1. Introduction
The initial understanding of solid materials is based on the difference of the band gap in their energy band structure, which is one of the most common ways of classification. The band gap is classified according to the size of the band gap between energy bands. Thus, the band gap can correspond to metal, semi-metal, and insulators in crystalline materials. After introducing the concept of topology, the first to catch people’s attention were topological insulators, and the first discoveries about topological insulators were in two-dimensional HgTe quantum wells [
1,
2], Bi
1−xSb
x [
3] and Bi
2Se
3 systems [
4]. Topologically protected edge states have been detected for the first time in HgTe quantum wells, and a method to detect their presence has been predicted. Later, the evidence for the discovery of topological quantum Hall states was gradually given in the Bi
1−xSb
x and Bi
2Se
3 alloy experiments. The special feature of topological semimetals is that they are a transition state between conventional insulators and topological insulators; similar to topological insulators, topological semimetals also have a nontrivial energy band structure, and the band gap in the energy band-like structure is usually zero; in addition, two bands of mutually inverted conducting bands and valence bands cross and overlap each other; this can form crossover points or nodal coils in momentum space [
5,
6], which makes many topological semimetals have many exotic physical properties, such as chiral anomalies, Fermi arcs, negative magnetoresistance effects, and so on [
7,
8,
9,
10]. In the momentum space, these crossings can show different energy level simplicity depending on the distribution position; according to the energy band simplicity, topological semimetals can be classified as Dirac semimetals, Weyl semimetals, and nodal line semimetals [
11,
12,
13].
The Weyl semimetal was obtained by breaking one of the time-reversal symmetry and space-reversal symmetry on the basis of the Dirac semimetal with quadruple simplicity [
14]. In nature, Weyl semimetals are apparently more difficult to find than Dirac semimetals. The earliest theoretical finding on Weyl semimetals was A
2Ir
2O
7 (A = Y, Eu, Nd, Sm, Pr) proposed by Xiangang Wan in 2011 [
15], although the Weyl semimetal in this system has the property of breaking the time-reversal symmetries, the complicated crystal preparation steps, and the impurity of the energy band structure itself, so it is difficult to synthesize experimentally. In 2015, Fang Zhong predicted that the family of TaAs materials belong to Weyl semimetals; then, they verified them experimentally [
16,
17]. The TaAs family satisfies the characteristic of Weyl semimetals breaking one of the symmetries; the TaAs keeping only the time-reversal symmetry, they do not suffer from some of the complex and unexplained problems associated with magnetic materials [
18,
19,
20,
21,
22,
23], which makes it easier to observe their properties experimentally. In 2019, Co
3Sn
2S
2 was discovered for the first time as a ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal outside that naturally occurring; this is the first discovery of a Weyl semimetal with inverse temporal symmetry. People confirmed that the Weyl semimetal of Co
3Sn
2S
2 has time reversal symmetry breaking and a huge Fermi arc by spectroscopy on different surfaces [
24,
25]. The semimetal ferromagnetic behavior of Co
3Sn
2S
2 was predicted by Weihrich recently [
22], who found that the ferromagnetic leap in this compound is accompanied by the formation of a band gap in the spin minority direction. The current work will not only deepen our understanding of the exotic physical phenomena associated with nontrivial band topology, but also provide inspiration for exploring novel electronic/spintronic devices based on anomalous hall effect (AHE), which will be important for studying the exotic quantum phenomena of a Weyl semimetal, and the emergence of Co
3Sn
2S
2 materials will accelerate fundamental research and their applications as magnetic material candidates.
Although there have been a large number of experimental studies on Weyl semimetal Co
3Sn
2S
2, up to now, people have all been prepared into large single crystals by physical methods, which cannot meet the application in actual micro and small electronic devices; the most traditional experimental methods are generally physical methods such as the flux method and the chemical vapor transfer method. Shama investigated the growth of Co
3Sn
2S
2 single crystals by the self-melting method [
26]. They confirmed that the crystals have large intrinsic anomalous Hall conductivity, and provides strong evidence for the topological band structure of the compound, which requires a special carrier and the required environment to reach extremely high temperatures for melt recrystallization. This method has high consumption, and the presence of fluxes during the growth process can easily contaminate the final sample. Therefore, the experimental method still has a large number of problems, and it needs to improve. Tanaka used the chemical vapor transport (CVT) method to synthesize Co
3Sn
2S
2 with high quality [
27], in which the growth rate needs to be controlled by varying the transport agent and temperature gradient; topological semimetals are intrinsically magnetic, can exhibit the highest mobility, and Co
3Sn
2S
2 produces a large intrinsic AHE with high sample quality and homogeneity; this will be important for studying the peculiar quantum phenomena of magnetic Weyl semimetal. The use of physical methods is very beneficial for the growth of large single crystals and is very convenient for the observation of topological signals in research discoveries, but still does not address the application of practical commercial micro and small devices. For future electronic device applications, we would prefer topological semimetals with smaller nanometer size for practical devices in daily and future applications, so there is an urgent need to develop a synthesis method to achieve the nanosize for tiny devices.
3. Results and Discussion
In the two-step hydrothermal preparation of Co3Sn2S2, the precursors of equal amounts react with different molar atomic ratios of S elements affecting the crystal structure of Co3Sn2S2. Therefore, we controlled the samples of Co3Sn2Sx (x = 0.4 mM, 0.46 mM, 0.5 mM, 0.6 mM) with different molar atomic ratios of elemental S reacting with 0.11 mM of the precursor Co3Sn2(OH)6 in the 150 °C temperature.
Figure 1 shows the XRD (X-ray Diffractometer) patterns of Co
3Sn
2Sx (x = 0.4 mM, 0.46 mM, 0.5 mM, 0.6 mM) obtained by equal amounts of 0.11 mM Co
3Sn
2(OH)
6, respectively. From the figure, it can be found that, when the molar ratio of element S is 0.4 mmol, the characteristic diffraction peaks of Co
3Sn
2S
2 were detected in XRD patterns at 19.89°, 22.97°, 32.68°, 36.63°, 38.65°, 40.24°, 46.87°, 52.84°, 58.26°, and 73.19°. This indicates that the content of the molar ratio of S elements reached the conditions for the preparation of Co
3Sn
2S
2, at the high temperature and pressure environment; the replacement reaction with OH
− was sufficiently performed under the alkaline environment to generate Co
3Sn
2S
2 with a shandite type structure. When we continue to increase the molar ratio of S elements beyond 0.4 mM, the characteristic diffraction peaks of Co
3Sn
2S
2 gradually become weaker, which indicates that Co
3Sn
2S
2 is successfully achieved with enough S elements, and when we continue to increase the molar amount of S elements to 0.6 mM, causing the diffraction peak signal to gradually disappear. Therefore, the molar atomic ratio of S elements has an important effect on the crystal structure of Co
3Sn
2S
2 under the same reaction temperature. As shown by the results of XRD energy spectrum, when the molar atomic ratio of S elements is 0.4 mM, Co
3Sn
2S
2 with Shandite structure was achieved.
After that, we combined SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope) images to analyze the morphology of Co
3Sn
2S
x (x = 0.4 mM, 0.46 mM, 0.5 mM, 0.6 mM) samples formed by different molar ratios of S elements. Under the same reaction temperature preparation conditions,
Figure 2a–d show the morphological images of Co
3Sn
2S
x samples prepared using equal amounts of 0.11 mM precursors with different molar ratios of S elements. From
Figure 2, it can be found that, when the molar atomic ratio of S element is 0.4 mM, the precursor preparation of Co
3Sn
2S
x sample surface is smooth and close, with almost regular box morphology and the size being about 200 nm. With the increase of the molar ratio of S elements, the surface of the Co
3Sn
2S
x samples we obtained gradually becomes rough, and the box morphology gradually becomes irregular. Therefore, we found that the increase of the molar ratio content of S elements can change the surface of Co
3Sn
2S
x.
The reaction temperature during the hydrothermal preparation plays a key role in the structure of Co
3Sn
2S
2, and we prepared Co
3Sn
2S
2 at different reaction temperatures separately.
Figure 3b shows the XRD patterns of Co
3Sn
2S
2 nanocrystals prepared at different temperatures of 140 °C, 160 °C, 190 °C, and 210 °C, respectively. It can be seen that multiple diffraction peaks appear in the diffraction map at 19.92°, 22.57°, 33.46°, 37.67°, 39.01°, 41.68°, 47.56°, 52.79°, 53.64°, 57.98°, 63.89°, 68.05°, 74.89°, and 78.77°, which are consistent with the MS (Materials Studio) fit of the standard shandite structure to the characteristic diffraction peak positions of Co
3Sn
2S
2, as shown in
Figure 3a. Comparing with the diffraction peaks positions of the Co
3Sn
2S
2 obtained at different temperatures, it was found that the Co
3Sn
2S
2 maintained the shandite structure in the temperature range of 140 °C to 160 °C. When the temperature continued to increase to 190 °C, the XRD pattern showed an impurity peak at about 23.35°, which was found to be the characteristic diffraction peaks of Co
3S
4 and SnS by Jade’s analysis, and this phenomenon can be attributed to the occurrence of secondary recrystallization due to the high temperature, generating intermediate compounds such as Co
3S
4 and SnS. With the temperature continuing to increase, the characteristic diffraction peaks of this intermediate compound become more and more obvious with higher peaks.
We performed elemental analysis of Co
3Sn
2S
2 at a reaction temperature of 150 °C. From the element distribution diagram in
Figure 4, we confirmed that the Co
3Sn
2S
2 nanocrystals have standard shandite structure in the reaction temperature range of 140 °C to 160 °C. As shown in
Figure 4a–c, the constituent elements Co, Sn, and S are uniformly distributed in the nanocrystal range, The EDS (Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy) energy spectral data showed that the elemental ratios of Co, Sn, and S were 3:2:2, as shown in
Figure 4d, which is consistent with the standard chemical elemental ratio of Co
3Sn
2S
2 nanocrystals.
During the preparation of Co
3Sn
2S
2, we found that the change of reaction temperature can have a great effect on the morphology of Co
3Sn
2S
2.
Figure 5 shows the SEM images of Co
3Sn
2S
2 at different reaction temperatures, As seen from the figure, at the reaction temperature of 140 °C, the nanocrystal has a smooth surface and almost square nanobox shape, as shown in
Figure 5a. When the temperature increases to 160 °C, the surface of the nanocrystals becomes rough and spherical. When the temperature continued to increase to 190 °C, the nanocrystals underwent a significant transformation in surface morphology, and sharp lamellar dendrites grew on the surface; this is due to the orientation growth of the nanocrystal structure breaking the symmetry of the crystal and wary recrystallization growth, which results in the growth of lamellar dendrites. With the increase of temperature, the previous near-box nanocrystal morphology grows completely to the sheet-like nanocrystal morphology at 200 °C.
Furthermore, we try to anneal the sample to improve its crystallinity.
Figure 6 shows the XRD patterns of the Co
3Sn
2S
2 nanocrystals at different annealing temperatures. Compared to before annealing, the XRD diffraction peaks change greatly after annealing, and, with the increase of annealing temperature, the diffraction peak was changed.
Figure 6a shows the XRD patterns of Co
3Sn
2S
2 after annealing at 450 °C and 550 °C. It can be seen that the diffractograms show CoO (JCPDS No.75-0419) characteristic diffraction peak positions at 27.32° and 58.46°. With the gradual increase of annealing temperature, when the annealing temperature is 650 °C, multiple diffraction peaks appear in the diffractogram, which are located at various positions such as 25.85°, 34.52°, 38.76°, 52.41°, and 65.91°, as shown in
Figure 6b. This is consistent with the position of the characteristic diffraction peak of SnO
2 as shown by Jade analysis (JCPDS No. 71-0652). Comparing the XRD patterns of Co
3Sn
2S
2 obtained after different annealing temperatures with before annealing, we found that the annealing temperature did not improve the crystallinity of Co
3Sn
2S
2, and, with the annealing temperature increasing, the original Shandite structure was gradually destroyed and new oxides were formed, such as CoO and SnO
2. This may be due to the instability of the S element in Co
3Sn
2S
2, and the increase in annealing temperature causes the S element to volatilize and overflow, resulting in the remaining Co element and Sn element combining with oxygen to form oxides. Furthermore, in combination with the EDS elemental ratio analysis, we verified the oxygen content variation.
The samples annealed at 450 °C, 550 °C, and 650 °C for 2 h were tested and analyzed for EDS elements. The proportional distribution of the Co
3Sn
2S
2 at different annealing temperatures is shown in
Figure 7. It can be seen that annealing reduces the relative amount of elemental sulfur in the sample as the annealing temperature increases. This is due to the fact that element S is very unstable during the annealing process, and when the annealing temperature is too high to reach the melting point of element S, it makes element S spill out of the sample surface to generate SO
2 gas, which verifies our speculation in the previous paragraph.
Next, the magnetic properties of Co
3Sn
2S
2 annealed at 450 °C for 2 h and the unannealed Co
3Sn
2S
2 prepared at 150 °C were tested and analyzed by the PPMS (Physical Property Measurement System) system; the heat treatment and annealing environment is in an anaerobic environment filled with Ar. The curve of its magnetic field strength versus magnetization strength is obtained, as shown in
Figure 8. As can be seen from
Figure 8, Co
3Sn
2S
2 is a ferromagnetic substance with obvious ferromagnetic properties. The magnetic properties of the unannealed Co
3Sn
2S
2 were weak, and the magnetization did not reach saturation. According to the results of comparing
Figure 8a with
Figure 8b, the coercivity and the residual magnetization intensity of the Co
3Sn
2S
2 annealed at 450 °C are larger than the corresponding values of the unannealed Co
3Sn
2S
2, and the magnetization intensity becomes larger in the same magnetic field. Combined with the XRD structural analysis, it is clear that annealing can change the Co
3Sn
2S
2 crystal structure and affect its ferromagnetism. The ZFC/FC magnetic measurements of the Co
3Sn
2S
2 nanocrystals revealed a weak Curie temperature transition point around 100 k, which indicates that we successfully synthesized Co
3Sn
2S
2 nanocrystals with ferromagnetic properties using the hydrothermal method.