Next Article in Journal
The Dilution Effect in High-Power Disk Laser Welding the Steel Plate Using a Nickel-Based Filler Wire
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrogen Effects in Equiatomic CrFeNiMn Alloy Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metals
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/met11060873
metals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effects of Sulphuric Acid and Sodium Chloride Agglomeration and Curing on Chalcopyrite Leaching

by
Víctor Quezada
1,2,*,
Antoni Roca
1,
Oscar Benavente
2,
Montserrat Cruells
1 and
Evelyn Melo
2
1
Departamento de Ciencia de los Materiales y Química Física, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
2
Departamento de Ingeniería Metalúrgica y Minas, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta 1270709, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2021, 11(6), 873; https://doi.org/10.3390/met11060873
Submission received: 10 March 2021 / Revised: 24 May 2021 / Accepted: 25 May 2021 / Published: 27 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Extractive Metallurgy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
An option to improve the leaching efficiency of chalcopyrite is pretreatment prior to leaching. Pretreatment variables, such as the curing time and the addition of chloride, can increase the kinetics of copper extraction, particularly for sulphide ores. However, there has been little research on the topic. The reactions that govern this phenomenon have not been clearly identified. In this study, the effects of sulphuric acid and sodium chloride agglomeration and curing on chalcopyrite leaching were evaluated at various temperatures: 25, 50, 70, and 90 °C. The pretreated ore and leach residues were characterised by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and reflected light microscopy. Under the conditions of 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing time (as pretreatment), the following products were identified: CuSO4, NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6, Cu2Cl(OH), and S0. Increasing the curing time and leaching temperature increased copper leaching. The copper extraction was 94% when leaching at 90 °C after pretreatment with 50 g/L of Cl− and 0.2 M of H2SO4. Elemental sulphur, jarosite, and copper polysulphide (CuS2) were detected in the leaching residues.

1. Introduction

In the transition of Chile from a developing economy to a developed economy, mining plays a key role in sustaining the economy with care to minimise the ecological impact on the environment and to promote social growth [1]. Innovation and new mineral processing alternatives are essential to maintaining copper production [2,3].
According to the Chilean Copper Commission (Cochilco), 27.3% of Chilean copper is produced using hydrometallurgy [4]. However, copper production by hydrometallurgy is expected to decrease 11.6% by 2029 owing to the depletion of the copper oxide ores in Chilean copper deposits. As a consequence, copper producers in Chile are switching to use concentration processes due to the mineralogy shifting to primary copper sulphides—mainly chalcopyrite. Chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) is the most abundant copper-bearing resource, accounting for more than 70% of global copper reserves [5].
One of the challenges for hydrometallurgy is the treatment of refractory copper minerals under conventional leaching conditions, such as black copper oxides [6,7] and primary sulphides (mainly chalcopyrite (CuFeS2)) [8,9]. The slow dissolution kinetics of chalcopyrite are due to the formation of a product layer that inhibits the contact of the solution with the mineral [10]. Many researchers have studied this layer [11,12,13].
Several leaching media have been proposed to improve the copper extraction and dissolution kinetics from copper sulphide ores, including chloride [14,15,16], nitrate [17,18], and ammonia [19,20,21,22]. Furthermore, the bioleaching alternative has also been studied [23,24,25,26,27]. Chloride media are some of the most widely studied and effective media due to the reactivity of the Cl− with sulphide ores [28]. Although chloride generates corrosive media, there are processes that successfully use chloride at an industrial scale [29,30].
Leaching pretreatments and, particularly, curing have been identified as beneficial in the dissolution of copper sulphide minerals [18,31,32,33]. According to Dhawan et al. [34], curing time generates a homogeneous distribution of acid in the mineral bed, increases the kinetics of copper dissolution, and inhibits the dissolution of aluminium-silicate minerals (acid consumers). However, [35] indicated that there has been limited research into the effect of curing time on the dissolution of copper ores. In recent years, the effect of acid curing has been studied mainly for chalcopyrite in chloride media. Most studies on pretreatments (especially curing time) have been conducted on chalcopyrite [18,31,32].
The results obtained by Quezada et al. [33] point to the benefits of curing time for leaching chalcocite/covellite minerals in columns. The authors demonstrated that an extended curing period, together with the addition of sulphuric acid and chloride, enhanced the dissolution rate of a secondary copper sulphide ore. They also found that it was possible to obtain a 72% Cu extraction when the ore was agglomerated and cured for 50 days in chloride media. According to the variance analysis, the curing time made a significantly more important contribution to the copper extraction (92.37%) than did the chloride concentration (7.05%) under the studied conditions. Similar results were obtained with the column leaching of chalcopyrite ore with a P80 of 5 mm achieving a maximum copper extraction of 43% using chloride media at room temperature and 100 days of curing [32].
Cerda et al. [31] studied the role of temperature in pretreatment [31]. The authors demonstrated that a copper extraction of 93% was obtained when the ore (mainly chalcopyrite) was treated with 90 kg of Cl−/t ore, with 40 days of curing at 50 °C in flask leaching. Cerda el al. [31] proposed pretreatment reactions that considered the effect of Cu2+ and Cl− on chalcopyrite, generating covellite and CuCl as products (Table 1, Reaction (1)). Covellite reacts in the presence of H+ and O2. According to Reaction (2), covellite does not generate Cu2+, necessary for the reaction of chalcopyrite (Reaction (1)). However, chalcocite may be a source of Cu2+ given the proposed reaction generated in the pretreatment (Table 1, Reaction (3)). Cu2+ can also be added to the solution. The corresponding Gibbs energy values are negative; therefore, these reactions are thermodynamically feasible (See Table 1).
This research evaluated the effects of sulphuric acid and sodium chloride agglomeration and curing on the chalcopyrite leaching efficiency at various temperatures. The agglomerated ore and leaching residues were characterised using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), reflected light microscopy, and a stereographic zoom microscope.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chalcopyrite Ore

Chalcopyrite was obtained from an operating plant in Antofagasta, Chile. The sample was initially crushed by a jaw crusher, followed by a secondary and tertiary cone crusher, and it was then dry milled in a ball mill to −38 + 25 µm. The mineral particles were reduced in size with a closed crushing and grinding circuit.
The chemical composition of the screened sample was determined using inductively coupled plasma‒optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Optima 8300, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Before ICP-OES analysis, the solid sample was digested using a 1 g sample in 20% aqua regia solution and reached the boiling point.
Mineralogical data were obtained through X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis using a diffractometer (PANalytical X’Pert PRO MPD Alpha1, Malvern, UK), operated from 4° to 100° 2θ, at 45 kV, 40 mA, Kα 1.54 Å, a step size of 0.017°, and a time per step of 150 s. X-ray diffractogram sand crystalline phase identification was interpreted using the software X’pert HighScore Plus v.3.0e (PANalytical, Almelo, Netherland).
Qemscan analysis was performed using a Model Zeiss EVO 50 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), with Bruker AXS XFlash 4010 detectors (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) and Software iDiscover 5.3.2.501 (FEI Company, Brisbane, Australia). Additionally, a reflected light microscope (Zeiss, Axiovert 100, Milan, Italy) was used. A Stereographic Zoom Microscope (Motic, SMZ-168, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada) was used for a superficial visual analysis. The microscope had a halogen fibre optic illuminator light box (Motic, MLC-150C, Xiamen, China). Finally, morphological characterisation was performed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, JEOL J-7100F, Tokyo, Japan), operated at 20 kV under high vacuum conditions (Emitech K-950X, Lohmar, Germany) coupled with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) microanalysis system (Oxford Instruments INCA, Oxfordshire, UK). Mineral samples were coated with a thin layer of carbon to improve their conductivity. A carbon source, in the form of a rod, was mounted in a vacuum system between two high-current electrical terminals. When the carbon source was heated to its evaporation temperature, a fine stream of carbon was deposited onto specimens, before SEM characterisation.

2.2. Curing Experiments

Two grams of chalcopyrite sample was used in each curing test. The mineral was agglomerated on an impermeable plastic surface by manually mixing the mineral with the solution. The samples were agglomerated with a solution of 15 kg/t of H2SO4 and 25 kg/t of NaCl using a solid/liquid ratio of 10/1 (mass/volume), namely using 0.1 mL of solution per 1 g of ore (Figure 1). After agglomeration, the samples were placed on watch glasses, covered with a protective film (thermoplastic) and cured in the dark at room temperature for 15 days. The cured samples were used for mineralogical characterisation and leaching tests. After the curing time, briquettes were formed for the mineralogical characterisation using a stereographic microscope, reflected light microscope, XRD, and SEM. The briquettes were prepared and polished without contact with water to avoid dissolving the soluble phases. Finally, cured samples were also used to evaluate the effect of pretreatment on the chalcopyrite dissolution.

2.3. Leaching Test

The pretreated and untreated chalcopyrite samples were leached in 200 mL (Figure 2) vessels using 100 mL of leaching solution containing 0.2 M of H2SO4 (19.6 g/L) and 50 g/L of Cl ions. The vessels were agitated using a hot plate magnetic stirrer IKA C-MAG HS7 at 200 min−1. When the solution reached desired temperatures of 25, 50, 70, and 90 °C (±1 °C), the 2 g sample of cured or noncured ore was added to the solution, and leaching was carried for a period of 48 h. During the leaching process, the holes in the vessel lid were not covered. Evaporation loss was compensated by adding deionised water.
Solution samples (3 mL aliquots) were periodically withdrawn for chemical analysis. The samples were filtered (0.2 μm), and the metal concentrations in the filtrate were determined by inductively coupled plasma‒optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). The pH and redox potential were regularly measured (only during sampling time) using a Crison pH meter (Crison Instruments S.A, Basic 20, Barcelona, Spain). The pH measurements were carried out by using a Crison electrode, series 52 03, with a ceramic diaphragm and a reference element of Ag/AgCl crystals. The oxidation–reduction potential (ORP) measurements were carried out by using a Crison electrode, series 53 61, with platinum as the metal indicator and a silver wire coated by AgCl as the reference element. All solution potentials were converted to values against the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE). The solid residues from the leaching experiments were analysed using XRD and SEM.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chalcopyrite Ore Characteristics

The sample used in this study was characterised in a previous study by the same authors [36]. The chemical composition of the sample was 28.5% Cu, 22.8% Fe, and 29.7% S (main elements). Other elements were detected in small percentages, namely, Na (0.220%), Ca (0.180%), and Zn (0.0800%). Chemical characterisation showed that insoluble residues represented 21.0% of the total mass, which suggests the presence of quartz and some silicates as insoluble phases in the sample.
Figure 3 (X-ray diffractogram) shows that the sample was mainly composed of chalcopyrite, together with quartz, pyrite, and chalcanthite. Sulphur can be associated with chalcopyrite and other species, such as chalcocite, covellite, and pyrite. Table 2 shows the mineralogical composition obtained via Qemscan analysis. The main species were chalcopyrite (73.7%), followed by quartz (16.3%) and covellite (1.80%). According to the Qemscan analysis, quartz was present at 16.3%, which is consistent with the insoluble residue product of the chemical characterisation (21.0%).
SEM analysis showed the dominance of chalcopyrite, quartz, and copper sulphate in the initial sample (Figure 4). The presence of chalcanthite was measured by washing the sample with water, and a copper extraction of 9% was obtained.

3.2. Characteristics of Cured Ore Samples

In a previous work [36], the authors obtained a copper extraction of 22.66% with a pretreatment using 25 kg/t of NaCl and 15 kg/t of H2SO4 with 15 days of curing time.
The pretreatment products obtained (agglomerated solids) were characterised to propose a mechanism for the pretreatment of chalcopyrite. The briquette formed and used for characterisation was observed using a stereographic microscope (Figure 5).
The agglomerated ore samples were characterised with a reflected light microscope to detect possible changes in the mineral composition as a result of the pretreatment. Several cracks were observed on the surface of the chalcopyrite particles as products of the pretreatment (Figure 6a). The cracks and products generated in Figure 6a suggest that they were caused by the reactivity of the system and chemical crushing. Figure 6b shows an area with the eventual formation of copper sulphate or a copper-chloride complex (green and white area). The formation of these products was subsequently confirmed by SEM and X-ray analysis.
The copper extraction achieved, using 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing, was 22.66% before leaching, evidencing the formation of new soluble phases. Figure 6b suggests the formation of a new soluble phase, such as CuCl, as suggested by [31], while the formation of a CuCl2 complex is also possible in nitrate and chloride media according to [18] (Reaction (4)).
2CuFeS2 + 10H2SO4 + 10NaNO3 + 4NaCl → 2CuCl2 + Fe2(SO4)3 + 10NO2 + 4S + 10H2O + 7Na2SO4.
The results of applying X-ray diffraction to the pretreatment products are presented in Figure 7, which indicated the presence of quartz and chalcopyrite. Quartz continued to remain present because it is not reactive in acid solutions [37]. Chalcopyrite was most abundant, and it is evident that not all CuFeS2 reacted during the pretreatment, which concurs with what is shown in Figure 6. Additionally, the presence of natrojarosite (NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6) was evidenced, and it was formed from the association of Na and Fe (derived from NaCl and chalcopyrite).
Quartz, chalcopyrite, and natrojarosite are the most abundant species in the pretreatment product. Other products, such as CuSO4, Cu2ClOH, and S0, were also identified. The presence of iron sulphate was reported as probable [18] (according to Reaction (4)). Likewise, the presence of elemental sulphur was proposed by [18,31]. These authors proposed the formation of a CuCl or CuCl2 complex, which differs from what was identified in this investigation.
The presence of CuSO4, NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6, S0, and Cu2Cl(OH) was confirmed by comparing the X-ray diffractogram of the original chalcopyrite with the diffractogram of the pretreatment products. With the software X’pert HighScore Plus v.3.0e, the main angles of the peak characteristics of the different species were identified. The angle (in 2 theta) of 16.16° was characteristic of CuSO4. Although CuSO4 was present in the initial sample as chalcanthite, the peak at 16.16° denotes a greater presence of this species (or, at least, a similar species in the structure) (Figure 8). A copper extraction of 22.66% was obtained with the use of 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature. Considering that 9% of the copper extraction was associated with chalcanthite, more than 10% of the copper dissolved as a result of generating a new soluble species.
Figure 9 shows the characteristic angles of natrojarosite, such as 28.65° (Figure 9a) and 49.79° (Figure 9b), with the peak at 28.65° being the angle associated with an intensity of 95%. According to [38], only four phases have been reported for the Na–Fe–SO4–OH system: the natrojarosite NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6, the jarosite Na0.84Fe2.86(SO4)2(OH)6, and two hydrated phases, the sideronatrite Na2FeOH(SO4)2·3H2O and metasideronatrite Na2FeOH(SO4)2·H2O. These phases are minerals but could be prepared via precipitation or under hydrothermal conditions. Therefore, an iron hydrosulphate natrojarosite can form.
The presence of S0 was identified by XRD and was compared with the initial chalcopyrite sample. In Figure 10a, the presence of S0 is demonstrated by the main angle of 23.07°, which represents an intensity of 100% in the case of S0. According to [39], when no strong oxidative conditions are available to produce SO42−, the predominant S product of chalcopyrite leaching is S0.
Cu2Cl(OH) was also identified by X-ray diffraction in the pretreated sample. Although the presence of this compound is demonstrated in Figure 11, the presence of other similar compounds, such as Cu2ClO3 or Cu2Cl(OH)3, cannot be ruled out. Under the studied conditions, the Cu2Cl(OH) had a better fit and recognition with the software used. The main peak was associated with the position 16.23°, which overlaps with the CuSO4 peak. However, other major peaks, such as 39.81° and 32.42°, were identified and are shown in Figure 11a,b, respectively.
The pretreated sample was also analysed by SEM. Figure 12 shows two images of unreacted or partially attacked chalcopyrite particles. Figure 12b,d include the EDS analysis of zone 1 shown in Figure 12a,c. Through the semi-quantitative reporting of elements, copper and iron depletion in chalcopyrite were identified. Figure 12a shows an atomic Cu:Fe:S ratio of 1:1:2, which indicates original or unreacted chalcopyrite, while Figure 12c shows an atomic ratio Cu:Fe:S of 1:1:5, which denotes a lower atomic ratio against the chemical formula of chalcopyrite due to the dissolution of copper and iron. Cracks were evident on the surface of the particles and surrounding them.
Nicol et al. [40] reported that surface cracks and fissures appeared during electrolysis in tests in which a massive chalcopyrite electrode was cathodically leached at 20 °C in 100 g/L of H2SO4 at −900 mV. The authors attributed the formation of cracks to the change in molar volume as chalcopyrite transformed into chalcocite and a copper-deficient sulphide, CuS.
Figure 13a shows the presence of chalcopyrite (1), copper sulphate (2), and natrojarosite (3). Figure 13b shows an enlargement of the area where the natrojarosite was found. The EDS analysis associated with copper sulphate is reported in Figure 13c. Si and Al were identified, which would be associated with a silicate, such as albite (NaAlSi3O8), and the sodium was overlapped by copper with a low presence. The semiquantitative analysis indicated that, in terms of the atomic %, the Cu:S:O ratio was 1:1:5 to make up the formula for CuSO4. Figure 13d shows the EDS analysis of the detected natrojarosite (3). The semiquantitative analysis indicated an Na:Fe:S:O atomic ratio of 0.8:2.3:3:7.6 ratio close to the natrojarosite NaFe2.3(SO4)2(OH)6 formula of 1:2.3:2:14, as observed in other natural and synthetic jarosites.
Figure 14a identifies a compound associated with Cu2Cl(OH). Figure 14b presents the EDS analysis associated with Figure 14a. The atomic ratio of Cu:Cl:O of 1.9:1:3.3 is sufficient for the formation of the proposed compound. However, because H was not reported by the EDS analysis, the formation of Cu2ClO should not be discarded.
Considering all the characterisation techniques applied on the chalcopyrite pretreatment products, the following reaction is proposed under the conditions used in this study. The treatment of a sample of natural chalcopyrite with concentrations of 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing is governed by Reaction (5).
3CuFeS2 + 3.5H2SO4 + NaCl + 2.5O2 → CuSO4 + NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 + 6.5S + Cu2Cl(OH)

3.3. Leaching Yields

To evaluate the effects of the curing time, chalcopyrite samples with pretreatment (agglomerated and cured with 15 kg/t of H2SO4 and 25 kg/t of NaCl for a period of 15 days) and without pretreatment were leached at 25, 50, 70, and 90 °C.
Figure 15a shows the results of the leaching tests without pretreatment. A tendency was observed that the copper extraction benefitted from increases in the temperature. At temperatures above 25 °C (ambient), a less protective and more porous passivating layer was formed, which allowed the dissolution of chalcopyrite [41]. Tests without pretreatment behaved almost identically in the first two hours of leaching, reaching a copper extraction of about 16%, considering that 9% of the copper was initially soluble (copper sulphate dissolution). The copper extraction curves changed after four hours owing to the effect of temperature. The tests at 90 and 70 °C yielded copper extractions of 90% and 87%, respectively, while the tests at 50 and 25 °C yielded copper extractions of 71% and 30%, respectively.
The test at 25 °C copper extraction reached a plateau at 24 h of leaching (by passivation), while the test at 50 °C achieved a plateau at 36 h. The test at 70°C did not clearly demonstrate passivation. The test at 90 °C had the highest copper extraction, although not as much higher than the test at 70 °C. A similar trend in the results was shown in [42] in a chalcopyrite leaching test between 85 and 95 °C. For tests performed at 25 °C, there was a limited dissolution of copper, which is consistent with the view that the dissolution of chalcopyrite requires temperatures between 35 and 95 °C [14,41].
As chalcanthite is present in the system, it is possible to rapidly obtain a fraction of dissolved copper. A 9% copper extraction is associated with the presence of chalcanthite, which represents 0.5 g/L of Cu2+ in the initial stage of leaching. Although this work did not include tests to evaluate the effect of cupric, other authors [43,44] have demonstrated the benefit of Cu2+ in the initial stage of chalcopyrite dissolution. According to [45], the presence of a small amount of cupric is important in achieving an acceptable chalcopyrite leaching; however, concentrations above 0.1 g/L did not increase the dissolution.
Figure 15b shows the results of the leaching tests with pretreatment. Tests with pretreatment are indicated by (P). As can be seen, the tests at 90, 70, 50, and 25 °C yielded copper extractions of 94%, 92%, 77%, and 29%, respectively. The copper extraction yields in the tests without pretreatment also increased with higher temperatures. However, the extraction yields of the pretreated tests at 70 and 50 °C were almost 5% higher than those of the untreated tests at the same temperature, while the test at 90 °C achieved an almost complete copper dissolution. A passivation curve can be seen at 24 h of leaching in the test at 25 °C. However, the dissolution kinetics, which benefitted from the soluble phases in the pretreatment, were identical to the dissolution kinetics in the first four hours of leaching in the test at 50 °C [46].
Comparing the tests with and without pretreatment, the curing time increased the copper extraction by 6% on average, compared to the rates in the tests without pretreatment (at 50 and 70 °C). The curing time benefitted copper extraction over time, favouring the oxidation of sulphide minerals [47]. Stable copper extraction curves were reached earlier in the tests with curing than in those without curing, which was due to the sulphation generated with pretreatment, which mainly formed copper sulphate.
Tests with acid curing accelerated the dissolution kinetics in the first 4 h of treatment. The results concur with those proposed by [32], who found that curing time increased the copper extraction by about 5% in column leaching tests using a chalcopyrite mineral. The same copper extraction was obtained in much less time at 90 °C compared with at 70 °C, or at 70 °C compared with at 50 °C. For comparative purposes, and during leaching at 70 °C, copper extractions of 75% in 24 h with pretreatment and in 32 h without pretreatment were obtained. During leaching at 90 °C, copper extractions of 84% in 24 h with pretreatment and in 32 h without pretreatment were obtained. Thus, the curing treatment significantly reduced the leaching time. Consequently, curing is considered beneficial to save agitated reactor and energy inputs. Curing processes only require time for the reactivity of the mineral and the solution (reagents). Table 3 shows a summary of the copper yields obtained via leaching test.

Characteristics of Leach Residues

Leach residues from all the tests were characterised using XRD and SEM. Table 4 shows the main species identified in the corresponding diffractograms. Figure 16 and Figure 17 show the information from the diffractograms of the residue, respectively, from the tests with the lowest copper extraction (at 25 °C without pretreatment) and the highest copper extraction (at 90 °C with pretreatment).
The X-ray diffractions of residues obtained at 25 °C indicated that they were composed mainly of chalcopyrite and quartz. Small amounts of CuS2 polysulphide and natrojarosite species were observed to inhibit chalcopyrite leaching under these experimental conditions [10,48,49]. Elemental sulphur was also detected by XRD.
The same tendency was observed in the tests with and without pretreatment at 50 °C, although with a notable increase in elemental sulphur. In tests at 70 °C, the dominance of elemental sulphur and quartz was observed, while minor quantities of chalcopyrite and natrojarosite were also detected. At this temperature, CuS2 in small amounts was also observed. The main angle of CuS2 overlapped with that of sulphur (31.4°); other angles of these species were also detected.
Although it is unclear if CuS2 was present, this cannot be ruled out. Clearly, the increased presence of S0 was due to the product released by the leached chalcopyrite, which benefited from temperature and pretreatment. Leaching tests at 50 and 70 °C also showed the presence of covellite, which may be a product of the dissolution of chalcopyrite. Tests carried out at 90 °C showed the presence of an abundant amount of elemental sulphur and quartz. The presence of unreacted chalcopyrite and natrojarosite was also evident.
Temperature [50] is a key factor in the formation of jarosite (MFe3(SO4)(OH)6 where M = Na, K, Rb, or NH4). Iron precipitation increases significantly with higher temperatures, especially in the range of 70 to 110 °C. According to [42], the formation of natrojarosite occurred at pH values close to 0.9 in tests at 95 °C. Natrojarosite can form in chloride media, in accordance with Reaction (6). A problem associated with the precipitation of natrojarosite is that decreasing the acid concentration also slightly decreases the rate of copper extraction due to chalcopyrite passivation [49,51,52].
3Fe3+ + 2SO42− + 6H2O + Na+ → NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 + 6H+
In summary, elemental sulphur and natrojarosite appeared in all leaching experiments by XRD analysis, and their content was more abundant at higher temperatures. Copper polysulphide was identified by XRD analysis in leach residues at 25, 50, and 70 ° C.
Figure 18 shows an SEM image of the leaching residue at 70 °C with pretreatment. Unreacted chalcopyrite particles (1) were observed appearing as leaching products on the surface. Figure 19 shows a sequence of SEM images and mapping analysis for four chalcopyrite particles remaining in the residue from leaching at 70 °C with pretreatment (Figure 18). The elements analysed were Cu, Fe, and S. Figure 19b,d show the presence, respectively, of Cu and S around the chalcopyrite particles.
The presence of copper and sulphur around the chalcopyrite were associated with CuS2 or a similar polysulphide. The passivation associated with polysulphides (CuS2) is explained in terms of the selective dissolution of iron as in a conventional process to form a thick layer of copper polysulphide over time. Additionally, in all the tests at 70 °C, the oxidation–reduction potential was measured in the range of 600–700 mV (SHE). This range is considered appropriate to form CuS2 or other polysulphides [48].
While Figure 19 shows an abundance of elemental sulphur, the authors, including [49] with chalcopyrite leaching tests at 68 °C, proposed that the elemental sulphur formed during chalcopyrite dissolution is porous and does not contribute to the passivation of the surface of chalcopyrite. The authors proposed that species, such as jarosite, are responsible for passivating chalcopyrite. Based on tests at 90 °C using FeCl3 and HCl, other researchers [53] indicated that the elemental sulphur layer formed on the chalcopyrite surface after leaching in a ferric chloride solution is porous and is not a barrier to further leaching. The results obtained in the present study confirmed that the porosity of the products layer increased with temperature.

4. Conclusions

The pretreatment of chalcopyrite with a sodium chloride–sulphuric acid media system (15 kg/t of H2SO4 and 25 kg/t of NaCl with 15 days of curing) resulted in a copper extraction of 22.66% prior to leaching. The presence of copper sulphate, natrojarosite, elemental sulphur, and copper hydroxychloride was detected by characterisation of the curing products. The stoichiometry proposed for this process is Reaction (5): 3CuFeS2 + 3.5H2SO4 + NaCl + 2.5O2·→ CuSO4 + NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 + 6.5S + Cu2Cl(OH).
Curing time benefits the kinetics of leaching copper from pretreated chalcopyrite. In synergy with temperatures of 50 and 90 °C, curing resulted in a copper extraction that was 6% higher than the extraction obtained without any curing time. A copper extraction of 94% was obtained at 90 °C with a pretreatment of 15 kg/t of H2SO4 and 25 kg/t of NaCl with 15 days of curing time, while an extraction of 90% was obtained at the same temperature but without pretreatment.
Copper extractions of 75% were obtained in 24 h at 70 °C with pretreatment and in 32 h at the same temperature without pretreatment, while at 90 °C, extractions of 84% were obtained in 24 h with pretreatment and in 32 h without pretreatment. Thus, the curing applied significantly reduced the leaching time.
The test at 25 °C led to a copper extraction close to 30%, with or without curing pretreatment, which confirms that the surface of chalcopyrite is passivated at this temperature by the formation of a compact layer of sulphur, likely with the formation of jarosite and copper polysulphides.
The surface of elemental sulphur formed at 70 °C appeared to have a more porous and less rigid surface than the surfaces of the leaching products at 25 °C. A more porous film of sulphur bordering the surface of the chalcopyrite allowed contact between the leaching solution and the mineral.
Abundant elemental sulphur and natrojarosite were identified in all the leaching products, and these are proposed as responsible for the passivation of chalcopyrite. The presence of CuS2 was observed in the tests at 25 and 50 °C.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.Q., A.R., O.B., and M.C.; methodology, V.Q., A.R., and M.C.; software, V.Q.; validation, A.R., O.B., and M.C.; formal analysis, E.M.; investigation, V.Q.; resources, A.R. and M.C.; data curation, M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, V.Q.; writing—review and editing, A.R., O.B., M.C., and E.M.; visualization, E.M.; supervision, A.R.; project administration, A.R.; funding acquisition, A.R. and M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Universitat de Barcelona and the Universidad Católica del Norte for the opportunity and funding provided to conduct this research. We also appreciate the contribution of the Scientific Equipment Unit-MAINI at the Universidad Católica del Norte for support in preparing samples, analysis, and data generation with QEMSCAN. We also thank the Centres Científics I Tecnològics, Universitat de Barcelona for their support in the application of characterization techniques.
The authors thank the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum (CIM) for the document “Effect of Curing Time on Copper Leaching from Chalcopyrite” from the Proceedings of the 58th Conference of Metallurgists Hosting Copper 2019, partially reprinted with permission of the CIM.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ghorbani, Y.; Kuan, S.H. A review of sustainable development in the Chilean mining sector: Past, present and future. Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 2017, 31, 137–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cánovas, M.; Valenzuela, J.; Romero, L.; González, P. Characterization of electroosmotic drainage: Application to mine tailings and solid residues from leaching. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 2960–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Valenzuela-Elgueta, J.; Cánovas, M.; García, A.; Zárate, R. Electrocoalescence of emulsions in raffinate from the solvent extraction phase under AC electrical fields. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 490–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cochilco. Proyección de la Producción de Cobre en Chile 2019–2030; Comunicaciones Cochilco: Santiago, Chile, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Qian, L.; Sun, M.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Kim, H.; Qiu, G. The dissolution and passivation mechanism of chalcopyrite in bioleaching: An overview. Miner. Eng. 2019, 136, 140–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Benavente, O.; Hernández, M.C.; Melo, E.; Núñez, D.; Quezada, V.; Zepeda, Y. Copper Dissolution from Black Copper Ore under Oxidizing and Reducing Conditions. Metals 2019, 9, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Quezada, V.; Benavente, O.; Beltrán, C.; Díaz, D.; Melo, E.; García, A. Dissolution of Black Copper Oxides from A Leaching Residue. Metals 2020, 10, 1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Beiza, L.; Quezada, V.; Melo, E.; Valenzuela, G. Electrochemical Behaviour of Chalcopyrite in Chloride Solutions. Metals 2019, 9, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wang, S. Copper leaching from chalcopyrite concentrates. JOM 2005, 57, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nicol, M.J. Hydrometallurgy The anodic behaviour of chalcopyrite in chloride solutions: Overall features and comparison with sulfate solutions. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 169, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dutrizac, J.E. Elemental sulphur formation during the ferric chloride leaching of chalcopyrite. Hydrometallurgy 1990, 23, 153–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nicol, M.; Zhang, S. Hydrometallurgy The anodic behaviour of chalcopyrite in chloride solutions: Potentiostatic measurements. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 167, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lv, C.; Wu, H.; Lin, W.; Illerup, J.B.; Karcz, A.P.; Ye, S.; Damø, A.J. Characterization of elemental sulfur in chalcopyrite leach residues using simultaneous thermal analysis. Hydrometallurgy 2019, 188, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lundström, M.; Aromaa, J.; Forsén, O.; Hyvärinen, O.; Barker, M.H. Leaching of chalcopyrite in cupric chloride solution. Hydrometallurgy 2005, 77, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Viñals, J.; Roca, A.; Hernández, M.C.; Benavente, O. Topochemical transformation of enargite into copper oxide by hypochlorite leaching. Hydrometallurgy 2003, 68, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dutrizac, J.E. The leaching of sulphide minerals in chloride media. Hydrometallurgy 1992, 29, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gok, O.; Anderson, C.G. Dissolution of low-grade chalcopyrite concentrate in acidified nitrite electrolyte. Hydrometallurgy 2013, 134, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hernández, P.C.; Dupont, J.; Herreros, O.O.; Jimenez, Y.P.; Torres, C.M. Accelerating copper leaching from sulfide ores in acid-nitrate-chloride media using agglomeration and curing as pretreatment. Minerals 2019, 9, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Adebayo, A.O.; Sarangi, K. Separation of copper from chalcopyrite-Ammoniacal leach liquor containing copper, zinc, and magnesium by supported liquid membrane. Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 2011, 25, 309–316. [Google Scholar]
  20. Moyo, T.; Petersen, J.; Nicol, M.J. The electrochemistry and kinetics of the oxidative dissolution of chalcopyrite in ammoniacal solutions: Part I—Anodic Reactions. Hydrometallurgy 2018, 182, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moyo, T.; Petersen, J.; Nicol, M.J. The electrochemistry and kinetics of the oxidative dissolution of chalcopyrite in ammoniacal solutions. Part II—Cathodic reactions. Hydrometallurgy 2019, 184, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baba, A.A.; Ghosh, M.K.; Pradhan, S.R.; Rao, D.S.; Baral, A.; Adekola, F.A. Characterization and kinetic study on ammonia leaching of complex copper ore. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2014, 24, 1587–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Petersen, J.; Dixon, D.G. Thermophilic heap leaching of a chalcopyrite concentrate. Miner. Eng. 2002, 15, 777–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Petersen, J.; Dixon, D. Principles, mechanisms and dynamics of chalcocite heap bioleaching. Microb. Process. Met. Sulfides 2007, 193–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tanne, C.K.; Schippers, A. Electrochemical investigation of chalcopyrite (bio)leaching residues. Hydrometallurgy 2019, 187, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tao, J.; Liu, X.; Luo, X.; Teng, T.; Jiang, C.; Drewniak, L.; Yang, Z.; Yin, H. An integrated insight into bioleaching performance of chalcopyrite mediated by microbial factors: Functional types and biodiversity. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 319, 124219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Brierley, C.L.; Brierley, J.A. Progress in bioleaching: Part B: Applications of microbial processes by the minerals industries. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 7543–7552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Velásquez Yévenes, L. The Kinetics of the Dissolution of Chalcopyrite in Chloride Media. Ph.D. Thesis, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rauld, J.; Aroca, F.; Montealegre, R.; Backit, A. Procedure to Leach Copper Concentrates, Under Pressure and at Ambient Temperature, by Forming a Reactive Gel in Sulfate-Chloride Medium. U.S. Patent 7491372B2, 13 February 2009. [Google Scholar]
  30. Aroca, F.; Backit, A.; Jacob, J. CuproChlor®, a hydrometallurgical technology for mineral sulphides leaching. In Proceedings of the 4th International Seminar on Process Hydrometallurgy, Santiago, Chile, 11–13 July 2012; pp. 98–110. [Google Scholar]
  31. Cerda, C.; Taboada, M.; Jamett, N.; Ghorbani, Y.; Hernández, P. Effect of Pretreatment on Leaching Primary Copper Sulfide in Acid-Chloride Media. Minerals 2017, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Velásquez-Yévenes, L.; Quezada-Reyes, V. Influence of seawater and discard brine on the dissolution of copper ore and copper concentrate. Hydrometallurgy 2018, 180, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Quezada, V.; Velásquez, L.; Roca, A.; Benavente, O.; Melo, E.; Keith, B. Effect of curing time on the dissolution of a secondary copper sulphide ore using alternative water resources. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Zawiercie, Poland, 26–29 September 2018; Volume 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Dhawan, N.; Safarzadeh, M.S.; Miller, J.D.; Moats, M.S.; Rajamani, R.K. Crushed ore agglomeration and its control for heap leach operations. Miner. Eng. 2013, 41, 53–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lu, J.; Dreisinger, D.; West-Sells, P. Acid curing and agglomeration for heap leaching. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 167, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Quezada, V.; Roca, A.; Benavente, O.; Cruells, M.; Keith, B.; Melo, E. Effect of pretreatment prior to leaching on a chalcopyrite mineral in acid media using NaCl and KNO3. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 10316–10324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bai, X.; Wen, S.; Liu, J.; Lin, Y. Response surface methodology for optimization of copper leaching from refractory flotation tailings. Minerals 2018, 8, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Gnanavel, M.; Lebedev, O.I.; Bazin, P.; Raveau, B.; Pralong, V. Reversible transformation from amorphouse Na3Fe3(SO4)2(OH)6 to crystallized NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 Jarosite-type hydroxysulfate. Solid State Ionics 2015, 278, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhong, S.; Li, Y. An improved understanding of chalcopyrite leaching kinetics and mechanisms in the presence of NaCl. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 3487–3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Elsherief, A.E. The influence of cathodic reduction, Fe2+ and Cu2+ ions on the electrochemical dissolution of chalcopyrite in acidic solution. Miner. Eng. 2002, 15, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Velásquez-Yévenes, L.; Nicol, M.; Miki, H. The dissolution of chalcopyrite in chloride solutions: Part 1. The effect of solution potential. Hydrometallurgy 2010, 103, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lu, Z.Y.; Jeffrey, M.I.; Lawson, F. Effect of chloride ions on the dissolution of chalcopyrite in acidic solutions. Hydrometallurgy 2000, 56, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Guy, S.; Broadbent, C.P. Formation of copper (I) sulphate during cupric chloride leaching on a complex Cu/Zn/Pb ore. Hydrometallurgy 1983, 11, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Veloso, T.C.; Peixoto, J.J.M.M.; Pereira, M.S.; Leao, V.A. Kinetics of chalcopyrite leaching in either ferric sulphate or cupric sulphate media in the presence of NaCl. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2016, 148, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Velásquez-Yévenes, L.; Miki, H.; Nicol, M. The dissolution of chalcopyrite in chloride solutions: Part 2: Effect of various parameters on the rate. Hydrometallurgy 2010, 103, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Quezada, V.A.; Roca, A.; Cruells, M.; Benavente, O.A. Effect of curing time on copper leaching from chalcopyrite. In Proceedings of the COM Hosting Copper 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 18–21 August 2019; p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  47. Jansen, M.; Taylor, A. Overview of gangue mineralogy issues in oxide copper heap leaching. In Proceedings of the ALTA Conference, Perth, Australia, 19–24 May 2003; p. 32. [Google Scholar]
  48. Nicol, M.; Miki, H.; Zhang, S. The anodic behaviour of chalcopyrite in chloride solutions: Voltammetry. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 171, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Córdoba, E.M.; Muñoz, J.A.; Blázquez, M.L.; González, F.; Ballester, A. Passivation of chalcopyrite during its chemical leaching with ferric ion at 68 °C. Miner. Eng. 2009, 22, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dutrizac, J.E. Factors affecting alkali jarosite precipitation. Metall. Trans. B 1983, 14, 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Martins, F.L.; Patto, G.B.; Leão, V.A. Chalcopyrite bioleaching in the presence of high chloride concentrations. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2019, 94, 2333–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nava, D.; González, I. Electrochemical characterization of chemical species formed during the electrochemical treatment of chalcopyrite in sulfuric acid. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 5295–5303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Majima, H.; Awakura, Y.; Hirato, T.; Tanakat, T. The leaching of chalcopyrite in ferric chloride and ferric sulfate solutions. Can. Metall. Q. 1985, 24, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metals 11 00873 g001 550
Figure 1. Agglomeration and curing procedure.
Figure 1. Agglomeration and curing procedure.
Metals 11 00873 g001
Metals 11 00873 g002 550
Figure 2. Scheme of the magnetic stirrer leaching system.
Figure 2. Scheme of the magnetic stirrer leaching system.
Metals 11 00873 g002
Metals 11 00873 g003 550
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction pattern of the initial sample [36].
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction pattern of the initial sample [36].
Metals 11 00873 g003
Metals 11 00873 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM image of the initial sample at various magnifications (a) ×2.000, (b) ×1.600, (c) ×850 and (d) ×3500. 1: chalcopyrite, 2: quartz, and 3: copper sulphate (chalcanthite) [36].
Figure 4. SEM image of the initial sample at various magnifications (a) ×2.000, (b) ×1.600, (c) ×850 and (d) ×3500. 1: chalcopyrite, 2: quartz, and 3: copper sulphate (chalcanthite) [36].
Metals 11 00873 g004
Metals 11 00873 g005 550
Figure 5. Images of the agglomerates obtained with a stereographic microscope. In (a) initial briquette, (b) at a magnification of ×0.75 and (c,d) at ×5.
Figure 5. Images of the agglomerates obtained with a stereographic microscope. In (a) initial briquette, (b) at a magnification of ×0.75 and (c,d) at ×5.
Metals 11 00873 g005
Metals 11 00873 g006 550
Figure 6. Reflected optical microscope images of the pretreatment products at a magnification of ×50 (a,b).
Figure 6. Reflected optical microscope images of the pretreatment products at a magnification of ×50 (a,b).
Metals 11 00873 g006
Metals 11 00873 g007 550
Figure 7. X-ray diffractogram for chalcopyrite agglomerated with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing time at room temperature.
Figure 7. X-ray diffractogram for chalcopyrite agglomerated with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing time at room temperature.
Metals 11 00873 g007
Metals 11 00873 g008 550
Figure 8. Identification of CuSO4 by X-ray diffraction analysis in chalcopyrite pretreated with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature.
Figure 8. Identification of CuSO4 by X-ray diffraction analysis in chalcopyrite pretreated with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature.
Metals 11 00873 g008
Metals 11 00873 g009 550
Figure 9. NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 identified by X-ray diffraction, a product of the pretreatment of chalcopyrite mineral with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature. In (a,b) the new presence of NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 was identified as (1), compared with the initial diffractogram of the sample.
Figure 9. NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 identified by X-ray diffraction, a product of the pretreatment of chalcopyrite mineral with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature. In (a,b) the new presence of NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 was identified as (1), compared with the initial diffractogram of the sample.
Metals 11 00873 g009
Metals 11 00873 g010 550
Figure 10. Elemental sulphur identified by X-ray diffraction, a product of the pretreatment of chalcopyrite mineral with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature. In (a,b) the new presence of elemental sulphur was identified as (1), compared with the initial diffractogram of the sample.
Figure 10. Elemental sulphur identified by X-ray diffraction, a product of the pretreatment of chalcopyrite mineral with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature. In (a,b) the new presence of elemental sulphur was identified as (1), compared with the initial diffractogram of the sample.
Metals 11 00873 g010
Metals 11 00873 g011 550
Figure 11. Cu2Cl(OH) identified by X-ray diffraction, a product of the pretreatment of chalcopyrite mineral with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature. In (a,b) the new presence of Cu2Cl(OH) was identified as (1), compared with the initial diffractogram of the sample.
Figure 11. Cu2Cl(OH) identified by X-ray diffraction, a product of the pretreatment of chalcopyrite mineral with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature. In (a,b) the new presence of Cu2Cl(OH) was identified as (1), compared with the initial diffractogram of the sample.
Metals 11 00873 g011
Metals 11 00873 g012 550
Figure 12. SEM images (a,c) and EDS analysis (b,d) of chalcopyrite in (1) after treatment with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t NaCl, and 15 days of curing time at room temperature. In (a) at a magnification of ×1.600 and (c) at ×1.700.
Figure 12. SEM images (a,c) and EDS analysis (b,d) of chalcopyrite in (1) after treatment with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t NaCl, and 15 days of curing time at room temperature. In (a) at a magnification of ×1.600 and (c) at ×1.700.
Metals 11 00873 g012
Metals 11 00873 g013 550
Figure 13. SEM images (a,b) and EDS analysis of chalcopyrite (1) and reaction products, such as CuSO4 (2) (EDS in (c)) and NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 (3) (EDS in (d)), products of the pretreatment of chalcopyrite mineral with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing time at room temperature. In (a) at a magnification of ×3.300 and (b) at ×10.000.
Figure 13. SEM images (a,b) and EDS analysis of chalcopyrite (1) and reaction products, such as CuSO4 (2) (EDS in (c)) and NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 (3) (EDS in (d)), products of the pretreatment of chalcopyrite mineral with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing time at room temperature. In (a) at a magnification of ×3.300 and (b) at ×10.000.
Metals 11 00873 g013
Metals 11 00873 g014 550
Figure 14. SEM image (a) and EDS analysis (b) of zone 1. The EDS confirms the formation of Cu2Cl(OH) (1) in the products of the pretreatment of chalcopyrite mineral with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature. In (a) at a magnification of ×5.500.
Figure 14. SEM image (a) and EDS analysis (b) of zone 1. The EDS confirms the formation of Cu2Cl(OH) (1) in the products of the pretreatment of chalcopyrite mineral with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature. In (a) at a magnification of ×5.500.
Metals 11 00873 g014
Metals 11 00873 g015 550
Figure 15. The dissolution of copper from chalcopyrite without pretreatment (a) in 0.2 M of H2SO4 and 50 g/L of Cl− ions from NaCl in deionised water at 25 °C (●25), 50 °C (▲50), 70 °C (■70), and 90 °C (♦90) and with pretreatment (b) at 25 °C (○25P), 50 °C (△50P), 70 °C (□70P), and 90 °C (◊90P).
Figure 15. The dissolution of copper from chalcopyrite without pretreatment (a) in 0.2 M of H2SO4 and 50 g/L of Cl− ions from NaCl in deionised water at 25 °C (●25), 50 °C (▲50), 70 °C (■70), and 90 °C (♦90) and with pretreatment (b) at 25 °C (○25P), 50 °C (△50P), 70 °C (□70P), and 90 °C (◊90P).
Metals 11 00873 g015
Metals 11 00873 g016 550
Figure 16. Species identified by X-ray diffraction in residues after chalcopyrite leaching at 25 °C without pretreatment.
Figure 16. Species identified by X-ray diffraction in residues after chalcopyrite leaching at 25 °C without pretreatment.
Metals 11 00873 g016
Metals 11 00873 g017 550
Figure 17. Species identified by X-ray diffraction in residues after chalcopyrite leaching at 90 °C after pretreatment with 15 kg/t of H2SO4 and 25 kg/t of NaCl and 15 days of curing.
Figure 17. Species identified by X-ray diffraction in residues after chalcopyrite leaching at 90 °C after pretreatment with 15 kg/t of H2SO4 and 25 kg/t of NaCl and 15 days of curing.
Metals 11 00873 g017
Metals 11 00873 g018 550
Figure 18. SEM image of the leaching residue from the test at 70 °C with pretreatment. CuFeS2 identified with (1).
Figure 18. SEM image of the leaching residue from the test at 70 °C with pretreatment. CuFeS2 identified with (1).
Metals 11 00873 g018
Metals 11 00873 g019 550
Figure 19. SEM mapping analysis of the leaching residue performed at 70 °C with pretreatment. (a) Chalcopyrite particles (1). Elements of interest are shown in red: (b) Cu, (c) Fe, and (d) S [46].
Figure 19. SEM mapping analysis of the leaching residue performed at 70 °C with pretreatment. (a) Chalcopyrite particles (1). Elements of interest are shown in red: (b) Cu, (c) Fe, and (d) S [46].
Metals 11 00873 g019
Table
Table 1. Proposed reactions for copper sulphide pretreatment (adapted from [31]).
Table 1. Proposed reactions for copper sulphide pretreatment (adapted from [31]).
N°ReactionsΔG 25 °C (kcal/mol)ΔG 50 °C (kcal/mol)
(1)CuFeS2 + 2Cu2+ + 2Cl− → 2CuCl + CuS + Fe2+ + S−15.6−16.4
(2)2CuS + 4H+ + O2 + 2Cl− → 2CuCl+ + 2H20 + 2S−55.2−53.2
(3)2Cu2S + 4H+ + O2 → 2CuS + 2Cu2+ + 2H20−68.1−65.9
Table
Table 2. Main minerals in the chalcopyrite ore (mass in %) based on Qemscan analysis [36].
Table 2. Main minerals in the chalcopyrite ore (mass in %) based on Qemscan analysis [36].
MineralMass %
Chalcopyrite73.7
Quartz16.3
Covellite1.80
K-Feldspar (orthoclase, anorthoclase)1.80
Pyrite1.30
Molybdenite1.00
Alunite0.900
Other gangue2.60
Other Cu minerals0.600
Table
Table 3. Summary of the copper yields obtained via leaching test with and without pretreatment.
Table 3. Summary of the copper yields obtained via leaching test with and without pretreatment.
TestPretreatment% Copper Extraction
●25No28.5
○25PYes27.5
▲50No51.5
△50PYes56.0
■70No65.0
□70PYes74.8
♦90No79.8
◊90PYes83.9
Table
Table 4. Summary of the species identified using X-ray diffraction analysis. Tests with pretreatment are indicated by (P).
Table 4. Summary of the species identified using X-ray diffraction analysis. Tests with pretreatment are indicated by (P).
TestMore Abundant SpeciesLess Abundant Species
25 °C (P)CuFeS2, SiO2, S, and FeS2CuS, NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6, and CuS2
25 °CCuFeS2, SiO2, S, and FeS2CuS, NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6, and CuS2
50 °C (P)CuFeS2, SiO2, S, CuS, and FeS2NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 and CuS2
50 °CCuFeS2, SiO2, S, CuS, and FeS2NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 and CuS2
70 °C (P)SiO2, S, and FeS2CuFeS2, CuS, NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6, and CuS2
70 °CSiO2, S, and FeS2CuFeS2, CuS, NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6, and CuS2
90 °C (P)SiO2 and SCuFeS2, FeS2, CuS, and NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6
90 °CSiO2 and SCuFeS2, FeS2, CuS, and NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Quezada, V.; Roca, A.; Benavente, O.; Cruells, M.; Melo, E. The Effects of Sulphuric Acid and Sodium Chloride Agglomeration and Curing on Chalcopyrite Leaching. Metals 2021, 11, 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11060873

AMA Style

Quezada V, Roca A, Benavente O, Cruells M, Melo E. The Effects of Sulphuric Acid and Sodium Chloride Agglomeration and Curing on Chalcopyrite Leaching. Metals. 2021; 11(6):873. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11060873

Chicago/Turabian Style

Quezada, Víctor, Antoni Roca, Oscar Benavente, Montserrat Cruells, and Evelyn Melo. 2021. "The Effects of Sulphuric Acid and Sodium Chloride Agglomeration and Curing on Chalcopyrite Leaching" Metals 11, no. 6: 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11060873

APA Style

Quezada, V., Roca, A., Benavente, O., Cruells, M., & Melo, E. (2021). The Effects of Sulphuric Acid and Sodium Chloride Agglomeration and Curing on Chalcopyrite Leaching. Metals, 11(6), 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11060873

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop