Evolution of Adaptive Variation in the Mosquito Culex pipiens: Multiple Independent Origins of Insecticide Resistance Mutations
by
, ,
Valentina Mastrantonio
1, 
Daniele Porretta
1,*, 
Valentina Lucchesi
1,
Nurper Güz
2,
Naciye Sena Çağatay
2,
Romeo Bellini
3,
John Vontas
4,5 and
Sandra Urbanelli
1 1
Department of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Mathematical, Physical and Natural Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
2
Molecular Entomology Laboratory, Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University, Ankara 06100, Turkey
3
Medical and Veterinary Entomology Department, Centro Agricoltura Ambiente “G. Nicoli”, 40014 Bologna, Italy
4
Department of Crop Science, Pesticide Science Lab, Faculty of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece
5
Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, 70013 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2021, 12(8), 676; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080676
Submission received: 8 July 2021
/
Accepted: 23 July 2021
/
Published: 27 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)
Abstract
:Simple Summary
The application of insecticides to control insect pests can result in the evolution of resistance. Within a population, the individuals carrying the resistant mutation survive after insecticide application while the others die, leading to the spread of resistance. The finding that the same mutations confer insecticide resistance in different species or populations raises the question how often these mutations arise in natural populations. Resistant mutations can originate once within a population and then spread. Alternatively, multiple origins can occur within the same population or in different geographic areas. Here, we used a phylogenetic approach to investigate the origin of three mutations conferring resistance to diflubenzuron insecticide in Italian and Turkish populations of the mosquito Culex pipiens. Our results support a scenario of multiple origins of the mutations. Resistance is a major threat to mosquito control, and these findings help inform resistance management. At the same time, insecticide resistance is an informative model for studying the origin of adaptive variation. In the words of Rachel Carson, “If Darwin were alive today, he would be astounded and delighted by the impressive verification that his theories of the survival of the fittest are receiving from the insect world” (Silent Spring, 1962)
Abstract
Insecticide resistance is an informative model for studying the appearance of adaptive traits. Simultaneously, understanding how many times resistance mutations originate is essential to design effective resistance management. In the mosquito Culex pipiens, target–site resistance to the insecticide diflubenzuron (DFB) has been recently found in Italian and Turkish populations. Three point mutations confer it at the codon 1043 of the chitin synthase 1 gene (chs-1): I1043L, I1043M, and I1043F. Whether the resistant mutations originated independently from different susceptible alleles or sequentially from resistant alleles and whether resistant alleles from Italy and Turkey have originated once or multiple times remain unresolved. Here, we sequenced a fragment of the chs-1 gene carrying the resistant mutations and inferred the phylogenetic relationships among susceptible and resistant alleles. Confirming previous findings, we found the three mutations in Italy and the I1043M in Turkey. Notably, the I1043F was also found for the first time in Turkish samples, highlighting the need for extensive monitoring activities. Phylogenetic analyses are consistent with an independent origin of the I1043F, I1043M, and I1043L mutations from different susceptible alleles and with multiple independent origins of the Italian and Turkish I1043M and I1043F alleles.
1. Introduction
The understanding of how new beneficial traits originate is still a major goal in evolutionary biology. In this context, insecticide resistance has proved to be an informative model for studying the acquisition of new adaptive traits. The molecular basis of insecticide resistance to almost classes of insecticides has been indeed elucidated and our ability to detect resistant mutations has significantly improved in recent years [1,2,3,4,5].
The number of times different mutations have appeared is a major issue in understanding the adaptive traits’ appearance. This subject can be addressed by surveying the phylogenies of extant susceptible and resistant alleles. If the same mutation has occurred independently more than once, then we should be able to see the susceptible progenitor allele for each resistance allele that may still carry similar flanking sequences [1].
In this paper, we investigated the origin of the insecticide resistance to diflubenzuron (DFB) in the mosquito Culex pipiens. DFB is a Chitin Insect Inhibitor (CSI) widely used to control insect pests in agriculture as well as vectors in public health [6,7]. Its mechanism of action involves the interaction with the chitin synthase 1 (CHS1), the enzyme responsible for chitin synthesis in the cuticle [8,9]. DFB mainly acts by inhibiting the chitin synthesis and deposition, causing abortive molting and other insect physiology alterations [8].
In Cx. pipiens, DFB resistance is associated with three point mutations in the chitin synthase 1 gene (chs-1) at the amino codon 1043. The susceptible individuals carry the “ATC” gene sequence corresponding to the Isoleucine amino acid (I1043). In contrast, the mutant individuals carry “CTC,” “ATG,” or “TTC” sequences corresponding to the Leucine (I1043L), Methionine (I1043M), or Phenylalanine amino acids (I1043F), respectively [9,10]. The three mutations have been functionally validated with CRIPSR/Cas9 in D. melanogaster, and it was shown that they confer significant levels of resistance: the I1043M and the I1043F mutations resulted in a Resistance Ratio of >15,000 fold and the I1043L mutation in a Resistance Ratio of >20 fold [8,9]. Furthermore, quality control treatment, regularly conducted in the frame of the Emilia-Romagna (Northern Italy) mosquito control plan, showed that resistance can dramatically affect DFB performance in the field [10].
Since the first detection of DFB resistance in 2015 in Italy, Cx. pipiens populations from Portugal, France, Spain, Italy, Greece, Turkey, and Israel were screened for the occurrence of resistant mutations [9,10,11,12]. Except for two heterozygous individuals, i.e., I1043/I1043F recently found in Montpellier (France) [10], Italy and Turkey are the major areas where the resistant mutations occur. In particular, all three resistant alleles were found in the Emilia-Romagna region (Italy), with the I1043L and I1043M mutations having a frequency up to 60% and 77%, respectively, and the I1043F mutation a frequency <10% [10,11]. In the Mugla province (Turkey), the I1043L and I1043M DFB mutations were reported with a frequency of 28.1% and 43.3%, respectively [12].
To date, the origin of these mutations remains unresolved. Here, we aimed to assess whether: (i) the I1043F, I1043M and I1043L mutations conferring resistance have originated independently from different susceptible alleles or whether they come from mutations in resistant alleles; (ii) the resistant alleles found in Italy and Turkey have originated from multiple independent mutation events. To this aim, we sequenced a fragment of the chs-1 gene, which carries the I1043-resistant mutations, and surveyed the phylogenies of susceptible and resistant alleles.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Sites and Samples
Collection of Cx. pipiens individuals was performed in urban and peri-urban areas from 10 localities of Italy and Turkey (Figure 1), based on the previous detection of DFB resistance [10,11,12]. In each locality, larval samples were collected from at least five breeding sites to reduce the probability of collecting isofemale mosquitoes. Population name, geographical origin, samples size and year of collection are shown in Table 1.
Mosquito larvae were identified morphologically to species [12,13] and stored in ethanol 90%. Since Cx. quinquefasciatus was recently documented in Turkey, the taxonomic status of all larvae analyzed from Turkey was verified also by molecular analysis using the acetylcholinesterase (ACE) rapid assay as described in Smith and Fonseca [14].
2.2. Laboratory Procedures
DNA from individual mosquitoes was extracted by standard CTAB (cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide) protocol [15]. A fragment of the chs-1 gene that encompass the site 1043 of point mutations responsible for DFB resistance was amplified by Polymerase Chain reaction using the primers CHSseqF (5′-CCGCGTTCAAGATTGACAACTGG-3′) and CHSseqR (5′TCCAGTAGGGGTTCGTCAGG-3′) [9,10].
The PCR reaction was carried out in a 25 µL volume containing 5 ng of DNA, 0.2 μM of the forward and reverse primers, 12.5 μL of Q5® Hot Start High-Fidelity 2X Master Mix (Vetro Scientifica, Roma, Italy) and water. Negative controls included all reagents, but DNA were also included in the reaction. PCR cycling procedure was 95 °C for 5 min, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 sec, 60 °C for 30 sec, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. Four microliters of the PCR products were run on 1% agarose, 0.5X TAE gel, and visualized by staining with Gelred (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) to check for quality. PCR products were then sequenced by standard Sanger sequencing by Microsynth Inc., Balgach, Switzerland (https://www.microsynth.ch.html). All individuals were double strand sequenced.
2.3. Sequence Analyses
Sequences were checked using the software Chromas 2.6.5 (Technelysium, Helensvale, Australia) and aligned using ClustalX 2.149. Heterozygous positions were identified by double peaks in the electropherograms and were encoded using the IUPAC ambiguity code. All homozygous sequences were submitted to GenBank (accession codes: MZ494156- MZ494187) and used for the following analyses. The RDP, Geneconv, MaxChi, and Chimaera tests as implemented in the program RDP4 [16], were used to detect the possible occurrence of recombination. Polymorphisms of nucleotide sequences, gene, and nucleotide diversity were estimated using the software DNASP v. 6.0. [17]. The average uncorrected p-distance between chs-alleles was computed using Mega 7.051 [18].
3. Results
A total of 266 sequences of a 608 bp fragment of the chs-1 gene encompassing the site 1043 were obtained: among them, 124 sequences were homozygous (i.e., without double peaks in any position) and were used for DNA polymorphism and phylogenetic analyses (Table 1).
DNA polymorphism analysis showed the occurrence of 32 chs-alleles (encoded as a1–a32) (Table 1), identified by 57 nucleotide substitutions in 61 polymorphic sites (57 parsimony informative). Mean gene diversity and nucleotide diversity estimates were, respectively: 0.945 (sd 0.004) and 0.0189 (sd 0.0036). The recombination analysis did not find any event within the sequences (all p values > 0.05). Average uncorrected p-distance between the chs-alleles was 0.0189 (standard error 0.0026).
Six chs-alleles carrying DFB-resistant mutations were found (Table 1 and Table 2 and Figure 2). Among them, two alleles (a11 and a18) carried the I1043M mutation: the a11 allele was found in the Forlì and Cesena populations from Italy, while the a18 allele was found in the Turkish populations of Milas and Bodrum (uncorrected p-distance between them is 0.0339) (Supplementary Table S1). One allele carrying the I1043L mutation was found only in the Italian populations (a7). Three alleles carrying the I1043F mutation were found (a13, a15, and a24). The a13 and a15 alleles were found only in Italy, and they are closely related (uncorrected p-distance 0.0049); the a24 allele was found in Turkey. The uncorrected p-distances between the a13, a15 Italian alleles and the Turkish a24 allele were 0.0150 and 0.0167, respectively (Supplementary Table S1).
The phylogenetic relationships between the chs-alleles were reconstructed using Statistical Parsimony [19,20]. As shown by the network in Figure 2, no evidence of geographical structuring was found, as the alleles collected in Turkey were not more closely related among them than with the alleles collected in Italy.
The Italian alleles carrying the I1043M mutation (a11) originated from the susceptible allele a12 found in Forlì. The Italian alleles that carry the I1043L mutation (a7) originated from the susceptible allele a4 that occurs in six out of seven Italian populations (Table 1, Figure 2). The Italian alleles carrying the I1043F mutation (a13 and a15) originated from the susceptible allele a2 that was found in the Fiorenzuola and Parma populations (Table 1, Figure 2).
The Turkish allele carrying the I1043M mutation (a18) originated from the susceptible allele a5. This allele was found in the Italian population of Fiorenzuola, Parma, Bologna, and Forlì. Likewise, the a24 allele carrying the I1043F mutation is closely related to the susceptible allele a6 found in Italy in the Bologna and Mizzana populations and to the susceptible allele a17 found in the Italian population of Rovigo populations (Table 1, Figure 2).
4. Discussion
Three nonsynonymous substitutions in the 1043 codon of the chs-1 gene (I1043M, I1043L, and I1043F) are involved in resistance to DFB insecticide in Cx. pipiens populations [10]. All three resistant alleles have been documented in Northern Italy [10], and both the I1043M and I1043L alleles were found in Cx. pipiens populations from Turkey [12]. Confirming previous findings, we found the I1043M, I1043L, and I1043F alleles in Northern Italy and the I1043M allele in Turkey. At the same time, we did not find the I1043L allele in the Turkish samples. Although updating the distribution and abundance of resistance mutations in the study areas is out this paper’s aim, the finding of the I1043F allele also in the Milas population is worthy of attention.
How many times a resistance mutation appears is a central issue in understanding the evolution of resistance and its subsequent spread upon different insecticide selection pressure. Here, by using a phylogenetic approach, we firstly investigated whether the I1043F, I1043M, and I1043L mutations originated independently from different susceptible alleles, or they came from mutations in a resistant allele. For example, the TTC mutation (I1043F phenotype) could have originated from the ATC-susceptible allele (I1043 phenotype) by one point mutation, from the CTC-resistant allele (I1043L phenotype) by one point mutation, or from the ATG-resistant allele (I1043M phenotype) by two point mutations. Our analyses strongly support the multiple origins of all three resistant alleles. The chs-alleles that carry the mutations I1043L, I1043M, and I1043F, indeed, differ by several nucleotide substitutions and are identical to different susceptible alleles, except for the associated resistant mutation or few additional nucleotide substitutions (Figure 2).
Secondly, we investigated whether the I1043M and I1043F alleles found in Northern Italy and Turkey evolved multiple times independently. Regarding the chs-alleles carrying the I1043M mutation, the phylogenetic analysis showed that the a11 allele from Italy is substantially different from the a18 allele from Turkey, which suggests a separate origin. Likewise, the chs-alleles that carry the I1043F mutation from Italy (a13 and 15) are closely related to each other but distantly related to the I1043F allele from Turkey (a24), again supporting an independent origin.
Regarding the geographic origin of the I1043M- and I1043F-resistant alleles, the differences observed in the flanking regions of the I1043M and I1043F mutations observed in Italy and Turkey would suggest an independent origin. Multiple evolutionary origins in separate geographic areas have been suggested in different species for point mutations at the insecticide target sites, such as the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors [21], the acetylcholinesterase [22], and the voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) [23,24]. However, because the chs-1 region analyzed in Cx. pipiens showed no phylogeographic structure, future genetic populations studies using Single Nucleotide Polymorphims (SNPs) or microsatellite genetic markers are needed to shed light on this issue.
DFB resistance is of major concern for Cx. pipiens control, as DFB is one of the very few active ingredients available in Europe against mosquito larvae [1,11,25]. To date, the Northern Italy and Southwestern Turkey are the only geographic regions where multiple resistant alleles have been documented since the first detection of DFB resistance in 2015 in Italy [9,12]. Here, we showed that the three resistant mutations most likely originated from different susceptible alleles, and that the I1043M and I1043F alleles from Italy and Turkey evolved multiple times independently upon selective pressure from DFB applications. These findings, along with the first report of the I1043F mutation in Turkey, highlight the need for further monitoring activities in the Mediterranean region, where DFB is used against mosquito vectors.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects12080676/s1, Table S1: Average uncorrected p-distance between the chs-alleles found in Culex pipiens populations.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, V.M. and D.P.; methodology, V.M. and V.L.; resources, N.G. and N.S.Ç.; data curation, V.M. and D.P.; writing—original draft preparation, D.P.; writing—review and editing, V.M., D.P., V.L., N.G., N.S.Ç., R.B., J.V., and S.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of Instructions, University and Research, PRIN 2018 to S.U.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data can be found within the article and the Supplementary Materials.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Editors and four anonymous Reviewers for their comments and suggestions, Federica Morgante for technical help. N.S.Ç., was supported by 100/2000 YÖK PhD Scholarship and TUBİTAK [The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, Project number: 1649B031801960] 2210-A PhD Scholarship Programs.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Ffrench-Constant, R.H. The molecular genetics of insecticide resistance. Genetics 2013, 194, 807–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Feyereisen, R.; Dermauw, W.; Van Leeuwen, T. Genotype to phenotype, the molecular and physiological dimensions of resistance in arthropods. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 2015, 121, 61–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, N.N. Insecticide resistance in mosquitoes: Impact, mechanisms, and research directions. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2015, 60, 537–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hawkins, N.J.; Bass, C.; Dixon, A.; Neve, P. The evolutionary origins of pesticide resistance. Biol. Rev. 2019, 94, 135–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IRAC Insecticide MoA Classification. Available online: https://irac-online.org/modes-of-action/ (accessed on 5 July 2021).
- Tunaz, H.; Uygun, N. Insect growth regulators for insect pest control. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2004, 28, 377–387. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, R.; Liu, C.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Q. Benzoylurea chitin synthesis inhibitors. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2015, 63, 6847–6865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Douris, V.; Steinbach, D.; Panteleri, R.; Livadaras, I.; Pickett, J.A.; Leeuwen, T.V.; Nauen, R.; Vontas, J. Resistance mutation conserved between insects and mites unravels the benzoylurea insecticide mode of action on chitin biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 14692–14697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Grigoraki, L.; Puggioli, A.; Mavridis, K.; Douris, V.; Montanari, M.; Bellini, R.; Vontas, J. Striking diflubenzuron resistance in Culex pipiens, the prime vector of West Nile Virus. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fotakis, E.A.; Mastrantonio, V.; Grigoraki, L.; Porretta, D.; Puggioli, A.; Chaskopoulou, A.; Osório, H.; Weill, M.; Bellini, R.; Urbanelli, S. Identification and detection of a novel point mutation in the Chitin Synthase gene of Culex pipiens associated with diflubenzuron resistance. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porretta, D.; Fotakis, E.A.; Mastrantonio, V.; Chaskopoulou, A.; Michaelakis, A.; Kioulos, I.; Weill, M.; Urbanelli, S.; Vontas, J.; Bellini, R. Focal distribution of diflubenzuron resistance mutations in Culex pipiens mosquitoes from Northern Italy. Acta. Trop. 2019, 193, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guz, N.; Çağatay, N.S.; Fotakis, E.A.; Durmuşoğlu, E.; Vontas, J. Detection of diflubenzuron and pyrethroid resistance mutations in Culex pipiens from Muğla, Turkey. Acta. Trop. 2020, 203, 105294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schaffner, F.; Angel, G.; Geoffroy, B.; Hervy, J.P.; Rhaiem, A. The Mosquitoes of Europe/Les Moustiques d’Europe. Logiciel d’identification Et d’enseignement (CD-Rom); IRD Editions & EID MeÂditerrane Âe: Montpellier, France, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, J.L.; Fonseca, D.M. Rapid assays for identification of members of the Culex (Culex) pipiens complex, their hybrids, and other sibling species (Diptera: Culicidae). Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2004, 70, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Navajas, M.; Lagnel, J.; Fauvel, G.; De Moraes, G. Sequence variation of ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS) in commercially important phytoseiidae mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1999, 23, 851–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, D.P.; Lemey, P.; Posada, D. Analysing Recombination in Nucleotide Sequences. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11, 943–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rozas, J.; Ferrer-Mata, A.; Sánchez-DelBarrio, J.C.; Guirao-Rico, S.; Librado, P. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 3299–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Posada, D.; Crandall, K.A. Intraspecific gene genealogies: trees grafting into networks. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Templeton, A.R.; Crandall, K.A.; Sing, C.F. A cladistics analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 1992, 132, 619–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andreev, D.; Kreitman, M.; Phillips, T.W.; Beeman, R.W.; ffrench-Constant, R.H. Multiple origins of cyclodiene insecticide resistance in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Mol. Evol. 1999, 48, 615e624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karasov, T.; Messer, P.W.; Petrov, D.A. Evidence that adaptation in Drosophila is not limited by mutation at single sites. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, 1000924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Rinkevich, F.D.; Su, C.; Lazo, T.A.; Hawthorne, D.J.; Tingey, W.M.; Naimov, S.; Scott, J.G. Multiple evolutionary origins of knockdown resistance (kdr) in pyrethroid-resistant Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2012, 104, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cosme, L.V.; Gloria-Soria, A.; Caccone, A.; Powell, J.R.; Martins, A.J. Evolution of kdr haplotypes in worldwide populations of Aedes aegypti: Independent origins of the F1534C kdr mutation. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bellini, R.; Michaelakis, A.; Petric, D.; Schaffner, F.; Alten, B.; Angelini, P.; Aranda, C.; Becker, N.; Carrieri, M.; Di Luca, M.; et al. Practical management plan for invasive mosquito species in Europe: I. Asian tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus). Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 2020, 35, 101691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
Map showing the location of the Culex pipiens samples used in this study. Population name and geographical coordinates are shown in Table 1. Blue and red dots represent the sampling sites from Italy and Turkey, respectively.
Figure 1.
Map showing the location of the Culex pipiens samples used in this study. Population name and geographical coordinates are shown in Table 1. Blue and red dots represent the sampling sites from Italy and Turkey, respectively.
Figure 2.
Statistical parsimony network showing the phylogenetic relationships among the 32 chs-alleles observed in the Culex pipiens populations. Alleles are shown as circles with sizes corresponding to their frequencies in the total sample. Alleles are encoded as in Table 1. Open dots are missing intermediate haplotypes. For each resistant allele, the name of the mutation is specified.
Figure 2.
Statistical parsimony network showing the phylogenetic relationships among the 32 chs-alleles observed in the Culex pipiens populations. Alleles are shown as circles with sizes corresponding to their frequencies in the total sample. Alleles are encoded as in Table 1. Open dots are missing intermediate haplotypes. For each resistant allele, the name of the mutation is specified.
Table 1.
Locations, year of collection of the Culex pipiens samples analyzed in this study and number of homozygous sequences found in each locality. In brackets how many times a chs-allele was found in the population is shown. The chs-alleles that carry the DFB-resistant mutations are shown in bold: a7 (I1043L mutation); a11 and a18 (I1043M mutation); a13, a15, and a24 (I1043F mutation).
Table 1.
Locations, year of collection of the Culex pipiens samples analyzed in this study and number of homozygous sequences found in each locality. In brackets how many times a chs-allele was found in the population is shown. The chs-alleles that carry the DFB-resistant mutations are shown in bold: a7 (I1043L mutation); a11 and a18 (I1043M mutation); a13, a15, and a24 (I1043F mutation).
| Country | Code. Locality | No Larvae Analyzed | No. Homozygous Genotypes | Lat. | Long. | Year | chs-alleles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1. Fiorenzuola | 28 | 12 | 44,9241667 N | 9,9130555 E | 2017 | a1(6), a2(10), a3(2), a4(2), a5(4) |
| 2. Parma | 26 | 11 | 44,768382 N | 10,319429 E | 2017 | a1(4), a2(6), a3(4), a4(4), a5(4) | |
| 3. Bologna | 25 | 11 | 44,533022 N | 11,344763 E | 2020 | a4(6), a5(2), a6(2), a7(6), a8(6) | |
| 4. Mizzana | 27 | 12 | 44,851931 N | 11,588654 E | 2017 | a1(8), a4(4), a6(6), a8(2), a9(2), a10(2) | |
| 5. Forlì | 25 | 13 | 44,2109124 N | 12,0552449 E | 2020 | a5(4), a11(16), a12(2), a13(2), a14(2) | |
| 6 Cesena | 25 | 12 | 44,1425853 N | 12,2596991 E | 2020 | a4(2), a7(8), a11(10), a15(2), a16(2) | |
| 7. Rovigo | 24 | 10 | 45,069454 N | 11,790022 E | 2018 | a1(4), a3(2), a4(2), a7(2), a8(4), a17(6) | |
| Turkey | 8. Milas | 30 | 16 | 36,796029 N | 28,796965 E | 2016 | a3(2), a18(10), a19(2), a20(2), a21(4), a22(2), a23(6), a24(2), a25(2) |
| 9. Bodrum | 28 | 15 | 37,058288 N | 27,233579 E | 2016 | a18(12), a21(4), a26(2), a27(6), a28(2), a29(2), a30(2) | |
| 10. Menteşe | 28 | 12 | 37,253156 N | 28,244305 E | 2016 | a3(4), a4(2), a20(2), a25(6), a29(2), a31(4), a32(4) |
Table 2.
Variable sites within the chs-1 alleles that carry the DFB-resistant mutations. Numbering starts from the first nucleotide of the 608 bp amplified sequence. In yellow, the DFB mutations in the codon I1043 (ATC) are shown: I1043L (CTC); I1043M (ATG); I1043F (TTC).
Table 2.
Variable sites within the chs-1 alleles that carry the DFB-resistant mutations. Numbering starts from the first nucleotide of the 608 bp amplified sequence. In yellow, the DFB mutations in the codon I1043 (ATC) are shown: I1043L (CTC); I1043M (ATG); I1043F (TTC).
| Allele | Variable sites | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2 4 |
2 8 |
3 4 |
4 6 |
5 2 |
6 4 |
9 1 |
1 1 2 |
1 2 4 |
1 3 9 |
1 4 8 |
1 5 4 |
1 7 5 |
1 9 0 |
1 9 9 |
2 2 3 |
2 3 8 |
2 4 1 |
2 7 1 |
2 8 9 |
2 9 0 |
2 9 2 |
2 9 5 |
3 1 1 |
3 1 7 |
3 1 9 |
3 3 1 |
3 5 8 |
3 6 1 |
3 6 7 |
3 7 3 |
3 8 8 |
3 9 1 |
4 0 9 |
4 1 8 |
4 2 1 |
4 2 7 |
4 3 9 |
4 5 4 |
4 6 9 |
4 7 2 |
5 1 1 |
5 1 7 |
5 2 0 |
5 2 3 |
5 3 2 |
5 5 6 |
5 5 9 |
5 6 0 |
5 6 5 |
5 7 4 |
5 7 7 |
5 8 0 |
5 8 1 |
6 0 0 |
6 0 1 |
6 0 4 | |||
| a1 | T | T | G | T | G | G | G | G | C | C | C | A | C | G | G | C | C | T | C | T | A | C | G | T | T | G | C | T | C | T | G | G | A | G | A | A | C | G | C | A | A | A | C | C | C | C | G | C | T | C | C | G | G | T | T | G | C | ||
| a2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | A | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | G | - | C | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | A | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | A | - | T | - | C | T | C | - | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | C | T | - | - | - | T | T | - | - | A | - | - | - | A | C | - | C | - | ||
| a6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | C | - | T | C | - | C | - | A | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a8 | C | C | - | - | A | - | - | T | - | T | - | - | - | C | A | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | A | C | - | A | - | A | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | C | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | A | - | A | - | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | ||
| a10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | C | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | G | A | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a11 | C | C | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | A | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | G | A | - | C | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a12 | C | C | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | A | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | A | - | C | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | T | - | A | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | A | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | G | - | T | - | C | - | - | G | - | T | - | - | - | - | A | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | T | ||
| a15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | C | T | - | A | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a16 | C | C | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | A | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | A | - | C | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | C | - | C | - | ||
| a17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | C | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | C | - | - | C | - | C | - | A | - | A | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | A | - | T | - | C | T | C | - | G | - | - | C | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | C | C | T | - | - | - | T | T | - | - | A | - | - | - | A | C | - | C | - | ||
| a19 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | C | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | A | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | T | - | - | A | - | - | - | A | C | - | C | - | |||
| a20 | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | G | - | - | - | T | A | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | G | A | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | A | T | - | - | A | C | - | C | - | ||
| a21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | A | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | A | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | G | T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a22 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | C | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | A | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | A | - | - | ||
| a23 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | G | - | C | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | T | - | - | C | - | - | C | - | C | T | A | - | A | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | A | - | - | ||
| a24 | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | C | - | T | - | - | - | C | T | - | - | - | C | - | T | C | - | C | - | A | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a25 | C | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | T | C | - | - | - | - | C | - | T | C | - | C | - | A | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a26 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | A | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | A | C | C | A | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | C | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | A | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | T | - | - | A | - | - | - | A | C | - | - | - | ||
| a28 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | G | - | C | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | A | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a29 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a30 | C | C | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | A | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | A | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a31 | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | C | - | T | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | G | A | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| a32 | C | C | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | T | - | - | - | A | - | T | - | T | - | C | - | - | - | - | C | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | A | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Mastrantonio, V.; Porretta, D.; Lucchesi, V.; Güz, N.; Çağatay, N.S.; Bellini, R.; Vontas, J.; Urbanelli, S. Evolution of Adaptive Variation in the Mosquito Culex pipiens: Multiple Independent Origins of Insecticide Resistance Mutations. Insects 2021, 12, 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080676
AMA Style
Mastrantonio V, Porretta D, Lucchesi V, Güz N, Çağatay NS, Bellini R, Vontas J, Urbanelli S. Evolution of Adaptive Variation in the Mosquito Culex pipiens: Multiple Independent Origins of Insecticide Resistance Mutations. Insects. 2021; 12(8):676. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080676
Chicago/Turabian StyleMastrantonio, Valentina, Daniele Porretta, Valentina Lucchesi, Nurper Güz, Naciye Sena Çağatay, Romeo Bellini, John Vontas, and Sandra Urbanelli. 2021. "Evolution of Adaptive Variation in the Mosquito Culex pipiens: Multiple Independent Origins of Insecticide Resistance Mutations" Insects 12, no. 8: 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080676
APA StyleMastrantonio, V., Porretta, D., Lucchesi, V., Güz, N., Çağatay, N. S., Bellini, R., Vontas, J., & Urbanelli, S. (2021). Evolution of Adaptive Variation in the Mosquito Culex pipiens: Multiple Independent Origins of Insecticide Resistance Mutations. Insects, 12(8), 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080676
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
