Next Article in Journal
Dust Deficiency in the Interacting Galaxy NGC 3077
Next Article in Special Issue
Modeling Polarized Emission from Black Hole Jets: Application to M87 Core Jet
Previous Article in Journal
A Non-Polynomial Gravity Formulation for Loop Quantum Cosmology Bounce
Previous Article in Special Issue
Knots in Relativistic Transverse Stratified Jets
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

SALT Spectropolarimetry and Self-Consistent SED and Polarization Modeling of Blazars †

by
Markus Böttcher
1,*,
Brian Van Soelen
2,
Richard J. Britto
2,‡,
David A. H. Buckley
3,
Johannes P. Marais
2 and
Hester Schutte
1
1
Centre for Space Research, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
2
Department of Physics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
3
South African Astronomical Observatory, Cape Town—Observatory 7935, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Based on observations made with the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT) under programme 2016-2-LSP-001 (PI: D. A. H. Buckley).
For the Fermi-LAT collaboration.
Galaxies 2017, 5(3), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies5030052
Submission received: 31 July 2017 / Revised: 6 September 2017 / Accepted: 7 September 2017 / Published: 11 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polarised Emission from Astrophysical Jets)

Abstract

:
We report on recent results froma target-of-opportunity program to obtain spectropolarimetry observations with the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT) on flaring gamma-ray blazars. SALT spectropolarimetry and contemporaneous multi-wavelength spectral energy distribution (SED) data are being modelled self-consistently with a leptonic single-zone model. Such modeling provides an accurate estimate of the degree of order of the magnetic field in the emission region and the thermal contributions (from the host galaxy and the accretion disk) to the SED, thus putting strong constraints on the physical parameters of the gamma-ray emitting region. For the specific case of the γ -ray blazar 4C+01.02, we demonstrate that the combined SED and spectropolarimetry modeling constrains the mass of the central black hole in this blazar to M BH 10 9 M .

1. Introduction

Blazars are a class of radio-loud, jet-dominated active galactic nuclei whose jets are closely aligned with our line of sight. Due to relativistic Doppler boosting, they are bright and often rapidly variable sources across the entire electromagnetic spectrum. Their spectral energy distribution (SED) is dominated by two broad non-thermal components. The low-frequency component (radio through optical—X-rays) is well understood as synchrotron radiation from relativistic electrons, while for the high-energy component (X-rays through γ -rays), both leptonic and hadronic emission mechanisms are possible (e.g., [1,2,3]). In leptonic models, the high-energy emission is produced by Compton scattering of soft radiation fields off the same relativistic electrons producing the synchrotron emission. A variety of target photon fields are possible, including the co-spatially produced synchrotron radiation and external photon fields from the accretion disk, the broad-line region, and/or the infrared-emitting dust torus around the central engine [1,2,4]. In the infrared through UV, thermal components from the host galaxy and the accretion-disk + dust-torus system also add to the SED. Due to the multitude of plausibly contributing radiation components and our lack of knowledge of the dominant particle acceleration mechanism, there is significant ambiguity concerning the underlying particle distributions and the location of and physical conditions within the γ -ray emission zone (e.g., [2,4]). These degeneracies can generally not be broken by SED modeling alone.
Polarization is an additional aspect of radiation which provides important information. While radio polarization is routinely employed to diagnose magnetic-field topologies in the large-scale jets of radio-loud active galactic nuclei (AGN; one of the main topics of this conference), the utility of optical and high-energy (X-ray/ γ -ray) polarimetry as a diagnostic for the physical conditions in the high-energy emission region has only recently begun to be considered (e.g., [5,6,7,8,9]). In view of a multitude of on-going optical polarimetric blazar monitoring programs, this provides a promising avenue for progress in our understanding of the physical conditions inAGNjets. Specifically, the optical emission from blazars is often dominated by synchrotron emission from the jet, which is well-known to be polarized at a degree Π sy related to the spectral index p of the underlying non-thermal electron distribution (resulting in a synchrotron radiation spectral index α = ( p - 1 ) / 2 ) and the degree of order of the magnetic field f B , order through
Π sy = f B , order p + 1 p + 7 / 3 = f B , order α + 1 α + 5 / 3
Additional contributions to the optical spectrum may arise from the host galaxy and a dust torus, which may be dominant towards the red, and from the accretion disk, which may contribute significantly towards the blue end of the spectrum. These thermal contributions are expected to be unpolarized, and will reveal their presence through a decline of the degree of polarization (compared to pure synchrotron emission) in spectropolarimetric observations (e.g., [10,11,12]).
The above considerations motivated us to use the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT—see Section 2.2) for spectropolarimetry of flaring Fermi-detected γ -ray blazars in order to constrain the degree of ordering of the magnetic field in the emission region and the contribution of thermal radiation components to the optical spectrum. We focus on the specific example of the high-redshift ( z   =   2 . 1 ) blazar 4C+01.02, which underwent a large γ -ray flare in July 2016. The resulting SEDs and spectropolarimetry results were modelled with a leptonic single-zone model that self-consistently calculates the SEDs along with the expected optical spectropolarimetry signatures (see Section 3). Results from this combined fitting procedure for the case of 4C+01.02 are presented and discussed in Section 4 and Section 5.

2. Observations

Our observations were conducted in the framework of a SALT large program on high-energy transients (PI: D. Buckley). This program aims at target-of-opportunity (ToO) spectroscopy and spectropolarimetry observations of various transients, including cataclysmic variables, novae, microlensing events, X-ray binaries, tidal disruption events, gamma-ray bursts, and flaring blazars. In the case of blazars, ToO observations are triggered by flaring activity detected by Fermi-Large Area Telescope (LAT) and, when possible, complemented by optical photometry using the Las Cumbres Observatory (LCO) network and X-ray observations with Swift. Within the first year of this program (April 2016–May 2017), 14 ToO spectropolarimetry observations targeting seven different blazars (five flat spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs) and two BL Lac objects) were conducted, revealing generally frequency-dependent polarization degrees in the range ~5–25%. In the following we focus on the particularly interesting case of the FSRQ 4C+01.02 (PKS B0106+013; z   =   2 . 1 ), which underwent a large γ -ray flare in July 2016.

2.1. Fermi-LAT

The Fermi Large Area Telescope observes the whole sky every 3 h, which enables an almost continuous monitoring of the flux variability of bright sources. Fermi-LAT is sensitive to photons from 20 MeV to >300 GeV [13]. We analysed data from 4C+01.02 between 100 MeV and 300 GeV during its high state in 2016, using the Pass 8 data representation [14] and the Fermi Science Tools version v10r0p51. We applied the following standard analysis cuts: radius of the region of interest (ROI) = 15 ; Source region = ROI + 10 ; source class; front + back event type; zenith angle <90 ; DATA_QUAL = 1, LAT_CONFIG = 1; Diffuse emission: gll_iem_v06.fits (Galactic) and iso_P8R2_SOURCE_V6_v06.txt (extragalactic) templates. In the light-curve processing, we used the unbinned likelihood gtlike/pyLikelihood tool, and modeled the source of interest by a single power law spectrum of photon index Γ . In the SED processing, we used the binned likelihood analysis from the same tool, within the Enrico Python package [15] for a preliminary SED construction. Figure 1 shows the light curve of 4C+01.02 during 11 April–29 August, 2016. We labeled the 2–20 July period as “Main flare”, as it contains the highest peak in flux for the considered high state, which also was the highest flux ever detected with Fermi-LAT for this source to date, with a daily average of F > 100 MeV ( 2 . 8 ± 0 . 3 ) × 10 - 6  ph cm - 2  s - 1 on 10 July (MJD 57579). The SED of the main flare is plotted in Figure 3 along with multiwavelength data.

2.2. SALT

The Southern African Large Telescope (SALT) is a 10-m class telescope located at the South African Astronomical Observatory (SAAO), near Sutherland, South Africa [16]. One of its main instruments is the Robert Stobie Spectrograph (RSS), located at the telescope’s prime focus. The RSS is capable of performing spectroscopy in various modes, including long-slit, multi-object slit, polarimetry, and Fabry–Pérot, and is sensitive to wavelengths from ~3200 Å to ≥9000 Å [17,18]. The results presented in Figure 2 were obtained using RSS in the spectropolarimetry “LINEAR” mode [19] on 9 July and 27–29 November 2016 . Each spectrum—along with the polarization degree and polarization angle as a function of wavelength—was obtained through four exposures of 600 s, one for each of the four orientations of the half-wave plates (0 , 45 , 22.5 , and 67.5 , respectively). Data reduction was performed using the polsalt reduction pipeline2.

2.3. LCO

The Las Cumbres Observatory (LCO) is a global network of 18 telescopes located at eight different locations [20]. Observations were undertaken with the 1-m class telescopes using the SBIG CCD. Data reduction followed the standard procedures using the iraf/noao packages. Differential photometry was performed using four nearby comparison stars whose magnitudes were taken from the NOMAD catalog [21]. The photometric data points included in Figure 3 were taken on 2 August 2016.

3. SED and Spectropolarimetry Modeling

The SEDs of blazars are often successfully modelled with simple single-zone leptonic radiation models (e.g., [2,22]). In this paper, we adopt the time-independent leptonic blazar emission model described in detail in [2]. The code evaluates the non-thermal synchrotron + Compton radiation spectrum based on an equilibrium solution for the electron spectrum, assuming a rapid acceleration mechanism that provides a power-law injection spectrum with index q between cut-off energies γ min and γ max that is balanced by self-consistent radiative losses and escape on a time scale t esc   =   η esc R / c , where R is the size of the spherical emission region. The non-thermal jet emission, direct accretion-disk emission, plus the dominant Ly α and C IV emission lines from the BLR (see Figure 2, top panel), are added up to yield the total SED.
The degree of polarization of the synchrotron emission is evaluated based on the local synchrotron spectral index α through Equation (1). The frequency-dependent degree of polarization of the total observed optical spectrum is then calculated assuming that the direct accretion-disk ( F AD ) + BLR line ( F line ) emissions are unpolarized, so that
Π ( ν ) = Π sy ( ν ) F sy ( ν ) F sy ( ν ) + F AD ( ν ) + F line ( ν )
Our fitting procedure consists of adjusting parameters of the model to obtain simultaneous agreement with the SED and spectropolarimetry data of 4C+01.02 during the γ -ray flare of July 2016. Since only the optical and γ -ray data are contemporaneous, we include the archival Swift-XRT X-ray spectrum from summed observations in 2007 and 2008 [22] as a guide for our spectral fit, since they also correspond to a moderately high γ -ray flux state of the source.

4. Results

Figure 3 shows the result of our combined SED + spectropolarimetry fit to 4C+01.02 in July 2016. The parameters used for this fit are listed in Table 1.
The chosen parameters result in a minimum allowed variability time scale from causality arguments of t var , min   =   R / ( δ c )   =   18 h, consistent with the lack of evidence for intra-day variability.
The peak of the accretion-disk emission is well constrained by the spectropolarimetry results to be located near or beyond the blue end of the optical spectrum, requiring a central black-hole mass of M BH     10 9 M . On the other hand, its significant contribution to the observed spectrum requires a luminosity on the order of the Eddington luminosity for a 10 9 M black hole. Thus, the mass of the central black hole in 4C+01.02 is well constrained to be M BH 10 9 M BH .

5. Summary and Conclusions

We have presented results of ToO spectropolarimetry observations using the SALT RSS, focusing on the case of the high-redshift FSRQ 4C+01.02 during a large γ -ray flare in July 2016. The contemporaneous SED and spectropolarimetry data were fitted in a consistent way with a single-zone leptonic model. This combined fitting constrained the accretion-disk contribution to the SED, and in particular, the black-hole mass in the center of 4C+01.02 to M BH 10 9 M . This is in tension with the claim by [22], who modelled the entire optical–UV spectrum of the source to be dominated by direct accretion-disk emission, requiring a black-hole mass of M BH = 5 × 10 9 M . If such an interpretation of the optical–UV emission from 4C+01.02 is correct, the degree of polarization in the optical should be close to zero. This contradicts our SALT spectropolarimetry results, which indicate that even in the moderate-activity state in November 2016, the optical polarization is still on the order of ~5–10%. Our combined SED + spectropolarimetry modeling therefore strongly favours a synchrotron-dominated optical emission scenario with the accretion-disk contributing only towards the blue end of the spectrum, requiring a black-hole mass of M BH 10 9 M .

Acknowledgments

The work of M.B. is supported through the South African Research Chairs Initiative (SARChI) of the South African Department of Science and Technology (DST) and National Research Foundation4. The authors acknowledge further support by the South African DST through the South African Gamma-Ray Astronomy Programme. The authors are grateful for the support provided by S. Crawford and K.H. Nordsieck with reducing the spectropolarimetry observations. This work makes use of observations from the LCO network. Some of the observations reported in this paper were obtained with the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT). The Fermi-LAT Collaboration acknowledges support for LAT development, operation, and data analysis from NASA and DOE (United States), CEA/Irfu and IN2P3/CNRS (France), ASI and INFN (Italy), MEXT, KEK, and JAXA (Japan), and the K.A. Wallenberg Foundation, the Swedish Research Council and the National Space Board (Sweden). Science analysis support in the operations phase from INAF (Italy) and CNES (France) is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author Contributions

M.B. led the theory and modeling aspects of the work; H.S. contributed to these efforts. B.v.S., R.J.B., and D.A.H.B. were responsible for the SALT observations and data analysis. The Fermi-LAT analysis was performed by R.J.B., while J.P.M. did the LCO data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Böttcher, M. Modeling the emission processes in blazars. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2007, 309, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Böttcher, M.; Reimer, A.; Sweeney, K.; Prakash, A. Leptonic and hadronic modeling of Fermi-detected blazars. Astrophys. J. 2013, 768, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Romero, G.E.; Böttcher, M.; Markoff, S.; Tavecchio, F. Relativistic jets in active galactic nuclei and microquasars. Space Sci. Rev. 2017, 207, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ghisellini, G.; Tavecchio, F.; Foschini, L.; Ghirlanda, G.; Maraschi, L.; Celoti, A. General physical properties of bright Fermi blazars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2010, 402, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Marscher, A.P. Turbulent, extreme multi-zone model for simulating flux and polarization variability in blazars. Astrophys. J. 2014, 780, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, H.; Böttcher, M. X-ray and gamma-ray polarization in leptonic and hadronic jet models of blazars. Astrophys. J. 2013, 774, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, H.; Chen, X.; Böttcher, M. Synchrotron polarization in blazars. Astrophys. J. 2014, 789, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Barres de Almeida, U.; Tavecchio, F.; Mankuzhiyil, N. Polarimetric tomography of blazar jets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 441, 2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, H.; Chen, X.; Böttcher, M.; Guo, F.; Li, H. Polarization swings reveal magnetic energy dissipation in blazars. Astrophys. J. 2015, 804, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Palma, N.I.; Böttcher, M.; de la Calle, I.; Agudo, I.; Aller, H.; Bach, U.; Benitez, E.; Buemi, C.S.; Escande, L. Multiwavelength observations of the gamma-ray blazar PKS 0528+134 in quiescence. Astrophys. J. 2011, 735, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Smith, P.; Balonek, T.J.; Heckert, P.A.; Elston, R. The optical an d near-infrared polarization properties of the OVV quasar 3C 345. Astrophys. J. 1986, 305, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Smith, P. Constraints on dark matter annihilation in clusters of galaxies with the Fermi large area telescope. Galaxies 2016, 4, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Atwood, W.B.; Abdo, A.A.; Achermann, M.; Althouse, W.; Anderson, B.; Axelsson, M.; Baldini, L.; Baller, J.; Band, D.L.; Barbiellini, G.; et al. The large area telescope on the Fermi gamma-ray space telescope mission. Astrophys. J. 2009, 697, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Atwood, W.; Albert, A.; Baldini, L.; Tinivella, M.; Bregeon, J.; Pesce-Rollins, M.; Sgrò, C.; Bruel, P.; Charles, E.; Drlica-Wagner, A.; et al. Pass 8: Toward the Full Realization of the Fermi-LAT Scientific Potential. arXiv 2012, arXiv:1303.3514. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sanchez, D.A.; Deil, C. Enrico: A Python package to simplify Fermi-LAT analysis. In Proceedings of the 33rd ICRC (2013), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2–9 July 2013. [Google Scholar]
  16. Buckley, D.A.H.; Swart, G.P.; Meiring, J.G. Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes. Proc. SPIE 2006, 6267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Burgh, E.B.; Bershady, M.A.; Westfall, K.B.; Nordsiech, K.H. Recombination ghosts in littrow configuration: Implications for spectrographs using volume phase holographic gratings. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 2007, 119, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kobulnicky, H.A.; Nordsieck, K.H.; Burgh, E.B.; Smith, M.P.; Percival, J.W.; Williams, T.B.; O’Donoghue, D. The prime focus imaging spectrograph for the Southern African Large Telescope- Operational modes. Proc. SPIE 2003, 4841, 1634–1644. [Google Scholar]
  19. Potter, S.B.; Nordsieck, K.H.; Romero-Colmenero, E.; Crawford, S.; Vaisanen, P.; Depagne, É.; Buckley, D.; Koeslag, A.; Brink, J.; Hetlage, C. Commissioning the polarimetric modes of the Robert Stobie spectrograph on the Southern African Large Telescope. Proc. SPIE 2016, 9908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Brown, T.M.; Baliber, N.; Bianco, F.B.; Bowman, M.; Burleson, B.; Conway, P.; Crelin, M.; Depagne, E.; De Vera, J.; Dilday, B. Las cumbres observatory global telescope network. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 2013, 125, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zacharias, N.; Monet, D.G.; Levine, S.E.; Urban, S.E.; Gaume, R.; Wycoff, G.L. The Naval Observatory Merged Astrometric Dataset (NOMAD). Am. Astron. Soc. Meet. Abstr. 2004, 36, 1418. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ghisellini, G.; Tagliaferri, G.; Foschini, L.; Ghirlanda, G.; Taveccio, F.; Della Ceca, R.; Haardt, F.; Volonterim, M.; Gehrels, N. High-redshift Fermi blazars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2011, 411, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
1.
2.
3.
4.
Any opinion, finding and conclusion or recommendation expressed in this material is that of the authors, and the NRF does not accept any liability in this regard.
Figure 1. Three-day binned Fermi-Large Area Telescope (LAT) light curve at E   >   100 MeV of 4C+01.02 for the period April–June 2016.
Figure 1. Three-day binned Fermi-Large Area Telescope (LAT) light curve at E   >   100 MeV of 4C+01.02 for the period April–June 2016.
Galaxies 05 00052 g001
Figure 2. Top panel: Southern African Large Telescope (SALT) Robert Stobie Spectrograph (RSS) count spectra of 4C+01.02 during four observing windows, including the 9 July 2016 flare indicated in Figure 1 (blue). Dashed vertical lines indicate the positions of the following lines: Ly α 1216 Å, Si IV 1400 Å, C IV 1549 Å, C III 1909 Å , and a telluric absorption line. Middle panel: Linear polarization degree as function of wavelength from SALT spectropolarimetry for the four SALT observing windows, as in the top panel. Bottom panel: Polarization angle as a function of wavelength for the four SALT observations.
Figure 2. Top panel: Southern African Large Telescope (SALT) Robert Stobie Spectrograph (RSS) count spectra of 4C+01.02 during four observing windows, including the 9 July 2016 flare indicated in Figure 1 (blue). Dashed vertical lines indicate the positions of the following lines: Ly α 1216 Å, Si IV 1400 Å, C IV 1549 Å, C III 1909 Å , and a telluric absorption line. Middle panel: Linear polarization degree as function of wavelength from SALT spectropolarimetry for the four SALT observing windows, as in the top panel. Bottom panel: Polarization angle as a function of wavelength for the four SALT observations.
Galaxies 05 00052 g002
Figure 3. Left panel: Contemporaneous optical + γ -ray spectral energy distribution (SED; red) of 4C+01.02, along with archival data (from NED3; blue), and our SED model (solid red). Right panel: Top: Optical spectrum with the 3 LCO photometry points, with our model (red lines). Bottom: SALT spectropolarimetry (data points), along with our model prediction (solid red line), and the degree of polarization of the synchrotron radiation component (red dotted).
Figure 3. Left panel: Contemporaneous optical + γ -ray spectral energy distribution (SED; red) of 4C+01.02, along with archival data (from NED3; blue), and our SED model (solid red). Right panel: Top: Optical spectrum with the 3 LCO photometry points, with our model (red lines). Bottom: SALT spectropolarimetry (data points), along with our model prediction (solid red line), and the degree of polarization of the synchrotron radiation component (red dotted).
Galaxies 05 00052 g003
Table 1. Model parameters. BH: black hole.
Table 1. Model parameters. BH: black hole.
ParameterValue
Electron injection γ min 230
Electron injection γ max 6 × 10 3
Electron injection index q2.1
Kinetic power in radiating electrons L e 2 . 5 × 10 45  erg/s
Doppler factor δ 35
Magnetic field B1 G
Magnetic-field order f B , order 0.16
Energy partition ratio L B / L e 0.45
Escape time-scale parameter η esc 1
Emission-region radius R 2 . 2 × 10 16  cm
Emission-region distance from BH0.2 pc
Black-hole mass M BH 10 9 M
Accretion-disk luminosity L d 1 . 26 × 10 47  erg/s = L Edd
External radiation field u ext 5 × 10 - 3  erg/cm 3

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Böttcher, M.; Van Soelen, B.; Britto, R.J.; Buckley, D.A.H.; Marais, J.P.; Schutte, H. SALT Spectropolarimetry and Self-Consistent SED and Polarization Modeling of Blazars. Galaxies 2017, 5, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies5030052

AMA Style

Böttcher M, Van Soelen B, Britto RJ, Buckley DAH, Marais JP, Schutte H. SALT Spectropolarimetry and Self-Consistent SED and Polarization Modeling of Blazars. Galaxies. 2017; 5(3):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies5030052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Böttcher, Markus, Brian Van Soelen, Richard J. Britto, David A. H. Buckley, Johannes P. Marais, and Hester Schutte. 2017. "SALT Spectropolarimetry and Self-Consistent SED and Polarization Modeling of Blazars" Galaxies 5, no. 3: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies5030052

APA Style

Böttcher, M., Van Soelen, B., Britto, R. J., Buckley, D. A. H., Marais, J. P., & Schutte, H. (2017). SALT Spectropolarimetry and Self-Consistent SED and Polarization Modeling of Blazars. Galaxies, 5(3), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies5030052

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop