Next Article in Journal
Characteristics of a Surgical Snare Using Microwave Energy
Next Article in Special Issue
Defining System Requirements for Simplified Blood Culture to Enable Widespread Use in Resource-Limited Settings
Previous Article in Journal
Monitoring Thermal Ablation via Microwave Tomography: An Ex Vivo Experimental Assessment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Triplex Real-Time PCR without DNA Extraction for the Monitoring of Meningococcal Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Systemic Response of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Regulators in Campylobacter and Salmonella Patients

1
Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Microbiology, Uppsala University, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 38, 75237 Uppsala, Sweden
2
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Stenbäckinkatu 9, PO Box 100, 00029 Helsinki, Finland
3
Department of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases, Uppsala University, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
4
Department of Dental Medicine, Division of Periodontology, Karolinska Institute, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2018, 8(4), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics8040082
Submission received: 26 October 2018 / Revised: 20 November 2018 / Accepted: 7 December 2018 / Published: 13 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis of Bacterial Pathogens)

Abstract

:
Campylobacters are major enteropathogens worldwide with a substantial financial burden. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are proteolytic metalloendopeptidases with ability to modify immune response and shown to be upregulated in patients with several tissue destructive diseases, including infections. We measured here serum concentrations of MMP-8 and MMP-9 together with their regulators myeloperoxidase (MPO), human neutrophil elastase (HNE), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1 in 80 Campylobacter and 25 Salmonella patients as well as in 27 healthy controls. Paired serum samples were available for 73 and 23 patients, respectively. When the initial serum samples were compared to those from controls, both Campylobacter and Salmonella patients showed elevated concentrations of all biomarkers tested (p ≤ 0.037). In the follow-up samples, collected about 25 days afterwards, MMP-8 levels of Campylobacter patients had already turned to normal but all the other biomarkers still showed elevated, although from the initial levels significantly dropped, levels. For the follow-up samples of Salmonella patients, only MMP-9 and MPO levels were at a significantly higher level than in controls. It remains to be studied if the systematically enhanced neutrophil-derived proteolytic and oxidative stress, induced by Campylobacter infection as shown here and persisting for several weeks, is important for the development of late sequelae.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Campylobacter is the most common cause of bacterial gastroenteritis in most parts of the world and the financial burden of the infections in the European Union alone is estimated to be 2.4 billion euro every year [1,2]. The symptoms of gastroenteritis caused by Campylobacter can vary from mild with watery diarrhea, fever, and abdominal cramps to more severe with bloody stools and vomiting [3]. Occasionally Campylobacter may even cause bacteraemia, which has been shown to occur in less than 1% of the total number of Campylobacter infections [4,5]. Even though the outcome of Campylobacter infections is generally good, late sequelae such as Guillain–Barré Syndrome [6], reactive arthritis [7] and irritable bowel syndrome [8] may develop.
The matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) family consists of genetically distinct but structurally related metalloendopeptidases with the ability to degrade almost all extracellular matrix components and to modify immune responses [9]. MMP-8 and MMP-9 are mainly stored in neutrophils and released as proenzymes during the inflammatory process. The proenzymes are locally activated and involved in leucocyte recruitment to the inflammation site [10]. MMPs are regulated at different levels; transcription and secretion, activation of the proenzyme, and local activity of MMP are regulated by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) [9,11]. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is a cationic heme protein released upon neutrophil degranulation [9]. MPO is upregulated during inflammation and involved in the regulation of neutrophil migration to inflammation site [10]. Also, MPO can, by generating oxidants, activate MMPs and inactivate TIMPs [10,12]. Degranulation of neutrophils also releases human neutrophil elastase (HNE), which is a serine protease involved in host response to bacteria and can activate latent proMMPs and inactivate their endogenous inhibitors, TIMPs [10].
Elevated MMP levels have been detected also in patients with gastrointestinal diseases, such as Crohn´s disease and ulcerative colitis, in which increased MMP levels have been suggested to exert a pathogenic role [13,14,15]. We have earlier shown enhanced systemic MMP response in adult patients [16] but not in children [17] with Helicobacter pylori infection. Furthermore, in several experimental studies, Gram-negative bacteria have been shown to induce the RNA expression of MMPs (reviewed in [18]). In one such study in a mouse model, an upregulated transcription of some MMPs, such as MMP-8, was detected following experimental infection with the enteric pathogens Salmonella Typhimurium and Yersinia enterocolitica [19]. In the very same study, the expression of TIMP-1 was also upregulated in Y. enterocolitica infection [19].
Here, we wanted to study the levels of neutrophil-derived MMP-8 and MMP-9, as well as their regulators MPO, HNE and TIMP-1, in patients with Campylobacter infections. Serum samples were collected from Campylobacter and, for comparison, Salmonella positive patients together with healthy donors. To better understand the kinetics of the biomarkers, follow-up samples were also collected from the enteritis patients. Studies on circulating levels of MMPs in Campylobacter patients are scarce and this is, to the best of our knowledge, the first showing the serum levels of MMP-8.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients and Serum Samples

In this prospective, observational study, serum samples were collected from Campylobacter jejuni/coli and non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica positive adult patients who had visited the Department of Infectious Diseases at Uppsala University Hospital due to an acute enteritis and whose infections were verified by routine stool culture at the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory at Uppsala University Hospital in 2009–2013. Characteristics of the patients included are shown in Table 1. All the patients gave their written informed consent. In addition, serum samples were collected from 27 anonymous blood donors. The study was approved by the local ethical committee of Uppsala, Sweden (Dnro 2009/207, 22 July 2009).

2.2. Measurement of Serum MMPs and TIMP-1 Concentrations

All serum concentrations of MMP-9, TIMP-1, MPO, and HNE were determined using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits as earlier described [16,17] except for MMP-8, which was analysed by immunofluorometric assay (IFMA, Medix Biochemica, Espoo, Finland) [20]. The determinations were performed in random order and blinded to the clinical status and samples were assayed according to the instructions of the manufacturers. The levels of the studied MMPs, TIMP-1, MPO, and HNE were expressed as ng per mL, and the detection limit for MMP-8 was 0.08 ng/mL and for the others as early described [16,17]. The concentration units (ng/mL) for calculation of MMP/TIMP-1 molar ratios, were converted to molarity units (mol/L) by using the molecular weights of MMP-8, MMP-9 and TIMP-1, respectively [16,17,20,21].

2.3. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using XLSTAT (Addinsoft, Paris, France). Biomarker data between the groups were compared using Mann–Whitney test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare biomarker concentrations in paired serum samples. Distribution of gender in the two patient groups was compared using Fisher´s exact test. Differences in the age of the patients as well as in the time intervals between the onset of symptoms and the first serum sample, and between the first and the second serum sample collected, between Campylobacter and Salmonella patients, were calculated using Mann–Whitney test. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

Acute-phase serum samples from a total of 80 Campylobacter (38 females; age: 18–77 years old, median 48 years) and 25 Salmonella (19 females; age: 18–81 years old, median 53 years) positive subjects were collected. There was no significant difference between Campylobacter and Salmonella patients as far as the age was concerned but there were significantly more female patients among Salmonella patients (p = 0.020). The onset of the symptoms was known for 78 Campylobacter and for all 25 Salmonella patients and for them, there was no significant difference in the time interval between the start of the symptoms and the collection of the first serum sample, which was a median of 12 days (range, 4–67 days) and 14 days (range, 4–27 days), respectively.
Acute-phase serum concentrations of MMP-8, MMP-9, MPO, HNE and TIMP-1 (Table 2) were significantly higher in both Campylobacter and Salmonella patients as compared to the healthy controls (HNE, Salmonella patients, p=0.037; all other p-values p ≤ 0.001) (Figure 1). However, when these values were compared between Campylobacter and Salmonella patients, no significant differences were detected in any of the biomarkers tested. Paired serum samples were available for 73 of 80 Campylobacter and for 23 of 25 Salmonella patients. The convalescent serum samples were collected 25 days (median; range, 17–54 days) and 24 days (median; range 15–35 days) after the first samples from Campylobacter and Salmonella patients, respectively. No significant differences in the timing of the collected samples between the two patient groups were detected.
When the acute-phase and convalescent serum samples from Campylobacter patients were compared to each other, significantly lower levels were demonstrated in the follow-up serum samples for all the biomarkers tested (all p-values ≤ 0.001) (Figure 2). A significant drop in the follow-up samples as compared to the acute-phase samples was also demonstrated in Salmonella patients for all biomarkers except for HNE (MMP-8, p = 0.001; MMP-9, p = 0.005; TIMP-1, p = 0.012; MPO, p = 0.014) (Figure 2). As the MMP-8/TIMP-1 and MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratios were concerned in enteritis patients, significant differences between acute and convalescent samples were detected except for MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio for Salmonella patients.
When the follow-up samples of Campylobacter patients were compared to samples collected from healthy controls, serum concentrations of MMP-8 had already returned to levels non-significantly different from those measured in controls but the levels of all other biomarkers tested were still significantly higher than those detected in controls (MMP-9, p < 0. 001; TIMP-1, p = 0.048; MPO, p < 0.001; HNE, p = 0.02) (Figure 2). For Salmonella patients, serum concentrations of MMP-8, TIMP-1 and HNE had returned to normal levels in the follow-up samples whereas MMP-9 and MPO levels were still significantly higher than those in controls (both p-values < 0.001) (Figure 2). For both Campylobacter and Salmonella patients, MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratios were significantly higher as compared to the controls (for both, p < 0.001).
A total of 22 Campylobacter patients and nine Salmonella patients were hospitalized due to their infections. The median time at hospital was three days (range, 1–21 days) for Campylobacter patients and three days (range, 2–30 days) for Salmonella patients, respectively. Paired serum samples were available for 20 Campylobacter and eight Salmonella patients treated at hospital. We wanted to see if a more severe infection, defined here as hospitalization, could be reflected in the biomarker levels. Among Campylobacter patients, there were no significant differences in any of the biomarker levels tested, when acute-phase and follow-up samples of hospitalized patients were compared to those of outpatients. However, Campylobacter patients not treated at hospital had higher initial MMP-8 levels (p<0.001) and higher MMP-9 levels in follow-up (p < 0.001) as compared to the corresponding samples from Salmonella patients. For Salmonella patients, serum concentrations of MMP-8 and TIMP-1 were significantly higher in the acute-phase samples of hospitalized patients compared to those of outpatients (for both, p = 0.023).
A total of 21 Campylobacter patients were treated with antimicrobials (nine hospitalized and 12 outpatients) but did not show significantly higher initial levels of any biomarkers tested as compared to those who did not receive antimicrobial therapy. However, those treated had significantly lower levels of MMP-8 in their follow-up samples as compared to the follow-up samples of patients not treated with antimicrobials (p = 0.041). For Salmonella patients, ten patients, eight of which were hospitalized, received antimicrobial therapy and showed no significant differences in any of the biomarker levels tested as compared to the Salmonella patients not treated with antimicrobials. No Campylobacter or Salmonella patients were treated with tetracyclines.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we wished to analyse the serum concentrations of MMP-8 and MMP-9 related to the key regulators MPO, HNE and TIMP-1 in Campylobacter patients. In order to study the kinetics of these proinflammatory biomarkers in acute infection, both acute-phase and follow-up serum samples were included. In the initial serum samples as compared to samples from healthy controls, both Campylobacter and Salmonella patients showed elevated concentrations of all biomarkers tested. In the follow-up serum samples of Campylobacter patients, all biomarkers except MMP-8, still showed elevated, although from the initial levels significantly dropped, levels. For Salmonella patients, three of the five initially elevated biomarkers had declined to normal levels in the follow-up samples.
Elevated MMP levels have been detected in patients with gastrointestinal diseases, such as Crohn´s disease and ulcerative colitis [13,14] and H. pylori infection [16]. As Campylobacter infections are concerned, the data are scarce but some experimental studies have suggested MMPs, such as MMP-9, to have a role in campylobacteriosis in mice [22,23]. In a study on childhood gastroenteritis, two Campylobacter and four Salmonella patients were included and showed elevated serum concentrations of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 as compared to healthy controls [24]. Here, we could show enhanced systemic response of MMP-8 and MMP-9 as well as of their regulators MPO, HNE and TIMP-1 in both Campylobacter and Salmonella patients. In this regard, the selected and analyzed biomarkers (MPO, HNE, MMP-8, MMP-9, and TIMP-1) form a/an pro/oxidative and –proteolytic tissue destructive activation cascade. MPO can oxidatively activate MMP-8 and MMP-9 as well as inactivate TIMP-1, and HNE can proteolytically activate MMP-9 and inactivate TIMP-1. In concert they accelerate and promote inflammation-induced tissue degeneration [9,10]. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report to demonstrate elevated circulating MMP-8 levels in enteritis patients.
In order to study the kinetics of the biomarkers, follow-up serum samples were analysed. In Campylobacter patients, MMP-8 showed the most rapid changes as the initially elevated serum levels had already turned to normal during follow-up, as compared to the samples of blood donors. For the other biomarkers tested, although the initial levels detected in the first samples had significantly declined during follow-up, the serum concentrations were still significantly higher than those measured in blood donors. In Salmonella patients, as compared to blood donors, only MMP-9 and MPO levels remained significantly elevated after follow-up. Longstanding elevation of neutrophil degranulation products in serum after acute enteritis reflects accelerated proteolysis and oxidative stress, which in turn may contribute to intestinal and extraintestinal sequelae. In a recent study on experimental chicken model, enhanced production of MMP-9 correlated with pathology in C. jejuni-induced Guillain-Barré syndrome [25]. Furthermore, in much older reports, MMPs, MMP-8 in particular, have been shown to be important in reactive arthritis [26], a frequent sequela of bacterial enteritis including that caused by Campylobacter [7].
Although Campylobacter infection in most of the patients is a self-limited disease, hospitalization and/or antimicrobial therapy might be needed in severe infections. As 28% of Campylobacter patients in the present study needed hospital treatment, we wanted to see whether these particular individuals, with presumably a more severe infection, would show higher serum concentrations of the biomarkers tested on the baseline. In contrast to Salmonella patients, there were no significant differences in any of the biomarker levels between inpatients and outpatients. However, interestingly, as the biomarker levels were compared between Campylobacter and Salmonella patients, Campylobacter patients not treated at hospital had initially higher MMP-8 levels than Salmonella outpatients. This finding remains to be confirmed and it should be kept in mind that the number of Salmonella patients was quite limited in the present study.
Campylobacter infections are not often treated with antimicrobials in Sweden, which was also reflected in the present study as only one fifth of the outpatients and less than half of the patients treated at hospital received antimicrobial therapy. Campylobacter patients treated with antimicrobials, as compared to those who did not receive therapy, did not show higher initial levels in any of the biomarkers tested but MMP-8 levels were significantly lower in the follow-up samples. Tetracyclines are well-known directly to inhibit MMPs [9] but no patient in this study was treated with this group of antimicrobials. The rapid decline in MMP-8 levels may reflect a lower bacterial load after successful therapy and fewer triggers for MMP production.
Although high biomarker levels could be demonstrated in the first serum samples collected, these initial samples could be collected only after the diagnosis was confirmed with culture, a median of 12 to 14 days after the onset of symptoms. It is tempting to speculate that earlier samples could have revealed even higher MMP levels. On the other hand, the follow-up was quite long as it in general took more than three weeks before the second serum sample was collected after the initial sample. Because of the long follow-up, it was possible to see that so many biomarkers, both in Campylobacter and Salmonella patients, remained elevated many weeks after the onset of the disease.
In conclusion, after human Campylobacter enteritis, the serum levels of MMP-8, MMP-9 and their regulators MPO, HNE and TIMP-1 are elevated as compared to the serum levels of healthy controls. This systematically enhanced neutrophil-derived proteolytic and oxidative stress seems to persist for several weeks. It remains to be studied if this increased production of MMPs and their regulators plays a role in the development of late sequelae after Campylobacter infection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.S. and H.R.; Formal Analysis, A.N. and H.R.; Investigation, T.T.; Resources, D.L, A.L., T.S. and H.R.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, A.N. and H.R.; Writing-Review & Editing, A.N., T.T., D.L., A.L., T.S. and H.R.; Visualization, A.N.; Project Administration, H.R.; Funding Acquisition, T.S. and H.R.

Funding

This research was supported by the Helsinki University Hospital grants TYH 2016251, TYH 2017251, TYH 2018229, Y1014SLO17, Y1014SLO18, Helsinki, Finland; ALF funding from Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala Sweden; Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Acknowledgments

The staff at the Research Section at the Department of Infectious Diseases, Uppsala, is gratefully acknowledged for their excellent work with the collections and storing of the blood samples.

Conflicts of Interest

Timo Sorsa is an inventor of patent nro 127416 on serum diagnostic analysis of MMP-8. Other authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. European Food Safety Authority; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2013. EFSA J. 2015, 13, 3991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. European Food Safety Authority. Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Campylobacter in broiler batches and of Campylobacter and Salmonella on broiler carcasses, in the EU, 2008; Part B: Analysis of factors associated with Campylobacter colonisation of broiler batches and with Campylobacter contamination of broiler carcasses; and investigation of the culture method diagnostic characteristics used to analyse broiler carcass samples. EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Blaser, M.J. Epidemiologic and clinical features of Campylobacter jejuni infections. J. Infect. Dis. 1997, 176, S103–S105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nielsen, H.; Hansen, K.K.; Gradel, K.O.; Kristensen, B.; Ejlertsen, T.; Østergaard, C.; Schønheyder, H.C. Bacteraemia as a result of Campylobacter species: A population-based study of epidemiology and clinical risk factors. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2010, 16, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Feodoroff, B.; Lauhio, A.; Ellström, P.; Rautelin, H. A nationwide study of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli bacteremia in Finland over a 10-year period, 1998-2007, with special reference to clinical characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 53, e99–e106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nachamkin, I.; Allos, B.M.; Ho, T. Campylobacter Species and Guillain-Barré Syndrome. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998, 11, 555–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hannu, T.; Mattila, L.; Rautelin, H.; Pelkonen, P.; Lahdenne, P.; Siitonen, A.; Leirisalo-Repo, M. Campylobacter-triggered reactive arthritis: A population-based study. Rheumatol. Oxf. Engl. 2002, 41, 312–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Spiller, R.C. Role of infection in irritable bowel syndrome. J. Gastroenterol. 2007, 42, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sorsa, T.; Tjäderhane, L.; Konttinen, Y.T.; Lauhio, A.; Salo, T.; Lee, H.-M.; Golub, L.M.; Brown, D.L.; Mäntylä, P. Matrix metalloproteinases: Contribution to pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of periodontal inflammation. Ann. Med. 2006, 38, 306–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alfakry, H.; Malle, E.; Koyani, C.N.; Pussinen, P.J.; Sorsa, T. Neutrophil proteolytic activation cascades: A possible mechanistic link between chronic periodontitis and coronary heart disease. Innate Immun. 2016, 22, 85–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lambert, E.; Dassé, E.; Haye, B.; Petitfrère, E. TIMPs as multifacial proteins. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2004, 49, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, Y.; Rosen, H.; Madtes, D.K.; Shao, B.; Martin, T.R.; Heinecke, J.W.; Fu, X. Myeloperoxidase Inactivates TIMP-1 by Oxidizing Its N-terminal Cysteine Residue. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 31826–31834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Medina, C.; Radomski, M.W. Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Intestinal Inflammation. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2006, 318, 933–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Von Lampe, B.; Barthel, B.; Coupland, S.; Riecken, E.; Rosewicz, S. Differential expression of matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in colon mucosa of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2000, 47, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Baugh, M.D.; Perry, M.J.; Hollander, A.P.; Davies, D.R.; Cross, S.S.; Lobo, A.J.; Taylor, C.J.; Evans, G.S. Matrix metalloproteinase levels are elevated in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 1999, 117, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rautelin, H.I.; Oksanen, A.M.; Veijola, L.I.; Sipponen, P.I.; Tervahartiala, T.I.; Sorsa, T.A.; Lauhio, A. Enhanced systemic matrix metalloproteinase response in Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Ann. Med. 2009, 41, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rautelin, H.; Tervahartiala, T.; Lauhio, A.; Sorsa, T.; Kolho, K.-L. Assessment of systemic matrix metalloproteinase and their regulator response in children with Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 2010, 70, 492–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Vanlaere, I.; Libert, C. Matrix Metalloproteinases as Drug Targets in Infections Caused by Gram-Negative Bacteria and in Septic Shock. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 224–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Handley, S.A.; Miller, V.L. General and specific host responses to bacterial infection in Peyer’s patches: A role for stromelysin-1 (matrix metalloproteinase-3) during Salmonella enterica infection. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 64, 94–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Laitinen, A.; Hagström, J.; Mustonen, H.; Kokkola, A.; Tervahartiala, T.; Sorsa, T.; Böckelman, C.; Haglund, C. Serum MMP-8 and TIMP-1 as prognostic biomarkers in gastric cancer. Tumour Biol. J. Int. Soc. Oncodevelopmental Biol. Med. 2018, 40, 1010428318799266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Visse, R.; Nagase, H. Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases: Structure, function, and biochemistry. Circ. Res. 2003, 92, 827–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alutis, M.E.; Grundmann, U.; Fischer, A.; Hagen, U.; Kühl, A.A.; Göbel, U.B.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. The Role of Gelatinases in Campylobacter Jejuni Infection of Gnotobiotic Mice. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 5, 256–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Alutis, M.E.; Grundmann, U.; Hagen, U.; Fischer, A.; Kühl, A.A.; Göbel, U.B.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Mediates Intestinal Immunopathogenesis in Campylobacter Jejuni-Infected Infant Mice. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 5, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kawamura, Y.; Gotoh, K.; Takeuchi, N.; Miura, H.; Nishimura, N.; Ozaki, T.; Yoshikawa, T. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in the pathogenesis of childhood gastroenteritis. J. Med. Virol. 2016, 88, 1341–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nyati, K.K.; Prasad, K.N.; Agrawal, V.; Husain, N. Matrix metalloproteinases-2 and -9 in Campylobacter jejuni-induced paralytic neuropathy resembling Guillain-Barré syndrome in chickens. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 111, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lauhio, A.; Konttinen, Y.T.; Tschesche, H.; Nordström, D.; Salo, T.; Lähdevirta, J.; Golub, L.M.; Sorsa, T. Reduction of matrix metalloproteinase 8-neutrophil collagenase levels during long-term doxycycline treatment of reactive arthritis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1994, 38, 400–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Acute-phase serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8 (A), MMP-9 (B), myeloperoxidase (MPO) (C), human neutrophil elastase (HNE) (D) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1 (E) in 80 Campylobacter patients, 25 Salmonella patients and 27 healthy donors. Data of two groups were compared using Mann–Whitney test. The grey horizontal line indicates the median.
Figure 1. Acute-phase serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8 (A), MMP-9 (B), myeloperoxidase (MPO) (C), human neutrophil elastase (HNE) (D) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1 (E) in 80 Campylobacter patients, 25 Salmonella patients and 27 healthy donors. Data of two groups were compared using Mann–Whitney test. The grey horizontal line indicates the median.
Diagnostics 08 00082 g001
Figure 2. Serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8 (A), MMP-9 (B), myeloperoxidase (MPO) (C), human neutrophil elastase (HNE) (D) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1 (E) in paired samples from 73 Campylobacter patients, 23 Salmonella patients, and 27 healthy donors. The paired samples were compared using Wilcoxan signed-rank test and comparison to the healthy control group was performed using the Mann–Whitney test. The grey horizontal line indicates median.
Figure 2. Serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8 (A), MMP-9 (B), myeloperoxidase (MPO) (C), human neutrophil elastase (HNE) (D) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1 (E) in paired samples from 73 Campylobacter patients, 23 Salmonella patients, and 27 healthy donors. The paired samples were compared using Wilcoxan signed-rank test and comparison to the healthy control group was performed using the Mann–Whitney test. The grey horizontal line indicates median.
Diagnostics 08 00082 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of Campylobacter and Salmonella patients included.
Table 1. Characteristics of Campylobacter and Salmonella patients included.
CharacteristicCampylobacter PatientsSalmonella Patients
Total number of patients (n)8025
Gender (Males/Females) 42/386/19
Age, median (range), years 48 (18–77) 53 (18–81)
* Treated with antimicrobials (n)2110
Hospitalized (n)22 a9 b
* None of the patients was treated with tetracyclines. Of the hospitalized patients, 9 Campylobacter a and 8 Salmonella b patients received antimicrobial therapy.
Table 2. Serum concentrations of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8, MMP-9, myeloperoxidase (MPO), human neutrophil elastaste (HNE) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1 in 80 Campylobacter and 25 Salmonella patients and 27 healthy controls. Paired samples were available for 73 Campylobacter and 23 Salmonella patients. Values are shown as median (25–75% percentiles).
Table 2. Serum concentrations of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8, MMP-9, myeloperoxidase (MPO), human neutrophil elastaste (HNE) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1 in 80 Campylobacter and 25 Salmonella patients and 27 healthy controls. Paired samples were available for 73 Campylobacter and 23 Salmonella patients. Values are shown as median (25–75% percentiles).
Group MMP-8
(IQR), (ng/mL)
MMP-9
(IQR), (ng/mL)
MPO
(IQR), (ng/mL)
HNE
(IQR), (ng/mL)
TIMP-1
(IQR), (ng/mL)
Campylobacteracute phase
n = 80
43.2
(28.7–61.5)
291.5
(234.1–427.9)
570.0
(480.0–736.4)
171.6
(112.2–265.7)
245.2
(197.5–282.3)
follow-up
n = 73
20.8
(12.0–37.6)
259.6
(209.7–323.9)
487.7
(370.4–656.8)
130.7
(93.6-232.6)
203.7
(178.2–245.0)
Salmonellaacute phase
n = 25
42.4
(19.6–54.4)
291.2
(215.4–436.6)
600.1
(437.5–881.8)
163.0
(113.3–212.1)
236.9
(193.4–279.7)
follow-up
n = 23
21.6
(14.2–29.2)
254.3
(177.8–310.1)
500.0
(391.6–700.5)
148.5
(81.8–209.7)
211.3
(166.1–253.4)
Control-
n = 27
16.7
(14.8–22.5)
151.4
(131.2–185.6)
224.7
(145.7–299.5)
82.0
(26.3–181.0)
180.4
(163.9–212.0)
IQR: Interquartile range from 25th percentile to 75th percentile.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nilsson, A.; Tervahartiala, T.; Lennebratt, D.; Lannergård, A.; Sorsa, T.; Rautelin, H. Enhanced Systemic Response of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Regulators in Campylobacter and Salmonella Patients. Diagnostics 2018, 8, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics8040082

AMA Style

Nilsson A, Tervahartiala T, Lennebratt D, Lannergård A, Sorsa T, Rautelin H. Enhanced Systemic Response of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Regulators in Campylobacter and Salmonella Patients. Diagnostics. 2018; 8(4):82. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics8040082

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nilsson, Anna, Taina Tervahartiala, David Lennebratt, Anders Lannergård, Timo Sorsa, and Hilpi Rautelin. 2018. "Enhanced Systemic Response of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Regulators in Campylobacter and Salmonella Patients" Diagnostics 8, no. 4: 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics8040082

APA Style

Nilsson, A., Tervahartiala, T., Lennebratt, D., Lannergård, A., Sorsa, T., & Rautelin, H. (2018). Enhanced Systemic Response of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Regulators in Campylobacter and Salmonella Patients. Diagnostics, 8(4), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics8040082

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop