Analysis of Design Method and Mechanical Properties of Plug-In Composite Shear Wall
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Design Method and Model Establishment
2.1. Composition of Composite Shear Wall
2.2. Modeling of Composite Shear Wall
2.3. Material Properties
3. Analysis of Mechanical Performance of Composite Shear Walls
3.1. Comparison between Assembled and Conventional Composite Shear Walls
3.2. Analysis of Hysteresis Performance of Composite Shear Walls
3.2.1. Analysis of Hysteretic Curve
- (1)
- The hysteresis curves at the initial stage are approximately linear, and in the elastic working stage, with almost no residual deformation.
- (2)
- With the reciprocal loads continuing to be applied, the hysteresis curves of the shear wall begin to be spindle-shaped and relatively full. The slope of the curve gradually decreases, which indicates that the stiffness of the shear wall begins to reduce; the unloading point of the hysteresis loop begins to be enriched with increasing residual deformation, indicating that the shear wall has developed into the elastic-plastic stage.
- (3)
- Continuing to apply reciprocal loads after reaching the peak load, the slope of the hysteresis curve decreases faster for shear walls with different parameter conditions, namely, the stiffness degeneration of the shear wall develops rapidly and the residual deformation at the unloading point of the hysteresis curves increases.
3.2.2. Analysis of Skeleton Curve
3.2.3. Analysis of Ductility
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- Comparing the prefabricated composite shear wall with the conventional composite shear wall of the same size, their damage forms are basically the same, and their initial stiffness and ultimate bearing capacity do not have much difference. The newly proposed composite shear wall can be prefabricated in the factory and bolted on site to speed up the installation process.
- (2)
- The plug-in composite shear wall shows great hysteretic performance and high bearing capacity under the reciprocating load. The hysteretic curves of this composite shear walls are full under different parameters, which indicates that the composite shear walls have strong energy dissipation capacity and good seismic performance. Therefore, it can be widely applied in the field of prefabricated steel structure construction.
- (3)
- The effects of height-span (aspect) ratio, axial compression ratio and end column size on the hysteretic behavior of composite shear walls are studied. The aspect ratio of the composite shear wall has a great influence on the seismic performance of the structure. The hysteretic performance of the shear wall with different aspect ratio is obviously different, and the hysteretic performance of the structure is the best when the aspect ratio is 1.5. With the increase of aspect ratio, the bearing capacity and ductility of joints decrease. The axial compression ratio shows better seismic performance when the axial compression ratio is 0.3 to 0.7. Moreover, increasing the size of the end column can improve the bearing capacity of the structure, but the ductility will decrease.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Link, R.A.; Elwi, A.E. Composite concrete-steel plate walls: Analysis and behavior. J. Struct. Eng. 1995, 12, 260–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emori, K. Compressive and shear strength of concrete filled steel box wall. Steel Struct. 2002, 68, 29–40. [Google Scholar]
- Mashiko, O.; Shodo, A.; Hiroshi, O. Study on steel plate reinforced concrete panels subjected to cyclic in-plane shear. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2004, 228, 225–244. [Google Scholar]
- Eom, T.S.; Park, H.G.; Lee, C.H. Behavior of double skin composite wall subjected to in-plane cyclic loading. J. Struct. Eng. 2009, 135, 1239–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nie, J.; Tao, M.; Fan, J. New research progress of double steel plate—Concrete composite shear wall. Build. Struct. 2011, 41, 52–60. [Google Scholar]
- Nie, J.; Bu, F.; Fan, J. Experimental study on seismic performance of double steel plate-concrete composite shear wall with low shear-span ratio. J. Build. Struct. 2011, 32, 74–81. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, D.; Lv, X.; Lu, W. Experimental study on seismic performance of prefabricated concrete shear wall ’s connection beam with joint. J. Build. Struct. 2013, 34, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, M.; Zhou, T. Experimental study on seismic performance of prefabricated laminated shear wall with concealed bracings. J. Hunan Univ. 2017, 44, 54–64. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, Z.; Guo, Z. Experimental study on seismic performance of prefabricated shear wall structure joints. China Civ. Eng. J. 2012, 45, 69–76. [Google Scholar]
- Qian, J.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, J. Seismic performance test of prefabricated shear wall connected by vertical steel grout sleeve splicing. Build. Struct. 2011, 41, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Ma, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, M. Finite element analysis of sleeve connection concrete shear wall. J. Shenyang Jianzhu Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2014, 30, 577–584. [Google Scholar]
- Xue, W.; Chu, M.; Liu, Y.; Hu, X. Seismic performance of new prefabricated concrete shear wall under high axial compression ratio. J. Harbin Eng. Univ. 2018, 39, 452–460. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, W. Study on Theoretical Analysis and Shaking Table Test of Prefabricated Isolation Shear Wall Structure; Southeast University: Nanjing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, W.; Zhai, Z.; Cui, Y.; Yu, Z.; Yu, X. Seismic performance assessment of low-rise precast wall panel structure with bolt connections. Eng. Struct. 2019, 181, 562–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; Qiu, H.; Jiang, H. Experimental study and associated mechanism analysis of horizontal bolted connections involved in a precast concrete shear wall system. Struct. Concr. 2019, 20, 282–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, C.; Wu, J.; Huang, W.; Wang, H.; Gao, J. Experimental and numerical study on seismic performance of semi-rigid steel frame infilled with prefabricated damping wall panels. Eng. Struct. 2021, 246, 113056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, K.; Chao, L.; Liu, B.; Yan, H. Research on finite element analysis and design method of double steel plate concrete composite shear wall. Build. Struct. 2015, 45, 70–75. [Google Scholar]
Member | Dimension Information |
---|---|
Steel plates on both sides | 1950 mm × 1500 mm × 6 mm steel plate |
Edge constraint steel tube column | 200 mm × 3 mm square steel tube column |
Lower connecting steel plate | 1870 mm × 350 mm × 10 mm steel plate |
Upper reinforced flitch plate | 1870 mm × 350 mm × 10 mm steel plate |
Bolts | M24 high-strengthen bolts |
Component | Mesh Shape | Delineation Technique | Unit Type |
---|---|---|---|
Bolt | Wedge | Scan | C3D6 |
Post pouring concrete | Hexahedron | Structure | C3D8 |
End steel tube column | Quadrilateral | Structure | S4 |
Steel plate wall | Quadrilateral, triangle | Structure, freedom | S4, S3 |
Number | Axial Compression Ratios | Component Height (mm) | End Column Size (mm × mm) |
---|---|---|---|
SPRC-1 | 0.4 | 3000 | 200 × 200 |
SPRC-2 | 0.5 | 3000 | 200 × 200 |
SPRC-3 | 0.6 | 3000 | 200 × 200 |
SPRC-4 | 0.7 | 3000 | 200 × 200 |
SPRC-5 | 0.5 | 2700 | 200 × 200 |
SPRC-6 | 0.5 | 3300 | 200 × 200 |
SPRC-7 | 0.5 | 3600 | 200 × 200 |
SPRC-8 | 0.5 | 3000 | 180 × 180 |
SPRC-9 | 0.5 | 3000 | 220 × 220 |
SPRC-10 | 0.5 | 3000 | 240 × 240 |
DSCW-1 | 0.5 | 3000 | 200 × 200 |
Number | Yield Load/kN | Yield Displacement/mm | Peak Load/kN | Peak Displacement/mm | Ultimate Displacement/mm | Ductility |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPRC-1 | 2791 | 7.72 | 3052 | 25.38 | 25.38 | 3.28 |
SPRC-2 | 2768 | 7.72 | 3088 | 28.93 | 28.93 | 3.74 |
SPRC-3 | 2708 | 7.19 | 2846 | 25.56 | 25.56 | 3.55 |
SPRC-4 | 2622 | 7.81 | 2792 | 28.07 | 28.07 | 3.58 |
SPRC-5 | 3220 | 7.66 | 3548 | 29.73 | 29.73 | 3.88 |
SPRC-6 | 2462 | 8.56 | 2711 | 29.72 | 29.72 | 3.47 |
SPRC-7 | 2250 | 9.35 | 2365 | 21.61 | 21.61 | 2.31 |
SPRC-8 | 2638 | 7.39 | 2796 | 29.22 | 29.22 | 3.95 |
SPRC-9 | 2968 | 7.92 | 3264 | 29.22 | 29.22 | 3.68 |
SPRC-10 | 3158 | 8.15 | 3363 | 29.06 | 29.06 | 3.56 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sun, X.; Liu, P.; Jiang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Mu, Z. Analysis of Design Method and Mechanical Properties of Plug-In Composite Shear Wall. Metals 2023, 13, 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13010177
Sun X, Liu P, Jiang Z, Yang Y, Wang Z, Mu Z. Analysis of Design Method and Mechanical Properties of Plug-In Composite Shear Wall. Metals. 2023; 13(1):177. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13010177
Chicago/Turabian StyleSun, Xiang, Peiyu Liu, Zhelong Jiang, Yuqing Yang, Zhe Wang, and Zaigen Mu. 2023. "Analysis of Design Method and Mechanical Properties of Plug-In Composite Shear Wall" Metals 13, no. 1: 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13010177
APA StyleSun, X., Liu, P., Jiang, Z., Yang, Y., Wang, Z., & Mu, Z. (2023). Analysis of Design Method and Mechanical Properties of Plug-In Composite Shear Wall. Metals, 13(1), 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13010177