National Level Support Programs for Youth in Relation to Effective School-to-Work Transition: Examples of Italy, Moldova, and Latvia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework
3. Empirical Context
4. Methodology
- Identification of keywords;
- Using the keywords to search on the web within the documents, focusing on useful information for our goals;
- Selecting studies, documents, and laws useful to describe the context in each country. To have a cross-country perspective, we selected studies and data from Eurostat and OECD;
- Extract and merge the information useful to describe the education system and institutional framework.
- Synthesize the main findings.
5. Countries’ Analysis of the Education System, Recent Reforms and State-Wide Programs
5.1. Case of Italy
- Lyceums, mainly characterized by theoretical contents, finalized to prepare students for university courses;
- Technical institutes, including both theoretical and technical subjects but specialized in a given field, such as trade, informatics, and so on. After their completion, it is possible to attend university;
- Professional institutes, finalized to prepare students for work, including very practical subjects. They allow students to attend university after their completion only if their duration is five years.
- A total of 210 h in professional institutes;
- A total of 150 h in technical institutes;
- A total of 90 h in the lyceums.
- -
- Make young people closer to the culture of work through stages and apprenticeship experience;
- -
- Enrich the training offer, make it even more productive and near to the student’s expectations and the needs of the socio-economic context;
- -
- Make the learning process more flexible;
- -
- Connect the experience with local development;
- -
- Make the work environment even more open to the learning processes.
5.2. Case of Moldova
- A total of 29.9% have completed the process, already having a satisfactory job (average age 25 years);
- A total of 26.6% are still in transition: (a) looking for a job; (b) having a job not satisfied with; or (c) not working or learning, but intending to work (average age 23.5 years);
- A total of 43.5% have not yet entered the transition process because (a) they are in training or studies, or (b) they neither study nor intend to look for work (average age 21.9).
- Promoting the participation of young people in decision-making processes;
- Diversification and consolidation of services for young people;
- Development of economic opportunities for young people;
- Consolidation of the youth sector (SNDST, 2020).
- -
- Offering space for rent for offices and production, at a price lower than the commercial price;
- -
- Administrative and technical services;
- -
- Consulting and guidance in business;
- -
- Access to financing.
5.3. Case of Latvia
5.4. Discussion about the Three Presented Examples of Italy, Moldova, and Latvia
6. Limits and Future Research
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Alegre, M.; Casado, D.; Sanz, J.; Todeschini, F. The Impact of Training-Intensive Labour Market Policies on Labour and Educational Prospects of NEETs: Evidence from Catalonia (Spain). Educ. Res. 2015, 57, 151–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farrugia, D. Spaces of Youth Work, Citizenship and Culture in a Global Context: Youth, Young Adulthood and Society; Routledge: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. The Structure of the European Education System 2021–2022, Schematic Diagram 2019; Eurydice: Luxembourg, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Ryan, P. The school-to-work transition: A cross-national perspective. J. Econ. Lit. 2011, 39, 34–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vogel, J. European Welfare regimes and the transition to adulthood: A comparative and longitudinal perspective. Soc. Ind. Res. 2002, 59, 275–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pohl, A.; Walther, A. Activating the disadvantaged. Variations in addressing youth transitions across Europe. Int. J. Lifelong Educ. 2007, 26, 533–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hadjivassiliou, K.P.; Tassinari, A.; Eichhorst, W.; Wozny, F. Assessing the Performance of School-to-Work Transition Regimes in the EU. IZA DP N. 10301, 1–26; October 2006. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2861086 (accessed on 23 April 2023).
- Pastore, F.; Quintano, C.; Rocca, A. The Duration of the School-to-Work transition in Italy and in other European countries: A flexible baseline hazard interpretation. Int. J. Manpow. 2022, 43, 1579–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berigel, M.; Boztaş, G.D.; Rocca, A.; Neagu, G. A model for predicting determinants factors for NEETs rates: Support for the decision-makers. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 2023, 87, 101605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabinet of Ministers Republic of Latvia. Rules Nr.747 from 27.11.2018. Available online: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/303768 (accessed on 3 August 2022).
- Avagianou, A.; Kapitsinis, N.; Papageorgiou, I.; Strand, A.H.; Gialis, S. Being NEET in Youthspaces in the EU South. A Post-recession regional perspective. Young 2022, 30, 425–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapitsinis, N.; Poulimas, M.; Emmanouil, E.; Gialis, S. Spatialities of being NEET in an era of turbulence: A regional resilience perspective for the Mediterranean EU South. J. Youth Stud. 2022, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caroleo, F.E.; Rocca, A.; Quintano, C.; Mazzocchi, P. Being NEET in Europe before and after the economic crisis: An analysis of the micro and macro determinants. Soc. Ind. Res. 2020, 149, 991–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pastore, F.; Quintano, C.; Rocca, A. Some young people have all the luck! The duration dependence of the school-to-work transition in Europe. Labour Econ. 2021, 70, 101982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Luca, G.; Mazzocchi, P.; Quintano, C.; Rocca, A. Going behind the high rates of NEETs in Italy and Spain: The role of Early School Leavers. Soc. Ind. Res. 2020, 151, 345–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lafton, T.; Holmarsdottir, H.B.; Kapella, O.; Sisask, M.; Zinoveva, L. Children’s Vulnerability to Digital Technology within the Family: A Scoping Review. Societies 2023, 13, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seland, I.; Holmarsdottir, H.B.; Hyggen, C.; Kapella, O.; Parsanoglou, D.; Sisask, M. Conditions Contributing to Positive and Negative Outcomes of Children’s ICT Use: Protocol for a Scoping Review. Societies 2022, 12, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liotti, G. Labour market flexibility, economic crisis and youth unemployment in Italy. Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn. 2020, 54, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ronchetti, M. Competence-based Education in the Italian Context: State of Affairs and Overcoming Difficulties. In Competence-based Vocational and Professional Education. Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects; Mulder, M., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD. Future of Education and Skills 2030. Conceptual Learning Framework. (n.d.). Available online: https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/skills/Skills_for_2030_concept_note.pdf (accessed on 6 March 2023).
- Lisimberti, C.; Montalbetti, K. Alternanza scuola-lavoro (work-based learning) as a resource for higher education. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’19), València, Spain, 26–28 June 2019; Universitat Politècnica de València: Valencia, Spain, 2019; pp. 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tino, C.; Fedeli, F.M. L’Alternanza Scuola-Lavoro: Uno studio qualitative. Form@Re Open J. Per La Form. Rete 2015, 15, 213–231. [Google Scholar]
- Orizzontescuola, Alternanza Scuola Lavoro: Docenti Lavoreranno Anche D’estate. Un Altro Tassello Sfata il Mito Dei “3 Mesi di Vacanza Degli Insegnanti”, 2017, 31 of March, Alternanza Scuola Lavoro: Docenti Lavoreranno Anche D’estate. Un Altro Tassello Sfata il Mito Dei “3 mesi di Vacanza degli Insegnanti; Orizzonte Scuola Notizie: Ragusa, Italy, 2023.
- Centro Studi Manzoni, Alternanza Scuola-Lavoro: Sì o No? 6 May 2020, Alternanza Scuola-Lavoro: Sì o no? Available online: centrostudimanzoni.com (accessed on 14 August 2023).
- Biroul Național de Statistică. Studiul Tranziţia de la școală la Muncă. [National Bureau of Statistics. Study Transition from School to Work]. Available online: https://statistica.gov.md/public/files/publicatii_electronice/Cercetarea_TSM/Sinteza_TSM_2015.pdf (accessed on 27 May 2022).
- International Labour Office. Tranziţia Tinerelor și Tinerilor Spre Piaţa Muncii în Republica Moldova. [Transition of Young Women and Men to the Labor Market in the Republic of Moldova. 2016]. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/documents/publication/wcms_536294.pdf (accessed on 28 May 2022).
- Raportul “Perspectiva Tinerilor în Strategia de Ocupare a Forţei de Muncă 2017–2021”. [Report “Youth Perspective in the Employment Strategy 2017–2021”]. Available online: https://cntm.md/news/perspectiva-tinerilor-%C3%AEn-strategia-de-ocupare-for%C8%9Bei-de-munc%C4%83-2017-2021/ (accessed on 31 May 2022).
- Strategia Națională de Dezvoltare a Sectorului de Tineret Pentru Anii 2014–2020 (SNDST 2020) [National Youth Sector Development Strategy for 2014–2020 (SNDST 2020)]. Available online: https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=49195&lang=ro (accessed on 31 May 2022).
- Strategia Națională de Ocupare a Forței de Muncă Pentru Anii 2017–2021 (SNOFM) [National Employment Strategy for 2017–2021 (SNOFM)]. Available online: https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=98639&lang=r (accessed on 5 June 2022).
- Legea, nr. 215 din 29.07.2016, cu Privire la Tineret. [Law no. 215 of 29.07.2016, Regarding Youth]. Available online: https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=105800&lang=ro (accessed on 29 May 2022).
- Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 664 din 03.06.2008 cu Privire la Programul Naţional de Abilitare Economică a Tinerilor (PNAET) [Government Decision no. 664 of 03.06.2008 Regarding the National Youth Economic Empowerment Program (PNAET)]. Available online: https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=13038&lang=ro (accessed on 28 May 2022).
- Legea nr. 179 din 21.07.2016 cu Privire la Întreprinderile Mici și Mijlocii (IMM) [Law no. 179 of 21.07.2016 Regarding Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)]. Available online: https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=105839&lang=ro (accessed on 29 May 2022).
- Strategia Naţională de Dezvoltare Regională 2016–2020 (SNDR) [National Regional Development Strategy (NRDS)]. Available online: https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=105791&lang=ro (accessed on 29 May 2022).
- ODIMM. Raport Privind Realizarea Planului de Activitate. [Organization for the Development of the SME Sector. Report on the Implementation of the Activity Plan]. Available online: http://odimm.md/files/ro/pdf/rapoarte/Raport%20privind%20realizarea%20Planului%20de%20activitate%20al%20ODIMM%202021.pdf (accessed on 30 May 2022).
- Centrul Pentru Educaţie Antreprenorială şi Asistenţă în Afaceri. [Center for Entrepreneurial Education and Business Assistance]. Available online: https://ceda.md/revocc-2/ (accessed on 28 May 2022).
- Cabinet of Ministers Republic of Latvia. Law of Education (Redaction of 15.04.2021). Available online: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/50759-izglitibas-likums (accessed on 3 June 2022).
- Latvijas Republikas Ministru Kabinets [Cabinet of Ministers Republic of Latvia]. Izglītības Attīstības Pamatnostādnes 2021.–2027.gadam. [Guidelines for the development of education for 2021–2027, Rules Nr.436]. Available online: www.likumi.lv (accessed on 3 June 2022).
- UNICEF Office of Research. An Unfair Start: Inequality in Children’s Education in Rich Countries, Innocenti Report Card 15. UNICEF Office of Research—Innocenti, Florence. 2018. Available online: https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/an-unfair-start-inequality-children-education_37049-RC15-EN-WEB.pdf (accessed on 3 June 2022).
- Project “Pumpurs”. Available online: www.pumpurs.lv (accessed on 10 May 2022).
- Cabinet of Ministers Republic of Latvia. Izglītības Attīstības Pamatnostādnes 2021.–2027.gadam. [Guidelines for the Development of Education for 2021–2027, Rules Nr.436]. Available online: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/324332-par-izglitibas-attistibas-pamatnostadnem-20212027-gadam (accessed on 10 June 2023).
- Central Statistical Bureau. Galvenie Statistikas Rādītāji. Latvija 2022 [Key Statistics. Latvia 2022]. Available online: https://admin.stat.gov.lv/system/files/publication/2022-05/Nr_02_Latvija_Galvenie_statistikas_raditaji_2022_%2822_00%29_LV_0.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2023).
- The State Education Quality Service. Eiropas Sociālā Fonda Projekta Nr. 8.3.4.0/16/I/001 “Atbalsts Priekšlaicīgas Mācību Pārtraukšanas Samazināšanai” Ietekmes Pušu Iesaistes, Informētības un Starprezultātu Novērtējuma Pētījums [European Social Fund Project no. 8.3.4.0/16/I/001 “Support to Reduce Early School Leaving” Stakeholder Engagement, Awareness and Interim Results Evaluation Study]. 2020. Available online: http://www.pumpurs.lv/sites/default/files/2020-06/IKVD_Pumpurs_Petijums_GALA_ZINOJUMS_29_06_2020.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2022).
Indicators | EU-27 | Italy | Latvia | Moldova * |
---|---|---|---|---|
% Early school leaver (18–24 years) | 9.6 | 11.5 | 6.7 | 19 1 |
% Tertiary educated (30–34 years) | 42.8 | 27.4 | 45.7 | 30.1 2 |
Spending on education as % of GDP (2020) | 5.02 | 4.44 | 4.63 | 5.5 2 |
% Students underachieving in literacy (2018) | 22.5 2 | 23.3 2 | 22.4 2 | 43 2 |
% NEETs (15–24 years) | 9.6 | 15.9 | 8.6 | 19.5 3 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Diacon, M.; Hačatrjana, L.; Juc, V.; Lisnic, V.; Rocca, A. National Level Support Programs for Youth in Relation to Effective School-to-Work Transition: Examples of Italy, Moldova, and Latvia. Societies 2023, 13, 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13090208
Diacon M, Hačatrjana L, Juc V, Lisnic V, Rocca A. National Level Support Programs for Youth in Relation to Effective School-to-Work Transition: Examples of Italy, Moldova, and Latvia. Societies. 2023; 13(9):208. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13090208
Chicago/Turabian StyleDiacon, Maria, Liena Hačatrjana, Victor Juc, Victoria Lisnic, and Antonella Rocca. 2023. "National Level Support Programs for Youth in Relation to Effective School-to-Work Transition: Examples of Italy, Moldova, and Latvia" Societies 13, no. 9: 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13090208
APA StyleDiacon, M., Hačatrjana, L., Juc, V., Lisnic, V., & Rocca, A. (2023). National Level Support Programs for Youth in Relation to Effective School-to-Work Transition: Examples of Italy, Moldova, and Latvia. Societies, 13(9), 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13090208