Next Article in Journal
The Potential of Parapanteles hyposidrae and Protapanteles immunis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) as Biocontrol Agents for the Tea Grey Geometrid Ectropis grisescens (Lepidoptera)
Next Article in Special Issue
Temporal and Spatial Distribution Patterns of Spodoptera frugiperda in Mountain Maize Fields in China
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
The Source Areas and Migratory Pathways of the Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) in Sichuan Province, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Transcription of Flight Energy Metabolism Enzymes Declined with Aging While Enzyme Activity Increased in the Long-Distance Migratory Moth, Spodoptera frugiperda

1
Yunnan Academy of Biodiversity, School of Biodiversity Conservation, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
2
Key Laboratory for Forest Resources Conservation and Utilization in the Southwest Mountains of China, Ministry of Education, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
3
School of Ecology and Environment, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2022, 13(10), 936; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13100936
Submission received: 19 September 2022 / Revised: 8 October 2022 / Accepted: 13 October 2022 / Published: 16 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Fall Armyworm Research)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In this study, we established the overall transcriptome framework of the thorax and aging-associated expression change trajectories, and constructed the possible flight energy metabolism pathways using potential energy metabolic enzymes in Spodoptera frugiperda females. Gene expression and functional prediction indicated that most genes and pathways related to energy metabolism and other biological processes (e.g., transport, longevity and signaling) were downregulated with aging, whereas the expression of enzymes of proline oxidation and genes related to immunity and repair increased with age. The increased expression of proline oxidation enzymes with age suggests that this energy metabolic pathway also is important or linked to some aging processes. Further activity assay showed that the activities of the five tested key metabolic enzymes increased with age. The transcriptional decrease but activity increase with aging imply that these enzymes are stable. A high activity of enzymes may be crucial for a long-distance migrator. The activity ratio of GAPDH/HOAD was <1 and decreased with age, indicating that lipid is the main flight fuel for this insect, particularly in aged individuals.

Abstract

Of all the things that can fly, the flight mechanisms of insects are possibly the least understood. By using RNAseq, we studied the aging-associated gene expression changes in the thorax of Spodoptera frugiperda females. Three possible flight energy metabolism pathways were constructed based on 32 key metabolic enzymes found in S. frugiperda. Differential expression analysis revealed up to 2000 DEGs within old females versus young ones. Expression and GO and KEGG enrichment analyses indicated that most genes and pathways related to energy metabolism and other biological processes, such as transport, redox, longevity and signaling pathway, were downregulated with aging. However, activity assay showed that the activities of all the five tested key enzymes increased with age. The age-associated transcriptional decrease and activity increase in these enzymes suggest that these enzymes are stable. S. frugiperda is a long-distance migrator, and a high activity of enzymes may be important to guarantee a high flight capacity. The activity ratio of GAPDH/HOAD ranged from 0.594 to 0.412, suggesting that lipid is the main fuel of this species, particularly in old individuals. Moreover, the expression of enzymes in the proline oxidation pathway increased with age, suggesting that this energy metabolic pathway also is important for this species or linked to some aging-specific processes. In addition, the expression of immunity- and repair-related genes also increased with age. This study established the overall transcriptome framework of the flight muscle and aging-associated expression change trajectories in an insect for the first time.

1. Introduction

Insects are the most successful and diverse group of organisms on the earth. The ability to fly is crucial for their survival and reproduction, which evolved relatively quickly across the class [1,2]. Insect flight is driven by flight muscles that are composed mainly of large myofibril that are histologically different from the common skeletal muscle fibers [3]. Myofibril consists of thick and thin filaments. The thick filament consists primarily of the motor molecule myosin, which interacts with the thin filament’s actin molecules and functions in the sliding motion between the two sets of filaments. Other conserved myofibril proteins were also found in the flight muscle, such as tropomyosin, troponin and titin. Later studies also found some flight muscle-specific proteins, such as flightin, troponin-H and glutathione S-transferase [4]. Flightin can bind to myosin rods to maintain the integrity and stability of sarcomeres [5]. Glutathione S-transferase interacts with troponin-H in the thin filament [6], which may be essential for the mechanics of the flight muscle while their precise function is still poorly known.
Insect flight is a very complicated and extremely energy-demanding process. The frequency of wing beat can be very high (up to 1000 Hz) in insects and thus metabolic activity is very high during flight [7]. The evolution of fuel use by insect flight muscles is still poorly understood. So far, the energy metabolisms of only a few species have been subjected to detailed examination [8]. Insects may use carbohydrates (primarily trehalose), fats (mostly diacylglycerol) and proline to fuel flight, which can be different between species and between stages of flight [8]. In some long-distance migratory insects, such as some moths and locusts, the flight is initially fueled by carbohydrates, and a long-distance flight is accompanied by the activation of fatty acid oxidation [9]. Bees mainly use carbohydrate to fuel flight [8] while some beetles use proline as the principal flight fuel [10]. Accordingly, some key enzymes that function in these energy metabolisms during flight have been identified in these insects, such as the trehalase that catalyzes the conversion of trehalose to glucose, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and phosphoglycerate kinase that catalyze glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate to pyruvate [9]. However, our knowledge on the mechanisms of insect flight and related energy metabolism is still limited.
Muscle aging inevitably results in the dysfunction, reduced performance and mass of muscles, which is a complex, multifactorial process [11,12]. As an important problem in biology, the underlying processes and mechanisms of muscle senescence have attracted the interest of researchers from pharmacology, physiology, ecology and evolution [11,12,13]. Quite a number of studies in insects have shown that aging profoundly impairs flight muscle structure [14], energy metabolism [15] and flight capacity [14,16]. For example, in the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis, the myofibrillar diameter and the size of mitochondria, as well as flight capacity decreased in aged females [14]. Studies in mammals suggested that mitochondrial dysfunction appears to have a key role in age-related decline of muscle function [17]. In the blowfly, Sarcophaga bullata, pyruvate-proline respiration in flight muscle mitochondria declined in senescent insects [18].
The growing sophistication of gene expression technologies and bioinformatics has led to the idea that aging can be understood by analyzing the transcriptome. Transcriptome-based mapping trajectories of gene expression changes in different tissues of different organisms have provided deep insights into how biological functions change with age [19,20]. Studies in mammal skeletal muscle transcriptome have established a detailed framework of the global transcriptome and mRNA isoforms that govern muscle damage and homeostasis with age [21,22]. For example, specific mRNAs that changed significantly with age in human skeletal muscles were enriched for several aging-related processes, including cellular senescence, insulin signaling, myogenesis, oxidative phosphorylation and adipogenesis [21]. However, the aging of insect flight muscles has not been studied by using transcriptome. Further research based on these findings and high-throughput technologies will help to deepen our understanding of insect biochemistry and evolutionary biology, and may also help to answer questions relevant to human health [9].
The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, is a major transnational migratory pest that is currently occurring in the world [23,24]. This pest was first discovered in Yunnan Province of China at the end of 2018, and then quickly spread northward to the vast areas of China [25]. The ability of long-distance migration is the key determinant of invasion status and evolutionary success of S. frugiperda [26]. Our previous study had revealed the flight capacity and flight muscle structure of S. frugiperda females [27], which provide a good basis for our in-depth research in this field. Moreover, the aging-related transcriptional changes and enzyme activity in the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females have not been investigated. In the present study, therefore, we studied the overall transcriptome framework of the thorax and aging-associated changes, and constructed the possible but the most detailed flight energy metabolism pathways using all potential key energy metabolic enzymes in S. frugiperda females. We further tested the effect of age on the activity of five key energy metabolic enzymes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insects and Sampling

The larvae of S. frugiperda were collected in corn field that near Dongchuan town in Yunnan Province, China. The larvae then were reared on the artificial diet [28] under 28 ± 1 °C and 60–80% relative humidity with 14:10 h light:dark photoperiod. Adults were fed with a 10% honey solution. Their offspring was used for the present study.
To ensure virginity and age, male and female pupae were sexed based on morphological characteristics [29] and then were caged separately. Newly eclosed female adults were collected and reared in plastic boxes (fed with 10% honey solution) for the following treatment and sampling. Females were sampled at 1-, 3-, 4-, 7- and 10-days-old. The adult lifespan of this insect is about 11 d under above rearing condition (Fu Y., unpubl. data). All insects were sampled at midnight (6 h into the scotophase). Thoraxes were cut from the insects and wings, feet and scales were removed from the thorax. For transcriptome, 10 thoraxes (from 10 insects) were used as replicates, and 3 replicates were used for each age. For enzyme activity assay, 8 thoraxes (from 8 insects) were used as replicates, and 4 replicates were used for each age. All samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after sampling and stored at −80 °C.

2.2. cDNA Library Preparation and Sequencing

The Trizol reagent (Invitrogen Inc., Calsbad, CA, USA) was used to isolate total RNA from samples following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was further purified by using the RNeasy MinElute Clean up Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) and eluted in RNA Storage Solution (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX, USA). RNA integrity was verified on an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). The sequencing cDNA libraries were prepared by using NEBnext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England BioLabs Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocols. The libraries were sequenced by Illumina Hiseq4000 platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and the paired-end reads were generated.

2.3. Quality Control and Assembly

The obtained raw reads were processed by trimming the adapter and low-quality reads to produce clean reads. Clean reads were then assembled using Trinity v2.5.1 to generate transcripts [30]. Transcript redundancies were removed using TGICL software v2.1 to acquire unigenes without redundancy [31]. The clean reads were then mapped to the reference genome sequence of S. frugiperda (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/?term=spodoptera%20frugiperda) (accessed on 21 December 2021) using Hisat2 v2.0.5 software.

2.4. Differential Expression Analysis and Enrichment Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs)

Transcripts per million (TPM) was used to determine gene expression levels and the edgeR R package (version 3.0.8) was used to analyze the differential expression between treatments. The significance threshold of p-value in multiple tests was adjusted by q-value [32]. We used q < 0.05 and |log2(foldchange)|>1 as the threshold to judge the significance of gene expression differences.
In order to well understand the biological function of DEGs, they were fully annotated based on the following databases: NR, Pfam, Swiss-Prot, Gene Ontology (GO), KEGG Orthology (KO) and Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG).
GOSeq program was used to perform GO enrichment analysis and KOBAS software was used to implement KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs. GO terms and KEGG pathways with q < 0.05 were significantly enriched in DEGs. These enriched terms and pathways were grouped based on their functions. In order to establish an overall picture of age-related transcriptome changes, all genes (DEGs and non-DEGs) which fall into these groups were identified and their expression change trajectories with age were analyzed and illustrated.
Aging is related to protein synthesis. We thus further analyzed the expression changes of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) with age, which is a key mRNA translation initiation factor. Significant differences in the expression of this gene between different ages were analyzed using an ANOVA.

2.5. Validation of RNAseq Sequencing Data by Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR

Real-time qPCR was performed to verify the accuracy of the RNAseq data. Six enzyme DEGs [LOC118268804 (ENO), LOC118281561 (PK), LOC118268149 (GPDH), LOC118271716 (GAPDH), LOC118263360 (THI), and LOC118278275 (ACDH); please see their full names and related pathways in Table 1] were selected for qRT-PCR analysis in different age comparison groups. The Actin (GeneBank ID: LOC118279073) was used as a reference gene. Actin has been regarded as a housekeeping gene and has been widely used as a reference gene in insects. In this study, the expression of this gene did not show significant changes between samples of S. frugiperda. RNAiso plus (TaKaRa Inc., Dalian, China) was used to isolate total RNA from samples and PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (Takara Inc., Dalian, China) was used to generate cDNA for qPCR. The PCR was carried out on a QuantStudio 7 Flex System (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with gene specific primers (Table S1). The reactions condition is 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 30 s and dissociation. The specificity of the SYBR Green PCR signal was confirmed by melting curve analysis. The 2−ΔΔCT method [33] was used to calculate the relative expression. Each experiment was repeated three times using three independent RNA samples.

2.6. Effect of Age on Enzyme Activities

Activities of the 5 key metabolic enzymes (GPDH, GAPDH, LDH, HOAD and CS; please see their full names and related pathways in Table 1) in the thorax of S. frugiperda were assayed by available ELISA kits (Jiangsu Meimian industrial Co., Ltd., China; catalogue no. of MM-91327O1 for GPDH, MM-91324O1 for GAPDH, MM-925259O1 for LDH, MM-91249O1 for HOAD, and MM-91334O1 for CS) according to the manufacture’s protocol. Briefly, above collected samples for enzyme activities assay were homogenized using a tissue grinder in PBS (PH7.4; containing multiple protease inhibitors) solution at a ratio of 0.1 g sample to 0.9 mL of PBS. The homogenate was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected for subsequent analysis. Sample or standard (50 μL) was added to the micro-ELISA plate wells which pre-coated with specific antibody for a specific enzyme. Shake the plate gently to allow the enzyme in the sample to combine with the antibody. Then, the enzyme labeling reagent (100 μL) was added to each well, and incubated for 60 min in water bath at 37 °C. Free components in the wells were washed away by using a wash buffer solution. Additionally, then the coloration reagent (100 μL) was added to each well, and incubated for 15 min in water bath at 37 °C. Stop solution (50 μL) was added to the wells to stop the coloration reaction. The optical densities (OD) value of each well of all samples was measured at 450 nm using a spectrophotometer. The OD value is proportional to the concentration of the enzyme in the sample. A standard curve of OD versus the enzyme concentration was produced using the calibration standards provided in the kit. The activities of the enzyme in the samples were determined by comparing to the OD value of the standard curve.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Significant differences in the expression of target genes between treatments measured by qPCR were analyzed by an ANOVA. Significant differences in the activity of different enzymes were analyzed by an ANOVA followed by Tukey’s studentized range (HSD) test for multiple comparisons. Linear regression between enzyme activity and age were analyzed using an analysis of regression (AOR).

3. Results

3.1. Summary of Sequencing Quality

RNAseq obtained ~55,000,000 clean reads from each of the 15 sequenced libraries, with Q20, Q30 and mapped ratios as 98.18–98.38%, 94.33–94.84% and 81.32–84.63%, respectively (Table S2). Pearson’s correlation coefficient showed higher correlations between biological replicates (Table S3) and principal component analysis (PCA) showed biological replicates cluster together (Figure S1), affirming the reproducibility of RNASeq and biological replicates. The RNAseq raw reads were deposited into the NCBI SRA database (BioProject ID: PRJNA857921).

3.2. Transcriptome-Based Discovery of Genes Encoding Flight Energy Metabolic Enzymes and Flight Muscle Structural Proteins

Based on known knowledge in insects and other organisms, 38 key enzymes were determined for flight energy metabolism in insects (Table 1). Blast searching indicated that most (32) of these enzymes exist in the transcripts of S. frugiperda (Figure 1; Table S4). Three possible flight energy metabolism pathways were constructed based on these enzymes for S. frugiperda (Figure 1). The first pathway is the glycolysis pathway and the initial fuel of this pathway can be glycogen in the flight muscle and trehalose from the fat body, which involved 14 key enzymes. The second pathway is the fat oxidation pathway that involved seven enzymes, the initial fuel of which is diacylglycerol from the body fat. The third pathway is the proline oxidation pathway that involved four enzymes. All the three pathways were connected to the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, which involved seven enzymes.
A total of nine types of flight muscle structural proteins were identified from transcripts of S. frugiperda, with myosin and actin showing higher number of transcripts, with 26 and 41, respectively (Table 2).

3.3. Overview of Aging-Associated Transcriptional Changes

Differential expression analysis revealed 758 (462 down, 296 up), 1154 (707 down, 447 up), 2100 (1106 down, 994 up) and 1935 (1174 down, 761 up) DEGs within 3-day-old females versus 1-day-old females (D3:D1), D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, respectively (Figure 2, Tables S5–S8). There are 499 common DEGS within D3:D1 and D4:D1 groups, 535 common DEGS within D3:D1 and D7:D1 groups, 453 common DEGS within D3:D1 and D10:D1 groups, and 339 common DEGs among the four groups (Figure 3, Tables S5–S8).
All these DEGs were annotated based on the six databases as mentioned above (Tables S5–S8) and were enriched to GO terms (Figure S2) and KEGG pathways (Figure S3). These DEGs were mainly enriched to metabolism, defense, soma maintenance and aging-related GO terms (Table S9) or KEGG pathways (Table S10). These enriched GO terms and KEGG pathways were categorized into 15 groups based on their functions (Figure 4).

3.4. Aging-Associated Expressional Changes in Flight Energy Metabolic Enzymes and Flight Muscle Structural Proteins

All or most of the enriched terms (Figure 4a–d) or pathways (Figure 4e–h) related to energy metabolism, including carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism, amino acid metabolism and TCA cycle were enriched to downregulated DEGs.
Correspondingly, with the increase in age, the expression of most metabolic enzymes in the glycolysis pathway (Figure 5, Table S11), fat oxidation pathway (Figure 6, Table S11) and TCA cycle (Figure 7, Table S11) generally showed a downward trend. However, the expression of enzymes in the proline oxidation pathway showed an increased pattern with age, with some enzymes showing increased expression in middle-aged females and others showing increased expression in old females (Figure 8, Table S11).
Figure 4. Enriched GO terms and KEGG pathways from the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females. (ad) represent GO terms of D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, respectively; (eh) represent the KEGG pathways of D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, respectively. Red columns represent terms or pathways enriched to upregulated DEGs and green columns represent terms or pathways enriched to downregulated DEGs. Upon the columns, the first number represents the number of terms or pathways, and the second number represents the number of DEGs.
Figure 4. Enriched GO terms and KEGG pathways from the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females. (ad) represent GO terms of D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, respectively; (eh) represent the KEGG pathways of D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, respectively. Red columns represent terms or pathways enriched to upregulated DEGs and green columns represent terms or pathways enriched to downregulated DEGs. Upon the columns, the first number represents the number of terms or pathways, and the second number represents the number of DEGs.
Insects 13 00936 g004
The expression of flight muscle structural protein also declined with age. Among them, LOC118266930 (Troponin C) showed the highest expression (Figure 9, Table S11).

3.5. Aging-Associated Expressional Changes in Other Gene Groups

All or most of the enriched terms (Figure 4a–d) or pathways (Figure 4e–h) related to RNA metabolism, transport, redox, cell adhesion, metal–ion binding, longevity, disease, signaling pathway and repair (including DNA and protein repair) were enriched to downregulated DEGs, while most of the enriched terms or pathways related to apoptosis and degradation, immune and defense were enriched to upregulated DEGs.
The expression of all transcripts (including DEGs and non-DEGs) related to RNA metabolism (Figure S4, Table S11), transport (Figure S5, Table S11), redox (Figure S6, Table S11), longevity (Figure S7, Table S11), disease (Figure S8, Table S11), and signaling pathway (Figure S9, Table S11) generally showed the same trend, i.e., decreased with the increase in age. For example, LOC118277946 (ATP synthase subunit b) from RNA metabolism, LOC118266866 (calcium-transporting ATPase) from transport, and LOC118266311 (protein lethal 2) from longevity showed high expression in young females and their expression declined quickly or gradually with age.
However, the expression of transcripts related to cell adhesion (Figure S10, Table S11), metal–ion binding (Figure S11, Table S11) and apoptosis and degradation (Figure S12, Table S11) did not show a consistent change pattern with age. Such as LOC118280713 (vinculin-like) from cell adhesion, and LOC118271756 (sarcoplasmic calcium-binding protein 1) from metal–ion binding decreased with age. While LOC118265563 (integrin alpha-PS3) from cell adhesion and LOC118277523 (caspase-1-like) from apoptosis and degradation increased with age.
Moreover, the expression of transcripts related to repair (Figure S13, Table S11) increased with aging, such as LOC118267122 (UV excision repair protein) and LOC118281733 (general transcription and DNA repair factor). Transcripts related to immune and defense (Figure S14, Table S11) increased with age and showed a sharp increase in aged (D7) females and then declined, such as LOC118265131 (lysozyme-like), LOC118273606 (defense protein Hdd11) and LOC118279240 (attacin-like).

3.6. Validation of RNAseq Results by qPCR

Six enzyme DEGs were selected and their expression changes with age were verified by qPCR, where three, five, five, and five of these DEGs were used for D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, respectively. The results showed that the expression levels of these genes (Figure 10) were similar to the RNAseq analysis results, indicating that the RNAseq data are reliable.

3.7. Effect of Aging on the Activity of Flight Energy Metabolic Enzymes

From an overall view, enzyme activity assay revealed remarkable difference on the activity of different enzymes (F4,95 = 273.66, p < 0.0001; Figure 11, Table S12). Post-hoc multiple comparisons showed that HOAD had the highest activity (p < 0.05), followed by GPDH and GAPDH (p < 0.05), and then CS (p < 0.05), and LDH showed the lowest activity (p < 0.05) (Figure 11).
From a daily and lifetime perspective, all the five enzymes showed a rising trend in their activity, with HOAD, GPDH and LDH showing a temporary reduction at 4-day-old, and GAPDH and CS showing a temporary reduction at day 3 and day 4 (Figure 11).
Analysis of regression showed that the activity of HOAD (F1,18 = 21.31, p < 0.0001), GPDH (F1,18 = 25.05, p < 0.0001), GAPDH (F1,18 = 7.05, p = 0.016) and LDH (F1,18 = 119.57, p < 0.0001) increased with age significantly (Figure 12), while CS did not show such trend significantly (F1,18 = 0.92, p = 0.349).
The ratio of GAPDH and HOAD activities were also measured, which can express the flight fuel use type in the energy metabolism of insects, with the ratio equal to or close to 1 using both lipid and carbohydrates, <1 mainly using lipid and >1 mainly using carbohydrates. The activity ratio of GAPDH:HOAD ranged from 0.4 to 0.6 in the thorax of S. frugiperda at different ages (Table 3), indicating that lipid is the main flight fuel in this insect.

4. Discussion

In this study, transcriptome and annotation identified nine families of flight muscle structural proteins in S. frugiperda, with myosin and actin showing higher number of transcripts (Table 2). Myosin is a superfamily of molecular motors that move along the track of actin filaments, which accounts for 60% of the total protein of myofibrils and plays a role in muscle contraction [63]. One flightin-encoding gene was also found in S. frugiperda. Flightin is a myosin-binding protein, which can bind to myosin rods and maintains the integrity of sarcomere [5]. Flightin orthologs were found not only in winged insects, but also in non-winged insects, and even non-insect species [66]. Flightin is a protein with deep ancestry and functions outside of flight muscles [66].
Insects in flight achieve the highest rates of metabolism known in all animals, but how they do this is still poorly known [2]. Studies suggested that the activity of most enzymes involved in fuel metabolism is much higher in insect flight muscle than in vertebrate skeletal muscle, and some enzymes in insect flight muscle have a high affinity for the myofibril and may exist as part of a complex that assists in the local generation of ATP [67]. A study in Drosophila showed GPDH isoform 1 (GPDH-1) is flight muscle-specific isoform and has a specific C-terminal tripeptide (QNL) that is indispensable for the localization of GPDH to the myofibril [68]. In the present study, we found two GPDH isoforms (Table S4) in S. frugiperda, while we did not find the same or similar C-terminal tripeptide as showed in Drosophila. Database blast and reference searching also did not find such C-terminal tripeptide in insect species other than Drosophila, suggesting that the evolution of GPDH may be species specific. Interestingly, we found a conserved C-terminal tetrapeptide (PKCS) in S. frugiperda and other three lepidopterans, S. litura, H. zea and M. sexta (Figure S15). Whether this tetrapeptide play function in localization of GPDH to the myofibril is still unknown and worth further study.
Three possible flight energy metabolism pathways were constructed based on the identified 32 key enzymes for S. frugiperda (Figure 1; Table 1). All the three pathways were connected to the TCA cycle. The expression on enzyme-encoding genes related to the glycolysis pathway, fat oxidation pathway, and TCA cycle generally showed a downward trend with the increase in age (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7, Table S11), which may be due to aging. However, the expression of enzymes in the proline oxidation pathway increased with age (Figure 8, Table S11). Lepidoptera and Orthoptera species usually use carbohydrate at the initiation of flight, whereas lipid is the main fuel during sustained flight [7,9]. In several dipteran, orthopteran, lepidopteran and hymenopteran species proline is considered to provide intermediates (such as α-ketoglutarate; Figure 1) of the citric acid cycle, which is necessary for the enhanced oxidation of acetyl-CoA from a flight-induced increase in degradation of carbohydrate or lipid [7]. This may explain why the expression of enzymes in the proline oxidation pathway increased with age in S. frugiperda.
The activity of all the five tested enzymes (HOAD, GPDH, GAPDH, CS and LDH) increased with age in S. frugiperda (Figure 11), which is contrary to the result found in Bactrocera dorsalis [15]. S. frugiperda is a long distance migrator, younger adults have higher flight capacity, with 3-day-olds showing the highest flight capacity, while old (11-day-old) females still have strong flight capacity [27]. A higher activity of enzymes in aged adults may be important to guarantee a high flight capacity. The age-associated decrease in the expression of these enzyme-encoding genes and the increase on the activity of these enzymes may suggest that these enzymes are stable in S. frugiperda. The ratio of GAPDH and HOAD activities can express the flight fuel use type in the energy metabolism of insects [7]. In Apis mellifica (Hymenoptera) the activity ratio of GAPDH/HOAD is more than 1000, while the ratio is about 3 for Locusta migratoria (Orthoptera) and Pieris brassicae (Lepidoptera), and 0.1 for Actias selene (Lepidoptera) [69]. Later studies further showed that biotic (such as sex and aging) [15] and abiotic (such as green light) [70] factors may affect this ratio. In Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera), the ratio is 14.66 and 18.08 for 1-day-old males and females, respectively; which decreased with the increase in age, and decreased to 1.0 in 25-day-old males and females [15]. In S. exigua, the ratio is 0.6 in mature pupae, which increase to 0.9 in 0-day-old adults and peaked (1.2) in 1-day-old adults, and then decreased to 0.9 in 7-day-old adults [71]. In the present study, the activity ratio of GAPDH/HOAD in S. frugiperda ranged from 0.594 to 0.412, and showed some decrease with age (Table 3), suggesting that lipid is the main fuel of this species, particularly in old individuals.
Human skeletal muscle transcriptome revealed 1134 aging-induced DEGs [21]. In the present study, the number of DEGs in aged moths compared to young ones increased with aging, from about 700 (D3:D1) to 2000 (D10:D1) (Figure 2). In addition to genes and pathways related to flight energy metabolic enzymes and flight muscle structural proteins as mentioned above, most other genes related to RNA metabolism, transport, redox, longevity, disease, and signaling pathway decreased with the increase in age. Muscle transcriptome in sheep showed genes related to muscle protein, phosphorylation, acetylation, metal binding and transport changed remarkably with aging, such as COX3, TPM2, MYL2, CYTB, ND4, TNNC and MYHT, their expression decreased with aging [22]. Homologous genes in S. frugiperda, such as AOB78_gp08 (COX3), AOB78_gp05 (ND4), AOB78_gp02 (CYTB), AOB78_gp12 (COX1), AOB78_gp11 (COX2), AOB78_gp04 (ND4L) and AOB78_gp09 (ATP6), also showed decreased expression with age (Figure S5, Table S11). In addition, aging is related to protein synthesis. The eIF4E is a key mRNA translation initiation factor [72]. A deletion mutant of eIF4E resulted in decreased protein synthesis in Caenorhabditis elegans [73]. In this study, eIF4E expression level decreased significantly in aged females (Figure S16, Table S11), representing that protein synthesis declined with age.
However, the expression levels of genes related to both repair and immune and defense increased with age. Age-dependent transcriptome changes in the human brain include decreased synaptic function and increased immune function [74]. Prolonged accumulation of cellular defects often results in immune activation [75]. There is sufficient evidence that pathways of DNA and protein repair become less efficient with aging, while much less is known about the causes of this deterioration [76]. In the present study, however, the increased expression trends on genes and pathways related to repair in old females may suggest an increased function, which needs further investigation.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects13100936/s1, Figure S1: The principal component analysis (PCA) for RNAseq of biological replicates of S. frugiperda. Figure S2: Go enrichment of DEGs from the D3:D1 (a), D4:D1 (b), D7:D1 (c) and D10:D1 (d) groups. The size of the dot indicates the number of DEGs in this term, and the color of the dot corresponds to different q-value ranges. Figure S3: KEGG enrichment of DEGs from the D3:D1 (a), D4:D1 (b), D7:D1 (c) and D10:D1 (d) groups. The size of the dot indicates the number of DEGs in this pathway, and the color of the dot corresponds to different q-value ranges. Figure S4: The expression of genes related to RNA metabolism in the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females at different ages. Figure S5: The expression of genes related to transport in the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females at different ages. Figure S6: The expression of genes related to redox in the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females at different ages. Figure S7: The expression of genes related to longevity in the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females at different ages. Figure S8: The expression of genes related to disease in the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females at different ages. Figure S9: The expression of genes related to signaling pathway in the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females at different ages. Figure S10: The expression of genes related to cell adhesion in the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females at different ages. Figure S11: The expression of genes related to metal–ion binding in the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females at different ages. Figure S12: The expression of genes related to apoptosis and degradation in the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females at different ages. Figure S13: The expression of genes related to repair in the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females at different ages. Figure S14: The expression of genes related to immunity and defense in the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females at different ages. Figure S15: C-terminal sequence comparison of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH) isoforms between dipteran and lepidoptera. Among different isoforms in the same species, amino acids highlighted by black indicate 100% similarity. Figure S16: The expression of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) in the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females at different age comparative groups. *** indicates p < 0.001. Table S1: Primers for quantitative realtime PCR. Table S2: Summary of the quality of all sample sequencing data. Table S3: Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Table S4: Enzymes related to energy metabolism in flight muscle of Spodoptera frugiperda. Table S5: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between D3 vs D1 (D3:D1) group. Table S6: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between D4 vs D1 (D4:D1) group. Table S7: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between D7 vs D1 (D7:D1) group. Table S8: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between D10 vs D1 (D10:D1) group. Table S9: Go enrichment classification of flight muscle of Spodoptera frugiperda (q < 0.05). Table S10: KEGG Pathway classification of flight muscle of Spodoptera frugiperda (q < 0.05). Table S11: Aging related gene expression. Table S12: Activities of the 5 metablic enzymes in Spodoptera frugiperda at different ages.

Author Contributions

Y.F., T.W., H.Y. (Hong Yu) and D.-Y.F. collected and reared the insects; J.X., J.-Z.Z., D.-Y.F. and H.Y. (Hui Ye) designed the study; Y.F., T.W. and D.-Y.F. dissected the insects and extracted DNA; Y.F., T.W., J.-Z.Z., J.X. and D.-Y.F. analyzed the data; Y.F., H.Y. (Hong Yu) and J.-Z.Z. performed the enzyme activity assay; Y.F., H.Y. (Hui Ye), J.X. and D.-Y.F. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was jointly supported by projects from Science and Technology Planning Project in Key Areas of Yunnan Province (202001BB050002), Basic Research Projects of Yunnan Province (202201AS070025), Joint Special Project of Yunnan Province for Agricultural Basic Research (2018FG001-002) and National Natural Science Foundation Program of P.R. China (31760635).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The transcriptome raw reads have been deposited to the NCBI SRA database, the accession numbers are SRR20084632-SRR20084646. Other data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and its Supplementary Information files.

Acknowledgments

We thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. We also thank Gu X. for her assistance on molecular biology research during this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vigoreaux, J.O. Nature’s Versatile Engine: Insect Flight Muscle Inside and Out; Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.: Georgetown, Texas, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. Glaeser, G.; Paulus, H.F.; Nachtigall, W. The Evolution of Flight; Springer International Publishing AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tiegs, O.W. The flight muscles of insects-their anatomy and histology; with some observations on the structure of striated muscle in general. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 1955, 2238, 221–347. [Google Scholar]
  4. Maughan, D.W.; Vigoreaux, I.O. An integrated view of insect flight muscle: Genes, motor molecules, and motion. News Physiol. Sci. 1999, 14, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ayer, G.; Vigoreaux, J.O. Flightin is a myosin rod binding protein. Cell Biochem. Biophys 2003, 38, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Clayton, J.D.; Cripps, R.M.; Sparrow, J.C.; Bullard, B. Interaction of troponin-H and glutathione S-transferase-2 in the indirect flight muscles of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Muscle. Res. Cell M. 1998, 19, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Beenakkers, A.M.T.; Vanderhorst, D.J.; Vanmarrewijk, W.J.A. Insect flight-muscle metabolism. Insect. Biochem. 1984, 14, 243–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Thompson, S.N.; Suarez, R.K. Metabolism. In Encyclopedia of Insects, 2nd ed.; Resh, V.H., Cardé, R.T., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 623–627. [Google Scholar]
  9. Arrese, E.L.; Soulages, J.L. Insect fat body: Energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2010, 55, 207–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Gade, G.; Auerswald, L. Beetles’ choice—Proline for energy output: Control by AKHs. Comp. Biochem. Phys. B 2002, 132, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bartke, A.; Brannan, S.; Hascup, E.; Hascup, K.; Darcy, J. Energy metabolism and ging. World J. Mens. Health 2021, 39, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wone, B.W.M.; Kinchen, J.M.; Kaup, E.R.; Wone, B. A procession of metabolic alterations accompanying muscle senescence in Manduca sexta. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Hindle, A.G.; Lawler, J.M.; Campbell, K.L.; Horning, M. Muscle aging and oxidative stress in wild-caught shrews. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 2010, 155, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chen, M.; Chen, P.; Ye, H.; Yuan, R.; Wang, X.; Xu, J. Flight capacity of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) adult females based on flight mill studies and flight muscle ultrastructure. J. Insect Sci. 2015, 15, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yuan, R.-L.; Wang, X.-W.; Yang, S.; Chen, P. Changes in the activities of enzymes related to energy metabolism in flight muscles of adult Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) at different ages and during tethered flight. Acta Entomol. Sin. 2015, 58, 471–478. [Google Scholar]
  16. Evenden, M.L.; Whitehouse, C.M.; Sykes, J. Factors influencing flight capacity of the mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Environ. Entomol. 2014, 43, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Austin, S.; St-Pierre, J. PGC1 alpha and mitochondrial metabolism—Emerging concepts and relevance in ageing and neurodegenerative disorders. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 4963–4971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Wohlrab, H. Age-related changes in the flight muscle mitochondria from the blowfly Sarcophaga bullata. J. Gerontol. 1976, 31, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Perez-Gomez, A.; Buxbaum, J.N.; Petrascheck, M. The aging transcriptome: Read between the lines. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2020, 63, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Eckley, D.M.; Coletta, C.E.; Orlov, N.V.; Wilson, M.A.; Iser, W.; Bastian, P.; Lehrmann, E.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Becker, K.G.; Goldberg, I.G. Transcriptome states reflect imaging of aging states. J. Gerontol. A biol. 2018, 73, 893–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Tumasian, R.A.; Harish, A.; Kundu, G.; Yang, J.H.; Ubaida-Mohien, C.; Gonzalez-Freire, M.; Kaileh, M.; Zukley, L.M.; Chia, C.W.; Lyashkov, A.; et al. Skeletal muscle transcriptome in healthy aging. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Arora, R.; Siddaraju, N.K.; Manjunatha, S.S.; Sudarshan, S.; Fairoze, M.N.; Kumar, A.; Chhabra, P.; Kaur, M.; Sreesujatha, R.M.; Ahlawat, S.; et al. Muscle transcriptome provides the first insight into the dynamics of gene expression with progression of age in sheep. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. CABI. Invasive Species Compendium: Fall Armyworm Portal. Available online: https://www.cabi.org/isc/fallarmyworm (accessed on 26 November 2020).
  24. Congdon, B.S.; Webster, C.G.; Severtson, D.; Spafford, H. In-field capable loop-mediated isothermal amplification detection of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae using a rapid and simple crude extraction technique. J. Econ. Entomol. 2021, 114, 2610–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guo, Z.B.; Jiang, R.X.; Tang, Y.L.; Gu, R.C.; Li, Q.Y.; Xing, T.; Xiang, L.; Wu, Y.Y.; Hu, Y.; Liu, X.; et al. Identification of new islolates of gut bacteria of Spodoptera frugiperda feeding on sorghum in Chongqing area. J. Southwest Univ. 2019, 41, 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nagoshi, R.N.; Nagoshi, B.Y.; Canarte, E.; Navarrete, B.; Solorzano, R.; Garces-Carrera, S. Genetic characterization of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in Ecuador and comparisons with regional populations identify likely migratory relationships. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Guo, P.; Yu, H.; Xu, J.; Li, Y.-H.; Ye, H. Flight muscle structure and flight capacity of females of the long-distance migratory armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda: Effect of aging and reproduction and trade-offs between flight and fecundity. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2022; in press. [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, W.; Zou, W.J.; Wang, L.H. The bionomics and control of Prodenia litura in Kunming. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 2006, 19, 85–89. [Google Scholar]
  29. Dong, Q.-J.; Zhou, J.-C.; Zhu, K.-H.; Z-T, Z.; Dong, H. A simple method for identifiying sexuality of Spodoptera frugiperd (J. E. Smith) pupae and adults. Plant Prot. 2019, 45, 96–98. [Google Scholar]
  30. Grabherr, M.G.; Haas, B.J.; Yassour, M.; Levin, J.Z.; Thompson, D.A.; Amit, I.; Adiconis, X.; Fan, L.; Raychowdhury, R.; Zeng, Q.; et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pertea, G.; Huang, X.; Liang, F.; Antonescu, V.; Sultana, R.; Karamycheva, S.; Lee, Y.; White, J.; Cheung, F.; Parvizi, B.; et al. TIGR gene indices clustering tools (TGICL): A software system for fast clustering of large EST datasets. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 651–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Storey, J.D. The positive false discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Ann. Stat. 2003, 31, 2013–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tevatiya, S.; Kumari, S.; Sharma, P.; Rani, J.; Chauhan, C.; Das De, T.; Pandey, K.C.; Pande, V.; Dixit, R. Molecular and functional characterization of trehalase in the mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 575718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shakeel, M.; Du, J.; Li, S.W.; Zhou, Y.J.; Sarwar, N.; Bukhari, S.A.H. Characterization, knockdown and parental effect of hexokinase gene of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) revealed by RNA interference. Genes 2020, 11, 1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, Y.-C. Insect Physiology; China Agricultural Press: Beijing, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rose, I.A. Mechanism of the aldose-ketose isomerase reactions. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 1975, 43, 491–517. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Hassan, A.; Huang, Q.; Xu, H.; Wu, J.; Mehmood, N. Silencing of the phosphofructokinase gene impairs glycolysis and causes abnormal locomotion in the subterranean termite Reticulitermes chinensis Snyder. Insect Mol. Biol. 2021, 30, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Malek, A.A.; Hy, M.; Honegger, A.; Rose, K.; Brenner-Holzach, O. Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase from Drosophila melanogaster: Primary structure analysis, secondary structure prediction, and comparison with vertebrate aldolases. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1988, 266, 10–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gavilane, F.G.; Gavilane, J.G.; Martin-Dudoigeon, R. Triosephosphate isomerase from the insect ceratitis-capitata molecular and enzymic properties. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Comp. Biochem. 1981, 70, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pelley, J.W. Glycolysis and pyruvate oxidation. In Elsevier’s Integrated Biochemistry; Pelley, J.W., Ed.; Mosby: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2007; pp. 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang, F.; Li, R.-H.; Ying, G.R. Research progress in phosphoglycerate mutase. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 2012, 24, 353–357. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang, Z.; Qi, J.; Shang, R.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, Z. Cloning and expression characteristics of pyruvate kinase gene of Nosema bombycis. Sciof. Sericult. 2019, 45, 212–217. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, D.-H.; QIin, Z.; Han, G.-B.; Wang, S.-G.; Tang, B.; ZHang, F. Cloning and sequence analysis of lactic dehydrogenase gene from Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellinae). China. J. Biol. Contr. 2011, 27, 458–463. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tortoriello, G.; Beiersdorf, J.; Romani, S.; Williams, G.; Cameron, G.A.; Mackie, K.; Williams, M.J.; Di Marzo, V.; Keimpema, E.; Doherty, P.; et al. Genetic manipulation of sn-1-diacylglycerol lipase and CB1 cannabinoid receptor gain-of-function uncover neuronal 2-linoleoyl glycerol signaling in Drosophila melanogaster. Cannab. Cannabin. Res. 2021, 6, 119–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tan, X.-L. Characterization of an Arabidopsis Long Chain Fatty Acyl-Coenzyme a Synthetase, Which Is Required for Seedling Establishment without Exogenous Sugar. Ph.D. Thesis, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Xianyang, China, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hiltunen, J.K.; Qin, Y. β-oxidation—Strategies for the metabolism of a wide variety of acyl-CoA esters. Bioch. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1484, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Stec, N.; Saleem, A.; Darveau, C.A. Proline as a sparker metabolite of oxidative metabolism during the flight of the bumblebee, Bombs impatiens. Metabolites 2021, 11, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. He, Y.-H. Comparison and Development of Measuring Methods for Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex. Master’s Thesis, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ye, S.-C.; Yao, X.-H.; Wang, K.-L.; Lin, P.; Gong, H.-E.; Zhuo, R.-Y. Cloning and expression analysis of citrate synthase (CS) gene in Camellia oleifera. Bul. Bot. Res. 2016, 36, 9. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang, W.-L.; Shen, W.-B.; Ye, M.-B.; Xu, L.-L. Aconitase and its physiological roles in plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2003, 39, 391–398. [Google Scholar]
  52. Wang, H.-Y.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, X.-K. Research progress of isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors. Chin. J. New Drug. 2017, 26, 1272–1278. [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang, X. Catalytic functions and mechanisms of key enzymes in the pathway of α-ketoglutaric acid to succinic acid in cyanobacteria. Master Thesis, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  54. Phillips, D.; Aponte, A.M.; French, S.A.; Chess, D.J.; Balaban, R.S. Succinyl-CoA synthetase is a phosphate target for the activation of mitochondrial metabolism. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 7140–7149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chen, Y.; Jian, K.-L.; Liu, X.-G.; Li, X.-N. Effects of exercise on creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase and succinate dehydrocgenase in blood. J. PLA Inst. Phys. Edu. 2000, 25–30. [Google Scholar]
  56. Wang, B.; Hou, S.-T.; Chen, L.; Wang, Z. Research progress on the structure and function of fumarases. Anhui Agricul. Sci. Bul. 2009, 15, 55–57. [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang, X.-Y.; Wang, B.; Hou, S.-T.; Zhu, G.-P. Structure and function of malate dehydrogenase. J. Biol. 2009, 26, 69–72. [Google Scholar]
  58. Roosterman, D.; Cottrell, G.S. Connecting pyruvate carboxylase and citrate synthase to the flow of energy and material. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6–17. [Google Scholar]
  59. Shelud’ko, N.S.; Matusovskaya, G.G.; Permyakova, T.V.; Matusovsky, O.S. Twitchin, a thick-filament protein from molluscan catch muscle, interacts with F-actin in a phosphorylation-dependent way. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 432, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pu, Y.; Hai-Zhong, Y.; Jia-An, C.; Zeng-Rong, Z. The proteins in flight muscles of insects. Inst. Appl. Entom. 2005, 42, 726–731. [Google Scholar]
  61. Vigoreaux, J.O.; Saide, J.D.; Valgeirsdottir, K.; Pardue, M.L. Flightin, a novel myofibrillar protein of Drosophila stretch-activated muscles. J. Cell Bio. 1993, 121, 587–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Liang, H.-F.; Li, X.-d. Locusta migratoria flight muscle troponin partially activates thin filament in a calcium-dependent manner. Insect Mol. Biol. 2022, 31, 346–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ojima, K. Myosin: Formation and maintenance of thick filaments. Anim. Sci. J. 2019, 90, 801–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Rynkiewicz, M.J.; Prum, T.; Hollenberg, S.; Kiani, F.A.; Fagnant, P.M.; Marston, S.B.; Trybus, K.M.; Fischer, S.; Moore, J.R.; Lehman, W. Tropomyosin must interact weakly with actin to effectively regulate thin filament function. Biophys. J. 2017, 113, 2444–2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Kabsch, W.; Vandekerckhove, J. Structure and function of actin. Annu. Rev. Bioph. Biom. 1992, 21, 49–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Soto-Adames, F.N.; Alvarez-Ortiz, P.; Vigoreaux, J.O. An evolutionary analysis of flightin reveals a conserved motif unique and widespread in Pancrustacea. J. Mol. Evol. 2014, 78, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Crabtree, B.; Newsholme, E.A. Comparative aspects of fuel utilization and metabolism by muscle. In Insect Muscle; Usherwood, P.N.R., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  68. Sullivan, D.T.; MacIntyre, R.; Fuda, N.; Fiori, J.; Barrilla, J.; Ramizel, L. Analysis of glycolytic enzyme co-localization in Drosophila flight muscle. J. Exp. Biol. 2003, 206, 2031–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Beenakkers, A.M. Carbohydrate and fat as a fuel for insect flight: A comparative study. J. Insect Physiol. 1969, 15, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kim, K.-N.; Sin, U.-C.; Yun, C.-N.; Song, H.-S.; Huang, Z.-J.; Huang, Q.-Y.; Lei, C.-L. Influence of green light illumination on several enzymes involved in energy metabolism in the oriental armyworm, Mythimna separata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Asia-Pacific Entomol. 2019, 22, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, K.; Luo, L. Activities of enzymes in the flight muscle of pupal and adult oriental armyworm, Mythimna separata (Walker). Acta Entomol. Sin. 1999, 42, 37–43. [Google Scholar]
  72. Gingras, A.C.; Raught, B.; Sonenberg, N. eIF4 initiation factors: Effectors of mRNA recruitment to ribosomes and regulators of translation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1999, 68, 913–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Syntichaki, P.; Troulinaki, K.; Tavernarakis, N. eIF4E function in somatic cells modulates ageing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 2007, 445, 922–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ham, S.; Lee, S.-J.V. Advances in transcriptome analysis of human brain aging. Exp. Mol. Med. 2020, 52, 1787–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ioannidou, A.; Goulielmaki, E.; Garinis, G.A. DNA damage: From chronic inflammation to age-related deterioration. Front. Genet. 2016, 7, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Gorbunova, V.; Seluanov, A.; Mao, Z.; Hine, C. Changes in DNA repair during aging. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 7466–7474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Possible flight energy metabolism pathways and key enzymes in S. frugiperda. The pathways with metabolic substrates and metabolites were constructed based on Thompson and Suarez [8]. Key enzymes were added to the pathways accordingly based on known knowledge in insects and other organisms. Black fonts represent substrates and metabolites, blue fonts represent enzymes found in S. frugiperda, and red fonts represent enzymes did not found in S. frugiperda. Full names of substrates, metabolites and enzymes can be found in Table 1.
Figure 1. Possible flight energy metabolism pathways and key enzymes in S. frugiperda. The pathways with metabolic substrates and metabolites were constructed based on Thompson and Suarez [8]. Key enzymes were added to the pathways accordingly based on known knowledge in insects and other organisms. Black fonts represent substrates and metabolites, blue fonts represent enzymes found in S. frugiperda, and red fonts represent enzymes did not found in S. frugiperda. Full names of substrates, metabolites and enzymes can be found in Table 1.
Insects 13 00936 g001
Figure 2. Volcano plots of DEGs from the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females. (ad) are DEGs from the D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, respectively. Genes with significant differential expression were indicated by red dots (upregulated) and green dots (downregulated). Genes with no significant differential expression were represented by gray dots.
Figure 2. Volcano plots of DEGs from the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females. (ad) are DEGs from the D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, respectively. Genes with significant differential expression were indicated by red dots (upregulated) and green dots (downregulated). Genes with no significant differential expression were represented by gray dots.
Insects 13 00936 g002
Figure 3. Venn diagrams of DEGs from the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females. (ac) are common DEGs within D3:D1 and D4:D1 groups, D3:D1 and D7:D1 groups, and D3:D1 and D10:D1 groups, respectively; and (d) is common DEGs among the four groups (D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1). The overlapping circles represented common DEGs among all combinations.
Figure 3. Venn diagrams of DEGs from the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females. (ac) are common DEGs within D3:D1 and D4:D1 groups, D3:D1 and D7:D1 groups, and D3:D1 and D10:D1 groups, respectively; and (d) is common DEGs among the four groups (D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1). The overlapping circles represented common DEGs among all combinations.
Insects 13 00936 g003
Figure 5. The expression of enzymes of the glycolysis pathway in S. frugiperda females at different ages. (a) Changes in enzyme gene expression with age; (b) DEGs of D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, wherein red columns represent upregulated DEGs and green columns represent downregulated DEGs.
Figure 5. The expression of enzymes of the glycolysis pathway in S. frugiperda females at different ages. (a) Changes in enzyme gene expression with age; (b) DEGs of D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, wherein red columns represent upregulated DEGs and green columns represent downregulated DEGs.
Insects 13 00936 g005
Figure 6. The expression of enzymes of the fat oxidation pathway in S. frugiperda females at different ages. (a) Changes in enzyme gene expression with age; (b) DEGs of D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, wherein red columns represent upregulated DEGs and green columns represent downregulated DEGs.
Figure 6. The expression of enzymes of the fat oxidation pathway in S. frugiperda females at different ages. (a) Changes in enzyme gene expression with age; (b) DEGs of D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, wherein red columns represent upregulated DEGs and green columns represent downregulated DEGs.
Insects 13 00936 g006
Figure 7. The expression of enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle in S. frugiperda females at different ages. (a) Changes in enzyme gene expression with age; (b) DEGs of D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, wherein red columns represent upregulated DEGs and green columns represent downregulated DEGs.
Figure 7. The expression of enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle in S. frugiperda females at different ages. (a) Changes in enzyme gene expression with age; (b) DEGs of D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, wherein red columns represent upregulated DEGs and green columns represent downregulated DEGs.
Insects 13 00936 g007
Figure 8. The expression of enzymes of the proline oxidation pathway in S. frugiperda females at different ages. (a) Changes in enzyme gene expression with age; (b) DEGs of D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, wherein red columns represent upregulated DEGs and green columns represent downregulated DEGs.
Figure 8. The expression of enzymes of the proline oxidation pathway in S. frugiperda females at different ages. (a) Changes in enzyme gene expression with age; (b) DEGs of D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, wherein red columns represent upregulated DEGs and green columns represent downregulated DEGs.
Insects 13 00936 g008
Figure 9. The expression of flight muscle structural proteins in S. frugiperda females at different ages. (a) Changes in gene expression with age; (b) DEGs of D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, wherein red columns represent upregulated DEGs and green columns represent downregulated DEGs.
Figure 9. The expression of flight muscle structural proteins in S. frugiperda females at different ages. (a) Changes in gene expression with age; (b) DEGs of D3:D1, D4:D1, D7:D1 and D10:D1 groups, wherein red columns represent upregulated DEGs and green columns represent downregulated DEGs.
Insects 13 00936 g009
Figure 10. Transcriptome validation for DEGs by qPCR. (ad) are relative expression levels of target genes measured by qPCR, and (eh) are their expression levels measured by RNAseq. Error bars were standard error (SE).
Figure 10. Transcriptome validation for DEGs by qPCR. (ad) are relative expression levels of target genes measured by qPCR, and (eh) are their expression levels measured by RNAseq. Error bars were standard error (SE).
Insects 13 00936 g010
Figure 11. Activities of the five metabolic enzymes (GPDH, GAPDH, LDH, HOAD and CS) in the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females at different ages. Lines with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Error bars were ± SE.
Figure 11. Activities of the five metabolic enzymes (GPDH, GAPDH, LDH, HOAD and CS) in the flight muscle of S. frugiperda females at different ages. Lines with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Error bars were ± SE.
Insects 13 00936 g011
Figure 12. Linear regression between enzyme activity and age in S. frugiperda females. (ad) are linear regression of HOAD, GPDH, GAPDH and LDH with age, respectively.
Figure 12. Linear regression between enzyme activity and age in S. frugiperda females. (ad) are linear regression of HOAD, GPDH, GAPDH and LDH with age, respectively.
Insects 13 00936 g012
Table 1. Enzymes and metabolites (full name and abbreviations) of flight energy metabolism in S. frugiperda.
Table 1. Enzymes and metabolites (full name and abbreviations) of flight energy metabolism in S. frugiperda.
Gene ID *Gene NameAbbreviationFunctionReference
The glycolysis pathway
LOC118280632TrehaloseTRECatalyzing the conversion of trehalose to glucose.[34]
LOC118276330HexokinaseHKCatalyzes the conversion of glucose to glucose 6-phosphate (G6P).[35]
LOC118265182Glycogen phosphorylaseGPPhosphorylation of glycogen to glucose 1-phosphate (G1P).[36]
——Glucose phosphate mutasePGMCatalytic conversion of G1P to G6P.[9]
LOC118277306Glucose-6-phosphate isomeraseGPIRearrange G6P into 6-phosphate-fructose (F6P).[37]
LOC118270306Phosphofructose kinasePFKCatalyzing F6P to produce fructose 1,6-diphosphate (FDP).[38]
LOC118275099Fructose-bisphosphate aldolaseFBAFDP was decomposed into glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (GAP) and dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP).[39]
LOC118268149Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenaseGPDHCatalytic conversion between DHAP and glycerol 3-phosphate (G3P).[15]
LOC118263360Triose phosphate isomeraseTPICatalytic conversion between GAP and DHAP.[40]
LOC118271716Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenaseGAPDHCatalytic conversion of GAP to 1,3-diphosphoglyceride.[15]
LOC118262502Phosphoglycerate kinasePGKCatalyzes the conversion of 1,3-diphosphoglyceride to 3-phosphoglycerate.[41]
LOC118274617Phosphoglycerate mutasePGAMCatalytic conversion of 3-phosphoglyceric acid to 2-phosphoglyceric acid.[42]
LOC118268804EnolaseENOCatalytic conversion of 2-phosphoglyceric acid to phosphoenolpyruvate.[41]
LOC118281561Pyruvate kinasePKCatalyzes phosphoenolpyruvate to transfer high-energy phosphate groups to ADP to produce ATP and pyruvate (PYR).[43]
LOC118272480Lactate dehydrogenasLDHCatalyze the reduction and oxidation reaction between PYR and lactic acid (LA).[44]
The fat oxidation pathway
LOC118266592Diacylglycerol lipaseDGLCatalyze the hydrolysis of Diacylglycerol lipid (DG-LP) to release free fatty acids (FFA) and monoacylglycerol.[45]
——Diglyceride lipaseDLCatalyzing the conversion of diglycerides to FFA.[36]
LOC118262085Acetyl CoA synthaseACSCatalytic synthesis of fatty acyl CoA (FA-CoA) from FFA.[46]
——Carnitine palmitoyl transferaseCPTSynthesis of lipoacyl carnitine catalyzed by lipoacyl coenzyme A and carnitine.[36]
LOC118273677Carnitine O-acetyltransferaseCATTransfer of lipoacyl carnitine into mitochondrial matrix.[36]
LOC118274443Acyl-CoA dehydrogenaseACDHMake (Cn) acyl coenzyme A in α and β One hydrogen is removed from each carbon atom to form β-enolyl-COA.[47]
LOC118271967Enoyl-CoA hydrataseECHCatalyzing trans alkenylacyl coenzyme A to produce β-hydroxyacyl COA.[47]
LOC1182720833-hydroxyacyl-CoA DehydrogenaseHOADCatalyzing 3-hydroxyacyl coenzyme A to produce β-ketoacyl-COA.[36]
LOC118265763ThiolaseTHICatalyzing the formation of (Cn-2) fatty acyl CoA from β-ketoacyl-COA.[47]
The proline oxidation pathway
LOC118274501Proline dehydrogenaseProDHThe first step of catalyzing the catabolism of proline is to oxidize proline to pyrrole-5-carboxylic acid.[48]
LOC118262586Pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenaseP5CDHGlutamic acid oxide- γ- Glutamic acid from semialdehyde.[36]
LOC118268408Alanine aminotransferaseALTCatalyzing the production of glutamate and alanine α-Ketoglutarate.[36]
LOC118263189Aspartate aminotransferaseASTCatalyzing the production of glutamic acid and oxaloacetic acid α-Ketoglutarate.[48]
Tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle
LOC118269912Pyruvate dehydrogenasePDHCatalytic oxidative dehydrogenation of PYR to acetyl-CoA.[49]
LOC118262833Citrate synthaseCSThe key enzyme at the entrance of the tricarboxylic acid cycle catalyzes the synthesis of citrate from oxaloacetate and acetyl CoA.[50]
LOC118264042AconitaseACOCatalytic citrate acid to isocitrate.[51]
LOC118267252Isocitrate dehydrogenaseIDHCatalytic oxidative dehydrogenation of isocitrate α-Ketoglutarate, the main factor controlling circulation.[52]
——α- Ketoglutarate dehydrogenaseα-KGDHCCatalysis α-Ketoglutarate to succinyl CoA.[53]
——Succinyl COA synthaseSCSIt is a TCA cycle enzyme that catalyzes succinyl CoA to produce succinate.[54]
LOC118271964Succinate dehydrogenaseSDHIt is a key enzyme involved in the tricarboxylic acid cycle in mitochondria and catalyzes succinate to fumarate.[55]
——FumaraseFumCatalyze the reversible hydration reaction between fumarate acid and malate.[56]
LOC118269324Malate dehydrogenase MDH Conversion between malate and oxaloacetate.[57]
LOC118267676Pyruvate carboxylasePCCatalyzing the carboxylation of H2CO3 and PYR to form oxaloacetic acid.[58]
* Genes without IDs indicate they are present in insects but not found in the transcripts of S. frugiperda.
Table 2. Flight muscle structural protein-encoding genes of S. frugiperda.
Table 2. Flight muscle structural protein-encoding genes of S. frugiperda.
ProteinGene IDFunctionReference
TwitchinLOC118280582 (twitchin-like)Interacts with F-actin.[59]
TropomodulinLOC118281560 (tropomodulin-1-like)Terminal capping protein of actin.[60]
FlightinLOC118267000 (flightin-like)A myosin-binding protein that maintains sarcomere stability.[61]
TroponinLOC118263234 (troponin T); LOC118263900 (troponin I); LOC118266930 (troponin C)A sensor that receives Ga2+ to regulate muscle contraction; consists of three subunits, TnT, TnI and TnC.[62]
MyosinA total of 26 transcripts were identified. Such as LOC118278200 (myosin-11-like); LOC118278607 (myosin-14-like); LOC118279007 (myosin-7B-like);
LOC118263248 (myosin-M heavy chain-like); LOC118264677 (myosin heavy chain); LOC118268178 (myosin heavy chain 95F-like); LOC118271963 (myosin-10-like)
A superfamily of molecular motors that move along the track of actin filaments, accounting for 60% of the total protein of myofibrils. Plays a role in muscle contraction.[63]
ParamyosinLOC118267608 (paramyosin-like);
LOC118269023 (paramyosin, long form-like)
Play roles in myoblast fusion, myofibril assembly, and muscle contraction.[60]
Connectin, TitinLOC118268606 (titin-like, transcript variant X4); LOC118268680 (titin-like, transcript variant X1); LOC118268988 (titin-like, transcript variant X2)
LOC118274312 (titin-like); LOC118267569 (connectin-like); LOC118267725 (connectin-like, transcript variant X1)
Intertwined with thick and thin filaments, making muscles elastic.[60]
TropomyosinLOC118273937 (tropomyosin-1, transcript variant X1); LOC118273938 (tropomyosin-2, transcript variant X1)Regulates myofibrils function by interacting with actin.[64]
ActinA total of 41 transcripts were identified. Such as LOC118279073 (actin, muscl); LOC118279603 (actin-like); LOC118279605 (actin, alpha skeletal muscle-like); LOC118280131 (actin-like protein 9A); LOC118264039 (actin-like protein 15A); LOC118264040 (actin-like protein 16A); LOC118268744 (actin-like protein 24A)Play roles in muscle movement, accounting for 20% of the total protein of muscles. Divided into α, β and γ-actin three categories.[65]
Table 3. The activity ratio of GAPDH:HOAD in S. frugiperda at different ages.
Table 3. The activity ratio of GAPDH:HOAD in S. frugiperda at different ages.
Age (Day)GAPDH:HOAD
D10.594
D30.433
D40.430
D70.412
D100.471
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fu, Y.; Wu, T.; Yu, H.; Xu, J.; Zhang, J.-Z.; Fu, D.-Y.; Ye, H. The Transcription of Flight Energy Metabolism Enzymes Declined with Aging While Enzyme Activity Increased in the Long-Distance Migratory Moth, Spodoptera frugiperda. Insects 2022, 13, 936. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13100936

AMA Style

Fu Y, Wu T, Yu H, Xu J, Zhang J-Z, Fu D-Y, Ye H. The Transcription of Flight Energy Metabolism Enzymes Declined with Aging While Enzyme Activity Increased in the Long-Distance Migratory Moth, Spodoptera frugiperda. Insects. 2022; 13(10):936. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13100936

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fu, Yan, Ting Wu, Hong Yu, Jin Xu, Jun-Zhong Zhang, Da-Ying Fu, and Hui Ye. 2022. "The Transcription of Flight Energy Metabolism Enzymes Declined with Aging While Enzyme Activity Increased in the Long-Distance Migratory Moth, Spodoptera frugiperda" Insects 13, no. 10: 936. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13100936

APA Style

Fu, Y., Wu, T., Yu, H., Xu, J., Zhang, J. -Z., Fu, D. -Y., & Ye, H. (2022). The Transcription of Flight Energy Metabolism Enzymes Declined with Aging While Enzyme Activity Increased in the Long-Distance Migratory Moth, Spodoptera frugiperda. Insects, 13(10), 936. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13100936

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop