The Association between Specimen Neuromuscular Characteristics and Urinary Incontinence after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Post-Surgery Continence
3.2. ICIQ Score and Patients’ Disease Features
3.3. Neuromuscular Characteristics
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ferlay, J.; Colombet, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Dyba, T.; Randi, G.; Bettio, M.; Gavin, A.; Visser, O.; Bray, F. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur. J. Cancer 2018, 103, 356–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sood, A.; Jeong, W.; Palma-Zamora, I.; Abdollah, F.; Butaney, M.; Corsi, N.; Wurst, H.; Arora, S.; Kachroo, N.; Hassan, O.; et al. Description of Surgical Technique and Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of the Precision Prostatectomy Procedure (IDEAL Stage 1-2b Study). Eur. Urol. 2022, 81, 396–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Du, Y.; Long, Q.; Guan, B.; Mu, L.; Tian, J.; Jiang, Y.; Bai, X.; Wu, D. Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients: A System Review and Meta-Analysis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2018, 24, 272–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- D’Ancona, C.; Haylen, B.; Oelke, M.; Abranches-Monteiro, L.; Arnold, E.; Goldman, H.; Hamid, R.; Homma, Y.; Marcelissen, T.; Rademakers, K.; et al. The international continence society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2019, 38, 433–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, K.N.; Truong, V.; Estey, E.; Voaklander, D.C. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: Can men at risk be identified preoperatively? J. Wound Ostomy Cont. Nurs. 2007, 34, 270–279, quiz 280–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zorn, K.C.; Gofrit, O.N.; Orvieto, M.A.; Mikhail, A.A.; Zagaja, G.P.; Shalhav, A.L. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: Functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur Urol. 2007, 51, 755–762, discussion 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patel, V.R.; Thaly, R.; Shah, K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: Outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int. 2007, 99, 1109–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amano, K.; Suzuki, K.; Ito, Y. Changes in quality of life and lower urinary tract symptoms over time in cancer patients after a total prostatectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Support. Care Cancer 2022, 30, 2959–2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinkhasov, R.M.; Lee, T.; Huang, R.; Berkley, B.; Pinkhasov, A.M.; Dodge, N.; Loecher, M.S.; James, G.; Pop, E.; Attwood, K.; et al. Prediction of Incontinence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Development and Validation of a 24-Month Incontinence Nomogram. Cancers 2022, 14, 1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacDiarmid, S.A. Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: Pathophysiology and management. Curr. Urol. Rep. 2001, 2, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oelrich, T.M. The urethral sphincter muscle in the male. Am. J. Anat. 1980, 158, 229–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Steiner, M.S. The puboprostatic ligament and the male urethral suspensory mechanism: An anatomic study. Urology 1994, 44, 530–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hagens, M.J.; Veerman, H.; de Ligt, K.M.; Tillier, C.N.; van Leeuwen, P.J.; van Moorselaar, R.J.A.; van der Poel, H.G. Functional outcomes rather than complications predict poor health-related quality of life at 6 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J. Robot. Surg. 2022, 16, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hikita, K.; Honda, M.; Shimizu, R.; Teraoka, S.; Kawamoto, B.; Yumioka, T.; Tsounapi, P.; Iwamoto, H.; Morizane, S.; Takenaka, A. Longitudinal, 5-year long-term outcomes for urinary continence and quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japanese patients. Low. Urin. Tract Symptoms 2022, 14, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gondoputro, W.; Thompson, J.; Evans, M.; Bolton, D.; Frydenberg, M.; Murphy, D.G.; Haynes, A.-M.; Agrawal, S.; Stricker, P.; Papa, N. How Does Age Affect Urinary Continence following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy? A Prospective Multi-Institutional Study Using Independently Collected, Validated Questionnaires. J. Urol. 2022, 207, 1048–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moschovas, M.C.; Patel, V. Neurovascular bundle preservation in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: How I do it after 15.000 cases. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2022, 48, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Strasser, H.; Frauscher, F.; Helweg, G.; Colleselli, K.; Reissigl, A.; Bartsch, G. Transurethral ultrasound: Evaluation of anatomy and function of the rhabdosphincter of the male urethra. J. Urol. 1998, 159, 100–104, discussion 4–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- John, H. Bulbourethral composite suspension: A new operative technique for post-prostatectomy incontinence. J. Urol. 2004, 171, 1866–1870, discussion 9–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majoros, A.; Bach, D.; Keszthelyi, A.; Hamvas, A.; Romics, I. Urinary incontinence and voiding dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy (prospective urodynamic study). Neurourol. Urodyn. 2006, 25, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Groutz, A.; Blaivas, J.G.; Chaikin, D.C.; Weiss, J.P.; Verhaaren, M. The pathophysiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: A clinical and video urodynamic study. J. Urol. 2000, 163, 1767–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trieu, D.; Ju, I.E.; Chang, S.B.; Mungovan, S.F.; Patel, M.I. Surgeon case volume and continence recovery following radical prostatectomy: A systematic review. ANZ J. Surg. 2020, 91, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ko, W.J.; Truesdale, M.D.; Hruby, G.W.; Landman, J.; Badani, K.K. Impacting factors for recovery of erectile function within 1 year following robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Sex. Med. 2011, 8, 1805–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haga, N.; Miyazaki, T.; Tsubouchi, K.; Okabe, Y.; Shibayama, K.; Emoto, D.; Matsuoka, W.; Maruta, H.; Aoyagi, C.; Matsuzaki, H.; et al. Comprehensive approach for preserving cavernous nerves and erectile function after radical prostatectomy in the era of robotic surgery. Int. J. Urol. 2021, 28, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reeves, F.; Preece, P.; Kapoor, J.; Everaerts, W.; Murphy, D.G.; Corcoran, N.M.; Costello, A.J. Preservation of the neurovascular bundles is associated with improved time to continence after radical prostatectomy but not long-term continence rates: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Urol. 2015, 68, 692–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haglind, E.; Carlsson, S.; Stranne, J.; Wallerstedt, A.; Wilderäng, U.; Thorsteinsdottir, T.; Lagerkvist, M.; Damber, J.-E.; Bjartell, A.; Hugosson, J.; et al. Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction after Robotic versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Non randomised Trial. Eur. Urol. 2015, 68, 216–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rahnama’i, M.S.; Marcelissen, T.; Geavlete, B.; Tutolo, M.; Hüsch, T. Current Management of Post-radical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence. Front. Surg. 2021, 8, 647656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Slusarenco, R.I.; Mikheev, K.V.; Prostomolotov, A.O.; Sukhanov, R.B.; Bezrukov, E.A. Analysis of Learning Curve in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed by a Surgeon. Adv. Urol. 2020, 2020, 9191830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Sivaraman, A.; Sanchez-Salas, R.; Prapotnich, D.; Yu, K.; Olivier, F.; Secin, F.P.; Barret, E.; Galiano, M.; Rozet, F.; Cathelineau, X. Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes. Urol. Oncol. 2017, 35, e1–e149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sanda, M.G.; Cadeddu, J.A.; Kirkby, E.; Chen, R.C.; Crispino, T.; Fontanarosa, J.; Freedland, S.J.; Greene, K.; Klotz, L.H.; Makarov, D.V.; et al. Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options. J. Urol. 2018, 199, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, X.; Wu, Y.; Guo, J.; Chen, H.; Weng, X.; Liu, X. Intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy improves patients’ postoperative continence recovery and erectile function: A pooled analysis based on available literatures. Medicine 2018, 97, e11297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Grøn Jensen, L.C.; Boie, S.; Axelsen, S. International consultation on incontinence questionnaire-Urinary incontinence short form ICIQ-UI SF: Validation of its use in a Danish speaking population of municipal employees. PLoS ONE. 2022, 17, e0266479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Sanchez-Salas, R.; Tourinho-Barbosa, R.; Sivaraman, A.; Borges, R.C.; Candela, L.; Cathala, N.; Mombet, A.; Marra, G.; Sanchez, L.R.; Boumezrag, C.B.; et al. Assessing the efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training and duloxetine on urinary continence recovery following radical prostatectomy: A randomized clinical trial. Prostate 2024, 84, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gacci, M.; De Nunzio, C.; Sakalis, V.; Rieken, M.; Cornu, J.N.; Gravas, S. Latest Evidence on Post-Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Steiner, M.S. Continence-preserving anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2000, 55, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bessede, T.; Sooriakumaran, P.; Takenaka, A.; Tewari, A. Neural supply of the male urethral sphincter: Comprehensive anatomical review and implications for continence recovery after radical prostatectomy. World J. Urol. 2017, 35, 549–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Porena, M.; Mearini, E.; Mearini, L.; Vianello, A.; Giannantoni, A. Voiding dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy: More than external urethral sphincter deficiency. Eur. Urol. 2007, 52, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kadono, Y.; Ueno, S.; Yaegashi, H.; Ofude, M.; Izumi, K.; Maeda, Y.; Mizokami, A.; Miwa, S.; Miyagi, T.; Namiki, M. Urodynamic evaluation before and immediately after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urology 2014, 84, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kadono, Y.; Ueno, S.; Iwamoto, D.; Takezawa, Y.; Nohara, T.; Izumi, K.; Mizokami, A.; Namiki, M. Chronological Urodynamic Evaluation of Changing Bladder and Urethral Functions after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Urology 2015, 85, 1441–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kadono, Y.; Ueno, S.; Kadomoto, S.; Iwamoto, H.; Takezawa, Y.; Nakashima, K.; Nohara, T.; Izumi, K.; Mizokami, A.; Gabata, T.; et al. Use of pre-operative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of post prostatectomy incontinence. Neurourol. Urodyn 2016, 35, 1034–1039. [Google Scholar]
- Hefermehl, L.; Bossert, K.; Ramakrishnan, V.M.; Seifert, B.; Lehmann, K. A Prospective Analysis of the Effects of Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy on Urinary Continence Based on Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite and International Index of Erectile Function Scoring Systems. Int. Neurourol. J. 2018, 22, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Secin, F.P.; Serio, A.; Bianco, F.J., Jr.; Karanikolas, N.T.; Kuroiwa, K.; Vickers, A.; Touijer, K.; Guillonneau, B. Preoperative and intra operative risk factors for side-specific positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 2007, 51, 764–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patel, V.R.; Sivaraman, A.; Coelho, R.F.; Chauhan, S.; Palmer, K.J.; Orvieto, M.A.; Camacho, I.; Coughlin, G.; Rocco, B. Pentafecta: A new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2011, 59, 702–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaye, D.R.; Hyndman, M.E.; Segal, R.L.; Mettee, L.Z.; Trock, B.J.; Feng, Z.; Su, L.M.; Bivalacqua, T.J.; Pavlovich, C.P. Urinary outcomes are significantly affected by nerve sparing quality during radical prostatectomy. Urology 2013, 82, 1348–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, N.; Wu, C.; Zhou, X.; Zhai, G.; Wu, J. Cavernous Nerve Injury Resulted Erectile Dysfunction and Regeneration. J. Immunol. Res. 2021, 2021, 5353785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Walsh, P.C.; Donker, P.J. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: Insight intoetiology and prevention. J. Urol. 1982, 128, 492–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ficarra, V.; Novara, G.; Rosen, R.C.; Artibani, W.; Carroll, P.R.; Costello, A.; Menon, M.; Montorsi, F.; Patel, V.R.; Stolzenburg, J.U.; et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012, 62, 405–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sanda, M.G.; Dunn, R.L.; Michalski, J.; Sandler, H.M.; Northouse, L.; Hembroff, L.; Lin, X.; Greenfield, T.K.; Litwin, M.S.; Saigal, C.S.; et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 1250–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Litwin, M.S.; Lubeck, D.P.; Henning, J.M.; Carroll, P.R. Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: Results of the CaPSURE database. J. Urol. 1998, 159, 1988–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
ICIQ Category (12 Months Post-Surgery) | Number of Patients (Percentage) | Early Full Continence—Number of Patients (6 Weeks Post-Surgery) (Percentage from the Group) | Erectile Preservation (Number of Patients with Preoperative Erectile Function) |
---|---|---|---|
Slight (1–5) | 9 (31%) | 4 (44%) | 2 (4) |
Moderate (6–12) | 9 (31%) | 2 (22%) | 1 (4) |
Severe and very severe (13–21) | 11 (38%) | 1 (9%) | 0 (4) |
ICIQ ≤ 12 (n = 18) | ICIQ > 12 (n = 11) | p Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Average ICIQ (IQR) | 6.5 (2.25–10.75) | 16.4 (14.5–18) | |
Age (IQR) | 67.3 (63.9–73.3) | 69.4 (67–72.7) | 0.44 |
Preoperative PSA (ng/mL) (IQR) | 9.1 (6.6–9.9) | 16 (9–22.2) | 0.02 |
Number of patients with preoperative LUTS (IPSS > 7) | 8 (45%) | 5 (45%) | 0.96 |
ISUP score | 0.302 | ||
1 | 1 (5.5%) | 0 (0%) | |
2 | 8 (44.4%) | 3 (27.2%) | |
3 | 5 (27.7%) | 4 (36.3%) | |
4 | 2 (11.1%) | 2 (18.1%) | |
5 | 2 (11.1%) | 0 (0%) | |
ISUPx—after hormonal treatment—2 (18.1%) | |||
Prostate size (gram) | 68 (55–73) | 63.2 (49.5–65.3) | 0.6 |
pT stage (2009) | 0.136 | ||
T2 | 8 (44.4%) | 1 (9%) | |
T3a | 9 (50%) | 9 (82%) | |
T3b | 1 (5.5%) | 1 (9%) | |
Full 6W continence day | 8 (45%) | 3 (27%) | 0.37 |
Full 6W continence night | 8 (45%) | 2 (18%) | 0.14 |
Overall (n = 29) | ICIQ Score ≤ 12 (n = 18) | ICIQ Score > 12 (n = 11) | p Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Presence of ganglion in the base, n (%) | 19 (65%) | 11 (61%) | 8 (72%) | 0.22 |
Presence of ganglion in the apex, n (%) | 12 (41%) | 8 (44%) | 4 (36%) | 0.11 |
Proportional area of detrusor muscle in the base, median (IQR) | 0.54 (0.31–1.00) | 0.45 (0.29–0.92) | 0.60 (0.40–1.00) | 0.57 |
Proportional area of striated muscle at the apex, median (IQR) | 0.13 (0.07–0.24) | 0.13 (0.06–0.24) | 0.13 (0.08–0.24) | 1.00 |
Number of nerves at the base, median (IQR) | 52 (13–139) | 69 (11–152) | 36 (14–108) | 0.65 |
Number of nerves at the apex, median (IQR) | 59 (28–129) | 61 (28–142) | 51 (33–116) | 0.46 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bashi, T.; Margalioth, J.; Savin, Z.; Marom, R.; Dekalo, S.; Fahoum, I.; Naamneh, R.; Mano, R.; Yossepowitch, O. The Association between Specimen Neuromuscular Characteristics and Urinary Incontinence after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2001. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14182001
Bashi T, Margalioth J, Savin Z, Marom R, Dekalo S, Fahoum I, Naamneh R, Mano R, Yossepowitch O. The Association between Specimen Neuromuscular Characteristics and Urinary Incontinence after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(18):2001. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14182001
Chicago/Turabian StyleBashi, Tomer, Jonathan Margalioth, Ziv Savin, Ron Marom, Snir Dekalo, Ibrahim Fahoum, Rabab Naamneh, Roy Mano, and Ofer Yossepowitch. 2024. "The Association between Specimen Neuromuscular Characteristics and Urinary Incontinence after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy" Diagnostics 14, no. 18: 2001. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14182001
APA StyleBashi, T., Margalioth, J., Savin, Z., Marom, R., Dekalo, S., Fahoum, I., Naamneh, R., Mano, R., & Yossepowitch, O. (2024). The Association between Specimen Neuromuscular Characteristics and Urinary Incontinence after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Diagnostics, 14(18), 2001. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14182001