Next Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Activity of an Extract of Hermetia illucens Larvae Immunized with Lactobacillus casei against Salmonella Species
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Cleaning Multiple-Funnel Traps on Captures of Bark and Woodboring Beetles in Northeastern United States
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/insects11100703
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluating Response of Mass-Reared and Irradiated Navel Orangeworm, Amyelois transitella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), to Crude Female Pheromone Extract

by
Joshua Reger
1,2,*,
Jacob Wenger
1,
Gurreet Brar
1,
Charles Burks
3 and
Houston Wilson
2
1
Department of Plant Science, California State University, 2415 E San Ramon, Fresno, CA 93740, USA
2
Department of Entomology, University of California, 900 University Ave, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
3
USDA, Agricultural Research Service, San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center 9611 South Riverbend Avenue, Parlier, CA 93648-9757, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2020, 11(10), 703; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11100703
Submission received: 8 September 2020 / Revised: 12 October 2020 / Accepted: 13 October 2020 / Published: 15 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The navel orangeworm is an important pest of almonds and pistachios in California. Sterile insect technique (SIT) is being explored as an additional component of management of this pest. Preliminary field releases of sterile navel orangeworm shipped from a facility in Phoenix, AZ resulted in poor recovery of males in pheromone traps, raising concerns about the mass-reared male moths’ quality. In this study, a wind tunnel was used to evaluate the response of irradiated and non-irradiated mass-reared navel orangeworm males to pheromone extract from females, and their performance was compared to two strains of locally reared non-irradiated navel orangeworm. Initial responses were similar for all moths tested. A lower proportion of mass-reared moths contacted the pheromone source. The underlying mechanism for this reduction remains unclear, but is likely related to damage incurred during the mass-rearing and shipping process. Our findings indicate navel orangeworm in the current program is generally competent to locate a sex pheromone source, but the rearing and transportation protocols may need refining.

Abstract

The navel orangeworm, Amyleois transitella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), is a key pest of almonds and pistachios in California. Larvae directly feed on nuts, reducing quality and yield, and adults can introduce fungi that produce aflatoxins. The development of sterile insect technique (SIT) is currently being explored as a management tool for this pest. Large quantities of A. transitella are mass-reared, irradiated, and shipped to California from a USDA APHIS facility in Phoenix, AZ. Preliminary field releases of sterile A. transitella from this facility resulted in poor recovery of males in pheromone traps, raising concerns that mass-reared male A. transitella may not be responding to pheromone from virgin females. In this study, a wind tunnel was used to evaluate the response of both irradiated and non-irradiated mass-reared A. transitella males to crude pheromone extract from females, and their performance was compared to two strains of locally reared non-irradiated A. transitella. While initial responses associated with pheromone detection where similar between mass-reared and locally reared moths, a lower proportion of the mass-reared moths ultimately made contact with the pheromone source. Surprisingly, the addition of irradiation did not further decrease their performance. While mass-reared moths respond to pheromone, their ability to locate and make contact with the pheromone source appears to be impeded. The underlying mechanism remains unclear, but is likely related to damage incurred during the mass-rearing and shipping process.

1. Introduction

Sterile inset technique (SIT) can be used for the area-wide prevention, eradication, or suppression of insect pests in agricultural, natural, and urban environments [1]. In this approach, sterilized insects are mass-reared and released to mate with wild conspecifics, which can lead to population reductions over time [2]. Lepidoptera have become an increasing target of SIT due to their growing impact on high-value agricultural crops around the world [3,4,5], and SIT has been successfully used as part of an area-wide integrated pest management (IPM) program to control multiple lepidopteran pests such as codling moth Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) [6], painted apple moth Teia anartoides (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) [7], and pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) [8]. The success of an SIT program is dependent on a variety of factors, but the competitiveness of mass-reared sterile insects is critical, and can be influenced by rearing conditions, sterilization process, transport and release methods. As such, a variety of laboratory assays are necessary to verify moth quality and performance throughout program development, including the use of wind tunnels [9].
The navel orangeworm, Amyelois transitella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), is the key pest of California almonds and pistachios. Adults deposit eggs on the nuts, and the larvae directly feed on the nut meat, which reduces crop yield and quality. Additionally, A. transitella adults can introduce the fungus Aspergillus flavus, which produces aflatoxins [10,11], known human carcinogens that are highly regulated in key export markets [12]. Currently, California growers have an extremely low threshold for A. transitella damage and typically aim for ≤2% infestation. This pest overwinters as larvae in remnant “mummy” nuts left behind in the orchard after harvest. As such, orchard sanitation is the foundation of A. transitella management, along with well-timed insecticide applications, mating disruption and timely harvest [13].
Recently, researchers have started to explore the development of SIT for A. transitella as well. This effort makes use of a mass-rearing and irradiation facility in Phoenix, AZ that is operated by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ). This facility was originally designed for production of P. gossypiella as part of an area-wide SIT program initiated in the late 1960s [14]. With the successful eradication of P. gossypiella in 2018, efforts were initiated to explore the use of this mass-rearing facility for production and sterilization of A. transitella.
Initial pilot studies in 2018 evaluated recapture of mass-reared and irradiated A. transitella in small (2 acre) and large (640 acre) pistachio orchard plots. In the small plot, moths were released on the ground by hand using metal trays suspended from the tree canopy. In the large plot, moths were released aerially from a modified small airplane. Multiple releases were made at both sites, but all of them resulted in very low recapture (<0.001%) of male moths in wing traps (Pherocon 1C, Trece Inc., Adair, OK, USA) baited with pheromone lures (Biolure, Suterra, Bend, OR, USA) [15]. Such poor recapture of the sterile A. transitella could be due to a variety of factors associated with the mass-rearing, sterilization, transportation and release process. More specifically, the absence of a flight component from the mass-rearing process poses the risk of selecting against moths that can adequately detect and follow pheromone plumes. Here, in order to verify that mass-reared male A. transitella would indeed respond to female A. transitella pheromone, a wind tunnel assay was used to evaluate the effects of moth strain, rearing conditions and irradiation, on male response to crude pheromone extract from females.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insect Cultures

In total, there were four moth types flown in this assay that included (1) locally-reared non-irradiated Mendota strain moths (“Mendota-Local”, n = 103), (2) locally-reared non-irradiated Phoenix strain moths (“Phoenix-Local”, n = 89), (3) mass-reared non-irradiated Phoenix strain moths (“Phoenix-Facility”, n = 101) and (4) mass-reared irradiated Phoenix strain moths (“Phoenix-Facility-Irradiated”, n = 88).
Locally reared moths were sourced from A. transitella colonies maintained at the USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Science Center (Parlier, CA). The “Mendota” strain was established in 2010 from A. transitella eggs collected from an almond orchard in Fresno County, and was refreshed with additional eggs from the same site in 2011. The “Phoenix” strain was established in 2018 using A. transitella larvae from the USDA-APHIS mass-rearing facility in Phoenix, AZ. Locally reared A. transitella were grown in 1-gallon glass jars on an artificial wheat bran diet [16] at 26 °C in a 14:10 (L:D) photoperiod. Late instar male larvae were sexed twice a week and isolated until adults emerged in a reverse photoperiod. The reverse photoperiod had an inverse L:D cycle with scotophase from 2 a.m. to 12 p.m., which allowed moths to be flown in the last 3 h of scotophase beginning at 9 a.m.
Irradiated and non-irradiated mass-reared adult A. transitella were sourced from the USDA APHIS mass-rearing facility, where they were also reared on a wheat-bran diet. Amyelois transitella at the APHIS facility emerge in darkness with a single light source to lure them into a vacuum tube collection system. The tubes transport moths to a cyclone chamber, where there are exposed to cold air (5 °C) to immobilize them. Cohorts of roughly 1000 moths (<24 h old, 50:50 M:F) were placed into a large Petri dish and prepared for shipment. Moths in the irradiated treatment were additionally exposed to 300 Gy of gamma radiation from a Cobalt-60 core. APHIS facility moths were then shipped overnight in a cooler held close to 5 °C. Upon arrival at the USDA-ARS San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Science Center, each Petri dish was emptied into a 30 × 30 × 30 cm cage (BugDorm-1, MegaView Science, Taiwan). After being transferred to the cage, moths were provided 10–30 min to move from the Petri dish to the walls of the cage. Fifteen virgin males from each treatment were then selected from individuals perched on the side of the cage. The male moths were placed in a growth chamber with the local strains and allowed 48 h to adjust to the reverse photoperiod.

2.2. Gland Extraction

Male moths were flown in a wind tunnel to a female A. transitella crude pheromone gland extract. Crude pheromone extract is a complete attractant known to produce highly replicable results with A. transitella, which is why it was selected for this study [17,18,19]. The gland extract was prepared using 1–5 day old adult calling females from the “Mendota” colony [17,18,19]. Pheromone glands were prepared in 150 µL of hexane containing 60 pheromone glands. The concentration of the main pheromone component (Z11, Z13–16: Ald) was verified via gas chromatography for each 150 µL batch. Verification was conducted with a Hewlett Packard model 6890 gas chromograph. Concentration of Z11, Z13–16: Ald was determined from a 10 µL aliquot subjected to the following temperature program: injection temperature of 80 °C, a temperature increase of 50 °C/min to 210 °C with a 7 min hold, then a temperature increase of 50 °C/min to 240 °C with a 5 min hold with helium as the carrier gas. Any batch that did not meet the minimum concentration of 0.5 µg/L of Z11, Z13–16: Ald was supplemented with additional glands. All pheromone solutions were stored in the freezer when not in use.

2.3. Wind Tunnel

The wind tunnel was housed in an isolated environmentally controlled room with no exterior windows and black vinyl strip door. The tunnel consisted of a Plexiglass rectangular enclosure measuring 98 × 98 × 250 cm with 5.08 cm circular red discs on the floor (25 discs per m2) [20]. During flights, the air speed was 75 cm s−1 and room held at 24–26 °C, >50% RH, and illuminated at 1–2 lux.

2.4. Assay Setup

Moths were individually flown in the wind tunnel during the last 3 h of scotophase, mimicking the time females naturally call for males in the orchard [21]. The afternoon before a flight date, 5–10 virgin males of each of the four moth type treatment groups were transferred from their holding cages and individually isolated in 2 × 2 × 4 inch wire mesh cages (i.e., 20–40 individually caged moths total that were flown individually on a single date). On the morning of a flight session, the wind tunnel room was set to optimal environmental conditions. Once conditions were obtained, the tray of individually caged moths was moved into the wind tunnel and allowed to adjust to the environment for 1 h.
A pheromone lure was prepared by pipetting 25 µL of pheromone extract or 12 ng of Z11, Z13–16: Ald on a hexane soaked 1 cm circle of #1 Whatman filter paper. The lure was mounted vertically to a 25 cm tall wire stand placed 169 cm upwind in the tunnel. Higher concentrations of solvent are released from the lure in the first few minutes. Consequently, the lure was allowed a 5 min off-gassing period after placement in the tunnel [18]. Each lure was used only once and for no longer than 35 min, which was the longest run time for a single session.
On each date, at least five males of each of the four moth-type treatment groups were individually flown. The order of moth type was randomized on each date. All moths from each treatment group (5–10 moths) were flown individually before a new moth type was tested so that behaviors could be clearly observed. During each flight session, five behaviors were measured for each moth; this included no response, wing fanning, taking flight, locking onto plume, and contact with the lure. Locking onto plume was defined when moths began to make a straight flight path towards and level with the lure. Each individual moth was given 1 min to initiate any behavior and transition to the next subsequent behavior. If no behavior or no new behavior was observed, the moth was removed and the absence of behavior recorded. No behavior after contact with the lure was recorded, although male A. transitella are known to perform additional mating rituals once contact with a female has been made [22].

2.5. Data Analysis

Mate-seeking behaviors were analyzed using the R Statistical Program (3.5.1, http://www.r-project.org/). Data were evaluated with generalized linear mixed models using the “lme4” package with a binomial distribution and logit link. Each of the five behavioral responses were analyzed separately. For each analysis, the proportion of total moths that exhibited the specific behavioral response were evaluated relative to fixed effects “Moth Strain”, “Rearing Method”, and “Irradiation”. Models included the random effect “Moth Type” nested within “Date”, since fixed effects were not fully crossed across the four moth types. In each model, significance (p ≤ 0.05) of fixed effects was determined by Pearson’s χ2 test using the “drop1” function.

3. Results

A total of 372 moths were flown over 12 separate dates. While generally a majority of individuals displayed the preliminary mate-seeking behaviors of wing fanning and taking flight (92–99%), fewer moths managed to successfully lock onto plume and contact the lure (56–71%). Only 1–6% of moths exhibited no behavior at all. Moth strain and irradiation had no influence on any of the measured behaviors, whereas mass rearing appeared to reduce the proportion of moths that successfully locked onto the plume and made contact with the pheromone source (Table 1, Figure 1).

4. Discussion

The success of a SIT program is dependent on sterile males locating and mating with wild female conspecifics, and the ability to do so can be affected by multiple aspects of the rearing, transport and release process [23]. For Lepidoptera in particular, it is critical that males are able to effectively detect, respond to and follow pheromone plume trails [24,25]. Here, findings indicate that the A. transitella production and transportation methods currently utilized appear to negatively influence the ability of males to adequately locate females.
Wing-fanning is an initial response of male A. transitella indicating that the female sex pheromone has been detected [21,26]. In other species such as P. gossypiella and Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Torticidae), this behavior is correlated with a higher rate of success contacting a pheromone source [27,28]. While this was the case for locally reared A. transitella, mass-reared moths from the USDA APHIS facility exhibited wing fanning and took flight but were less successful at locking onto the plume and making contact with the pheromone source. As such, the mass-reared and shipped moths appear to detect pheromone but seem to have a reduced ability to follow plumes and make source contact.
Without adequate maintenance of genetic diversity or built-in processes to preserve key performance features, mass-rearing can potentially place selection pressure on organisms towards traits associated with the rearing environment itself, which can in turn detract from field performance. In the current mass-rearing process, dozens of virgin male and female A. transitella are mated in 1-gallon glass jars, and females subsequently deposit eggs onto paper material that covers the top of the jar [29]. In such an enclosed environment, there is little need for males to follow pheromone plumes over long distances, and in this may present a selective force against long-distance plume-following behavior. Alternately, mass-reared females may evolve to express an abnormal blend of pheromone that in turn alters male response to synthetic and/or wild moth pheromone, which has been observed in other Lepidoptera [27,30,31]. Here, both locally reared “Mendota” and “Phoenix” strains of A. transitella responded to pheromone, while mass-reared moths were less successful in actually locating and making contact with the source, suggesting that the “Phoenix” strain pheromone response remains intact but mass-rearing of this strain seems to have a negative impact on their ability to fly towards and make contact with the pheromone source. That said, both “Mendota” and “Phoenix” are laboratory strains, and a comparison of their performance with wild-collected A. transitella males would be a more accurate evaluation. Another alternate approach would be to compare the attraction of wild male A. transitella to pheromone extract from “Phoenix” strain versus wild-collected females.
The mass-rearing and shipping process can also result in physical damage to moths associated with collection, handling, and transportation to release sites. While both local and mass-reared A. transitella were reared at constant optimal temperatures, upon emergence in the USDA APHIS facility the mass-reared adult A. transitella was aggregated through a vacuum collection system and then rapidly chilled and held at 2–10 °C for over 24 h. Susceptibility of adult A. transitella to chill injury remains unclear, but in other lepidopteran programs this has been shown to be an important factor that can influence moth performance [32,33,34]. The effect of cold temperatures on A. transitella has thus-far only been explored as a post-harvest management strategy, with data indicating that eggs and larvae are more susceptible to mortality from cold temperatures than pupae or adults [16,35]. In addition to cold chilling, the mass-reared moths were also subjected to a long-distance shipping process, which can have variable impacts due to vibrations and changes in atmospheric conditions. For instance, false codling moth, Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Torticidae) flight ability and longevity were all negatively impacted by long-distance transport [36], whereas in contrast shipping pupae and adults of C. pomonella from Canada to South Africa did not seem to have any effect on emergence, longevity or ability to mate [37].
Surprisingly, the addition of irradiation did not appear to further deteriorate moth performance. The first study of A. transitella radiation biology found that full sterility was induced when adults were gamma-irradiated at 540 Gy using a Cobalt-60 source [38]. At this dose rate, the total number of matings per male was only slightly lower than non-irradiated controls. In contrast, a more recent study that utilized X-ray irradiation found that mating frequency of males following irradiation was negatively impacted at doses >125 Gy [39]. In this current study, males were gamma-irradiated at 300 Gy using a Cobalt-60 source, and the impacts of irradiation on male response were confounded by the mass-rearing effect. As such, impacts of irradiation remain unclear and merit further evaluation. For instance, it may be that irradiation does have a negative impact on male performance in the wind tunnel, but here the effect was masked by the stronger negative effects associated with mass-rearing and shipping.
As with other laboratory assays, results from this wind tunnel study may overestimate A. transitella performance due to the artificial nature of the testing environment. Furthermore, selection of healthy perched mass-reared moths may have actually underestimated the negative effects of the mass-rearing, irradiation and shipping processes, as the strongest moths from these cohorts were selected for study. Even so, the mass-reared moths used in this assay clearly did not perform as well as the locally reared controls. While findings presented here do indicate that the “Phoenix” strain of A. transitella do appear to respond to pheromone cues, modifications to the mass-rearing and transportation process will be necessary to further optimize their performance.

5. Conclusions

As with other laboratory assays, results from this wind tunnel study may overestimate A. transitella performance due to the artificial nature of the testing environment. Furthermore, selection of healthy perched mass-reared moths may have actually underestimated the negative effects of the mass-rearing, irradiation and shipping process, as the strongest moths from these cohorts were selected for study. Even so, the mass-reared moths used in this assay clearly did not perform as well as the locally reared controls. While findings presented here do indicate that the ‘Phoenix’ strain of A. transitella do appear to respond to pheromone cues, modifications to the mass-rearing and transportation process will be necessary to further optimize their performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.R., H.W., C.B., and J.W.; methodology, J.R.; investigation, J.R.; formal analysis, J.R. and H.W.; writing-original draft preparation, J.R.; writing-review and editing, J.R., H.W., C.B., J.W., G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This was supported through funding from the California Pistachio Research Board and APHIS Plant Protection Act Section 7721 awarded to H.W. and C.S.B., as well as scholarship support from the Jordan and Harvey Fellowship awarded to J.E.R. project.

Acknowledgments

Authors extend thanks to John Claus, Earl Andress and Eoin Davis at the USDA APHIS Phoenix Rearing Facility for providing moths used in this study. Additional thanks to Matt Hicks and Gabby Nikolich at the USDA ARS for their assistance with setting up the wind tunnel and insect rearing.
Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Klassen, W. Area-wide integrated pest management and the sterile insect technique. In Sterile Insect Technique; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 39–68. [Google Scholar]
  2. Knipling, E. Possibilities of insect control or eradication through the use of sexually sterile males. J. Econ. Entomol. 1955, 48, 459–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bloem, K.; Bloem, S.; Carpenter, J. Impact of moth suppression/eradication programmes using the sterile insect technique or inherited sterility. In Sterile Insect Technique; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 677–700. [Google Scholar]
  4. Suckling, D.; Conlong, D.; Carpenter, J.; Bloem, K.; Rendon, P.; Vreysen, M. Global range expansion of pest Lepidoptera requires socially acceptable solutions. Biol. Invasions 2017, 19, 1107–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Vreysen, M.J.; Klassen, W.; Carpenter, J.E. Overview of technological advances toward greater efficiency and efficacy in sterile insect-inherited sterility programs against moth pests. Fla. Entomol. 2016, 99, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Thistlewood, H.; Judd, G.J. Twenty-five Years of Research Experience with the Sterile Insect Technique and Area-Wide Management of Codling Moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), in Canada. Insects 2019, 10, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Stephens, A.; Barrington, A.; Fletcher, N.; Suckling, D. Irradiation conditions affect the quality of irradiated painted apple moth. N. Z. Plant Prot. 2006, 59, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Walters, M.; Staten, R.; Roberson, R. Pink bollworm integrated management using sterile insects under field trial conditions, Imperial Valley, California. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Area-Wide Control of Insect Pests, Imperial Valley, CA, USA, 28 May–2 June 1998 and the Fifth International Symposium on Fruit Flies of Economic Importance, Penang, Malaysia, 1–5 June 1998; pp. 201–206. [Google Scholar]
  9. Simmons, G.; Suckling, D.; Carpenter, J.; Addison, M.; Dyck, V.; Vreysen, M. Improved quality management to enhance the efficacy of the sterile insect technique for lepidopteran pests. J. Appl. Entomol. 2010, 134, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Doster, M.; Michailides, T. Aspergillus molds and aflatoxins in pistachio nuts in California. Phytopathology 1994, 84, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Palumbo, J.D.; Mahoney, N.E.; Light, D.M.; Siegel, J.; Puckett, R.D.; Michailides, T.J. Spread of Aspergillus flavus by navel orangeworm (Amyelois transitella) on almond. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 1194–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Robens, J.; Richard, J. Aflatoxins in animal and human health. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1992; pp. 69–94. [Google Scholar]
  13. Haviland, D.; Symmes, E.J.; Adaskaveg, J.E.; Duncan, R.A.; Roncoroni, J.A.; Gubler, W.D.; Hanson, B.; Hembree, K.J.; Holtz, B.A.; Stapleton, J.J.; et al. UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Almond. Available online: https://www2.ipm.ucanr.edu/agriculture/almond/Navel-Orangeworm/ (accessed on 15 September 2020).
  14. Walters, M. Pink bollworm integrated management using sterile insect under field trial conditions. In Programme Book of Abstracts; IAEA-CN-71, 17; Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia: Vienna, Austria, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wilson, H.W.; University of California, Riverside, Calif., USA; Burks, C.; United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Parlier, Calif., USA. Personal communication, 2020.
  16. Tebbets, J.; Curtis, C.; Fries, R. Mortality of immature stages of the navel orangeworm stored at 3.5 C. J. Econ. Entomol. 1978, 71, 875–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kanno, H.; Kuenen, L.; Klingler, K.A.; Millar, J.G.; Cardé, R.T. Attractiveness of a four-component pheromone blend to male navel orangeworm moths. J. Chem. Ecol. 2010, 36, 584–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kuenen, L.; Steven McElfresh, J.; Millar, J.G. Identification of critical secondary components of the sex pheromone of the navel orangeworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2010, 103, 314–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Kuenen, L.; Rowe, H.; Steffan, K.; Millar, J. Incomplete female sex pheromone of the navel orangeworm Amyelois transitella. Calif. Pist. Comm. Annu. Rep. Crop Year 2001, 2002, 96. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kuenen, L.; Rowe, H. Cowpea weevil flights to a point source of female sex pheromone: Analyses of flight tracks at three wind speeds. Physiol. Entomol. 2006, 31, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Coffelt, J.; Vick, K.; Sower, L.; McClellan, W. Sex pheromone mediated behavior of the navel orangeworm, Amyelois transitella. Environ. Entomol. 1979, 8, 587–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Parra-Pedrazzoli, A.L.; Leal, W.S. Sexual behavior of the navel orangeworm, Amyelois transitella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 2006, 35, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Calkins, C.; Parker, A. Sterile insect quality. In Sterile Insect Technique; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 269–296. [Google Scholar]
  24. Miller, J.R.; Gut, L.J. Mating disruption for the 21st century: Matching technology with mechanism. Environ. Entomol. 2015, 44, 427–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Evenden, M. Mating disruption of moth pests in integrated pest management a mechanistic approach. In Pheromone Communication in Moths: Evolution, Behavior, and Application; Allison, J.D., Carde, R.T., Eds.; Univ of California Press: Oakland, CA, USA, 2016; pp. 365–393. [Google Scholar]
  26. Girling, R.D.; Cardé, R.T. Analysis of the courtship behavior of the navel orangeworm, Amyelois transitella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), with a commentary on methods for the analysis of sequences of behavioral transitions. J. Insect Behav. 2006, 19, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Collins, R.; Cardé, R. Wing fanning as a measure of pheromone response in the male pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 1989, 15, 2635–2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Baker, T.C.; Cardé, R.T. Analysis of pheromone-mediated behaviors in male Grapholitha molesta, the oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environ. Entomol. 1979, 8, 956–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Finney, G.L.; Brinkman, D. Rearing the navel orangeworm in the laboratory. J. Econ. Entomol. 1967, 60, 1109–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, Y.-B.; Haynes, K.F. Evolution of behavioral responses to sex pheromone in mutant laboratory colonies of Trichoplusia ni. J. Chem. Ecol. 1994, 20, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Evenden, M.; Haynes, K. Potential for the evolution of resistance to pheromone-based mating disruption tested using two pheromone strains of the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni. Entomol. Exp. et Appl. 2001, 100, 131–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Boersma, N.; Carpenter, J.E. Influence of holding temperature and irradiation on field performance of mass-reared Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Fla. Entomol. 2016, 99, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Boersma, N.; Boardman, L.; Gilbert, M.; Terblanche, J.S. Sex-dependent thermal history influences cold tolerance, longevity and fecundity in false codling moth Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Lepidoptera: T ortricidae). Agric. For. Entomol. 2018, 20, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Matveev, E.; Kwon, J.; Judd, G.; Evenden, M. The effect of cold storage of mass-reared codling moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) on subsequent flight capacity. Can. Entomol. 2017, 149, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Johnson, J. Survival of Indianmeal moth and navel orangeworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) at low temperatures. J. Econ. Entomol. 2007, 100, 1482–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nepgen, E.; Hill, M.; Moore, S. The effect of long-distance transportation on the fitness of irradiated false codling Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) for use in a sterile insect release program. J. Econ. Entomol. 2015, 108, 2610–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Blomefield, T.; Carpenter, J.; Vreysen, M. Quality of mass-reared codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) after long-distance transportation: 1. Logistics of shipping procedures and quality parameters as measured in the laboratory. J. Econ. Entomol. 2011, 104, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Husseiny, M.; Madsen, H. Sterilization of the navel orangeworm, Paramyelois transitella (Walker), by gamma radiation (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae). Hilgardia 1964, 36, 113–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Light, D.M.; Ovchinnikova, I.; Jackson, E.S.; Haff, R.P. Effects of x-ray irradiation on male navel orangeworm moths (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on mating, fecundity, fertility, and inherited sterility. J. Econ. Entomol. 2015, 108, 2200–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Insects 11 00703 g001 550
Figure 1. Proportion of male A. transitella exhibiting each mate-seeking behavior. Letters indicate significant differences between local and mass-reared moth types.
Figure 1. Proportion of male A. transitella exhibiting each mate-seeking behavior. Letters indicate significant differences between local and mass-reared moth types.
Insects 11 00703 g001
Table
Table 1. Summary of analysis (χ2 values) to determine influence of strain, rearing method, and irradiation on male A. transitella response to crude pheromone extract (n = 372).
Table 1. Summary of analysis (χ2 values) to determine influence of strain, rearing method, and irradiation on male A. transitella response to crude pheromone extract (n = 372).
Fixed EffectBehavioral Response
No ResponseWing FanningTake FlightPlume LockContact
Strain1.221.221.591.191.19
Rearing1.121.120.364.09 *4.09 *
Irradiation0.090.090.000.040.04
* p < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reger, J.; Wenger, J.; Brar, G.; Burks, C.; Wilson, H. Evaluating Response of Mass-Reared and Irradiated Navel Orangeworm, Amyelois transitella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), to Crude Female Pheromone Extract. Insects 2020, 11, 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11100703

AMA Style

Reger J, Wenger J, Brar G, Burks C, Wilson H. Evaluating Response of Mass-Reared and Irradiated Navel Orangeworm, Amyelois transitella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), to Crude Female Pheromone Extract. Insects. 2020; 11(10):703. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11100703

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reger, Joshua, Jacob Wenger, Gurreet Brar, Charles Burks, and Houston Wilson. 2020. "Evaluating Response of Mass-Reared and Irradiated Navel Orangeworm, Amyelois transitella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), to Crude Female Pheromone Extract" Insects 11, no. 10: 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11100703

APA Style

Reger, J., Wenger, J., Brar, G., Burks, C., & Wilson, H. (2020). Evaluating Response of Mass-Reared and Irradiated Navel Orangeworm, Amyelois transitella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), to Crude Female Pheromone Extract. Insects, 11(10), 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11100703

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop