Effect of Heat Treatment on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Nitrogen-Alloyed High-Mn Austenitic Hot Work Die Steel

Abstract

In view of the requirements for mechanical properties and service life above 650 °C, a high-Mn austenitic hot work die steel, instead of traditional martensitic hot work die steel such as H13, was developed in the present study. The effect of heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the newly developed work die steel was studied. The results show that the microstructure of the high-Mn as-cast electroslag remelting (ESR) ingot is composed of γ-Fe, V(C,N), and Mo₂C. V(C,N) is an irregular multilateral strip or slice shape with severe angles. Most eutectic Mo₂C carbides are lamellar fish-skeleton-like, except for a few that are rod-shaped. With increasing solid solution time and temperature, the increased hardness caused by solid solution strengthening exceeds the effect of decreased hardness caused by grain size growth, but this trend is reversed later. As a result, the hardness of specimens after various solid solution heat treatments increases first and then decreases. The optimal combination of hardness and austenitic grain size can be obtained by soaking for 2 h at 1170 °C. The maximum Rockwell hardness (HRC) is 47.24 HRC, and the corresponding austenite average grain size is 58.4 μm. When the solid solution time is 3 h at 1230 °C, bimodality presented in the histogram of the austenite grain size as a result of further progress in secondary recrystallization. Compared with the single-stage aging, the maximum impact energy of the specimen after two-stage aging heat treatment was reached at 16.2 J and increased by 29.6%, while the hardness decreased by 1–2 HRC. After two-stage aging heat treatment, the hardness of steel reached the requirements of superior grade H13, and the maximum impact energy was 19.6% higher than that of superior grade H13, as specified in NADCA#207-2003.

1. Introduction

In recent years, with the development of manufacturing industry and advanced metal materials, the working conditions of tools and dies become increasingly severer. The problem of raising service temperatures of high-load tools for hot deformation of metals and extending their service life will remain current for as long as this kind of process exists in metal treatment. This problem is especially difficult to solve when the working surface of the tool is heated to 700–900 °C or higher temperatures. Current commercial martensitic die steels such as AISI H13 and AISI H21—which are widely used for hot extrusion dies, forging dies, and casting dies—have a limited working capacity above a working temperature of 650 °C because of the decreasing strength [1]. The impossibility to overcome such a barrier is explainable by the occurrence of a polymorphic α → γ transformation in these steels, which limits their service temperature [2]. It would be natural to assume that die materials—which do not possess the mentioned barrier within the service temperature range and have a strength exceeding that of highly heat-resistant martensitic steels at a temperature exceeding 700 °C—should have an austenitic structure or belong to high-temperature alloys. Due to the high production cost of high-temperature alloys, highly heat-resistant austenitic steels may have good research and application prospects.

In contrast with martensitic hot work die steel, austenitic hot work die steel has no matrix phase transformation and is strengthened by precipitation hardening with various intermetallics, carbides, and nitrides [3]. The heat treatment gives austenitic steel excellent strength at elevated temperatures. In particular, when the temperature exceeds 650 °C, the strength of austenitic hot work die steel is much higher than that of martensitic type. Another effective method for increasing steel quality is alloying with nitrogen. It has been pointed out that the addition of an appropriate amount of nitrogen can control the amount of carbonitrides and the austenite grain size to improve the mechanical properties [4]. The addition of nitrogen in steel, even in small quantities, makes it possible to obtain highly complex properties, such as strength, impact elasticity, and corrosion resistance. In addition, nitrogen is an effective and economic substitute for some expensive elements: nickel, manganese, molybdenum, and tungsten. According to these characteristics, high-nitrogen steels, especially high-nitrogen austenitic stainless steels, have been studied intensively in recent years [5,6,7]. In addition, it also reported that the effects of nitrogen element increase the impact toughness of steel and high-temperature strength of hot work die steels [8,9,10].

The current commercial austenitic hot work die steels, such as Cr₁₄Ni₂₅Co₂V, 14Ni₁₄W₂Mo, 5Mn₁₅Cr₈Ni₂₅Mo₃V, Mn₁₀Cr₈Ni₁₀Mo₃V, and Mn₁₅Cr₂Al₃V₂WMo, contain a large amount of alloying elements, leading to high steel production costs. In the present work, a new nitrogen-alloyed Fe–Mn–Cr austenitic hot work die steel was developed by reducing Cr, Ni, and Mo contents and adding a certain amount of nitrogen. The studies on the development of austenitic hot work die steel serving above the temperature of 650 °C have been rarely reported. Zhang et al. [11] reported that high manganese–vanadium austenitic steel, which is used for copper alloyed hot press die, has a great future in the development of hot work die steel used at a high temperature over 700 °C. Grabovskii et al. [3] also reported that new austenitic alloys KhN35V6TYu (ÉK39) and KhN30VMYu (ÉK40) based on the Fe–Cr–Ni system can be recommended for manufacturing tools for hot deformation of metals serving at a temperature exceeding 700 °C. In this study, the effect of heat treatment on the microstructures and mechanical properties in nitrogen-microalloyed high-Mn austenitic hot work die steel (HMAS-N) were examined first. An alternative hot work die steel—which is used for dies, needles, and washers—for the hot pressing of copper alloys is expected to serve above 700 °C.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Experimental Materials

HMAS-N steel was melted in a vacuum-induction furnace. Nitrogen-containing ferrochromium alloy was added in the smelting process. After vacuum-induction, the liquid steel was cast into the ingots of 120 mm diameter, which were thereafter used as consumable electrodes in electroslag remelting (ESR) experiments. The chemical composition of the steel is shown in

Table 1. Chemical composition of tested steel (mass %).

C	Mn	Cr	Mo	V	Si	P	S	N	Fe
0.56	14.5	3.192	1.641	1.723	0.52	0.015	0.029	0.15	Bal.

. The experimental process includes forging, solid solution heat treatment (SSHT), and aging heat treatment. The as-cast ESR ingots were held at 1140 °C for 360 min and forged. The forging start and finish temperatures were T_s = 1200 °C and T_f = 980 °C. The ESR ingot was forged into a rod of Ø160 mm × 170 mm. For solid solution heat treatment and aging heat treatment, the specimens taken from forged sample were heat treated in an electric resistance furnace.

2.2. Microstructure and Precipitates of As-Cast ESR Ingot

Thermo-Calc software (Thermo-Calc Software Inc., Solna, Sweden) was used to investigate phase equilibrium diagrams and identify the chemistry of various precipitates at different temperatures. The specimens were subjected to grinding, polishing, and etching. The microstructure and precipitates in these specimens were analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM, FEI Quanta-250, FEI Corporation, Hillsboro, OR, USA) equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS, Xflash 5030, Bruker, Germany). The specimens taken from ESR ingots were machined to a bar of Ø15 mm × 80 mm. The precipitates were electrolytically extracted from steel in organic solution (methanol, tetramethylammonium chloride, glycerin, diethanol amine). The collected precipitates were analyzed using XRD (Rigaku Dmax-RB, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) technique to determine their types, and observed by SEM.

2.3. Solid Solution Heat Treatment

The specimens of the HMAS-N were solid solution treated at the temperatures of 1170 °C, 1200 °C, and 1230 °C for 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 h. Thereafter, the specimens were quenched in water, and prepared for optical microscope (Leica DM4M, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) analysis. The average grain size was determined by the standard linear intercept method [12] through SISC IAS V8.0 image software [13]. About 400 austenite grains were selected randomly for the grain size measurement in each specimen. After various SSHT processes, the specimens were subjected to the same aging heat treatment at 720 °C for 2 h. Then, the specimens’ Rockwell hardness values were measured.

2.4. Aging Heat Treatment

The optimum SSHT process can be selected by the above experimental scheme. After the specimens were subjected to the optimum SSHT, the following two kinds of aging heat treatments (single-stage aging and two-stage aging) were carried out. Single-stage aging and two-stage aging schemes are shown in

Table 2. Single-stage aging heat treatment process after solid solution heat treatment (SSHT).

The Specimen Number	Aging Temperature	Aging Time
S-680	680 °C	2 h
S-700	700 °C
S-710	710 °C
S-720	720 °C
S-740	740 °C
S-760	760 °C

and

Table 3. Two-stage aging heat treatment process after SSHT.

The Specimen Number	Pre-Aging Temperature	Pre-Aging Time	Re-Aging Temperature	Re-Aging Time
T-700	650 °C	1 h	700 °C	1 h
T-720			720 °C
T-740			740 °C
T-760			760 °C
T-780			780 °C
T-800			800 °C

, respectively. For single-stage aging, the specimens, after optimal SSHT, were subjected to an aging heat treatment at 680–760 °C for 2 h. For two-stage aging, the specimens, after optimal SSHT, were subjected to pre-aging treatment at 650 °C for 1 h, and then re-aging was subsequently carried out in a temperature range from 700 °C to 800 °C for 1 h.

2.5. Mechanical Properties

The impact energy of specimens was tested at room temperature, using a JB-30B testing machine, with the Charpy V-notch test method according to ASTM 370 [14]. The value of impact energy presented in this paper is an average of three measurements. The Rockwell hardness (HRC) measurements with an applied load of 150 kg were performed on the heat-treated specimens. The average value of five tests for each specimen were recorded as the standard hardness.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Precipitation and Microstructure of As-Cast ESR Ingot

The equilibrium formation of precipitates in the studied steel was investigated using Thermo-Calc software (TCFE7 database). Figure 1 shows the relationship between the amount of precipitates and their precipitation temperatures in the temperature range from 600 °C to 1600 °C. The transformation (precipitation) temperatures of precipitates in the investigated steel are listed in

Table 4. Calculation results of transformation temperatures of precipitates in steel, calculated using Thermo-Calc.

Ts/°C					Tf/°C
γ-Fe	M(C,N)	M2C	M23C6	M7C3	M2C	M7C3
1400	1392	910	690	790	435	670

T_s represents phase transformation starting temperature, T_f represents phase transformation finish temperature.

.

It can be seen from Figure 1 and Table 4 that M(C,N), M₂C, M₂₃C₆, and M₇C₃ precipitate in sequence with the decrease of temperature. The precipitation temperature of M(C,N) is above 1300 °C. This indicates that M(C,N) is a highly stable phase and remains undissolved during heat treatment process.

To predict phase precipitation during liquid steel solidification in a practical ESR refining process, the Scheil–Gulliver model included in Thermo-Calc software was employed to calculate the nonequilibrium phase precipitation in HMAS-N, as shown in Figure 2. M(C,N) precipitates from liquid steel directly. As the austenite continues to precipitate from liquid steel, carbon and alloying element contents keep increasing. Primary carbides M₂C precipitate directly from liquid steel when the solid fraction of liquid steel exceeds 0.93. As shown in Figure 3a,b, partial primary carbides precipitate along preexisting austenite due to the composition of residual liquid steel reaching eutectic point. There are two types of precipitates (i.e., white- and gray-colored ones), which are represented by I and II, in as-cast ESR ingot as shown in Figure 4. The gray-colored and white-colored precipitates both distributed along grain boundaries. It can be seen in Figure 4 that some M(C,N) carbonitrides are mixed with M₂C carbides on the grain boundary. This is because the M(C,N) phase precipitates at a higher temperature prior to the precipitation of the M₂C phase.

It can be confirmed from the microstructure in Figure 4 and the XRD results in Figure 6a that the matrix is a single austenite phase.

Table 5. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer EDS analyzed results of carbides or carbonitrides (mass %).

Point	Element
	C	V	Mo	Cr	N	Fe	Mn
1	14.68	41.60	0.64	1.68	33.11	6.31	1.98
2	56.69	6.88	17.35	7.94	0.05	5.55	5.54

presents the EDS results of the carbides or carbonitrides shown in Figure 5. As shown in Table 5 and Figure 6b, M(C,N) (namely V(C,N)) contains a certain amount of the elements Cr and Mo. In addition, M₂C is Mo₂C, which contains more Cr and Mo atoms. As shown in Figure 5, the morphology of V(C,N) is an irregular multilateral strip or slice shape with severe angles. The morphology of Mo₂C is rod-shaped or lamellar fish-skeleton-like, which is typical eutectic carbide according to eutectic reaction (L → γ + M₂C).

3.2. Effect of Solid Solution Heat Treatment on Hardness and Microstructure

Solid solution heat treatment (SSHT) was carried out to dissolve coarse primary precipitates in the matrix, which were then reprecipitated from supersaturated solid solution during the subsequent aging process with the purpose of precipitation strengthening. If the solution temperature is too low, large primary precipitates are difficult to dissolve into matrix. However, if the solid solution temperature is too high, austenitic grain size (AGS) will grow up excessively. The AGS tremendously influences diffusive and diffusionless phase transformations, precipitation, and mechanical properties such as strength, hardness, toughness, and ductility [15]. Hence, the SSHT process is quite important for microstructures and mechanical properties. The effects of SSHT on the austenite grain size, microstructure, and Rockwell hardness were studied in detailed.

The hardness value of the specimens, which were subjected to various SSHT and the same aging treatment at 720 °C for 2 h, is shown in Figure 7a. The hardness value increased from 45.34 HRC to 47.24 HRC at a solution temperature of 1170 °C with increasing solution time from 0.5 h to 2 h. However, the hardness value decreased rapidly to 39 HRC when the solid solution time was 3 h at 1170 °C. When the solid solution temperature reached 1200 °C and 1230 °C, the hardness decreased linearly with the increase of solution holding time from 0.5 h to 3 h.

The AGS after different solution heat treatments is shown in Figure 7b. The austenite grain grew gradually with increasing solution temperature and solution time. The austenite grains grew slowly at a solution temperature below 1200 °C. A tangible grain growth was detected at 1170 °C for soaking times over 3 h due to the coupled effects of the soaking time and temperature on the grain growth. The results presented in Figure 7b also implied that the effect of solution temperature on grain growth was more noticeable than solution time.

Figure 8 and Figure 9 show the microstructure evolution at different solution temperatures and solution times with corresponding austenitic grain-size distribution histograms, respectively. As shown in Figure 9, the grain size distribution of austenite is close to lognormal distribution, which is consistent with the results presented by Han et al. [16] and Kurtz et al. [17]. When the solid solution time is 0.5 h at 1170 °C, the fine austenite grains distribute inhomogeneously as coarse austenite grains and contact each other, as shown in Figure 8a. Figure 9a indicates the grain size of austenite is mainly in the range of 20–50 μm. The percentage of AGS smaller than 20 μm is 14.9%. When the specimens were solid solution treated at 1170 °C for an aging time between 0.5 h and 2 h, AGS ranged from 54.8 μm to 58.4 μm. No obvious grain growth was observed in Figure 8a,b. Those primary carbonitride particles that precipitated along grain boundaries affected the diffusion of iron and carbon atoms, and finally prevented the growth of austenite grain in the heating process [15,18]. Compared with the results shown in Figure 9a, AGS distributes more uniform after SSHT for 2 h, as shown in Figure 9b. The grain size of austenite shown in Figure 9c was mostly in the range of 60–80 μm, and the number of austenite grains larger than 50 μm increased with rising solution temperature. When the solid solution time is 3 h at 1230 °C, the bimodality of the histogram presented as a result of further progress in the second recrystallization, presented in Figure 9d.

As shown in Figure 8a, the precipitates were not completely dissolved at 1170 °C, which is consistent with thermodynamic calculation using Thermo-Calc software. Thermodynamic calculation illustrates that precipitation temperature of the primary V(C,N) reaches up to 1390 °C, as shown in Table 4. N addition in steel increased the melting point and stability of carbonitrides. In addition, most primary V(C,N) were distributed along the austenite grain boundary and were not significantly influenced by solution heat treatment [19]. Hence, primary V(C,N) cannot completely dissolve into the matrix when the solution temperature is below 1390 °C. Therefore, it can be concluded that the pinning effect of undissolved V(C,N) [20] suppressed austenite grain growth with increasing solution time from 0.5 h to 2 h at 1170 °C. Meanwhile, more carbides, carbonitrides, and alloying elements dissolved into the austenite matrix with increasing solid solution time at 1170 °C. Owing to solution strengthening and the second phase strengthening during the process of aging heat treatment, the hardness of steel reached the maximum value at 2 h aging time when solution temperature was at 1170 °C. When aging time exceeded 2 h at 1170 °C, the austenite grain grew rapidly, which led to the decrease of hardness value. When the solution temperature is more than 1170 °C, the AGS grows rapidly, despite a significant amount of undissolved secondary phases. This is attributed to coagulation process during the SSHT process, leading to the growth of large particles at the expense of small ones and the reduction in the amount of precipitates. A small number of large precipitates do not limit grain boundary mobility, and pinning effects disappear [21]. Grain growth highly depends on the grain boundary migration and the atomic diffusion. Moreover, the dissolution/coarsening of precipitates occurs at higher temperatures [22,23]. Furthermore, the solute drag effect of alloying elements is not effective enough at very high temperatures due to their higher frequency of vibration and mobility [24]. Therefore, the grain growth kinetics is intensified by increasing solid solution temperature. At a very high solution temperature of 1230 °C, the austenite grains coarsened significantly. The coarse austenite grains accelerated the development and growth of fatigue-induced cracks, which will lead to hot work steel failure. After solid solution at 1230 °C for 3 h, grain coarsening became more evident as a result of further progress in the second recrystallization, shown in Figure 8d and Figure 9d. Hence, austenitic grain-coarsening speed is accelerated, and undissolved V(C,N) pinning effect was weakened, resulting in the decrease of hardness in a linear trend when the solution temperature exceeds 1200 °C. Hence, the optimal combination of hardness and AGS can be obtained by soaking for 2 h at 1170 °C.

3.3. Effect of Aging Heat Treatment on Mechanical Properties and Microstructure

To remove residual stress caused by SSHT and dispersed small secondary phase particles, high-temperature aging heat treatment was carried out. The aging heat treatment process has a significant effect on comprehensive performance of HMAS-N. According to Grabovskii et al. and Lanskaya’s [3,25] reports, two-stage aging instead of single-stage aging can substantially increase impact toughness at the same level of high-temperature strength, which positively affects the crack resistance of the tools and increases their service life. However, there are few literatures on the effect of multiple aging on the microstructure and properties of austenitic hot work die steels. Al–Zn–Mg alloys and some high-temperature alloys such as iron–nickel superalloys are subjected to multistage aging to enhance their comprehensive performance [26,27]. To improve the comprehensive performance of HMAS-N, the effects of single-stage aging and two-stage aging on the microstructure and properties of steel were studied.

As for single-stage aging, experiments were carried out in a temperature range from 680 °C to 760 °C for 2 h, as shown in Table 2. The hardness improves gradually with aging temperature increasing from 680 °C to 720 °C, as shown in Figure 10. When the aging temperature was at 720 °C, significant secondary hardening occurred, and the hardness reached the maximum value of 47.24 HRC. It can be attributed to the enrichment and segregation of precipitate-forming elements at 720 °C, such as V, Mo, Cr, C, and N [8]. As the aging temperature continued to increase, the hardness decreased to 45.04 HRC at 760 °C. As for the two-stage aging, pre-aging and re-aging heat treatment experiments were carried out, shown in Table 3. The hardness increases with the re-aging temperature increasing from 700 °C to 760 °C. When the two-stage aging temperature was at 760 °C, the hardness reached the peak value of 46.06 HRC. As the re-aging temperature continued to increase, the hardness decreased and dropped to 43.84 HRC at 800 °C. Compared to single-stage aging, the hardness value of two-stage aging is slightly less than single-stage aging at the same aging temperature. In addition, the temperature for maximum hardness delayed. To ensure that the steel has higher hardness and impact toughness to restrain crack initiation and growth in the process of service, the Charpy impact tests were carried out for the specimens with Rockwell hardness values greater than 45 HRC after aging heat treatment. The impact energies after different aging heat treatments are shown in Figure 11. For single-aging at 720 °C, the hardness value reached the maximum value of 47.24 HRC, whereas the impact energy reached the minimum value at 9.2 J. The impact energy reached the maximum value of 12.5 J and the corresponding hardness value was 46.05 HRC at 740 °C. For two-stage aging, the impact energy gradually increased and reached the maximum value of 16.2 J at 780 °C with increasing temperature from 740 °C to 780 °C. As for two-stage aging heat treatment, impact energy greatly improved despite the hardness decreasing by 1–2 HRC compared with single-stage aging.

The maximum impact energy value of 16.2 J is not only higher than premium H13 (10.84 J), but also almost exceeds superior H13 (13.55 J) [28]. The newly prepared HMAS-N, in terms of the toughness, is considerably outstanding when taking H13 mechanical properties into consideration. Compared with the maximum impact energy of single-stage aging, two-stage aging impact energy increased 29.6%. Despite the lowest hardness value of 45.1 HRC at 780 °C re-aging temperature, it still meets the service requirements of hot work steel. Hence, in order to improve the comprehensive performance and service life, the optimal aging process is re-aging at 780 °C.

It is well known that structure and fractograph of a specimen are related to the mechanisms involved in the fracture process. The microstructure determines the performance of the steel. Figure 12a is a SEM micrograph of specimen S-720 at low magnification. It can be seen that there are massive, undissolved primary precipitates. Figure 12b–d are the scanning electron micrographs of specimens S-720, S-740, and S-760 at high magnification, respectively. When the aging temperature increased from 720 °C to 740 °C, the number of fine dispersed secondary carbonitrides increased, as shown in Figure 12b,c. As the aging temperature increased to 760 °C, the number of secondary carbonitrides decreased, but the secondary carbonitrides appeared to be aggregated, and the grain boundary was widened, as shown in Figure 12d. This is attributed to growth of large particles at the expense of small ones, resulting in the reduction in the total number of particles. Precipitation of carbides along the grain boundary will result in deterioration of toughness, which can be attributed to the decrease of grain boundary cohesion.

The SEM fractograph of specimens after the Charpy test for a fixed solid solution temperature (1170 °C) and various aging processes are shown in Figure 13a–f. Both quasi-cleavage facets and ductile dimples were observed, which indicated the mixed mechanism of fracture. The specimen S-720 showed mainly brittle-fractured surface zones characterized by transgranular quasi-cleavage and intergranular fracture (Figure 13a). It can be noticed that quasi-cleavage fracture facets encircled by ridges are much smaller than the austenite grain (58.4 μm), and this kind of morphology forms when a crack propagates along the primary precipitates. The size of intergranular fracture grains (~60 μm) was similar to the size of austenite grains (58.4 μm). This implies that intergranular fracture along the boundaries of austenite grains operated partially for specimen S-720. As shown in Figure 13b, quasi-cleavage facets show massive primary precipitates, which is consistent with the observation in Figure 11a. It indicated that quasi-cleavage nucleated along the precipitates. Some portions of the fracture surface exhibited ductile-fractured surface with fine dimples (Figure 13c). The dimple percentage increases with increasing aging temperature (from 720 °C to 760 °C) for single-stage aging treatment. The specimens S-740 and S-760 showed mainly ductile-fractured areas with fines dimples and some quasi-cleavage features (Figure 13d,e). It is clear that the fracture surface of specimen S-760 contained microcracks and some spherical secondary precipitates precipitated from the aging process, as shown in Figure 13e. The EDS results of the precipitates shown in Figure 13b,e are presented in

Table 6. The EDS results for precipitates (mass %).

Point	Element
	C	V	Mo	Cr	N	Fe	Mn
1	28.48	40.50	0.24	0.92	27.57	1.72	0.57
2	37.07	0.26	16.57	1.65	0.00	43.62	0.83

. Figure 14 shows fractograph EDS element distribution mappings of specimen S-760. Figure 14 and the EDS results of point 1, shown in Figure 13b, indicate that elements N, V, C were enriched in the same area, confirming that undissolved coarse primary carbonitrides are V(C,N), which also contains a small amount of Cr. Figure 14 and the EDS results of point 2, shown in Figure 13e, indicate that spherical secondary carbides are Mo-rich carbides. Specimen T-780 presented more ductile dimples and fewer quasi-cleavage facets (Figure 13f).

The undissolved primary precipitates, austenite grain size, strength of the matrix, secondary precipitates, and the strength of grain boundary have great effects on the impact energy, while aging heat treatment has little effect on primary precipitates and austenite grain size. For specimen S-720, the massive undissolved primary V(C,N) had a higher hardness value (47.2 HRC) and is not easy to deform, which is responsible for embrittlement for the lower impact energy (9.3 J). A lower binding force among precipitates and steel matrix resulted from the existence of primary and secondary precipitates. It is much easier to generate cracks at the regions where primary V(C,N) are enriched.

With increasing aging temperature from 720 °C to 740 °C for single-stage aging, the amount of secondary precipitates increased, which meant the interstitial atoms dissolved in the matrix precipitated and the degree of supersaturation decreased, resulting in the softening of the steel matrix [29]. The increasing number of secondary precipitates has a negative effect on impact energy. The softer the base metal, the larger the plastic district around the crack tip when the stress concentration is high enough and plastic deformation occurs. A larger plastic district will result in greater crack propagation and larger impact energy [30]. For specimen S-720 and S-740, the base metal plays the main role on impact energy compared to the negative effect of secondary precipitates. Hence, impact energy increased from 9.3 J to 12.5 J with increasing temperature, from 720 °C to 740 °C, for single-stage aging temperature. When increasing temperature to 760 °C for the single-stage aging, the amount of secondary precipitates increases and the coarsening of the austenite grain boundary has a major effect on the impact energy, which led to impact energy decreasing from 12.5 J to 11.4 J.

For two-stage aging, the low-temperature pre-aging of the two-stage aging process is equivalent to the nucleation stage, and the high-temperature aging is the stabilization stage [26]. The first stage in aging of the alloy is to promote the formation of the GP (Guinier-Preston) zone, and then to obtain a large number of dispersed GP areas, and to make the GP areas extend to a certain scale without dissolution in the second stage of aging. In the second high-temperature aging process, the aging precipitation sequence of the alloy changes from GP zone to secondary precipitates, and the alloy enters the aging stage. This improves the working capacity of tools for hot deformation. The two-stage aging may be more conducive to distributed homogeneous precipitation of secondary precipitates and reducing growth of secondary precipitates, which will weaken the reduction of the impact energy compared to single-stage aging. As a result, the impact energy increases from 9.2 J to 16.2 J with a slight decrease of the strength when increasing the re-aging temperature from 740 °C to 780 °C.

4. Conclusions

The microstructure of as-cast high-Mn ingot is composed of γ-Fe + M(C,N) + M₂C. M(C,N) precipitated from liquid steel directly, which is a highly stable phase. M(C,N) is V(C,N) containing Cr, Mo elements. M₂C is Mo₂C, containing more Cr and Mo elements, which formed by eutectic reaction (L → γ + M₂C). The morphology of V(C,N) is an irregular multilateral strip or slice shape with severe angles. Most of Mo₂C morphology are lamellar fish-skeleton-like and a small number of Mo₂C morphology are rod-shaped.

When increasing solid solution time from 0.5 h to 2 h at 1170 °C, AGS ranges from 54.8 μm to 58.4 μm and no significant grain growth was observed, which can be attributed to the pinning effect of undissolved V(C,N). Additionally, the hardness increased from 45.34 HRC to 47.24 HRC due to solid solution strengthening. When the solid solution temperature reached 1200 °C and 1230 °C, the effect of grain growth, which decreases hardness, exceeds the effect of solid solution strengthening, which increases hardness. The hardness value decreased linearly with the increase of solution temperature from 1200 °C to 1230 °C.

The AGS distribution of austenite is close to lognormal distribution. The austenite grains grew slowly at a solution temperature below 1200 °C. A tangible grain growth was detected at 1170 °C for soaking times over 3 h due to the synergic effect of the soaking time and temperature on the grain growth. When the solid solution time is 3 h at 1230 °C, the bimodality of histogram is presented as a result of further progress in secondary recrystallization.

For single-stage aging and two-stage aging, Rockwell hardness shows a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with increasing aging temperature. In addition, hardness reach the maximum at 740 °C (47.24 HRC) and 760 °C (46.06 HRC), respectively, which is attributed to significant secondary hardening. Compared to single-stage aging, impact energy greatly improved despite the hardness decreasing by 1–2 HRC. In addition, the temperature for maximum hardness delayed.

Both quasi-cleavage facets and ductile dimples were observed in the fractograph, which indicates the mixed mechanisms of fracture. The two-stage aging may be more conducive to homogeneously distributed precipitation of secondary precipitates and reduced growing tendency of secondary precipitates, which will weaken the reduction of the impact energy compared to single-stage aging. Compared with the maximum impact energy of single-stage aging, maximum impact energy reached 16.2 J and increased by 29.6% when using two-stage aging. Thus, the optimum heat treatment process is subjected to solution treatment for 2 h at 1170 °C, followed by pre-aging treatment for 1 h at 650 °C, and, finally, by re-aging for 1 h at 780 °C.