Next Article in Journal
Another Look at Obesity Paradox in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Association Rule Mining
Next Article in Special Issue
MicroRNA Alterations Induced in Human Skin by Diesel Fumes, Ozone, and UV Radiation
Previous Article in Journal
Social Response to the Vaccine against COVID-19: The Underrated Power of Influence
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Three microRNAs in Environmental Asbestiform Fibers-Associated Malignant Mesothelioma
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JPM
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/jpm12010014
jpm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Interaction among Microbiota, Epigenetic Regulation, and Air Pollutants in Disease Prevention

by
Alessandra Pulliero
1,*,
Deborah Traversi
2,
Elena Franchitti
2,
Martina Barchitta
3,
Alberto Izzotti
4,5 and
Antonella Agodi
3
1
Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
2
Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
3
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “GF Ingrassia”, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
4
Department of Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
5
UOC Mutagenesis and Cancer Prevention, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010014
Submission received: 4 October 2021 / Revised: 9 December 2021 / Accepted: 22 December 2021 / Published: 29 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of MicroRNA in Cancer Development and Treatment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Environmental pollutants can influence microbiota variety, with important implications for the general wellbeing of organisms. In subjects at high-risk of cancer, gut, and lung microbiota are distinct from those of low-risk subjects, and disease progression is associated with microbiota alterations. As with many inflammatory diseases, it is the combination of specific host and environmental factors in certain individuals that provokes disease outcomes. The microbiota metabolites influence activity of epigenetic enzymes. The knowledge of the mechanisms of action of environmental pollution now includes not only the alteration of the gut microbiota but also the interaction between different human microbiota niches such as the lung–gut axis. The epigenetic regulations can reprogram differentiated cells in response to environmental changes. The microbiota can play a major role in the progression and suppression of several epigenetic diseases. Accordingly, the maintenance of a balanced microbiota by monitoring the environmental stimuli provides a novel preventive approach for disease prevention. Metagenomics technologies can be utilized to establish new mitigation approaches for diseases induced by polluted environments. The purpose of this review is to examine the effects of particulate matter exposure on the progression of disease outcomes as related to the alterations of gut and lung microbial communities and consequent epigenetic modifications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The microbiota, present in various regions of the human body (intestine, lung, skin, etc.), is exposed to the action of environmental pollutants and contaminants present in food (preservatives, residues of antibiotics or pesticides, etc.). These environmental factors can influence microbiota variety, viability, and functionality in the long term. Some effects of the environment on the microbiota have important implications for the general wellbeing of organisms. The “microbiome”, meaning the genome of the microbiota combined with its environmental interactions, includes more than 3 million genes and is 150 times the size of the human genome [1].
Alterations of the pulmonary microbiota induced by inhalation of pollutants are related to the appearance of chronic obstructive respiratory diseases (COPDs) [2].
The lung microbiota can also be the target (or at least one of the targets) of the injury induced by airborne particles of assorted sizes, as well as by toxins derived from atmospheric pollution (NO, NO2, SO2, etc.) [3].
Exposure to elevated levels of airborne pollution increases the abundance in the lung microbiota of potential pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria sp. [4]. It is now well known that environmental pollution represents an important risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, but the mechanisms of this effect are poorly known. Atmospheric pollution can activate local inflammatory responses as a direct effect of inhaled particles and toxic gas [5]. Local lung inflammation can become systemic due to the release of immunological and biological mediators, thus increasing the cardiovascular risk. Airborne oxidizing gaseous pollutants damage the membrane of lung macrophages in the alveoli determining the release of thromboxane from the intracellular vacuoles into the bloodstream [6]. This situation increases plasma viscosity and thrombo-philicity, facilitating platelet aggregation and clot formation, thus increasing the risk of infarction. In this scenario, similar adverse effects can be mediated by the alteration of lung microbiota, including eubiosis and dysbiosis [7]. The exact differentiation between eubiosis and dysbiosis is not yet established; however, some microbiota characteristics, such as biodiversity and ratio between microorganism groups, have been proposed [8]. Exposure to environmental pollutants, especially in early life, can lead to variations in the microbiota not only in the lung but also in the entire body, establishing a generalized dysbiosis that correlates with the incidence of a series of pathological issues at later ages such as those of an immune (such as atopic), metabolic, epigenomic, or neurological nature [9]. The maintenance of the state of wellbeing of microbiota (intestinal or otherwise) is a more complex issue than the assumption of a healthy diet rich in dietary fiber. Components of a healthy diet (such as five courses of fruit or vegetables per day) represent the preferred metabolic substrate of fermentative saprophyte intestinal bacteria allowing xenobiotic (carcinogen and pollutant) metabolization and detoxification [9,10]. Conversely, components of an unhealthy diet (such as those abundant in nitrosable substrates or amino acid pyrolysates) represent the preferred metabolic substrate of bacteria producing endogenous putrescins, mutagens, and carcinogens [11]. The knowledge of the mechanisms of action of environmental pollution should now include the alteration of the gut microbiota as well as the interaction between different human microbiota niches such as the lung–gut axis [2]. In this regard, particular emphasis should be given to new trace pollutants such as drugs, antibiotics, and disinfectants that are detected in soil, water, and air in continuously increasing amounts.
This work aims to review the existing evidence dealing with microbiota modulation and epigenetic regulation as intermediate actors between air pollution and lung cancer. The interactions between microbiota and epigenetic modulations resulting from air pollution exposure are discussed with focus on the lung–gut microbiota axis and its influence on the immune system especially during early human development.

2. Early Exposure to Environmental Pollutants, and Dysbiosis as Risk Factor for Late Onset Diseases

Environmental exposure, particularly in early life, can result in the development of dysbiosis and consequent diseases [12]. Chemicals, including xenoestrogens, pesticides, and heavy metals, as well as tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, and medical drug abuse, are major factors that unfavorably influence prenatal development and increase the susceptibility of offspring to later disease development [13]. Exposure to unhealthy lifestyle factors and environmental human-made chemical pollutants often results in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cellular oxidative damage [14]. Oxidative stress is involved in pregnancy disorders such as abortion, intrauterine growth retardation, and prenatal mortality [15]. Upper airway microbiota assemblage begins at birth and is thus affected by the environmental exposure occurring during birth (i.e., maternal vaginal (normal birth) or skin microbiota (cesarean)). If an infant is born via cesarean, their nasopharyngeal microbiota represents their mother’s skin microbiota, whereas if born via the vaginal route, their microbiota will resemble the maternal urogenital microbiota [16]. Positive and negative changes to the microbiota may be attributed to intramicrobial interaction and the immune response to a pathogen [17]. Influenza A infections modify the lung microbiota by increasing the presence of pathogenic bacteria. Probiotics are a promising therapeutic for dysbiosis and are used in many diseases, such as asthma. Distinct nasopharyngeal microbiota predicts the risk and severity of asthma-related inflammation [18]. During the first year of life, increased nasopharyngeal colonization of Streptococcus sp. occurs. Individuals suffering from obstructive sleep apnea have a distinct nasal microbiota, the microbial diversity and composition distinctions in patients correlating with inflammatory biomarkers. A recent study in children presenting SARS-CoV-2 infection demonstrated that both the upper respiratory tract and the gut microbiota were altered. The alteration of the microbiota in these children was dominated by the genus Pseudomonas and remained altered up to 25–58 days in different individuals [19]. As children do not experience the same complications associated with COVID-19 as adults do, these microbiota profiles give important insight into the role of the microbiota in disease susceptibility. The pollution and prolonged stress change the balance of the systems, in particular the immune system, which obviously dialogues with all other systems. In fact, the basic condition common to many diseases, including cancer, is mild and silent but chronic systemic inflammation.
Insults provided by pollutants—from motor vehicles, incinerators, particulate matter, heavy metals, pesticides, or electromagnetic fields—are more harmful if the exposure occurs during gestation or in the very first years of life. At this point the epigenetic programming takes place that even 10 or 20 years later or in subsequent generations could lead to serious pathologies [20]. The entire genome is a unitary, dynamic, fluid, and systemic molecular network in a continuous relationship with the environment. The flow of information from the outside meets the information that has been encoded for millions of years in DNA, organizing the main molecular processes that determine the structure and functions of cells and tissues. Thus, the human microbiota is constantly changing because of the information it receives from the outside resulting in a physiological (or pathological) adaptive reactivity.

The Microbiota and Epigenetic Regulation

Since the beginning of their evolution, humans have lived in constant association with bacteria. The number of bacteria in the human body exceeds the number of human cells. The bacteria genome (metagenome) is about 100 times the size of the human genome. The total weight of the bacteria contained in our body is about 1.5 kg. This massive bacteria presence has been neglected by research for many years and its importance underestimated in the therapeutic protocols [21].
The microbiota is present in five macro-areas of the human body, all in continuity with the outer environment, oral nasal cavity, skin, and gastrointestinal and urogenital tracts. Ongoing research programs aim at sequencing the metagenome, examining the relationship between bacterial species and human health by computational analyses. About 70% of the bacteria composing the human microbiota is in the gastrointestinal tract, with a concentration increasing in an exponential way in the oral–fecal sense. Bacteria colonization happens at the moment of birth, and the initial pattern of bacteria depends on the type of birth [22], even if such diversity disappeared early. Indeed, a natural birth allows high number of maternal bacteria to be transmitted to the newborn, while this situation does not occur in the cesarean delivery [23].
From the first 4 weeks of life onwards, especially after weaning, the composition of the bacterial microbiota tends to be pretty stable but may remarkably vary in case of pathological conditions. The intestinal bacteria perform important metabolic functions: (a) digestion of non-digestible carbohydrates, (b) production of short-chain fatty acids representing an energy source for bacteria and intestinal epithelial cells and regulating the sensitivity to insulin, (c) acidification of the intestinal lumen limiting the formation of endogenous mutagens such as putrescins and nitrosable amines, (d) physiological maintenance of the intestinal motility, (e) production of vitamins of group B (pantothenic acid, pyridoxine, and riboflavin) and biotin, (f) participation in the transformation and re-adsorption of bile, and (g) synthesis of amino acids. The microbiota can be seen as a tuned metabolic “organ” of our physiology [24]. It also performs protective functions and increases the barrier effect increasing the production of mucin and zoludine, a component of the tight junctions allowing the intestinal epithelium to perform a protective barrier function.
Nutrition is an acceptable intervention opportunity which plays a key role in many aspects of health. Food imbalances are the main determinants of chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, and cancer. Many epidemiological and experimental data show that suboptimal early nutrition can have consequences for health even several decades later, supporting the hypothesis that epigenetic mechanisms form the link between nutritional imbalances and disease risk [25]. Of course, diet is one of the factors that most affects the variability of genetic expression since, in addition to a direct biochemical action of nutrients, it determines the composition of the microbiota, especially the intestinal one. However, it is only one of the complex modulators of health that has been studied under an exposome approach, including external and internal factors. Accordingly, the microbiota represents a dialogue interface between the environment and the host.
The microbiota affects host health by regulating epigenetic mechanisms such as host microRNAs (small non-coding RNAs), chromatin dynamics, and histone modifications [26] as well as DNA methylation [27].
In pregnant women an association was revealed between bacterial predominance and epigenetic profile. In particular, in mothers in which Firmicutes bacteria were dominant, methylation profile analysis carried out in blood samples found 568 hypermethylated genes and 254 hypomethylated genes, some of which are associated with the risk of cardiovascular disease, lipid metabolism, obesity, and inflammatory response [28]. In mice, microbial intestinal colonization of the mother may alter epigenetic signatures of the gut establishing an inflammatory environment predisposing to the delivery of premature infants. The same study analyzed intestinal bacteria in mice at 2 weeks of life showing that 16S RNA sequencing conditioned early microbiota colonization leading to differential bacterial colonization at different taxonomic levels [29].
The microbiota amplifies our adaptive capacity as it changes quickly in relation to the environment and protects us from environmental changes. Microbiota colonization by pathogenic bacteria such as Helicobacter pylori and Klebsiella sp. influences the methylation patterns of the host. Individuals with Helicobacter pylori infection display very high methylation levels in several CpG islands in the gastric mucosa, this finding indicating that the infection alters DNA methylation [30]. Different studies have shown that changes in the gut bacterial composition can alter methylation and inhibit histone deacetylases [31].
The microbiota metabolites influence activity of epigenetic enzymes. For example, butyrate, a metabolite produced in case of dysbiosis, inhibits histone deacetylases increasing the expression of the FOXP3 gene through the acetylation of histone H3 in its promoter [27,32]. Environmental exposure during the first years of life can induce persistent alterations in the epigenome thus leading to an increased risk of obesity later in life. This also means that it is feasible to predict the risk of obesity of an individual at a young age by analyzing their intestinal microbiota. This prediction is the prerequisite for targeted prevention strategies modifying unfavorable epigenomic and microbiota profiles, starting from the lifestyle of the pregnant woman and then continuing during adulthood and ageing [33].

3. Air Pollution Can Modify the Intestinal Microbiota

The development of techniques based on the sequencing of the 16S subunit of ribosomal RNA, allowing the detection of “living” and “non-living” bacteria, has facilitated the identification of the metagenome, that is the complex superorganism consisting of the microbiota and the host genome [34]. This ecosystem, in which billions of bacteria coexist and interact with the host organism, is capable of (a) regulating many systemic functions; (b) contributing to the state of health; (c) playing a role in gastrointestinal diseases (irritable colon, chronic inflammatory colitis, diverticulitis, colon cancer); and (d) playing a role in systemic diseases (allergies, obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, atherosclerosis) [35].
Air pollution seems to be able to modify the composition and the function of the human gut microbiome even if the mechanism of action is not yet clearly understood. A recent study reported that inhalation for 24 h of high levels of ozone gas was associated with Bacteroides caecimuris increase in gut microbiota and alteration of multiple gene pathways in the microbiome. Conversely, exposure to high nitrogen oxide was associated with Firmicutes increase in gut microbiota [36].
The percent of variation in gut bacterial composition that was explained by exposure to air pollution was up to 11.2% for ozone, thus identifying this pollutant as able to alter the human gut microbiota [37]. A significant association between exposure to air pollutants and gut microbiome alterations was reported in young adults residing in Southern California, identifying inhalation of ozone gas as an important pollutant that may alter the human gut microbiome [37]. They found that 128 bacterial species were associated with inhalation of ozone gas, and four and five bacterial species were associated with inhalation of nitrogen oxides. Various atmospheric pollutants have been associated with modifications of gut microbiota in humans. A positive correlation was shown between the abundance of the Micrococcus and Actinobacteria and exposure to high levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) such as dibenzo (a, h) anthracene and indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene. Accordingly, PAH exposure may disturb metabolic pathways (such as metabolism of purine, pyrimidine, lipid, and folate) through imbalance of commensal microbiota. Two studies have shown that exposure to nitrogen oxide near roadways correlated to an increase in gut bacteria associated with obesity and altered metabolism [38]. A recent population-based epidemiological study found that the gut microbiota partially mediates the effect of fine particulate matter (PM) on the risk of developing type 2 diabetes [7]. Studies suggested that air pollutants can adversely affect the gastrointestinal tract [39], where ultrafine particles can reach the intestine through inhalation and diffusion from the terminal alveoli into the systemic circulation or through the ingestion of inhaled particles after mucociliary clearance from the airways to the oropharynx [39,40,41]. Once in the gut, PM components can alter the composition and the function of the gut microbiota selecting the growth of specific bacteria [42,43,44]. PM 2.5 and inhaled ozone gas have been shown to have extrapulmonary effects that can alter the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis through vagal nerve activation [45] or effects on the hippocampus [46] thus increasing the levels of catecholamines and steroid hormones. Recent studies revealed a link between PM and gastrointestinal diseases including appendicitis [47] and colorectal cancer [48]. In PM-exposed mice, increases of gut microbiota diversity in the small bowel, colon, and feces and alterations of the gut microbiota composition along the gastrointestinal tract have been reported [49]. Experimental studies have indicated that alterations in the gut microbiota play a role in the pathway of diabetes induction resulting from particulate matter pollution with aerodynamic diameters <2.5 μm (PM 2.5 was positively associated with the risks of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and type 2 diabetes and negatively associated with alpha diversity indices of the gut microbiota [50] (Figure 1, Table 1).

4. The Lung–Gut Axis and the Influence of the Microbiota on the Immune System

Intestinal microbiota modifications can modulate disease outcomes in the gut but also in distant organs as demonstrated in animal models by experimentally transferring of dysbiotic microbiota [53,54,59,60].
The communication between the gut and other organs and tissues is mainly mediated by microbial metabolites and immunity modulation [61]
Gut and lung microbiota are different, both in terms of abundance and in terms of composition, even if there are some structural and functional similarities between lung and gut epithelium [62]. The different composition is due to the existing differences in oxygen availability. One of the most relevant similarities is the ability to interact with the immune system in conjunction with associated lymphoid tissue [63].
The lungs have a large surface area with high environmental exposure. In healthy lungs, microbial DNA was detected. Microorganisms probably reached the lungs from the oral cavity through microaspiration, as the taxonomic profiles of the two sites were quite similar. Comparing the two profiles, the lung microbiota had a decreased abundance of Prevotella spp. and an enrichment of Enterobacteriaceae, Ralstonia spp., and Haemophilus spp. with respect to the oral cavity microbiota [64].
The lung microbiota differential genera in healthy individuals with respect to COPD and lung cancer patients are mainly Moraxella, Haemophilus, Streptococcus, Pseudomonas, Staphylococci, Veillonella, Enterobacter, Escherichia, and Megasphaera [65]
A lower lung microbiota alpha diversity was observed in subjects with a higher exposition to air pollutants [38]. Moreover, variance in both the respiratory microbiota [66] and gut microbiota [67] was observed also in relation to air pollution exposure.
The gut microbiota metabolites can reach distant organs including both the lungs and particularly protected organs such as the brain [68]. Promising research frontiers include psychobiotics development as a complementary treatment for depression or other mental illness and personalized care protocols considering the genetic and microbiome patient characteristics for example in chemotherapy treatment [69]. Alterations in the microbiota can also modulate host behaviors such as social activity, stress, and anxiety-related responses that are linked to diverse neuropsychiatric disorders [70]. Indeed, some researchers demonstrated that manipulation of the microbiota in either antibiotic-treated or germ-free adult mice results in significant deficits in fear extinction learning [71,72]. After birth, the microbiota strictly influences the host’s immune system maturation. A range of hypotheses exist for disease pathogenic pathways [64] such as for T1DM [71,72,73] and (Bowel Inflammatory Disease) IBD [74]. All such models include an altered stimulation of the host immune system by the microbiota [75].
The complex feedback between microbiota and immunity is mediated by inflammatory cytokine production, change in oxygen levels, and altered epithelial metabolism, disrupting the composition and function of intestinal microbiota. These alterations contribute to intestinal inflammation, epithelial barrier disruption, and decreased production of antimicrobial peptides, favoring secondary enteric infections.
Recent evidence on the respiratory diseases showed that gut dysbiosis due to viral respiratory infection also results in diminished production of microbial associated protective molecular patterns including toll-like receptor and microbial metabolites such as SCFAs, thus reducing antibacterial pulmonary immunity. Such lung–gut interconnections might be particularly relevant during SARS-CoV-2 infection [76], especially when associated with other weakening of the lung defenses due to high level of air pollutants [77]. However, the experimental data are fast increasing on lung–gut interaction, and one of the main questions is how to clear a causation or an association relationship, also considering the role of the air pollution exposure of the host.
CO2, SO2, and other toxic gases and airborne particulate matter (PM) constitute a universal danger to exposed organisms. Correlations of long-term exposure to air pollution and mortality have been addressed in different studies worldwide [78]. The existence of an association between long term exposure to fine PM and an increased risk of cardiovascular and lung disease, as well as lung cancer, has been established [79] Air pollution is also associated with gastrointestinal disorders and inflammatory bowel diseases [80]. Where inhaled particles are deposited in the respiratory system depends on their size. Most of the larger particles are sequestered in the upper airways such as trachea and large bronchi [81]. Smaller size particles, particularly PM 2.5 or less, can reach the bronchioles and alveolar spaces where they are phagocytosed by alveolar macrophages [49]. Particles sequestered in macrophages and directly in the mucus layer in lower airways are subsequently transported up to the oropharynx and then swallowed into the gastrointestinal tract [82]. PM can also be ingested directly by consumption of food and water contaminated by PM [36,41,74,75,83]. It has been estimated that 1012–1014 particles are ingested per day by an individual on a Western diet [84]. Treatment of gut epithelial cells with PM caused increased production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS), release of inflammatory cytokines, and induced apoptosis of colonocytes [37]. Several studies suggested that smoking suppresses the innate immune response to bacteria through the direct inhibition of bacterial sensing patterns such as the recognition of lipopolysaccharides by the TLR4/MD-2 receptor. Smokers with active Crohn’s disease were reported to have a clinically relevant dysbiosis of the gut microbiota [85]. In mice, high-fat and fiber-deprived diets change the composition of intestinal microbiota and damage the intestinal barrier through increased intestinal permeability, reduced thickness of the mucous layer, abnormalities of tight junction proteins of the epithelial barrier, and low-grade intestinal inflammation [41]. A variety of environmental factors, such as diet and PM exposure can influence H2S regulation and function. Epigenetics also have a role in H2S regulation. In addition, new research into the role of gut microbiota in the development of hypertension has highlighted the need to further explore these microorganisms and how they influence the levels of H2S throughout the body affecting the microbiota [41].
In bronchoalveolar lavage cells, tobacco smoke exposure increased the activity of inflammatory pathways by inducing continuous active demethylation processes [86].
Exposure of human macrophages to cigarette smoke extract also promoted pro-inflammatory cytokine release by activation of the NF-κB pathway and concomitant posttranslational modifications of HDACs [87].

5. Metagenomics Approaches to Study Microbial Communities

Metagenomics is a set of research techniques, comprising many related approaches and methods, to understand the genetic composition and activities of microbial communities so complex that they can only be sampled, never completely characterized. The use of new high-throughput technologies is driving microbiology from an approach predominantly focused on the study of single species in pure laboratory culture into a new era focused on the characterization of whole microbial communities. Metagenomics involves the characterization of the genomes in these microbial communities, as well as their corresponding messenger RNA, protein, and metabolic products. Thus, metagenomics combines the power of genomics, bioinformatics, and systems biology to analyze the genomes of many organisms simultaneously. Particularly, in metagenomics studies, DNA is extracted directly from all the microbes living in a particular environment, and the mixed DNA sample is analyzed, using different high-throughput DNA sequencing approaches and computational methods, in order to create a plethora of metagenomic library/datasets that contain the genomes of all the microbes found in that environment [88]. This can be used to analyze the microbial diversity, population structure, evolutionary relationship, functional activity, and the relationship between community and environment [89] and is one of the best technological innovations to improve bioremediation strategies. Metagenomic datasets from different microbial ecosystems can also be compared to uncover the traits that are important to each ecosystem [90]. Metagenomics can address several potential prospects in different areas ranging from life and biomedical sciences to environmental biotechnologies, agriculture, and microbial forensics. Furthermore, metagenomics has most frequently been utilized to study the microbial communities capable of degrading hydrocarbon and thus establishing new mitigation approaches for polluted environment [91].
In 2007, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) launched the Human Microbiome Project (HMP) in order to study and characterize the microbiome and the factors that influence the distribution and evolution of the microbiota. The project aims to identify new diagnostic biomarkers for health applications and a deeper understanding of the nutritional requirements of humans to drive new recommendations for food production, distribution, and consumption [92].
Over the past decade, numerous technologies have been developed for analyzing microbial community structure and functions. In traditional techniques, cultivation-based methodologies and phenotypic characterization were used to describe the diversity of microorganisms in the studied samples. Although amplicon sequencing, as the PCR-based 16S rRNA analysis, is the most widely used method for characterizing the diversity of microbiota, these methods, also referred to as metataxonomic, have some limitations. For example, novel or highly diverged microbes are difficult to study using this approach since sequencing is limited to the analysis of taxa for which taxonomically informative genetic markers are known. In any case metataxonomic methods, requiring sequences from a single gene, provide a cost-effective means to identify a wide range of organisms. Limitations of this approach have been addressed by the development of metagenomic analysis that uses sequencing, and now high-throughput sequencing and microarray technologies—“open-format” and “closed-format” detection technologies, respectively—combined with high-performance computational tools, to provide information on the species composition of a microbiome [15]. In recent years, next generation sequencing technology has been used to rapidly and efficiently profile whole microbial communities in various samples, revolutionizing genome research because of its capability to produce a large quantity of sequence data in a relatively short period of time [93]. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing, a relatively new and powerful sequencing approach that uses the random sequencing of all genomic content of a microbiome, allows researchers to measure all genes in all organisms present in the community of the study sample, overcoming many of the limitations of amplicon sequencing. Shotgun metagenomics also provides a means to study unculturable microorganisms and to study biological functions encoded in the genomes of the organisms that make up the community [94]. In a recent study, results obtained by the metataxonomic approach and metagenomics were compared to investigate their reliability for bacteria profiling. The results showed that 16S rRNA gene sequencing detects only part of the gut microbiota community revealed by shotgun sequencing, and interestingly, the less abundant genera detected only by shotgun sequencing are biologically meaningful [95]. However, targeted and shotgun sequencing of DNA cannot distinguish between expressed and nonexpresser genes in a given environment. Thus, new meta-transcriptomic sequencing approaches have provided insight into microbial community functions and activities from diverse habitats in understanding how a microbial community responds over time to its changing environmental conditions [96].

6. Environmental Antibiotic Pollution and Microbiota: Implication for Public Health

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the top 10 global public health threats facing humanity that requires urgent multisectoral action to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). AMR occurs naturally, and antimicrobial resistant organisms and antimicrobial resistant genes (ARG) are found in humans, animals, food, plants, and in the environment, including water, soil, and air [15]. However, one of the most reported consequences of the widespread overuse and inappropriate usage of antibiotics is the increased frequency of bacteria harboring ARGs in different environments, now referred to as “antibiotic resistance pollution” [97]. Since ARGs may cause consequences for human health, understanding their occurrence would be of great public health interest and value. New technologies such as next generation sequencing and metagenomics approaches allow the real-time monitoring of antimicrobial resistant organisms and ARGs in the environment and have the potential to detect microbial reservoirs and transmission routes [98] in order to prevent the increase and the spread of AMR with consequences for human health. Recently, due to an emerging public health concern, airborne ARGs carried by antimicrobial resistant organisms found in urban air have received more attention. Interestingly, it has been reported that the quantity of ARGs inhaled via airborne fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) was equivalent to that ingested via water intake [99]. A recent article reports results of a global metagenomic map of urban microbiomes and antimicrobial resistance in 60 cities across the world identifying 4246 known species of urban microorganisms, a set of 31 species distinct from human commensal organisms and an irregular distribution of AMR genes across cities that could be the result of different levels of antibiotic usage or reflect the background microbiome in different places in the world [100]. A global survey of ARG abundance in air conducted across 19 world cities demonstrated that urban air had been polluted by several ARGs and that different cities are challenged with health risks due to airborne ARG exposure [101]. The study of Hu et al., using publicly available metagenome sequences characterized the diversity and abundance of ARGs in the PM during a severe smog event in Beijing and revealed that both the abundance and diversity of airborne ARGs were higher in smog days than in non-smog days [102]. In another recent study using a high-throughput sequencing approach, profiles of ARGs were obtained from PM2.5 and PM10 sampled in four seasons for one year from a general hospital, the urban community near the hospital, and the nearest suburban community in China. In total, 643 ARG subtypes belonging to 22 different ARG types were identified. The hospital exhibited higher ARG abundance and was more closely associated with clinically important pathogens than the nearby communities [103]. In conclusion, the availability of environmental microbiome and ARG characterization and of metagenomic maps could provide the opportunity to generate significant evidence on the impact of environmental antibiotic pollution and microbiota on human health and give tools to public health authorities to assess risk, map outbreaks, and predict epidemiological risks and trends [104]. Understanding and fighting antibiotic resistance pollution using a “One Health Approach”, in which multiple sectors—public health, animal health, plant health, and the environment—work together to achieve better public health outcomes, may aid in creating more societal engagement and ultimately more efficient policies to evaluate direct risks of transmission posed by certain contaminated environments [105] (Figure 2).

7. Conclusions

The microbiota is considered a “system” that carries out various vital functions in our bodies. Many factors are involved in the normal functioning of this organ system of the body which leads to microbial dysbiosis. This not only alters the composition of microbial communities but also leads to alteration in normal physiological functioning associated with normal microflora. Alteration in the composition and function of the gut microbiota has a direct effect on human health and plays an important role in the occurrence of several diseases.
In this review, we discuss various host and environmental factors that significantly influence the biodiversity of microbiota. There is evidence suggesting that respiratory infections not only alter the lung microbiome but also promote signals of infection from the lungs to the gut with consequent alterations in the gut microbiome [106]. During a respiratory infection, bacteria and immune cells can translocate across lung epithelial cells and reach the gastrointestinal tract via lymphatic or blood circulation to activate local intestinal immunity. The microbiome of the lung and the gut have been implicated in environmentally determined diseases. The symbiosis between the microbiota and its mammalian host encompasses multiple relationships [107]. The capacity of a given microbe, including those composing the microbiota, to trigger or promote disease is highly contextual, and some microbes can shift from mutualist to commensal to parasite according to the state of activation of the host, coinfection, or localization [108]. These results demonstrate the level of communication between the gut and the lungs in response to alterations in the intestinal microbiota and intestinal permeability. The lung–gut axis is a two-way system that involves interactions between the respective microbiota and immune cells. There has been growing evidence of host–microbe and microbe–microbe interactions that shape immune responses in respiratory diseases and the development of subsequent effects in the gut. Environmental insults induce these imbalances but environ-mental exposure has also been identified to protect against allergies, foster in particular microbiome diversity, and contribute significantly to barrier organ functioning. Pollutants induce oxidative stress and inflammation, genomic and epigenetic alterations, mitochondrial dysfunction, altered intercellular communication, and altered microbiome communities. Taken together, they provide a framework for understanding how environmental insults, even at relatively low concentrations, can manifest chronic diseases. Advances in biomedical technologies will elucidate the complex interplay of environmental insults down to the single cell level. There is an important potential for harnessing the understanding of the links between environmental insults and health to propose individualized prevention and treatment strategies. As reviewed herein, experimental studies to date provide evidence that exposure to environmental pollutants triggers alteration of the human microbiome. Still pending is the possibility of preventing, or at least attenuating, these alterations by preventive approaches such as diet modification, dietary integration, oral administration of probiotics, and fecal transplant. Further studies are required to evaluate whether or not these approaches may represent a new strategy in protecting the human organism form environmental pollutants.
The variability of experimental conditions combined with the presence of mixtures of emerging contaminants as well as the epigenetic effects constitute the main challenges to be overcome for prioritization of “One Health” environmental pollutants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Section 1, Section 2 and Section 3, and Abstract: A.P.; Section 4 D.T. writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing; Section 5 and Section 6: M.B. and A.A. All authors: editing; coordination assembly and homogenization: A.P. and A.I. Supervision: A.P., D.T. and A.I., Figure draft preparation, editing collaboration and writing the draft: E.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Marchesi, J.R.; Ravel, J. The vocabulary of microbiome research: A proposal. Microbiome 2015, 30, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Budden, K.F.; Shukla, S.D.; Rehman, S.F.; Bowerman, K.L.; Keely, S.; Hugenholtz, P.; Armstrong-James, D.P.H.; Adcock, I.M.; Chotirmall, S.; Chung, K.F.; et al. Functional effects of the microbiota in chronic respiratory disease. Lancet Respir Med. 2019, 7, 907–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hu, J.; Bao, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Osman, R.; Shen, M.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; Cao, S.; Li, L.; Wu, Q. The Preliminary Study on the Association Between PAHs and Air Pollutants and Microbiota Diversity. Arch Environ. Contam. Toxicol 2020, 79, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Adar, S.D.; Huffnagle, G.B.; Curtis, J.L. The respiratory microbiome: An underappreciated player in the human response to inhaled pollutants? Ann Epidemiol. 2016, 26, 355–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Maier, K.L.; Alessandrini, F.; Beck-Speier, I.; Josef Hofer, T.P.; Diabaté, S.; Bitterle, E.; Stöger, T.; Jakob, T.; Behrendt, H.; Horsch, M.; et al. Health effects of ambient particulate matter—Biological mechanisms and inflammatory responses to in vitro and in vivo particle exposures. Inhal. Toxicol. 2008, 20, 319–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Conti, P.; Allegretta, M.; Williams, T.W.; Cifone, M.G.; Alesse, E.; Reale, M.; Boidi, E.; Dempsey, R.A. Enhanced thromboxane synthesis and vacuolization in human polymorphonuclear leucocytes induced by human lymphokine containing supernatants. Clin Rheumatol. 1985, 4, 410–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Liu, T.; Chen, X.; Xu, Y.; Wu, W.; Tang, W.; Chen, Z.; Ji, G.; Peng, J.; Jiang, Q.; Xiao, J.; et al. Gut microbiota partially mediates the effects of fine particulate matter on type 2 diabetes: Evidence from a population-based epidemiological study. Environ. Int. 2019, 130, 104882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cani, P.D. Human gut microbiome: Hopes, threats and promises. Gut 2018, 67, 1716–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Koppel, N.; Maini Rekdal, V.; Balskus, E.P. Chemical transformation of xenobiotics by the human gut microbiota. Science 2017, 356, eaag2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Levin, B.J.; Huang, Y.Y.; Peck, S.C.; Wei, Y.; Martínez-Del Campo, A.; Marks, J.A.; Franzosa, E.A.; Huttenhower, C.; Balskus, E.P. A prominent glycyl radical enzyme in human gut microbiomes metabolizes trans-4-hydroxy-l-proline. Science 2017, 355, eaai8386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mah, J.H.; Park, Y.K.; Jin, Y.H.; Lee, J.H.; Hwang, H.J. Bacterial Production and Control of Biogenic Amines in Asian Fermented Soybean Foods. Foods 2019, 8, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Elgamal, Z.; Singh, P.; Geraghty, P. The Upper Airway Microbiota, Environmental Exposures, Inflammation, and Disease. Medicina 2021, 57, 823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gruzieva, O.; Xu, C.J.; Yousefi, P.; Relton, C.; Merid, S.K.; Breton, C.V.; Gao, L.; Volk, H.E.; Feinberg, J.I.; Ladd-Acosta, C.; et al. Prenatal Particulate Air Pollution and DNA Methylation in Newborns: An Epigenome-Wide Meta-Analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2019, 127, 57012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhou, J.; He, Z.; Yang, Y.; Deng, Y.; Tringe, S.G.; Alvarez-Cohen, L. High-throughput metagenomic technologies for complex microbial community analysis: Open and closed formats. mBio 2015, 6, e02288-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Al-Gubory, K.H. Environmental pollutants and lifestyle factors induce oxidative stress and poor prenatal development. Reprod Biomed Online 2014, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. De Steenhuijsen Piters, W.A.; Sanders, E.A.; Bogaert, D. The role of the local microbial ecosystem in respiratory health and disease. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2015, 370, 20140294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Hanada, S.; Pirzadeh, M.; Carver, K.Y.; Deng, J.C. Respiratory Viral Infection-Induced Microbiome Alterations and Secondary Bacterial Pneumonia. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Teo, S.M.; Mok, D.; Pham, K.; Kusel, M.; Serralha, M.; Troy, N.; Holt, B.J.; Hales, B.J.; Walker, M.L.; Hollams, E.; et al. The infant nasopharyngeal microbiome impacts severity of lower respiratory infection and risk of asthma development. Cell Host Microbe. 2015, 17, 704–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sharma, N.S.; Vestal, G.; Wille, K.; Patel, K.N.; Cheng, F.; Tipparaju, S.; Tousif, S.; Banday, M.M.; Xu, X.; Wilson, L.; et al. Differences in airway microbiome and metabolome of single lung transplant recipients. Respir. Res. 2020, 21, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Saenen, N.D.; Martens, D.S.; Neven, K.Y.; Alfano, R.; Bové, H.; Janssen, B.G.; Roels, H.A.; Plusquin, M.; Vrijens, K.; Nawrot, T.S. Air pollution-induced placental alterations: An interplay of oxidative stress, epigenetics, and the aging phenotype? Clin. Epigenet. 2019, 11, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Y.J.; Li, S.; Gan, R.Y.; Zhou, T.; Xu, D.P.; Li, H.B. Impacts of gut bacteria on human health and diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 12, 7493–7519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hugon, P.; Dufour, J.C.; Colson, P.; Fournier, P.E.; Sallah, K.; Raoult, D. A comprehensive repertoire of prokaryotic species identified in human beings. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2015, 10, 1211–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Alcon-Giner, C.; Caim, S.; Mitra, S.; Ketskemety, J.; Wegmann, U.; Wain, J.; Belteki, G.; Clarke, P.; Hall, L.J. Optimisation of 16S rRNA gut microbiota profiling of extremely low birth weight infants. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Bäckhed, F.; Ding, H.; Wang, T.; Hooper, L.V.; Koh, G.Y.; Nagy, A.; Semenkovich, C.F.; Gordon, J.I. The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 44, 15718–15723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Wu, G.D.; Chen, J.; Hoffmann, C. Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science 2011, 334, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Li, K.; Liu, Y.; Cao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, Z.; Liu, X.; Yu, A.; Kaphle, P.; Dickerson, K.E.; Ni, M.; et al. Interrogation of enhancer function by enhancer-targeting CRISPR epigenetic editing. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ansari, I.; Raddatz, G.; Gutekunst, J.; Ridnik, M.; Cohen, D.; Abu-Remaileh, M.; Tuganbaev, T.; Shapiro, H.; Pikarsky, E.; Elinav, E.; et al. The microbiota programs DNA methylation to control intestinal homeostasis and inflammation. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 610–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kumar, H.; Salminen, S.; Verhagen, H.; Rowland, I.; Heimbach, J.; Bañares, S.; Young, T.; Nomoto, K.; Lalonde, M. Novel probiotics and prebiotics: Road to the market. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2015, 32, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cortese, R.; Lu, L.; Yu, Y.; Ruden, D.; Claud, E.C. Epigenome-Microbiome crosstalk: A potential new paradigm influencing neonatal susceptibility to disease. Epigenetics 2016, 11, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Pero, R.; Angrisano, T.; Brancaccio, M.; Falanga, A.; Lombardi, L.; Natale, F.; Laneri, S.; Lombardo, B.; Galdiero, S.; Scudiero, O. Beta-defensins and analogs in Helicobacter pylori infections: mRNA expression levels, DNA methylation, and antibacterial activity. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Arpaia, N.; Campbell, C.; Fan, X.; Dikiy, S.; van der Veeken, J.; de Roos, P.; Liu, H.; Cross, J.R.; Pfeffer, K.; Coffer, P.J.; et al. Metabolites produced by commensal bacteria promote peripheral regulatory T-cell generation. Nature 2013, 504, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kogut, M.H.; Lee, A.; Santin, E. Microbiome and pathogen interaction with the immune system. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 1906–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Goldenberg, R.L.; Hauth, J.C.; Andrews, W.W. Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000, 20, 1500–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guamer, F. Role of intestinal flora in health and disease. Nutr. Hosp. 2007, 22, 14–19. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sekirov, I.; Gill, N.; Jogova, M.; Tam, N.; Robertson, M.; de Llanos, R.; Li, Y.; Finlay, B.B. Salmonella SPI-1-mediated neutrophil recruitment during enteric colitis is associated with reduction and alteration in intestinal microbiota. Gut Microbes 2010, 1, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Mutlu, E.A.; Engen, P.A.; Soberanes, S. Particulate matter air pollution causes oxidant-mediated increase in gut permeability in mice. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2011, 8, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Fouladi, F.; Bailey, M.J.; Patterson, W.B.; Sioda, M.; Blakley, I.C.; Fodor, A.A.; Jones, R.B.; Chen, Z.; Kim, J.S.; Lurmann, F.; et al. Air pollution exposure is associated with the gut microbiome as revealed by shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Environ. Int. 2020, 138, 105604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alderete, T.L.; Jones, R.B.; Chen, Z.; Kim, J.S.; Habre, R.; Lurmann, F.; Gilliland, F.D.; Goran, M.I. Exposure to traffic-related air pollution and the composition of the gut microbiota in overweight and obese adolescents. Environ. Res. 2018, 161, 472–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Beamish, L.A.; Osornio-Vargas, A.R.; Wine, E.J. Air pollution: An environmental factor contributing to intestinal disease. Crohns Colitis 2011, 5, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Elder, A.; Oberdörster, G. Translocation and effects of ultrafine particles outside of the lung. Clin. Occup. Environ. Med. 2006, 5, 785–796. [Google Scholar]
  41. Salim, S.Y.; Kaplan, G.G.; Madsen, K.L. Air pollution effects on the gut microbiota: A link between exposure and inflammatory disease. Gut Microbes 2014, 5, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Jia, W.; Rajani, C.A. The Influence of Gut Microbial Metabolism on the Development and Progression of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1061, 95–110. [Google Scholar]
  43. Li, K.J.; Chen, Z.L.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Luan, X.Q.; Lei, T.T. Dysbiosis of lower respiratory tract microbiome are associated with inflammation and microbial function variety. Respir Res. 2019, 20, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yasuyuki, M.; Kunihiro, K.; Kurissery, S.; Kanavillil, N.; Sato, Y.; Kikuchi, Y. Antibacterial properties of nine pure metals: A laboratory study using Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Biofouling 2010, 26, 851–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gackière, F.; Saliba, L.; Baude, A.; Bosler, O.; Strube, C. Ozone inhalation activates stress-responsive regions of the CNS. J. Neurochem. 2011, 117, 961–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Thomson, E.M.J. Air Pollution, Stress, and Allostatic Load: Linking Systemic and Central Nervous System Impacts. Alzheimers Dis. 2019, 69, 597–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Kaplan, G.G.; Hubbard, J.; Korzenik, J.; Sands, B.E.; Panaccione, R.; Ghosh, S. The inflammatory bowel diseases and ambient air pollution: A novel association. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 105, 2412–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. López-Abente, G.; García-Pérez, J.; Fernández-Navarro, P.; Boldo, E.; Ramis, R. Colorectal cancer mortality and industrial pollution in Spain. BMC Public Health 2012, 12, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Mutlu, E.A.; Comba, I.Y.; Cho, T.; Engen, P.A.; Yazıcı, C.; Soberanes, S.; Hamanaka, R.B.; Niğdelioğlu, R.; Meliton, A.Y.; Ghio, A.J.; et al. Inhalational exposure to particulate matter air pollution alters the composition of the gut microbiome. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 240, 817–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ran, Z.; An, Y.; Zhou, J.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Lu, D.; Zhon, J.; et al. Subchronic exposure to concentrated ambient PM2.5 perturbs gut and lung microbiota as well as metabolic profiles in mice. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 272, 115987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, Y.; Wang, T.; Si, B.; Du, H.; Liu, Y.; Waqas, A.; Huang, S.; Zhao, G.; Chen, S.; Xu, A. Intratracheally instillated diesel PM2.5 significantly altered the structure and composition of indigenous murine gut microbiota. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 210, 111903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Curciarello, R.; Canziani, K.E.; Docena, G.H.; Muglia, C.I. Contribution of Non-immune Cells to Activation and Modulation of the Intestinal Inflammation. Front Immunol. 2019, 10, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Bailey, J.M.; Noopur, N.; Naik, N.N.; Laura, E.; Wild, E.L.; Patterson, B.W.; Alderete, L.T. Exposure to air pollutants and the gut microbiota: A potential link between exposure, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. Gut Microbes 2020, 11, 1188–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Vari, H.K.; Roslund, M.I.; Oikarinen, S.; Nurminen, N.; Puhakka, R.; Parajuli, A.; Grönroos, M.; Siter, N.; Laitinen, O.H.; Hyöty, H.; et al. ADELE research group. Associations between land cover categories, gaseous PAH levels in ambient air and endocrine signaling predicted from gut bacterial metagenome of the elderly. Chemosphere 2021, 265, 128965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yang, C.; Kwon, D.I.; Kim, M.; Im, S.H.; Lee, Y.J. Commensal Microbiome Expands Tγδ17 Cells in the Lung and Promotes Particulate Matter-Induced Acute Neutrophilia. Front Immunol. 2021, 12, 645741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yang, K. Ultrafine particles altered gut microbial population and metabolic profiles in a sex-specific manner in an obese mouse. Sci. Rep. 2021, 25, 6906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Van den Brule, S.; Rappe, M.; Ambroise, J.; Bouzin, C.; Dessy, C.; Paquot, A.; Muccioli, G.G.; Lison, D. Diesel exhaust particles alter the profile and function of the gut microbiota upon subchronic oral administration in mice. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2021, 18, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Crawford, S.M.; Nordgren, M.T.; McCole, F.D. Every breath you take: Impacts of environmental dust exposure on intestinal barrier function—From the gut-lung axis to COVID-19. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2021, 320, G586–G600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gilbert, J.A.; Blaser, M.J.; Caporaso, J.G.; Jansson, J.K.; Lynch, S.V.; Knight, R. Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Maruvada, P.; Leone, V.; Kaplan, L.M.; Chang, E.B. The Human Microbiome and Obesity: Moving beyond Associations. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 22, 589–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Yang, K.L.; Lejeune, A.; Scher, G.C.J.; Koralov, S.B. Microbial-derived antigens and metabolites in spondyloarthritis. Semin. Immunopathol. 2021, 43, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Woodby, B.; Schiavone, M.L.; Pambianchi, E.; Mastaloudis, A.; Hester, S.N.; Wood, S.M.; Pecorelli, A.; Valacchi, A. Particulate matter decreases intestinal barrier-associated proteins levels in 3D human intestinal model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Alemao, C.A.; Budden, K.F.; Gomez, H.M.; Rehman, S.F.; Marshall, J.E.; Shukla, S.D.; Donovan, C.; Forster, S.C.; Yang, I.A.; Keely, S.; et al. Impact of diet and the bacterial microbiome on the mucous barrier and immune disorders. Allergy 2021, 76, 714–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Xue, Y.; Chu, J.; Li, Y.; Kong, X. The influence of air pollution on respiratory microbiome: A link to respiratory disease. Toxicol. Lett. 2020, 334, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mariani, J.; Favero, C.; Spinazzè, A.; Cavallo, D.M.; Carugno, M.; Motta, V.; Bonzini, M.; Cattaneo, A.; Pesatori, A.C.; Bollati, V. Short-term particulate matter exposure influences nasal microbiota in a population of healthy subjects. Environ. Res. 2018, 162, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Vignal, C.; Guilloteau, E.; Gower-Rousseau, C.; Body-Malapel, M. Review article: Epidemiological and animal evidence for the role of air pollution in intestinal diseases. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 757, 143718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Morais, L.H.; Schreiber, H.L.; Mazmanian, S.K. The gut microbiota–brain axis in behaviour and brain disorders. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Misra, S.; Mohanty, D. Psychobiotics: A new approach for treating mental illness? Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 1230–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Cammarota, G.; Ianiro, G.; Ahern, A.; Carbone, C.; Temko, A.; Claesson, M.J.; Gasbarrini, A.; Tortora, G. Gut microbiome, big data and machine learning to promote precision medicine for cancer. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 17, 635–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chu, C.; Murdock, M.H.; Jing, D.; Won, T.H.; Chung, H.; Kressel, A.M.; Tsaava, T.; Addorisio, M.E.; Putzel, G.G.; Zhou, L.; et al. The microbiota regulate neuronal function and fear extinction learning. Nature 2019, 574, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Siljander, H.; Honkanen, J.; Knip, M. Microbiome and type 1 diabetes. EBioMedicine 2019, 46, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Kamada, N.; Seo, S.U.; Chen, G.Y.; Núñez, G. Role of the gut microbiota in immunity and inflammatory disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zununi Vahed, S.; Moghaddas Sani, H.; Rahbar Saadat, Y.; Barzegari, A.; Omidi, Y. Type 1 diabetes: Through the lens of human genome and metagenome interplay. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 104, 332–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sencio, V.; Machado, M.G.; Trottein, F. The lung–gut axis during viral respiratory infections: The impact of gut dysbiosis on secondary disease outcomes. Mucosal. Immunol. 2021, 14, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Brunekreef, B.; Downward, G.; Forastiere, F.; Gehring, U.; Heederik, D.J.J.; Hoek, G.; Koopmans, M.P.G.; Smith, L.A.M.; Vermeulen, R.C.H. Air Pollution and COVID-19. Eur. Parliam. 2021, 2, 317–328. [Google Scholar]
  76. Franklin, B.A.; Brook, R.; Arden Pope, C., III. Air pollution and cardiovascular disease. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2015, 40, 207–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hamra, G.B.; Guha, N.; Cohen, A.; Laden, F.; Raaschou-Nielsen, O.; Samet, J.M. Outdoor particulate matter exposure and lung cancer. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 906–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Kreyling, W.G.; Semmler, M.; Möller, W. Dosimetry and toxicology of ultrafine particles. J. Aerosol Med. 2004, 17, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kreyling, W.G.; Dirscherl, P.; Ferron, G.A.; Heilmann, P.; Josten, M.; Miaskowski, U.; DNeuner, M.; Reitmeir, P.; Ruprecht, L.; Schumann, G.; et al. Health effects of sulfur-related environmental air pollution. III. Nonspecific respiratory defense capacities. Inhal Toxicol. 1999, 11, 391–422. [Google Scholar]
  80. Semmler-Behnke, M.; Takenaka, S.; Fertsch, S.; Wenk, A.; Seitz, J.; Mayer, P.; Oberdörster, G.; Kreyling, W.G. Efficient elimination of inhaled nanoparticles from the alveolar region: Evidence for interstitial uptake and subsequent reentrainment onto airways epithelium. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007, 115, 728–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. De Brouwere, K.; Buekers, J.; Cornelis, C.; Schlekat, C.E.; Oller, A.R. Assessment of indirect human exposure to environmental sources of nickel: Oral exposure and risk characterization for systemic effects. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 419, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tilly-Kiesi, M.; Schaefer, E.J.; Knudsen, P.; Welty, F.K.; Dolnikowski, G.G.; Taskinen, M.R.; Lichtenstein, A.H. Lipoprotein metabolism in sujects with hepatic lipase deficiency. Metabolism 2004, 53, 520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Benjamin, J.L.; Hedin, C.R.H.; Koutsoumpas, A.; Ng, S.C.; McCarthy, N.E.; Prescott, N.J.; Pessoa-Lopes, P.; Mathew, C.G.; Sanderson, J.; Hart, A.L.; et al. Smokers with active Crohn’s disease have a clinically relevant dysbiosis of the gastrointestinal microbiota. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2012, 18, 1092–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Schroeder, B.O.; Birchenough, G.M.H.; Ståhlman, M.; Arike, L.; Johansson, M.E.V.; Hansson, G.C.; Bäckhed, F. Bifidobacteria or Fiber Protects against Diet-Induced Microbiota-Mediated Colonic Mucus Deterioration. Cell Host Microbe 2018, 23, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Ostrakhovitch, E.A.; Tabibzadeh, S. Homocysteine in Chronic Kidney Disease. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2015, 72, 77–106. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Ringh, M.V.; Hagemann-Jensen, M.; Needhamsen, M.; Kular, L.; Breeze, C.E.; Sjöholm, L.K.; Slavec, L.; Kullberg, S.; Wahlström, J.; Grunewald, J.; et al. Tobacco smoking induces changes in true DNA methylation, hydroxymethylation and gene expression in bronchoalveolar lavage cells. BioMedicine 2019, 46, 290–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Yang, S.R.; Chida, A.S.; Bauter, M.R.; Shafiq, N.; Seweryniak, K.; Maggirwar, S.B.; Kilty, I.; Rahman, I. Cigarette smoke induces proinflammatory cytokine release by activation of NF-kappaB and posttranslational modifications of histone deacetylase in macrophages. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2006, 291, L46–L57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. The Committee on Metagenomics. The New Science of Metagenomics: Revealing the Secrets of Our Microbial Planet; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  89. Li, M.; Wen, J. Recent progress in the application of omics technologies in the study of bio-mining microorganisms from extreme environments. Microb. Cell Fact. 2021, 20, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Tringe, S.G.; von Mering, C.; Kobayashi, A.; Salamov, A.A.; Chen, K.; Chang, H.W.; Podar, M.; Short, J.M.; Mathur, E.J.; Detter, J.C.; et al. Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities. Science 2005, 308, 554–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Gaur, V.K.; Gupta, S.; Pandey, A. Evolution in mitigation approaches for petroleum oil-polluted environment: Recent advances and future directions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Turnbaugh, P.J.; Ley, R.E.; Hamady, M.; Fraser-Liggett, C.M.; Knight, R.; Gordon, J.I. The human microbiome project. Nature 2007, 449, 804–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wani, G.A.; Khan, M.A.; Dar, M.A.; Shah, M.A.; Reshi, Z.A. Next Generation High Throughput Sequencing to Assess Microbial Communities: An Application Based on Water Quality. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2021, 106, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Young, R.B.; Marcelino, V.R.; Chonwerawong, M.; Gulliver, E.L.; Forster, S.C. Key Technologies for Progressing Discovery of Microbiome-Based Medicines. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 685935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Durazzi, F.; Sala, C.; Castellani, G.; Manfreda, G.; Remondini, D.; De Cesare, A. Comparison between 16S rRNA and shotgun sequencing data for the taxonomic characterization of the gut microbiota. Sci Rep. 2021, 11, 3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Shakya, M.; Lo, C.C.; Chain, P.S.G. Advances and Challenges in Metatranscriptomic Analysis. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial Resistance. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance (accessed on 29 September 2021).
  98. Martínez, J.L. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments. Science 2008, 321, 365–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhu, Y.G.; Gillings, M.; Simonet, P.; Stekel, D.; Banwart, S.; Penuelas, J. Microbial mass movements. Science 2017, 357, 1099–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Xie, J.; Jin, L.; He, T.; Chen, B.; Luo, X.; Feng, B.; Huang, W.; Li, J.; Fu, P.; Li, X. Bacteria and Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARGs) in PM2.5 from China: Implications for Human Exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 52, 963–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Danko, D.; Bezdan, D.; Afshin, E.E.; Ahsanuddin, S.; Bhattacharya, C.; Butler, D.J.; Chng, K.R.; Donnellan, D.; Hecht, J.; Jackson, K.; et al. International MetaSUB Consortium. A global metagenomic map of urban microbiomes and antimicrobial resistance. Cell 2021, 184, 3376–3393.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Li, J.; Cao, J.; Zhu, Y.G.; Chen, Q.L.; Shen, F.; Wu, Y.; Xu, S.; Fan, H.; Da, G.; Huang, R.J.; et al. Global Survey of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Air. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 10975–10984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Hu, J.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, X.X.; Li, K.; Li, C.; Ye, L.; Li, M. Metagenomic profiling of ARGs in airborne particulate matters during a severe smog event. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 1332–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. He, P.; Wu, Y.; Huang, W.; Wu, X.; Lv, J.; Liu, P.; Bu, L.; Bai, Z.; Chen, S.; Feng, W.; et al. Characteristics of and variation in airborne ARGs among urban hospitals and adjacent urban and suburban communities: A metagenomic approach. Environ. Int. 2020, 139, 105625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Kraemer, S.A.; Ramachandran, A.; Perron, G.G. Antibiotic Pollution in the Environment: From Microbial Ecology to Public Policy. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Enaud, R.; Prevel, R.; Ciarlo, E.; Beaufils, F.; Wieërs, G.; Guery, B.; Delhaes, L. The gut-lung axis in health and respiratory diseases: A place for inter-organ and inter-kingdom crosstalks. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, S.; Peng, Z.; Liu, X.; Chen, J.; Zheng, X. Role of lung and gut microbiota on lung cancer pathogenesis. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 14, 2177–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Belkaid, Y.; Hand, T.W. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell 2014, 157, 121–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Jpm 12 00014 g001 550
Figure 1. How the environment affects the lung–gut axis of microbiota.
Figure 1. How the environment affects the lung–gut axis of microbiota.
Jpm 12 00014 g001
Jpm 12 00014 g002 550
Figure 2. Bidirectional communication between the lung and gut microbiota. The impact of environmental pollution, including the airborne resistome, on human lung health is influenced by the lung–gut axis microbiome and epigenetic regulation. The green arrows represent the microorganisms that change after exposure to air pollution [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57].
Figure 2. Bidirectional communication between the lung and gut microbiota. The impact of environmental pollution, including the airborne resistome, on human lung health is influenced by the lung–gut axis microbiome and epigenetic regulation. The green arrows represent the microorganisms that change after exposure to air pollution [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57].
Jpm 12 00014 g002
Table
Table 1. An overview of studies focused on associations between particulate matter, gut, and lung microbiota alteration.
Table 1. An overview of studies focused on associations between particulate matter, gut, and lung microbiota alteration.
Particulate MatterMicrobiotaReferences
PM2.5 exposure in miceLung/intestinal damage and systemic inflammatory reactions[51]
Inhaled diesel PM2.5 in mice Alteration of gut microbiota diversity and community[7]
PM can be indirectly deposited in oropharynx via mucociliary clearance and upon swallowing of saliva and mucusAlteration of the GI epithelium and gut microbiome[49]
Antibiotics, air pollutants, lifestyle, diet, breast feeding Mucosal inflammation[52]
Particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and ozoneAlteration of the gut microbiota with risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes[53]
Traffic-related air pollution Gut microbial taxa and fasting glucose levels[38]
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)Modulation of endocrine signaling pathways in gut microbiota[54]
Particulate matter (PM) PM-induced neutrophilia[55]
Air pollutionIncreased risk of metabolic dysfunction in obese individuals[56]
Particulate matter including diesel exhaust particlesAt relevant doses, changes the composition and function of the gut microbiota[57]
Particulate matter Promote Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection[50]
Particulate mattermultiple gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with COVID-19 and progression with special emphasis on the lung–gut axis [58]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pulliero, A.; Traversi, D.; Franchitti, E.; Barchitta, M.; Izzotti, A.; Agodi, A. The Interaction among Microbiota, Epigenetic Regulation, and Air Pollutants in Disease Prevention. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010014

AMA Style

Pulliero A, Traversi D, Franchitti E, Barchitta M, Izzotti A, Agodi A. The Interaction among Microbiota, Epigenetic Regulation, and Air Pollutants in Disease Prevention. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pulliero, Alessandra, Deborah Traversi, Elena Franchitti, Martina Barchitta, Alberto Izzotti, and Antonella Agodi. 2022. "The Interaction among Microbiota, Epigenetic Regulation, and Air Pollutants in Disease Prevention" Journal of Personalized Medicine 12, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010014

APA Style

Pulliero, A., Traversi, D., Franchitti, E., Barchitta, M., Izzotti, A., & Agodi, A. (2022). The Interaction among Microbiota, Epigenetic Regulation, and Air Pollutants in Disease Prevention. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010014

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop