Next Article in Journal
Changes in the Incidence Rates of Gastrointestinal Diseases Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic in South Korea: A Long-Term Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Increased Risk of NAFLD in Adults with Glomerular Hyperfiltration: An 8-Year Cohort Study Based on 147,162 Koreans
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modulation of Secondary Cancer Risks from Radiation Exposure by Sex, Age and Gonadal Hormone Status: Progress, Opportunities and Challenges
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JPM
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/jpm12071143
jpm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Sex Differences in Patent Ductus Arteriosus Incidence and Response to Pharmacological Treatment in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

by
Moreyba Borges-Lujan
1,
Gema E. Gonzalez-Luis
1,
Tom Roosen
2,
Maurice J. Huizing
2 and
Eduardo Villamor
2,*
1
Department of Neonatology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil (CHUIMI) de Canarias, 35016 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
2
Department of Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), School for Oncology Reproduction (GROW), 6202 Maastricht, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(7), 1143; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071143
Submission received: 16 June 2022 / Revised: 5 July 2022 / Accepted: 8 July 2022 / Published: 14 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalizing Medicine by Sex, Gender and Hormonal Status: Progress, Opportunities and Challenges)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A widely accepted concept in perinatal medicine is that boys are more susceptible than girls to complications of prematurity. However, whether this ‘male disadvantage of prematurity’ also involves persistent patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) has been scarcely investigated. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on studies addressing sex differences in the risk of developing PDA among preterm infants. We also investigated whether the response to pharmacological treatment of PDA differs between boys and girls. PubMed/Medline and Embase databases were searched. The random-effects male/female risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. We included 146 studies (357,781 infants). Meta-analysis could not demonstrate sex differences in risk of developing any PDA (37 studies, RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.08), hemodynamically significant PDA (81 studies, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.02), or in the rate of response to pharmacological treatment (45 studies, RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.04). Subgroup analysis and meta-regression showed that the absence of sex differences was maintained over the years and in different geographic settings. In conclusion, both the incidence of PDA in preterm infants and the response rate to pharmacological treatment of PDA are not different between preterm boys and girls.

1. Introduction

The ductus arteriosus (DA) is an essential fetal blood vessel that connects the pulmonary artery to the aorta and serves to shunt blood away from the lungs into the umbilical placental circulation where gas exchange takes place [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. At birth, closure of the DA is a critical event in the transition to the postnatal circulatory pattern. However, there are situations in which DA closure does not occur or is delayed, resulting in the condition known as persistent patent DA (PDA) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. In term and late-preterm infants, PDA is a relatively rare condition that frequently is related to inherent abnormality of the DA and/or signaling pathways that normally trigger its closure [7,8]. In contrast, PDA is very common among very preterm infants because it is generally due to developmental immaturity. PDA would likely not be present if the infant had been born at term [7,8]. The clinical consequences and the therapeutic approach to PDA in very preterm infants are matters of an intense debate that still seems far from being resolved [9,10].
Male–female differences in human health and disease have been recognized for many years [11,12,13,14]. A widely accepted concept in perinatal medicine is the so-called ‘male disadvantage of prematurity’. This concept is supported by a large body of evidence showing that boys are more susceptible than girls to adverse outcomes of prematurity, including bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), chronic neurodevelopmental and cognitive impairment, and mortality [15,16,17,18,19]. However, whether PDA is one of the complications of prematurity that is affected by this male disadvantage has not been thoroughly investigated. Interestingly, time to spontaneous DA closure in healthy full-term neonates is longer in girls than in boys [20] and male-to-female ratio for PDA in term infants is about 1:2 in most reports [7,8,21,22,23,24,25]. However, as mentioned above, PDA in term and preterm newborns are two conditions with a different etiopathogenic background and therefore may have a different sex ratio. The results of two recent meta-analyses suggest that there is no sex difference in the risk of developing PDA among preterm infants [19,26], but these meta-analyses were limited by the small number of studies included.
The aim of this systematic review is to answer the question of whether there are sex differences in the risk of developing PDA in preterm infants. We used a broad search strategy in order to include a large number of studies. We also investigated whether the response to pharmacological treatment of PDA differs between boys and girls. Finally, we used subgroup analysis and meta-regression to elucidate whether there are geographic differences or changes over the years in sex differences in PDA risk.

2. Materials and Methods

The methodology of this study is based on that of earlier studies of our group on risk factors for PDA [27,28,29,30]. The study was performed and reported according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines [15]. Review protocol was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO international register of systematic reviews (ID = CRD42018095509). The two research questions were “Do preterm boys have a higher risk of developing PDA than preterm girls?” and “Do preterm boys respond differently than preterm girls to pharmacological treatment of PDA?”

2.1. Sources and Search Strategy

A comprehensive literature search was undertaken using the PubMed/Medline and EMBASE databases. Databases of grey literature were not searched. The search strategy is detailed in Table S1. No language limit was applied. The literature search was updated up to December 2021. Narrative reviews, systematic reviews, case reports, letters, editorials, and commentaries were excluded, but read to identify potential additional studies. Additional strategies to identify studies included a manual review of reference lists from key articles that fulfilled our eligibility criteria, use of “related articles” feature in PubMed, and use of the “cited by” tool in Web of Science and Google scholar.

2.2. Study Selection and Definitions

Studies were included if they had a prospective or retrospective cohort design, examined preterm infants (GA < 37 weeks) and reported primary data that could be used to measure the association between infant sex and (1) rate of PDA and (2) response to pharmacological treatment. Studies that exclusively included late preterm infants (GA ≥ 34 weeks) or combined preterm and term infants were excluded. To identify relevant studies, two reviewers (MB-L, TR) independently screened the results of the searches and applied inclusion criteria using a structured form. Discrepancies were resolved by two other reviewers (GG-L, EV). The studies in English, Spanish, French, German, Dutch, Italian, Portuguese, Catalan, and Galician were directly analyzed by one of the authors with knowledge of the language. Articles in other languages were translated into English using an electronic translator (DeepL®, Cologne, Germany). If the translation was unclear, the articles were excluded.
As in our previous meta-analyses [27,28,29,30], the studies were divided according to the way they considered small ductal shunts [27,28,29,30]. Studies comparing small + large PDA vs. closed DA were classified as reporting on “any PDA.” Studies comparing large PDA vs. small PDA + closed DA were classified as reporting on “hemodynamically significant PDA” (hsPDA). Since in our previous meta-analyses we detected several studies that did not consider closed DAs and only compared hsPDA with small PDA, we conducted a meta-analysis in which closed DAs were not taken into account. We assumed the definition “PDA requiring treatment” as a proxy for hsPDA. Regarding response to drug treatment, when a study reported on several treatment courses, only the final response was taken into account.

2.3. Data Extraction and Assessment of Study Quality

Two investigators (MB-L and TR) extracted data on study design, demographics, rate of PDA and/or hsPDA, and response to treatment. A second group of investigators (MJH, GG-L and EV) checked the data extraction for completeness and accuracy. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort studies [15]. This scale assigns a maximum of 9 points (4 for selection, 2 for comparability, and 3 for outcome). NOS scores ≥ 7 were considered high-quality studies (low risk of bias), and scores of 5 to 6 denoted moderate quality (moderate risk of bias) [15].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Studies were combined and analyzed using comprehensive meta-analysis V3.0 software (Biostat Inc., Englewood, NJ, USA). Due to anticipated heterogeneity, summary statistics were calculated with a random-effects model. This model accounts for variability between studies as well as within studies. The risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran’s Q statistic and by the I2 statistic. I2 was interpreted on the basis of Higgins and Thompson criteria, where 25%, 50%, and 75% correspond to low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively [31]. Potential sources of heterogeneity were assessed through subgroup analysis and/or random effects (method of moments) univariate meta-regression analysis as previously described [16,17]. For both categorical and continuous covariates, the R2 analog, defined as the total between-study variance explained by the moderator, was calculated based on the meta-regression matrix. Predefined sources of heterogeneity included the following characteristics of cohorts: mean or median GA, median year of birth, geographical location (continent), and drug used for PDA treatment. We used the Egger’s regression test and funnel plots to assess publication bias. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and publication bias assessment were performed only when there were at least ten studies in the meta-analysis. A probability value of less than 0.05 (0.10 for heterogeneity) was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Description of Studies and Quality Assessment

The flow diagram of the search process is shown in Figure S1. Of 2130 potentially relevant studies, 146 (including 357,781 infants) were included [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177]. Their characteristics are summarized in Table S2. The quality score of each study according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale is depicted in Table S2. All studies received at least seven points indicating a low risk of bias.

3.2. Meta-Analysis

As mentioned in the methods, we carried out four meta-analyses (Table 1): (1) Any PDA (hsPDA + non-hsPDA vs. closed DA) (Figure 1); (2) hsPDA vs. non-hsPDA + closed DA (Figure 2); (3) hsPDA vs. non-hsPDA (Figure 3); and (4) Response to pharmacological treatment (Figure 4). None of the four meta-analyses could demonstrate the presence of significant male-female differences. Heterogeneity was low to moderate in all four meta-analyses (Table 1). Neither visual inspection of funnel plots (Figure S2) nor Egger’s test suggested publication or selection bias for any of the meta-analyses.

3.3. Subgroup Analysis and Meta-Regression

As shown in Figure 4, subgroup analysis based on the medication used to treat PDA showed no significant sex differences for any of the drugs. As shown in Table 2, when the studies were divided according to whether they included exclusively extremely preterm infants (i.e., GA < 29 weeks) or also included infants with GA above 28 weeks, the meta-analyses showed no significant sex differences. In addition, subgroup analysis based on the geographic location (continent) of the studies showed no significant male–female differences for any of the continents analyzed (Table 3).
Meta-regression showed that the effect size of the association between male sex and PDA has remained stable over time. That is, it does not correlate with the median year of birth of the cohort (Table S3). The meta-regression also could not demonstrate a correlation between the mean/median GA of the cohort and the effect size of the association between sex and PDA (Table S3).

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, this study is the largest and most comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis on sex differences in PDA. Our results suggest that both the incidence of PDA in preterm infants and the response rate to pharmacological treatment of PDA are not different between preterm boys and girls. Moreover, subgroup analysis and meta-regression showed that the absence of sex differences in PDA is maintained over the years and in different geographic settings.
In a previous meta-analysis, we investigated the male disadvantage for the most important complications of prematurity and found an increased risk of IVH, BPD, ROP, NEC, late onset sepsis, and mortality in preterm boys [19]. However, this was not the case for PDA. In that previous analysis, we included only studies in which infant sex was the independent variable and outcome the dependent variable. This allowed the comparison of the different outcomes but at the cost of including only 18 studies on PDA. A recent meta-analysis by Liu et al. evaluated several risk factors for developing PDA in preterm infants [26]. They found that the risk of developing PDA was slightly higher for boys than for girls but only included 28 studies in the analysis on sex differences. The major strength of the present meta-analysis is the comprehensive database search to identify all the potential studies. Thus, the 146 included studies encompassed a total population of 357,781 infants from 36 different countries and were conducted over more than 35 years. Therefore, our data provide strong evidence for the lack of sex differences in PDA incidence and response to treatment among preterm infants.
A common conception among neonatologists is the strong interaction between DA closure in the first days of life of preterm infants and their respiratory evolution. The presence of a hemodynamically significant PDA is frequently suspected on the basis of respiratory findings, such as increased oxygen or mechanical ventilation requirements [178,179]. Conversely, changes in pulmonary precapillary tone as consequence of respiratory distress evolution and/or therapy can alter the left-to-right PDA shunt [178,179]. In addition, infants with a moderate to large PDA are at the greatest risk of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) [178,179]. Interestingly, our previous meta-analysis showed that the respiratory course in the first days of life was more complicated in preterm boys than in preterm girls [19]. Male sex was associated with increased risk of RDS, higher rate of intubation at birth, treatment with surfactant, mechanical ventilation, and pneumothorax [19]. However, our present results suggest that the presence of PDA is unlikely to play a role in these sex differences in respiratory courses.
It has been proposed that the male disadvantage begins in utero, when gonadal steroid production already differs strongly by sex [180]. Therefore, the presence of sex differences in DA development and closure might be plausible from a developmental biology perspective. Conventionally, DA closure is divided into two sequential steps: an initial functional closure, mediated by constriction of DA smooth muscle, followed by anatomical vessel remodeling, leading to luminal obliteration [4,5]. Oxygen-mediated contraction and withdrawal of prostaglandin E2-induced relaxation contribute synergistically to the initial constriction [4,5]. As mentioned in the Introduction, it has been reported that, among term newborns, the first phase of functional closure of the DA is more rapid in boys than in girls [20], but there is no evidence that this can be extrapolated to the immature DA. Our results do not point in that direction.
To the best of our knowledge, the only model in which it has been studied potential sex differences in the maturation of DA reactivity is the chicken embryo model [181]. Interestingly, chicken embryo development takes place under very different hormonal environments with respect to estrogen levels [182]. In humans, the main source of estrogens is the placenta and, therefore, both female and male fetuses are exposed to high concentrations of the hormone. In the chicken, female embryos have much higher estrogen concentrations than male embryos [182]. Estrogens are also vasoactive in the DA of embryos of both sexes [181]. However, Flisenberg et al. found no differences between males and females in either oxygen-mediated ductal contraction or DA response to different vasoactive agents [181]. Moreover, maturation of the DA contractile response occurred at the same rate in both sexes [181]. Unfortunately, this study has not yet been reproduced in a mammalian model.
Sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are common for many drugs and contribute to individual differences in their efficacy and toxicity [183,184,185]. The inhibitors of prostaglandin synthesis indomethacin and ibuprofen are the most frequently used drugs in the treatment of PDA [186]. Paracetamol has been added to these drugs in recent years [186]. Evidence from several experimental and clinical studies indicates differences in levels of prostaglandins and other eicosanoids, as well as in the activity or expression of their synthesizing and metabolizing enzymes between adult males and females [187,188,189]. In addition, there is also substantial evidence of sex differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of indomethacin, ibuprofen and paracetamol in adults [190,191,192]. Moreover, the preventive effects of indomethacin on IVH in preterm infants appear to be sex-specific [193,194]. In contrast, and although some studies have reported sex differences in the efficacy of the drugs used for pharmacological treatment of PDA [33,49,105], the meta-analysis did not confirm these differences.
Using subgroup and meta-regression analyses, we examined the influence of geographic and temporal factors on the results of the meta-analysis. Our data suggest that the absence of sex differences in PDA incidence and response to pharmacological treatment can be found in all geographical areas and remains unchanged over the years. In contrast, our previous meta-analysis showed that geographic location and age of cohorts affected sex differences in some of the outcomes of prematurity. Thus, the male disadvantage in periventricular leukomalacia was significantly lower in the cohorts from America when compared with Asian and European cohorts and the male disadvantage in mortality decreased progressively over the years. The analysis of time factor is particularly relevant for PDA because neonatologists have been debating for decades what a hemodynamically significant PDA is, what the health consequences of the presence of a ductal shunt for the preterm newborn are and when and how PDA should be treated [1,9,10]. Our results suggest that these changes as well as advances in neonatology have not affected the sex ratio of preterm PDA.
Finally, we analyzed the effect of the gestational age of the cohort on the results of the meta-analysis. Since the incidence of term PDA is higher in girls than in boys [7,8,21,22,23,24,25], it would possible that those studies including more mature infants had a different sex ratio than those exclusively focused on extremely preterm infants. However, neither the meta-regression nor the subgroup study confirmed this hypothesis. The mean gestational age of the cohort did not correlate with the sex ratio for PDA. Moreover, subgroup analysis in which only extremely preterm infants (gestational age ≤ 28 weeks) were included showed no sex differences either in the incidence of PDA or in response to pharmacological treatment.

5. Conclusions

Although the occurrence of sex differences in incidence and response to treatment of PDA among preterm infants would be plausible from a biological, pharmacological or clinical point of view, the current evidence does not support these differences. Nevertheless, sex is increasingly being recognized as a key variable in the regulation of physiology, pathology, pharmacology and therapeutics, calling for more consideration of sex differences in biomedical research [187,189,195,196,197]. The current clinical approach to PDA therapy in preterm infants is less aggressive with a propensity to observe physiological evolution without pharmacological intervention [1,9,10]. There is a growing body of information on this approach to PDA, and it would be necessary for future studies to take into account the sex variable in their design, sample size calculation, and reporting of the results.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jpm12071143/s1, Table S1: Search strategy; Table S2: Characteristics of the included studies; Table S3: Meta-regression of continuous covariates; Figure S1: Flow diagram of the systematic search; Figure S2: Funnel plot for publication bias analysis for the studies included in the different meta-analyses.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.V. and G.E.G.-L.; methodology, E.V. and G.E.G.-L.; formal analysis, E.V. and G.E.G.-L.; investigation, M.B.-L., T.R., G.E.G.-L., M.J.H. and E.V.; data curation, M.B.-L., T.R., G.E.G.-L. and M.J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, E.V.; writing—review and editing, M.B.-L., T.R., G.E.G.-L., M.J.H. and E.V.; supervision, E.V. and G.E.G.-L.; funding acquisition, M.B.-L. and G.E.G.-L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by FUNDACION CANARIA COLEGIO DE MEDICOS DE LAS PALMAS, Grant No. 26/2021. The APC was funded by Maastricht University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. Additional data are available upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ana Martinez-Olaizola for her technical and administrative support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Hundscheid, T.; Onland, W.; Van Overmeire, B.; Dijk, P.; van Kaam, A.H.; Dijkman, K.P.; Kooi, E.M.; Villamor, E.; Kroon, A.A.; Visser, R. Early treatment versus expectative management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: A multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial in Europe (BeNeDuctus trial). BMC Pediatrics 2018, 18, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Reese, J.; Laughon, M.M. The patent ductus arteriosus problem: Infants who still need treatment. J. Pediatrics 2015, 167, 954–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Sallmon, H.; Koehne, P.; Hansmann, G. Recent advances in the treatment of preterm newborn infants with patent ductus arteriosus. Clin. Perinatol. 2016, 43, 113–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Villamor, E.; Moreno, L.; Mohammed, R.; Pérez-Vizcaíno, F.; Cogolludo, A. Reactive oxygen species as mediators of oxygen signaling during fetal-to-neonatal circulatory transition. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 142, 82–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Stoller, J.Z.; DeMauro, S.B.; Dagle, J.M.; Reese, J. Current perspectives on pathobiology of the ductus arteriosus. J. Clin. Exp. Cardiol. 2012, 8, S8-001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gillam-Krakauer, M.; Reese, J. Diagnosis and management of patent ductus arteriosus. Neoreviews 2018, 19, e394–e402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hajj, H.; Dagle, J.M. Genetics of patent ductus arteriosus susceptibility and treatment. Semin. Perinatol. 2012, 36, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schneider, D.J. The patent ductus arteriosus in term infants, children, and adults. Semin. Perinatol. 2012, 36, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. de Waal, K.; Prasad, R.; Kluckow, M. Patent ductus arteriosus management and the drift towards therapeutic nihilism–What is the evidence? Semin. Perinatol. 2021, 26, 101219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. El-Khuffash, A.; Rios, D.R.; McNamara, P.J. Toward a Rational Approach to Patent Ductus Arteriosus Trials: Selecting the Population of Interest. J. Pediatrics 2021, 233, 11–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Putting gender on the agenda. Nature 2010, 465, 665. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kardys, I.; Vliegenthart, R.; Oudkerk, M.; Hofman, A.; Witteman, J.C. The female advantage in cardiovascular disease: Do vascular beds contribute equally? Am. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 166, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Van Oyen, H.; Nusselder, W.; Jagger, C.; Kolip, P.; Cambois, E.; Robine, J.-M. Gender differences in healthy life years within the EU: An exploration of the “health–survival” paradox. Int. J. Public Health 2013, 58, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Townsend, E.A.; Miller, V.M.; Prakash, Y. Sex differences and sex steroids in lung health and disease. Endocr. Rev. 2012, 33, 1–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Shim, S.-Y.; Cho, S.J.; Kong, K.A.; Park, E.A. Gestational age-specific sex difference in mortality and morbidities of preterm infants: A nationwide study. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Mohamed, M.A.; Aly, H. Male gender is associated with intraventricular hemorrhage. Pediatrics 2010, 125, e333–e339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. O’Driscoll, D.N.; McGovern, M.; Greene, C.M.; Molloy, E.J. Gender disparities in preterm neonatal outcomes. Acta Paediatr. 2018, 107, 1494–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Raju, T.N.; Buist, A.S.; Blaisdell, C.J.; Moxey-Mims, M.; Saigal, S. Adults born preterm: A review of general health and system-specific outcomes. Acta Paediatr. 2017, 106, 1409–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. van Westering-Kroon, E.; Huizing, M.J.; Villamor-Martínez, E.; Villamor, E. Male Disadvantage in Oxidative Stress-Associated Complications of Prematurity: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nagasawa, H.; Hamada, C.; Wakabayashi, M.; Nakagawa, Y.; Nomura, S.; Kohno, Y. Time to spontaneous ductus arteriosus closure in full-term neonates. Open Heart 2016, 3, e000413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Arena, J.F.P.; Smith, D.W. Sex liability to single structural defects. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1978, 132, 970–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Singham, K.; Wong, H. Patent ductus arteriosus in Malaysia. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 1979, 9, 174–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Aubry, P.; Demian, H. Sex differences in congenital heart disease. Ann. Cardiol. Angeiol. 2016, 65, 440–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sampayo, F.; Pinto, F.F. The sex distribution of congenital cardiopathies. Acta Med. Port. 1994, 7, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Šamánek, M. Boy: Girl ratio in children born with different forms of cardiac malformation: A population-based study. Pediatric Cardiol. 1994, 15, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, C.; Zhu, X.; Li, D.; Shi, Y. Related Factors of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Pediatrics 2020, 8, 605879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Simon, S.R.; Van Zogchel, L.; Bas-Suárez, M.P.; Cavallaro, G.; Clyman, R.I.; Villamor, E. Platelet counts and patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neonatology 2015, 108, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Behbodi, E.; Villamor-Martínez, E.; Degraeuwe, P.L.; Villamor, E. Chorioamnionitis appears not to be a risk factor for patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Villamor-Martinez, E.; Kilani, M.A.; Degraeuwe, P.L.; Clyman, R.I.; Villamor, E. Intrauterine growth restriction and patent ductus arteriosus in very and extremely preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. González-Luis, G.; Ghirardello, S.; Bas-Suárez, P.; Cavallaro, G.; Mosca, F.; Clyman, R.I.; Villamor, E. Platelet counts and patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Pediatrics 2021, 965, 613766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Higgins, J.P.; Thompson, S.G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 2002, 21, 1539–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Adrouche-Amrani, L.; Green, R.S.; Gluck, K.M.; Lin, J. Failure of a repeat course of cyclooxygenase inhibitor to close a PDA is a risk factor for developing chronic lung disease in ELBW infants. BMC Pediatrics 2012, 12, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Ahamed, M.; Verma, P.; Lee, S.; Vega, M.; Wang, D.; Kim, M.; Fuloria, M. Predictors of successful closure of patent ductus arteriosus with indomethacin. J. Perinatol. 2015, 35, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ahmed, E.G.; Samra, N.M.; Amin, S.A.; Borayek, H.A.; Abdelrazek, G. Platelets and platelet derived growth factor and ductus arteriosus in preterm neonates. Prog. Pediatric Cardiol. 2020, 57, 101226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aikio, O.; Harkin, P.; Saarela, T.; Hallman, M. Early paracetamol treatment associated with lowered risk of persistent ductus arteriosus in very preterm infants. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014, 27, 1252–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Akar, S.; Topcuoglu, S.; Tuten, A.; Ozalkaya, E.; Karatepe, H.O.; Gokmen, T.; Ovali, F.; Karatekin, G. Is the First Postnatal Platelet Mass as an Indicator of Patent Ductus Arteriosus? Arch. Iran. Med. 2019, 22, 687. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Alan, S.; Karadeniz, C.; Okulu, E.; Kılıc, A.; Erdeve, O.; Ucar, T.; Atasay, B.; Atalay, S.; Arsan, S. Management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: Clinical judgment might be a fair option. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013, 26, 1850–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Asrani, P.; Aly, A.M.; Jiwani, A.K.; Niebuhr, B.R.; Christenson, R.H.; Jain, S.K. High-sensitivity troponin T in preterm infants with a hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus. J. Perinatol. 2018, 38, 1483–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Antonucci, R.; Cuzzolin, L.; Arceri, A.; Dessì, A.; Fanos, V. Changes in urinary PGE 2 after ibuprofen treatment in preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2009, 65, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bas-Suárez, M.P.; González-Luis, G.E.; Saavedra, P.; Villamor, E. Platelet counts in the first seven days of life and patent ductus arteriosus in preterm very low-birth-weight infants. Neonatology 2014, 106, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Becerra, G.H.; Bernárdez Zapata, I.; Iglesias Leboreiro, J.; Bahena, E.J.P.; Rendón Macías, M.E. Medical care of children‹ 30 weeks gestation with ductus arteriosus persistent. Rev. Mex. De Pediatría 2013, 80, 131–135. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bertino, E.; Coscia, A.; Boni, L.; Rossi, C.; Martano, C.; Giuliani, F.; Fabris, C.; Spada, E.; Zolin, A.; Milani, S. Weight growth velocity of very low birth weight infants: Role of gender, gestational age and major morbidities. Early Hum. Dev. 2009, 85, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Boghossian, N.S.; Geraci, M.; Edwards, E.M.; Horbar, J.D. Sex differences in mortality and morbidity of infants born at less than 30 weeks’ gestation. Pediatrics 2018, 142, e20182352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Bonamy, A.-K.E.; Gudmundsdottir, A.; Maier, R.F.; Toome, L.; Zeitlin, J.; Bonet, M.; Fenton, A.; Hasselager, A.B.; Van Heijst, A.; Gortner, L. Patent ductus arteriosus treatment in very preterm infants: A European population-based cohort study (EPICE) on variation and outcomes. Neonatology 2017, 111, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Boo, N.Y.; Mohd-Amin, I.; Bilkis, A.; Yong-Junina, F. Predictors of failed closure of patent ductus arteriosus with indomethacin. Singapore Med. J. 2006, 47, 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bravo Laguna, M.C. Evaluación del Tratamiento Farmacológico Convencional Para el Cierre del Ductus Arterioso Persistencte en el Recién Nacido Pretérmino: Impacto de Nuevas Líneas Terapéuticas. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 2011. Available online: https://repositorio.uam.es/bitstream/handle/10486/7350/41683_bravo_laguna_mari_carmen.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 15 June 2022).
  47. Breatnach, C.R.; Franklin, O.; James, A.T.; McCallion, N.; Afif, E.-K. The impact of a hyperdynamic left ventricle on right ventricular function measurements in preterm infants with a patent ductus arteriosus. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017, 102, F446–F450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Breatnach, C.R.; Franklin, O.; McCallion, N.; Afif, E.-K. The effect of a significant patent ductus arteriosus on Doppler flow patterns of preductal vessels: An assessment of the brachiocephalic artery. J. Pediatrics 2017, 180, 279–281.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Brooks, J.; Travadi, J.; Patole, S.; Doherty, D.; Simmer, K. Is surgical ligation of patent ductus arteriosus necessary? The Western Australian experience of conservative management. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005, 90, F235–F239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Brunner, B.; Hoeck, M.; Schermer, E.; Streif, W.; Kiechl-Kohlendorfer, U. Patent ductus arteriosus, low platelets, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, and intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight preterm infants. J. Pediatrics 2013, 163, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Buddhe, S.; Dhuper, S.; Kim, R.; Weichbrod, L.; Mahdi, E.; Shah, N.; Kona, S.; Sokal, M. NT-proBNP levels improve the ability of predicting a hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in very low-birth-weight infants. J. Clin. Neonatol. 2012, 1, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Cakir, U.; Tayman, C. A mystery of patent ductus arteriosus and serum osmolality in preterm infants. Am. J. Perinatol. 2019, 36, 641–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chen, H.-L.; Yang, R.-C.; Lee, W.-T.; Lee, P.-L.; Hsu, J.-H.; Wu, J.-R.; Dai, Z.-K. Lung function in very preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus under conservative management: An observational study. BMC Pediatrics 2015, 15, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chessex, P.; Khashu, M.; Harrison, A.; Hosking, M.; Sargent, M.; Lavoie, J.-C. Early life events, sex, and arterial blood pressure in critically ill infants. Pediatric Crit. Care Med. 2010, 11, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chock, V.Y.; Punn, R.; Oza, A.; Benitz, W.E.; Van Meurs, K.P.; Whittemore, A.S.; Behzadian, F.; Silverman, N.H. Predictors of bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death in premature infants with a patent ductus arteriosus. Pediatric Res. 2014, 75, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Chock, V.Y.; Ramamoorthy, C.; Van Meurs, K.P. Cerebral oxygenation during different treatment strategies for a patent ductus arteriosus. Neonatology 2011, 100, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chock, V.Y.; Rose, L.A.; Mante, J.V.; Punn, R. Near-infrared spectroscopy for detection of a significant patent ductus arteriosus. Pediatric Res. 2016, 80, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Choi, B.M.; Lee, K.H.; Eun, B.L.; Yoo, K.H.; Hong, Y.S.; Son, C.S.; Lee, J.W. Utility of rapid B-type natriuretic peptide assay for diagnosis of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2005, 115, e255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Clyman, R.I.; Hills, N.K. The effect of prolonged tracheal intubation on the association between patent ductus arteriosus and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (grades 2 and 3). J. Perinatol. 2020, 40, 1358–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Collins, R.T., II; Lyle, R.E.; Rettiganti, M.; Gossett, J.M.; Robbins, J.M.; Casey, P.H. Long-Term Neurodevelopment of Low-Birthweight, Preterm Infants with Patent Ductus Arteriosus. J. Pediatrics 2018, 203, 170–176.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Coviello, C.; Tataranno, M.L.; Corsini, I.; Leonardi, V.; Longini, M.; Bazzini, F.; Buonocore, G.; Dani, C. Isoprostanes as biomarker for patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Front. Pediatrics 2020, 8, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dagle, J.M.; Lepp, N.T.; Cooper, M.E.; Schaa, K.L.; Kelsey, K.J.; Orr, K.L.; Caprau, D.; Zimmerman, C.R.; Steffen, K.M.; Johnson, K.J. Determination of genetic predisposition to patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2009, 123, 1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Dagle, J.M.; Ryckman, K.K.; Spracklen, C.N.; Momany, A.M.; Cotten, C.M.; Levy, J.; Page, G.P.; Bell, E.F.; Carlo, W.A.; Shankaran, S. Genetic variants associated with patent ductus arteriosus in extremely preterm infants. J. Perinatol. 2019, 39, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Dani, C.; Bertini, G.; Corsini, I.; Elia, S.; Vangi, V.; Pratesi, S.; Rubaltelli, F.F. The fate of ductus arteriosus in infants at 23–27 weeks of gestation: From spontaneous closure to ibuprofen resistance. Acta Paediatr. 2008, 97, 1176–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Demir, N.; Peker, E.; Ece, İ.; Ağengin, K.; Bulan, K.A.; Tuncer, O. Is platelet mass a more significant indicator than platelet count of closure of patent ductus arteriosus? J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016, 29, 1915–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Derzbach, L.; Treszl, A.; Balogh, Á.; Vásárhelyi, B.; Tulassay, T.; Rigó, J.J. Gender dependent association between perinatal morbidity and estrogen receptor-alpha Pvull polymorphism. J. Perinat Med. 2005, 33, 461–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dix, L.; Molenschot, M.; Breur, J.; de Vries, W.; Vijlbrief, D.; Groenendaal, F.; Van Bel, F.; Lemmers, P. Cerebral oxygenation and echocardiographic parameters in preterm neonates with a patent ductus arteriosus: An observational study. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016, 101, F520–F526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. El-Khuffash, A.F.; Molloy, E.J. Influence of a patent ductus arteriosus on cardiac troponin T levels in preterm infants. J. Pediatrics 2008, 153, 350–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Elsmen, E.; Hansen Pupp, I.; Hellstrom-Westas, L. Preterm male infants need more initial respiratory and circulatory support than female infants. Acta Paediatr. 2004, 93, 529–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Engeseth, M.S.; Engan, M.; Clemm, H.; Vollsæter, M.; Nilsen, R.M.; Markestad, T.; Halvorsen, T.; Røksund, O.D. Voice and Exercise Related Respiratory Symptoms in Extremely Preterm Born Children After Neonatal Patent Ductus Arteriosus. Front. Pediatrics 2020, 8, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Engür, D.; Kaynak-Türkmen, M.; Deveci, M.; Yenisey, Ç. Platelets and platelet-derived growth factor in closure of the ductus arteriosus. Turk. J. Pediatrics 2015, 57, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fink, D.; Nitzan, I.; Bin-Nun, A.; Mimouni, F.; Hammerman, C. Ductus arteriosus outcome with focus on the initially patent but hemodynamically insignificant ductus in preterm neonates. J. Perinatol. 2018, 38, 1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Flood, T.; Guthrie, J.D. Echocardiographic markers for the prediction of nonclosure of the patent ductus arteriosus in premature neonates. J. Diagn. Med. Sonogr. 2015, 31, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Furzan, J.A.; Reisch, J.; Tyson, J.E.; Laird, P.; Rosenfeld, C.R. Incidence and risk factors for symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus among inborn very-low-birth-weight infants. Early Hum. Dev. 1985, 12, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ghirardello, S.; Raffaeli, G.; Crippa, B.L.; Gulden, S.; Amodeo, I.; Consonni, D.; Cavallaro, G.; Schena, F.; Mosca, F. The Thromboelastographic Profile at Birth in Very Preterm Newborns with Patent Ductus Arteriosus. Neonatology 2020, 117, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Godambe, S.; Newby, B.; Shah, V.; Shah, P.S. Effect of indomethacin on closure of ductus arteriosus in very-low-birthweight neonates. Acta Pædiatrica 2006, 95, 1389–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gomez-Pomar, E.; Makhoul, M.; Westgate, P.M.; Ibonia, K.T.; Patwardhan, A.; Giannone, P.J.; Bada, H.S.; Jawdeh, E.G.A. Relationship between perfusion index and patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Pediatric Res. 2017, 81, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Goudjil, S.; Imestouren, F.; Chazal, C.; Ghostine, G.; Wallois, F.; Leke, A.; Kongolo, G. Patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants is associated with cardiac autonomic alteration and predominant parasympathetic stimulation. Early Hum. Dev. 2013, 89, 631–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Griesmaier, E.; Santuari, E.; Edlinger, M.; Neubauer, V.; Waltner-Romen, M.; Kiechl-Kohlendorfer, U. Differences in the maturation of amplitude-integrated EEG signals in male and female preterm infants. Neonatology 2014, 105, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Grosfeld, J.L.; Chaet, M.; Molinari, F.; Engle, W.; Engum, S.A.; West, K.W.; Rescorla, F.J.; Scherer, L., III. Increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants with patent ductus arteriosus treated with indomethacin. Ann. Surg. 1996, 224, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Halil, H.; Buyuktiryaki, M.; Atay, F.Y.; Yekta Oncel, M.; Uras, N. Reopening of the ductus arteriosus in preterm infants; Clinical aspects and subsequent consequences. J. Neonatal-Perinat. Med. 2018, 11, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Halliday, H.; Hirata, T.; Brady, J. Indomethacin therapy for large patent ductus arteriosus in the very low birth weight infant: Results and complications. Pediatrics 1979, 64, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Hammoud, M.S.; Elsori, H.A.; Hanafi, E.A.; Shalabi, A.A.; Fouda, I.A.; Devarajan, L.V. Incidence and risk factors associated with the patency of ductus arteriosus in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome in Kuwait. Saudi Med. J. 2003, 24, 982–985. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Härkin, P.; Härmä, A.; Aikio, O.; Valkama, M.; Leskinen, M.; Saarela, T.; Hallman, M. Paracetamol accelerates closure of the ductus arteriosus after premature birth: A randomized trial. J. Pediatrics 2016, 177, 72–77.e72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Härkin, P.; Marttila, R.; Pokka, T.; Saarela, T.; Hallman, M. Morbidities associated with patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Nationwide cohort study. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018, 31, 2576–2583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Harris, C.; Zivanovic, S.; Lunt, A.; Calvert, S.; Bisquera, A.; Marlow, N.; Peacock, J.L.; Greenough, A. Lung function and respiratory outcomes in teenage boys and girls born very prematurely. Pediatric Pulmonol. 2020, 55, 682–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Harris, S.L.; More, K.; Dixon, B.; Troughton, R.; Pemberton, C.; Horwood, J.; Ellis, N.; Austin, N. Factors affecting N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels in preterm infants and use in determination of haemodynamic significance of patent ductus arteriosus. Eur. J. Pediatrics 2018, 177, 521–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hintz, S.R.; Kendrick, D.E.; Vohr, B.R.; Poole, W.K.; Higgins, R.D.; Network, N.N.R. Gender differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely preterm, extremely-low-birthweight infants. Acta Paediatr. 2006, 95, 1239–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hoodbhoy, S.A.; Cutting, H.A.; Seddon, J.A.; Campbell, M.E. Cerebral and splanchnic hemodynamics after duct ligation in very low birth weight infants. J. Pediatrics 2009, 154, 196–200.e192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hsu, J.-H.; Yang, S.-N.; Chen, H.-L.; Tseng, H.-I.; Dai, Z.-K.; Wu, J.-R. B-type natriuretic peptide predicts responses to indomethacin in premature neonates with patent ductus arteriosus. J. Pediatrics 2010, 157, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hsu, K.-H.; Wu, T.-W.; Wu, I.-H.; Lai, M.-Y.; Hsu, S.-Y.; Huang, H.-W.; Mok, T.-Y.; Lee, C.-C.; Lien, R. Baseline cardiac output and its alterations during ibuprofen treatment for patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. BMC Pediatrics 2019, 19, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Inayat, M.; Bany-Mohammed, F.; Valencia, A.; Tay, C.; Jacinto, J.; Aranda, J.V.; Beharry, K.D. Antioxidants and biomarkers of oxidative stress in preterm infants with symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus. Am. J. Perinatol. 2015, 32, 895–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Isayama, T.; Mirea, L.; Mori, R.; Kusuda, S.; Fujimura, M.; Lee, S.K.; Shah, P.S.; Neonatal Research Network of Japan; Canadian Neonatal Network. Patent ductus arteriosus management and outcomes in Japan and Canada: Comparison of proactive and selective approaches. Am. J. Perinatol. 2015, 32, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Ito, M.; Tamura, M.; Namba, F. Neonatal Research Network of Japan. Role of sex in morbidity and mortality of very premature neonates. Pediatrics Int. 2017, 59, 898–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Janz-Robinson, E.M.; Badawi, N.; Walker, K.; Bajuk, B.; Abdel-Latif, M.E.; Bowen, J.; Sedgley, S.; Carlisle, H.; Smith, J.; Craven, P. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of premature infants treated for patent ductus arteriosus: A population-based cohort study. J. Pediatrics 2015, 167, 1025–1032.e1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Jennische, M.; Sedin, G. Gender differences in outcome after neonatal intensive care: Speech and language skills are less influenced in boys than in girls at 6.5 years. Acta Paediatr. 2003, 92, 364–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Jhaveri, N.; Moon-Grady, A.; Clyman, R.I. Early surgical ligation versus a conservative approach for management of patent ductus arteriosus that fails to close after indomethacin treatment. J. Pediatrics 2010, 157, 381–387.e381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Jim, W.-T.; Chiu, N.-C.; Chen, M.-R.; Hung, H.-Y.; Kao, H.-A.; Hsu, C.-H.; Chang, J.-H. Cerebral hemodynamic change and intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants with patent ductus arteriosus. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2005, 31, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Jones, H.P.; Karuri, S.; Cronin, C.M.; Ohlsson, A.; Peliowski, A.; Synnes, A.; Lee, S.K. Actuarial survival of a large Canadian cohort of preterm infants. BMC Pediatrics 2005, 5, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Juujärvi, S.; Saarela, T.; Hallman, M.; Aikio, O. Intravenous paracetamol was associated with closure of the ductus arteriosus in extremely premature infants. Acta Paediatr. 2018, 107, 605–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kahvecioglu, D.; Erdeve, O.; Akduman, H.; Ucar, T.; Alan, S.; Çakır, U.; Yıldız, D.; Atasay, B.; Arsan, S.; Atalay, S. Influence of platelet count, platelet mass index, and platelet function on the spontaneous closure of ductus arteriosus in the prematurity. Pediatrics Neonatol. 2018, 59, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Kara, M.; Bilen, M.M.; Tekgündüz, K.Ş.; Laloğlu, F.; Ceviz, N. Relation of shunt index with the patent ductus arteriosus among preterm infants under 30 weeks or 1500 g. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019, 33, 4016–4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Karabulut, B.; Arcagök, B.C.; Simsek, A. Utility of the Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Diagnosing and Predicting Treatment Success in Preterm Neonates with Patent Ductus Arteriosus. Fetal Pediatric Pathol. 2019, 40, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Katheria, V.; Poeltler, D.; Brown, M.; Hassen, K.; Patel, D.; Rich, W.; Finer, N.; Katheria, A. Early prediction of a significant patent ductus arteriosus in infants <32 weeks gestational age. J. Neonatal-Perinat. Med. 2018, 11, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Kaur, S.; Stritzke, A.; Soraisham, A.S. Does Postmenstrual Age Affect Medical Patent Ductus Arteriosus Treatment Success in Preterm Infants? Am. J. Perinatol. 2019, 36, 1504–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kazanci, E.G.; Buyuktiryaki, M.; Unsal, H.; Tayman, C. Useful platelet indices for the diagnosis and follow-up of patent ductus arteriosus. Am. J. Perinatol. 2019, 36, 1521–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kent, A.L.; Wright, I.M.; Abdel-Latif, M.E. Mortality and adverse neurologic outcomes are greater in preterm male infants. Pediatrics 2012, 129, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kim, E.S.; Kim, E.-K.; Choi, C.W.; Kim, H.-S.; Kim, B.I.; Choi, J.-H.; Park, J.S.; Moon, K.C. Intrauterine inflammation as a risk factor for persistent ductus arteriosus patency after cyclooxygenase inhibition in extremely low birth weight infants. J. Pediatrics 2010, 157, 745–750.e741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kim, J.S.; Shim, E.J. B-type natriuretic Peptide assay for the diagnosis and prognosis of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Korean Circ. J. 2012, 42, 192–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Kwinta, P.; Rudzinski, A.; Kruczek, P.; Kordon, Z.; Pietrzyk, J.J. Can early echocardiographic findings predict patent ductus arteriosus? Neonatology 2009, 95, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Laughon, M.; Bose, C.; Clark, R. Treatment strategies to prevent or close a patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants and outcomes. J. Perinatol. 2007, 27, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Lauterbach, M.D.; Raz, S.; Sander, C.J. Neonatal hypoxic risk in preterm birth infants: The influence of sex and severity of respiratory distress on cognitive recovery. Neuropsychology 2001, 15, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Ledo, A.; Aguar, M.; Núñez-Ramiro, A.; Saénz, P.; Vento, M. Abdominal near-infrared spectroscopy detects low mesenteric perfusion early in preterm infants with hemodynamic significant ductus arteriosus. Neonatology 2017, 112, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Leonhardt, A.; Isken, V.; Kühl, P.; Seyberth, H. Prolonged indomethacin treatment in preterm infants with symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus: Efficacy, drug level monitoring, and patient selection. Eur. J. Pediatrics 1987, 146, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Letshwiti, J.B.; Sirc, J.; O’Kelly, R.; Miletin, J. Serial N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide measurement as a predictor of significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants beyond the first week of life. Eur. J. Pediatrics 2014, 173, 1491–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Li, D.; Rosito, G.; Slagle, T. Probiotics for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates: An 8-year retrospective cohort study. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2013, 38, 445–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Louis, D.; Wong, C.; Ye, X.Y.; McNamara, P.J.; Jain, A. Factors associated with non-response to second course indomethacin for PDA treatment in preterm neonates. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018, 31, 1407–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Madan, J.; Fiascone, J.; Balasubramanian, V.; Griffith, J.; Hagadorn, J.I. Predictors of ductal closure and intestinal complications in very low birth weight infants treated with indomethacin. Neonatology 2008, 94, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Madan, J.C.; Kendrick, D.; Hagadorn, J.I.; Frantz III, I.D.; Health, N.I.o.C.; Network, H.D.N.R. Patent ductus arteriosus therapy: Impact on neonatal and 18-month outcome. Pediatrics 2009, 123, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Martin, C.G.; Snider, A.R.; Katz, S.M.; Peabody, J.L.; Brady, J.P. Abnormal cerebral blood flow patterns in preterm infants with a large patent ductus arteriosus. J. Pediatrics 1982, 101, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Meinarde, L.; Hillman, M.; Rizzotti, A.; Basquiera, A.L.; Tabares, A.; Cuestas, E. C-reactive protein, platelets, and patent ductus arteriosus. Platelets 2016, 27, 821–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Mellander, M.; Leheup, B.; Lindstrom, D.P.; Palme, C.; Graham Jr, T.P.; Stahlman, M.T.; Cotton, R.B. Recurrence of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in extremely premature infants, treated with indomethacin. J. Pediatrics 1984, 105, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Mine, K.; Ohashi, A.; Tsuji, S.; Nakashima, J.; Hirabayashi, M.; Kaneko, K. B-type natriuretic peptide for assessment of haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants. Acta Paediatr. 2013, 102, e347–e352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Natarajan, G.; Shankaran, S.; McDonald, S.A.; Das, A.; Ehrenkranz, R.A.; Goldberg, R.N.; Stoll, B.J.; Tyson, J.E.; Higgins, R.D.; Schendel, D. Association Between Blood Spot Transforming Growth Factor-β and Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Extremely Low-Birth Weight Infants. Pediatric Cardiol. 2013, 34, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Nemerofsky, S.L.; Parravicini, E.; Bateman, D.; Kleinman, C.; Polin, R.A.; Lorenz, J.M. The ductus arteriosus rarely requires treatment in infants >1000 grams. Am. J. Perinatol. 2008, 25, 661–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Neubauer, V.; Griesmaier, E.; Ralser, E.; Kiechl-Kohlendorfer, U. The effect of sex on outcome of preterm infants—A population-based survey. Acta Paediatr. 2012, 101, 906–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Nizarali, Z.; Marques, T.; Costa, C.; Barroso, R.; Cunha, M. Patent Ductus Arteriosus: Perinatal Risk Factors. J. Neonatal Biol. 2012, 1, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Nuntnarumit, P.; Khositseth, A.; Thanomsingh, P. N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide and patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. J. Perinatol. 2009, 29, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. O’Rourke, D.J.; El-Khuffash, A.; Moody, C.; Walsh, K.; Molloy, E.J. Patent ductus arteriosus evaluation by serial echocardiography in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2008, 97, 574–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Oh, S.H.; Lee, B.S.; Jung, E.; Oh, M.Y.; Do, H.-J.; Kim, E.A.-R.; Kim, K.-S. Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide cannot predict treatment response to ibuprofen in preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 4430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Okur, N.; Tayman, C.; Büyüktiryaki, M.; Kadıoğlu Şimşek, G.; Ozer Bekmez, B.; Altuğ, N. Can lactate levels be used as a marker of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm babies? J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2019, 33, e22664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Oliveira, A.; Soares, P.; Flor-de-Lima, F.; Neves, A.L.S.; Guimarães, H.l. PDA management in VLBW infants: Experience of a level III NICU. J. Pediatric Neonatal Individ. Med. 2016, 5, e050227. [Google Scholar]
  133. Olsson, K.W.; Jonzon, A.; Sindelar, R. Early haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus does not predict future persistence in extremely preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2019, 108, 1590–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Olsson, K.W.; Larsson, A.; Jonzon, A.; Sindelar, R. Exploration of potential biochemical markers for persistence of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants at 22–27 weeks’ gestation. Pediatric Res. 2018, 86, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Olukman, O.; Ozdemir, R.; Karadeniz, C.; Calkavur, S.; Mese, T.; Vergin, C. Is there a relationship between platelet parameters and patency of ductus arteriosus in preterm infants? Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 2017, 28, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Bekmez, B.O.; Tayman, C.; Buyuktiryaki, M.; Cetinkaya, A.K.; Cakir, U.; Derme, T. A promising, novel index in the diagnosis and follow-up of patent ductus arteriosus: Red cell distribution width-to-platelet ratio. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2018, 32, e22616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Patole, S.K.; Kumaran, V.; Travadi, J.N.; Brooks, J.M.; Doherty, D.A. Does patent ductus arteriosus affect feed tolerance in preterm neonates? Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007, 92, F53–F55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Peacock, J.L.; Marston, L.; Marlow, N.; Calvert, S.A.; Greenough, A. Neonatal and infant outcome in boys and girls born very prematurely. Pediatric Res. 2012, 71, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Pees, C.; Walch, E.; Obladen, M.; Koehne, P. Echocardiography predicts closure of patent ductus arteriosus in response to ibuprofen in infants less than 28 week gestational age. Early Hum. Dev. 2010, 86, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Pereira, S.S.; Kempley, S.T.; Shah, D.K.; Morris, J.K.; Sinha, A.K. Early echocardiography does not predict subsequent treatment of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in extremely preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2018, 107, 1909–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Polat, T.B.; Celik, I.H.; Erdeve, O. Early predictive echocardiographic features of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm VLBW infants. Pediatrics Int. 2016, 58, 589–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Pourarian, S.; Farahbakhsh, N.; Sharma, D.; Cheriki, S.; Bijanzadeh, F. Prevalence and risk factors associated with the patency of ductus arteriosus in premature neonates: A prospective observational study from Iran. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017, 30, 1460–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Reller, M.D.; Lorenz, J.M.; Kotagal, U.R.; Meyer, R.A.; Kaplan, S. Hemodynamically significant PDA: An echocardiographic and clinical assessment of incidence, natural history, and outcome in very low birth weight infants maintained in negative fluid balance. Pediatric Cardiol. 1985, 6, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Rodriguez-Blanco, S.; Oulego-Erroz, I.; Gautreaux-Minaya, S.; Perez-Muñuzuri, A.; Couce-Pico, M.L. Early NT-proBNP levels as a screening tool for the detection of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus during the first week of life in very low birth weight infants. J. Perinatol. 2018, 38, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Romagnoli, V.; Pedini, A.; Santoni, M.; Scutti, G.; Colaneri, M.; Pozzi, M.; Cogo, P.E.; Carnielli, V.P. Patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants born before 30 weeks’ gestation: High rate of spontaneous closure after hospital discharge. Cardiol. Young 2018, 28, 995–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Rooney, S.R.; Shelton, E.L.; Aka, I.; Shaffer, C.M.; Clyman, R.I.; Dagle, J.M.; Ryckman, K.; Lewis, T.R.; Reese, J.; Van Driest, S.L. CYP2C9* 2 is associated with indomethacin treatment failure for patent ductus arteriosus. Pharmacogenomics 2019, 20, 939–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Sadeck, L.S.; Leone, C.R.; Procianoy, R.S.; Guinsburg, R.; Marba, S.; Martinez, F.E.; Rugolo, L.M.; Moreira, M.E.L.; Fiori, R.M.; Ferrari, L.L. Effects of therapeutic approach on the neonatal evolution of very low birth weight infants with patent ductus arteriosus. J. Pediatr. 2014, 90, 616–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Sallmon, H.; Weber, S.C.; Dirks, J.; Schiffer, T.; Klippstein, T.; Stein, A.; Felderhoff-Müser, U.; Metze, B.; Hansmann, G.; Bührer, C. Association between platelet counts before and during pharmacological therapy for patent ductus arteriosus and treatment failure in preterm infants. Front. Pediatrics 2018, 6, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Sallmon, H.; Weber, S.C.; Huning, B.; Stein, A.; Horn, P.A.; Metze, B.C.; Dame, C.; Buhrer, C.; Felderhoff-Muser, U.; Hansmann, G.; et al. Thrombocytopenia in the first 24 hours after birth and incidence of patent ductus arteriosus. Pediatrics 2012, 130, e623–e630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Sanjeev, S.; Pettersen, M.; Lua, J.; Thomas, R.; Shankaran, S.; L’Ecuyer, T. Role of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide in screening for hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm neonates. J. Perinatol. 2005, 25, 709–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Schwarz, C.E.; Preusche, A.; Wolf, M.; Poets, C.F.; Franz, A.R. Prospective observational study on assessing the hemodynamic relevance of patent ductus arteriosus with frequency domain near-infrared spectroscopy. BMC Pediatrics 2018, 18, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Sellmer, A.; Bjerre, J.V.; Schmidt, M.R.; McNamara, P.J.; Hjortdal, V.E.; Høst, B.; Bech, B.H.; Henriksen, T.B. Morbidity and mortality in preterm neonates with patent ductus arteriosus on day 3. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013, 98, F505–F510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Semberova, J.; Sirc, J.; Miletin, J.; Kucera, J.; Berka, I.; Sebkova, S.; O’Sullivan, S.; Franklin, O.; Stranak, Z. Spontaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus in infants ≤1500 g. Pediatrics 2017, 140, e20164258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Seon, H.-S.; Lee, J.-B.; Kim, I.-U.; Kim, S.-H.; Lee, J.-H.; Kim, D.-H.; Kim, H.-S. Association with ductus arteriosus closure by ibuprofen and intrauterine inflammation in very low birth weight infants. Korean J. Perinatol. 2013, 24, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Shah, N.A.; Hills, N.K.; Waleh, N.; McCurnin, D.; Seidner, S.; Chemtob, S.; Clyman, R. Relationship between circulating platelet counts and ductus arteriosus patency after indomethacin treatment. J. Pediatrics 2011, 158, 919–923.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  156. Skiöld, B.; Alexandrou, G.; Padilla, N.; Blennow, M.; Vollmer, B.; Ådén, U. Sex differences in outcome and associations with neonatal brain morphology in extremely preterm children. J. Pediatrics 2014, 164, 1012–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Stark, M.J.; Hodyl, N.A.; Wright, I.M.; Clifton, V. The influence of sex and antenatal betamethasone exposure on vasoconstrictors and the preterm microvasculature. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011, 24, 1215–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Steiner, M.; Salzer-Muhar, U.; Swoboda, V.; Unterasinger, L.; Baumgartner, S.; Waldhoer, T.; Langgartner, M.; Klebermass-Schrehof, K.; Berger, A. Preterm infants who later require duct ligation show different vital signs and pH in early postnatal life. Acta Paediatr. 2015, 104, e7–e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Stevenson, D.K.; Verter, J.; Fanaroff, A.A.; Oh, W.; Ehrenkranz, R.A.; Shankaran, S.; Donovan, E.F.; Wright, L.L.; Lemons, J.A.; Tyson, J.E. Sex differences in outcomes of very low birthweight infants: The newborn male disadvantage. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000, 83, F182–F185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Strauss, T.; Pessach, I.; Jacoby, E.; Schushan-Eisen, I.; Mazkereth, R.; Kuint, J. Carina angle measurements for diagnosis of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Neonatology 2011, 99, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Tauber, K.; Granina, E.; Doyle, R.; Munshi, U. Gestational and postnatal age influence B-type natriuretic peptide level used in diagnosis of a hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. J. Clin. Neonatol. 2016, 5, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Terek, D.; Yalaz, M.; Ulger, Z.; Koroglu, O.A.; Kultursay, N. Medical closure of patent ductus arteriosus does not reduce mortality and development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2014, 19, 1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Tioseco, J.A.; Aly, H.; Essers, J.; Patel, K.; El-Mohandes, A.A. Male sex and intraventricular hemorrhage. Pediatric Crit. Care Med. 2006, 7, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Uchiyama, A.; Nagasawa, H.; Yamamoto, Y.; Tatebayashi, K.; Suzuki, H.; Yamada, K.; Arai, M.; Kohno, Y. Clinical aspects of very-low-birthweight infants showing reopening of ductus arteriosus. Pediatrics Int. 2011, 53, 322–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Vaidya, R.; Knee, A.; Paris, Y.; Singh, R. Predictors of successful patent ductus arteriosus closure with acetaminophen in preterm infants. J. Perinatol. 2021, 41, 998–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. van de Bor, M.; Verloove-Vanhorick, S.P.; Brand, R.; Ruys, J.H. Patent ductus arteriosus in a cohort of 1338 preterm infants: A collaborative study. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 1988, 2, 328–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Velazquez, D.M.; Reidy, K.J.; Sharma, M.; Kim, M.; Vega, M.; Havranek, T. The effect of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus on acute kidney injury and systemic hypertension in extremely low gestational age newborns. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018, 32, 3209–3214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Vieux, R.; Desandes, R.; Boubred, F.; Semama, D.; Guillemin, F.; Buchweiller, M.-C.; Fresson, J.; Hascoet, J.-M. Ibuprofen in very preterm infants impairs renal function for the first month of life. Pediatric Nephrol. 2010, 25, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Visconti, L.F.; Morhy, S.S.; Deutsch, A.D.; Tavares, G.M.; Wilberg, T.J.; Rossi Fde, S. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics associated with the evolution of the ductus arteriosus in the neonate with birth weight lower than 1500 g. Einstein 2013, 11, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Weiss, H.; Cooper, B.; Brook, M.; Schlueter, M.; Clyman, R. Factors determining reopening of the ductus arteriosus after successful clinical closure with indomethacin. J. Pediatrics 1995, 127, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Weisz, D.E.; Mirea, L.; Rosenberg, E.; Jang, M.; Ly, L.; Church, P.T.; Kelly, E.; Kim, S.J.; Jain, A.; McNamara, P.J. Association of patent ductus arteriosus ligation with death or neurodevelopmental impairment among extremely preterm infants. JAMA Pediatrics 2017, 171, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Yang, C.-Z.; Lee, J. Factors affecting successful closure of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus with indomethacin in extremely low birth weight infants. World J. Clin. Pediatrics 2008, 4, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Yoon, M.J.; Yoon, H.S.; Chung, S.H.; Han, M.Y.; Bae, C.W. The factors associated with the efficacy of indomethacin treatment in premature infants with patent ductus arteriosus. Korean J. Pediatrics 2007, 50, 531–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Yum, S.K.; Moon, C.-J.; Youn, Y.-A.; Lee, J.Y.; Sung, I.K. Echocardiographic assessment of patent ductus arteriosus in very low birthweight infants over time: Prospective observational study. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018, 31, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Zanardo, V.; Vedovato, S.; Chiozza, L.; Faggian, D.; Favaro, F.; Trevisanuto, D. Pharmacological closure of patent ductus arteriosus: Effects on pulse pressure and on endothelin-1 and vasopressin excretion. Am. J. Perinatol. 2008, 25, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Zisk, J.L.; Genen, L.H.; Kirkby, S.; Webb, D.; Greenspan, J.; Dysart, K. Do premature female infants really do better than their male counterparts? Am. J. Perinatol. 2011, 28, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Zozaya, C.; Avila-Alvarez, A.; Arruza, L.; Rodrigo, F.G.-M.; Fernandez-Perez, C.; Castro, A.; Cuesta, M.T.; Vacas, B.; Couce, M.L.; Torres, M.V. The effect of morbidity and sex on postnatal growth of very preterm infants: A multicenter cohort study. Neonatology 2019, 115, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Clyman, R.I. Patent ductus arteriosus, its treatments, and the risks of pulmonary morbidity. Semin. Perinatol. 2018, 42, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Clyman, R.I.; Kaempf, J.; Liebowitz, M.; Erdeve, O.; Bulbul, A.; Håkansson, S.; Lindqvist, J.; Farooqi, A.; Katheria, A.; Sauberan, J. Prolonged tracheal intubation and the association between patent ductus arteriosus and bronchopulmonary dysplasia: A secondary analysis of the PDA-TOLERATE trial. J. Pediatrics 2021, 229, 283–288.e282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Drevenstedt, G.L.; Crimmins, E.M.; Vasunilashorn, S.; Finch, C.E. The rise and fall of excess male infant mortality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 5016–5021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Flinsenberg, T.W.; Van der Sterren, S.; van Cleef, A.N.; Schuurman, M.J.; Ågren, P.; Villamor, E. Effects of sex and estrogen on chicken ductus arteriosus reactivity. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2010, 298, R1217–R1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Bruggeman, V.; Van As, P.; Decuypere, E. Developmental endocrinology of the reproductive axis in the chicken embryo. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2002, 131, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Waxman, D.J.; Holloway, M.G. Sex differences in the expression of hepatic drug metabolizing enzymes. Mol. Pharmacol. 2009, 76, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  184. Madla, C.M.; Gavins, F.K.; Merchant, H.A.; Orlu, M.; Murdan, S.; Basit, A.W. Let’s talk about sex: Differences in drug therapy in males and females. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2021, 175, 113804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Franconi, F.; Campesi, I. Pharmacogenomics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: Interaction with biological differences between men and women. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 580–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  186. Mitra, S.; Florez, I.D.; Tamayo, M.E.; Mbuagbaw, L.; Vanniyasingam, T.; Veroniki, A.A.; Zea, A.M.; Zhang, Y.; Sadeghirad, B.; Thabane, L. Association of placebo, indomethacin, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen with closure of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama 2018, 319, 1221–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Gerges, S.H.; El-Kadi, A.O. Sex differences in eicosanoid formation and metabolism: A possible mediator of sex discrepancies in cardiovascular diseases. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 234, 108046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Pace, S.; Sautebin, L.; Werz, O. Sex-biased eicosanoid biology: Impact for sex differences in inflammation and consequences for pharmacotherapy. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2017, 145, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Pace, S.; Rossi, A.; Krauth, V.; Dehm, F.; Troisi, F.; Bilancia, R.; Weinigel, C.; Rummler, S.; Werz, O.; Sautebin, L. Sex differences in prostaglandin biosynthesis in neutrophils during acute inflammation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Ochoa, D.; Prieto-Pérez, R.; Román, M.; Talegón, M.; Rivas, A.; Galicia, I.; Abad-Santos, F.; Cabaleiro, T. Effect of gender and CYP2C9 and CYP2C8 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen enantiomers. Pharm. J. 2015, 16, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Soldin, O.P.; Chung, S.H.; Mattison, D.R. Sex differences in drug disposition. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011, 2011, 187103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Walker, J.S.; Carmody, J.J. Experimental pain in healthy human subjects: Gender differences in nociception and in response to ibuprofen. Anesth. Analg. 1998, 86, 1257–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Ohlsson, A.; Roberts, R.S.; Schmidt, B.; Davis, P.; Moddeman, D.; Saigal, S.; Solimano, A.; Vincer, M.; Wright, L.; trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms (TIPP) Investigators. Male/female differences in indomethacin effects in preterm infants. J. Pediatrics 2005, 147, 860–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Ment, L.R.; Vohr, B.R.; Makuch, R.W.; Westerveld, M.; Katz, K.H.; Schneider, K.C.; Duncan, C.C.; Ehrenkranz, R.; Oh, W.; Philip, A.G. Prevention of intraventricular hemorrhage by indomethacin in male preterm infants. J. Pediatrics 2004, 145, 832–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Ritz, S.A.; Antle, D.M.; Côté, J.; Deroy, K.; Fraleigh, N.; Messing, K.; Parent, L.; St-Pierre, J.; Vaillancourt, C.; Mergler, D. First steps for integrating sex and gender considerations into basic experimental biomedical research. FASEB J. 2014, 28, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Martin, Y.N.; Pabelick, C.M. Sex differences in the pulmonary circulation: Implications for pulmonary hypertension. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2014, 306, H1253–H1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  197. Stallings, E.; Antequera, A.; López-Alcalde, J.; García-Martín, M.; Urrútia, G.; Zamora, J. Sex as a Prognostic Factor in Systematic Reviews: Challenges and Lessons Learned. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jpm 12 01143 g001 550
Figure 1. Meta-analysis on the association between sex of preterm newborns and risk of developing any patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Any ductal shunt was compared with closed DA. The median incidence of PDA in the cohorts was 49.8% (range 12.4 to 82.4%); CI: confidence interval; Risk ratio above 1 means higher risk in males.
Figure 1. Meta-analysis on the association between sex of preterm newborns and risk of developing any patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Any ductal shunt was compared with closed DA. The median incidence of PDA in the cohorts was 49.8% (range 12.4 to 82.4%); CI: confidence interval; Risk ratio above 1 means higher risk in males.
Jpm 12 01143 g001
Jpm 12 01143 g002 550
Figure 2. Meta-analysis on the association between sex of preterm newborns and risk of developing hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA). Large ductal shunts were compared with small shunts plus closed DA. The median incidence of hsPDA in the cohorts was 36.7% (range 10.7 to 83.6%); CI: confidence interval; Risk ratio above 1 means higher risk in males.
Figure 2. Meta-analysis on the association between sex of preterm newborns and risk of developing hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA). Large ductal shunts were compared with small shunts plus closed DA. The median incidence of hsPDA in the cohorts was 36.7% (range 10.7 to 83.6%); CI: confidence interval; Risk ratio above 1 means higher risk in males.
Jpm 12 01143 g002
Jpm 12 01143 g003 550
Figure 3. Meta-analysis on the association between sex of preterm newborns and risk of developing hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA). Large ductal shunts were compared with small shunts. The median incidence of hsPDA in the cohorts was 48.3% (range 24.3 to 89.2%). CI: confidence interval; Risk ratio above 1 means higher risk in males.
Figure 3. Meta-analysis on the association between sex of preterm newborns and risk of developing hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA). Large ductal shunts were compared with small shunts. The median incidence of hsPDA in the cohorts was 48.3% (range 24.3 to 89.2%). CI: confidence interval; Risk ratio above 1 means higher risk in males.
Jpm 12 01143 g003
Jpm 12 01143 g004 550
Figure 4. Meta-analysis on the association between sex of preterm newborns and rate of response to pharmacological treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). CI: confidence interval. COX: cyclooxygenase. Risk ratio above 1 means higher response in males.
Figure 4. Meta-analysis on the association between sex of preterm newborns and rate of response to pharmacological treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). CI: confidence interval. COX: cyclooxygenase. Risk ratio above 1 means higher response in males.
Jpm 12 01143 g004
Table
Table 1. Main meta-analyses.
Table 1. Main meta-analyses.
Meta-AnalysisKRR95% CIpHeterogeneity
Lower LimitUpper LimitI2 (%)p
Any PDA vs. closed DA371.0250.9731.0810.35153.20.000
hsPDA vs. (small PDA + closed DA)810.9960.9741.0180.71522.10.045
hsPDA vs. small PDA280.9900.9471.0350.6516.00.374
Responders vs. non responders451.0070.9791.0360.61014.40.207
CI: confidence interval; DA: ductus arteriosus; hs: hemodinamically significant; K: number of studies; PDA: patent ductus arteriosus; RR: risk ratio.
Table
Table 2. Subgroup analysis based on inclusion criteria for gestational age.
Table 2. Subgroup analysis based on inclusion criteria for gestational age.
Meta-Analysis SubgroupKRR95% CIpHeterogeneity
Lower LimitUpper LimitI2 (%)p
Any PDA vs. closed DAGA < 29 weeks261.0230.9581.0920.50251.70.001
GA ≥ 29 weeks101.0470.9331.1750.43453.30.023
hsPDA vs. (small PDA + closed DA)GA < 29 weeks501.0060.9791.0330.68817.70.143
GA ≥ 29 weeks300.9770.9311.0250.33423.00.130
hsPDA vs. small PDAGA < 29 weeks171.0240.9361.1190.60917.80.245
GA ≥ 29 weeks110.9750.9321.0190.2650.00.690
Responders vs. non respondersGA < 29 weeks401.0140.9851.0430.34918.20.160
GA ≥ 29 weeks50.9360.8541.0270.1620.00.937
CI: confidence interval; DA: ductus arteriosus; GA: gestational age; hs: hemodinamically significant; K: number of studies; PDA: patent ductus arteriosus; RR: risk ratio.
Table
Table 3. Subgroup analysis based on continent.
Table 3. Subgroup analysis based on continent.
Meta-AnalysisContinentKRR95% CIpHeterogeneity
Lower LimitUpper LimitI2 (%)p
Any PDA vs. closed DAAmerica141.0340.9591.1160.38364.90.000
Asia51.1040.8921.3680.36338.80.163
Europe160.9920.9151.0750.84132.40.104
hsPDA vs. (small PDA + closed DA)America260.9880.9581.0190.44837.50.029
Asia191.0210.9371.1120.64011.80.310
Europe301.0050.9591.0520.8437.60.348
Oceania40.9400.8651.0220.1490.00.915
hsPDA vs. small PDAAmerica120.9640.9281.0010.0583.70.409
Asia61.0900.9581.2390.18915.30.316
Europe91.0120.8981.1400.8490.070.537
Responders vs. non respondersAmerica181.0290.9901.0690.14417.50.245
Asia101.0000.9211.0860.9979.80.352
Europe150.9960.9381.0580.9050.00.779
CI: confidence interval; DA: ductus arteriosus; hs: hemodynamically significant; K: number of studies; PDA: patent ductus arteriosus; RR: risk ratio.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Borges-Lujan, M.; Gonzalez-Luis, G.E.; Roosen, T.; Huizing, M.J.; Villamor, E. Sex Differences in Patent Ductus Arteriosus Incidence and Response to Pharmacological Treatment in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1143. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071143

AMA Style

Borges-Lujan M, Gonzalez-Luis GE, Roosen T, Huizing MJ, Villamor E. Sex Differences in Patent Ductus Arteriosus Incidence and Response to Pharmacological Treatment in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12(7):1143. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Borges-Lujan, Moreyba, Gema E. Gonzalez-Luis, Tom Roosen, Maurice J. Huizing, and Eduardo Villamor. 2022. "Sex Differences in Patent Ductus Arteriosus Incidence and Response to Pharmacological Treatment in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression" Journal of Personalized Medicine 12, no. 7: 1143. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071143

APA Style

Borges-Lujan, M., Gonzalez-Luis, G. E., Roosen, T., Huizing, M. J., & Villamor, E. (2022). Sex Differences in Patent Ductus Arteriosus Incidence and Response to Pharmacological Treatment in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(7), 1143. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071143

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop