Next Article in Journal
Petals Reduce Attachment of Insect Pollinators: A Case Study of the Plant Dahlia pinnata and the Fly Eristalis tenax
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review on Digestive System of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus as Potential Target to Develop Control Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
The Adult and Larva of a New Species of the Genus Dila (Coleoptera, Blaptinae, Blaptini) from Himalayas, with Molecular Phylogenetic Inferences of Related Genera of the Blaptini
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/insects14030283
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationship between Dubas Bug (Ommatissus lybicus) Infestation and the Development of Fungal-Induced Leaf Spots in Date Palms (Phoenix dactylifera)

by
Salem S. Al-Nabhani
1,
Rethinasamy Velazhahan
2,
Shah Hussain
2,
Suad Al-Raqmi
1,
Maryam Al-Hashmi
1 and
Abdullah M. Al-Sadi
2,*
1
Directorate General of Agriculture and Livestock Research, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Water Resources, Muscat 123, Oman
2
Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khoud, Muscat 123, Oman
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(3), 283; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030283
Submission received: 7 February 2023 / Revised: 3 March 2023 / Accepted: 7 March 2023 / Published: 14 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Palm Ecosystems: Tackling Insect Challenges through Ecology and Conservation Biology, Pest Control and Biotechnology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Insect infestation can cause severe loss to the production of agricultural crops in two ways. The first is direct injury to the plant by the feeding insect, which eats the tissues of leaves, stems, fruits, or roots. The second type is indirect damage, in which the insect itself does little or no harm but transmits or influences the infection of bacteria, viruses, or fungi into a crop. We examined the development of fungal infection in date palm leaves following dubas bug infestation. The study provided evidence that dubas bug infestation in date palm leaves facilitated the infection of several fungal species, such as Alternaria destruens, Cladosporium pseudochalastosporoides, C. endophyticum, Fusarium fujikuroi species complex, F. humuli, F. microconidium, Quambalaria cyanescens, Phaeoacremonium krajdenii, and P. venezuelense. This was the first study to report this kind of association between dubas bugs and these fungi in date palms. Future studies should focus on the management of dubas bug infestations to limit the development of other diseases in the host plants.

Abstract

The dubas bug (Ommatissus lybicus) (Hemiptera: Tropiduchidae) is a serious pest in date palms in several date-producing countries, including Oman. Infestation results in a severe reduction in yield and a weakening of date palm growth. In addition, egg laying, which causes injuries to date palm leaves, results in the development of necrotic lesions on the leaves. This study aimed at investigating the role of fungi in the development of necrotic leaf spots following dubas bug infestation. Leaf samples developing leaf spot symptoms were collected from dubas-bug-infested leaves, as the leaf spot symptoms were not observed on the non-infested leaves. Isolation from date palm leaves collected from 52 different farms yielded 74 fungal isolates. Molecular identification of the isolates revealed that they belonged to 31 fungal species, 16 genera, and 10 families. Among the isolated fungi, there were five Alternaria species, four species each of Penicillium and Fusarium, three species each of Cladosporium and Phaeoacremonium, and two species each of Quambalaria and Trichoderma. Out of the thirty-one fungal species, nine were pathogenic on date palm leaves and induced varying levels of leaf spot symptoms. The pathogenic species were Alternaria destruens, Fusarium fujikuroi species complex, F. humuli, F. microconidium, Cladosporium pseudochalastosporoides, C. endophyticum, Quambalaria cyanescens, Phaeoacremonium krajdenii, and P. venezuelense, which were reported for the first time as leaf spot causal agents in date palms. The study provided novel information on the effect of dubas bug infestation in date palms on the development of fungal infection and associated leaf spot symptoms.

1. Introduction

In Oman, date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) is the most important fruit crop, occupying approximately 50% of the agricultural land of the country. Currently, Oman is the eighth largest producer of dates, producing 374,000 tons [1] from more than 350 different cultivars. Most cultivars are grown for direct human consumption, such as khunaiz cv., Fardh cv., and khellass cv., while others are used as animal feed or for processing. The major production areas of date palm are in Al-Dakhilyah, Al-Batinah, Al-Sharqiya, Al-Dhahira, AL-Buraimi, and Musandam governorates. Date palms have a significant presence in Arabian society. The tree parts have been used for food, feed, shelter, and fuel.
Date palm is affected by many harmful insect pests, attacking all parts of the tree. Approximately 54 insect pests have been reported on date palm trees in Oman [2,3]. Among these insects, the dubas bug (Ommatissus lybicus; Hemiptera: Tropiduchidae) has been the most prominent insect affecting date palm trees in Oman since 1962 [4,5]. This bug is extremely devastating to the production of dates, resulting in approximately 28% losses in dates yield in Oman and nearly 50% in Iraq [6,7,8]. Dates of infested palms remain smaller and take longer time to ripen, with a reduction in sugars and sucrose percentages [9]. Many trees have been lost due to infestation by this pest [10]. Other pests of date palms include the red palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), the lesser date moth Batrachedra amydraula (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Cosmopterygidae), the old-world date mite Oligonychus afrasiaticus (McGregor) (Prostigmata: Tetranychidae), Fiorinia sp. (Hemiptera: Diaspididae), Parlatoria blanchardi (Hemiptera: Diaspididae), the red date scale Phoenicoccus marlatti (Cockerell) (Homoptera: Phoenicoccidae), Pseudaspidoproctus hyphaeniacus (Monophlebidae: Pseudaspidoproctus), Platypleura arabica (Mayers) (Hemiptera: Cicadidae), Arenipases sabella, the red Palm Mite Raoiella indica (Hirst) (Acari: Tenuipalpidae), Vespa orientalis (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), and Drosophilla melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae) [2,3].
Dubas bug is a hemimetabolous insect that completes its life cycle in three developmental stages: the egg, the nymph, and the adult [11]. It has two reproductive cycles per year, called the spring generation from February to May and the autumn generation from August to November [11,12,13,14,15]. In the spring, females tend to lay eggs on the fifth frond of date palm leaves to provide maximum protection for eggs against heat during the summer season, while in the autumn they tend to lay eggs on the third frond [16]. The life cycle begins with egg laying; the eggs hatch into nymphs and the nymphs molt five times until they reach the adult stage, in 34 to 95 days at 32.5 °C and 20 °C, respectively [17]. The adults are yellowish-brown to greenish in color, with two black spots on their head; the female is larger in size (5–6 mm) and has a strong ovipositor toothed-saw form, while the male is shorter (3–3.5 mm). Furthermore, eggs are mostly embedded inside the date leaf tissue [17]. On average, each female lays about 129–144 eggs [3,18,19,20]. The dubas bug produces honeydew over the leaf, frond, fruits, and surrounding the date palm tree, as a result of sucking sap [21,22]. Similarly, the egg’s oviposition pattern around the fronds, leaves, and leaflets can cause necrotic areas in the tissues of these parts of the plant [23]. However, it is not clear whether the necrotic lesions are due to fungal infections following dubas bug injuries to the leaves.
Insect pests become a serious threat to plant life because insect infestation facilitates fungal infection in plants [24]. Approximately 30 to 40% of losses in crop yield result from pathogen infections following insect infestation [25]. Fungal infection in plants is further spread over a large area by insect vectors [26]. Several fungal species, such as Alternaria alternata, Curvularia lunata, Fusarium oxysporum, F. proliferatum, and Bipolaris oryzae have been isolated from the adult date palm borer (Oryctes elegans) [26]. In mango trees, a secondary infection of Alternaria species has been reported following infestation by the mango leaf-gall midge Procontrinia matteiana (Kieffer and Cecconi) [27]. Capnodium sp., the cause of black sooty mold, has been reported to be associated with the feeding activity of whiteflies and aphids in several crops in Oman, including tomatoes, potatoes, eggplants, chilies, watermelons, sweet melons, chickpeas, and faba beans. Additionally, guava fruit rot, caused by Alternaria spp., and inflorescence rot caused by Fusarium equiseti, have been reported to be facilitated by insect damage [28].
The study hypothesizes that dubas bug infestation in date palm leaves may favor infection by leaf spot pathogens. The present study was designed to investigate the potential association of fungal species with leaf spots developed in dubas-bug-infested leaves. Knowledge on this subject will clarify whether fungal species play a role in augmenting the damage in date palms caused by the dubas bug, which will be helpful in planning proper management strategies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Isolation of Fungal Isolates from Dubas-Bug-Infested Leaves

Sampling was carried out at four administrative units (Wilayat) that are famous for date palm production in Oman. Thirteen villages were surveyed: six villages in Izki Wilayat, five in Samail Wilayat, and one each in Al Hamra and Ibri Wilayats. In each village, four date palm farms and fifty date palm trees per farm were surveyed. The details of the sampling sites are given in Table 1. Samples were collected from date palm leaves infested by the dubas bug and developing leaf spot symptoms at the sites of infestation [2,6]. The infestation by dubas bugs was high, approximately 100 insects per leaflet. No spots were observed on leaves not infested by dubas bugs.
For the isolation of fungi, each leaf sample was cut into small sections of a specific size (1 × 1 cm2). Each section was surface disinfested with 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) (Clorox, MAAPICO-NCP, Saudi Arabia) for one minute and then washed in laboratory-produced sterile distilled water for the same period. The sections were dried and then used for the isolation of fungi on 2.5% PDA (potato dextrose agar, Oxoid, UK) medium at a temperature of 27 °C. Emerging fungal colonies were transferred to new Petri dishes, followed by obtaining pure cultures using mycelium tip culture [29]. The pure cultures of the isolated fungi were preserved in slant; i.e., 3.5 mL PDA media with 13% glycerol (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from the fungal mycelia using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 = ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA was used for the identification of the fungal isolates. Firstly, the ITS1 and ITS4 primer combination was used for the amplification of the ITS region [30]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using PuReTaqTM Ready-To-Go PCR beads (GE Healthcare UK Limited, Buckinghamshire, UK) in a Mastercycler gradient-5331 (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), with 1.0 µL of each primer (10 µmol/L), 22 µL H2O, and 1 µL template DNA. The final volume of the PCR mix was 25 µL. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 98 °C for 30 s, followed by 35 cycles with denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s; with a final extension for 5 min at 72 °C [29]. The PCR products were purified followed by sequencing using the same primers at Macrogen Inc.© (Seoul, Republic of Korea).

2.3. Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analyses

The resulted sequences were trimmed using BioEdit 7.2.5 [31] and were subjected to BLAST analyses to check the sequence similarity against the GenBank sequences in the NCBI database. Sequences of the type of materials of each genus were retrieved from GenBank, and an individual dataset was constructed for each genus for subsequent phylogenetic analysis. Sequences were aligned and assembled using Clustal X 2.1 [32]. For species delimitation, maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis was performed in RAxML v.7.2.6 [32], using a GTR + G model of evolution with 1000 bootstraps replicated. A bootstrap (BT) proportion of ≥50% was considered significant. Following species delimitation, we combined all the newly generated sequences in a dataset and performed the maximum likelihood analysis in RAxML v.7.2.6 [33] with the same parameters. FigTree 1.4.2 [34] was used for phylogenetic tree visualization, followed by tree annotation using Adobe Illustrator CC2019 (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

2.4. Pathogenicity Test

All the isolated fungal species were tested for their pathogenicity on date palm leaflets using detached leaves. The test was conducted on leaflets obtained from 3- to 4-years-old date palms. Whatman No. 1 filter papers were placed in 150 mm Petri dishes and moistened with 50 mg L−1 benzimidazole [35]. Then, two 90 mm leaflets were surface disinfected using 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for 60 s, washed in sterile distilled water, dried on filter papers, and then placed in a Petri dish in an X shape. Two sets of leaflets were used for each fungal species, one without injury and the other one with superficial injury. The superficial injury was created using a sterilized scalpel, which induced injury on the leaves similar to the ones created by dubas bugs. Mycelial plugs (5 mm) from 2-week-old fungal cultures were placed on the leaflets; two plugs on each leaflet, 50 mm between the plugs. The control leaflets received the same treatment, except using PDA agar plugs instead of mycelial plugs. The Petri dishes were incubated under laboratory room temperature 25 ± 3 °C [35]. There were five replicate Petri dishes for each set of leaves for each fungal species. After 2 weeks of incubation, the development of leaf spots was assessed by measuring the diameter of the area covered with leaf spots. In addition, fungal isolates were re-isolated from the inoculated leaflets. The pathogenicity test was repeated one more time.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data from the pathogenicity test were statistically analyzed using the Statistical Analysis System, SAS (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The separation of means was based on Tukey’s Studentized range test. Standard deviations were also determined for all means.

3. Results

3.1. Fungal Identification

The isolated fungi were identified using the ITS barcode. A total of 74 fungal isolates were recovered from the dubas-bug-infested leaves, representing 31 fungal species belonging to 16 genera of 10 fungal families. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree is depicted in Figure 1, where each species is highlighted in a specific color shade with their respective family.

3.2. Isolation of Fungal Isolates from Dubas Bug-Infested Leaves

Among the sixteen genera, Alternaria was the highly diverse genus with five species; followed by Penicillium with four species; Cladosporium, Fusarium, Phaeoacremonium each with three species; and Quambalaria, Trichoderma each with two species. The remaining genera had a single species each: Aureobasidium melanogenum, Canariomyces subthermophilus, Clonostachys swieteniae, Pleiocarpon algeriense, Sarocladium terricola, Talaromyces allahabadensis, Trichothecium crotocinigenum, and Xenoacremonium recifei. The most frequently isolated species was Cladosporium endophyticum with ten isolates, followed by Fusarium fujikuroi with eight isolates, Alternaria alstroemeriae and Cladosporium pseudochalastosporoides each with seven, Aureobasidium melanogenum with six, Alternaria destruens, A. prunicola, and Penicillium bilaiae each with three isolates. The remaining nineteen fungal species were represented by one isolate each.
The highest number of fungal species was recorded from date palm plantations of the villages Alhajer and Mesfat alabriyn, with seven species each, followed by Sifalat with six species, while the lowest number of species was reported from Qarrot South (3). The details are presented in Table 2.

3.3. Pathogenicity Test

Pathogenicity tests of the 31 fungal species showed varying levels of leaf spot development. Nine fungal species induced leaf spot symptoms on the wounded leaflets, while twenty-two species resulted in no symptoms. The nine species that induced symptoms are shown in Table 3 and Figure 2. They resulted in brown to black leaf spots that ranged in size from 3.4–9.0 mm within two weeks of inoculation. The highest leaf spot severity was induced by Phaeoacremonium krajdenii (9.0 mm), followed by the Fusarium fujikuroi species complex (8.2 mm), F. humuli (8.2 mm), and F. microconidium (8.1 mm). The least disease severity was caused by Phaeoacremonium venezuelense (3.4 mm), followed by Quambalaria cyanescens (5.6 mm). However, no symptom development was observed on the uninjured leaves, or the control leaves for up to two weeks of incubation.

4. Discussion

Dubas bug infestation in date palms has always been found to be associated with the development of necrotic areas (leaf spots) on the affected leaves. This study aimed at investigating the role of fungal species in the development of leaf spots following dubas bug infestation. A total of 31 fungal species, belonging to 16 fungal genera, were isolated from necrotic areas on date palm leaves infested by dubas bugs. Ascomycota was represented by 15 genera, and Basidiomycota was represented by the genus Quambalaria J.A. Simpson.
Inoculation of date palm leaves revealed that nine out of thirty-one fungal species induced leaf spot symptoms on the injured leaves. The injury, which was mechanically induced on the leaves, was similar to the ones created by dubas bugs, in order to understand the effect of this injury on the infection by fungi. No symptoms developed on the non-injured leaves. This may suggest that these fungal species cannot penetrate the leaf tissue of a date palm by themselves, and that they need a source of injury. This provides evidence that the fungal species cause leaf spot symptoms following injuries caused by dubas bugs when they insert eggs into the leaves. Insects are known to play an important role in infections by plant pathogenic fungi, which usually happens by facilitating entry through wounds created by insects [37,38,39]. Fusarium spp., causing root rot disease in forage legumes, was found to be common in clovers infested with clover root curculio Sitona hispidulus F. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) [38,40,41]. Maize roots chewed by the worm of western corn root (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte; Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) help in the colonization by Fusarium verticillioides (Saccardo) Nirenberg [42]. Fusarium and Pythium spp. have been reported to be transported by the fungus gnat larvae (Bradysia spp.; Diptera: Sciaridae) in legumes such as alfalfa and soybean [43,44]. Phytophthora spp. were isolated from the root tissues of citrus injured by the weevil Diaprepes abbreviatus L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) [45,46].
Our findings showed that Alternaria destruens, Fusarium fujikuroi species complex, F. humuli, F. microconidium, Cladosporium pseudochalastosporoides, C. endophyticum, Quambalaria cyanescens, Phaeoacremonium krajdenii, and P. venezuelense induced varying levels of leaf spot symptoms on date palm leaves. Alternaria is a genus with several species causing leaf spots on different plants. Alternaria destruens has been reported to be associated with leaf spots on Lingustrum sinense in China [47]. Similarly, in Iran, A. destruens has been reported to be associated with black spot disease in cabbage [48]. This is the first record of the association of A. destruens with date palm leaf spot.
Fusarium is a widely distributed pathogen in different crops in different parts of the world. Fusarium fujikuroi is a pathogen of rice seeds [49], maize sheath rot [50], round spot disease of Zanthoxylum armatum [51], and brown leaf spot on kiwifruit [52]. Fusarium humuli has been reported to cause wilt in yams in China [53], while F. microconidium is a recently described species with unknown origin and unknown substrate, with an ex-type culture located in the Centraal Bureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS) culture collection (CBS 119843 = MRC 8391) [54]. This is the first record of the association of the F. fujikuroi complex, F. humuli, and F. microconidium with date palm leaf spot.
Our findings showed that two Cladosporium species are pathogenic on date palm leaves, which are C. pseudochalastosporoides and C. endophyticum. There have been limited studies on the pathogenicity of C. pseudochalastosporoides and C. endophyticum. This is the first report of an association of these Cladosporium species with date palm leaf spot.
Quambalaria cyanescens has been reported to be associated with leaf spot and branch and shoot blight in Iranian grapevine [55]. Quambalaria spp. have also been reported to be associated with trunk necrosis and canker and leaf spot symptoms in Eucalyptus and Corymbia plants [56]. This is the first record of the association of Q. cyanescens with date palm leaf spot.
Phaeoacremonium krajdenii has been reported to be associated with chlorotic and black spots in xylem vessels and stunted leaves on grapevines (Vitis vinifera) [57,58,59,60,61,62]. Phaeoacremonium krajdenii has also been reported in Prunus fruit tree orchards, such as cherry, peach, and apricot, with several symptoms including defoliation, gummosis, and dieback of branches [63]. Other species, P. venezuelense, have been reported to cause a decline and dieback in Vitis vinifera [57,58,64], a dieback of branches, and shoots and leaf discoloration and black spot in branches of apricot trees (Prunus armeniaca) in Spain [65], and dieback and gummosis on branches of Calligonum amoenum in Iran [66]. This is the first record of the association of P. krajdenii and P. venezuelense with date palm leaf spot.
The present study provides evidence that dubas bug infestation in date palm leaves facilitates infection by Alternaria destruens, Fusarium fujikuroi species complex, F. humuli, F. microconidium, Cladosporium pseudochalastosporoides, C. endophyticum, Quambalaria cyanescens, Phaeoacremonium krajdenii, and P. venezuelense, which results in leaf spot symptoms. The infection by fungi is largely because of the injuries created by the dubas bug on the leaves. This is the first study reporting this kind of association between dubas bug and these fungi. Future studies should focus on the management of dubas bug infestation to limit the development of other associated diseases.

Author Contributions

All authors have contributed extensively to this work. Conceptualization, S.S.A.-N., R.V., A.M.A.-S. and S.H.; methodology, S.S.A.-N., R.V., A.M.A.-S., S.A.-R., M.A.-H. and S.H.; software, S.S.A.-N. and S.H.; validation, S.S.A.-N., R.V., A.M.A.-S. and S.H.; formal analysis, S.S.A.-N. and S.H.; investigation, S.S.A.-N.; resources, A.M.A.-S.; data curation, S.S.A.-N.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S.A.-N.; writing—review and editing, S.S.A.-N., R.V., A.M.A.-S., S.A.-R., M.A.-H. and S.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Thanks to Sultan Qaboos University and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Water Resources for providing financial support to the study.

Data Availability Statement

The sequence data presented in this study are openly available in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) (accessed on 6 March 2023).

Acknowledgments

Thanks to growers and Ministry staff for their support in the collection and processing of samples. Special thanks to Hamoud Al-Abri, Nasser Al-Wardy, Sami Al-Riyami and Ahmed Al-Alawi.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. FAO. FAOSTAT. Available online: http://faostat3.faoorg/browse/rankings/countries_by_commodity/E5 (accessed on 26 December 2022).
  2. Mokhtar, A.M.; Al-Khatri, S.A.; A’Rab’ani, M.A.; Al-Busaidi, A.Y.; Al-Zadjali, T.S.; El-Haidari, H.S.; Faheem, F. Survey of insect pest attacking date palm in Oman Interior and AL-Dhahira regions in Sultanate of Oman. In Annual Report of Research Work; Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries: Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, 1994; pp. 306–310. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kinawi, M.M. Date Palm and Date Pests in Oman; Royal Court Affairs: Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  4. MAF. Dubas Bug, Ommtissus lybicus; Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries: Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, 1997; pp. 3–18. [Google Scholar]
  5. MAF. Perennial Book of Date Palm Tree; Department for Statistics of Agriculture and Livestock, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries: Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  6. Khan, N.A.; Mukhtar, A.; Alam, M. To asses the extent of the economic damage caused by Dubas bug Ommatissus binotatus on date palms with particular reference to yield and quality of fruits. In Annual Report of Research Work (1980–1981); Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries: Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, 1983; pp. 170–179. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gassouma, M.S. Pests of the date palm (Phoenix dactylifera). In Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Date Palm Development in the GCC countries of the Arabian Peninsula, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 29–31 May 2004. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kinaway, M.; Al-Siyabi, A. Major arthropod pests of date palm in Arab countries. In Proceedings of the First Regional Conference about Management of Date Palm Pests, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 22–25 September 2012. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hussain, A.A. Date Palm, Dates and Their Pests. Ph.D. Thesis, Basra University, Basra, Iraq, 1985. (In Arabic). [Google Scholar]
  10. Howard, F.W.; Giblin-Davis, R.; Moore, D.; Abad, R. Insects on Palms; CABI Publishing: London, UK, 2001; pp. 1–400. [Google Scholar]
  11. Resh, V.H.; Cardé, R.T. Encyclopedia of Insects, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2009; pp. 1–1136. [Google Scholar]
  12. Thacker, J.R.M.; Al-Mahmooli, I.H.S.; Deadman, M.L. Population dynamics and control of the dubas bug Ommatissus lybicus in the Sultanate of Oman. In Proceeding of the BCPC International Congress: Crop Science and Technology, Volumes 1 and 2. Proceedings of an International Congress Held at the SECC, Glasgow, UK, 10–12 November 2003. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ba-Angood, S.A.; Al-Ghurabi, A.S.; Hubaishan, M.A. Biology and chemical control of the old world bug (Doubas bug) Ommatissus lybicus DeBerg on date palm trees in the coastal areas of Hadramout Governorate, Republic of Yemen. Arab J. Plant Prot. 2009, 27, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  14. Payandeh, A.; Kamali, K.; Fathipour, Y. Population structure and seasonal activity of Ommatissus lybicus in Bam region of Iran (Homoptera Tropiduchidae). Munis Entomol. Zool. 2010, 5, 726–733. [Google Scholar]
  15. Elwan, A.A.; Al-Tamimi, S.S. Life cycle of Dubas bug Ommatissus binotatus lybicus de Berg. (Homoptera: Tropiduchidae) in Sultanate of Oman. Egypt. J. Agric. Res. 1999, 77, 1547–1553. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mokhtar, M.; Al-Nabhani, S.S. Oviposition pattern of Dubas bug Ommatissus lybicus de Berg. on date palm. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Date Palm Production and processing Technology, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, 9–11 May 2006; Sultan Qaboos University: Seeb, Sultanate of Oman, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mokhtar, M.; Al-Nabhani, S.S. Temperature-dependent development of dubas bug, Ommatissus lybicus (Hemiptera: Tropiduchidae), an endemic pest of date palm, Phoenix dactylifera. Eur. J. Entomol. 2010, 107, 681–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Al-Mjeni, A.M.; Mokhtar, A. Comparison between Nogos and Malathion on Dubas bug. In Annual Report of Research Work (1979–1980); Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries: Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, 1983; pp. 157–165. [Google Scholar]
  19. Abd-Allah, F.F.; Al-Zadjali, T.S.; Al-Khatri, S.A. Biology of Ommatissus lybicus Bergevin under field and laboratory conditions during spring generation. In Agricultural Research Annual Report; Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries: Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, 1994; pp. 29–293. [Google Scholar]
  20. Abd-Allah, F.F.; Al-Zidjali, T.S.; Al-Khatri, S.A. Biology of Ommatissus lybicus Bergevin under field and laboratory conditions during spring 1995. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Integrated Pest Management, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, 23–25 February 1998; Sultan Qaboos University: Seeb, Sultanate of Oman, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mokhtar, A.M.; Al-Mjeni, A.M. A novel approach to determine the efficacy of control measures against Dubas bug, Ommatissus lybicus de Bergevin, on date palm. J. Agricult. Sci. 1999, 4, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  22. Al-Yahyai, R.; Khan, M.M. Date palm status and perspective in Oman. In Date Palm Genetic Resources and Utilization; Al-Khayri, J.M., Jain, S.M., Johnson, D.V., Eds.; Springer: London, UK, 2015; pp. 207–240. [Google Scholar]
  23. Howard, F.W. Sap-feeders on Palms. In Insects on Palms; Howard, F.W., Giblin-Davis, R., Moore, D., Abad, R., Eds.; CABI Publishing: London, UK, 2001; pp. 128–161. [Google Scholar]
  24. Blandino, M.; Scarpino, V.; Vanara, F.; Sulyok, M.; Krska, R.; Reyneri, A. Role of the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) on contamination of maize with 13 Fusarium mycotoxins. Food Addit. Contam. Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2015, 32, 533–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Agrios, N.G. Plant Pathology, 5th ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  26. Khudhair, M.W.; Aboud, H.M.; Khalaf, M.Z.; Shbar, A.K. Oryctes elegans, a vector of Fusarium proliferatum causing wilt disease symptoms of date palm. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2014, 3, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shivanathan, P. Preliminary study of plant disease in selected crops in northern regions of Oman. In Annual Report of Research Work (1990); Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries: Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, 1990; pp. 156–171. [Google Scholar]
  28. Shivanathan, P.; Al-Zidjali, A.; Al-Raisi, Y.; Al-Ragmi, H.; Abdel-Haleem, S. Record of diseases at Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Rumais 92/93. In Annual Report of Research Work (1993); Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries: Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, 1993; pp. 173–174. [Google Scholar]
  29. Al-Sadi, A.M.; Deadman, M.L. Influence of seed-borne Cochliobolus sativus (Anamorph Bipolaris sorokiniana) on crown rot and root rot of barley and wheat. J. Phytopathol. 2010, 158, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hall, T.A. BioEdit 5.0.9: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  32. Larkin, M.A.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.P.; Chenna, R.; McGettigan, P.A.; McWilliam, H.; Valentin, F.; Wallace, I.M.; Wilm, A.; Lopez, R.; et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Rambaut, A. FigTree Tree Figure Drawing Tool Version 131, Institute of Evolutionary 623 Biology, University of Edinburgh. Available online: http://treebioedacuk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 3 January 2022).
  35. Al-Sadi, A.M. Variation in resistance to spot blotch and the aggressiveness of Bipolaris sorokiniana on barley and wheat cultivars. J. Plant Pathol. 2016, 98, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wijayawardene, N.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Rajeshkumar, K.C.; Hawksworth, D.L.; Madrid, H.; Kirk, P.M.; Braun, U.; Singh, R.V.; Crous, P.W.; Kukwa, M.; et al. Notes for genera: Ascomycota. Fungal Divers. 2017, 86, 1–594. [Google Scholar]
  37. Godfrey, L.D.; Yeargan, K.V. Effects and interactions of early season pests on alfalfa yield in Kentucky. J. Econ. Entomol. 1987, 80, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kalb, D.W.; Bergstrom, G.C.; Shields, E.J. Prevalence, severity, and association of fungal crown and root rots with injury by the clover root curculio in New York alfalfa. Plant Dis. 1994, 78, 491–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Willsey, T.; Chatterton, S.; Cárcamo, H. Interactions of root-feeding insects with fungal and oomycete plant pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Dickason, E.A.; Leach, C.M.; Gross, A.E. Clover root curculio injury and vascular decay of alfalfa roots. J. Econ. Entomol. 1968, 61, 1163–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Leath, K.T.; Hower, A.A. Interaction of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. medicaginis with feeding activity of clover root curculio larvae in alfalfa. Plant Dis. 1993, 77, 799–802. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kurtz, B.; Karlovsky, P.; Vidal, S. Interaction between western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) larvae and root-infecting Fusarium verticillioides. Environ. Entomol. 2010, 39, 1532–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Leath, K.T.; Newton, R.C. Interaction of a fungus gnat, Bradysia sp. (Sciaridae) with Fusarium spp. on alfalfa and red clover. Phytopathology 1969, 59, 257–258. [Google Scholar]
  44. Graham, C.L.; McNeill, M.J. Soybean crown and root damage by Bradysia coprophila. J. Econ. Entomol. 1972, 65, 597–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rogers, S.; Graham, J.H.; McCoy, C.W. Insect-plant pathogen interactions: Preliminary studies of Diaprpes root weevil injuries and Phytophthora infection. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 1996, 109, 57–62. [Google Scholar]
  46. Graham, J.H.; Bright, D.B.; McCoy, C.W. Phytophthora-Diaprepes weevil complex: Phytophthora spp. relationship with citrus rootstocks. Plant Dis. 2003, 87, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Yang, Q.Q.; Ma, X.Y.; Chen, T.G.; Liang, W.X. First report of Alternaria destruens causing leaf spot on Ligustrum sinense in China. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rahimloo, T.; Ghosta, Y. The occurrence of Alternaria species on cabbage in Iran. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 2015, 102, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Eğerci, Y.; Kınay-Teksür, P.; Uysal-Morca, A. Reactions of rice varieties to Bakanae disease caused by Fusarium fujikuroi in Turkey. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2022, 55, 900–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, X.; Xu, X.; Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Shen, G.; Teng, H.; Yang, C.; Song, C.; Xiang, W.; Wang, X.; et al. Identification, pathogenicity, and genetic diversity of Fusarium spp. associated with maize sheath rot in Heilongjiang Province, China. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jiang, Y.R.; Yi, J.M.; Zhu, T.H.; Li, S.J.; Qiao, T.M.; Liu, Y.G.; Yang, C.L.; Lin, T.T.; Wang, Y.L.; Li, T.; et al. Round spot disease of Zanthoxylum armatum caused by Fusarium fujikuroi in China. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, H.; Tang, W.; Liu, K.; Zhang, L.; Tang, X.; Miao, M.; Liu, Y. First report of Fusarium fujikuroi causing brown leaf spot on kiwifruit. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, X.; Zeng, R.; Huang, X.; Chen, J.; Fang, W.; Cao, A.; Hua, J. First report in China of Fusarium humuli as a causative agent of Chinese yam wilt. Plant Dis. 2021. Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lombard, L.; Van Doorn, R.; Crous, P.W. Neotypification of Fusarium chlamydosporum-a reappraisal of a clinically important species complex. Fung. Syst. Evolut. 2019, 4, 183–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Narmani, A.; Arzanlou, M. Quambalaria cyanescens, a new fungal trunk pathogen associated with grapevine decline in Iran. Crop Prot. 2019, 124, 104875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Simpson, J.A. Quambalaria, a new genus of eucalypt pathogens. Aust. Mycol. 2000, 19, 57–62. [Google Scholar]
  57. Mostert, L.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Summerbell, R.C.; Robert, V.; Sutton, D.A.; Padhye, A.A.; Crous, P.W. Species of Phaeoacremonium associated with human infections and environmental reservoirs in infected woody plants. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 1752–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Mostert, L.; Halleen, F.; Fourie, P.; Crous, P.W. A review of Phaeoacremonium species involved in Petri disease and esca of grapevines. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2006, 45, 12–29. [Google Scholar]
  59. Aroca, A.; Raposo, R. Pathogenicity of Phaeoacremonium species on grapevines. J. Phytopathol. 2009, 157, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gramaje, D.; Aguilar, M.I.; Armengol, J. First report of Phaeoacremonium krajdenii causing Petri disease of grapevine in Spain. Plant Dis. 2011, 95, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Arabnezhad, M.; Mohammadi, H. First report of Fusicoccum aesculi (Tel: Botryosphaeria dothidea) associated with grapevine decline in Kerman province. In Proceeding of the 20th Iranian Plant Protection Congress, Shiraz, Iran, 26–29 August 2012. [Google Scholar]
  62. Sami, S.; Mohammadi, H.; Heydarnejad, J. Phaeoacremonium species associated with necrotic wood of pome fruit trees in Iran. J. Plant Pathol. 2014, 96, 487–495. [Google Scholar]
  63. Soltaninejad, N.; Mohammadi, H.; Massumi, H. Isolation, identification and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae and Phaeoacremonium species associated with decline of Prunus species in Iran. J. Plant Pathol. 2017, 99, 571–581. [Google Scholar]
  64. Berraf-Tebbal, A.; Bouznad, Z.; Santos, J.M.; Coelho, M.A.; Peros, J.P.; Phillips, A.J. Phaeoacremonium species associated with Eutypa dieback and esca of grapevines in Algeria. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2011, 50, S86–S97. [Google Scholar]
  65. Olmo, D.; Gramaje, D.; Agustí-Brisach, C.; Leon, M.; Armengol, J. First report of Phaeoacremonium venezuelense associated with wood decay of apricot trees in Spain. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nazmadini, S.; Mohammadi, H.; Kazemzadeh Chakusary, M. First report of Phaeoacremonium venezuelense and Neoscytalidium hyalinum from Calligonum amoenum in Iran. In Proceedings of the 23rd Iranian Plant Protection Congress, Gorgan, Iran, 27–30 August 2018. [Google Scholar]
Insects 14 00283 g001 550
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of individual fungal isolates obtained in this study. The phylogeny is based on the ITS sequences generated during this study, each species of individual genus is highlighted in similar color shade. The taxa represent nine families of Ascomycota and one of Basidiomycota. Two genera Sarocladium and Trichothecium are in Incertae sedis following the modern classification system of fungi [36]. The numbers on branches are the bootstrap values.
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of individual fungal isolates obtained in this study. The phylogeny is based on the ITS sequences generated during this study, each species of individual genus is highlighted in similar color shade. The taxa represent nine families of Ascomycota and one of Basidiomycota. Two genera Sarocladium and Trichothecium are in Incertae sedis following the modern classification system of fungi [36]. The numbers on branches are the bootstrap values.
Insects 14 00283 g001
Insects 14 00283 g002 550
Figure 2. Pathogenic results of detached leaf assays in leaflets of date palm inoculated with (A) Alternaria destruens SQU-LSS1b, (B) Cladosporium endophyticum SQU-EIQQ1, (C) Cladosporium pseudochalastosporoides SQU-LIQ4, (D) Fusarium fujikuroi species complex SQU-LIS1, (E) Fusarium humuli SQU-LSFM3c, (F) Fusarium microconidium SQU-LSS2b, (G) Phaeoacremonium krajdenii SQU-LMA4b, (H) Phaeoacremonium venezuelense SQU-LAH3, and (I) Quambalaria cyanescens SQU-EIH1a.
Figure 2. Pathogenic results of detached leaf assays in leaflets of date palm inoculated with (A) Alternaria destruens SQU-LSS1b, (B) Cladosporium endophyticum SQU-EIQQ1, (C) Cladosporium pseudochalastosporoides SQU-LIQ4, (D) Fusarium fujikuroi species complex SQU-LIS1, (E) Fusarium humuli SQU-LSFM3c, (F) Fusarium microconidium SQU-LSS2b, (G) Phaeoacremonium krajdenii SQU-LMA4b, (H) Phaeoacremonium venezuelense SQU-LAH3, and (I) Quambalaria cyanescens SQU-EIH1a.
Insects 14 00283 g002
Table
Table 1. Sample collection of date palm leaves infested with dubas bug in different administrative units in Oman.
Table 1. Sample collection of date palm leaves infested with dubas bug in different administrative units in Oman.
WilayatVillageNo. of FarmsNo. of Leaflets/TreeCoordinates
IzkiSaima42522.96179, 57.91549
Qarrot South42522.98207, 57.78078
Muqazzah42523.01378, 57.87333
Al humaydah42522.90664, 57.91260
Al qariyatain42522.93293, 57.76855
Al kharmah42522.84934, 57.95692
SamailSifalat42523.31527, 58.02095
Alayat42523.30303, 57.98520
Alaainh42523.29954, 58.06131
Bory42523.16340, 57.92657
falaj almaraghah42523.17980, 57.90918
IbriAlhajer42523,22415, 56.47231
Al HamraMesfat alabriyn42523.14048, 57.31255
Table
Table 2. Fungal species isolated from the infected leaves of date palm collected from different villages in Oman.
Table 2. Fungal species isolated from the infected leaves of date palm collected from different villages in Oman.
WilayatWilayatFungi Isolated from Leaflets
Al HamraMesfat alabriynCanariomyces subthermophilus (Mouch.) X. Wei Wang and Houbraken
Cladosporium endophyticum Tibpromma and K.D. Hyde
Quambalaria simpsonii Cheew. and Crous
Penicillium bilaiae Kucey
Penicillium citrinum Thom
Phaeoacremonium fuscum L. Mostert, Damm and Crous
Phaeoacremonium krajdenii L. Mostert, Summerb. and Crous
IzkiAl-QariyatainCladosporium pseudochalastosporoides Bensch, Crous and Braun
Penicillium hetheringtonii Houbraken, Frisvad and Samson
Trichoderma lentiforme (Rehm) P. Chaverri, Samuels and Rocha
Qarrot SouthAlternaria destruens Simmons
Cladosporium pseudochalastosporoides Bensch, Crous and Braun
Cladosporium endophyticum Tibpromma and Hyde
Fusarium fujikuroi Nirenberg species complex
MuqazzahAlternaria alstroemeriae Simmons and Hill
Cladosporium pseudochalastosporoides Bensch, Crous and Braun
Fusarium fujikuroi Nirenberg species complex
Penicillium crustosum Thom
Trichoderma afarasin Chaverri and Rocha
SaimaAlternaria alstroemeriae Simmons and Hill
Alternaria prunicola Chethana, Yan, Li and Hyde
Cladosporium pseudochalastosporoides Bensch, Crous and Braun
Cladosporium endophyticum Tibpromma and Hyde
Fusarium fujikuroi Nirenberg species complex
Al-HumaydahAlternaria alstroemeriae Simmons and Hill
Aureobasidium melanogenum (Hermanides-Nijhof) Zalar P., Gostincar, Gunde-Cimerman
Cladosporium pseudochalastosporoides Bensch, Crous and Braun
Cladosporium endophyticum Tibpromma and Hyde
Clonostachys swieteniae Perera, Jones and Hyde
Quambalaria cyanescens (de Hoog and de Vries) de Beer, Begerow and Bauer
IbriAlhajerAureobasidium melanogenum (Hermanides-Nijhof) Zalar P., Gostincar, Gunde-Cimerman
Cladosporium oxysporum Berk. and Curtis
Cladosporium endophyticum Tibpromma and Hyde
Penicillium bilaiae Kucey
Phaeoacremonium venezuelense Mostert, Summerb. and Crous
Xenoacremonium recifei (Leao and Lobo) Lombard and Crous
Talaromyces allahabadensis (Mehrotra and Kumar) Samson, Yilmaz and Frisvad
SamailAlaainhAlternaria prunicola Chethana, Yan, Li and Hyde
Fusarium chlamydosporum Wollenweber and Reinking
Sarocladium terricola (Mill., Giddens and Foster) Giraldo, Gené and Guarro
AlayateCanariomyces subthermophilus (Mouch.) Wei Wang and Houbraken
Cladosporium endophyticum Tibpromma and Hyde
Aureobasidium melanogenum (Hermanides-Nijhof) Zalar P., Gostincar, Gunde-Cimerman
Fusarium fujikuroi Nirenberg species complex
Trichothecium crotocinigenum (Schol-Schwarz) Summerb., Seifert and Schroers
SifalatAlternaria alstroemeriae Simmons and Hill
Alternaria destruens Simmons
Aureobasidium melanogenum (Hermanides-Nijhof) Zalar, Gostincar, Gunde-Cimerman
Cladosporium endophyticum Tibpromma and Hyde
Fusarium microconidium Lombard and Crous
Quambalaria cyanescens (de Hoog and de Vries) de Beer, Begerow and Bauer
Falaj almaraghahAlternaria alstroemeriae Simmons and Hill
Alternaria doliconidium Li, Camporesi and Hyde
Fusarium humuli Wang, Qian Chen and Cai
Pleiocarpon algeriense Aigoun-Mouhous, Cabral and Berraf-Tebbal
BoryAlternaria destruens Simmons
Alternaria burnsii Uppal, Patel and Kamat
Fusarium chlamydosporum Wollenw. and Reinking
Table
Table 3. Pathogenicity test of fungal species on date palm leaves.
Table 3. Pathogenicity test of fungal species on date palm leaves.
Fungal Species *Mean Diameter of Leaf Spot(mm ± SD) **
Phaeoacremonium krajdenii9.0 ± 1.2 a
Fusarium fujikuroi species complex8.2 ± 1.9 a
Fusarium humuli8.2 ± 1.5 a
Fusarium microconidium8.1 ± 1.8 a
Alternaria destruens7.9 ± 1.7 ab
Cladosporium pseudochalastosporoides7.8 ± 1.4 ab
Cladosporium endophyticum5.9 ± 1.3 bc
Quambalaria cyanescens5.6 ± 1.2 c
Phaeoacremonium venezuelense3.4 ± 2.0 d
* Data is shown for the nine fungal species that resulted in leaf spot symptoms. The other 22 species (Table 1) did not cause any symptoms on the inoculated leaflets. ** The values indicate the average of 20 leaf spot measurements for each fungal isolate ± Standard Deviation (SD). Means with the same latter are not significantly different from each other at p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Nabhani, S.S.; Velazhahan, R.; Hussain, S.; Al-Raqmi, S.; Al-Hashmi, M.; Al-Sadi, A.M. Relationship between Dubas Bug (Ommatissus lybicus) Infestation and the Development of Fungal-Induced Leaf Spots in Date Palms (Phoenix dactylifera). Insects 2023, 14, 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030283

AMA Style

Al-Nabhani SS, Velazhahan R, Hussain S, Al-Raqmi S, Al-Hashmi M, Al-Sadi AM. Relationship between Dubas Bug (Ommatissus lybicus) Infestation and the Development of Fungal-Induced Leaf Spots in Date Palms (Phoenix dactylifera). Insects. 2023; 14(3):283. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030283

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Nabhani, Salem S., Rethinasamy Velazhahan, Shah Hussain, Suad Al-Raqmi, Maryam Al-Hashmi, and Abdullah M. Al-Sadi. 2023. "Relationship between Dubas Bug (Ommatissus lybicus) Infestation and the Development of Fungal-Induced Leaf Spots in Date Palms (Phoenix dactylifera)" Insects 14, no. 3: 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030283

APA Style

Al-Nabhani, S. S., Velazhahan, R., Hussain, S., Al-Raqmi, S., Al-Hashmi, M., & Al-Sadi, A. M. (2023). Relationship between Dubas Bug (Ommatissus lybicus) Infestation and the Development of Fungal-Induced Leaf Spots in Date Palms (Phoenix dactylifera). Insects, 14(3), 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030283

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop