uropathobionts. There were no significant differences in the microbiome between those who had RUTI and renal transplantation. Thus, postmenopausal status has a stronger impact on microbiome composition than other factors. Additionally, RUTI was generally caused by Escherichia/Shigella in premenopausal women, but the causative pathogen of RUTIs were varied in postmenopausal women.
Curtiss et al. [53] analyzed the bladder microbiome using urine samples from 79 healthy women and identified 60 different genera. Although the number of genera decreased with advancing age, the changes were not statistically significant. The prevalence of Lactobacillus was significantly lower in menopausal women than in premenopausal women, and the prevalence of Mobiluncus was significantly higher in menopausal women than in premenopausal women.
The clinical significance of postmenopausal changes in the urinary microbiome is suggested by the prevalence of urinary tract diseases. Bossa et al. reported that changes in the urinary microbiome precede the onset of urinary tract infections, and the normal urinary microbiome is restored after urinary tract infections are resolved [60]. Morand et al. [61] reported the taxa percentages of major phyla in the human urinary tract to be Proteobacteria, 35.6%; Firmicutes, 31.3%; Actinobacteria, 22.4%; Bacteroidetes, 6.4%; and others, 4.3%. Therefore, it was concluded that the majority of pathogenic bacteria are commensal in the human urinary tract and that their pathogenicity is induced by an imbalance in the relative abundance ratios [61]. Menopause, which has a significant impact on the urinary microbiota environment, may facilitate the pathogenicity of pathogenic bacteria.
Vaughan et al. [62] conducted a cross-sectional study including patients with recurrent cystitis who were administered prophylactic antibiotics, patients with recurrent cystitis who did not undergo antibiotic prophylaxis, and age-matched controls of menopausal women (mean participant age: 55 years). All three groups were undergoing estrogen therapy after menopause. No significant differences were observed between the groups in the number of bacteria in the microbiome, including Lactobacillus. This result may be attributable to the fact that all three groups were undergoing hormone therapy after menopause. Significant differences in anaerobic taxa associated with phenotypic groups were identified in the previous study. Most of these differences included Bacteroidales and the Prevotellaceae family, though differences in Actinobacteria and certain genera of Clostridiales were also noted. Yoo et al. [63] examined the differences in the microbiomes of patients with acute uncomplicated cystitis (AUC) and patients with recurrent cystitis (mean patient age: 54 years) and found no significant differences in the microbiomes between the groups. The percentage of menopausal women was 54.5% in the AUC group, 67.7% in the recurrent cystitis group, and 64.2% in the total study population. Microbiome diversity was significantly higher among patients with recurrent cystitis than in those with AUC, and the microbiome composition was significantly different between the groups. In the urine next generation sequencing, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, and Enterobacteriaceae were identified in the AUC group, and Sphingomonas, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Rothia spp. were detected in patients with recurrent cystitis. AUC is a temporary infection caused by a specific causative organism, while dysbiosis seems to play a more important role in the pathophysiology of recurrent cystitis [64]. In addition, there is a possibility that the dysbiosis of patients with recurrent cystitis changes as the condition is prolonged. The increased prevalence of recurrent cystitis among menopausal women may be due to an acceleration of dysbiosis as a result of menopause-related hormone changes.
Differences in urinary microbiome between IC/BPS patients and normal controls have been investigated in several studies. Abernethy et al. [65] suggested that Lactobacillus strains and higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines are associated with IC/BPS [65]. However, in other studies, a midstream urine sample from IC/PBS patients and asymptomatic controls showed no significant difference in the presence, variety, and abundance of species and genera across groups [66,67]. Therefore, further research is necessary to arrive at a consensus. Moreover, there is lack of study on the characteristics of urinary microbiome in postmenopausal women with IC/BPS. Considering the worsening of IC/BPS symptoms with the onset of the menstrual period in many women, low estrogen level is likely to play a role in IC/BPS [68]. Furthermore, there is some evidence that estrogen affects immune cells, such as Th1, Treg, Th17, dendritic, and mast cells [69,70,71]. Therefore, postmenopausal changes in estrogen levels clearly affect the pathophysiology of IC/BPS. More research on the effect of postmenopausal changes in urinary microbiome on IC/BPS is warranted.
Postmenopausal women may undergo local hormone therapy for primary or secondary prevention of urinary tract infections [11,72]. Lillemon et al. [73] investigated the effects of a 12-week estrogen-containing vaginal ring on the bladder microbiome in postmenopausal women and observed no significant changes after treatment. However, other studies found that local vaginal estrogen therapy increased vaginal [74] and bladder [75] Lactobacillus counts in menopausal women, and local vaginal estrogen supplementation and Lactobacillus supplements decreased the risk of urinary tract infections among patients with recurrent urinary tract infections [74,76,77,78]. Anglim et al. [79] reported that local estrogen therapy alters the local hormonal environment of the urinary bladder and thus reduces Finegoldia magna in the bladder, thereby lowering the incidence of RUTI in postmenopausal women.
A systemic review reported that all commercially available vaginal estrogen products are useful for urinary urgency, urinary frequency, nocturia, and recurrent urinary tract infections [80]. Previous studies have reported that vaginal microbiome transplantation from a healthy donor can restore a Lactobacillus-dominant vaginal microbiome and prevent urinary tract infections in women with refractory or recurrent bacterial vaginitis [59,81,82].
Table 2. Summary of studies on the urinary microbiome in postmenopausal women.
Table 2. Summary of studies on the urinary microbiome in postmenopausal women.
StudyYearSubjects (n)SpecimensAnalysis
Technique
Meaningful Results
Ammitzbøll et al. [58] 202141 premenopausal and 42 postmenopausal womenCatheterized urine samples16S rRNA gene sequencingMore diverse urinary microbiota with higher abundance of the genera Gardnerella and Prevotella
Hugenholtz et al. [59]202218 premenopausal controls and 18 premenopausal recurrent UTI (RUTI) cases, and 30 postmenopausal controls and 20 postmenopausal RUTI cases with and without a renal transplantSelf-collected midstream urine and vaginal flocked swab16S rRNA gene sequencingLittle relative abundances of lactobacilli (L. crispatus), lower gram-negative uropathobionts, and higher bacterial vaginosis anaerobes and gram-positive uropathobionts in urine and vaginal samples
Jung et al. [76]202217 postmenopausal women with RUTIClean-catch urine samples16S rRNA gene sequencingLactobacillus increases in the urogenital microbiome of postmenopausal women with RUTI after 6 months of vaginal estrogen. Relative increase in L. crispatus specifically is associated with treatment success
Curtiss et al. [53]201860 healthy premenopausal and 19 postmenopausal womenClean-catch mid-stream urine16S rRNA gene sequencingLactobacillus is more common in premenopausal women and Mobiluncus is more common in postmenopausal women
Anglim et al. [79]202237 postmenopausal women with (n = 17) and without (n = 20) RUTICatheterized urine sample at recruitment and 3–6 months following treatment with local estrogen therapy16S rRNA gene sequencingKlebsiella aerogenes in 80% of RUTI group and in 53.3% of control group, abundance of Finegoldia magna was decreased from 33.3% to 6.7% after local estrogen therapy
Lillemon et al. [73]202239 postmenopausal women randomly divided into two groups (placebo vs. estrogen)Catheterized urine and mid-vaginal swab samples at recruitment and 12 weeks following treatment 16S rRNA gene sequencingNo significant change in the bacterial composition of the vaginal or urinary bladder microbiome
Thomas-White et al. [75]202062 postmenopausal women with overactive bladderCatheterized urine samples, vaginal and perineal swabsExpanded Quantitative Urine CultureEstrogen therapy for overactive bladder resulted in decreased bladder bacterial diversity and increased bladder Lactobacillus

5. Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM)

In a paired sample analysis of 197 vaginal and urinary samples from women (mean participant age: 53 years), Komesu et al. [83] reported that 60 of the 100 most abundant operational taxonomic units in the samples overlapped. Hugenholtz et al. [59] compared the urinary and vaginal microbiomes in premenopausal and postmenopausal women and identified Lactobacilli, bacterial vaginosis anaerobes, and gram-positive uropathobionts in urine and the vagina. In addition, Lactobacilli dominance was greater in the vagina than in urine, a trend that was more evident among premenopausal women than among postmenopausal women. These results suggest that manipulation of the vaginal microbiome may have a significant impact on the development of lower urinary tract diseases as the vaginal microbiome and bladder or urinary tract microbiomes may directly influence one another [83]. However, studies regarding the interactions between vaginal and urinary microbiomes are lacking [83]. To understand the mutual influence between the vaginal and urinary microbiomes, GSM must be considered. GSM is a collection of symptoms resulting from diminished hormonal stimulation to the vulva, vagina, or lower urinary tract. Approximately 50% of postmenopausal women report symptoms of GSM. These symptoms are typically progressive and unlikely to resolve spontaneously [84]. One study examined the effects of the vaginal microbiome composition on genitourinary menopausal symptoms, serum estrogen, and vaginal glycogen in 88 menopausal women [85] and reported that 66% of women had at least one Lactobacillus species and that 38% had a Lactobacillus-dominant vaginal microbiome. While 24% had both L. crispatus and L. iners, 9%, 32%, and 34% had L. crispatus only, L. iners only, or neither, respectively [85]. GSM was not present in women with Lactobacillus species in their microbiome [85]. Furthermore, menopausal women with Lactobacillus-dominant microbiomes had higher levels of unconjugated serum estrone, although their vaginal glycogen levels did not significantly differ from those of women with non-Lactobacillus-dominant microbiomes [85].
The impact of estrogen on the vaginal microbiome has been the subject of recent research. In the premenopausal vagina, the microbiome is represented by five Community State Types (CST), including type I, with a predominance of Lactobacillus crispatus; type II, with a predominance of Lactobacillus gasseri; type III, with a predominance of Lactobacillus iners; and type V, with a predominance of Lactobacillus jensenii. Type IV does not identify Lactobacillus, but focuses on a heterogeneous population of bacteria. Type IV-A is composed of a small proportion of Lactobacillus and anaerobic bacteria (Anaerococcus, Entomophiles, and Prevotella). Type IV-B has a large proportion of Atopobium and also includes Prevotella, Parvimonas, Sneathia, Gardnerella, Mobiluncus, and Peptoniphilus species [86,87]. Studies regarding the microbiome of symptomatic postmenopausal women report that Lactobacillus species are diminished, with a shift toward CST IV and increased bacterial diversity [27]. The 20–50% of postmenopausal women with a Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiome have a lower prevalence of GSM symptoms. Thus, altering the vaginal microbiome with estrogen or Lactobacillus supplementation could be considered as a treatment option for GSM. Lillemon et al. [73] reported that treatment with 12 weeks of vaginal estrogen just changed the main symptoms of GSM from vulvovaginal dryness and urinary frequency to dyspareunia and urgency without significant improvement of GSM symptoms. There was a pilot RCT attempting to improve GSM using the microbiome [88]. The study placed 35 pre- and 35 postmenopausal women into treatment groups that either received Lactobacillus-containing feminine soap and cream and/or Lactobacillus-containing feminine gel (4 weeks), or a control group (no treatment). A comparison of the changes in vaginal microbiota and genitourinary symptoms after four weeks showed that those treated with the Lactobacillus-containing soap and cream had lower vaginal pH and pathogenic flora compared to the control group. This change was more pronounced in the postmenopausal group. GSM symptoms were improved in 81.3% of postmenopausal women—a significant improvement compared to the control group. The symptom of overactive bladder also improved in 91.7% of postmenopausal women in the treatment group [88]. Jaisamrarn et al. [89] conducted a clinical trial investigating the effects of combined estrogen and Lactobacillus therapy. In this study, patients with GSM were divided into the placebo and intervention group that used a vaginal cream containing estriol and L. acidophilus (KS400) for 14 weeks. The cream containing estrogen and Lactobacillus significantly improved GSM symptoms compared to the placebo and significantly restored vaginal microbiome colonies. Therefore, it is possible that such combination therapy is more effective than estrogen or Lactobacillus monotherapy for GSM management (Table 3).

6. Conclusions

The gut, vaginal, and urinary microbiomes are mutually influential, and dysbiosis of one of these microbiota results in several health problems. Menopause alters the gut, vaginal, and urinary microbiota due to drastic hormone changes. Therefore, menopause may cause several physical changes and subsequent health consequences. An understanding of the changes in the microbiome and their significance in menopausal women is crucial, and further research is required to analyze their correlations with various diseases. In particular, endometrial cancer appears to be closely related to changes in the postmenopausal vaginal microbiome. In contrast to postmenopausal changes in the gut and vaginal microbiota, research regarding the urinary microbiome is inadequate. Lower urinary tract symptoms or recurrent cystitis that commonly affect postmenopausal women are likely to be associated with changes in the urinary microbiome after menopause. This fact highlights the importance of research regarding menopause-related changes in the urinary microbiome and the clinical implications of these changes. In addition, there is substantial overlap between the vaginal and urinary microbiomes, which directly and indirectly influence one another. Therefore, GSM, a prevalent syndrome among postmenopausal women, must be studied from this perspective.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.O.; methodology, M.M.O.; formal analysis, M.G.P. and S.C.; investigation, M.G.P. and M.M.O.; data curation, M.G.P. and S.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.G.P.; writing—review and editing, M.G.P.; supervision, M.M.O.; project administration, M.M.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

References

  1. de Oliveira, N.S.; de Lima, A.B.F.; de Brito, J.C.R.; Sarmento, A.C.A.; Gonçalves, A.K.S.; Eleutério, J., Jr. Postmenopausal Vaginal Microbiome and Microbiota. Front. Reprod. Health 2021, 3, 780931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gilbert, S.F.; Sapp, J.; Tauber, A.I. A symbiotic view of life: We have never been individuals. Q. Rev. Biol. 2012, 87, 325–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Cumpanas, A.A.; Bratu, O.G.; Bardan, R.T.; Ferician, O.C.; Cumpanas, A.D.; Horhat, F.G.; Licker, M.; Pricop, C.; Cretu, O.M. Urinary Microbiota-Are We Ready for Prime Time? A Literature Review of Study Methods’ Critical Steps in Avoiding Contamination and Minimizing Biased Results. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yang, M.; Wen, S.; Zhang, J.; Peng, J.; Shen, X.; Xu, L. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Changes of Gut Microbiota before and after Menopause. Dis. Mrk. 2022, 2022, 3767373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Younes, J.A.; Lievens, E.; Hummelen, R.; van der Westen, R.; Reid, G.; Petrova, M.I. Women and Their Microbes: The Unexpected Friendship. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Meštrović, T.; Matijašić, M.; Perić, M.; Čipčić Paljetak, H.; Barešić, A.; Verbanac, D. The Role of Gut, Vaginal, and Urinary Microbiome in Urinary Tract Infections: From Bench to Bedside. Diagnostics 2020, 11, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pearce, M.M.; Hilt, E.E.; Rosenfeld, A.B.; Zilliox, M.J.; Thomas-White, K.; Fok, C.; Kliethermes, S.; Schreckenberger, P.C.; Brubaker, L.; Gai, X.; et al. The female urinary microbiome: A comparison of women with and without urgency urinary incontinence. MBio 2014, 5, e01283–e01314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wu, P.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, G.; Chen, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H. Urinary Microbiome and Psychological Factors in Women with Overactive Bladder. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leue, C.; Kruimel, J.; Vrijens, D.; Masclee, A.; van Os, J.; van Koeveringe, G. Functional urological disorders: A sensitized defence response in the bladder-gut-brain axis. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2017, 14, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bučević Popović, V.; Šitum, M.; Chow, C.T.; Chan, L.S.; Roje, B.; Terzić, J. The urinary microbiome associated with bladder cancer. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Stapleton, A.E. The Vaginal Microbiota and Urinary Tract Infection. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Thomas-White, K.J.; Gao, X.; Lin, H.; Fok, C.S.; Ghanayem, K.; Mueller, E.R.; Dong, Q.; Brubaker, L.; Wolfe, A.J. Urinary microbes and postoperative urinary tract infection risk in urogynecologic surgical patients. Int. Urogynecology J. 2018, 29, 1797–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Perez-Carrasco, V.; Soriano-Lerma, A.; Soriano, M.; Gutiérrez-Fernández, J.; Garcia-Salcedo, J.A. Urinary Microbiome: Yin and Yang of the Urinary Tract. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 617002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Flores, R.; Shi, J.; Fuhrman, B.; Xu, X.; Veenstra, T.D.; Gail, M.H.; Gajer, P.; Ravel, J.; Goedert, J.J. Fecal microbial determinants of fecal and systemic estrogens and estrogen metabolites: A cross-sectional study. J. Transl. Med. 2012, 10, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Yoshikata, R.; Yamaguchi, M.; Mase, Y.; Tatsuzuki, A.; Myint, K.Z.Y.; Ohta, H. Age-Related Changes, Influencing Factors, and Crosstalk Between Vaginal and Gut Microbiota: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Pre- and Postmenopausal Women. J. Women’s Health 2022, 31, 1763–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Leite, G.; Barlow, G.M.; Parodi, G.; Pimentel, M.L.; Chang, C.; Hosseini, A.; Wang, J.; Pimentel, M.; Mathur, R. Duodenal microbiome changes in postmenopausal women: Effects of hormone therapy and implications for cardiovascular risk. Menopause 2022, 29, 264–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Santos-Marcos, J.A.; Rangel-Zuñiga, O.A.; Jimenez-Lucena, R.; Quintana-Navarro, G.M.; Garcia-Carpintero, S.; Malagon, M.M.; Landa, B.B.; Tena-Sempere, M.; Perez-Martinez, P.; Lopez-Miranda, J.; et al. Influence of gender and menopausal status on gut microbiota. Maturitas 2018, 116, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, H.; Chen, J.; Li, X.; Sun, Q.; Qin, P.; Wang, Q. Compositional and functional features of the female premenopausal and postmenopausal gut microbiota. FEBS Lett. 2019, 593, 2655–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Göker, M.; Gronow, S.; Zeytun, A.; Nolan, M.; Lucas, S.; Lapidus, A.; Hammon, N.; Deshpande, S.; Cheng, J.F.; Pitluck, S.; et al. Complete genome sequence of Odoribacter splanchnicus type strain (1651/6). Stand. Genom. Sci. 2011, 4, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gomez-Arango, L.F.; Barrett, H.L.; McIntyre, H.D.; Callaway, L.K.; Morrison, M.; Dekker Nitert, M. Increased Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Is Associated With Altered Gut Microbiota Composition and Butyrate Production in Early Pregnancy. Hypertension 2016, 68, 974–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Mao, T.; Huang, Y.; Liang, J.; Zhu, M.; Yao, P.; Zong, Y.; Lang, J.; Zhang, Y. The relationship between menopausal syndrome and gut microbes. BMC Women’s Health 2022, 22, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yang, X.; Chang, T.; Yuan, Q.; Wei, W.; Wang, P.; Song, X.; Yuan, H. Changes in the composition of gut and vaginal microbiota in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 930244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lehtoranta, L.; Ala-Jaakkola, R.; Laitila, A.; Maukonen, J. Healthy Vaginal Microbiota and Influence of Probiotics Across the Female Life. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 819958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Auriemma, R.S.; Scairati, R.; Del Vecchio, G.; Liccardi, A.; Verde, N.; Pirchio, R.; Pivonello, R.; Ercolini, D.; Colao, A. The Vaginal Microbiome: A Long Urogenital Colonization Throughout Woman Life. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 686167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Srinivasan, S.; Liu, C.; Mitchell, C.M.; Fiedler, T.L.; Thomas, K.K.; Agnew, K.J.; Marrazzo, J.M.; Fredricks, D.N. Temporal variability of human vaginal bacteria and relationship with bacterial vaginosis. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Brotman, R.M.; Shardell, M.D.; Gajer, P.; Tracy, J.K.; Zenilman, J.M.; Ravel, J.; Gravitt, P.E. Interplay between the temporal dynamics of the vaginal microbiota and human papillomavirus detection. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 210, 1723–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Muhleisen, A.L.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M. Menopause and the vaginal microbiome. Maturitas 2016, 91, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kim, S.; Seo, H.; Rahim, M.A.; Lee, S.; Kim, Y.S.; Song, H.Y. Changes in the Microbiome of Vaginal Fluid after Menopause in Korean Women. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 31, 1490–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hillier, S.L.; Lau, R.J. Vaginal microflora in postmenopausal women who have not received estrogen replacement therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1997, 25 (Suppl. S2), S123–S126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fettweis, J.M.; Brooks, J.P.; Serrano, M.G.; Sheth, N.U.; Girerd, P.H.; Edwards, D.J.; Strauss, J.F.; The Vaginal Microbiome, C.; Jefferson, K.K.; Buck, G.A. Differences in vaginal microbiome in African American women versus women of European ancestry. Microbiology 2014, 160, 2272–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Cauci, S.; Driussi, S.; De Santo, D.; Penacchioni, P.; Iannicelli, T.; Lanzafame, P.; De Seta, F.; Quadrifoglio, F.; de Aloysio, D.; Guaschino, S. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and vaginal flora changes in peri- and postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 2147–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Mirmonsef, P.; Modur, S.; Burgad, D.; Gilbert, D.; Golub, E.T.; French, A.L.; McCotter, K.; Landay, A.L.; Spear, G.T. Exploratory comparison of vaginal glycogen and Lactobacillus levels in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Menopause 2015, 22, 702–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Lee, J.E.; Lee, S.; Lee, H.; Song, Y.M.; Lee, K.; Han, M.J.; Sung, J.; Ko, G. Association of the vaginal microbiota with human papillomavirus infection in a Korean twin cohort. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Petricevic, L.; Domig, K.J.; Nierscher, F.J.; Sandhofer, M.J.; Krondorfer, I.; Kneifel, W.; Kiss, H. Differences in the vaginal lactobacilli of postmenopausal women and influence of. Climacteric 2013, 16, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Giudice, L.C. Challenging dogma: The endometrium has a microbiome with functional consequences! Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 215, 682–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Gressel, G.M.; Usyk, M.; Frimer, M.; Kuo, D.Y.S.; Burk, R.D. Characterization of the endometrial, cervicovaginal and anorectal microbiota in. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0259188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Walsh, D.M.; Hokenstad, A.N.; Chen, J.; Jenkins, G.D.; Chia, N.; Mariani, A.; Nelson, H.; Sung, J.; Walther-Antonio, M.R.S. Postmenopause as a key factor in the composition of the Endometrial Cancer. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wang, L.; Yang, J.; Su, H.; Shi, L.; Chen, B.; Zhang, S. Endometrial microbiota from endometrial cancer and paired pericancer tissues in. Menopause 2022, 29, 1168–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ribeiro, A.E.; Monteiro, N.E.S.; Moraes, A.V.G.; Costa-Paiva, L.H.; Pedro, A.O. Can the use of probiotics in association with isoflavone improve the symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause? Results from a randomized controlled trial. Menopause 2018, 26, 643–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ratten, L.K.; Plummer, E.L.; Bradshaw, C.S.; Fairley, C.K.; Murray, G.L.; Garland, S.M.; Bateson, D.; Tachedjian, G.; Masson, L.; Vodstrcil, L.A. The Effect of Exogenous Sex Steroids on the Vaginal Microbiota: A Systematic Review. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 732423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Petricevic, L.; Unger, F.M.; Viernstein, H.; Kiss, H. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of oral lactobacilli to improve the vaginal flora of postmenopausal women. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2008, 141, 54–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Karstens, L.; Asquith, M.; Davin, S.; Stauffer, P.; Fair, D.; Gregory, W.T.; Rosenbaum, J.T.; McWeeney, S.K.; Nardos, R. Does the Urinary Microbiome Play a Role in Urgency Urinary Incontinence and Its Severity? Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Pearce, M.M.; Zilliox, M.J.; Rosenfeld, A.B.; Thomas-White, K.J.; Richter, H.E.; Nager, C.W.; Visco, A.G.; Nygaard, I.E.; Barber, M.D.; Schaffer, J.; et al. The female urinary microbiome in urgency urinary incontinence. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 213, 347.e1-e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Schneeweiss, J.; Koch, M.; Umek, W. The human urinary microbiome and how it relates to urogynecology. Int. Urogynecology J. 2016, 27, 1307–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Curtiss, N.; Balachandran, A.; Krska, L.; Peppiatt-Wildman, C.; Wildman, S.; Duckett, J. A case controlled study examining the bladder microbiome in women with Overactive Bladder (OAB) and healthy controls. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2017, 214, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fouts, D.E.; Pieper, R.; Szpakowski, S.; Pohl, H.; Knoblach, S.; Suh, M.J.; Huang, S.T.; Ljungberg, I.; Sprague, B.M.; Lucas, S.K.; et al. Integrated next-generation sequencing of 16S rDNA and metaproteomics differentiate the healthy urine microbiome from asymptomatic bacteriuria in neuropathic bladder associated with spinal cord injury. J. Transl. Med. 2012, 10, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Bhide, A.; Tailor, V.; Khullar, V. Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome and recurrent urinary tract infection and the potential role of the urinary microbiome. Post Reprod. Health 2020, 26, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jung, C.; Brubaker, L. The etiology and management of recurrent urinary tract infections in postmenopausal women. Climacteric 2019, 22, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Coyne, K.S.; Sexton, C.C.; Thompson, C.L.; Milsom, I.; Irwin, D.; Kopp, Z.S.; Chapple, C.R.; Kaplan, S.; Tubaro, A.; Aiyer, L.P.; et al. The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in the USA, the UK and Sweden: Results from the Epidemiology of LUTS (EpiLUTS) study. BJU Int. 2009, 104, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Irwin, D.E.; Milsom, I.; Hunskaar, S.; Reilly, K.; Kopp, Z.; Herschorn, S.; Coyne, K.; Kelleher, C.; Hampel, C.; Artibani, W.; et al. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: Results of the EPIC study. Eur. Urol. 2006, 50, 1306–1314, discussion 1314-1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Raz, R. Urinary tract infection in postmenopausal women. Korean J. Urol. 2011, 52, 801–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Price, T.K.; Hilt, E.E.; Thomas-White, K.; Mueller, E.R.; Wolfe, A.J.; Brubaker, L. The urobiome of continent adult women: A cross-sectional study. BJOG 2020, 127, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Curtiss, N.; Balachandran, A.; Krska, L.; Peppiatt-Wildman, C.; Wildman, S.; Duckett, J. Age, menopausal status and the bladder microbiome. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2018, 228, 126–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lewis, D.A.; Brown, R.; Williams, J.; White, P.; Jacobson, S.K.; Marchesi, J.R.; Drake, M.J. The human urinary microbiome; bacterial DNA in voided urine of asymptomatic adults. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2013, 3, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Liu, F.; Ling, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Yang, Q.; Zheng, L.; Jiang, P.; Li, L.; Wang, W. Characterization of the urinary microbiota of elderly women and the effects of type 2 diabetes and urinary tract infections on the microbiota. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 100678–100690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Kumar, M.; Babaei, P.; Ji, B.; Nielsen, J. Human gut microbiota and healthy aging: Recent developments and future prospective. Nutr. Healthy Aging 2016, 4, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Brotman, R.M.; Shardell, M.D.; Gajer, P.; Fadrosh, D.; Chang, K.; Silver, M.I.; Viscidi, R.P.; Burke, A.E.; Ravel, J.; Gravitt, P.E. Association between the vaginal microbiota, menopause status, and signs of vulvovaginal atrophy. Menopause 2014, 21, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Ammitzbøll, N.; Bau, B.P.J.; Bundgaard-Nielsen, C.; Villadsen, A.B.; Jensen, A.M.; Leutscher, P.D.C.; Glavind, K.; Hagstrøm, S.; Arenholt, L.T.S.; Sørensen, S. Pre- and postmenopausal women have different core urinary microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hugenholtz, F.; van der Veer, C.; Terpstra, M.L.; Borgdorff, H.; van Houdt, R.; Bruisten, S.; Geerlings, S.E.; van de Wijgert, J. Urine and vaginal microbiota compositions of postmenopausal and premenopausal women differ regardless of recurrent urinary tract infection and renal transplant status. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bossa, L.; Kline, K.; McDougald, D.; Lee, B.B.; Rice, S.A. Urinary catheter-associated microbiota change in accordance with treatment and infection status. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Morand, A.; Cornu, F.; Dufour, J.C.; Tsimaratos, M.; Lagier, J.C.; Raoult, D. Human Bacterial Repertoire of the Urinary Tract: A Potential Paradigm Shift. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 57, e00675–e00718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Vaughan, M.H.; Mao, J.; Karstens, L.A.; Ma, L.; Amundsen, C.L.; Schmader, K.E.; Siddiqui, N.Y. The Urinary Microbiome in Postmenopausal Women with Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections. J. Urol. 2021, 206, 1222–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Yoo, J.J.; Shin, H.B.; Song, J.S.; Kim, M.; Yun, J.; Kim, Z.; Lee, Y.M.; Lee, S.W.; Lee, K.W.; Kim, W.B.; et al. Urinary Microbiome Characteristics in Female Patients with Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis and Recurrent Cystitis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gasiorek, M.; Hsieh, M.H.; Forster, C.S. Utility of DNA Next-Generation Sequencing and Expanded Quantitative Urine Culture in Diagnosis and Management of Chronic or Persistent Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 58, e00204–e00219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Abernethy, M.G.; Rosenfeld, A.; White, J.R.; Mueller, M.G.; Lewicky-Gaupp, C.; Kenton, K. Urinary Microbiome and Cytokine Levels in Women With Interstitial Cystitis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 129, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nickel, J.C.; Stephens-Shields, A.J.; Landis, J.R.; Mullins, C.; van Bokhoven, A.; Lucia, M.S.; Henderson, J.P.; Sen, B.; Krol, J.E.; Ehrlich, G.D. A Culture-Independent Analysis of the Microbiota of Female Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome Participants in the MAPP Research Network. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Bresler, L.; Price, T.K.; Hilt, E.E.; Joyce, C.; Fitzgerald, C.M.; Wolfe, A.J. Female lower urinary tract microbiota do not associate with IC/PBS symptoms: A case-controlled study. Int. Urogynecology J. 2019, 30, 1835–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, G.Z.; Zhang, N.; Du, P.; Yang, Y.; Wu, S.L.; Xiao, Y.X.; Jin, R.; Liu, L.; Shen, H.; Dai, Y. Risk factors for interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: A Chinese multi-center study. Chin. Med. J. 2010, 123, 2842–2846. [Google Scholar]
  69. Tan, I.J.; Peeva, E.; Zandman-Goddard, G. Hormonal modulation of the immune system—A spotlight on the role of progestogens. Autoimmun. Rev. 2015, 14, 536–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Andersson, A.; Stubelius, A.; Karlsson, M.N.; Engdahl, C.; Erlandsson, M.; Grahnemo, L.; Lagerquist, M.K.; Islander, U. Estrogen regulates T helper 17 phenotype and localization in experimental autoimmune arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2015, 17, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Laffont, S.; Seillet, C.; Guéry, J.C. Estrogen Receptor-Dependent Regulation of Dendritic Cell Development and Function. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Hooton, T.M.; Gupta, K. Recurrent Simple Cystitis in Women; UpToDate: Waltham, WA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  73. Lillemon, J.N.; Karstens, L.; Nardos, R.; Garg, B.; Boniface, E.R.; Gregory, W.T. The Impact of Local Estrogen on the Urogenital Microbiome in Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Randomized-Controlled Trial. Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. 2022, 28, e157–e162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Raz, R.; Stamm, W.E. A controlled trial of intravaginal estriol in postmenopausal women with recurrent urinary tract infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993, 329, 753–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Thomas-White, K.; Taege, S.; Limeira, R.; Brincat, C.; Joyce, C.; Hilt, E.E.; Mac-Daniel, L.; Radek, K.A.; Brubaker, L.; Mueller, E.R.; et al. Vaginal estrogen therapy is associated with increased Lactobacillus in the urine of postmenopausal women with overactive bladder symptoms. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 223, 727.e1-e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Jung, C.E.; Estaki, M.; Chopyk, J.; Taylor, B.C.; Gonzalez, A.; McDonald, D.; Shin, J.; Ferrante, K.; Wasenda, E.; Lippmann, Q.; et al. Impact of Vaginal Estrogen on the Urobiome in Postmenopausal Women With Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection. Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. 2022, 28, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Eriksen, B. A randomized, open, parallel-group study on the preventive effect of an estradiol-releasing vaginal ring (Estring) on recurrent urinary tract infections in postmenopausal women. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999, 180, 1072–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Stapleton, A.E.; Au-Yeung, M.; Hooton, T.M.; Fredricks, D.N.; Roberts, P.L.; Czaja, C.A.; Yarova-Yarovaya, Y.; Fiedler, T.; Cox, M.; Stamm, W.E. Randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of a Lactobacillus crispatus probiotic given intravaginally for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 52, 1212–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Anglim, B.; Phillips, C.; Shynlova, O.; Alarab, M. The effect of local estrogen therapy on the urinary microbiome composition of postmenopausal women with and without recurrent urinary tract infections. Int. Urogynecology J. 2022, 33, 2107–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Schwenger, E.M.; Tejani, A.M.; Loewen, P.S. Probiotics for preventing urinary tract infections in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, 2015, Cd008772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lev-Sagie, A.; Goldman-Wohl, D.; Cohen, Y.; Dori-Bachash, M.; Leshem, A.; Mor, U.; Strahilevitz, J.; Moses, A.E.; Shapiro, H.; Yagel, S.; et al. Vaginal microbiome transplantation in women with intractable bacterial vaginosis. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1500–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ma, D.; Chen, Y.; Chen, T. Vaginal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: A conceptual analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2019, 366, fnz025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Komesu, Y.M.; Dinwiddie, D.L.; Richter, H.E.; Lukacz, E.S.; Sung, V.W.; Siddiqui, N.Y.; Zyczynski, H.M.; Ridgeway, B.; Rogers, R.G.; Arya, L.A.; et al. Defining the relationship between vaginal and urinary microbiomes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 222, 154.e1-e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Phillips, N.A.; Bachmann, G.A. The genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Menopause 2021, 28, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mitchell, C.M.; Srinivasan, S.; Zhan, X.; Wu, M.C.; Reed, S.D.; Guthrie, K.A.; LaCroix, A.Z.; Fiedler, T.; Munch, M.; Liu, C.; et al. Vaginal microbiota and genitourinary menopausal symptoms: A cross-sectional analysis. Menopause 2017, 24, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Ravel, J.; Gajer, P.; Abdo, Z.; Schneider, G.M.; Koenig, S.S.; McCulle, S.L.; Karlebach, S.; Gorle, R.; Russell, J.; Tacket, C.O.; et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108 (Suppl. S1), 4680–4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Marconi, C.; El-Zein, M.; Ravel, J.; Ma, B.; Lima, M.D.; Carvalho, N.S.; Alves, R.R.F.; Parada, C.; Leite, S.H.M.; Giraldo, P.C.; et al. Characterization of the Vaginal Microbiome in Women of Reproductive Age From 5 Regions in Brazil. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2020, 47, 562–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Yoshikata, R.; Yamaguchi, M.; Mase, Y.; Tatsuyuki, A.; Myint, K.Z.Y.; Ohta, H. Evaluation of the efficacy of Lactobacillus-containing feminine hygiene products on vaginal microbiome and genitourinary symptoms in pre- and postmenopausal women: A pilot randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0270242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Jaisamrarn, U.; Triratanachat, S.; Chaikittisilpa, S.; Grob, P.; Prasauskas, V.; Taechakraichana, N. Ultra-low-dose estriol and lactobacilli in the local treatment of postmenopausal. Climacteric 2013, 16, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Shen, J.; Song, N.; Williams, C.J.; Brown, C.J.; Yan, Z.; Xu, C.; Forney, L.J. Effects of low dose estrogen therapy on the vaginal microbiomes of women with. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Dahn, A.; Saunders, S.; Hammond, J.A.; Carter, D.; Kirjavainen, P.; Anukam, K.; Reid, G. Effect of bacterial vaginosis, Lactobacillus and Premarin estrogen replacement. Microbes Infect. 2008, 10, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Heinemann, C.; Reid, G. Vaginal microbial diversity among postmenopausal women with and without hormone. Can. J. Microbiol. 2005, 51, 777–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Changes in the vaginal microbiome during a woman’s lifetime.
Table 1. Changes in the vaginal microbiome during a woman’s lifetime.
BirthChildhoodPubertyReproductive Pregnancy
Dominating vaginal microbiomeWide range of aerobes and facultative anaerobesGram-positive anaerobic bacteria: Actinomyces, Bifidobacterium, Peptocuccus, Peptostreptococcus, Propionibacterium
Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria: Bacteroides, Mycoplasma, Fusobacterium, Veillonella
Gram-negative aerobic bacteria:
Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus viridans, Enterococcus faecallis
L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. iners, and L. jensenii,
Atopobium, Streptococcus spp.
L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. jensenii, L. iners, Anaerobic bacteriaIncreasing lactobacilli dominance, especially L. iners,
L. crispatus (most stable species across pregnancy)
Postpartum: Streptococcus anginosus, P. bivia, L. iners.
Less diverse and lower abundance
of Lactobacillus spp.
Vaginal pHNeutral or alkalizedNeutral or alkalineAcidic Lowering of local pH (<4.5)Acidic
Table 3. Summary of the studies about therapeutic interventions affecting the postmenopausal vaginal and urinary microbiome.
Table 3. Summary of the studies about therapeutic interventions affecting the postmenopausal vaginal and urinary microbiome.
StudyYearSubjects (n)Therapeutic RegimenRoute of
Probiotics
Administration
Meaningful Results
Ribeiro et al. [39] 201860 postmenopausal womenIsoflavone alone, isoflavone with probiotics, estradiol and norethisterone acetateOralVaginal pH and Lactobacilli levels were restored in the hormone therapy group
Shen et al. [90] 2016Experimental group of 30 postmenopausal women with
vaginal atrophy and 29 postmenopausal women without vaginal atrophy as control group
Conjugated low dose estrogenOralSignificant increases in the relative abundance of Lactobacillus spp. and decrease of Gardnerella, two-fold increase in the Vaginal Maturation Index
Dahn et al. [91]200820 postmenopausal women divided into experiment and control groupsPermarin® (conjugated equine estrogen in combination with progesterone)OralIncrease of Lactobacillus and significant improvement of Nugent score after estrogen replacement
Petricevic et al. [41] 200872 healthy postmenopausal women randomly divided into experimental and placebo groupsProbiotic capsules containing L. rhamnosus GR-1 and L. reuteri RC-14OralSignificant improvement in Nugent score compared to the placebo group
Heinemann et al. [92]200540 postmenopausal women divided into experimental and control groupsPermarin® (conjugated equine estrogen in combination with progesterone)OralLactobacillus was more often the dominant and only colonizer and significantly fewer bacteria with pathogenic potential were found with lower incidence of bacterial vaginosis in the estrogen replacement group
Raz et al. [74]199393 postmenopausal women with history of recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) randomly divided into two groups (placebo vs. estrogen)Intravaginal estriol creamTopically vaginaSignificant decrease in incidence of UTI and vaginal lactobacilli reappeared with decrease of the rate of vaginal enterobacteriaceae colonization in estrogen treatment group
Yoshikata et al. [88]202235 premenopausal and 35 postmenopausal healthy womenLactobacillus-containing feminine soap and cream or Lactobacillus-containing feminine gel in addition to soap and creamTopically vaginaImprovement of genitourinary symptoms and creation of a better balance of Lactobacillus and pathogenic flora population, especially in the postmenopausal women with feminine hygiene products and gel containing Lactobacillus
Jaisamrarn et al. [89]201387 postmenopausal women with vaginal atrophy symptoms randomly divided into two groups (placebo vs. experimental)Vaginal tablet (estriol 0.03 mg in combination with viable Lactobacillus acidophilus KS400)VaginaSignificant improvement in vaginal flora, maintaining the improved maturation of the vaginal epithelium and preventing relapse of symptomatic vaginal atrophy
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, M.G.; Cho, S.; Oh, M.M. Menopausal Changes in the Microbiome—A Review Focused on the Genitourinary Microbiome. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061193

AMA Style

Park MG, Cho S, Oh MM. Menopausal Changes in the Microbiome—A Review Focused on the Genitourinary Microbiome. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(6):1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061193

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Min Gu, Seok Cho, and Mi Mi Oh. 2023. "Menopausal Changes in the Microbiome—A Review Focused on the Genitourinary Microbiome" Diagnostics 13, no. 6: 1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061193

APA Style

Park, M. G., Cho, S., & Oh, M. M. (2023). Menopausal Changes in the Microbiome—A Review Focused on the Genitourinary Microbiome. Diagnostics, 13(6), 1193. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061193

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop