Next Article in Journal
The Orowan Stress Measurement of Twinning Dislocations in Magnesium
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Cooling Rates on the Local—Overall Morphology Characteristics of Solidification Structure at Different Stages for High Carbon Steel
Previous Article in Journal
Atomic Simulations of U-Mo under Irradiation: A New Angular Dependent Potential
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microstructural Characterization and Mechanical Property of Al-Li Plate Produced by Centrifugal Casting Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationship between Microstructure Evolution and Tensile Properties of AlSi10Mg Alloys with Varying Mg Content and Solidification Cooling Rates

by
Maressa Gandolfi
1,
Marcella Gautê Cavalcante Xavier
1,
Leonardo Fernandes Gomes
1,
Rodrigo André Valenzuela Reyes
1,
Amauri Garcia
2 and
José Eduardo Spinelli
1,3,*
1
Graduate Program in Materials Science and Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos 13565-905, Brazil
2
Department of Manufacturing and Materials Engineering, University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas 13083-860, Brazil
3
Department of Materials Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos 13565-905, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2021, 11(7), 1019; https://doi.org/10.3390/met11071019
Submission received: 1 June 2021 / Revised: 20 June 2021 / Accepted: 22 June 2021 / Published: 24 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Casting and Solidification Processing)

Abstract

:
This work explored and contrasted the effect of microstructure on the tensile properties of AlSi10Mg alloys generated by transient directional solidification depending on variations in cooling rate and magnesium (Mg) content (i.e., 0.45 and 1 wt.% Mg), with a focus on understanding the dendritic growth and phases constitution. Optical and scanning electron (SEM) microscopies, CALPHAD, and thermal analysis were used to describe the microstructure, forming phases, and resulting tensile properties. The findings showed that the experimental evolution of the primary dendritic spacing is very similar when both directionally solidified (DS) Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg and Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg alloys samples are compared. The secondary dendritic spacing was lower for the alloy with more Mg, especially considering the range of high growth velocities. Moreover, a greater fraction of (Al + Si + Mg2Si) ternary eutectic islands surrounding the α-Al dendritic matrix was noted for the alloy with 1 wt.% Mg. As a result of primary dendritic spacings greater than 180 μm related to lower cooling rates, slightly higher tensile properties were attained for the Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg alloy. In contrast, combining dendritic refining (<150 μm) and a larger Mg2Si fraction, fast-solidified DS Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg samples exhibited higher tensile strength and elongation. The control of cooling rate and fineness of the dendritic array provided a new insight related to the addition of Mg in slightly higher levels than conventional ones, capable of achieving a better balance of tensile properties in AlSi10Mg alloys.

1. Introduction

Even though the AlSi10Mg (Al-10 wt.% Si-Mg) alloys may be processed through a variety of techniques (i.e., additive manufacturing (AM), high pressure die casting (HPD), and permanent mold casting (PM), among others), a better understanding of the solidification cooling rate effects on the microstructure and mechanical properties remains a task to be achieved. In addition to more precise control of solidification process variables and resulting microstructures, a challenge that arises is the increase in the Mg content of these alloys (usually not higher than 0.5 wt.%) to reduce or even eliminate heat treatment steps, which would be an appreciable gain in the processing routes. The main studies and their findings will be reported next, demonstrating processing and microstructure aspects regarding the as-cast AlSi10Mg alloys.
PM casting processes—unlike HPD, which is carried out by injecting the molten metal into a mold at high speed, high cooling rates (101–102 °C/s), and high pressure—are performed under the effect of gravity. In this case, the molten metal enters the mold at low speeds and solidifies at lower cooling rates (<101 °C/s). Regarding the microstructural analysis carried out by Zhang et al. [1] for Al-10Si-0.6Mg samples solidified by HPD, the formation of an outermost layer containing α-Al dendrites enveloped by the (Al + Si) eutectic was observed, a sub-layer rich in eutectic and another sub-layer rich in α-Al dendrites [2,3]. Dendrite length-scale size also changed, becoming coarser towards the center of the sample. This was attributed to changes in the cooling rate, which are significantly higher for positions closer to the mold walls. After the formation of these surface layers (~180–200 µm thick), the microstructure becomes more uniform and coarser. As expected, the average secondary dendritic spacing, λ2, of the PM samples was greater than that observed in the HPD samples due to the lower cooling rates [1]. Moreover, the eutectic Si and the Mg2Si phase in the PM sample were larger in size than in the HPD sample.
Yan and coauthors [4] investigated the influence of microstructure features on the mechanical properties of the AlSi10Mg alloy manufactured by conventional casting (100–101 °C/s) compared with those of the same alloy manufactured by selective laser fusion (SLM: 103–106 °C/s), with an emphasis on understanding the mechanisms of microstructure formation. Large differences in performance were observed between the as-cast sample and the SLM sample. The SLM sample was shown to have anisotropy in relation to the tensile properties, but it also had more refined grains and different precipitated phases, which also led to increased tensile strength for loading conditions perpendicular to the grain alignment direction. In contrast, loads in the parallel direction in relation to that of the grain alignment provided lower values. Overall, as a result of grain refinement and a tortuous crack course, the SLM AlSi10Mg sample showed higher tensile strength but lower elongation than the as-cast sample.
In the assessment of slightly higher Si levels, Kakitani and coauthors [5] investigated solidification features of the Al-15 wt.% Si-1.5 wt.% Mg alloy. It was demonstrated that dendrite interphase spacing measurements agreed with Hall–Petch calculations for ultimate tensile strength and elongation to fracture considering a broad range of solidification cooling rates. It was demonstrated that controlling the distance between the ductile α-Al phase as well as the eutectic strengthening constituent is essential, since it affects the alloy’s tensile properties. As the dendrite interphase spacing was shortened, remarkable increases in strength and ductility were attained. Studies evaluating dendritic growth in aluminum (Al) alloys and factors influencing this growth, as well as consequences on the application properties, are prominent in the specialized literature [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
Marola et al. [14] found a connection between the microstructure, phase constitution, and thermal behavior of AlSi10Mg samples generated using different rapid and intermediate solidification techniques. Wider and lower reflections as the cooling rate increases indicate increased supersaturation and smaller grain size. However, neither the values of the cooling rates nor their direct interrelationships with microstructural parameters such as λ2, for instance, have been determined.
Pereira and collaborators [15] performed a comparison of microstructure features and mechanical properties of the Al-7% Si-0.6% Mg alloy obtained through SLM and lost wax (LW) casting. Regarding the microstructure of the generated samples, it was noted that the SLM sample was composed of a thin cellular structure having α-Al cells smaller than 1 µm in size and with eutectic Si and Mg2Si grouped in the intercellular regions. In the LW sample, the microstructure was composed of the α-Al dendritic matrix, eutectic Si, and β Fe-bearing intermetallic particles.
Recent studies by Arici et al. [16,17] have evaluated both the microstructure and the mechanical properties of Al alloys containing high silicon (Si) and low Mg in their compositions. These studies focused on the impact of minor additions of transition elements such as zirconium (Zr), vanadium (V), and titanium (Ti) on the properties of these Al alloys. One of the chosen alloys was the Al-10 wt.% Si-0.3 wt.% Mg for melting in PM casting. Manganese (Mn) was added to reduce the tendency of the alloy to react with the mold. The resulting microstructures showed dendritic growth and formation of (Al + Si) eutectic. Long needles of intermetallic phases and the presence of the Mg2Si phase were also observed. There was no control of the thermal solidification parameters such as cooling rate and growth velocity, which makes the understanding of the microstructural characteristics less evident.
The AlSi10Mg alloys have demonstrated great potential and versatility in several processes involving melting and solidification. Therefore, the studies listed so far show the need to establish reliable interrelationships between microstructural and solidification thermal parameters and between microstructure aspects and properties, counting on cooling rate measurement and control. Although there is a reasonable amount of research carried out on AlSi10Mg alloys, no study was found with a focus on determining the solidification rates in an expressive range in order to comprehend the influence of this thermal parameter. This type of approach can increase the prospect of microstructural and properties control for processes such as conventional casting, LW, PM, and HPD. It is worth mentioning that in the case of rapid solidification processes such as AM-related techniques, direct cooling rate measurements are more difficult due to the nature of the process, that is, extremely high cooling rates and reduced times [18].
Because of their high strength-to-weight ratio, heat-treatable capability, and excellent castability, Al-Si-Mg alloys are commonly used to manufacture components for the automotive and aerospace sectors of the industry. According to precedent findings, Copper (Cu) and Mg are used in Al-Si foundry alloys to produce typical precipitation-hardening phases such as Al2Cu, Mg2Si, and Al2CuMg, which can provide improved mechanical properties to the alloy [19,20]. Dunn and Dickert [21] demonstrated that adding Mg up to 0.55 percent might improve the tensile properties and hardness of the A380 and 383 alloys. Those alloys for which this Mg limit has been established have high Si, but also high Cu and zinc (Zn). In the case of the ternary Al-10 wt.% Si(-Mg) alloys, the Mg limit has not been verified so far, to the best of the present authors’ knowledge. High-silicon Al-Si-Mg alloys are specifically engineered for casting high-integrity structural components. These alloys have a broad variety of property levels to satisfy the criteria for hardness, high mechanical properties, and crash efficiency. Moreover, Al-Si-Mg alloys, in addition to their excellent corrosion resistance, can be used to cast thin and massive structural parts due to their extremely high fluidity [22].
A transient directional solidification casting was used in this study to allow two Al-10 wt.% Si (−0.45 and −1 wt.% Mg) alloys with substantially different microstructures and tensile properties to be generated. The differences in cooling rates, growth velocities, dendritic growth (either primary or secondary arms), phase constitution, and tensile properties between both directionally solidified Al-Si-Mg alloys have been investigated. A number of techniques including CALPHAD, optical and scanning electronic microscopies, thermal analysis, and mechanical tests were used to clarify how Mg content and cooling rate might affect output disparities in either dendritic growth or tensile properties.

2. Experimental Procedure

In an induction furnace with an Si carbide crucible covered with zircon, two alloys were prepared using commercially pure Al (>99.9 percent purity), Si (>99.7 percent purity), and Mg (>99.5 percent purity). To generate the desired ternary Al-10 wt.% Si (−0.45 and 1 wt.% Mg) alloys, appropriate quantities of Mg and Si were added to the melt. They were applied to the molten bath in small pieces so that they could melt easily. After, the molten alloys were poured into a split AISI 304 stainless steel mold with an internal diameter of 60 mm, a height of 157 mm, and a wall thickness of 5 mm. To minimize radial heat losses, a coating of insulating alumina was applied to the vertical inner mold wall. A thin AISI 1020 carbon steel plate was used to seal the bottom of the mold (3 mm thick). The inner plate’s surface was ground with #1200 finishing sandpaper.
The molten alloy was degassed with argon gas for 2 min using a perforated quartz tube before being scorified with the appropriate flux and cast as 60 mm × 157 mm cylindrical ingots. A directional solidification method, as described in previous articles [23,24], was used to achieve non-stationary heat flow conditions during the production of the castings. To allow continuous temperature measurements during solidification, eight fine K-type thermocouples were mounted along the length of the casting. The thermocouple tips were set in distinct longitudinal points until 74 mm, with the cooled bottom of the mold serving as a reference. As a result, temperature shifts may be used to track the directional growth of the alloy casting. With thermocouples in place and activated, the alloy was poured into the mold and the electric heaters were turned off; additionally, when the programmed melt overheating was reached, the regulated water flow was turned on.
After the Al-Si-Mg alloys castings were produced, longitudinal and transverse section samples were extracted from them using a precision saw. Metallography was used to examine eight sections at different distances from the cooled surface of the casting. For revealing the microstructures, the sections of interest of each casting were sanded following the sequence #80, #120, #150, #180, #240, #320, #400, #600 and #1200. Primary (λ1) and secondary (λ2) dendritic arm spacings were measured using an Olympus Metallurgical Microscope (model GX51, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), while the dendritic arrays were clearly visualized. The intercept procedure was used on longitudinal samples to detect λ2, whereas the triangle method distinguished λ1. Both spacing values were defined by the average counting of 50 measurements per position (P) along the casting length [25]. This is essential because each position relative to the base of the casting experiences a different solidification condition, the closest being, for example, related to faster solidification.
To supplement the optical microstructural characterization, a scanning electron microscope (SEM-EDS) FEI (Inspect S50L, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) was used. This instrument was used to examine transverse section samples of the DS Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg alloys castings, and EDS elemental mapping was performed to assess the relative distribution of the formed phases in each alloy.
Tensile experiments were carried out on transverse specimens machined from various locations along the length of the DS castings. Three specimens per position of interest were prepared in accordance with the ASTM Standard E 8M [26] specifications and tested at a strain rate of 3 × 10−3 s−1.

3. Results and Discussion

The thermal profiles registered for the two Al-Si-Mg alloys are shown in Figure 1. Each line shows the time evolution of the temperature from the liquid metal at a certain point across the length of the casting. Smaller values of positions (P), such as 5 mm and 10 mm, mean smaller distances in relation to the cooled base of the casting, whereas higher “P” values mean more distant positions, with softer cooling profiles. These profiles will be very useful in order to determine cooling rates and growth velocities, as will be seen next. The liquidus temperatures (TL) are illustrated with horizontal dashed lines in the graphs. These temperatures were obtained by examining the results observed in cooling curves registered in very slow cooling-down periods.
The profiles of the associated positions in each alloy casting are very similar, which indicates to a certain extent little influence of the increase in Mg on the drop in temperature during directional solidification. By observing the Scheil solidification diagrams in Figure 2, it can be seen that the freezing solidification intervals of the two alloys are very similar. This corroborates the limited comparative variations in the thermal profiles of the same positions between both alloys around the liquidus temperature. Even though Timelli and Bonollo [27] affirmed that the Mg content has some impact on the fluidity of Al-Si alloys, decreasing it with increasing Mg content, it appears that contents that are as low as those applied to the alloys evaluated here may not be enough to significantly alter the alloy fluidity.
Solidification interval and melt fluidity are considered key factors in altering thermal conductance at the metal/mold interface [28,29]. These factors influence the thermal history during solidification. In the present case, it seems not to be sufficient to cause significant changes, as can be seen in Figure 1.
The series of phases forming and their proportions are critical for controlling multicomponent alloy solidification. Given that the addition of Mg might change the precipitation series from easy to complicated in Al-Si alloys, the CALPHAD approach becomes an important tool for modeling multicomponent alloys [30].
Figure 2 depicts the Scheil evolutions of the fractions of the phases produced for each alloy as a function of temperature. It should be noted that the primary α-Al phase may correspond to 22% of mass fraction, growing for higher temperatures. For lower temperatures, the Si phase precipitates until the temperature attains the eutectic plateau. The proportions of ternary eutectic are 6% and 17% for the Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg and Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg alloys, respectively. This means that the Scheil calculations predict a fraction of ternary eutectic 3 times higher for the alloy with more Mg.
The data in Figure 1 allow monitoring of the displacement of the liquidus isotherm along the length of the casting during the cooling process. As such, plots of the position (P) in the castings versus time (t) of passage of the isotherm corresponding to each alloy could be generated. The liquidus growth velocities (VL) were obtained by taking the time derivative of these P × t functions, and the time derivative of each cooling curve (dT/dt) was computed right after the liquidus isotherms passed by each thermocouple, thus permitting the liquidus cooling rate, Ṫ, to be determined as a function of P. Cooling rate and growth velocity color maps for both alloys are plotted as a way of exemplifying the changes in these solidification thermal parameters along the casting length, as observed in Figure 3. The parameter graduation is shown by the color scales on the right side of each map. Confirming what was observed by the previous analysis of the thermal profiles in Figure 1, it can be noted that the evolutions in the color graphs of both the growth velocity and the cooling rate were very similar when the results of the alloys under evaluation were compared.
Most DS castings may have two main macrostructural zones that correspond to either columnar or equiaxed grains. These castings may present one of the two zones or both, depending mainly on the solidification conditions and alloy composition. Columnar grains often grow from the bottom mold surface, where thermal gradients are strong, and the growth is preferentially oriented in the direction of the heat flux. As soon as the gradients towards the top of the casting are reduced, equiaxed grains may nucleate in the remaining liquid [31,32]. In the case of the macrostructures in Figure 4, high starting cooling rates provided a predominance of columnar macromorphology at approximately 85% of the length of the castings, regardless of alloy Mg content. Many of the columnar grains are guided by very elongated vertical primary dendritic trunks containing lateral branches.
Light microstructures, as seen in Figure 5 and Figure 6, were revealed to verify the characteristics of the dendritic arrangements along the solidified castings. It is also possible to compare the length-scale of the dendrites in both cross and longitudinal sections as a function of the thermal solidification parameters. These images were used to measure the primary (cross section) and secondary (longitudinal) dendritic spacings. For all levels of cooling rates, in addition to the α-Al dendrites, the interdendritic regions (dark areas) are composed of Si and Mg2Si, part of the eutectic constituent. It is also possible to perceive an effective microstructural thickening with the reduction in cooling rate and growth velocity.
The microstructures in both Figure 5 and Figure 6 changed significantly with a reduction in the cooling rate. Lower cooling rates mean longer local solidification times. Under such conditions, secondary dendrite arms may grow slowly, permitting diffusion mechanisms to operate for longer times. The secondary dendritic spacings are coarser the longer the contact time of the dendritic branch with the interdendritic liquid. This effect can be clearly seen in Figure 5 and Figure 6.
Figure 7 depicts the secondary phase’s morphologies at cooling rates around 10 K/s for both examined alloys. The morphology of the Mg2Si phase (dark phase) in the ternary eutectic area is Chinese-script-like [33]. Si particles (light phase) show a lamellar morphology typically found in these alloys for a wide range of cooling rates [34,35]. SEM/EDS analyses with EDS elemental mappings in Figure 7 show the element composition and distribution in each phase. According to Liu and Kang [33], the addition of Mg to Al-Mg-Si alloys has a significant impact on the development of solidification microstructures. Moreover, increased Mg content promotes an increase in the fraction of Mg2Si particles. This was also observed in the present results.
The experimental evolutions of measured λ1 and λ2 are shown in Figure 8. It shows expressive variations of values representative of the dendritic scale in the two alloys of interest. As expected, the length-scale related to λ1 is much higher compared with the λ2 scale size.
Figure 9 shows a comparison of further results for the Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg and Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg alloys. In the matter of λ1 growth versus Ṫ, a −0.4 exponent was matched with a single relation being able to represent the whole set of experimental points of both alloys. While the exponent −0.55 is more commonly used in this type of scaling relation for binary Al alloys [36,37], the solidification of ternary alloys with more complex phase formation may have induced a slightly lower exponent. Another assessment involved plotting λ2 against the growth velocity, as also seen in Figure 9. The alloy containing more Mg showed lower λ2 values if the same growth velocity is considered.
These correlations were proposed in the following format: λ1 × cooling rate and λ2 × growth velocity. This is based on previous relationships presented in many literature models that linked these dendritic spacing values with the solidification thermal parameters in this manner [38,39,40].
Figure 10 shows how the ultimate tensile strength, yield tensile strength, and elongation values of the DS Al-Si-Mg alloys castings differ over their microstructural range. The plots were proposed on a Hall–Petch basis. The Hall–Petch coefficients were determined based on the trend lines obtained by linear regression of the experimental points for each case of interest. Thus, the relationships between two variables were determined, that is, σu × λ1 and δ × λ1. In the case of the σy × λ1, the variations were considered insignificant, and it was chosen to draw a constant horizontal line as representative of these results. Due to the orientation of the extracted tensile specimens in the normal direction in relation to the primary dendritic trunks, it is understood here that a more representative correlation of the tensile properties should be established with λ1.
As previously shown in Figure 9, the quantified dendrite interphase spacing of the Al-rich matrix, λ1, is that related to the different cooling rates measured for the solidified samples. While the properties of the Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg alloy are superior for coarser λ1 spacing, the properties of Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg alloy are superior and stand out in relation to the entire data set for more refined microstructure arrangements. In terms of λ1, such reversal behavior means values less than 150 μm, and λ2 values less than 20 μm. The best balance of properties provided a yield tensile strength, σy, of 142 MPa, an ultimate tensile strength, σu, of 220 MPa, and an elongation, δ, of 5%.
This superior set of properties represents DS samples of the unmodified Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg alloy with λ2 of about 16 μm. These values are higher than those reported by Zhang et al. [1] in samples of the Sr-modified Al-10Si-0.6Mg-0.6Mn alloy solidified via PM casting with λ2 of 12 μm. The tensile properties under such conditions were σu of 180 MPa, σy of 120 MPa, and δ of 1.8%. For the present DS samples, a 22% increase in σu, 18% increase in σy, and a 177% increase in δ are shown to occur as compared with those of the PM casting condition attained by Zhang et al. [1]. This is an interesting comparison because the results under PM casting involve an alloy with eutectic Si modification and insertion of Mn, in addition to greater dendritic fineness. This shows that a slight increase in Mg up to 1 wt.% can result in significant improvements. Moreover, these properties tend to improve even more with T6 treatment, as shown in other studies in the literature [1,16,17].
Li et al. [41] demonstrated that the ideal Mg content for the as-cast Al-10Si-series alloys remains around 2 wt.% Mg, even observing good balance of tensile properties in the alloy containing 0.8 wt.% Mg, which are σy of 96 MPa, σu of 212 MPa, and δ of 12%. In this study, additions of 0.4 wt., 0.8 wt., 1.2 wt., 2 wt., and 3 wt.% Mg to the Al-10 wt.% Si alloy solidified in a permanent steel mold were investigated. However, variations in cooling rates and dendritic spacing were not analyzed. The observations of this study are especially useful to explain the simultaneous increase in ductility and strength for the refined samples of the Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg alloy as compared with the Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg alloy. At the 1.0 wt.% Mg addition level, crack initiation and dissemination were minimized as compared with the Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg alloy, because the high Mg addition level caused even more tortuous dendrite borders, which is directly conducive to increased strength and ductility. Moreover, because of the substantial reduction in growing space induced by the refinement of λ2, the increased Mg content indirectly facilitated the size reduction of the Mg2Si intermetallic particles, improving both strength and ductility.

4. Conclusions

The macrostructure of both DS Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg and Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg alloys castings is characterized by a columnar macromorphology at approximately 85% of the length of the castings from the cooled bottom. The microstructure of both alloys is formed by an α-Al matrix with a dendritic arrangement and well-defined primary (λ1) and secondary (λ2) arms, with interdendritic regions composed of the eutectic mixture: α-Al; Si particles of lamellar morphology; and Chinese-script-like Mg2Si intermetallics.
Dendritic growth laws were experimentally determined relating λ2 to the growth velocity (vL), and to the solidification cooling rate (Ṫ), that is:
Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg: λ2 = 22 (vL)−2/3
Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg: λ2 = 14 (vL)−1.0
And λ1 = 165 (Ṫ)−0.4 for both alloys, where λ [µm]; Ṫ [°C/s] and vL [mm/s].
According to Hall–Petch-type relationships, the ultimate tensile strength (σu) and elongation (δ) of both alloys studied varied with λ1:
Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg: σu = 527 (1/λ1)1/2 +152.5, and δ = 57.4 (1/λ1)1/2 + 0.9
Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg: σu = 1057.4 (1/λ1)1/2 +105.8, and δ = 206 (1/λ1)1/2 − 11.5
where σu is in MPa and δ in %. The tensile properties of the Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg alloy were shown to be superior and stand out in relation to the entire data set for more refined microstructure arrangements (λ1 < 150 μm and λ2 < 20 μm). The best balance of properties provided a yield tensile strength, σy, of 142 MPa; ultimate tensile strength, σu, of 220 MPa; and elongation, δ, of 5%.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.E.S.; analysis, M.G., R.A.V.R., M.G.C.X., and L.F.G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.G., R.A.V.R., and J.E.S.; writing—review and editing, A.G.; project administration, M.G. and J.E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by FAPESP—São Paulo Research Foundation, Brazil (grant 2019/23673-7); Capes—Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brazil (Funding Code 001); and CNPq—National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent Statement

The enclosed manuscript has been accepted by all of the informed authors.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, J.E.S., upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

We announce that we have no financial or personal arrangements with other individuals or organizations that may improperly affect our work, and that we have no technical or other personal interest in any good, service, or business that could be construed as affecting the results presented in, or the analysis of, the manuscript enclosed.

References

  1. Zhang, Z.; Liu, M.Y.; Breton, F.; Chen, X.G. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of AlSi10Mg Permanent Mould and High Pressure Vacuum Die Castings. In Proceedings of the 16th International Aluminum Alloys Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, 17–21 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gourlay, C.M.; Laukli, H.I.; Dahle, A.K. Defect Band Characteristics in Mg-Al and Al-Si High-Pressure Die Castings. Metall. Mater. Trans. 2007, 38, 1833–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ji, S.; Wang, Y.; Watson, D.; Fan, Z. Microstructural Evolution and Solidification Behavior of Al-Mg-Si Alloy in High-Pressure Die Casting. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2013, 44, 3185–3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yan, Q.; Song, B.; Shi, Y. Comparative study of performance comparison of AlSi10Mg alloy prepared by selective laser melting and casting. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 41, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kakitani, R.; Reyes, R.V.; Garcia, A.; Cheung, N.; Spinelli, J.E. Effects of Melt Superheating on the Microstructure and Tensile Properties of a Ternary Al-15 Wt Pct Si-1.5 Wt Pct Mg Alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2019, 50, 1308–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Niklas, A.; Bakedano, A.; Orden, S.; Da Silva, M.; Nogués, E.; Fernández-Calvo, A.I. Effect of Microstructure and Casting Defects on the Mechanical Properties of Secondary AlSi10MnMg(Fe) Test Parts Manufactured by Vacuum Assisted high Pressure Die Casting Technology. Mater. Today Proc. 2015, 2, 4931–4938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Seifeddine, S.; Johansson, S.; Svensson, I.L. The influence of cooling rate and manganese content on the β-Al5FeSi phase formation and mechanical properties of Al–Si-based alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 490, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Goulart, P.R.; Osório, W.R.; Spinelli, J.E.; Garcia, A. Dendritic Microstructure Affecting Mechanical Properties and Corrosion Resistance of an Al-9 wt% Si Alloy. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2007, 22, 328–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goulart, P.R.; Spinelli, J.E.; Osório, W.R.; Garcia, A. Mechanical properties as a function of microstructure and solidification thermal variables of Al–Si castings. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2006, 421, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Birol, Y. Impact of grain size on mechanical properties of AlSi7Mg0.3 alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2013, 559, 394–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Samuel, E.; Golbahar, B.; Samuel, A.M.; Doty, H.W.; Valtierra, S.; Samuel, F.H. Effect of grain refiner on the tensile and impact properties of Al–Si–Mg cast alloys. Mater. Des. 2014, 56, 468–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rooy, E.L. Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys. In MET Handbook, 9th ed.; ASM International: Novelty, OH, USA, 1988; Volume 15, pp. 743–770. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ghassemali, E.; Riestra, M.; Bogdanoff, T.; Kumar, B.S.; Seifeddine, S. Hall-Petch equation in a hypoeutectic Al-Si cast alloy: Grain size vs. secondary dendrite arm spacing. Procedia Eng. 2017, 207, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marola, S.; Manfredi, D.; Fiore, G.; Poletti, M.G.; Lombardi, M.; Fino, P.; Battezzati, L. A comparison of Selective Laser Melting with bulk rapid solidification of AlSi10Mg alloy. J. Alloy. Compd. 2018, 742, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pereira, J.C.; Gil, E.; Solaberrieta, L.; San Sebastián, M.; Bilbao, Y.; Rodríguez, P.P. Comparison of AlSi7Mg0.6 alloy obtained by selective laser melting and investment casting processes: Microstructure and mechanical properties in as-built/as-cast and heat-treated conditions. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020, 778, 139124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Arici, A. Development of Al-Si-Mg Alloys for Permanent Mold Casting and High-Pressure Vacuum Die Casting Applications. Master’s Thesis, University Of Quebec At Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC, Canada, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  17. Arici, A.; Zhang, Z.; Breton, F.; Chen, X.G. Effect of Zr and V Additions on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of the AlSi10Mg Cast Alloy. In Proceedings of the 16th International Aluminum Alloys Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, 17–21 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, Y.J.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, G.W.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, L.C. Gradient in microstructure and mechanical property of selective laser melted AlSi10Mg. J. Alloy. Compd. 2018, 735, 1414–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moustafa, M.A.; Samuel, F.H.; Doty, H.W.; Valtierra, S. Effect of Mg and Cu additions on the microstructural characteristics and tensile properties of Sr-modified Al-Si eutectic alloys. Int. J. Cast Met. Res. 2002, 14, 235–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ouellet, P.; Samuel, F.H. Effect of Mg on the ageing behaviour of Al-Si-Cu 319 type aluminium casting alloys. J. Mater. Sci. 1999, 34, 4671–4697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dunn, R.; Dickert, W. Magnesium effect on the strength of A380.0 and 383.0 aluminum die casting alloys. Die Cast. Eng. 1975, 19, 12–20. [Google Scholar]
  22. Baral, M.; Ha, J.; Korkolis, Y.P. Plasticity and ductile fracture modeling of an Al–Si–Mg die-cast alloy. Int. J. Fract. 2019, 216, 101–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gomes, L.F.; Silva, B.L.; Garcia, A.; Spinelli, J.E. Dendritic Growth, Solidification Thermal Parameters, and Mg Content Affecting the Tensile Properties of Al-Mg-1.5 Wt Pct Fe Alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2017, 48, 1841–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Silva, B.L.; Garcia, A.; Spinelli, J.E. The effects of microstructure and intermetallic phases of directionally solidified Al–Fe alloys on microhardness. Mater. Lett. 2012, 89, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gündüz, M.; Çadırlı, E. Directional solidification of aluminium–copper alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2002, 327, 167–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. ASTM E28 Committee Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. 2016, p. 30. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1520/E0008_E0008M-16A (accessed on 10 June 2021).
  27. Timelli, G.; Bonollo, F. Fluidity of aluminium die castings alloy. Int. J. Cast Met. Res. 2007, 20, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cheung, N.; Santos, N.S.; Quaresma, J.M.V.; Dulikravich, G.S.; Garcia, A. Interfacial heat transfer coefficients and solidification of an aluminum alloy in a rotary continuous caster. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2009, 52, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Santos, W.L.R.; Silva, B.L.; Bertelli, F.; Spinelli, J.E.; Cheung, N.; Garcia, A. An alternative thermal approach to evaluate the wettability of solder alloys. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 107, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kroupa, A. Modelling of phase diagrams and thermodynamic properties using Calphad method—Development of thermodynamic databases. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2013, 66, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gandin, C.-A. From constrained to unconstrained growth during directional solidification. Acta Mater. 2000, 48, 2483–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Siqueira, C.A.; Cheung, N.; Garcia, A. Solidification thermal parameters affecting the columnar-to-equiaxed transition. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2002, 33, 2107–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Liu, Y.L.; Kang, S.B. The solidification process of Al–Mg–Si alloys. J. Mater. Sci. 1997, 32, 1443–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hosch, T.; England, L.G.; Napolitano, R.E. Analysis of the high growth-rate transition in Al–Si eutectic solidification. J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 4892–4899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Warmuzek, M. Aluminum-Silicon Casting Alloys: Atlas of Microfractographs; ASM International: Materials Park, OH, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  36. Peres, M.D.; Siqueira, C.A.; Garcia, A. Macrostructural and microstructural development in Al–Si alloys directionally solidified under unsteady-state conditions. J. Alloy. Compd. 2004, 381, 168–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rosa, D.M.; Spinelli, J.E.; Garcia, A. Tertiary dendrite arm spacing during downward transient solidification of Al–Cu and Al–Si alloys. Mater. Lett. 2006, 60, 1871–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hunt, J.D. Solidification and Casting of Metals; The Metals Society: London, UK, 1979; pp. 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kurz, W.; Fisher, J.D. Dendrite growth at the limit of stability: Tip radius and spacing. Acta Metall. 1981, 29, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hunt, J.D.; Lu, S.Z. Numerical modeling of cellular/dendritic array growth: Spacing and structure predictions. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 1996, 27, 611–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, Q.; Qiu, F.; Dong, B.X.; Yang, H.Y.; Shu, S.L.; Zha, M.; Jiang, Q.C. Investigation of the influences of ternary Mg addition on the solidification microstructure and mechanical properties of as-cast Al–10Si alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2020, 798, 140247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Temperature x time profiles registered at different points along the length of the casting during solidification of the (a) Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg and (b) Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg alloys. The distances marked within the graphics represent the positions from the metal/mold interface.
Figure 1. Temperature x time profiles registered at different points along the length of the casting during solidification of the (a) Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg and (b) Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg alloys. The distances marked within the graphics represent the positions from the metal/mold interface.
Metals 11 01019 g001
Figure 2. Scheil diagrams showing the solidification sequences related to the (a) Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg and (b) Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg alloys.
Figure 2. Scheil diagrams showing the solidification sequences related to the (a) Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg and (b) Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg alloys.
Metals 11 01019 g002
Figure 3. Representations in color maps of the evolution of growth velocities and cooling rates from top to bottom along the length of the solidified Al-Si-Mg bodies: (a,b) VL and (c,d) Ṫ for both examined alloys.
Figure 3. Representations in color maps of the evolution of growth velocities and cooling rates from top to bottom along the length of the solidified Al-Si-Mg bodies: (a,b) VL and (c,d) Ṫ for both examined alloys.
Metals 11 01019 g003
Figure 4. Columnar-type grain morphology revealed along the longitudinal section of the evaluated (a) Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg and (b) Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg alloys.
Figure 4. Columnar-type grain morphology revealed along the longitudinal section of the evaluated (a) Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg and (b) Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg alloys.
Metals 11 01019 g004
Figure 5. Light microstructures showing dendritic arrangements and their dependencies with cooling rates and growth velocities for the Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg alloy.
Figure 5. Light microstructures showing dendritic arrangements and their dependencies with cooling rates and growth velocities for the Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg alloy.
Metals 11 01019 g005
Figure 6. Light microstructures showing dendritic arrangements and their dependencies with cooling rates and growth velocities for the Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg alloy.
Figure 6. Light microstructures showing dendritic arrangements and their dependencies with cooling rates and growth velocities for the Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg alloy.
Metals 11 01019 g006aMetals 11 01019 g006b
Figure 7. SEM images showing the formed phases, details with greater magnification and color mapping of the elements Al, Si, and Mg: (a) Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg and (b) Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg.
Figure 7. SEM images showing the formed phases, details with greater magnification and color mapping of the elements Al, Si, and Mg: (a) Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg and (b) Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg.
Metals 11 01019 g007aMetals 11 01019 g007b
Figure 8. Experimental variations of (a) λ1 and (b) λ2 against position from the metal–mold interface along the length of the Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg and Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg alloys castings.
Figure 8. Experimental variations of (a) λ1 and (b) λ2 against position from the metal–mold interface along the length of the Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg and Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg alloys castings.
Metals 11 01019 g008
Figure 9. Scaling relations of microstructural spacings with thermal solidification parameters, such as (a) cooling rate and (b) growth velocity for the Al-Si(-Mg) alloys.
Figure 9. Scaling relations of microstructural spacings with thermal solidification parameters, such as (a) cooling rate and (b) growth velocity for the Al-Si(-Mg) alloys.
Metals 11 01019 g009
Figure 10. Tensile properties of the Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg and Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg alloys as function of λ1: (a) σu, (b) σy, (c) δ.
Figure 10. Tensile properties of the Al-10 wt.% Si-1 wt.% Mg and Al-10 wt.% Si-0.45 wt.% Mg alloys as function of λ1: (a) σu, (b) σy, (c) δ.
Metals 11 01019 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gandolfi, M.; Xavier, M.G.C.; Gomes, L.F.; Reyes, R.A.V.; Garcia, A.; Spinelli, J.E. Relationship between Microstructure Evolution and Tensile Properties of AlSi10Mg Alloys with Varying Mg Content and Solidification Cooling Rates. Metals 2021, 11, 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11071019

AMA Style

Gandolfi M, Xavier MGC, Gomes LF, Reyes RAV, Garcia A, Spinelli JE. Relationship between Microstructure Evolution and Tensile Properties of AlSi10Mg Alloys with Varying Mg Content and Solidification Cooling Rates. Metals. 2021; 11(7):1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11071019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gandolfi, Maressa, Marcella Gautê Cavalcante Xavier, Leonardo Fernandes Gomes, Rodrigo André Valenzuela Reyes, Amauri Garcia, and José Eduardo Spinelli. 2021. "Relationship between Microstructure Evolution and Tensile Properties of AlSi10Mg Alloys with Varying Mg Content and Solidification Cooling Rates" Metals 11, no. 7: 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11071019

APA Style

Gandolfi, M., Xavier, M. G. C., Gomes, L. F., Reyes, R. A. V., Garcia, A., & Spinelli, J. E. (2021). Relationship between Microstructure Evolution and Tensile Properties of AlSi10Mg Alloys with Varying Mg Content and Solidification Cooling Rates. Metals, 11(7), 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11071019

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop