Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Population Dynamics of Namib Desert Tenebrionid Beetles Reveal Complex Relationships to Pulse-Reserve Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Organic Farming and Agricultural Abandonment on Beneficial Arthropod Communities Associated with Olive Groves in Western Spain: Implications for Bactrocera oleae Management
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Heartwood Extracts Combined with Linseed Oil as Wood Preservatives in Field Tests in Southern Mississippi, USA
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Climate Change and Major Pests of Mediterranean Olive Orchards: Are We Ready to Face the Global Heating?

BioLabs, Institute of Life Science, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Piazza Martiri Della Libertà 33, 56127 Pisa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2021, 12(9), 802; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12090802
Submission received: 19 August 2021 / Revised: 2 September 2021 / Accepted: 6 September 2021 / Published: 8 September 2021

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The phenomenon of climate change affects the entire world, especially the most vulnerable areas such as the Mediterranean. Since the olive growing is one of the main economic sources for the Mediterranean countries, investigations on olive pests under global heating are necessary. Nowadays, knowledge on the topic is scarce, and nothing is known about the effects of climate change on olive pest parasitoids and predators. This information could be fundamental to understand the phenomena of pest outbreaks that are spreading in the Mediterranean olive orchards. The use of prevention tools (e.g., monitoring, prediction models) may help in controlling olive pests under a climate change scenario.

Abstract

Evidence of the impact of climate change on natural and agroecosystems is nowadays established worldwide, especially in the Mediterranean Basin, an area known to be very susceptible to heatwaves and drought. Olea europaea is one of the main income sources for the Mediterranean agroeconomy, and it is considered a sensitive indicator of the climate change degree because of the tight relationship between its biology and temperature trend. Despite the economic importance of the olive, few studies are nowadays available concerning the consequences that global heating may have on its major pests. Among the climatic parameters, temperature is the key one influencing the relation between the olive tree and its most threatening parasites, including Bactrocera oleae and Prays oleae. Therefore, several prediction models are based on this climatic parameter (e.g., cumulative degree day models). Even if the use of models could be a promising tool to improve pest control strategies and to safeguard the Mediterranean olive patrimony, they are not currently available for most O. europaea pests, and they have to be used considering their limits. This work stresses the lack of knowledge about the biology and the ethology of olive pests under a climate change scenario, inviting the scientific community to focus on the topic.

1. Introduction

Climate emergency is the major environmental global challenge of this century, and anthropogenic activities are the most significant driver of this phenomenon [1,2,3]. Dramatic data reveal that the carbon dioxide concentration has increased from 280 ppm in the preindustrial period to 401 ppm in 2015. Furthermore, an increase in temperature of about 0.85 °C has been recorded since the 19th century, and future projections hypothesize the average temperature will increase further [2,4]. Indeed, the global human population growth entails an ever-rising demand for food, placing pressure on the regulation of agroecosystem services [4,5,6]. The agriculture sector is one of the major contributors to climate emergency, and paradoxically, it is also the most afflicted by its worst impacts [6]. As a result of this imbalance, pest populations may become alarming, exceeding the economic thresholds of insect pests [2]. Climatic change directly interferes in insect survival, fecundity, voltinism and dispersal, and among climatic parameters, temperature is the most influential since insects are heterothermic [2,7,8]. Abiotic factors, such as temperature and humidity, can alter the coadaptation relationship between a host and its pest, resulting in pest outbreaks [9,10]. The capacity of a pest to face climatic variation is strictly related to the physiology of its host plant(s) [11,12] and to the adaptation of its natural enemies and their fitness, as temperature can affect the host searching behavior and the parasitization efficacy [13]. Insects may respond to climate change in several ways, with modification in phenology and distribution, influencing the composition of the community and causing great disorders on population dynamics (e.g., the size of swarming populations, the alteration of voltinism) [2,7,14,15].
The Mediterranean Basin is an area highly vulnerable to climate change, and observed rates for most climatic parameters exceed global trends [16,17]. Additionally, southern Mediterranean countries are expected to be the most afflicted by heatwaves and drought, and a huge backlash on agriculture productivity is predictable [18,19]. Olea europaea L. is one of the oldest permanent crops of the Mediterranean, where it has an essential socioeconomic and ecological relevance [19,20,21,22,23,24]. Nearly all (95%) of global olive oil demand is satisfied by the southern European countries; among them, Spain is the most devoted to oil production, followed by Italy, Greece and Portugal [23,25]. This high productivity is explained by the perfect adaptation of the olive tree to the Mediterranean climate due to its tolerance to drought conditions [18,23,26,27]. However, future projections of climate change forecast challenging perspectives for olive growers since temperature is increasing and water availability is becoming a serious problem for Mediterranean agriculture, particularly on European islands (e.g., Corsica, Sardinia and Sicily) that are expected to be highly susceptible to desertification [19,28]. Olea europaea is considered a sensitive indicator of the climate change degree since its phenology is strongly related to the temperature trend [25,29,30]. High temperatures may cause a default of O. europaea chilling requirement (450 h of chilling below 7.3 °C) and consequent problems in flowering and fruit bud development [31,32]. In addition to temperature, other abiotic factors directly influence olive productivity, such as precipitation, solar radiation, relative humidity and wind [25]. Furthermore, climatic parameters interfere in the manifestation of olive pests and diseases [25]. The set of organisms potentially detrimental to O. europaea is composed of more than 255 species, including insect pests, mites, nematodes and pathogenic microorganisms [33,34]. In the Mediterranean Basin, the yield loss caused by insects alone is estimated at about 15% of production per year, and the majority of this drop is caused by the key olive pest Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) [34]. Furthermore, other major secondary pests (e.g., Prays oleae) contribute locally or occasionally to the yield decline [34]. Insects can also play the role of pathogen vectors affecting O. europaea indirectly. For instance, in the Salento peninsula (Italy), the main cause of the olive quick decline syndrome is the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa transmitted between olive plants by the spittlebug Philaenus spumarius L. [35]. In this scenario, the ability to predict pests’ cycle and damage risk is a promising tool for programming a proper control strategy. To have a prediction as close as possible to the reality, the use of physiologically based models that include the effects of weather, the assessment of previous pest population densities, the biology of the pest and the interactions between key species is required [28,36,37,38,39,40].
Although olive growing is one of the main sources of income for Mediterranean agriculture [41], few studies are nowadays available concerning the consequences that climate change may have on major olive pests. This review examines the current knowledge on the topic, focusing on the possible adoptable strategies for dealing with future challenges and perspectives in a climate change scenario.

2. Climatic Consequences on the Key Olive Pest Bactrocera oleae

Worldwide, the exclusive key insect pest of the olive tree is the tephritid fly B. oleae [22,34,42,43,44]. Bactrocera oleae is a monophagous pest on the genus Olea that causes direct damage to olive yield since its larval stages feed on drupe pulp [43,45,46]. It causes serious economic losses that have been estimated at more than USD 1 billion per year in the Mediterranean alone [47]. In this area, B. oleae can complete several generations that vary from one to four depending on temperature and area characteristics (e.g., elevation, distance to sea) [40,48,49]. Among the environmental factors, temperature is the key parameter influencing B. oleae phenology and the relation with O. europaea [50]. High temperatures in summer induce B. oleae mortality and slowdown on pest activity, since adult physiological processes cease at 35 °C [51,52]. However, other patterns such as weather conditions, season extension and crop–pest synchrony impact temporal changes in pest abundance [40,53]. The tight relation that links B. oleae to Olea species [42] makes this system a proper scenario for studying the climatic change in the Mediterranean Basin [28].

2.1. Prediction Models of B. oleae Population Dynamics

The global climate change may influence insects’ population dynamics and pest outbreaks [40]. The ability of B. oleae to fly for long distances and the poor knowledge on the overwintering generation may influence the monitoring of the pest and consequently the prediction of infestation risk [49]. In this scenario, the use of prediction models is essential to improve pest control strategies, deal with environmental impact and ameliorate product quality [49,54,55]. Models based on long-term datasets, concerning both insect population dynamics and weather parameters, are relevant for organizing proper pest control strategies [40]. Even if B. oleae is the major insect pest of the olive tree worldwide, few studies have been currently done about predictive modeling of olive fly population dynamics, particularly in a climate change scenario. Below, models based on cumulative degree day, B. oleae physiology, endogenous and exogenous factors influencing B. oleae demography and machine learning models are analyzed.

2.1.1. Cumulative Degree Day Models

Bactrocera oleae evolves from pupae to adult when the cumulated degree day (CDD) reaches the value of 379.02 from oviposition, which usually takes place in October (base temperature of 8.99 °C) [40,49,56]. The heat unit accumulation by CDD has always been used as a temperature-dependent method to predict the adult emergence [49], even if an error of 10–15% is estimated [49,57]. In order to reduce errors in the CDD model, accurate calibration of the starting date is needed, and proper monitoring of B. oleae flight during the previous winter and spring seasons is essential [49]. Furthermore, the availability of long-term insect monitoring greatly influences the prediction quality [58]. In Liguria (northwest Italy), Petacchi et al. (2015) [49] demonstrated that the CDD model, supported by GIS approach and agrometeorological regional network, gave a reliable prediction of B. oleae emergence, highlighting the B. oleae diversity at the local scale and the strong coastal influence in pest distribution. According to Volpi et al. (2020) [59], the olive fruit fly finds advantageous conditions in coastal areas characterized by cool summers and mild winters, and the probability of infestation becomes low if the olive is cultivated far from the coast. The output of the CDD model was mapped with regression correlation, providing a precise description of B. oleae diversity and reporting the high spatial climatic variability of Liguria [49]. Additionally, Marchi et al. (2016) [40] described an important relationship between the degree of B. oleae infestation and temperature-based indices in Tuscany (central Italy), using 13 years (2001–2014) of monitoring data and a CDD model. In this temporal span, the highest attack by B. oleae was recorded in 2007 and 2014, years in which mild winters were observed. Indeed, in the last years, an increase in winter temperatures with few frost days has been registered in the Tuscany region [40,60]. These conditions usually cause a reduction in pest mortality and an acceleration in recovering from overwintering [59,61]. Furthermore, during summer 2014, temperatures rarely overpassed the thermic threshold of 35 °C. In this context, adult physiological activities remained undamaged, and great consequences on olive yield were reported [40]. The CDD model has also been used in northeast Portugal to predict the second generation of B. oleae, the most threatening in the Trás-os-Montes region, using data from 2005 to 2008 [62]. The model was suitable for predicting in advance B. oleae infestation both in 2006 and 2008. In 2007, the same model was not so efficient, probably in consequence of abnormal low summer temperatures (average 20.7 °C) [62]. Despite this unusual condition, the model was demonstrated to be a potential tool for B. oleae management, allowing the prior identification of the second-generation activity and consequently the estimation of the infestation risk [62].

2.1.2. Machine Learning Models

Machine learning (ML) algorithms are used for various purposes (e.g., data mining, image processing, predictive analytics) and allow the users to manage complex datasets and target trend analysis [59,63]. In agronomical studies, they are generally employed to build predictive models from regression or classification analysis depending on the variables [64]. For this purpose, large datasets are required over several years [65]. Volpi et al. (2020) [59] described an ML model based on a long-running sampling network (2002–2019) to predict, in Tuscany, the occurrence of the first summer generation of B. oleae. The algorithm selected for the model was greatly able to distinguish both the presence and the absence of the infestation, reaching an accuracy of 85% and 78%, respectively [59]. The model properly identified the mechanism that drove the occurrence of the olive fly summer generation, highlighting a good ability as a preventive tool in IPM of B. oleae. However, it did not show a clear relationship between summer temperatures and the olive fruit fly infestation [59].
Among ML techniques, the maximum entropy (ME) is a statistical–probabilistic technique that, except for its complex math, does not require high precision and huge datasets to accurately estimate species distributions [66]. It has been used to model the climatic suitability of B. oleae in the Iberian Peninsula and its probability of occurrence, determining a priori the presence or the absence of O. europaea (see Benhadi-Marín et al., 2020 [67]). In the model, the climatic suitability of the olive fruit fly was negatively influenced by high precipitation values recorded in the coldest quarter, and precipitation of the driest month agrees with the adaptation of the olive fly and the olive tree to the Mediterranean drought occurring in summer since it is in harmony with B. oleae bioecology [67]. Limiting environmental factors for both B. oleae and the olive tree are the main drivers influencing the habitat requirements for olive fly survival [67]. Additionally, temperature deeply contributes to the model, predicting a strong decrease in B. oleae suitability at a mean diurnal range >10 °C and an optimal for the mean temperature of the coldest quarter at 4.5 °C [67].

2.1.3. Physiologically Based Demographic Models

The management of a pest must include realistic estimates about its phenology and potential distribution in time and space and an evaluation of the damage [68]. These estimates are based on the multifactor time-varying complexity of pest systems, which are often tricky to assess, particularly in a climate change scenario [69]. For these purposes, mechanistic models, such as physiologically based demographic models (PBSMs), could be successfully used [70]. Gutierrez et al. (2009) [51] described the Italian distribution and abundance of olive and B. oleae using a PBDM under observed weather, considering 84 locations covering the whole peninsula, and climatic data from 1999 to 2005. The model created three warming scenarios by increasing daily mean temperature (+1 °C, +2 °C, +3 °C) and assuming all other variables as unaltered. The model estimated an increase in olive yields in the entire Italian territory, especially in the northern currently inhospitable areas (e.g., Po Valley), in all warming scenarios. However, some reductions in olive tree adaptability are predicted in southern areas due to excessively hot temperatures [51]. The PBDM estimated higher damages due to B. oleae with a 1 °C increase in temperature, particularly in northern Italy since the weather was predicted favorable for the species and also for the olive tree. Increases of +2 °C and +3 °C, instead, seem to cause inhospitable conditions for olive fly reproduction and survival, especially in the southern areas of the peninsula [51].

2.1.4. Model Based on Exogenous and Endogenous Factors Influencing Insect Population Dynamics

Insect population dynamics can be well investigated when global climatic indicators are considered together with local weather conditions [71]. Among global indicators, the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) is an important factor influencing plant and animal populations in the Mediterranean Basin [72]. Ordano et al. (2015) [73] investigated and modeled the joint role of exogenous (e.g., local climatic factors, NAO) and endogenous (e.g., intrinsic population dynamics) factors involved in the autoregressive process and population dynamics of B. oleae in five locations within Palestine and Israel. The model revealed that the main exogenous driver in all populations was the local climatic variation measured as night land surface temperature, while NAO was influential in only one of the studied populations [73]. The same population was also significantly influenced by olive fruit availability [73]. However, despite the strong influence of exogenous factors, the model indicated endogenous factors as the main driver influencing B. oleae population dynamics since it showed recurrent olive fly infestations revealing density-dependent population feedback [73].

2.1.5. Considerations on the Reliability of Predictive Models

Predictive models are based on associations between climate and natural distribution of a species, and they are focused on the conditions that keep the population alive and viable [74,75]. They are widely used in applied ecology to predict the future distribution of a species in a climate change framework [76]. Ecological niche models, such as the already cited ME model, are used in olive orchard context to provide future scenarios not only on insect pests but also on the epidemiology of pathogens, such as X. fastidiosa [77], and on Olea spp. future distribution [78]. However, predictive models have been recently questioned since they do not take into account many factors (e.g., biotic interactions, evolutionary change, dispersal ability) that together with the climate are involved in determining the distribution of a species [74,79]. Furthermore, species distribution models that are based entirely on contemporary realized distributions are considered potentially misleading for previsions in a climate change context [80]. Moreover, data must be collected according to a structured sampling design in order to avoid limits in drawing deductions on species distribution [76]. Despite the limits reported above, ME is one of the most popular predictive models since its simulation precision is greater than that of other niche models. Moreover, it has a short operation time, and it can also be used with small samples [79]. In general, the bioclimate predictive models can provide useful approximation about the impact of climate change on biodiversity and species distribution. Indeed, scientists must consider that the spatial scale at which these models are used is essential to interpret the results. Furthermore, to avoid misleading interpretation, the model’s output should be read taking into account the limitations involved in the selected model [74].

2.2. Climate Influence on B. oleae Parasitoids and Predators

The current knowledge about the influence of climatic factors on B. oleae parasitoid and predator complex is extremely patchy, despite the high interest in olive fly natural enemies as bio-controllers [22]. Among B. oleae parasitoids, Psyttalia concolor (Szépligeti) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) has been the most studied [81,82]. It was introduced in Europe in the early 1900s as a natural enemy of the olive fruit fly, but unsuccessfully [82,83]. Low winter temperatures may contribute to this failure, since P. concolor survival is negatively influenced by cold [82]. Furthermore, the climate breakdown may limit the success of B. oleae parasitoids [44]. Recently, Abd El-Salam et al. (2019) [44] described the influence of temperature and relative humidity on P. concolor survival in two Egyptian localities vulnerable to climate change. The study showed that the adverse change of temperature and relative humidity negatively influenced the relationship between the young stages of B. oleae and their parasitoid P. concolor [44]. Furthermore, temperature had a key role in determining P. concolor survival compared to relative humidity [44].
Soil arthropods (e.g., carabids, staphylinids, ants, spiders, opilionids, centipedes, earwigs, chilopods) are included in the predator complex of B. oleae, since the olive fly larvae leave the drupe to pupate in the soil before the winter [22,84,85]. The soil environment is highly dynamic, both because it hosts a huge number of plants and arthropods and because it is susceptible to changes in moisture, temperature and fluctuating redox states [86]. Even if most climate studies refer to the atmospheric conditions, climate change strongly influences soil characteristics (e.g., temperature, soil organic carbon) [87,88] and, consequently, arthropods dwelling in the ecosystem. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have been currently carried on about climate heating and soil predators of B. oleae.

2.3. Control Strategies of B. oleae under Global Warming

Climate change is one of the main factors that contribute to the use of pesticides and influences their behavior in the environment (e.g., transformation, degradation, volatilization, runoff, leaching) [89]. Historically, the control of B. oleae has been mainly based on the use of chemicals, even if it has changed over time [33,90]. Nowadays, since global heating influences the biology and distribution of B. oleae [50], its control methods must be adjusted according to this phenomenon. In autumn, the current extension of the period in which temperatures are favorable to B. oleae oviposition (>12 °C) increases the risk of yield loss for Mediterranean olive producers [91]. Marchini et al. (2017) [92] declared that olive fly females can complete one generation in spring, adding new evidence on the reproductive behavior of this species and pointing out the necessity of proper control strategies. Accordingly, preventive adulticide treatments (e.g., attract and kill techniques with canopy traps, bait traps) that cause a decrease in B. oleae reproductive activity are recommended to reduce B. oleae population in the following summer when olive fruits are set [92].
Moreover, the recent discovery of insecticide residues in olive oil and in the environment and the growing resistance to chemicals encourage the shift to eco-friendly control methods (e.g., botanical insecticides, insect growth regulators, semiochemicals) and conservation biological control programs (e.g., the enhancement of generalist predators) [33,93]. The implementation of a decision support system (DSS), together with reliable monitoring of the pest, allows bridging the gap between prediction models and extension services and technically supports the olive farmers in suggesting suitable management for the orchard [40]. In accordance with this, scheduled calendar treatments are abandoned, and chemical applications are reduced in time and space in favor of integrated pest management [40,94] (Figure 1). Furthermore, the recent development of advanced data process technologies allows monitoring and managing insect pests following an ecofriendly approach [90]. For instance, precision agriculture in olive fly control drives the chemical application directly on the hot spot area, limiting the treatment just to a few trees per orchard [90,95]. This causes a decrease in pesticide application and consequently a limitation of environmental pollution, since the chemical drift is reduced and the use of fossil fuel (CO2 emission) for the sprayer machines is limited [95,96]. Therefore, in the olive orchard, the adoption of new technologies together with alternative and eco-friendly control strategies might contribute to limit global heating thanks to a more sustainable use of pesticides and a reduction in air pollutants, limiting the carbon dioxide emission overall.

3. Influence of Climate on Some of the Major Secondary Pests of O. europaea

3.1. Olive Moths

The ecology and phenology of olive lepidopterans are strongly conditioned by weather conditions, characteristics of the host and the presence of antagonists [97]. Temperature is the most influential climatic parameter on the correlation between O. europaea and its moth pests [97]. Among the numerous moths linked to O. europaea, Prays oleae (Bernard) (Lepidoptera: Praydidae) is a major pest in all Mediterranean olive-growing scenarios [97]. The intensity of its attack is related to local climate conditions and olive phenology. In Morocco, coastal areas are more vulnerable to P. oleae, since temperatures are mild and humidity is important, while warmer and less humid regions do not advance P. oleae survival [97]. Morocco is one of the most vulnerable regions of the North Africa states to climate change because of its sensitivity and its limited adaptive capacities [98]. In this fragile framework, in which the gravity of P. oleae attack fluctuates each year depending on the climate [99], the use of prediction models could strongly contribute to P. oleae control.
In Greece, the polyphagous moth Euzophera bigella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) was noticed for the first time infesting the olive tree in 2011. Strong infestations were recorded in the province of Amphipolis with few cases of tree death [100]. The reasons for this outbreak were not investigated; however, Simoglou et al. (2012) [100] hypothesized a combination of climate alterations as the main driver.
Palpita vitrealis (=P. unionalis) (Rossi) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), also known as the jasmine moth, is an important pest of young olive plantations in several Mediterranean regions (e.g., Italy, Algeria) [101,102]. It feeds on new buds and leaflets causing shoot malformation and alteration of the vegetative structure [101,103]. Nowadays, the intensive (400–600 trees/ha) and the super-intensive (1600–2000 trees/ha) methods of olive growing are substituting for traditional systems in several Italian regions, causing an increase in P. vitrealis infestation number and intensity [103,104]. These management systems, together with advantageous climatic conditions, allow the insect to carry on continual generations during the year [103]. Even if is still unknown how climate change is influencing P. vitrealis life cycle, elevated temperatures promote high population density in the Mediterranean, especially in the autumn. Furthermore, temperature is the major climatic parameter influencing the duration of the P. vitrealis pupal stage [101].

3.2. The Olive Leaf Gall Midge, Dasineura oleae

The recent outbreaks of Dasineura oleae (Angelini) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in several Mediterranean regions prompted the consideration of this gall pest as a serious threat for the olive grove [100,105,106,107,108]. Little is known about this species, since before these outbreaks it has never been assumed as problematic [108]. However, leaves attacked by D. oleae are physiologically compromised, and premature foliar dropping is recorded when serious infestations occur, prompting yield losses to be hypothesized [106,107]. The causes of D. oleae outbreaks are currently unknown. However, Simoglou et al. (2012) [100] speculated about the importance of climate change on this phenomenon, since alterations of the climate parameters may affect several aspects of the pest (e.g., number of generations, abundance) and its natural enemies (e.g., success of parasitization activity) [100]. This may lead to an alteration of the tritrophic interaction concerning D. oleae, its parasitoids and the olive tree [2], resulting in unpredictable D. oleae outbreaks [2,100] (Figure 2). Picchi et al. (2021) [108] stressed the importance of pest monitoring in the outbreak areas to provide useful information concerning pest control strategies for olive growers. In this way, farmers may have an overview of pest population abundance and its natural enemies, offering the chance to study the effect of climate change on crop–pest synchrony over a long period [108].

4. Conclusions

Olea europaea is a perennial plant having a slow vegetative growth and a long biological cycle. The estimation of its adaptability to climate change is not simple since the availability of long-term climatic data is scarce. Consequentially, the investigation concerning the influence of global heating on olive pests is complex. The use of predictive models may help in this challenging task, even if the adoption of these tools in the Mediterranean scenario is mostly only related to the key pest B. oleae, while few studies have been conducted on the other major olive pests (e.g., the olive moths, D. oleae). Scientists should consider the limits linked to the predictive model selected in order to avoid misleading interpretation of the model’s output. Moreover, to face the global climatic change, the use of preventive techniques, such as frequent pest monitoring, together with the participation of the local extension services and the use of DSS, is fundamental. According to Damos (2015) [109], the use of these tools implies less chemical adoption and replacement by eco-friendly and safe alternatives, avoiding unwanted consequences of pesticide applications that may have an influence on climate change. Furthermore, even the issue of olive orchard scale has to be considered since the dynamic pest populations, especially in the case of good fliers, can vary according to this parameter. For instance, B. oleae adaptive behavior is already known at the regional scale (e.g., movement from low to high altitude in function of season, food availability, climate change) [110]. According to Hamman et al. (2021) [111], future scenarios at a major scale may include distributional changes, such as expansions into new areas, especially towards the historically cooler and upper elevations. Since the olive tree cultivation range is expected to increase in currently unfavorable and cool areas, we also expect a geographical shift of olive pests. In Italy, B. oleae distribution under climate warming is expected to reach the coolest areas of the peninsula, namely the Po Valley and the Apennines [51]. Nowadays, the lack of knowledge on the effects of global warming on major olive pests makes the olive groves an even more fragile and vulnerable agroecosystem. Further investigations are urgently needed on the topic in order to protect the Mediterranean olive heritage.

Funding

This manuscript has been realized with the funding provided by the scholarship granted by Agrobiosciences Ph.D. program at Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna of Pisa to Alice Caselli.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Marco Ferrali for his helpful assistance during the preparation of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mgbemene, C.A.; Nnaji, C.C.; Nwozor, C. Industrialization and its backlash: Focus on climate change and its consequences. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 9, 301–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. War, A.R.; Taggar, G.K.; War, M.Y.; Hussain, B. Impact of climate change on insect pests, plant chemical ecology, tritrophic interactions and food production. Int. J. Clin. Biol. Sci. 2016, 1, 16–29. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rădoi, M.I. Interconnections between sustainable development, climate change and agriculture. Rev. Stiinte Pol. 2020, 68, 53–61. [Google Scholar]
  4. Arora, N.K. Impact of climate change on agriculture production and its sustainable solutions. Environ. Sustain. 2019, 2, 95–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. McMichael, A.J. Globalization, climate change, and human health. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1335–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Clapp, J.; Newell, P.; Brent, Z.W. The global political economy of climate change, agriculture and food systems. J. Peasant Stud. 2018, 45, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Karuppaiah, V.; Sujayanad, G.K. Impact of climate change on population dynamics of insect pests. World J. Agric. Sci. 2012, 8, 240–246. [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang, J.; Li, J. Effects of climate change on overwintering pupae of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Int. J. Biometerol. 2015, 59, 863–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, X.; Levy, K.; Son, Y.; Johnson, M.W.; Daane, K.M. Comparison of the thermal performance between a population of the olive fruit fly and its co-adapted parasitoids. Biol. Control 2012, 60, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jaworski, T.; Hilszezański, J. The effect of temperature and humidity changes on insects development and their impact on forest ecosystems in the context of expected climate change. For. Res. Pap. 2013, 74, 345–355. [Google Scholar]
  11. Harrington, R.; Clark, S.J.; Welham, S.J.; Verrier, P.J.; Denholm, C.H.; Hullé, M.; Maurice, D.; Rounsevell, M.D.; Cocu, N.; European Union Examine Consortium. Environmental change and the phenology pf European aphids. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2007, 13, 1550–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Boullis, A.; Francis, F.; Verheggen, F.J. Climate change and tritrophic interactions: Will modifications to greenhouse gas emissions increase the vulnerability of herbivorous insects to natural enemies? Environ. Entomol. 2015, 44, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Chen, L.; Enkegaard, A.; Sørensen, J.G. Temperature affects biological control efficacy: A microcosm study of Trichogramma achaeae. Insects 2021, 12, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Menéndez, R. How are insects responding to global warming? Tijd. Entomol. 2007, 150, 355–365. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jönsson, A.M.; Harding, S.; Bärring, L.; Ravn, H.P. Impact of climate change on the population dynamics of Ips typographus in southern Sweden. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2007, 146, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Milano, M.; Ruelland, D.; Fernandez, S.; Dezetter, A.; Fabre, J.; Servat, E.; Fritsch, J.M.; Ardoin-Bardin, S.; Thivet, G. Current state of Mediterranean water resources and future trends under climatic and anthropogenic changes. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2013, 58, 498–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cramer, W.; Guiot, J.; Fader, M.; Garrabou, J.; Gattuso, J.P.; Iglesias, A.; Lange, M.A.; Lionello, P.; Llasat, M.C.; Paz, S.; et al. Climate change and interconnected risks to suitable development in the Mediterranen. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2018, 8, 972–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ponti, L.; Gutierrez, A.P.; Ruti, P.M.; Dell’Aquila, A. Fine-scale ecological and economic assessment of climate change on olive in the Mediterranean Basin reveals winner and losers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 5598–5603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Michalopoulos, G.; Kasapi, K.A.; Koubouris, G.; Psarras, G.; Arampatzis, G.; Hatzigiannakis, E.; Kavvadis, V.; Xiloyannis, C.; Montanaro, G.; Malliaraki, S.; et al. Adaptation of Mediterranean olive groves to climate change through sustainable cultivation practices. Climate 2020, 8, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Vossen, P. Olive oil: History, production, and characteristics of the world’s classic oils. HortScience 2007, 42, 1093–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Giunti, G.; Benelli, G.; Conte, G.; Mele, M.; Caruso, G.; Gucci, R.; Flamini, G.; Canale, A. VOCs-mediated location of olive fly larvae by the braconid parasitoid Psyttalia concolor. A multivariate comparison among VOC bouquets from three olive cultivars. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 7827615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Picchi, M.S.; Marchi, S.; Albertini, A.; Petacchi, R. Organic management of olive orchards increases the predation rate of overwintering pupae of Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Biol. Control 2017, 108, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fraga, H.; Pinto, J.G.; Viola, F.; Santos, J.A. Climate change projections for olive yields in the Mediterranean Basin. Int. J. Climatol. 2020, 40, 769–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Julca, I.; Marcet-Houben, M.; Cruz, F.; Gómez-Garrido, J.; Gaut, B.S.; Díez, C.M.; Gut, I.G.; Alioto, T.S.; Vargas, P.; Gabaldón, T. Genomic evidence for recurrent genetic admixture during the domestication of Mediterranean olive trees (Olea europaea L.). BMC Biol. 2020, 18, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fraga, H.; Moriondo, M.; Leolini, L.; Santos, J.A. Mediterranean olive orchards under climate change: A review of future impacts and adaptation strategies. Agronomy 2021, 11, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Orlandi, F.; Avolio, E.; Bonofiglio, T.; Federico, S.; Romano, V.; Fornaciari, M. Potential shifts in olive flowering according to climate variations in Southern Italy. Meteorol. Appl. 2012, 20, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Moriondo, M.; Ferrise, R.; Trombi, G.; Brilli, L.; Dibari, C.; Bindi, M. Modelling olive trees and grapevines in a changing climate. Environ. Model. Softw. 2015, 72, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ponti, L.; Cossu, A.; Gutierrez, A.P. Climate warming effects on the Olea europaea-Bactrocera oleae system in Mediterranean islands: Sardinia as an example. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2009, 15, 2874–2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Obsborne, C.P.; Chuine, I.; Viner, D.; Woodward, F.I. Olive phenology as a sensitive indicator of future climatic warning in the Mediterranean. Plant Cell Environ. 2000, 23, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Besnard, G.; Casas, R.R.D.; Vargas, P. Plastid and nuclear DNA polymorphism reveals historical processes of isolation and reticulation in the olive tree complex (Olea europaea). J. Biogeogr. 2007, 34, 736–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ayerza, R.; Sibbett, G.S. Thermal adaptability of olive (Olea europaea L.) to the Arid Chaco of Argentina. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001, 84, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gutierrez, A.P.; Ponti, L.; d‘Oultremont, T.; Ellis, C.K. Climate change effects on poikilotherm tritrophic interactions. Clim. Chang. 2008, 87 (Suppl. S1), S167–S192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Montiel-Bueno, A.; Jones, O. Alternative methods for controlling the olive fly, Bactrocera oleae, involving semiochemicals. Use of pheromones and other semiochemicals in integrated production. IOBC WPRS Bull. 2002, 25, 147–156. [Google Scholar]
  34. Haniotakis, E.G. Olive pest control: Present status and prospects. Integrated Protection of Olive Crops. IOBC WPRS Bull. 2005, 28, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  35. Cornara, D.; Saponari, M.; Zeilinger, A.R.; de Stradis, A.; Boscia, D.; Loconsole, G.; Bosco, D.; Martelli, G.P.; Almeida, R.P.P.; Porcelli, F. Spittlebugs as vectors of Xylella fastidiosa in olive orchards in Italy. J. Pest. Sci. 2017, 90, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Rochat, J.; Gutierrez, A.P. Weather-mediated regulation of olive scale by two parasitoids. J. Anim. Ecol. 2001, 70, 476–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Schmitz, O.J.; Post, E.; Burns, C.E.; Johnston, K.M. Ecosystem responses to global climate change: Moving beyond color mapping. Bioscience 2003, 53, 1199–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gutierrez, A.P.; Pitcairn, M.J.; Ellis, C.K.; Carruthers, N.; Ghezelbash, R. Evaluating biological control of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) in California: A GIS based supply-demand demographic model. Biol. Control 2005, 34, 115–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Merrill, R.M.; Gutierrez, D.; Lewis, O.T.; Gutierrez, J.; Diez, S.B.; Wilson, R.J. Combined effects of climate and biotic interactions on the elevational range of a phytophagous insect. J. Anim. Ecol. 2008, 77, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Marchi, S.; Guidotti, D.; Ricciolini, M.; Petacchi, R. Towards understanding temporal and spatial dynamics of Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) infestations using decade-long agrometeorological time series. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2016, 60, 1681–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Iofrida, N.; De Luca, A.I.; Gulisano, G.; Strano, A. An application of Q-methodology to Mediterranean olive production-stakeholders’ understanding of sustainability issues. Agric. Syst. 2018, 162, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nardi, F.; Carapelli, A.; Dallai, R.; Roderick, G.K.; Frati, F. Population structure and colonization history of the olive fly, Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 2729–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Malheiro, R.; Casal, S.; Baptista, P.; Pereira, J.A. A review of Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) impact in olive products: From the tree to the table. Trends Food Sci. 2015, 44, 226–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Abd El-Salam, A.M.E.; Salem, S.A.W.; Abdel-Rahman, R.S.; El-Behery, H.H.; Magd Elden, M.A. Effects of climatic changes on olive fly, Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) population dynamic with respect to the efficacy of its larval parasitoid in Egyptian olive trees. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2019, 43, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Daane, K.M.; Johnson, M.W. Olive fruit fly: Managing an ancient pest in modern times. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2010, 55, 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Benelli, G. Aggressive behavior and territoriality in the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae): Role of residence and time of day. J. Insect Behav. 2014, 27, 145–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Naz Eti, C.; Dogac, E.; Taskin, B.G.; Gokdere, G.; Taskin, V. Population structure and patterns of geographic differentiation on Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Eastern Mediterranean Basin. Mitochondrial DNA A 2018, 29, 1051–1062. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kounatidis, N.T.; Papadopoulos, P.; Mavragani-Tsipidou, P.; Cohen, Y.; Tertivanidis, K.; Nomikou, M.; Nestel, D. Effect of elevation on spatio-temporal patterns of olive fly (Bactrocera oleae) populations in northern Greece. J. Appl. Entomol. 2008, 132, 722–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Petacchi, R.; Marchi, S.; Federici, S.; Ragaglini, G. Large-scale simulation of temperature-dependent phenology in wintering populations of Bactrocera oleae (Rossi). J. Appl. Entomol. 2015, 139, 496–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ragaglini, G.; Tomassone, D.; Petacchi, R. Can spring-preventive adulticide treatments be assumed to improve Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) management? IOBC WPRS Bull. 2005, 30, 309–314. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gutierrez, A.P.; Ponti, L.; Cossu, Q.A. Effects of climate warming on olive and olive fly (Bactrocera oleae (Gmelin)) in California and Italy. Clim. Chang. 2009, 95, 195–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, X.G.; Johnson, M.W.; Daane, K.M.; Opp, S.B. Combined effects of heat stress and food supply on the flight performance of olive fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2009, 102, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Porter, J.H.; Parry, M.; Carter, T.R. The potential effects of climatic change on agricultural insect pests. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1991, 57, 221–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Park, Y.L.; Tollefson, J.J. Spatial prediction of corn root-worm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) adult emergence in Iowa corn fields. J. Econ. Entomol. 2005, 98, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Carriere, Y.; Ellsworth, P.C.; Dutilleul, P.; Ellers-Kirk, C.; Barkley, V.; Antilla, L. A GIS-based approach for area-wide pest management: The scales of Lygus hesperus movements to cotton from alfalfa, weeds, and cotton. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2006, 118, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Crovetti, A.; Quaglia, F.; Loi, G.; Rossi, E.; Malfatti, P.; Chesi, F.; Conti, B.; Belcari, A.; Raspi, A.; Paparatti, B. Influence of temperature and humidity on the development of the immature stages of Dacus oleae (Gmelin). Frustula Entomol. 1982, 5, 133–166. [Google Scholar]
  57. Higley, L.G.; Pedigo, L.P.; Ostlie, K.R. DEGDAY: A program for calculating degree-days and assumptions behind the degree-day approach. Environ. Entomol. 1986, 15, 999–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Bale, J.S.; Masters, G.J.; Hodkinson, I.D.; Awmack, C.; Bezemer, T.M.; Brown, V.K.; Butterfield, J.; Buse, A.; Coulson, J.C.; Farrar, J.; et al. Herbivory in global climate change research: Direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2002, 8, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Volpi, I.; Guidotti, D.; Mammini, M.; Petacchi, R.; Marchi, S. Managing complex datasets to predict Bactrocera oleae infestation at the regional scale. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 179, 105867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Moonen, A.C.; Ercoli, L.; Mariotti, M.; Masoni, A. Climate change in Italy indicated by agrometeorological indices over 122 years. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2002, 11, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bale, J.S.; Hayward, S.A.L. Insect overwintering in a changing climate. J. Exp. Biol. 2010, 213, 980–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Gonçalves, M.F.; Torres, L.M. The use of cumulative degree-days to predict olive fly, Bactrocera oleae (Rossi), activity in traditional olive groves from the northeast pf Portugal. J. Pest Sci. 2011, 84, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Dey, A. Machine learning algorithms: A review. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. IJCSIT 2016, 7, 1174–1179. [Google Scholar]
  64. Ip, R.H.L.; Ang, L.M.; Seng, K.P.; Broster, J.C.; Pratley, J.E. Big data and machine learning for crop protection. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 151, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hill, M.G.; Connolly, P.G.; Reutemann, P.; Fletcher, D. The use of data mining to assist crop protection decisions on kiwifruit in New Zealand. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2014, 108, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kornejady, A.; Ownegh, M.; Bahremand, A. Landslide susceptibility assessment using maximum entropy model with two different data sampling method. Catena 2017, 152, 144–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Benhadi-Marín, J.; Santos, S.A.P.; Baptista, P.; Pereira, J.A. Distribution of Bactrocera oleae (Rossi, 1790) throughout the Iberian Peninsula based on a maximum entropy modelling approach. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2020, 177, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gutierrez, A.P.; Mills, N.J.; Ponti, L. Limits to the potential distribution of the light brown apple moth in Arizona-California based on climate suitability and host plant availability. Biol. Invasions 2010, 12, 3319–3331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Tylianakis, J.M.; Didham, R.K.; Bascompte, J.; Wardle, D.A. Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11, 1351–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Ponti, L.; Gilioli, G.; Biondi, A.; Desneux, N.; Gutierrez, A.P. Physiologically based demographic models streamline identification and collection of data in evidence-based pest risk assessment. Bull. OEPP 2015, 45, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Aluja, M.; Ordano, M.; Guillén, L.; Rull, J. Understanding long-term fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) population dynamics: Implications for area wide management. J. Econ. Entomol. 2012, 105, 823–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hódar, J.A.; Zamora, R.; Cayuela, L. Climate change and the incidence of a forest pest in Mediterranean ecosystem: Can the North Atlantic Oscillation be used as a predictor? Clim. Chang. 2012, 113, 699–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ordano, M.; Engelhard, I.; Rempoulakis, P.; Nemny-Lavy, E.; Blum, M.; Yasin, S.; Lensky, I.M.; Papadopoulos, N.T.; Nestel, D. Olive fruit fly (Bactrocera oleae) population dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean: Influence of exogenous uncertainty on a monophagous frugivorous insect. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Pearson, R.G.; Dawson, T.P. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: Are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob. Ecol. Biogeol. 2003, 12, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Araújo, M.B.; Peterson, A.T. Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling. Ecology 2012, 93, 1527–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Yackulic, C.B.; Chandler, R.; Zipkin, E.F.; Royle, A.; Nichols, J.D.; Campbell Grant, E.H.; Veran, S. Presence-only modelling using MAXENT: When can we trust the inferences? Methods Ecol. Evol. 2013, 4, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bosso, L.; Di Febbraio, M.; Cristinzio, G.; Zoina, A.; Russo, D. Shedding light on the effects of climate change on the potential distribution of Xylella fastidiosa in the Mediterranean basin. Biol. Invasions 2016, 18, 1759–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ashraf, U.; Peterson, A.T.; Chaudhry, M.N.; Ashraf, I.; Saqib, Z.; Ahmad, S.R.; Ali, H. Ecological niche model comparison uder different climate scenarios: A case study of Olea sp. in Asia. Ecosphere 2017, 8, e01825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, A.; Wang, J.; Wang, R.; Yang, H.; Yang, W.; Yang, C.; Jin, Z. MaxEnt modeling to predict current and future distributions of Batocera lineolata (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) under climate change in China. Écoscience 2019, 27, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Veloz, S.D.; Williams, J.W.; Blois, J.L.; He, F.; Otto-Bliesner, B.; Liu, Z. No-analog climates and shifting realized niches during the late quaternary: Implications for the 21st-century predictions by species distribution models. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2012, 18, 1698–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, W.G.; Johnson, M.W.; Yokoyama, V.Y.; Pickett, C.H.; Daane, K.M. Comparative evaluation of two olive fruit fly parasitoids under varying abiotic conditions. BioControl 2011, 56, 283–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Garantonakis, N.; Varikou, K.; Birouraki, A. Parasitism of Psyttalia concolor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae) infesting different olive varieties. Phytoparasitica 2017, 45, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hoelmer, K.A.; Kirk, A.A.; Pickett, C.H.; Daane, K.M.; Johnson, M.W. Prospect for improving biological control of olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae), with introduced parasitoids (Hymenoptera). BioControl Sci. Technol. 2011, 21, 1005–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Orsini, M.M.; Daane, K.M.; Sime, K.R.; Nelson, E.H. Mortality of olive fruit fly pupae in California. BioControl Sci. Technol. 2007, 17, 797–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Albertini, A.; Pizzolotto, R.; Petacchi, R. Carabid patterns in olive orchards and woody semi-natural habitats: First implications for conservation biological control against Bactrocera oleae. BioControl 2017, 62, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Jansson, J.K.; Hofmockel, K.S. Soil microbiomes and climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Dimou, I.; Koutsikopoulos, C.; Economopoulos, A.P.; Lykakis, J. Depth of pupation of the wild olive fruit fly Bactrocera (Dacus) oleae (Gmel.) (Dipt., Tephritidae), as affected by soil abiotic factors. J. Appl. Entomol. 2003, 127, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, Y.; Chen, W.; Smith, S.L.; Riseborough, W.; Cihlar, J. Soil temperature in Canada during the twentieth century: Complex responses to atmospheric climate change. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2005, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tudi, M.; Ruan, H.D.; Wang, L.; Lyu, J.; Sadler, R.; Connell, D.; Chu, C.; Phung, D.T. Agriculture development, pesticide application and its impact on the environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Nestel., D.; Rempoulakis, P.; Yanovski, L.; Miranda, M.A.; Papadopoulos, N.T. The evolution of alternative control strategies in a traditional crop: Economy and policy as drivers of olive fly control. Adv. Insect Control Resist. Manag. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Petacchi, R.; Ferrali, M.; Valicenti, M. Mosca delle olive, il metodo “push-pull”. Olivo Olio 2021, 4, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
  92. Marchini, D.; Petacchi, R.; Marchi, S. Bactrocera oleae reproductive biology: New evidence on wintering wild populations in olive groves of Tuscany (Italy). Bull. Insectology 2017, 70, 121–128. [Google Scholar]
  93. Albertini, A.; Marchi, S.; Ratti, C.; Burgio, G.; Petacchi, R.; Magagnoli, S. Bactrocera oleae pupae predation by Ocypus olens detected by molecular gut content analysis. BioControl 2018, 63, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Miranda, M.A.; Barceló, C.; Valdés, F.; Feliu, J.F.; Nestel, D.; Papadopoulos, N.; Sciarretta, A.; Ruiz, M.; Alorda, B. Developing and implementation of decision support system (DSS) for the control of olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae, in Mediterranean olive orchards. Agronomy 2019, 9, 620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Pontikakos, C.M.; Tsiligiridis, T.A.; Drougka, M.E. Location-aware system for olive fruit fly spray control. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2010, 70, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Fenger, J. Air pollution in the last 50 years-from local to global. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ait Mansour, A.; Ouanaimi, F.; Chemseddine, M.; Boumezzough, A. Study of the flight dynamics of Prays oleae (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) using sexual trapping in olive orchards of Essaouira region, Morocco. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2017, 5, 943–952. [Google Scholar]
  98. Schilling, J.; Freier, K.P.; Hertig, E.; Scheffran, J. Climate change, vulnerability and adaptation in North Africa with focus on Morocco. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 156, 12–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Rosales, R.; Garrido, D.; Ramos, P.; Ramos, J.M. Ethylene can reduce Prays oleae attack in olive trees. Crop Prot. 2006, 25, 140–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Simoglou, K.B.; Karataraki, A.; Roditakis, N.E.; Roditakis, E. Euzophera bigella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Dasineura oleae (F. Low) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae): Emerging olive crop pests in the Mediterranean? J. Pest Sci. 2012, 85, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chaouche, S.T.; Bengouga, K.; Fadlaoui, H. The first detection of the olive leaf moth Palpita vitrealis (Rossi) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) as a serious pest in Biskra province (Algeria). Bull. OEPP 2019, 49, 593–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Antonelli, R.; Rossi, E. La Palpita unionalis (Lepidoptera: Pyraustidae): Un fitofago di recente importanza negli oliveti toscani. Inf. Fitopatol. 1989, 39, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  103. Valicenti, M.; Granchi, P.; Petacchi, R. Olivo, monitoraggio efficace e controllo di fitofagi fillofagi. L’Informatore Agrar. 2021, 4, 57–65. [Google Scholar]
  104. Proietti, P.; Nasini, L.; Ilarioni, L. Photosynthetic behavior of Spanish Arbequina and Italian Maurino olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars under super-intensive grove conditions. Photosynthetica 2012, 50, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Doğanlar, M. Parasitoids complex of the olive leaf gall midge, Dasineura oleae (Angelini, 1831) and Lasioptera oleicola Skuhravá (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in Hatay Turkey, with descriptions of new genus and species from Tetrastichinae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Türkiye Entomol. Derneği 2011, 35, 245–264. [Google Scholar]
  106. Tondini, E.; Petacchi, R. First observations on the parasitoids complex and on the biology of Dasineura oleae during an outbreak in Tuscany, Italy. Bull. Insectology 2019, 72, 93–102. [Google Scholar]
  107. Caselli, A.; Francini, A.; Minnocci, A.; Petacchi, R. Dasineura oleae: Morphological and physiological characterization following the midge attack on olive leaves. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2021, 128, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Picchi, M.S.; Tondini, E.; Albertarelli, N.; Monteforti, G.; Petacchi, R. Following the outbreak: Preliminary findings on the landscape effect on Dasineura oleae and its parasitoids in Central Italy. Phytoparasitica 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Damos, P. Modular structure of web-based decision support systems for integrated pest management. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 1347–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Guidotti, D.; Ragaglini, G.; Petacchi, R. Analysis of spatio-temportal Bactrocera oleae (Diptera, Tephritidae) infetstation distributions obtained from a large-scale monitoring network and its importance to IPM. IOBC Bull. 2005, 28, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
  111. Hammann, E.; Blevins, C.; Franks, S.J.; Jameel, M.I.; Anderson, J.T. Climate change alters plant-herbivore interactions. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 1894–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Long-term climatic data are the basis of insect pest prediction models together with insect data obtained by proper monitoring [40]. The decision support systems (DSSs), which bridge the gap between prediction models and extension services, have the task of technically supporting farmers in olive orchard management. In order to abandon scheduled treatments and then to avoid the risk of carrying out unnecessary chemical uses, farmers need a good scenario of the current status of the pest and its potential future trend. As a consequence of a conscious olive orchard management, positive outcomes on the environmental impact and global heating can be recorded (e.g., less air pollution) [49,54,55,96].
Figure 1. Long-term climatic data are the basis of insect pest prediction models together with insect data obtained by proper monitoring [40]. The decision support systems (DSSs), which bridge the gap between prediction models and extension services, have the task of technically supporting farmers in olive orchard management. In order to abandon scheduled treatments and then to avoid the risk of carrying out unnecessary chemical uses, farmers need a good scenario of the current status of the pest and its potential future trend. As a consequence of a conscious olive orchard management, positive outcomes on the environmental impact and global heating can be recorded (e.g., less air pollution) [49,54,55,96].
Insects 12 00802 g001
Figure 2. The tritrophic interaction of Dasienura oleae (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), its parasitoids and the olive tree could be hypothetically altered by global heating. Under increasing temperature (atmosphere and soil), the olive tree starts suffering, and the production of secondary metabolites and other plant defensive traits (e.g., the phenomena of “talking tree” (host–host) and “crying for help” (host–parasitoids)) may be affected [2]. This may cause a disequilibrium of the tritrophic interaction and the consequent occurrence of pest outbreaks [2,100].
Figure 2. The tritrophic interaction of Dasienura oleae (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), its parasitoids and the olive tree could be hypothetically altered by global heating. Under increasing temperature (atmosphere and soil), the olive tree starts suffering, and the production of secondary metabolites and other plant defensive traits (e.g., the phenomena of “talking tree” (host–host) and “crying for help” (host–parasitoids)) may be affected [2]. This may cause a disequilibrium of the tritrophic interaction and the consequent occurrence of pest outbreaks [2,100].
Insects 12 00802 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Caselli, A.; Petacchi, R. Climate Change and Major Pests of Mediterranean Olive Orchards: Are We Ready to Face the Global Heating? Insects 2021, 12, 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12090802

AMA Style

Caselli A, Petacchi R. Climate Change and Major Pests of Mediterranean Olive Orchards: Are We Ready to Face the Global Heating? Insects. 2021; 12(9):802. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12090802

Chicago/Turabian Style

Caselli, Alice, and Ruggero Petacchi. 2021. "Climate Change and Major Pests of Mediterranean Olive Orchards: Are We Ready to Face the Global Heating?" Insects 12, no. 9: 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12090802

APA Style

Caselli, A., & Petacchi, R. (2021). Climate Change and Major Pests of Mediterranean Olive Orchards: Are We Ready to Face the Global Heating? Insects, 12(9), 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12090802

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop