Effect of Current Input Method and Solid Fraction on the Roundness and Mechanical Properties in Semi-Solid Processing of Aluminum Materials
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Experimental Equipment and Material
2.1. Electromagnetic Stirrer
2.2. A356 Alloy
3. Experiment
3.1. Current Input Method for A356 Alloy
3.2. Manufacturing for Two-Cavity Lower Arm
4. Results and Discussion
5. Conclusions
- Using EMS for die-casting, it was confirmed that the optimal melting temperature of products with good castability with a solid fraction of 20–30% was 600–610 °C.
- The mechanical properties were superior when an AC was used as the current input method: the tensile strength and elongation were 177 MPa and 8.7%, respectively, compared to 147 MPa and 9.2% when the input method was a DC, confirming that the tensile strength was improved by 20%.
- The tensile strength of the material containing a solid fraction of 20% was 8% higher compared to that of the material with a solid fraction of 30%. In terms of the equivalent diameter and roundness, those of the material with a solid fraction of 20% prepared with an AC yielded the most optimal results.
- The manufactured lower arm made of 16kg molten metal under the optimal conditions at 5 kg showed good mechanical properties depending on the positions and showed 39% higher tensile strength through the T6 heat treatment.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kaplan, Y.; Tan, E.; Ada, H.; Aksöz, S. Comparison of the effects of B4C and SiC reinforcement in Al-Si matrix alloys produced via PM method. In Light Metals; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 129–134. [Google Scholar]
- Patel, J.B.; Liu, Y.Q.; Shao, G.; Fan, Z. Rheo-processing of an alloy specifically designed for semi-solid metal processing based on the Al–Mg–Si system. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 479, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirsch, J. Recent development in aluminium for automotive applications. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2014, 24, 1995–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.H.; Lee, M.S.; Kang, C.G. Reduction in liquid segregation and microstructure improvement in a semisolid die casting process by varying injection velocity. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2011, 42, 156–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pola, A.; Tocci, M.; Kapranos, P. Microstructure and Properties of Semi-Solid Aluminum Alloys: A Literature Review. Metals 2018, 8, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kapranos, P. Current state of semi-solid net-shape die casting. Metals 2019, 9, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Irani, S.B.; Z-Hanzaki, A.; Bazaz, B.; Roosraei, A.A. Microstructure evolution and semi-solid deformation behavior of an A356 aluminum alloy processed by strain induced melt activated method. Mater. Des. 2013, 46, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ko, J.H.; Seo, P.K.; Kang, C.G. A Study on Rheology Forming Process of Al-7%Si Alloy with Electromagnetic Application. Trans. Mater. Processing 2006, 15, 195–205. [Google Scholar]
- Jaberi, F.S.; Cockcroft, S.L.; Maijer, D.M.; Philion, A.B. Comparison of the semi-solid constitutive behaviour of A356 and B206 aluminum foundry alloys. J. Mater. Processing Technol. 2019, 266, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bae, J.W.; Kim, T.W.; Kang, C.G. Experimental investigation for rheology forming process of Al–7% Si aluminum alloy with electromagnetic system. J. Mater. Processing Technol. 2007, 191, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, C.G.; Jin, C.K.; Bolouri, A. Semisolid forming of thin plates with microscale features. Procedia Eng. 2014, 81, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Spencer, D.B.; Mehrabian, R.; Flemings, M.C. Rheological behavior of Sn-15 pct Pb in the crystallization range. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 1972, 3, 1925–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, C.G.; Bae, J.W.; Kim, B.M. The grain size control of A356 aluminum alloy by horizontal electromagnetic stirring for rheology forging. J. Mater. Processing Technol. 2007, 187, 344–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zoqui, E.J.; Paes, M.; Sadipi, E.E. Macro- and microstructure analysis of SSM A356 produced by electromagnetic stirring. J. Mater. Processing Technol. 2002, 120, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, Y.C.; Chou, C.Y.; Lee, S.L.; Lin, C.K.; Lin, J.C.; Lim, S.W. Effect of trace La addition on the microstructures and mechanical properties of A356 (Al–7Si–0.35Mg) aluminum alloys. J. Alloy. Compd. 2009, 487, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, C.; Kim, S.S.; Kwon, Y.N.; Lee, Y.S.; Lee, J.H. Mechanical and corrosion properties of rheocast and low-pressure cast A356-T6 alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 391, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurz, W.; Fisher, D.J. Fundamentals of Solidification; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, M.S.; Kang, C.G. Comparative study of direct and indirect forging processes for rheological material of A356 aluminium alloy. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2011, 27, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.H.; Kang, C.G. Vacuum-assisted rheo-forging process of A356 aluminum alloys. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2008, 48, 1626–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Si | Mg | Ti | Fe | Sr | Zn | Pb | Ni |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.000 | 0.350 | 0.120 | 0.080 | 0.022 | 0.020 | 0.016 | 0.010 |
Mn | Cu | Sn | Cr | Ca | Al | TL | TS |
0.008 | 0.008 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.001 | Bal | 617 °C | 553 °C |
No | Final Temperature (°C) /Solid Fraction (%) | Magnetic Impression Method | Stirring | Stirring Current (A) | Current Input | Hertz (Hz) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 614/10 | symmetry magnetic pole | Yes | 120A | direct current | - |
2 | 610/20 | symmetry magnetic pole | Yes | 120A | direct current | - |
3 | 600/30 | symmetry magnetic pole | Yes | 120A | direct current | - |
4 | 588/40 | symmetry magnetic pole | Yes | 120A | direct current | - |
5 | 614/10 | three-phase magnetic pole | Yes | - | alternating current | 45/55 |
6 | 610/20 | three-phase magnetic pole | Yes | - | alternating current | 45/55 |
7 | 600/30 | three-phase magnetic pole | Yes | - | alternating current | 45/55 |
8 | 588/40 | three-phase magnetic pole | Yes | - | alternating current | 45/55 |
Final Temperature (°C) /Solid Fraction (%) | Magnetic Impression Method | Stirring | Current Input | Hertz (Hz) |
---|---|---|---|---|
610/20 | three-phase magnetic pole | Yes | alternating current | 45/55 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lee, W.-J.; Babu, J.-P.-S.-S.; Kang, C.-G.; Lee, M.-S. Effect of Current Input Method and Solid Fraction on the Roundness and Mechanical Properties in Semi-Solid Processing of Aluminum Materials. Metals 2022, 12, 1670. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12101670
Lee W-J, Babu J-P-S-S, Kang C-G, Lee M-S. Effect of Current Input Method and Solid Fraction on the Roundness and Mechanical Properties in Semi-Solid Processing of Aluminum Materials. Metals. 2022; 12(10):1670. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12101670
Chicago/Turabian StyleLee, Won-Jin, Janarthanan-Pillai-Sumathi-Suresh Babu, Chung-Gil Kang, and Min-Sik Lee. 2022. "Effect of Current Input Method and Solid Fraction on the Roundness and Mechanical Properties in Semi-Solid Processing of Aluminum Materials" Metals 12, no. 10: 1670. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12101670
APA StyleLee, W. -J., Babu, J. -P. -S. -S., Kang, C. -G., & Lee, M. -S. (2022). Effect of Current Input Method and Solid Fraction on the Roundness and Mechanical Properties in Semi-Solid Processing of Aluminum Materials. Metals, 12(10), 1670. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12101670