Next Article in Journal
Three New Species and One New Record of Hesperoschema (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae) from China
Next Article in Special Issue
Thelytokous Reproduction of Onion Thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman 1889, Infesting Welsh Onion and Genetic Variation among Their Subpopulations
Previous Article in Journal
Climate Change Impacts on the Potential Distribution of Apocheima cinerarius (Erschoff) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Frontiers Approaches to the Diagnosis of Thrips (Thysanoptera): How Effective Are the Molecular and Electronic Detection Platforms?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/insects13010061
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Problems with the Concept of “Pest” among the Diversity of Pestiferous Thrips

by
Laurence A. Mound
1,*,
Zhaohong Wang
2,
Élison F. B. Lima
3 and
Rita Marullo
4
1
Australian National Insect Collection, CSIRO, Canberra 2601, Australia
2
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Science, Guangzhou 510260, China
3
Campus Amílcar Ferreira Sobral, Universidade Federal do Piauí, BR 343, Km 3.5, Floriano 64808-605, PI, Brazil
4
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Università degli Studi Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, I-81924 Reggio Calabria, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2022, 13(1), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13010061
Submission received: 10 December 2021 / Revised: 30 December 2021 / Accepted: 30 December 2021 / Published: 5 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Economic Pest Thrips: Biology, Ecology, and Population Genetics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The word “pest” can be interpreted in many ways, ranging from something that causes minor personal irritation to something that results in major economic losses. The various insects that are referred to as thrips are used to discuss the question “what is a pest”. Many species of thrips feed on young leaves and developing fruits, and we emphasize that crop loss and reduced financial yield are more significant than mere presence of a thrips on a crop. The diversity in biology among species of thrips is discussed within the context of their respective families and subfamilies, emphasising that pest behaviour is found in relatively few species of the insect Order Thysanoptera.

Abstract

Almost all of the thrips species that are considered pests are members of a single subfamily of Thripidae, the Thripinae, a group that represents less than 30% of the species in the insect Order Thysanoptera. Three of the five major Families of Thysanoptera (Aeolothripidae, Heterothripidae, Melanthripidae) are not known to include any pest species. The Phlaeothripidae that includes more than 50% of the 6300 thrips species listed includes very few that are considered to be pests. Within the Thripidae, the members of the three smaller subfamilies, Panchaetothripinae, Dendrothripinae and Sericothripinae, include remarkably few species that result in serious crop losses. It is only in the subfamily Thripinae, and particularly among species of the Frankliniella genus-group and the Thrips genus-group that the major thrips species are found, including all but one of the vectors of Orthotospovirus infections. It is argued that the concept of pest is a socio-economic problem, with the pest status of any particular species being dependent on geographical area, cultivation practices, and market expectations as much as the intrinsic biology of any thrips species.

1. Introduction

“What is a pest?” seems a particularly simple question. Yet, a simple reply is difficult to construct, because the concept of “pest” is itself a complex socio-economic problem. It involves human perceptions and behaviour, the food production systems as well as the health of our differing societies, and the biogeographic differences in natural and human-made ecosystems. Any definition of “pest” will range from an organism that causes serious economic damage, to an organism that is merely unwelcome at some particular place. This latter definition is by no means unreasonable when we consider the activities of thrips, the members of the insect Order Thysanoptera. These insects commonly display thigmotactic behaviour, with the adults crawling into enclosed spaces such that the maximum area of their body surface is in contact with their surroundings. A typical example is Limothrips cerealium, a species known as the Thunder Fly in Britain due to its habit of taking flight from its grass host plants in vast numbers when a summer storm approaches [1]. These thrips swarms may then enter and activate smoke detector fire alarms, causing distress particularly to staff in hospitals. Similar thigmotactic behaviour by Haplothrips victoriensis in southern Australia can result in these insects hiding in the central cavity of freshly harvested raspberries; this thrips does not feed on or damage the crop, but its presence within the fruit is clearly unwelcome. Similarly, the bean thrips of California, Caliothrips fasciatus, crawls into the navels of oranges where it is regarded as a quarantine risk by countries importing the fruit [2]. In some warmer countries the leaves of Ficus trees are often galled by Gynaikothrips ficorum. These large thrips fly around and sometimes fall into a glass of wine or beer held by someone relaxing beneath the shady trees—that person would certainly consider that particular thrips a pest. Thus, the statement by Lewis [3] that “Several hundred species of thrips are pests” depends on how the word “pest” is interpreted. For the purposes of this article, we focus our concept of “pest” on those thrips species for which we have reason to believe they are associated repeatedly with serious damage to cultivated plants (Table 1).
We have two objectives here. One is a factual account of the systematic relationships amongst the various Thysanoptera species that have been reported to be pestiferous in some part of the world. In doing this we emphasize the relatively close evolutionary relationships amongst thrips species that are considered to be pests; most are members of just one subfamily, the Thripinae. The other objective is more contentious. We examine the unpredictability of thrips species as pests, both in time and space, emphasising that different parts of the world have different climates and crops, with different societies having differing expectations. For this we have tabulated the thrips considered to be pests in Brazil and China (Table 2 and Table 3), two widely differing countries with diversified crop production systems. The first of these essentially represents a single biogeographical, Neotropical, entity. In contrast, China is biogeographically complex, from the Palaearctic of Heilongjiang, to the Oriental fauna of Hainan and Yunnan, with the Province of Xinjiang in the west sharing faunal elements with Iran.

2. Assessing the Pest Status of Thrips

The published literature about thrips commonly involves an assumption that any thrips found on a cultivated plant will be a pest. This assumption can occur even in the absence of any evidence of damage, let alone crop loss or economic impact. One example, also mentioned below, is the Black Plague thrips in Australia (Figure 1A) that disperses from its grass host plants as these dry in summer; vast numbers then land on irrigated crops where they do not breed. Mass flights also occur in Thrips australis, a species that breeds primarily in the flowers of Eucalyptus trees that commonly have mass-flowering periods. All of the flowers on a single tree thus die within a short period, and the adult thrips then disperse in very large numbers, seeking shelter in the flowers of many different surrounding plants but without breeding in them. This phenomenon of massed flights of adults occurs in other thrips species but again, it is not necessarily associated with any damage to the plants (Figure 1B).
Even when some cultivated plant shows symptoms of thrips feeding damage, the culprit pest is not necessarily the most visible or abundant species. For example, a severely damaged crop of Solanum melongena in Brazil was observed to bear large numbers of the highly visible and dark species, Caliothrips phaseoli, but the leaf damage to the plants was due to small numbers of the small pale species, Thrips palmi [4]. Additionally, economically significant damage can occur on some sensitive fruit crops with remarkably low thrips populations. Even a single larva of Frankliniella occidentalis feeding under the sepals on a young nectarine (Prunus persica) may cause undesirable skin blemishes as that fruit expands.
A further confusion for any simple definition of “pest” is due to the opportunistic behaviour that is widespread amongst Thysanoptera [5], such that a known crop pest may behave as an effective predator, constraining populations of leaf mite pests [6,7]. Moreover, the pest status of a species may change with time, such that the European species, Taeniothrips inconsequens, was an important pest of pear trees in California early in the 20th century, but is now of little importance in that area, although later in the century it became a major pest causing defoliation of sugar maple trees in northeastern USA [8]. Similarly, Thrips calcaratus has been responsible for damaging the leaves of Tilia trees in eastern USA [9], but populations in its native habitats in Europe are small and often localized [10].
Any attempt at a broad definition of pest must consider that “pest” is not an essential attribute of any thrips species. A species that is associated with crop damage at one site does not necessarily cause damage at some other site. Additionally, “crop damage” itself can vary from trivial markings on leaves to crop failure and economic losses. For example, Anaphothrips obscurus and A. sudanensis sometimes occur at some localities in sufficiently large numbers to cause visible leaf damage to cereal crops, but more commonly the populations of these thrips are inconspicuous and not associated with any visible damage. Other thrips species that are listed as pests have restricted distributions and thus have a relatively local economic impact; for example. Bradinothrips musae on banana trees in Brazil [11], or Ceratothripoides claratris as a virus vector on tomatoes in parts of southeast Asia [12]. At the opposite extreme there are polyphagous species such as Frankliniella occidentalis and Thrips tabaci whose feeding and virus vectoring have come to involve serious economic losses worldwide [13]. It is among these, and similar highly polyphagous species, that the most important thrips pests have developed.

3. The Diversity of Pest Thysanoptera

About 6300 thrips species are currently recognized [14], and these are considered to be members of one or other of the two Thysanoptera Suborders, the Terebrantia and the Tubulifera. The latter comprises 65% of all Thysanoptera species, and these are placed in the single family Phlaeothripidae. Remarkably few of the 3800 species in this family can be considered pests, with the majority of the species feeding only on fungi [15] on dead leaves and branches; these species may even be beneficial in facilitating nutrient recycling. The remaining Phlaeothripidae species are found mainly feeding on green leaves where they often cause leaf distortions or even galls; relatively few species live and breed in flowers. Typical leaf-galling thrips are the Gynaikothrips species on the leaves of Ficus species that are widely planted as amenity trees in tropical and subtropical areas [16]. However, there seems to be no demonstration that this inhibits the growth of infested trees. Similar leaf damage is caused on persimmon trees (Diospyros kaki) in Japan by Ponticulothrips diospyrosi [17]; in southern Europe, Liothrips oleae is known to cause leaf distortions on olive trees [18]; several species of Liothrips are associated with similar damage to Piper vines, including commercial pepper crops, between southern India and northern Australia [19]. In South America, Holopothrips fulvus has been reported damaging the foliage of Cashew trees (Anacardium occidentale) [20], and Pseudophilothrips adisi is considered the key pest on cultivated Guarana (Paullinia cupana) [21]. One rare demonstration of actual damage to the growth of a tree by a leaf-feeding phlaeothripid was provided by [22]. These authors recorded an experiment with almost 50% reduction in tree height to Polyalthia longifolia, a widespread Asian amenity tree, due to infestation by the leaf-galling species Crotonothrips polyalthiae. Even more severe damage, leading to the death of the endemic plant Myoporum sandwichense, has been recorded on Hawaii by the introduced Australian phlaeothripid Klambothrips myopori [23]. In contrast, few Phlaeothripidae breed in flowers, although some that breed in the florets of Poaceae can occur in very large numbers. One such species, Haplothrips froggatti, is known as the Black Plague thrips in Australia because vast numbers of adults fly off as the grass heads dry out, and these thrips may then land on and seek shelter on irrigated plants on which they neither feed nor breed (Figure 1A).
The Thysanoptera Suborder Terebrantia comprises eight families [14], and the majority of pestiferous thrips are members of the single family Thripidae. It is only within this family that the vectors of Orthotospoviruses are known, and these vector species are the thrips that cause the greatest economic damage worldwide. Indeed, the major thrips pests are all members of the Thripinae, the largest of the four subfamilies recognized in the Thripidae. Each of the other three subfamilies, Panchaetothripinae, Dendrothripinae and Sericothripinae, includes a few pest thrips, but with only one species known as a virus vector. The discussion below about pest thrips is organized around these four subfamilies.

4. Pestiferous Panchaetothripinae

With the exception of Caliothrips species, the species of this subfamily breed mainly on older leaves rather than on newly emerged leaves, and not in flowers. They are thus very different in behaviour and effect from most pest species of Thripinae, such as Scirtothrips species that feed particularly on young, developing tissues. The Panchaetothripinae comprises about 150 species, of which the most well-known is the Greenhouse Thrips, Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis. First described from Europe, but native to South America [11,24], this thrips is now found throughout the world. In cool climates, it is usually found only in sheltered conditions, but in warmer climates it breeds readily out of doors. All life-stages of this species live on mature leaves, and affected leaves usually bear dark spots of faecal material that have been exuded by the larvae. It has been found breeding on a wide range of plant species, but is particularly associated with hard leaves, such as those of Arbutus unedo or Camellia sinensis. However, ferns with relatively soft fronds sometimes bear large populations, particularly when water-stressed; this thrips was reported recently from strawberries in Brazil [25].
Several species of the genus Helionothrips are similar in appearance and biology to Heliothrips species, with H. aino forming large populations on Taro (Colocasia esculenta), and H. annosus similarly on Cinnamomum burmanii, with the leaves of these plants often showing white patches. The red-banded cacao thrips, Selenothrips rubrocinctus, also Retithrips syriacus, commonly damage the leaves of various plants in tropical countries, ranging from cocoa to roses. In the greenhouses of temperate areas Parthenothrips dracaenae sometimes causes similar problems. However, it is unusual for any of these species to be associated with crop yield reduction. The genus Hercinothrips includes at least three species that are associated with damaged leaves: H. bicinctus and H. femoralis both develop large populations on the older leaves of a wide range of plants; and H. dimidiatus has recently become a pest in southern Europe on decorative Aloe plants [26]. The genus Caliothrips includes several species that are associated with the leaves of Poaceae including Sugar Cane, for example C. striatopterus. Other Caliothrips species are reported to damage crop plants, such as C. impurus and C. sudanensis on seedling cotton in Africa. As mentioned above, C. fasciatus is considered a quarantine risk when found hiding in imported navel oranges. Several other species of this subfamily are sometimes found irregularly in association with leaf damage (Table 1), but they are rarely reported to be of economic importance except locally.

5. Pestiferous Dendrothripinae

Just over 100 species are known in this group, and they all feed and breed primarily on mature leaves rather than on young newly emerged leaves. Almost any of them may, at times, be associated with feeding symptoms, but very few are known to cause serious damage. Dendrothrips ornatus sometimes causes pale markings on the leaves of Privet (Ligustrum vulgare) in Europe, as well as similar symptoms on Lilac (Syringa vulgaris), a related member of the Oleaceae [27], in northern China. However, the only crop reported to be seriously damaged by a Dendrothrips species is Camellia sinensis in China, where D. minowai usually develops large populations. Two species of Pseudodendrothrips are also recorded in association with leaf damage: P. mori can be particularly serious on mulberry (Morus alba) in dry climates [28], but P. stuardoi seems to be less damaging on fig trees (Ficus carica) [29]. In South America, Leucothrips species are sometimes reported in association with leaf damage to capsicum crops and also to crops of Sechium edule [30].

6. Pestiferous Sericothripinae

This subfamily currently comprises only three genera, with a total of 170 species [14], but only a few species in the genus Neohydatothrips have been associated with damage to any plants. The most important one, N. variabilis, is the main vector of soybean vein necrosis virus across much of North America [31]. This is the only Orthotospovirus known to be vectored by any thrips species that is not a member of the Thripinae. Considering the widespread cultivation around the world of soybean (Glycine max), this combination of thrips and virus has the potential of becoming of major economic importance. In Colombia, N. burungae (but under the name signifer) has been reported as damaging Passion fruit vines (Passiflora edulis) [32], and in southern China, N. flavicingulus has been found in large numbers damaging the leaves of Camphor trees (Cinnamomum camphora). The marigold thrips, N. samayunkur, occurs widely around the world inducing damage to the leaves and flowers of garden plants in the genus Tagetes [33,34]. The only other sericothripine species that has an impact on the human economy is Sericothrips staphylinus, a species that has been used in the biological control of Gorse (Ulex europea), an invasive weed in several countries [35].

7. Pestiferous Thripinae

Before considering the pest status among the 1800 known species in this subfamily it is important to emphasise that less than 1% of these species are recorded as vectors of the serious crop diseases known as Orthotospoviruses [36]. With the exception of Neohydatothrips variabilis in the Sericothripinae, the other 14 species recorded as vectors of this group of plant viruses are all members of the Thripinae, and these species are members of five different genera (Figure 2). Eight vector species are members of the genus Frankliniella: three are members of the genus Thrips; the remaining three are each placed in different unrelated genera. This suggests that the association between thrips and the various Orthotospovirus species has arisen independently several times and on different continents. Zhang et al. [36], in recognizing 30 species of Orthotospovirus stated that 17 of these are reported from China (including undescribed species). However, no known vector species is endemic to China, although Thrips palmi is possibly native in the tropical southwest of that country. In contrast, eight of the 15 thrips vector species are originally from the American continent, with five from North America, and three from South America (Figure 2).

7.1. Thripinae Pest Species in Genus-Groups

The evolutionary relationships among the 230 genera recognized in this subfamily remain far from clear, with only a few major supra-generic groupings reasonably diagnosed [37]. Among the 90 listed species of Thripinae in Table 1 there are two major groups: Frankliniella species mainly from the New World; Thrips and related genera mainly from the Old World. Of the smaller groups, the Megalurothrips group is almost entirely Old World in its distribution, as is the Mycterothrips group. In contrast, Scirtothrips and its relatives are essentially pantropical, and the Anaphothrips, Chirothrips and Taeniothrips groups also all have native species in widely separated parts of the world. The range of pest species within each of these groups is here considered separately.

7.1.1. Frankliniella Genus-Group

This genus-group includes Frankliniella, with almost 240 species, plus six small genera [38] that comprise a total of 33 species. These small genera are all from the Old World, and, apart Kakothrips pisivorus that was described originally as a pest of pea crops in Britain, none of the included species are considered pests. In contrast, Frankliniella is almost entirely New World in origin, with only six species native to the Palaearctic [39]. Of these six species only F. intonsa is seriously pestiferous at times, whereas amongst the many New World species there are several that are associated with damage to cultivated plants.
Some of these New World Frankliniella pest species are restricted in their host range, or at least in the range of plants on which they have been reported to cause damage. For example, F. melanommata, sometimes causes extensive damage to crops of cassava (Manihot utilissima) in parts of South America [40], and in various countries the Poaceae-living species, F. tenuicornis and F. williamsi, can develop large populations on the leaves of maize (Zea mays) [39], although usually without serious yield reduction. Two species that possibly have a wider host range, F. brevicaulis and F. parvula, are particularly associated with damage to bananas (Musa sativa), and both are also commonly associated with cocoa trees (Theobroma cacao) [40]. A few common species occur on many different plant species including crops and garden ornamentals (F. gardeniae, F. insularis, F. tritici), but are not usually considered serious pests. Then, there are eight highly polyphagous pest species of Frankliniella, of which seven originate from the American continent (Table 2).
Unfortunately, species recognition in this genus continues to pose considerable problems. For example, F. gemina cannot be distinguished satisfactorily from F. zucchini [41], despite them both being considered Orthotospovirus vectors. Even greater confusion exists with the worldwide pest, F. schultzei, within which molecular studies have distinguished a complex of sibling species [42]. However, no evidence has been produced of any consistent biological differences between these siblings, including their ability to transmit Orthotospoviruses. As a result, for the purposes of practical horticulture and agriculture, F. schultzei continues to be treated as a single entity.
F. occidentalis is the thrips species that has become of greatest economic importance in the past 50 years [43]. Individuals taken from crops around the world are remarkably uniform in their colour and structure, and can be identified from the CO1 gene [44]. However, the species is considered to have come from western North America. In the mountains of California, populations of either yellow or dark brown forms have been collected in the absence of the bicoloured pest form that is common on crops in the California Central Valley, but there has been only one study of molecular variation among Californian F. occidentalis populations. This indicated the presence of two sibling species [45], one of which occurs worldwide and the second (the Lupin strain) known from China and New Zealand as well as California. However, this study did not include the native colour variants from the mountains of western USA. Breeding experiments in California [46] indicated that the colour forms segregated according to Mendelian expectations, but those results do not accord with the fact that dark forms of this species occur in various parts of the world that are subject to low temperatures, even in winter in parts of eastern Australia. Despite this species being so well-known [47], further studies on the native populations of F. occidentalis in western USA, including experimental rearing together with associated molecular work, could yield a better understanding of the origin of this remarkable pest.

7.1.2. Thrips Genus-Group

About 15 genera are considered members of this genus-group, with 300 species in the genus Thrips. Of the other 14 genera, eight of them each includes a single species, and the remaining six genera comprise a total of 67 species. Apart from members of Thrips genus, the only other members of this genus-group that involve pest species are species of three Old World genera associated with Poaceae, Bolacothrips, Fulmekiola and Stenchaetothrips. The 13 species listed under Bolacothrips are of minor importance, but F. serrata is sometimes considered an important pest on young sugar cane. Amongst the 42 species of Stenchaetothrips several are associated with leaf damage on cereal crops or even on decorative species of bamboo [48]. One of them, the Rice Thrips, S. biformis, used to be a serious pest in beds of rice seedlings, but it is usually of limited importance on established rice crops that are grown using modern cultivation techniques.
Among the many species of Thrips genus several have been recorded as damaging plants, including a few species that have a restricted host range. Feeding by the Gladiolus Thrips, T. simplex, can cause linear markings on the leaves and flowers of cultivated Gladiolus plants as well as a few related Iridaceae [49]. The Linden Thrips, T. calcaratus, is largely restricted to the leaves of Tilia species [9], the Hop-flower thrips, T. albopilosus, is sometimes abundant on Humulus lupulus in Europe, and T. alliorum is sometimes a problem on chives and onions in China [50]. It is amongst the polyphagous species of the genus that serious pests are found, although wide host range is not closely correlated with pest status. For example, T. hawaiiensis is often abundant in tropical and subtropical countries and can be found in the flowers of many different plants; but high numbers of adults are not always associated with serious crop damage or yield reduction. Moreover, in Malaysia this thrips is considered beneficial in being the main pollinator on plantations of Oil Palm, Elaeis guineensis [51]. Similarly. T. parvispinus is generally a harmless flower thrips, but at some localities on particular plants, such as in Hawaii on pawpaw (Carica papaya), it can cause economic problems [52].
This situation of unpredictable pest status occurs with several of the Thrips species listed here (Table 1). Thus T. obscuratus is an abundant species that is widespread in New Zealand on many native plants [53], although locally it can be an important pest in fruit orchards. Similarly, although the highly polyphagous Australian Plague Thrips, T. imaginis, was considered an orchard pest early in the 20th century it is currently not usually associated with extensive crop damage. This is not the only thrips species in which behaviour has changed over time. One polyphagous species native to Japan, T. setosus, is typically associated with crops of Solanaceae in that country [54], but in recent years has become of quarantine significance, being found on the leaves of Hydrangea plants imported into Europe.
Worldwide, the two most important pest species in the genus Thrips are T. palmi and T. tabaci. Both of these are Orthotospovirus vectors, and although flower-living they both cause serious feeding damage on the leaves of some plants that they attack. The Melon Thrips, T. palmi, is a major pest in tropical countries [55], sometimes almost defoliating crops of Eggplant (Solanum melongena) (Figure 3B), although it also causes serious damage to crops of other Cucurbitaceae related to melons. Similarly, the Onion Thrips, T. tabaci, is highly polyphagous and particularly known as a pest of species in the genus Allium. However, it causes considerable damage to Brassica crops and is sometimes associated with distantly related plant species such as wheat (Triticum). However, T. tabaci shares with Frankliniella schultzei the ability to be a beneficial insect when it acts as a predator on mites, including Eriophyidae [56].

7.1.3. Megalurothrips Genus-Group

The three major genera that comprise this group all involve species that breed mainly in the flowers of Fabaceae. Species in two of them, Odontothrips and the Australian genus Odontothripiella, are rarely associated with crop plants, whereas several species of Megalurothrips are important as pests of bean crops in tropical and subtropical countries [57,58,59]. Two further genera that are possibly related to this genus-group are Ceratothripoides and Pezothrips [37]. The first includes C. claratris that is an Orthotospovirus vector on tomato plants in Asia [12], and the second includes an Australian species, P. kellyanus, that causes damage to citrus fruits in Australia, New Zealand and the European Mediterranean area [60].

7.1.4. Scirtothrips Genus-Group

Although nine genera are placed in this group [61], totalling almost 120 species from various tropical countries, more than 100 of these species are members of the genus Scirtothrips. Adults and larvae of species in this genus feed on young, rapidly growing, plant tissues. As a result, they not only cause damage and distortion to newly emerging leaves, but also cause serious economic damage to the fruits of Citrus and avocado by feeding on these in the earliest stages of fruit development [62]. Feeding on young citrus fruits by S. aurantii in South Africa, and S. citri in California, leads to similar symptoms of a ring of scar tissue around the fruit attachment point. Similarly, S. perseae feeds on the surface of young avocado fruits in California leading to extensive surface damage as each fruit expands, or even limiting the growth of a fruit. Two further Scirtothrips species cause leaf damage in particular regions, S. manihoti on cassava plants in South America [63], and S. mangiferae on mango plants in western Asia [64]. In contrast, the Asian species, S. dorsalis, is important as a vector of Orthotospoviruses. This species is known as the Chilli Thrips due to the damage caused to Capsicum crops in India, but it is also a pest of Tea (Camellia sinensis) and of Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) [65]. In recent years it has become well-established as an invader in the Caribbean region and Florida [66]. One thrips in a closely related genus, Drepanothrips reuteri, is sometimes a pest on the leaves of vines (Vitis vinifera) in southern Europe. Similarly, the tiny species, Biltothrips minutus, has been found causing linear markings on the leaves of Taro (Colocasia esculenta) (Figure 3A) as well as on cassava (Manihot esculenta) and some other crops but without obvious crop loss [23].

7.1.5. Taeniothrips Genus-Group

This is a weakly diagnosed group of nine small genera, mainly from the Old World [67]. Introduced to North America, Taeniothrips inconsequens was a serious pest of pear crops (Pyrus spp.) in California early in the 20th century, but late in that century it was responsible for extensive defoliation of Sugar Maple trees (Acer saccharum) in northeastern USA [8]. The Cardamom thrips, Sciothrips cardamomi, is an Asian species apparently specific to the flowers of this crop (Elettaria cardamomum) on which it is a minor pest in Central America. Of the other species in this genus-group, adults of Tenothrips frici are often found on different plants whilst breeding particularly in the flowers of several weedy Asteraceae, and Ctenothrips kwanzanensis has also been taken from many different plants and is widespread in the mountains of China and Japan, but neither of these species is associated with serious crop damage.

7.1.6. Mycterothrips Genus-Group

This group comprises about five genera of leaf-feeding species mainly from the Old World [68], but relationships among these genera have been questioned in a more recent phylogenetic study [37]. Mycterothrips glycines is closely associated with crops of soy beans (Glycine max) on which large populations may cause leaf damage in parts of Asia, but the other members of this genus are of little economic significance. Species of Dichromothrips, the Old World orchid thrips, feed specifically on various Orchidaceae and sometimes cause visible damage to the flowers of these valuable plants in cultivation. One little-known species described from coffee in Kenya over 100 years ago, Diarthrothrips coffeae, has more recently been reported as a pest of this crop in southern Ethiopia [69].

7.1.7. Anaphothrips Genus-Group

A total of 20 genera worldwide is included in this group, although there are good reasons for doubting if all of these are closely related [70]. None of the included species is considered a major crop pest, but large populations of some species may induce leaf damage involving linear markings on the leaves of cereal and grass crops. Anaphothrips obscurus is particularly common on wheat crops in relatively cool areas including India and parts of North America [71], whereas A. sudanensis is a tropical species that breeds on various Poaceae including sugar cane. Similarly, large populations of the wingless European Aptinothrips rufus may create problems in some grass crops that are being grown for seed, and in Brazil, Psydrothrips kewi has been reported as damaging crops of Calla lilies [72]. Apterothrips apteris has been found on the leaves of plants as different as garlic and lucerne, but it is not usually considered a pest, although a single potted Asteraceae plant was found dead through the feeding by a large population [73]. The only Orthotospovirus vector species in this group is a central European species, Dictyothrips betae, that is recorded as a virus vector on weedy species of the genus Polygonum in Italy [74].

7.1.8. Chirothrips Genus-Group

The members of this group all feed on Poaceae, with Limothrips species breeding on the leaves of grasses, and species of Arorathrips and Chirothrips breeding in the florets of grasses [75]. The European species L. cerealium has been considered a pest of grass production in parts of North America. However, it plays a more significant role in human society through its habit of over-wintering in confined spaces, such as the back of framed pictures and computer discs, but particularly in smoke alarms which it can trigger in late summer [1]. The 16 species of Arorathrips are all New World in origin [76], although A. mexicanus is now found worldwide in tropical areas and has sometimes been taken in the flowering heads of sugar cane. In contrast, the 42 species of Chirothrips are from many different parts of the world. As with the species of Arorathrips, the eggs of these thrips are laid within a grass floret where each larva develops at the expense of an individual grass “seed”. C. manicatus has been known as the Timothy Thrips and has been considered a pest in New Zealand in the production of Cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata).

7.1.9. Ungrouped Genera

Although a wide range of genera is considered here, few of them involve species of any serious economic importance. One species from eastern North America, Echinothrips americanus, variously known as the Impatiens Thrips or the Poinsettia Thrips, has caused considerable economic problems through damaging the leaves of a wide range of plants in greenhouses, including Capsicum crops [77]. In parts of Asia on the leaves of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) both Bathrips melanicornis and Dendrothripoides innoxius are common, but despite the leaf damage there is little evidence of a serious effect on crop yields. On crops of coffee in Asia, between India and Timor Leste, Euphysothrips subramanii can be common on the leaves, but this species apparently feeds on the fungus, coffee leaf rust (Hemileia vastatrix), rather than on the leaf tissues [78]. Similarly, Foliothrips traegardhi is widely reported across Africa and India and is often listed as a pest on a wide range of plants, but without any published information about crop loss. This is possibly another example of a species that, because it sometimes occurs in large numbers, is regarded as a pest but with little evidence of any effect on crop yields. In contrast, Enneothrips flavens is sometimes a serious pest causing extensive foliar damage and yield reduction to groundnut crops in parts of South America [79]. Several species in the genera Chaetanaphothrips and Danothrips are known to cause leaf damage to a range of unrelated plants, such that C. signipennis is sometimes called the banana rust thrips, and C. orchidii has been called the Anthurium thrips and also the Orchid thrips, despite being known as a pest of Citrus in Florida [80].

8. Discussion

Given the right conditions, any phytophagous Thysanoptera species may develop locally a particularly large population and cause visible damage to some part of a plant. However, there is a considerable economic difference between the markings on a few leaves of Ligustrum due to the feeding of Dendrothrips ornatus, and the defoliation of a valuable crop of Solanum melongena by a population of Thrips palmi. It is the loss of income to a cultivator, whether through yield reduction or through quality reduction, that is the ultimate criterion of pest status. However, this is not a simple quality of a particular thrips species; it involves many variables other than the variation in the biology and behaviour of a pest thrips across its range. Thrips tabaci can be a serious pest on onions, but it occurs widely across Australia (and other places) on many different plant species on which it is rarely any problem. Similarly, Danothrips trifasciatus, Chaetanaphothrips orchidii, and C. signipennis are all recorded in various parts of the world as damaging plants as different as bananas, citrus and orchids, but each of these species is more commonly found in low numbers. In Brazil, Frankliniella schultzei is considered a major pest, whereas in China this species is not listed as a serious pest. Moreover, at any one site pest populations can be transient. For example, in March 2014 extensive leaf damage by C. orchidii to Commelina cyanea was observed on Norfolk Island, but six months later that same stand of plants had very few C. orchidii but large numbers of Hercinothrips bicinctus [73]. Why thrips populations should be so unstable is a question that is beyond the scope of this article, but it seems to be inherent among Thysanoptera.
Thrips that breed only on older leaves are least likely to severely affect the yield of a crop, although the unsightly cosmetic damage on leaves soiled by Heliothrips faecal droplets can have financial implications. In contrast, all Scirtothrips and some Thrips species feed on young tissues. These may, at relatively low populations, inflict serious damage to emerging leaves and developing fruits with resultant economic losses. Additionally, presence of a suitable thrips vector together with an Orthotospovirus can result in total loss of income to a cultivator. The unpredictability of thrips species is reflected not just in the diversity of plants that they might attack, but also in the time and place of such attacks, and the population size. In publishing an account of the many species of Scirtothrips known from Australia, Hoddle and Mound [81] stated that no specimens of the Oriental pest species, S. dorsalis, had been seen on this continent from south of Brisbane. However, in 2020 large populations of this thrips were reported near Perth in Western Australia causing considerable damage to rose plants and to the leaves and fruit on grape vines (Figure 3E).
Population size and economic damage by thrips species are thus essentially unpredictable in time, space and crop. Different parts of the world often cultivate different crops and also have a different native thrips fauna, and as a result the species recorded as pests also differ, with Brazil and China sharing only 11 widespread pest thrips (Table 2 and Table 3). However, in addition to faunal differences, human perceptions and socio-economic expectations in crop production are likely to produce differing views on “pest damage” (Figure 3). Based on their individual experiences and commercial expectations, different observers will come to different conclusions as to what constitutes a pest. As with any human activity, some growers within the horticultural industry are clearly more skillful than others, often deploying a range of practices from careful selection of seedlings and planting date, to good quarantine and weed control. Such growers may produce a profitable crop requiring minimal use of chemical pest control. In contrast, a neighbouring grower may be persuaded by agricultural salesmen that the easiest approach to cultivation is to use large quantities of chemicals. In southern Australia, the citrus pest Pezothrips kellyanus has been shown to form mating aggregations late in the afternoon [82]. These aggregations are on exposed parts of the trees where they provide a good target for chemical sprays, but commercial pest control firms spray only in the mornings when the thrips are widely dispersed in the tree canopies. Understanding such differences in human behaviour can, at times, be equally as important as establishing the pestiferous nature of a particular thrips species. For growers, it is thus best practice to approach each pest thrips situation individually, considering the biology of that particular species on that particular crop. The alternative extreme, a semi-industrial approach with a predetermined programme of pesticide spraying, carries the risk of inducing pesticide resistance and of population resurgence.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.A.M. and R.M.; methodology, L.A.M., Z.W. and É.F.B.L.; validation, R.M.; investigation, L.A.M., Z.W. and É.F.B.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.A.M., Z.W. and É.F.B.L.; writing—review and editing, L.A.M., Z.W. and É.F.B.L.; visualization, L.A.M., Z.W. and É.F.B.L.; supervision, L.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Z.W. acknowledges funding from the GDAS Special Project of Science and Technology Development (2022GDASZH-2022010106).The other authors received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Amongst many other thrips colleagues around the world we are grateful to Adriano Cavalleri, Arturo Goldarazena, Masami Masumoto, Bert Vierbergen, Ng Foo Yong, and Zhang Hongrui. The image 6 reproduced here was produced by Varga Andras, Hungary. The image 8 was produced by Pia Scanlon, Department of Primary Industries, Perth, Australia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kirk, W. The link between cereal thrips and thunderstorms. Acta Phytopath. Entomol. Hung. 2004, 39, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hoddle, M.S.; Stosic, C.D.; Mound, L.A. Populations of North American bean thrips, Caliothrips fasciatus (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae: Panchaetothripinae) not detected in Australia. Aust. J. Entomol. 2006, 45, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Lewis, T. Thrips, Their Biology, Ecology and Economic Importance; Academic Press: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1973; 349p. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mound, L.A. Biological diversity. In Thrips as Crop Pests; Lewis, T., Ed.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1997; Chapter 6; pp. 197–215. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mound, L.A.; Teulon, D.A.J. Thysanoptera as phytophagous opportunists. In Thrips Biology and Management; Parker, B.L., Skinner, M., Lewis, T., Eds.; Plenum Publishing Corp.: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 3–20. [Google Scholar]
  6. Trichilo, P.J.; Leigh, T.F. Predation on spider mite eggs by the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), an opportunist in a cotton agroecosystem. Environ. Entomol. 1986, 15, 821–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gilstrap, F.E. Six-spotted thrips: A gift from nature that controls spider mites. In Thrips Biology and Management; Parker, B.L., Skinner, M., Lewis, T., Eds.; Plenum Publishing Corp.: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 305–316. [Google Scholar]
  8. Teulon, D.A.; Groninger, J.W.; Cameron, E.A. Distribution and host plant associations of Taeniothrips inconsequens (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Environ. Entomol. 1994, 23, 587–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Raffa, K.F.; Hall, D.J.; Kearby, W.; Katovich, S. Seasonal life history of introduced basswood thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Wisconsin, with observations on associated thrips species. Environ. Entomol. 1992, 21, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mound, L.; Collins, D.; Hastings, A. Thysanoptera Britannica et Hibernica. A Guide to British Thrips; Lucidcentral.org, Identic Pty Ltd.: Stafford Heights, QLD, Australia, 2018; Available online: https://keys.lucidcentral.org/keys/v3/british_thrips/ (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  11. Lima, É.F.B.; O’Donnell, C.A.; Miyasato, E.A.; Br, P. The Panchaetothripinae (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) of Brazil, with one new Caliothrips species. Zootaxa 2020, 4820, 201–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Premachandra, W.T.S.D.; Borgemeister, C.; Maiss, E.; Knierim, D.; Poehling, H.M. Ceratothripoides claratris, a new vector of a Capsicum chlorosis virus isolate infecting tomato in Thailand. Phytopathology 2005, 95, 659–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Reitz, S.R. Biology and Ecology of the Western Flower Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae): The Making of a Pest. Fla. Entomol. 2009, 92, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. ThripsWiki. ThripsWiki—Providing Information on the World’s Thrips. 2021. Available online: http://thrips.info/wiki/Main_Page (accessed on 5 December 2021).
  15. Morse, J.G.; Hoddle, M.S. Invasion biology of thrips. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2006, 51, 67–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mound, L.A.; Tree, D.J. Taxonomic problems with Gynaikothrips and related genera (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae): The ficorum/uzeli complex and taxa endemic to Australia. Zootaxa 2021, 5023, 537–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Okajima, S. The Suborder Tubulifera (Thysanoptera). In The Insects of Japan; The Entomological Society of Japan, Touka Shobo Co., Ltd.: Fukuoka, Japan, 2006; Volume 2, pp. 1–720. [Google Scholar]
  18. Vono, G.; Bonsignore, C.P.; Gullo, G.; Marullo, R. Olive Production Threatened by a Resurgent Pest Liothrips oleae (Costa, 1857) (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) in Southern Italy. Insects 2020, 12, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mound, L.A. Liothrips species (Thysanoptera, Phlaeothripinae) from leaf-galls on Piper species in Southeast Asia and Australia. Zootaxa 2020, 4830, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lima, M.G.A.; Dias-Pini, N.S.; Lima, É.F.B.; Maciel, G.P.S.; Vidal-Neto, F.C. Identification and pest status of Holopothrips fulvus (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) on dwarf-cashew crops in northeastern Brazil. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 2017, 61, 271–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zur Strassen, R. A new species of Liothrips from the Amazonas harmful to Guarana plantations (Insecta: Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae). Acta Amazon. 1978, 7, 551–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Nasruddin, A.; Mound, L.A. Seasonal abundance and biology of Crotonothrips polyalthiae (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae), and its damage to a shade tree, Polyalthia longifolia. Fla. Entomol. 2021, 95, 610–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mound, L.A.; Matsunaga, J.; Bushe, B.; Hoddle, M.S.; Wells, A. Adventive Thysanoptera Species on the Hawaiian Islands: New Records and Putative Host Associations. Proc. Haw. Entomol. Soc. 2017, 49, 17–28. [Google Scholar]
  24. Xie, Y.L.; Mound, L.A.; Zhang, H.R. A new species of Heliothrips (Thysanoptera, Panchaetothripinae), based on morphological and molecular data. Zootaxa 2019, 4638, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. De Souza, M.T.; de Souza, M.T.; Zawadneak, M.A.C. Biology and life table parameters of the Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis on strawberries. Phytoparasitica 2021, 50, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schifani, E.; Mazza, G. Hercinothrips dimidiatus (Thysanoptera, Thripidae), an emerging pest of Aloe arborescens [Asphodelaceae] newly recorded from Italy. Zootaxa 2021, 5039, 440–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, H.; Zhu, L.; Qi, R.; Xu, Z. A new recorded thrips Dendrothrips ornatus: Its biology and control. Acta Agric. Univ. Pekin. 1994, 20, 171–177. [Google Scholar]
  28. Etebari, K.; Matindoost, L.; Singh, R.N. Decision tools for mulberry thrips Pseudodendrothrips mori (Niwa, 1908) management in sericultural regions; An overview. Insect Sci. 2004, 11, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rasool, I.; Mound, L.A.; Soliman, A.M.; Aldhafer, H.M. The Dendrothripinae (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) of Saudi Arabia, with new records, one new species, and revised status of Pseudodendrothrips stuardoi. Zootaxa 2021, 4999, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lima, E.F.B.; Souza-Filho, M.F. Leucothrips furcatus (Thysanoptera Thripidae): A new pest of Sechium edule (Cucurbitaceae) in Brazil. Bull. Insectol. 2018, 71, 189–191. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lagos-Kutz, D.; Pawlowski, M.L.; Haudenshield, J.; Han, J.; Domier, L.L.; Hartman, G.L. Evaluation of Soybean for Resistance to Neohyadatothrips variabilis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Noninfected and Infected With Soybean Vein Necrosis Virus. J. Econ. Entomol. 2020, 113, 949–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Santos, A.O.; Varon, E.H.; Gaigi, A.; Florianoa, A. Economic injury level for Neohydatothrips signifer (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in passion fruit at the Huila region. Colomb. Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 2012, 38, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
  33. Monteiro, R.C.; Zawadneak, M.A.; Mound, L.A. Neohydatothrips samayunkur (Kudô) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) infesting marigold (Tagetes patula, Compositae) in Brazil. Anais Socied. Entomol. Brasil 1999, 28, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lima, E.F.B.; Mound, L.A. Species-richness in Neotropical Sericothripinae (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Zootaxa 2016, 4162, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Ireson, J.E.; Gourlay, A.H.; Holloway, R.J.; Chatterton, W.S.; Foster, S.D.; Kwong, R.M. Host specificity, establishment and dispersal of the gorse thrips, Sericothrips staphylinus Haliday (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), a biological control agent for gorse, Ulex europaeus L. (Fabaceae), in Australia. Bio Control 2008, 45, 460–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Z.K.; Zheng, K.Y.; Zhao, L.H.; Su, X.X.; Zheng, X.; Wanf, T.T. Occurrence, Distribution, Evolutionary Relationships, Epidemiology, and Management of Orthotospoviruses in China. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 686025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, S.M.; Mound, L.A.; Feng, J.N. Morphological phylogeny of Thripidae (Thysanoptera: Terebrantia). Invertebr. Syst. 2019, 33, 671–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mound, L.A. The Thrips and Frankliniella genus groups: The phylogenetic significance of ctenidia. In Thrips and Tospoviruses: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Thysanoptera; Marullo, R., Mound, L.A., Eds.; Australian National Insect Collection: Canberra, Australia, 2002; pp. 379–386. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, Z.H.; Mound, L.A.; Tong, X.L. Relationships of the Frankliniella genus-group based on morphological analysis, with a revision of Iridothrips (Thysanoptera, Thripidae). Zootaxa 2019, 4651, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mound, L.A.; Marullo, R. The Thrips of Central and South America: An Introduction. Mem. Entomol. Int. 1996, 6, 1–488. [Google Scholar]
  41. Cavalleri, A.; Mound, L.A. Toward the identification of Frankliniella species in Brazil (Thysanoptera, Thripidae). Zootaxa 2012, 3270, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Hereward, J.; Hutchinson, J.A.; McCulloch, G.A.; Silva, R.; Walter, G.H. Divergence among generalist herbivores: The Frankliniella schultzei species complex in Australia (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Arthropod-Plant Interac. 2017, 11, 875–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Reitz, S.R.; Gao, Y.; Kirk, W.D.; Hoddle, M.S.; Leiss, K.A.; Funderburk, J.E. Invasion biology, ecology, and management of western flower thrips. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2020, 65, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Gunawardana, D.N.; Li, D.M.; Masumoto, M.; Mound, L.A.; O’Donnell, C.A.; Skarlinsky, T.L. Resolving the confused identity of Frankliniella panamensis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Zootaxa 2017, 4323, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Rugman-Jones, P.F.; Hoddle, M.S.; Stouthamer, R. Nuclear-mitochondrial barcoding exposes the global pest Western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) as two sympatric cryptic species in its native California. J. Econ. Entomol. 2010, 103, 877–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bryan, D.E.; Smith, R.F. The Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) Complex in California (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Uni. California Publ. Entomol. 1965, 10, 359–410. [Google Scholar]
  47. Rotenberg, D.; Baumann, A.A.; Ben-Mahmoud, S.; Christiaens, O.; Dermauw, W.; Ioannidis, P.; Richards, S. Genome-enabled insights into the biology of thrips as crop pests. BMC Biol. 2020, 18, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mound, L.A.; Gunawardana, D.N.; Li, D.M. A new species of Stenchaetothrips (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) from Bamboo, based on morphological and molecular data. Zootaxa 2017, 4323, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Denmark, H.A.; Price, J.F. Gladiolus Thrips, Thrips simplex (Morison) (Insecta: Thysanoptera: Thripidae). DPI Entomol. Circ. 1998, 322, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  50. Duan, B.S.; Lv, P.K. Investigation on the species of thrips that endanger allium vegetables. J. Plant Prot. 1999, 25, 29–31. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  51. Teo, T.M. Effectiveness of the oil palm pollinating weevil, Elaeidobius kamerunicus, in Malaysia. Utar Agric. Sci. J. 2015, 1, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
  52. Mound, L.A.; Nakahara, S.; Tsuda, D.M. Thysanoptera-Terebrantia of the Hawaiian Islands: An identification manual. ZooKeys 2016, 549, 71–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Teulon, D.A.; Penman, D.R. Host records for the New Zealand flower thrips (Thrips obscuratus (Crawford) Thysanoptera: Thripidae). N. Z. Entomol. 1990, 13, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Masumoto, M.; Okajima, S. Review of the genus Thrips and related genera (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) from Japan. Zootaxa 2013, 3678, 1–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Capinera, J.H. Melon Thrips, Thrips palmi Karny (Insecta: Thysanoptera: Thripidae). 2000. Available online: https://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/veg/melon_thrips.htm (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  56. Wilson, L.J.; Bauer, L.R.; Walter, G.H. Phytophagous thrips are predators of twospotted spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) on cotton in Australia. Bull. Entomol. Res. 1996, 86, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chhabra, K.S.; Kooner, B.S. Problem of flower shedding caused by thrips, Megalurothrips distalis (Karny), on summer mungbean, Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek, and its control. Int. J. Pest Manag. 1985, 31, 186–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Niassy, S.; Tamiru, A.; Hamilton, J.G.; Kirk, W.D.; Mumm, R.; Sims, C.; Subramanian, S. Characterization of male-produced aggregation pheromone of the bean flower thrips Megalurothrips sjostedti (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 2019, 45, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Liu, P.; Qin, Z.; Feng, M.; Zhang, L.; Huang, X.; Shi, W. The male-produced aggregation pheromone of the bean flower thrips Megalurothrips usitatus in China: Identification and attraction of conspecifics in the laboratory and field. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 2986–2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vassiliou, V.A. Ecology and behavior of Pezothrips kellyanus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on citrus. J. Econ. Entomol. 2010, 103, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Masumoto, M.; Okajima, S. The genus Scirtothrips Shull (Insecta, Thysanoptera, Thripidae) and three related genera in Japan. Zootaxa 2007, 1552, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hoddle, M.S.; Nakahara, S.; Philips, P.A. Foreign exploration for Scirtothrips perseae Nakahara (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and associated natural enemies on avocado (Persea americana Miller). Biol. Contr. 2002, 24, 251–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Mound, L.A.; Palmer, J.M. Identification, distribution and host-plants of the pest species of Scirtothrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 1981, 71, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ben-David, T.; Venezian, A.; Ben-Dov, Y. Observations on the phenology, biology and control of the mango thrips, Scirtothrips mangiferae Priesner, in the Arava of Israel. Hassadeh 1985, 65, 1826–1830. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhang, W.Q.; Lu, Y.F.; Tong, X.L. A New Insect Pest of Lotus Flower, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood and its Control Strategies. J. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2004, 20, 3. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  66. Kumar, V.; Seal, D.R.; Kakkar, G. Chilli Thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Insecta: Thysanoptera: Thripidae). 2017. Available online: https://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/orn/thrips/chilli_thrips.htm (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  67. Wang, Z.H.; Li, Y.J.; Tong, X.L.; Mound, L.A. Phylogenetic analysis of the Taeniothrips genus-group, with revision of the species of Ctenothrips and Vulgatothrips (Thysanoptera, Thripinae). Zootaxa 2020, 4750, 301–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Masumoto, M.; Okajima, S. A revision of and key to the world species of Mycterothrips Trybom (Thysanoptera, Thripidae). Zootaxa 2006, 1261, 1–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Guteta, N.; Wariyo, A.; Atinafu, G.; Gebreselassie, H. Coffee Thrips, Diarthrothrips coffeae Williams (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) a threatening pest to Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) production in Southern Ethiopia. Int. J. Res. Stud. Agric. Sci. 2017, 3, 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  70. Masumoto, M.; Okajima, S. Anaphothrips genus-group: Key to world genera, with two new species and three new records from Japan (Thysanoptera, Thripidae). Zootaxa 2017, 4272, 201–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Reisig, D.D.; Godfrey, L.D.; Marcum, D.B. Grass Thrips (Anaphothrips obscurus) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Population Dynamics and Sampling Method Comparison in Timothy. Environ. Entomol. 2010, 39, 1617–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Cavalleri, A.; Goretti, M.; Luiz, P.L.; Pereira, A.P.L. The First Record of Psydrothrips kewi (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in South America, with Notes on Its Damage on Calla Lily (Alismatales: Araceae). Fla. Entomol. 2014, 97, 852–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mound, L.A.; Wells, A. Endemics and adventives: Thysanoptera (Insecta) Biodiversity of Norfolk, a tiny Pacific Island. Zootaxa 2015, 3964, 183–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Ciuffo, M.; Mautino, G.C.; Bosco, L.; Turina, M.; Tavella, L. Identification of Dictyothrips betae as the vector of Polygonum ring spot virus. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2010, 157, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Minaei, K.; Mound, L.A. Grass-flower thrips of the genus Chirothrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), with a key to species from Iran. Zootaxa 2010, 2411, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nakahara, S.; Foottit, R.G. Review of Chirothrips and related genera (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) of the Americas, with one new genus and four new species. Zootaxa 2012, 3251, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Panthi, B.; Liburd, O. Echinothrips americanus. Featured Creatures EENY-730, University of Florida. 2019. Available online: https://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/ORN/THRIPS/Echinothrips_americanus.html#top (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  78. Mound, L.A. Euphysothrips: An Old World genus of Thripidae (Thysanoptera) associated with rust fungi (Pucciniales). Zootaxa 2018, 4532, 447–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Moraes, A.R.A.D.; Lourenção, A.L.; Godoy, I.J.D.; Teixeira, G.D.C. Infestation by Enneothrips flavens Moulton and yield of peanut cultivars. Sci. Agric. 2005, 62, 469–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Childers, C.C.; Stansly, P.A. Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) pests of Florida grapefruit: Biology, seasonal and relative abundance, fruit damage and monitoring. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 2005, 118, 54–61. [Google Scholar]
  81. Hoddle, M.S.; Mound, L.A. The genus Scirtothrips in Australia (Insecta, Thysanoptera, Thripidae). Zootaxa 2003, 268, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Webster, K.W.; Cooper, P.; Mound, L.A. Studies on Kelly’s Citrus Thrips (Pezothrips kellyanus Bagnall): Sex attractants, host associations and country of origin. Aust. J. Entomol. 2006, 45, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 13 00061 g001 550
Figure 1. Aggregations of adult thrips. (A) Black Plague Thrips (Haplothrips froggatti) on cotton bud. (B) Thrips parvispinus on garden Lily flower.
Figure 1. Aggregations of adult thrips. (A) Black Plague Thrips (Haplothrips froggatti) on cotton bud. (B) Thrips parvispinus on garden Lily flower.
Insects 13 00061 g001
Insects 13 00061 g002 550
Figure 2. Geographical origins of Orthotospovirus vector species.
Figure 2. Geographical origins of Orthotospovirus vector species.
Insects 13 00061 g002
Insects 13 00061 g003 550
Figure 3. Feeding damage by thrips. (A) Biltothrips minutus markings on leaf of Taro (Colocasia esculenta). (B) Thrips palmi damage to aubergine crop (Solanum melongena). (C) Dendrothrips ornatus on Ligustrum leaf. (D) Damage to Capsicum fruits by Franklliniella occidentalis and Orthotospovirus. (E) Surface damage to grapes (Vitis vinifera) by Scirtothrips dorsalis.
Figure 3. Feeding damage by thrips. (A) Biltothrips minutus markings on leaf of Taro (Colocasia esculenta). (B) Thrips palmi damage to aubergine crop (Solanum melongena). (C) Dendrothrips ornatus on Ligustrum leaf. (D) Damage to Capsicum fruits by Franklliniella occidentalis and Orthotospovirus. (E) Surface damage to grapes (Vitis vinifera) by Scirtothrips dorsalis.
Insects 13 00061 g003
Table
Table 1. Thripidae species (by subfamily) impacting on human crop productivity.
Table 1. Thripidae species (by subfamily) impacting on human crop productivity.
DendrothripinaeFrankliniella bispinosa (Morgan) 2,3
Dendrothrips latimaculatus Nonaka & Okajima 1Frankliniella brevicaulis Hood 1
Dendrothrips minowai Priesner 2Frankliniella cephalica Crawford 1,3
Dendrothrips octosparsus Wang, Mound & Tong 1Frankliniella fusca (Hinds) 2,3
Dendrothrips ornatus (Jablonowski) 1Frankliniella gardeniae Moulton 1
Leucothrips spp. 1Frankliniella gemina Bagnall 1,3
Pseudodendrothrips mori (Niwa) 1Frankliniella hemerocallis Crawford 1
Frankliniella insularis (Franklin) 1
PanchaetothripinaeFrankliniella intonsa (Trybom) 2,3
Anisopilothrips venustulus (Priesner) 1Frankliniella melanommata Williams 1
Astrothrips spp. 1Frankliniella musaeperda Hood 1,
Bradinothrips musae (Hood) 1Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) 2,3
Caliothrips fasciatus (Pergande) 2Frankliniela parvula Hood 1
Caliothrips impurus (Priesner) 1Frankliniella schultzei (Trybom) 2,3
Caliothrips phaseoli (Hood) 1Frankliniella tenuicornis (Uzel) 1
Caliothrips striatopterus (Kobus) 1Frankliniella tritici (Fitch) 1
Caliothrips sudanensis (Bagnall & Cameron) 1Frankliniella williamsi Hood 1
Dinurothrips hookeri Hood 1Frankliniella zucchini Nakahara & Monteiro 1,3
Elixothrips brevisetis (Bagnall) 1Fulmekiola serrata (Kobus) 2
Helionothrips aino (Ishida) 1Kakothrips pisivorus (Westwood) 1
Helionothrips annosus Wang 1Kurtomathrips morrilli Moulton 1
Helionothrips cephalicus Hood 1Lefroyothrips lefroyi (Bagnall) 1
Helionothrips errans (Williams) 1Limothrips cerealium (Haliday) 1
Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis (Bouché) 2Megalurothrips distalis (Karny) 1
Heliothrips longisensibilis Xie, Mound & Zhang 1Megalurothrips sjostedti (Trybom) 2
Hercinothrips bicinctus (Bagnall) 1Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagnall) 2
Hercinothrips dimidiatus Hood 1Microcephalothrips abdominalis (Crawford) 1
Hercinothrips femoralis (Reuter) 1Mycterothrips glycines (Okamoto) 1
Hoodothrips lineatus Hood 1Odontothrips loti (Haliday) 1
Panchaeothrips spp. 1Organothrips bianchii Hood 1
Parthenothrips dracaenae (Heeger) 2Pezothrips kellyanus (Bagnall) 2
Retithrips syriacus (Mayet) 2Psydrothrips spp. 1
Rhipiphorothrips cruentatus Hood 1Salpingothrips aimotofus Kudô 1
Selenothrips rubrocinctus (Giard) 2Sciothrips cardamomi (Ramakrishna) 1
Scirtothrips aurantii Faure 2
SericothripinaeScirtothrips bispinosus (Bagnall) 1
Neohydatothrips flavicingulus Mirab-balou,
Tong & Yang 1		Scirtothrips citri (Moulton) 2
Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood 2,3
Neohydatothrips samayunkur (Kudo) 1Scirtothrips inermis Priesner 1
Neohydatothrips burungae (Hood) 1Scirtothrips mangiferae Priesner 1
Neohydatothrips variabilis (Beach) 1,3Scirtothrips manihoti (Bondar) 1
Scirtothrips perseae Nakahara 2
ThripinaeStenchaetothrips biformis (Bagnall) 2
Anaphothrips obscurus (Müller) 2Stenchaetothrips spp. 1
Anaphothrips sudanensis Trybom 2Stenothrips graminum Uzel 1
Apterothrips apteris (Daniel) 1Systenothrips latens Hood 1
Aptinothrips rufus (Haliday) 1Taeniothrips euchariae Whetzel 1
Arorathrips mexicanus (Crawford) 1Taeniothrips inconsequens Uzel 2
Aurantothrips orchidearum (Bondar) 1Tenothrips frici (Uzel) 1
Bathrips melanicornis (Shumsher) 1Thrips alliorum (Priesner) 1
Biltothrips minutus (Bhatti) 1Thrips albopilosus Uzel 1
Bolacothrips spp. 1Thrips angusticeps Uzel 2
Ceratothripoides brunneus Bagnall 1Thrips atactus Bhatti 1
Ceratothripoides claratris (Shumsher) 2,3Thrips australis (Bagnall) 1
Chaetanaphothrips orchidii (Moulton) 2Thrips calcaratus Uzel 1
Chaetanaphothrips signipennis (Bagnall) 2Thrips coloratus Schmutz 1
Chirothrips manicatus (Haliday) 1Thrips flavus Schrank 1
Corynothrips stenopterus Williams 1,Thrips florum Schmutz 1
Ctenothrips kwanzanensis Takahashi 1Thrips hawaiiensis (Morgan) 2
Danothrips trifasciatus Sakimura 1Thrips imaginis Bagnall 2
Dendrothripoides innoxius (Karny) 1Thrips madronii Moulton 1
Diarthrothrips coffeae Williams 1Thrips major Uzel 1
Dichromothrips corbetti (Priesner) 1Thrips meridionalis (Priesner) 1
Dichromothrips smithi (Zimmermann) 1Thrips nigropilosus Uzel 2
Dictyothrips betae Uzel 1,3Thrips obscuratus (Crawford) 1
Drepanothrips reuteri Uzel 1Thrips orientalis (Bagnall) 1
Echinothrips americanus Morgan 2Thrips palmi Karny 2,3
Enneothrips flavens Moulton 2Thrips parvispinus (Karny) 2
Euphysothrips subramanii (Ramakrishna &
Margabandhu) 1		Thrips setosus Moulton 1,3
Thrips simplex (Morison) 2
Florithrips traegardhi (Trybom) 1Thrips tabaci Lindeman 2,3
1 Local or minor pest; 2 Frequently a pest; 3 Orthotospovirus vector.
Table
Table 2. (A) Pest Thripidae species in Brazil (by subfamily). (B) Introduced pest Thripidae of little economic importance in Brazil.
Table 2. (A) Pest Thripidae species in Brazil (by subfamily). (B) Introduced pest Thripidae of little economic importance in Brazil.
(A)
DendrothripinaeCorynothrips stenopterus Williams 1,5
Leucothrips furcatus Hood 1,4Danothrips trifasciatus Sakimura 2,5
Dichromothrips corbetti (Priesner) 2,5
PanchaetothripinaeDendrothripoides innoxius (Karny) 2,5
Brachyurothrips anomalus Bagnall 2,5Echinothrips americanus Morgan 2,5
Bradinothrips musae (Hood) 1,4Echinothrips mexicanus Moulton 1,5
Caliothrips phaseoli (Hood) 1,4Enneothrips flavens Moulton 1,4
Dinurothrips hookeri Hood 1,5Frankliniella brevicaulis Hood 1,5
Elixothrips brevisetis (Bagnall) 2,4Frankliniella gemina Bagnall1,3,5
Helionothrips errans (Williams) 2,5Frankliniella musaeperda Hood 1,5
Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis (Bouché) 1,5Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) 2,3,4
Heliothrips longisensibilis Xie et al. 1,5Frankliniella insularis (Franklin) 1,5
Hoodothrips lineatus (Hood) 1,5 Frankliniella parvula Hood 1,5
Parthenothrips dracaenae (Heeger) 2,5Frankliniella schultzei (Trybom) 1,3,4
Retithrips syriacus Mayet 2,5Frankliniella williamsi Hood 1,5
Selenothrips rubrocinctus (Giard) 2,4Frankliniella zucchini Nakahara & Monteiro 1,3,4
Psydrothrips kewi Palmer & Mound 1,5
SericothripinaeScirtothrips dorsalis Hood 2,3,4
Neohydatothrips samayunkur (Kudô) 2,4Scirtothrips manihoti (Bondar) 1,5
Stenchaetothrips minutus (Deventer) 2,4
ThripinaeThrips palmi Karny 2,3,4
Aurantothrips orchidearum (Bondar) 1,5Thrips simplex (Morison) 2,5
Chaetanaphothrips orchidii (Moulton) 2,5Thrips tabaci Lindeman 2,3,4
(B)
Aptinothrips rufus (Haliday)Leucothrips nigripennis Reuter
Frankliniella hemerocallis CrawfordMicrocephalothrips abdominalis (Crawford)
Frankliniella tritici (Fitch)Pseudodendrothrips mori (Niwa)
Hercinothrips bicinctus (Bagnall)Thrips australis (Bagnall)
Hercinothrips femoralis (Reuter)Thrips florum Schmutz
1 Native; 2 Exotic; 3 Orthotospovirus vector; 4 Major pest (at least in some areas); 5 Minor pest.
Table
Table 3. (A) Pest Thripidae species in China (by subfamily). (B) Pest Thripidae of little economic importance in China.
Table 3. (A) Pest Thripidae species in China (by subfamily). (B) Pest Thripidae of little economic importance in China.
(A)
DendrothripinaeDichromothrips corbetti (Priesner) 1,5
Dendrothrips latimaculatus Nonaka & Okajima 1,5Dichromothrips smithi (Zimmermann) 1,5
Dendrothrips minowai Priesner 1,4 Echinothrips americanus Morgan 2,4
Dendrothrips octosparsus Wang, Mound & Tong 1,5Frankliniella cephalica (Crawford DL) 2,3,5
Dendrothrips ornatus (Jablonowski) 1,5Frankliniella intonsa (Trybom) 1,3,4
Pseudodendrothrips mori (Niwa) 1,4Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) 2,3,4
Frankliniella tenuicornis (Uzel) 1,4
PanchaetothripinaeFulmekiola serrata (Kobus) 1,5
Anisopilothrips venustulus (Priesner) 2,5Lefroyothrips lefroyi (Bagnall) 1,5
Helionothrips aino (Ishida) 1,5Megalurothrips distalis (Karny) 1,5
Helionothrips annosus Wang 1,5Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagnall) 1,4
Helionothrips cephalicus Hood 1,5Microcephalothrips abdominalis (Crawford) 2,4
Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis (Bouché) 2,5Mycterothrips glycines (Okamoto) 1,5
Rhipiphorothrips cruentatus Hood 1,5Odontothrips loti (Haliday) 1,5
Selenothrips rubrocinctus (Giard) 2,4 Salpingothrips aimotofus Kudô 1,5
Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood 1,3,4
SericothripinaeStenchaetothrips biformis (Bagnall) 1,4
Neohydatothrips flavicingulus Mirab-balou,
Tong & Yang 1,5		Stenchaetothrips spp. 1,5
Taeniothrips eucharii (Whetzel) 1,5
Neohydatothrips samayunkur (Kudô) 1,5Thrips alliorum (Priesner) 1,5
Thrips atactus Bhatti 1,5
ThripinaeThrips australis (Bagnall) 2,5
Anaphothrips obscurus (Müller) 1,5Thrips coloratus Schmutz 1,5
Anaphothrips sudanensis Trybom 2,4Thrips flavus Schrank 1,5
Aptinothrips rufus (Haliday) 1,5Thrips hawaiiensis (Morgan) 1,4
Arorathrips mexicanus (Crawford) 2,5Thrips major Uzel 1,4
Bathrips melanicornis (Shumsher) 1,5Thrips nigropilosus Uzel 1,5
Bolacothrips spp. 1,5Thrips orientalis (Bagnall) 1,4
Chaetanaphothrips orchidii (Moulton) 1,5Thrips palmi Karny 1,3,4
Chaetanaphothrips signipennis (Bagnall) 1,5Thrips parvispinus (Karny) 1,5
Chirothrips manicatus (Haliday) 1,5Thrips simplex (Morison) 2,5
Dendrothripoides innoxius (Karny) 2,5Thrips tabaci Lindeman 1,3,4
(B)
Apterothrips apteris (Daniel) 2Frankliniella schultzei (Trybom) 2,3
Ceratothripoides claratris (Shumsher) 2,3Frankliniella williamsi Hood 2
Danothrips trifasciatus Sakimura 2Kurtomathrips morrilli Moulton 2
Dictyothrips betae Uzel 1,3Leucothrips nigripennis Reuter 2
Drepanothrips reuteri Uzel 1Tenothrips frici (Uzel) 2
1 Native; 2 Exotic; 3 Orthotospovirus vector; 4 Major pest (at least in some areas); 5 Minor pest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mound, L.A.; Wang, Z.; Lima, É.F.B.; Marullo, R. Problems with the Concept of “Pest” among the Diversity of Pestiferous Thrips. Insects 2022, 13, 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13010061

AMA Style

Mound LA, Wang Z, Lima ÉFB, Marullo R. Problems with the Concept of “Pest” among the Diversity of Pestiferous Thrips. Insects. 2022; 13(1):61. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13010061

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mound, Laurence A., Zhaohong Wang, Élison F. B. Lima, and Rita Marullo. 2022. "Problems with the Concept of “Pest” among the Diversity of Pestiferous Thrips" Insects 13, no. 1: 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13010061

APA Style

Mound, L. A., Wang, Z., Lima, É. F. B., & Marullo, R. (2022). Problems with the Concept of “Pest” among the Diversity of Pestiferous Thrips. Insects, 13(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13010061

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop