Building a Personalized Medicine Infrastructure for Gynecological Oncology Patients in a High-Volume Hospital
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Tailoring and Centralizing Care According to Patients’ Needs
- –
- Quality of sleep, variation in their nutritional plan, physical symptoms (e.g., feeling pain, fatigue, nausea, constipation), and changes related to the reproductive system (physiological needs);
- –
- Uncertainty about the future, the possibility of continuing to work or resigning because of health issues that affect personal safety, the availability of financial resources to meet treatment costs, and possibly travel and lodging expenses (safety needs);
- –
- Family and social distress with respect to roles, functions, and relationships of proximity and intimacy. These aspects redefine the sense of closeness with others (love and belonging needs);
- –
- Self-esteem, emotional distress (e.g., anxiety, fear of recurrence), cognitive changes, need for control, and changes in social/professional status (esteem needs);
- –
- Meaning of life, personal purpose, redefinition of self and priorities (hopes, desires and ambitions, inner strength), and meaning of illness (self-actualization needs).
2.1. Physiological and Safety Needs
- –
- The organization and coordination of patient care and information on how and to whom to report symptoms [34];
- –
- –
2.2. Love and Belonging, Esteem, and Self-Actualization Needs
3. Infrastructure of the Gynecologic Oncology Unit at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino IRCCS
3.1. Referral
3.2. Tumor Board
3.3. Integration of Services for Gynecological Cancer Patients
3.4. Personalized Medicine for Specific Needs
3.5. Possibilities for Personalized Medicine Research
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cesario, A.; D’Oria, M.; Bove, F.; Privitera, G.; Boškoski, I.; Pedicino, D.; Boldrini, L.; Erra, C.; Loreti, C.; Liuzzo, G.; et al. Personalized Clinical Phenotyping through Systems Medicine and Artificial Intelligence. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hood, L.; Balling, R.; Auffray, C. Revolutionizing medicine in the 21st century through systems approaches. Biotechnol. J. 2012, 7, 992–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Auffray, C.; Charron, D.; Hood, L. Predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory medicine: Back to the future. Genome Med. 2010, 2, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Q.; Price, N.D.; Hood, L. Systems cancer medicine: Towards realization of predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory (P4) medicine. J. Intern. Med. 2012, 271, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Carelle, N.; Piotto, E.; Bellanger, A.; Germanaud, J.; Thuillier, A.; Khayat, D. Changing patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer 2002, 95, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmqvist, C.; Staf, C.; Mateoiu, C.; Johansson, M.; Albertsson, P.; Dahm-Kähler, P. Increased disease-free and relative survival in advanced ovarian cancer after centralized primary treatment. Gynecol. Oncol. 2020, 159, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsuo, K.; Shimada, M.; Yamaguchi, S.; Matoda, M.; Nakanishi, T.; Kikkawa, F.; Ohmichi, M.; Okamoto, A.; Sugiyama, T.; Mikami, M. Association of Radical Hysterectomy Surgical Volume and Survival for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 133, 1086–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woo, Y.L.; Kyrgiou, M.; Bryant, A.; Everett, T.; Dickinson, H.O. Centralisation of services for gynaecological cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 2012, CD007945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Minig, L.; Padilla-Iserte, P.; Zorrero, C. The Relevance of Gynecologic Oncologists to Provide High-Quality of Care to Women with Gynecological Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2016, 5, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Manchanda, R.; Godfrey, M.; Wong-Taylor, L.A.; Halaska, M.J.; Burnell, M.; Grabowski, J.P.; Gultekin, M.; Haidopoulos, D.; Zapardiel, I.; Vranes, B.; et al. The need for accredited training in gynaecological oncology: A report from the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists (ENYGO). Ann. Oncol. 2013, 24, 944–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lanner, M.; Nikolova, T.; Gutic, B.; Nikolova, N.; Pletnev, A.; Selcuk, I.; Vlachos, D.E.; Razumova, Z.; Bizzarri, N.; Theofanakis, C.; et al. Subspecialty training in Europe: A report by the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2021, 31, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maslow, A.H. Motivation and Personality; Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.: Boston, MA, USA, 1954. [Google Scholar]
- Reb, A.M.; Cope, D.G. Quality of Life and Supportive Care Needs of Gynecologic Cancer Survivors. West. J. Nurs. Res. 2019, 41, 1385–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beesley, V.L.; Alemayehu, C.; Webb, P.M. A systematic literature review of the prevalence of and risk factors for supportive care needs among women with gynaecological cancer and their caregivers. Support. Care Cancer 2018, 26, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Westin, S.N.; Sun, C.C.; Tung, C.S.; Lacour, R.A.; Meyer, L.A.; Urbauer, D.L.; Frumovitz, M.M.; Lu, K.H.; Bodurka, D.C. Survivors of gynecologic malignancies: Impact of treatment on health and well-being. J. Cancer Surviv. 2016, 10, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). What Is Personalized Medicine. ESMO Patients Guide Series. Available online: https://www.esmo.org/content/download/20122/337223/1/ESMO-Patient-Guide-Personalised-Cancer-Medicine.pdf (accessed on 9 October 2021).
- Cesario, A.; D’Oria, M.; Calvani, R.; Picca, A.; Pietragalla, A.; Lorusso, D.; Daniele, G.; Lohmeyer, F.M.; Boldrini, L.; Valentini, V.; et al. The role of artificial intelligence in managing multimorbidity and cancer. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carter, J.; Stabile, C.; Gunn, A.; Sonoda, Y. The physical consequences of gynecologic cancer surgery and their impact on sexual, emotional, and quality of life issues. J. Sex. Med. 2013, 10 (Suppl. S1), 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komatsu, H.; Oishi, T.; Sato, S.; Osaku, D.; Sawada, M.; Kudoh, A.; Nonaka, M.; Sato, S.; Shimada, M.; Itamochi, H.; et al. Evaluating Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Food Intake in Patients with Gynecologic Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2019, 39, 4555–4560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Randall, L.M.; Pothuri, B. The genetic prediction of risk for gynecologic cancers. Gynecol. Oncol. 2016, 141, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cordeiro, C.N.; Gemignani, M.L. Gynecologic Malignancies in Pregnancy: Balancing Fetal Risks with Oncologic Safety. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2017, 72, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- De Felice, F.; Marchetti, C.; Di Pinto, A.; Musella, A.; Palaia, I.; Porpora, M.G.; Muzii, L.; Tombolini, V.; Panici, P.B.; Tomao, F. Fertility preservation in gynaecologic cancers. Ecancermedicalscience 2018, 12, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- ASCO. Recommendations on Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients: Guideline Summary. J. Oncol. Pract. 2006, 2, 143–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boldrini, L.; Romano, A.; Placidi, L.; Mattiucci, G.C.; Chiloiro, G.; Cusumano, D.; Pollutri, V.; Antonelli, M.V.; Indovina, L.; Gambacorta, M.A.; et al. Case Report: First in Human Online Adaptive MR Guided SBRT of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Nodules: A New Therapeutic Approach for the Oligo-Metastatic Patient. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 601739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clair, K.H.; Tewari, K.S. Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: Indications, techniques and controversies. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2020, 46, 828–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weston, E.; Raker, C.; Huang, D.; Parker, A.; Robison, K.; Mathews, C. The Association between Mindfulness and Postoperative Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study of Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2020, 27, 1119–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stanic, J.; Barth, J.; Danon, N.; Bondolfi, G.; Jermann, F.; Eicher, M. Adherence to standardized 8-week mindfulness-based interventions among women with breast or gynecological cancer: A scoping review. J. Psychosoc. Oncol. Res. Pract. 2021, 3, e048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alcântara-Silva, T.R.; de Freitas-Junior, R.; Freitas, N.M.A.; de Paula Junior, W.; da Silva, D.J.; Machado, G.D.P.; Ribeiro, M.K.A.; Carneiro, J.P.; Soares, L.R. Music Therapy Reduces Radiotherapy-Induced Fatigue in Patients with Breast or Gynecological Cancer: A Randomized Trial. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2018, 17, 628–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Rithirangsriroj, K.; Manchana, T.; Akkayagorn, L. Efficacy of acupuncture in prevention of delayed chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting in gynecologic cancer patients. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015, 136, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilodeau, K.; Dubois, S.; Pepin, J. The care continuum with interprofessional oncology teams: Perspectives of patients and family. Can. Oncol. Nurs. J. 2015, 25, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramirez, P.T.; Chiva, L.; Eriksson, A.G.Z.; Frumovitz, M.; Fagotti, A.; Gonzalez Martin, A.; Jhingran, A.; Pareja, R. COVID-19 Global Pandemic: Options for Management of Gynecologic Cancers. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2020, 30, 561–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Martinelli, F.; Garbi, A. Change in practice in gynecologic oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic: A social media survey. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2020, 30, 1101–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogani, G.; Brusadelli, C.; Guerrisi, R.; Lopez, S.; Signorelli, M.; Ditto, A.; Raspagliesi, F. Gynecologic oncology at the time of COVID-19 outbreak. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2020, 31, e72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jones, J.M.; Ferguson, S.; Edwards, E.; Walton, T.; McCurdy, N.; Howell, D. Experiences of care delivery: Endometrial cancer survivors at end of treatment. Gynecol. Oncol. 2012, 124, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dawson, G.; Madsen, L.T.; Dains, J.E. Interventions to manage uncertainty and fear of recurrence in female breast cancer survivors: A review of the literature. Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2016, 20, E155–E161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maheu, C.; Lebel, S.; Courbasson, C.; Lefebvre, M.; Singh, M.; Bernstein, L.J.; Muraca, L.; Benea, A.; Jolicoeur, L.; Harris, C.; et al. Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of the fear of recurrence therapy (FORT) intervention for women with breast or gynecological cancer. BMC Cancer 2016, 16, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Maguire, R.; Kotronoulas, G.; Simpson, M.; Paterson, C. A systematic review of the supportive care needs of women living with and beyond cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015, 136, 478–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Loomans-Kropp, H.A.; Umar, A. Cancer prevention and screening: The next step in the era of precision medicine. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2019, 3, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Di Mattei, V.E.; Carnelli, L.; Taranto, P.; Bernardi, M.; Brombin, C.; Cugnata, F.; Noviello, A.; Currin, M.; Mangili, G.; Rabaiotti, E.; et al. “Health in the Mirror”: An Unconventional Approach to Unmet Psychological Needs in Oncology. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nichipor, A. Religion and the BRCA Mutation. Harv. Divin. Bull. Arch. 2018, 46, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Andersen, B.L.; Anderson, B. Psychosomatic Aspects of Gynecologic Oncology: Present Status and Future Directions. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1986, 5, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Solbrække, K.N.; Søiland, H.; Lode, K.; Gripsrud, B.H. Our genes, our selves: Hereditary breast cancer and biological citizenship in Norway. Med. Health Care Philos. 2017, 20, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Klitzman, R. Am I My Genes? Confronting Fate and Family Secrets in the Age of Genetic Testing; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Sacerdoti, R.C.; Laganà, L.; Koopman, C. Altered sexuality and body image after gynecological cancer treatment: How can psychologists help? Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract. 2010, 41, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Katz, A. My body my self: Body image and sexuality in women with cancer. Can. Oncol. Nurs. J. 2015, 19, E1–E4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Freedman, T.G. Social and cultural dimensions of hair loss in women treated for breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 1994, 17, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McGarvey, E.L.; Baum, L.D.; Pinkerton, R.C.; Rogers, L.M. Psychological sequelae and alopecia among women with cancer. Cancer Pract. 2001, 9, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zannini, L.; Verderame, F.; Cucchiara, G.; Zinna, B.; Alba, A.; Ferrara, M. ‘My wig has been my journey’s companion’: Perceived effects of an aesthetic care programme for Italian women suffering from chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Eur. J. Cancer Care 2012, 21, 650–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schuit, A.S.; Holtmaat, K.; van Zwieten, V.; Aukema, E.J.; Gransier, L.; Cuijpers, P.; Verdonck-de Leeuw, I.M. Organizing Psycho-Oncological Care for Cancer Patients: The Patient’s Perspective. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 625117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenlee, H.; DuPont-Reyes, M.J.; Balneaves, L.G.; Carlson, L.E.; Cohen, M.R.; Deng, G.; Johnson, J.A.; Mumber, M.; Seely, D.; Zick, S.M.; et al. Clinical practice guidelines on the evidence-based use of integrative therapies during and after breast cancer treatment. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017, 67, 194–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.F.; Wen, Y.S.; Liu, W.Y.; Peng, L.F.; Wu, X.D.; Liu, Q.W. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based therapy for reducing anxiety and depression in patients with cancer: A meta-analysis. Medicine 2015, 94, e0897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, R.F.; Butow, P.N.; Boyle, F.; Tattersall, T.H.N. Seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials. Psycho-Oncology 2007, 16, 507–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bailo, L.; Guiddi, P.; Vergani, L.; Marton, G.; Pravettoni, G. The patient perspective: Investigating patient empowerment enablers and barriers within the oncological care process. Ecancermedicalscience 2019, 13, 912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bowen, D.J.; Makhnoon, S.; Shirts, B.H.; Fullerton, S.M.; Larson, E.; Ralston, J.D.; Leppig, K.; Crosslin, D.R.; Veenstra, D.; Jarvik, G.P. What improves the likelihood of people receiving genetic test results communicating to their families about genetic risk? Patient Educ. Couns. 2021, 104, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Konstantinopoulos, P.A.; Norquist, B.; Lacchetti, C.; Armstrong, D.; Grisham, R.N.; Goodfellow, P.J.; Kohn, E.C.; Levine, D.A.; Liu, J.F.; Lu, K.H.; et al. Germline and Somatic Tumor Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, 1222–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, M.I.; Wong, D.H.; Walsh, C.S.; Farias-Eisner, R.; Cohen, J.G. Cancer Genetic Counseling and Testing: Perspectives of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients and Gynecologic Oncology Healthcare Providers. J. Genet. Couns. 2018, 27, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pasacreta, J.V. Psychosocial issues associated with genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk: An integrative review. Cancer Invest. 2003, 21, 588–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meiser, B.; Gaff, C.; Julian-Reynier, C.; Biesecker, B.B.; Esplen, M.J.; Vodermaier, A.; Tibben, A. International perspectives on genetic counseling and testing for breast cancer risk. Breast Dis. 2007, 27, 109–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, H.E.; Masaud, H.; Mohammed, R.; Ramadan, S. Self-knowledge and body image among cervical cancer survivors women in northern upper Egypt. Furth. Appl. Healthc. 2021, 1, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- De Maria Marchiano, R.; Di Sante, G.; Piro, G.; Carbone, C.; Tortora, G.; Boldrini, L.; Pietragalla, A.; Daniele, G.; Tredicine, M.; Cesario, A.; et al. Translational Research in the Era of Precision Medicine: Where We Are and Where We Will Go. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Russo, A.; Aceto, P.; Grieco, D.L.; Anzellotti, G.M.; Perilli, V.; Costantini, B.; Romanò, B.; Scambia, G.; Sollazzi, L.; Antonelli, M. Goal-directed hemodynamic management in patients undergoing primary debulking gynaecological surgery: A matched-controlled precision medicine study. Gynecol. Oncol. 2018, 151, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Timmerman, D.; Planchamp, F.; Bourne, T.; Landolfo, C.; du Bois, A.; Chiva, L.; Cibula, D.; Concin, N.; Fischerova, D.; Froyman, W.; et al. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus statements on the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumours. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 58, 148–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Epstein, E.; Fischerova, D.; Valentin, L.; Testa, A.C.; Franchi, D.; Sladkevicius, P.; Frühauf, F.; Lindqvist, P.G.; Mascilini, F.; Fruscio, R.; et al. Ultrasound characteristics of endometrial cancer as defined by International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) consensus nomenclature: Prospective multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 51, 818–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gaurilcikas, A.; Vaitkiene, D.; Cizauskas, A.; Inciura, A.; Svedas, E.; Maciuleviciene, R.; Di Legge, A.; Ferrandina, G.; Testa, A.C.; Valentin, L. Early-stage cervical cancer: Agreement between ultrasound and histopathological findings with regard to tumor size and extent of local disease. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 38, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garganese, G.; Fragomeni, S.M.; Pasciuto, T.; Leombroni, M.; Moro, F.; Evangelista, M.T.; Bove, S.; Gentileschi, S.; Tagliaferri, L.; Paris, I.; et al. Ultrasound morphometric and cytologic preoperative assessment of inguinal lymph-node status in women with vulvar cancer: MorphoNode study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 55, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moro, F.; Uccella, S.; Testa, A.C.; Scambia, G.; Fagotti, A. Intraoperative Ultrasound-Guided Excision of Cardiophrenic Lymph Nodes in an Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patient. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2018, 28, 1672–1675. [Google Scholar]
- Bisch, S.P.; Jago, C.A.; Kalogera, E.; Ganshorn, H.; Meyer, L.A.; Ramirez, P.T.; Dowdy, S.C.; Nelson, G. Outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in gynecologic oncology. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol. Oncol. 2021, 161, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Macchia, G.; Lazzari, R.; Colombo, N.; Laliscia, C.; Capelli, G.; D’Agostino, G.R.; Deodato, F.; Maranzano, E.; Ippolito, E.; Ronchi, S.; et al. A Large, Multicenter, Retrospective Study on Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in Oligometastatic Ovarian Cancer (MITO RT1 Study): A Collaboration of MITO, AIRO GYN, and MaNGO Groups. Oncologist 2020, 25, e311–e320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferrandina, G.; Gambacorta, A.; Gallotta, V.; Smaniotto, D.; Fagotti, A.; Tagliaferri, L.; Foti, E.; Fanfani, F.; Autorino, R.; Scambia, G.; et al. Chemoradiation with concomitant boosts followed by radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer: Long-term results of the ROMA-2 prospective phase 2 study. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2014, 90, 778–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gentileschi, S.; Servillo, M.; Garganese, G.; Simona, F.; Scambia, G.; Salgarello, M. Versatility of pedicled anterolateral thigh flap in gynecologic reconstruction after vulvar cancer extirpative surgery. Microsurgery 2017, 37, 516–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Q.; Peng, H.; Qi, X.; Wu, M.; Zhao, X. Targeted therapies in gynecological cancers: A comprehensive review of clinical evidence. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gueli Alletti, S.; Cianci, S.; Perrone, E.; Fanfani, F.; Vascone, C.; Uccella, S.; Gallotta, V.; Vizzielli, G.; Fagotti, A.; Monterossi, G.; et al. Technological innovation and personalized surgical treatment for early-stage endometrial cancer patients: A prospective multicenter Italian experience to evaluate the novel percutaneous approach. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2019, 23, 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perrone, E.; Fanfani, F.; Rossitto, C.; Cianci, S.; Fagotti, A.; Restaino, S.; Fedele, C.; Scambia, G.; Gueli Alletti, S. Laparoscopic vs percutaneous hysterectomy in obese patients: A prospective evaluation. Facts Views Vis. ObGyn 2020, 11, 307–313. [Google Scholar]
- Rinninella, E.; Fagotti, A.; Cintoni, M.; Raoul, P.; Scaletta, G.; Quagliozzi, L.; Miggiano, G.A.D.; Scambia, G.; Gasbarrini, A.; Mele, M.C. Nutritional Interventions to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Eortc Quality of Life. Questionnaires. Available online: https://qol.eortc.org/questionnaires/ (accessed on 9 October 2021).
- Bizzarri, N.; Restaino, S.; Gueli Alletti, S.; Monterossi, G.; Gioè, A.; La Fera, E.; Gallotta, V.; Fagotti, A.; Scambia, G.; Fanfani, F. Sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer with indocyanine green: Laparoscopic versus robotic approach. Facts Views Vis. ObGyn 2021, 13, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mazzon, I.; Corrado, G.; Masciullo, V.; Morricone, D.; Ferrandina, G.; Scambia, G. Conservative surgical management of stage IA endometrial carcinoma for fertility preservation. Fertil. Steril. 2010, 93, 1286–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raffone, A.; Catena, U.; Travaglino, A.; Masciullo, V.; Spadola, S.; Della Corte, L.; Piermattei, A.; Insabato, L.; Zannoni, G.F.; Scambia, G.; et al. Mismatch repair-deficiency specifically predicts recurrence of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial carcinoma after conservative treatment: A multi-center study. Gynecol. Oncol. 2021, 161, 795–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). G8 Questionnaire. Source: Items. Available online: http://www.siog.org (accessed on 9 October 2021).
- Meric-Bernstam, F.; Farhangfar, C.; Mendelsohn, J.; Mills, G.B. Building a personalized medicine infrastructure at a major cancer center. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 1849–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krzyszczyk, P.; Acevedo, A.; Davidoff, E.J.; Timmins, L.M.; Marrero-Berrios, I.; Patel, M.; White, C.; Lowe, C.; Sherba, J.J.; Hartmanshenn, C.; et al. The growing role of precision and personalized medicine for cancer treatment. Technology 2018, 6, 79–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cecchin, E.; Roncato, R.; Guchelaar, H.J.; Toffoli, G. Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics Consortium. Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics (U-PGx): The Time for Implementation is Now. An Horizon2020 Program to Drive Pharmacogenomics into Clinical Practice. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2017, 18, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grisafi, D.; Ceschi, A.; Avalos Clerici, V.; Scaglione, F. The Contribution of Clinical Pharmacologists in Precision Medicine: An Opportunity for Health Care Improvement. Curr. Ther. Res. Clin. Exp. 2021, 94, 100628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Patients | Clinical Solution | Description |
---|---|---|
Endometrial cancer | Ultra-minimally invasive approach | Minimally invasive surgery using ultra-thin instruments with the aim of further reducing postoperative pain and improve aesthetic outcomes [72]. |
All patients | Assessment of nutritional status | Patients are assessed with specially designed tools to guide the potential need for supplements in both the preoperative and postoperative periods [73,74]. |
All patients | Cinema therapy as supportive care | The psycho-oncologist organizes bi-weekly groups for patients to watch specific movies, and reflect on specific themes related to the illness experience. |
All patients | Psycho-oncologists | Patients receive specific questionnaires to assess their Quality of Life (QoL), while having the possibility to talk with the psycho-oncologist about their illness experience (e.g., EORTC QLQ-OV28, EORTC QLQ-OV30, EORTC QLQ-CR29, EQ-5D-5L) [75]. |
Obese patients (BMI > 30) | Access to robotic platform | Patients are given the opportunity to be operated on with the robotic approach, which has been demonstrated as beneficial by different studies in the literature [76]. |
Ovarian and endometrial cancer patients | Molecular profiling of tumors as a standard for risk definition | Possibility to characterize endometrial and ovarian tumors from a molecular perspective to tailor adjuvant treatment. For other cancers, specific research protocols are available. |
Patients with personal or familiar history of multiple cancers | Genetic profiling and counselling | Patients with personal/familiar history of multiple cancers or according to the patient’s age are tested for genetic profiling and given individualized counselling. |
Young patients (<40 years) | Fertility-sparing treatment in early-stage disease | Young patients with early-stage disease can be treated with uterine conservation leaving the possibility of subsequent pregnancy [77,78]. A multidisciplinary team (gynecologists, psychologists, oncologists, senologists, ematologists, radiation oncologists, and pediatricians) provides specific patient-specific counselling to identify viable candidates. |
Elderly patient (>75 years) | Specialized geriatrician | Patients receive a specific questionnaire (G8) to assess their frailty score [79]. |
Patients from other regions/unable to travel for long distances | Telemedical consultations | Because many patients had difficulty travelling to the hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedical consultations with clinicians were arranged to provide continuity of care and maintain contacts between the unit and patients in other regions, to reduce their travel expenses. |
Total Numbers | 2020 |
---|---|
Beds | 81 |
Patients treated | 4.296 |
Surgical procedures | 4.726 |
Mininvasive surgical robotic treatments | 199 |
Chemotherapies | 13.612 |
Requested radiotherapies | 926 |
Tumor boards (once a week, subdivided for main pathology sites) | over 140 |
Active clinical trials | over 40 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bizzarri, N.; Nero, C.; Sillano, F.; Ciccarone, F.; D’Oria, M.; Cesario, A.; Fragomeni, S.M.; Testa, A.C.; Fanfani, F.; Ferrandina, G.; et al. Building a Personalized Medicine Infrastructure for Gynecological Oncology Patients in a High-Volume Hospital. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010003
Bizzarri N, Nero C, Sillano F, Ciccarone F, D’Oria M, Cesario A, Fragomeni SM, Testa AC, Fanfani F, Ferrandina G, et al. Building a Personalized Medicine Infrastructure for Gynecological Oncology Patients in a High-Volume Hospital. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12(1):3. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010003
Chicago/Turabian StyleBizzarri, Nicolò, Camilla Nero, Francesca Sillano, Francesca Ciccarone, Marika D’Oria, Alfredo Cesario, Simona Maria Fragomeni, Antonia Carla Testa, Francesco Fanfani, Gabriella Ferrandina, and et al. 2022. "Building a Personalized Medicine Infrastructure for Gynecological Oncology Patients in a High-Volume Hospital" Journal of Personalized Medicine 12, no. 1: 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010003
APA StyleBizzarri, N., Nero, C., Sillano, F., Ciccarone, F., D’Oria, M., Cesario, A., Fragomeni, S. M., Testa, A. C., Fanfani, F., Ferrandina, G., Lorusso, D., Fagotti, A., & Scambia, G. (2022). Building a Personalized Medicine Infrastructure for Gynecological Oncology Patients in a High-Volume Hospital. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010003