Next Article in Journal
Cryptic Diversity in the Monotypic Neotropical Micromoth Genus Angelabella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in the Peru-Chile Desert
Next Article in Special Issue
Antimicrobial Activity of an Extract of Hermetia illucens Larvae Immunized with Lactobacillus casei against Salmonella Species
Previous Article in Journal
Wolbachia-Mitochondrial DNA Associations in Transitional Populations of Rhagoletis cerasi
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transcriptome Analysis of Psacothea hilaris: De Novo Assembly and Antimicrobial Peptide Prediction

1
Department of Agricultural Biology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, 166, Nongsaengmyeong-ro, Iseo-myeon, Wanju-gun, Jeollabuk-do 55365, Korea
2
3BIGS CO. LTD., 156, Gwanggyo-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do 16506, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Insects 2020, 11(10), 676; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11100676
Submission received: 11 September 2020 / Revised: 29 September 2020 / Accepted: 2 October 2020 / Published: 5 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insects and Their Derivatives for Human Practical Uses)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Multidrug resistance for classical antibiotics is the major problem faced in clinical infections. Insects have antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) which are a part of the immune repertoire to protect it from microbial pathogens. AMPs are short chain protein molecules that function as antibacterial, antifungal, antiparasitic and antiviral factors. Insect AMPs are present in their hemolymph or produced in response to entry of pathogens and kill them to protect the host. The objective of this study is to identify novel AMPs from Psacothea hilaris, the yellow spotted long horned beetle. The beetle was immunized with bacteria and fungi and RNA was isolated. The RNA was processed and screened by in silico strategies to identify novel AMPs. We obtained one potential candidate which was tested to be effective against harmful bacteria and fungi. This will be useful in treating multidrug resistant microbes alone or in combination with antibiotics with future validations.

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are the frontline innate defense system evolutionarily preserved in insects to combat invading pathogens. These AMPs could serve as an alternative to classical antibiotics to overcome the burden of treating multidrug resistant bacteria. Psacotheasin, a knottin type AMP was isolated from Psacothea hilaris and shown to exhibit antimicrobial activity, especially against fungi through apoptosis mediated cell death. In this study, we aimed to identify novel probable AMPs from Psacothea hilaris, the yellow spotted longicorn beetle. The beetle was immunized with the two bacterial strains (E. coli and S. aureus), and the yeast strain C. albicans. After immunization, total RNA was isolated and sequenced in Illumina platform. Then, beetle transcriptome was de novo assembled and searched for putative AMPs with the known physiochemical features of the AMPs. A selection of AMP candidates were synthesized and tested for antimicrobial activity. Four peptides showed stronger activity against E. coli than the control AMP, melittin while one peptide showed similar activity against S. aureus. Moreover, four peptides and two peptides showed antifungal activity stronger than and similar to melittin, respectively. Collectively one peptide showed both antibacterial and antifungal activity superior to melittin; thus, it provides a potent antimicrobial peptide. All the peptides showed no hemolysis in all the tested concentrations. These results suggest that in silico mining of insects’ transcriptome could be a promising tool to obtain and optimize novel AMPs for human needs.

1. Introduction

Insects are the largest producer of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) with distinct characteristics. The habitat of the insects which includes confronting microbes necessarily potentiates it to produce a wide range of AMPs for its survival. Thus, AMPs especially in insects are foreground defense machinery against attacking microbes entering the host. Most of them are cationic, hydrophobic, and amphipathic peptides with < 50 amino acids [1]. These unique features of the AMPs target the microbial cell membrane and increases the permeability, leading to microbial cell death. In the recent years, AMPs gained attention as new drugs or alternate candidates over classical antibiotics to overcome the acquired multidrug resistance of microbes in clinical settings, because the targets of the AMPs are predominantly microbial membrane which allows reduced resistance compared to conventional antibiotics targeting intracellular components [2,3]. Several AMPs have been purified, identified, and studied from the largest class insect of arthropods in the past decades [4,5,6,7].
Knottin type peptides have a cysteine knot formed by the unique disulfide bonds between Cys1-Cys4, Cys2-Cys5, Cys3-Cys6 residues. Apart from antimicrobial effect, knottin displays a wide range of bio functional activities which include protease and enzyme inhibitors, cytotoxic, and anti-HIV agents [8,9,10]. A knottin type novel AMP “psacotheasin” was isolated from Psacothea hilaris (P. hilaris), the yellow spotted long horned beetle of Asiatic origin [11]. Psacotheasin is reported to be effective in inhibiting the growth of pathogenic Gram-positive, Gram-negative bacterial and fungal strains without hemolytic effect [11]. The antifungal activity on human fungal pathogen C. albicans was by pore formation in the fungal plasma membrane and disturbing its permeability. Furthermore, evidences of mitochondrial mediated apoptosis events may likely contribute to the antifungal activity [12,13].
The promising pharmaceutical effect of psacotheasin accelerated our interest to further identify putative AMPs from P. hilaris. We utilized next generation sequencing technology, a modern age tool, to divulge putative AMPs [14,15,16]. In silico screening for AMPs was done on transcriptome of the yellow spotted long horned beetle immunized with bacterial and yeast strains. After immunization, total RNA was isolated and sequenced using the Illumina platform. Transcriptome was assembled de novo followed by the AMP prediction pipeline. Furthermore, selected peptides were synthesized and tested for antibacterial activity and toxicity. We identified a candidate AMP with antimicrobial activity which also showed no hemolysis on mouse red blood cells. This AMP could serve as a candidate therapeutic agent which on further validation could prove it a promising clinical applicant.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microbial Growth Conditions

The bacterial strains Escherichia coli (KACC 13821, ATCC 11775) and Staphylococcus aureus (KACC 10768, ATCC 25923), and the yeast strain Candida albicans (KCTC 7121, ATCC 14053) were purchased from the Korean Agricultural Culture Collection (KACC) and Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC). Both bacteria and yeast were grown overnight in tryptic soy broth (TSB; Difco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 37 °C, 200 rpm to the stationary phase. Bacteria were re-inoculated in fresh TSB medium and cultivated for 3 h to the log phase. The strains were stored with 15% glycerol at −70 °C.

2.2. Immunization of Insects

P. hilaris were reared at room temperature with 60% ± 5% relative humidity and a 16/8 light/dark photoperiod cycle. For immunization, each larva of the yellow-spotted longicorn beetle was injected with the mixture of E. coli, S. aureus, C. albicans (1 × 106 colony-forming units) suspended in 100 μL sodium phosphate buffer (10 mM; pH 7.4). Non-immunized control larva was injected with 100 μL sodium phosphate buffer (10 mM; pH 7.4) alone. After maintaining both immunized and non-immunized larvae at 25 °C ± 1 °C for 18 h, total RNA was isolated.

2.3. Transcriptome Sequencing, De Novo Assembly and Functional Annotation

Total RNA quality and quantity of each sample were analyzed by a Bioanalyzer 2100 system using an RNA 6000 Nano kit (Agilent technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). Approximately 2 μg of total RNA ((RNA Integrity Number (RIN) > 7.0) of each sample was used to construct transcriptome cDNA libraries using a Truseq Stranded mRNA Prep Kit (Illumina Technologies, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Furthermore, cDNA libraries were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform to generate 100 bp paired end reads. Initial raw data quality was checked by FastQC (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). Then, Trimmomatic [17] was used to remove low quality reads, adaptor contents, contaminated reads from raw reads to obtain clean reads. Further, the Trinity program [18] was used for de novo assembly of high-quality reads with default parameters. The redundancy transcripts were identified through Cluster Database at High Identity with Tolerance CD-HIT-EST [19] with an identify threshold of 95% sequence similarity. In addition, a TransDecoder [18] was used to identify the longest open reading frame (ORF) per transcripts and protein fragment for peptide prediction. Furthermore, functional annotations of filtered unigenes were identified through a homology search against Swiss-Prot databases by BLASTX with E-value cut-off of 10−5. The assembled unigenes were subjected to gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis by GOseq Bioconductor package [20] based on the Wallenius non-central hypergeometric distribution with a corrected p-value less than 0.05.

2.4. Gene Expression Analysis

To identify gene expression and differential gene expression (DEG) analysis, cleaned raw reads were mapped to assembled unigenes with Bowtie [21] using default parameters. The gene transcript abundance was calculated as transcripts per kilobase million (TPM) [22] using the RNA-Seq by the Expectation-Maximization (RSEM) package [23]. The generated read counts of all genes were given as input for identification of differential expressed genes (DEG) using EdgeR [24]. A p-value less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) and a log2 Fold Change (log2FC) ≥ 1 between control and immunized samples were selected for downstream analysis.

2.5. AMP Screening and Prediction

The deduced amino acid sequences were subjected to AMP prediction analysis using a modified in silico strategy. Peptide characteristics of molecular propensity (based on physicochemical properties) and aggregation propensity (in vitro and in vivo) were determined, and AMP prediction was established using a predefined in silico strategy with parameters defined previously [14]. Finally, the AMPs were mapped with the Collection of Anti-Microbial Peptides (CAMP), A Database of Anti-Microbial peptides (ADAM), Antimicrobial Peptide Database (APD) databases [25,26,27] and classified as novel and known AMPs. The BLAST results were filtered with a similarity score ≥ 80. Sequences with observed similarity at the given cutoff values were considered as known AMPs, and others were considered as novel AMPs. Further, putative AMPs were validated using CAMP and ADAM classifiers. Finally, the novel and the known AMPs were manually validated for continuous stretches of amino acids to account for the low-complexity regions and assembly artifacts.

2.6. Peptide Synthesis

The final filtered peptides were synthesized using solid-phase peptide synthesis methods at AnyGen Co. Ltd. (Gwangju, Korea). Then, each peptide was purified to > 95% by high-performance liquid chromatography, and the purity was confirmed by mass spectrometry analysis. The peptides were dissolved in acidified distilled water (0.01% acetic acid) and stored at −20 °C until being used in subsequent experiments.

2.7. Antimicrobial Activity Assay

The radial diffusion assay was performed to test the antimicrobial activities of peptides, as described previously with slight modifications [28]. In brief, bacteria and yeast strains were grown to the mid-logarithmic phase in TSB at 37 °C and then washed twice with 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). A total of 4 × 106 colony forming unit (CFU) was added to 10 mL of an underlay agarose gel (9 mM sodium phosphate, 1 mM sodium citrate, pH 7.4, 1% (w/v) Type I (low electroendosmosis) agarose (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 3% TSB (Difco, USA)). The underlay gel was poured into a 100-mm INTEGRIDTM Petri dish. After agarose solidification, 3-mm-diameter wells were punched and 5 μL of each peptide solution was added to each well. Buffer alone was used as a negative control. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 3 h to allow for diffusion of the peptides. The underlay gel was then covered with 10 mL of nutrient-rich agar overlay (6% TSB and 1% agarose). The antimicrobial activity of a peptide was measured as the diameter of the cleared zone around each well after 12 h of incubation at 37 °C. This experiment was repeated at least 3 times.

2.8. Hemolytic Assay

This experiment was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences (approval number: NAS-202014). The hemolytic activity of the peptides was determined by monitoring the release of hemoglobin from mouse erythrocytes at 540 nm. For the hemolytic assay, 20 μL of each peptide solution at a predetermined concentration was added to 180 μL of a 2.5% (v/v) suspension of mouse erythrocytes in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Melittin (Sigma), a hemolytic and α-helical peptide isolated from bee venom, were used as the positive control. This mixture was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C, and 600 μL of PBS was then added to each tube. After 3 min of centrifugation at 10,000× g, the supernatant was removed, and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm. Evaluations were made from the results of at least three independent experiments, each carried out in triplicate.

2.9. Data Availability

All the raw data utilized in this study have been deposited in the National Centre for Biotechnology (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number SRA1096680.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. Transcriptome Sequencing and Assembly

RNA was isolated and sequenced from totally six samples (Three biological replicates for each group, (Non-immunized vs. Immunized)). Overall workflow includes RNA sequencing, de novo assembly and AMP prediction of P. hilaris transcriptome. The total number of raw reads obtained in each group is summarized in Table 1. A total of 132,438,330 clean reads were obtained after adapter trimming and low-quality sequences were removed. Secondly, the obtained clean reads were processed with the de novo transcriptome assembly software package “Trinity”. The de novo alignment of the individual sample ranged between 81.16% and 86.32% (Table 1). The assembly resulted in 35,715 unigenes with the average length of 2052 bp and the unigenes > 500 bp was considered for further processing.

3.2. Functional Annotations, Species Distribution and Differential Gene Expression Analysis (DEG)

After the assembly, the unigenes were searched against the Swiss-Prot, and GO databases and annotated. A total of 33,932 (95%) unigenes were annotated by the blastx search against the Swiss-Prot database. The species distribution of the top-hit BLAST against the Swiss-Prot database revealed two closely matched species viz., A. glabripennis and D. melanogaster (Figure 1). The gene function prediction by GO analysis resulted in 26,492 annotated genes distributed in three major categories, biological process, cellular component, and molecular function (Figure 2). All three categories biological process (22,812), cellular component (21,648), and molecular function (22,970) represented similar number of functional groups. Furthermore, DEG was analyzed to find differences in the expression pattern between immunized and non-immunized P. hilaris. The immunization mixture of Gram positive, Gram negative and fungus might potentiate defense pathway activation. A cutoff of log2FC ≥ 2 and a p-value < 0.05 was set and a total of 2381 transcripts were obtained to be differentially expressed. Among these, 1206 transcripts were upregulated while 1175 transcripts were downregulated in the immunized group when compared with the control.

3.3. AMP Prediction

We aimed to identify putative AMPs from the transcriptome of immunized as well as non-immunized P. hilaris utilizing in silico strategies. Previous analysis of AMPs through computation methods has an added scientific insight in understanding AMPs [14,15,16]. Insects are diversified organisms with strong environmental adaptation and a well-built defense system against invading harmful bacteria, fungus, parasites, and viruses [7]. AMPs are multi- targeted which can be competently used to combat the increasing global burden of multidrug resistant bacteria. Psacotheasin, a knottin type AMP isolated from P. hilaris was proved to possess antibacterial and antifungal activity [11,12]. The immunized beetle might produce a defensive AMPs which we thrived to study and utilize for human needs. Herein, we used several physiochemical filters obtained from the known AMPs to screen for the possible AMPs. The molecular charge indispensable predictor of physiochemical property is very important so that the AMPs are usually cationic and amphipathic. The aggregation propensity is also necessary so that it does not affect the function of other native proteins. The critical cutoff value and the number of novel AMPs passing through the filters are detailed in Table 2. After the final filters we obtained 2290 AMPs in total, which were again filtered with our inhouse filtering tool. The obtained AMPs were then selected for synthesis and subjected to experimental validations.

3.4. Experimental Validation of Putative and Novel AMPs

Experimental validation is required to examine the accuracy of any putative and novel AMPs identified. The 248 peptides were sorted according to the AMPs prediction pipeline, and 193 novel AMPs with potentially high activity were ultimately selected (patent application number: 10-2019-0019906). Among them, 26 peptides were synthesized according to results of the Network Protein Sequence Analysis (NPS@) web server (https://npsa-prabi.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page=npsa_gor4.html). We chose the α-helix regions based on secondary structure due to efficiency and cost of peptide synthesis for development of antimicrobial agents. After screening the synthesized peptides, we finally selected 13 AMPs (Table 3) and tested their antimicrobial activities against E. coli, S. aureus and C. albicans using a radial diffusion assay (Figure 3). We found antimicrobial activity in 13 synthetic peptides (Ph 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 22, 24, 26), which increased in a dose-dependent manner. Remarkably, the peptides Ph 1, 2, 22, 26 showed stronger antimicrobial activity than melittin and Ph 3, 4 showed similar antimicrobial activity with melittin in E. coli. The antimicrobial activities of Ph 22 showed similar antimicrobial activity with melittin in S. aureus. Correspondingly, Ph 2, 3, 14, 22 showed stronger antimicrobial activity than melittin and Ph 1, 16, 20 showed similar antimicrobial activity with melittin against C. albicans (Table 4). The results showed that Ph 22 had a broad range of activities toward Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, and yeast.
The hemolytic effects of the 13 selected synthetic peptides showing antimicrobial activity in the radial diffusion assay were shown in Figure 4. Melittin lysed 92% of mouse red blood cells at a concentration of 12.5 μg/mL, whereas no or little hemolytic activity was observed for the 13 synthetic peptides at this concentration and up to 100 μg/mL. Melittin has strong and broad antimicrobial spectrum, but the peptide lacks selectivity in normal cells. The purpose of this experimental study is to find novel peptides, which have potent antimicrobial activities with little or no cytotoxicity. Thus, these data indicate that the selected peptides are useful for the development of novel antimicrobial agents.

4. Conclusions

Insects are rich sources of AMPs with broad range therapeutic potential against pathogenic microbes. In this study we chose P. hilaris, the yellow spotted long horned beetle and immunized it with a bacterial and fungal strain. A potential AMP candidate was then obtained from the immune challenged transcriptome. The observed antimicrobial activity of these AMPs with further validation could serve as new curative for multidrug resistant microbes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.H.L. and J.P.; experiments, J.L., Y.P.S., I.-W.K. and M.S.; analyzed the data, H.C., S.N. and K.V.; data curation, J.P.; writing, J.L., H.C., S.N., K.V. and J.S.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (Project No. PJ01325601), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, J.; Koh, J.J.; Liu, S.; Lakshminarayanan, R.; Verma, C.S.; Beuerman, R.W. Membrane Active Antimicrobial Peptides: Translating Mechanistic Insights to Design. Front. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Fry, D.E. Antimicrobial Peptides. Surg. Infect. 2018, 19, 804–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Haney, E.F.; Mansour, S.C.; Hancock, R.E. Antimicrobial Peptides: An Introduction. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1548, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Brady, D.; Grapputo, A.; Romoli, O.; Sandrelli, F. Insect Cecropins, Antimicrobial Peptides with Potential Therapeutic Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Yi, H.Y.; Chowdhury, M.; Huang, Y.D.; Yu, X.Q. Insect antimicrobial peptides and their applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 5807–5822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Tonk, M.; Vilcinskas, A. The Medical Potential of Antimicrobial Peptides from Insects. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 554–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, Q.; Patocka, J.; Kuca, K. Insect Antimicrobial Peptides, a Mini Review. Toxins 2018, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kolmar, H. Biological diversity and therapeutic potential of natural and engineered cystine knot miniproteins. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2009, 9, 608–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gracy, J.; Chiche, L. Structure and modeling of knottins, a promising molecular scaffold for drug discovery. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2011, 17, 4337–4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tam, J.P.; Wang, S.; Wong, K.H.; Tan, W.L. Antimicrobial Peptides from Plants. Pharmaceuticals 2015, 8, 711–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hwang, J.S.; Lee, J.; Hwang, B.; Nam, S.H.; Yun, E.Y.; Kim, S.R.; Lee, D.G. Isolation and characterization of Psacotheasin, a novel Knottin-type antimicrobial peptide, from Psacothea hilaris. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 20, 708–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Hwang, B.; Hwang, J.S.; Lee, J.; Lee, D.G. Antifungal properties and mode of action of psacotheasin, a novel knottin-type peptide derived from Psacothea hilaris. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 400, 352–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hwang, B.; Hwang, J.S.; Lee, J.; Lee, D.G. The antimicrobial peptide, psacotheasin induces reactive oxygen species and triggers apoptosis in Candida albicans. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 405, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yoo, W.G.; Lee, J.H.; Shin, Y.; Shim, J.Y.; Jung, M.; Kang, B.C.; Oh, J.; Seong, J.; Lee, H.K.; Kong, H.S.; et al. Antimicrobial peptides in the centipede Scolopendra subspinipes mutilans. Funct. Integr. Genomics 2014, 14, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, I.W.; Lee, J.H.; Subramaniyam, S.; Yun, E.Y.; Kim, I.; Park, J.; Hwang, J.S. De Novo Transcriptome Analysis and Detection of Antimicrobial Peptides of the American Cockroach Periplaneta americana (Linnaeus). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0155304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kim, I.W.; Markkandan, K.; Lee, J.H.; Subramaniyam, S.; Yoo, S.; Park, J.; Hwang, J.S. Transcriptome Profiling and In Silico Analysis of the Antimicrobial Peptides of the Grasshopper Oxya chinensis sinuosa. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 26, 1863–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Haas, B.J.; Papanicolaou, A.; Yassour, M.; Grabherr, M.; Blood, P.D.; Bowden, J.; Couger, M.B.; Eccles, D.; Li, B.; Lieber, M.; et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8, 1494–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, W.; Godzik, A. Cd-hit: A fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 1658–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Young, M.D.; Wakefield, M.J.; Smyth, G.K.; Oshlack, A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: Accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010, 11, R14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Langmead, B.; Trapnell, C.; Pop, M.; Salzberg, S.L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009, 10, R25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Robinson, M.D.; Oshlack, A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2010, 11, R25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Li, B.; Dewey, C.N. RSEM: Accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Lee, H.T.; Lee, C.C.; Yang, J.R.; Lai, J.Z.; Chang, K.Y. A large-scale structural classification of antimicrobial peptides. Biomed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 475062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, G.; Li, X.; Wang, Z. APD3: The antimicrobial peptide database as a tool for research and education. Nucleic. Acids Res. 2016, 44, D1087–D1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Waghu, F.H.; Gopi, L.; Barai, R.S.; Ramteke, P.; Nizami, B.; Idicula-Thomas, S. CAMP: Collection of sequences and structures of antimicrobial peptides. Nucleic. Acids Res. 2014, 42, D1154–D1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Steinberg, D.A.; Lehrer, R.I. Designer assays for antimicrobial peptides. Disputing the “one-size-fits-all” theory. Methods Mol. Biol. 1997, 78, 169–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Blast Top hit species distribution match of Psacothea hilaris in Arthropoda phylum.
Figure 1. Blast Top hit species distribution match of Psacothea hilaris in Arthropoda phylum.
Insects 11 00676 g001
Figure 2. Gene ontology (GO) classification of the Psacothea hilaris transcriptome. The GO was summarized into three main categories: Biological process, Cellular component, Molecular function. X axis indicates number of unigenes, and y axis indicates the sub-categories of GO terms.
Figure 2. Gene ontology (GO) classification of the Psacothea hilaris transcriptome. The GO was summarized into three main categories: Biological process, Cellular component, Molecular function. X axis indicates number of unigenes, and y axis indicates the sub-categories of GO terms.
Insects 11 00676 g002
Figure 3. Antimicrobial activity assay. Antimicrobial activities of 13 selected peptides against E. coli, S. aureus, and C. albicans determined by a radial diffusion assay. Peptide concentration (x-axis) was plotted against the diameter of the microbial growth inhibition zone (y-axis) after incubation for 12 h and is expressed in units (1 mm = 10 units). Melittin was used as a positive control. Mean values were obtained from tests repeated three times.
Figure 3. Antimicrobial activity assay. Antimicrobial activities of 13 selected peptides against E. coli, S. aureus, and C. albicans determined by a radial diffusion assay. Peptide concentration (x-axis) was plotted against the diameter of the microbial growth inhibition zone (y-axis) after incubation for 12 h and is expressed in units (1 mm = 10 units). Melittin was used as a positive control. Mean values were obtained from tests repeated three times.
Insects 11 00676 g003
Figure 4. Cytotoxic effects of 13 selected peptides. Hemolytic activity of the peptides. Peptide concentration (x-axis) is plotted against the percentage of hemolysis (y-axis) of mouse red blood cells after incubation for 30 min. Melittin was used as the positive control. The percent hemolysis was calculated with the following equation: hemolysis (%) = (A540 of samp—A540 of peptide-free control)/(A540 of 100% control—A540 of peptide-free control) × 100. Each symbol represents the mean value estimated from triplicate experiments.
Figure 4. Cytotoxic effects of 13 selected peptides. Hemolytic activity of the peptides. Peptide concentration (x-axis) is plotted against the percentage of hemolysis (y-axis) of mouse red blood cells after incubation for 30 min. Melittin was used as the positive control. The percent hemolysis was calculated with the following equation: hemolysis (%) = (A540 of samp—A540 of peptide-free control)/(A540 of 100% control—A540 of peptide-free control) × 100. Each symbol represents the mean value estimated from triplicate experiments.
Insects 11 00676 g004
Table 1. Summary of sequencing and annotation.
Table 1. Summary of sequencing and annotation.
NameRaw ReadsSize (GB)Clean ReadsDe Novo Alignment (%)
PH_N1 122,668,170622,247,65781.36
PH_N2 123,223,9966.922,706,27781.48
PH_N3 122,065,4147.321,617,38281.16
PH_I1 219,915,8446.819,547,00386.32
PH_I2 222,838,132722,388,34185.36
PH_I3 224,414,1156.623,931,67083.60
De novo assembly
Unigenes
Base pairs
Average length of unigenes
GC percentage
Annotation
Descriptions
BLAST- Swissprot
No blast
Gene Ontology

35,715
73,299,234
2052
37.53

No of hits
33,932

1783
26,492






Percentage
95.0

5.0
74.0
1 Non-immunized, 2 Immunized, GB—Gigabyte, GC—Guanine-cytosine.
Table 2. Antimicrobial peptide properties prediction and filtration.
Table 2. Antimicrobial peptide properties prediction and filtration.
PropensityMethodsCutoffNo. of Peptide Sequences
Raw Sequence Total peptides
(2 to 50 amino acids)
104,615
MolecularPepstats
Pepstats
AMPA
Charge > 0 (+)
8 ≥ pI ≤ 12
Stretch no ≥1
70,364
51,494
83,783
Aggregation
(Invivo)
Tango
Tango
Tango
AGG (≤500)
Helix (≥0 helix ≤25)
Beta (≥25 beta ≤100)
85,941
98,871
48,068
Aggregation
(Invitro)
AggrescanNa4VSS (≥−40 Na4vSS ≤60)80,821
SimilarityBlastP
(E value:
1E-05)
Known AMPs (ADAM, >80)
Known AMPs (APD, >80)
Known AMPs (CAMP, >80)
Novel AMPs (Similarity <80)
0
0
0
14,405
AMPCAMP
CAMP
CAMP
CAMP
ADAM
SVM (>0.5, AMP)
RF (>0.5, AMP)
ANN (AMP)
DA (>0.5, AMP)
SVM (>0.5, AMP)
4653
5019
7363
5655
10,590
Final 2290
ADAM—A Database of Anti-Microbial peptides, APD—Antimicrobial Peptide Database, ANN—Artificial Neural Network.
Table 3. Primary sequences of P. hilaris peptides.
Table 3. Primary sequences of P. hilaris peptides.
PeptideProtein LengthCAMP-SVM ScoreCAMP-RF ScoreCAMP-DA ScoreADAM-SVM ClassPeptide Sequence
Ph 1160.7930.89450.7321.63RAIKWPGNGLLFLKY *
Ph 2150.7010.9760.9591.84KLPIVNVKLVNRIK *
Ph 3140.7750.6880.7841.2KRGYQVPRIAFII *
Ph 4160.6740.63850.9651.2KLQVVPAIHLVWLQK *
Ph 8140.8320.77250.7461.63RCLKTCFLSFIRY *
Ph 10130.5550.8160.8550.45RISCVAMRLILK *
Ph 12130.5510.63250.9022.53RLLLLCYACGKS *
Ph 141010.6270.9893.49RRRCRCCRY *
Ph 16100.9990.65850.8332.15RKSWRHWKC *
Ph 20130.6670.63650.7511.2KMFTKCIRYRKM *
Ph 22120.930.6210.5541.06KRIFYLYIRGQ *
Ph24140.7060.70950.5951.56KLSNAVFKSCRKI *
Ph26140.8980.5340.7880.72KIGTFIKKLSYTS *
* Signify C—terminal amidation, CAMP—Collection of Anti-Microbial Peptides, SVM—Support vector machine, RF—Random Forest, DA—Discriminant Analysis.
Table 4. Antimicrobial activities of P. hilaris peptides.
Table 4. Antimicrobial activities of P. hilaris peptides.
Peptides (200 μg/mL)E. coliS. aureusC. albicans
Melittin7510065
Ph 1858665
Ph 2809080
Ph 3728580
Ph 4758030
Ph 8718345
Ph 10677248
Ph 12707540
Ph 146570105
Ph 16508765
Ph 20658568
Ph 22859592
Ph 24496547
Ph 26857525
Diameters of clearing zone have been expressed in units (1 mm = 10 Units).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.H.; Chung, H.; Shin, Y.P.; Kim, I.-W.; Natarajan, S.; Veerappan, K.; Seo, M.; Park, J.; Hwang, J.S. Transcriptome Analysis of Psacothea hilaris: De Novo Assembly and Antimicrobial Peptide Prediction. Insects 2020, 11, 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11100676

AMA Style

Lee JH, Chung H, Shin YP, Kim I-W, Natarajan S, Veerappan K, Seo M, Park J, Hwang JS. Transcriptome Analysis of Psacothea hilaris: De Novo Assembly and Antimicrobial Peptide Prediction. Insects. 2020; 11(10):676. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11100676

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Joon Ha, Hoyong Chung, Yong Pyo Shin, In-Woo Kim, Sathishkumar Natarajan, Karpagam Veerappan, Minchul Seo, Junhyung Park, and Jae Sam Hwang. 2020. "Transcriptome Analysis of Psacothea hilaris: De Novo Assembly and Antimicrobial Peptide Prediction" Insects 11, no. 10: 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11100676

APA Style

Lee, J. H., Chung, H., Shin, Y. P., Kim, I. -W., Natarajan, S., Veerappan, K., Seo, M., Park, J., & Hwang, J. S. (2020). Transcriptome Analysis of Psacothea hilaris: De Novo Assembly and Antimicrobial Peptide Prediction. Insects, 11(10), 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11100676

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop